Transmission and re-infection of Omicron variant XBB.1.5 in hamsters

Amino acid substitutions in NSP6 and NSP13 of SARS-CoV-2 contribute to superior virus growth at low temperatures

In general, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replicates well at 37°C, which is the temperature of the human lower respiratory tract, but it poorly at 30°C‒32°C, which is the temperature of the human upper respiratory tract. The replication efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 in the upper respiratory tract may directly affect its transmissibility. In this study, an XBB.1.5 isolate showed superior replicative ability at 32°C and 30°C, whereas most other Omicron sub-variant isolates showed limited growth. Deep sequencing analysis demonstrated that the frequencies of viruses possessing the NSP6-S163P and NSP13-P238S substitutions increased to more than 97% during propagation of the XBB.1.5 isolate at 32°C but did not reach 55% at 37°C. Reverse genetics revealed that these substitutions contributed to superior virus growth in vitro at these low temperatures by improving virus genome replication. Mutant virus possessing both substitutions showed slightly higher virus titers in the upper respiratory tract of hamsters compared to the parental virus; however, transmissibility between hamsters was similar for the mutant and parental viruses. Taken together, our findings indicate that NSP6-S163P and NSP13-P238S contribute to superior virus growth at low temperatures in vitro and in the upper respiratory tract of hamsters.

IMPORTANCE

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replicates efficiently at 37°C. However, the temperature of the human upper airway is 30°C-32°C. Therefore, the replicative ability of SARS-CoV-2 at low temperatures could influence virus replication in the upper airway and transmissibility. In this study, we assessed the growth of Omicron sub-variants at low temperatures and found that an XBB.1.5 isolate showed increased replicative ability. By deep sequencing analysis and reverse genetics, we found that amino acid changes in NSP6 and NSP13 contribute to the low-temperature growth; these changes improved RNA polymerase activity at low temperatures and enhanced virus replication in the upper airway of hamsters. Although these substitutions alone did not drastically affect virus transmissibility, in combination with other substitutions, they could affect virus replication in humans. Furthermore, since these substitutions enhance virus replication in cultured cells, they could be used to improve the production of inactivated or live attenuated vaccine virus.

Clinical profile analysis of SARS-CoV-2 community infections during periods with omicron BA.2, BA.4/5, and XBB dominance in Hong Kong: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Existing studies on SARS-CoV-2 infection have mainly focused on severe clinical outcomes; understanding of the clinical severity profile of general community infections is poor. We aimed to assess and compare the clinical profiles of infections with SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) subvariants in a representative community cohort in Hong Kong during periods of BA.2, BA.4/5, and XBB dominance.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study in Hong Kong, a representative community cohort of individuals aged at least 5 years were recruited by random-digit dialling and underwent weekly rapid antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2, irrespective of symptoms, during three periods from March 1, 2022, to Oct 31, 2023, in which the BA.2, BA.4/5, or XBB subvariants were dominant. We analysed the likelihood of symptoms, as well as the patterns, severity, and duration of symptoms and their associations with participant demographics and vaccination and infection histories.

FINDINGS

1126 (11·0%) of 10 279 participants in the BA.2 period, 830 (6·6%) of 12 588 in the BA.4/5 period, and 633 (11·1%) of 5690 during the XBB period tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection on rapid antigen tests. Community infections were generally mild, with asymptomatic infections comprising 22·0-25·0% of infections. No hospitalisations or deaths occurred as a direct result of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the study period. Compared with children aged 5-17 years, a higher likelihood of being symptomatic on infection was found for adults aged 18-59 years during the period of BA.2 dominance and adults aged 60 years or older during XBB dominance. Most (>90·0%) participants with symptomatic infections reported respiratory and systemic symptoms. Up-to-date vaccination with a regimen containing the BNT162b2 vaccine, compared with those without an up-to-date vaccine, was associated with a reduced likelihood of symptoms on infection during the period of BA.2 dominance and of severe symptoms causing substantial disturbance to daily life (grade 3 symptoms) during periods of BA.2 and BA.4/5 dominance, whereas no association was observed during the period of XBB dominance. Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a reduced likelihood of symptoms on infection during BA.4/5 and XBB dominance and of severe symptoms during XBB dominance. Reports of severe symptoms increased over the three periods, from 236 (27·7%) of 852 symptomatic participants during BA.2 dominance to 176 (37·1%) of 475 during XBB dominance. The duration of symptoms was longest in the BA.2 period (median 10·0 days [95% CI 9·0-10·0]) and similar in the other two periods (8·0 [8·0-9·0] during BA.4/5 dominance and 8·0 [8·0-9·0] during XBB dominance). A symptom duration of 60 days or longer was reported only during the period of BA.2 dominance, in six (0·7%) of 824 infections.

INTERPRETATION

SARS-CoV-2 infections were generally mild, but not increasingly so, along the evolution of omicron subvariants in this highly vaccinated population. About a third of participants with symptomatic infections reported that the symptoms severely affected daily life even if they were not admitted to hospital, resulting in morbidity, absence from work or school due to illness, productivity loss, and increased medicoeconomic burden. A gradual reduction in the association of vaccines and increase in the association of previous infection with the symptom profile, possibly reflecting the effects of immune escape and waning, were observed over the study period.

FUNDING

Henry Fok Foundation and Hong Kong Health Bureau.

Fusion protein-based COVID-19 vaccines exemplified by a chimeric vaccine based on a single fusion protein (W-PreS-O)

In this article we discuss characteristics of fusion protein-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. We focus on recombinant vaccine antigens comprising fusion proteins consisting of combinations of SARS-CoV-2-derived antigens or peptides or combinations of SARS-CoV-2 antigens/peptides with SARS-CoV-2-unrelated proteins/peptides. These fusion proteins are made to increase the immunogenicity of the vaccine antigens and/or to enable special targeting of the immune system. The protein-based vaccine approach is exemplified solely in a proof of concept study by using W-PreS-O, a chimeric vaccine based on a single fusion protein (W-PreS-O), combining RBDs from Wuhan hu-1 wild-type and Omicron BA.1 with the hepatitis B virus (HBV)-derived PreS surface antigen adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide. The W-PreS-O vaccine was evaluated in Syrian hamsters which were immunized three times at three-week intervals with W-PreS-O or with aluminum hydroxide (placebo) before they were infected with Omicron BA.1. Neutralizing antibody (nAB) titers, weight, lung symptoms, and viral loads, as measured using RT-PCR in the upper and lower respiratory tracts, were determined. In addition, infectious virus titers from the lungs were measured using a plaque-forming assay. We found that W-PreS-O-vaccinated hamsters developed robust nABs against Omicron BA.1, showed almost no development of pneumonia, and had significantly reduced infectious virus titers in the lungs. Importantly, the viral loads in the nasal cavities of W-PreS-O-vaccinated hamsters were close to or above the PCR cycle threshold considered to be non-infectious. The data of our proof-of-concept study provides compelling evidence that the W-PreS-O vaccine has protective effect against Omicron BA.1 in a Syrian hamster in vivo infection model and thus support the promising results obtained also for other fusion protein-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

Characterization of the Pathogenic Features of Multiple SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Strains in Different Mouse Models

Elucidating the detailed features of emerging SARS-CoV-2 strains both in vitro and in vivo is indispensable for the development of effective vaccines or drugs against viral infection. We thoroughly characterized the virological and pathogenic features of eight different pandemic SARS-CoV-2 strains, from the WT strain to current circulating sublineage EG.5.1, both in vitro and in vivo. Besides detailed virological features observed in Vero E6 cells, the Omicron variants, from BA.1 to EG.5.1, exhibited enhanced infectious effects to upper respiratory tract in K18 human angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE2) (K18 hACE2) transgenic mice. Both XBB.1.9.1 and EG.5.1 presented stronger tropism to brain, which could be the main reason for the increased lethal effects on mice. In addition, the pathogenesis comparisons among all these viruses in C57BL/6JGpt mice indicated that Omicron variant BA.1 and two new sublineages XBB.1.9.1 and EG.5.1 possessed dual tropisms to both human and mice, which were further confirmed by subsequent bioinformatic analyses and actual affinity comparison between viral RBDs and mouse or human receptor ACE2. Furthermore, the immunocompromised BKS-db mice were found to be more susceptible to Omicron strains compared to C57BL/6JGpt mice, which revealed that viral infectivity was determined by both its affinity to the host receptor and host immunocompetence. Thus, this study not only contributes to a systematic understanding of the pathogenic features of SARS-CoV-2 in mice, but also provides new insights to combat potential future surges of new SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Virological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5.2.48

With the prevalence of sequentially-emerged sublineages including BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5, SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection has transformed into a regional epidemic disease. As a sublineage of BA.5, the BA.5.2.48 outbroke and evolved into multi-subvariants in China without clearly established virological characteristics. Here, we evaluated the virological characteristics of two isolates of the prevalent BA.5.2.48 subvariant, DY.2 and DY.1.1 (a subvariant of DY.1). Compared to the normal BA.5 spike, the double-mutated DY.1.1 spike demonstrates efficient cleavage, reduced fusogenicity and higher hACE2 binding affinity. BA.5.2.48 demonstrated enhanced airborne transmission capacity than BA.2 in hamsters. The pathogenicity of BA.5.2.48 is greater than BA.2, as revealed in Omicron-lethal H11-K18-hACE2 rodents. In both naïve and convalescent hamsters, DY.1.1 shows stronger fitness than DY.2 in hamster turbinates. Thus regional outbreaking of BA.5.2.48 promotes the multidirectional evolution of its subvariants, gaining either enhanced pathogenicity or a fitness in upper airways which is associated with higher transmission.

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants progressively adapt to human cells with altered host cell entry

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant exhibits high transmissibility with a strong immune escape ability and causes frequent large-scale global infections by producing predominant subvariants. Here, using human upper/lower airway and intestinal cells, we examined the previously dominant BA.1-BA.5 and BA.2.75 subvariants, together with the recently emerged XBB/BQ lineages, in comparison to the former Delta variant. We observed a tendency for each virus to demonstrate higher growth capability than the previously dominant subvariants. Unlike human bronchial and intestinal cells, nasal epithelial cells accommodated the efficient entry of certain Omicron subvariants, similar to the Delta variant. In contrast to the Delta's reliance on cell-surface transmembrane protease serine 2, all tested Omicron variants depended on endosomal cathepsin L. Moreover, S1/S2 cleavage of early Omicron spikes was less efficient, whereas recent viruses exhibit improved cleavage efficacy. Our results show that the Omicron variant progressively adapts to human cells through continuous endosome-mediated host cell entry.IMPORTANCESARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019, has evolved into a number of variants/subvariants, which have generated multiple global waves of infection. In order to monitor/predict virological features of emerging variants and determine appropriate strategies for anti-viral development, understanding conserved or altered features of evolving SARS-CoV-2 is important. In this study, we addressed previously or recently predominant Omicron subvariants and demonstrated the gradual adaptation to human cells. The host cell entry route, which was altered from the former Delta variant, was conserved among all tested Omicron subvariants. Collectively, this study revealed both changing and maintained features of SARS-CoV-2 during the Omicron variant evolution.

Immunobiology of COVID-19: Mechanistic and therapeutic insights from animal models

The distribution of the immune system throughout the body complicates in vitro assessments of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) immunobiology, often resulting in a lack of reproducibility when extrapolated to the whole organism. Consequently, developing animal models is imperative for a comprehensive understanding of the pathology and immunology of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. This review summarizes current progress related to COVID-19 animal models, including non-human primates (NHPs), mice, and hamsters, with a focus on their roles in exploring the mechanisms of immunopathology, immune protection, and long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as their application in immunoprevention and immunotherapy of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Differences among these animal models and their specific applications are also highlighted, as no single model can fully encapsulate all aspects of COVID-19. To effectively address the challenges posed by COVID-19, it is essential to select appropriate animal models that can accurately replicate both fatal and non-fatal infections with varying courses and severities. Optimizing animal model libraries and associated research tools is key to resolving the global COVID-19 pandemic, serving as a robust resource for future emerging infectious diseases.

Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB.1.5 variant

Circulation of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB has resulted in the emergence of XBB.1.5, a new Variant of Interest. Our phylogenetic analysis suggests that XBB.1.5 evolved from XBB.1 by acquiring the S486P spike (S) mutation, subsequent to the acquisition of a nonsense mutation in ORF8. Neutralization assays showed similar abilities of immune escape between XBB.1.5 and XBB.1. We determine the structural basis for the interaction between human ACE2 and the S protein of XBB.1.5, showing similar overall structures between the S proteins of XBB.1 and XBB.1.5. We provide the intrinsic pathogenicity of XBB.1 and XBB.1.5 in hamsters. Importantly, we find that the ORF8 nonsense mutation of XBB.1.5 resulted in impairment of MHC suppression. In vivo experiments using recombinant viruses reveal that the XBB.1.5 mutations are involved with reduced virulence of XBB.1.5. Together, our study identifies the two viral functions defined the difference between XBB.1 and XBB.1.5.

Characterization of a SARS-CoV-2 EG.5.1 clinical isolate in vitro and in vivo

EG.5.1 is a subvariant of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron XBB variant that is rapidly increasing in prevalence worldwide. However, the pathogenicity, transmissibility, and immune evasion properties of isolates of EG.5.1 are largely unknown. Here, we show that there are no obvious differences in growth ability and pathogenicity between EG.5.1 and XBB.1.5 in hamsters. We also demonstrate that, like XBB.1.5, EG.5.1 is transmitted more efficiently between hamsters compared to its predecessor, BA.2. In contrast, unlike XBB.1.5, we detect EG.5.1 in the lungs of four of six exposed hamsters, suggesting that the virus properties of EG.5.1 are different from those of XBB.1.5. Finally, we find that the neutralizing activity of plasma from convalescent individuals against EG.5.1 was slightly, but significantly, lower than that against XBB.1.5 or XBB.1.9.2. Our data suggest that the different virus properties after transmission and the altered antigenicity of EG.5.1 may be driving its increasing prevalence over XBB.1.5 in humans.

Omicron breakthrough infections in vaccinated or previously infected hamsters

The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 epidemic was marked by the repeated emergence and replacement of "variants" with genetic and phenotypic distance from the ancestral strains, the most recent examples being viruses of the Omicron lineage. Here, we describe a hamster direct contact exposure challenge model to assess protection against reinfection conferred by either vaccination or prior infection. We found that two doses of self-amplifying RNA vaccine based on the ancestral Spike ameliorated weight loss following Delta infection and decreased viral loads but had minimal effect on Omicron BA.1 infection. Prior vaccination followed by Delta or BA.1 breakthrough infections led to a high degree of cross-reactivity to all tested variants, suggesting that repeated exposure to antigenically distinct Spikes, via infection and/or vaccination drives a cross-reactive immune response. Prior infection with ancestral or Alpha variant was partially protective against BA.1 infection, whereas all animals previously infected with Delta and exposed to BA.1 became reinfected, although they shed less virus than BA.1-infected naive hamsters. Hamsters reinfected with BA.1 after prior Delta infection emitted infectious virus into the air, indicating that they could be responsible for onwards airborne transmission. We further tested whether prior infection with BA.1 protected from reinfection with Delta or later Omicron sublineages BA.2, BA.4, or BA.5. BA.1 was protective against BA.2 but not against Delta, BA.4, or BA.5 reinfection. These findings suggest that cohorts whose only immune experience of COVID-19 is Omicron BA.1 infection may be vulnerable to future circulation of reemerged Delta-like derivatives, as well as emerging Omicron sublineages.