Agmatine and a cannabinoid agonist, WIN 55212-2, interact to produce a hypothermic synergy

The hyperthermic response to intra-preoptic area administration of agmatine in male rats

Agmatine is an endogenous biogenic amine that exerts various effects on the central nervous system. The hypothalamic preoptic area (POA, thermoregulatory command center) has high agmatine immunoreactivity. In this study, in conscious and anesthetized male rats, agmatine microinjection into the POA induced hyperthermic responses associated with increased heat production and locomotor activity. Intra-POA administration of agmatine increased the locomotor activity, the brown adipose tissue temperature and rectum temperature, and induced shivering as demonstrated by increased neck muscle electromyographic activity. However, intra-POA administration of agmatine almost had no impact on the tail temperature of anesthetized rats. Furthermore, there were regional differences in the response to agmatine in the POA. The most effective sites for the microinjection of agmatine to elicit hyperthermic responses were localized in the medial preoptic area (MPA). Agmatine microinjection into the median preoptic nucleus (MnPO) and lateral preoptic nucleus (LPO) had a minimal effect on the mean core temperature. Analysis of the in vitro discharge activity of POA neurons in brain slices when perfused with agmatine showed that agmatine inhibited most warm-sensitive but not temperature-insensitive neurons in the MPA. However, regardless of thermosensitivity, the majority of MnPO and LPO neurons were not responsive to agmatine. The results demonstrated that agmatine injection into the POA of male rats, especially the MPA, induced hyperthermic responses, which may be associated with increased BAT thermogenesis, shivering and locomotor activity by inhibiting warm-sensitive neurons.

Imidazoline Receptor System: The Past, the Present, and the Future

Imidazoline receptors historically referred to a family of nonadrenergic binding sites that recognize compounds with an imidazoline moiety, although this has proven to be an oversimplification. For example, none of the proposed endogenous ligands for imidazoline receptors contain an imidazoline moiety but they are diverse in their chemical structure. Three receptor subtypes (I₁, I₂, and I₃) have been proposed and the understanding of each has seen differing progress over the decades. I₁ receptors partially mediate the central hypotensive effects of clonidine-like drugs. Moxonidine and rilmenidine have better therapeutic profiles (fewer side effects) than clonidine as antihypertensive drugs, thought to be due to their higher I₁/α ₂-adrenoceptor selectivity. Newer I₁ receptor agonists such as LNP599 [3-chloro-2-methyl-phenyl)-(4-methyl-4,5-dihydro-3H-pyrrol-2-yl)-amine hydrochloride] have little to no activity on α ₂-adrenoceptors and demonstrate promising therapeutic potential for hypertension and metabolic syndrome. I₂ receptors associate with several distinct proteins, but the identities of these proteins remain elusive. I₂ receptor agonists have demonstrated various centrally mediated effects including antinociception and neuroprotection. A new I₂ receptor agonist, CR4056 [2-phenyl-6-(1H-imidazol-1yl) quinazoline], demonstrated clear analgesic activity in a recently completed phase II clinical trial and holds great promise as a novel I₂ receptor-based first-in-class nonopioid analgesic. The understanding of I₃ receptors is relatively limited. Existing data suggest that I₃ receptors may represent a binding site at the Kir6.2-subtype ATP-sensitive potassium channels in pancreatic β-cells and may be involved in insulin secretion. Despite the elusive nature of their molecular identities, recent progress on drug discovery targeting imidazoline receptors (I₁ and I₂) demonstrates the exciting potential of these compounds to elicit neuroprotection and to treat various disorders such as hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and chronic pain.

Agmatine attenuates methamphetamine-induced conditioned place preference in rats

The polyamine agmatine modulates a variety of behavioral effects including the abuse-related effects of opioids and has been proposed as a potential medication candidate for the treatment of opioid abuse. However, little is known of the effects of agmatine on the abuse-related effects of other drugs of abuse. This study examined the effects of agmatine on the rewarding effects of methamphetamine in rats using a conditioned place preference paradigm. Methamphetamine (0.1-1.0mg/kg) dose-dependently increased the time spent in methamphetamine-paired side (place preference). Agmatine, at doses that did not produce place preference or aversion (10-32mg/kg), significantly decreased the development of methamphetamine-induced place preference when agmatine was administered in combination with methamphetamine during place conditioning. Agmatine also significantly decreased the expression of methamphetamine-induced place preference when an acute injection of agmatine was given immediately before test session. These doses of agmatine do not alter the motor activity in rats, suggesting that the observed attenuation of methamphetamine-induced place preference was not due to general behavioral disruption. Together, these data suggests that agmatine attenuates the rewarding effects of methamphetamine and may be able to modulate the abuse liability of methamphetamine.

Effects of opioids, cannabinoids, and vanilloids on body temperature

Cannabinoid and opioid drugs produce marked changes in body temperature. Recent findings have extended our knowledge about the thermoregulatory effects of cannabinoids and opioids, particularly as related to delta opioid receptors, endogenous systems, and transient receptor potential (TRP) channels. Although delta opioid receptors were originally thought to play only a minor role in thermoregulation compared to mu and kappa opioid receptors, their activation has been shown to produce hypothermia in multiple species. Endogenous opioids and cannabinoids also regulate body temperature. Mu and kappa opioid receptors are thought to be in tonic balance, with mu and kappa receptor activation producing hyperthermia and hypothermia, respectively. A particularly intense research focus is TRP channels, where TRPV1 channel activation produces hypothermia whereas TRPA1 and TRPM8 channel activation causes hyperthermia. The marked hyperthermia produced by TRPV1 channel antagonists suggests these warm channels tonically control body temperature. A better understanding of the roles of cannabinoid, opioid, and TRP systems in thermoregulation may have broad clinical implications and provide insights into interactions among neurotransmitter systems involved in thermoregulation.

Effects of opioids, cannabinoids, and vanilloids on body temperature

Cannabinoid and opioid drugs produce marked changes in body temperature. Recent findings have extended our knowledge about the thermoregulatory effects of cannabinoids and opioids, particularly as related to delta opioid receptors, endogenous systems, and transient receptor potential (TRP) channels. Although delta opioid receptors were originally thought to play only a minor role in thermoregulation compared to mu and kappa opioid receptors, their activation has been shown to produce hypothermia in multiple species. Endogenous opioids and cannabinoids also regulate body temperature. Mu and kappa opioid receptors are thought to be in tonic balance, with mu and kappa receptor activation producing hyperthermia and hypothermia, respectively. A particularly intense research focus is TRP channels, where TRPV1 channel activation produces hypothermia whereas TRPA1 and TRPM8 channel activation causes hyperthermia. The marked hyperthermia produced by TRPV1 channel antagonists suggests these warm channels tonically control body temperature. A better understanding of the roles of cannabinoid, opioid, and TRP systems in thermoregulation may have broad clinical implications and provide insights into interactions among neurotransmitter systems involved in thermoregulation.

Analgesic efficacy of CR4056, a novel imidazoline-2 receptor ligand, in rat models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain

Two decades of investigations have failed to unequivocally clarify the functions and the molecular nature of imidazoline-2 receptors (I2R). However, there is robust pharmacological evidence for the functional modulation of monoamino oxidase (MAO) and other important enzyme activities by I2 site ligands. Some compounds of this class proved to be active experimental tools in preventing both experimental pain and opioid tolerance and dependence. Unfortunately, even though these compounds bind with high potency to central I2 sites, they fail to represent a valid clinical opportunity due to their pharmacokinetic, selectivity or side-effects profile. This paper presents the preclinical profile of a novel I2 ligand (2-phenyl-6-(1H-imidazol-1yl) quinazoline; [CR4056]) that selectively inhibits the activity of human recombinant MAO-A in a concentration-dependent manner. A sub-chronic four day oral treatment of CR4056 increased norepinephrine (NE) tissue levels both in the rat cerebral cortex (63.1% ±4.2%; P < 0.05) and lumbar spinal cord (51.3% ± 6.7%; P < 0.05). In the complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) rat model of inflammatory pain, CR4056 was found to be orally active (ED50 = 5.8 mg/kg, by mouth [p.o.]). In the acute capsaicin model, CR4056 completely blocked mechanical hyperalgesia in the injured hind paw (ED50 = 4.1 mg/kg, p.o.; ED100 = 17.9 mg/kg, p.o.). This effect was dose-dependently antagonized by the non-selective imidazoline I2/α2 antagonist idazoxan. In rat models of neuropathic pain, oral administration of CR4056 significantly attenuated mechanical hyperalgesia and allodynia. In summary, the present study suggests a novel pharmacological opportunity for inflammatory and/or neuropathic pain treatment based on selective interaction with central imidazoline-2 receptors.

Agmatine enhances cannabinoid action in the hot-plate assay of thermal nociception

Agmatine-cannabinoid interactions are supported by the close association between cannabinoid CB(1) receptors and agmatine immunoreactive neurons and evidence that shared brain mechanisms underlie the pharmacological effects of agmatine and cannabinoid agonists. In the present study, we used the hot-plate assay of thermal nociception to determine if agmatine alters cannabinoid action through activation of imidazoline sites and/or alpha(2)-adrenoceptors. WIN 55212-2 (1, 2 or 3 mg/kg, i.p.) or CP55,940 (1, 2 or 3 mg/kg, i.p.) administration increased hot-plate response latency. Agmatine (50 or 100 mg/kg, i.p.) was ineffective. Administration of agmatine (50 mg/kg, i.p.) with WIN 55212-2 (1, 2 or 3 mg/kg, i.p.) or CP55,940 (1, 2 or 3 mg/kg, i.p.) produced response-latency enhancement. Regression analysis indicated that agmatine increased the potency of WIN 55212-2 and CP55,940 by 3- and 4.4-fold, respectively, indicating synergy for both drug interactions. Idazoxan, a mixed imidazoline site/alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist, but not yohimbine (5 mg/kg, i.p.), a selective alphia(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist, blocked response-latency enhancement produced by a combination of WIN 55212-2 (2 mg/kg) and agmatine. Response-latency enhancement produced by WIN 55212-2 (2 mg/kg) was blocked by SR 141716A (5 mg/kg, i.p.), a cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist; attenuated by idazoxan (2 and 5 mg/kg); and not affected by yohimbine (5 mg/kg). These results demonstrate a synergistic interaction between agmatine and cannabinoid agonists and suggest that agmatine administration enhances cannabinoid action in vivo.

Agmatine: identification and inhibition of methamphetamine, kappa opioid, and cannabinoid withdrawal in planarians

Agmatine blocks morphine physical dependence in mammals, but its effects on withdrawal signs caused by other abused drugs have been less studied. One of the reasons is that withdrawal to some of these drugs is difficult to quantify in mammals. An alternative to mammals is planarians, a type of flatworm. Planarians possess mammalian-like neurotransmitters and display withdrawal from amphetamines, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, cocaine, and opioids. The withdrawal is manifested as a reduction in locomotor behavior following discontinuation of drug exposure. In the present study, our goal was to identify agmatine in planarians and to determine if planarians exposed to agmatine display withdrawal to methamphetamine, a cannabinoid receptor agonist (WIN 55,212-2), or a kappa-opioid receptor agonist (U-50,488H). Neurochemical experiments revealed that the concentration of agmatine in planarians was 185 +/- 33.7 pmol per mg of planarian weight (dry weight). In behavioral experiments, withdrawal (i.e., reduced locomotor activity) was observed when planarians exposed to each drug (10 microM) for 60 min were placed into water. The withdrawal was attenuated when methamphetamine- or U-50,488H-exposed planarians were tested in agmatine (100 microM). Withdrawal was inhibited similarly when planarians coexposed to agmatine (100 microM) plus methamphetamine (10 microM), WIN 55,212-2 (10 microM), or U-50,488H (10 microM) were tested in water. Arginine, the metabolic precursor to agmatine, was ineffective. Our results identify endogenous agmatine in planarians and demonstrate that agmatine exposure blocks withdrawal to three different drugs in planarians. This suggests that a change in agmatine signaling is a common mechanism in the withdrawal caused by these drugs, at least in planarians.

NOP receptor antagonist, JTC-801, blocks cannabinoid-evoked hypothermia in rats

The present study used the endpoint of hypothermia to investigate cannabinoid and nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) interactions in conscious animals. Prior work has established that cannabinoids produce hypothermia by activating central cannabinoid CB(1) receptors. The administration of N/OFQ into the brain also causes significant hypothermia. Those data suggest a link between cannabinoid CB(1) receptors and N/OFQ peptide (NOP) receptors in the production of hypothermia. Therefore, we determined if NOP receptor activation is required for cannabinoid-evoked hypothermia and if cannabinoid CB(1) receptor activation is necessary for N/OFQ-induced hypothermia. In actual experiments, a cannabinoid agonist, WIN 55212-2 (2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg, i.p.), caused significant hypothermia in male Sprague-Dawley rats (200-225 g). A NOP receptor antagonist, JTC-801 (1 mg/kg, i.p.), did not affect body temperature. For combined administration, JTC-801 (1 mg/kg, i.p.) blocked a significant proportion of the hypothermia caused by each dose of WIN 55212-2 (2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg, i.p.). JTC-801 (1 mg/kg, i.p.) also blocked the hypothermia caused by another cannabinoid agonist, CP-55, 940 (1 mg/kg, i.p.). In separate experiments, the direct administration of N/OFQ (9 microg/rat, i.c.v.) into the brain produced significant hypothermia. The hypothermic effect of N/OFQ was blocked by JTC-801 (1 mg/kg, i.p.) but not by a selective cannabinoid CB(1) antagonist, SR 141716A (5 mg/kg, i.m.). The finding that a NOP receptor antagonist abolishes a significant percentage of cannabinoid-induced hypothermia suggests that NOP receptor activation is required for cannabinoids to produce hypothermia. This interaction, quantitated in the present study, is the first evidence that NOP receptors mediate a cannabinoid-induced effect in conscious animals.

Agmatine blocks morphine-evoked hyperthermia in rats

The present study investigated the effect of agmatine on morphine-evoked hyperthermia in rats. Morphine (4 mg/kg, s.c.) produced hyperthermia by activating mu opioid receptors. Agmatine (10 and 50 mg/kg, i.p.) was ineffective. For combined administration, agmatine decreased morphine-evoked hyperthermia. The effect was prevented by idazoxan (5 mg/kg, i.p.), an imidazoline/alpha(2)-adrenoeceptor receptor antagonist. Yohimbine, an alpha(2)-adrenoeceptor antagonist, did not prevent the attenuation of morphine-evoked hyperthermia by agmatine. The present data provide pharmacological evidence that agmatine blocks the hyperthermic effect of morphine by activating imidazoline receptors.