Efficacy of bevacizumab in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Evaluation of serum mid-infrared spectroscopy as new prognostic marker for first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Bevacizumab-based chemotherapy is a recommended first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Robust biomarkers with clinical practice applicability have not been identified for patients with this treatment. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic yield of serum mid-infrared spectroscopy (MIRS) on patients receiving first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy for mCRC.

METHODS

We conducted an ancillary analysis from a multicentre prospective study (NCT00489697). All baseline serums were screened by attenuated total reflection method. Principal component analysis and unsupervised k-mean partitioning methods were performed blinded to all patients' data. Endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

From the 108 included patients, MIRS discriminated two prognostic groups. First group patients had significantly lower body mass index (p = 0.026) and albumin levels (p < 0.001), and higher levels of angiogenic markers, lactate dehydrogenase and carcinoembryonic antigen (p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, their OS and PFS were shorter with respective medians: 17.6 vs 27.9 months (p = 0.02) and 8.7 vs 11.3 months (p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, PFS was significantly shorter (HR = 1.74, p = 0.025) with a similar trend for OS (HR = 1.69, p = 0.061).

CONCLUSION

By metabolomic fingerprinting, MIRS proves to be a promising prognostic tool for patients receiving first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy for mCRC.

Evolution and current trends in the management of colorectal cancer liver metastasis

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a major cause of cancer-related death, with a 5-year relative overall survival of up to 20%. The liver is the most common site of distant metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC), with about 50% of CRC patients metastasizing to their liver over the course of their disease. Complete liver resection is the primary modality of treatment for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM), with an overall 5-year survival rate of up to 58%. However, only 15% to 20% of patients with CRLM are deemed suitable for resection at presentation. For unresectable diseases, the median survival of patients remains low even with the best chemotherapy. In recent decades, the management of CRLM has continued to evolve with the expansion of resection criteria, novel targeted systemic therapies, and improved locoregional therapies. However, due to the heterogeneity of the CRC patient population, the optimal evaluation of treatment options for CRLM remains complex. Therefore, effective management requires a multidisciplinary team to help define resectability and devise a personalized treatment approach, from the initial diagnosis to the final treatment.

Prediction of resistance to bevacizumab plus FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer-Results of the prospective multicenter PERMAD trial

BACKGROUND

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are widely used for tumor treatment, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). So far, there are no biomarkers that reliably predict resistance to anti-VEGF mAbs like bevacizumab. A biomarker-guided strategy for early and accurate assessment of resistance could avoid the use of non-effective treatment and improve patient outcomes. We hypothesized that repeated analysis of multiple cytokines and angiogenic growth factors (CAFs) before and during treatment using machine learning could provide an accurate and earlier, i.e., 100 days before conventional radiologic staging, prediction of resistance to first-line mCRC treatment with FOLFOX plus bevacizumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

15 German and Austrian centers prospectively recruited 50 mCRC patients receiving FOLFOX plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment. Plasma samples were collected every two weeks until radiologic progression (RECIST 1.1) as determined by CT scans performed every 2 months. 102 pre-selected CAFs were centrally analyzed using a cytokine multiplex assay (Luminex, Myriad RBM).

RESULTS

Using random forests, we developed a predictive machine learning model that discriminated between the situations of "no progress within 100 days before radiological progress" and "progress within 100 days before radiological progress". We could further identify a combination of ten out of the 102 CAF markers, which fulfilled this task with 78.2% accuracy, 71.8% sensitivity, and 82.5% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a CAF marker combination that indicates treatment resistance to FOLFOX plus bevacizumab in patients with mCRC within 100 days prior to radiologic progress.

Impact of bevacizumab on clinical outcomes and its comparison with standard chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Advances in targeted therapies have expanded the treatment options for colorectal cancer (CRC), allowing for more tailored and effective approaches to managing the disease. In targeted therapy, Bevacizumab is a commonly prescribed anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody that has a direct anti-vascular impact in cancer patients. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors (VEGFs), especially VEGF-A, are significant agents in promoting tumour angiogenesis.

Objective

To assess the impact of adding Bevacizumab to chemotherapy on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Methodology

Comprehensive searches have been performed on electronic databases such as PubMed, and Google Scholar using the following terms: colorectal cancer, adenocarcinoma, Bevacizumab, chemotherapy, and monoclonal antibody.

Results

In the meta-analysis, 16 out of the 24 included studies were analysed. In the final analysis, incorporating Bevacizumab with chеmothеrapy demonstrated favourable outcomes for OS with a hazard ratio (HR = 0.689,95%CI: 0.51-0.83, I² = 39%, p <0.01) and for PFS with a hazard ratio (HR = 0.77 95% CI: 0.60-0.96, I² = 54%, p < 0.01). The subgroup analysis of PFS, categorised by study dеsign (prospеctivе vs rеtrospеctivе), reveals that the Hazard Ratio (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.62-0.97, I² = 21%, p < 0.01) and for OS with a hazard ratio (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.52-0.86, I² = 17%, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that combining Bevacizumab with chemotherapy enhances clinical outcomes and results in a significant increase in PFS and OS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Positive outcomes are demonstrated by a substantial 23% increase in PFS and 31% increase in OS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who undergo Bevacizumab in conjunction with chemotherapy.

Monoclonal Antibodies for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

In addition to discontinuing treatment at disease progression, cumulative toxicity limitations and genetic mutations play important roles in chemotherapy choice in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, in recent years, targeted therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), have been used with chemotherapy to improve clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC.

AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY

Approximately 15% of patients with CRC would be eligible for further targeted therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors based on genetic testing, but most patients with CRC would not qualify, especially Kirsten rat sarcoma wild-type. Therefore, adding MoAb is only an option for most patients until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs. However, the results are not consistent with the combination of MoAb and different chemotherapy bases. In addition, most results from combining MoAb with different chemotherapy bases are not consistent.

DATA SOURCES

This meta-analysis includes published of the PubMed and Embase databases, limited to English literature, and patients were treated with MoAb combination. Randomized control trials conducted published up to May 2021 were considered for inclusion.

THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES

Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy has been the backbone of palliative therapy for mCRC, with demonstrated benefits. This article will review the efficacy and safety of randomized control trials comparing different MoAb with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with mCRC, particularly in Kirsten rat sarcoma wild-type.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis revealed that MoAb plus chemotherapy has better progression-free survival and objective response rate than chemotherapy alone. However, treatment-related serious adverse events (grade ≥ 3) should be considered, particularly severe rash, diarrhea, and hypertension.

Comparative effectiveness of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer stratified by microsatellite instability status

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy have demonstrated promising outcomes in patients with high microsatellite instability (MSI) (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer. However, the comparative effectiveness of Immunotherapy and chemotherapy for patients with low MSI (MSI-L), and microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer remains unclear.

AIM

To investigate immunotherapy vs chemotherapy for treatment of MSI-L/MSS metastatic colorectal cancer, and to evaluate the success of immunotherapy against chemotherapy in managing MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer during a follow-up of 50 months.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate the overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with immunotherapy or chemotherapy. The study population was stratified by MSI status (MSI-H, MSI-L, and MSS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between treatment modality and OS, adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 21951 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were included in the analysis, of which 2358 were MSI-H, and 19593 were MSI-L/MSS. In the MSI-H cohort, immunotherapy treatment (n = 142) was associated with a significantly improved median OS compared to chemotherapy (n = 860). After adjusting for potential confounders, immunotherapy treatment remained significantly associated with better OS in the MSI-H cohort [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.57, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.43-0.77, P < 0.001]. In the MSS cohort, no significant difference in median OS was observed between immunotherapy treatment and chemotherapy (aHR: 0.94, 95%CI: 0.69-1.29, P = 0.715).

CONCLUSION

In this population-based study using the NCDB, immunotherapy treatment was associated with significantly improved OS compared to chemotherapy in patients with MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer, but not in those with MSI-L/MSS metastatic colorectal cancer. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal therapeutic approach for patients with MSI-L/MSS metastatic colorectal cancer.

The Safety and Effectiveness of Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Unresectable Metastases: A Real-Life Study From the South of Morocco

Background Colorectal cancer constitutes a significant public health challenge, despite remarkable strides made in the last two decades, particularly in the medical management of metastatic stages. Notable progress has been achieved through targeted therapies such as anti-epidermal growth factor receptors or anti-angiogenic antibodies, as well as advancements in surgical approaches for hepatic metastases. This study seeks to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in individuals with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methodology This is an observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study of all patients who were followed up for metastatic colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases and were treated with bevacizumab in combination with standard chemotherapy from January 2010 until December 2019 in the medical oncology department of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Souss-Massa of Agadir. Results Of the total 162 cases, 117 (72%) had metastatic disease, and 45 (28%) progressed to metastatic disease after initial treatment. The median age of the patients was 55 years (range = 23-79 years) with a sex ratio of 1.1 (M/F). The tumor was located in the left colon in 135 (83.3%) patients. The results represented adenocarcinoma in 137 (84.6) cases and mucinous subtype in 23 (14.19) cases. The three most common sites of metastasis were the liver (99, 61.1), peritoneum (67, 41.3), and lung (33, 20.3). In the first line, all patients received bi-chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, i.e., fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and leucovorin in 34 (20.9%) patients; capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in 88 (54.3%) patients; leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan in 17 (10.4%) patients; and capecitabine plus irinotecan in 23 (14.1%) patients. Response after first-line treatment was progression in 74 (45.7) cases, stability in 42 (25.9) cases, partial response in 35 (21.6) cases, and complete response in 11 (6.8) cases. Nine (6%) patients were able to benefit from surgical resection of metastatic lesions. Overall, 77 (47%) patients received second-line chemotherapy, i.e., 5-FU with irinotecan in 40 (51.8%) cases or with oxaliplatin in 30 (38.8%) cases. Two patients developed undesirable side effects under bevacizumab (hypertension). The median progression-free survival and median overall survival of the study cohort were 9 months and 14 months, respectively. Nevertheless, patients who underwent primary tumor resection (p = 0.048), those with right‑sided tumors (p = 0.022), those who received a higher number of treatment cycles (p = 0.020), and those who received maintenance treatment (p = 0.001) had a longer median overall survival. Conclusions Chemotherapy combination with bevacizumab is considered as the cornerstone of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment in our region. With the new healthcare and social security systems, easier access to expensive treatments and molecular pathology tests is currently available. It is important to highlight that real-world data can offer valuable insights into the daily clinical practice of medical oncology.

Blood Vessel-Targeted Therapy in Colorectal Cancer: Current Strategies and Future Perspectives

The vasculature is a key player and regulatory component in the multicellular microenvironment of solid tumors and, consequently, a therapeutic target. In colorectal carcinoma (CRC), antiangiogenic treatment was approved almost 20 years ago, but there are still no valid predictors of response. In addition, treatment resistance has become a problem. Vascular heterogeneity and plasticity due to species-, organ-, and milieu-dependent phenotypic and functional differences of blood vascular cells reduced the hope of being able to apply a standard approach of antiangiogenic therapy to all patients. In addition, the pathological vasculature in CRC is characterized by heterogeneous perfusion, impaired barrier function, immunosuppressive endothelial cell anergy, and metabolic competition-induced microenvironmental stress. Only recently, angiocrine proteins have been identified that are specifically released from vascular cells and can regulate tumor initiation and progression in an autocrine and paracrine manner. In this review, we summarize the history and current strategies for applying antiangiogenic treatment and discuss the associated challenges and opportunities, including normalizing the tumor vasculature, modulating milieu-dependent vascular heterogeneity, and targeting functions of angiocrine proteins. These new strategies could open perspectives for future vascular-targeted and patient-tailored therapy selection in CRC.

Deep learning for the prediction of the chemotherapy response of metastatic colorectal cancer: comparing and combining H&E staining histopathology and infrared spectral histopathology

Colorectal cancer is a global public health problem with one of the highest death rates. It is the second most deadly type of cancer and the third most frequently diagnosed in the world. The present study focused on metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who had been treated with chemotherapy-based regimen for which it remains uncertainty about the efficacy for all eligible patients. This is a major problem, as it is not yet possible to test different therapies in view of the consequences on the health of the patients and the risk of progression. Here, we propose a method to predict the efficacy of an anticancer treatment in an individualized way, using a deep learning model constructed on the retrospective analysis of the primary tumor of several patients. Histological sections from tumors were imaged by standard hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and infrared spectroscopy (IR). Images obtained were then processed by a convolutional neural network (CNN) to extract features and correlate them with the subsequent progression-free survival (PFS) of each patient. Separately, HE and IR imaging resulted in a PFS prediction with an error of 6.6 and 6.3 months respectively (28% and 26% of the average PFS). Combining both modalities allowed to decrease the error to 5.0 months (21%). The inflammatory state of the stroma seemed to be one of the main features detected by the CNN. Our pilot study suggests that multimodal imaging analyzed with deep learning methods allow to give an indication of the effectiveness of a treatment when choosing.

Liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: pathogenetic development, immune landscape of the tumour microenvironment and therapeutic approaches

Colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) is one of the leading causes of death among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Although immunotherapy has demonstrated encouraging outcomes in CRC, its benefits are minimal in CRLM. The complex immune landscape of the hepatic tumour microenvironment is essential for the development of a premetastatic niche and for the colonisation and metastasis of CRC cells; thus, an in-depth understanding of these mechanisms can provide effective immunotherapeutic targets for CRLM. This review summarises recent studies on the immune landscape of the tumour microenvironment of CRLM and highlights therapeutic prospects for targeting the suppressive immune microenvironment of CRLM.

Targeted Therapies in Colorectal Cancer: Recent Advances in Biomarkers, Landmark Trials, and Future Perspectives

In 2022, approximately 600,000 cancer deaths were expected; more than 50,000 of those deaths would be from colorectal cancer (CRC). The CRC mortality rate in the US has decreased in recent decades, with a 51% drop between 1976 and 2014. This drop is attributed, in part, to the tremendous therapeutic improvements, especially after the 2000s, in addition to increased social awareness regarding risk factors and diagnostic improvement. Five-fluorouracil, irinotecan, capecitabine, and later oxaliplatin were the mainstays of mCRC treatment from the 1960s to 2002. Since then, more than a dozen drugs have been approved for the disease, betting on a new chapter in medicine, precision oncology, which uses patient and tumor characteristics to guide the therapeutic choice. Thus, this review will summarize the current literature on targeted therapies, highlighting the molecular biomarkers involved and their pathways.

Bevacizumab Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Real-World Clinical Practice

Background and Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality and morbidity worldwide. Bevacizumab was approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on favorable benefit-risk assessments from randomized controlled trials, but evidence on its use in the real-world setting is limited. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the outcomes and safety profile of bevacizumab in mCRC in a real-world setting in Romania. Patients and Methods: This was an observational, retrospective, multicentric, cohort study conducted in Romania that included patients with mCRC treated with bevacizumab as part of routine clinical practice. Study endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, adverse events, and patterns of bevacizumab use. Results: A total of 554 patients were included in the study between January 2008 and December 2018. A total of 392 patients (71%) received bevacizumab in the first line and 162 patients (29%) in the second line. Bevacizumab was mostly combined with a capecitabine/oxaliplatin chemotherapy regimen (31.6%). The median PFS for patients treated with bevacizumab was 8.4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 4.7-15.1 months) in the first line and 6.6 months (IQR, 3.8-12.3 months) in the second line. The median OS was 17.7 months (IQR, 9.3-30.6 months) in the first line and 13.5 months (IQR, 6.7-25.2 months) in the second line. Primary tumor resection was associated with a longer PFS and OS. The safety profile of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy was similar to other observational studies in mCRC. Conclusions: The safety profile of bevacizumab was generally as expected. Although the PFS was generally similar to that reported in other studies, the OS was shorter, probably due to the less frequent use of bevacizumab after disease progression and the baseline patient characteristics. Patients with mCRC treated with bevacizumab who underwent resection of the primary tumor had a higher OS compared to patients with an unresected primary tumor.

New developments in targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most lethal cancer worldwide and the prognosis of metastatic CRC (mCRC) remains poor. Recent advancements in translational research have led to the identification of several new therapeutic targets and improved the treatment outcome of patients with tumours harbouring BRAF V600E mutation, (HER2) ErBB2 alterations, NTRK gene fusions and KRAS(G12C) mutation. Improved understanding towards the mechanism of resistance to targeted therapy such as anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies and the evolving role of therapeutic monitoring with circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has enabled the longitudinal tracking of clonal evolution during treatment and the individualization of subsequent treatments. To broaden the community-based implementation of precision oncology in directing targeted therapies for patients with gastrointestinal cancers including mCRC, the feasibility of 'Master Protocols' that utilizes ctDNA-based genotyping platforms is currently being evaluated. Such protocols encompass both observational and interventional clinical trials of novel targeted therapies conducted within a large clinical trial network. In this review, we will discuss the latest developments in targeted therapies, and therapeutic strategies for overcoming acquired drug resistance in patients with mCRC.

Receipt of Targeted Therapy and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Professional society guidelines recommend treating patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with targeted therapies, including epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, depending on the presence or absence of certain mutations. Since most studies of first-line targeted therapies have been limited by sample size, there is a need for larger studies using data from routine clinical care.

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors associated with receipt of first-line targeted therapies among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer for whom RAS or BRAF mutation data in the tumor were available and investigate whether targeted therapy is associated with survival.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study used deidentified data from an electronic health record-derived database to include patients from 800 sites of patient care across the US who were diagnosed with de novo metastatic colorectal cancer between January 1, 2013, and March 31, 2020 (n = 9134).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Receipt of first-line targeted therapy, categorized as ever having received EGFR inhibitors, VEGF inhibitors, or neither. The secondary outcome was overall survival.

RESULTS

The study population included 9134 patients. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years (IQR, 53-71 years), 5019 (54.9%) were male, and 5692 (62.3%) were White. The median follow-up period was 15 months. Overall, 713 patients (7.8%) received EGFR inhibitors and 5081 patients (55.6%) received VEGF inhibitors as part of their first-line treatment. Among patients with RAS wild-type (RAS-WT) tumors, 625 patients (15.5%) received EGFR inhibitors and 2053 patients (50.9%) received VEGF inhibitors. In patients with RAS mutant (RAS-Mut) tumors, 50 patients (1.1%) received EGFR inhibitors and 2682 patients (59.7%) received VEGF inhibitors; among those with BRAF-mutant (BRAF-Mut) tumors, 38 patients (6.3%) received EGFR inhibitors and 346 patients (57.2%) received VEGF inhibitors. More than one-third of the patients (36.6%) received neither EGFR inhibitors nor VEGF inhibitors. Compared with patients younger than age 40 years, those aged 80 years or older had significantly lower odds to receive targeted therapies (EGFR or VEGF inhibitors in patients with RAS-WT tumors: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0.79; and VEGF inhibitors in patients with RAS-Mut tumors: aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.90). Improved survival was associated with EGFR inhibitor therapy in patients with RAS-WT tumors (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98). Unlike in clinical trials, however, no survival benefit was noted with use of VEGF inhibitors among patients with RAS-WT (aHR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.91-1.11) or RAS-Mut (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93-1.10) tumors.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this study showed mixed results on survival benefits associated with targeted therapy. In addition, given that some of the results differed from those of randomized clinical trials, this study highlights the importance of using data originating from routine clinical care.

TRESBIEN (OGSG 2101): encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab for early recurrent stage II/III BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer

The BRAF V600E mutation accounts for approximately 5% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and is an extremely poor prognostic factor. However, there are no clear recommendations regarding first-line therapy for patients with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated CRC, during or after adjuvant chemotherapy. Recently, a novel combination of encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab, showed a higher response rate than standard chemotherapy in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated CRC. Here we describe our plan for the TRESBIEN study (OGSG 2101), which is an open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase II study designed to evaluate whether encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab are effective for patients with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer, during or after adjuvant chemotherapy. The planned number of subjects is 25.

Myocardial Ischemia Related to Common Cancer Therapy-Prevention Insights

Modern antineoplastic therapy improves survival and quality of life in cancer patients, but its indisputable benefits are accompanied by multiple and major side effects, such as cardiovascular ones. Endothelial dysfunction, arterial spasm, intravascular thrombosis, and accelerated atherosclerosis affect the coronary arteries, leading to acute and chronic coronary syndromes that negatively interfere with the oncologic treatment. The cardiac toxicity of antineoplastic agents may be mitigated by using adequate prophylactic measures. In the absence of dedicated guidelines, our work provides the most comprehensive, systematized, structured, and up-to-date analyses of the available literature focusing on measures aiming to protect the coronary arteries from the toxicity of cancer therapy. Our work facilitates the implementation of these measures in daily practice. The ultimate goal is to offer clinicians the necessary data for a personalized therapeutic approach for cancer patients receiving evidence-based oncology treatments with potential cardiovascular toxicity.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of preanalytical factors and methodological differences influencing the measurement of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor

BACKGROUND

Intraocular treatment with antibodies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) inhibits pathological vessel growth in adults and preterm infants. Recently, concerns regarding the impact of anti-VEGF treatment on systemic VEGF levels in preterm infants have been raised. Earlier studies suggest that preanalytical and methodological parameters impact analytical VEGF concentrations, but we have not found a comprehensive systematic review covering preanalytical procedures and methods for VEGF measurements.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to evaluate the most critical factors during sample collection, sample handling, and the analytical methods that influence VEGF levels and therefore should be considered when planning a prospective collection of samples to get reproducible, comparable results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed and Scopus databases were searched 2021/Nov/11. In addition, identification of records via other methods included reference, citation, and Google Scholar searches. Rayyan QCRI was used to handle duplicates and the selection process. Publications reporting preanalytical handling and/or methodological comparisons using human blood samples were included. Exclusion criteria were biological, environmental, genetic, or physiological factors affecting VEGF. The data extraction sheets included bias assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool, evaluating patient selection, index-test, reference standard, and flow and timing. Concentrations of VEGF and results from statistical comparisons of analytical methods and/or preanalytical sample handling and/or different sample systems were extracted. The publications covering preanalytical procedures were further categorized based on the stage of the preanalytical procedure. Meta-analysis was used to visualize VEGF concentrations among healthy individuals. The quality of evidence was rated according to GRADE.

RESULTS

We identified 1596 publications, and, after the screening process, 43 were considered eligible for this systematic review. The risk of bias estimation was difficult for 2/4 domains due to non-reported information. Four critical steps in the preanalytical process that impacted VEGF quantification were identified: blood drawing and the handling before, during, and after centrifugation. Sub-categorization of those elements resulted in nine findings, rated from moderate to very low evidence grade. The choice of sample system was the most reported factor. VEGF levels (mean [95% CI]) in serum (n = 906, 20 publications), (252.5 [213.1-291.9] pg/mL), were approximated to ninefold higher than in plasma (n = 1122, 23 publications), (27.8 [23.6-32.1] pg/mL), based on summarized VEGF levels with meta-analysis. Notably, most reported plasma levels were below the calibration range of the used method.

CONCLUSION

When measuring circulating VEGF levels, choice of sample system and sample handling are important factors to consider for ensuring high reproducibility and allowing study comparisons. Protocol: CRD42020192433.

Potential ovarian toxicity and infertility risk following targeted anti-cancer therapies

Unlike traditional chemotherapy agents which are generally cytotoxic to all cells, targeted anti-cancer therapies are designed to specifically target proliferation mechanisms in cancer cells but spare normal cells, resulting in high potency and reduced toxicity. There has therefore been a rapid increase in their development and use in clinical settings, including in curative-intent treatment regimens. However, the targets of some of these drugs including kinases, epigenetic regulatory proteins, DNA damage repair enzymes and proteasomes, have fundamental roles in governing normal ovarian physiology. Inhibiting their action could have significant consequences for ovarian function, with potentially long-lasting adverse effects which persist after cessation of treatment, but there is limited evidence of their effects on reproductive function. In this review, we will use literature that examines these pathways to infer the potential toxicity of targeted anti-cancer drugs on the ovary.

Lay summary

Compared to traditional chemotherapy agents, anti-cancer therapies are thought to be highly effective at targeting cancer cells but sparing normal cells, resulting in reduced drug side effects. However, many of processes within the cells that these drugs affect are also important for the ovary to work normally, so suppressing them in this way could have long-lasting implications for female fertility. This review examines the potential toxicity of anti-cancer therapies on the ovary.

From Intestinal Epithelial Homeostasis to Colorectal Cancer: Autophagy Regulation in Cellular Stress

The intestinal epithelium is continuously exposed to abundant stress stimuli, which relies on an evolutionarily conserved process, autophagy, to maintain its homeostasis by degrading and recycling unwanted and damaged intracellular substances. Otherwise, disruption of this balance will result in the development of a wide range of disorders, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Dysregulated autophagy is implicated in the regulation of cellular responses to stress during the development, progression, and treatment of CRC. However, experimental investigations addressing the impact of autophagy in different phases of CRC have generated conflicting results, showing that autophagy is context-dependently related to CRC. Thus, both inhibition and activation of autophagy have been proposed as therapeutic strategies against CRC. Here, we will discuss the multifaceted role of autophagy in intestinal homeostasis and CRC, which may provide insights for future research directions.

Predictive value of chromosome 18q11.2-q12.1 loss for benefit from bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer; a post-hoc analysis of the randomized phase III-trial AGITG-MAX

The VEGF‐A monoclonal antibody bevacizumab is currently recommended for first‐line treatment of all metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Cost‐benefit ratio and side‐effects however necessitate patient selection. A large retrospective yet nonrandomized study showed that patients with loss of chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 in the tumor and treated with bevacizumab have 3 months improved median progression‐free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit compared to patients without this loss and/or treatment modality. Implementation for loss of chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 as a marker in clinical practice mandates evidence in a randomized controlled trial for bevacizumab. Of the trials with randomization of chemotherapy vs chemotherapy with bevacizumab, the AGITG‐MAX trial was the only one with tumor materials available. Chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 copy number status was measured for 256 AGITG‐MAX trial patients and correlated with PFS according to a predefined analysis plan with marker‐treatment interaction as the primary end‐point. Chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 losses were detected in 71% of patients (181/256) characteristic for mCRC. Consistent with the nonrandomized study, significant PFS benefit of bevacizumab was observed in patients with chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 loss (P = .009), and not in patients without 18q loss (P = .67). Although significance for marker‐treatment interaction was not reached (P_interaction = .28), hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval of this randomized cohort (HR_interaction = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.39‐1.32) shows striking overlap with the nonrandomized study cohorts (HR_interaction = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.32‐0.8) supported by a nonsignificant Cochrane χ² test (P = .11) for heterogeneity. We conclude that post hoc analysis of the AGITG‐MAX RCT provides supportive evidence for chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 as a predictive marker for bevacizumab in mCRC patients.

Personalized Immunotherapy in Colorectal Cancers: Where Do We Stand?

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the world. Immunotherapy using monoclonal antibodies, immune-checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell therapy, and cancer vaccines has raised great hopes for treating poor prognosis metastatic CRCs that are resistant to the conventional therapies. However, high inter-tumor and intra-tumor heterogeneity hinder the success of immunotherapy in CRC. Patients with a similar tumor phenotype respond differently to the same immunotherapy regimen. Mutation-based classification, molecular subtyping, and immunoscoring of CRCs facilitated the multi-aspect grouping of CRC patients and improved immunotherapy. Personalized immunotherapy using tumor-specific neoantigens provides the opportunity to consider each patient as an independent group deserving of individualized immunotherapy. In the recent decade, the development of sequencing and multi-omics techniques has helped us classify patients more precisely. The expansion of such advanced techniques along with the neoantigen-based immunotherapy could herald a new era in treating heterogeneous tumors such as CRC. In this review article, we provided the latest findings in immunotherapy of CRC. We elaborated on the heterogeneity of CRC patients as a bottleneck of CRC immunotherapy and reviewed the latest advances in personalized immunotherapy to overcome CRC heterogeneity.

Examination of Micro Vascular Density on Metastatic Colorectal Cancer of RAS Mutant-Type as Anti Vegf Therapy Predictor

According to the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) on Colon Cancer Version 2.2019, mCRC patients with mutant type RAS were treated with anti-VEGF. However, the use of the targeting therapy still had inconsistent results. Neoangiogenesis studies had been used as a basis to assess the prognosis of mCRC. Microvascular density (MVD) had become the morphological gold standard to assess neovascularization in human tumors. This study proved the existence of low microvascular density (MVD) in mCRC patients with mutant type RAS status as a predictor of failure of anti-VEGF therapy. There were 29 patients at Dr. Soetomo Academic Hospital from 2015-2018 who had their RAS status checked and tested for microvascular density (MVD). The results of this study were analyzed using SPSS 23.0. In the Mutant-type of RAS group, this study examined microvascular density (MVD). 11 (73%) research subjects with high MVD scores and 4 (27%) research subjects had low MVD scores. Besides, 27% microvascular density (MVD) was low, in the mutant-type of RAS mCRC patient which could be a predictor factor for the failure of anti-VEGF therapy.

Metastatic colorectal cancer: Advances in the folate-fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy backbone

Notwithstanding recent treatment advances in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), chemotherapy with a combination of a fluoropyrimidine and a folate agent, often 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin, remains the backbone of treatment regimens for the majority of patients with mCRC. This is despite a recent focus on molecular-targeted treatments and patient stratification according to mutational status or expression levels of specific genes. Intracellular folate concentration was discovered to be pivotal in the cytotoxic efficacy of 5-FU, paving the way to the current standard combination therapy approach. Subsequent discovery that systemic chemotherapy agents, such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin, can further increase the efficacy of 5-FU-based treatments led to the development of several combination chemotherapy regimens, including FOLFOX, FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI. Subsequent efforts to optimise 5-FU-based treatments have focused on 5-FU analogues, initially capecitabine and the combination drug tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) and then TAS-102, which has recently been evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials for refractory colorectal cancer. Further approaches taken to improve the efficacy of 5-FU chemotherapy regimens have focused on optimising the route and dosing schedules and regulating folate metabolism. Pharmacokinetic variability caused by the requirement for metabolic conversion of leucovorin has been central to recent research, and the development of agents such as arfolitixorin which bypass the need for metabolic conversion remains promising for future therapeutic candidates. In this review, we summarise the evidence leading to the current treatment regimens employing 5-FU and leucovorin, focusing on recent approaches taken to optimise and refine treatments to improve clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC.

Management of colorectal cancer in the era of COVID-19: Challenges and suggestions

The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic had a huge impact on all sectors around the world. In particular, the healthcare system has been subject to an enormous pressure that has surpassed its ability in many instances. Additionally, the pandemic has called for a review of our daily medical practices, including our approach to colorectal cancer management where treatment puts patients at high risk of virus exposure. Given their higher median age, patients are at an increased risk for severe symptoms and complications in cases of infection, especially in the setting of immunosuppression. Therefore, a review of the routine colorectal cancer practices is needed to minimize risk of exposure. Oncologists should weigh risk of exposure versus the patient's oncologic benefits when approaching management. In addition, treatment protocols should be modified to minimize hospital visits and admissions while maintaining the same treatment efficacy. In this review, we will focus on challenges that colorectal cancer patients face during the pandemic, while highlighting the priority in each case. We will also discuss the evidence for potential modifications to existing treatment plans that could reduce infectious exposure without compromising care. Finally, we will discuss the impact of the socio-economic difficulties faced by Lebanese patients due to a poor economy toppled by an unexpected pandemic.

Doubling the Dose of Bevacizumab Beyond Progression in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-the Experience of a Tertiary Cancer Center

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in Europe, with an annual increase in incidence ranging between 0.4 and 3.6% in various countries. Although the development of CRC was extensively studied, limited number of new therapies were developed in the last few years. Bevacizumab is frequently used as first- and second-line therapy for management of metastatic CRC (mCRC). The aim of this study is to present our experience with using bevacizumab beyond disease progression at different dosage levels in mCRC patients, in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, and toxicities.

Methods: We performed a consecutive retrospective analysis of patients with confirmed mCRC who were treated with bevacizumab at "Prof Dr. Ion Chiricuta" Institute of Oncology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. We included patients who had received bevacizumab as first- or second-line therapy and further stratified them according to the dose administered as a second-line (either standard dose of 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or double dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks–depending on the classical chemotherapy partner). All patients had received bevacizumab beyond progression (BYP) which is defined as continuing bevacizumab administration through second-line treatment despite disease progression. In each group, we evaluated the prognostic factors that influenced survival and treatment outcome.

Results: One hundred and fifty-one (151) patients were included in the study. Themedian age of patients receiving double dose bevacizumab (DDB) and standard dose bevacizumab (SDB) was 58 years (range 41–71) and 57 years (range 19–75), respectively. The median overall survival in the DDB group was 41 months (range 27–49) compared to 25 months (range 23–29) in the SDB group (p = 0.01 log-rank test). First-line oxaliplatin-based treatment was used more frequently regardless of group, while irinotecan-based more frequently used as a second-line treatment (p = 0.014). Both oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based regimens were found to be suitable partners for BYP. Statistical analysis revealed that dose intensity, primary tumor location, and cumulative exposure to BYP had significant influence on survival.

Conclusion: Doubling the dose of bevacizumab after first progression may improve survival in mCRC patients. Increasing bevacizumab dose intensity could override the prognostic impact of primary tumor location in patients receiving double the dose of bevacizumab after first disease progression.

Tumor immune infiltration estimated from gene expression profiles predicts colorectal cancer relapse

A substantial fraction of patients with stage I-III colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) experience disease relapse after surgery with curative intent. However, biomarkers for predicting the likelihood of CRC relapse have not been fully explored. Therefore, we assessed the association between tumor infiltration by a broad array of innate and adaptive immune cell types and CRC relapse risk. We implemented a discovery-validation design including a discovery dataset from Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC; Tampa, FL) and three independent validation datasets: (1) GSE41258 (2) the Molecular Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer (MECC) study, and (3) GSE39582. Infiltration by 22 immune cell types was inferred from tumor gene expression data, and the association between immune infiltration by each cell type and relapse-free survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Within each of the four independent cohorts, CD4+ memory activated T cell (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.90-0.96; FDR = 0.0001) infiltration was associated with longer time to disease relapse, independent of stage, microsatellite instability, and adjuvant therapy. Based on our meta-analysis across the four datasets, 10 innate and adaptive immune cell types associated with disease relapse of which 2 were internally validated using multiplex immunofluorescence. Moreover, immune cell type infiltration was a better predictors of disease relapse than Consensus Molecular Subtype (CMS) and other expression-based biomarkers (Immune-AICMCC:238.1-238.9; CMS-AICMCC: 241.0). These data suggest that transcriptome-derived immune profiles are prognostic indicators of CRC relapse and quantification of both innate and adaptive immune cell types may serve as candidate biomarkers for predicting prognosis and guiding frequency and modality of disease surveillance.

Hypoxia-induced therapy resistance: Available hypoxia-targeting strategies and current advances in head and neck cancer

Most solid tumors, such as head and neck cancers, feature a hypoxic microenvironment due to angiogenic dysregulation and the consequent disruption of their vascular network. Such nutrient-deprived environment can induce genomic changes in several tumor cell populations, conferring survival and proliferative advantages to cancer cells through immunosuppression, metabolic switches and enhanced invasiveness. These transcriptional changes, together with the selective pressure hypoxia exerts on cancer cells, leads to the propagation of more aggressive and stress-resistant subpopulations increasing therapy resistance and worsening patient outcomes. Although extensive preclinical and clinical studies involving hypoxia-targeted drugs have been performed, most of these drugs have failed late-stage clinical trials and only a few have managed to be implemented in clinical practice. Here, we provide an overview of three main strategies to target tumor hypoxia: HIF-inhibitors, hypoxia-activated prodrugs and anti-angiogenic agents; summarizing the clinical advances that have been made over the last decade. Given that most hypoxia-targeted drugs seem to fail clinical trials because of insufficient drug delivery, combination with anti-angiogenic agents is proposed for the improvement of therapy response via vascular normalization and enhanced drug delivery. Furthermore, we suggest that using novel nanoparticle delivery strategies might further improve the selectivity and efficiency of hypoxia-targeted therapies and should therefore be taken into consideration for future therapeutic design. Lastly, recent findings point out the relevance that hypoxia-targeted therapy is likely to have in head and neck cancer as a chemo/radiotherapy sensitizer for treatment efficiency improvement.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors for Colorectal Cancer. A Review of the Clinical Data

Since the late 1990s, therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has changed considerably, and the combination of doublet or triplet chemotherapy and a targeted agent are now routinely used. The targeting of angiogenesis, the development of new blood vessels, represents a key element in the overall treatment strategy. Since the approval in 2004 of the first anti-angiogenetic drug, multiple agents have been approved and others are currently under investigation. We present an overview of the recent literature on approved systemic treatment of mCRC, with a focus on anti-angiogenic drugs, and current treatment approaches, and elaborate on the future role of angiogenesis in colorectal cancer as seen from a clinical perspective. The treatment of mCRC, in general, has changed from "one strategy fits all" to a more personalized approach. This is, however, not entirely the case for anti-angiogenetic treatments, partly due to a lack of validated biomarkers. The anti-angiogenetic standard treatment at the present primarily includes monoclonal antibodies. The therapeutic field of angiogenesis, however, has received increased interest after the introduction of newer combinations. These approaches will likely change the current treatment strategy, once again, to the overall benefit of patients.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Review

IMPORTANCE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide with more than 1.85 million cases and 850 000 deaths annually. Of new colorectal cancer diagnoses, 20% of patients have metastatic disease at presentation and another 25% who present with localized disease will later develop metastases.

OBSERVATIONS

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cause of cancer mortality for men and women in the United States, with 53 200 deaths projected in 2020. Among people diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer, approximately 70% to 75% of patients survive beyond 1 year, 30% to 35% beyond 3 years, and fewer than 20% beyond 5 years from diagnosis. The primary treatment for unresectable metastatic CRC is systemic therapy (cytotoxic chemotherapy, biologic therapy such as antibodies to cellular growth factors, immunotherapy, and their combinations.) Clinical trials completed in the past 5 years have demonstrated that tailoring treatment to the molecular and pathologic features of the tumor improves overall survival. Genomic profiling to detect somatic variants is important because it identifies the treatments that may be effective. For the 50% of patients with metastatic CRC with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type tumors, cetuximab and panitumumab (monoclonal antibodies to the epithelial growth factor receptor [EGFR]), in combination with chemotherapy, can extend median survival by 2 to 4 months compared with chemotherapy alone. However, for the 35% to 40% of patients with KRAS or NRAS sequence variations (formerly termed mutations), effective targeted therapies are not yet available. For the 5% to 10% with BRAF V600E sequence variations, targeted combination therapy with BRAF and EGFR inhibitors extended overall survival to 9.3 months, compared to 5.9 months for those receiving standard chemotherapy. For the 5% with microsatellite instability (the presence of numerous insertions or deletions at repetitive DNA units) or mismatch repair deficiency, immunotherapy may be used in the first or subsequent line and has improved treatment outcomes with a median overall survival of 31.4 months in previously treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Advances in molecular profiling of metastatic CRC facilitate the ability to direct treatments to the biologic features of the tumor for specific patient subsets. Although cures remain uncommon, more patients can anticipate extended survival. Genomic profiling allows treatment selection so that more patients derive benefit and fewer are exposed to toxicity from ineffective therapies.

Monoclonal antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Besides common therapeutic approaches, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, novel therapeutic approaches, including immunotherapy, have been an advent in CRC treatment. The immunotherapy approaches try to elicit patients` immune responses against tumor cells to eradicate the tumor. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are two branches of cancer immunotherapy. MAbs demonstrate the great ability to completely recognize cancer cell-surface receptors and blockade proliferative or inhibitory pathways. On the other hand, T cell activation by genetically engineered CAR receptor via the TCR/CD3 and costimulatory domains can induce potent immune responses against specific tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). Both of these approaches have beneficial anti-tumor effects on CRC. Herein, we review the different mAbs against various pathways and their applications in clinical trials, the different types of CAR-T cells, various specific CAR-T cells against TAAs, and their clinical use in CRC treatment.

Optimal duration of therapy in the first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: single center experience

Background / Aim. FOLFOX (5fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin)/CapOx (capecitabine, oxaliplatin) plus bevacizumab and FOLFIRI (5 fluorouracil, folinic acid, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab are a standard treatment options for a first line treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). The aim of this study was to compare overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the groups of patients with mCRC who were treated in the first line with FOLFIRI/bev versus FOLFOX/bev. At the same time, it was compared the safety profile in observed groups of patients and investigated optimal treatment duration and characteristics of patients who had the best treatment outcomes. Methods. In a retrospective-prospective study, patients with mCRC were treated with a chemotherapy protocols for the first line in combination with bevacizumab (FOLFOX/bev, respectively, FOLFIRI/bev). Treatment efficacy was evaluated on the basis of overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the safety of treatment was evaluated by monitoring adverse drug reactions. Results. ORR was 70% in the FOLFIRI/bev group and 50% in the FOLFOX/bev group. Median PFS for FOLFIRI/bev (n = 30) and for FOLFOX/bev (n = 30) was 15.6 months and 12.1 months respectively (HR, 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-1.53; P = 0.5591). Median OS for FOLFIRI/bev and for FOLFOX/bev was 24.7 months and 19.9 months respectively (HR, 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-1.23; P = 0.1552). In both patient groups, the patients who received more than 9 cycles of induction therapy had better treatment response in comparison with patients who received less than 9 cycles of therapy. In FOLFOX/bev group PFS was 16.9 versus 9.7 months and OS was 22.1 versus 17.6 months respectively. In FOLFIRI/bev group PFS was 9 months for patients who received less than 9 cycles of therapy versus 18.8 months for patients who received more than 9 cycles, OS was 18.0 versus 27.7 respectively. The adverse drug reactions grade 3 and 4 were 7% in the FOLFIRI/bev group versus 27% in the FOLFOX/bev group. Conclusion. Patients who received FOLFIRI/bev had better ORR (70 % versus 50 %), PFS (15.6 versus 12.1 months) and OS (24.7 versus 19.9 months). In both patient groups, better treatment response had the patients who received induction therapy for 4-6 months (more than 9 cycles of therapy).

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Plus Oxaliplatin- or Irinotecan-Based Doublet Backbone Chemotherapy as the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Guidelines recommend combined doublet backbone chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (OX) or irinotecan (IR) as the first-line treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer. However, it is still unknown which is better when combined with bevacizumab (BEV). This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare BEV-IR with BEV-OX regimens in terms of efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We searched studies from databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and conference papers. The outcomes were overall response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival, and the incidence of the most common adverse events. The dichotomous data were reported as the risk ratio (RR) and the survival outcomes were extracted as the hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Eleven studies including 5632 patients were identified. No difference was found in overall survival or overall response rate between BEV-IR and BEV-OX regimens. The pooled progression-free survival was significantly longer in the BEV-IR group than the BEV-OX group (hazard ratio = 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.98, p = 0.08). Compared with the BEV-OX group, the BEV-IR group was related to a higher risk of bleeding events (RR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-0.98, p = 0.03), venous thromboembolism (RR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.46-0.79, p = 0.0002), and diarrhea (RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.80, p < 0.00001). Conversely, the BEV-OX group was related to a higher risk of thrombocytopenia (RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.67-3.42, p < 0.00001) and neuropathy (RR 3.80, 95% CI 1.90-7.64, p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

The BEV-IR regimen was superior in improving progression-free survival as the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. The two different doublet regimens combined with BEV had their specific features of adverse events.

Pivalopril improves anti-cancer efficiency of cDDP in breast cancer through inhibiting proliferation, angiogenesis and metastasis

Breast cancer is the most common cancer type among female worldwide. Cisplatin (cDDP) is one of the most effective chemotherapies for the treatment of breast cancer. Nevertheless, there is an urgent requirement to reduce its systemic side effects and chemoresistance. In this present study, pivalopril (PP), a clinically used antihypertensive drug, has been verified as a chemosensitizer that extremely improves the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to cDDP. PP treatment markedly promoted the capacity of cDDP to reduce the proliferation of breast cancer cells. The combination of PP and cDDP significantly induced apoptosis and inhibited vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in breast cancer cells, accompanied with reduced angiogenesis. Furthermore, PP plus cDDP effectively reduced the cell migration and invasion in breast cancer cells. The in vivo studies confirmed that the anti-metastatic effect of cDDP was further improved by PP, as evidenced by the markedly decreased number of metastatic nodules in lungs. Moreover, we confirmed that PP combined with cDDP cooperatively suppressed tumor growth in breast cancer xenograft mouse models without extra toxicity. Together, the present study provided the first evidence that PP greatly sensitized breast cancer cells to cDDP without additional toxicity, and the synergistic effect may be mainly through cooperatively inhibiting proliferation, angiogenesis, metastasis, and inducing apoptotic cell death.

Combinatorial Immunotherapies for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent and deadly forms of cancer. About half of patients are affected by metastasis, with the cancer spreading to e.g., liver, lungs or the peritoneum. The majority of these patients cannot be cured despite steady advances in treatment options. Immunotherapies are currently not widely applicable for this disease, yet show potential in preclinical models and clinical translation. The tumour microenvironment (TME) has emerged as a key factor in CRC metastasis, including by means of immune evasion-forming a major barrier to effective immuno-oncology. Several approaches are in development that aim to overcome the immunosuppressive environment and boost anti-tumour immunity. Among them are vaccination strategies, cellular transplantation therapies, and targeted treatments. Given the complexity of the system, we argue for rational design of combinatorial therapies and consider the implications of precision medicine in this context.

Current treatment options in RAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis of 14 randomized phase III trials

PURPOSE

Although biomarkers for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer exist, the benefit patients with RAS mutated tumors derive from established regimens is unclear.

METHODS

Efficacy of therapeutic strategies available for RAS mutated patients (addition of chemotherapeutic agents and/or anti angiogenic agents) were investigated in fourteen randomized controlled phase III trials at trial level by meta-analysing individual study hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

6810 of 10,748 patients (63.3%) were available (48.5% RAS wildtype, 51.5% RAS mutated). Across all treatment lines, additional treatment efficacy (chemotherapy and/or anti angiogenic agents) was significantly smaller in RAS mutated compared to wildtype tumors for OS and PFS. In detail, patients with RAS mutated metastatic colorectal cancer derived significant benefit in PFS but not in OS by the addition of either chemotherapy or anti angiogenic agents to the respective comparator. In patients with RAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer, PFS and OS were improved by the addition of chemotherapy or anti angiogenic agent.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic benefit of additional substances is less distinct in patients with RAS mutated as compared to RAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer, especially with regard to OS.

Coadjuvant Anti-VEGF A Therapy Improves Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer with Liver Metastasis: A Systematic Review

Background: the presence of liver metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the most significant prognostic factors. Objective: systematically review the results of studies evaluating the benefit of adding bevacizumab to a normal chemotherapy regime in the survival of patients with colorectal-cancer liver metastasis (CRLM). Search methods: Pubmed and Google Scholar databases were searched for eligible articles (from inception up to the 2 April 2019). Inclusion criteria: studies including patients with CRLM receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; bevacizumab) as treatment, overall survival as an outcome; regarding language restrictions, only articles in English were accepted. Main results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. In 73% of these cases, chemotherapy with bevacizumab was an effective treatment modality for treating CRLM, and its administration significantly extended both overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS). Nevertheless, three articles showed no influence on survival rates of bevacizumab-associated chemotherapy. Author conclusions: It is necessary to standardize methodologies that aim to evaluate the impact of bevacizumab administration on the survival of patients with CRLM. Furthermore, follow-up time and the cause of a patient’s death should be recorded, specified, and cleared in order to better calculate the survival rate and provide a comparison between the produced literature.

TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

TAS-102 (trifluridine-tipiracil) has shown a significant overall survival benefit compared with placebo in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Inspired by the encouraging results of a small phase 1-2 study, C-TASK FORCE, which evaluated the combination of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer, we aimed to compare the efficacy of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab versus TAS-102 monotherapy in patients receiving refractory therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer .

METHODS

This investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) with metastatic colorectal from four cancer centres in Denmark. The main inclusion criteria were histopathologically confirmed metastatic colorectal cancer refractory or intolerant to a fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and cetuximab or panitumumab (only for RAS wild-type), and WHO performance status of 0 or 1. Previous therapy with bevacizumab, aflibercept, ramucirumab, or regorafenib was allowed but not mandatory. Participants were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) in block sizes of two, four, or six by a web-based tool to receive oral TAS-102 (35 mg/m² twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 every 28 days) alone or combined with intravenous bevacizumab (5 mg/kg on days 1 and 15) until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient decision to withdraw. Treatment assignment was not masked, and randomisation was stratified by institution and RAS mutation status. The primary endpoint was investigator-evaluated progression-free survival. All analyses were based on intention to treat. This trial is registered with EudraCT, 2016-005241-23.

FINDINGS

From Aug 24, 2017, to Oct 31, 2018, 93 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to TAS-102 (n=47) or TAS-102 plus bevacizumab (n=46). The clinical cut-off date was Feb 15, 2019, after a median follow-up of 10·0 months (IQR 6·8-14·0). Median progression-free survival was 2·6 months (95% CI 1·6-3·5) in the TAS-102 group versus 4·6 months (3·5-6·5) in the TAS-102 plus bevacizumab group (hazard ratio 0·45 [95% CI 0·29-0·72]; p=0·0015). The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse event was neutropenia (18 [38%] of 47 in the TAS-102 monotherapy group vs 31 [67%] of 46 in the TAS-102 plus bevacizumab group). Serious adverse events were observed in 21 (45%) patients in the TAS-102 group and 19 (41%) in the TAS-102 plus bevacizumab group. No deaths were deemed treatment related.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab, as compared with TAS-102 monotherapy, was associated with a significant and clinically relevant improvement in progression-free survival with tolerable toxicity. The combination of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab could be a new treatment option for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer and could be a practice-changing development.

FUNDING

Servier.