Updated recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology on prostate cancer management in older patients

Extra-anatomical urinary diversion for malignant ureteric obstruction: our clinical experience

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Ureteral stenosis and upper urinary tract obstruction present significant clinical challenges, especially in cases involving complex, long strictures. Traditional management options like ureteral stents and percutaneous nephrostomy tubes often result in complications and diminished quality of life. Extra-anatomical urinary diversion (EAUD) offers an alternative approach, particularly for oncologic patients requiring palliative care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2015 to 2019, eight patients with cancer-related ureteral strictures underwent EAUD. In all patients cancer-specific prognosis exceeded one year. The procedure was performed using a standard surgical technique.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 62.5 years, ranging from 22 to 82 years. The mean follow-up duration was 62.8 months. Improvement in renal function was observed in some patients, while the early complication rate was 62.5%. Notable complications included infections and encrustation of the prosthesis. Two patients experienced multiple infections of the overlying skin and soft tissue necessitated the dislodgement of the prothesis after 38 and 101 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Extra-anatomical stent placement constitutes a somewhat effective and safe option in the context of complex ureteral obstruction management in oncologic patients. The lack of external devices and its longer duration without the need for substitution compared with conventional double J stents can theoretically assure a better quality of life. However, a careful patient selection is needed in order to maximize the patients' benefit.

Should magnetic resonance imaging be considered in every patient before a bladder outflow obstruction procedure?

To the Editor Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a highly prevalent histological condition in aging men that can commonly cause lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). BPH typically begins developing after the age of 40 and affects approximately 50-60% of men by age 60.....

Facilitators of, and barriers to, prostate cancer screening uptake: A descriptive phenomenological study of adult men in Namibia

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer poses a significant health risk for aging men, with a higher prevalence observed in individuals aged 40 and above. The objectives of this study were to describe the facilitators of, and barriers to, prostate cancer screening among men between the ages of 50 and 70.

METHODS

The study employed a qualitative descriptive phenomenological design. Data were collected at the oncology and urology departments of an intermediate hospital in Oshana region, Namibia using a semi-structured interview guide. Individual, face-to-face interviews were held between September and October 2022, after which the data gathered were analyzed thematically following Colaizzi's 7-step method.

RESULTS

Fifteen (15) participants took part in this study. The two major themes that were generated were: (1) Value of early detection, which described the participants' perceptions regarding the facilitators of prostate cancer screening; and (2) Potential threats to PCa screening, which described the participants' perceptions regarding the barriers to taking up cancer screening.

CONCLUSIONS

The study revealed modifiable barriers to PCa screening, including fear of stigmatization, lack of knowledge, and insufficient screening access, as well as facilitators that can be strengthened for successful prostate cancer screening, such as advanced age, history of prostate cancer, and social support. These findings emphasize the need to implement gender-specific campaigns that address masculinity, lack of knowledge, and cultural stigmatization.

Current Evidence on Cabazitaxel for Prostate Cancer Therapy: A Narrative Review

The incidence of prostate cancer (PC) has recently increased in Japan. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been a key treatment in patients with castration-sensitive PC (CSPC); however, resistance typically emerges through multiple mechanisms, leading to metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC). Taxane-based therapy (i.e., docetaxel, cabazitaxel) has been standard care in patients with mCRPC. New evidence supporting the addition of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs, e.g., enzalutamide, abiraterone) to docetaxel and ADT for patients with metastatic CSPC (mCSPC) raises questions about the role of taxane-based therapies and their optimal sequencing, as well as how to identify patients who may benefit from taxane-based therapy. Here we review the evidence on taxane-based therapy, including cabazitaxel, in the treatment of PC, with a focus on clinical and real-world evidence from Japan. Cabazitaxel has proven effective for patients with mCRPC who have a history of ARSI and docetaxel use, and it is preferable to a second alternative ARSI, as indicated in the CARD study. The safety profile of cabazitaxel (particularly, the incidence of neutropenia) can be managed through prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, as well as a lower dosage and possibly variation of the dosage interval. However, a certain dose intensity is required because neutropenia has been identified as a potential prognostic indicator for treatment effectiveness. In the ARSI era for mCSPC, evidence on mCRPC treatment sequencing is limited. A better understanding of PC biology and the collection of real-world data is essential for effective treatment and improved safety-benefit outcomes.

Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment in Elderly Patients: A Cross-Sectional Survey Exploring Practice Patterns and Preferences of Uro-Oncologists in Northeast Italy

Background: The optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for prostate cancer (PCa) in patients aged ≥75 years (mild-old and oldest-old) are still contentious. Resource allocation and ideal treatment for older patients are challenges, mainly due to their comorbidities and reduced life expectancy. This survey aims to assess current clinical practices and the experiences of healthcare providers in the diagnosis and management of elderly patients with PCa. Materials and Methods: In Northeast Italy, members of the Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord-Est (GUONE) conducted a survey involving 104 physicians of different specialties (Nuclear Medicine, Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Radiology, Urology) between 1 November 2024 and 30 November 2024. The survey encompassed 51 questions, evaluating various diagnostic and therapeutic scenarios. Results: Digital rectal exam (DRE) was recommended by 35.9% of physicians for patients aged 75 or older at risk of PCa. PSA testing was continued in 76.3% of these patients. For 36.5% of the physicians, there should be no age limit for prostate biopsy. Moreover, 42.6% of physicians recommended a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided prostate biopsy regardless of age. A prostate biopsy was deemed mandatory before initiating any form of hormonal therapy by 57.7% of the participants. For 22.3% and 34.7% of physicians, there should be no age limit for prostate MRI and PET/CT for staging purposes. Interestingly, PET/CT was not recommended in 52% of cases as a staging tool for patients older than 85 years. For patients without comorbidities, the age limit to consider radical prostatectomy (RP) was 75, with 58.6% of physicians in favor. There were no definitive limits for radiotherapy (RT). Chemotherapy had an age limit for 81.6% of the respondents; for 18.4%, 22.5%, and 26.5% of physicians, age limits were 75, 80, and 85 years, respectively. The use of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) had no definitive age limits for 46.5% of respondents. For patients with no comorbidities and low-volume metastatic PCa, the preferred option was androgen deprivation therapy + ARPIs + RT. The follow-up schedule after RP or RT exhibited heterogeneity with no consensus regarding the frequency of PSA testing or the age at which it should be discontinued. Conclusions: This survey highlights the need for consensus guidelines in diagnosing and managing mild-old and oldest-old elderly PCa patients. With the aging population, standardized protocols are essential to ensure optimal care.

Frailty and malnutrition scores in predicting postoperative complications in minimally invasive prostatectomy for malignancy of the prostate

Prostate cancer (PCa), the second most common cancer in men, is typically diagnosed between ages 65 and 74. When planning radical prostatectomy, patient frailty and nutritional status must be carefully evaluated. This study investigates the association between frailty, malnutritional status, and postprostatectomy complications in PCa patients. We analyzed the ACS-NSQIP prostatectomy series (2019-2022), focusing on minimally invasive procedures, including only malignant neoplasm diagnoses. The modified 5-index frailty (mFI-5) was calculated, where values of 2 or higher indicated frailty. Nutritional risk was assessed using a Nutritional Risk Index (NRI) of ≤ 97.5 and preoperative hypoalbuminemia (≤ 3.5) as indicators of malnutrition. Incomplete records were excluded, and remaining data were analyzed using R 4.3.3. The study included 21,067 patients. Compared to non-frail patients, frail individuals were significantly older and showed higher rates of diabetes, smoking, elevated BMI, and ASA scores > 2 (all p < 0.001). Frail patients also experienced longer hospital stays and operative times (p < 0.001), along with higher rates of renal insufficiency (p = 0.018), urinary infections (p = 0.001), systemic shock (p = 0.003), and overall complications (p = 0.002) compared to non-frail patients. Of the 9,932 patients evaluated for nutritional status, 342 met malnutrition criteria. Those identified by NRI criteria, experienced longer hospital stays and higher rates of myocardial infarction, and those identified by low albumin levels, showed increased length of stay (p = 0.044), major complications (p = 0.013), and rates of return to the operating room (p = 0.005), when compared to the normal cohort. Frailty and malnutrition are independent risk factors for postoperative complication in minimally invasive prostatectomy, highlighting the need for preoperative optimization.

First-line talazoparib plus enzalutamide versus placebo plus enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: patient-reported outcomes from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 TALAPRO-2 trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer have poor prognoses, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic strategies. First-line talazoparib plus enzalutamide significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival compared with placebo plus enzalutamide in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the phase 3 TALAPRO-2 study. We aimed to evaluate patient-reported outcomes in the all-comers cohort of TALAPRO-2, which included patients with and without alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes.

METHODS

TALAPRO-2 is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial conducted at 223 hospitals, cancer centres, and medical centres in 26 countries worldwide. Eligible participants were male patients aged 18 years or older (≥20 years in Japan) who were receiving ongoing androgen deprivation therapy, had asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and had not received previous life-prolonging systemic therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a centralised interactive web response system and a permuted block size of 4 to oral talazoparib 0·5 mg once daily or placebo, plus oral enzalutamide 160 mg once daily. The funder, patients, and investigators were masked to allocation of talazoparib or placebo; enzalutamide was open-label. Stratification factors were HRR gene alteration status (deficient vs non-deficient or unknown) and previous treatment with docetaxel or abiraterone, or both (yes vs no) in the castration-sensitive setting. The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival by blinded independent central review and has been reported previously. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed as secondary endpoints in the patient-reported outcomes population, which comprised patients from the intention-to-treat population with a baseline patient-reported outcome assessment followed by at least one post-baseline patient-reported outcome assessment. Patient-reported outcomes included mean change from baseline in patient-reported pain symptoms (per Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form [BPI-SF]); global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL), overall cancer and prostate cancer-specific functioning and symptoms (per European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] Core Quality of Life Questionnaire [QLQ-C30] and Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate [QLQ-PR25]); and general health status (per EQ-5D-5L). Time to deterioration in patient-reported pain symptoms (per BPI-SF), and time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported GHS/QoL (per EORTC QLQ-C30) and prostate cancer-specific urinary symptoms (per EORTC-QLQ-PR25) were the other secondary endpoints. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03395197, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 7, 2019, and Sept 17, 2020, 805 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment irrespective of HRR gene alteration status. 395 patients assigned to talazoparib plus enzalutamide and 398 assigned to placebo plus enzalutamide were included in the patient-reported outcome population. Median follow-up was 28·0 months (IQR 23·9-31·7) for talazoparib plus enzalutamide and 26·8 months (23·4-30·6) for placebo plus enzalutamide. Time to definitive deterioration in GHS/QoL was longer with talazoparib plus enzalutamide versus placebo plus enzalutamide (median 30·8 months [95% CI 27·0-non-estimable] vs 25·0 months [22·9-30·7]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·78 [95% CI 0·62-0·99]; two-sided p=0·038). Median time to definitive deterioration in urinary symptoms was non-estimable (95% CI non-estimable-non-estimable) in the talazoparib plus enzalutamide group and was 35·9 months (95% CI 32·3-non-estimable) in the placebo plus enzalutamide group (HR 0·76 [95% CI 0·54-1·06]; two-sided p=0·11). No clinically meaningful differences (≥10 points) in mean changes from baseline were observed in GHS/QoL, symptom, and functional scales between the treatment groups. No differences were observed between the groups in time to deterioration of pain as measured by the BPI-SF (HR 0·98 [95% CI 0·69-1·40]; two-sided p=0·93), mean pain scores (estimated mean difference in value of worst pain in the past 24 h between treatment groups was -0·1 [95% CI -0·3 to 0·1]; two-sided p=0·27), or general health status as measured by the EQ-5D-5L (estimated mean difference 0·0 [95% CI 0·0-0·0]; two-sided p=0·37).

INTERPRETATION

Talazoparib plus enzalutamide prolonged time to definitive deterioration in GHS/QoL versus placebo plus enzalutamide. Together with clinical efficacy and safety data, these results inform the risk-benefit assessment of talazoparib plus enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in TALAPRO-2.

FUNDING

Pfizer.

Unveiling Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults with Cancer on Systemic Anticancer Therapy: A Comprehensive Review

Cancer-related cognitive impairment significantly affects cancer management and decision-making. While the exact mechanisms underlying cancer-related cognitive dysfunction remain complex and multifaceted, different factors have been identified that may help predict which patients are at increased risk for cognitive decline. In this article, we provide a comprehensive overview of systemic cancer therapy-induced cognitive impairment in older adults, including signs and symptoms, diagnosis, and management. In addition, we discuss the evidence available on the impact of endocrine therapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted agents on cognition in this population.

[Implementation of geriatric oncology in a remote hospital in French Guiana]

INTRODUCTION

The aim was to analyze the implementation of the Onco-Geriatrics model in a remote ultramarine territory: West-French Guiana. The population is socially precarious in terms of income, social coverage and administrative status, and most often speaks a non-French language and has a non-Western culture.

METHODS

Narrative description of the implementation and retrospective study of anonymized data from the database of older patients managed for cancer between September 2014 and December 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 574 new patients were managed. Of these, 107 were aged 70 and over; 78 (73 %) had a G8 test. Forty-two patients had a multidimensional geriatric assessment (MGA). More than half the patients had dependency criteria, malnutrition and a high number of severe comorbidities. Difficulties encountered were language, level of education, clinical context (in 18 patients), but also insufficient involvement of health professional and the consequences of health organization and gradual implementation.

DISCUSSION

Implementation was impacted by the fact that quality criteria for implementation were not sufficient. Studies in high-middle-income countries in South America suggest that initial implementation of the MGA may be preferable, that frailty screening tests and the MGA procedure can be adapted to non-Western populations, and that the use of new technologies can improve the management of older patients in this context.

Hospital care trajectories of older adults with cancer and the associated clinical profiles

BACKGROUND

The longitudinal hospital care experiences of older adults with cancer, from the treatment decision-making process until their end of life, remain unexplored. We examined the hospital care trajectories of these patients and identified associated clinical determinants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We linked the ELCAPA multicenter cohort study (patients aged ≥70 with a solid tumor and having been referred for a geriatric assessment between 2012 and 2019) and the Greater Paris University Hospitals' clinical data warehouse. Individual care trajectories, defined as series of consultations, hospital admissions (in day, acute, or rehabilitation units), and emergency room (ER) visits, were clustered using multichannel sequence analysis. Cluster membership determinants were identified among socio-demographic, oncological, and geriatric parameters by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Seven hundred seven patients (median age: 82; metastatic cancer: 45.2%; 10 998 care episodes) were included. Four trajectory clusters were identified: cluster A (n = 149, 21.1%) with in-hospital surgical trajectories, cluster B (n = 198, 28.0%) with outpatient care trajectories with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, cluster C (n = 302, 42.7%) without any hospital cancer treatments, and cluster D (n = 58, 8.2%) with mostly chemotherapy and high hospital care consumption. Cluster belonging determinants included metastatic status and cancer site (for cluster A); cognition, mobility, and mood status (unimpaired parameters for cluster B and impaired for cluster C); and younger age (for cluster D).

CONCLUSIONS

While highlighting varied hospital care experiences among older patients with cancer, we found that age remains an independent determinant of chemotherapy-dominant care trajectories.

Real-world effectiveness and cardiovascular safety of abiraterone versus enzalutamide amongst older patients diagnosed with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Abiraterone and enzalutamide are both approved in the United States for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The objective of this study was to compare the real-world effectiveness and cardiovascular safety of these agents, drawing from a cohort of older adult patients diagnosed with mCRPC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was used to conduct an observational study comparing three-year overall survival and one-year risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between initiators of abiraterone or enzalutamide between September 2012 and June 2017. Inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting was used to balance measured confounders. MACE was defined as a hospitalization for myocardial infarction, heart failure, or ischemic event (stroke or transient attack). Results were additionally stratified by levels of a claims frailty index (robust, prefrail, frail) and the presence of baseline cardiovascular comorbidities.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 4622 male adults 66 years of age and older diagnosed with mCRPC, of which 2430 initiated abiraterone and 2192 enzalutamide. The adjusted three-year overall survival was lower in patients initiating abiraterone (27.9 %) than enzalutamide (31.5 %) (adjusted survival difference [aSD] = -3.6 %, 95 % CI: -6.2 %, -0.9 %). In frailty-stratified analysis, no survival difference was found for the robust (aSD = 0.6 %, 95 % CI: -5.0 %, 6.3 %) or frail (aSD = -1.2 %, 95 % CI: -6.1 %, 3.7 %) subgroups, but there was lower survival with abiraterone for the prefrail group (aSD = -5.9 %, 95 % CI: -9.6, -2.3). The adjusted one-year risk of MACE was higher in abiraterone initiators (5.5 %) than enzalutamide initiators (3.6 %) (adjusted risk difference [aRD] = 1.8 %, 95 % CI: 0.6 %, 3.1 %); the increase was significant in the frail (aRD = 4.8 %, 95 % CI = 1.4 %, 8.3 %) and pre-frail subgroups (aRD =1.9 %, 95 % CI: 0.1 %, 3.6 %) but not the robust subgroup (aRD = -0.3 %, 95 % CI: -1.8 %, 1.2 %).

DISCUSSION

The three-year survival of abiraterone initiators was slightly lower than that of enzalutamide initiators, though the agents showed similar survival for patients with robust fitness. A one-year increase in MACE risk was observed in abiraterone initiators, especially amongst frail individuals, highlighting the importance of assessing frailty during therapy selection.

Comprehensive assessment in uro-oncologic geriatric patients: interdisciplinary management to improve survival

Urological cancers represent 13.1% of cancer cases in the world, with a mean age of diagnosis of 67 years, making it a geriatric disease. The lack of participation and evaluation of treatments by the geriatric oncologic population has made their mortality rate higher than that of other oncologic population groups, urologic cancers being no exception. The comprehensive management of older people with urological cancers is a bet that is presented to improve the quality of life and survival of this group. Managing elements such as nutritional, physical, cognitive, psychosocial, and sexual status improves the chances of adherence and treatment, contributing significantly to improving the quality of life. The integrated management of the geriatric oncology population has brought positive effects on quality of life, enhancing levels of depression and anxiety and also allowing the classification of oncology patients based on other criteria in addition to their chronologic age, contributing to the management of specialized treatments that have allowed the implementation of more specific interventions with better results.

Evaluation of claims-based frailty measurements in older patients with cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Frailty is associated with poor outcomes in older adults with cancer. Several efforts have been made to assess frailty using the administrative claims data based on the number of clinical diagnosis codes, yet the literature reporting on this is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of frailty measures using administrative databases in Japan.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

5176 patients with cancer aged ≥65 years who underwent cancer treatment in hospitals.

METHODS

The Electronic Frailty Index (eFI) and Veterans Affairs Frailty Index (VA-FI), based on diagnostic codes recorded were calculated. We plotted Kaplan-Meier survival curves and calculated hazard ratios (HR) using Cox regression analyses. The primary outcome was mortality, whereas the composite secondary outcome included a decline in care-need level, admission to a long-term care facility (LTCF) or mortality.

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated a significant association between the eFI and VA-FI and each research outcome. Compared to the lowest frailty group, the highest frailty group exhibited an HR of 2.59 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.66-4.06] for eFI and 2.45 (95%CI, 1.02-5.91) for VA-FI in relation to a decline in care-need level, an LTCF admission and mortality. The trend test indicated a significant increase in the rate of each outcome with higher frailty levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher frailty levels are associated with an increased risk of composite outcomes in older adults with cancer. This study suggests the potential application of frailty measurements in oncology care settings.

Frailty in Older Adults with Prostate Cancer

Older adults with all stages of prostate cancer are prone to developing frailty. These patients should have a frailty assessment and be managed by a multidisciplinary team. Lifestyle measures and tailoring of cancer-related treatment to the patient's fitness level can help in mitigating the adverse effects of frailty.

Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Report from the 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Innovations have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer (PC). Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of topics that greatly impact daily practice. The 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) surveyed experts on key questions in clinical management in order to supplement evidence-based guidelines. Here we present voting results for questions from APCCC 2024.

METHODS

Before the conference, a panel of 120 international PC experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 183 multiple-choice consensus questions on eight different topics. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the voting panel members ("panellists").

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Consensus was a priori defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. The voting results show varying degrees of consensus, as discussed in this article and detailed in the Supplementary material. These findings do not include a formal literature review or meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The voting results can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers in prioritising areas for future research. Diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised on the basis of patient and cancer characteristics, and should incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence, guidelines, and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is always strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2024 once again identified important gaps (areas of nonconsensus) that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials.

Pain and Health-related Quality of Life with Biweekly Versus Triweekly Cabazitaxel Schedule in Older Men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in the Multicenter, Randomized CABASTY Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The CABASTY study showed that more frequent administration of a lower dose of cabazitaxel (CBZ) reduced toxicity in older men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), without compromising efficacy. Here, we investigated the impact of a biweekly CBZ schedule on patient-reported pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

METHODS

We randomized 196 patients from 25 centers (1:1, stratified by age and G8 score) to the biweekly CBZ16 (CBZ 16 mg/m2) experimental arm or the triweekly CBZ25 (CBZ 25 mg/m2) control arm (CABASTY study, NCT02961257). We assessed pain using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and HRQoL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 141 patients were available for a pain and 160 for an HRQoL analysis. Median time to pain progression (stratified hazard ratio [HR]: 1.7, confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-4.22, p = 0.3) and median time to first opiate use (stratified HR: 1.05, CI: 0.44-2.55, p = 0.9) did not differ between arms. We did not see a significant difference in median time to deterioration of FACT-P total score between treatments (stratified HR: 0.88, CI: 0.47-1.7, p = 0.7). Interestingly, the time to onset of several adverse events was significantly longer in the biweekly CBZ16 group.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

HRQoL did not significantly differ between the biweekly CBZ16 and the standard schedule. Additionally, onset of some adverse events was delayed. These results may increase health care providers' confidence in using CBZ in older patients with mCRPC who are denied chemotherapy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors are often preferred to taxane chemotherapy as a treatment of second or subsequent line in older metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients due to more frequent treatment-related toxicities. Here, we showed that quality of life and pain did not differ significantly with an adapted schedule of cabazitaxel (CBZ), compared with the standard regimen. This CBZ schedule could increase eligibility of older patients for chemotherapy.

Navigating management of localized prostate cancer in the geriatric population

Prostate cancer (PCa) is highly prevalent among aging men and a significant contributor to global mortality. Balancing early detection and treatment of "clinically significant" disease with avoiding over-detection and overtreatment of slow-growing tumors is challenging, especially for elderly patients with competing health risks and potentially aggressive disease phenotypes. This review emphasizes the importance of individualized approaches for diagnosing and treating PCa in geriatric patients. Active surveillance and watchful waiting are common strategies, while surgical interventions are less frequent but considered based on comorbidities, disease risk, and patient preferences. Radiotherapy, often combined with androgen deprivation therapy, is typical for higher-risk cases, and focal therapy is emerging to reduce morbidity. An inclusive approach combining advanced diagnostics, life expectancy considerations, and minimally invasive interventions can improve decision-making. Integrating multidisciplinary strategies with better risk stratification and less invasive options can significantly enhance care and outcomes for elderly patients with significant PCa.

Frailty and gynecologic cancer: a cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

OBJECTIVE

There is significant heterogeneity in the recovery of individuals after gynecological cancer treatment. The Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging provided a distinct opportunity to evaluate the associations between psychosocial and functional factors and long-term health outcomes. We sought to examine the prevalence of frailty and utilization of social and community support among community-dwelling older adults with a history of gynecologic cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of female participants in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, a population-based cohort comprising over 50,000 individuals aged 45 to 85 years old. Frailty was operationalized using the deficit accumulation model (frailty defined as Frailty Index >0.21). Associations were evaluated using multivariate regression analyses adjusted for sociodemographic, lifestyle, economic, and social support factors.

RESULTS

Data points to measure frailty were available for 15,149 of the 15,320 (98.8%) female participants. The prevalence of frailty was 19.9% in those with a history of gynecologic cancer compared to 9.1% in those without (p < .001; adjusted OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.9). For all female participants, regardless of a history of gynecologic cancer, history of smoking, alcohol use, lower income, lower educational level, never having been married, living alone, and less social support availability were significantly associated with frailty in univariate analysis. Those with a history of gynecologic cancer classified as frail were more likely to require assistance from family members (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.0 to 5.7) and professional community supports (OR 7.9, 95% CI 4.1 to 15.0) than those who were not frail.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large national cohort study, a history of gynecological cancer was independently associated with frailty. We identified the factors of social vulnerability that may affect health outcomes. These novel findings can be instrumental in advocating for resource allocation and designing proactive strategies.

Neoadjuvant darolutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy for high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer: a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial

PROPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant treatment of darolutamide, a next-generation androgen receptor inhibitor, plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC).

METHODS

This single-arm, multicenter, open-label phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05249712, 2022-01-01), recruited 30 localized high-risk/very high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa/VHRPCa) patients from three centers in China between 2021 and 2023. Following six months of neoadjuvant therapy combining darolutamide with ADT, the patients underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR) or minimal residual disease (MRD). The secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), positive surgical margin rate and safety. Exploratory endpoint was the relationship between postoperative ctDNA and primary outcome.

RESULTS

The pCR or MRD rate was 40%(n = 12). Only four patients (13.3%) had positive surgical margins. The 12 months PFS was 90.0% (95% CI, 74.4-96.5%). The detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) accurately predicts the disease progression. No grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed. The most frequent adverse events included hot flashes and elevated alanine aminotransferase or aspartate transaminase levels, which were observed in three patients (10%).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant therapy with darolutamide plus ADT for six months followed by RP is effective and safe for HRPCa and LAPC. The detection of ctDNA can predict disease progression.

Docetaxel Versus Androgen-Receptor Signaling Inhibitors (ARSI) as Second-Line Therapy After Failure of First-Line Alternative ARSI for the Elderly ≥ 75 Years Old With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): A SPARTACUSS-Meet-URO 26 Real-World Study

BACKGROUND

Androgen receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSIs) abiraterone acetate (AA) enzalutamide (Enza), are currently the standard first-line (L1) treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and docetaxel (D) is reserved as second-line (L2) after ARSI failure. Nonetheless, D use in men ≥ 75 years old is restricted owing to treatment toxicities and patient comorbidities, and a L2 alternative ARSI is frequently used. We aimed to evaluate real-life survival and toxicity outcomes of these elderly patients after failure of L1 ARSI treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated efficacy and safety in a real-world international cohort of consecutive patients ≥ 75 years old when starting L1 ARSI for mCRPC according to the choice of L2 treatment (D versus alternative ARSI).

RESULTS

Of the 122 identified patients, 57 (46.7%) had received L2 ARSI and 65 (53.3%) L2 D. No difference was found in the L1 overall survival (OS) for the ARSI and D groups (32.8 vs. 30.0 months, respectively; Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.77-1.95; P = .40) or in the L2 OS (18.5 vs. 17.8 months, respectively; HR = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.69-1.74; P = .71). No difference was observed for rPFS from L2 (P = .12), although a trend was observed for a numerically improved rPFS on D.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of a retrospective design and small population, our study suggests that D or ARSI after failure of L1 alternative ARSI are clinically comparable L2 options for elderly patients with mCRPC.

Novel hormonal agents in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer and reduced performance status: Experiences of a specialized single center

Objectives

Attaining castration resistance in metastatic prostate cancer (mCRPC) represents a pivotal juncture in the progression of the patient's illness and treatment regimen. Within this therapeutic context, novel hormonal agents (NHA) constitute a fundamental component of pharmacological intervention. However, the efficacy of NHA therapy remains uncertain for patients with a compromised general condition, as indicated by an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score of ≥2. Notably, most clinical trials excluded individuals with an ECOG PS ≥2, leaving a gap in our understanding of the potential benefits of NHA therapy for this specific patient cohort.

Methods

We conducted an analysis of fifty-three NHA-naïve men characterized by attaining mCRPC at an ECOG PS of ≥2 subsequent to androgen deprivation monotherapy between 2008 and 2023. Patients were then treated with either NHA or Best Supportive Care (BSC) based on individual decisions. Survival and adverse event (AE) analysis was performed to assess the outcomes of NHA therapy compared to BSC.

Results

Among the patients, 30 (56.6%) received NHA, whereas the remaining 23 (43.4%) choose BSC. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the NHA and BSC group. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.1 months in the BSC group and 7.0 months in the NHA group, with no significant OS benefits associated with NHA treatment. AEs and severe AEs commonly occurred, but remained indifferent between treatment groups.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that NHA therapy may confer reduced survival benefits in mCRPC patients with ECOG PS ≥2. While hope for NHA treatment persists, particularly given its oral administration and tolerability, careful consideration and discussion with patients regarding treatment expectations and palliative care goals are warranted in this challenging patient population.

Preoperative geriatric assessment to predict functional outcome after major urologic operations: Results from a multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Major urological tumor surgery entails a severe risk of unexpected adverse events, persistent functional deterioration, and death in older patients. The Erlangen Index (EI) geriatric assessment tool has previously been shown to predict incomplete functional recovery following major urological tumor surgery in an elderly patient collective. We prospectively evaluated assessment tools including EI in a multicenter setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 340 patients over the age of 65 were assessed prospectively before and after cystectomy, prostatectomy, or renal tumor surgery at three academic centers in Germany and Austria. Endpoints were long-term functional deterioration (Activities of daily living (ADL) measured by Barthel-Index) at day 30 and day 180, and mortality at day 180.

RESULTS

In this study 58 (17.0 %) patients underwent cystectomy, 140 (41.2 %) prostatectomy and 142 (41.8 %) a kidney tumor operation. Mean age was 74.8 years. ADL impairment as a measure of incomplete recovery at day 30 and 180 after surgery were recorded in 47.6 % and 37.4 % of cases, respectively. The EI showed good sensitivity for mortality at day 180 (reference cohort: 85 %, validation center 1: 100 %, validation center 2: 50 %) and for ADL impairment at day 180 (reference cohort 75.4 %, validation center 1 72.3 %, validation center 2 83.3 %).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with a poor performance status have a high risk of persistent functional deterioration. Data from this multicenter external validation trial confirms the EI as an accurate and reliable tool to identify patients with high risk of mortality or persistent postoperative functional impairment.

Trends of prostate cancer treatment in Ehime Prefecture, Japan: analysis of a hospital-based cancer registry

BACKGROUND

We previously conducted a retrospective Japanese cohort study of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between January 2010 and December 2020 in Ehime Prefecture. This study revealed an increase in the number of RP, but other treatment trends remained unclear. In the current study, we examined prostate cancer treatment in Ehime Prefecture using the hospital-based cancer registry of all designated cancer care hospitals and community cancer care hospitals belonging to the Council of Ehime Cancer Care Hospitals.

METHODS

Trends of prostate cancer were compared by year according to stage and treatment using data from the hospital-based cancer registry between 2011 and 2020.

RESULTS

The number of patients with stage 1 disease increased over time, but the proportion of patients with stage 1 disease among all patients decreased from 65.2% in 2012 to 56.9% in 2020. The number of patients with stage 2 disease also increased, but the proportion of such patients among all patients remained constant. Meanwhile, the proportions of patients with stage 3 or 4 disease increased significantly over time, while that of patients undergoing RP increased from 29.2% in 2011 to 45.7% in 2020 (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) decreased from 25.8% in 2011 to 17.2% in 2020. The use of hormone therapy (HT) remained unchanged, and the proportion of patients undergoing observation fell from 11.0% in 2011 to 7.0% in 2020. A higher proportion of patients with stage 3 cancer received HT, and RT was more frequently used in stage 3 cancer than in stage 1-2 cancer. The use of HT increased with age.

CONCLUSIONS

The data highlighted differences in prostate cancer stages and treatment over time. This information could be shared with both urologists and radiologists to improve treatment.

Darolutamide in Japanese patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: Phase 3 ARASENS subgroup analysis

BACKGROUND

In the global ARASENS study (NCT02799602), darolutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and docetaxel significantly reduced risk of death by 32.5% versus placebo plus ADT and docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.80; p < 0.0001), with a favorable safety profile in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). We investigated outcomes in Japanese participants.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to oral darolutamide 600 mg twice daily or placebo, plus ADT and docetaxel. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS

The Japanese subgroup comprised 148 patients (darolutamide 63, placebo 85). In the Japanese versus overall population, more patients were aged ≥75 years (darolutamide/placebo 35%/22% vs. 16%/17%) and had body mass index <25 kg/m2 (78%/79% vs. 46%/43%), The ECOG performance status 0 (92%/88% vs. 72%/71%), de novo mHSPC (95%/97% vs. 86%/87%), and Gleason score ≥8 (94%/92% vs. 78%/79%). Median treatment duration was 43.3/15.4 months for darolutamide/placebo. The overall survival HR for darolutamide versus placebo was 0.91 (95% CI 0.50-1.64), despite 85% of patients in the placebo group receiving subsequent life-prolonging therapy. Darolutamide prolonged time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.17-0.55). Treatment-emergent adverse event incidences were generally similar between groups. Adverse events known to be associated with docetaxel (e.g., neutropenia) were more frequent in the Japanese versus overall population.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, efficacy outcomes showed positive trends for darolutamide plus ADT and docetaxel in Japanese patients with mHSPC, consistent with the overall population, despite higher risk factors. The combination was well tolerated, with no new safety signals in Japanese patients.

Multivariable models of outcomes with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617: analysis of the phase 3 VISION trial

Background

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) prolonged life in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in VISION (NCT03511664). However, distinguishing between patients likely and unlikely to respond remains a clinical challenge. We present the first multivariable models of outcomes with 177Lu-PSMA-617 built using data from VISION, a large prospective phase 3 clinical trial powered for overall survival.

Methods

Adults with progressive post androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and taxane prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive mCRPC received 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus protocol-permitted standard of care (SoC) or SoC alone. In this post hoc analysis, multivariable Cox proportional hazards models of overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and a logistic regression model of prostate-specific antigen response (≥50% decline; PSA50) were constructed and evaluated using C-index or receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses with bootstrapping validation. Nomograms were constructed for visualisation.

Findings

Patients were randomised between June 2018 and October 2019. Data from all 551 patients in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 arm were analysed in multivariable modelling. The OS nomogram (C-index, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.76) included whole-body maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax), time since diagnosis, opioid analgesic use, aspartate aminotransferase, haemoglobin, lymphocyte count, presence of PSMA-positive lesions in lymph nodes, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and neutrophil count. The rPFS nomogram (C-index, 0.68; 0.65-0.72) included SUVmax, time since diagnosis, opioid analgesic use, lymphocyte count, presence of liver metastases by computed tomography, LDH, and ALP. The PSA50 nomogram (area under ROC curve, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.68-0.77) included SUVmax, lymphocyte count and ALP. Performances of the OS and rPFS models were maintained when they were reconstructed excluding SUVmax.

Interpretation

These models of outcomes with 177Lu-PSMA-617 are the first built using prospective phase 3 data. They show that a combination of pretreatment laboratory, clinical, and imaging parameters, reflecting both patient and tumour status, influences outcomes. These models are important for aiding treatment selection, patient management, and clinical trial design.

Funding

Novartis.

Correlation analyses of radiographic progression-free survival with clinical and health-related quality of life outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Analysis of the phase 3 VISION trial

BACKGROUND

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) plus protocol-permitted standard of care (SOC) prolonged overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) versus SOC in patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the phase 3 VISION study, in addition to beneficial effects on symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

METHODS

Post hoc analyses used the full analysis set from the VISION study (N = 831) overall and by randomized treatment arm (177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC, n = 551; SOC, n = 280). Correlations were determined between OS and rPFS and between rPFS or OS and time to SSE or to worsening HRQOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate [FACT-P] and 5-level EQ-5D [EQ-5D-5L]). Correlation analyses used an iterative multiple imputation copula-based approach (correlation coefficients [rho] of <0.3 were defined as weak, ≥0.3 and <0.5 as mild, ≥0.5 and <0.7 as moderate, and ≥0.7 as strong).

RESULTS

In the overall population, rPFS correlated strongly with OS (rho, ≥0.7). Correlations between rPFS or OS and time to SSE without death were weak or mild. Time to worsening in the FACT-P total score and emotional and physical well-being domains correlated mildly or moderately with rPFS and moderately with OS. Correlation coefficients for time-to-worsening EQ-5D-5L scores were mild to moderate for both rPFS and OS. Correlation coefficients were similar between treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis of the VISION study, rPFS correlated strongly with OS but not with time to SSE or worsening HRQOL. These findings require further investigation.

Lower urinary tract symptoms in elderly men: Considerations for prostate cancer testing

PURPOSE

Both lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and prostate cancer (PCa) are common in elderly men. While LUTS are generally due to a benign etiology, they may provoke an evaluation with prostate-specific antigen (PSA), which can lead to a cascade of further testing and possible overdiagnosis in patients with competing risks. There is limited patient and provider understanding of the relationship between LUTS and PCa risk, and a lack of clarity in how to evaluate these men to balance appropriate diagnosis of aggressive PCa with avoidance of overdiagnosis.

METHODS

A literature review was performed using keywords to query the electronic database PubMed. All articles published before November 2023 were screened by title and abstract for articles relevant to our subject.

RESULTS

Epidemiological studies suggest that LUTS and PCa are largely independent in elderly men. The best available tools to assess PCa risk include PSA permutations, novel biomarkers, and imaging, but there are limitations in older men based on lack of validation in the elderly and unclear applicability of traditional definitions of "clinically significant" disease. We present a three-tiered approach to evaluating these patients.

CONCLUSION

Elderly men commonly have LUTS as well as a high likelihood of indolent PCa. A systematic and shared decision-making-based approach can help to balance objectives of appropriate detection of phenotypically dangerous disease and avoidance of over-testing and overdiagnosis.

Activity of Lutetium-177 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen and Determinants of Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated with Cabazitaxel: The PACAP Study

BACKGROUND

Both cabazitaxel and lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen (Lu-PSMA) improve survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and docetaxel, but there are limited data regarding Lu-PSMA activity after cabazitaxel.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the activity of Lu-PSMA and determinants of outcomes after cabazitaxel in mCRPC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of consecutive mCRPC patients from eight European centers treated with Lu-PSMA after cabazitaxel.

INTERVENTION

Lu-PSMA every 6-8 wk at a dose of 6-7.6 GBq.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). The secondary endpoints included time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (TTPSA), overall survival (OS), PSA decline, objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit, and safety.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Of 126 patients, 68% had International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 4-5 disease, 21% had visceral metastases, and 7% had lymph node disease only. DNA damage repair (DDR) alterations were detected in 11/50 (22%) patients with available testing. Patients received a median number of 3 Lu-PSMA cycles (interquartile range 2-4). With a median follow-up of 12.0 mo, the median rPFS was 4.4 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.2-5.4), TTPSA 3.5 mo (95% CI 3.0-4.6), and OS 8.9 mo (95% CI 6.5-12.7). The ORR was 35%, and 55 patients (44%) experienced a PSA decline of ≥50%. The time to castration resistance of <12 mo was associated with shorter rPFS (p = 0.01). A similar trend was observed for ISUP grade 4-5 (p = 0.08), and baseline positron-emission tomography parameters including PSMA mean standardized uptake value (SUV) and maximum SUV (respectively, p = 0.06 and 0.05). The duration of previous cabazitaxel or DDR status did not impact outcomes. Patients experiencing a PSA decline of ≥ 50% on therapy demonstrated longer rPFS, TTPSA, and OS (all p < 0.0001). Limitations include retrospective data collection and investigator-based rPFS assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Lu-PSMA demonstrated a substantial PSA decline but limited rPFS after cabazitaxel in a real-life setting. Adverse baseline characteristics, baseline positron-emission tomography parameters, and quality of PSA response may help identify patients less likely to benefit from Lu-PSMA.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen (Lu-PSMA) improved outcomes in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer, but there are limited data about its activity after cabazitaxel, a chemotherapy that is also the standard of care in this setting. We conducted a study across eight European centers and showed substantial responses on Lu-PSMA after cabazitaxel, although activity was short lived in a heavily pretreated population. Our findings prompt for real-life evaluation of Lu-PSMA in earlier settings to define the best therapeutic sequence.

Outcomes of First-Line Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide for Older Adults With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer According to Use of Upfront Docetaxel for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in an International Multicenter Registry: A SPARTACUSS-Meet-URO 26 Study

BACKGROUND

Managing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in men aged ≥ 75 is challenging due to limited data. Regardless of age, in real-world clinical practice, most mCRPC still derive from failure of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel (D) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). As abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA) and enzalutamide (Enza) are common first-line treatments for mCRPC. The impact of prior use of D for mCSPC on the efficacy and safety of AA or Enza in this older population remains unclear.

METHODS

A cohort of patients aged ≥ 75 years starting AA or Enza as first-line therapy for mCRPC from January 2015 to April 2019 was identified from the registries of 10 institutions. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on previous use of D for mCSPC. Primary endpoints were cancer-specific survival (CSS) from AA or Enza start, CSS from ADT onset, and safety. We used Kaplan-Meier method to estimate the endpoints distribution, including median values with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

Of the 337 patients identified, 24 (7.1%) received ADT+D and 313 (92.9%) received ADT alone for mCSPC. Median follow-up from AA/Enza start was 18.8 months. Median CSS from ADT or AA/Enza was not significantly different between ADT+D and ADT alone cohorts (71.9 vs. 52.7 months, P = .97; 25.4 vs. 27.2 months, P = .89, respectively). No statistically significant difference in adverse events (AEs) of any grade rate (58.3% vs. 52.1%, respectively; P = .67) or grade ≥ 3 (12.5% vs. 15.7%, respectively; P = 1.0) was found between ADT+D and ADT alone cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the innate limitations of a retrospective design and relatively small size of the ADT+D cohort, this analysis suggests that elderly men receiving AA or Enza as first-line therapy for mCRPC have similar survival outcomes and tolerability, regardless of previous D for mCSPC.

Safety profile of darolutamide versus placebo: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Darolutamide is an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) used in patients with prostate cancer (PC). In pivotal trials, it has demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile. There are no head-to-head comparison studies between the different ARPIs, but the efficacy of these drugs seems to be similar making the toxicity profile a key element for treatment selection.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of all clinical trials assessing treatment with darolutamide for patients with PC using placebo as the control using the PubMed/Medline and Cochrane library databases. We also performed a meta-analysis to compare the safety of darolutamide versus placebo evaluating adverse events (AE) leading to treatment discontinuation and the rate of the AE reported as "AE of interest" in the ARAMIS trial. The comparison among darolutamide and the placebo group in terms of safety and tolerability was performed using odds ratio (OR) as meta-analytic outcome.

RESULTS

We identified three articles comprising 2902 patients for the systematic review and meta-analysis (1652 treated with darolutamide and 1250 with placebo). Darolutamide did not increase AE leading to treatment discontinuation compared to placebo (pooled OR: 1.176, 95% CI 0.918-1.507, p = 0.633). Regarding the "AE of interest" there was no difference between darolutamide and placebo in terms of asthenia, cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac disorder, coronary artery disorder, depression mood disorder, falls, fatigue, heart failure, hot flushes, hypertension, mental-impairment disorder, rash, seizure and weight loss. The only "AE of interest" with a statistically significant difference in favor of placebo was bone fractures (pooled OR: 1.523, 95% CI 1.081-2.146).

CONCLUSIONS

In our systematic review and meta-analysis, darolutamide showed a toxicity profile comparable to placebo with the exception of bone fractures. In the absence of head-to-head comparison studies between the different ARPIs, the results of our research suggest a preferred use of darolutamide in the approved settings.

Effectiveness and Feasibility of Home-Based Palliative Care Interventions for Geriatric Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review Using Narrative Synthesis

BACKGROUND

Due to an urgent need to develop palliative care services for geriatric patients with advanced cancer, an overview of available information regarding home-based palliative care interventions would be valuable.

AIM

To summarize current literature for interventions targeted to homebound, older patients with incurable cancer, and investigate whether these patients can be benefited from home-based palliative care and achieve improved outcomes.

DESIGN

A search strategy consisting of terms related to home care, palliation, oncology, and geriatrics was employed. A protocol following PRISMA guidelines was prospectively uploaded at PROSPERO (ID = CRD42023404675).

DATA SOURCES

Pubmed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Epistemonikos.org databases were searched from inception until the present day. Eligibility criteria were selected based on the research question, the population of interest, and the research design. The Risk of Bias Assessment Tool version 2 (RoB-2) was used to appraise study quality.

RESULTS

A total of 10 articles including 871 patients (out of 1236 titles and 141 fully-reviewed texts) were selected. Four studies assessed exercise interventions, two evaluated multi-component home-care models, two focused on supervision services, and two had nutrition and activity components. Eight studies reported improved outcomes in either specified or mixed cancer geriatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a scarcity of clinical trials regarding home-based palliative care for geriatric oncology patients, resulting in poor information and a lack of evidence. At-home interventions seem feasible and have a positive effect on pain management and functional status, but more high-quality studies are required.

EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines provide recommendations for the management of clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa). This paper aims to present a summary of the 2024 version of the EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised PCa.

METHODS

The panel performed a literature review of all new data published in English, covering the time frame between May 2020 and 2023. The guidelines were updated, and a strength rating for each recommendation was added based on a systematic review of the evidence.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

A risk-adapted strategy for identifying men who may develop PCa is advised, generally commencing at 50 yr of age and based on individualised life expectancy. The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in order to avoid unnecessary biopsies is recommended. When a biopsy is considered, a combination of targeted and regional biopsies should be performed. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography imaging is the most sensitive technique for identifying metastatic spread. Active surveillance is the appropriate management for men with low-risk PCa, as well as for selected favourable intermediate-risk patients with International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 2 lesions. Local therapies are addressed, as well as the management of persistent prostate-specific antigen after surgery. A recommendation to consider hypofractionation in intermediate-risk patients is provided. Patients with cN1 PCa should be offered a local treatment combined with long-term intensified hormonal treatment.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The evidence in the field of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of localised PCa is evolving rapidly. These PCa guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This article is the summary of the guidelines for "curable" prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is "found" through a multistep risk-based screening process. The objective is to find as many men as possible with a curable cancer. Prostate cancer is curable if it resides in the prostate; it is then classified into low-, intermediary-, and high-risk localised and locally advanced prostate cancer. These risk classes are the basis of the treatments. Low-risk prostate cancer is treated with "active surveillance", a treatment with excellent prognosis. For low-intermediary-risk active surveillance should also be discussed as an option. In other cases, active treatments, surgery, or radiation treatment should be discussed along with the potential side effects to allow shared decision-making.

Localized prostate cancer in older patients: Radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy versus observation

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluates the effects of radical prostatectomy (RP) or irradiation on overall survival (OS) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in older patients with localized prostate cancer (PC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature review across PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception up to December 2023 to identify studies comparing the outcomes of surgery or radiotherapy (RT) versus observation in patients aged 65 and older with localized PC. We pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and PCSM using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies involving 284,066 patients were analyzed. Three were large randomized trials (RCTs) and 10 were retrospective studies. Overall survival with surgery was greater in observational studies (HR = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.59; P < 0.001) than in RCTs (HR = 0.84, 95%CI 0.72-0.98; P = 0.03). Data on PCSM from seven studies also indicated a significant benefit for RP in RCTs (HR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.3-0.73; P < 0.001) and observational studies (HR = 0.41, 95%CI 0.27-0.62; P < 0.001). Both analyses presented high heterogeneity (I2 = 90%, P < 0.001 and I2 = 65%, P = 0.01). An analysis of patients receiving RT indicated a significant, albeit smaller, OS (n = 7 studies) and PCSM (n = 5 studies) advantage (HR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.59-0.79; P < 0.001; and HR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.44-0.82; P = 0.001) compared to observation (1 RCT and 8 observational studies).

DISCUSSION

The evidence suggests that patients with PC might consider opting for surgery as the main treatment option or, alternatively, for RT, as an alternative to observation, based on their individual medical history, life expectancy, and preferences.

TOward a comPrehensive supportive Care intervention for Older men with metastatic Prostate cancer (TOPCOP3): A pilot randomized controlled trial and process evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Current management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) includes androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy (ARATs), which is associated with substantial toxicity in older adults. Geriatric assessment and management and remote symptom monitoring have been shown to reduce toxicity and improve quality of life in patients undergoing chemotherapy, but their efficacy in patients being treated with ARATs has not been explored. The purpose of this study is to examine whether these interventions, alone or in combination, can improve treatment tolerability and quality of life (QOL) for older adults with metastatic prostate cancer on ARATs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOPCOP3 is a multi-centre, factorial pilot clinical trial coupled with an embedded process evaluation. The study includes four treatment arms: geriatric assessment and management (GA + M); remote symptom monitoring (RSM); geriatric assessment and management plus remote symptom monitoring; and usual care and will be followed for six months. The aim is to recruit 168 patients between two cancer centres in Toronto, Canada. Eligible participants will be randomized equally via REDCap. Participants in all arms will complete a comprehensive baseline assessment upon enrollment following the Geriatric Core dataset, as well as follow-up assessments at 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 months. The co-primary outcomes will be grade 3-5 toxicity and QOL. Toxicities will be graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. QOL will be measured by patient self-reporting using the EuroQol 5 dimensions of health questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include fatigue, insomnia, and depression. Finally, four process evaluation outcomes will also be observed, namely feasibility, fidelity, and acceptability, along with implementation barriers and facilitators.

DISCUSSION

Data will be collected to observe the effects of GA + M and RSM on QOL and toxicities experienced by older adults receiving ARATs for metastatic prostate cancer. Data will also be collected to help the design and conduct of a definitive multicentre phase III randomized controlled trial. This study will extend supportive care interventions for older adults with cancer into new areas and inform the design of larger trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT05582772).

Pro-inflammatory cytokines and CXC chemokines as game-changer in age-associated prostate cancer and ovarian cancer: Insights from preclinical and clinical studies' outcomes

Prostate cancer (PC) and Ovarian cancer (OC) are two of the most common types of cancer that affect the reproductive systems of older men and women. These cancers are associated with a poor quality of life among the aged population. Therefore, finding new and innovative ways to detect, treat, and prevent these cancers in older patients is essential. Finding biomarkers for these malignancies will increase the chance of early detection and effective treatment, subsequently improving the survival rate. Studies have shown that the prevalence and health of some illnesses are linked to an impaired immune system. However, the age-associated changes in the immune system during malignancies such as PC and OC are poorly understood. Recent research has suggested that the excessive production of inflammatory immune mediators, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), transforming growth factor (TGF), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), CXC motif chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1), CXC motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12), and CXC motif chemokine ligand 13 (CXCL13), etc., significantly impact the development of PC and OC in elderly patients. Our review focuses on the latest functional studies of pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukins) and CXC chemokines, which serve as biomarkers in elderly patients with PC and OC. Thus, we aim to shed light on how these biomarkers affect the development of PC and OC in elderly patients. We also examine the current status and future perspective of cytokines (interleukins) and CXC chemokines-based therapeutic targets in OC and PC treatment for elderly patients.

Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Combination Treatment Outcomes: A Review

Importance

Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer is currently an incurable disease. Despite a high response rate to androgen-deprivation therapy, most cases progress to castration-resistant disease, the terminal phase. This review provides a summary of the most recent evidence for current and emerging management strategies, including treatment intensification with combinations of therapies. It also provides recommendations on applying the evidence in clinical practice to encourage appropriate treatment to improve survival outcomes among patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

Observations

Androgen-deprivation therapy is the backbone of treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; however, it is insufficient alone to provide sustained disease control and long-term survival. Addition of an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and/or docetaxel significantly improves survival, as demonstrated by several international phase 3 randomized clinical trials. Triplet therapy composed of androgen-deprivation therapy plus an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor plus docetaxel has been shown to improve overall survival over androgen-deprivation therapy plus docetaxel. In the ARASENS trial (darolutamide), the hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.68 (95% CI, 0.57-0.80) in the overall population; 0.71 (95% CI, 0.59-0.85) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.35-1.05) in patients with de novo and recurrent disease, respectively; 0.69 (95% CI, 0.57-0.82) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.41-1.13) in patients with high-volume and low-volume disease, respectively; and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58-0.86) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.42-0.90) in patients with high-risk and low-risk disease, respectively. In the PEACE-1 trial (abiraterone acetate + prednisone), the HRs were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.59-0.95; all de novo) in the overall population and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.55-0.95) and immature in the high-volume and low-volume subgroups, respectively. In the ENZAMET trial (enzalutamide), the HRs were 0.82 (95% CI, 0.63-1.06) in the overall population; 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55-0.99) and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.65-1.86) in the de novo and recurrent subgroups, respectively; and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.66-1.17) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.33-1.10) in the high-volume and low-volume subgroups. Combination regimens are generally well tolerated, with adverse effects dependent on the profiles of the component drugs.

Conclusions and relevance

The findings of this review show compelling evidence from phase 3 randomized clinical trials in favor of initiating triplet combination therapy for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer for the best overall survival. Patients who are eligible for chemotherapy should be offered androgen-deprivation therapy plus an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor plus docetaxel, particularly patients with high-volume, high-risk, or de novo metastatic disease.

Outcomes in studies regarding older patients with prostate cancer: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Older patients are often deemed ineligible for clinical research, and many frequently-used endpoints and outcome measures are not as relevant for older patients for younger ones. This systematic review aimed to present an overview of outcomes used in clinical research regarding patients over the age of 65 years with prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed and Embase were systematically searched to identify studies on prostate cancer (treatment) in patients aged ≥65 between 2016 and 2023. Data on title, study design, number of participants and age, stage of disease, treatment, and investigated outcomes were synthesized and descriptively analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight studies were included. Of these most included patients over 65 years, while others used a higher age. Overall, 39 articles (57.3%) reported on survival-related outcomes, 22 (32.4%) reported on progression of disease and 38 (55.9%) used toxicity or adverse events as an outcome measure. Health-related quality of life and functional outcomes were investigated in 29.4%, and cognition in two studies. The most frequently investigated survival-related outcomes were overall and cancer-specific survival (51.3%); however, 38.5% only studied overall survival.

DISCUSSION

The main focus of studies included in this review remains survival and disease progression. There is limited attention for health-related quality of life and functional status, although older patients often prioritize the latter. Future research should incorporate outcome measures tailored to the aged population to improve care for older patients with prostate cancer.

Geographic and socioeconomic variation in treatment of elderly prostate cancer patients in Norway - a national register-based study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine geographic and socioeconomic variation in curative treatment and choice of treatment modality among elderly prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

METHODS

This register-based cohort study included all Norwegian men ≥ 70 years when diagnosed with non-metastatic, high-risk PCa in 2011-2020 (n = 10 807). Individual data were obtained from the Cancer Registry of Norway, the Norwegian Prostate Cancer Registry, and Statistics Norway. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to model variation across hospital referral areas (HRAs), incorporating clinical, demographic and socioeconomic factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 5186 (48%) patients received curative treatment (radical prostatectomy (RP) (n = 1560) or radiotherapy (n = 3626)). Geographic variation was found for both curative treatment (odds ratio 0.39-2.19) and choice of treatment modality (odds ratio 0.10-2.45). Odds of curative treatment increased with increasing income and education, and decreased for patients living alone, and with increasing age and frailty. Patients with higher income had higher odds of receiving RP compared to radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed geographic and socioeconomic variation in treatment of elderly patients with non-metastatic, high-risk PCa, both in relation to overall curative treatment and choice of treatment modality. Further research is needed to explore clinical practices, the shared decision process and how socioeconomic factors influence the treatment of elderly patients with high-risk PCa.

Adequacy of clinical guideline recommendations for patients with low-risk cancer managed with monitoring: systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to summarize national and international guidelines that made recommendations for monitoring patients diagnosed with low-risk cancer. It appraised the quality of guidelines and determined whether the guidelines adequately identified patients for monitoring, specified which tests to use, defined monitoring intervals, and stated triggers for further intervention. It then assessed the evidence to support each recommendation.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses, we searched PubMed and Turning Research into Practice databases for national and international guidelines' that were written in English and developed or updated between 2012 and 2023. Quality of individual guidelines was assessed using the AGREE II tool.

RESULTS

Across the 41 published guidelines, 48 different recommendations were identified: 15 (31%) for prostate cancer, 11 (23%) for renal cancer, 6 (12.5%) for thyroid cancer, and 10 (21%) for blood cancer. The remaining 6 (12.5%) were for brain, gastrointestinal, oral cavity, bone and pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma cancer. When combining all guidelines, 48 (100%) stated which patients qualify for monitoring, 31 (65%) specified which tests to use, 25 (52%) provided recommendations for surveillance intervals, and 23 (48%) outlined triggers to initiate intervention. Across all cancer sites, there was a strong positive trend with higher levels of evidence being associated with an increased likelihood of a recommendation being specific (P = 0.001) and the evidence for intervals was based on expert opinion or other guidance.

CONCLUSION

With the exception of prostate cancer, the evidence base for monitoring low-risk cancer is weak and consequently recommendations in clinical guidelines are inconsistent. There is a lack of direct evidence to support monitoring recommendations in the literature making guideline developers reliant on expert opinion, alternative guidelines, or indirect or nonspecific evidence.

Preoperative geriatric assessment of urological patients: a narrative review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The proportion of older people is increasing disproportionately. The age between 60 and 65 years is seen as the transition to 'old age'. Frailty is a risk factor for morbidity, mortality, and complications in the context of medical interventions or adverse effects of drug therapies. One of the core components of frailty, the age-related loss of muscle mass, is sarcopenia. Is there an influence of frailty, as well as sarcopenia and some other aspects, i.e. malnutrition, on the outcome in elderly urologic patients?

RECENT FINDINGS

These phenomena of aging correlate with the incidence postoperative complication, infections, readmission rates or mortality. There are numerous studies on the value and informative value of the 5-item frailty index or the G8 questionnaire in older urological patients.

SUMMARY

Geriatric assessment is becoming increasingly important in urological surgery. Simple instruments that are practicable in clinical routine are required in this clinical setting. Which method of preoperative assessment is chosen is secondary. It is important that the risk of geriatric syndromes is assessed prior to surgical interventions in order to determine the most suitable therapeutic approach for each patient.

Exploring the Language Used to Describe Older Patients at Multidisciplinary Cancer Conferences

Older adults with cancer often present with distinct complexities that complicate their care, yet the language used to discuss their management at multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCCs) remains poorly understood. A mixed methods study was conducted at a tertiary cancer centre in Toronto, Canada, where MCCs spanning five tumour sites were attended over six months. For presentations pertaining to a patient aged 75 or older, a standardized data collection form was used to record their demographic, cancer-related, and non-cancer-related information, as well as the presenter's specialty and training level. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were employed to explore MCC depictions of older patients (n = 75). Frailty status was explicitly mentioned in 20.0% of presentations, but discussions more frequently referenced comorbidity burden (50.7%), age (33.3%), and projected treatment tolerance (30.7%) as surrogate measures. None of the presentations included mentions of formal geriatric assessment (GA) or validated frailty tools; instead, presenters tended to feature select GA domains and subjective descriptions of appearance ("looks to be fit") or overall health ("relatively healthy"). In general, MCCs appeared to rely on age-focused language that may perpetuate ageism. Further work is needed to investigate how frailty and geriatric considerations can be objectively incorporated into discussions in geriatric oncology.

Precise diagnosis and risk stratification of prostate cancer by comprehensive serum metabolic fingerprints: a prediction model study

OBJECTIVES

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies in men worldwide and has caused increasing clinical morbidity and mortality, making timely diagnosis and accurate staging crucial. The authors introduced a novel approach based on mass spectrometry for precise diagnosis and stratification of PCa to facilitate clinical decision-making.

METHODS

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry analysis of trace blood samples was combined with machine learning algorithms to construct diagnostic and stratification models. A total of 367 subjects, comprising 181 with PCa and 186 with non-PCa were enrolled. Additional 60 subjects, comprising 30 with PCa and 30 with non-PCa were enrolled as an external cohort for validation. Subsequent metabolomic analysis was carried out using Autoflex MALDI-TOF, and the mass spectra were introduced into various algorithms to construct different models.

RESULTS

Serum metabolic fingerprints were successfully obtained from 181 patients with PCa and 186 patients with non-PCa. The diagnostic model based on the eight signals demonstrated a remarkable area under curve of 100% and was validated in the external cohort with the area under curve of 87.3%. Fifteen signals were selected for enrichment analysis, revealing the potential metabolic pathways that facilitate tumorigenesis. Furthermore, the stage prediction model with an overall accuracy of 85.9% precisely classified subjects with localized disease and those with metastasis. The risk stratification model, with an overall accuracy of 89.6%, precisely classified the subjects as low-risk and high-risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study facilitated the timely diagnosis and risk stratification of PCa and provided new insights into the underlying mechanisms of metabolic alterations in PCa.

Characteristics of adverse drug reactions induced by flutamide and bicalutamide: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using FAERS

BACKGROUND

Flutamide and bicalutamide are indicated for the management of prostate metastatic carcinoma. The current study evaluated the adverse drug reactions related to flutamide and bicalutamide in a real-world setting.

METHODS

To quantify the signals of flutamide and bicalutamide associated adverse events (AEs), we used the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for this pharmacovigilance study using established pharmacovigilance methods.

RESULTS

A total of 2711 AEs of flutamide were investigated as the primary suspected; 522 AEs were related to prostate cancer. A total of 4459 AEs were investigated as the primary suspected for bicalutamide; 2251 AEs were related to prostate cancer. The analysis demonstrated 29 signals for flutamide and 84 for bicalutamide. Liver function test was the most common AEs for flutamide, and malignant neoplasm progression was the most common for bicalutamide. The signal strength of Dementia Alzheimer's type was 26.53 (17.89-39.35) and 26.33 (607.34), which had the highest strength for flutamide. Anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome exhibited the strongest signal for bicalutamide. Generating awareness of rare AEs that were not listed on the label is critical.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of the AE signals may provide support for prescribing flutamide and bicalutamide.

The association between age and long-term quality of life after curative treatment for prostate cancer: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the associations between age at radical prostate cancer treatment and long-term global quality of life (QoL), physical function (PF), and treatment-related side effects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This single-center, cross-sectional study included men treated for localized prostate cancer with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in 2014-2018. Global QoL and PF were assessed by the European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30), side effects by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26). Adjusted linear regression models were estimated to assess associations between age (continuous variable) at treatment and outcomes. QLQ-C30 scores were compared to normative data after dividing the cohort in two groups, <70 years and ≥70 years at treatment.

RESULTS

Of 654 men included, 516 (79%) had undergone RARP, and 138 (21%) had undergone EBRT combined with androgen deprivation therapy for 93%. Mean time since treatment was 57 months. Median age at treatment was 68 (min-max 44-84) years. We found no statistically significant independent association between age at treatment and global QoL, PF or side effects, except for sexual function (regression coefficient [RC] -0.77; p < 0.001) and hormonal/vitality (RC 0.30; p = 0.006) function. Mean QLQ-C30 scores were slightly poorer than age-adjusted normative scores, for men <70 years (n = 411) as well as for men ≥70 years (n = 243) at treatment, but the differences were not beyond clinical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of prostate cancer survivors, age at treatment had little impact on long-term QoL and function. Due to the cross-sectional design, short term impact or variation over time cannot be ruled out.

Contemporary Systemic Therapy Intensification for Prostate Cancer: A Review for General Practitioners in Oncology

Prostate cancer accounts for a significant proportion of cancer diagnoses in Canadian men. Over the past decade, the therapeutic landscape for the management of metastatic prostate cancer has undergone rapid changes. Novel strategies use hormonal agents, chemotherapy, homologous recombination repair inhibitors, and radioligand therapy or combination strategies in addition to androgen deprivation therapy. In this review, we summarize the available data addressing key therapeutic areas along the disease continuum and focus on practical aspects for general practitioners in oncology managing patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

First-line talazoparib with enzalutamide in HRR-deficient metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: the phase 3 TALAPRO-2 trial

Preclinical evidence has suggested an interplay between the androgen receptor, which largely drives the growth of prostate cancer cells, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. This association provides a rationale for their co-inhibition for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), an area of unmet medical need. The phase 3 TALAPRO-2 study investigated combining the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor talazoparib with enzalutamide versus enzalutamide alone as first-line treatment of mCRPC. Patients were prospectively assessed for tumor alterations in DNA damage response genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR). Two cohorts were enrolled sequentially: an all-comers cohort that was enrolled first (cohort 1; N = 805 (169 were HRR-deficient)), followed by an HRR-deficient-only cohort (cohort 2; N = 230). We present results from the alpha-controlled primary analysis for the combined HRR-deficient population (N = 399). Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to talazoparib or placebo, plus enzalutamide. The primary endpoint, radiographic progression-free survival, was met (median not reached at the time of the analysis for the talazoparib group versus 13.8 months for the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.61; P < 0.0001). Data for overall survival, a key secondary endpoint, are immature but favor talazoparib (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 1.03; P = 0.07). Common adverse events in the talazoparib group were anemia, fatigue and neutropenia. Combining talazoparib with enzalutamide significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival in patients with mCRPC harboring HRR gene alterations, supporting talazoparib plus enzalutamide as a potential first-line treatment for these patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03395197 .

Apalutamide efficacy, safety and wellbeing in older patients with advanced prostate cancer from Phase 3 randomised clinical studies TITAN and SPARTAN

BACKGROUND

Apalutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) improved outcomes in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and non-metastatic castration-resistant PC (nmCRPC) in the Phase 3 randomised TITAN and SPARTAN studies, respectively, and maintained health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Apalutamide treatment effect by patient age requires assessment.

METHODS

Post-hoc analysis assessed patients receiving 240 mg/day apalutamide (525 TITAN and 806 SPARTAN) or placebo (527 TITAN and 401 SPARTAN) with ongoing ADT, stratified by age groups. Prostate-specific antigen declines, radiographic progression-free survival, metastasis-free survival, overall survival (OS), HRQoL and safety were assessed using descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional-hazards model and mixed-effects model for repeated measures.

RESULTS

Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) generally favoured apalutamide plus ADT versus ADT alone across all endpoints regardless of age; e.g., OS values were 0.57 (0.40-0.80), 0.70 (0.54-0.91) and 0.74 (0.40-1.39) (TITAN) and 0.39 (0.19-0.78), 0.89 (0.69-1.16) and 0.81 (0.58-1.15) (SPARTAN) in patients aged <65, 65-79 and ≥80 years. Regardless of age, apalutamide also maintained HRQoL and was tolerated well with a potential trend in rates of adverse events increasing with age. Limitations include post-hoc nature and variability in sample size of age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Apalutamide plus ADT was an effective and well-tolerated option maintaining HRQoL in patients with mCSPC and nmCRPC regardless of age.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

TITAN (NCT02489318); SPARTAN (NCT01946204).