What are the Risk Factors for Renal Failure following Open Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair?

Postoperative Intensive Care Management of Aortic Repair

Vascular surgery patients have multiple comorbidities and are at high risk for perioperative complications. Aortic repair surgery has greatly evolved in recent years, with an increasing predominance of endovascular techniques (EVAR). The incidence of cardiac complications is significantly reduced with endovascular repair, but high-risk patients require postoperative ST-segment monitoring. Open aortic repair may portend a prohibitive risk of respiratory complications that could be a contraindication for surgery. This risk is greatly reduced in the case of an endovascular approach, and general anesthesia should be avoided whenever possible in the case of endovascular repair. Preoperative renal function and postoperative kidney injury are powerful determinants of short- and long-term outcome, so that preoperative risk stratification and secondary prevention are critical tasks. Intraoperative renal protection with selective renal and distal aortic perfusion is essential during open repair. EVAR has lower rates of postoperative renal failure compared to open repair, with approximately half the risk for acute kidney injury (AKI) and one-third of the risk of hemodialysis requirement. Spinal cord ischemia used to be the most distinctive and feared complication of aortic repair. The risk has significantly decreased since the beginning of aortic surgery, with advances in surgical technique and spinal protection protocols, and is lower with endovascular repair. Endovascular repair avoids extensive aortic dissection and aortic cross-clamping and is generally associated with reduced blood loss and less coagulopathy. The intensive care physician must be aware that aortic repair surgery has an impact on every organ system, and the importance of early recognition of organ failure cannot be overemphasized.

Short-term outcomes of open surgical abdominal aortic aneurysm repair from the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit

Background

The sharp decrease in open surgical repair (OSR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has raised concerns about contemporary postoperative outcomes. The study was designed to analyse the impact of complications on clinical outcomes within 30 days following OSR.

Methods

Patients who underwent OSR for intact AAA registered prospectively between 2016 and 2019 in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit were included. Complications and outcomes (death, secondary interventions, prolonged hospitalization) were evaluated. The adjusted relative risk (aRr) and 95 per cent confidence intervals were computed using Poisson regression. Subsequently, the population-attributable fraction (PAF) was calculated. The PAF reflects the expected percentage reduction of an outcome if a complication were to be completely prevented.

Results

A total of 1657 patients were analysed. Bowel ischaemia and renal complications had the largest impact on death (aRr 12·44 (95 per cent c.i. 7·95 to 19·84) at PAF 20 (95 per cent c.i. 8·4 to 31·5) per cent and aRr 5·07 (95 per cent c.i. 3·18 to 8.07) at PAF 14 (95 per cent c.i. 0·7 to 27·0) per cent, respectively). Arterial occlusion had the greatest impact on secondary interventions (aRr 11·28 (95 per cent c.i. 8·90 to 14·30) at PAF 21 (95 per cent c.i. 14·7 to 28·1) per cent), and pneumonia (aRr 2·52 (95 per cent c.i. 2·04 to 3·10) at PAF 13 (95 per cent c.i. 8·3 to 17·8) per cent) on prolonged hospitalization. Small effects were observed on outcomes for other complications.

Conclusion

The greatest clinical impact following OSR can be made by focusing on measures to reduce the occurrence of bowel ischaemia, arterial occlusion and pneumonia.

[Summary of the S3 guideline on abdominal aortic aneurysm from an anesthesiological perspective]

The current article is a summary of the 2018 revised S3 guideline on screening, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) from an anesthesiological point of view. It is the only interdisciplinary guideline that describes in particular the perioperative anesthesiological and intensive care management.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms part two: Surgical management, postoperative complications and surveillance

Large, symptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms are usually treated surgically if patients are deemed fit enough. This may be achieved through endovascular or open surgical repair. The type of treatment that a patient receives is dependant on many factors, such as the rupture status of the aneurysm. Each approach is also associated with different risks and postoperative complications. Multiple guidelines exist to inform the surgical management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. This literature review combines these recommendations and explores the evidence upon which they are based. In addition, it highlights the key perioperative considerations that need to be considered in cases of unruptured and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Prospective Comparison of 70-kVp Single-Energy CT versus Dual-Energy CT: Which is More Suitable for CT Angiography with Low Contrast Media Dosage?

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the objective and subjective image qualities between single-energy computed tomography (CT) at 70 kVp and virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) of dual-source dual-energy CT for CT angiography with 180 mgI/kg.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Total 63 patients scanned with 180 mgI/kg were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (32 patients) underwent CT angiography at 70-kVp, and Group B (31 patients) underwent dual-energy CT. VMI sets were generated at 10-keV increments between 40 and 100 keV. We calculated aortic attenuation, contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise-ratio, figure of merit of CNR, and effective dose for each protocol. Three radiologists scored overall image quality and various arteries' visibility using a four-point scale. Quantitative and qualitative comparisons between 70 kVp and VMI with the highest CNR were performed with the two-tailed t test or Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

The 40-keV images offered the highest CNR among VMIs. Aortic attenuation at 70 kVp was significantly lower than that at 40 keV (p < 0.001). However, the signal-to-noise-ratio, CNR, and figure of merit of CNR were significantly higher at 70 kVp than those at 40-keV (p < 0.001, p < 0.05, and p < 0.05, respectively). The effective dose of each group was almost equal. The qualitative visibility scores for various arteries, except the ascending and upper-abdominal aorta, were also better at 70 kVp than those at 40 keV.

CONCLUSION

Aortic attenuation at 70 kVp with 180 mg I/kg was lower than that of VMI at 40 keV, and the objective and subjective image qualities were higher at 70 kVp than those at 40 keV.

Conditioning attenuates kidney and heart injury in rats following transient suprarenal occlusion of the abdominal aorta

Suprarenal aortic clamping during abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair results in ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in local (i.e. kidney) and distant (i.e. heart) tissue. To investigate perioperative approaches that mitigate IRI-induced tissue damage, Wistar rats underwent suprarenal aortic clamping either alone or in combination with short cycles of ischemic conditioning before and/or after clamping. Serum analysis revealed significant reduction in key biochemical parameters reflecting decreased tissue damage at systemic level and improved renal function in conditioned groups compared to controls (p < 0.05), which was corroborated by histolopathological evaluation. Importantly, the levels of DNA damage, as reflected by the biomarkers 8-oxo-G, γH2AX and pATM were reduced in conditioned versus non-conditioned cases. In this setting, NADPH oxidase, a source of free radicals, decreased in the myocardium of conditioned cases. Of note, administration of 5-HD and 8-SPT blocking key protective signaling routes abrogated the salutary effect of conditioning. To further understand the non-targeted effect of IRI on the heart, it was noted that serum TGF-β1 levels decreased in conditioned groups, whereas this difference was eliminated after 5-HD and 8-SPT administration. Collectively, conditioning strategies reduced both renal and myocardial injury. Additionally, the present study highlights TGF-β1 as an attractive target for manipulation in this context.

Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Complications After Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Meta-Analysis With Randomized Control Trials

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIP) on complications after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in Google scholar, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to February 2019. The pooled risk difference (RD) as well as their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 249 patients receiving abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with RIP and 248 receiving abdominal aortic aneurysm repair without RIP in 7 included studies were reanalyzed in this meta-analysis. The results showed that RIP cannot significantly reduce the postoperative mortality (RD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.06, P = .87), myocardial infarction (RD = -0.01, 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.07, P = .79), and renal impairment (RD = 0.06, 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.30, P = .89) and renal failure (RD = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.10, P = .30). Moreover, the pooled estimate indicated that the RIP significantly increased the risk of arrhythmia after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair surgery (RD = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01 to -0.16, P = .03). Nevertheless, sensitivity analyses indicated unreliable results for risk of arrhythmia.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence that RIP reduces mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Moreover, the current evidence is not robust enough to prove the effect of RIP on kidney- and cardiac-related complications.

Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ischemic preconditioning is an innate mechanism of cytoprotection against ischemia, with potential for end-organ protection. The primary goal of this study was to systematically review the literature to determine the effect of ischemic preconditioning on outcomes after open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

METHODS

The methodology followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. We included randomized clinical trials that evaluated the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in reducing morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing open or endovascular AAA repair surgery. The primary outcomes were death, myocardial infarction, and renal impairment. Outcomes were addressed separately for open AAA repair and endovascular AAA repair (EVAR). Data were collected on patient characteristics, methodology, and preconditioning protocol for each trial.

RESULTS

Nine trials of ischemic preconditioning in aortic aneurysm surgery were included with a total of 599 patients; 336 patients were included in the open AAA repair meta-analysis, and 263 patients were included in the EVAR meta-analysis. For both open and endovascular repairs, ischemic preconditioning did not have a significant effect on death, myocardial infarction, or renal impairment requiring dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of ischemic preconditioning on outcomes after open and endovascular AAA repair that have been completed to date have not been adequately powered to evaluate improvements in patient-important outcomes. The evidence is insufficient to support the use of ischemic preconditioning for AAA repair in clinical practice. The variability in treatment effect across studies may be explained by clinical and methodological heterogeneity.

Predictors of acute kidney injury after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians

OBJECTIVE

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common postoperative complication after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, limited studies have investigated this complication in elderly patients. This study aims to evaluate AKI in octogenarians after open endovascular AAA repair (OAR) and endovascular AAA repair (EVAR).

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Vascular Quality Initiative database on all patients who underwent elective infrarenal AAA repair between January 2003 and April 2017. Univariate analysis was used to compare AKI rates as well as failure to rescue after AKI between octogenarians and nonoctogenarians in OAR and EVAR. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis was implemented to identify independent predictors and develop a risk calculator of AKI in octogenarians undergoing AAA repair.

RESULTS

A total of 27,993 patients (12% OAR and 88% EVAR) were included, of which 6708 (24%) were octogenarians (OAR, 332; EVAR, 6376). Postoperative AKI was more common in octogenarians as compared with nonoctogenarians in OAR (15.1% vs 10.1%; P = .01) and EVAR (4.2% vs 2.7%; P < .001). Similarly, failure to rescue, defined as 30-day mortality after postoperative AKI, was higher in octogenarians whether undergoing OAR (28.0% vs 8.8%; P < .001) or EVAR (14.1% vs 7.5%; P < .01). On multivariable analysis, octogenarians undergoing OAR had a 3.5 times higher odds of AKI compared with those undergoing EVAR (odds ratio [OR], 3.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.36-5.23; P < .001). Other independent risk factors for postoperative AKI in octogenarians included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.14-1.93), chronic kidney disease stage III (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.26-3.76) and chronic kidney disease stage IV-V (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 3.0-10.9), peripheral artery disease (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.34-2.94), preoperative β-blocker use (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.45-2.38), and aneurysm diameter (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.11-1.41). These predictors were incorporated in an interactive risk calculator of AKI after AAA repair in octogenarians (C-statistic = 0.728).

CONCLUSIONS

AKI is a serious complication after AAA repair, especially in octogenarians, and is associated with high failure to rescue rates. A careful assessment of risk factors for AKI in elderly patients should be performed to inform clinical decision making.

Severe Infrarenal Atheroma Load in Open Aortic Aneurysm Repair Is Not a Risk Factor for Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) after open aortic repair is subject to multiple patient- and operation-related variables. Hostile neck morphology in open aneurysm repair is thought to contribute to this AKI risk postoperatively. The aim of this study was to evaluate if large neck atheroma is a possible risk factor in the postoperative development of AKI.

METHODS

Retrospectively 137 patients were evaluated for neck atheroma and AKI incidence. Atheroma load measurements were performed by 2 different techniques. Results were compared, and secondly a univariate analysis was performed for multiple additional risk factors regarding AKI occurrence.

RESULTS

Significant (>30%) neck atheroma was not associated with a higher risk for developing AKI (odds ratio [OR]: 1.81; 95% confidence intervals: 0.74-4.44). Overall incidence of AKI based upon Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria was 19.7%. In univariate analysis coronary artery disease and the presence of a renal artery stenosis were both significantly associated with AKI (OR: 2.38, 3.31, respectively) as well as the use of B-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (OR 3.05, 2.48, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Cross-clamping in case of significant neck atheroma during open aortic aneurysm repair is not associated with increased risk of AKI. Defining high-risk patients based on additional risk factors must be a part of preoperative patient selection.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms: pre- and post-procedural imaging

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a relatively common, potentially life-threatening disorder. Rupture of AAA is potentially catastrophic with high mortality. Intervention for AAA is indicated when the aneurysm reaches 5.0-5.5 cm or more, when symptomatic, or when increasing in size > 10 mm/year. AAA can be accurately assessed by cross-sectional imaging including computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography. Current options for intervention in AAA patients include open surgery and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), with EVAR becoming more prevalent over time. Cross-sectional imaging plays a crucial role in AAA surveillance, pre-procedural assessment, and post-EVAR management. This paper will discuss the current role of imaging in the assessment of AAA patients prior to intervention, in evaluation of procedural complications, and in long-term follow-up of EVAR patients.

Risk factors for postoperative renal dysfunction following open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms retrospective analysis

Objectives

To identify the risk factors for postoperative renal dysfunction after open surgical repair (OSR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and to establish a scoring system.

Results

The overall 30-day mortality rates were 22.0%(ruptured) vs 2.6% (unruptured), respectively. For the ruptured group, the independent risk factors were hemodynamic instability (P = 0.002) blood loss >1 L (P = 0.041) and preoperative creatinine >150 μmol/L (P < 0.001). By contrast, for the unruptured group, factors were smoking (P = 0.028), blood loss >1 L (P = 0.018), and antihypertensive drugs (P < 0.001). The areas under the curve of the WCRDA scoring system are 0.794 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.686–0.902, P < 0.001) and 0.811 (95% CI 0.691–0.932, P < 0.001) for the ruptured and unruptured groups, respectively.

Conclusions

Hemodynamic instability, blood loss >1 L and Hb <90 g/L are independent risk factors for postoperative renal dysfunction following rAAA OSR, whereas smoking, blood loss >1 L, and antihypertensive drugs are independent risk factors. WCRDA performs well in predicting postoperative renal dysfunction.

Materials and Methods

287 patients from the Vascular Department of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, who were planned to perform OSR for AAA from November 2003 to January 2017. 274 patients underwent OSR for AAA were finally included in the study. A total of 118 patients had ruptured AAA and 156 unruptured AAA.

The patients were divided into the ruptured and unruptured groups. Logistic regression was used to identify the independent risk factors for postoperative renal dysfunction. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the scoring system.

Predictors of renal dysfunction after endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Renal complications after repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, limited data have assessed risk factors for renal complications in the endovascular era. This study aimed to identify predictors of renal complications after endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) and open repair.

METHODS

Patients who underwent EVAR or open repair of a nonruptured infrarenal AAA between 2011 and 2013 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Targeted Vascular module. Patients on hemodialysis preoperatively were excluded. Renal complications were defined as new postoperative dialysis or creatinine increase >2 mg/dL. Patient demographics, comorbidities, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), operative details, and outcomes were compared using univariate analysis between those with and without renal complications. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of renal complications.

RESULTS

We identified 4503 patients who underwent elective repair of an infrarenal AAA (EVAR: 3869, open repair: 634). Renal complication occurred in 1% of patients after EVAR and in 5% of patients after open repair. There were no differences in comorbidities between patients with and without renal complications. A preoperative GFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2 occurred more frequently among patients with renal complications (EVAR: 81% vs 37%, P < .01; open: 60% vs 34%, P < .01). The 30-day mortality was also significantly increased (EVAR: 55% vs 1%, P < .01; open: 30% vs 4%, P < .01). After adjustment, renal complications were strongly associated with 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 38.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 20.4-71.9). Independent predictors of renal complications included GFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2 (OR, 4.6; 95% CI, 2.4-8.7), open repair (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-5.3), transfusion (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 3.0-12.6), and prolonged operative time (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.6-5.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Predictors of renal complications include elevated baseline GFR, open approach, transfusion, and prolonged operative time. Given the dramatic increase in mortality associated with renal complications, care should be taken to use renal protective strategies, achieve meticulous hemostasis to limit transfusions, and to use an endovascular approach when technically feasible.

Organ protection during aortic cross-clamping

Open surgical repair of an aortic aneurysm requires aortic cross-clamping, resulting in temporary ischemia of all organs and tissues supplied by the aorta distal to the clamp. Major complications of open aneurysm repair due to aortic cross-clamping include renal ischemia-reperfusion injury and postoperative colonic ischemia in case of supra- and infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair. Ischemia-reperfusion injury results in excessive production of reactive oxygen species and in oxidative stress, which can lead to multiple organ failure. Several perioperative protective strategies have been suggested to preserve renal function during aortic cross-clamping, such as pharmacotherapy and therapeutic hypothermia of the kidneys. In this chapter, we will briefly discuss the pathophysiology of ischemia-reperfusion injury and the preventative measures that can be taken to avoid abdominal organ injury. Finally, techniques to minimize the risk of complications during and after open aneurysm repair will be presented.

Perioperative glutamine supplementation restores disturbed renal arginine synthesis after open aortic surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Postoperative renal failure is a common complication after open repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The amino acid arginine is formed in the kidneys from its precursor citrulline, and citrulline is formed from glutamine in the intestines. Arginine enhances the function of the immune and cardiovascular systems, which is important for recovery after surgery. We hypothesized that renal arginine production is diminished after ischemia-reperfusion injury caused by clamping of the aorta during open abdominal aortic surgery and that parenteral glutamine supplementation might compensate for this impaired arginine synthesis. This open-label clinical trial randomized patients who underwent clamping of the aorta during open abdominal aortic surgery to receive a perioperative supplement of intravenous alanyl-glutamine (0.5 g·kg(-1)·day(-1); group A, n = 5) or no supplement (group B, n = 5). One day after surgery, stable isotopes and tracer methods were used to analyze the metabolism and conversion of glutamine, citrulline, and arginine. Whole body plasma flux of glutamine, citrulline, and arginine was significantly higher in group A than in group B (glutamine: 391 ± 34 vs. 258 ± 19 μmol·kg(-1)·h(-1), citrulline: 5.7 ± 0.4 vs. 2.8 ± 0.4 μmol·kg(-1)·h(-1), and arginine: 50 ± 4 vs. 26 ± 2 μmol·kg(-1)·h(-1), P < 0.01), as was the synthesis of citrulline from glutamine (4.8 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.3 μmol·kg(-1)·h(-1)), citrulline from arginine (2.3 ± 0.3 vs. 0.96 ± 0.1 μmol·kg(-1)·h(-1)), and arginine from glutamine (7.7 ± 0.4 vs. 2.8 ± 0.2 μmol·kg(-1)·h(-1)), respectively (P < 0.001 for all). In conclusion, the production of citrulline and arginine is severely reduced after clamping during aortic surgery. This study shows that an intravenous supplement of glutamine increases the production of citrulline and arginine and compensates for the inhibitory effect of ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning May Attenuate Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in a Porcine Model of Supraceliac Aortic Cross-Clamping

AIM

The effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in decreasing renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) during a suprarenal aortic cross-clamping was examined in a swine model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four groups of pigs were examined: (a) ischemia-reperfusion (IR) group, renal IRI produced by 30 min of supraceliac aortic cross-clamping; (b) RIPC I group, the same renal IRI following RIPC by brief occlusion of the infrarenal aorta (15 min ischemia and 15 min reperfusion); (c) RIPC II group, the same renal IRI following RIPC by brief occlusion of the infrarenal aorta (3 cycles of 5 min ischemia and 5 min reperfusion); (d) sham group. Renal function was assessed before and after IRI by examining creatinine, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), TNF-α, malondialdehyde (MDA), cystatin C and C-reactive protein (CRP) from renal vein blood samples at specific time intervals.

RESULTS

Both RIPC groups presented significantly less impaired results compared to the IR group when considering MDA, cystatin C, CRP and creatinine. Between the two RIPC groups, RIPC II presented a better response with regard to CRP, NGAL, TNF-α, MDA and cystatin C.

CONCLUSIONS

Remote IR protocols and mainly repetitive short periods of cycles of IR ameliorate the biochemical kidney effects of IRI in a model of suprarenal aortic aneurysm repair.

Development of a scoring system to estimate mortality in abdominal aortic aneurysms management

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to define risk factors associated with inpatient mortality in patients undergoing elective repair for unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and utilize these factors to create a scoring system to estimate risk of mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was completed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2011. Patients who underwent elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair were identified using ICD-9 codes. Demographics, comorbidities, length of stay, insurance status, and mortality were recorded. Statistically significant variables were identified using a multivariate analysis, and a discriminant analysis was used to identify factors predictive of inpatient mortality.

RESULTS

Over a 14-year period, 28,448 patients underwent elective repair of an unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Independent variables associated with inpatient mortality included: age >60, female gender, congestive heart failure, peripheral artery disease, renal failure, malnutrition, and hypercoagulability. Endovascular aneurysm repair was protective against inpatient mortality. The area under the curve for the discriminant function was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.81-0.85) and successfully classified 87.9% of patients within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (25,006/28,448 patients).

CONCLUSION

Seven factors that predict an increased risk of mortality and one factor that decreased the risk of mortality were identified. Preoperative risk factor mitigation may improve mortality following elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Renal function 5 years after open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair from a randomized trial

Background

Deterioration of renal function after major vascular surgery is an important complication, and may vary between patients undergoing endovascular (EVAR) or open surgical (OR) repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The objective was to determine the impact of OR and EVAR on renal function after 5 years.

Methods

This was a post hoc analysis of data collected prospectively from the Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) trial. Five years after surgery, creatinine levels were available for 189 patients (94 after OR and 95 after EVAR). The severity of renal disease was staged using the chronic kidney disease classification of the US National Kidney Foundation clinical guidelines.

Results

Using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for the entire group declined over time, with a mean(s.d.) preoperative value of 80·0(7·6) ml per min per 1·73 m2 compared with 75·7(9·7) ml per min per 1·73 m2 after 5 years (mean difference 4·2 (95 per cent confidence interval 3·2 to 5·3) ml per min per 1·73 m2; P &lt; 0·001). Five years after surgery, the mean eGFR (CKD-EPI equation) was not significantly different between the OR and EVAR groups: 76·3(9·3) versus 75·1(10·0) ml per min per 1·73 m2 (mean difference 1·2 (−1·6 to 3·9) ml per min per 1·73 m2; P = 0·410).

Conclusion

Renal function 5 years after OR and EVAR for AAA was similar. Neither surgical procedure accelerated the loss of renal function. Registration number: NCT00421330 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).