Efficacy and Safety of Sparsentan Compared With Irbesartan in Patients With Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: Randomized, Controlled Trial Design (DUET)

From Plan to Pivot: How Model-Informed Drug Development Shaped the Dose Strategy of the Zibotentan/Dapagliflozin ZENITH Trials

Getting the dose right is a key challenge in drug development; model-informed drug development (MIDD) provides powerful tools to shape dose strategies and inform decision making. In this tutorial, the case study of the ZENITH trials showcases how a set of clinical pharmacology and MIDD approaches informed an impactful dose strategy. The endothelin A receptor antagonist zibotentan, combined with the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin, has yielded a robust and significant albuminuria reduction in the Phase IIb trial ZENITH-CKD and is being investigated for reduction of kidney function decline in a high-risk chronic kidney disease population in the Phase III trial ZENITH High Proteinuria. Endothelin antagonist treatment has, until now, been limited by the class effect fluid retention. ZENITH-CKD investigated a wide range of zibotentan doses based on pharmacokinetics in renal impairment, competitor-data exposure-response modeling, and clinical trial simulations. Recruitment delays reduced interim analysis data availability; here, supportive dose-response modeling recovered decision-making confidence. At trial completion, the low-dose arm enabled Phase III dose selection between Phase IIb doses. Dose-response modeling of efficacy and Kaplan-Meier analyses of tolerability identified a kidney-function-based low-dose strategy of 0.25 or 0.75 mg zibotentan (with 10 mg dapagliflozin) to balance benefit/risk in ZENITH High Proteinuria. The applied clinical pharmacology and MIDD principles enabled successful Phase IIb dose finding, rationalized and built confidence in the innovative Phase III dosing strategy and identified a potential therapeutic window for zibotentan/dapagliflozin, providing the opportunity for a significant improvement in the treatment of chronic kidney disease with high proteinuria.

Sparsentan: A First-in-Class Dual Endothelin and Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of the guidelines on the management of immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), review the evidence for sparsentan, and discuss its place in therapy.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and clinicaltrials.gov using the search terms "sparsentan" and "RE-021" up to the end of Jun 2023.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

English studies were included if they evaluated the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of sparsentan in human subjects. Information from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and manufacturer's monograph were also extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In comparison with irbesartan, sparsentan reduced urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) in both IgAN (-49.8% vs -15.1% at interim 36 weeks) and FSGS (-44.8% vs -18.5% at 8 weeks). Hypotension and edema were the most common adverse events in the sparsentan groups. Hepatotoxicity appears to be comparable between sparsentan and irbesartan in short-term results.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON WITH EXISTING DRUGS

Sparsentan provides a new option for patients with IgAN who are otherwise at high risk of progressive kidney disease. Continued FDA approval is dependent on long-term study results on renal function decline and safety.

CONCLUSION

Sparsentan reduces proteinuria in IgAN and FSGS, and has expedited approval by the FDA for IgAN in patients at risk of rapid disease progression, generally at urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) ≥1.5 g/g. Interim results from PROTECT and results from DUET showed promise for improving proteinuria in IgAN and FSGS. Long-term renal function benefit and safety data are pending.

Sparsentan for Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in the DUET Open-Label Extension: Long-term Efficacy and Safety

Rationale & Objective

Sparsentan is a novel, non-immunosuppressive, single-molecule, dual endothelin angiotensin receptor antagonist (DEARA) examined in the ongoing phase 2 DUET trial for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). In the DUET 8-week double-blind period, sparsentan resulted in greater proteinuria reduction versus irbesartan. We report the long-term efficacy and safety of sparsentan during the open-label extension over more than 4 years.

Study Design

Patients were examined from their first sparsentan dose (double-blind period or open-label extension) through 4.6 years.

Setting & Participants

Patients with FSGS, excluding secondary FSGS.

Intervention

Sparsentan (200, 400, and 800 mg/d).

Outcomes

Urinary protein-creatinine ratio, FSGS partial remission endpoint (urinary protein-creatinine ratio ≤1.5 g/g and >40% reduction from baseline), estimated glomerular filtration rate, and blood pressure approximately every 12 weeks. Treatment-emergent adverse events by year and cases/100 patient-years.

Results

109 patients were enrolled; 108 received ≥1 sparsentan dose; 103 entered the open-label extension (68 sparsentan, 35 irbesartan during the double-blind period). Sparsentan was ongoing in 45/108 patients (41.7%); median time to treatment discontinuation was 3.9 years (95% CI, 2.6-5.2). Mean percent proteinuria reduction from baseline was sustained through follow-up. Achieving partial remission within 9 months of first sparsentan dose (52.8% of patients) versus not achieving (47.2%) was associated with significantly slower rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate decline over the entire treatment period (-2.70 vs -6.56; P = 0.03) and in the first 2 years (-1.69 vs -6.46; P = 0.03). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (>9 cases/100 patient-years) were headache, peripheral edema, upper respiratory infection, hyperkalemia, and hypotension. Peripheral edema and hypotension declined from year 1 (13.9% and 15.7% of patients, respectively) to ≤4% in years ≥2. There were no cases of heart failure and no patient deaths.

Limitations

The open-label extension does not include a comparison group.

Conclusions

Long-term sparsentan treatment showed sustained proteinuria reduction and a consistent safety profile.

Treatment of IgA Nephropathy: A Rapidly Evolving Field

The pivotal event in the pathophysiology of IgA nephropathy is the binding of circulating IgA-containing immune complexes to mesangial cells, with secondary glomerular and tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis. The paramount difficulty in the management of IgA nephropathy is the heterogeneity in its clinical presentation and prognosis, requiring an individualized treatment approach. Goal-directed supportive care remains the bedrock of therapy for all patients, regardless of risk of progression. Sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors and sparsentan should be integral to contemporary supportive care, particularly in patients with chronic kidney damage. Pending the development of reliable biomarkers, it remains a challenge to identify patients prone to progression due to active disease and most likely to derive a net benefit from immunosuppression. The use of clinical parameters, including the degree of proteinuria, the presence of persistent microscopic hematuria, and the rate of eGFR loss, combined with the mesangial hypercellularity, endocapillary hypercellularity, segmental glomerulosclerosis, tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis, crescents score, is currently the best approach. Systemic glucocorticoids are indicated in high-risk patients, but the beneficial effects wane after withdrawal and come at the price of substantial treatment-associated toxicity. Therapies with direct effect on disease pathogenesis are increasingly becoming available. While targeted-release budesonide has garnered the most attention, anti-B-cell strategies and selective complement inhibition will most likely prove their added value. We propose a comprehensive approach that tackles the different targets in the pathophysiology of IgA nephropathy according to their relevance in the individual patient.

Implications of Complete Proteinuria Remission at any Time in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: Sparsentan DUET Trial

Introduction

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a rare glomerular disease with high unmet clinical need. Interest in proteinuria as a surrogate end point for regulatory approval of novel treatments has increased. We assessed the relationship between achieving complete remission (CR) of proteinuria at least once during follow-up and long-term kidney outcomes.

Methods

This post hoc analysis included all patients enrolled in the DUET trial of sparsentan in FSGS and the open-label extension (OLE). Evaluations occurred every 12 weeks, including blood pressure (BP), edema, proteinuria, and kidney function. CR was defined as a urine protein/creatinine ratio ≤0.3g/g in a first morning urine sample.

Results

A total of 108 patients who received ≥1 sparsentan dose were included in this study. During a median follow-up of 47.0 months, 46 patients (43%) experienced ≥1 CR, 61% occurring within 12 months of starting sparsentan. There was an increased likelihood of CR with a higher sparsentan dose or baseline subnephrotic-range proteinuria. Achieving ≥1 CR was associated with significantly slower rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline versus non-CR patients (P < 0.05). Use of immunosuppressive agents was more frequent in patients who achieved a CR. However, the antiproteinuric effect of sparsentan was additive to that achieved with concomitant immunosuppressive treatment. No unanticipated adverse events occurred.

Conclusion

We conclude that sparsentan can be safely administered for extended periods and exerts a sustained antiproteinuric effect. Achievement of CR at any time during follow-up, even if it is not sustained, may be an indicator of a favorable response to treatment and a predictor of improved kidney function outcomes.

Investigating the Impact of Selective Modulators on the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: Unraveling Their Off-Target Perturbations of Transmembrane Ionic Currents

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a crucial role in maintaining various physiological processes in the body, including blood pressure regulation, electrolyte balance, and overall cardiovascular health. However, any compounds or drugs known to perturb the RAAS might have an additional impact on transmembrane ionic currents. In this retrospective review article, we aimed to present a selection of chemical compounds or medications that have long been recognized as interfering with the RAAS. It is noteworthy that these substances may also exhibit regulatory effects in different types of ionic currents. Apocynin, known to attenuate the angiotensin II-induced activation of epithelial Na+ channels, was shown to stimulate peak and late components of voltage-gated Na+ current (INa). Esaxerenone, an antagonist of the mineralocorticoid receptor, can exert an inhibitory effect on peak and late INa directly. Dexamethasone, a synthetic glucocorticoid, can directly enhance the open probability of large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels. Sparsentan, a dual-acting antagonist of the angiotensin II receptor and endothelin type A receptors, was found to suppress the amplitude of peak and late INa effectively. However, telmisartan, a blocker of the angiotensin II receptor, was effective in stimulating the peak and late INa along with a slowing of the inactivation time course of the current. However, telmisartan's presence can also suppress the erg-mediated K+ current. Moreover, tolvaptan, recognized as an aquaretic agent that can block the vasopressin receptor, was noted to suppress the amplitude of the delayed-rectifier K+ current and the M-type K+ current directly. The above results indicate that these substances not only have an interference effect on the RAAS but also exert regulatory effects on different types of ionic currents. Therefore, to determine their mechanisms of action, it is necessary to gain a deeper understanding.

RhoA/ROCK inhibition attenuates endothelin-1-induced elevated glomerular permeability to albumin, inflammation, and fibrosis

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) contributes to the development of kidney diseases. However, the underlying molecular mechanism is largely undefined. Here we sought to investigate the potential role of ET-1 receptors, ET_A and ET_B in the regulation of increased glomerular permeability and underlying signaling pathways post-ET-1 infusion. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were infused with ET-1 (2 pmol/kg per minute, i.v.) for four weeks, and the effect on glomerular permeability to albumin (P_alb) and albuminuria was measured. The selective ROCK-1/2 inhibitor, Y-27632, was administered to a separate group of rats to determine its effect on ET-1-induced P_alb and albuminuria. The role of ET_A and ET_B receptors in regulating RhoA/ROCK activity was determined by incubating isolated glomeruli from normal rats with ET-1 and with selective ET_A and ET_B receptor antagonists. ET-1 infusion for four weeks significantly elevated P_alb and albuminuria. Y-27632 significantly reduced the elevation of P_alb and albuminuria. The activities of both RhoA and ROCK-1/2 were increased by ET-1 infusion. Selective ET_B receptor antagonism had no effect on the elevated activity of both RhoA and ROCK-1/2 enzymes. Selective ET_A receptor and combined ET_A/ET_B receptors blockade restored the activity of RhoA and ROCK-1/2 to normal levels. In addition, chronic ET-1 infusion increased the levels of glomerular inflammatory and fibrotic markers. These effects were all attenuated in rats following ROCK-1/2 inhibition. These observations suggest that ET-1 contributes to increased albuminuria, inflammation, and fibrosis by modulating the activity of the ET_A-RhoA/ROCK-1/2 pathway. Selective ET_A receptor blockade may represent a potential therapeutic strategy to limit glomerular injury and albuminuria in kidney disease.

Sparsentan: First Approval

Sparsentan (FILSPARI™) is an oral, dual endothelin angiotensin receptor antagonist that is being developed by Travere Therapeutics for the treatment of immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). In February 2023, sparsentan received accelerated approval in the USA for reducing proteinuria in adults with primary IgA nephropathy who are at risk of rapid disease progression. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of sparsentan leading to this first approval for IgA nephropathy.

Sparsentan in patients with IgA nephropathy: a prespecified interim analysis from a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Sparsentan is a novel, non-immunosuppressive, single-molecule, dual endothelin and angiotensin receptor antagonist being examined in an ongoing phase 3 trial in adults with IgA nephropathy. We report the prespecified interim analysis of the primary proteinuria efficacy endpoint, and safety.

METHODS

PROTECT is an international, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled study, being conducted in 134 clinical practice sites in 18 countries. The study examines sparsentan versus irbesartan in adults (aged ≥18 years) with biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy and proteinuria of 1·0 g/day or higher despite maximised renin-angiotensin system inhibitor treatment for at least 12 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive sparsentan 400 mg once daily or irbesartan 300 mg once daily, stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate at screening (30 to <60 mL/min per 1·73 m² and ≥60 mL/min per 1·73 m²) and urine protein excretion at screening (≤1·75 g/day and >1·75 g/day). The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 36 in urine protein-creatinine ratio based on a 24-h urine sample, assessed using mixed model repeated measures. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were safety endpoints. All endpoints were examined in all participants who received at least one dose of randomised treatment. The study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03762850.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 20, 2018, and May 26, 2021, 404 participants were randomly assigned to sparsentan (n=202) or irbesartan (n=202) and received treatment. At week 36, the geometric least squares mean percent change from baseline in urine protein-creatinine ratio was statistically significantly greater in the sparsentan group (-49·8%) than the irbesartan group (-15·1%), resulting in a between-group relative reduction of 41% (least squares mean ratio=0·59; 95% CI 0·51-0·69; p<0·0001). TEAEs with sparsentan were similar to irbesartan. There were no cases of severe oedema, heart failure, hepatotoxicity, or oedema-related discontinuations. Bodyweight changes from baseline were not different between the sparsentan and irbesartan groups.

INTERPRETATION

Once-daily treatment with sparsentan produced meaningful reduction in proteinuria compared with irbesartan in adults with IgA nephropathy. Safety of sparsentan was similar to irbesartan. Future analyses after completion of the 2-year double-blind period will show whether these beneficial effects translate into a long-term nephroprotective potential of sparsentan.

FUNDING

Travere Therapeutics.

Effect of Multiple Doses of Sparsentan on the Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Dapagliflozin: An Open-Label Drug-Drug Interaction Study in Healthy Adults

Sparsentan is a single-molecule dual antagonist of the endothelin type A receptor and angiotensin II type 1 receptor under investigation for the treatment of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, has recently been indicated in chronic kidney disease. Sparsentan may be considered for concomitant use with dapagliflozin. The purpose of this open-label, 1-sequence crossover study was to determine whether drug-drug interactions between sparsentan and dapagliflozin affect dapagliflozin pharmacokinetics (PK). In addition, exposure to the inactive metabolite of dapagliflozin, dapagliflozin-3-O-glucuronide, was used to evaluate the effect of sparsentan on the primary metabolizing enzyme of dapagliflozin, uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase 1A9. The study included 22 healthy adults treated with 10 mg of dapagliflozin on day 1, and 800 mg/day of sparsentan on days 5-14, with a 10-mg dose of dapagliflozin coadministered on day 11. PK samples were taken for dapagliflozin, dapagliflozin-3-O-glucuronide, and sparsentan before and after treatment throughout the study. Steady-state concentrations of sparsentan following daily dosing did not affect the PK of single-dose dapagliflozin in healthy adults. Dapagliflozin-3-O-glucuronide PK suggests a minimal effect of sparsentan on metabolism of dapagliflozin by uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase 1A9. No deaths, serious adverse events, or unusual safety signals occurred. Results suggest dapagliflozin PK is not affected by sparsentan daily dosing.

Targeting tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells in the kidney is a potential therapeutic strategy to ameliorate podocyte injury and glomerulosclerosis

Although tissue-resident memory T (T_RM) cells, a recently identified non-circulating memory T cell population, play a crucial role in mediating local immune responses and protect against pathogens upon local reinfection, the composition, effector function, and specificity of T_RM cells in the kidney and their relevance for chronic kidney disease remain unknown. In this study, we found that renal tissue displayed high abundance of tissue-resident lymphocytes and the proportion of CD8⁺ T_RM cells was significantly increased in the kidney from patients and mice with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and lupus nephritis (LN). Mechanistically, IL-15 significantly promoted CD8⁺ T_RM cell formation and activation, thereby promoting podocyte injury and glomerulosclerosis. Interestingly, Sparsentan, the dual angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor and endothelin Type A receptor antagonist, can also reduce T_RM cell responses by intervening IL-15 signaling, exploring its new pharmacological functions. Mechanistically, Sparsentan inhibited Ang II or endothelin-1 (ET-1)-mediated IL-15 signaling, thereby further regulating renal CD8⁺ T_RM cell fates. Collectively, our studies provide direct evidence for the pivotal role of renal CD8⁺ T_RM cells in podocyte injury, and further strengthen that targeting T_RM cells represents a novel therapeutic strategy for patients with glomerular diseases.

Interventions for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in adults

BACKGROUND

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) can be separated into primary, genetic or secondary causes. Primary disease results in nephrotic syndrome while genetic and secondary forms may be associated with asymptomatic proteinuria or with nephrotic syndrome. Overall only about 20% of patients with FSGS experience a partial or complete remission of nephrotic syndrome with treatment. FSGS progresses to kidney failure in about half of the cases. This is an update of a review first published in 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of immunosuppressive and non-immunosuppressive treatment regimens in adults with FSGS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies to 21 June 2021 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of any intervention for FSGS in adults were included. Studies comparing different types, routes, frequencies, and duration of immunosuppressive agents and non-immunosuppressive agents were assessed.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model and results were expressed as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, or mean difference (MD) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen studies (560 participants) were included. No studies specifically evaluating corticosteroids compared with placebo or supportive therapy were identified. Studies evaluated participants with steroid-resistant FSGS. Five studies (240 participants) compared cyclosporin with or without prednisone with different comparators (no specific treatment, prednisone, methylprednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), dexamethasone). Three small studies compared monoclonal antibodies (adalimumab, fresolimumab) with other agents or placebo. Six single small studies compared rituximab with tacrolimus, cyclosporin plus valsartan with cyclosporin alone, MMF with prednisone, chlorambucil plus methylprednisolone and prednisone with no specific treatment, different regimens of dexamethasone and CCX140-B (an antagonist of the chemokine receptor CCR2) with placebo. The final study (109 participants) compared sparsentan, a dual inhibitor of endothelin Type A receptor and of the angiotensin II Type 1 receptor, with irbesartan. In the risk of bias assessment, seven and five studies were at low risk of bias for sequence generation and allocation concealment, respectively. Four studies were at low risk of performance bias and 14 studies were at low risk of detection bias. Thirteen, six and five studies were at low risk of attrition bias, reporting bias and other bias, respectively. Of five studies evaluating cyclosporin, four could be included in our meta-analyses (231 participants). Cyclosporin with or without prednisone compared with different comparators may increase the likelihood of complete remission (RR 2.31, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.73; I² = 1%; low certainty evidence) and of complete or partial remission (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.44; I² = 19%) but not of partial remission (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.39, I² = 22%). In Individual studies, cyclosporin with prednisone versus prednisone may increase the likelihood of partial (49 participants: RR 7.96, 95% CI 1.09 to 58.15) or complete or partial remission (49 participants: RR 8.85, 95% CI 1.22 to 63.92) but not of complete remission. The remaining individual comparisons may make little or no difference to the likelihood of complete remission, partial remission or complete or partial remission compared with no treatment, methylprednisolone, MMF, or dexamethasone. Individual study data and combined data showed that cyclosporin may make little or no difference to the outcomes of chronic kidney disease or kidney failure. It is uncertain whether cyclosporin compared with these comparators in individual or combined analyses makes any difference to the outcomes of hypertension or infection. MMF compared with prednisone may make little or no difference to the likelihood of complete remission (33 participants: RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.88; low certainty evidence), partial remission, complete or partial remission, glomerular filtration rate, or infection. It is uncertain whether other interventions make any difference to outcomes as the certainty of the evidence is very low. It is uncertain whether sparsentan reduces proteinuria to a greater extent than irbesartan.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No RCTs, which evaluated corticosteroids, were identified although the KDIGO guidelines recommend corticosteroids as the first treatment for adults with FSGS. The studies identified included participants with steroid-resistant FSGS. Treatment with cyclosporin for at least six months was more likely to achieve complete remission of proteinuria compared with other treatments but there was considerable imprecision due to few studies and small participant numbers. In future studies of existing or new interventions, the investigators must clearly define the populations included in the study to provide appropriate recommendations for patients with primary, genetic or secondary FSGS.

The Evidence for Sparsentan-Mediated Inhibition of INa and IK(erg): Possibly Unlinked to Its Antagonism of Angiotensin II or Endothelin Type a Receptor

Sparsentan is viewed as a dual antagonist of endothelin type A (ET_A) receptor and angiotensin II (AngII) receptor and it could be beneficial in patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Moreover, it could improve glomerular filtration rate and augment protective tissue remodeling in mouse models of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The ionic mechanisms through which it interacts with the magnitude and/or gating kinetics of ionic currents in excitable cells were not thoroughly investigated. Herein, we aimed to examine the effects of varying sparsentan concentrations on ionic currents residing in pituitary GH₃ somatolactotrophs. From whole-cell current recordings made in GH₃ cells, sparsentan (0.3–100 μM) differentially inhibited the peak and late components of voltage-gated Na⁺ current (I_Na). The IC₅₀ value of sparsentan required to exert a reduction in peak and late I_Na in GH₃ cells was 15.04 and 1.21 μM, respectively; meanwhile, the K_D value estimated from its shortening in the slow component of I_Na inactivation time constant was 2.09 μM. The sparsentan (10 μM) presence did not change the overall current–voltage relationship of I_Na; however, the steady-state inactivation curve of the current was shifted to more negative potential in its presence (10 μM), with no change in the gating charge of the curve. The window I_Na activated by a brief upsloping ramp was decreased during exposure to sparsentan (10 μM); moreover, recovery of peak I_Na became slowed in its presence. The Tefluthrin (Tef)-stimulated resurgent I_Na activated in response to abrupt depolarization followed by the descending ramp pulse was additionally attenuated by subsequent application of sparsentan. In continued presence of Tef (3 μM) or β-pompilidotoxin (3 μM), further application of sparsentan (3 μM) reversed their stimulation of I_Na. However, sparsentan-induced inhibition of I_Na failed to be overcome by subsequent application of either endothelin 1 (1 μM) or angiotensin II (1 μM); moreover, in continued presence of endothelin (1 μM) or angiotensin II (1 μM), further addition of sparsentan (3 μM) effectively decreased peak I_Na. Additionally, the application of sparsentan (3 μM) inhibited the peak and late components of erg-mediated K⁺ current in GH₃ cells, although it mildly decreased the amplitude of delayed-rectifier K⁺ current. Altogether, this study provides a distinct yet unidentified finding that sparsentan may perturb the amplitude or gating of varying ionic currents in excitable cells.

An Update on Targeted Treatment of IgA Nephropathy: An Autoimmune Perspective

Immunoglobulin (Ig) A nephropathy (IgAN) is the commonest form of primary glomerulonephritis worldwide and is, considered a significant cause of end-stage renal disease in young adults. The precise pathogenesis of IgAN is unclear. The clinical and pathological features vary significantly between individuals and races, which makes treating IgAN difficult. Currently, the therapeutic strategies in IgAN are still optimal blood pressure control and proteinuria remission to improve the renal function in most cases. Immunosuppressive drugs such as corticosteroids can be considered in patients with persistent proteinuria and a high risk of renal function decline; however, they include a high toxicity profile. Therefore, the safety and selectivity of medications are critical concerns in the treatment of IgAN. Various pharmacological therapeutic targets have emerged based on the evolving understanding of the autoimmune pathogenesis of IgAN, which involves the immune response, mucosal immunity, renal inflammation, complement activation, and autophagy; treatments based on these mechanisms have been explored in preclinical and clinical studies. This review summarizes the progress concerning targeted therapeutic strategies and the relevant autoimmune pathogenesis in IgAN.

Endothelin-1 axes in the framework of predictive, preventive and personalised (3P) medicine

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is involved in the regulation of a myriad of processes highly relevant for physical and mental well-being; female and male health; in the modulation of senses, pain, stress reactions and drug sensitivity as well as healing processes, amongst others. Shifted ET-1 homeostasis may influence and predict the development and progression of suboptimal health conditions, metabolic impairments with cascading complications, ageing and related pathologies, cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative pathologies, aggressive malignancies, modulating, therefore, individual outcomes of both non-communicable and infectious diseases such as COVID-19. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the involvement of ET-1 and related regulatory pathways in physiological and pathophysiological processes and estimates its capacity as a predictor of ageing and related pathologies,a sensor of lifestyle quality and progression of suboptimal health conditions to diseases for their targeted preventionand as a potent target for cost-effective treatments tailored to the person.

Current understandings in treating children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) remains a challenge for paediatric nephrologists. SRNS is viewed as a heterogeneous disease entity including immune-based and monogenic aetiologies. Because SRNS is rare, treatment strategies are individualized and vary among centres of expertise. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have been effectively used to induce remission in patients with immune-based SRNS; however, there is still no consensus on treating children who become either CNI-dependent or CNI-resistant. Rituximab is a steroid-sparing agent for patients with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, but its efficacy in SRNS is controversial. Recently, several novel monoclonal antibodies are emerging as treatment option, but their efficacy remains to be seen. Non-immune therapies, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, have been proven efficacious in children with SRNS and are recommended as adjuvant agents. This review summarizes and discusses our current understandings in treating children with idiopathic SRNS.

Treatment of nephrotic syndrome: going beyond immunosuppressive therapy

It is indisputable that immunosuppressive therapy and pathological diagnosis of renal biopsy have greatly improved the prognosis of childhood nephrotic syndrome. Unfortunately, there is no "one-size-fits-all" approach for precise patient stratification and treatment when facing the huge challenges posed by steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). But genomic medicine has brought a glimmer of light, and the cognition of SRNS has entered a new stage. Based on this, identification of single genetic variants of SRNS has recognized the key role of podocyte injury in its pathogenesis. Targeted treatment of podocyte injury is paramount, and immunosuppressant with podocyte-targeted therapy seems to be more suitable as the first choice for SRNS, that is, we need to pay attention to their additional non-immunosuppressive effects. In the same way, other effect factors of nephrotic syndrome and the related causes of immunosuppressive therapy resistance require us to select reasonable and targeted non-immunosuppressive therapies, instead of only blindly using steroids and immunosuppressants, which may be ineffective and bring significant side effects. This article provides a summary of the clinical value of identification of genetic variants in podocytes and non-immunosuppressive therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children.

Study Design of the Phase 3 Sparsentan Versus Irbesartan (DUPLEX) Study in Patients With Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

Introduction

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), a histologic lesion in the kidney caused by varied pathophysiological processes, leads to end-stage kidney disease in a large proportion of patients. Sparsentan is a first-in-class orally active compound combining endothelin type A (ET_A) receptor blockade with angiotensin II type 1 (AT₁) receptor antagonism in a single molecule. A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Parallel, Active-Control Study of the Effects of Sparsentan, a Dual Endothelin Receptor and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker, on Renal Outcomes in Patients With Primary FSGS (DUPLEX) study evaluates the long-term antiproteinuric efficacy, nephroprotective potential, and safety profile of sparsentan compared with an AT₁ receptor blocker alone in patients with FSGS.

Methods

DUPLEX is a multicenter, international, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study of sparsentan in patients with FSGS. Approximately 300 patients aged 8 to 75 years, inclusive (United States), and 18 to 75 years, inclusive (outside United States) will be randomized 1:1 to daily treatment with sparsentan or irbesartan. After renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor washout, treatment will be administered for 108 weeks, with the final assessment at week 112, four weeks after withdrawal of study drug.

Results

The primary endpoint will be the slope of estimated glomerular filtration rate from week 6 to week 108. A novel surrogate efficacy endpoint, the proportion of patients achieving urinary protein-to-creatinine (UP/C) ratio of ≤1.5 g/g and >40% reduction from baseline in UP/C (FSGS partial remission endpoint: FPRE), will be evaluated at a planned interim analysis at week 36. Safety and tolerability of sparsentan will also be assessed.

Conclusion

The phase 3 DUPLEX study will characterize the long-term antiproteinuric efficacy and nephroprotective potential of dual ET_A and AT₁ receptor blockade with sparsentan in patients with FSGS.

Interventions for idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

The majority of children who present with their first episode of nephrotic syndrome achieve remission with corticosteroid therapy. Children who fail to respond to corticosteroids in the first episode of nephrotic syndrome (initial resistance) or develop resistance after one or more responses to corticosteroids (delayed resistance) may be treated with immunosuppressive agents including calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) (cyclosporin or tacrolimus) and with non-immunosuppressive agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). However, response to these agents is limited so newer agents are being assessed for efficacy. This is an update of a review first published in 2004 and updated in 2006, 2010 and 2016.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of different interventions used in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, who do not achieve remission following four weeks or more of daily corticosteroid therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies to 17 September 2019 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs were included if they compared different immunosuppressive agents or non-immunosuppressive agents with placebo, prednisone or other agent given orally or parenterally in children aged three months to 18 years with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). Studies, which enrolled children and adults but in which paediatric data could not be separated from adult data, were also included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently searched the literature, determined study eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. For dichotomous outcomes, results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). For continuous outcomes, results were expressed as mean difference (MD) and 95% CI. Data were pooled using the random effects model. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-five studies (1063 participants) were included. Fourteen studies were at low risk of bias for sequence generation and allocation concealment. Five and 19 studies were at low risk of performance and detection bias. Fourteen, 14 and 13 studies were at low risk of attrition bias, reporting bias and other bias respectively. Cyclosporin compared with placebo or no treatment may increase the number of participants who achieve complete remission (4 studies, 74 participants: RR 3.50, 95% CI 1.09 to 11.20) or complete or partial remission (4 studies, 74 children: RR 3.15, 95% CI 1.04 to 9.57) by 6 months (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether cyclosporin increases the likelihood of worsening hypertension or reduces the likelihood of end-stage kidney disease (very low certainty evidence). CNI compared with IV cyclophosphamide (CPA) may increase the number of participants with complete or partial remission at 3 to 6 months (2 studies, 156 children: RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.13) (low certainty evidence) and probably reduces the number with treatment failure (non response, serious infection, persistently elevated creatinine (1 study, 124 participants: RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.58) (moderate certainty evidence) with little or no increase in serious infections (1 study, 131 participants: RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.56) (moderate certainty evidence). Tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin may make little or no difference to the number who achieve complete or partial remission (2 studies, 58 participants: RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.25) (low certainty evidence) or in the number with worsening hypertension (2 studies, 58 participants: RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.15) (low certainty evidence). Cyclosporin compared with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and dexamethasone probably makes little or no difference to the number who achieve complete or partial remission (1 study, 138 participants: RR 2.14, 95% CI 0.87 to 5.24) (moderate certainty evidence) and makes little or no difference to the number dying (1 study, 138 participants: RR 2.14, 95% CI 0.87 to 5.24) or with 50% reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (1 study, 138 participants: RR 2.29, 95% CI 0.46 to 11.41) (low certainty evidence). Among children, who have achieved complete remission, tacrolimus compared with MMF may increase the number of children who maintain complete or partial response for 12 months (1 study, 60 children: RR 2.01, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.07) (low certainty evidence). Oral CPA with prednisone compared with prednisone alone may make little or no difference to the number who achieve complete remission (2 studies, 84 children: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.87) (low certainty evidence). IV CPA compared with oral CPA (2 studies, 61 children: RR 1.58, 95% CI 0.65 to 3.85) and IV compared with oral CPA plus IV dexamethasone (1 study, 49 children: RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.96) may make little or no difference to the number who achieve complete remission (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether rituximab and cyclosporin compared with cyclosporin increases the likelihood of remission because the certainty of the evidence is very low. It is uncertain whether adalimumab or galactose compared with conservative therapy increases the likelihood of remission because the certainty of the evidence is very low. Two studies reported that ACEi may reduce proteinuria in children with SRNS. One study reported that the dual angiotensin II and endothelin Type A receptor antagonist, sparsentan, may reduce proteinuria more effectively than the angiotensin receptor blocker, irbesartan.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

To date RCTs have demonstrated that CNIs may increase the likelihood of complete or partial remission compared with placebo/no treatment or CPA. For other regimens assessed, it remains uncertain whether the interventions alter outcomes because the certainty of the evidence is low. Further adequately powered, well designed RCTs are needed to evaluate other regimens for children with idiopathic SRNS. Since SRNS represents a spectrum of diseases, future studies should enrol children from better defined groups of patients with SRNS.

Design and optimization strategies for the development of new drugs that treat chronic kidney disease

Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by increased risks of progression to end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis and cardiovascular mortality, predicted to be among the five top causes of death by 2040. Only the design and optimization of novel strategies to develop new drugs to treat CKD will contain this trend. Current therapy for CKD includes nonspecific therapy targeting proteinuria and/or hypertension and cause-specific therapies for diabetic kidney disease, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, glomerulonephritides, Fabry nephropathy, hemolytic uremic syndrome and others.Areas covered: Herein, the authors review the literature on new drugs under development for CKD as well as novel design and development strategies.Expert opinion: New therapies for CKD have become a healthcare priority. Emerging therapies undergoing clinical trials are testing expanded renin-angiotensin system blockade with double angiotensin receptor/endothelin receptor blockers, SGLT2 inhibition, and targeting inflammation, the immune response, fibrosis and the Nrf2 transcription factor. Emerging therapeutic targets include cell senescence, complement activation, Klotho expression preservation and microbiota. Novel approaches include novel model systems that can be personalized (e.g. organoids), unbiased systems biology-based identification of new therapeutic targets, drug databases that speed up drug identification and repurposing, nanomedicines that improve drug delivery and RNA targeting to expand the number of targetable proteins.

Renoprotection Provided by Additional Diuretic Treatment in Partially Nephrectomized Ren-2 Transgenic Rats Subjected to the Combined RAS and ETA Blockade

Objective

Our previous study in heterozygous Ren-2 transgenic rats (TGR) demonstrated that long-term treatment with endothelin receptor A (ET_A) blocker atrasentan added to the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade had renoprotective effects in a model of chronic kidney disease (CKD) induced by partial nephrectomy. Since ET_A blockade is known to cause edema, we were interested whether diuretic treatment added to this therapy would be beneficial.

Design and Methods

Partial nephrectomy (NX) was performed at the age of 3 months in TGR rats which were subjected to: (i) RAS blockade alone (angiotensin receptor blocker losartan and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor trandolapril), (ii) combined RAS (losartan and trandolapril) and ET_A receptor blockade (atrasentan), or (iii) diuretic (hydrochlorothiazide) added to the combined RAS + ET_A blockade for 50 weeks following NX.

Results

At the end of the study systolic blood pressure and cardiac hypertrophy were similarly decreased in all treated groups. Survival was significantly improved by ET_A receptor blockade added to RAS blockade with no further effects of diuretic treatment. However, additional diuretic treatment combined with RAS + ET_A blockade decreased body weight and had beneficial renoprotective effects - reductions of both kidney weight and kidney damage markers. Proteinuria gradually increased in rats treated with RAS blockade alone, while it was substantially lowered by additional ET_A blockade. In rats treated with additional diuretic, proteinuria was progressively reduced throughout the experiment.

Conclusion

A diuretic added to the combined RAS and ET_A blockade has late renoprotective effects in CKD induced by partial nephrectomy in Ren-2 transgenic rats. The diuretic improved: renal function (evaluated as proteinuria and creatinine clearance), renal morphology (kidney mass, glomerular volume), and histological markers of kidney damage (glomerulosclerosis index, tubulointerstitial injury).

Management of Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an increasingly prevalent condition globally and is strongly associated with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD). Hypertension is both a cause and effect of CKD and affects the vast majority of CKD patients. Control of hypertension is important in those with CKD as it leads to slowing of disease progression as well as reduced CVD risk. Existing guidelines do not offer a consensus on optimal blood pressure (BP) targets. Therefore, an understanding of the evidence used to create these guidelines is vital when considering how best to manage individual patients. Non-pharmacological interventions are useful in reducing BP in CKD but are rarely sufficient to control BP adequately. Patients with CKD and hypertension will often require a combination of antihypertensive medications to achieve target BP. Certain pharmacological therapies provide additional BP-independent renoprotective and/or cardioprotective action and this must be considered when instituting therapy. Managing hypertension in the context of haemodialysis and following kidney transplantation presents further challenges. Novel therapies may enhance treatment in the near future. Importantly, a personalised and evidence-based management plan remains key to achieving BP targets, reducing CVD risk and slowing progression of CKD.

Novel Therapeutic Approaches Targeting the Renin-Angiotensin System and Associated Peptides in Hypertension and Heart Failure

Despite the success of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) blockers, current therapies for hypertension and related cardiovascular diseases are still inadequate. Identification of additional components of the RAS and associated vasoactive pathways, as well as new structural and functional insights into established targets, have led to novel therapeutic approaches with the potential to provide improved cardiovascular protection and better blood pressure control and/or reduced adverse side effects. The simultaneous modulation of several neurohumoral mediators in key interconnected blood pressure-regulating pathways has been an attractive approach to improve treatment efficacy, and several novel approaches involve combination therapy or dual-acting agents. In addition, increased understanding of the complexity of the RAS has led to novel approaches aimed at upregulating the ACE2/angiotensin-(1-7)/Mas axis to counter-regulate the harmful effects of the ACE/angiotensin II/angiotensin III/AT1R axis. These advances have opened new avenues for the development of novel drugs targeting the RAS to better treat hypertension and heart failure. Here we focus on new therapies in preclinical and early clinical stages of development, including novel small molecule inhibitors and receptor agonists/antagonists, less conventional strategies such as gene therapy to suppress angiotensinogen at the RNA level, recombinant ACE2 protein, and novel bispecific designer peptides.

Podocytopathy in the mesangial proliferative immunoglobulin A nephropathy: new insights into the mechanisms of damage and progression

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) was defined as a mesangiopathic disease, since the primary site of deposition of IgA immune material is the mesangium, and proliferation of mesangial cells and matrix excess deposition are the first histopathologic lesions. However, the relentless silent progression of IgAN is mostly due to the development of persistent proteinuria, and recent studies indicate that a major role is played by previous damage of function and anatomy of podocytes. In IgAN, the podocytopathic changes are the consequence of initial alterations in the mesangial area with accumulation of IgA containing immune material. Podocytes are therefore affected by interactions of messages originally driven from the mesangium. After continuous insult, podocytes detach from the glomerular basement membrane. This podocytopathy favours not only the development of glomerular focal and segmental sclerosis, but also the progressive renal function loss. It is still debated whether these lesions can be prevented or cured by corticosteroid/immunosuppressive treatment. We aimed to review recent data on the mechanisms implicated in the podocytopathy present in IgAN, showing new molecular risk factors for progression of this disease. Moreover, these observations may indicate that the target for new drugs is not only focused on decreasing the activity of mesangial cells and inflammatory reactions in IgAN, but also on improving podocyte function and survival.

DUET: A Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Sparsentan in Patients with FSGS

BACKGROUND

We evaluated and compared the effects of sparsentan, a dual endothelin type A (ETA) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, with those of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with primary FSGS.

METHODS

In this phase 2, randomized, double-blind, active-control Efficacy and Safety of Sparsentan (RE-021), a Dual Endothelin Receptor and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker, in Patients with Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS): A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-Control, Dose-Escalation Study (DUET), patients aged 8-75 years with biopsy-proven FSGS, eGFR>30 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UP/C) ≥1.0 g/g received sparsentan (200, 400, or 800 mg/d) or irbesartan (300 mg/d) for 8 weeks, followed by open-label sparsentan only. End points at week 8 were reduction from baseline in UP/C (primary) and proportion of patients achieving FSGS partial remission end point (FPRE) (UP/C: ≤1.5 g/g and >40% reduction [secondary]).

RESULTS

Of 109 patients randomized, 96 received study drugs and had baseline and week 8 UP/C measurements. Sparsentan-treated patients had greater reductions in UP/C than irbesartan-treated patients did when all doses (45% versus 19%; P=0.006) or the 400 and 800 mg doses (47% versus 19%; P=0.01) were pooled for analysis. The FSGS partial remission end point was achieved in 28% of sparsentan-treated and 9% of irbesartan-treated patients (P=0.04). After 8 weeks of treatment, BP was reduced with sparsentan but not irbesartan, and eGFR was stable with both treatments. Overall, the incidence of adverse events was similar between groups. Hypotension and edema were more common among sparsentan-treated patients but did not result in study withdrawals.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with FSGS achieved significantly greater reductions in proteinuria after 8 weeks of sparsentan versus irbesartan. Sparsentan was safe and well tolerated.

Emerging therapeutic strategies for minimal change disease and focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Minimal change disease (MCD) and Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) are two of the major causes of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in children and adults. According to KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines, the treatment of adult primary MCD and FSGS should be based on immunosuppressants and antiproteinuric drugs. Recently, Rituximab, a humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb) has emerged as a potential treatment for steroid or calcineurin inhibitor-dependent patients; it has however demonstrated lower efficacy in those with nephrotic syndrome that is resistant to the above indicated drugs.

AREAS COVERED

Analysis of ongoing and already completed clinical trials, retrieved from clinicaltrials.gov, clinicaltrialsregister.eu and PubMed involving new therapies for nephrotic syndrome secondary to MCD and FSGS.

EXPERT OPINION

The most promising drugs under investigation for MCD and FSGS are mAbs. We are hopeful that new therapeutic options to treat multi-drug resistant MCD and FSGS will emerge from currently ongoing studies. What appears certain is the difficulty in enrolling patients affected by orphan renal diseases and the selection of valid endpoints in clinical trials, such as kidney failure.

Management of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children and adolescents

More than 85% of children and adolescents (majority between 1-12 years old) with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome show complete remission of proteinuria following daily treatment with corticosteroids. Patients who do not show remission after 4 weeks' treatment with daily prednisolone are considered to have steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). Renal histology in most patients shows presence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, minimal change disease, and (rarely) mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis. A third of patients with SRNS show mutations in one of the key podocyte genes. The remaining cases of SRNS are probably caused by an undefined circulating factor. Treatment with calcineurin inhibitors (ciclosporin and tacrolimus) is the standard of care for patients with non-genetic SRNS, and approximately 70% of patients achieve a complete or partial remission and show satisfactory long-term outcome. Additional treatment with drugs that inhibit the renin-angiotensin axis is recommended for hypertension and for reducing remaining proteinuria. Patients with SRNS who do not respond to treatment with calcineurin inhibitors or other immunosuppressive drugs can show declining kidney function and are at risk for end-stage renal failure. Approximately a third of those who undergo renal transplantation show recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in the allograft and often respond to combined treatment with plasma exchange, rituximab, and intensified immunosuppression.

Renoprotective effects of ET(A) receptor antagonists therapy in experimental non-diabetic chronic kidney disease: Is there still hope for the future?

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a life-threatening disease arising as a frequent complication of diabetes, obesity and hypertension. Since it is typically undetected for long periods, it often progresses to end-stage renal disease. CKD is characterized by the development of progressive glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy along with a decreased glomerular filtration rate. This is associated with podocyte injury and a progressive rise in proteinuria. As endothelin-1 (ET-1) through the activation of endothelin receptor type A (ET(A)) promotes renal cell injury, inflammation, and fibrosis which finally lead to proteinuria, it is not surprising that ET(A) receptors antagonists have been proven to have beneficial renoprotective effects in both experimental and clinical studies in diabetic and non-diabetic CKD. Unfortunately, fluid retention encountered in large clinical trials in diabetic CKD led to the termination of these studies. Therefore, several advances, including the synthesis of new antagonists with enhanced pharmacological activity, the use of lower doses of ET antagonists, the addition of diuretics, plus simply searching for distinct pathological states to be treated, are promising targets for future experimental studies. In support of these approaches, our group demonstrated in adult subtotally nephrectomized Ren-2 transgenic rats that the addition of a diuretic on top of renin-angiotensin and ET(A) blockade led to a further decrease of proteinuria. This effect was independent of blood pressure which was normalized in all treated groups. Recent data in non-diabetic CKD, therefore, indicate a new potential for ET(A) antagonists, at least under certain pathological conditions.

New drugs and emerging therapeutic targets in the endothelin signaling pathway and prospects for personalized precision medicine

During the last thirty years since the discovery of endothelin-1, the therapeutic strategy that has evolved in the clinic, mainly in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, is to block the action of the peptide either at the ET(A) subtype or both receptors using orally active small molecule antagonists. Recently, there has been a rapid expansion in research targeting ET receptors using chemical entities other than small molecules, particularly monoclonal antibody antagonists and selective peptide agonists and antagonists. While usually sacrificing oral bio-availability, these compounds have other therapeutic advantages with the potential to considerably expand drug targets in the endothelin pathway and extend treatment to other pathophysiological conditions. Where the small molecule approach has been retained, a novel strategy to combine two vasoconstrictor targets, the angiotensin AT(1) receptor as well as the ET(A) receptor in the dual antagonist sparsentan has been developed. A second emerging strategy is to combine drugs that have two different targets, the ET(A) antagonist ambrisentan with the phosphodiesterase inhibitor tadalafil, to improve the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. The solving of the crystal structure of the ET(B) receptor has the potential to identify allosteric binding sites for novel ligands. A further key advance is the experimental validation of a single nucleotide polymorphism that has genome wide significance in five vascular diseases and that significantly increases the amount of big endothelin-1 precursor in the plasma. This observation provides a rationale for testing this single nucleotide polymorphism to stratify patients for allocation to treatment with endothelin agents and highlights the potential to use personalized precision medicine in the endothelin field.

Diagnosis and primary care management of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in children

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a pattern of kidney damage that can occur in individuals at any age, including children. Pediatric patients with FSGS require medication monitoring, growth, and psychological health. This article discusses the NP's role in the clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, and treatment of FSGS in pediatric patients.

Determining the optimal dose of atrasentan by evaluating the exposure-response relationships of albuminuria and bodyweight

This study aimed to identify the optimal dose of the endothelin-1 receptor antagonist atrasentan with maximal albuminuria reduction and minimal signs of sodium retention, as manifested by increase in bodyweight. Data from the RADAR-JAPAN studies were used, evaluating the effect of 0.75 or 1.25 mg/d of atrasentan in 161 patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a population pharmacokinetic approach. Subsequently, changes in the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and bodyweight from baseline after 2 weeks' exposure were modelled as a function of the pharmacokinetic parameters. The 0.75 and 1.25 mg doses showed a mean UACR reduction of 34.0% and 40.1%, whereas mean bodyweight increased by 0.9 and 1.1 kg, respectively. A large variation between individuals was observed in the UACR and bodyweight responses. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters correlated significantly with both individual UACR and bodyweight responses (P < .01). The individual response curves for UACR and bodyweight crossed at approximately the mean trough concentration of 0.75 mg atrasentan, indicating that 0.75 mg/d of atrasentan is the optimal dose for kidney protection with maximal efficacy (albuminuria reduction) and safety (minimal sodium retention).

Protecting Podocytes: A Key Target for Therapy of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

BACKGROUND

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a histologic pattern of injury demonstrated by renal biopsy that can arise from a diverse range of causes and mechanisms. It has an estimated incidence of 7 per 1 million and is the most common primary glomerular disorder leading to end-stage renal disease in the United States. This review focuses on damage to the podocyte and the consequences of this injury in patients with FSGS, the genetics of FSGS, and approaches to treatment with a focus on the effects on podocytes.

SUMMARY

The podocyte is central to the glomerular filtration barrier and is particularly vulnerable because of its highly differentiated post-mitotic phenotype. The progressive structural changes involved in the pathology of FSGS include podocyte foot process effacement, death of podocytes and exposure of the glomerular basement membrane, filtration of nonspecific plasma proteins, expansion of capillaries, misdirected filtration at points of synechiae, and mesangial matrix proliferation. Although damage to and death of podocytes can result from single-gene disorders, evidence also suggests a role for soluble factors, such as soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor, cardiotrophin-like cytokine-1, and anti-CD40 antibodies, that promote FSGS recurrence post transplant. Several classes of medications, including corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, endothelin receptor antagonists, adrenocorticotropic hormone, and rituximab, have been shown to be effective for the treatment of FSGS and have been demonstrated to have significant protective effects on podocytes. Key Messages: Greater understanding of podocyte biology is essential to the identification of new treatment targets and medications for the management of patients with FSGS.

Update on Endothelin Receptor Antagonists in Hypertension

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the most recent data on the development of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) for the treatment of hypertension and the management of diabetic nephropathy RECENT FINDINGS: Recent reviews and meta-analyses of experimental and clinical data obtained with ERAs confirmed that endothelin receptor blockade is associated with significant decreases in blood pressure in essential hypertension but also in resistant hypertension. In addition, in patients with diabetic nephropathy, ERAs induce significant 30-40% decreases in albuminuria when administered on top of blockers of the renin-angiotensin system. Yet, the benefits of ERAs have often been limited by their tolerability profile, essentially fluid retention and the development of edema and liver toxicity. Hence, several programs have been interrupted. Today, only one ERA, aprocitentan, is still under development for the treatment of resistant hypertension. Regarding the place of ERAs in the management of diabetic nephropathy, the results of the SONAR trial with atrasentan are eagerly awaited but the recent interruption of this trial because of insufficient events is worrisome, as one might not obtain all the expected information for this major trial. Blockade of endothelin receptor have a high potential in the treatment of hypertension and the prevention of the progression of renal diseases such as diabetic nephropathy. Today, the number of clinical programs investigating the potential benefits of ERAs is limited and more data must be obtained to define the real place of ERAs in these indications.

Treatment of Genetic Forms of Nephrotic Syndrome

Idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is most frequently characterized by focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) but also other histological lesions, such as diffuse mesangial sclerosis. In the past two decades, a multitude of genetic causes of SRNS have been discovered raising the question of effective treatment in this cohort. Although no controlled studies are available, this review will discuss treatment options including pharmacologic interventions aiming at the attenuation of proteinuria in genetic causes of SRNS, such as inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and indomethacin. Also, the potential impact of other interventions to improve podocyte stability will be addressed. In this respect, the treatment with cyclosporine A (CsA) is of interest, since a podocyte stabilizing effect has been demonstrated in various experimental models. Although clinical response to CsA in children with genetic forms of SRNS is inferior to sporadic SRNS, some recent studies show that partial and even complete response can be achieved even in individual patients inherited forms of nephrotic syndrome. Ideally, improved pharmacologic and molecular approaches to induce partial or even complete remission will be available in the future, thus slowing or even preventing the progression toward end-stage renal disease.