1
|
Almeria M, Cejudo JC, Deus J, Krupinski J. Neurocognitive and Neuropsychiatric Sequelae in Long COVID-19 Infection. Brain Sci 2024; 14:604. [PMID: 38928604 PMCID: PMC11202095 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14060604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Revised: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective: To characterize the cognitive profile of long COVID-19 subjects and its possible association with clinical symptoms, emotional disturbance, biomarkers, and disease severity. Methods: We performed a single-center cross-sectional cohort study. Subjects between 20 and 60 years old with confirmed COVID-19 infection were included. The assessment was performed 6 months following hospital or ambulatory discharge. Excluded were those with prior neurocognitive impairment and severe neurological/neuropsychiatric disorders. Demographic and laboratory data were extracted from medical records. Results: Altogether, 108 participants were included, 64 were male (59.25%), and the mean age was 49.10 years. The patients were classified into four groups: non-hospitalized (NH, n = 10), hospitalized without Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or oxygen therapy (HOSPI, n = 21), hospitalized without ICU but with oxygen therapy (OXY, n = 56), and ICU (ICU, n = 21) patients. In total, 38 (35.18%) reported Subjective Cognitive Complaints (SCC). No differences were found considering illness severity between groups. Females had more persistent clinical symptoms and SCC than males. Persistent dyspnea and headache were associated with higher scores in anxiety and depression. Persistent fatigue, anxiety, and depression were associated with worse overall cognition. Conclusions: No cognitive impairment was found regarding the severity of post-COVID-19 infection. SCC was not associated with a worse cognitive performance, but with higher anxiety and depression. Persistent clinical symptoms were frequent independent of illness severity. Fatigue, anxiety, and depression were linked to poorer cognitive function. Tests for attention, processing speed, and executive function were the most sensitive in detecting cognitive changes in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Almeria
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari MútuaTerrassa, 08221 Terrassa, Spain;
| | - Juan Carlos Cejudo
- Cognitive Impairment and Dementia Unit, Hospital Sagrat Cor, Hermanas Hospitalarias, 08760 Martorell, Spain
| | - Joan Deus
- Clinical and Health Department, Psychology Faculty, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
- MRI Research Unit, Department of Radiology, Hospital del Mar, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jerzy Krupinski
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari MútuaTerrassa, 08221 Terrassa, Spain;
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Department of Life Sciences John Dalton Building, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Matus A, Quinn R, Stawnychy MA, Thomas G, Goba M, Garo J, Gordon D, Riegel B. Social Determinants of Health are Associated with Coping of Informal Caregivers of Adults with Heart Failure. Clin Nurs Res 2024; 33:334-343. [PMID: 38288601 PMCID: PMC11188556 DOI: 10.1177/10547738231223790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
We explored the influence of social determinants of health (SDH) risk on stress and coping style in heart failure (HF) caregivers. In this cross-sectional study, data from 250 caregivers were analyzed. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine the extent to which SDH risk (measured using a modified PRAPARE tool (National Association of Community Health Centers), range 0-22) predicted stress (Perceived Stress Scale, 0-56) and coping style (active (0-45), avoidance (0-30), and minimization (0-30)) while accounting for caregiver burden (HF Caregiver Questionnaire (HF-CQ) 0-100). Multivariable regression analysis with backwards elimination variable selection approach was used to identify which SDH risk factors best predicted coping styles. SDH risk was significantly associated with avoidance and minimization coping styles. Each unit increase in SDH risk was associated with an increase of 0.6 ± 0.2 units (p = .0008) in avoidance and 0.7 ± 0.2 units (p < .0001) in minimization coping style. Race and "supporting others" significantly predicted avoidance coping style; scores were 3.3 ± 0.8 units greater for caregivers who were not White (p < .0001) and 1.4 ± 0.5 units greater (p < .01) for each additional person whom they supported. Race significantly predicted minimization coping style; scores were 4.4 ± 0.7 units greater for caregivers who were not White (p < .0001). Caregivers with higher SDH risk may avoid and minimize to cope with caregiving challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin Matus
- Institute for Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ryan Quinn
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Gladys Thomas
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Miatta Goba
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jenna Garo
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Deborah Gordon
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Barbara Riegel
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aiello EN, Pucci V, Diana L, Corvaglia A, Niang A, Mattiello S, Preti AN, Durante G, Ravelli A, Consonni L, Guerra C, Ponti AD, Sangalli G, Difonzo T, Scarano S, Perucca L, Zago S, Appollonio I, Mondini S, Bolognini N. The Telephone Language Screener (TLS): standardization of a novel telephone-based screening test for language impairment. Neurol Sci 2024; 45:1989-2001. [PMID: 38010584 PMCID: PMC11021315 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-07149-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed at developing and standardizing the Telephone Language Screener (TLS), a novel, disease-nonspecific, telephone-based screening test for language disorders. METHODS The TLS was developed in strict pursuance to the current psycholinguistic standards. It comprises nine tasks assessing phonological, lexical-semantic and morpho-syntactic components, as well as an extra Backward Digit Span task. The TLS was administered to 480 healthy participants (HPs), along with the Telephone-based Semantic Verbal Fluency (t-SVF) test and a Telephone-based Composite Language Index (TBCLI), as well as to 37 cerebrovascular/neurodegenerative patients-who also underwent the language subscale of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-L). An HP subsample was also administered an in-person language battery. Construct validity, factorial structure, internal consistency, test-retest and inter-rater reliability were tested. Norms were derived via Equivalent Scores. The capability of the TLS to discriminate patients from HPs and to identify, among the patient cohort, those with a defective TICS-L, was also examined. RESULTS The TLS was underpinned by a mono-component structure and converged with the t-SVF (p < .001), the TBCLI (p < .001) and the in-person language battery (p = .002). It was internally consistent (McDonald's ω = 0.67) and reliable between raters (ICC = 0.99) and at retest (ICC = 0.83). Age and education, but not sex, were predictors of TLS scores. The TLS optimally discriminated patients from HPs (AUC = 0.80) and successfully identified patients with an impaired TICS-L (AUC = 0.92). In patients, the TLS converged with TICS-L scores (p = 0.016). DISCUSSION The TLS is a valid, reliable, normed and clinically feasible telephone-based screener for language impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Nicolò Aiello
- PhD Program in Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
| | - Veronica Pucci
- Dipartimento di Filosofia, Pedagogia e Psicologia Applicata (FISPPA), University of Padova, SociologiaPadua, Italy
- Human Inspired Technology Research Centre (HIT), University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Diana
- Laboratory of Neuropsychology, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessia Corvaglia
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco", University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Aida Niang
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Mattiello
- Dipartimento di Filosofia, Pedagogia e Psicologia Applicata (FISPPA), University of Padova, SociologiaPadua, Italy
| | - Alice Naomi Preti
- PhD Program in Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Giorgia Durante
- Dipartimento di Filosofia, Pedagogia e Psicologia Applicata (FISPPA), University of Padova, SociologiaPadua, Italy
| | - Adele Ravelli
- Dipartimento di Filosofia, Pedagogia e Psicologia Applicata (FISPPA), University of Padova, SociologiaPadua, Italy
| | - Lucia Consonni
- Dipartimento di Filosofia, Pedagogia e Psicologia Applicata (FISPPA), University of Padova, SociologiaPadua, Italy
| | - Carolina Guerra
- Dipartimento di Filosofia, Pedagogia e Psicologia Applicata (FISPPA), University of Padova, SociologiaPadua, Italy
| | - Adriana Delli Ponti
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaia Sangalli
- Laboratory of Neuropsychology, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| | - Teresa Difonzo
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Scarano
- Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Perucca
- Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Zago
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ildebrando Appollonio
- Neurology Section, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Sara Mondini
- Dipartimento di Filosofia, Pedagogia e Psicologia Applicata (FISPPA), University of Padova, SociologiaPadua, Italy
- Human Inspired Technology Research Centre (HIT), University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Nadia Bolognini
- Laboratory of Neuropsychology, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Perrottelli A, Sansone N, Giordano GM, Caporusso E, Giuliani L, Melillo A, Pezzella P, Bucci P, Mucci A, Galderisi S. Cognitive Impairment after Post-Acute COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Pers Med 2022; 12:2070. [PMID: 36556290 PMCID: PMC9781311 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12122070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study aims to provide a critical overview of the literature on the relationships between post-acute COVID-19 infection and cognitive impairment, highlighting the limitations and confounding factors. A systematic search of articles published from 1 January 2020 to 1 July 2022 was performed in PubMed/Medline. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only studies using validated instruments for the assessment of cognitive impairment were included. Out of 5515 screened records, 72 studies met the inclusion criteria. The available evidence revealed the presence of impairment in executive functions, speed of processing, attention and memory in subjects recovered from COVID-19. However, several limitations of the literature reviewed should be highlighted: most studies were performed on small samples, not stratified by severity of disease and age, used as a cross-sectional or a short-term longitudinal design and provided a limited assessment of the different cognitive domains. Few studies investigated the neurobiological correlates of cognitive deficits in individuals recovered from COVID-19. Further studies with an adequate methodological design are needed for an in-depth characterization of cognitive impairment in individuals recovered from COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Giulia Maria Giordano
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
O'Connor EE, Rednam N, O'Brien R, O'Brien S, Rock P, Levine A, Zeffiro TA. Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Attention, Memory, and Sensorimotor Performance. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2022:2022.09.22.22280222. [PMID: 36172134 PMCID: PMC9516858 DOI: 10.1101/2022.09.22.22280222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recovery after SARS-CoV-2 infection is extremely variable, with some individuals recovering quickly, and others experiencing persistent long-term symptoms or developing new symptoms after the acute phase of infection, including fatigue, poor concentration, impaired attention, or memory deficits. Many existing studies reporting cognitive deficits associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection are limited by the exclusive use of self-reported measures or a lack of adequate comparison groups. METHODS Forty-five participants, ages 18-70, (11 Long-COVID, 14 COVID, and 20 No-COVID) underwent behavioral testing with the NIH Toolbox Neuro-Quality of Life survey and selected psychometric tests, including a flanker interference task and the d2 Test of Attention. RESULTS We found greater self-reported anxiety, apathy, fatigue, emotional dyscontrol, sleep disturbance and cognitive dysfunction in COVID compared No-COVID groups. After categorizing COVID patients according to self-reported concentration problems, we observed declining performance patterns in multiple attention measures across No-COVID controls, COVID and Long-COVID groups. COVID participants, compared to No-COVID controls, exhibited worse performance on NIH Toolbox assessments, including the Eriksen Flanker, Nine-Hole Pegboard and Auditory Verbal Learning tests. CONCLUSION This study provides convergent evidence that previous SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with impairments in sustained attention, processing speed, self-reported fatigue and concentration. The finding that some patients have cognitive and visuomotor dysfunction in the absence of self-reported problems suggests that SARS-CoV-2 infection can have unexpected and persistent subclinical consequences.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wild CJ, Norton L, Menon DK, Ripsman DA, Swartz RH, Owen AM. Disentangling the cognitive, physical, and mental health sequelae of COVID-19. Cell Rep Med 2022; 3:100750. [PMID: 36103880 PMCID: PMC9448696 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
As COVID-19 cases exceed hundreds of millions globally, many survivors face cognitive challenges and prolonged symptoms. However, important questions about the cognitive effects of COVID-19 remain unresolved. In this cross-sectional online study, 478 adult volunteers who self-reported a positive test for COVID-19 (mean = 30 days since most recent test) perform significantly worse than pre-pandemic norms on cognitive measures of processing speed, reasoning, verbal, and overall performance, but not short-term memory, suggesting domain-specific deficits. Cognitive differences are even observed in participants who did not require hospitalization. Factor analysis of health- and COVID-related questionnaires reveals two clusters of symptoms—one that varies mostly with physical symptoms and illness severity, and one with mental health. Cognitive performance is positively correlated with the global measure encompassing physical symptoms, but not the one that broadly describes mental health, suggesting that the subjective experience of “long COVID” relates to physical symptoms and cognitive deficits, especially executive dysfunction. Survivors of COVID-19 exhibit cognitive differences in specific domains Speed of processing, verbal, and reasoning are affected, but not memory function Performance in affected domains is linked to physical but not mental health These effects are observed in mild and hospitalized cases of COVID-19
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor J Wild
- Western Institute for Neuroscience, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
| | - Loretta Norton
- Western Institute for Neuroscience, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; Department of Psychology, King's University College, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - David K Menon
- Division of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - David A Ripsman
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
| | - Richard H Swartz
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Adrian M Owen
- Western Institute for Neuroscience, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; Department of Psychology, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aiello EN, Preti AN, Pucci V, Diana L, Corvaglia A, Barattieri di San Pietro C, Difonzo T, Zago S, Appollonio I, Mondini S, Bolognini N. The Italian telephone-based Verbal Fluency Battery (t-VFB): standardization and preliminary clinical usability evidence. Front Psychol 2022; 13:963164. [PMID: 35992426 PMCID: PMC9384842 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.963164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed at standardizing and providing preliminary evidence on the clinical usability of the Italian telephone-based Verbal Fluency Battery (t-VFB), which includes phonemic (t-PVF), semantic (t-SVF) and alternate (t-AVF) verbal fluency tasks. Methods Three-hundred and thirty-five Italian healthy participants (HPs; 140 males; age range = 18-96 years; education range = 4-23 years) and 27 individuals with neurodegenerative or cerebrovascular diseases were administered the t-VFB. Switch number and cluster size were computed via latent semantic analyses. HPs underwent the telephone-based Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Backward Digit Span (BDS). Construct validity, factorial structure, internal consistency, test-retest and inter-rater reliability and equivalence with the in-person Verbal Fluency tasks were assessed. Norms were derived via Equivalent Scores. Diagnostic accuracy against clinical populations was assessed. Results The majority of t-VFB scores correlated among each other and with the BDS, but not with the MMSE. Switch number correlated with t-PVF, t-SVF, t-AVF scores, whilst cluster size with the t-SVF and t-AVF scores only. The t-VFB was underpinned by a mono-component structure and was internally consistent (Cronbach's α = 0.91). Test-retest (ICC = 0.69-0.95) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.98-1) were optimal. Each t-VFB test was statistically equivalent to its in-person version (equivalence bounds yielding a p < 0.05). Education predicted all t-VFB scores, whereas age t-SVF and t-AVF scores and sex only some t-SVF scores. Diagnostic accuracy against clinical samples was optimal (AUC = 0.81-0.86). Discussion The t-VFB is a valid, reliable and normed telephone-based assessment tool for language and executive functioning, equivalent to the in-person version; results show promising evidence of its diagnostic accuracy in neurological populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Nicolò Aiello
- Ph.D. Program in Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Alice Naomi Preti
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Veronica Pucci
- Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
- Human Inspired Technology Research Centre, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Diana
- Neuropsychological Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessia Corvaglia
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Luigi Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Barattieri di San Pietro
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Teresa Difonzo
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Zago
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Ildebrando Appollonio
- Neurology Section, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Sara Mondini
- Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
- Human Inspired Technology Research Centre, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Nadia Bolognini
- Neuropsychological Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Neurocognitive screening in patients following SARS-CoV-2 infection: tools for triage. BMC Neurol 2022; 22:285. [PMID: 35907815 PMCID: PMC9338515 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02817-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cognitive complaints are common in patients recovering from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), yet their etiology is often unclear. We assess factors that contribute to cognitive impairment in ambulatory versus hospitalized patients during the sub-acute stage of recovery. Methods In this cross-sectional study, participants were prospectively recruited from a hospital-wide registry. All patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection using a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase-chain-reaction assay. Patients ≤ 18 years-of-age and those with a pre-existing major neurocognitive disorder were excluded. Participants completed an extensive neuropsychological questionnaire and a computerized cognitive screen via remote telemedicine platform. Rates of subjective and objective neuropsychological impairment were compared between the ambulatory and hospitalized groups. Factors associated with impairment were explored separately within each group. Results A total of 102 patients (76 ambulatory, 26 hospitalized) completed the symptom inventory and neurocognitive tests 24 ± 22 days following laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Hospitalized and ambulatory patients self-reported high rates of cognitive impairment (27–40%), without differences between the groups. However, hospitalized patients showed higher rates of objective impairment in visual memory (30% vs. 4%; p = 0.001) and psychomotor speed (41% vs. 15%; p = 0.008). Objective cognitive test performance was associated with anxiety, depression, fatigue, and pain in the ambulatory but not the hospitalized group. Conclusions Focal cognitive deficits are more common in hospitalized than ambulatory patients. Cognitive performance is associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms in ambulatory but not hospitalized patients. Objective neurocognitive measures can provide essential information to inform neurologic triage and should be included as endpoints in clinical trials. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-022-02817-9.
Collapse
|
9
|
COVID-19 associated cognitive impairment: A systematic review. Cortex 2022; 152:77-97. [PMID: 35537236 PMCID: PMC9014565 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION COVID-19 has a wide range of clinical manifestations. Neurological manifestations in COVID-19 patients were demonstrated during the pandemic, including cognitive impairment. This study aimed to determine any relationship between COVID-19 and cognitive complaints, such as dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or subjective cognitive decline (SCD). METHODS We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE via Ebsco, Cochrane EMBASE, SCOPUS, and LILACS electronic databases of observational studies with COVID-19 patients confirmed by serology or PCR who developed new cognitive impairment or deteriorated from previous cognitive impairment after infection. This review protocol was recorded on PROSPERO with registration number CRD 42021241590. RESULTS A total of 3.520 articles were retrieved and read. Twenty-two studies were selected for our review. A wide range of cognitive assessment tools (n = 25) was used. The most described affected domains in these studies were executive functions, attention, and episodic memory. Thirteen studies showed a pattern of cognitive impairment in processing speed, inattention, or executive dysfunction assessed through working memory. CONCLUSION This review highlights the high frequency of cognitive impairment after COVID-19 infection. However, we were unable to differentiate whether the cognitive impairment found corresponded to mild cognitive impairment or dementia through data from selected studies, and this issue serves as one objective of future studies to be addressed on this topic.
Collapse
|
10
|
Biagianti B, Di Liberto A, Nicolò Edoardo A, Lisi I, Nobilia L, de Ferrabonc GD, Zanier ER, Stocchetti N, Brambilla P. Cognitive Assessment in SARS-CoV-2 Patients: A Systematic Review. Front Aging Neurosci 2022; 14:909661. [PMID: 35847679 PMCID: PMC9283975 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.909661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with post-infective severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) often show both short- and long-term cognitive deficits within the dysexecutive/inattentive spectrum. However, little is known about which cognitive alterations are commonly found in patients recovered from SARS-CoV-2, and which psychometric tools clinicians should consider when assessing cognition in this population. The present work reviewed published studies to provide a critical narrative of neuropsychological (NPs) deficits commonly observed after SARS-CoV-2 infection and the tests most suited for detecting such cognitive sequelae depending on illness severity. Methods This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was pre-registered on Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42021253079). Observational studies quantitatively assessing cognition in patients with post-infective SARS-CoV-2 were considered. From 711 retrieved articles, 19 studies conducted on patients with SARS-CoV-2 without medical comorbidities were included and stratified by disease severity. Results The majority of studies (N = 13) adopted first-level tests. The most frequently administered screeners were the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)—with the former more likely to detect mild, and the latter moderate/severe deficits. Among second-level tests, those assessing attention and executive functions (EFs) were highly represented. Remotely-delivered tests yielded lower percentages of cognitive impairment. Overall, cognitive domains often found to be impaired were EFs, attention, and memory. Conclusion Cognitive sequelae in patients with post-infective SARS-CoV-2 can be detected with NPs testing. Depending on the psychometric test features, the likelihood of observing cognitive deficits can vary. Further studies on larger sample sizes are needed to investigate the clinical usefulness of second-level tools. The primary goal of preventative health services should be the early detection and intervention of emerging cognitive deficits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Biagianti
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- *Correspondence: Bruno Biagianti, , orcid.org/0000-0002-5955-3019
| | - Asia Di Liberto
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Aiello Nicolò Edoardo
- University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Ilaria Lisi
- Laboratory of Acute Brain Injury and Therapeutic Strategies, Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Nobilia
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Delor de Ferrabonc
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa R. Zanier
- Laboratory of Acute Brain Injury and Therapeutic Strategies, Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Nino Stocchetti
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Brambilla
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aiello EN, Pucci V, Diana L, Niang A, Preti AN, Delli Ponti A, Sangalli G, Scarano S, Tesio L, Zago S, Difonzo T, Appollonio I, Mondini S, Bolognini N. Telephone-based Frontal Assessment Battery (t-FAB): standardization for the Italian population and clinical usability in neurological diseases. Aging Clin Exp Res 2022; 34:1635-1644. [PMID: 35699839 PMCID: PMC9194888 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-022-02155-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Despite the relevance of telephone-based cognitive screening tests in clinical practice and research, no specific test assessing executive functioning is available. The present study aimed at standardizing and providing evidence of clinical usability for the Italian telephone-based Frontal Assessment Battery (t-FAB). Methods The t-FAB (ranging 0–12), comprising two subtests, has two versions: one requiring motor responses (t-FAB-M) and the other verbal responses (t-FAB-V). Three hundred and forty-six Italian healthy adults (HPs; 143 males; age range = 18–96 years; education range = 4–23 years) and 40 participants with neurological diseases were recruited. To HPs, the t-FAB was administered along with a set of telephone-based tests: MMSE, verbal fluency (VF), backward digit span (BDS). The in-person version of the FAB was administered to both HPs and clinical groups. Factorial structure, construct validity, inter-rater and test–retest reliability, t-FAB-M vs. t-FAB-V equivalence and diagnostic accuracy were assessed. Norms were derived via Equivalent Scores. Results In HPs, t-FAB measures yielded high inter-rater/test–retest reliability (ICC = .78–.94), were internally related (p ≤ .005) and underpinned by a single component, converging with the telephone-based MMSE, VF, BDS (p ≤ .0013). The two t-FAB versions were statistically equivalent in clinical groups (ps of both equivalence bounds < .001). Education predicted all t-FAB scores (p < .001), whereas age only the t-FAB-M score (p ≤ .004). t-FAB scores converge with the in-person FAB in HPs and clinical groups (rs = .43–.78). Both t-FAB versions were accurate in discriminating HPs from the clinical cohort (AUC = .73-.76). Discussion The t-FAB is a normed, valid, reliable and clinically usable telephone-based cognitive screening test to adopt in both clinical and research practice. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40520-022-02155-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Nicolò Aiello
- PhD Program in Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy.
| | - Veronica Pucci
- Dipartimento di Filosofia, Sociologia, Pedagogia e Psicologia Applicata (FISPPA), University of Padova, Padua, Italy.,Human Inspired Technology Research Centre (HIT), University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Diana
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.,Neuropsychological Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| | - Aida Niang
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Naomi Preti
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.,Neurology Unit, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Milan, Italy
| | - Adriana Delli Ponti
- Neurology Unit, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaia Sangalli
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.,Neuropsychological Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Scarano
- Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Tesio
- Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Zago
- Neurology Unit, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Milan, Italy
| | - Teresa Difonzo
- Neurology Unit, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Milan, Italy
| | - Ildebrando Appollonio
- Neurology Section, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Sara Mondini
- Dipartimento di Filosofia, Sociologia, Pedagogia e Psicologia Applicata (FISPPA), University of Padova, Padua, Italy.,Human Inspired Technology Research Centre (HIT), University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Nadia Bolognini
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.,Neuropsychological Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ali ST, Kang AK, Patel TR, Clark JR, Perez-Giraldo GS, Orban ZS, Lim PH, Jimenez M, Graham EL, Batra A, Liotta EM, Koralnik IJ. Evolution of neurologic symptoms in non-hospitalized COVID-19 "long haulers". Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2022; 9:950-961. [PMID: 35607826 PMCID: PMC9268866 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective We characterized the evolution of neurologic symptoms and self‐perceived recovery of non‐hospitalized COVID‐19 “long haulers” 6–9 months after their initial Neuro‐COVID‐19 clinic evaluation. Methods In this follow‐up study on the first 100 patients, 50 SARS‐CoV‐2 laboratory‐positive (SARS‐CoV‐2+), and 50 laboratory‐negative (SARS‐CoV‐2−), evaluated at our Neuro‐COVID‐19 clinic between May and November 2020, patients completed phone questionnaires on their neurologic symptoms, subjective impression of recovery and quality of life. Results Of 52 patients who completed the study (27 SARS‐CoV‐2+, 25 SARS‐CoV‐2−) a median 14.8 (range 11–18) months after symptom onset, mean age was 42.8 years, 73% were female, and 77% were vaccinated for SARS‐CoV‐2. Overall, there was no significant change in the frequency of most neurologic symptoms between first and follow‐up evaluations, including “brain fog” (81 vs. 71%), numbness/tingling (69 vs. 65%), headache (67 vs. 54%), dizziness (50 vs. 54%), blurred vision (34 vs. 44%), tinnitus (33 vs. 42%), and fatigue (87 vs. 81%). However, dysgeusia and anosmia decreased overall (63 vs. 27%, 58 vs. 21%, both p < 0.001). Conversely, heart rate and blood pressure variation (35 vs. 56%, p = 0.01) and gastrointestinal symptoms (27 vs. 48%, p = 0.04) increased at follow‐up. Patients reported improvements in their recovery, cognitive function, and fatigue, but quality of life measures remained lower than the US normative population (p < 0.001). SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination did not have a positive or detrimental impact on cognitive function or fatigue. Interpretation Non‐hospitalized COVID‐19 “long haulers” continue to experience neurologic symptoms, fatigue, and compromised quality of life 14.8 months after initial infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sareen T Ali
- Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Anthony K Kang
- Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Tulsi R Patel
- Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jeffrey R Clark
- Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Gina S Perez-Giraldo
- Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Zachary S Orban
- Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Patrick H Lim
- Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Millenia Jimenez
- Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Edith L Graham
- Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ayush Batra
- Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Eric M Liotta
- Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Igor J Koralnik
- Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Aiello EN, Esposito A, Giannone I, Diana L, Appollonio I, Bolognini N. Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS): Italian adaptation, psychometrics and diagnostics. Neurol Sci 2022; 43:3071-3077. [PMID: 34792669 PMCID: PMC8600494 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05729-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telephone-based cognitive screening (TBCS) is crucial to telehealth care of neurological patients, prevention campaigns, and epidemiological studies on cognitive impairment. The Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) is one of the most widespread and psychometrically/diagnostically sound TBCS test, with several versions developed worldwide (e.g., with and without a delayed recall item). In Italy, only attempts of adaptation and preliminary evidence of its statistical features have been provided so far. This study thus aimed at (1) developing an Italian version of the TICS and assessing its (2) psychometric and (3) diagnostic properties. METHODS A back-translated and culturally adapted version of the TICS was developed. Three-hundred and sixty-five healthy individuals from different regions of Italy (147 males, 216 females; age: 53.2 ± 16 years; education: 13 ± 4.5 years) were administered the TICS and the Italian telephone-based Mini-Mental State Examination (Itel-MMSE). Validity was tested by convergence and at the structure level, whereas reliability as internal consistency, test-retest, and inter-rater. Diagnostic accuracy, item difficulty, and discrimination were also examined. RESULTS The TICS featured a single component and its score converged with that of the Itel-MMSE (rs = .37). Reliability was excellent as inter-rater (ICC = .94), good as test-retest (ICC = .78), and acceptable as internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .63). Accuracy was high as tested against the Itel-MMSE (AUC = .83) and did not improve when adding the delayed recall. Backward subtraction was the most difficult and discriminative task. DISCUSSION The Italian TICS is a valid, reliable, and diagnostically accurate TBCS test. The original format of the TICS can be thus adopted in both clinical and research settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Nicolò Aiello
- PhD Program in Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | | | - Ilaria Giannone
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Diana
- PhD Program in Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Ildebrando Appollonio
- Neurology Section, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Nadia Bolognini
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Neuropsychological Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Montani D, Savale L, Noel N, Meyrignac O, Colle R, Gasnier M, Corruble E, Beurnier A, Jutant EM, Pham T, Lecoq AL, Papon JF, Figueiredo S, Harrois A, Humbert M, Monnet X. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Eur Respir Rev 2022; 31:31/163/210185. [PMID: 35264409 PMCID: PMC8924706 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0185-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that has resulted in millions of deaths and a major strain on health systems worldwide. Medical treatments for COVID-19 (anticoagulants, corticosteroids, anti-inflammatory drugs, oxygenation therapy and ventilation) and vaccination have improved patient outcomes. The majority of patients will recover spontaneously or after acute-phase management, but clinicians are now faced with long-term complications of COVID-19 including a large variety of symptoms, defined as "post-acute COVID-19 syndrome". Most studies have focused on patients hospitalised for severe COVID-19, but acute COVID-19 syndrome is not restricted to these patients and exists in outpatients. Given the diversity of symptoms and the high prevalence of persistent symptoms, the management of these patients requires a multidisciplinary team approach, which will result in the consumption of large amounts of health resources in the coming months. In this review, we discuss the presentation, prevalence, pathophysiology and evolution of respiratory complications and other organ-related injuries associated with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Montani
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Service de Pneumologie et Soins Intensifs Respiratoires, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 5 Thorinno, Inserm UMR_S999, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Laurent Savale
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Service de Pneumologie et Soins Intensifs Respiratoires, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 5 Thorinno, Inserm UMR_S999, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Nicolas Noel
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Service de Médecine Interne et Immunologie Clinique, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 7 Endocrinologie-Immunités-Inflammations-Cancer-Urgences, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Olivier Meyrignac
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Service de Radiologie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 14 Smart Imaging, BioMaps, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Romain Colle
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Service de Psychiatrie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 11 Psychiatrie, Santé Mentale, Addictologie et Nutrition, Équipe MOODS, Inserm U1178, CESP (Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations), Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Matthieu Gasnier
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Service de Psychiatrie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 11 Psychiatrie, Santé Mentale, Addictologie et Nutrition, Équipe MOODS, Inserm U1178, CESP (Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations), Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Emmanuelle Corruble
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Service de Psychiatrie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 11 Psychiatrie, Santé Mentale, Addictologie et Nutrition, Équipe MOODS, Inserm U1178, CESP (Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations), Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Antoine Beurnier
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Service de Pneumologie et Soins Intensifs Respiratoires, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 5 Thorinno, Inserm UMR_S999, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Etienne-Marie Jutant
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Service de Pneumologie et Soins Intensifs Respiratoires, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 5 Thorinno, Inserm UMR_S999, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.,Université de Poitiers, CHU de Poitiers, Service de Pneumologie, Inserm CIC 1402, Poitiers, France
| | - Tài Pham
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 4 CORREVE Maladies du Dœur et des Vaisseaux, Inserm UMR_S999, FHU Sepsis, CARMAS, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Anne-Lise Lecoq
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Centre de Recherche Clinique Paris-Saclay, DMU 13 Santé Publique, Information Médicale, Appui à la Recherche Clinique, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Jean-François Papon
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Service d'ORL et de Chirurgie Cervico-faciale, DMU 9 Neurosciences, Inserm U955, E13, CNRS ERL7000, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Samy Figueiredo
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Périopératoire, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 12 Anesthésie, Réanimation, Douleur, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Anatole Harrois
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Périopératoire, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 12 Anesthésie, Réanimation, Douleur, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Marc Humbert
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Service de Pneumologie et Soins Intensifs Respiratoires, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 5 Thorinno, Inserm UMR_S999, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Xavier Monnet
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 4 CORREVE Maladies du Dœur et des Vaisseaux, Inserm UMR_S999, FHU Sepsis, CARMAS, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ceban F, Ling S, Lui LM, Lee Y, Gill H, Teopiz KM, Rodrigues NB, Subramaniapillai M, Di Vincenzo JD, Cao B, Lin K, Mansur RB, Ho RC, Rosenblat JD, Miskowiak KW, Vinberg M, Maletic V, McIntyre RS. Fatigue and cognitive impairment in Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun 2022; 101:93-135. [PMID: 34973396 PMCID: PMC8715665 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 628] [Impact Index Per Article: 314.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE COVID-19 is associated with clinically significant symptoms despite resolution of the acute infection (i.e., post-COVID-19 syndrome). Fatigue and cognitive impairment are amongst the most common and debilitating symptoms of post-COVID-19 syndrome. OBJECTIVE To quantify the proportion of individuals experiencing fatigue and cognitive impairment 12 or more weeks following COVID-19 diagnosis, and to characterize the inflammatory correlates and functional consequences of post-COVID-19 syndrome. DATA SOURCES Systematic searches were conducted without language restrictions from database inception to June 8, 2021 on PubMed/MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, Embase, Web of Science, Google/Google Scholar, and select reference lists. STUDY SELECTION Primary research articles which evaluated individuals at least 12 weeks after confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis and specifically reported on fatigue, cognitive impairment, inflammatory parameters, and/or functional outcomes were selected. DATA EXTRACTION & SYNTHESIS Two reviewers independently extracted published summary data and assessed methodological quality and risk of bias. A meta-analysis of proportions was conducted to pool Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformed proportions using the random-effects restricted maximum-likelihood model. MAIN OUTCOMES & MEASURES The co-primary outcomes were the proportions of individuals reporting fatigue and cognitive impairment, respectively, 12 or more weeks following COVID-19 infection. The secondary outcomes were inflammatory correlates and functional consequences associated with post-COVID-19 syndrome. RESULTS The literature search yielded 10,979 studies, and 81 studies were selected for inclusion. The fatigue meta-analysis comprised 68 studies, the cognitive impairment meta-analysis comprised 43 studies, and 48 studies were included in the narrative synthesis. Meta-analysis revealed that the proportion of individuals experiencing fatigue 12 or more weeks following COVID-19 diagnosis was 0.32 (95% CI, 0.27, 0.37; p < 0.001; n = 25,268; I2 = 99.1%). The proportion of individuals exhibiting cognitive impairment was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.17, 0.28; p < 0.001; n = 13,232; I2 = 98.0). Moreover, narrative synthesis revealed elevations in proinflammatory markers and considerable functional impairment in a subset of individuals. CONCLUSIONS & RELEVANCE A significant proportion of individuals experience persistent fatigue and/or cognitive impairment following resolution of acute COVID-19. The frequency and debilitating nature of the foregoing symptoms provides the impetus to characterize the underlying neurobiological substrates and how to best treat these phenomena. STUDY REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42021256965).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicia Ceban
- Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada,Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Susan Ling
- Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada,Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Leanna M.W. Lui
- Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yena Lee
- Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada,Braxia Health, Mississauga, ON, Canada
| | - Hartej Gill
- Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kayla M. Teopiz
- Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nelson B. Rodrigues
- Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Joshua D. Di Vincenzo
- Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada,Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bing Cao
- Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Faculty of Psychology, Ministry of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
| | - Kangguang Lin
- Department of Affective Disorders, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China,Laboratory of Emotion and Cognition, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rodrigo B. Mansur
- Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Roger C. Ho
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore,Institute for Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joshua D. Rosenblat
- Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada,Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kamilla W. Miskowiak
- Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark,Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maj Vinberg
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark,Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatric Centre North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Vladimir Maletic
- Department of Psychiatry, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Roger S. McIntyre
- Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada,Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation, Toronto, ON, Canada,Braxia Health, Mississauga, ON, Canada,Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,Corresponding author at: University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, MP 9-325, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Daroische R, Hemminghyth MS, Eilertsen TH, Breitve MH, Chwiszczuk LJ. Cognitive Impairment After COVID-19-A Review on Objective Test Data. Front Neurol 2021; 12:699582. [PMID: 34393978 PMCID: PMC8357992 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.699582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The aim was to conduct a review on the literature on objective cognitive impairment in patients after COVID-19. Methods: We performed a literature review and searched Ovid Medline in February 2021 based on a PECO scheme. Results: Twelve articles met all inclusion criteria. Total patient sample was <1,000. All studies on global cognitive function found impairment, ranging from 15 to 80% of the sampled patients. Seven studies on attention and executive functions reported impairment, with varying results depending on sub-domain and different tests. Three out of four studies reported memory difficulties, with two studies reporting short-term memory deficits. Although results indicate possible language impairment, only one study used domain-specific language tasks. Two out of four studies on visuospatial function did not report any impairment. Conclusion: Patients with recent SARS-CoV-2 infection appear to experience global cognitive impairment, impairment in memory, attention and executive function, and in particular verbal fluency. Based on the current results, we recommend clinicians to evaluate the need for cognitive assessment of patients with a recent COVID-19 infection, regardless of the severity of the disease, treatment methods and length of ICU stay. We need studies with larger sample and control group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rania Daroische
- Neuropsychological Unit, Helse-Fonna HF Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund, Norway
| | - Mathilde S. Hemminghyth
- Neuropsychological Unit, Helse-Fonna HF Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund, Norway
- Department of Research and Innovation, Helse-Fonna HF Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund, Norway
| | - Thomas H. Eilertsen
- Neuropsychological Unit, Helse-Fonna HF Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund, Norway
| | - Monica H. Breitve
- Neuropsychological Unit, Helse-Fonna HF Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund, Norway
- Department of Research and Innovation, Helse-Fonna HF Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund, Norway
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Clinic of Psychiatry, Helse-Fonna HF Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund, Norway
| | - Luiza J. Chwiszczuk
- Department of Research and Innovation, Helse-Fonna HF Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund, Norway
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Clinic of Psychiatry, Helse-Fonna HF Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vanderlind WM, Rabinovitz BB, Miao IY, Oberlin LE, Bueno-Castellano C, Fridman C, Jaywant A, Kanellopoulos D. A systematic review of neuropsychological and psychiatric sequalae of COVID-19: implications for treatment. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2021; 34:420-433. [PMID: 34016818 PMCID: PMC8183238 DOI: 10.1097/yco.0000000000000713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW COVID-19 impacts multiple organ systems and is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Pathogenesis of viral infection, co-morbidities, medical treatments, and psychosocial factors may contribute to COVID-19 related neuropsychological and psychiatric sequelae. This systematic review aims to synthesize available literature on psychiatric and cognitive characteristics of community-dwelling survivors of COVID-19 infection. RECENT FINDINGS Thirty-three studies met inclusion/exclusion criteria for review. Emerging findings link COVID-19 to cognitive deficits, particularly attention, executive function, and memory. Psychiatric symptoms occur at high rates in COVID-19 survivors, including anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disruption, and to a lesser extent posttraumatic stress. Symptoms appear to endure, and severity of acute illness is not directly predictive of severity of cognitive or mental health issues. The course of cognitive and psychiatric sequelae is limited by lack of longitudinal data at this time. Although heterogeneity of study design and sociocultural differences limit definitive conclusions, emerging risk factors for psychiatric symptoms include female sex, perceived stigma related to COVID-19, infection of a family member, social isolation, and prior psychiatry history. SUMMARY The extant literature elucidates treatment targets for cognitive and psychosocial interventions. Research using longitudinal, prospective study designs is needed to characterize cognitive and psychiatric functioning of COVID-19 survivors over the course of illness and across illness severity. Emphasis on delineating the unique contributions of premorbid functioning, viral infection, co-morbidities, treatments, and psychosocial factors to cognitive and psychiatric sequelae of COVID-19 is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Michael Vanderlind
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine
- NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York
| | - Beth B. Rabinovitz
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine
- NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York
- NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Westchester Behavioral Health Center, White Plains
| | - Iris Yi Miao
- Department of Psychology, New School for Social Research
| | - Lauren E. Oberlin
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine
- NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Westchester Behavioral Health Center, White Plains
| | - Christina Bueno-Castellano
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine
- NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Westchester Behavioral Health Center, White Plains
| | - Chaya Fridman
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine
- NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York
| | - Abhishek Jaywant
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine
- NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dora Kanellopoulos
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine
- NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York
- NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Westchester Behavioral Health Center, White Plains
| |
Collapse
|