1
|
Taye BK, Gezie LD, Atnafu A, Mengiste SA, Kaasbøll J, Gullslett MK, Tilahun B. Effect of Performance-Based Nonfinancial Incentives on Data Quality in Individual Medical Records of Institutional Births: Quasi-Experimental Study. JMIR Med Inform 2024; 12:e54278. [PMID: 38578684 PMCID: PMC11031696 DOI: 10.2196/54278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the potential of routine health information systems in tackling persistent maternal deaths stemming from poor service quality at health facilities during and around childbirth, research has demonstrated their suboptimal performance, evident from the incomplete and inaccurate data unfit for practical use. There is a consensus that nonfinancial incentives can enhance health care providers' commitment toward achieving the desired health care quality. However, there is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of nonfinancial incentives in improving the data quality of institutional birth services in Ethiopia. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the effect of performance-based nonfinancial incentives on the completeness and consistency of data in the individual medical records of women who availed institutional birth services in northwest Ethiopia. METHODS We used a quasi-experimental design with a comparator group in the pre-post period, using a sample of 1969 women's medical records. The study was conducted in the "Wegera" and "Tach-armacheho" districts, which served as the intervention and comparator districts, respectively. The intervention comprised a multicomponent nonfinancial incentive, including smartphones, flash disks, power banks, certificates, and scholarships. Personal records of women who gave birth within 6 months before (April to September 2020) and after (February to July 2021) the intervention were included. Three distinct women's birth records were examined: the integrated card, integrated individual folder, and delivery register. The completeness of the data was determined by examining the presence of data elements, whereas the consistency check involved evaluating the agreement of data elements among women's birth records. The average treatment effect on the treated (ATET), with 95% CIs, was computed using a difference-in-differences model. RESULTS In the intervention district, data completeness in women's personal records was nearly 4 times higher (ATET 3.8, 95% CI 2.2-5.5; P=.02), and consistency was approximately 12 times more likely (ATET 11.6, 95% CI 4.18-19; P=.03) than in the comparator district. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that performance-based nonfinancial incentives enhance data quality in the personal records of institutional births. Health care planners can adapt these incentives to improve the data quality of comparable medical records, particularly pregnancy-related data within health care facilities. Future research is needed to assess the effectiveness of nonfinancial incentives across diverse contexts to support successful scale-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biniam Kefiyalew Taye
- Department of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
- Ministry of Health, The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Lemma Derseh Gezie
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Asmamaw Atnafu
- Department of Health System and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | | | - Jens Kaasbøll
- Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Monika Knudsen Gullslett
- Faculty of Health & Social Sciences, Science Center Health & Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Notodden, Norway
| | - Binyam Tilahun
- Department of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pritchard JE, Wilson LE, Miller SM, Greiner MA, Cohen HJ, Kaye DR, Zhang T, Dinan MA. Association between cognitive impairment and oral anticancer agent use in older patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:2330-2343. [PMID: 35499667 PMCID: PMC9378524 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney cancer is the fastest-growing cancer diagnosis in the developed world. About 16% of new cases are stage IV, which has a low five-year survival rate. Many patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are older and may have mild cognitive impairment or dementia (MCI/D). Given prior reports of patients with dementia initiating less cancer therapy and the importance of oral anticancer agents (OAAs) in mRCC treatment, we investigated the prevalence of preexisting MCI/D in patients with mRCC and their OAA use. METHODS SEER-Medicare patients were analyzed who were ≥65 years, diagnosed with mRCC between 2007 and 2015, and had Medicare part D coverage. Patterns and predictors of (a) OAA utilization within the 12 months following mRCC diagnosis and (b) adherence (percent of days covered [PDC] ≥ 80%) during the first 90 days following treatment initiation were assessed. RESULTS Of the 2792 eligible patients, 268 had preexisting MCI/D, and 907 initiated OAA treatment within 12 months of mRCC diagnosis. Patients with preexisting MCI/D were less likely to begin an OAA than those without MCI/D (fully-adjusted HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.76). Among OAA initiators, a preexisting MCI/D diagnosis did not alter the likelihood that a person would be adherent (adjusted RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.55-1.28). CONCLUSIONS Patients with preexisting MCI/D were half as likely to start an OAA during the year following mRCC diagnosis than patients without comorbid MCI/D. The 90-day adherence of OAA initiators was not significantly different between those with and without preexisting MCI/D. In light of this, clinicians should assess mRCC patients for cognitive impairment and take steps to optimize OAA utilization by those with MCI/D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Samuel M. Miller
- National Clinician Scholars Program, Yale University
- Department of Surgery, Yale University
| | | | - Harvey Jay Cohen
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University
| | | | - Tian Zhang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center
| | - Michaela A. Dinan
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van den Heuvel L, Hoefsloot W, Post B, Meinders MJ, Bloem BR, Stiggelbout AM, van Til JA. Professionals’ Treatment Preferences in the Prodromal Phase of Parkinson’s Disease: A Discrete Choice Experiment. JOURNAL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2022; 12:1655-1664. [PMID: 35527565 PMCID: PMC9398060 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-223208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: In Parkinson’s disease (PD), several disease-modifying treatments are being tested in (pre-)clinical trials. To successfully implement such treatments, it is important to have insight into factors influencing the professionals’ decision to start disease-modifying treatments in persons who are in the prodromal stage of PD. Objective: We aim to identify factors that professionals deem important in deciding to a start disease-modifying treatment in the prodromal stage of PD. Methods: We used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit preferences of neurologists and last-year neurology residents regarding treatment in the prodromal phase of PD. The DCE contained 16 hypothetical choice sets in which participants were asked to choose between two treatment options. The presented attributes included treatment effect, risk of severe side-effects, risk of mild side-effects, route of administration, and annual costs. Results: We included 64 neurologists and 18 last year neurology residents. Participants attached most importance to treatment effect and to the risk of severe side-effects. Participants indicated that they would discuss one of the presented treatments in daily practice more often in persons with a high risk of being in the prodromal phase compared to those with a moderate risk. Other important factors for deciding to start treatment included the amount of evidence supporting the putative treatment effect, the preferences of the person in the prodromal phase, and the life expectancy. Conclusion: This study provides important insights in factors that influence decision making by professionals about starting treatment in the prodromal phase of PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieneke van den Heuvel
- Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Wibe Hoefsloot
- Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bart Post
- Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marjan J. Meinders
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Centre for Quality of Healthcare, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan R. Bloem
- Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M. Stiggelbout
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Janine A. van Til
- University of Twente, Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Center, Enschede, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yan J, Wei Y, Teng Y, Liu S, Li F, Bao S, Ren Y, Chen Y. Physician Preferences and Shared-Decision Making for the Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment of Lung Cancer: A Discrete-Choice Experiment Study in China. Patient Prefer Adherence 2022; 16:1487-1497. [PMID: 35747587 PMCID: PMC9211799 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s365109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With progress being made in the treatment of cancer, various clinical and treatment options are being pursued. In China, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is used widely in the treatment of cancer. OBJECTIVE To estimate TCM treatment preferences and SDM mode of physicians in China. METHODS This study was conducted among physicians (n=185) from nine tertiary hospitals in China by discrete-choice experiment (DCE) survey and Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire-physician version (SDM-Q-Doc) survey. The DCE was developed with the inclusion of the most relevant attributes at appropriate levels for the TCM treatment of lung cancer. The empirical data analyses of physicians were performed using mixed logit models. Additionally, subgroup analysis was conducted. RESULTS In total, 185 respondents completed the questionnaire. All attributes were statistically significant except out-of-pocket costs. Physicians showed the strongest preferences for increasing disease control rate, relieving nausea and vomiting, and reducing the risk of side effects. Most of the physicians (78.38%) self-reported a high willingness to use SDM during the decision-making process. The physicians with a higher SDM-Q-Doc score had more preference for improving all three attributes than those with a lower score. Little variation was found in preferences among the physicians with other sociodemographic characteristics. CONCLUSION In China, physicians considered disease control rate as the most essential attribute in the TCM treatment of lung cancer. The physicians in China mainly preferred SDM, and the preference was different according to SDM mode when involving the TCM therapy for patients with lung cancer. The study findings could inform future TCM therapy for lung cancer and promote SDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juntao Yan
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yan Wei
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Yan Wei, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-18930749707, Email
| | - Yue Teng
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Outpatient Department of Shanghai Research Institute of Acupuncture and Meridian, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shimeng Liu
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fuming Li
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shiyi Bao
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yanfeng Ren
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yingyao Chen
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gautier G, Lucas M, Vermeulin T, Di Fiore F, Merle V. Deprived social status is associated with decreased use of oral chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study on administrative databases in a French University Hospital. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2021; 9:e00888. [PMID: 34766736 PMCID: PMC8587174 DOI: 10.1002/prp2.888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Factors associated with the choice of oral versus intravenous CT are not clearly established. Our purpose was to evaluate the influence of social status and home distance to hospital on the use of oral CT in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This retrospective single-center study included mCRC patients between 2011 and 2017. Patient social status was assessed by European Deprivation Index (EDI) and home distance to the hospital was calculated. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. One hundred and seventy-five mCRC patients were included, with 71 receiving oral CT. Most deprived patients received less oral CT (OR 0.5 [0.26, 0.96], p = .039). No association was found for road distance. Previous use of adjuvant oral CT was associated with oral CT in mCRC (OR 2.65 [1.06, 6.66], p = .038). Our results suggest that deprived social status is a factor associated with decreased use of oral CT in patients with mCRC. Clinical trial registration: no registration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwendoline Gautier
- Department of HepatogastroenterologyRouen University HospitalUNIROUENRouenFrance
| | - Mélodie Lucas
- Department of Medical InformationLe Havre HospitalLe HavreFrance
- Dynamiques et Evènements des Soins et des Parcours Research GroupRouen University HospitalUNIROUENRouenFrance
| | - Thomas Vermeulin
- Dynamiques et Evènements des Soins et des Parcours Research GroupRouen University HospitalUNIROUENRouenFrance
- CLCC H. BecquerelUnicancerRouenFrance
- LEDA‐LEGOSUniversité Paris‐DauphineParisFrance
| | - Frederic Di Fiore
- Department of HepatogastroenterologyRouen University HospitalUNIROUENRouenFrance
- CLCC H. BecquerelUnicancerRouenFrance
| | - Veronique Merle
- Dynamiques et Evènements des Soins et des Parcours Research GroupRouen University HospitalUNIROUENRouenFrance
- Inserm U1086 ANTICIPECaenFrance
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Collacott H, Soekhai V, Thomas C, Brooks A, Brookes E, Lo R, Mulnick S, Heidenreich S. A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Oncology Treatments. THE PATIENT 2021; 14:775-790. [PMID: 33950476 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00520-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the number and type of cancer treatments available rises and patients live with the consequences of their disease and treatments for longer, understanding preferences for cancer care can help inform decisions about optimal treatment development, access, and care provision. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are commonly used as a tool to elicit stakeholder preferences; however, their implementation in oncology may be challenging if burdensome trade-offs (e.g. length of life versus quality of life) are involved and/or target populations are small. OBJECTIVES The aim of this review was to characterise DCEs relating to cancer treatments that were conducted between 1990 and March 2020. DATA SOURCES EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for relevant studies. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Studies were included if they implemented a DCE and reported outcomes of interest (i.e. quantitative outputs on participants' preferences for cancer treatments), but were excluded if they were not focused on pharmacological, radiological or surgical treatments (e.g. cancer screening or counselling services), were non-English, or were a secondary analysis of an included study. ANALYSIS METHODS Analysis followed a narrative synthesis, and quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics, including rankings of attribute importance. RESULT Seventy-nine studies were included in the review. The number of published DCEs relating to oncology grew over the review period. Studies were conducted in a range of indications (n = 19), most commonly breast (n =10, 13%) and prostate (n = 9, 11%) cancer, and most studies elicited preferences of patients (n = 59, 75%). Across reviewed studies, survival attributes were commonly ranked as most important, with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) ranked most important in 58% and 28% of models, respectively. Preferences varied between stakeholder groups, with patients and clinicians placing greater importance on survival outcomes, and general population samples valuing health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Despite the emphasis of guidelines on the importance of using qualitative research to inform attribute selection and DCE designs, reporting on instrument development was mixed. LIMITATIONS No formal assessment of bias was conducted, with the scope of the paper instead providing a descriptive characterisation. The review only included DCEs relating to cancer treatments, and no insight is provided into other health technologies such as cancer screening. Only DCEs were included. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Although there was variation in attribute importance between responder types, survival attributes were consistently ranked as important by both patients and clinicians. Observed challenges included the risk of attribute dominance for survival outcomes, limited sample sizes in some indications, and a lack of reporting about instrument development processes. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020184232.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Collacott
- Evidera, The Ark, 2nd Floor, 201 Talgarth Road, London, W6 8BJ, UK.
| | - Vikas Soekhai
- Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caitlin Thomas
- Evidera, The Ark, 2nd Floor, 201 Talgarth Road, London, W6 8BJ, UK
| | - Anne Brooks
- Evidera, 7101 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1400, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA
| | - Ella Brookes
- Evidera, The Ark, 2nd Floor, 201 Talgarth Road, London, W6 8BJ, UK
| | - Rachel Lo
- Evidera, The Ark, 2nd Floor, 201 Talgarth Road, London, W6 8BJ, UK
| | - Sarah Mulnick
- Evidera, 7101 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1400, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Havrilesky LJ, Scott AL, Davidson BA, Secord AA, Yang JC, Johnson FR, Gonzalez JM, Reed SD. The preferences of women with ovarian cancer for oral versus intravenous recurrence regimens. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:440-446. [PMID: 34053748 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess preferences of women with ovarian cancer regarding features of available anti-cancer regimens for platinum-resistant, biomarker-positive disease, with an emphasis on oral PARP inhibitor and standard intravenous (IV) chemotherapy regimens. METHODS A discrete-choice-experiment preferences survey was designed, tested, and administered to women with ovarian cancer, with 11 pairs of treatment profiles defined using seven attributes (levels/ranges): regimen (oral daily, IV weekly, IV monthly); probability of progression-free (PFS) at 6 months (40%-60%); probability of PFS at 2 years (10%-20%); nausea (none, moderate); peripheral neuropathy (none, mild, moderate); memory problems (none, mild); and total out-of-pocket cost ($0 to $10,000). RESULTS Of 123 participants, 38% had experienced recurrence, 25% were currently receiving chemotherapy, and 18% were currently taking a PARP inhibitor. Given attributes and levels, the relative importance weights (sum 100) were: 2-year PFS, 28; cost, 27; 6-month PFS, 19; neuropathy,14; memory problems, nausea, and regimen, all ≤5. To accept moderate neuropathy, participants required a 49% (versus 40%) chance of PFS at 6 months or 14% (versus 10%) chance at 2 years. Given a 3-way choice where PFS and cost were equal, 49% preferred a monthly IV regimen causing mild memory problems, 47% preferred an oral regimen causing moderate nausea, and 4% preferred a weekly IV regimen causing mild memory and mild neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS These findings challenge the assumption that oral anti-cancer therapies are universally preferred by patients and demonstrate that there is no "one size fits all" regimen that is preferable to women with ovarian cancer when considering recurrence treatment regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J Havrilesky
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Amelia L Scott
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Brittany A Davidson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Angeles Alvarez Secord
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Jui-Chen Yang
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - F Reed Johnson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Juan Marcos Gonzalez
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Shelby D Reed
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Implementation of pharmacist-managed early switch from intravenous to oral therapy using electronic identification at a tertiary academic hospital. Saudi Pharm J 2021; 29:324-336. [PMID: 33994827 PMCID: PMC8093584 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2021.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Overutilization of intravenous (IV) medications can result in drug shortages, which is one of the major health care crisis, in addition to increasing costs, length of hospital stays (LOS) and the associated complications. We hypothesized that IV therapy was overused at our hospital where oral (PO) was applicable, and that the implementation of IV-PO protocol could result in a cost-effective practice. Hence, we aimed at assessing impact and outcomes of implementing such a protocol. A single center, prospective quasi-interventional study conducted at tertiary academic hospital. A protocol was implemented targeting 17 medications, with educational sessions to medical staff during a 5-month phase. IV orders of 48 h or more, among adult patients at medical or surgical wards with no contraindication to PO route were eligible. Once eligible, pharmacists send interventions using hospital's computerized order entry system, and physicians' responses were monitored on daily basis. Efficacy was estimated by percentage of switch recommendations that resulted in effective switch to PO medication. Cost-minimization analysis was used for course cost between the control phase and intervention phase. Length of hospital stay (LOS), readmissions within 90 days and in-hospital mortality were analyzed as secondary outcomes. During intervention phase, 781 patients had at least one IV order switched to PO. Gastric acid-reducing agents (GARAs) accounted for the most IV prescriptions (50.4%), followed by antibiotics (39.6%). Pharmacists carried out 2677 interventions to which switch recommendations were issued in 1185 (44.3%). Primary switch recommendations (N = 677) led to effective switch in 60.7% cases. These included per protocol switch (8.9%), switch to another PO (2.5%), spontaneous switch by physician (17.6%) and IV discontinuation (31.8%). The overall efficacy was estimated as 62.8%. The intervention was associated with reduced IV consumption from 4,574-18,597 vials in control phase to 3,654-15,546 vials in intervention phase, which resulted in overall cost saving of 50,960.8 SAR ($13,589.5), with an average monthly cost saving of 10,192.2 SAR ($2,717.9). Pharmacist-managed early switch from IV-PO therapy, with physicians' education, showed significant reduction in IV medication use in our hospital. By reducing unnecessary IV use, this strategy enabled considerable cost savings, besides the potential advantages of convenience and safety.
Collapse
|
9
|
Feinberg B, Hime S, Wojtynek J, Dokubo I, Gajra A, Smith Y, Kish J. Physician treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in the immuno-oncology era: a discrete choice experiment. Future Oncol 2020; 16:2713-2722. [PMID: 32954797 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: Guidelines list atezolizumab with nab-paclitaxel (ANP) as the preferred first-line (1L) therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) with PD-L1 expression ≥1%, but which clinical attributes impact ANP prescribing? Materials & methods: Medical oncologists participated in a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with four hypothetical mTNBC clinical scenarios to assess influences of: PD-L1 expression, menopausal status, prior adjuvant therapy and bulky liver metastases. Results: A total of 47% chose ANP in 1L irrespective of menopausal status, prior adjuvant therapy or tumor bulk. PD-L1 expression was the only attribute with a significant impact on ANP preference, with 69% choosing ANP for those with ≥1% expression versus only 26% for those with <1% (p < 0.00001). Conclusion: ANP choice for 1L mTNBC deviated from guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce Feinberg
- Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions Dublin, OH 60173, USA
| | - Skyler Hime
- Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions Dublin, OH 60173, USA
| | | | | | - Ajeet Gajra
- Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions Dublin, OH 60173, USA
| | - Yolaine Smith
- Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions Dublin, OH 60173, USA
| | - Jonathan Kish
- Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions Dublin, OH 60173, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Santoleri F, Romagnoli A, Costantini A. Real-life adherence in capecitabine therapy using two analysis methods and persistence after 6 months of treatment. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020; 27:1112-1118. [PMID: 32799777 DOI: 10.1177/1078155220949634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Medication adherence in the field of Oncology is crucial in therapy management and can influence the probability of achieving and maintaining efficacy over time. We conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate adherence and persistence to oral therapy with Capecitabine, using two different calculation methods: therapy diary and indirect prescription refilling patterns. The main objective of the study was to compare the two methods of analysis and to propose a reliable adherence datum, yielded by the application of two complementary methodologies. We consequently set out to verify if data collected from therapy diaries can be superimposed to those gathered from prescription refilling patterns. Furthermore, we included data on patient-perceived quality in relation to Capecitabine therapy, as well as adverse reactions and their duration. Of 594 patients who used the study drug as of January 1, 2012, 45 completed their therapy diary. Adherence to treatment was 0.93 ± 0.10 and 0.84 ± 0.15, calculated using therapy diaries and pharmacy refill data, respectively. In terms of persistence, 53% of patients continued with treatment after six months of therapy. On a 1 to 5 scale, perceived quality was 3.31. In conclusion, when it comes to calculating adherence, it is important to preserve the objectivity of the method, which must be unencumbered by any conditioning. Regardless of the method, also considering what has already been discussed in the available literature, adherence in patients under treatment with Capecitabine, unlike persistence, is good.
Collapse
|
11
|
Roosendaal J, Groenland SL, Rosing H, Lucas L, Venekamp N, Nuijen B, Huitema ADR, Beijnen JH, Steeghs N. Determination of the absolute bioavailability of oral imatinib using a stable isotopically labeled intravenous imatinib-d8 microdose. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 76:1075-1082. [PMID: 32430518 PMCID: PMC7351863 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-020-02888-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to ascertain whether the absolute bioavailability of oral imatinib (Glivec®) during steady state plasma pharmacokinetics in cancer patients could be determined through a concomitant intravenous administration of a single 100 μg microdose of deuterium labeled imatinib (imatinib-d8). Secondly, the usefulness of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was investigated for simultaneous analysis of orally and intravenously administered imatinib. METHODS Included patients were on a stable daily dose of 400 mg oral imatinib prior to study participation. On day 1, patients received a 100 μg intravenous imatinib-d8 microdose 2.5 h after intake of the oral dose. Plasma samples were collected for 48 h. Imatinib and imatinib-d8 concentrations were simultaneously quantified using a validated LC-MS/MS assay. The absolute bioavailability was calculated by comparing the dose-normalized exposure with unlabeled and stable isotopically labeled imatinib in plasma. RESULTS A total of six patients were enrolled. All patients had a history of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). The median absolute bioavailability of oral imatinib at steady state was 76% (range 44-106%). Imatinib and imatinib-d8 plasma concentrations were quantified in all collected plasma samples, with no samples below the limit of quantification for imatinib-d8. CONCLUSION The absolute bioavailability of imatinib was successfully estimated at steady state plasma pharmacokinetics using the stable isotopically labeled microdose trial design. This study exhibits the use of a stable isotopically labeled intravenous microdose to determine the absolute bioavailability of an oral anticancer agent in patients with LC-MS/MS as the analytical tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen Roosendaal
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Stefanie L Groenland
- Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hilde Rosing
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luc Lucas
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nikkie Venekamp
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan Nuijen
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alwin D R Huitema
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jos H Beijnen
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Neeltje Steeghs
- Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sun H, Wang H, Shi L, Wang M, Li J, Shi J, Ni M, Hu X, Chen Y. Physician preferences for chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in China: evidence from multicentre discrete choice experiments. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e032336. [PMID: 32051302 PMCID: PMC7045216 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate physician risk-benefit preferences and trade-offs when making chemotherapy decisions for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). DESIGN A discrete choice experiment (DCE). SETTINGS Tertiary hospitals in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Chengdu of China. PARTICIPANTS The participants were 184 physicians (mean age of 37 years) with more than 1 year of NSCLC chemotherapy practice. OUTCOMES The DCE survey was constructed by six attributes: progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), risk of moderate side effects, risk of severe side effects, mode of administration and out-of-pocket costs. Physicians' relative preferences and trade-offs in patient out-of-pocket costs for each attribute level were estimated using a mixed logit model, and interaction terms were added to the model to assess preferences variation among physicians with different sociodemographic factors. RESULTS Physicians had the strongest preferences for improvements in PFS, followed by reducing the risk of severe side effects. The DCR, risk of moderate side effects and mode of administration were ranked in decreasing order of importance. There was little variation in preferences among physicians with different sociodemographic characteristics. Physicians were willing to trade $4814 (95% CI $4149 to $5480) of patient out-of-pocket costs per month for a chemotherapy that guaranteed 11 months of PFS, followed by $1908 (95% CI $1227 to $2539) for reducing the risk of severe side effects to 2%. CONCLUSIONS With regard to chemotherapy for patients with NSCLC, prolonging PFS, reducing severe and moderate side effects were primary considerations for physicians in China. The mode of administration and treatment costs significantly influenced physicians' therapeutic decision. The current findings could add some evidence to inform NSCLC chemotherapy implementation and promote shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Sun
- Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Health Technology Assessment Research, Shanghai Health Development Research Center, Shanghai Medical Information Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Huishan Wang
- The Second Clinical Medical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lizheng Shi
- Health Systems Analytics Research Center, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Meifeng Wang
- Department of Health Technology Assessment Research, Shanghai Health Development Research Center, Shanghai Medical Information Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Junling Li
- Department of Oncology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jufang Shi
- Department of Oncology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Ni
- Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianzhi Hu
- Department of Human Resource, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yingyao Chen
- Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ciruelos EM, Díaz MN, Isla MD, López R, Bernabé R, González E, Cirauqui B, Coves J, Morales S, Arcediano A, Barneto I, Cerezuela P, Illarramendi JJ, Morales C, Ponce S. Patient preference for oral chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast and lung cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e13164. [PMID: 31571304 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although new therapies against metastatic cancer have been developed in recent decades, chemotherapy is still an important treatment option. Prolonged treatment and side-effects are often discouraging for patients, and in many cases, therapy is only palliative, not curative. This study explores patient preference for oral or intravenous (IV) chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast or lung cancer. METHODS It is a descriptive, open label, multicentre, nation-wide study, in which a 16-item questionnaire consisting of single-choice questions scored on a 5-point Likert scale was administered to patients in a single visit, and another 11-item questionnaire was self-administered by the patient's oncologist. RESULTS A total of 131 breast and lung cancer specialists at 64 hospitals enrolled 412 patients (lung cancer = 161; breast cancer = 251). To be eligible, patients must have already received IV therapy and at least 2 cycles of oral chemotherapy. Most (77%) patients expressed preference for oral therapy. Most considered their daily life was less disrupted with tablets (70.4%), had no trouble swallowing them (86.9%), and were not concerned about forgetting to take them (56.8%). Half (56.3%) were worried about problems related to drug infusion with IV therapy, 61.7% were concerned about nurses failing to find a suitable vein, and 63.1% were dissatisfied with hospital waiting times. A uniform response was obtained from both samples of patients. CONCLUSION Convenience, ease of administration, fewer side effects and better quality of life tilt the balance towards oral drug administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rafael López
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Reyes Bernabé
- Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | | | | | - Juan Coves
- Hospital Universitari Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Pablo Cerezuela
- Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mauro M, De Grandis RA, Campos ML, Bauermeister A, Peccinini RG, Pavan FR, Lopes NP, De Moraes NV. Acid diterpenes from Copaiba oleoresin (Copaifera langsdorffii): Chemical and plasma stability and intestinal permeability using Caco-2 cells. JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY 2019; 235:183-189. [PMID: 30763698 DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE Copaiba oleoresin has been used in folk medicine in the treatment of bronchitis, syphilis, skin diseases and ulcers due to its anti-inflammatory and antiseptic activities, but there is no information about major compounds oral absorption to support the traditional use. AIM OF STUDY Considering the potential of copalic (CA) and kaurenoic acid (KA) - major biological activity (in vitro) diterpenes found in the oleoresin, this study aimed to evaluate the intestinal permeability of CA and KA using Caco-2 cells model as predictive test for oral drug absorption. MATERIALS AND METHODS Chemical stability at pH 1.2 and 7.4 and plasma stability were evaluated to mimic physiological conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. The intestinal permeability of CA and KA was evaluated in Caco-2 cells in the presence and absence of the P-glycoprotein inhibitor verapamil. RESULTS CA and KA were rapidly degraded at pH 1.2 (0.2 M Clark-Lubs buffer). At pH 7.4 (0.1 M phosphate buffer), CA was stable for up to 24 h and KA for up to 6 h. In human plasma, CA and KA can be considered stable for 24 h and 12 h at 37 °C, respectively. Caco-2 cells were considered viable when incubated with CA or KA in the range of 3.9-250 μM for 24 h. CA and KA exhibited moderate apparent permeability (Papp) of 4.67 (±0.08) × 10-6 cm/s and 4.66 (±0.04) × 10-6 cm/s, respectively. Simultaneous incubation with verapamil showed that P-glycoprotein does not play a relevant role on CA and KA oral absorption, with Papp of 4.48 (±0.26) × 10-6 cm/s and 5.37 (±0.72) × 10-6 cm/s observed for CA and KA, respectively. CONCLUSION The oral absorption of both CA and KA is driven by mainly passive permeability, is not limited by p-glycoprotein, but enteric-coated dosage forms should be used to avoid chemical instability in the gastric pH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Mauro
- São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, SP ZIP 14801-902, Brazil.
| | - R A De Grandis
- São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, SP ZIP 14801-902, Brazil.
| | - M L Campos
- Federal University of Mato Grosso, Sinop, MT, Brazil.
| | - A Bauermeister
- University of Sao Paulo (USP), NPPNS, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, SP ZIP 14040-903, Brazil.
| | - R G Peccinini
- São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, SP ZIP 14801-902, Brazil.
| | - F R Pavan
- São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, SP ZIP 14801-902, Brazil.
| | - N P Lopes
- University of Sao Paulo (USP), NPPNS, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, SP ZIP 14040-903, Brazil.
| | - N V De Moraes
- São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, SP ZIP 14801-902, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yé M, Tapsoba C, Zabré P, Diboulo E, Sanou A, Kagoné M, Millogo O, Sié A, Nebié E, Congo C, Soenen C, Zampaligré F. [Determinants of the choice of healthcare worker positions in rural areas in Burkina Faso.]. SANTE PUBLIQUE 2019; S1:113-125. [PMID: 30066538 DOI: 10.3917/spub.180.0113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2014, in Burkina Faso, more than 60% of healthcare workers were working in urban areas to the detriment of rural areas. The two largest cities concentrated the majority of healthcare workers, while these cities represent only 10% of the population. This study was designed to identify incentive strategies that could enable more equitable deployment of healthcare workers. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was carried out in 2016 in six health regions in Burkina Faso. Key informant interviews were conducted to determine the factors influencing the choice of jobs. The results were used to construct job packages useful for the discrete choice experiment survey.Levels of preferences for 1,173 health workers for incentive packages linked to the job were explored by means of electronic questionnaire data collection.Sawtooth software was used to develop and randomize job pairing preferences proposed to healthcare workers. STATA14 software was used for mixed-logit analysis. RESULTS The determinants to promote more equitable deployment and maintenance of health workers in their workplace include access to good accommodation, on-job training, responsibility, and improved salaries.In terms of acceptability of deployment, more than 75% (p-value < 0.001) of workers would agree to be redeployed in rural areas if the above conditions were met. CONCLUSION Adequate and sustainable human resource development strategies should be set up by policymakers in order to improve the maintenance of healthcare workers in rural areas.
Collapse
|
16
|
Al Kadour A, Marridi WA, Al-Badriyeh D. Pharmacoeconomics Evaluations of Oral Anticancer Agents: Systematic Review of Characteristics, Methodological Trends, and Reporting Quality. Value Health Reg Issues 2018; 16:46-60. [PMID: 30144775 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Revised: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To review literature characteristics, describe methodological trends, and assess the reporting quality of the economic evaluations of oral anticancer drugs (OACDs). METHODS The review included comparative economic evaluations of OACDs. The search was conducted via PubMed, Embase, EconLit, and Economic Evaluation Database, and studies till December 2017 were included. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist, literature inclusion and data extraction were performed in duplicate by separate investigators. Outcome measures were literature characteristics, gaps and methodological trends, and reporting quality using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist. Data were summarized on the basis of methodological themes of interest. Descriptive statistics and tabulations were used for result presentation. RESULTS Out of 241 found articles, 21 were included. There is a recent increasing interest in the economics of OACDs, whereby the cost per quality-adjusted life-year, via cost-utility analysis, is the most used for decision making. Most of the studies were from the payer perspective, and the primary sources of data were clinical trials, expert panels, and medical charts. The dominance status (higher effect, lower cost) was a commonly reported outcome. Decision-analytic modeling was used in most of the studies, mostly including Markov modeling. Studies were highly heterogeneous in methodological aspects, and the included studies did not meet most of the reporting quality criteria. CONCLUSIONS High heterogeneity in methods in studies may limit the robustness and transferability of results, potentially misleading decision makers toward wrong decisions on OACDs. The transferability and generalizability of results are further limited by a "less than ideal" adherence to current reporting standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wafa Al Marridi
- College of Pharmacy, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar; Pharmacy Department, Sidra Medical and Research Centre, Doha, Qatar
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tetteh EK, Morris S, Titcheneker-Hooker N. Discrete-choice modelling of patient preferences for modes of drug administration. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2017; 7:26. [PMID: 28752223 PMCID: PMC5532178 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-017-0162-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Accepted: 07/03/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The administration of (biologically-derived) drugs for various disease conditions involves consumption of resources that constitutes a direct monetary cost to healthcare payers and providers. An often ignored cost relates to a mismatch between patients' preferences and the mode of drug administration. The "intangible" benefits of giving patients what they want in terms of the mode of drug delivery is seldom considered. This study aims to evaluate, in monetary terms, end-user preferences for the non-monetary attributes of different modes of drug administration using a discrete-choice experiment. It provides empirical support to the notion that there are significant benefits from developing patient-friendly approaches to drug delivery. The gross benefits per patient per unit administration is in the same order of magnitude as the savings in resource costs of administering drugs. The study argues that, as long as the underlying manufacturing science is capable, a patient-centred approach to producing drug delivery systems should be encouraged and pursued.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Steve Morris
- University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Breast cancer oral anti-cancer medication adherence: a systematic review of psychosocial motivators and barriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 165:247-260. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4317-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2017] [Accepted: 05/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
19
|
González JM, Ogale S, Morlock R, Posner J, Hauber B, Sommer N, Grothey A. Patient and physician preferences for anticancer drugs for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a discrete-choice experiment. Cancer Manag Res 2017; 9:149-158. [PMID: 28490902 PMCID: PMC5414575 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s125245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Many publications describe preferences for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening; however, few studies elicited preferences for anticancer-drug treatment for metastatic CRC (mCRC). This study was designed to elicit preferences and risk tolerance among patients and oncologists in the USA for anticancer drugs to treat mCRC. Materials and methods Patients aged 18 years or older with a self-reported diagnosis of mCRC and board-certified (or equivalent) oncologists who had treated patients with mCRC were recruited by two survey research companies from existing online patient panels in the USA. Additional oncologists were recruited from a list of US physicians. Patients and oncologists completed a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) survey. DCEs offer a systematic method of eliciting preferences and quantifying both the relative importance of treatment attributes and the tradeoffs respondents are willing to make among benefits and risks. Treatment attributes in the DCE were progression-free survival (PFS) and risks of severe papulopustular rash, serious hemorrhage, cardiopulmonary arrest, and gastrointestinal perforation. Patients’ and physicians’ maximum levels of acceptable treatment-related risks for two prespecified increases in efficacy were estimated. Results A total of 127 patients and 150 oncologists completed the survey. Relative preferences for the treatment attributes in the study were mostly consistent with the expectation that better clinical outcomes were preferred over worse clinical outcomes. Risk tolerance varied between patients and physicians. On average, physicians were willing to tolerate higher risks than patients, although these differences were mostly not statistically significant. Post hoc latent-class analyses revealed that some patients and physicians were unwilling to forgo any efficacy to avoid toxicities, while others were willing to make such tradeoffs. Conclusion Differences in preferences between patients and physicians suggest that there is the potential for improvement in patients’ well-being. Initiating or enhancing discussions about patient tolerance for toxicities, such as skin rash and gastrointestinal perforations, may help prescribe treatments that entail more appropriate benefit–risk tradeoffs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Marcos González
- Health Preference Assessment Department, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC
| | | | | | - Joshua Posner
- Health Preference Assessment Department, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Brett Hauber
- Health Preference Assessment Department, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC
| | | | - Axel Grothey
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tetteh EK, Morris S, Titchener-Hooker N. Estimating preferences for modes of drug administration: The case of US healthcare professionals. Res Social Adm Pharm 2017; 14:86-95. [PMID: 28279612 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2017] [Accepted: 02/04/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are hidden drug administration costs that arise from a mismatch between end-user preferences and how manufacturers choose to formulate their drug products for delivery to patients. The corollary of this is: there are "intangible benefits" from considering end-user preferences in manufacturing patient-friendly medicines. It is important then to have some idea of what pharmaceutical manufacturers should consider in making patient-friendly medicines and of the magnitude of the indirect benefits from doing so. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate preferences of healthcare professionals in the US for the non-monetary attributes of different modes of drug administration. It uses these preference orderings to compute a monetary valuation of the indirect benefits from making patient-friendly medicines. METHODS A survey collected choice preferences of a sample of 210 healthcare professionals in the US for two unlabelled drug options. These drugs were identical except in the levels of attributes of drug administration. Using the choice data collected, statistical models were estimated to compute gross welfare benefits, measured by the expected compensating variation, from making drugs in a more patient-friendly manner. RESULTS The monetary value of end-user benefits from developing patient-friendly drug delivery systems is: (1) as large as the annual acquisition costs per full treatment episode for some biologic drugs; and (2) likely to fall in the "high end" of the distribution of the direct monetary costs of drug administration. CONCLUSIONS An examination of end-user preferences should help manufacturers make more effective and efficient use of limited resources for innovations in drug delivery system, or manufacturing research in general.
Collapse
|
21
|
Herbrink M, Schellens JHM, Beijnen JH, Nuijen B. Inherent formulation issues of kinase inhibitors. J Control Release 2016; 239:118-27. [PMID: 27578098 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.08.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2016] [Revised: 08/24/2016] [Accepted: 08/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The small molecular Kinase Inhibitor (smKI) drug class is very promising and rapidly expanding. All of these drugs are administered orally. The clear relationship between structure and function has led to drugs with a general low intrinsic solubility. The majority of the commercial pharmaceutical formulations of the smKIs are physical mixtures that are limited by the low drug solubility of a salt form. This class of drugs is therefore characterized by an impaired and variable bioavailability rendering them costly and their therapies suboptimal. New formulations are sparingly being reported in literature and patents. The presented data suggests that continued research into formulation design can help to develop more efficient and cost-effective smKI formulation. Moreover, it may also be of help in the future design of the formulations of new smKIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Herbrink
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Louwesweg 6, 1006 BK Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - J H M Schellens
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Louwesweg 6, 1006 BK Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J H Beijnen
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Louwesweg 6, 1006 BK Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Nuijen
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Louwesweg 6, 1006 BK Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Broom J, Broom A, Adams K, Plage S. What prevents the intravenous to oral antibiotic switch? A qualitative study of hospital doctors' accounts of what influences their clinical practice. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016; 71:2295-9. [PMID: 27121400 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkw129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2015] [Accepted: 03/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Escalating antimicrobial resistance worldwide necessitates urgent optimization of antimicrobial prescribing to preserve antibiotics for future generations. Early intravenous (iv) to oral switch campaigns are one strategy that hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship programmes can incorporate to minimize inappropriate antibiotic use. Yet, iv antibiotics continue to be offered for longer than is clinically indicated, increasing hospital length of stay, increasing costs and placing patients at risk (e.g. cannula-related infections). This study aims to identify why this inappropriate prescribing trend continues. METHODS Twenty doctors (9 females and 11 males) working at a teaching hospital in north-east England participated in semi-structured interviews about their experiences of antibiotic use. NVivo10 software was used to conduct a thematic content analysis of the full interview transcripts driven by the framework approach. Results are reported according to COREQ guidelines. RESULTS Decisions around the choice of iv over oral antibiotics were influenced by three key issues: (i) consumerism, i.e. participants were concerned about the risk of litigation or complaints if patient expectations were not met; (ii) hierarchy of the medical team structure limited opportunities for de-escalation of antibiotics; and (iii) iv antibiotics were perceived as more potent and having significant mythical qualities, which participants acknowledged were not necessarily evidence based. CONCLUSIONS The iv to oral switch interventions should tailor strategies to demystify iv versus oral antibiotic efficacy, engage consumers around the negative effects of iv antibiotic overuse and examine strategies to streamline team decision-making. Addressing these issues has the potential to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use and resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Broom
- Department of Medicine, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, PO Box 547, Nambour, QLD 5470, Australia The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Alex Broom
- School of Social Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Kate Adams
- Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust, Kingston upon Hull HU3 2JZ, UK
| | - Stefanie Plage
- School of Social Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chen TT, Lai MS, Chung KP. Participating physician preferences regarding a pay-for-performance incentive design: a discrete choice experiment. Int J Qual Health Care 2015; 28:40-6. [PMID: 26660443 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/17/2015] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether the magnitude of incentives or other design attributes should be prioritized and the most important attributes, according to physicians, of the diabetes P4P (pay-for-performance) program design. DESIGN We implemented a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit the P4P incentive design-related preferences of physicians. PARTICIPANTS All of the physicians (n = 248) who participated in the diabetes P4P program located in the supervisory area of the northern regional branch of the Bureau of National Health Insurance in 2009 were included. The response rate was ∼ 60%. RESULTS Our research found that the bonus type of incentive was the most important attribute, followed by the incentive structure and the investment magnitude. CONCLUSIONS Physicians may feel that good P4P designs are more important than the magnitude of the investment by the insurer. The two most important P4P designs include providing the bonus type of incentive and using pay-for-excellence plus pay-for-improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung-Tai Chen
- Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Mei-Shu Lai
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Kuo-Piao Chung
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Room 635, No 17, Hsuchow Rd, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Herbrink M, Nuijen B, Schellens JHM, Beijnen JH. Variability in bioavailability of small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer Treat Rev 2015; 41:412-22. [PMID: 25818541 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2015] [Revised: 03/11/2015] [Accepted: 03/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitors (smTKIs) are in the centre of the very quickly expanding area of personalized chemotherapy and oral applicability thereof. The number of drugs in this class is rapidly growing, with twenty current approvals by both the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The drugs are, however, generally characterized by a poor oral, and thus variable, bioavailability. This results in significant variation in plasma levels and exposure. The cause is a complex interplay of factors, including poor aqueous solubility, issued permeability, membrane transport and enzymatic metabolism. Additionally, food and drug-drug interactions can play a significant role. The issues related with an impaired bioavailability generally receive little attention. To the best of our knowledge, this article is the first to provide an overview of the factors that determine the bioavailability of the smTKIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maikel Herbrink
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Louwesweg 6, 1006 BK Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Bastiaan Nuijen
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Louwesweg 6, 1006 BK Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan H M Schellens
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Louwesweg 6, 1006 BK Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jos H Beijnen
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Louwesweg 6, 1006 BK Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Oldenkamp R, Huijbregts MAJ, Hollander A, Ragas AMJ. Environmental impact assessment of pharmaceutical prescriptions: Does location matter? CHEMOSPHERE 2014; 115:88-94. [PMID: 24508156 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2013] [Revised: 12/11/2013] [Accepted: 01/06/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
A methodology was developed for the assessment and comparison of the environmental impact of two alternative pharmaceutical prescriptions. This methodology provides physicians with the opportunity to include environmental considerations in their choice of prescription. A case study with the two antibiotics ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin at three locations throughout Europe showed that the preference for a pharmaceutical might show spatial variation, i.e. comparison of two pharmaceuticals might yield different results when prescribed at different locations. This holds when the comparison is based on both the impact on the aquatic environment and the impact on human health. The relative impacts of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin on human health were largely determined by the local handling of secondary sludge, agricultural disposal practices, the extent of secondary sewage treatment, and local food consumption patterns. The relative impacts of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin on the aquatic environment were mostly explained by the presence of specific sewage treatment techniques, as effluents from sewage treatment plants (STPs) are the most relevant emission pathway for the aquatic environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rik Oldenkamp
- Department of Environmental Science, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Mark A J Huijbregts
- Department of Environmental Science, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Hollander
- Department of Environmental Science, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Ecological Risk Assessment, National Institute for Public Health and The Environment, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ad M J Ragas
- Department of Environmental Science, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Clark MD, Determann D, Petrou S, Moro D, de Bekker-Grob EW. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2014; 32:883-902. [PMID: 25005924 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 512] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly used in health economics to address a wide range of health policy-related concerns. OBJECTIVE Broadly adopting the methodology of an earlier systematic review of health-related DCEs, which covered the period 2001-2008, we report whether earlier trends continued during 2009-2012. METHODS This paper systematically reviews health-related DCEs published between 2009 and 2012, using the same database as the earlier published review (PubMed) to obtain citations, and the same range of search terms. RESULTS A total of 179 health-related DCEs for 2009-2012 met the inclusion criteria for the review. We found a continuing trend towards conducting DCEs across a broader range of countries. However, the trend towards including fewer attributes was reversed, whilst the trend towards interview-based DCEs reversed because of increased computer administration. The trend towards using more flexible econometric models, including mixed logit and latent class, has also continued. Reporting of monetary values has fallen compared with earlier periods, but the proportion of studies estimating trade-offs between health outcomes and experience factors, or valuing outcomes in terms of utility scores, has increased, although use of odds ratios and probabilities has declined. The reassuring trend towards the use of more flexible and appropriate DCE designs and econometric methods has been reinforced by the increased use of qualitative methods to inform DCE processes and results. However, qualitative research methods are being used less often to inform attribute selection, which may make DCEs more susceptible to omitted variable bias if the decision framework is not known prior to the research project. CONCLUSIONS The use of DCEs in healthcare continues to grow dramatically, as does the scope of applications across an expanding range of countries. There is increasing evidence that more sophisticated approaches to DCE design and analytical techniques are improving the quality of final outputs. That said, recent evidence that the use of qualitative methods to inform attribute selection has declined is of concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Clark
- Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Weernink MGM, Janus SIM, van Til JA, Raisch DW, van Manen JG, IJzerman MJ. A Systematic Review to Identify the Use of Preference Elicitation Methods in Healthcare Decision Making. Pharmaceut Med 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s40290-014-0059-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
28
|
Benjamin L, Buthion V, Vidal-Trécan G, Briot P. Impact of the healthcare payment system on patient access to oral anticancer drugs: an illustration from the French and United States contexts. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14:274. [PMID: 24950778 PMCID: PMC4082413 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2013] [Accepted: 06/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Oral anticancer drugs (OADs) allow treating a growing range of cancers. Despite their convenience, their acceptance by healthcare professionals and patients may be affected by medical, economical and organizational factors. The way the healthcare payment system (HPS) reimburses OADs or finances hospital activities may impact patients’ access to such drugs. We discuss how the HPS in France and USA may generate disincentives to the use of OADs in certain circumstances. Discussion French public and private hospitals are financed by National Health Insurance (NHI) according to the nature and volume of medical services provided annually. Patients receiving intravenous anticancer drugs (IADs) in a hospital setting generate services, while those receiving OADs shift a part of service provision from the hospital to the community. In 2013, two million outpatient IADs sessions were performed, representing a cost of €815 million to the NHI, but positive contribution margin of €86 million to hospitals. Substitution of IADs by OADs mechanically induces a shortfall in hospital income related to hospitalizations. Such economic constraints may partially contribute to making physicians reluctant to prescribe OADs. In the US healthcare system, coverage for OADs is less favorable than coverage for injectable anticancer drugs. In 2006, a Cancer Drug Coverage Parity Act was adopted by several states in order to provide patients with better coverage for OADs. Nonetheless, the complexity of reimbursement systems and multiple reimbursement channels from private insurance represent real economic barriers which may prevent patients with low income being treated with OADs. From an organizational perspective, in both countries the use of OADs generates additional activities related to physician consultations, therapeutic education and healthcare coordination between hospitals and community settings, which are not considered in the funding of hospitals activities so far. Summary Funding of healthcare services is a critical factor influencing in part the choice of cancer treatments and this is expected to become increasingly important as economic constraints grow. Drug reimbursement systems and hospital financing changes, coupled with other accompanying measures, should contribute to improve equal and safe patient access to appropriate anticancer drugs and improve the management and care pathway of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laure Benjamin
- Department of Epidemiology, Evaluation and Health Policies, University of Paris Descartes, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kobori T, Harada S, Nakamoto K, Tokuyama S. Mechanisms of P-Glycoprotein Alteration During Anticancer Treatment: Role in the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacological Effects of Various Substrate Drugs. J Pharmacol Sci 2014; 125:242-54. [DOI: 10.1254/jphs.14r01cr] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
30
|
Stuurman FE, Nuijen B, Beijnen JH, Schellens JHM. Oral anticancer drugs: mechanisms of low bioavailability and strategies for improvement. Clin Pharmacokinet 2013; 52:399-414. [PMID: 23420518 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-013-0040-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The use of oral anticancer drugs has increased during the last decade, because of patient preference, lower costs, proven efficacy, lack of infusion-related inconveniences, and the opportunity to develop chronic treatment regimens. Oral administration of anticancer drugs is, however, often hampered by limited bioavailability of the drug, which is associated with a wide variability. Since most anticancer drugs have a narrow therapeutic window and are dosed at or close to the maximum tolerated dose, a wide variability in the bioavailability can have a negative impact on treatment outcome. This review discusses mechanisms of low bioavailability of oral anticancer drugs and strategies for improvement. The extent of oral bioavailability depends on many factors, including release of the drug from the pharmaceutical dosage form, a drug's stability in the gastrointestinal tract, factors affecting dissolution, the rate of passage through the gut wall, and the pre-systemic metabolism in the gut wall and liver. These factors are divided into pharmaceutical limitations, physiological endogenous limitations, and patient-specific limitations. There are several strategies to reduce or overcome these limitations. First, pharmaceutical adjustment of the formulation or the physicochemical characteristics of the drug can improve the dissolution rate and absorption. Second, pharmacological interventions by combining the drug with inhibitors of transporter proteins and/or pre-systemic metabolizing enzymes can overcome the physiological endogenous limitations. Third, chemical modification of a drug by synthesis of a derivative, salt form, or prodrug could enhance the bioavailability by improving the absorption and bypassing physiological endogenous limitations. Although the bioavailability can be enhanced by various strategies, the development of novel oral products with low solubility or cell membrane permeability remains cumbersome and is often unsuccessful. The main reasons are unacceptable variation in the bioavailability and high investment costs. Furthermore, novel oral anticancer drugs are frequently associated with toxic effects including unacceptable gastrointestinal adverse effects. Therefore, compliance is often suboptimal, which may negatively influence treatment outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik E Stuurman
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Shen C, Chien CR, Geynisman DM, Smieliauskas F, Shih YCT. A review of economic impact of targeted oral anticancer medications. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2013; 14:45-69. [PMID: 24378038 DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2014.868310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
There has been a rapid increase in the use of targeted oral anticancer medications (OAMs) in the past decade. As OAMs are often expensive, economic consideration play a significant role in the decision to prescribe, receive or cover them. This paper performs a systematic review of costs or budgetary impact of targeted OAMs to better understand their economic impact on the healthcare system, patients as well as payers. We present our review in a summary table that describes the method and main findings, take into account multiple factors, such as country, analytical approach, cost type, study perspective, timeframe, data sources, study population and care setting when we interpret the results from different papers, and discuss the policy and clinical implications. Our review raises a concern regarding the role of sponsorship on findings of economic analyses as the vast majority of pharmaceutical company-sponsored studies reported cost advantages toward the sponsor's drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chan Shen
- Departments of Health Services Research and Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Benjamin L, Buthion V, Iskedjian M, Farah B, Rioufol C, Vidal-Trécan G. Budget impact analysis of the use of oral and intravenous anti-cancer drugs for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. J Med Econ 2013; 16:96-107. [PMID: 22970840 DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2012.729549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Two anti-cancer drugs are currently approved for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC): trastuzumab-based therapy (TBT) administered intravenously as first line therapy until disease progression and lapatinib, an oral self-administered dual therapy with capecitabine (L+C) as second intention for patients who continue to progress despite TBT. In current practice, TBT is still prescribed beyond disease progression. In addition to medical reasons, the difficulty to switch eligible patients to oral drugs may also be explained by economic reasons. Thus, we aimed at comparing the budgetary impact of TBT and L+C for progressing HER2+MBC after TBT from the French Health Insurance perspective. METHODS A budget impact analysis was performed on a 3-year time horizon (2012-2014) to simulate a dynamic cohort of 4182 HER2-positive patients with a progressing MBC treated with TBT (73%) and L + C (27%). The model was adjusted on progression-free survival (PFS). Office visits, clinical evaluations, drug acquisition, administration costs, and transportation costs obtained from the literature and published databases were considered. RESULTS In the base case analysis (2012), the annual treatment cost per patient for TBT (€36,077) was 2-times higher than that of L + C (€17,165). Using L + C for all patients (n = 4182) would avoid €34.8 million of drug administration and transportation costs. Hospital costs represented 1% vs 88%, while community costs represented 99% vs 12% of L + C and TBT treatment costs, respectively. The lack of direct comparison PFS and treatment dosage modification data were the main limitations. However, no major changes from baseline results were observed from sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS Despite a slightly higher acquisition cost, the treatment cost of L + C remains lower than that of TBT, and it is the only approved anti-HER2 treatment for HER2-positive patients with progressing MBC. Based on this, it seems important to consider the potential savings for Health Insurance with the use of oral drug due to the reduction of outpatient hospitalizations. Such reductions may result in a subsequent budget reduction for hospitals, but may also provide those facing acute medical activity with opportunities to better manage other diseases whose treatment cannot be externalized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laure Benjamin
- Epidémiologie, évaluation et politiques de santé, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lee YH, Jeong IS. Factors Influencing Medication Adherence to Oral Anticancer Drugs. ASIAN ONCOLOGY NURSING 2013. [DOI: 10.5388/aon.2013.13.4.201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yeon Hee Lee
- College of Nursing, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Ihn Sook Jeong
- College of Nursing, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ali S, Ronaldson S. Ordinal preference elicitation methods in health economics and health services research: using discrete choice experiments and ranking methods. Br Med Bull 2012; 103:21-44. [PMID: 22859714 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/lds020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The predominant method of economic evaluation is cost-utility analysis, which uses cardinal preference elicitation methods, including the standard gamble and time trade-off. However, such approach is not suitable for understanding trade-offs between process attributes, non-health outcomes and health outcomes to evaluate current practices, develop new programmes and predict demand for services and products. Ordinal preference elicitation methods including discrete choice experiments and ranking methods are therefore commonly used in health economics and health service research. AREAS OF AGREEMENT Cardinal methods have been criticized on the grounds of cognitive complexity, difficulty of administration, contamination by risk and preference attitudes, and potential violation of underlying assumptions. Ordinal methods have gained popularity because of reduced cognitive burden, lower degree of abstract reasoning, reduced measurement error, ease of administration and ability to use both health and non-health outcomes. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY The underlying assumptions of ordinal methods may be violated when respondents use cognitive shortcuts, or cannot comprehend the ordinal task or interpret attributes and levels, or use 'irrational' choice behaviour or refuse to trade-off certain attributes. CURRENT USE AND GROWING AREAS: Ordinal methods are commonly used to evaluate preference for attributes of health services, products, practices, interventions, policies and, more recently, to estimate utility weights. AREAS FOR ON-GOING RESEARCH: There is growing research on developing optimal designs, evaluating the rationalization process, using qualitative tools for developing ordinal methods, evaluating consistency with utility theory, appropriate statistical methods for analysis, generalizability of results and comparing ordinal methods against each other and with cardinal measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shehzad Ali
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|