1
|
Alqahtani A, Bhattacharjee S, Almopti A, Li C, Nabi G. Radiomics-Based Computed Tomography Urogram Approach for the Prediction of Survival and Recurrence in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3119. [PMID: 39335090 PMCID: PMC11429600 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2024] [Revised: 08/30/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. The accurate prediction of survival and recurrence in UTUC is crucial for effective risk stratification and guiding therapeutic decisions. Models combining radiomics and clinicopathological data features derived from computed tomographic urograms (CTUs) can be a way to predict survival and recurrence in UTUC. Thus, preoperative CTUs and clinical data were analyzed from 106 UTUC patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy. Radiomics features were extracted from segmented tumors, and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) method was used to select the most relevant features. Multivariable Cox models combining radiomics features and clinical factors were developed to predict the survival and recurrence. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) was applied to evaluate the performance and survival distribution analyses were assessed by a Kaplan-Meier analysis. The significant outcome predictors were identified by multivariable Cox models. The combined model achieved a superior predictive accuracy (C-index: 0.73) and higher recurrence prediction (C-index: 0.84). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in the survival (p < 0.0001) and recurrence (p < 0.002) probabilities for the combined datasets. The CTU-based radiomics models effectively predicted survival and recurrence in the UTUC patients, and enhanced the prognostic performance by combining radiomics features with clinical factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulsalam Alqahtani
- School of Medicine, Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
- Radiology Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Najran University, Najran 55461, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sourav Bhattacharjee
- School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 W6F6 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Abdulrahman Almopti
- School of Medicine, Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
| | - Chunhui Li
- School of Science and Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK
| | - Ghulam Nabi
- School of Medicine, Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu MZ, Li XY, Gao XS, Lyu F, Ma MW, Chen JY, Gao Y, Ren XY, Li XS. Outcomes of Radical Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Localized Renal Pelvic and Ureteral Carcinoma Intolerant to Surgery: A Real-World Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102216. [PMID: 39326156 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the safety and efficacy of radical radiotherapy for localized inoperable renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma. METHODS 23 patients who received radiotherapy were enrolled. The prescribed dose was 60 to 67.5 Gy in 25 fractions and for bulky tumors, SABR was used in the first 3 to 5 times with tumor center boosted synchronously with 6 to 8 Gy/f. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate local control (LC), DMFS, CSS and OS. Univariate analysis was performed by the log-rank test. The change in the eGFR before and after radiotherapy was compared by paired t test. The side effects were graded by CTCAE, version 5.0. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 17 months. The LC rates at 2 years after radiotherapy were 85.0%; the DMFS rates were 52.2%; the CSS rates were 83.0%; and the OS rates were 77.8%. The main failure mode after radiotherapy was distant metastasis. Univariate analysis revealed that T3-4 stage (P = .001), N+ status (P < .001) and a tumor volume ≥ 20 cc (P = .005) were poor prognostic factors for DMFS. There was no significant difference in the mean eGFR before and after radiotherapy (47.0 mL/min/1.73m2 vs. 48.5 mL/min/1.73m2, P = .632). Only 1 patient developed acute grade 3 anemia. No patients developed grade 3 or higher late toxicities. CONCLUSION For localized inoperable renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma, radiotherapy is well tolerable with high local control and expected to bring survival benefits. In such patients, radiotherapy may be an option when surgery is unsuitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Zhu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Ying Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xian-Shu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Feng Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ming-Wei Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jia-Yan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xue-Ying Ren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xue-Song Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tsuboi I, Matsukawa A, Kardoust Parizi M, Klemm J, Schulz RJ, Cadenar A, Mancon S, Chiujdea S, Fazekas T, Miszczyk M, Laukhtina E, Kawada T, Katayama S, Iwata T, Bekku K, Wada K, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Teoh J, Singla N, Araki M, Shariat SF. Differential effect of surgical technique on intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. World J Urol 2024; 42:488. [PMID: 39162743 PMCID: PMC11335797 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05185-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff resection is the standard treatment in patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). However, it is unclear which specific surgical technique may lead to improve oncological outcomes in term of intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients with UTUC. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of surgical techniques and approaches of RNU in reducing IVR in UTUC patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Three databases were queried in January 2024 for studies analyzing UTUC patients who underwent RNU. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of IVR among various types of surgical techniques and approaches of RNU. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Thirty-one studies, comprising 1 randomized controlled trial and 1 prospective study, were included for a systematic review and meta-analysis. The rate of IVR was significantly lower in RNU patients who had an early ligation (EL) of the ureter compared to those who did not (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94, p = 0.02). Laparoscopic RNU significantly increased the IVR compared to open RNU (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.06-1.54, p < 0.001). Intravesical bladder cuff removal significantly reduced the IVR compared to both extravesical and transurethral bladder cuff removal (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51-0.83, p = 0.02 and HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.15-2.34, p = 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS EL of the affected upper tract system, ureteral management, open RNU, and intravesical bladder cuff removal seem to yield the lowest IVR rate in patients with UTUC. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to conclusively elucidate the optimal surgical technique in the setting of single post-operative intravesical chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ichiro Tsuboi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Robert J Schulz
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Cadenar
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Mancon
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Sever Chiujdea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Spitalul Clinic Judetean Murures, University of Medicine, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Pharmacy, Mures, Romania
| | - Tamás Fazekas
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Marcin Miszczyk
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Collegium Medicum - Faculty of Medicine, WSB University, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takehiro Iwata
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Koichiro Wada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Urology, PARIS, F- 75013, France
| | - Jeremy Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Park 213, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia, Czechia.
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
- Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oedorf K, Haug ES, Liedberg F, Järvinen R, Gudjonsson S, Boström PJ, Jerlström T, Gudbrandsdottir G, Jensen JB, Lam GW. Perioperative management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in the Nordic countries. BMC Urol 2024; 24:132. [PMID: 38914985 PMCID: PMC11197368 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01515-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare malignancy, with typically only few new cases annually per urological department. Adherence to European association of urology (EAU) guidelines on UTUC in the Nordic countries is unknown. The objective of this survey was to examine the implementation of EAU guidelines, the perioperative management and organization of the treatment of UTUC in the Nordic countries. METHODS The electronic survey was distributed to 93 hospitals in the Nordic countries performing radical nephroureterectomy (NU). The survey consisted of 57 main questions and data was collected between December 1st, 2021 and April 23rd, 2022. RESULTS Overall response rate was 47/93 (67%) with a completion rate of 98%. Five out of the 6 examined subjects on diagnostic practice are applied by ≥ 72% of the participating centers. NU as treatment for high-risk UTUC is performed by 37/47 (79%), and 91% include a bladder cuff excision. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to EAU guidelines is high on diagnostic practice in the Nordic countries, whereas disease management is less coherent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimie Oedorf
- Department of Urology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Urology, Skaanes Universitetssjukhus, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Riikka Järvinen
- Department of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sigurdur Gudjonsson
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, University of Iceland, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Peter J Boström
- Department of Urology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Tomas Jerlström
- Department of Urology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | | | | | - Gitte Wrist Lam
- Department of Urology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kardoust Parizi M, Rouprêt M, Singla N, Teoh JYC, Chlosta P, Babjuk M, Abufaraj M, Margulis V, D'Andrea D, Klemm J, Matsukawa A, Laukhtina E, Fazekas T, Karakiewicz PI, Bhanvadia R, Gontero P, Shariat SF. Preoperative Plasma Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I and Its Binding Proteins-Based Risk Stratification of Patients Treated With Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102133. [PMID: 38945766 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 05/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We evaluate the predictive and prognostic value of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-1), IGF binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) and -3 (IGFBP-3) in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional database comprising 753 patients who underwent RNU for UTUC and had a preoperative plasma available. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed. The discriminative ability and clinical utility of the models was calculated using the lasso regression test, area under receiver operating characteristics curves, C-index, and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS Lower preoperative plasma levels of IGFBP-2 and -3 independently correlated with increased risks of lymph node metastasis, pT3/4 disease, nonorgan confined disease, and worse recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) (all P ≤ .004). The addition of both IGFBP-2 and -3 to a postoperative multivariable model, that included standard clinicopathologic characteristics, improved the model's concordance index by 10%, 9%, and 8% for RFS, CSS, and OS, respectively. On DCA, addition of both IGFBP-2 and -3 to base models improved their performance for RFS, CSS, and OS by a statistically and clinically significant margin. Plasma IGF-1 was not associated with any of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS We confirmed that a lower plasma levels of IGFBP-2 and -3 both are independent and clinically significant predictors of adverse pathological features and survival outcomes in UTUC patients treated with RNU. These findings might help guide the clinical decision-making regarding perioperative systemic therapy and follow-up scheduling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Departement of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Piotr Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Special Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tamas Fazekas
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Departement of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Raj Bhanvadia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Urology, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Special Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Departement of Urology, Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ferro M, Chiujdea S, Vartolomei MD, Bove P, Porreca A, Busetto GM, Del Giudice F, Antonelli A, Foschi N, Racioppi M, Autorino R, Chiancone F, Longo N, Barone B, Crocetto F, Musi G, Luzzago S, Piccinelli ML, Mistretta FA, de Cobelli O, Tataru OS, Hurle R, Liguori G, Borghesi M, Veccia A, Greco F, Schips L, Marchioni M, Lucarelli G, Dutto D, Colucci F, Russo GI, Giudice AL, Montanari E, Boeri L, Simone G, Rosazza M, Livoti S, Gontero P, Soria F. Advanced Age Impacts Survival After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:27-37. [PMID: 37661507 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Upper tract urothelial carcinoma is rare but has a poor prognosis. Prognostic factors have been extensively studied in order to provide the best possible management for patients. We have aimed to investigate commonly available factors predictive of recurrence and survival in this patient population at high risk of death and recurrence, with an emphasis on the effects of age (using a cutoff of 70 years) on survival outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1387 patients with clinically nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy at 21 academic hospital centers between 2005 and 2021, 776 patients were eligible and included in the study. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were built to evaluate the independent prognosticators for intravesical and extravesical recurrence, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival according to age groups. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS We did not find an association between groups aged <70 and >70 years old and preoperatively clinical or histopathological characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was found no statistical significance between the 2 age groups in terms of intravesical or extravesical recurrence (P = .09 and P = .57). Overall survival (P = .0001) and cancer-specific survival (P = .0001) have been found to be statistically significantly associated with age as independent predictors (confounding factors: gender, tumor size, tumor side, clinical T stage, localization, preoperative hydronephrosis, tumor localization, type of surgery, multifocality of the tumor, pathological grade, lymphovascular invasion, concomitant CIS, lymph node status, necrosis, or history of previous bladder cancer). CONCLUSION This research confirms that patients aged 70 and above who undergo radical nephroureterectomy may have worse outcomes compared to younger patients, older patients needing an improved care and management of UTUC to improve their outcomes in the setting of an increase in this aged population group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Sever Chiujdea
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria; The Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies (I.O.S.U.D.), George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Mihai Dorin Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria; The Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies (I.O.S.U.D.), George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Pierluigi Bove
- San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy; Department of Experimental Medicine, Tor vergata Oncoscience Research Centre of Excellence, TOR, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Porreca
- Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nazario Foschi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Racioppi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Nicola Longo
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Octavian Sabin Tataru
- The Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies (I.O.S.U.D.), George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania; Department of Simulation Applied in Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Liguori
- Urology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Marco Borghesi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical Integrated Sciences (DISC), Urology Section, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Greco
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Luigi Schips
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d'Annunzio, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d'Annunzio, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Daniele Dutto
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Fulvia Colucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ivan Russo
- Department of Surgery, Urology Section, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Arturo Lo Giudice
- Department of Surgery, Urology Section, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Emanuele Montanari
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boeri
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Rosazza
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Livoti
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gwak CH, Suh J, Lim B, Song C, You D, Jeong IG, Hong JH, Hong B, Ahn H. Preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio as a novel prognostic biomarker for the oncological outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:30.e17-30.e23. [PMID: 38072737 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) on progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from a single-center nephroureterectomy registry between January 2011 and December 2017. Participants were categorized into high and low CAR groups based on the optimal CAR cut-off value determined using the Youden index. The primary endpoint was PFS, the time from RNU to metastasis or disease recurrence. The secondary endpoint was CSS, the time from RNU to UTUC-related death. Median PFS and CSS were compared between the high and low CAR groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to assess the prognostic significance of CAR, adjusting for known prognostic factors. RESULTS We included 491 patients with UTUC in the analysis. The optimal CAR cut-off value was determined to be 0.036, which resulted in classifying 49.3% (242/491) of patients into the high CAR group. The high CAR group had older patients (69.8 vs. 67.4, p-value = 0.01), advanced T and N stages (p-value<0.001), high-grade tumor (p-value = 0.03), and a higher incidence of preoperative hydronephrosis (p-value < 0.01) than the low CAR group. The high CAR group demonstrated significantly inferior median PFS (78.3 vs. 100.3 months, p-value < 0.01) and CSS (73.2 vs. 96.1 months, p-value < 0.01) than the low CAR group. Moreover, high CAR independently increased the risk of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-2.64, p < 0.01) and UTUC-related mortality (HR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.15, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Pre-operative CAR is independently associated with poor PFS and CSS in patients with UTUC undergoing RNU. Moreover, CAR may be an independent UTUC prognostic factor, offering a cost-effective and minimally invasive marker. However, further validation through large-scale, multi-center studies is necessary to confirm these findings and determine the optimal CAR cut-off value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chan Hoon Gwak
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jungyo Suh
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Bumjin Lim
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Cheryn Song
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Dalsan You
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - In Gab Jeong
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jun Hyuk Hong
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Bumsik Hong
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hanjong Ahn
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang CS, Lee YC, Jhan JH, Li WM, Chang LL, Huang AM, Lin HH, Wu YR, Hsu WC, Ke HL. MicroRNA-299-3p inhibits cell proliferation, motility, invasion and angiogenesis via VEGFA in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Gene Med 2024; 26:e3616. [PMID: 38049938 DOI: 10.1002/jgm.3616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare tumor with extraordinarily different features between Eastern and Western countries. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGFA) was originally identified as a secreted signaling protein and regulator of vascular development and cancer progression. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of VEGFA by microRNA in UTUC. METHODS VEGFA expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 140 human UTUC tissue samples. Next, we assessed the regulatory relationship between VEGFA and miR-299-3p by real-time PCR, western blotting, ELISA and dual-luciferase reporter assays using two UTUC cell lines. The role of miR-299-3p/VEGFA in cell proliferation, motility, invasion, and tube formation was analyzed in vitro. RESULTS High VEGFA expression was significantly associated with tumor stage, grade, distant metastasis and cancer-related death and correlated with poor progression-free and cancer-specific survival. VEGFA knockdown repressed proliferation, migration, invasion and angiogenesis in UTUC cell lines. miR-299-3p significantly reduced VEGFA protein expression and miR-299-3p overexpression inhibited VEGFA mRNA and protein expression by directly targeting its 3'-UTR. Functional studies indicated that VEGFA overexpression reversed the miR-299-3p-mediated suppression of tumor cell proliferation, migration, invasion and angiogenesis. In addition, miR-299-3p/VEGFA suppressed cellular functions in UTUC by modulating the expression of P18 and cyclin E2. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that miR-299-3p possibly suppresses UTUC cell proliferation, motility, invasion and angiogenesis via VEGFA. VEGFA may act as a prognostic predictor, and both VEGFA and miR-299-3p could be potential therapeutic targets for UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chien-Shen Wang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chen Lee
- Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jhen-Hao Jhan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Lin-Li Chang
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - A-Mei Huang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Hui Lin
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Ru Wu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chi Hsu
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Lung Ke
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ślusarczyk A, Zapała P, Zapała Ł, Rajwa P, Moschini M, Laukhtina E, Radziszewski P. Oncologic outcomes of patients treated with kidney-sparing surgery or radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: a population-based study. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:22.e1-22.e11. [PMID: 37981503 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) is a nonminor option for low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC), its oncological benefits in high-risk UTUC remain unclear when compared to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). This study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of RNU and KSS in patients with UTUC. METHODS We searched the SEER database for patients treated for primary non-metastatic UTUC with either RNU or a kidney-sparing approach (segmental ureterectomy (SU) or local tumor excision (LTE)) between 2004 and 2018. RESULTS The study included 6,659 patients with primary non-metastatic UTUC treated with surgery; 2,888 (43.4%) and 3,771 (56.6%) patients presented with ureteral and renal pelvicalyceal tumors, respectively. Finally, 5,479 (82.3%) patients underwent RNU, 799 (12.0%) were treated with SU, and 381 (5.7%) patients received LTE. For confounder control, propensity score matching (PSM) of patients treated with SU and RNU was performed to adjust for T stage, grade, age, gender, tumor size, and lymphadenectomy performance. PSM analysis included 694 patients treated with RNU and 694 individuals who underwent SU. In multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses, we found no difference in either CSS or OS between RNU and SU, even in the subgroup of high-grade and/or muscle-invasive UTUC including pT3-T4 tumors (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION In this population-based study, SU provides equivalent CSS and OS compared to RNU, even in high-risk and locally advanced ureteral cancer. Due to the unavoidable risk of selection bias, further prospective studies are expected to overcome the limitations of this study and support the wider implementation of KSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksander Ślusarczyk
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Piotr Zapała
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Łukasz Zapała
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Piotr Radziszewski
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zheng Y, Shi H, Fu S, Wang H, Wang J, Li X, Li Z, Hai B, Zhang J. A computed tomography urography-based machine learning model for predicting preoperative pathological grade of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6901. [PMID: 38174830 PMCID: PMC10807597 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Development and validation of a computed tomography urography (CTU)-based machine learning (ML) model for prediction of preoperative pathology grade of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS A total of 140 patients with UTUC who underwent CTU examination from January 2017 to August 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Tumor lesions on the unenhanced, medullary, and excretory periods of CTU were used to extract Features, respectively. Feature selection was screened by the Pearson and Spearman correlation analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). The logistic regression (LR) was used to screen for independent influencing factors of clinical baseline characteristics. Machine learning models based on different feature datasets were constructed and validated using algorithms such as LR, RF, SVM, and XGBoost. By computing the selected features, a radiomics score was generated, and a diverse feature dataset was constructed. Based on the training set, 16 ML models were created, and their performance was evaluated using the validation set for metrics including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and others. RESULTS The training set consisted of 98 patients (mean age: 64.5 ± 10.5 years; 30 males), whereas the validation set consisted of 42 patients (mean age: 65.3 ± 9.78 years; 17 males). Hydronephrosis was the best independent influence factor (p < 0.05). The RF model had the best performance in predicting high-grade UTUC, with AUC of 0.914 (95% Confidence Interval [95%CI] 0.852-0.977) and 0.903 (95%CI 0.809-0.997) in the training set and validation set, and accuracy of 0.878 and 0.857, respectively. CONCLUSIONS An ML model based on the RF algorithm exhibits excellent predictive performance, offering a non-invasive approach for predicting preoperative high-grade UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanghuang Zheng
- Department of UrologyThe 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityKunmingYunnanPeople's Republic of China
| | - Hongjin Shi
- Department of UrologyThe 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityKunmingYunnanPeople's Republic of China
| | - Shi Fu
- Department of UrologyThe 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityKunmingYunnanPeople's Republic of China
| | - Haifeng Wang
- Department of UrologyThe 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityKunmingYunnanPeople's Republic of China
| | - Jincheng Wang
- Department of UrologyThe First People's Hospital of Luliang CountyLijiangYunnanPeople's Republic of China
| | - Xin Li
- Department of UrologyThe Cancer Hospital of Yunnan ProvinceKunmingYunnanPeople's Republic of China
| | - Zhi Li
- Department of RadiologyThe First People's Hospital of Yunnan ProvinceKunmingYunnanPeople's Republic of China
| | - Bing Hai
- Department of Respiratory MedicineThe 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityKunmingYunnanPeople's Republic of China
| | - Jinsong Zhang
- Department of UrologyThe 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityKunmingYunnanPeople's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Klemm J, Bekku K, Abufaraj M, Laukhtina E, Matsukawa A, Parizi MK, Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF. Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Narrative Review of Current Surveillance Strategies for Non-Metastatic Disease. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:44. [PMID: 38201472 PMCID: PMC10777993 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Non-metastatic upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) is a comparatively rare condition, typically managed with either kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) or radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Irrespective of the chosen therapeutic modality, patients with UTUC remain at risk of recurrence in the bladder; in patients treated with KSS, the risk of recurrence is high in the remnant ipsilateral upper tract system but there is a low but existent risk in the contralateral system as well as in the chest and in the abdomen/pelvis. For patients treated with RNU for high-risk UTUC, the risk of recurrence in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, as well as the contralateral UT, depends on the tumor stage, grade, and nodal status. Hence, implementing a risk-stratified, location-specific follow-up is indicated to ensure timely detection of cancer recurrence. However, there are no data on the type and frequency/schedule of follow-up or on the impact of the recurrence type and site on outcomes; indeed, it is not well known whether imaging-detected asymptomatic recurrences confer a better outcome than recurrences detected due to symptoms/signs. Novel imaging techniques and more precise risk stratification methods based on time-dependent probabilistic events hold significant promise for making a cost-efficient individualized, patient-centered, outcomes-oriented follow-up strategy possible. We show and discuss the follow-up protocols of the major urologic societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8525, Japan
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman 11733, Jordan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada;
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (K.B.); (M.A.); (E.L.); (A.M.); (M.K.P.); (S.F.S.)
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 11942, Jordan
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 252 50 Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Calleris G, Rouprêt M, Seisen T, Bendjeddou L, Chevallier T, Masson-Lecomte A, Thibault C, Neuzillet Y, Audenet F, Xylinas E, Houédé N. Design and rationale of a single-arm phase II study of neoadjuvant Durvalumab and Gemcitabine associated with Cisplatin or Carboplatin for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: the iNDUCT trial (NCT04617756). World J Urol 2023; 41:3413-3420. [PMID: 37698632 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04596-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is often locally advanced at initial diagnosis and is associated with high recurrence and mortality rates after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy has shown a recurrence-free survival benefit in a randomised phase III trial, while neoadjuvant treatment seems promising in retrospective series. On the contrary, little is known about the role of perioperative immunotherapy and its combination with chemotherapy for UTUC patients, although initial positive results have been published for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. STUDY DESIGN AND ENDPOINTS Against this backdrop, we are running a multi-centre single-arm phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant Durvalumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death ligand 1, combined with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin or Carboplatin for high-risk UTUC patients. The primary outcome is pathological complete response rate at RNU. Secondary endpoints include the partial pathological response rate, safety, as well as disease-free and overall survival. A biomarker analysis is also planned. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS Included patients must have a good performance status and harbour a non-metastatic UTUC, considered at high risk of progression, defined as either biopsy-proven high-grade disease or invasive features at imaging with or, more recently, without high-grade cytology at the multidisciplinary team discretion, as specified in the latest amendment. Enrolled patients receive 3 cycles of neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy before RNU, and the standard of care thereafter. The trial is registered as NCT04617756 and is supervised by an independent data monitoring committee.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Calleris
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology Research Group and Urology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Urology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology Research Group and Urology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France.
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology Research Group and Urology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Lyamin Bendjeddou
- Research and Innovation Department, Nimes University Hospital, 30029, Nimes, France
| | - Thierry Chevallier
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Public Health and Innovation in Methodology (BESPIM), Nimes University Hospital, 30029, Nimes, France
- UMR 1302, Institute Desbrest of Epidemiology and Public Health, INSERM, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- Department of Urology, Saint Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Cité University, 75010, Paris, France
| | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Foch Hospital, Paris Saclay University, Suresnes, France
| | - François Audenet
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Nadine Houédé
- Gard Cancer Institute, Nimes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, 30029, Nimes, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hongda Z, Kang L, Ng CF, de la Rosette J, Laguna P, Gontero P, Baard J, Yildiz O, Teoh JYC. Impact of Adjuvant Gemcitabine Containing Chemotherapy Following Radical Nephroureterectomy for Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from a Propensity-Score Matched Cohort Study. Bladder Cancer 2023; 9:217-226. [PMID: 38993186 PMCID: PMC11181833 DOI: 10.3233/blc-230041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence regarding perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy and personalized surveillance strategies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma is limited. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether adjuvant gemcitabine containing chemotherapy affects the oncological outcomes of advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS The CROES-UTUC registry is an observational, international, multi-center study on patients diagnosed with UTUC. Patient and disease characteristics from 2380 patients with UTUC were collected, and finally 738 patients were included in this analysis. The primary outcome of this study was recurrence-free survival. Propensity score matching was performed. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed by stratifying patients according to the treatment of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS A total of 738 patients were included in this analysis, and 59 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), including 50 patients who received gemcitabine. A propensity score matching was performed, including 50 patients who received gemcitabine containing treatment and 50 patients without adjuvant chemotherapy. Disease recurrence occurred in 34.0% of patients. The recurrence rate in the AC group was 22.0%, which was significantly lower than the non-AC group (46.0%). Kaplan-Meier analyses also showed that AC was associated with a lower likelihood of tumor recurrence (p = 0.047). However, AC was not significantly associated with a higher overall survival (OS) (p = 0.908) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.979). Upon multivariate Cox regression analysis, AC was associated with a lower risk of tumor recurrence (HR = 0.297, p = 0.028). CONCLUSION The present study confirms that adjuvant gemcitabine containing chemotherapy could decrease the risk of tumor recurrence in patients with locally advanced UTUC following nephroureterectomy. However, more studies are need to draw a clearer image of the value of this treatment method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhao Hongda
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Liu Kang
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Chi-Fai Ng
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jean de la Rosette
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Pilar Laguna
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Paolo Gontero
- University of Turin, Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ozcan Yildiz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Qiu Y, Zhang X, Dong Z, Zhang Y, Zhai Q, Lv S, Wei Q. Comparable survival benefits of partial ureterectomy to radical nephroureterectomy in non-metastatic ureter carcinoma: a population-matched study. Int Urol Nephrol 2023; 55:579-588. [PMID: 36472798 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-022-03429-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aim to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes, including overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and bladder cancer recurrence (BCR) among patients with ureter carcinoma who received nephroureterectomy (RNU) or partial ureterectomy (PU). METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2015 of patients with ureter carcinoma who underwent RNU or PU. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the baseline data. The Kaplan-Meier method with subgroup analysis was conducted to verify the effect of the two surgery types. Fine-Gray competing risk regression estimated the cumulative incidence of BCR. RESULTS A total of 2509 patients were involved; 665 (26.5%) patients underwent PU, and 1844 (73.5%) patients underwent RNU. Patients who underwent PU experienced a similar OS and CSS compared with those who underwent RNU in both PSM cohorts (HR [hazard ratio], 1.07 (0.93-1.23); P = 0.37; HR, 1.10 (0.91-1.31); P = 0.32, respectively), adjust model (HR, 0.99 (0.88-1.11); P = 0.87; HR, 1.05 (0.90-1.20); P = 0.55, respectively), and the subgroup analysis. For BCR, the patients who underwent PU were associated with a similar risk of developing BCR compared with those that received RNU, according to the univariate competing risk model (P = 0.47), adjust model (HR, 1.00 (0.73-1.37); P = 1), and subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION RNU did not confer a distinct survival advantage compared with PU, which supports the role of PU in treating patients with ureter carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Qiu
- Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xuehua Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ziyan Dong
- Department of Adult Surgery, Guangdong Women and Children's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yifan Zhang
- Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Qiliang Zhai
- Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shidong Lv
- Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Comparing Oncological and Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Laparoscopic versus Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Multinational, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051409. [PMID: 36900201 PMCID: PMC10000228 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify correlates of survival and perioperative outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients undergoing open (ORNU), laparoscopic (LRNU), and robotic (RRNU) radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study that included non-metastatic UTUC patients who underwent RNU between 1990-2020. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to impute missing data. Patients were divided into three groups based on their surgical treatment and were adjusted by 1:1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Survival outcomes per group were estimated for recurrence-free survival (RFS), bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Perioperative outcomes: Intraoperative blood loss, hospital length of stay (LOS), and overall (OPC) and major postoperative complications (MPCs; defined as Clavien-Dindo > 3) were assessed between groups. RESULTS Of the 2434 patients included, 756 remained after PSM with 252 in each group. The three groups had similar baseline clinicopathological characteristics. The median follow-up was 32 months. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests demonstrated similar RFS, CSS, and OS between groups. BRFS was found to be superior with ORNU. Using multivariable regression analyses, LRNU and RRNU were independently associated with worse BRFS (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.22-2.28, p = 0.001 and HR 1.73, 95%CI 1.22-2.47, p = 0.002, respectively). LRNU and RRNU were associated with a significantly shorter LOS (beta -1.1, 95% CI -2.2-0.02, p = 0.047 and beta -6.1, 95% CI -7.2-5.0, p < 0.001, respectively) and fewer MPCs (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.31-0.79, p = 0.003 and OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.16-0.46, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In this large international cohort, we demonstrated similar RFS, CSS, and OS among ORNU, LRNU, and RRNU. However, LRNU and RRNU were associated with significantly worse BRFS, but a shorter LOS and fewer MPCs.
Collapse
|
16
|
Herout R, Baunacke M, Flegar L, Borkowetz A, Reicherz A, Koch R, Kraywinkel K, Thomas C, Groeben C, Huber J. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma in Germany: epidemiological data and surgical treatment trends in a total population analysis from 2006 to 2019. World J Urol 2023; 41:127-133. [PMID: 36445373 PMCID: PMC9849285 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04219-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report contemporary epidemiological data and treatment trends for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in Germany over a 14-year period. METHODS We analyzed data from the nationwide German hospital billing database and the German cancer registry from 2006 to 2018/2019. The significance of changes over time was evaluated via regression analysis. Survival outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS There was a non-significant increase in the age-standardized incidence rate from 2.5/100,000 in 2006 to 2.9/100.000 in 2018. 13% of patients presented with lymph node metastasis and 7.6% of patients presented with distant metastasis at primary diagnosis. The 5-year overall survival was estimated at 45% and the 10-year overall survival at 32%. Endoscopic biopsies of the renal pelvis and ureter as well as ureteroscopies with excision/destruction of UTUC all increased significantly over the study period. The number of radical nephroureterectomies (RNU) for UTUC steadily increased from 1643 cases in 2006 to 2238 cases in 2019 (p < 0.005) with a shift from open surgery towards minimally invasive surgery. Complex reconstructive procedures like ileal ureter replacement or autotransplantation are rarely performed for urothelial carcinoma of the ureter. CONCLUSION Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for UTUC have increased and minimally invasive nephroureterectomy is the predominant approach concerning radical surgery in 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Herout
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Martin Baunacke
- grid.4488.00000 0001 2111 7257Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Luka Flegar
- grid.10253.350000 0004 1936 9756Department of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Angelika Borkowetz
- grid.4488.00000 0001 2111 7257Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alina Reicherz
- grid.459734.80000 0000 9602 8737Department of Urology, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Marien Hospital Herne, Herne, Germany
| | - Rainer Koch
- grid.10253.350000 0004 1936 9756Department of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kraywinkel
- grid.13652.330000 0001 0940 3744National Center for Cancer Registry Data, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Thomas
- grid.4488.00000 0001 2111 7257Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christer Groeben
- grid.10253.350000 0004 1936 9756Department of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Huber
- grid.10253.350000 0004 1936 9756Department of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wu G, Li H, Li J, Chen M, Xie L, Luo H, Chen Z, Ye D, Lai C. Case Report: Step-by-step procedures for total intracorporeal laparoscopic kidney autotransplantation in a patient with distal high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1142819. [PMID: 37168366 PMCID: PMC10164996 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1142819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
A 47-year-old man presented to the emergency department with right abdominal pain and a new onset of painless haematuria two weeks earlier. Urine cytology test results suggested urothelial carcinoma. Computed tomography urography (CTU) showed a filling defect in the lower right ureter with right hydronephrosis. Lymphadenopathy and any signs of metastatic disease were absent on CTU. Cystoscopy appeared normal. Creatinine level was also normal before surgery. After the treatment options were discussed, the patient chose to undergo 3D total intracorporeal laparoscopic kidney autotransplantation, bladder cuff excision, and segmental resection of the proximal two-thirds of the ureter based on the membrane anatomy concept. After more than one year of follow-up, the patient was in good health and showed no signs of haematuria. Surveillance cystoscopy and CTU examination showed no evidence of disease recurrence. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that kidney-sparing surgery may be considered for carefully selected patients with high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guohao Wu
- Department of Urology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, China
| | - Haomin Li
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Junqiang Li
- Department of Urology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, China
| | - Mubiao Chen
- Operating Room, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, China
| | - Lishan Xie
- Department of Urology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, China
| | - Huilan Luo
- Department of Urology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, China
| | - Zhihui Chen
- Department of Urology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, China
| | - Dongming Ye
- Department of Urology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, China
| | - Caiyong Lai
- Department of Urology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, China
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
- Institute of Kidney Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Caiyong Lai,
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jiang Y, Peng Y, Ding S, Zheng Y, He Y, Liu J. Kidney‐sparing surgery for distal high‐risk ureteral carcinoma: Clinical efficacy and preliminary experiences in 22 patients. Cancer Med 2022; 12:7835-7843. [PMID: 36533431 PMCID: PMC10134309 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several groups proved kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) had equivalent oncological outcomes compared with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for the low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients. Whereas, the clinical efficacy of KSS for high-risk UTUC, especially for distal high-risk ureteral carcinoma, remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of KSS for patients with distal high-risk ureter cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Our study included 22 patients who diagnose the distal high-risk ureter cancer and underwent KSS between May 2012 and July 2021 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Overall survival (OS), confirmed as the primary endpoint of present study, was assessed by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC). The secondary endpoints included the postoperative SF-36 (the short form 36 health survey questionnaire) score, progression-free survival (PFS), postoperative complications, and so on. RESULTS Overall, 17 (77.3%) and 5 (22.7%) patients underwent segmental ureterectomy (SU) and endoscopic ablation (EA), respectively. By the cut-off date, the mean OS was 76.3 months (95% Cl: 51.3-101.1 months) and the mean PFS was 47.0 months (95% Cl: 31.1-62.8 months), respectively. And the SF-36 score in a majority of patients was >300 (90.9%). CONCLUSION This is a daring endeavor to explore the clinical efficacy of KSS in distal high-risk ureter cancer based on the high-risk UTUC criteria, which shows satisfactory results in the long-term prognosis and operation-associated outcomes. However, future randomized or prospective multicenter studies are necessary to validate our conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Jiang
- Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Yueqiang Peng
- Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Siwei Ding
- Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Yongbo Zheng
- Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Yunfeng He
- Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Jiayu Liu
- Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Radical nephroureterectomy for UTUC conferred survival benefits irrespective of age and comorbidities. World J Urol 2022; 40:2657-2665. [PMID: 36125506 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04152-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated the effects of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA) grading and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) on the survival outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS The CROES-UTUC registry was an international, multicenter study on patients with UTUC. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed by stratifying patients according to their age (≤ 70 and > 70 years old) and ASA grade (I-II and III-V)/CCI (0-1 and ≥ 2). RESULTS A total of 2352 patients were included in this study. Patients aged ≤ 70 years with ASA grading of I-II (p = 0.002), and patients aged ≤ 70 years with a CCI of 0-1 (p = 0.002) had the best OS. Upon multivariate analysis, both in patients aged ≤ 70 and > 70 years, ASA grading and CCI were not significantly associated with OS. Patients aged ≤ 70 years with ASA grading of III-IV (p = 0.024) had the best DFS. When stratified according to age and CCI, no significant difference in DFS was noted. Upon multivariate analysis, radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) was significantly associated with better DFS in patients aged ≤ 70 and > 70 years; CCI of ≥ 3 was significantly associated with worse DFS in patients ≤ 70 years; ASA grading was not associated with DFS in patients aged ≤ 70 and > 70 years. CONCLUSIONS A high ASA grading and CCI should not be considered contraindications for RNU. RNU should be considered even in elderly patients when it is deemed feasible and achievable after a geriatric assessment.
Collapse
|
20
|
Wang J, Tang J, Liu X, He D. A web-based prognostic nomogram for the cancer specific survival of elderly patients with T1-T3N0M0 renal pelvic transitional cell carcinoma based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. BMC Urol 2022; 22:78. [PMID: 35610606 PMCID: PMC9131540 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01028-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background At present, there are few studies on renal pelvic transitional cell carcinoma (RPTCC) in elderly patients in the literature. The study aims to establish a new nomogram of cancer-specific survival (CSS) in elderly patients with T1-T3N0M0 RPTCC and validate its reliability. Methods This study downloaded the data of 1375 elderly patients with T1-T3N0M0 RPTCC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Final Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2018. Patients were randomly divided into training cohort (n = 977) and validation cohort (n = 398). Proportional subdistribution hazard analyse was applied to determine independent prognostic factors. Based on these factors, we constructed a compting risk model nomogram. We use the calibration plots, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), concordance index (C-index), and decision curve analysis (DCA) to validate predictive performance and clinical applicability. Patients were divided into low-risk group and high-risk group based on nomogram risk score. Kaplan–Meier curve was applied to analyze the difference in survival curve between the two groups of patients. Results We found that the risk factors affecting CSS in elderly patients with T1-T3N0M0 RPTCC are surgery, AJCC stage, laterality, tumor size, histological grade, and tumour laterality. Based on these factors, we established a nomogram to predict the CSS of RPTCC patients at 1-, 3-, and 5-year. The calibration plots showed that the predicted value was highly consistent with the observed value. In the training cohort and validation cohort, the C-index of the nomogram were 0.671(95% CI 0.622–0.72) and 0.679(95% CI 0.608–0.750), respectively, the AUC showed similar results. The DCA suggests that namogram performs better than the AJCC stage system. The Kaplan–Meier curve showed that CSS of patients was significantly higher in the low-risk group. Conclusions In this study, the SEER database was used for the first time to create and validate a new nomogram prediction model for elderly patients with T1-T3N0M0 RPTCC. Compared with the traditional AJCC stage system, our new nomogram can more accurately predict the CSS of elderly patients with T1-T3N0M0 RPTCC, which is helpful for patient prognosis assessment and treatment strategies selection. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-022-01028-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinkui Wang
- Department of Urology; Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders; National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders (Chongqing); China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 2 ZhongShan Rd, Chongqing, 400013, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Tang
- Department of Epidemiology, Public Health School, Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiaozhu Liu
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Dawei He
- Department of Urology; Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders; National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders (Chongqing); China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 2 ZhongShan Rd, Chongqing, 400013, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yan P, Chen D, Yan X, Yan X, Wang Y, Liu C, Yang X. Ex Vivo Near-Infrared Molecular Imaging of Human Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma With a CD47-Based Targeted Tracer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:825476. [PMID: 35295998 PMCID: PMC8919026 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.825476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveThe low detection rate of early and small tumors remains a clinical problem that urgently needs to be solved in the accurate diagnosis and treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of CD47 as a target for optical molecular imaging of human UTUC and conduct preliminary ex vivo imaging experiments.MethodsWe firstly analyzed the genome-wide mRNA expression data from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Paraffin-embedded tissue specimens comprising UTUC and normal urothelium were collected. All tissue specimens were used for immunohistochemistry to compare CD47 protein expression in normal and cancer tissue. Meanwhile, 12 patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy were prospectively included in ex vivo imaging experiments. Freshly isolated upper urinary tract specimens were incubated with anti-CD47-Alexa Fluor 790 and then imaged under white light and near-infrared (NIR) light. Standard histopathologic evaluation was performed, and findings were correlated with CD47-targeted NIR molecular imaging.ResultsThe GEO data revealed that CD47 mRNA expression was higher in UTUC specimens than that in paracancer normal tissue. In immunohistochemical analysis, the CD47 protein expression level was higher in both non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive (stage ≥T2) UTUCs than that in normal uroepithelium, and the localization of CD47 protein was the tumor cell membrane. In the ex vivo imaging experiments, all patients were pathologically diagnosed with UTUC, and no adverse effects of anti-CD47-Alexa Fluor 790 on the histological structure of the tumor and normal uroepithelium were observed. In the NIR grayscale images, the mean fluorescence intensity of the tumor tissue was significantly higher than that of the adjacent normal background tissue, which greatly improved the visualization of the tumor.ConclusionsCD47-targeted NIR molecular imaging could be a feasible and powerful strategy for the accurate diagnosis of UTUC. Larger-scale randomized trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengyu Yan
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Dan Chen
- Department of Pathology and Cancer Research Center, Yanbian University Medical College, Yanji, China
| | - Xutao Yan
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xiaoting Yan
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Yingpeng Wang
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Chao Liu
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- *Correspondence: Xiaofeng Yang, ; Chao Liu,
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- *Correspondence: Xiaofeng Yang, ; Chao Liu,
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jhan JH, Hsu WC, Lee YC, Li WM, Huang AM, Lin HH, Wang CS, Wu YR, Li CC, Wu WJ, Ke HL. MicroRNA-375-3p Suppresses Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Cell Migration and Invasion via Targeting Derlin-1. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14040880. [PMID: 35205628 PMCID: PMC8869792 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14040880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Little is known regarding the molecular characterization of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Novel therapeutic targets and prognostic predictors are imminent. In the present study, we aim to examine the oncogenic function and molecular mechanism of Derlin-1 in UTUC. Derlin-1 overexpression is significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients with UTUC. In vitro, knockdown or over-expression of Derlin-1 markedly regulated UTUC cell invasion and migration. We further discovered miR-375-3p suppresses cell invasion and migration by inversely regulating Derlin-1 and blocking EMT in UTUC cells. Taking this together, miR-375-3p functions as a tumor suppressive microRNA by directly targeting Derlin-1 and blocking epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jhen-Hao Jhan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.J.); (W.-C.H.); (W.-M.L.); (H.-H.L.); (C.-C.L.); (W.-J.W.)
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan;
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital, Kaohsiung 81267, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan;
| | - Wei-Chi Hsu
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.J.); (W.-C.H.); (W.-M.L.); (H.-H.L.); (C.-C.L.); (W.-J.W.)
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chen Lee
- Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan;
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.J.); (W.-C.H.); (W.-M.L.); (H.-H.L.); (C.-C.L.); (W.-J.W.)
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan;
- Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung 90054, Taiwan
| | - A-Mei Huang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan;
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Hui Lin
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.J.); (W.-C.H.); (W.-M.L.); (H.-H.L.); (C.-C.L.); (W.-J.W.)
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan;
| | - Chien-Sheng Wang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan;
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan;
| | - Yi-Ru Wu
- General Division, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan;
| | - Ching-Chia Li
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.J.); (W.-C.H.); (W.-M.L.); (H.-H.L.); (C.-C.L.); (W.-J.W.)
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan;
| | - Wen-Jeng Wu
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.J.); (W.-C.H.); (W.-M.L.); (H.-H.L.); (C.-C.L.); (W.-J.W.)
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan;
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Lung Ke
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.J.); (W.-C.H.); (W.-M.L.); (H.-H.L.); (C.-C.L.); (W.-J.W.)
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan;
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80145, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-07-3121101 (ext. 6694); Fax: +886-07-3211033
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Grossmann NC, Pradere B, D'Andrea D, Schuettfort VM, Mori K, Rajwa P, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Katayama S, Fankhauser CD, Xylinas E, Margulis V, Moschini M, Abufaraj M, Bandini M, Lonati C, Nyirady P, Karakiewicz PI, Fajkovic H, Shariat SF. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: Oncologic Outcomes from a Multicenter Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:227-236. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
24
|
Olson KM, Faraj KS, Singh P, Tyson MD. Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89891-5_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
25
|
Koll FJ, Meisenzahl E, Haller B, Maisch P, Kirchhoff F, Horn T, Gschwend JE, Schmid SC. Evaluation of Pre-operative Biopsy, Surgical Procedures and Oncologic Outcomes in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC). Front Surg 2021; 8:790738. [PMID: 34901146 PMCID: PMC8655158 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.790738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Discordance between pre-operative biopsy and final pathology for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) is high and optimal management remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of pre-operative biopsy, to identify prognostic factors and to evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival and oncologic outcome in UTUC. Methods: We analyzed records of patients receiving surgical treatment for UTUC. Pathology of pre-operative biopsy was compared to surgical specimen. We used Kaplan-Meier method to estimate survival probabilities and Cox's proportional hazards models to estimate the association between covariates and event times. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). A matched-pair analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: 151 patients underwent surgical treatment (28% open, 36% laparoscopic, 17% robotic radical nephroureterectomy; 14% segmental ureteral resections and 5% palliative nephrectomy) for UTUC and were included in the analysis. Upstaging from <pT1 in endoscopic biopsy to ≥pT1 in final pathology occurred in 61% of patients and upgrading from low-grade to high-grade occurred in 30% of patients. Five-year OS was 59.5%. In the univariate Cox-regression model pathological stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion and positive surgical margins were associated with OS. Matched pair analysis for stage (<pT3; ≥pT3; pN+) and age revealed a significant survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.40, 0.14-0.77, p < 0.018) in this cohort. Conclusion: UTUC is often underestimated in pre-operative biopsy, and it is associated with significant mortality. Pathological stage and grade, lymphovascular invasion and lymph node metastases are predictors of oncologic outcome and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florestan J Koll
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Eva Meisenzahl
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Haller
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Maisch
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.,Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Florian Kirchhoff
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Horn
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian C Schmid
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Challenging Visualization of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10235465. [PMID: 34884167 PMCID: PMC8658349 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Revised: 11/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the possibility of detecting sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and to perform analysis of lymphatic outflow in patients with suspicion of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) with the use of a radioisotope-based technique. Methods: During 2018–2021, a prospective study was conducted on 19 patients with the suspicion of UTUC and for whom diagnostic ureterorenoscopy (URS) was planned. Technetium-99m (99mTc) nanocolloid radioactive tracer injection and a tumor biopsy were performed for staging procedures. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and fusion of images were performed for better localization of lymph nodes (LNs). Detection of SLNs and the analysis of the radiotracer outflow was conducted with the use of single-photon emission-computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) lymphangiography. Results: The mean age of the patients was 73.4 years; 7 (36%) were male. Pathological staging from the biopsy was T0—8 (42%), Ta—7 (36%), T1—4 (21%). SLNs were detected in two of 19 cases (10%). In one patient a single SLN (5.3%) was visualized, and in another case (5.3%), multiple (double) radioactive lymph nodes were visualized. In 17 out of the 19 (89.5%) cases, no lymphatic outflow was observed, and out of these five cases (26.3%) of gravitational leakage of injected radiotracer to the retroperitoneal space was noted. Conclusions: We demonstrated that detection of SLNs in the upper urinary tract is possible yet challenging. Radiotracer injection in the upper urinary tract during ureterorenoscopy is difficult to perform, and the expected result of injection is unsatisfactory. Lymphatic outflow from the tumor site to the first LNs in our studied group of patients is visible in 10.5% of cases. SPECT/CT lymphangiography in cases of UTUC may provide valuable information about a patient’s individual anatomy of the lymphatic system and the position of the first lymph nodes draining lymph with potential metastatic cells from the tumor.
Collapse
|
27
|
Laukhtina E, Lemberger U, Bruchbacher A, Ilijazi D, Korn S, Berndl F, D’Andrea D, Susani M, Enikeev D, Compérat E, Shariat SF, Hassler MR. Expression Analysis and Mutational Status of Histone Methyltransferase KMT2D at Different Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Locations. J Pers Med 2021; 11:1147. [PMID: 34834500 PMCID: PMC8625702 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11111147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The gene coding for histone methyltransferase KMT2D is found among the top mutated genes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); however, there is a lack of data regarding its association with clinicopathologic features as well as survival outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to investigate KMT2D expression, mutation patterns, and their utility as prognostic biomarkers in patients with UTUC. A single-center study was conducted on tumor specimens from 51 patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Analysis of KMT2D protein expression was performed using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Customized next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to assess alterations in KMT2D exons. Cox regression was used to assess the relationship of KMT2D protein expression and mutational status with survival outcomes. KMT2D expression was increased in patients with a previous history of bladder cancer (25% vs. 0%, p = 0.02). The NGS analysis of KMT2D exons in 27 UTUC tumors revealed a significant association between pathogenic KMT2D variants and tumor location (p = 0.02). Pathogenic KMT2D variants were predominantly found in patients with non-pelvic or multifocal tumors (60% vs. 14%), while the majority of patients with a pelvic tumor location (81% vs. 20%) did not harbor pathogenic KMT2D alterations. Both IHC and NGS analyses of KMT2D failed to detect a statistically significant association between KMT2D protein or KMT2D gene alteration status and clinical variables such as stage/grade of the disease or survival outcomes (all p > 0.05). KMT2D alterations and protein expression were associated with UTUC features such as multifocality, ureteral location, and previous bladder cancer. While KMT2D protein expression and KMT2D mutational status do not seem to have prognostic value in UTUC, they appear to add information to improve clinical decision-making regarding the type of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119435 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Ursula Lemberger
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Andreas Bruchbacher
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Dafina Ilijazi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Stephan Korn
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Florian Berndl
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
| | - David D’Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Martin Susani
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (M.S.); (E.C.)
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119435 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (M.S.); (E.C.)
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119435 Moscow, Russia;
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, 1010 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Melanie R. Hassler
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Park CK, Cho NH. Differences in genomic profile of high-grade urothelial carcinoma according to tumor location. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:109.e1-109.e9. [PMID: 34663543 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To establish targeted therapies based on the molecular landscape in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), we tried to investigate the molecular characteristics of UTUC compared with those of bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLUC) by next-generation sequencing (NGS). MATERIALS AND METHODS We selected 71 high-grade infiltrating urothelial carcinoma tissue specimens from 33 UTUC and 38 BLUC patients. NGS analysis was performed with the Illumina TruShigt Oncology-500 panel. RESULTS Both UTUC and BLUC showed similar clinicopathologic characteristics, as well as morphologic similarities. The median tumor mutation burden (TMB) of all cases was 7.8 mutations/Mb. The majority of alterations were missense mutations. TP53 (40/71, 56.3%), KDM6A (30/71, 42.3%), and TERT promoter mutations (23/71, 32.4%) were observed regardless of tumor location. Compared with UTUC, BLUC showed frequent mutations in several genes: ARID1A (P = 0.001), ASXL1 (P = 0.017), ERBB3 (P = 0.005), PRKDC (P = 0.004) and RB1 (P = 0.041). On the contrary, copy number loss of FGFR3 was observed more in UTUC than BLUC (P = 0.018). Also, 6 cases showed oncogenic fusions: 3 cases with FGFR2 fusion in UTUC and 3 cases with FGFR3-TACC3 fusion in BLUC. CONCLUSION Despite the small cohort size, we identified genetic differences between UTUC and BLUC in Korean patients by NGS. An understanding of the comprehensive molecular characteristics of UTUC and BLUC may be helpful in detecting candidates for targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheol Keun Park
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nam Hoon Cho
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mori K, Katayama S, Laukhtina E, Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Quhal F, Sari Motlagh R, Mostafaei H, Grossmann NC, Rajwa P, Zimmermann K, Karakiewicz PI, Abufaraj M, Fajkovic H, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Enikeev DV, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Discordance Between Clinical and Pathological Staging and Grading in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 20:95.e1-95.e6. [PMID: 34764007 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to evaluate the concordance in tumor stage and grade between ureteroscopic (URS) biopsy and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Records of 1,214 UTUC patients who had undergone URS biopsy followed by RNU were included. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors contributing to the pathological upstaging. RESULTS The concordance between URS biopsy-based clinical and RNU pathological staging was 34.5%. Clinical understaging occurred in 59.5% patients. Upstaging to muscle-invasive disease occurred in 240 (41.7%) of 575 patients diagnosed with ≤cT1 disease. Of those diagnosed with muscle-invasive disease on final pathology, 89.6% had been clinically diagnosed with ≤cT1 disease. In the univariable analyses, computed tomography urography (CTU)-based invasion, ureter location, hydronephrosis, high-grade cytology, high-grade biopsy, sessile architecture, age, and women sex were significantly associated with pathological upstaging (P < .05). In the multivariable analyses, CTU-based invasion and hydronephrosis remained associated with pathological upstaging (P < .05). URS biopsy-based clinical and pathological gradings were concordant in 634 (54.2%) patients. Clinical undergrading occurred in 496 (42.4%) patients. CONCLUSIONS Clinical understaging/undergrading and upstaging to muscle-invasive disease occurred in a high proportion of UTUC patients undergoing RNU. Despite the inherent selection bias, these data underline the challenges of accurate UTUC staging and grading. In daily clinical practice, URS biopsy and CTU offer the most accurate preoperative information albeit with limited predictive value when used alone. These findings should be considered when utilizing preoperative, risk-adapted strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, CHRU Tours, France; Université François Rabelais de Tours, PRES Centre Val de Loire, Tours, France
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | | | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, F-75013 PARIS, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Dmitry V Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Grobet-Jeandin E, Pinar U, Rouprêt M. Conservative Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Referee. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 32:40-42. [PMID: 34541558 PMCID: PMC8437769 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Grobet-Jeandin
- Division of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital, Paris, France
| | - Ugo Pinar
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Liu MZ, Gao XS, Qin SB, Li XY, Ma MW, Xie M, Lyu F, Wang D. Radiation therapy for nonmetastatic medically inoperable upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:2929-2937. [PMID: 34430395 PMCID: PMC8350229 DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The standard management for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). However, some patients cannot undergo this procedure for several reasons, such as unresectable disease, old age, and multiple comorbidities. Our study explored the potential safety and effectiveness of radiotherapy as a curative treatment for UTUC patients unfit for surgery. Methods The data of patients treated with radiotherapy between December 2017 and November 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. For the literature review, computerized PubMed Medline, Index Medicus, and Web of Science databases and reference lists from the identified publications of interest were used. And “upper-tract urothelial carcinoma” and “radiotherapy” were used as key words in the search. Results We describe 8 patients with UTUC who were treated with radiotherapy. The median follow-up time was 13.5 months (range, 8.6–30.9 months). Local tumor control was achieved in all patients. However, distant metastases were observed in 2 patients with T3-4/N+ status. One patient had T4 status and the other had N2+ status. The patients died of tumor progression at 15.0 and 17.7 months. In addition, the other 6 patients who were still alive had relatively early-stage tumors without nodal involvement. Regarding acute toxicity, according to the CTCAE v5.0, mild side effects were noted, including grade 1 nausea and diarrhea. Four patients developed mild anemia, generally of grade 1–2. One patient experienced grade 3 anemia, but it was manageable and improved with symptomatic support. In addition, no grade 4 acute or late toxicities were observed. No significant long-term impairment of renal function occurred. Conclusions For patients with nonmetastatic UTUC who are not suitable for surgery, radiotherapy is a safe treatment and can achieve good local tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Zhu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xian-Shu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Shang-Bin Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Ying Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Ming-Wei Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Mu Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Dian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rice P, Somani BK. A Systematic Review of Thulium Fiber Laser: Applications and Advantages of Laser Technology in the Field of Urology. Res Rep Urol 2021; 13:519-527. [PMID: 34327179 PMCID: PMC8314925 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s233979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Laser technology is widely used in urological surgery, from lithotripsy, prostate surgery to en-bloc resection of tumours. While Holmium:YAG has been widely employed over the last two decades, in recent years, there has been a surge of interest in Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL), which offers theoretical advantages of better water absorption and lower stone ablation thresholds. A systematic review was conducted to assess the evidence from clinical research on TFL's application for lithotripsy and prostate surgery. It identified 357 articles and 8 (1506 patients) were selected, of which 4 clinical studies each investigated TFL enucleation of prostate (ThuFLEP) and TFL lithotripsy. For flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURSL), stone ablation settings ranged from 0.1-4 J, and 7-300 Hz, mean operative time ranged from 23.4-39.8 minutes and lasing time ranged from 1.2-10 minutes. For stone dusting in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), settings of 0.2 J and 125-200 Hz were found to be optimal. For ThuFLEP, all studies showed a significant improvement in IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score), urinary flow rate (Qmax), quality of life measures, and post-void residual volume, with mean operative time ranging from 67-104.5 minutes. Our review shows that there is limited evidence on the use and clinical outcomes of TFL. ThuFLEP might suggest equivalence to the widely used HoLEP in the available evidence so far. TFL lithotripsy shows promising results but further prospective, randomized trials are required to properly assess its usability, clinical effectiveness and standardisation of the settings for successful adoption of the technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Rice
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
- Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
König F, Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Mun DH, Rink M, Pradere B. Quality indicators for the management of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma requiring radical nephroureterectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:291-296. [PMID: 33973537 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this article was to identify quality indicators for an optimized management of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) requiring radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). RECENT FINDINGS RNU with bladder cuff resection is the standard treatment of high-risk UTUC. For the bladder cuff resection, two main approaches are accepted: transvesical and extravesical. Lymph node dissection following a dedicated template should be performed in all high-risk patients undergoing RNU as it improves tumour staging and possibly survival. Postoperative bladder instillation of single-dose chemotherapy should be administered after RNU to decrease the risk of intravesical tumour recurrence. Perioperative systemic chemotherapy should always be considered for advanced cancers. Although level-1 evidence is available for adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, neoadjuvant regimens are still being evaluated. SUMMARY Optimal management of high-risk UTUC requires evidence-based reproducible quality indicators in order to allow guidance and frameworks for clinical practices. Adherence to quality indicators allows for the measurement and comparison of outcomes that are likely to improve prognosis. Based on the literature, we found four evidence-based accepted quality indicators that are easily implementable to improve the management of high-risk UTUC patients treated with RNU: adequate management of the distal ureter/ bladder cuff, template-based lymph node dissection, single-shot postoperative intravesical chemotherapy, and perioperative systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Dong-Ho Mun
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pizzighella M, Bruyere F, Peyronnet B, Grafeille V, Brichart N, Mori K, Verhoest G, Bensalah K, Moschini M, Xylinas E, Pradere B. THE MANAGEMENT OF DISTAL URETER DURING RADICAL NEPHROURETERECTOMY DOES NOT INFLUENCE BLADDER RECURRENCE. J Endourol 2021; 36:77-82. [PMID: 34121446 DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The bladder cuff management and its surgical approach represent an essential and debated step in radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The objective of our study was to determine which bladder-cuff management has the best oncological outcomes in terms of bladder recurrence-free survival ( BRFS). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent an open robot-assisted laparoscopic (RNU) or a combined RNU between March 2012 and March 2019 in three academic hospitals. Bladder-cuff management approaches were divided into two categories: (O-cuff) open bladder cuff and (R-cuff) robot-assisted bladder cuff. We assessed demographic characteristics, distal ureter approach, pathology, and operative details as well as oncological outcomes including BRFS. Survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictive factors of bladder recurrence. RESULTS A total of 117 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 40.4 months. Patients with a history of bladder cancer, RNU with pure laparoscopic approach and endoscopic bladder cuff were excluded. There were 53 (45%) patients in the O-cuff group and 64 (55%) in the R-cuff group. BRFS at 2 years was 73.3% and 72.7% for O-cuff and R-cuff respectively (p=0.9). On multivariable analysis, distal ureter tumor (odds ratio (OR): 6.24, 95% CI: 1.95- 21.5; p < 0.01) was associated with bladder recurrence (BR). CONCLUSION There was no statistically significant difference in BRFS between the O-cuff and R-cuff groups. Nevertheless, we underlined that distal ureter tumor was associated with bladder recurrence. Although we did not find differences regarding the surgical approach, bladder-cuff remains a very important step of RNU and caution should be taken when performed laparoscopically to avoid any tumor spillage. Risk factors for bladder cancer recurrence might be taken into account for the choice of its surgical approach. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Franck Bruyere
- CHRU Tours, 26928, urology, 2 bd Tonnellé, Tours, France, 37044;
| | - Benoit Peyronnet
- CHU Rennes, Department of urology, 2 rue Henri Le Guilloux, Rennes, France, 35000;
| | - Vivien Grafeille
- CHU Rennes, 36684, Department of urology, Rennes, Bretagne, France;
| | - Nicolas Brichart
- CHR Orleans, 52817, Department of urology, Orleans, Centre, France;
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- The Jikei University School of Medicine, Urology, Minato, Tokyo, Japan;
| | - Gregory Verhoest
- RENNES Univeristy Hospital, Urology, Henri Le Guillou St, RENNES, France, 35033;
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Rennes University Hospital (France), Urology, 2 rue Henri Le Guillou, Rennes, France, 35000;
| | - Marco Moschini
- Luzerner Kantonsspital, 30748, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland, 6000.,United States;
| | | | - Benjamin Pradere
- CHU Tours, Department of urology, Tours, France.,Medical University of Vienna, 27271, urology, Wien, Wien, Austria;
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Foerster B, Abufaraj M, Matin SF, Azizi M, Gupta M, Li WM, Seisen T, Clinton T, Xylinas E, Mir MC, Schweitzer D, Mari A, Kimura S, Bandini M, Mathieu R, Ku JH, Marcq G, Guruli G, Grabbert M, Czech AK, Muilwijk T, Pycha A, D'Andrea D, Petros FG, Spiess PE, Bivalacqua T, Wu WJ, Rouprêt M, Krabbe LM, Hendricksen K, Egawa S, Briganti A, Moschini M, Graffeille V, Kassouf W, Autorino R, Heidenreich A, Chlosta P, Joniau S, Soria F, Pierorazio PM, Shariat SF. Pretreatment Risk Stratification for Endoscopic Kidney-sparing Surgery in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An International Collaborative Study. Eur Urol 2021; 80:507-515. [PMID: 34023164 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several groups have proposed features to identify low-risk patients who may benefit from endoscopic kidney-sparing surgery in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). OBJECTIVE To evaluate standard risk stratification features, develop an optimal model to identify ≥pT2/N+ stage at radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), and compare it with the existing unvalidated models. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a collaborative retrospective study that included 1214 patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy with biopsy followed by RNU for nonmetastatic UTUC between 2000 and 2017. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We performed multiple imputation of chained equations for missing data and multivariable logistic regression analysis with a stepwise selection algorithm to create the optimal predictive model. The area under the curve and a decision curve analysis were used to compare the models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 659 (54.3%) and 555 (45.7%) patients had ≤pT1N0/Nx and ≥pT2/N+ disease, respectively. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis of our model, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.03, p = 0.013), high-grade biopsy (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.37-2.40, p < 0.001), biopsy cT1+ staging (OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.93-5.41, p < 0.001), preoperative hydronephrosis (OR 1.37 95% CI 1.04-1.80, p = 0.024), tumor size (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17, p = 0.029), invasion on imaging (OR 5.10, 95% CI 3.32-7.81, p < 0.001), and sessile architecture (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.58-3.36, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with ≥pT2/pN+ disease. Compared with the existing models, our model had the highest performance accuracy (75% vs 66-71%) and an additional clinical net reduction (four per 100 patients). CONCLUSIONS Our proposed risk-stratification model predicts the risk of harboring ≥pT2/N+ UTUC with reliable accuracy and a clinical net benefit outperforming the current risk-stratification models. PATIENT SUMMARY We developed a risk stratification model to better identify patients for endoscopic kidney-sparing surgery in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beat Foerster
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mounsif Azizi
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mohit Gupta
- Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Urology, GRC 5, Predictive ONCO-URO, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Timothy Clinton
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia Foundation, Valencia, Spain
| | - Donald Schweitzer
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marco Bandini
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Ja H Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Urology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Markus Grabbert
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anna K Czech
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Tim Muilwijk
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Armin Pycha
- Department of Urology, Provincial Hospital of Bozen, Bozen, Italy; Medical School, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Firas G Petros
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Urology and Kidney Transplant, The University of Toledo Medical Center and Eleanor N. Dana Cancer Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Trinity Bivalacqua
- Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Wen-Jeng Wu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Urology, GRC 5, Predictive ONCO-URO, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laura-Maria Krabbe
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Wassim Kassouf
- Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Piotr Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Phillip M Pierorazio
- Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Palagonia E, Scarcella S, Dell'Atti L, Milanese G, Schatteman P, D'Hondt F, De Naeyer G, Galosi AB, Mottrie A. Robot-assisted segmental ureterectomy with psoas hitch ureteral reimplantation: Oncological, functional and perioperative outcomes of case series of a single centre. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 93:101-106. [PMID: 33754620 DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2021.1.101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION According to the Urology guidelines, in selected cases of distal upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) segmental ureterectomy (SU) can be offered. There is no consensus in the surgical technique of preference. Robot-assisted SU could be an option to overcome all the limitations of open and laparoscopic techniques. We describe our first experience of robot assisted SU with psoas hitch ureteral reimplantation (RAPHUR). MATERIALS AND METHODS 11 patients underwent RAPHUR for distal UTUC between 2013 and 2017 in a single centre. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. Conventional imaging was performed after 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year from surgery as follow up protocol. We retrospectively evaluated the technical feasibility, oncological and functional outcomes. RESULTS Median age was 71 years (57-91). The median length of the ureteral defect was 23 mm (10-40). Median preoperative creatinine level was 1.22 mg/dl (0.7-1.85) and median eGFR was 57.5 ml/min/1.73m2 (31-80). Five (45.5%) patients were symptomatic and 7 (63.6%) had hydronephrosis. Median operative time was 185 min (120-240), with a median blood loss of 100 ml (50-300). No case required conversion to open surgery. Overall, only 1 (9%) patient developed Clavien Dindo ≥ 3 postoperative complications. Average hospital stay was 7 (2-9) days. Mean postoperative creatinine was 1.05 mg/dl (0.8-1.85) and mean postoperative eGFR was 72 (36-83). During a median follow up time of 25.5 months (12-53), 4 (36.4%) patients experienced recurrence of urothelial cancer at conventional imaging follow up and 2 (18.2%) died due to its progression. CONCLUSIONS In our initial experience RAPHUR can be proposed to selected cases of distal ureteral carcinoma with optimal perioperative and functional outcomes. However, cancer control may be undermined compared to nephroureterectomy. Thus, further prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Palagonia
- Division of Urology, United Hospital of Ancona, School of Medicine Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Marche, Italy; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Moorselbaan, Aalst.
| | - Simone Scarcella
- Division of Urology, United Hospital of Ancona, School of Medicine Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Marche.
| | - Lucio Dell'Atti
- Division of Urology, United Hospital of Ancona, School of Medicine Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Marche.
| | - Giulio Milanese
- Division of Urology, United Hospital of Ancona, School of Medicine Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Marche.
| | - Peter Schatteman
- ORSI Academy, Melle; Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Moorselbaan, Aalst.
| | - Frederiek D'Hondt
- ORSI Academy, Melle; Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Moorselbaan, Aalst.
| | - Geert De Naeyer
- ORSI Academy, Melle; Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Moorselbaan, Aalst.
| | - Andrea B Galosi
- Division of Urology, United Hospital of Ancona, School of Medicine Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Marche.
| | - Alexander Mottrie
- ORSI Academy, Melle; Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Moorselbaan, Aalst.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Almås B, Øverby S, Halvorsen OJ, Reisæter LAR, Carlsen B, Beisland C. Preoperative predictors of pathological tumour stage and prognosis may be used when selecting candidates for intensified treatment in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Scand J Urol 2021; 55:100-107. [PMID: 33517813 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2021.1877343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intensified treatment such as extended lymph node dissection (LND) and/or perioperative chemotherapy in addition to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) has been suggested for high-risk cases of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We aimed to identify preoperative predictors of tumour stage and prognosis in the diagnostic work-up before RNU. Further to evaluate if our findings could be used in selecting patients for intensified treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 179 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at Haukeland University Hospital (HUS) and Vestfold Hospital Trust (VHT) during 2005-2017 were included in this retrospective study. All relevant preoperative variables regarding the patient, the CT and the ureteroscopy (URS) were registered and analysed regarding their ability to predict non-organ confined disease (NOCD, pT3+ and/or N+) at final pathology after RNU. The prognosis was assessed calculating survival for the cohort and stratified by preoperative variables. RESULTS Local invasion and pathological lymph nodes at CT predicted NOCD in uni and multivariate regression analyses (OR 3.36, p=.004 and OR 6.21, p=.03, respectively). Reactive oedema surrounding the tumour (OR 2.55, p=.02), tumour size (4.8 vs. 3.9 cm, p=.006) and high-grade tumour at URS biopsy (OR 3.59, p=.04) predicted NOCD at univariate regression analyses. The 5-year CSS and OS for the entire cohort was 79% and 60%. ECOG, local invasion, pathological lymph nodes and reactive oedema surrounding the tumour at CT predicted CSS. CONCLUSIONS Several variables at the CT predicted both stage and survival. Local invasion at CT seems the most promising feature for selecting patients for intensified treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjarte Almås
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Stein Øverby
- Department of Urology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Ole J Halvorsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lars A R Reisæter
- Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Birgitte Carlsen
- Department of Pathology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Afferi L, Abufaraj M, Soria F, D'Andrea D, Xylinas E, Seisen T, Roupret M, Lonati C, DE LA Taille A, Peyronnet B, Laukhtina E, Pradere B, Mari A, Krajewski W, Alvarez-Maestro M, Kikuchi E, Shigeta K, Chlosta P, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Simone G, Ornaghi PI, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A, Matsumoto K, Karakiewicz PI, Mordasini L, Mattei A, Shariat SF, Moschini M. A comparison of perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 74:49-56. [PMID: 33439575 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.20.04127-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with the concomitant excision of the distal ureter and bladder cuff is the current standard of care for the treatment of muscle invasive and/or high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). In small uncontrolled studies, laparoscopic RNU has been suggested to be associated with better perioperative outcomes compared to open RNU. The aim of our study was to compare the perioperative oncological and functional outcomes of open RNU versus laparoscopic RNU after adjusting for preoperative baseline patient-related characteristics. METHODS We evaluated a multi-institutional retrospective database composed by 1512 patients diagnosed with UTUC and treated with open or laparoscopic RNU between 1990 and 2016. Perioperative outcomes included operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay, as well as postoperative complications, readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates at 30 and 90 days from surgery. A 1:1 propensity score matching estimated using logistic regression with the teffects psmatch function of STATA 13® (caliper 0.2, no replacement; StataCorp LLC; College Station, TX, USA) was performed using preoperative parameters such as: age, gender, Body Mass Index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score. RESULTS Overall, 1007 (66.6%) patients were treated with open and 505 (33.4%) with laparoscopic RNU. Open RNU resulted into shorter median operative time (180 vs. 230 min, P<0.001) and longer median hospital stay (10 vs. 7 days, P<0.001) in comparison to laparoscopic RNU. No statistically significant difference was identified for the other variables of interest (all P>0.05). At multivariable linear regression after propensity score matching adjusted for lymph node dissection and year of surgery, laparoscopic RNU resulted in longer operative time (coefficient 43.6, 95% CI 27.9-59.3, P<0.001) and shorter hospital stay (coefficient -1.27, 95% CI -2.1 to -0.3, P=0.01) compared to open RNU, but the risk of other perioperative complications remained similar between the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic RNU is associated with shorter hospital stay, but longer operative time in comparison to open RNU. Otherwise, there were no differences in other perioperative outcomes between these surgical modalities even after propensity score matching. The choice to offer laparoscopic or open RNU in the treatment of UTUC should not be based on concerns of different safety outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland -
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.,National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology Bichat Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), University of Paris6, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), University of Paris6, Paris, France
| | - Chiara Lonati
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.,Department of Urology, University of Brescia, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alexandre DE LA Taille
- Department of Urology, Henri-Mondor University Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | - Benoit Peyronnet
- Department of Urology, Hopital Pontchaillou (CHU) Rennes, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | - Eiji Kikuchi
- School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Shigeta
- School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Piotr Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Kazumasa Matsumoto
- School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | - Livio Mordasini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Urology, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, University of Texas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.,Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Farrow JM, Kern SQ, Gryzinski GM, Sundaram CP. Nephron-sparing management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Investig Clin Urol 2021; 62:389-398. [PMID: 34190434 PMCID: PMC8246013 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20210113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is uncommon and presents unique challenges for diagnosis and management. Nephroureterectomy has been the preferred management option, but it is associated with significant morbidity. Nephron-sparing treatments are a valuable alternative and provide similar efficacy in select cases. A PubMed literature review was performed in English language publications using the following search terms: urothelial carcinoma, upper tract, nephron-sparing, intraluminal and systemic therapy. Contemporary papers published within the last 10 years were primarily included. Where encountered, systematic reviews and meta-analyses were given priority, as were randomized controlled trials for newer treatments. Core guidelines were referenced and citations reviewed for inclusion. A summary of epidemiological data, clinical diagnosis, staging, and treatments focusing on nephron-sparing approaches to upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are outlined. Nephron-sparing management strategies are viable options to consider in patients with favorable features of UTUC. Adjunctive therapies are being investigated but the data remains mixed. Protocol variability and dosage differences limit statistical interpretation. New mechanisms to improve treatment dwell times in the upper tracts are being designed with promising preliminary results. Studies investigating systemic therapies are ongoing but implications for nephron-sparing management are uncertain. Nephron-sparing management is an acceptable treatment modality best suited for favorable disease. More work is needed to determine if intraluminal and/or systemic therapies can further optimize treatment outcomes beyond resection alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Farrow
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Sean Q Kern
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Gustavo M Gryzinski
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Chandru P Sundaram
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Nandurkar R, Basto M, Sengupta S. Nephron-sparing surgery for the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an outline of surgical technique and review of outcomes. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:3160-3167. [PMID: 33457288 PMCID: PMC7807310 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.11.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) often occurs in elderly patients with multiple co-morbidities including renal impairment. As such, nephron sparing surgery (NSS) often needs to be considered. This article reviews the available NSS techniques for UTUC, including ureteroscopy, percutaneous approaches and segmental ureterectomy. PubMed and OvidMEDLINE reviews of available case series from the last 10 years demonstrated that recurrence was highly variable between studies and occurred in 19–90.5% of ureteroscopic cases, 29–98% of percutaneous resections and in 10.2–31.4% of patients who underwent segmental ureterectomy. The small number of included studies and variable follow up periods made comparison between techniques difficult. NSS is a necessary alternative for patients with significant comorbidities or renal impairment who cannot undergo radical nephro-ureterectomy. However, there is significant variation in oncological outcomes, with an increased risk of progression or death from cancer—salvage by radical surgery may sometimes be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruchira Nandurkar
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marnique Basto
- Department of Urology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shomik Sengupta
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Urology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Singla N, Christie A, Freifeld Y, Ghandour RA, Woldu SL, Clinton TN, Petros FG, Robyak H, Yeh HC, Fang D, Enikeev D, Bagrodia A, Sagalowsky AI, Lotan Y, Raman JD, Matin SF, Margulis V. Pathologic stage as a surrogate for oncologic outcomes after receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:933.e7-933.e12. [PMID: 32430254 PMCID: PMC10676742 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Whether pathologic stage at radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) can serve as an appropriate surrogate for oncologic outcomes in patients with high-grade (HG) upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is not defined. We sought to determine whether patients who achieve pathologically non-muscle-invasive (ypT0, ypTa, ypT1, ypTis) HG UTUC after receipt of NAC exhibit oncologic outcomes comparable to those who are inherently low stage without chemotherapy. METHODS We identified 647 UTUC patients who underwent RNU among 3 institutions from 1993to2016. Patients with low or unknown grade, pathologic muscle invasion, or receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. We compared clinicopathologic data and oncologic outcomes between pT0-1 and ypT0-1 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess overall (OS), cancer-specific (CSS), and systemic recurrence-free (RFS) survival. Predictors of these endpoints were identified using Cox regression. RESULTS 234 (43 ypT0-1, 191 pT0-1) patients with HG UTUC were included. Two patients exhibited pathologic complete response after NAC. OS (P = 0.055), CSS (P = 0.152), and RFS (P = 0.098) were similar between ypT0-1 and pT0-1 patients. Predictors of worse outcomes included African-American race (RFS, CSS, and OS), Charlson score (OS), and systemic recurrence (OS and CSS). CONCLUSIONS Patients with HG UTUC who achieve ypT0-1 stage after NAC exhibit favorable oncologic outcomes comparable to those inherently non-muscle-invasive who do not receive chemotherapy. Improvements in clinical staging will play an important role in better defining candidacy for NAC in treating HG UTUC while minimizing overtreatment. Furthermore, pathologic stage may serve as an appropriate early surrogate for oncologic endpoints in designing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Alana Christie
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Clinical Sciences, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Yuval Freifeld
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Rashed A Ghandour
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Solomon L Woldu
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Timothy N Clinton
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Firas G Petros
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Haley Robyak
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Hsin-Chih Yeh
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Dong Fang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Arthur I Sagalowsky
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jay D Raman
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Veccia A, Antonelli A, Martini A, Falagario U, Carrieri G, Grob MB, Guruli G, Simeone C, Wiklund P, Porpiglia F, Autorino R. Ureteral location is associated with survival outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A population-based analysis. Int J Urol 2020; 27:966-972. [PMID: 32776386 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prognostic value of tumor location in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Incidence Database, 6619 upper tract urothelial carcinoma cases were identified, including 3719 confined to the renal pelvis and 2971 to the ureter. Predictors of surgical technique (kidney sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy), as well as 2- and 5-year cancer-specific survival and overall survival were evaluated. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 29 months (interquartile range 0-126 months) for both groups. Multivariate logistic analysis showed tumor dimension as the only factor associated with radical nephroureterectomy (odds ratio 1.02; P < 0.001). Ureteral 2- and 5-year overall survival were lower (log-rank P = 0.001) compared with renal pelvis. When stratifying tumor location according to dimensions, a ureteral carcinoma >3 cm was associated with the worst 2- and 5-year cancer-specific mortality (Pepe-Mori P < 0.001), and overall survival (log-rank P < 0.001). The 2- and 5-year cancer-specific mortality (Pepe-Mori P < 0.001) and overall survival were the worst for ureteral ≥T3 tumors (log-rank P < 0.001). The 2- and 5-year cancer-specific mortality (Pepe-Mori P < 0.001) and overall survival (log-rank P < 0.001) were the worst for ureteral grade III-IV cancers. Ureteral tumor location (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.18, P < 0.001), tumor dimension ≥3 (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.25, P < 0.001), T staging (T2-4 all P < 0.001), grading (grade III subdistribution hazard ratio 2.20, P = 0.001; grade IV subdistribution hazard ratio 2.39, P < 0.001) were found to be associated with higher cancer mortality. CONCLUSIONS Ureteral tumor location in upper tract urothelial carcinoma seems to be associated with worse oncological outcomes, especially in the case of advanced disease. Although the type of surgical treatment does not seem to impact survival, surgeons should use caution in adopting a kidney-sparing surgery for patients with ureteral upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Veccia
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health System, Richmond, Virginia, USA
- Urology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Science and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Urology Unit AUOI Verona, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Ugo Falagario
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health System, Richmond, Virginia, USA
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Mayer B Grob
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health System, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Georgi Guruli
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health System, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Claudio Simeone
- Urology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Science and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, "San Luigi Gonzaga" Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health System, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Diagnostic accuracy of photodynamic diagnosis for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2020; 32:102067. [PMID: 33096285 DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) by performing a meta-analysis. METHOD Relevant articles were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases. Studies evaluating the accuracy of PDD for the diagnosis of upper UTUC were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated by STATA 16.0 at the per-lesion level. RESULTS Six studies with 289 lesions were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that PDD can differentiate upper UTUC from benign lesions with a sensitivity of 0.96 (95 % confidence interval: 0.85-0.99) and a specificity of 0.86 (95 % confidence interval: [0.64-0.95]; AUC, 0.97). Compared with white-light ureterorenoscopy, PDD can significantly improve the additional detection rate of UTUC (RR 0.16, 95 % CI 0.07-0.34 P = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS PDD is a valid technique that improves the diagnostic accuracy of UTUC compared with standard white-light ureterorenoscopy at the per-lesion level. PDD is a promising endoscopic technique for upper UTUC.
Collapse
|
44
|
Pre-therapy serum albumin-to-globulin ratio in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 2020; 39:2567-2577. [PMID: 33067726 PMCID: PMC8332553 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03479-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The accurate selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important challenge in oncology. Serum AGR has been found to be associated with oncological outcomes in various malignancies. We assessed the association of pre-therapy serum albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) with pathologic response and oncological outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant platin-based chemotherapy followed by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for clinically non-metastatic UTUC. METHODS We retrospectively included all clinically non-metastatic patients from a multicentric database who had neoadjuvant platin-based chemotherapy and RNU for UTUC. After assessing the pretreatment AGR cut-off value, we found 1.42 to have the maximum Youden index value. The overall population was therefore divided into two AGR groups using this cut-off (low, < 1.42 vs high, ≥ 1.42). A logistic regression was performed to measure the association with pathologic response after NAC. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the association of AGR with OS and RFS. RESULTS Of 172 patients, 58 (34%) patients had an AGR < 1.42. Median follow-up was 26 (IQR 11-56) months. In logistic regression, low AGR was not associated with pathologic response. On univariable analyses, pre-therapy serum AGR was neither associated with OS HR 1.15 (95% CI 0.77-1.74; p = 0.47) nor RFS HR 1.48 (95% CI 0.98-1.22; p = 0.06). These results remained true regardless of the response to NAC. CONCLUSION Pre-therapy low serum AGR before NAC followed by RNU for clinically high-risk UTUC was not associated with pathological response or long-term oncological outcomes. Biomarkers that can complement clinical factors in UTUC are needed as clinical staging and risk stratification are still suboptimal leading to both over and under treatment despite the availability of effective therapies.
Collapse
|
45
|
Stage Migration for Upper Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 19:e184-e192. [PMID: 33153919 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) account for 5% to 10% of urothelial cancers. The phenomenon of stage migration in tumors has been evident with increased use and higher resolution of cross-sectional imaging. Using the National Cancer Database, we analyzed trends in stage at presentation and overall survival for UTUCs. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed UTUCs in the renal pelvis or ureter from 2004 to 2016. Pathologic tumor stage data were available for 71.3% of patients and clinical tumor staging were available for 28.7% of patients. Five-year overall survival was analyzed comparing patients between 2004-2007 and 2008-2011. Tumor stage was categorized as early (0-1), intermediate (2-3), or late (4) for survival analyses. Linear regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were utilized. RESULTS A total of 37,210 renal pelvic and 23,200 ureteral origin UTUC cases were evaluated. Stage migration toward stage 0 and stage 4 was observed. There was a significant increase in proportion of stage 0 Ta/Tis (22.8%-33.4%, R2 = 0.86, P < .001) and stage 4 (22.3%-26.4%, R2 = 0.57, P = .003) disease for renal pelvic tumors, and a significant decrease in stages 1, 2, and 3. For UTUCs of ureteral origin, diagnosis at stage 0 Ta/Tis (37.6%-44.7%, R2 = 0.53, P = .005) and stage 4 (10.9%-14.6%, R2 = 0.63, P = .001) increased significantly, with significant reductions in stage 1 and 2. There was no difference in 5-year overall survival for ureteral or renal pelvic UTUCs for patients during 2004-2007 versus 2008-2011 when stratified by early, intermediate, or late stage. CONCLUSION There is a stage migration toward stage 0 and stage 4 disease for UTUC. Five-year survival data from 2004 to 2011 remained stable across early, intermediate, and late stage groups.
Collapse
|
46
|
Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Quhal F, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, Mori K, Motlagh RS, Rink M, D'Andrea D, Abufaraj M, Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF. Diagnostic challenges and treatment strategies in the management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Turk J Urol 2020; 47:S33-S44. [PMID: 33052841 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease, posing many challenges for the treating physician due to the lack of strong evidence-based recommendations. However, novel molecular discoveries and a better understanding of the clinical behavior of the disease lead to a continuous evolution of therapeutic landscape in UTUC. The aim of the review is to provide a comprehensive update of the current diagnostic modalities and treatment strategies in UTUC with a special focus on recent developments and challenges. A comprehensive literature search including relevant articles up to August 2020 was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed database. Despite several technological improvements, accurate staging and outcome prediction remain major challenges and hamper appropriate risk stratification. Kidney-sparing surgery can be offered in low risk UTUC; however, physician and patient must be aware of the high rate of recurrence and risk of progression due to tumor biology and understaging. The value and efficacy of intracavitary therapy in patients with UTUC remains unclear due to the lack of high-quality data. In high-risk diseases, radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision and template lymph node dissection is the standard of care. Perioperative systemic chemotherapy is today accepted as a novel standard for advanced cancers. In metastatic or unresectable disease, the therapeutic landscape is rapidly changing due to several novel agents, such as checkpoint inhibitors. While several diagnostic and treatment challenges remain, progress in endoscopic technology and molecular knowledge have ushered a new age in personalized management of UTUC. Novel accurate molecular and imaging biomarkers are, however, still needed to guide decision making as tissue acquisition remains suboptimal. Next generation sequencing and novel agents are promising to rapidly improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
[Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma]. Urologe A 2020; 59:1265-1274. [PMID: 32936335 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-020-01323-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare entity. The incidence in Germany is approximately 2/100,000 with a ratio between women and men of 1:2.5. Most clinical signs are nonspecific, which is why early diagnosis is rarely successful. Computed tomography urography in combination with diagnostic ureterorenoscopy is currently the gold standard in the diagnostics of UTUC. Regarding surgical treatment, radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with resection of a bladder cuff remains the method of choice, although the radical approach is developing towards laparoscopic/robotic or endourological procedures with preservation of kidney tissue. Due to the high recurrence rate (22-47%) of urothelial carcinoma inside the bladder, close follow-up after RNU is mandatory.
Collapse
|
48
|
Piraino JA, Snow ZA, Edwards DC, Hager S, McGreen BH, Diorio GJ. Nephroureterectomy vs. segmental ureterectomy of clinically localized, high-grade, urothelial carcinoma of the ureter: Practice patterns and outcomes. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:851.e1-851.e10. [PMID: 32859461 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nephroureterectomy (NU) remains the gold-standard for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, nephron-sparing management (NSM), specifically segmental ureterectomy (SU) for urothelial tumors distal to the renal pelvis may offer decreased risk of renal insufficiency and equivalent cancer control. OBJECTIVES To identify patient-specific and facility-related factors that are associated with the selection of SU vs. NU for patients with clinically localized, high-grade, ureteral UTUC. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS We searched the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2015 for patients with high-grade, clinically localized, primary ureteral UTUC managed by either NU or SU. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to assess patient, disease-specific, facility and treatment-related factors associated with SU vs. NU. Since surgical approach was only indexed after 2010, separate multivariable logistic regressions were performed including and excluding surgical approach in order to capture patients treated between 2004 and 2009. Survival analysis utilized Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Multivariate analysis including surgical approach demonstrated that among other factors, higher clinical stage (P = 0.034), larger tumor size (P < 0.001), the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.002), and the utilization of minimally invasive surgery (P < 0.05) decreased the likelihood of patients receiving SU. In this same cohort, institutions with larger facility volumes (P = 0.038) and performing intraoperative lymph node dissection (P < 0.001) were associated with a higher probability of SU. Excluding surgical approach, once again more advanced clinical stage (P = 0.005), larger tumor size (P < 0.001), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.003) decreased the probability of patients receiving SU, while increasing age (P = 0.049) and intraoperative lymph node dissection (P < 0.001) were more closely associated with SU compared to NU. No differences were noted in pathological T stage (P > 0.05), 30-day readmission (P = 0.7), 30-day mortality (P = 0.09), and 90-day mortality (P = 0.157) on multivariate analysis between SU and NU. Additionally, no significant differences were seen in median overall survival between patients receiving SU or NU (53 vs. 50 months; P = 0.143). CONCLUSIONS Comparable outcomes suggest segmental ureterectomy for high-grade ureteral UTUC is appropriate in well-selected patients. Practice patterns appear consistent with guideline recommendations (decreased tumor size and lower clinical stage favor SU), but treatment disparities may exist based on a multitude of patient, pathologic- and facility-related factors. Improved dissemination of knowledge regarding practice patterns and outcomes of SU for UTUC of the ureter has the potential to improve delivery of NSM in appropriate patients. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study, we examined factors associated with different surgical procedures for cancer of the ureter. We found that smaller tumor sizes, a less advanced clinical stage, intraoperative lymph dissection higher facility volumes tended to favor kidney-sparing treatment, while survival outcomes appear comparable to renal extirpation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Shaun Hager
- Main Line Health, Department of Urology, Wynnewood, PA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kenigsberg AP, Meng X, Ghandour R, Margulis V. Oncologic outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1841-1852. [PMID: 32944548 PMCID: PMC7475687 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Radical nephroureterectomy is the mainstay of surgical treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a disease which comprises approximately 5% of urothelial malignancies. Minimally-invasive and nephron-sparing interventions have been explored, although thus far have not shown comparable oncologic outcomes except in a relatively narrow set of patients. Due to the relative rarity of the disease, it has taken decades and multi-disciplinary efforts to sufficiently identify prognostic factors of oncologic outcomes. Despite these efforts, however, oncologic outcomes of nephroureterectomy have remained remarkably stable over the past 30 years. New techniques, such as laparoscopic and robotic surgery, have been applied to this procedure. High level evidence regarding equivalent oncologic outcomes is lacking and open surgery remains the standard of care for high-stage disease, although there is a role for laparoscopic and robotic nephroureterectomy. The importance of bladder cuff removal in improving oncologic outcomes has been broadly accepted, although there is no consensus as to the most oncologically appropriate technique. There does appear to be evidence that endoscopic techniques confer worse oncologic control. The role of lymphadenectomy remains controversial, although there is evidence that increased nodal yield could have oncologic benefit. Given disease heterogeneity and varied technical approaches to the procedure, no consensus standardized template has been identified. There is level 1 evidence for the use of intravesical chemotherapy peri-operatively and that this intervention can improve the risk of intravesical recurrence. Advances in systemic neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy have yielded promising results and are likely to become standard of care for patients without contraindications. Immunotherapy and targeted biologic agents are also likely to improve the surgical efficacy of radical nephroureterectomy as well. Ultimately, more high level evidence is needed to identify successful surgical and medical approaches to UTUC and multi-institutional collaboration is critical to this progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xiaosong Meng
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Rashed Ghandour
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update. Eur Urol 2020; 79:62-79. [PMID: 32593530 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 493] [Impact Index Per Article: 123.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) has prepared updated guidelines to aid clinicians in the current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate recommendations into clinical practice. OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The recommendations provided in the current guidelines are based on a thorough review of available UTUC guidelines and articles identified following a systematic search of Medline. Data on urothelial malignancies and UTUC were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, upper urinary tract carcinoma, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, and survival. References were weighted by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Owing to the rarity of UTUC, there are insufficient data to provide strong recommendations. The 2017 tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification is recommended. Recommendations are given for diagnosis and risk stratification as well as for radical and conservative treatment, and prognostic factors are discussed. A single postoperative dose of intravesical mitomycin after nephroureterectomy reduces the risk of bladder tumour recurrence. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk tumour and two functional kidneys. After radical nephroureterectomy, cisplatin-based chemotherapy is indicated in locally advanced UTUC. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to a current standardised approach. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen, based on the proposed risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, an appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.
Collapse
|