Phosphorylation, desensitization and internalization of human alpha1B-adrenoceptors induced by insulin-like growth factor-I

Roles of the α1B-Adrenergic Receptor Phosphorylation Domains in Signaling and Internalization

The function of the α1B-adrenergic receptor phosphorylation sites previously detected by mass spectrometry was evaluated by employing mutants, substituting them with non-phosphorylatable amino acids. Substitution of the intracellular loop 3 (IL3) sites did not alter baseline or stimulated receptor phosphorylation, whereas substitution of phosphorylation sites in the carboxyl terminus (Ctail) or both domains (IL3/Ctail) markedly decreased receptor phosphorylation. Cells expressing the IL3 or Ctail receptor mutants exhibited a noradrenaline-induced calcium-maximal response similar to those expressing the wild-type receptor, and a shift to the left in the concentration-response curve to noradrenaline was also noticed. Cells expressing the IL3/Ctail mutant exhibited higher apparent potency and increased maximal response to noradrenaline than those expressing the wild-type receptor. Phorbol ester-induced desensitization of the calcium response to noradrenaline was reduced in cells expressing the IL3 mutant and abolished in cells in which the Ctail or the IL3/Ctail were modified. In contrast, desensitization in response to preincubation with noradrenaline was unaffected in cells expressing the distinct receptor mutants. Noradrenaline-induced ERK phosphorylation was surprisingly increased in cells expressing IL3-modified receptors but not in those expressing receptors with the Ctail or IL3/Ctail substitutions. Our data indicate that phosphorylation sites in the IL3 and Ctail domains mediate and regulate α1B-adrenergic receptor function. Phorbol ester-induced desensitization seems to be closely associated with receptor phosphorylation, whereas noradrenaline-induced desensitization likely involves other elements.

Sites phosphorylated in human α1B-adrenoceptors in response to noradrenaline and phorbol myristate acetate

Phosphorylation of the human α_1B-adrenergic receptor (fused with the green fluorescent protein) was studied employing the inducible Flp-ln HEK293 T-Rex system for expression. Serine/alanine substitutions were performed in five sites corresponding to those previously identified as phosphorylation targets in the hamster ortholog. Desensitization was decreased in these mutants but receptor phosphorylation was still clearly detected. The protein phosphorylation of the wild-type receptor (fused to the green fluorescent protein) was studied, using mass spectrometry, under baseline and stimulated conditions (noradrenaline or phorbol myristate acetate). Basal phosphorylation was detected at sites located at the intracellular loop 3 and carboxyl terminus, and the number of sites detected increased under agonist activation and stimulation of protein kinase C. The phosphorylation patterns differed under the distinct conditions. Three of the phosphorylation sites detected in this work corresponded to those observed in the hamster receptor. The phosphorylation sites detected included the following: a) at the intracellular loop 3: serines 246, 248, 257, 267, and 277; and threonines 252, 264, and 268, and b) at the carboxyl terminus: serines 396, 400, 402, 406, 423, 425, 427, 455, and 470, and threonines 387, 392, 420, and 475. Our data indicate that complex phosphorylation patterns exist and suggest the possibility that such differences could be relevant in receptor function and subcellular localization.

Phosphorylation and Internalization of Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptors LPA1, LPA2, and LPA3

Results

The lysophosphatidic acid receptors LPA₁, LPA₂, and LPA₃ were individually expressed in C9 cells and their signaling and regulation were studied. Agonist-activation increases intracellular calcium concentration in a concentration-dependent fashion. Phorbol myristate acetate markedly inhibited LPA₁- and LPA₃-mediated effect, whereas that mediated by LPA₂ was only partially diminished; the actions of the phorbol ester were inhibited by bisindolylmaleimide I and by overnight incubation with the protein kinase C activator, which leads to down regulation of this protein kinase. Homologous desensitization was also observed for the three LPA receptors studied, with that of LPA₂ receptors being consistently of lesser magnitude; neither inhibition nor down-regulation of protein kinase C exerted any effect on homologous desensitization. Activation of LPA_1–3 receptors induced ERK 1/2 phosphorylation; this effect was markedly attenuated by inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase activity, suggesting growth factor receptor transactivation in this effect. Lysophosphatidic acid and phorbol myristate acetate were able to induce LPA_1–3 phosphorylation, in time- and concentration-dependent fashions. It was also clearly observed that agonists and protein kinase C activation induced internalization of these receptors. Phosphorylation of the LPA₂ subtype required larger concentrations of these agents and its internalization was less intense than that of the other subtypes.

Conclusion

Our data show that these three LPA receptors are phosphoproteins whose phosphorylation state is modulated by agonist-stimulation and protein kinase C-activation and that differences in regulation and cellular localization exist, among the subtypes.

α1B-adrenergic receptors differentially associate with Rab proteins during homologous and heterologous desensitization

Internalization of G protein-coupled receptors can be triggered by agonists or by other stimuli. The process begins within seconds of cell activation and contributes to receptor desensitization. The Rab GTPase family controls endocytosis, vesicular trafficking, and endosomal fusion. Among their remarkable properties is the differential distribution of its members on the surface of various organelles. In the endocytic pathway, Rab 5 controls traffic from the plasma membrane to early endosomes, whereas Rab 4 and Rab 11 regulate rapid and slow recycling from early endosomes to the plasma membrane, respectively. Moreover, Rab 7 and Rab 9 regulate the traffic from late endosomes to lysosomes and recycling to the trans-Golgi. We explore the possibility that α_1B-adrenergic receptor internalization induced by agonists (homologous) and by unrelated stimuli (heterologous) could involve different Rab proteins. This possibility was explored by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) using cells coexpressing α_1B-adrenergic receptors tagged with the red fluorescent protein, DsRed, and different Rab proteins tagged with the green fluorescent protein. It was observed that when α_1B-adrenergic receptors were stimulated with noradrenaline, the receptors interacted with proteins present in early endosomes, such as the early endosomes antigen 1, Rab 5, Rab 4, and Rab 11 but not with late endosome markers, such as Rab 9 and Rab 7. In contrast, sphingosine 1-phosphate stimulation induced rapid and transient α_1B-adrenergic receptor interaction of relatively small magnitude with Rab 5 and a more pronounced and sustained one with Rab 9; interaction was also observed with Rab 7. Moreover, the GTPase activity of the Rab proteins appears to be required because no FRET was observed when dominant-negative Rab mutants were employed. These data indicate that α_1B-adrenergic receptors are directed to different endocytic vesicles depending on the desensitization type (homologous vs. heterologous).

Visualizing G protein-coupled receptors in action through confocal microscopy techniques

G protein-coupled receptors constitute one of the most abundant entities in cellular communication. Elucidation of their structure and function as well as of their regulation began 30-40 years ago and the advance has markedly increased during the last 15 years. They participate in a plethora of cell functions such as regulation of metabolic fluxes, contraction, secretion, differentiation, or proliferation, and in essentially all activities of our organism; these receptors are targets of a large proportion of prescribed and illegal drugs. Fluorescence techniques have been used to study receptors for many years. The experimental result was usually a two-dimensional (2D) micrograph. Today, the result can be a spatiotemporal (four-dimensional, 4D) movie. Advances in microscopy, fluorescent protein design, and computer-assisted analysis have been of great importance to increase our knowledge on receptor regulation and function and create opportunities for future research. In this review we briefly depict the state of the art of the G protein-coupled receptor field and the methodologies used to study G protein-coupled receptor location, trafficking, dimerization, and other types of receptor-protein interaction. Fluorescence techniques now permit the capture of receptor images with high resolution and, together with a variety of fluorescent dyes that color organelles (such as the plasma membrane or the nucleus) or the cytoskeleton, allow researchers to obtain a much clearer idea of what is taking place at the cellular level. These developments are changing the way we explore cell communication and signal transduction, permitting deeper understanding of the physiological and pathophysiological processes.

Sphingosine 1-phosphate-mediated α1B-adrenoceptor desensitization and phosphorylation. Direct and paracrine/autocrine actions

Sphingosine-1-phosphate-induced α1B-adrenergic receptor desensitization and phosphorylation were studied in rat-1 fibroblasts stably expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein-tagged adrenoceptors. Sphingosine-1-phosphate induced adrenoceptor desensitization and phosphorylation through a signaling cascade that involved phosphoinositide 3-kinase and protein kinase C activities. The autocrine/paracrine role of sphingosine-1-phosphate was also studied. It was observed that activation of receptor tyrosine kinases, such as insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-I) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptors increased sphingosine kinase activity. Such activation and consequent production of sphingosine-1-phosphate appear to be functionally relevant in IGF-I- and EGF-induced α1B-adrenoceptor phosphorylation and desensitization as evidenced by the following facts: a) expression of a catalytically inactive (dominant-negative) mutant of sphingosine kinase 1 or b) S1P1 receptor knockdown markedly reduced this growth factor action. This action of sphingosine-1-phosphate involves EGF receptor transactivation. In addition, taking advantage of the presence of the eGFP tag in the receptor construction, we showed that S1P was capable of inducing α1B-adrenergic receptor internalization and that its autocrine/paracrine generation was relevant for internalization induced by IGF-I. Four distinct hormone receptors and two autocrine/paracrine mediators participate in IGF-I receptor-α1B-adrenergic receptor crosstalk.

Roles of the α1A-adrenergic receptor carboxyl tail in protein kinase C-induced phosphorylation and desensitization

Noradrenaline- and tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate (TPA)-induced phosphorylation and functional desensitization of the following receptors were studied: (1) wild-type bovine α(1A)- and hamster α(1B)-adrenergic receptors (ARs), (2) chimeric ARs in which the carboxyl terminus tails were exchanged (α(1AB)- and α(1BA)-ARs), and (3) carboxyl terminus-truncated α(1A)-ARs fussed to enhanced green fluorescent protein. Noradrenaline and TPA pronouncedly increased α(1B)-AR phosphorylation while TPA markedly desensitized these receptors. In contrast, TPA-induced desensitization and TPA- and noradrenaline-induced phosphorylation of α(1A)-ARs were clearly of lesser magnitude. Chimeric ARs with exchanged carboxyl terminus tails showed that the extent of phosphorylation reflected the carboxyl domain rather than the receptor core. Surprisingly, there was no correlation between phosphorylation and functional desensitization, i.e., activation of protein kinase C clearly desensitized both chimeric receptors to a similar extent. Interestingly, TPA and noradrenaline increased carboxyl terminus-truncated α(1A)-AR phosphorylation and TPA also induced receptor desensitization. We were unable to detect carboxyl terminus-truncated α(1A)-AR internalization after 5-min stimulations with noradrenaline or TPA. Our results suggest the following: (a) the α(1A)-AR carboxyl terminus tail was not essential for signaling or desensitization; (b) carboxyl terminus tail exchange "transplanted" the phosphorylation pattern of the receptors, but the functional consequences of such a transplant were very limited; (c) α(1A)-AR desensitization was not associated to receptor internalization.

Dissecting how receptor tyrosine kinases modulate G protein-coupled receptor function

Receptor tyrosine kinases and G protein-coupled receptors modulate physiological processes and are also involved in the pathogenesis of some diseases. These receptors have intense bidirectional crosstalks leading to interactions in their signaling pathways and also modulation of the receptors themselves. In some cases, the receptor tyrosine kinases phosphorylate G protein-coupled receptors whereas in others phosphoinositide 3-kinase, protein kinase B and protein kinase C are key elements in these crosstalks. Two paracrine/ autocrine processes also participate, i.e., epidermal growth factor transactivation and sphingosine 1-phosphate generation and signaling. G proteins seem to mediate actions of receptor tyrosine kinases, but how this takes place is far from completely understood; some models are presented. Recent data indicate that the mitogen activated protein kinase cascade also mediate crosstalks. In the present perspective these processes are outlined using information from receptors that have been intensively studied, and important gaps in our knowledge are indicated.

Functional linkage as a direction for studies in oxidative stress: α-adrenergic receptorsThis review is one of a selection of papers published in a Special Issue on Oxidative Stress in Health and Disease

The α-adrenergic receptors (adrenoceptors) are activated by the endogenous agonists epinephrine and norepinephrine. They are G protein-coupled receptors that may be broadly classified into α1 (subclasses α1A, α1B, α1D) and α2 (subclasses α2A, α2B, α2C). The α1-adrenoceptors act by binding to Gαq subunits of the G proteins, causing activation of phospholipase C (PLC). PLC converts phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate into inositol trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG), which have downstream effects on cytosolic Ca2+ concentration. The α2-adrenoceptors bind to Gαi thus inhibiting adenylyl cyclase and decreasing cAMP levels. DAG alters protein kinase C activity and cAMP activates protein kinase A. The downstream pathways of the two receptors may also interact. Activation of α1- and α2-adrenoceptors in vascular smooth muscle results in vasoconstriction. However, the densities of individual receptor subclasses vary between vessel beds or between vessels of various sizes within the same bed. In vasculature, the densities of adrenoceptor subclasses differ between conduit arteries and arterioles. These differences, along with differences in coupling mechanisms, allow for fine regulation of arterial blood flow. This diversity is enhanced by interactions resulting from homo- and heterodimer formation of the receptors, metabolic pathways, and kinases. Reactive oxygen species generated in pathologies may alter α1- and α2-adrenoceptor cascades, change vascular contractility, or cause remodeling of blood vessels. This review emphasizes the need for understanding the functional linkage between α-adrenoceptor subtypes, coupling, cross talk, and oxidative stress in cardiovascular pathologies.

Effect of inhibitors of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase on alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor phosphorylation

1 Mitogen-activated protein kinases mediate hormone/neurotransmitter action on proliferation and differentiation and participate in receptor regulation. The effect of inhibitors of mitogen-activated kinase kinase (MEK) on alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor phosphorylation state and function was studied using different cell lines. It was observed that at nanomolar concentrations the MEK inhibitors, PD98059 (2'-amino-3'-methoxyflavone) and UO126 [1,4-(diamino-2,3-dicyano/1,4-bis-(2-aminophenylthio)-butadiene], increased alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor phosphorylation and diminished the functional response of this receptor to noradrenaline. These agents did not alter the action of lysophosphatidic acid. 2 Staurosporine (IC(50) approximately 0.8 nm) (a general protein kinase inhibitor) and bis-indolyl-maleimide I (IC(50) approximately 200 nm) (a selective protein kinase C inhibitor) inhibited PD98059-induced alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor phosphorylation. In contrast, neither wortmannin (phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor) nor genistein (protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor) had any effect. The data suggest the possibility that MEK might exert control on the activity of the enzymes that regulate receptor phosphorylation, such as G-protein-coupled receptor kinases, protein kinase C or serine/threonine protein phosphatases. 3 Coimmunoprecipitation studies showed a constant association of total extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 (ERK2) with alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors. Association of phospho-ERK 1/2 to alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors increased not only in response to agonist but also in response to agents that increase alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor and ERK1/2 phosphorylation [such as endothelin-1, phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) and epidermal growth factor (EGF)]; not surprisingly, PD98059 decreased this effect. 4 Our data show that blockade of MEK activity results in increased alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor phosphorylation, diminished adrenoceptor function and perturbation of receptor-ERK1/2 interaction.