Readiness for weight change and its association with diet knowledge and skills, diet decision making and diet and exercise barriers in patients with type 2 diabetes

Web-Based Intervention to Act for Weight Loss in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes With Obesity (Chance2Act): Protocol for a Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

In adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), weight loss can improve hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, and triglycerides, and reduce the frequency of medications needed. Unfortunately, a large proportion of these individuals are not ready to initiate weight efforts, making existing obesity management strategies less effective. Many digital health interventions aim at weight loss, but there is still limited evidence on their effectiveness in changing weight loss behavior, especially in adults with T2D.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to develop and validate "Chance2Act," a new web-based intervention, designed specifically to facilitate behavioral change in adults with T2D with obesity who are not ready to act toward weight loss. Then, the effectiveness of the newly developed intervention will be determined from a nonrandomized controlled trial.

METHODS

A web-based intervention will be developed based on the Transtheoretical Model targeting adults with T2D with obesity who are not ready to change for weight loss. Phase 1 will involve the development and validation of the web-based health intervention module. In phase 2, a nonrandomized controlled trial will be conducted in 2 government health clinics selected by the investigator. This is an unblinded study with a parallel assignment (ie, intervention vs control [usual care] with an allocation ratio of 1:1). A total of 124 study participants will be recruited, of which 62 participants will receive the Chance2Act intervention in addition to the usual care. The primary outcome is the changes in an individual's readiness from a stage of not being ready to change (precontemplation, contemplation, or preparation stage) to being ready for weight loss (action stage). The secondary outcomes include changes in self-efficacy, decisional balance, family support for weight loss, BMI, waist circumference, and body fat composition.

RESULTS

The phase 1 study will reveal the intervention's validity through the Content Validity Index and Face Validity Index, considering it valid if both indices exceed 0.83. The effectiveness of the intervention will be determined in phase 2, where the differences within and between groups will be analyzed in terms of the improvement of stages of change and all secondary outcomes as defined in the methodology. Data analysis for phase 2 will commence in 2024, with the anticipated publication of results in March 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

If proven effective, the result of the study may give valuable insights into the effective behavioral modification strategies for a web-based intervention targeting adults with T2D with obesity but not yet ready to change for weight loss. This intervention may be replicated or adopted in different settings, focusing on behavioral modification support that patients need. This study offers a deeper understanding of the application of behavior change techniques for a more holistic approach to obesity care in T2D.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05736536; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05736536.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/48313.

Do Weight trajectories influence diabetes control? A prospective study in Switzerland (CoLaus study)

OBJECTIVE

Identify anthropometric trajectories among subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and associate them with glycaemic control.

METHODS

Prospective study including 268 community-dwelling participants with T2DM (34% women, mean age 68.7 ± 8.9 years) followed for 10.7 years (range: 8.8-13.6 years). T2DM control was considered for 1) fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < 7.0 mmol/L, or 2) HbA1c < 7.0% (53 nmol/mol). Changes in weight or waist and weight variability were considered.

RESULTS

One half (FPG) and one third (HbA1c) of participants presented with uncontrolled T2DM. Half of the participants presented with obesity and 75% with abdominal obesity. During follow-up, half of the participants maintained their weight, 25% gained > 5 kg, and 25% lost < 5 kg; almost half increased their waist by > 5 cm. Using FPG as criterion, participants who lost > 5 cm waist were more likely to be controlled: multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.10 (1.23-7.78). Participants with controlled T2DM also presented with a higher weight variability: multivariable adjusted mean ± standard error 4.8 ± 0.3 vs. 3.9 ± 0.3 kg, p = 0.028. Using HbA1c as criterion, participants who lost > 5 kg were less likely to be controlled: OR and (95% CI): 0.35 (0.18-0.66). Similar findings were obtained when restricting the analysis to participants who were diabetic throughout the whole study period.

CONCLUSION

In a Swiss community-based sample of participants with T2DM, T2DM control rates could be implemented. Neither weight nor waist variability was significantly and consistently associated with T2DM control.

Nutritional Status Measurement Instruments for Diabetes: A Systematic Psychometric Review

Background: Diabetes is a serious chronic disease associated with a large number of complications and an increased risk of premature death. A dietary evaluation is of utmost importance for health promotion, disease prevention and individual treatment plans in patients with diabetes. Methods: An exhaustive search was carried out in various databases—Medline, Web of Science, Open Gray Cochrane Library and Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN)—for systematic review of the measurement properties of instruments that evaluate the dietary intake of people with diabetes mellitus type 1 and/or 2 according to COSMIN standards. Results: Seven instruments were identified. There was no instrument measuring nutritional status for which all the psychometric properties were evaluated. The methodological quality for each of the psychometric properties evaluated was ‘inadequate’ or ‘doubtful’ for all instruments. The Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) evaluated the most psychometric characteristics and with a better score in terms of quality of the evidence. Conclusions: Several instruments have been developed for the evaluation of dietary intake in people with diabetes. Evaluation of this construct is very useful, both in clinical practice and in research, requiring new knowledge in this area. The FFQ is the best instrument available to assess dietary intake in people with diabetes.