The sigma agonist 1,3-di-o-tolyl-guanidine directly blocks SK channels in dopaminergic neurons and in cell lines

Quantitation of guanidine derivatives as representative persistent and mobile organic compounds in water: method development

Persistent and mobile organic compounds (PMOCs) are highly soluble in water, thereby posing a threat to water resource quality. Currently, there are no methods that can accurately quantify guanidine derivative PMOCs, other than 1,3-diphenylguanidine (DPG) and cyanoguanidine (CG), in aqueous media. In this study, we developed a quantitation method that combines solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography (LC)-tandem mass spectrometry to detect seven guanidine derivatives in aquatic environments and applied it to environmental water samples. Five LC columns were examined, and among them, a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography column was chosen owing to its suitable instrument detection limit and retention factor. Method precision was assessed using seven replicate analyses of river water. The corresponding analyte recoveries ranged from 73 to 137% (coefficient of variation = 2.1-5.8%). DPG and CG were detected in ultrapure water samples at levels up to 0.69 and 150 ng L^-1, respectively; DPG and CG levels up to 44 and 2600 ng L^-1, respectively, were detected in lake water, river water, sewage effluent, and tap water sampled in Western Japan. This is the first reported detection of DPG in the surface water of Japan, revealing that DPG and CG are ubiquitous compounds in aquatic environments. Moreover, this is the first study to detect 1-(o-tolyl)biguanide and N,N'''-1,6-hexanediylbis(N'-cyanoguanidine) in water. This study provides a foundation for further research on the distribution, fate, and emission source of these pollutants, which is critical to maintain high water quality and to determine regulatory limits for these pollutants.

Inhibitory Effects of Dronedarone on Small Conductance Calcium Activated Potassium Channels in Patients with Chronic Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison to Amiodarone

BACKGROUND Dysfunction of small conductance calcium activated potassium (SK) channels plays a vital role in atrial arrhythmogenesis. Amiodarone and dronedarone are the most effective class III antiarrhythmic drugs. It is unclear whether the antiarrhythmic effect of amiodarone and dronedarone is related to SK channel inhibition. MATERIAL AND METHODS Tissue samples were obtained from the right atria of 46 patients with normal sinus rhythm and 39 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Isolated atrial myocytes were obtained by enzymatic dissociation. KCNN2 (SK2) channels were transiently expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells. SK currents were recorded using whole-cell conventional patch clamp techniques. RESULTS Amiodarone and dronedarone showed a concentration-dependent inhibitory effect on SK currents (IKAS) in atrial myocytes from normal sinus rhythm patients and chronic atrial fibrillation patients. The suppressed efficacy of dronedarone and amiodarone on IKAS was greater in atrial myocytes from chronic atrial fibrillation patients than that from normal sinus rhythm patients. Furthermore, in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation, the IC₅₀ value was 2.42 µM with dronedarone and 8.03 µM with amiodarone. In HEK-293 cells with transiently transfected SK2 channels, both dronedarone and amiodarone had a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on IKAS. The IC₅₀ value was 1.7 µM with dronedarone and 7.2 µM with amiodarone in cells from patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Compared to amiodarone, dronedarone is more efficacy to inhibit IKAS and could be a potential intervention for patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS Dronedarone provides a great degree of IKAS inhibition in atrial myocytes from chronic atrial fibrillation than amiodarone. IKAS might be a potential target of amiodarone and dronedarone for the management of chronic atrial fibrillation.

Chlorination and bromination of 1,3-diphenylguanidine and 1,3-di-o-tolylguanidine: Kinetics, transformation products and toxicity assessment

This works investigates the chlorination and bromination of two rubber and polymer related chemicals, which have emerged as relevant water contaminants, i.e. 1,3-di-o-tolylguanidine (DTG) and 1,3-diphenylguanidine (DPG). Kinetic constants at different pH values were obtained and modelled, taking into account the pK_a values of DTG/DPG and HClO, showing that the maximum reaction rate (k_app > 10⁴ M^-1 s^-1) is obtained at pH values 8.8 for DPG and 9.1 for DTG. Bromination is also very fast, although unlike chlorination, deviation from the model was observed at neutral pH, which was attributed to formation of metastable transformation product (TP). A total of 35 TPs, corresponding to halogenation, hydroxylation, formation of monophenylguanidine derivatives and cyclization reactions, were tentatively identified. Furthermore it was found that chloroform can be formed up to a 25% molar yield, while dichloroacetonitrile was formed into less than a 3% yield. Several ecotoxicological endpoints were predicted by quantitative structure-activity relationship models (QSAR) for the TPs, some of which were predicted to be more toxic than DPG/DTG. Also a chlorinated solution investigated by a Vibrio Fisheri acute toxicity test, confirmed that toxicity increases with chlorination.

The sigma-1 receptor behaves as an atypical auxiliary subunit to modulate the functional characteristics of Kv1.2 channels expressed in HEK293 cells

Expression of Kv1.2 within Kv1.x potassium channel complexes is critical in maintaining appropriate neuronal excitability and determining the threshold for action potential firing. This is attributed to the interaction of Kv1.2 with a hitherto unidentified protein that confers bimodal channel activation gating, allowing neurons to adapt to repetitive trains of stimulation and protecting against hyperexcitability. One potential protein candidate is the sigma-1 receptor (Sig-1R), which regulates other members of the Kv1.x channel family; however, the biophysical nature of the interaction between Sig-1R and Kv1.2 has not been elucidated. We hypothesized that Sig-1R may regulate Kv1.2 and may further act as the unidentified modulator of Kv1.2 activation. In transiently transfected HEK293 cells, we found that ligand activation of the Sig-1R modulates Kv1.2 current amplitude. More importantly, Sig-1R interacts with Kv1.2 in baseline conditions to influence bimodal activation gating. These effects are abolished in the presence of the auxiliary subunit Kvβ2 and when the Sig-1R mutation underlying ALS16 (Sig-1R-E102Q), is expressed. These data suggest that Kvβ2 occludes the interaction of Sig-1R with Kv1.2, and that E102 may be a residue critical for Sig-1R modulation of Kv1.2. The results of this investigation describe an important new role for Sig-1R in the regulation of neuronal excitability and introduce a novel mechanism of pathophysiology in Sig-1R dysfunction.

Pharmacological Modulation of the Sigma 1 Receptor and the Treatment of Pain

There is a critical need for new analgesics acting through new mechanisms of action, which could increase the efficacy with respect to existing therapies and reduce their unwanted effects. Current preclinical evidence supports the modulatory role of sigma-1 receptors (σ1R) in nociception, mainly based on the pain-attenuated phenotype of σ1R knockout mice and on the antinociceptive effect exerted by σ1R antagonists on pains of different etiologies. σ1R is highly expressed in different pain areas of the CNS and the periphery (particularly dorsal root ganglia), and interacts and modulates the functionality of different receptors and ion channels . The antagonism of σ1R leads to decreased amplification of pain signaling within the spinal cord (central sensitization), but recent data also support a role at the periphery. σ1R antagonists have consistently demonstrated efficacy in neuropathic pain , but also in other types of pain including inflammatory, orofacial, visceral, and post-operative pain. Apart from acting alone, when combined with opioids, σ1R antagonists enhance opioid analgesia but not opioid-induced unwanted effects. Interestingly, unlike opioids, σ1R antagonists do not modify normal sensory mechanical and thermal sensitivity thresholds but they exert antihypersensitive effects in sensitizing conditions, enabling the reversal of nociceptive thresholds back to normal values. Accordingly, σ1R antagonists are not strictly analgesics; they are antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic drugs acting when the system is sensitized following prolonged noxious stimulation or persistent abnormal afferent input (e.g., secondary to nerve injury). These are distinctive features allowing σ1R antagonists to exert a modulatory effect specifically in pathophysiological conditions such as chronic pain .

Sigma-1 Receptor and Pain

There is a critical need for new analgesics acting through new mechanisms of action, which could increase the efficacy respect to existing therapies and/or reduce their unwanted effects. Current preclinical evidence supports the modulatory role of the sigma-1 receptor (σ1R) in nociception, mainly based on the pain-attenuated phenotype of σ1R knockout mice and on the antinociceptive effect exerted by σ1R antagonists on pain of different etiology, very consistently in neuropathic pain, but also in nociceptive, inflammatory, and visceral pain. σ1R is highly expressed in different pain areas of the CNS and the periphery, particularly dorsal root ganglia (DRG), and interacts and modulates the functionality of different receptors and ion channels. Accordingly, antinociceptive effects of σ1R antagonists both acting alone and in combination with other analgesics have been reported at both central and peripheral sites. At the central level, behavioral, electrophysiological, neurochemical, and molecular findings support a role for σ1R antagonists in inhibiting augmented excitability secondary to sustained afferent input. Moreover, the involvement of σ1R in mechanisms regulating pain at the periphery has been recently confirmed. Unlike opioids, σ1R antagonists do not modify normal sensory mechanical and thermal sensitivity thresholds but they exert antihypersensitivity effects (antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic) in sensitizing conditions, enabling the reversal of nociceptive thresholds back to normal values. These are distinctive features allowing σ1R antagonists to exert a modulatory effect specifically in pathophysiological conditions such as chronic pain.

Sigma-1 Receptor and Neuronal Excitability

The sigma-1 receptor (Sig-1R), via interaction with various proteins, including voltage-gated and ligand-gated ion channels (VGICs and LGICs), is involved in a plethora of neuronal functions. This capability to regulate a variety of ion channel targets endows the Sig-1R with a powerful capability to fine tune neuronal excitability, and thereby the transmission of information within brain circuits. This versatility may also explain why the Sig-1R is associated to numerous diseases at both peripheral and central levels. To date, how the Sig-1R chooses its targets and how the combinations of target modulations alter overall neuronal excitability is one of the challenges in the field of Sig-1R-dependent regulation of neuronal activity. Here, we will describe and discuss the latest findings on Sig-1R-dependent modulation of VGICs and LGICs, and provide hypotheses that may explain the diverse excitability outcomes that have been reported so far.

Sigma receptor type 1 knockout mice show a mild deficit in plasticity but no significant change in synaptic transmission in the CA1 region of the hippocampus

The sigma-1 receptor (σ-1R) is a chaperone protein located at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) mitochondrial interface with roles in neuroprotection and cognition. Increasing evidence suggests that loss of σ-1R function could contribute to neurological disease states making it a target for therapeutic intervention. Our objective was to elucidate the consequences to synaptic transmission and plasticity when σ-1R is absent. We utilized a knockout mouse in which the gene encoding for σ-1R was deleted (σ-1R-KO mouse). Using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from CA1 pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus, we examined neuronal excitability and glutamatergic synaptic function. Surprisingly, we detected no significant change in action potential firing and basic cellular characteristics. Furthermore, we found no significant change to pre-synaptic function as indicated by a similar paired-pulse ratio and miniature excitatory post-synaptic current frequency in σ-1R-KO compared to wild-type (WT) mice. Similarly, the glutamate gated AMPA receptor and NMDA receptors were unaffected with no significant difference in AMPA/NMDA ratio or decay kinetics in σ-1R-KO compared to WT mice. We further examined long-term potentiation in extracellular field recordings in CA1 stratum radiatum following Schaffer collateral stimulation. Interestingly, we found a small but significant reduction in the magnitude of long-term potentiation in mutant compared to WT mice. The results of this investigation suggest that basic cellular physiology is unaffected by σ-1R loss, however the neuronal network is partially compromised. The sigma-1 receptor (σ-1R) is a chaperone protein with roles in neuroprotection and cognition. We determined the consequences to synaptic transmission and plasticity when σ-1R was absent. Utilizing the σ-1R knockout mouse and electrophysiological recordings, we found no change in neuronal excitability and glutamatergic synaptic function. However, we found a significant reduction in long-term potentiation.

Sigma-1 receptor agonists directly inhibit Nav1.2/1.4 channels

(+)-SKF 10047 (N-allyl-normetazocine) is a prototypic and specific sigma-1 receptor agonist that has been used extensively to study the function of sigma-1 receptors. (+)-SKF 10047 inhibits K(+), Na(+) and Ca2+ channels via sigma-1 receptor activation. We found that (+)-SKF 10047 inhibited Na(V)1.2 and Na(V)1.4 channels independently of sigma-1 receptor activation. (+)-SKF 10047 equally inhibited Na(V)1.2/1.4 channel currents in HEK293T cells with abundant sigma-1 receptor expression and in COS-7 cells, which barely express sigma-1 receptors. The sigma-1 receptor antagonists BD 1063,BD 1047 and NE-100 did not block the inhibitory effects of (+)-SKF-10047. Blocking of the PKA, PKC and G-protein pathways did not affect (+)-SKF 10047 inhibition of Na(V)1.2 channel currents. The sigma-1 receptor agonists Dextromethorphan (DM) and 1,3-di-o-tolyl-guanidine (DTG) also inhibited Na(V)1.2 currents through a sigma-1 receptor-independent pathway. The (+)-SKF 10047 inhibition of Na(V)1.2 currents was use- and frequency-dependent. Point mutations demonstrated the importance of Phe(1764) and Tyr(1771) in the IV-segment 6 domain of the Na(V)1.2 channel and Phe(1579) in the Na(V)1.4 channel for (+)-SKF 10047 inhibition. In conclusion, our results suggest that sigma-1 receptor agonists directly inhibit Na(V)1.2/1.4 channels and that these interactions should be given special attention for future sigma-1 receptor function studies.

The chemistry and biology of organic guanidine derivatives

The chemistry and biology of organic natural guanidines are reviewed, including the isolation, structure determination, synthesis, biosynthesis and biological activities of alkaloids, non-ribosomal peptides, guanidine-bearing terpenes, polyketides and shikimic acid derivatives from natural sources.