1
|
Schiller S, Carmeli I, Orgad R, Kashtan H, Cooper L, Solomon D. Esophagectomy in the Older Adult: A Systematic Review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2024; 34:464-478. [PMID: 38587375 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Current management of esophageal carcinoma (EC) involves combining different modalities, offering the opportunity of personalized strategies. This is particularly enticing in the geriatric population, where tailoring treatment modalities remains key to achieve good outcomes in terms of both quality of life and survival. Primary outcomes of our review included (1) evidence on short-term outcomes following esophagectomy, and (2) evidence on long-term outcomes following esophagectomy. Secondary review questions compared outcomes of (1) neoadjuvant treatment versus upfront surgery for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma, (2) endoscopic submucosal dissection versus esophagectomy for early esophageal carcinoma, and (3) definitive radiation with or without chemotherapy versus surgery. Twenty-six articles were included in the review for the main review questions. Our systematic review underscores the need for comprehensive geriatric evaluations to guide decision-making. Despite concerns about perioperative risks, well-selected older patients can derive survival benefits from surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Idan Carmeli
- Division of General Surgery, Samson Assuta Ashdod Hospital, Ashdod, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
| | - Ran Orgad
- Division of General Surgery, Samson Assuta Ashdod Hospital, Ashdod, Israel
| | - Hanoch Kashtan
- Division of General Surgery, Samson Assuta Ashdod Hospital, Ashdod, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
| | - Lisa Cooper
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Geriatrics, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Daniel Solomon
- Division of General Surgery, Samson Assuta Ashdod Hospital, Ashdod, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bostel T, Nikolaidou E, Wollschläger D, Mayer A, Kaufmann J, Hopprich A, Rühle A, Grosu AL, Debus J, Fottner C, Moehler M, Grimminger P, Schmidberger H, Nicolay NH. Multicenter analysis on the value of standard (chemo)radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:28. [PMID: 38433231 PMCID: PMC10910868 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02414-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the tolerability and oncological results of chemoradiation in elderly patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. METHODS This multi-center retrospective analysis included 86 elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (median age 73 years; range 65-92 years) treated with definitive or neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. The treatment was performed at 3 large comprehensive cancer centers in Germany from 2006 to 2020. Locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-associated toxicities according to CTCAE criteria v5.0 were analyzed, and parameters potentially relevant to patient outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS Thirty-three patients (38%) were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, while the remaining patients received definitive (chemo)radiation. The delivery of radiotherapy without dose reduction was possible in 80 patients (93%). In 66 patients (77%), concomitant chemotherapy was initially prescribed; however, during the course of therapy, 48% of patients (n = 32) required chemotherapy de-escalation due to treatment-related toxicities and comorbidities. Twenty-nine patients (34%) experienced higher-grade acute toxicities and 14 patients (16%) higher-grade late toxicities. The 2-year LRC, DMFS, PFS, and OS amounted to 72%, 49%, 46%, and 52%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery was shown to be associated with significantly better PFS (p = 0.006), DMFS (p = 0.006), and OS (p = 0.004) compared with all non-surgical treatments (pooled definitive radiotherapy and chemoradiation). No such advantage was seen over definitive chemoradiation. The majority of patients with neoadjuvant therapy received standard chemoradiotherapy without dose reduction (n = 24/33, 73%). In contrast, concurrent chemotherapy was only possible in 62% of patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy (n = 33/53), and most of these patients required dose-reduction or modification of chemotherapy (n = 23/33, 70%). CONCLUSIONS In our analysis, omission of chemotherapy or adjustment of chemotherapy dose during definitive radiotherapy was necessary for the overwhelming majority of elderly esophageal cancer patients not eligible for surgery, and hence resulted in reduced PFS and OS. Therefore, optimization of non-surgical approaches and the identification of potential predictive factors for safe administration of concurrent chemotherapy in elderly patients with (gastro)esophageal adenocarcinoma is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Radiological Institute Dr. Von Essen, Koblenz, Germany.
| | - Eirini Nikolaidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Wollschläger
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Justus Kaufmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anne Hopprich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Fottner
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Moehler
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Grimminger
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils Henrik Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cooper L, Orgad R, Levi Y, Shmilovitch H, Feferman Y, Solomon D, Kashtan H. Esophageal cancer in octogenarians: Should esophagectomy be done? J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101710. [PMID: 38281389 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Esophagectomy is the treatment of choice for esophageal cancer. In octogenarians data is conflicting. We evaluated postoperative outcomes and long-term survival of octogenarians and their younger counterparts. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database including consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy at a large referral, academic center between 2012 and 2021. Subgroups were designed according to age (<70, 70-79, and ≥ 80). RESULTS A total of 359 patients underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, 223 (62%) aged <70, 107 (30%) aged 70-79 and 29 (8%) aged ≥80. Octogenarians had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] scores (p = 0.001), and fewer received neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.04). Octogenarians experienced more major complications (P < 0.001) with significantly higher 30-day mortality rate (P = 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, major complications were associated with higher risk of being discharged to a rehabilitation center (odds ratio [OR] 14.839, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.921-44.747, p < 0.001) while age was not. Overall survival was reduced in octogenarians, with a 50th percentile survival of 10 months compared to 32 and 26 months in patients age < 70 and 70-79, respectively (p = 0.014). In a multivariable analysis, age ≥ 80 (hazard ratio [HR] 4.478 95% CI 2.151-9.322, p < 0.001), cancer stage (HR 1.545, 95% CI 1.095-2.179, p = 0.013), and postoperative major complications (HR 2.705 95% CI 1.913-3.823, p < 0.001) were independently associated with reduced survival. DISCUSSION Our study showed that octogenarians had significantly higher postoperative major complications compared to younger age groups. Overall survival was significantly reduced in these patients, probably due to an increased rate of perioperative mortality. Better patient selection and preparation may improve postoperative outcomes and increase long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Cooper
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel..
| | - Ran Orgad
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yochai Levi
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hila Shmilovitch
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yael Feferman
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Daniel Solomon
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hanoch Kashtan
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bostel T, Akbaba S, Wollschläger D, Mayer A, Nikolaidou E, Murnik M, Kirste S, Rühle A, Grosu AL, Debus J, Fottner C, Moehler M, Grimminger P, Schmidberger H, Nicolay NH. Chemoradiotherapy in geriatric patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: Multi-center analysis on the value of standard treatment in the elderly. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1063670. [PMID: 36937445 PMCID: PMC10022427 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1063670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose To evaluate the tolerability and outcomes of chemoradiation in elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Materials and methods This multi-center retrospective analysis included 161 patients with SCC of the esophagus with a median age of 73 years (range 65-89 years) treated with definitive or neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy between 2010 and 2019 at 3 large comprehensive cancer centers in Germany. Locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-associated toxicities were analyzed, and parameters determining patient outcomes and treatment tolerance were assessed. Results The delivery of radiotherapy without dose reduction was possible in 149 patients (93%). In 134 patients (83%), concomitant chemotherapy was initially prescribed; however, during the course of therapy, 41% of these patients (n = 55) required chemotherapy de-escalation due to treatment-related toxicities. Fifty-two patients (32%) experienced higher-grade acute toxicities, and 22 patients (14%) higher-grade late toxicities. The 2-year LRC, DMFS, PFS, and OS rates amounted to 67.5%, 33.8%, 31.4%, and 40.4%, respectively. Upon multivariate analysis, full-dose concomitant chemotherapy (vs. no or modified chemotherapy) was associated with significantly better DMFS (p=0.005), PFS (p=0.005) and OS (p=0.001). Furthermore, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by tumor resection (vs. definitive chemoradiotherapy or definitive radiotherapy alone) significantly improved PFS (p=0.043) and OS (p=0.049). We could not identify any clinico-pathological factor that was significantly associated with LRC. Furthermore, definitive (chemo)radiotherapy, brachytherapy boost and stent implantation were significantly associated with higher-grade acute toxicities (p<0.001, p=0.002 and p=0.04, respectively). The incidence of higher-grade late toxicities was also significantly associated with the choice of therapy, with a higher risk for late toxicities when treatment was switched from neoadjuvant to definitive (chemo)radiotherapy compared to primary definitive (chemo)radiotherapy (p<0.001). Conclusions Chemoradiation with full-dose and unmodified concurrent chemotherapy has a favorable prognostic impact in elderly ESCC patients; however, about half of the analyzed patients required omission or adjustment of chemotherapy due to comorbidities or toxicities. Therefore, the identification of potential predictive factors for safe administration of concurrent chemotherapy in elderly ESCC patients requires further exploration to optimize treatment in this vulnerable patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Tilman Bostel,
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Wollschläger
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eirini Nikolaidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Murnik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Fottner
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Moehler
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Grimminger
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils Henrik Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dezube AR, Cooper L, Mazzola E, Dolan DP, Lee DN, Kucukak S, De Leon LE, Dumontier C, Ademola B, Polhemus E, Bueno R, White A, Swanson SJ, Jaklitsch MT, Frain L, Wee JO. Long-term Outcomes Following Esophagectomy in Older and Younger Adults with Esophageal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:1119-1131. [PMID: 35357674 PMCID: PMC9474270 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05295-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patterns of overall and disease-free survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in older adults have not been carefully studied. METHODS Retrospective analysis of all patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 at our institution was performed. Differences in outcomes were stratified by age groups, < 75 and ≥ 75 years old, and two time periods, 2005-2012 and 2013-2020. RESULTS A total of 1135 patients were included: 979 (86.3%) patients were < 75 (86.3%), and 156 (13.7%) were ≥ 75 years old. Younger patients had fewer comorbidities, better nutritional status, and were more likely to receive neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy (all p < 0.05). However, tumor stage and operative approach were similar, except for increased performance of the McKeown technique in younger patients (p = 0.02). Perioperatively, younger patients experienced fewer overall and grade II complications (both p < 0.05). They had better overall survival (log-rank p-value < 0.001) and median survival, 62.2 vs. 21.5 months (p < 0.05). When stratified by pathologic stage, survival was similar for yp0 and pathologic stage II disease (both log-rank p-value > 0.05). Multivariable Cox models showed older age (≥ 75 years old) had increased hazard for reduced overall survival (HR 2.04 95% CI 1.5-2.8; p < 0.001) but not disease-free survival (HR 1.1 95% CI 0.78-1.6; p = 0.54). Over time, baseline characteristics remained largely similar, while stage became more advanced with a rise in neoadjuvant use and increased performance of minimally invasive esophagectomy (all p < 0.05). While overall complication rates improved (p < 0.05), overall and recurrence-free survival did not. Overall survival was better in younger patients during both time periods (both log-rank p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Despite similar disease-free survival rates, long-term survival was decreased in older adults as compared to younger patients. This may be related to unmeasured factors including frailty, long-term complications after surgery, and competing causes of death. However, our results suggest that survival is similar in those with complete pathologic responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron R Dezube
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Lisa Cooper
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emanuele Mazzola
- Division of Data Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel P Dolan
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Daniel N Lee
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Suden Kucukak
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Luis E De Leon
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Clark Dumontier
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- New England GRECC, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bayonle Ademola
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily Polhemus
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Raphael Bueno
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Abby White
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Scott J Swanson
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Michael T Jaklitsch
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Laura Frain
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jon O Wee
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Holstein Y, Trompet S, van Deudekom FJ, van Munster B, de Glas NA, van den Bos F, Uit den Boogaard A, van der Elst MJT, van der Kaaij MAE, Neelis KJ, Langers AMJ, Slingerland M, Portielje JEA, Mooijaart SP. Geriatric assessment and treatment outcomes in a Dutch cohort of older patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:459-467. [PMID: 35193449 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2036366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer can be treated with neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy with curative intent. For frail older patients choosing the appropriate oncological treatment can be difficult, and data on geriatric deficits as determinants of treatment outcomes are not yet available. OBJECTIVES To describe the prevalence of geriatric deficits and to study their association with treatment discontinuation and mortality in older patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cohort study was conducted in a Dutch tertiary care hospital including patients aged ≥70 years with primary stage I-IVA esophageal cancer. Geriatric screening and assessment data were collected. Outcomes were treatment discontinuation and one year all-cause mortality. RESULTS In total, 138 patients with curable esophageal cancer were included. Mean age was 76.1 years (standard deviation 4.7), 54% had clinical stage III and 24% stage IVA disease. Most patients received neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery (41%), 32% definitive chemoradiotherapy and 22% palliative radiotherapy. Overall, one year all-cause mortality was 36%. Geriatric screening and assessment was performed in 94 out of 138 patients, of which 60% was malnourished, 20% dependent in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and 52% was frail. Malnutrition was associated with higher mortality risk (Hazard Ratio, 3.2; 95% Confidence Interval, 1.3-7.7)) independent of age, sex and tumor stage. Seventy-six out of 94 patients were treated with chemoradiotherapy, of which 23% discontinued treatment. Patients with IADL dependency and Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥1 discontinued treatment more often. CONCLUSION All-cause mortality within one year was high, irrespective of treatment modality. Treatment discontinuation rate was high, especially in patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Geriatric assessment associates with outcomes in older patients with esophageal cancer and may inform treatment decisions and optimization in future patients, but more research is needed to establish its predictive value. Trial registration: The study is retrospectively registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), trial number NL8107. Date of registration: 22-10-2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara van Holstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Stella Trompet
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Floor J. van Deudekom
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara van Munster
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke A. de Glas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Uit den Boogaard
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Marjan J. T. van der Elst
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | | | - Karen J. Neelis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra M. J. Langers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | | | - Simon P. Mooijaart
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dezube AR, Cooper L, Mazzola E, Dolan DP, Lee DN, Kucukak S, De Leon LE, Dumontier C, White A, Swanson SJ, Jaklitsch MT, Frain LN, Wee JO, Ademola B, Polhemus E. Perioperative Esophagectomy Outcomes in Older Esophageal Cancer Patients in Two Different Time Eras. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 35:412-426. [PMID: 35248724 PMCID: PMC10049881 DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
To investigate perioperative outcomes of esophagectomies by age groups. Retrospective analysis of esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 at a single academic institution. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were analyzed by 3 age groups: <70, 70-79, and ≥80 years-old. Sub-analysis was done for 2 time periods: 2005-2012 and 2013-2020. Of 1135 patients, 789 patients were <70, 294 were 70-79, and 52 were ≥80 years-old. Tumor characteristics, and operative technique were similar, except positive longitudinal margins rates (all <3%) (P = 0.008). Older adults experienced increased complications (53.6% vs 69.7% vs 65.4% respectively; P < 0.001) attributable to grade II complications (41.4% vs 62.2% vs 63.5% respectively; P < 0.001). Hospital length of stay (LOS) and rehabilitation requirements were higher in older adults (both P < 0.05). 30-day readmissions, reoperation, and 30-day mortality rates (all <2%) showed no association with age group. Overall complications, LOS, discharge disposition and re-operative rates improved from 2005 to 2012 to 2013-2020 for all (P < 0.05). Increasing age was an independent risk factor for cardiovascular complications (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.23-2.46 for ages 70-79 and OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.37-5.10 for ages ≥80 ), inpatient rehabilitation (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.26-5.05 for ages 70-79 and OR 12.1 95% CI 5.83-25.04 for ages ≥80), and prolonged LOS (OR 1.64 95% CI 1.16-2.31 for ages 70-79 and OR 3.6 95% CI 1.71-7.67 for ≥80. After adjusting for time period, older age remained associated with complications (P < 0.05). Highly selected older adults at a large volume esophagectomy center can undergoesophagectomy with increased minor complication and rehabilitation needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron R Dezube
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Lisa Cooper
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emanuele Mazzola
- Division of Data Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel P Dolan
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel N Lee
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Suden Kucukak
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Luis E De Leon
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Clark Dumontier
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; New England GRECC, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Abby White
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Scott J Swanson
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael T Jaklitsch
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laura N Frain
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jon O Wee
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bayonle Ademola
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emily Polhemus
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|