Comorbidités chez 207 usagers de cannabis en consultation jeunes consommateurs

Motivational interviewing-based interventions with patients with comorbid anxiety and substance use disorders

Individuals with substance misuse and substance use disorder (SUD) experience especially high rates of elevated anxiety, including anxiety disorders, and the co-occurrence of these conditions is related to worse treatment outcomes. Given that these patients may have little motivation to change their substance misuse if they use substances to cope with their chronically elevated anxiety, interventions that include components that target motivation may be especially useful. Thus, this paper reviews the recent extant literature on treatments developed specifically for these high-risk patients that include motivational interviewing (MI) techniques to increase motivation for behavioral change. Results indicate that two modalities have been tested - in-person therapies and online interventions. The majority use MI techniques to change substance use and some to change anxiety-related behaviors. The majority also incorporate cognitive-behavioral skills to manage substance use and anxiety. Data indicate that MI techniques can be administered in-person and online to decrease substance misuse and anxiety among patients with elevated anxiety and substance misuse.

Greater vulnerability to cannabis dependence among heavy cannabis user French women

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Between 1990 and the mid-2010s, France registered a sharp rise in the spread and consumption of cannabis. At the same time, there has been an increase in the concentration of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol contained in cannabis. The aims of our study are to measure addictive and psychiatric comorbidities in cannabis users in France, and to compare characteristics between women and men.

METHODS

Three hundred and forty-two heavy cannabis users seen in a cannabis clinic between 2004 and 2014 were assessed during a 2-h clinical interview (DSM-IV, MINI).

RESULTS

83.2% of users are currently cannabis dependent, 10.6% alcohol dependent, and 2.1% cocaine/crack dependent. 37.8% have a current mood disorder, 47.6% have a current anxiety disorder, and 8.8% are psychotic. Women suffer significantly more often than men from major depressive episodes, dysthymia, agoraphobia, social phobia, generalized anxiety disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), both current and lifetime. Logistic regression shows that women have a significantly higher risk than men of suffering from PTSD over their lifetime (odds ratio [OR] = 5.48; p < 10-3). The vast majority of women suffering from PTSD report having been sexually assaulted in the course of their lives. In addition, women are at greater risk of cannabis dependence (OR = 3.87; p < .05) for lower cannabis consumption (grams smoked per week) (OR = 0.96; p < .05).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

French women heavy cannabis users are particularly at risk of PTSD and are more likely than men to be dependent despite consuming fewer.

SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE

Further studies are needed to clinically quantify cannabis consumption and distinguish its impact on women and men.

Is alexithymia related to cannabis use disorder? Results from a case-control study in outpatient adolescent cannabis abusers

OBJECTIVE

In recent decades, alexithymia has been considered a risk factor for multiple somatic and psychiatric conditions. Yet, whereas alexithymia has been extensively studied in adults with a substance misuse, only one study has reported data on cannabis abusers from the general population. Hence, our main objective was to explore alexithymia in a clinical sample of treatment-seeking young outpatients with a DSM-IV cannabis dependence or abuse diagnosis compared to controls.

METHODS

120 young patients (95 males - mean age 17.9years (SD=2.8; 14 to 25)) with a cannabis dependence or abuse (DSM-IV-TR criteria evaluated with the MINI), seeking treatment in an addiction unit, and 110 healthy control subjects (77 males - mean age 18.2years (SD=3.4; 14 to 25)) participated in the study. They completed a battery of self-reports measuring alexithymia (TAS-20; BVAQ-B), depression (BDI-13) and state and trait anxiety (STAI).

RESULTS

35.3% of cannabis users were alexithymic, and logistic regression analysis showed that the alexithymic components of difficulties identifying and describing feelings combined with trait anxiety predicted group membership.

CONCLUSION

This first study on young cannabis abusers and dependent subjects further emphasizes the importance of considering the affective style, and particularly the anxious temperament and alexithymia features, as factors associated with substance misuse during late adolescence.

[Which psychiatric comorbidities in cannabis dependence during adolescence? Comparison of outpatients and controls]

BACKGROUND

The use of illicit substances, in particular cannabis, among French adolescents and young adults has become an important public health concern. A better understanding of the mechanisms involved in pathological substance use is nowadays critical. Psychiatric comorbidities have been previously reported in adult substance abusers but are less documented in adolescents, especially regarding cannabis dependence.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated mental health problems in adolescents and young adults, seeking treatment for their problematic cannabis use, comparatively to healthy controls, taking into account the participant's gender and age. Moreover, we explored the relationships between psychiatric diagnosis and substance use modalities.

METHODS

In total, 100 young patients (80 males - mean age 18.2 (SD=2.9; [14 to 25] years old)) with a cannabis dependence (DSM-IV-TR criteria) seeking treatment in an addiction unit, and 82 healthy control subjects (50 males - mean age 18.3 (SD=3.4; [14 to 25] years old)) with no substance misuse diagnostic other than for alcohol, participated in the study. The MINI was administered to evaluate cannabis dependence, and DSM-IV axis I comorbid diagnosis, and a semi-structured interview was used to determine psychoactive substance use.

RESULTS

Statistical analyses revealed that 79 % of the patients reported at least one other non-drug or alcohol comorbid diagnosis, versus 30.5 % in the control group (χ²=16.83; P<0.001). Logistic regression indicated that participants with a psychiatric diagnosis had an 8.6 times higher risk (P<0.001; OR 95 % CI=[4.38-16.81]) of being patients. Significant inter-group differences and OR were noted for several diagnoses: dysthymia over the previous 2years (χ²=14.06; P<0.001; OR=10.63; OR 95 % CI=[2.41-46.87]), life-time panic attack disorder (χ²=4.15; P<0.042; OR=3.59; OR 95 % CI=[0.98-13.19]), alcohol abuse (χ²=47.72; P<0.001; OR=66.27; OR 95 % CI=[8.87-495.11]) and dependence (V=0.230; P=0.001) and generalized anxiety disorder (χ²=7.46; P=0.006-OR=3.57; OR 95 % CI=[1.37-9.30]). On the whole, the females (n=20) of our clinical sample presented significantly more comorbid diagnoses than the males (n=80) (95 % versus 75 %; χ²=6.25, P=0.011). These significant gender differences were found for life-time eating disorder (V=0.352; P=0.007) and generalized anxiety disorder diagnoses (V=0.278; P=0.013). Moreover, young adult patients (19-25years old; n=35) presented, on the whole, significantly more comorbid diagnoses than adolescent patients (14-18years old; n=65) (70.8 % versus 94.3 %; χ²=7.58, P=0.006). These age inter-group differences were found for several diagnoses: alcohol dependence (6.2 % versus 20 %; V=0.211, P=0.047), dysthymia over the past 2years (13.8 % versus 34.3 %; χ²=5.73, P=0.017) and generalized anxiety disorder (12.3 % versus 40 %; χ²=10.17, P=0.001). Various associations were observed between psychiatric comorbid diagnosis and substance use indicators.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that cannabis dependence in adolescents and young adults is related to great psychological distress and puts emphasis on the importance of substance use prevention as early as middle school. Moreover, the psychiatric features of adolescents and young adults need to be taken into consideration for treatment planning.

Cannabis and Psychosis: a Critical Overview of the Relationship

Interest in the relationship between cannabis use and psychosis has increased dramatically in recent years, in part because of concerns related to the growing availability of cannabis and potential risks to health and human functioning. There now exists a plethora of scientific articles addressing this issue, but few provide a clear verdict about the causal nature of the cannabis-psychosis association. Here, we review recent research reports on cannabis and psychosis, giving particular attention to how each report provides evidence relating to two hypotheses: (1) cannabis as a contributing cause and (2) shared vulnerability. Two primary kinds of data are brought to bear on this issue: studies done with schizophrenic patients and studies of first-episode psychosis. Evidence reviewed here suggests that cannabis does not in itself cause a psychosis disorder. Rather, the evidence leads us to conclude that both early use and heavy use of cannabis are more likely in individuals with a vulnerability to psychosis. The role of early and heavy cannabis use as a prodromal sign merits further examination, along with a variety of other problem behaviors (e.g., early or heavy use of cigarettes or alcohol and poor school performance). Future research studies that focus exclusively on the cannabis-psychosis association will therefore be of little value in our quest to better understand psychosis and how and why it occurs.

CT genotype of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism is protector factor of major depressive disorder in the Tunisian population: a case control study

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric disorder with considerable mortality. Death from unnatural causes, largely suicidal or quasi-suicidal, has a particularly high risk for the functional disorders, especially depression and schizophrenia. One of the prospective risk factors for this disease is hyperhomocysteinemia and folate deficiency. The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene encodes for a 5-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase involved in folate metabolism and neurotransmitter synthesis. The aim of this research is to study the association between the C677T polymorphism of MTHFR gene and depression in Tunisian population, to explore their relationship with clinical and therapeutic characteristics of this disease. And it may lead to discover a novel marker to identify a patient with a higher risk of development of depressive disorder to be. This marker can be used for better therapeutic management and prevent disease installation.

METHODS

Our study included 208 depressive patients, 187 controls aged between 44.1 ± 13.5 and 38.9 ± 13.2 years, respectively. MTHFR gene polymorphisms were determined by PCR-RFLP (polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism).

RESULTS

No significant difference was detected in the distribution of the genotype frequencies of MTHFR C677T polymorphisms (χ (2) = 5.443, df = 2, p = 0.066) between patients and controls. But when we study the risk of these genotypes, CT genotype is significantly more frequent in controls compared to patients, it may be a protection from depression (OR = 0.655, CI 95 % = 0.432-0.995, p = 0.047, OR* = 0.638, CI 95 %* = 0.415-0.983, p* = 0.04, before and after adjustment). Women, TT Genotype can increase four times the risk to be depressive. Addictive behavior seems to be associated with CT genotype and there was no significant association between clinical and therapeutic characteristics and this polymorphism.

CONCLUSION

This paper is the first study to prove that CT genotype of MTHFR C677T polymorphism may protect from depression and TT genotype seems to be associated with women's depression. Further studies are required with other polymorphisms and biochemical factors that must be investigated to clarify the implication of MTHFR C677T polymorphism in the pathophysiology of depression.

Anxiety and substance use disorders: co-occurrence and clinical issues

The co-occurrence of substance use disorders (SUDs) and anxiety disorders has been now well established. This association is frequent and can be explained by three models: the shared vulnerability factors model, the self-medication model, and the substance-induced model. General population epidemiological studies provide strong evidence of the frequency of the association for the most used substances: tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, and to a lesser extent sedatives, opiates, and cocaine. For substances that are less commonly used in the general population, the frequency of the co-occurrence can more precisely be studied in clinical samples. We provide the most recent literature results on the association of SUDs and anxiety, and evidence for one explicative model or the other when available. For substances with sedative properties (alcohol, benzodiazepines, cannabis, opioids), both evidence for a self-medication and for a toxic effect exist. For substances with psychostimulant properties (tobacco, cocaine, and amphetamines), the literature favors the toxic hypothesis to explain the association with anxiety disorders. We give practical steps for the recognition of these dual diagnoses and present therapeutic issues, although the strategies are rarely evidence based.