1
|
Jaffe K, Patel S, Chen L, Slat S, Bohnert A, Lagisetty P. Impact of Perceived Access and Treatment Knowledge on Medication Preferences for Opioid Use Disorder. SUBSTANCE USE & ADDICTION JOURNAL 2024; 45:706-715. [PMID: 38828548 DOI: 10.1177/29767342241254591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medications for opioid use disorders (MOUDs) are effective, but most people with opioid use disorder (OUD) do not receive treatment. Prior research has explored patients' structural barriers to access and perceptions of MOUD. Little research has considered treatment knowledge and perceptions outside of the patient population. Members of the public without OUD themselves (eg, family, friends) can significantly influence treatment decisions of persons with OUD. Considering these gaps, we conducted an original survey with a diverse sample of US adults to explore knowledge and preferences toward OUD treatments. METHODS We conducted an online survey with 1505 White, Black, and Latino/a Americans including a small percentage (8.5%) with self-reported lifetime OUD. The survey used vignettes to describe hypothetical patients with OUD, provide basic treatment information (ie, methadone, buprenorphine, naltrexone, nonmedication treatment), and then assessed treatment preferences. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined associations between covariates of interest (eg, perceived access, knowledge, demographics) and preference for MOUD versus nonmedication treatment. RESULTS There were 523 White, 502 Black, and 480 Latino/a respondents. Across racial/ethnic subsamples, respondents had the greatest knowledge of nonmedication treatments, with Black (72.7%) and Latino/a (70.2%) respondents having significantly greater knowledge compared to White respondents (61.8%). However, after viewing the vignette, a greater proportion of respondents chose methadone (35.8%) or buprenorphine (34.8%) as their first-choice treatment for hypothetical patients. Multivariable logistic regression suggested that among Black respondents, those with knowledge of nonmedication treatment were more likely to choose MOUD than those without knowledge (odds ratio = 2.41, 95% confidence interval = 1.34-4.34). Perceived treatment access did not affect treatment choice. CONCLUSIONS Across racial groups, knowledge and perceived access to nonmedication treatment was greater than for MOUD, but many still selected MOUD as a first-choice treatment. Significant findings emphasized the importance of treatment knowledge around decision-making, highlighting opportunities for tailored education efforts to improve uptake of evidence-based treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn Jaffe
- Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Shivam Patel
- Department of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Liying Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Stephanie Slat
- Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Amy Bohnert
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Pooja Lagisetty
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aronowitz SV, Holliday-Davis M, French R, Suhail-Sindhu S, O'Donnell N, Perrone J, Lowenstein M. Barriers and facilitators to implementing CareConnect: A telehealth, low-barrier buprenorphine bridge clinic in Philadelphia. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2024; 133:104569. [PMID: 39241439 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 07/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rates of fatal overdose continue to rise in the United States, and most people with opioid use disorder (OUD) are not engaged in evidence-based treatment with medications. In Philadelphia, a city with one of the highest fatal overdose rates in the country, many residents face significant care access barriers. The COVID-19 pandemic - which destabilized the street drug supply and forced many clinics to limit services - worsened this crisis, but also led to regulatory changes that allowed for buprenorphine induction and maintenance visits via telehealth in the U.S. To increase access to buprenorphine across the Philadelphia area and reach individuals who struggle to access care, Penn Medicine developed the CareConnect Warmline in October 2021. CareConnect is embedded in an existing virtual urgent care practice. Staffed by advanced practice providers and substance use navigators (SUNs), CareConnect provides same-day buprenorphine bridge (i.e., short-term) prescriptions and linkage to longitudinal OUD care. OBJECTIVE To examine barriers and facilitators to implementing CareConnect from the perspective of key stakeholders, including CareConnect leadership, clinicians, and staff, and attitudes and beliefs about providing care for patients with OUD via this model. METHODS In this qualitative descriptive study, we interviewed 14 participants and used thematic analysis to analyze the data. The sample included CareConnect prescribing clinicians, SUNs, and administrative staff. RESULTS Our analysis yielded four themes: 1/ CareConnect is a unique program that fills an important care gap; 2/ Benefits of leveraging existing infrastructure; 3/ Importance of an interdisciplinary team; and 4/ Necessity of relationships with outside stakeholders. Prescribing clinicians and administrative staff - most of whom had little experience with OUD care before CareConnect - stressed how embedding the model within an existing virtual clinic and involving experienced SUNs increased their comfort prescribing buprenorphine. However, all participants highlighted how the program's effectiveness is contingent upon buy-in from outside stakeholders, including pharmacists who fill the prescriptions and longitudinal care providers in the community. CONCLUSIONS Innovative delivery models can help expand OUD care access to individuals who are poorly served by traditional treatment infrastructure. Our findings provide valuable insight to improve and sustain CareConnect and can guide the development and implementation of future programs nationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - M Holliday-Davis
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rachel French
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Nicole O'Donnell
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeanmarie Perrone
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Margaret Lowenstein
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wyte-Lake T, Cohen DJ, Williams S, Casey D, Chan M, Frank B, Levander XA, Stein D, White KK, Bailey SR. Patients' and Clinicians' Experiences with In-person, Video, and Phone Modalities for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: A Qualitative Study. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:2179-2186. [PMID: 38228990 PMCID: PMC11347548 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08586-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a chronic condition that requires regular visits and care continuity. Telehealth implementation has created multiple visit modalities for OUD care. There is limited knowledge of patients' and clinicians' perceptions and experiences related to multi-modality care and when different modalities might be best employed. OBJECTIVE To identify patients' and clinicians' experiences with multiple visit modalities for OUD treatment in primary care. DESIGN Comparative case study, using video- and telephone-based semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS Patients being treated for OUD (n = 19) and clinicians who provided OUD care (n = 15) from two primary care clinics within the same healthcare system. APPROACH Using an inductive approach, interviews were analyzed to identify patients' and clinicians' experiences with receiving/delivering OUD care via different visit modalities. Clinicians' and patients' experiences were compared using a group analytical process. KEY RESULTS Patients and clinicians valued having multiple modalities available for care, with flexibility identified as a key benefit. Patients highlighted the decreased burden of travel and less social anxiety with telehealth visits. Similarly, clinicians reported that telehealth decreased medical intrusion into the lives of patients stable in recovery. Patients and clinicians saw the value of in-person visits when establishing care and for patients needing additional support. In-person visits allowed the ability to conduct urine drug testing, and to foster relationships and trust building, which were more difficult, but not impossible via a telehealth visit. Patients preferred telephone over video visits, as these were more private and more convenient. Clinicians identified benefits of video, including being able to both hear and see the patient, but often deferred to patient preference. CONCLUSIONS Considerations for utilization of visit modalities for OUD care were identified based on patients' needs and preferences, which often changed over the course of treatment. Continued research is needed determine how visit modalities impact patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar Wyte-Lake
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Deborah J Cohen
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Shannon Williams
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - David Casey
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Matt Chan
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Brian Frank
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Ximena A Levander
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Dan Stein
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Katie Kirkman White
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Steffani R Bailey
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Draanen J, Adwell A, Wettemann C, Fockele CE, Goh B, Perlmutter DL, Williams GW, Holland N, Frohe T. "You might be nice, but where you take me, they're not gonna be": Preferences for field-based post-overdose interventions. Drug Alcohol Rev 2024. [PMID: 39205432 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Emergency medical services (EMS) systems are piloting interventions to respond to overdoses with additional services such as leave-behind naloxone and medication for opioid use disorder, but little is known about the perspectives of people who use drugs (PWUD) on these interventions being delivered by EMS during an overdose response. METHODS The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided the development of data collection tools, the analytic strategy and the organisation of results. A community engaged method was used which included both academically trained researchers and community trained researchers who are also PWUD. This study used semi-structured interviews to gather data from 13 PWUD in King County, Washington in June 2022. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS The people interviewed for this study viewed EMS distribution of leave-behind naloxone and field-based buprenorphine favourably. They viewed EMS facilitation of hepatitis C virus and HIV testing in the field less favourably and were concerned about stigmas associated with those results. Additional themes emerged regarding: the need for different approaches to post-overdose care; the need for new services, including post-overdose trauma counselling and an alternative destination to the emergency department; and the harms of law enforcement presence at overdose responses. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS This study found strong support for leave-behind naloxone and field-initiated buprenorphine. Further training for EMS should include trauma-informed care and strategies to address burnout and increase compassion. Alternatives to the emergency department as a post-overdose destination are needed. These strategies should be considered by jurisdictions revising overdose response protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna van Draanen
- Department of Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Addy Adwell
- Department of Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Courteney Wettemann
- Department of Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
- Research with Expert Advisors on Drug Use, Seattle, USA
| | | | - Brenda Goh
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - David L Perlmutter
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | | | | | - Tessa Frohe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sitar SI, Yarbrough CR, Mataczynski MJ, Peralta AM, Kan M, Crawford ND, Kee C, Young HN, Welsh JW. Qualitative Assessment of Barriers to Buprenorphine Access: The Role of Pharmacies. Subst Use Misuse 2024:1-9. [PMID: 39155479 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2392545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients continue to face challenges accessing medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) despite attempts to loosen prescribing restrictions and streamline service provision. Past research has mainly focused on potential barriers surrounding prescribing practices for buprenorphine, but has had limited investigation into the role of pharmacies. OBJECTIVE This study investigates the role of both pharmacists and pharmacies in creating or circumventing barriers to accessing buprenorphine for individuals in Georgia seeking medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). METHODS Semi-structured interviews of pharmacists across 12 access and no access pharmacies were used to create a codebook of 179 discreet statements. The (N = 12) 20-35-minute phone interviews included questions addressing substance use, pharmacy practices, treatment, harm reduction, and psychoeducation. RESULTS Pharmacists widely agreed that opioid use has caused negative effects on community members (N = 11), that buprenorphine formulation stocking decisions are made based on patient needs (N = 11), and that buprenorphine is relatively easy to stock (N = 10). Additionally, respondents generally stated that buprenorphine is a helpful tool for treating opioid use disorder (OUD) (N = 12) but some reported positive experiences while others reported challenging or negative experiences with patients receiving buprenorphine (N = 7). Finally, few (N = 4) pharmacists agreed that they could benefit from extra training despite many asserting that training is important to inform their own practice (N = 8). CONCLUSION Results from respondents generally show that training may be beneficial for pharmacists to develop an enhanced understanding of addiction and treatment. Enhanced effort to stock different formulations or dosages of buprenorphine and develop relationships with prescribers may increase community access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Andrea M Peralta
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mary Kan
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Natalie D Crawford
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Caroline Kee
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Henry N Young
- College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
LeBeau LS, White MC, Henke RM, Hyde J, Sarpong A, Weisberg RB, Livingston NA, Mulvaney-Day N. Considerations for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment From Policy Makers' Experiences With COVID-19 Policy Flexibilities. Psychiatr Serv 2024:appips20230260. [PMID: 38835255 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This qualitative study aimed to examine how states implemented COVID-19 public health emergency-related federal policy flexibilities for opioid use disorder treatment from the perspective of state-level behavioral health policy makers. Recommendations are given for applying lessons learned to improve the long-term impact of these flexibilities on opioid use disorder treatment. METHODS Eleven semistructured interviews were conducted with 13 stakeholders from six state governments, and transcripts were qualitatively coded. Data were analyzed by grouping findings according to state-, institution-, and provider-level barriers and facilitators and were then compared to identify overarching themes. RESULTS Policy makers expressed positive opinions about the opioid use disorder treatment flexibilities and described benefits regarding treatment access, continuity of care, and quality of care. No interviewees reported evidence of increased adverse events associated with the relaxed medication protocols. Challenges to state-level implementation included gaps in the federal flexibilities, competing state policies, facility and provider liability concerns, and persistent systemic stigma. CONCLUSIONS As the federal government considers permanent adoption of COVID-19-related flexibilities regarding opioid use disorder treatment policies, the lessons learned from this study are crucial to consider in order to avoid continuing challenges with policy implementation and to effectively remove opioid use disorder treatment barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lavonia Smith LeBeau
- Customer Value Partners, Washington, D.C. (Smith LeBeau); IBM Consulting, Bethesda (White); The Lewin Group, Optum Serve, Boston (Henke); Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston (Hyde, Weisberg, Livingston); Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts (Hyde); Boston VA Research Institute, Boston (Sarpong); Behavioral Science Division, National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston (Livingston); Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mulvaney-Day)
| | - Mackenzie C White
- Customer Value Partners, Washington, D.C. (Smith LeBeau); IBM Consulting, Bethesda (White); The Lewin Group, Optum Serve, Boston (Henke); Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston (Hyde, Weisberg, Livingston); Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts (Hyde); Boston VA Research Institute, Boston (Sarpong); Behavioral Science Division, National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston (Livingston); Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mulvaney-Day)
| | - Rachel Mosher Henke
- Customer Value Partners, Washington, D.C. (Smith LeBeau); IBM Consulting, Bethesda (White); The Lewin Group, Optum Serve, Boston (Henke); Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston (Hyde, Weisberg, Livingston); Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts (Hyde); Boston VA Research Institute, Boston (Sarpong); Behavioral Science Division, National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston (Livingston); Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mulvaney-Day)
| | - Justeen Hyde
- Customer Value Partners, Washington, D.C. (Smith LeBeau); IBM Consulting, Bethesda (White); The Lewin Group, Optum Serve, Boston (Henke); Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston (Hyde, Weisberg, Livingston); Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts (Hyde); Boston VA Research Institute, Boston (Sarpong); Behavioral Science Division, National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston (Livingston); Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mulvaney-Day)
| | - Alexis Sarpong
- Customer Value Partners, Washington, D.C. (Smith LeBeau); IBM Consulting, Bethesda (White); The Lewin Group, Optum Serve, Boston (Henke); Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston (Hyde, Weisberg, Livingston); Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts (Hyde); Boston VA Research Institute, Boston (Sarpong); Behavioral Science Division, National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston (Livingston); Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mulvaney-Day)
| | - Risa B Weisberg
- Customer Value Partners, Washington, D.C. (Smith LeBeau); IBM Consulting, Bethesda (White); The Lewin Group, Optum Serve, Boston (Henke); Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston (Hyde, Weisberg, Livingston); Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts (Hyde); Boston VA Research Institute, Boston (Sarpong); Behavioral Science Division, National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston (Livingston); Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mulvaney-Day)
| | - Nicholas A Livingston
- Customer Value Partners, Washington, D.C. (Smith LeBeau); IBM Consulting, Bethesda (White); The Lewin Group, Optum Serve, Boston (Henke); Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston (Hyde, Weisberg, Livingston); Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts (Hyde); Boston VA Research Institute, Boston (Sarpong); Behavioral Science Division, National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston (Livingston); Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mulvaney-Day)
| | - Norah Mulvaney-Day
- Customer Value Partners, Washington, D.C. (Smith LeBeau); IBM Consulting, Bethesda (White); The Lewin Group, Optum Serve, Boston (Henke); Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston (Hyde, Weisberg, Livingston); Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts (Hyde); Boston VA Research Institute, Boston (Sarpong); Behavioral Science Division, National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston (Livingston); Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mulvaney-Day)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aronowitz SV, French R, Schachter A, Seeburger E, O'Donnell N, Perrone J, Lowenstein M. Mapping Buprenorphine Access at Philadelphia Pharmacies. J Addict Med 2024; 18:269-273. [PMID: 38345212 PMCID: PMC11150095 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Buprenorphine is not reliably stocked in many pharmacies, and pharmacy-level barriers may deter patients from opioid use disorder care. We surveyed all outpatient pharmacies in Philadelphia to describe variation in buprenorphine access and developed a map application to aid in identifying pharmacies that stock the medication. METHODS Using a dataset from the Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs, we conducted a telephone survey of operating outpatient pharmacies (N = 422) about their buprenorphine stocking and dispensing practices. We used ArcGIS Pro 3.0.3 to join US Census Bureau ZIP code-level race and ethnicity data, conduct descriptive analyses, and create a map application. RESULTS We collected data from 351 pharmacies (83% response rate). Two hundred thirty-eight pharmacies (68%) indicated that they regularly stock buprenorphine; 6 (2%) would order it when a prescription is sent. Ninety-one (26%) said that they do not stock or order buprenorphine, and 16 (5%) were unsure. We identified 137 "easier access" pharmacies (39%), meaning they regularly stock buprenorphine, dispense to new patients, and have no dosage maximums. Zip codes with predominantly White residents had a median (interquartile range) of 3 (2-4) "easier access" pharmacies, and those with predominantly Black residents a median (interquartile range) of 2 (1-4.5). Nine zip codes had no "easier access" pharmacies, and 3 had only one; these 3 zip codes are areas with predominantly Black residents. CONCLUSIONS Buprenorphine access is not equitable across Philadelphia and a quarter of pharmacies choose not to carry the medication. Our map application may be used to identify pharmacies in Philadelphia that stock buprenorphine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoshana V Aronowitz
- From the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA (SA); University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA (RF, AS, ES, NO, JP, ML); University of Pennsylvania Center for Emergency Care Policy and Research, Philadelphia, PA (ES); University of Pennsylvania Urban Health Lab, Philadelphia, PA (SA, ES); and University of Pennsylvania Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy, Philadelphia, PA (SA, RF, NO, JP, ML)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Davoust M, Bazzi AR, Blakemore S, Blodgett J, Cheng A, Fielman S, Magane KM, Theisen J, Saitz R, Ventura AS, Weinstein ZM. Patient and Clinician Experiences with the Implementation of Telemedicine and Related Adaptations in Office-Based Buprenorphine Treatment During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study. RESEARCH SQUARE 2024:rs.3.rs-4272282. [PMID: 38746460 PMCID: PMC11092823 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4272282/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Background Deaths from opioid overdose have increased dramatically in the past decade, representing an epidemic in the United States. For individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD), agonist medications such as methadone and buprenorphine reduce opioid-related morbidity and mortality. Historically, the provision of buprenorphine treatment in office-based settings has relied on frequent in-person contact, likely influencing patients' access to and retention in care. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, providers of office-based buprenorphine treatment rapidly adapted their care processes, increasingly relying on telemedicine visits. To date, relatively few prior studies have combined patient and clinician perspectives to examine the implementation of telemedicine and related care adaptations, particularly in safety-net settings. Methods Qualitative methods were used to explore clinician and patient experiences with telemedicine in an office-based buprenorphine treatment clinic affiliated with an urban safety-net hospital. From this clinic, we interviewed 25 patients and 16 clinicians (including prescribers and non-prescribers) to understand how telemedicine impacted treatment quality and engagement in care, as well as preferences for using telemedicine moving forward. Results Five themes regarding the implementation of telemedicine and other COVID-19-related care adaptations arose from patient and clinician perspectives: 1) telemedicine integration precipitated openness to more flexibility in care practices, 2) concerns regarding telemedicine-related adaptations centered around safety and accountability, 3) telemedicine encounters required rapport and trust between patients and clinicians to facilitate open communication, 4) safety-net patient populations experienced unique challenges when using telemedicine, particularly in terms of the technology required and the need for privacy, and 5) there is an important role for telemedicine in office-based buprenorphine treatment moving forward, primarily through its use in hybrid models of care. Conclusions Telemedicine implementation within office-based buprenorphine treatment has the potential to improve patients' engagement in care; however, our findings emphasize the need for tailored approaches to implementing telemedicine in office-based buprenorphine treatment, particularly within safety-net settings. Overall, this study supports the maintenance of changes to policy and practice that facilitate the use of telemedicine in office-based buprenorphine treatment beyond the COVID-19 public health emergency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Anna Cheng
- Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine
| | | | | | - Jacqui Theisen
- Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Martinez NG, Truong AQ, Nordeck CD, Agus D, Genberg BL, Buresh ME. "I want to stay here": Patient and staff perspectives on transitioning from a low-threshold buprenorphine program to clinic-based care. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024; 257:111130. [PMID: 38452408 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Project Connections At Re-Entry (PCARE) Van is a low-threshold buprenorphine program operating outside the Baltimore City Detention Center. Like other low-threshold programs, PCARE seeks to engage a vulnerable population in care, stabilize patients, then transition patients to longer-term care; however, <10% of patients transition to clinic-based buprenorphine treatment. Our goal was to better understand these low transition rates and center patient perspectives in discussion of broader low-threshold program design. METHODS From December 2022 to June 2023, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 former and current PCARE patients and 6 staff members. We used deductive and inductive coding followed by thematic content analysis to identify themes around treatment experiences and care preferences. RESULTS There were strong preferences among current and former patients for continuing buprenorphine treatment at the PCARE Van. Several themes emerged from the data that explained patient preferences, including both advantages to continuing care at the van (preference for continuity, feeling respected by the program's structure and philosophy) and disadvantages to transitioning to a clinic (perceived harms associated with rigid or punitive care models). Staff noted limited program capacity, and patients expressed that if needed, they would transition to a clinic for altruistic reasons. Staff expressed varied perspectives on low-threshold care, emphasizing both larger systems factors, as well as beliefs about individual patient responsibility. CONCLUSIONS While many low-threshold care settings are designed as transitional bridge models, this research highlights patient preference for long-term care at low-threshold programs and supports efforts to adapt low-threshold models to be sustainable as longitudinal care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noelle G Martinez
- Division of Addiction Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Mason F. Lord Building East Tower 2nd Floor, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
| | - Ashley Q Truong
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Courtney D Nordeck
- Friends Research Institute, 1040 Park Avenue, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Deborah Agus
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Behavioral Health Leadership Institute, 2601N. Howard Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Becky L Genberg
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Megan E Buresh
- Division of Addiction Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Mason F. Lord Building East Tower 2nd Floor, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chi W, Okeke C, Thornton D, Chen H, Sadeghi A, Varisco TJ. Leveraging prescription monitoring program data to evaluate the implementation of buprenorphine telehealth flexibilities: An interrupted time series analysis in Texas. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE REPORTS 2024; 10:100222. [PMID: 38463634 PMCID: PMC10920117 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
Background In March 2020, policy changes by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and the Drug Enforcement Administration aimed to maintain access to office-based opioid treatment services by easing telehealth buprenorphine prescribing restrictions. However, the effectiveness of these changes remains largely unmeasured. The objective of this study was to measure the effectiveness of COVID-19-related telehealth flexibilities in an all-payer cohort from the Texas Prescription Monitoring Program. Methods Using Texas Prescription Monitoring Program data, we identified oral buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone prescriptions dispensed in Texas between September 1, 2019, and September 26, 2020. Weekly counts of prescriptions, prescribing physicians, and dispensing pharmacies were analyzed. An autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model estimated changes in prescription volume between pre-implementation (September 1, 2019 - February 15, 2020) and post-implementation (April 12, 2020 - September 26, 2020) periods. Results Pre-flexibility, an average of 8898 (SD: 342) buprenorphine prescriptions were dispensed to 7829 (SD: 326) patients weekly. This declined to 8360 (SD: 247) prescriptions and 7661 (SD: 229) patients post-flexibility. Adjusted for seasonality, this represented a statistically significant average decline of -257.27 (95% CI: -426.06, -88.49) patients and -647.01 (95% CI: -856.67, -437.36) prescriptions per week. Discussion Our results suggest a modest decline in buprenorphine dispensing volume early in the COVID-19 pandemic. While difficult to assess its significance, it can be assumed that telehealth flexibilities mitigated a potentially larger decline. Future research should explore system and individual-level barriers to telehealth utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whanhui Chi
- The Prescription Drug Misuse Education and Research Center, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX 77204, USA
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX 77204, USA
| | - Chijioke Okeke
- The Prescription Drug Misuse Education and Research Center, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX 77204, USA
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX 77204, USA
| | - Douglas Thornton
- The Prescription Drug Misuse Education and Research Center, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX 77204, USA
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX 77204, USA
| | - Hua Chen
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX 77204, USA
- Center for Population Health Outcomes and Pharmacoepidemiology Education and Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX 77204, USA
| | - Abofazl Sadeghi
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX 77204, USA
| | - Tyler J Varisco
- The Prescription Drug Misuse Education and Research Center, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX 77204, USA
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX 77204, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Khail JW, Rawal S, Young HN, Caballero J. Addressing buprenorphine supply barriers: A guidance commentary. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2024; 64:377-379. [PMID: 38272311 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2024.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
The current supply-side constraints limiting buprenorphine availability at pharmacies may reduce the potential impact of recent initiatives to improve medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) access. The recent opioid litigation combined with existing federal regulation and enforcement has resulted in significant restrictions to the distribution and dispensing practices of pharmaceutical wholesalers and pharmacies countrywide. Previously discussed solutions to these problems do not seem to have produced actionable improvements to the current landscape. However, a novel solution to this problem may exist in the form of a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) guidance letter. These guidance letters allow the DEA to communicate directly to registrants, providing detailed interpretation and clarity regarding the DEA's expectations and enforcement realities. Recently, the DEA guidance letter portal was used to remind registrants that the DEA does not create quantitative thresholds or volume limits on controlled substance distribution. An additional guidance letter could be issued to ease the concerns about liability connected to the distribution and dispensing of buprenorphine. In particular, this guidance could acknowledge certain terms of the distributor settlement agreement as legal precedent and clarify that buprenorphine is not subject to the same restriction as other defined "highly diverted" controlled substances. Such guidance may also serve to provide both pharmaceutical wholesalers and pharmacies with assurance that an increase in buprenorphine distribution would not directly result in increased DEA scrutiny. This strategy represents an actionable step toward the goal of providing better access to MOUD by reducing existing supply-side limitations.
Collapse
|
12
|
DiPaula BA, Cooke CE. Assessing suboxone access in community pharmacies: Secret shopper model. EXPLORATORY RESEARCH IN CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PHARMACY 2023; 12:100356. [PMID: 38023634 PMCID: PMC10663689 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess whether Maryland community pharmacies had Suboxone available for dispensing. Methods This cross-sectional study used a secret shopper model to contact public-facing community pharmacies in Maryland. The secret shopper, guided by a script, asked whether a prescription for Suboxone was available for the same or next day pick-up. A small convenience sample of pharmacies who did not have Suboxone available received an in-person visit to inquire about medication availability and dispensing barriers. Results After contacting 99% (n = 1046) of Maryland public-facing pharmacies, Suboxone was confirmed available for immediate pick-up in 31% (n = 326). The remaining did not have, would not disclose, or had limited access (existing patients or specific providers only). Significant differences in Suboxone availability were found for National Capital vs. Baltimore metro region and when pharmacist asked questions vs. no questions. Of the 11 pharmacy visits completed, 10 said they had Suboxone currently in stock, with one clarifying medication was for existing patients only. Conclusion About 69% of patients may face challenges when calling to find out whether they can obtain Suboxone in Maryland pharmacies. Better patient education and more thorough pharmacy-level investigation of system and workflow barriers could offer solutions.
Collapse
|
13
|
Suarez E, Bartholomew TS, Plesons M, Ciraldo K, Ostrer L, Serota DP, Chueng TA, Frederick M, Onugha J, Tookes HE. Adaptation of the Tele-Harm Reduction intervention to promote initiation and retention in buprenorphine treatment among people who inject drugs: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Med 2023; 55:733-743. [PMID: 36856571 PMCID: PMC9980015 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2182908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: At the start of the pandemic, relaxation of buprenorphine prescribing regulations created an opportunity to create new models of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) delivery and care. To expand and improve access to MOUD, we adapted and implemented the Tele-Harm Reduction (THR) intervention; a multicomponent, telehealth-based and peer-driven intervention to promote HIV viral suppression among people who inject drugs (PWID) accessing a syringe services program (SSP). This study examined buprenorphine initiation and retention among PWID with opioid use disorder who received the adapted THR intervention at the IDEA Miami SSP.Methods: A retrospective chart review of participants who received the THR intervention for MOUD was performed to examine the impact of telehealth on buprenorphine retention. Our primary outcome was three-month retention, defined as three consecutive months of buprenorphine dispensed from the pharmacy.Results: A total of 109 participants received the adapted THR intervention. Three-month retention rate on buprenorphine was 58.7%. Seeing a provider via telehealth at baseline or any follow up visit (aOR = 7.53, 95% CI: [2.36, 23.98]) and participants who had received an escalating dose of buprenorphine after baseline visit (aOR = 8.09, 95% CI: [1.83, 35.87]) had a higher adjusted odds of retention at three months. Participants who self-reported or tested positive for a stimulant (methamphetamine, amphetamine, or cocaine) at baseline had a lower adjusted odds of retention on buprenorphine at three months (aOR = 0.29, 95% CI: [0.09, 0.93]).Conclusions: Harm reduction settings can adapt dynamically to the needs of PWID in provision of critical lifesaving buprenorphine in a truly destigmatising approach. Our pilot suggests that an SSP may be an acceptable and feasible venue for delivery of THR to increase uptake of buprenorphine by PWID and promote retention in care.KEY MESSAGESThe Tele-Harm Reduction intervention can be adapted for initiating and retaining people who inject drugs with opioid use disorder on buprenorphine within a syringe services program settingUsing telehealth was associated with increased three-month buprenorphine retentionBaseline stimulant use was negatively associated with three-month buprenorphine retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Suarez
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Tyler S. Bartholomew
- Division of Health Services Research and Policy, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Marina Plesons
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Katrina Ciraldo
- Department of Family and Community Medicine & Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Lily Ostrer
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - David P. Serota
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Teresa A. Chueng
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Morgan Frederick
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jason Onugha
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hansel E. Tookes
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kusic DM, Heil J, Zajic S, Brangan A, Dairo O, Heil S, Feigin G, Kacinko S, Buono RJ, Ferraro TN, Rafeq R, Haroz R, Baston K, Bodofsky E, Sabia M, Salzman M, Resch A, Madzo J, Scheinfeldt LB, Issa JPJ, Jelinek J. Postmortem toxicology findings from the Camden Opioid Research Initiative. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0292674. [PMID: 37910493 PMCID: PMC10619848 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The United States continues to be impacted by decades of an opioid misuse epidemic, worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic and by the growing prevalence of highly potent synthetic opioids (HPSO) such as fentanyl. In instances of a toxicity event, first-response administration of reversal medications such as naloxone can be insufficient to fully counteract the effects of HPSO, particularly when there is co-occurring substance use. In an effort to characterize and study this multi-faceted problem, the Camden Opioid Research Initiative (CORI) has been formed. The CORI study has collected and analyzed post-mortem toxicology data from 42 cases of decedents who expired from opioid-related toxicity in the South New Jersey region to characterize substance use profiles. Co-occurring substance use, whether by intent or through possible contamination of the illicit opioid supply, is pervasive among deaths due to opioid toxicity, and evidence of medication-assisted treatment is scarce. Nearly all (98%) of the toxicology cases show the presence of the HPSO, fentanyl, and very few (7%) results detected evidence of medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder, such as buprenorphine or methadone, at the time of death. The opioid toxicity reversal drug, naloxone, was detected in 19% of cases, but 100% of cases expressed one or more stimulants, and sedatives including xylazine were detected in 48% of cases. These results showing complex substance use profiles indicate that efforts at mitigating the opioid misuse epidemic must address the complications presented by co-occurring stimulant and other substance use, and reduce barriers to and stigmas of seeking effective medication-assisted treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dara M. Kusic
- Research, Coriell Institute for Medical Research, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Jessica Heil
- Clinical Research Office, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Stefan Zajic
- Research, Coriell Institute for Medical Research, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Andrew Brangan
- Coriell Institute for Medical Research, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Oluseun Dairo
- Coriell Institute for Medical Research, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Stacey Heil
- Coriell Institute for Medical Research, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Gerald Feigin
- Office of the Medical Examiner, Gloucester County Health Department, Sewell, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Sherri Kacinko
- Forensic Toxicology, NMS Labs, Horsham, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Russell J. Buono
- Biomedical Sciences, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Thomas N. Ferraro
- Biomedical Sciences, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Rachel Rafeq
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Rachel Haroz
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Kaitlan Baston
- Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Elliot Bodofsky
- Neurological Institute, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Michael Sabia
- Anesthesiology, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Matthew Salzman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Alissa Resch
- Research, Coriell Institute for Medical Research, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Jozef Madzo
- Research, Coriell Institute for Medical Research, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
- Biomedical Sciences, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Laura B. Scheinfeldt
- Research, Coriell Institute for Medical Research, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
- Biomedical Sciences, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Jean-Pierre J. Issa
- Research, Coriell Institute for Medical Research, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
- Biomedical Sciences, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Jaroslav Jelinek
- Research, Coriell Institute for Medical Research, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
- Biomedical Sciences, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Grande LA, Cundiff D, Greenwald MK, Murray M, Wright TE, Martin SA. Evidence on Buprenorphine Dose Limits: A Review. J Addict Med 2023; 17:509-516. [PMID: 37788601 PMCID: PMC10547105 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES As overdose deaths from fentanyl continue to increase, optimizing use of medications for opioid use disorder has become increasingly important. Buprenorphine is a highly effective medication for reducing the risk of overdose death, but only if a patient remains in treatment. Shared decision making between prescribers and patients is important to establish a dose that meets each patient's treatment needs. However, patients frequently face a dose limit of 16 or 24 mg/d based on dosing guidelines on the Food and Drug Administration's package label. METHODS This review discusses patient-centered goals and clinical criteria for determining dose adequacy, reviews the history of buprenorphine dose regulation in the United States, examines pharmacological and clinical research results with buprenorphine doses up to 32 mg/d, and evaluates whether diversion concerns justify maintaining a low buprenorphine dose limit. RESULTS Pharmacological and clinical research results consistently demonstrate buprenorphine's dose-dependent benefits up to at least 32 mg/d, including reductions in withdrawal symptoms, craving, opioid reward, and illicit use while improving retention in care. Diverted buprenorphine is most often used to treat withdrawal symptoms and reduce illicit opioid use when legal access to it is limited. CONCLUSIONS In light of established research and profound harms from fentanyl, the Food and Drug Administration's current recommendations on target dose and dose limit are outdated and causing harm. An update to the buprenorphine package label with recommended dosing up to 32 mg/d and elimination of the 16 mg/d target dose would improve treatment effectiveness and save lives.
Collapse
|
16
|
Zalmai R, Hill LG, Loera LJ, Mosgrove Q, Brown C. Independent community pharmacists' attitudes and intentions toward dispensing buprenorphine/naloxone for opioid use disorder. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:1558-1565.e4. [PMID: 37331654 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP/NX) for opioid use disorder (OUD) is associated with positive health outcomes; however, challenges accessing prescribed BUP/NX at community pharmacies have been identified. OBJECTIVE The theory of planned behavior was applied to determine whether independent community pharmacists' attitudes toward dispensing BUP/NX for OUD predict intentions to dispense. METHODS A 40-item survey was administered to 185 Texas Community Pharmacy Enhanced Services Network pharmacists. The survey assessed intentions to dispense BUP/NX (3 items), attitudes toward BUP/NX (24 items), current barriers to dispensing BUP/NX (2 items), and demographics (10 items). Inferential statistics determined associations among pharmacists' attitudes, practice setting characteristics, and intentions to dispense BUP/NX. Regression analysis determined whether attitude predicted intention to dispense BUP/NX, controlling for practice setting and demographic characteristics. RESULTS Responses were obtained from 82 community independent pharmacists (response rate = 44%). Respondents were predominantly non-Hispanic white (45.8%) and women (56.6%) and practiced in pharmacies with an average 1129.1 (± 1034.5) dispensed prescriptions/week. Pharmacists had positive intentions (6.2 ± 3.5) and attitudes (14.4 ± 24.9) toward dispensing BUP/NX and attitudes did not predict intentions to dispense (P = 0.330). Positive drivers of attitude were related to improving patient outcomes, fulfilling a community need, and absence of conflicts with pharmacists' personal and religious beliefs. A negative driver of attitude was financial reimbursement/loss. Pharmacists dispensing 2000 or more prescriptions/week had higher intentions (b = 3.22, P = 0.014) to dispense than those dispensing less than 500 prescriptions/week. The most common barrier to dispense BUP/NX was "refill was too soon" (54.8%). CONCLUSION Community independent pharmacists had positive attitudes toward and intentions of dispensing BUP/NX for OUD. However, attitudes did not predict intentions to dispense. Negative drivers of attitudes were related to factors not within pharmacists' control, such as time to refill or financial reimbursement.Future studies focused on community pharmacy-based access to BUP/NX are warranted to elucidate issues that are impactful in improving pharmacists' dispensing intentions and behavior.
Collapse
|
17
|
Krawczyk N, Rivera BD, King C, Dooling BCE. Pandemic telehealth flexibilities for buprenorphine treatment: a synthesis of evidence and policy implications for expanding opioid use disorder care in the United States. HEALTH AFFAIRS SCHOLAR 2023; 1:qxad013. [PMID: 38145115 PMCID: PMC10734906 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxad013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
Buprenorphine is a highly effective treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) and a critical tool for addressing the worsening US overdose crisis. However, multiple barriers to treatment-including stringent federal regulations-have historically made this medication hard to reach for many who need it. In 2020, under the COVID-19 public health emergency, federal regulators substantially changed access to buprenorphine by allowing prescribers to initiate patients on buprenorphine via telehealth without first evaluating them in person. As the public health emergency has been set to expire in May of 2023, Congress and federal agencies can leverage extensive evidence from studies conducted during the wake of the pandemic to make evidence-based decisions on the regulation of buprenorphine going forward. To aid policy makers, this narrative review synthesizes and interprets peer-reviewed research on the effect of buprenorphine flexibilities on the uptake and implementation of telehealth, and its impact on OUD patient and prescriber experiences, access to treatment, and health outcomes. Overall, our review finds that many prescribers and patients took advantage of telehealth, including the audio-only option, with a wide range of benefits and few downsides. As a result, federal regulators-including agencies and Congress-should continue nonrestricted use of telehealth for buprenorphine initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noa Krawczyk
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy (COEP), Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison, New York, NY 10016, United States
| | - Bianca D Rivera
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy (COEP), Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison, New York, NY 10016, United States
| | - Carla King
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy (COEP), Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison, New York, NY 10016, United States
| | - Bridget C E Dooling
- Regulatory Studies Center, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Varisco TJ, Wanat M, Hill LG, Thornton D. The impact of the mainstreaming addiction treatment act and associated legislative action on pharmacy practice. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:1039-1043. [PMID: 37088366 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
The recent passage of the Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment (MAT) Act will expand access to treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) by eliminating prescriber registration requirements introduced as part of the Drug Abuse Treatment Act (DATA) of 2000. Without the X-Waiver, and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) registered prescriber can now prescribe buprenorphine. Eliminating DATA-2000 registration is the first step in improving access to buprenorphine, but additional barriers, including unclear restrictions on wholesale buprenorphine supply and insurance coverage, remain. Recently, the DEA formally clarified that suspicious order monitoring programs were managed entirely by wholesalers and manufacturers and that DEA does not set suspicious order monitoring limits. In this commentary, we address the somewhat conflicting implications of the MAT Act and recent DEA guidance on buprenorphine dispensing in community pharmacies. We also discuss innovative practice models that leverage pharmacists' cognitive skills to manage pharmacotherapy for persons with OUD. Recent policy changes and emerging evidence suggest that pharmacists are better positioned than ever to provide low-barrier access to treatment for OUD and to show their value in this practice area by actively engaging patients with prescribed buprenorphine.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ostrach B, Hill L, Carpenter D, Pollini R. Addressing buprenorphine bottlenecks in the context of MAT Act implementation: A shared responsibility. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:1044-1048. [PMID: 37149144 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) such as buprenorphine reduce overdose mortality and other opioid related acute health events but have historically been highly regulated. The recent Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment (MAT) Act ended the requirement clinicians complete a specified training and apply for a DATA 2000 ("X") waiver on their Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) number, to prescribe buprenorphine. With the MAT Act, any practitioner with Schedule III prescribing authority (a regular DEA number) can now prescribe buprenorphine for OUD. While this has potential to improve OUD treatment access, the impact will depend on implementation. Though the MAT Act may facilitate increased buprenorphine prescribing, ensuring adequate buprenorphine dispensing is also critical to improving Medications for opioid use disorder. Recognized buprenorphine bottlenecks arise from a complex convergence of factors in community pharmacies, threatening to undercut the benefits of the MAT Act. If prescribing increases but is not matched by increased dispensing, bottlenecks may worsen. Any worsening of buprenorphine bottlenecks could have a disproportionate impact in rural areas where residents may rely on fewer pharmacies to fill prescriptions for people in larger geographic area and where larger prescribing-dispensing gaps already exist such as in Southern states. Rigorous research will be needed to document the overall impact of the MAT Act on community pharmacists and their patients. At the federal level, pharmacists and their professional organizations should lobby the DEA to de-schedule or re-schedule buprenorphine. The DEA should announce a moratorium on enforcement actions against wholesalers and pharmacies related to buprenorphine distribution and dispensing. More supports should be offered to community pharmacies by state pharmacy boards and associations including continuing pharmacy education and technical assistance for advocating with wholesalers to increase buprenorphine order sizes, and to more effectively communicate with prescribers. Pharmacies should not have to face these challenges alone. Regulators, wholesalers, and researchers must join together with community pharmacies to further reduce regulatory barriers to dispensing, provide evidence-based interventions where needed to support pharmacy dispensing efforts, conduct rigorous implementation research, and be constantly vigilant in identifying and addressing multi-level buprenorphine bottlenecks in the wake of the MAT Act.
Collapse
|
20
|
Tutag Lehr V, Nolan C. Community Pharmacists' Knowledge and Perceptions of Buprenorphine for Patients with Opioid Use Disorder. J Addict Med 2023; 17:e224-e231. [PMID: 37579094 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aims of the study are to evaluate community pharmacists' knowledge and perceptions regarding buprenorphine for opioid use disorder and their willingness to dispense buprenorphine and to identify opportunities for education. METHODS An electronic survey of Michigan pharmacists (n = 11,123) assessed demographics, training, buprenorphine knowledge, dispensing, perceptions of stigma, diversion, and confidence in patient/provider interactions. Composite scores for knowledge, stigma, diversion, and confidence were calculated. Cross-tabulations and logistic regressions examined associations. RESULTS There were 775 surveys returned (response 7%, n = 11,123) with 390 community pharmacists completing the survey. Twenty-five percent practiced in a rural area. Common practice sites were chain or independent pharmacies (30% each). Ninety-seven percent had buprenorphine training, 50% from Accredited Continuing Pharmacy Education. Eighty percent reported that their pharmacy dispensed buprenorphine with 90% of rural pharmacists compared with 71% urban responding yes. Composite knowledge scores did not differ between urban or rural location ( P > 0.05). Predictors of willingness to dispense buprenorphine were urban location (odds ratio, OR, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34-0.91; P = 0.01), independent pharmacy (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30-0.94; P = 0.03), Accredited Continuing Pharmacy Education training (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34-0.87; P = 0.01), low stigma/diversion (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.37-0.70; P = 0.00), and confidence in patient/provider interactions (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.10-0.19; P = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS Most survey pharmacists practice at pharmacies that dispense buprenorphine for opioid use disorder, with a larger proportion from rural pharmacies reporting availability. Pharmacists at independent pharmacies in urban locations have increased willingness to dispense buprenorphine, with urban pharmacists having lower perceptions of diversion compared with rural. Differences in buprenorphine availability, pharmacist willingness to dispense, and perceptions are opportunities for education. Limitations include one state, response bias, self-assessed competencies, and small samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Tutag Lehr
- From the Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI (VTL)
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Welsh JW, Yarbrough CR, Sitar SI, Mataczynski MJ, Peralta AM, Kan M, Crawford ND, Conrad TA, Kee C, Young HN. Demographic and socioeconomic correlates to buprenorphine access in pharmacies. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:751-759. [PMID: 36658013 PMCID: PMC11332381 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research has focused on buprenorphine prescribing with limited attention to the role of pharmacy access to buprenorphine for opioid use disorder. OBJECTIVE This study examines demographic and socioeconomic correlates to buprenorphine access in Georgia pharmacies. METHODS A 5-question (12 potential subqueries) telephone administered survey was used to investigate access and stocking patterns of specific dosages and formulations of buprenorphine in Georgia pharmacies (n = 119). Descriptive statistics characterized physician and pharmacy demographics and buprenorphine stocking practices. Correlations between various factors including buprenorphine stocking practices, geographic, and sociodemographic characteristics were identified using nonlinear regression models. RESULTS The majority of pharmacies stocked the most commonly prescribed 8/2 mg dosage strength of buprenorphine/naloxone films and tablets (69.0% and 63.0%, respectively). Other strengths were less likely to be readily available. Pharmacies in Suburban Census tracts were 77.0% more likely to stock any type of buprenorphine monotherapy [odds ratio (OR) = 1.77, t = 2.37, P < 0.05] and 58.1% more likely to stock the 8 mg buprenorphine monotherapy formulation [OR = 1.58, t = 2.15, P < 0.05] than Urban tracts. Pharmacies in areas with above-average non-White populations were 29.6% more likely to stock a monotherapy product [OR = 1.30, t = 2.16, P < 0.05], and those in areas with above-average poverty rates were more likely to stock the 8 mg/2 mg buprenorphine/naloxone tablets [OR = 1.04, t = 2.02, P < 0.05]. There were no additional differences across the sample in formulation or dosage strengths. Pharmacists who endorsed challenges dispensing buprenorphine (23.3%) cited issues around insurance coverage, payment difficulty, prior authorization issues, and low stock of specific formulations. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that low availability of certain dosages or formulations of buprenorphine in local pharmacies could obstruct access for patients. Future research should address barriers to supplying buprenorphine and collaborative measures between pharmacists and prescribers to improve access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine W. Welsh
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory Addiction Center, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Siara I. Sitar
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory Addiction Center, Atlanta, GA
| | - Maggie J. Mataczynski
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Mary Kan
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | | | - Henry N. Young
- Department Head, Director of Pharmaceutical Health Services, Outcomes, and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Krawczyk N, Rivera BD, King C, Dooling BC. Pandemic telehealth flexibilities for buprenorphine treatment: A synthesis of evidence and policy implications for expanding opioid use disorder care in the U.S. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.03.16.23287373. [PMID: 36993696 PMCID: PMC10055597 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.16.23287373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
Buprenorphine is a highly effective treatment for opioid use disorder and a critical tool for addressing the worsening U.S. overdose crisis. However, multiple barriers to treatment - including stringent federal regulations - have historically made this medication hard to reach for many who need it. In 2020, under the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency, federal regulators substantially changed access to buprenorphine by allowing prescribers to initiate patients on buprenorphine via telehealth without first evaluating them in person. As the Public Health Emergency is set to expire in May of 2023, Congress and federal agencies can leverage extensive evidence from studies conducted during the wake of the pandemic to make evidence-based decisions on the regulation of buprenorphine going forward. To aid policy makers, this review synthesizes and interprets peer-reviewed research on the effect of buprenorphine flexibilities on uptake and implementation of telehealth, and its impact on OUD patient and prescriber experiences, access to treatment and health outcomes. Overall, our review finds that many prescribers and patients took advantage of telehealth, including the audio-only option, with a wide range of benefits and few downsides. As a result, federal regulators-including agencies and Congress-should continue non-restricted use of telehealth for buprenorphine initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noa Krawczyk
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy (COEP), Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York NY
| | - Bianca D. Rivera
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy (COEP), Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York NY
| | - Carla King
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy (COEP), Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bratberg JP, Falleni A. Preserving dignity through expanded and sustained access to buprenorphine. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:220-223. [PMID: 36599800 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.12.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alyssa Falleni
- VA Health Professions Education, Evaluation and Research Fellow, West Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hill LG, Light AE, Green TC, Burns AL, Sanaty Zadeh P, Freeman PR. Perceptions, policies, and practices related to dispensing buprenorphine for opioid use disorder: A national survey of community-based pharmacists. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:252-260.e6. [PMID: 36202711 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing buprenorphine prescribing for opioid use disorder (OUD) has been a major focus of U.S. opioid response efforts. However, concerns related to dispensing buprenorphine have been identified among pharmacists. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to describe perceptions, policies, and practices reported by community-based pharmacists in relation to dispensing buprenorphine for OUD and to compare these responses by practice setting. METHODS A cross-sectional online survey was administered to a random sample of 6376 pharmacists. Responses were collected anonymously from October 16, 2021, to November 7, 2021. RESULTS A response rate of 5.1% was achieved with 325 responders, and 281 were eligible to complete the survey. Most reported practicing in a chain (50.9%) or independent pharmacy (34.7%) as a staff pharmacist (39.7%) or pharmacist-in-charge (37.0%). Most (68.1%) indicated they could usually or always fill a buprenorphine prescription promptly. The most common pharmacy policies related to buprenorphine dispensing were checking the prescription drug monitoring program (71.3%), validating the prescriber's X-waiver (44.9%), accepting only local prescribers (37.4%), and prohibiting refills more than one day early (35.8%). Policies limiting buprenorphine access to local prescribers, local patients, and established patients varied by practice setting and were most common in independent pharmacies. The strongest barriers to buprenorphine dispensing were insurance prior authorization, difficulty reaching prescribers with questions, and concerns about buprenorphine diversion. The strongest facilitators of buprenorphine dispensing were increased communication with prescribers, increased trust with prescribers, increased trust with patients, and increased education for pharmacists. CONCLUSION Most respondents indicated they were willing and able to dispense buprenorphine products for OUD promptly. However, they also reported discomfort dispensing when factors representing potential risk of diversion are present. Mitigating this hypersensitivity to diversion risk among pharmacists should be a focus of regulatory agencies and professional organizations. Efforts to address the unique concerns of independent pharmacists will also be essential to improve access.
Collapse
|
25
|
Teck JTW, Zlatkute G, Perez A, Dritschel H, Ghosh A, Potenza MN, Ambekar A, Ekhtiari H, Stein D, Khazaal Y, Arunogiri S, Torrens M, Ferri M, Galea-Singer S, Baldacchino A. Key implementation factors in telemedicine-delivered medications for opioid use disorder: a scoping review informed by normalisation process theory. Lancet Psychiatry 2023; 10:50-64. [PMID: 36526346 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(22)00374-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Telemedicine could improve access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Telemedicine-delivered MOUD (TMOUD) has expanded substantially in response to the restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic on in-person clinical contact, yet this expansion has not happened consistently across all health systems and countries. This Review aims to understand key factors in TMOUD implementation that might explain variations in uptake. We did a scoping review using three English language databases for articles reporting on the implementation of TMOUD services. 57 peer-reviewed articles were identified, subjected to open coding and thematic analysis, and further interpreted through normalisation process theory (NPT). NPT was originally used to evaluate telehealth innovations and has been applied extensively to describe, assess, and develop the implementation potential of a broad range of complex health-care interventions. By categorising our findings according to the four core NPT constructs of coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring, we aim to rationalise the current evidence base to show the workability of TMOUD in practice. We find that variations in TMOUD models in practice depend on organisations' attitudes towards risk, clinicians' tensions around giving up control over standard practices, organisation-level support in overcoming operational and technological challenges, and evaluation methods that might neglect a potential widening of the digital divide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Tay Wee Teck
- DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK; Forward Leeds and Humankind Charity, Durham, UK.
| | - Giedre Zlatkute
- DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Alberto Perez
- DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Heidi Dritschel
- DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Abhishek Ghosh
- Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Marc N Potenza
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; the Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Atul Ambekar
- National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Dan Stein
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Yasser Khazaal
- Addiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Research Center, Institute of Mental Health, Montréal University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Shalini Arunogiri
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Marta Torrens
- School of Medicine, Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVIC-UCC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marica Ferri
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Susanna Galea-Singer
- DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK; NHS Fife Addiction Services, Leven, UK
| | - Alex Baldacchino
- DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Comanici KH, Nichols MA, Scott C, Conklin M, Ott CA, Arnett S, Karwa R. Understanding the role of community pharmacies in current medication for opioid use disorder care practices. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:261-268.e2. [PMID: 36209034 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many barriers for patient access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) exist in current care practices. Previous literature has evaluated subsets of pharmacists, patients, and prescribers; however, few have collectively evaluated the perspectives of all 3 groups. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to identify barriers, facilitators, and opportunities for improvement in Indiana community pharmacy MOUD care practices from the perspectives of peer recovery coaches, community pharmacists, and prescribers to optimize patient care. METHODS Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with each participant. Interviews explored stakeholders' perspectives on their current role in MOUD care practices and how current pharmacy practices could be improved. Data were analyzed using preconceived deductive and iterative inductive codes. The first author analyzed all transcripts, of which 3 were also analyzed separately by the last author to confirm consistent utilization of codes. All transcripts were coded once, followed by a second coding to ensure inductive codes were thoroughly applied. RESULTS Ten peer recovery coaches, 10 pharmacists, and 6 prescribers were included. Interviews identified barriers, facilitators, and opportunities for improvement in current MOUD care practices. Stigma was a major barrier identified by all groups. Other barriers identified included limited patient engagement at pharmacies and lack of access to patient-specific health information in community pharmacy settings. Pharmacists also identified additional barriers including Drug Enforcement Administration regulations and difficulties balancing patient care with external factors like insurance and legal policies. Positive prescriber/pharmacist relationships were identified as a facilitator of care. Opportunities for improvement included having community MOUD resource information available at pharmacies, further education on MOUD for pharmacists, and increased collaboration between pharmacists and prescribers. CONCLUSION Many barriers exist in current MOUD care practices. Additional pharmacist MOUD education and intentional collaboration between pharmacists, peer recovery coaches, and prescribers would facilitate better care and leverage the accessibility of pharmacists within their communities.
Collapse
|
27
|
Syros A, Rodriguez MG, Rennick AC, Dima GA, Gibstein AR, de la Parte L, Hermenau MG, Ciraldo KJ, Chueng TA, Tookes HE, Bartholomew TS, Serota DP. Availability of medications for opioid use disorder in outpatient and inpatient pharmacies in South Florida: a secret shopper survey. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2022; 17:63. [PMID: 36401298 PMCID: PMC9673453 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-022-00346-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the proven efficacy of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and recent reduction in barriers to prescribers, numerous obstacles exist for patients seeking MOUD. Prior studies have used telephone surveys to investigate pharmacy-related barriers to MOUD. We applied this methodology to evaluate inpatient and outpatient pharmacy barriers to MOUD in South Florida. Methods Randomly selected pharmacies in South Florida (Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties) were called using a standardized script with a “secret shopper” approach until 200 successful surveys had been completed. The primary outcome was the availability of any buprenorphine products. Second, a list of all 48 acute care hospitals within the aforementioned counties was compiled, and hospitals were contacted by telephone using a second structured script. Results A total of 1374 outpatient pharmacies and 48 inpatient pharmacies were identified. 378 randomly selected outpatient pharmacies were contacted to accrue 200 successful calls (53% success rate). All 48 inpatient pharmacies were contacted to successfully complete 25 inpatient surveys (52%). Of the 200 outpatient pharmacies contacted, 38% had any buprenorphine available. There was a significant difference in buprenorphine availability by county, with Miami-Dade having the least availability and Palm Beach having the most availability (27% vs. 47%, respectively; p = 0.04). Of the 38% with buprenorphine available, 82% had a sufficient supply for a two-week prescription of buprenorphine 8 mg twice daily. Of the pharmacies that did not have buprenorphine, 55% would be willing to order with a median estimated time to receive an order of 2 days (IQR 1.25–3 days). Of the 25 surveyed inpatient pharmacies, 88% reported having buprenorphine on inpatient formulary, and 55% of hospitals had at least one restriction on ordering of buprenorphine beyond federal regulations. Conclusions The results of this study highlight significant pharmacy-related barriers to comprehensive OUD treatment across the healthcare system including both acute care hospital pharmacies and outpatient community pharmacies. Despite efforts to increase the number of MOUD providers, there still remain downstream obstacles to MOUD access.
Collapse
|
28
|
Winstanley EL, Thacker EP, Choo LY, Lander LR, Berry JH, Tofighi B. Patient-reported problems filling buprenorphine prescriptions and motivations for illicit use. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE REPORTS 2022; 5:100091. [PMID: 36844166 PMCID: PMC9949336 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
Background While barriers to accessing buprenorphine (BUP) therapy have been well described, little is known about pharmacy-related barriers. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of patient-reported problems filling BUP prescriptions and determine whether these problems were associated with illicit use of BUP. The secondary objectives included identifying motivations for illicit BUP use and the prevalence of naloxone acquisition among patients prescribed BUP. Methods Between July 2019 and March 2020, 139 participants receiving treatment for an opioid use disorder (OUD) at two sites within a rurally-located health system, completed an anonymous 33-item survey. A multivariable model was used to assess the association between pharmacy-related problems filling BUP prescriptions and illicit substance use. Results More than a third of participants reported having problems filling their BUP prescription (34.1%, n = 47) with the most commonly reported problems being insufficient pharmacy stock of BUP (37.8%, n = 17), pharmacist refusal to dispense BUP (37.8%, n = 17), and insurance problems (34.0%, n = 16). Of those who reported illicit BUP use (41.5%, n = 56), the most common motivations were to avoid/ease withdrawal symptoms (n = 39), prevent/reduce cravings (n = 39), maintain abstinence (n = 30), and treat pain (n = 19). In the multivariable model, participants who reported a pharmacy-related problems were significantly more likely to use illicitly obtained BUP (OR=8.93, 95% CI: 3.12, 25.52, p < 0.0001). Conclusion Efforts to improve BUP access have primarily focused on increasing the number of clinicians waivered to prescribe; however, challenges persist with BUP dispensing and coordinated efforts may be needed to systematically reduce pharmacy-related barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin L. Winstanley
- Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States,Department of Neuroscience, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States,Corresponding author at: Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.
| | - Emily P. Thacker
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Lyn Yuen Choo
- West Virginia Clinical and Translational Science Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | - Laura R. Lander
- Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States,Department of Neuroscience, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | - James H. Berry
- Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States,Department of Neuroscience, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | - Babak Tofighi
- Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, United States
| |
Collapse
|