1
|
Schuil HW, Figaroa OJA, Baard J, Lifshitz DA, Jamaludin FS, Kamphuis GM. Comparison of surgical effectiveness: kidney sparing surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Curr Opin Urol 2024:00042307-990000000-00206. [PMID: 39512154 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review provides an overview of the recent publications on kidney-sparing-surgery (KSS) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), an alternative to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for an increasing number of indications. RECENT FINDINGS Recent studies highlight comparable survival outcomes between KSS [ureterorenoscopy with tumour ablation (URS) or segmental ureteral resection (SUR)] and RNU, even in high-risk UTUC patients. KSS has shown to preserve renal function without significantly compromising oncologic control in appropriately selected patients. Included literature also researched surgical complications, surveillance strategies, such as second-look ureteroscopy, and comparative cost analyses. SUMMARY Over the past two and a half years, studies have emphasized the growing usage of URS and SUR in treating selected UTUC patients. Recent literature has remarkably included relatively large numbers of typically high-risk patients with features such as high-grade tumours, stage >Ta, multifocality, and hydronephrosis with acceptable results. Further research should expand on the different indications for KSS, its postoperative surveillance and comparative economic analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo W Schuil
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Orlane J A Figaroa
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David A Lifshitz
- Division of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Faridi S Jamaludin
- Medical Library AMC, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Guido M Kamphuis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Basile G, Gallioli A, Territo A, Verri P, Gaya JM, Afferi L, Diana P, Sanz I, Dieguez L, Uleri A, Berquin C, Gavrilov P, Algaba F, Palou J, Breda A. Cumulative morbidity of ureteroscopy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Actas Urol Esp 2024; 48:665-673. [PMID: 38735432 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess complications after ureteroscopy (URS) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) management and to assess its postoperative cumulative morbidity burden using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). MATERIALS AND METHODS Single center retrospective study including patients submitted to URS for UTUC suspicion. URSs were both diagnostic and operative. Postoperative complications were recorded according to the EAU Guidelines and graded according to Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC). The cumulative postoperative morbidity burden developed by patients experiencing multiple events was assessed using the CCI. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) analyses identified factors independently associated with the development of any grade and major postoperative complications. RESULTS Overall, 360 patients with UTUC suspicion were included with a total of 575 URSs performed. The cumulative number of all postoperative complications recorded was 111. In 86 (15%) procedures, patients experienced at least one postoperative complication, while 25 (4.3%) experienced more than one complication. Of these, 16 (14%) were severe (CDC ≥ IIIa). The most frequent type of complications were urinary (34%), bleeding (30%) and infectious (30%). The higher the CDC grade, the higher the median CCI, with a statistically significant increase in median CCI from CDC II to major complications. Patients who experienced intraoperative complications were at higher risk of developing any grade and major postoperative complications at MLR. CONCLUSIONS Complications after ureteroscopy for UTUC are relatively uncommon events. Patients who experience intraoperative complications are at higher risk of developing postoperative complications. The comprehensive complication index appeared more representative of the cumulative postoperative morbidity rather than the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Basile
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Servicio de Urología, IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele, Milán, Italy.
| | - A Gallioli
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Territo
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Verri
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Servicio de Urología, Universidad de Turín, Turín, Italy
| | - J M Gaya
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Afferi
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Diana
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Sanz
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Dieguez
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Uleri
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Servicio de Urología, Universidad Humanitas, Rozzano, Milán, Italy
| | - C Berquin
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Gante, Bélgica, Centro acreditado en la Red Europea de Referencia (ERN) eUROGEN, Belgium
| | - P Gavrilov
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F Algaba
- Área de Anatomía Patológica, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Palou
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Breda
- Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xie Z, Liu M, Chen S, Tang W, Liang G, Xu J, Zhao Z. Long segment ureterectomy with tapered demucosalized ileum replacement of ureter for ureteral cancer: a case report and literature review. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1426003. [PMID: 39184042 PMCID: PMC11341426 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1426003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder sleeve resection is currently the gold standard for the treatment of high-risk ureteral cancer. However, in certain special cases, such as bilateral upper tract urothelial carcinoma(UTUC), isolated and chronic kidney disease, and low-risk UTUC, kidney sparing surgery(KSS) may represent a viable alternative, though it remains highly challenging. The current KSS options for ureteral cancer include endoscopic treatment, segmental ureterectomy, total ureterectomy combined with kidney autotransplantation and nephrostomy. These methods are associated with significant disadvantages, such as a high risk of recurrence and vascular-related complications. On the basis of previous studies, we creatively proposed a surgical method of long segment ureterectomy with tapered demucosalized ileum(TDI) replacement of the ureter for ureteral cancer, and successfully performed this operation on a patient with ureteral cancer. The follow-up results showed that this surgical method provides good tumor control while preserving the patient's renal function and improves the inherent defect of the ileal replacement of the ureter, which is a feasible choice for patients with ureteral cancer and kidney preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhifei Xie
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China
| | - Mingwen Liu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China
| | - Shulian Chen
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China
| | - Wen Tang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China
| | - Guobiao Liang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China
| | - Jingyu Xu
- The Collaborative Innovation Center of Tissue Damage Repair and Regeneration Medicine of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China
| | - Zeju Zhao
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schuil HW, Figaroa OJ, Hendriks N, Schout BM, Beerlage HP, van Jamaludin FS, M.E.L. Henderickx M, van Moorselaar RJA, Kamphuis GM, Baard J. Navigating the Aftermath: A Comprehensive Scoping Review on Follow-up Strategies After Kidney-sparing Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 66:82-92. [PMID: 39050911 PMCID: PMC11268123 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) can be managed efficiently and safely through kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) in selected patient groups. However, the most effective and efficient postoperative surveillance strategy remains undetermined. We aimed to provide a comprehensive synopsis of the follow-up strategies and survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with UTUC treated by KSS. Methods Following the systematic methodology outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews, we conducted searches in four databases (MEDLINE [Ovid], Embase [Ovid], Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) up until December 11, 2023. Key findings and limitations A total of 3121 articles underwent screening, of which 19 were selected for inclusion in this review. The follow-up schedules after KSS exhibited considerable variability among the included studies. Diagnostic modalities employed consisted of computed tomography urography (present in 84% of protocols), X urography (21%), ultrasound (21%), thoracic imaging (26%), voided urine cytology (89%), selective upper tract cytology (5.3%), cystoscopy (84%), and ureterorenoscopy (53%) at varying frequencies. At 5 yr of follow-up, the reported recurrence-free survival rate ranged from 30% to 86%, overall survival was 50-92%, and metastasis-free survival was 77-90%. Conclusions and clinical implications This review unveils significant heterogeneity in clinical practices and survival outcomes, indicating disparities between real-world approaches and guideline recommendations. The lack of consensus on follow-up schemes is evident, emphasising the necessity for future initiatives aimed at developing a comprehensive protocol. Patient summary This review shows significant heterogeneity in follow-up strategies after kidney-sparing surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. A lack of evidence contributes to discrepancies between guidelines and real-world approaches. Thus, future endeavours should aim at establishing a comprehensive protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo W. Schuil
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Orlane J.A. Figaroa
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nora Hendriks
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Harrie P. Beerlage
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michaël M.E.L. Henderickx
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. Jeroen A. van Moorselaar
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Guido M. Kamphuis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Figaroa OJA, Hendriks N, Kamphuis GM, Beerlage HP, van Moorselaar RJA, Bins AD, Baard J. Longer is Better for Endoscopic Follow-up of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Ureteroscopic Treatment: An Evaluation Spanning 10 Years of Data. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:853-859. [PMID: 38057192 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumour recurrences are frequent among patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with ureteroscopy (URS). Therefore, guidelines recommend a strict follow-up regimen, but there is little evidence on how to do this. OBJECTIVE To analyse outcomes during our follow-up regimen and the impact on treatment in terms of ipsilateral UTUC recurrence, treatment conversion, and tumour upgrading, and to evaluate potential prognostic factors, including second-look URS outcomes. A secondary objective was to evaluate survival outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The single-centre cohort included all adult patients with nonmetastatic UTUC treated with URS from January 2010 to December 2020. Follow-up involved endoscopy at 3-mo intervals in the first year, then at 6-mo intervals up to year 3, and yearly thereafter. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Descriptive analyses were performed for the follow-up outcomes. The Andersen-Gill model for recurrent event analysis was used to analyse tumour recurrences, and multivariable Cox regression to analyse for predictors for treatment conversion in low-grade tumours. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS We analysed 71 patients with median follow-up of 49.5 mo. The overall 2-yr recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 22%. In low-grade disease, the 1-yr RFS rate was 50% and the 2-yr RFS rate was 29%. Treatment was converted to radical nephroureterectomy for 23 patients, at a median time to conversion of 9.9 mo. Upgrading was seen in 13 patients, at a median time to upgrading of 21.9 mo. No factors were prognostic for either tumour recurrence or treatment conversion. The 5-yr OS, CSS, and MFS rates were 82%, 86%, and 84%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our data show that it is rational to extend endoscopic follow-up for UTUC treated with URS, as clinically relevant events (treatment conversion and tumour upgrading) occur beyond the current 6-mo guideline recommendation. Second-look URS outcomes were not prognostic for tumour recurrence or treatment conversion during follow-up. PATIENT SUMMARY Our study results show that for patients with cancer of the upper urinary tract treated with kidney-sparing surgery through a small telescope called a ureteroscope (URS), most of the clinically relevant events (treatment conversion and tumour upgrading) occur outside the current recommended follow-up of 6 months. Therefore, URS follow-up should be extended for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orlane J A Figaroa
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Immunology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Nora Hendriks
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Guido M Kamphuis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harrie P Beerlage
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Jeroen A van Moorselaar
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan D Bins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Immunology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Giulioni C, Brocca C, Tramanzoli P, Stramucci S, Mantovan M, Perpepaj L, Cicconofri A, Gauhar V, Merseburger AS, Galosi AB, Castellani D. Endoscopic intervention versus radical nephroureterectomy for the management of localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. World J Urol 2024; 42:318. [PMID: 38743260 PMCID: PMC11093876 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05032-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Localized Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) is an uncommon cancer typically detected at an advanced stage. Currently, radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision is the standard treatment for high-risk UTUC. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the 5-year overall and cancer-specific survival and bladder recurrence rates in studies comparing endoscopic kidney-sparing surgeries (E-KSS) with RNU in localized UTUC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a literature search on 20th April 2023 through PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The PICOS model was used for study inclusion: P: adult patients with localized UTUC; I: E-KSS. C: RNU; O: primary: overall survival (OS); secondary: cancer-specific survival (CSS), bladder recurrence rate, and metastasis-free survival (MFS). S: retrospective, prospective, and randomized studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, 11 studies involving 2284 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis, 737 in the E-KSS group and 1547 in the RNU group. E-KSS showed a similar overall 5-year OS between E-KSS and RNU, and for low-grade tumors, while 5-year OS favored RNU for high-grade tumors (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.26-2.69, p = 0.002). No difference emerged for 5-year CSS between the two groups, even when the results were stratified for low- and high grade tumors. Bladder recurrence rate and 5-year MFS were also similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Our review showed that E-KSS is a viable option for patients with localized UTUC with non-inferior oncological outcomes as compared with RNU, except for 5-year OS in high-grade tumors which favoured RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Giulioni
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
| | - Carlo Brocca
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Pietro Tramanzoli
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Silvia Stramucci
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Matteo Mantovan
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Leonard Perpepaj
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Cicconofri
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Vineet Gauhar
- Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Axel Stuart Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Andrea Benedetto Galosi
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Daniele Castellani
- Department of Urology, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 71 Conca Street, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ma Z, Yi Y, Qiu Z. Recent trends in incidence, mortality, survival, and treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. THE FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2024; 34:102573. [PMID: 38330829 DOI: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To examine the recent trends in incidence, incidence-based mortality, survival, and treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) from 2004 to 2019 and investigate whether patients would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we identified 18,422 patients diagnosed with UTUC from 2004 to 2019. Joinpoint regression analyses were used to test the trends in annual percentage change (APC) for statistical significance. RESULTS From 2004 to 2019, the incidence of all UTUC decreased from 1.46 to 1.27 per 100,000 person-years [APC: -1.11, P<0.001]. In subgroup analysis, the incidence decreased for localized, regional and stage I-II, but increased for distant. Over the study period, changes in trend for 5-year cancer specific survival [APC: -0.21, P=0.676] and 5-year overall survival [APC: 0.18, P=0.751] of all UTUC were not significant. The 5-year cancer specific survival and 5-year overall survival for regional and stage III cancer improved significantly from 2004 to 2014. Since 2004, rates of treatment with nephroureterectomy combined with chemotherapy increased significantly [APC: 7.38, P<0.001], while rates of treatment with nephroureterectomy alone decreased significantly [APC: -1.89, P<0.001]. CONCLUSION The overall incidence of UTUC is reduced, with a significant reduction in the incidence of early stage UTUC but an increase in the incidence of late stage UTUC. No significant change in IBM was observed over the study period. No significant improvement in survival for early stage UTUC. Significant improvements in regional and stage III survival were observed with active adjuvant chemotherapy. There is also an excess of combination therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zecong Ma
- Department of Urology, Longyan First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Longyan, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yi Yi
- Department of Urology, Longyan First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Longyan, Fujian Province, China.
| | - Zini Qiu
- Minxi Vocational and Technical College, Longyan, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bernabei M, Fabbri N, Romeo D, Paiolo E, Bandi M, Simone M. Conservative management of an early abdominal complication during a Tullio percutaneous endoscopic excision of renal pelvis urothelial carcinoma: A case report. World J Clin Urol 2024; 13:1-6. [DOI: 10.5410/wjcu.v13.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) representing only a small fraction of all urothelial tumors. It predominantly affects the renal pelvis in men, often coexisting with bladder carcinoma. UTUC displays a more aggressive genetic profile compared to bladder neoplasms, with the majority of patients presenting with advanced disease. Histologically, about a quarter of UTUC cases exhibit high-grade subtypes, associated with a worse prognosis. Tobacco use and past exposure to aromatic amines are significant risk factors for UTUC. Imaging modalities such as Uro-computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging play crucial roles in diagnosis. Ureterorenoscopy is vital for direct visualization and biopsy sampling, but its limited sampling capacity presents challenges in determining tumor depth and staging. Traditionally, nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision has been the gold-standard treatment for UTUC. Endoscopic conservative treatment has recently emerged as a viable option for selected patients, offering comparable oncological outcomes to radical surgery. Percutaneous access is also feasible for larger intrarenal tumors.
CASE SUMMARY We present a case of an 84-year-old woman who underwent percutaneous endoscopic excision of a renal pelvis neoplasm using the Tullio laser. Despite successful tumor removal, the patient experienced a postoperative complication with abdominal fluid leakage. Conservative management effectively resolved the complication. Given the patient's age and refusal for radical surgery, the conservative approach proved to be a valid therapeutic choice.
CONCLUSION Overall, UTUC remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to its rarity. However, advances in endoscopic and percutaneous techniques provide valuable alternatives for selected patients, warranting further exploration in this evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicolò Fabbri
- Department of Surgery, University of Ferrara, Azienda USL of Ferrara, Azienda USL of Ferrara, Ferrara 44100, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Danila Romeo
- Local Health Agency of Ferrara, Ferrara 44100, Italy
| | - Elisa Paiolo
- Department of Urology, Azienda USL di Ferrara, Ferrara 44100, Italy
| | - Martina Bandi
- Department of Urology, Azienda USL di Ferrara, Ferrara 44100, Italy
| | - Maurizio Simone
- Department of Urology, Azienda USL di Ferrara, Ferrara 44100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ishikawa K, Nagata M, Tomari M, Mito O, Hirano H, Shimizu F, Isotani S, Ide H, Horie S. Simultaneous Urothelial Carcinoma in the Upper Urinary Tract and Contralateral Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report. Case Rep Oncol 2024; 17:1316-1321. [PMID: 39564551 PMCID: PMC11575923 DOI: 10.1159/000542059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 11/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Although urological surgeons often diagnose cases of simultaneous double cancers of the urinary tract in our clinical practice, few reports have shown that treatment strategies achieve both anticancer effects and preservation of renal function for simultaneous contralateral renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. Although there are many options for the treatment of renal cancer, such as immunotherapy and - drugs, and many surgical procedures, such as laparoscopic surgery and robot-assisted surgery, no treatment strategy has been established for double cancer of the bilateral urinary tracts. We encountered a case in which contralateral renal surgery was performed under a precise preoperative plan; as a result, the introduction of dialysis could be avoided, and the anticancer effect could be maintained. Case Presentation A 73-year-old man was diagnosed with contralateral left renal cell carcinoma and right ureteral cancer. Initially, the patient underwent laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for right ureteral urothelial carcinoma. Subsequently, robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for left renal cell carcinoma was performed after treatment with the molecular-targeted agent, pazopanib. Even after partial nephrectomy, renal function was maintained, and dialysis was avoided. Conclusion In cases of simultaneous renal cell carcinoma and contralateral ureteral cancer, it is possible to preserve both anticancer effects and renal function using careful treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keisuke Ishikawa
- Department of Urology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Nagata
- Department of Urology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Miki Tomari
- Department of Urology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Mito
- Department of Urology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisashi Hirano
- Department of Urology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumitaka Shimizu
- Department of Urology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuji Isotani
- Department of Urology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisamitsu Ide
- Department of Urology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigeo Horie
- Department of Urology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Giulioni C, Pirola GM, Maggi M, Brocca C, Tramanzoli P, Stramucci S, Mantovan M, Perpepaj L, Cicconofri A, Gauhar V, Galosi AB, Castellani D. Current Evidence on Utility, Outcomes, and Limitations of Endoscopic Laser Ablation for Localized Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from a Scoping Review. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 59:7-17. [PMID: 38298767 PMCID: PMC10829601 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Context The occurrence of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is uncommon and is usually identified at an advanced and multifocal stage. Currently, there is growing interest in utilizing endoscopic laser ablation (ELA). Objective To evaluate the survival rates and perioperative complications of ELA. Evidence acquisition We performed a literature search through PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The analysis included observational studies that examined the oncological outcomes of patients with UTUC treated with ELA. Evidence synthesis Neodymium and diode lasers are no longer used due to their high complication rates. Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) and thulium:YAG lasers provided excellent tumor ablation and hemostasis in both the collecting system and the ureter. These lasers offer good disease-free and cancer-specific survival, especially for low-grade tumors. Conclusions Advancements in laser technology and ablation techniques, and understanding of UTUC tumor biology hold significant promise in improving the use of conservative UTUC treatment, with excellent safety and good oncological outcomes for low-grade diseases. Patient summary With the advancement of technology, the conservative approach utilizing endoscopic laser ablation for upper tract urothelial tumors has been proved to be both safe and effective, showcasing promising survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Giulioni
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Brocca
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Pietro Tramanzoli
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Silvia Stramucci
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Matteo Mantovan
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Leonard Perpepaj
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Cicconofri
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Vineet Gauhar
- Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Andrea Benedetto Galosi
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Daniele Castellani
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Qiu J, Deng R, Yu C, Gong K. The long-term outcome of nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy for organ-localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a population-based study of 1969 patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:14869-14878. [PMID: 37598342 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05264-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the long-term outcomes after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and investigate prognostic factors for organ-localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) as the role of NSS for UTUC remains unclear. METHODS Patients diagnosed with organ-localized UTUC between 2004 and 2020 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The propensity score overlap weighting (PSOW) process, Cox regression analysis, Kaplan‒Meier analysis, competing-risks models, and subgroup analysis were employed to compare the outcomes and identify prognostic factors. The overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) nomograms were developed and evaluated using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. RESULTS A total of 1969 patients were included. After the process of PSOW, baseline data were well balanced. RNU was associated with similar OS and CSS than NSS in the overall cohort. Age, T stage, and histologic grade were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS, while marital status was an independent prognostic factor only for OS. Four and three predictors were identified for developing the OS and CSS nomograms, respectively. C-index (OS 0.637, CSS 0.670), calibration curve, and Kaplan-Meier analysis proved excellent predictive accuracy of nomograms. CONCLUSION Patients accepting RNU had a comparative or better outcome in each sample group. NSS achieved a similar oncologic control for selected patients with organ-localized UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianhui Qiu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Ruiyi Deng
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Chaojian Yu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Kan Gong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Xu B, Zhang JE, Ye L, Yuan CW. Evaluation of the diagnostic efficiency of voided urine fluorescence in situ hybridization for predicting the pathology of preoperative "low-risk" upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1225428. [PMID: 37576882 PMCID: PMC10412927 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1225428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the clinical utility of voided urine fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for predicting the pathology of preoperative "low-risk" upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Methods Information of patients preoperatively diagnosed with "low-risk" UTUC receiving radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) between May 2014 and October 2019 were retrospectively collected. All of the patients accepted the FISH test and then were divided into two groups according to the results of FISH. The diagnostic value of FISH was assessed through the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and area under the curve. Logistic regression analysis was applied to examine FISH as a predictive factor of tumor final stage and grade of preoperative "low-risk" UTUC. Results In total, 129 patients were included. Of them, 70 (54.2%) were marked with positive FISH result. The difference at final pathology in tumor stage and tumor grade between these two groups of FISH (-) and FISH (+) had significantly statistical significance (p<0.001). Regarding to the tumor stage at final pathology, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of FISH were 70.7 (58.9-80.3)68.5 (54.3-80.1)75.7 (63.7-84.8) and 62.7 (49.1-74.7), respectively. Regarding to the tumor grade at final pathology, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of FISH were 64.7 (53.5-74.6), 65.9 (50.0-79.1), 78.6 (66.8-87.1) and 49.1 (36.5-62.3), respectively. The results of logistic regression analysis indicated that FISH could predict the pathologic characteristics of preoperative "low-risk" UTUC independently. Conclusions FISH was qualified with relatively high diagnostic estimates for predicting tumor stage and grade of preoperative "low-risk" UTUC, and could be an independent predictive factor in clinical practice. For preoperative "low-risk" UTUC patients but with positive FISH result, choosing nephron-sparing surgery may require special caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Herout R, Baunacke M, Flegar L, Borkowetz A, Reicherz A, Koch R, Kraywinkel K, Thomas C, Groeben C, Huber J. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma in Germany: epidemiological data and surgical treatment trends in a total population analysis from 2006 to 2019. World J Urol 2023; 41:127-133. [PMID: 36445373 PMCID: PMC9849285 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04219-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report contemporary epidemiological data and treatment trends for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in Germany over a 14-year period. METHODS We analyzed data from the nationwide German hospital billing database and the German cancer registry from 2006 to 2018/2019. The significance of changes over time was evaluated via regression analysis. Survival outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS There was a non-significant increase in the age-standardized incidence rate from 2.5/100,000 in 2006 to 2.9/100.000 in 2018. 13% of patients presented with lymph node metastasis and 7.6% of patients presented with distant metastasis at primary diagnosis. The 5-year overall survival was estimated at 45% and the 10-year overall survival at 32%. Endoscopic biopsies of the renal pelvis and ureter as well as ureteroscopies with excision/destruction of UTUC all increased significantly over the study period. The number of radical nephroureterectomies (RNU) for UTUC steadily increased from 1643 cases in 2006 to 2238 cases in 2019 (p < 0.005) with a shift from open surgery towards minimally invasive surgery. Complex reconstructive procedures like ileal ureter replacement or autotransplantation are rarely performed for urothelial carcinoma of the ureter. CONCLUSION Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for UTUC have increased and minimally invasive nephroureterectomy is the predominant approach concerning radical surgery in 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Herout
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Martin Baunacke
- grid.4488.00000 0001 2111 7257Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Luka Flegar
- grid.10253.350000 0004 1936 9756Department of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Angelika Borkowetz
- grid.4488.00000 0001 2111 7257Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alina Reicherz
- grid.459734.80000 0000 9602 8737Department of Urology, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Marien Hospital Herne, Herne, Germany
| | - Rainer Koch
- grid.10253.350000 0004 1936 9756Department of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kraywinkel
- grid.13652.330000 0001 0940 3744National Center for Cancer Registry Data, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Thomas
- grid.4488.00000 0001 2111 7257Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christer Groeben
- grid.10253.350000 0004 1936 9756Department of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Huber
- grid.10253.350000 0004 1936 9756Department of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kawada T, Laukhtina E, Quhal F, Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Pallauf M, von Deimling M, Bianchi A, Pradere B, Fajkovic H, Enikeev D, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Seisen T, Araki M, Shariat SF. Oncologic and Safety Outcomes for Endoscopic Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 9:236-240. [PMID: 36463089 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
We systematically reviewed the literature and summarized oncologic and safety outcomes for endoscopic management (EM) compared to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Studies comparing oncologic and/or safety results for EM versus RNU in patients with UTUC were included in our review. Overall, 13 studies met the criteria, and five studies were included in a meta-analysis using adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS). EM was associated similar OS (HR 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-2.16), CSS (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.99-1.91), and BRFS (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.61-1.55) to RNU, while 28-85% of patients treated with EM experienced upper tract recurrence across the studies. EM required more interventions with a higher cumulative risk of complications and lower likelihood of renal preservation. In summary, EM for low-grade UTUC had comparable survival outcomes to RNU at the cost of higher local recurrence rates resulting in a need for long-term rigorous surveillance and repeated interventions. PATIENT SUMMARY: For selected cases of cancer in the upper urinary tract, surgical treatment via a telescope inserted through the urethra or the skin (endoscope) results in cancer control outcomes that are comparable to those after removal of the kidney and ureter. However, because of its higher rate of local recurrence, this approach requires repeated endoscopic treatment sessions. Patients should be well informed about these issues to help in shared decision-making.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hendriks N, Baard J, Beerlage HP, Schout BM, Doherty KS, Pelger RC, Kamphuis GM. Survival and Long-term Effects of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy on Kidney Function in Patients with Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 40:104-111. [PMID: 35638087 PMCID: PMC9142752 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Current European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines discriminate between high- and low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) to determine treatment by means of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) or kidney-sparing surgery (KSS). Objective To compare long-term oncological outcomes and renal function for patients with UTUC treated by RNU versus KSS. Design, setting, and participants A retrospective cohort study, including 186 renal units with nonmetastatic UTUC treated in a tertiary referral centre between 2010 and 2021, was conducted. Intervention RNU, ureterorenoscopy, percutaneous tumour resection, and segmental ureteral resection. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and renal function were analysed by means of the log-rank test and the independent-sample t test. Results and limitations OS was 71.1% for the RNU group and 81.9% for the KSS group. In a cohort matched for propensity weight based on EAU risk stratification progression-free survival (PFS; RNU 96.0%; KSS 86.0%), MFS (RNU 72.0%; KSS 84.0%), CSS (RNU 84.0%; KSS 86.0%), and OS (RNU 76.0%; KSS 76.0%) were all similar between both groups. No significant differences in renal function were seen at 2 and 5 yr after the intervention. Although this series represents the largest cohort of (high-risk) UTUC patients treated by means of KSS to date, it is not suitable for performing a multivariate analysis. Conclusions PFS, MFS, CSS, and OS were all comparable when analysing the RNU and KSS groups. Similar results for groups with evenly distributed risk factors and a large percentage of high-risk disease suggest that current risk stratification might not be accurate in discriminating low-risk from high-risk disease. Patient summary In this report, we looked at outcomes for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in a specialised hospital. We conclude that kidney-sparing surgery and radical nephroureterectomy have comparable outcomes and that risk factors for worse outcome might not be identified correctly.
Collapse
|
16
|
Xu C, Yuan C, Zhang C, Fang D, Yu Y, Wang X, Li Z, Wang Y, Tang Q, Xiong G, Zhang L, He Z, Lin J, Zhou L, Li X. The Evolution of Clinicopathological Diagnostic Features of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in China: A Summary of 2561 Cases in the Last 20 Years. Front Oncol 2022; 12:769252. [PMID: 35356203 PMCID: PMC8959429 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.769252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To summarize the clinicopathological diagnostic features and evolutionary trends of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in China over the past 20 years. Methods All patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma in the Peking University First Hospital from 2001 to 2020 were retrospectively collected. Data were divided into two groups (2001-2010 and 2011-2020) according to the date of diagnosis. Statistical analysis was done with the SPSS V22.0. Chi-square analysis and t-test were adopted to analyze depending on the data type. Subgroup analysis based on 5 years was used for visualization to present trends. Both Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression were used for univariate and multivariate survival analysis. Results The study included 2561 cases diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma in total. Compared with the first decade (2001-2010), patients of the second decades (2011-2020) had elder mean age (66.65 versus 67.59, years, p=0.025), higher male proportion (43.5% versus 49.0%, p=0.034), lower incidence of renal pelvic tumors (53.4% versus 45.8%, p<0.001) and multifocality (18.6% versus 12.0%, p<0.001), higher incidence of ureteral tumors (52.2% versus 60.9%, p<0.001).In recent ten years, the incidence of muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (pT2+) decreased significantly (64.4% versus 54.9%, p<0.001),and the mean size of renal pelvic tumors increased(3.46 versus 3.73, cm, p=0.043). The size of the ureteral tumor, the histopathologic grade showed no significant change. The prognostic analysis based on 709 patients regularly followed at our center revealed that the male gender and G3 histopathological grade were independent risk factors for poorer prognosis in patients with UTUC. Conclusion In the past 20 years, the clinicopathological diagnostic features of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in the Chinese population has changed significantly, suggesting an increased risk of a poorer prognosis for UTUC. This trend may be related to updating diagnostic techniques and self-monitoring awareness. However, we need more high-grade, multicenter trials to verify it in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunru Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Changwei Yuan
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Cuijian Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Dong Fang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Yanfei Yu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Xiang Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Zhihua Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.,Department of Nursing, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.,Department of Nursing, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qi Tang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Gengyan Xiong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Zhisong He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Lin
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fero KE, Shan Y, Lec PM, Sharma V, Srinivasan A, Movva G, Baillargeon J, Chamie K, Williams SB. Treatment Patterns, Outcomes, and Costs Associated With Localized Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2021; 5:pkab085. [PMID: 34805743 PMCID: PMC8599752 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkab085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a heterogeneous disease that presents a clinical management challenge for the urologic surgeon. We assessed treatment patterns, costs, and survival outcomes among patients with nonmetastatic UTUC. Methods We identified 4114 patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic UTUC from 2004 to 2013 in the Survival Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare population-based database. Patients were stratified into low- or high-risk disease groups. Median total costs from 30 days prior to diagnosis through 365 days after diagnosis were compared between groups. Overall and cancer-specific survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results After risk stratification, 1027 (24.9%) and 3087 (75.0%) patients were classified into low- vs high-risk UTUC groups. Most patients underwent at least 1 surgical intervention (95.1%); 68.4% underwent at least 1 endoscopic intervention. Patients diagnosed with high- vs low-risk UTUC were more likely to undergo nephroureterectomy (83.6% vs 72.0%; P < .001); few patients with low-risk disease were exclusively managed endoscopically (16.9%). At 365 days after diagnosis, costs of care for high- vs low-risk UTUC were statistically significantly higher ($108 520 vs $91 233; median difference $16 704, 95% confidence interval [CI] = $11 619 to $21 778; P < .001). Those with high-risk UTUC had worse cancer-specific and overall survival compared with patients with low-risk UTUC (cancer-specific survival hazard ratio [HR] = 4.14, 95% CI = 3.19 to 5.37; overall survival HR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.62 to 1.96). Conclusions UTUC continues to be managed primarily with nephroureterectomy, regardless of risk stratification, and patients with high-risk UTUC have worse overall and cancer-specific survival. Substantial costs are associated with management of low- and high-risk UTUC, with the latter being more costly up to 1 year from diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E Fero
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yong Shan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Patrick M Lec
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Vidit Sharma
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Aditya Srinivasan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Giri Movva
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Jacques Baillargeon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Sealy Center on Aging, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Karim Chamie
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stephen B Williams
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pulford C, Keating K, Rohloff M, Peifer D, Eames R, Maatman T. How we do it: robotic-assisted distal ureterectomy with ureteral reimplantation. Int Braz J Urol 2021; 47:1277-1278. [PMID: 34156191 PMCID: PMC8486464 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2021.0207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: High risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is typically managed with radical nephroureterectomy, however, renal preservation can be attempted when UTUC is localized to the distal ureter in the presence of chronic kidney disease (1–3). Distal ureterectomy is typically managed with a ureteral reimplantation and psoas hitch in order to maintain urothelial continuity, to avoid comprising the contralateral ureter, and reducing risk of chronic urinary tract infections and electrolyte abnormalities (4). We present our case of distal ureteral UTUC managed robotically with a distal ureterectomy with ureteral reimplantation. Technique and Follow-Up: Initially, an Orandi needle on a resectoscope circumscribed the left ureteral orifice. Next, robotically, the retroperitoneum was exposed and a left sided pelvic lymphadenectomy was completed. The left ureter was mobilized and the diseased ureteral segment was transected. The mobilized bladder was sutured to psoas fascia. After a cystotomy, the ureter was re-anastomosed to the bladder. The patient was discharged on postoperative day three and re-evaluated one week later with a cystogram. Final pathology was downgraded to non-invasive low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma with negative lymph nodes and margins. Conclusion: High risk UTUC localized to the distal ureter in the setting of chronic kidney disease can be managed with a distal ureterectomy (3). Robotic distal ureterectomy with ureteral reimplantation can be assisted by an Orandi needle to achieve negative margins. Utilizing a robotic technique can offer challenges with the ureteral spatulation and reanastomosis (5–7). By fixating the ureter to the bladder prior to reanastomosis, our technique offers a solution for these difficulties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kevin Keating
- Department of Urology, Metro Health, University of Michigan, MI, USA
| | - Matthew Rohloff
- Department of Urology, Metro Health, University of Michigan, MI, USA
| | - David Peifer
- Department of Urology, Metro Health, University of Michigan, MI, USA
| | - Richard Eames
- Department of Urology, Metro Health, University of Michigan, MI, USA
| | - Thomas Maatman
- Department of Urology, Metro Health, University of Michigan, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Foerster B, Abufaraj M, Matin SF, Azizi M, Gupta M, Li WM, Seisen T, Clinton T, Xylinas E, Mir MC, Schweitzer D, Mari A, Kimura S, Bandini M, Mathieu R, Ku JH, Marcq G, Guruli G, Grabbert M, Czech AK, Muilwijk T, Pycha A, D'Andrea D, Petros FG, Spiess PE, Bivalacqua T, Wu WJ, Rouprêt M, Krabbe LM, Hendricksen K, Egawa S, Briganti A, Moschini M, Graffeille V, Kassouf W, Autorino R, Heidenreich A, Chlosta P, Joniau S, Soria F, Pierorazio PM, Shariat SF. Pretreatment Risk Stratification for Endoscopic Kidney-sparing Surgery in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An International Collaborative Study. Eur Urol 2021; 80:507-515. [PMID: 34023164 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several groups have proposed features to identify low-risk patients who may benefit from endoscopic kidney-sparing surgery in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). OBJECTIVE To evaluate standard risk stratification features, develop an optimal model to identify ≥pT2/N+ stage at radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), and compare it with the existing unvalidated models. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a collaborative retrospective study that included 1214 patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy with biopsy followed by RNU for nonmetastatic UTUC between 2000 and 2017. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We performed multiple imputation of chained equations for missing data and multivariable logistic regression analysis with a stepwise selection algorithm to create the optimal predictive model. The area under the curve and a decision curve analysis were used to compare the models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 659 (54.3%) and 555 (45.7%) patients had ≤pT1N0/Nx and ≥pT2/N+ disease, respectively. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis of our model, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.03, p = 0.013), high-grade biopsy (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.37-2.40, p < 0.001), biopsy cT1+ staging (OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.93-5.41, p < 0.001), preoperative hydronephrosis (OR 1.37 95% CI 1.04-1.80, p = 0.024), tumor size (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17, p = 0.029), invasion on imaging (OR 5.10, 95% CI 3.32-7.81, p < 0.001), and sessile architecture (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.58-3.36, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with ≥pT2/pN+ disease. Compared with the existing models, our model had the highest performance accuracy (75% vs 66-71%) and an additional clinical net reduction (four per 100 patients). CONCLUSIONS Our proposed risk-stratification model predicts the risk of harboring ≥pT2/N+ UTUC with reliable accuracy and a clinical net benefit outperforming the current risk-stratification models. PATIENT SUMMARY We developed a risk stratification model to better identify patients for endoscopic kidney-sparing surgery in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beat Foerster
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mounsif Azizi
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mohit Gupta
- Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Urology, GRC 5, Predictive ONCO-URO, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Timothy Clinton
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia Foundation, Valencia, Spain
| | - Donald Schweitzer
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marco Bandini
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Ja H Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Urology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Markus Grabbert
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anna K Czech
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Tim Muilwijk
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Armin Pycha
- Department of Urology, Provincial Hospital of Bozen, Bozen, Italy; Medical School, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Firas G Petros
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Urology and Kidney Transplant, The University of Toledo Medical Center and Eleanor N. Dana Cancer Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Trinity Bivalacqua
- Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Wen-Jeng Wu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Urology, GRC 5, Predictive ONCO-URO, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laura-Maria Krabbe
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Wassim Kassouf
- Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Piotr Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Phillip M Pierorazio
- Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
van Doeveren T, van der Mark M, van Leeuwen PJ, Boormans JL, Aben KKH. Rising incidence rates and unaltered survival rates for primary upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a Dutch population-based study from 1993 to 2017. BJU Int 2021; 128:343-351. [PMID: 33690922 PMCID: PMC8453942 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Aim To assess trends in the incidence, disease management and survival rates for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in the Netherlands. Materials and methods Patients diagnosed with primary UTUC in the Netherlands between 1993 and 2017 were identified through the population‐based Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Patient and tumour characteristics, as well as information on treatment and vital status, were retrieved from the NCR. Age‐standardized incidence rates were calculated, stratified by age, gender, calendar period and disease stage. Relative survival served as an approximation for cancer‐specific survival. Results We identified 13 314 patients with primary UTUC. The age‐standardized incidence rate increased from 2.0 in 1993 to 3.2 per 100 000 person‐years in 2017, without change in gender distribution. The increase in incidence held for all disease stages except organ‐confined (T1–T2) disease. The most prominent increase was in superficial (Tis/Ta) and metastatic (M+) UTUC, which increased from 0.6 to 1.2 and 0.1 to 0.4 per 100 000 person‐years, respectively. The 5‐year relative survival did not change over time: 57.0% (95% confidence interval 55.9–58.1). Applied treatments were largely the same over the study period, although fewer radical nephroureterectomies and more kidney‐sparing surgeries were performed in the most recent years. The use of peri‐operative intravesical chemotherapy modestly increased. Conclusion Between 1993 and 2017, the age‐standardized incidence of primary UTUC in the Netherlands has increased by more than 50%, but the relative survival of UTUC patients remained unchanged. Preventive measures against exposure to risk factors, early detection of disease, and more efficacious treatment methods are needed to improve outcomes of patients with UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas van Doeveren
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne van der Mark
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katja K H Aben
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kim TH, Lee CU, Kang M, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Sung HH. Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Sci Rep 2021; 11:7828. [PMID: 33837237 PMCID: PMC8035162 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87573-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aims to compare oncologic and functional outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and segmental ureterectomy (SU) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent either RNU or SU of UTUC. Propensity score matching was performed among 394 cases to yield a final cohort of 40 RNU and 40 SU cases. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS) between the groups. We also compared the change in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). There was no significant difference in terms of CSS, PFS, and IVRFS between the RNU and SU groups, but the RNU group had a better OS than the SU group (p = 0.032). Postoperative eGFR was better preserved in the SU group than in the RNU group (p < 0.001). SU provides comparable CSS, PFS, and IVRFS for patients with UTUC compared to RNU, even in patients with advanced-stage and/or high-grade cancer. Further, SU achieves better preservation of renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Heon Kim
- Department of Urology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Chung Un Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Minyong Kang
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Hwang Gyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Soo Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Moo Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Hwan Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tafuri A, Odorizzi K, Di Filippo G, Cerrato C, Fassio G, Serafin E, Princiotta A, D'Aietti D, Gozzo A, Porcaro AB, Brunelli M, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. Acute kidney injury strongly influences renal function after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A single-centre experience. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 93:9-14. [PMID: 33754601 DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2021.1.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of our study was to investigate frequency and predictors both of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal function decline in a population of consecutive upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). MATERIALS AND METHODS Between October 2014 and February 2020, 93 patients underwent RNU at our Institution. After considered exclusion criteria, 89 patients were selected. Perioperative clinical factors were retrospectively collected. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKDEPI) equation. We defined AKI as an increase in serum creatinine by ≥ 0.3 mg/dl or a 1.5-1.9-fold increase in serum creatinine from baseline to I post-operative day (POD). A significant renal function reduction was defined as an eGFR reduction of 40% from baseline at discharge and at last clinical evaluation. Frequency of AKI and eGFR decline was investigated. Association between perioperative clinical factors and AKI and eGFR reduction at discharged and last follow-up was studied using univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS AKI was detected at I POD in 45 patients. On multivariate analysis, pre-operative eGFR was an independent predictor of AKI (OR 1.03; p = 0.042). Further, AKI was found to be a significant predictor of eGFR reduction ≥ 40% at discharge at univariate analysis (OR 19.42; p = 0.005) and at multivariate analysis (OR 12.49; p = 0.02). In a multivariate logistic regression model post-operative AKI (OR 5.18; p = 0.033), lack of ipsilateral preoperative hydronephrosis (OR 0.17; p = 0.016), preoperative eGFR (OR 1.04; p = 0.047) and antiplatelet therapy (OR 5.14; p = 0.018) were found to be independent predictors of an eGFR reduction higher than 40% at last clinical evaluation made at a median of 15 (IQR 5-30) months. CONCLUSIONS In our cohort, AKI was present in almost 50% of patients after RNU and it was a strong predictor of renal function decline after RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona; Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Science, Physiology and Physiopathology division, "G. D'Annunzio" University, Chieti.
| | - Katia Odorizzi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona.
| | - Giacomo Di Filippo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona; Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona,.
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona.
| | - Giulia Fassio
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona.
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona.
| | - Alessandro Princiotta
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona.
| | - Damiano D'Aietti
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona.
| | - Alessandra Gozzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona.
| | - Antonio B Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona.
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona.
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona.
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Endoscopic management versus radical nephroureterectomy for localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma in a high endemic region. Sci Rep 2021; 11:4040. [PMID: 33597574 PMCID: PMC7889610 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83495-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Our aim was to analyze the clinical and survival differences among patients who underwent the two main treatment modalities, endoscopic ablation and radical nephroureterectomy. This study examined all patients who had undergone endoscopic management and RNU between Jul. 1988 and Mar. 2019 from the Taiwan UTUC registry. The inclusion criteria were low stage UTUC in RNU and all cases in endoscopic managed UTUC with a curative intent. The demographic and clinical characteristics were included for analysis. In total, 84 cases in the endoscopic group and 272 cases in the RNU group were enrolled for final analysis. The median follow-up period were 33.5 and 42.0 months in endoscopic and RNU group, respectively (p = 0.082). Comparison of Kaplan–Meier estimated survival curves between groups, the endoscopic group was associated with similar overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), and intravesical recurrence free survival (IVRS) but demonstrated inferior disease free survival (DFS) (p = 0.188 for OS, p = 0.493 for CSS and p < 0.001 for DFS). Endoscopic management of UTUC was as safe as RNU in UTUC endemic region.
Collapse
|
24
|
Farrow JM, Kern SQ, Gryzinski GM, Sundaram CP. Nephron-sparing management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Investig Clin Urol 2021; 62:389-398. [PMID: 34190434 PMCID: PMC8246013 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20210113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is uncommon and presents unique challenges for diagnosis and management. Nephroureterectomy has been the preferred management option, but it is associated with significant morbidity. Nephron-sparing treatments are a valuable alternative and provide similar efficacy in select cases. A PubMed literature review was performed in English language publications using the following search terms: urothelial carcinoma, upper tract, nephron-sparing, intraluminal and systemic therapy. Contemporary papers published within the last 10 years were primarily included. Where encountered, systematic reviews and meta-analyses were given priority, as were randomized controlled trials for newer treatments. Core guidelines were referenced and citations reviewed for inclusion. A summary of epidemiological data, clinical diagnosis, staging, and treatments focusing on nephron-sparing approaches to upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are outlined. Nephron-sparing management strategies are viable options to consider in patients with favorable features of UTUC. Adjunctive therapies are being investigated but the data remains mixed. Protocol variability and dosage differences limit statistical interpretation. New mechanisms to improve treatment dwell times in the upper tracts are being designed with promising preliminary results. Studies investigating systemic therapies are ongoing but implications for nephron-sparing management are uncertain. Nephron-sparing management is an acceptable treatment modality best suited for favorable disease. More work is needed to determine if intraluminal and/or systemic therapies can further optimize treatment outcomes beyond resection alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Farrow
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Sean Q Kern
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Gustavo M Gryzinski
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Chandru P Sundaram
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mao W, Wu J, Wang K, Xu B, Chen M. Marital status does not affect the cancer-specific survival of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy: a propensity score matching study. Ther Adv Urol 2020; 12:1756287220981510. [PMID: 33488776 PMCID: PMC7768858 DOI: 10.1177/1756287220981510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between marital status and the prognosis of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with nephroureterectomy (NU). Methods: Patients with UTUC who received NU treatment were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression were used to analyze the effect of marital status on cancer-specific survival (CSS), and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for married and unmarried patients to explore further the effect of marital status on patients with UTUC. Results: Among 1565 eligible patients, 960 (61.3%) were married and 605 (38.7%) were unmarried, of which 146 (9.3%) were divorced/separated, 306 (19.6%) were widowed, and 153 (9.8%) were single. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that marital status was not an independent risk factor for patients with UTUC treated with NU. After stratification by grade and SEER stage, multivariate analysis showed that there was no significant difference in 5-year CSS between divorced/separated, widowed, and single patients compared with married patients in different grades and SEER stages. In addition, after PSM analysis, marital status was still not an independent risk factor for patients with UTUC treated with NU. Conclusion: For patients with UTUC treated with NU, marital status has no prognostic effect on CSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weipu Mao
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jianping Wu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Keyi Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bin Xu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, No. 87 Dingjiaqiao, Hunan Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, No. 87 Dingjiaqiao, Hunan Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210009, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Linehan J, Schoenberg M, Seltzer E, Thacker K, Smith AB. Complications Associated With Ureteroscopic Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Urology 2020; 147:87-95. [PMID: 33031842 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compile and examine safety data from clinical studies of endoscopic management of patients with low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) to identify rates and factors associated with reported complications. METHODS Ovid Medline and Ovid Medline Daily (with Embase as secondary search) including citations from 1946-2018 were queried using the following terms: ureteroscopy, ureter, catheter, endoscopy, complication, adverse events, morbidity, ablation, laser, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, ureteral stricture, ureteral stenosis, and ureteral injury. Abstracts were reviewed for relevance; diagnostic studies, case studies, and reviews were excluded. RESULTS Thirty-eight publications (7 prospective, 31 retrospective) representing >1100 patients were identified. Ureteral stricture was the most frequently reported complication (studies; rates) (26/38; 0-27%), with incidence associated with number of procedures and treatment method. Bleeding, infection, and fever were most common with adjuvant treatment (BCG or mitomycin). Serious and fatal complications were rare. CONCLUSIONS Ureteral stricture is the most frequent complication of endoscopic UTUC management but can be managed successfully in most cases. Most complications were minor. Although additional prospective studies are needed, these results support the safety of ureteroscopic management of UTUC in appropriately selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Linehan
- Department of Urology, John Wayne Cancer Institute, Providence St. John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Mark Schoenberg
- Department of Urology, The Montefiore Medical Center & The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; UroGen Pharma, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Benamran D, Seisen T, Naoum E, Vaessen C, Parra J, Mozer P, Shariat SF, Rouprêt M. Risk stratification for upper tract urinary carcinoma. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1799-1808. [PMID: 32944543 PMCID: PMC7475669 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urinary carcinoma (UTUC) is a heterogeneous group of rare tumors. The aim of this article is to critically review current therapeutic strategies and to propose a change in the risk-stratification of the disease. A non-systematic review of the literature was performed using the Medline database with the search terms: “upper tract urothelial carcinoma” together with “prognostic factor”, “risk stratification”, “risk factor”, “recurrence”, “predictive tool”, “nomograms” and “treatment”. Preoperative risk factors can be viewed as patient-related risk factors (gender, age, ethnicity, body mass index, smoking status, or genetic factors), or tumor-related risk factors (stage, grade, size, architecture, multifocality, ureteric obstruction). Several biomarkers, available either in blood, urine, or the tumor itself have also been proposed. However, many of these prognostic factors lack accuracy and validation in predicting oncological outcomes, despite their use in predictive tools. After risk stratification, kidney-sparing strategies should be considered (endoscopic management and segmental ureterectomy) and could benefit from new diagnostic tools and technical improvements in in situ adjuvant endocavitary instillations. Radical nephroureterectomy remains the first choice therapy for high-grade disease and will probably be associated with other treatments in the future (lymphadenectomy, perioperative chemotherapy, or immunotherapy). In view of the major recent improvements in UTUC treatment strategies, a new classification should be proposed, including low-, intermediate-, high- and very high-risk disease. Subgroup analysis of good quality trials and better understanding of UTUC risk factors will help validate this new approach toward more personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Benamran
- Division of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.,Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Urology Department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Urology Department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Elias Naoum
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Urology Department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Christophe Vaessen
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Urology Department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Jérome Parra
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Urology Department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Pierre Mozer
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Urology Department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013 Paris, France
| | | | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Urology Department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
While radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold-standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a growing volume of literature surrounding endoscopic, organ-sparing procedures has developed over the past few decades. Based on this, endoscopic management of UTUC has gained acceptance as a standard of care approach, particularly among those with low-risk disease or with imperative indications for organ preservation. As a rare disease, however, data is mostly restricted to retrospective single institution series with relatively small numbers. Therefore, comparative outcomes of endoscopic management to RNU remain incompletely defined. Furthermore, the comparative utility of endoscopic approaches (ureteroscopy versus percutaneous resection) and topical therapy following resection lacks prospective analysis. In this article we review the available literature on endoscopic management of UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J Knoedler
- Division of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kocher NJ, Canes D, Bensalah K, Roupret M, Lallas C, Margulis V, Shariat S, Colin P, Matin S, Tracy C, Xylinas E, Wagner A, Roumiguie M, Kassouf W, Klatte T, Raman JD. Incidence and preoperative predictors for major complications following radical nephroureterectomy. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1786-1793. [PMID: 32944541 PMCID: PMC7475660 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.01.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the referent standard for managing bulky, invasive, or high grade upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The UTUC patient population, however, generally harbor medical comorbidities thereby placing them at risk of surgical complications. This study reviews a large international cohort of RNU patients to define the risk of major complications and preoperative factors associated with their occurrence. Methods Patients undergoing RNU at 14 academic medical centers between 2002 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative clinical, demographic, operative, and comorbidity indices were recorded. The modified Clavien-Dindo index was used to grade complications occurring within 30 days of surgery. The association between preoperative variables and major complications occurring after RNU was determined by multivariable logistic regression. Results One thousand two hundred and sixty-six patients (707 men; 559 women) with a median age of 70 years and BMI of 27 kg/m2 were included. Over three-quarters of the cohort was white, 50.1% had baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD) ≥ stage III, 22.4% had a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score >5, and 17.1% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥2. Overall, 413 (32.6%) experienced a complication including 103 (8.1%) with a major event. Specific distribution of major complications included 49 Clavien III, 44 Clavien IV, and 10 Clavien V. On univariate analysis, patient age (P=0.006), hypertension (P=0.002), diabetes mellitus (P=0.023), CKD stage (P<0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (P=0.022), ECOG (P<0.001), and CCI (P<0.001) all were associated with major complications. On multivariate analysis, ECOG ≥2 (OR 2.38, 95% CI, 1.46–3.90), P=0.001), CCI >5 (OR 3.45, 95% CI, 1.41–8.33, P=0.007), and CKD stage ≥3 (OR 3.64, P=0.008) were independently associated with major complications. Conclusions Major complications following RNU occurred in almost 10% of patients. Impaired preoperative performance status and baseline CKD are preoperative variables associated with these major post-surgical adverse event. These easily measurable indices warrant consideration and discussion prior to proceeding with RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil J Kocher
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - David Canes
- Department of Urology, Lahey Clinic Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Department of Urology, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Costas Lallas
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Shahrokh Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pierre Colin
- Department of Urology, La Louviere Private Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Surena Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chad Tracy
- Department of Urology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - Andrew Wagner
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mathieu Roumiguie
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jay D Raman
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
The Performance of Tumor Size as Risk Stratification Parameter in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC). Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 19:272.e1-272.e7. [PMID: 33046411 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of different tumor diameters for identifying ≥ pT2 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) at radical nephroureterectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a multi-institutional retrospective study that included 932 patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy for nonmetastatic UTUC between 2000 and 2016. Tumor sizes were pathologically assessed and categorized into 4 groups: ≤ 1 cm, 1.1 to 2 cm, 2.1 to 3 cm, and > 3 cm. We performed logistic regression and decision-curve analyses. RESULTS Overall, 45 (4.8%) patients had a tumor size ≤ 1 cm, 141 (15.1%) between 1.1 and 2 cm, 247 (26.5%) between 2.1 and 3 cm, and 499 (53.5%) > 3 cm. In preoperative predictive models that were adjusted for the effects of standard clinicopathologic features, tumor diameters > 2 cm (odds ratio, 2.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.70-3.32; P < .001) and > 3 cm (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-2.38; P < .001) were independently associated with ≥ pT2 pathologic staging. The addition of the > 2-cm diameter cutoff improved the area under the curve of the model from 58.8% to 63.0%. Decision-curve analyses demonstrated a clinical net benefit of 0.09 and a net reduction of 8 per 100 patients. CONCLUSION The 2-cm cutoff appears to be most useful in identifying patients at risk of harboring ≥ pT2 UTUC. This confirms the current European Association of Urology guideline's risk stratification. Tumor size alone is not sufficient for optimal risk stratification, rather a constellation of features is needed to select the best candidate for kidney-sparing surgery.
Collapse
|
31
|
Piraino JA, Snow ZA, Edwards DC, Hager S, McGreen BH, Diorio GJ. Nephroureterectomy vs. segmental ureterectomy of clinically localized, high-grade, urothelial carcinoma of the ureter: Practice patterns and outcomes. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:851.e1-851.e10. [PMID: 32859461 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nephroureterectomy (NU) remains the gold-standard for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, nephron-sparing management (NSM), specifically segmental ureterectomy (SU) for urothelial tumors distal to the renal pelvis may offer decreased risk of renal insufficiency and equivalent cancer control. OBJECTIVES To identify patient-specific and facility-related factors that are associated with the selection of SU vs. NU for patients with clinically localized, high-grade, ureteral UTUC. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS We searched the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2015 for patients with high-grade, clinically localized, primary ureteral UTUC managed by either NU or SU. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to assess patient, disease-specific, facility and treatment-related factors associated with SU vs. NU. Since surgical approach was only indexed after 2010, separate multivariable logistic regressions were performed including and excluding surgical approach in order to capture patients treated between 2004 and 2009. Survival analysis utilized Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Multivariate analysis including surgical approach demonstrated that among other factors, higher clinical stage (P = 0.034), larger tumor size (P < 0.001), the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.002), and the utilization of minimally invasive surgery (P < 0.05) decreased the likelihood of patients receiving SU. In this same cohort, institutions with larger facility volumes (P = 0.038) and performing intraoperative lymph node dissection (P < 0.001) were associated with a higher probability of SU. Excluding surgical approach, once again more advanced clinical stage (P = 0.005), larger tumor size (P < 0.001), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.003) decreased the probability of patients receiving SU, while increasing age (P = 0.049) and intraoperative lymph node dissection (P < 0.001) were more closely associated with SU compared to NU. No differences were noted in pathological T stage (P > 0.05), 30-day readmission (P = 0.7), 30-day mortality (P = 0.09), and 90-day mortality (P = 0.157) on multivariate analysis between SU and NU. Additionally, no significant differences were seen in median overall survival between patients receiving SU or NU (53 vs. 50 months; P = 0.143). CONCLUSIONS Comparable outcomes suggest segmental ureterectomy for high-grade ureteral UTUC is appropriate in well-selected patients. Practice patterns appear consistent with guideline recommendations (decreased tumor size and lower clinical stage favor SU), but treatment disparities may exist based on a multitude of patient, pathologic- and facility-related factors. Improved dissemination of knowledge regarding practice patterns and outcomes of SU for UTUC of the ureter has the potential to improve delivery of NSM in appropriate patients. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study, we examined factors associated with different surgical procedures for cancer of the ureter. We found that smaller tumor sizes, a less advanced clinical stage, intraoperative lymph dissection higher facility volumes tended to favor kidney-sparing treatment, while survival outcomes appear comparable to renal extirpation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Shaun Hager
- Main Line Health, Department of Urology, Wynnewood, PA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mohapatra A, Strope SA, Liu N, Winer A, Benfante NE, Coleman JA, Vetter J, Murray KS. Importance of long-term follow-up after endoscopic management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma and factors leading to surgical management. Int Urol Nephrol 2020; 52:1465-1469. [PMID: 32157621 PMCID: PMC7572076 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02439-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients undergoing endoscopic management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma often progress to definitive therapy with radical nephroureterectomy. This study examined the rate of progression as well as risk factors for transitions in treatment over time. METHODS Retrospective review at two institutions identified patients undergoing endoscopic management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Patients were assessed for progression to radical nephroureterectomy. Baseline characteristics were compared using Chi square analysis. Kaplan-Meier method analyzed the probability of patients not progressing to radical nephroureterectomy. Cox proportional hazards identified factors associated with progression to radical nephroureterectomy. RESULTS Eighty-one patients had endoscopic management alone and 89 progressed to radical nephroureterectomy. The two groups had similar age, histories of bladder cancer, and Charlson comorbidity index. Positive urinary cytology, ureteroscopic visualization, and biopsy grade were higher in those progressing to RNU (p < 0.001). Hazard modeling demonstrated higher rates of progression to radical nephroureterectomy with positive biopsy (HR 11.8, 95% CI 2.4-59.5, p = 0.003) or visible lesion on ureteroscopy (HR 8.4, 95% CI 3.0-23.9, p < 0.001). Patients with a higher Charlson comorbidity index were less likely to have radical nephroureterectomy. On Kaplan-Meier modeling, the probability of not undergoing radical nephroureterectomy at 2 years and 5 years was 50% and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Patients who progress to radical nephroureterectomy after endoscopic management have fewer comorbid conditions and changes in disease status including visible lesions on ureteroscopy and positive biopsies. The high rate of progression to radical nephroureterectomy reinforces the need for long-term follow-up of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand Mohapatra
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Kaufmann Medical Building, 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 700, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| | - Seth A Strope
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Nick Liu
- Department of Urology, St. Joseph Mercy Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Andrew Winer
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Nicole E Benfante
- Department of Surgery-Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan A Coleman
- Department of Surgery-Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joel Vetter
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Katie S Murray
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kokorovic A, Matin SF. UGN-101 (mitomycin gel): a novel treatment for low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12:1758835920937950. [PMID: 32670424 PMCID: PMC7339071 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920937950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare malignancy. The standard treatment for localized high-risk disease is radical nephroureterectomy, which confers significant morbidity and is not appropriate for all patients. Patients harboring low-risk, non-invasive disease may be candidates for organ-sparing treatment, which includes endoscopic resection with or without intracavitary drug therapy. Successful administration of intracavitary chemotherapy to the upper tracts is impeded by rapid washout of the agent and short dwell times. This has limited the clinical utility of mitomycin C for treatment of upper tract tumors, despite the successful outcomes observed in low-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Currently, there is an unmet need for development of a technically feasible and oncologically sound intracavitary therapy for management of low-grade UTUC. UGN-101 (Jelmyto™) is a novel formulation of mitomycin C that uses a unique hydrogel designed to increase urinary dwell time, and thereby efficacy of treatment. Preclinical data demonstrated promising results regarding the safety and feasibility of this agent. Preliminary results of a phase III trial (OLYMPUS study) [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02793128] demonstrated the efficacy of UGN-101 as a successful chemo-ablative agent for low-grade upper tract tumors. UGN-101 may represent a pivotal paradigm shift in the treatment of low-grade UTUC. Indeed, the drug has recently been granted approval by the US Food and Drug Administration as the first treatment for low-grade UTUC, which may lead to significant improvements in patient care and a long-awaited decrease in the burden of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Kokorovic
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas
MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Surena F. Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas
MD Anderson Cancer Center, 11555 Pressler Street, Unit 1373, Houston TX
77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Matsuda Y, Inoue T, Maeno A, Koizumi A, Yamamoto R, Nara T, Kanda S, Numakura K, Saito M, Narita S, Satoh S, Habuchi T. A patient with synchronous bilateral low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent nephroureterectomy and total ureterectomy with ileal ureteric replacement. Int Cancer Conf J 2020; 9:82-87. [PMID: 32257759 DOI: 10.1007/s13691-020-00402-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
We present the case of a synchronous bilateral low-grade upper-tract urothelial carcinoma patient who underwent left nephroureterectomy and right total ureterectomy with ileal ureteric replacement resulting in a favorable prognosis. A 66-year-old male presented with bilateral hydronephrosis. Computed tomography revealed left pelvic and right upper-middle ureteral tumors with no lymph node swelling or distant metastasis. The patient underwent a left nephroureterectomy with a bladder cuff, and histopathology revealed a low-grade urothelial carcinoma. Considering the contralateral low-grade nature as revealed in histopathology and the right retrograde ureterography being noninvasive, he underwent a right total ureterectomy with ileal ureteric replacement. Histopathology of the right ureter revealed a low-grade urothelial carcinoma. The patient successfully avoided an anephric status without renal function deterioration for 4 years with a transurethral resection for a recurrent small papillary bladder tumor on 18 months after the total ureterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshinori Matsuda
- 1Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan.,Department of Urology, Akita City Hospital, Akita, Japan
| | - Takamitsu Inoue
- 1Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Atsushi Maeno
- 1Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan.,Department of Urology, Akita City Hospital, Akita, Japan
| | - Atsushi Koizumi
- 1Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Ryohei Yamamoto
- 1Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Taketoshi Nara
- 1Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Sohei Kanda
- 1Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Numakura
- 1Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Mitsuru Saito
- 1Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Shintaro Narita
- 1Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Shigeru Satoh
- 2Center for Kidney Disease and Transplantation, Akita University Hospital, Akita, Japan
| | - Tomonori Habuchi
- 1Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
[French ccAFU guidelines - Update 2018-2020: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma]. Prog Urol 2019; 28 Suppl 1:R34-R47. [PMID: 31610873 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To propose an update of the French guidelines from the national committee ccAFU on upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). METHODS A systematic Medline search was performed between 2016 and 2018, with regards to the diagnosis, the options of treatment and the follow-up of UTUC, to evaluate the different studies with levels of evidence. RESULTS The diagnosis of this rare disease is based on CT-scan acquisition during excretion and ureteroscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, nevertheless a conservative endoscopic approach can be proposed for low-risk diseases: unifocal tumour, possible complete resection low-grade and lack of invasion on CT-scan. Close monitoring with endoscopic follow-up (flexible ureteroscopy) in compliant patients is therefore necessary. After RNU, bladder instillation of chemotherapy is recommended in order to reduce the risk of bladder recurrence. An adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended after RNU in pT2-T4 N0-3 M0 disease. CONCLUSION These updated guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for diagnosis and treatment of UTUC.
Collapse
|
36
|
Aragon-Ching JB, Choudhury A, Margulis V, Yu EY. Formidable Scenarios in Urothelial and Variant Cancers of the Urinary Tract. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2019; 39:262-275. [PMID: 31099661 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_237451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the field of bladder and upper tract cancers provide opportunities for multidisciplinary care. Urothelial cancers make up the majority of the histologic subtype of bladder and upper tract cancers. Although the existence of variant histology, nonurothelial cancers, and urethral cancers is rare, these cancers pose a challenging clinical dilemma given the lack of well-defined consensus treatment guidelines. This review focuses on key issues of treatment: cisplatin ineligibility with emphasis on the definition, nuances of chemotherapy and frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, use of radiation in bladder-preservation strategies, upper tract urothelial cancer management, and highlights of urothelial variants and nonurothelial tumors and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- 2 The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- 3 The Univeristy of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Evan Y Yu
- 4 University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bagrodia A, Audenet F, Pietzak EJ, Kim K, Murray KS, Cha EK, Sfakianos JP, Iyer G, Singla N, Arcila M, Bochner BH, Al-Ahmadie HA, Solit DB, Coleman JA. Genomic Profile of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Tract from Ureteroscopic Biopsy: Feasibility and Validation Using Matched Radical Nephroureterectomy Specimens. Eur Urol Focus 2019; 5:365-368. [PMID: 29396293 PMCID: PMC7583604 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC) presents specific challenges regarding accurate staging and tumor sampling. We aimed to assess the feasibility of applying next-generation sequencing to biopsy specimens and gauged the concordance of their genetic profiles with matched radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) specimens. Of the 39 biopsy specimens collected, 36 (92%) had adequate material for sequencing using a hybridization-based exon capture assay (MSK-IMPACT). The most frequently altered genes across the patient cohort were consistent with the urothelial carcinoma-associated alterations identified in a cohort of 130 RNU specimens previously sequenced at our center, including mutations in the TERT promoter (64%), hotspot activating mutations in FGFR3 (64%), and frequent mutations in chromatin remodeling genes. For 12 patients, a matching tumor sample from a subsequent RNU was sequenced. We found a high level of concordance between matched biopsy and RNU specimens, up to 92% for the likely pathogenic alterations. PATIENT SUMMARY: We evaluated the feasibility of genomic characterization of tumor tissue collected at the time of ureteroscopic biopsy and found high concordance with subsequent radical nephroureterectomy specimens. Molecular characterization of urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract biopsies could guide treatment decision-making and identify high-risk patients who could benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy and low-risk patients who could benefit from conservative or organ-sparing strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Francois Audenet
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eugene J Pietzak
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kwanghee Kim
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katie S Murray
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eugene K Cha
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - John P Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gopa Iyer
- Department of Medicine, Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Maria Arcila
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bernard H Bochner
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David B Solit
- Department of Medicine, Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan A Coleman
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kleinmann N, Wirth G, Lin JS, Matin SF, Nativ O, Mayer G, Witjes JA, Shvero A, Chamie K, Pantuck AJ, Smith A, Schoenberg M, Malchi N, Hakim G, Agmon-Gerstein Y, Jeshurun-Gutshtat M, Klein I, Kopelen H, Lerner SP. Thermo Reversible Hydrogel Based Delivery of Mitomycin C (UGN-101) for Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC). Bladder Cancer 2019. [DOI: 10.3233/blc-180182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jeffrey S. Lin
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Ofer Nativ
- Benai-Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Gil Mayer
- Benai-Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | | | - Asaf Shvero
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | | | | | | | - Mark Schoenberg
- The Montefiore Medical Center and The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
- UroGen, Pharma Ltd., Ra’anana, Israel
| | | | - Gil Hakim
- UroGen, Pharma Ltd., Ra’anana, Israel
| | | | | | | | - Helen Kopelen
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Seth P. Lerner
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bosshard P, Thalmann GN, Roth B. [Instillation therapies for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract]. Urologe A 2019; 58:25-29. [PMID: 30649582 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-018-0830-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Traditionally, urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract was a clear indication for radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision. It has been shown that in well-selected patients and depending on tumor stage, a kidney-sparing approach can be pursued with good oncological outcome and equivalent to the radical approach. The prevention of local and bladder recurrences is an important factor. Instillation therapies with bacillus Calmette-Guérin and/or mitomycin C have been successfully used to this end. Due to the low incidence of upper tract urothelial cancer and due to the usually retrospective nature of existing literature, however, data is limited. In this article, we provide a review of the indication, technical execution and results of instillation therapies of the upper urinary tract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Bosshard
- Urologische Universitätsklinik, Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern, 3010, Bern, Schweiz
| | - G N Thalmann
- Urologische Universitätsklinik, Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern, 3010, Bern, Schweiz.
| | - B Roth
- Urologische Universitätsklinik, Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern, 3010, Bern, Schweiz
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Breda A, Territo A, Sanguedolce F, Basile G, Subiela JD, Reyes HV, Ferrer OM, Gaya JM, Palou J. Comparison of biopsy devices in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 2018; 37:1899-1905. [PMID: 30560298 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2586-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A correct characterization of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) lesions is fundamental to appropriately select patients suitable for endoscopic management. We analyzed the diagnostic yield of three different biopsy tools for the histology evaluation of the UTUC. Furthermore, the concordance between biopsy grading and final UTUC pathology results at specimen (i.e., after ureterectomy or radical nephroureterectomy-RNU) was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three different devices were evaluated: 3F biopsy forceps, 6F BIGopsy® Backloading biopsy forceps and the 2.2F Nitinol Basket. Data were collected between January 2015 and October 2017 and retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the variables related to diagnosis. RESULTS A total of 302 biopsies were taken: lesions could be characterized in 236 (78.2%) specimens by the pathologist. Positive biopsies for UTUC were found in 140 specimens. In 66 biopsies (21.8%), the quality of the tissue sampled was inadequate for a histological characterization; of these, 55 (83.3%) were taken using 3F forceps and 11 (16.7%) using BIGopsy forceps. No inadequate specimen arose using the 2.2F Nitinol Basket. Among 28 patients who underwent distal ureterectomy or RNU, the tumor was upgraded to high grade in 9 (32%), while in 19 (68%) the grading was confirmed. CONCLUSION In comparison to 3F forceps, the BIGopsy forceps showed to be more accurate in obtaining sufficient specimen for pathologic examination. In papillary lesions, the 2.2F Nitinol basket achieves a final histology characterization in 100% of the cases. For tumor < 2 cm, there is a high concordance between URS biopsy grade and final pathology (distal ureterectomy or RNU).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Angelo Territo
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesco Sanguedolce
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Basile
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jose D Subiela
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Helena Vila Reyes
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olga Mayordomo Ferrer
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jose M Gaya
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Knoedler JJ, Raman JD. Advances in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: improved endoscopic management through better diagnostics. Ther Adv Urol 2018; 10:421-429. [PMID: 30574202 DOI: 10.1177/1756287218805334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
As a rare disease, the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) continues to evolve. While radical nephroureterectomy remains the gold standard, there is a growing desire to pursue nephron-sparing approaches through endoscopic management, particularly for low-risk disease or in the setting of imperative indications. A particular challenge for those undertaking endoscopic management is appropriate grading and staging of tumors, and thereby appropriate patient selection. In this review we will cover the current state of diagnostics for UTUC as well as highlight the challenges in accurate diagnosis. Additionally, we will focus on emerging technologies to aid in optimizing diagnostic accuracy in UTUC. This will include discussion of narrow band imaging, photodynamic diagnosis, optical coherence tomography, and confocal laser endomicroscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J Knoedler
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Dr., c4830, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Jay D Raman
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rouprêt M, Xylinas E, Colin P, Houédé N, Compérat E, Audenet F, Larré S, Masson-Lecomte A, Pignot G, Brunelle S, Roumiguié M, Neuzillet Y, Méjean A. RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU — Actualisation 2018—2020 : tumeurs de la voie excrétrice supérieure French ccAFU guidelines — Update 2018—2020: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Prog Urol 2018; 28:S32-S45. [PMID: 30318333 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.07.284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy).
Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations.
Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.005.
C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article.
This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published.
The replacement has been published at the doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.005.
That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rouprêt
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, GRC n∘5, ONCOTYPE-URO, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - E Xylinas
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie de l'hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, université Paris Descartes, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75018 Paris, France
| | - P Colin
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital privé de la Louvière, 59042 Lille, France
| | - N Houédé
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'oncologie Médicale, CHU Caremaux, Montpellier université, 30029 Nîmes, France
| | - E Compérat
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'anatomie pathologique, hôpital tenon, HUEP, Sorbonne Université, GRC n∘5, ONCOTYPE-URO, 75020 Paris, France
| | - F Audenet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Européen-Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France
| | - S Larré
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU de Reims, 51100 Reims, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, université Paris-Diderot, 75010 Paris, France
| | - G Pignot
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de chirurgie oncologique 2, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - S Brunelle
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de radiologie, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'urologie, CHU Rangueil, 31400 Toulouse, France
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Européen-Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Treatment utilization and overall survival in patients receiving radical nephroureterectomy versus endoscopic management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: evaluation of updated treatment guidelines. World J Urol 2018; 37:1157-1164. [PMID: 30267197 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2506-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE While radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the gold standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), select patients may benefit from endoscopic treatment (ET). European Association of Urology guidelines recommend ET for patients with low-risk (LR) disease: unifocal, < 2 cm, low-grade lesions without local invasion. To inform the utility of ET, we compare the overall survival (OS) of patients receiving ET and RNU using current and previous guidelines of LR disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with non-metastatic, cT1 or less UTUC diagnosed in 2004-2012 were collected from the National Cancer Database. OS was analyzed with inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox proportional hazard regression. Analyses were conducted for LR disease under updated (size < 2 cm) and previous guidelines (size < 1 cm). RESULTS Patients who were older, healthier, and treated at an academic facility had higher odds of receiving ET. In 851 identified patients with LR disease, RNU was associated with increased OS compared with ET (p = 0.006); however, there was no difference between ET and RNU (p = 0.79, n = 202) under the previous guidelines (size < 1 cm). In, otherwise, LR patients, the largest tumor size with no difference between ET and RNU was ≤ 1.5 cm (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS RNU is associated with improved survival when compared with ET in the management of LR UTUC using current guidelines with a size threshold of < 2 cm. In appropriately selected LR patients, we find no difference between RNU and ET up to a tumor size of ≤ 1.5 cm. However, in the absence of prospective studies, the usage of ET is best left up to clinician discretion.
Collapse
|
44
|
Freifeld Y, Krabbe LM, Clinton TN, Woldu SL, Margulis V. Therapeutic strategies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 18:765-774. [PMID: 29848133 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1481395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many controversies exist regarding the appropriate management of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), including staging, surgical management, use of systemic therapy, and prevention of bladder recurrence. Due to the rarity of this condition, high-level evidence is often lacking and in many cases guidelines are extrapolated from existing evidence on urothelial bladder cancer. Areas covered: This review paper summarizes the evidence on proper diagnosis and staging, surgical techniques, prevention of bladder recurrences, the use of local or systemic treatments in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings as well as special consideration for hereditary UTUC. Expert commentary: UTUC is a rare malignancy and slow progress is being made in the acquisition of high-quality evidence in this field. Treatments that facilitate preservation of the kidney are being explored such as advanced endoscopic techniques or partial resection of ureteral disease with seemingly acceptable oncological results. Further prospective evidence is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuval Freifeld
- a Department of Urology , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA
| | - Laura-Maria Krabbe
- a Department of Urology , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA.,b Department of Urology , University of Muenster Medical Center , Muenster , Germany
| | - Timothy N Clinton
- a Department of Urology , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA
| | - Solomon L Woldu
- a Department of Urology , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- a Department of Urology , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Comparison of Radical Nephroureterectomy and Partial Ureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:2793172. [PMID: 29854736 PMCID: PMC5944270 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2793172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 03/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the oncological and renal outcomes of partial ureterectomy (PU) versus radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). UTUC patients' clinical information was reviewed, and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and kidney function were collected. The mean follow-up period was 59 (6-135) months in the RNU group and 34.5 (5-135) months in the PU group. The mean operation time in the PU group was 141 (64-340) min, which is significantly shorter than the RNU group (P < 0.01). Regarding kidney function at one year or two years after operation, the PU group had significantly improved mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels and a remarkably decreased constitution of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) III or higher group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in PFS and OS between the RNU group and the PU group (P > 0.05). Multifactor Cox regression analysis indicated that age and the preoperative CKD stages were independent risk factors for poor kidney functions of UTUC patients. Compared to patients in RNU group, patients in PU have no significant difference in survival time but have shorter operation time, shorter hospital stay, and improved kidney functions.
Collapse
|
46
|
Qi N, Chen Y, Gong K, Li H. Concurrent renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma: long-term follow-up study of 27 cases. World J Surg Oncol 2018; 16:16. [PMID: 29370814 PMCID: PMC5785803 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-018-1321-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the clinical manifestation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of simultaneous occurrence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and urothelial carcinoma. METHODS Twenty-seven consecutive patients with synchronous renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma treated in two tertiary medical centers from March 2005 to December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Their clinical, pathological, and prognostic features were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate overall survival. RESULTS The median age was 69 years (range, 37-79 years). Seventeen patients presented with macroscopic hematuria, and 10 patients were asymptomatic. B-ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and cystoscopy initially indicated RCC concurrent with ipsilateral upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in 5 cases, RCC concurrent with contralateral UTUC in 1 case, RCC concurrent with bladder tumor in 17 cases, RCC concurrent with both ipsilateral UTUC and bladder tumor in 1 case, RCC in 2 cases and ureter carcinoma in 1 case. Different treatments were performed. The median follow-up time after surgery was 23 months. For patients with synchronous RCC and bladder tumor, there was no significant survival difference between patients treated with partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy. During follow up, four patients died of RCC, three patients died of non-oncological disease, one patient died of ureter carcinoma. The 3-year overall survival rate was 80.8%. CONCLUSIONS Concurrence of RCC and urothelial carcinoma is clinically rare. Treatments should be individualized. The prognosis for a patient with synchronous RCC and urothelial carcinoma is possibly associated with the more aggressive one.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienie Qi
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Yue Chen
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Kan Gong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Hailong Li
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Chatzikonstantinou G, Tselis N. Radiation Therapy in Carcinomas of the Renal Pelvis and the Ureters. Radiat Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52619-5_40-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
48
|
Lin SY, Lin CL, Chang CH, Wu HC, Wang IK, Chou CY, Liang JA. Risk of acute myocardial infarction in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients receiving radical nephroureterectomy: a population-based cohort study. Oncotarget 2017; 8:79498-79506. [PMID: 29108329 PMCID: PMC5668062 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 05/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) receiving radical nephroureterectomy were usually limited to small sample size, case-control studies, and often focused on cancer progression. Risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in these patients was never investigated. Results The overall incidences of AMI were 3.39, 1.44, and 1.70 per 10,000 person-years in the radical nephroureterectomy, nonnephroureterectomy, and non-UTUC cohorts, respectively. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed a significantly higher AMI risk in the radical nephroureterectomy cohort [adjusted HR (aHR) = 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08–3.11], compared with non-UTUC cohorts. The risk of mortality were the highest in patients with UTUC who had undergone radical nephroureterectomy [adjusted HR (aHR) = 5.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.80–6.02]. Materials and Methods From the Taiwan National Health Insurance claims data, 1,359 patients with UTUC who had undergone radical nephroureterectomy and 3,154 patients with UTUC who had undergone nephron sparing surgery and were newly diagnosed between 2000 and 2010 were identified. For each patient, 4 individuals without UTUC were randomly selected and frequency matched by age, sex, and diagnosis year. Conclusions Patients with UTUC who have undergone radical nephroureterectomy are at a higher risk of developing AMI, compared with those receiving nephron sparing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shih-Yi Lin
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Division of Nephrology and Kidney Institute, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Li Lin
- Managment Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - His-Chin Wu
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - I-Kuan Wang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Division of Nephrology and Kidney Institute, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Che-Yi Chou
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Division of Nephrology and Kidney Institute, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ji-An Liang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Improved prediction of invasive cancer using a ureteroscopic scoring model. Surg Oncol 2017; 26:252-256. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Revised: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 04/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
50
|
Villa L, Haddad M, Capitanio U, Somani BK, Cloutier J, Doizi S, Salonia A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Traxer O. Which Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Can be Safely Treated with Flexible Ureteroscopy with Holmium:YAG Laser Photoablation? Long-Term Results from a High Volume Institution. J Urol 2017; 199:66-73. [PMID: 28818526 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We tested the effects of tumor size, distribution and grade on progression-free survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with flexible ureteroscopy with Ho:YAG laser photoablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Included in analysis were data on 92 consecutive patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with Ho:YAG laser photoablation from 2003 to 2015 at a single tertiary care referral center. Stringent followup was offered according to EAU (European Association of Urology) guidelines. Progression during followup was defined by tumor upgrading, distant metastases and/or a relapsing tumor that could not be completely removed with a conservative approach. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess the rate of disease progression according to tumor size (1 or less cm vs greater than 1 cm), tumor distribution (unifocal vs multifocal) and tumor grade (low vs high). Cox regression analysis was done to test the impact of clinical and pathological characteristics on the rate of progression-free survival. RESULTS At a median followup of 52 months (IQR 27.8-76.4) the progression-free survival rate was 68% vs 72% in patients with a tumor size of 1 or less vs greater than 1 cm (p = 0.9), 72% vs 69% in patients with unifocal vs multifocal lesions (p = 0.6) and 75% vs 52% in patients with a low vs a high grade tumor (p = 0.03). On multivariable Cox regression analysis tumor grade at first treatment was the only independent predictor of disease progression (HR 5.16, 95% CI 1.19-22.26, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS High tumor grade independently decreased progression-free survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with Ho:YAG laser photoablation. Tumor size greater than 1 cm and multifocality did not increase the risk of disease progression in patients treated conservatively with Ho:YAG laser photoablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Villa
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France; Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattieu Haddad
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France; Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton National Health Service Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Cloutier
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Steeve Doizi
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Olivier Traxer
- Group Recherche Clinique Lithiase No. 20, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|