The elusive alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor: molecular and cellular characteristics and integrative roles

The characteristics and molecular targets of antiarrhythmic natural products

Arrhythmia is one of the most common cardiovascular diseases. The search for new drugs to suppress various types of cardiac arrhythmias has always been the focus of attention. In the past decade, the screening of antiarrhythmic active substances from plants has received extensive attention. These natural compounds have obvious antiarrhythmic effects, and chemical modifications based on natural compounds have greatly increased their pharmacological properties. The chemical modification of botanical antiarrhythmic drugs is closely related to the development of new and promising drugs. Therefore, the structural characteristics and action targets of natural compounds with antiarrhythmic effects are reviewed in this paper, so that pharmacologists can select antiarrhythmic lead compounds from natural compounds based on the disease target - chemical structural characteristics.

Distinct phosphorylation sites/clusters in the carboxyl terminus regulate α1D-adrenergic receptor subcellular localization and signaling

The human α_1D-adrenergic receptor is a seven transmembrane-domain protein that mediates many of the physiological actions of adrenaline and noradrenaline and participates in the development of hypertension and benign prostatic hyperplasia. We recently reported that different phosphorylation patterns control α_1D-adrenergic receptor desensitization. However, to our knowledge, there is no data regarding the role(s) of this receptor's specific phosphorylation residues in its subcellular localization and signaling. In order to address this issue, we mutated the identified phosphorylated residues located on the third intracellular loop and carboxyl tail. In this way, we experimentally confirmed α_1D-AR phosphorylation sites and identified, in the carboxyl tail, two groups of residues in close proximity to each other, as well as two individual residues in the proximal (T442) and distal (S543) regions. Our results indicate that phosphorylation of the distal cluster (T507, S515, S516 and S518) favors α_1D-AR localization at the plasma membrane, i. e., substitution of these residues for non-phosphorylatable amino acids results in the intracellular localization of the receptors, whereas phospho-mimetic substitution allows plasma membrane localization. Moreover, we found that T442 phosphorylation is necessary for agonist- and phorbol ester-induced receptor colocalization with β-arrestins. Additionally, we observed that substitution of intracellular loop 3 phosphorylation sites for non-phosphorylatable amino acids resulted in sustained ERK1/2 activation; additional mutations in the phosphorylated residues in the carboxyl tail did not alter this pattern. In contrast, mobilization of intracellular calcium and receptor internalization appear to be controlled by the phosphorylation of both third-intracellular-loop and carboxyl terminus-domain residues. In summary, our data indicate that a) both the phosphorylation sites present in the third intracellular loop and in the carboxyl terminus participate in triggering calcium signaling and in turning-off α_1D-AR-induced ERK activation; b) phosphorylation of the distal cluster appears to play a role in receptor's plasma membrane localization; and c) T442 appears to play a critical role in receptor phosphorylation and receptor-β-arrestin colocalization.

Different phosphorylation patterns regulate α1D-adrenoceptor signaling and desensitization

Human α_1D-adrenoceptors (α_1D-ARs) are a group of the seven transmembrane-spanning proteins that mediate many of the physiological and pathophysiological actions of adrenaline and noradrenaline. Although it is known that α_1D-ARs are phosphoproteins, their specific phosphorylation sites and the kinases involved in their phosphorylation remain largely unknown. Using a combination of in silico analysis, mass spectrometry and site directed mutagenesis, we identified distinct α_1D-AR phosphorylation patterns during noradrenaline- or phorbol ester-mediated desensitizations. We found that the G protein coupled receptor kinase, GRK2, and conventional protein kinases C isoforms α/β, phosphorylate α_1D-AR during these processes. Furthermore, we showed that the phosphorylated residues are located in the receptor's third intracellular loop (S300, S323, T328, S331, S332, S334) and carboxyl region (S441, T442, T477, S486, S492, T507, S515, S516, S518, S543) and are conserved among orthologues but are not conserved among the other human α₁-adrenoceptor subtypes. Additionally, we found that phosphorylation in either the third intracellular loop or carboxyl tail was sufficient to regulate calcium signaling desensitization. By contrast, mutations in either of these two domains significantly altered mitogen activated protein kinase (ERK) pathway and receptor internalization, suggesting that they have differential regulatory mechanisms. Our data provide new insights into the functional repercussions of these posttranslational modifications in signaling outcomes and desensitization.

Glucocorticoids, genes and brain function

The identification of key genes in transcriptomic data constitutes a huge challenge. Our review of microarray reports revealed 88 genes whose transcription is consistently regulated by glucocorticoids (GCs), such as cortisol, corticosterone and dexamethasone, in the brain. Replicable transcriptomic data were combined with biochemical and physiological data to create an integrated view of the effects induced by GCs. The most frequently reported genes were Errfi1 and Ddit4. Their up-regulation was associated with the altered transcription of genes regulating growth factor and mTORC1 signaling (Gab1, Tsc22d3, Dusp1, Ndrg2, Ppp5c and Sesn1) and progression of the cell cycle (Ccnd1, Cdkn1a and Cables1). The GC-induced reprogramming of cell function involves changes in the mRNA level of genes responsible for the regulation of transcription (Klf9, Bcl6, Klf15, Tle3, Cxxc5, Litaf, Tle4, Jun, Sox4, Sox2, Sox9, Irf1, Sall2, Nfkbia and Id1) and the selective degradation of mRNA (Tob2). Other genes are involved in the regulation of metabolism (Gpd1, Aldoc and Pdk4), actin cytoskeleton (Myh2, Nedd9, Mical2, Rhou, Arl4d, Osbpl3, Arhgef3, Sdc4, Rdx, Wipf3, Chst1 and Hepacam), autophagy (Eva1a and Plekhf1), vesicular transport (Rhob, Ehd3, Vps37b and Scamp2), gap junctions (Gjb6), immune response (Tiparp, Mertk, Lyve1 and Il6r), signaling mediated by thyroid hormones (Thra and Sult1a1), calcium (Calm2), adrenaline/noradrenaline (Adcy9 and Adra1d), neuropeptide Y (Npy1r) and histamine (Hdc). GCs also affected genes involved in the synthesis of polyamines (Azin1) and taurine (Cdo1). The actions of GCs are restrained by feedback mechanisms depending on the transcription of Sgk1, Fkbp5 and Nr3c1. A side effect induced by GCs is increased production of reactive oxygen species. Available data show that the brain's response to GCs is part of an emergency mode characterized by inactivation of non-core activities, restrained inflammation, restriction of investments (growth), improved efficiency of energy production and the removal of unnecessary or malfunctioning cellular components to conserve energy and maintain nutrient supply during the stress response.

Endogenous N-terminal Domain Cleavage Modulates α1D-Adrenergic Receptor Pharmacodynamics

The α1D-adrenergic receptor (ADRA1D) is a key regulator of cardiovascular, prostate, and central nervous system functions. This clinically relevant G protein-coupled receptor has proven difficult to study, as it must form an obligate modular homodimer containing the PDZ proteins scribble and syntrophin or become retained in the endoplasmic reticulum as non-functional protein. We previously determined that targeted removal of the N-terminal (NT) 79 amino acids facilitates ADRA1D plasma membrane expression and agonist-stimulated functional responses. However, whether such an event occurs in physiological contexts was unknown. Herein, we report the ADRA1D is subjected to innate NT processing in cultured human cells. SNAP near-infrared imaging and tandem-affinity purification revealed the ADRA1D is expressed as both full-length and NT truncated forms in multiple human cell lines. Serial truncation mapping identified the cleavage site as Leu(90)/Val(91) in the 95-amino acid ADRA1D NT domain, suggesting human cells express a Δ1-91 ADRA1D species. Tandem-affinity purification MS/MS and co-immunoprecipitation analysis indicate NT processing of ADRA1D is not required to form scribble-syntrophin macromolecular complexes. Yet, label-free dynamic mass redistribution signaling assays demonstrate that Δ1-91 ADRA1D agonist responses were greater than WT ADRA1D. Mutagenesis of the cleavage site nullified the processing event, resulting in ADRA1D agonist responses less than the WT receptor. Thus, we propose that processing of the ADRA1D NT domain is a physiological mechanism employed by cells to generate a functional ADRA1D isoform with optimal pharmacodynamic properties.

Carboxyl terminus-truncated α1D-adrenoceptors inhibit the ERK pathway

Human α1D-adrenoceptors are G protein-coupled receptors that mediate adrenaline/noradrenaline actions. There is a growing interest in identifying regulatory domains in these receptors and determining how they function. In this work, we show that the absence of the human α1D-adrenoceptor carboxyl tail results in altered ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase) and p38 phosphorylation states. Amino terminus-truncated and both amino and carboxyl termini-truncated α1D-adrenoceptors were transfected into Rat-1, HEK293, and B103 cells, and changes in the phosphorylation state of extracellular signal-regulated kinase was assessed using biochemical and biophysical approaches. The phosphorylation state of other protein kinases (p38, MEK1, and Raf-1) was also studied. Noradrenaline-induced ERK phosphorylation in Rat-1 fibroblasts expressing amino termini-truncated α1D-adrenoceptors. However, in cells expressing receptors with both amino and carboxyl termini truncations, noradrenaline-induced activation was abrogated. Interestingly, ERK phosphorylation that normally occurs through activation of endogenous G protein-coupled receptors, EGF receptors, and protein kinase C, was also decreased, suggesting that downstream steps in the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway were affected. A similar effect was observed in B103 cells but not in HEK 293 cells. Phosphorylation of Raf-1 and MEK1 was also diminished in Rat-1 fibroblasts expressing amino- and carboxyl-truncated α1D-adrenoceptors. Our data indicate that expression of carboxyl terminus-truncated α1D-adrenoceptors alters ERK and p38 phosphorylation state.

Sphingosine-1-phosphate signalling as a therapeutic target for patients with abnormal glucose metabolism and ischaemic heart disease

Abnormalities of glucose metabolism in patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) are common and are associated with a poor outcome in patients with and without diabetes. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive lipid which has been shown to increase insulin sensitivity in rodents and to increase myocardial tolerance to ischaemia. In the present review, I explore the relevance of S1P signalling pathway to IHD and abnormalities in glucose tolerance, and its potential as a therapeutic target for patients with abnormal glucose metabolism and IHD.

Visualizing G protein-coupled receptors in action through confocal microscopy techniques

G protein-coupled receptors constitute one of the most abundant entities in cellular communication. Elucidation of their structure and function as well as of their regulation began 30-40 years ago and the advance has markedly increased during the last 15 years. They participate in a plethora of cell functions such as regulation of metabolic fluxes, contraction, secretion, differentiation, or proliferation, and in essentially all activities of our organism; these receptors are targets of a large proportion of prescribed and illegal drugs. Fluorescence techniques have been used to study receptors for many years. The experimental result was usually a two-dimensional (2D) micrograph. Today, the result can be a spatiotemporal (four-dimensional, 4D) movie. Advances in microscopy, fluorescent protein design, and computer-assisted analysis have been of great importance to increase our knowledge on receptor regulation and function and create opportunities for future research. In this review we briefly depict the state of the art of the G protein-coupled receptor field and the methodologies used to study G protein-coupled receptor location, trafficking, dimerization, and other types of receptor-protein interaction. Fluorescence techniques now permit the capture of receptor images with high resolution and, together with a variety of fluorescent dyes that color organelles (such as the plasma membrane or the nucleus) or the cytoskeleton, allow researchers to obtain a much clearer idea of what is taking place at the cellular level. These developments are changing the way we explore cell communication and signal transduction, permitting deeper understanding of the physiological and pathophysiological processes.

Molecular design and synthesis of 1,4-disubstituted piperazines as α(1)-adrenergic receptor blockers

A new series of 4,5,6,7-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-c]pyridine-3-carboxylic acid amide and 3,5,6,8-tetrahydropyrido[4',3':4,5]thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-one derivatives were designed, synthesized, their binding and functional properties as α1-adrenoreceptors blockers were evaluated. A new validated α1-adrenoreceptor blocker pharmacophore model (hypothesis) was generated using Discovery Studio 2.5. The compare-fit study for the designed molecules with the generated hypothesis was fulfilled and several compounds showed significant high fit values. Compounds IVa-c, VIIa-d, VIIIa-c, Xa-c, XIa-d have shown blocking activity ranging from 46.73% up to 94.74% compared to 99.17% for prazosin.

α1D-Adrenoceptors are responsible for the high sensitivity and the slow time-course of noradrenaline-mediated contraction in conductance arteries

The objective of this study was to determine whether the different time-course characteristics of α₁-adrenoceptor-mediated contraction in arteries can be related to the subtypes involved. Contractile responses to noradrenaline (NA) were compared with inositol phosphate accumulation and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 phosphorylation after α₁-agonist stimuli in the same vessels in the presence or absence of α₁-antagonists in rat or in α₁-subtype knockout (KO) mice. Aorta, where α_1D-AR is the main functional subtype, had higher sensitivity to NA (in respect of inositol phosphate [IP], pERK1/2, and contractile response) than tail artery, where the α_1A-adrenoceptor subtype is predominant. Furthermore, the contraction in aorta exhibited a slower decay after agonist removal and this was consistent in all strains harboring α_1D-adrenoceptors (from rat, α_1B-KO, and wild-type [WT] mice) but was not observed in the absence of the α_1D-adrenoceptor signal (α_1D-adrenoceptor blocked rat aorta or aorta from α_1D-KO). IP formation paralleled α₁-adrenoceptor-mediated contraction (agonist present or postagonist) in aorta and tail artery. High sensitivity to agonist and persistence of response after agonist removal is a property of α_1D-adrenoceptors. Therefore, the preponderance of this subtype in noninnervated conductance arteries such as aorta allows responsiveness to circulating catecholamines and prevents abrupt changes in vessel caliber when the stimulus fluctuates. Conversely, in innervated distributing arteries, high local concentrations of NA are required to activate α_1A-adrenoceptors for a response that is rapid but short lived allowing fine adjustment of the contractile tone by perivascular sympathetic nerves.

α(1D)-Adrenoceptor regulates the vasopressor action of α(1A)-adrenoceptor in mesenteric vascular bed of α(1D)-adrenoceptor knockout mice

1 The pressor action of the α(1A)-adrenoceptor (α(1A)-AR) agonist A61603 (N-[5-(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-2-hydroxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-yl] methanesulfonamide) and the α(1)-ARs agonist phenylephrine and their blockade by selective α(1)-ARs antagonists in the isolated mesenteric vascular bed of wild-type (WT) mice and α(1D)-AR knockout (KO α(1D)-AR) mice were evaluated. 2 The apparent potency of A61603 to increase the perfusion pressure in the mesenteric vascular bed of WT and KO α(1D)-AR mice is 86 and 138 times the affinity of phenylephrine, respectively. 3 A61603 also enhanced the perfusion pressure by ≈1.7 fold in the mesenteric vascular bed of WT mice compared with KO α(1D)-AR mice. 4 Because of its high affinity, low concentrations of the α(1A)-AR selective antagonist RS100329 (5-methyl-3-[3-[4-[2-(2,2,2,-trifluoroethoxy) phenyl]-1-piperazinyl] propyl]-2,4-(1H)-pyrimidinedione) shifted the agonist concentration-response curves to the right in the mesenteric vascular bed of WT and KO α(1D)-AR mice. 5 The α(1D)-AR selective antagonist BMY7378 (8-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-8-azaspiro[4.5] decane-7,9-dione) did not modify the A61603 or the phenylephrine-induced pressor effect. 6 The α(1B/D)-ARs alkylating antagonist chloroethylclonidine (CEC) shifted the agonist concentration-response curves to the right and decreased the maximum phenylephrine-induced vascular contraction in KO α(1D)-AR mice when compared to WT mice; however, CEC only slightly modified the contraction induced by A61603. 7 The results indicate that the isolated mesenteric vascular bed of WT and KO α(1D)-AR mice expresses α(1A)-AR, that the pressor action of α(1A)-AR is up-regulated for α(1D)-AR in WT mice and suggest an important role of α(1B)-AR in the vascular pressure evoked by phenylephrine in KO α(1D)-AR mice.

Mechanisms involved in α1B-adrenoceptor desensitization

α(1B)-Adrenergic receptors mediate many of the actions of the natural catecholamines, adrenaline and noradrenaline. They belong to the seven transmembrane domains G protein-coupled receptor superfamily and exert their actions mainly through activation of Gq proteins and phosphoinositide turnover/calcium signaling. Many hormones and neurotransmitters are capable of inducing α(1B)-adrenergic receptor phosphorylation and desensitization; among them: adrenaline and noradrenaline, phorbol esters, endothelin-I, bradykinin, lysophosphatidic acid, insulin, EGF, PDGF, IGF-I, TGF-β, and estrogens. Key protein kinases for these effects are G protein coupled receptor kinases and protein kinase C. The lipid/protein kinase, phosphoinositide-3 kinase also appears to play a key role, acting upstream of protein kinase C. In addition to the agents employed for cells stimulation, we observed that paracrine/autocrine mediators also participate; these processes include EGF transactivation and sphingosine-1-phosphate production and action. The complex regulation of these receptors unlocks opportunities for therapeutic intervention.

Functional linkage as a direction for studies in oxidative stress: α-adrenergic receptorsThis review is one of a selection of papers published in a Special Issue on Oxidative Stress in Health and Disease

The α-adrenergic receptors (adrenoceptors) are activated by the endogenous agonists epinephrine and norepinephrine. They are G protein-coupled receptors that may be broadly classified into α1 (subclasses α1A, α1B, α1D) and α2 (subclasses α2A, α2B, α2C). The α1-adrenoceptors act by binding to Gαq subunits of the G proteins, causing activation of phospholipase C (PLC). PLC converts phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate into inositol trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG), which have downstream effects on cytosolic Ca2+ concentration. The α2-adrenoceptors bind to Gαi thus inhibiting adenylyl cyclase and decreasing cAMP levels. DAG alters protein kinase C activity and cAMP activates protein kinase A. The downstream pathways of the two receptors may also interact. Activation of α1- and α2-adrenoceptors in vascular smooth muscle results in vasoconstriction. However, the densities of individual receptor subclasses vary between vessel beds or between vessels of various sizes within the same bed. In vasculature, the densities of adrenoceptor subclasses differ between conduit arteries and arterioles. These differences, along with differences in coupling mechanisms, allow for fine regulation of arterial blood flow. This diversity is enhanced by interactions resulting from homo- and heterodimer formation of the receptors, metabolic pathways, and kinases. Reactive oxygen species generated in pathologies may alter α1- and α2-adrenoceptor cascades, change vascular contractility, or cause remodeling of blood vessels. This review emphasizes the need for understanding the functional linkage between α-adrenoceptor subtypes, coupling, cross talk, and oxidative stress in cardiovascular pathologies.

α(1D)-Adrenergic receptors constitutive activity and reduced expression at the plasma membrane

Adrenergic receptors are a heterogeneous family of the G protein-coupled receptors that mediate the actions of adrenaline and noradrenaline. Adrenergic receptors comprise three subfamilies (α(1), α(2), and β, with three members each) and the α(1D)-adrenergic receptor is one of the members of the α(1) subfamily with some interesting traits. The α(1D)-adrenergic receptor is difficult to express, seems predominantly located intracellularly, and exhibits constitutive activity. In this chapter, we will describe in detail the conditions and procedures used to determine changes in intracellular free calcium concentration which has been instrumental to define the constitutive activity of these receptors. Taking advantage of the fact that truncation of the first 79 amino acids of α(1D)-adrenergic receptors markedly increased their membrane expression, we were able to show that constitutive activity is present in receptors truncated at the amino and carboxyl termini, which indicates that such domains are dispensable for this action. Constitutive activity could be observed in cells expressing either the rat or human α(1D)-adrenergic receptor orthologs. Such constitutive activity has been observed in native rat arteries and we will discuss the possible functional implications that it might have in the regulation of blood pressure.

Signaling properties of human alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors lacking the carboxyl terminus: intrinsic activity, agonist-mediated activation, and desensitization

alpha(1)-Adrenoceptors are differentially regulated by protein kinase C-mediated phosphorylation. The most sensitive member of this family is the alpha(1D)-subtype, which is also characterized by a constitutive activity and a reduced expression at the plasma membrane controlled by the amino terminus. Information on the structural domains that determine the function and regulation of this receptor subtype is scarce. Therefore, the function and phosphorylation of amino terminus-truncated (Delta1-79, (DeltaN)) alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors were studied and compared with those of alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors truncated both at the amino and carboxyl termini (Delta1-79 and Delta441-572, (DeltaN-DeltaC)). These receptors were stably expressed in rat-1 fibroblast, at relatively high density ( approximately 2 pmol/mg of membrane protein), and showed intrinsic activity that was markedly increased by noradrenaline. Interestingly, activation of protein kinase C markedly attenuated (desensitized) the function of both DeltaN and DeltaN-DeltaC alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors. These receptors were photolabeled and immunoprecitated with an antibody directed against an influenza hemagglutinin epitope inserted at the amino termini. Metabolic labeling with radioactive phosphate and receptor immunoprecipitation studies indicated that these receptors are phosphoproteins whose phosphorylation state is increased by noradrenaline and by activation of protein kinase C. Our data indicate that carboxyl terminus-truncated alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors are fully functional and subjected to regulation by phosphorylation. The roles of the carboxyl termini differ among alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes.

Long-term consequences of drugs on the paediatric cardiovascular system

Many pharmacological and toxicological actions of drugs in children cannot be fully predicted from adult clinical experience or from standard non-clinical toxicology studies. Numerous drugs have direct or indirect pharmacological effects on the heart and are prescribed for children of all ages. Toxicity or secondary effects may be immediate or delayed for years after drug exposure has ceased. Originally, the aim of this review was to compile information on the effect of specific drugs on the post-natal development of the cardiovascular system and to examine long-term follow-up of the use of cardio-active drugs in children. The limited database of published information caused the original question to evolve into an examination of the medical literature for three areas of information: (i) whether vulnerable developmental windows have been identified that reflect the substantial functional development that the cardiovascular system undergoes after birth; (ii) what is known about pharmacological perturbation of development; and (iii) what the likelihood is of drug exposure during childhood. We examined different scenarios for exposure including random, isolated exposure, conditions historically associated with adults, primary or secondary cardiac disease, psychiatric and neurological conditions, asthma, cancer and HIV. Except for random, isolated drug exposures, each category of possible exposure contained numerous drugs known to have either primary or secondary effects on the cardiovascular system or to influence factors associated with atherosclerosis. It is likely that a significant number of children will be prescribed drugs having either direct or indirect effects upon the immature cardiovascular system. A confounding factor is the simultaneous use of over-the-counter medications and herbal or nutraceutical preparations that a patient, parent or guardian does not mention to a prescribing physician. Metabolism is also important in assessing drug effects in children. Differences in body water : body fat ratio, age-related gastrointestinal absorption, distribution, excretion, renal function and drug metabolizing capabilities make it possible for children to have a different metabolite profile for a drug compared with adults. There is little examination of drug effects on the interdependent processes of cardiac maturation and less examination of metabolite effects. It is difficult to identify delayed toxicities in children as these adverse events may take years to manifest with many patients lost to follow-up. Clearly this is an area of study where intermediate endpoints and surrogate markers would be of great benefit. Pharmacogenomics may be useful in providing markers of increased risk or susceptibility. A perspective must be kept in balancing the possibility of a problem with the very real benefits that many children experience from the use of these pharmaceuticals.

Vascular alpha-1D-adrenoceptors are overexpressed in aorta of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor null mouse: role of increased angiotensin II

1 The hypothesis that alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors may mediate the pro-hypertensive actions of angiotensin II (Ang II) was tested in isolated aorta (alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor bearing tissue) of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor null mouse (AhR(-/-)), which shows increased levels of Ang II, cardiac hypertrophy and hypertension. 2 The effect of captopril (an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor) on both blood pressure and aortic alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor expression and function in mice were determined. 3 Basal blood pressure was higher in AhR(-/-) mice, while captopril therapy decreased it to wild-type (WT) values. 4 Aortas of adult WT and AhR(-/-) mice were stimulated by phenylephrine or noradrenaline to induce contraction; the maximal effect was higher in AhR(-/-) mice, without a significant change in pEC(50). 5 PA(2) values for the selective alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor antagonist BMY 7378 (8-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazynil]ethyl]-8-azaspiro [4.5]decane-7,9-dione) were 9.19 and 8.94 for WT and AhR(-/-), respectively; while Schild slopes were not different from 1. 6 PCR experiments showed c. 77% increase in AhR(-/-)alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors cDNA compared with WT mice; while western blot analysis demonstrated c. 88% increase in alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor protein in AhR(-/-) mice. 7 Captopril therapy decreased alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor-induced contraction and protein in AhR(-/-) mice to WT levels. 8 These data support the hypothesis that under conditions where Ang II is elevated, vascular alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors are increased, and further suggest that both Ang II and vascular alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors could be related in the onset of hypertension.

Evidence of alpha1-adrenoceptor functional changes in omental arteries of patients with end-stage renal disease

1 Alpha1-Adrenoceptor (alpha1-AR) subtypes were characterized in isolated omental arteries obtained after abdominal surgery in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or with Diabetes Mellitus type 2 plus ESRD (ESRD-DM). 2 Omental arteries from patients with ESRD and ESRD-DM elicited a significant increase in sensitivity to phenylephrine with a pD(2) (-log EC50) of 6.7 and 6.6, respectively, vs. the control (5.8, P < 0.001). 3 Stimulation with phenylephrine was conducted in the presence or absence of selective alpha1-AR competitive antagonists: 5-methylurapidil (alpha1A-), AH11110A (1-[biphenyl-2-yloxy]-4-imino-4-piperidin-1-yl-butan-2-ol; alpha1B-) and BMY7378 (8-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-8-azaspiro [4.5] decane-7,9-dione; alpha(1D)-). The relative abundance of mRNA for all three alpha(1)-ARs was determined. 4 The maximal contractile responses to phenylephrine were: E(max) 1.59 +/- 0.17, 1.48 +/- 0.08 and 1.55 +/- 0.14 g for the ESRD, ESRD-DM and control groups, respectively. 5 Functionally, there was an increment in the affinity for the alpha(1A)-AR antagonist (pA2: control 7.45, ESRD 8.36, ESRD-DM 8.0; P < 0.01), and a reduction in the alpha1B-AR antagonist affinity (8.3 for controls, 7.6 for ESRD and 7.3 for ESRD-DM; P < 0.01) associated with renal disease. The affinities for the alpha1D-AR antagonist were similar among the studied groups (8.5 for the controls, 8.7 for the ESRD and 8.1 for the ESRD-DM groups). 6 Renal disease increased mRNA expression of alpha(1B)-ARs and reduced both alpha1A- and alpha(1D)-ARs subtypes in ESRD and ESRD-DM patients. 7 The results suggest that human omental arteries exposed to chronic uraemia show vascular hypersensitivity to phenylephrine, because of functional alpha1-AR changes.

Influence of combined hypertension and renal failure on functional alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes in the rat kidney

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study investigated whether the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor responsiveness of the renal vasculature was altered in the state of hypertension combined with renal failure.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) received cisplatin (5 mg kg(-1) i.p.) to induce renal failure. Seven days later, the rats were anaesthetized and the reductions in renal blood flow (RBF) to electrical renal nerve stimulation (RNS) and intrarenal administration of three adrenoceptor agonists (noradrenaline, phenylephrine and methoxamine) were determined before and after amlodipine, 5-methylurapidil, chloroethylclonidine or BMY 7378.

KEY RESULTS

In renal failure SHR (RFSHR), RBF and creatinine clearance were significantly reduced (approximately 70%), while urine output and fractional sodium excretion were four and twenty-fold higher, respectively, compared to SHR. Vasoconstrictions induced by RNS or the adrenoceptor agonists were greater in RFSHR than SHR, and these responses were blunted by 5-methylurapidil, BMY 7378 and amlodipine in the SHR, while chloroethylclonidine had no effect. In the RFSHR, all renal vasoconstrictions were reduced by amlodipine and BMY 7378 but 5-methylurapidil attenuated those caused by RNS, noradrenaline and methoxamine while those to phenylephrine were enhanced. Chloroethylclonidine potentiated renal vasoconstrictor responses to methoxamine and phenylephrine but not RNS or noradrenaline in RFSHR.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

These findings suggest alpha(1A)- and alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors mediated the renal vasoconstrictor responses in SHR and RFSHR. In the RFSHR, other alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes, for example, alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors appeared to play a greater role.

Alpha1A-adrenoceptors predominate in the control of blood pressure in mouse mesenteric vascular bed

1 The pressor action of the alpha1A-adrenoceptor agonist, A61603 (N-[5-(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-2-hydroxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-yl] methanesulfonamide) or the alpha1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine, and their blockade by selective alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists in the mouse isolated mesenteric vascular bed were evaluated. 2 A61603 showed a approximately 235-fold higher potency in elevating perfusion pressure in mesenteric bed compared to phenylephrine. 3 The alpha1A-adrenoceptor selective antagonist RS 100329 (5-methyl-3-[3-[4-[2-(2,2,2,-trifluoroethoxy) phenyl]-1-piperazinyl] propyl]-2,4-(1H)-pyrimidinedione), displaced with high affinity agonist concentration-response curves to the right in a concentration-dependent manner. 4 The alpha1D-adrenoceptor selective antagonist BMY 7378 (8-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-8-azaspiro[4.5] decane-7,9-dione), did not displace A61603 nor did it block the phenylephrine-induced pressor response. 5 The alpha1B/D-adrenoceptor alkylating antagonist chloroethylclonidine (CEC), caused a rightward shift of the phenylephrine concentration-response curve and reduced its maximum response; however, CEC only slightly modified A61603 evoked contraction. 6 The results indicate that the isolated mouse mesenteric vascular bed expresses alpha1A-adrenoceptors and suggest a very discrete role for 1B-adrenoceptors.

Postjunctional alpha1-adrenoceptors in the vasculature of the pithed mouse are of the alpha1A-subtype

1. The pressor action of noradrenaline and its blockade by selective alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists in the pithed mouse were evaluated. 2. Chloroethylclonidine (alpha(1B/D)-adrenoceptor alkylating agent) or BMY 7378 (alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor antagonist), both at 1 mg kg(-1), did not block the increase in blood pressure induced by noradrenaline. 3. 5-Methylurapidil (alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor antagonist), at 0.1 mg kg(-1), displaced the dose-response curve approximately six-fold to the right. 4. The results support the idea that the pithed mouse vasculature express alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors and suggest that it is a good model to study the roles of alpha(1)-adrenoceptors in gene knockout or overexpression.

[Alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes and alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists]

Alpha(1)-adrenoceptors are widely distributed in the human body and play important physiologic roles. Three alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes (alpha(1A), alpha(1B) and alpha(1D)) have been cloned and show different pharmacologic profiles. In addition, a putative alpha(1)-adrenoceptor (alpha(1L) subtype) has also been proposed. Recently, three drugs (tamsulosin, naftopidil, and silodosin) have been developed in Japan for the treatment of urinary obstruction in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. In this review, we describe recent alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subclassifications and the pharmacologic characteristics (subtype selectivity and clinical relevance) of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists.

Captopril therapy decreases both expression and function of alpha1D-adrenoceptors in pre- hypertensive rat aorta

1.-- The effects of captopril on alpha(1)-adrenoceptor mRNA and protein and phenylephrine-induced contraction was assessed in aorta of pre-hypertensive spontaneously hypertensive rats. 2.-- Four-week-old SHR and WKY rats were treated with captopril [an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor] 3 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for 1 week. 3.-- pA(2) values for BMY 7378, an alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor antagonist, were 8.63-9.20 among the different groups. Schild slopes were close to unity suggesting that contraction was produced primarily by alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor stimulation and was not changed with therapy. 4.-- Alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor mRNA and protein values were higher in pre-hypertensive SHR than in WKY, whereas alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor mRNA was higher in WKY and alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors were similar in both strains, and protein was not significantly different for alpha(1A)- and alpha(1B)-subtypes. 5.-- Captopril decreased maximal contraction in SHR, without having effect in WKY rats, while alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor mRNA was decreased in both rat strains but alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor protein was significantly decreased only in SHR, and increased alpha(1A)-mRNA in SHR, no effect of captopril treatment was observed on alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor mRNA and protein nor on alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor protein. 6.-- These data suggest that ACE inhibition by captopril influences both expression and function of alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors in aorta of pre-hypertensive rats, probably avoiding alpha(1D)-subtype expression by blockade of angiotensin II synthesis.

The alpha(1D)-adrenergic receptor: cinderella or ugly stepsister

This Perspective focuses on the alpha(1D)-adrenergic receptor (AR), the often neglected sibling of the alpha(1)-AR family. This neglect is due in part to its poor cell-surface expression. However, it has recently been shown that dimerization of the alpha(1D)-AR with either the alpha(1B)-AR or the beta(2)-AR increases alpha(1D)-AR cell-surface expression, and in this issue of Molecular Pharmacology, Hague et al. (p. 45) demonstrate that dimerization of the alpha(1D)-AR with the alpha(1B)-AR not only leads to increased cell-surface expression but also results in the formation of a novel functional entity.

Addition of a signal peptide sequence to the alpha1D-adrenoceptor gene increases the density of receptors, as determined by [3H]-prazosin binding in the membranes

1. Both in mammalian tissues and in transfected cells, only low levels of alpha1D-adrenoceptors are detected in radioligand binding studies. It has been implicated that the comparatively long N-terminal tail of the alpha1D-adrenoceptor is responsible for the inefficient surface expression of the receptor. 2. In the present study, we created gene constructs for six N-terminally truncated variants of the human alpha1D-adrenoceptor. These constructs were used to transfect Neuro2A cells. We show that the density of alpha1D-adrenoceptors, observed by [3H]-prazosin binding, gradually increased with longer truncations of the N-terminus. This seems to indicate that the long N-terminal tail nonspecifically interferes with receptor translocation to the plasma membrane. 3. The addition of a 16 amino acids long signal peptide to the N-terminus of the wild-type alpha1D-adrenoceptor increased the density of receptor binding sites 10-fold in Neuro2A and COS-7 cells. This indicates that, after the addition of a signal peptide, the long N-terminal tail of the alpha1D-adrenoceptor does not interfere with proper translocation of the receptor to the plasma membrane. This, in turn, indicates that the N-terminal tail of the wild-type alpha1D-adrenoceptor, merely by its long length, hinders the first transmembrane helix of the receptor from being a signal anchor. 4. Neither the wild-type alpha1D-adrenoceptor (for which the expression level of [3H]-prazosin binding sites is low) nor the truncated alpha1D-adrenoceptor variant (for which the expression level of [3H]-prazosin binding sites is high) showed any constitutive activity in stimulating inositol phosphate accumulation. This indicates that the low expression level of [3H]-prazosin binding sites, after transfection with the wild-type alpha1D-adrenoceptor, is not caused by constitutive activity of the receptor and subsequent receptor downregulation.

Effect of Haloperidol on mPer1 Gene Expression in Mouse Suprachiasmatic Nuclei

The effect of a typical neuroleptic haloperidol (Hal) on mPer1 gene expression was investigated in mouse suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). Hal induced mPer1 mRNA levels both in vivo and in cultured SCN cells. For mechanisms underlying Hal-induced mPer1 expression, N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor subtype, the phosphorylation form of the transcription factor, and the Ser-133 phosphorylation form of cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB) played an important role, because the induction of mPer1 mRNA significantly decreased after pretreatment with a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, such as MK-801 or CREB antisense. These results suggest that Hal may increase CREB phosphorylation and mPer1 expression according to the activation of the NMDA receptor through the dopaminergic pathways. Although the injection of Hal during the light period increased the amplitude of mPer1 mRNA rhythmicity in a nondrug state, the injection of the drug during the dark period disturbed the rhythmic pattern of mPer1 mRNA. These results suggest that the rhythmicity of clock genes in SCN may be disturbed depending on the dosing time of Hal. On the other hand, because the induction of mPer1 mRNA by Hal seems to be at least partly caused by the NMDA receptor, showing a phase shift or resetting effect of the circadian clock, Hal may also cause such phase shift effects.