1
|
Gidwani R, Yank V, Burgette L, Kofner A, Asch SM, Wagner Z. The impact of telehealth cost-sharing on healthcare utilization: Evidence from high-deductible health plans. Health Serv Res 2024. [PMID: 39135532 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate whether cost-sharing decreases led high-deductible health plans (HDHP) enrollees to increase their use of healthcare. DATA SOURCES, STUDY SETTING National sample of chronically-ill patients age 18-64 from 2018 to 2020 (n = 1,318,178). STUDY DESIGN Difference-in-differences analyses using entropy-balancing weights were used to evaluate the effect of a policy shift to $0 cost-sharing for telehealth on utilization for HDHP compared with non-HDHP enrollees. Due to this shock, HDHP enrollees experienced substantial declines in cost-sharing for telehealth, while non-HDHP enrollees experienced small declines. Event study models were also used to evaluate changes over time. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS Outcomes included use of any outpatient care; use of $0 telehealth; use of $0 telehealth as a proportion of all outpatient care; and use of any telehealth. To test whether any differences were due to preferences for care modality versus cost-sharing, we further evaluated use of non-$0 telehealth as a placebo test. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS There was no difference in change in overall outpatient visits (p = 0.84), with chronicall-ill HDHP enrollees using less care both before and after the policy shift. However, compared with non-HDHP enrollees, HDHP enrollees increased their use of $0 telehealth by 0.08 visits over a 9-month period, a 27% increase (95% CI 0.07-0.09, p < 0.001) and shifted 1.2 percentage points more of their care to $0 telehealth, a 15% increase (ß = 0.01, 95% CI 0.01, 0.01, p < 0.001). However, HDHP enrollees had lower uptake of non-$0 telehealth than non-HDHP enrollees (ß = -0.01, 95%CI -0.02, 0.00, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Recent-but-expiring federal legislation exempts telehealth from HDHP deductibles for care provided in 2023 and 2024. Our results indicate that extending the protections provided by this legislation could help reduce the gap in access to care for chronically-ill persons enrolled in HDHPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Risha Gidwani
- Economics, Sociology, and Statistics (ESS), RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Veronica Yank
- School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lane Burgette
- Economics, Sociology, and Statistics (ESS), RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia, USA
| | - Aaron Kofner
- Economics, Sociology, and Statistics (ESS), RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia, USA
| | - Steven M Asch
- Department of Medicine at Stanford, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Zachary Wagner
- Economics, Sociology, and Statistics (ESS), RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eddelbuettel JCP, Kennedy-Hendricks A, Meiselbach MK, Stuart EA, Huskamp HA, Busch AB, Hollander MAG, Schilling C, Barry CL, Eisenberg MD. Changes in Healthcare Spending Attributable to High Deductible Health Plan Offer Among Enrollees with Comorbid Substance Use Disorder and Cardiovascular Disease. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:1993-2000. [PMID: 38459412 PMCID: PMC11306437 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08700-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rise in prevalence of high deductible health plans (HDHPs) in the United States may raise concerns for high-need, high-utilization populations such as those with comorbid chronic conditions. In this study, we examine changes in total and out-of-pocket (OOP) spending attributable to HDHPs for enrollees with comorbid substance use disorder (SUD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS We used de-identified administrative claims data from 2007 to 2017. SUD and CVD were defined using algorithms of ICD 9 and 10 codes and HEDIS guidelines. The main outcome measures of interest were spending measure for all non-SUD/CVD-related services, SUD-specific services, and CVD-specific services, for all services and medications specifically. We assessed both total and OOP spending. We used an intent-to-treat two-part model approach to model spending and computed the marginal effect of HDHP offer as both the dollar change and percent change in spending attributable to HDHP offer. RESULTS Our sample included 33,684 enrollee-years and was predominantly white and male with a mean age of 53 years. The sample had high demonstrated substantial healthcare utilization with 94% using any non-SUD/CVD services, and 84% and 78% using SUD and CVD services, respectively. HDHP offer was associated with a 17.0% (95% CI = [0.07, 0.27] increase in OOP spending for all non-SUD/CVD services, a 21.1% (95% CI = [0.11, 0.31]) increase in OOP spending for all SUD-specific services, and a 13.1% (95% CI = [0.04, 0.23]) increase in OOP spending for all CVD-specific services. HDHP offer was also associated with a significant increase in OOP spending on non-SUD/CVD-specific medications and SUD-specific medications, but not CVD-specific medications. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that while HDHPs do not change overall levels of annual spending among enrollees with comorbid CVD and SUD, they may increase the financial burden of healthcare services by raising OOP costs, which could negatively impact this high-need and high-utilization population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mark K Meiselbach
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Stuart
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Haiden A Huskamp
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Mara A G Hollander
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Cameron Schilling
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Colleen L Barry
- Brooks School of Public Policy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Matthew D Eisenberg
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Optum Labs, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Constant BD, Long MD, Scott FI, Higgins PDR. Insurer-Mandated Medication Utilization Barriers are Associated With Decreased Insurance Satisfaction and Adverse Clinical Outcomes: An Inflammatory Bowel Disease Partners Survey. Am J Gastroenterol 2024:00000434-990000000-01152. [PMID: 38819004 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Insurer-mandated barriers to timely initiation of advanced therapies used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been shown to worsen clinical outcomes and increase healthcare utilization, yet rarely alter the medication ultimately prescribed. METHODS We conducted a survey within the IBD Partners longitudinal cohort to evaluate the frequency and patient-reported impacts of medication utilization barriers on insurance satisfaction and clinical outcomes. Barriers included medication denials, prior authorizations, and forced medication switches. Variables associated with insurance satisfaction, measured on a 1-7 Likert scale, were identified. The association between insurance-related barriers and downstream clinical outcomes (surgery, corticosteroid requirement, and disease activity) were evaluated. RESULTS Two thousand seventeen patients (age 45 [interquartile range 34-58] years, 73% female) were included. Seventy-two percent experienced an insurer-mandated barrier, most commonly prior authorizations (51%). Fifteen percent were denied an IBD medication by their insurer, 22% experienced an insurance-related gap in therapy, and 8% were forced by their insurer to switch from an effective medication. Insurance satisfaction was negatively associated with medication denials, prior authorization-related delays, gaps in therapy, and high-deductible health plan coverage. In the year following the initial survey, several insurance barriers were linked to negative downstream clinical outcomes, including prior authorizations associated with corticosteroid rescue (odds ratio [OR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-4.00), forced medication switches associated with continued disease activity (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.56-6.89), and medication denials associated with IBD-related surgery (OR 8.92, 95% CI 1.97-40.39). DISCUSSION These data illustrate the frequency and negative impacts of insurer-mandated medication barriers on patients with IBD, including decreased insurance satisfaction and negative downstream clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brad D Constant
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Millie D Long
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Frank I Scott
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Peter D R Higgins
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
ElSayed NA, Bannuru RR, Bakris G, Bardsley J, de Boer IH, Gabbay RA, Gockerman J, McCoy RG, McCracken E, Neumiller JJ, Pilla SJ, Rhee CM. Diabetic Kidney Disease Prevention Care Model Development. Clin Diabetes 2023; 42:274-294. [PMID: 38694240 PMCID: PMC11060626 DOI: 10.2337/cd23-0063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
More than one-third of people with diabetes develop diabetic kidney disease (DKD), which substantially increases risks of kidney failure, cardiovascular disease (CVD), hypoglycemia, death, and other adverse health outcomes. A multifaceted approach incorporating self-management education, lifestyle optimization, pharmacological intervention, CVD prevention, and psychosocial support is crucial to mitigate the onset and progression of DKD. The American Diabetes Association convened an expert panel to develop the DKD Prevention Model presented herein. This model addresses prevention and treatment, including screening guidelines, diagnostic tools, and management approaches; comprehensive, holistic interventions; well-defined roles for interdisciplinary health care professionals; community engagement; and future directions for research and policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuha A. ElSayed
- American Diabetes Association, Alexandria, VA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - George Bakris
- Department of Medicine, American Heart Association Comprehensive Hypertension Center, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Joan Bardsley
- MedStar Health Research Institute and MedStar System Nursing, Columbia, MD
| | - Ian H. de Boer
- Division of Nephrology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Rozalina G. McCoy
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, University of Maryland Institute for Health Computing, Rockville, MD
| | | | - Joshua J. Neumiller
- College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, WA
- Providence Medical Research Center, Providence Health Care, Spokane, WA
| | - Scott J. Pilla
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Connie M. Rhee
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Kidney Transplantation, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jones KD, Lakatta AC, Haddock NT, Teotia SS. The Effects of High Deductible Health Plans on Breast Cancer Treatment and Reconstruction. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:856-863. [PMID: 37709587 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-deductible health plans (HDHP) have expanded rapidly creating the potential for substantially increased out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. The associated financial strain has been associated with the decision to forego care, but the impact on patients undergoing breast cancer reconstruction is not known. We examined the impact of HDHPs vs. LDHPs and OOP maximums on breast reconstruction. METHODS Between January 2014 and 2020, patients who had breast reconstruction by the 2 senior authors were retrospectively evaluated. Information on patient's insurance contract was collected. Criteria for HDHP and LDHP were defined following section 223(c)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code. All aspects of cancer diagnosis, cancer treatment, and surgical procedures were reviewed. RESULTS About 507 patients (262 in LDHPs and 245 in HDHPs) were reviewed. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to be enrolled in HDHPs (25.7% vs. 36.8%, P < .01). There was no significant difference in total operations, number of revisions, or length of reconstruction in days or calendar years. Additionally, no difference existed in the choice of autologous implant reconstruction. CONCLUSION The cost-sharing burden of HDHPs creates the potential for patients to forego care, and thus, effort should be directed toward increasing patient education concerning health plan benefits. Utilization of postdeductible spending, as well as resources of health savings accounts, may limit the adverse effects of HDHPs. This study also emphasizes the importance for providers to increase cost transparency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin D Jones
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Alexis C Lakatta
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Nicholas T Haddock
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| | - Sumeet S Teotia
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gupta R, Yang L, Lewey J, Navathe AS, Groeneveld PW, Khatana SAM. Association of High-Deductible Health Plans With Health Care Use and Costs for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease. J Am Heart Assoc 2023; 12:e030730. [PMID: 37750565 PMCID: PMC10727247 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.030730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Background By increasing cost sharing, high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) aim to reduce low-value health care use. The association of HDHPs with health care use and costs in patients with chronic cardiovascular disease is unknown. Methods and Results This longitudinal cohort study analyzed 57 690 privately insured patients, aged 18 to 64 years, from a large commercial claims database with chronic cardiovascular disease from 2011 to 2019. Health care entities in which all or most beneficiaries switched from being in a traditional plan to an HDHP were identified. A difference-in-differences design was used to account for differences between individuals who remained in traditional plans and those who switched to HDHPs and to assess changes in health care use and costs. Among the 934 individuals in the HDHP group and the 56 756 in the traditional plan group, switching to an HDHP was not associated with statistically significant changes in annual outpatient visits, hospitalizations, or emergency department visits (-8.3% [95% CI, -16.8 to 1.1], -28.5% [95% CI, -62.1 to 34.6], and 11.2% [95% CI, -20.9 to 56.5], respectively). Switching to an HDHP was associated with an increase of $921 (95% CI, $743-$1099) in out-of-pocket costs but no statistically significant difference in total health care costs. Conclusions Among commercially insured patients with chronic cardiovascular disease, switching to an HDHP was not associated with a change in health care use but was associated with an increase in out-of-pocket costs. Although health care use by individuals with chronic cardiovascular disease may not be sensitive to higher cost sharing associated with HDHP enrollment, there may be a significant increase in patients' financial burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi Gupta
- Division of General Internal MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMD
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreMD
- Hopkins Business of Health Initiative, Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMD
| | - Lin Yang
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPA
- Center for Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality and Evaluative Research CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPA
| | - Jennifer Lewey
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPA
- Center for Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality and Evaluative Research CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPA
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPA
| | - Amol S. Navathe
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPAPhiladelphia
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical CenterPAPhiladelphia
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPA
| | - Peter W. Groeneveld
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPA
- Center for Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality and Evaluative Research CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPAPhiladelphia
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical CenterPAPhiladelphia
| | - Sameed Ahmed M. Khatana
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPA
- Center for Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality and Evaluative Research CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPA
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPA
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical CenterPAPhiladelphia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jiang DH, Herrin J, Van Houten HK, McCoy RG. Evaluation of High-Deductible Health Plans and Acute Glycemic Complications Among Adults With Diabetes. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2250602. [PMID: 36662531 PMCID: PMC9860518 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Optimal diabetes care requires regular monitoring and care to maintain glycemic control. How high-deductible health plans (HDHPs), which reduce overall spending but may impede care by increasing out-of-pocket expenses, are associated with risks of severe hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia is unknown. Objective To examine the association between an employer-forced switch to HDHP and severe hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used deidentified administrative claims data for privately insured adults with diabetes from a single insurance carrier with multiple plans across the US between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2018. Analyses were conducted between May 15, 2020, and November 3, 2022. Exposures Patients with 1 baseline year of enrollment in a non-HDHP whose employers subsequently forced a switch to an HDHP were compared with patients who did not switch. Main Outcomes and Measures Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to examine the association between switching to an HDHP and the odds of severe hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia (ascertained using diagnosis codes in emergency department [ED] visits and hospitalizations), adjusting for patient age, sex, race and ethnicity, region, income, comorbidities, glucose-lowering medications, baseline ED and hospital visits for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, and baseline deductible amount, and applying inverse propensity score weighting to account for potential treatment selection bias. Results The study population was composed of 42 326 patients who switched to an HDHP (mean [SD] age: 52 [10] years, 19 752 [46.7%] women, 7375 [17.4%] Black, 5740 [13.6%] Hispanic, 26 572 [62.8%] non-Hispanic White) and 202 729 patients who did not switch (mean [SD] age, 53 [10] years, 89 828 [44.3%] women, 29 551 [14.6%] Black, 26 689 [13.2%] Hispanic, 130 843 [64.5%] non-Hispanic White). When comparing all study years, switching to an HDHP was not associated with increased odds of experiencing at least 1 hypoglycemia-related ED visit or hospitalization (OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.95-1.06]; P = .85), but each year of HDHP enrollment did increase these odds by 2% (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00-1.04]; P = .04). In contrast, switching to an HDHP did significantly increase the odds of experiencing at least 1 hyperglycemia-related ED visit or hospitalization (OR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.11-1.42]; P < .001), with each year of HDHP enrollment increasing the odds by 5% (OR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01-1.09]; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, employer-forced switching to an HDHP was associated with increased odds of potentially preventable acute diabetes complications, potentially because of delayed or deferred care. These findings suggest that employers should be more judicious in their health plan offerings, and health plans and policy makers should consider allowing preventive and high-value services to be exempt from deductible requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H. Jiang
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jeph Herrin
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Holly K. Van Houten
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rozalina G. McCoy
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- OptumLabs, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jiang DH, O'Connor PJ, Huguet N, Golden SH, McCoy RG. Modernizing Diabetes Care Quality Measures. Health Aff (Millwood) 2022; 41:955-962. [PMID: 35759700 PMCID: PMC9288231 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
The proliferation of diabetes quality measures in the US since the mid-1990s has increased the burden of measurement without commensurate improvements in the quality of care or health outcomes. Measures in use today do not represent or incentivize achievement of care goals in all domains of quality that are necessary to achieve optimal diabetes health. We recommend reimagining and improving diabetes quality measurement through the following propositions: widespread adoption of new measures and modernization of existing measures across six domains of quality; use of a subset of new and modernized metrics as top-line measures for reporting and reimbursement; and optional use of the remaining new and modernized measures for evaluative purposes at all levels of the care delivery system to identify and address gaps in care quality and outcomes. These propositions would support practices and policies at all levels of the health care system to improve the health of people with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nathalie Huguet
- Nathalie Huguet, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | | |
Collapse
|