1
|
Zuo W, Zhang J, Xu L, Xiong G, Xu C, Tang Q, Li X, Zhou L. Clinical, Prognosis, and Treatment Effect Features Analysis of Metachronous and Synchronous UTUC and BUC. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102192. [PMID: 39261258 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Revised: 08/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a comprehensive understanding of the clinical features of patients with synchronous and metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and bladder urothelial carcinoma (BUC) and inform surgical and postoperative adjuvant treatment planning. PATIENTS AND METHOD A total of 292 consecutive patients with synchronous and metachronous UTUC-BUC were retrospectively enrolled and were categorized into three groups: (1) UTUC metachronous BUC (N = 185, UTUC-mBUC), (2) BUC-metachronous UTUC (N = 43, BUC-mUTUC), (3) synchronous UTUC-BUC (N = 64, sUTUC-BUC). We compared pathological characteristics and survival data among groups with Wilcoxon's rank sum tests, Pearson's chi-squared, and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS In the sUTUC-BUC group, a higher proportion of patients exhibited UTUC tumors with grade G3 (56%, P = .001) and stage T4 (6%, P < .001) than group UTUC-mBUC (G3 = 16%, T4 = 0%). The proportion of patients with variant histology subtype in group sUTUC-BUC was higher than that of metachronous UTUC-BUC, involving squamous (P = .003), adenoid (P = .012), and sarcomatoid (P < .001) differentiation. It was also observed that the maximum diameter of the UTUC tumor of group sUTUC-BUC (median = 3.5) was significantly larger than group UTUC-mBUC (median = 2.5, P = .002) and group BUC-mUTUC (median = 2.2, P < .001). Notably, sUTUC-BUC has an increased risk of cancer-specific death compared with UTUC-mBUC (P < .001) and BUC-mUTUC (P < .001). On multivariable Cox regression, synchronous UTUC-BUC was an independent predictor of both RFS (P < .001; vs. UTUC-mBUC: HR 0.555, P = .004; vs. BUC-mUTUC: HR 0.279, P < .001) and CSS (P < .001, HR 29.737). Moreover, sUTUC-BUC showed a better response to intravesical therapy and chemotherapy with higher cancer-specific survival (P < .001) and recurrence-free survival (P = .034). CONCLUSIONS The prognosis and pathological characteristics among different metachronous and synchronous UTUC and BUC were diverse. The synchronous UTUC-BUC group showed variant histology subtype, high-grade tumors, advanced tumors, multifocal UTUC, worse cancer-specific survival, but better response to intravesical therapy and chemotherapy.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Male
- Female
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy
- Aged
- Retrospective Studies
- Middle Aged
- Prognosis
- Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/pathology
- Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/mortality
- Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/therapy
- Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/surgery
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/pathology
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/mortality
- Treatment Outcome
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/mortality
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/therapy
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/surgery
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy
- Survival Analysis
- Aged, 80 and over
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zuo
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Jilong Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Liqing Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Gengyan Xiong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Chunru Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Qi Tang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang H, Xu Y, Wang K, Zheng C, Li Y, Gong H, Liu C, Sheng M, Xu Q, Sun Y, Chen J, Zhang X, Zhang C, Zhang H, Wang W. Large-scale Prospective Validation Study of a Multiplex RNA Urine Test for Noninvasive Detection of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:1384-1393. [PMID: 38523018 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current approaches for diagnosis and monitoring of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are often invasive, costly, and not efficient for early-stage and low-grade tumors. OBJECTIVE To validate a noninvasive urine-based RNA test for accurate UTUC diagnosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Urine samples were prospectively collected from 61 patients with UTUC and 99 controls without urothelial carcinomas, in five clinical centers between October 2022 and August 2023 prior to any invasive test (cystoscope or ureteroscope) or treatment. All samples were analyzed with a urine-based RNA test composed of eight genes (CA9, CCL18, ERBB2, IGF2, MMP12, PPP1R14D, SGK2, and SWINGN). The test results were presented with a risk score for each participant, which was applied to categorize patients into low- or high-risk groups. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The diagnosis of UTUC was based mainly on preoperative radiological examination criteria and confirmed by postoperative pathological results. The recursive feature elimination and support vector machine algorithms, χ2, and Student t test were used. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The eight-gene urine test accurately detected UTUC patients and controls with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.901 in a single-center testing cohort (n = 93) and an AUC of 0.926 in a multicenter clinical validation cohort (n = 66). In the merged validation cohort, the eight-gene urine test achieved high sensitivity of 90.16%, specificity of 88.89%, and overall accuracy of 89.38%. Remarkably, excellent performance was achieved in 11 low-grade UTUC patients with accuracy of 100%. However, this study collected the urine of UTUC patients only at a single preoperative time point and did not perform continuous tests during the pathological process of UTUC in the surveillance population. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrated that the eight-gene urine test can differentiate accurately between UTUC and other urological diseases with high sensitivity and specificity. In clinical practice, it may be used for identifying UTUC patients effectively, leading to reduced reliance on ureteroscopy and blind surgery. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study, we investigated a multiplex RNA urine test for noninvasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) diagnosis before treatment. We found that the risk scores derived from the multiplex RNA urine test differed significantly between UTUC patients and corresponding controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yue Xu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chaoyue Zheng
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yanfeng Li
- Department of Urology, Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Huijie Gong
- Department of Urology, Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Changming Liu
- The Department of Urology, Mindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Fuan, Fujian, China
| | - Mingxiong Sheng
- The Department of Urology, Mindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Fuan, Fujian, China
| | - Qinghua Xu
- The Canhelp Genomics Research Center, Canhelp Genomics Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China
| | - Yifeng Sun
- The Canhelp Genomics Research Center, Canhelp Genomics Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China; Department of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinying Chen
- The Canhelp Genomics Research Center, Canhelp Genomics Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China; Department of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Changwen Zhang
- Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
| | - Hongxian Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kardoust Parizi M, Rouprêt M, Singla N, Teoh JYC, Chlosta P, Babjuk M, Abufaraj M, Margulis V, D'Andrea D, Klemm J, Matsukawa A, Laukhtina E, Fazekas T, Karakiewicz PI, Bhanvadia R, Gontero P, Shariat SF. Preoperative Plasma Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I and Its Binding Proteins-Based Risk Stratification of Patients Treated With Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102133. [PMID: 38945766 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 05/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We evaluate the predictive and prognostic value of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-1), IGF binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) and -3 (IGFBP-3) in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional database comprising 753 patients who underwent RNU for UTUC and had a preoperative plasma available. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed. The discriminative ability and clinical utility of the models was calculated using the lasso regression test, area under receiver operating characteristics curves, C-index, and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS Lower preoperative plasma levels of IGFBP-2 and -3 independently correlated with increased risks of lymph node metastasis, pT3/4 disease, nonorgan confined disease, and worse recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) (all P ≤ .004). The addition of both IGFBP-2 and -3 to a postoperative multivariable model, that included standard clinicopathologic characteristics, improved the model's concordance index by 10%, 9%, and 8% for RFS, CSS, and OS, respectively. On DCA, addition of both IGFBP-2 and -3 to base models improved their performance for RFS, CSS, and OS by a statistically and clinically significant margin. Plasma IGF-1 was not associated with any of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS We confirmed that a lower plasma levels of IGFBP-2 and -3 both are independent and clinically significant predictors of adverse pathological features and survival outcomes in UTUC patients treated with RNU. These findings might help guide the clinical decision-making regarding perioperative systemic therapy and follow-up scheduling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Departement of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Piotr Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Special Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tamas Fazekas
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Departement of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Raj Bhanvadia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Urology, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Special Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Departement of Urology, Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee J, Lim SH, Chung JH, Song W, Sung HH, Jeong BC, Park SH. Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Real-World, Retrospective Study. Cancer Res Treat 2024; 56:871-876. [PMID: 38228080 PMCID: PMC11261205 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2023.1226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), administered following radical nephroureterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with UTUC, arising from renal pelvis or ureter, staged pT3/T4 or N+ were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery. The chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for up to 4 cycles. Endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and safety. RESULTS Among 89 eligible patients, 85 (95.5%) completed at least 3 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, the main toxicities being mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal toxic effects and pruritus. With a median follow-up of 37 months, median DFS was 30 months (95% confidence interval, 22 to 39), and the median MFS was not reached. The 3-year DFS and MFS were 44% and 56%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that the main factor associated with DFS and MFS was the lymph node involvement, whereas age, T category, grade, or the primary site of UTUC were not significantly associated with DFS or MFS. CONCLUSION Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy after radical surgery of pT3/T4 or N+ UTUC was feasible and may demonstrate benefits in DFS and MFS. Whether novel agents added to the chemotherapy regimen, as a concurrent combination or maintenance, impacts on survival or reduces the development of metastases remains to be studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junho Lee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Hee Lim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Chung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wan Song
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Hwan Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se Hoon Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ferro M, Chiujdea S, Vartolomei MD, Bove P, Porreca A, Busetto GM, Del Giudice F, Antonelli A, Foschi N, Racioppi M, Autorino R, Chiancone F, Longo N, Barone B, Crocetto F, Musi G, Luzzago S, Piccinelli ML, Mistretta FA, de Cobelli O, Tataru OS, Hurle R, Liguori G, Borghesi M, Veccia A, Greco F, Schips L, Marchioni M, Lucarelli G, Dutto D, Colucci F, Russo GI, Giudice AL, Montanari E, Boeri L, Simone G, Rosazza M, Livoti S, Gontero P, Soria F. Advanced Age Impacts Survival After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:27-37. [PMID: 37661507 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Upper tract urothelial carcinoma is rare but has a poor prognosis. Prognostic factors have been extensively studied in order to provide the best possible management for patients. We have aimed to investigate commonly available factors predictive of recurrence and survival in this patient population at high risk of death and recurrence, with an emphasis on the effects of age (using a cutoff of 70 years) on survival outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1387 patients with clinically nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy at 21 academic hospital centers between 2005 and 2021, 776 patients were eligible and included in the study. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were built to evaluate the independent prognosticators for intravesical and extravesical recurrence, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival according to age groups. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS We did not find an association between groups aged <70 and >70 years old and preoperatively clinical or histopathological characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was found no statistical significance between the 2 age groups in terms of intravesical or extravesical recurrence (P = .09 and P = .57). Overall survival (P = .0001) and cancer-specific survival (P = .0001) have been found to be statistically significantly associated with age as independent predictors (confounding factors: gender, tumor size, tumor side, clinical T stage, localization, preoperative hydronephrosis, tumor localization, type of surgery, multifocality of the tumor, pathological grade, lymphovascular invasion, concomitant CIS, lymph node status, necrosis, or history of previous bladder cancer). CONCLUSION This research confirms that patients aged 70 and above who undergo radical nephroureterectomy may have worse outcomes compared to younger patients, older patients needing an improved care and management of UTUC to improve their outcomes in the setting of an increase in this aged population group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Sever Chiujdea
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria; The Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies (I.O.S.U.D.), George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Mihai Dorin Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria; The Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies (I.O.S.U.D.), George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Pierluigi Bove
- San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy; Department of Experimental Medicine, Tor vergata Oncoscience Research Centre of Excellence, TOR, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Porreca
- Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nazario Foschi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Racioppi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Nicola Longo
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Octavian Sabin Tataru
- The Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies (I.O.S.U.D.), George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania; Department of Simulation Applied in Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Liguori
- Urology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Marco Borghesi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical Integrated Sciences (DISC), Urology Section, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Greco
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Luigi Schips
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d'Annunzio, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d'Annunzio, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Daniele Dutto
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Fulvia Colucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ivan Russo
- Department of Surgery, Urology Section, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Arturo Lo Giudice
- Department of Surgery, Urology Section, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Emanuele Montanari
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boeri
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Rosazza
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Livoti
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Narita C, Urabe F, Fukuokaya W, Iwatani K, Imai Y, Yasue K, Mori K, Aikawa K, Yanagisawa T, Kimura S, Tashiro K, Tsuzuki S, Yamada Y, Yuen SKK, Teoh JYC, Shimomura T, Yamada H, Furuta A, Miki J, Kimura T. Site-Specific Differences of Eligibility for Adjuvant Immunotherapy Among Urothelial Carcinoma Patients Treated With Radical Surgery: Results From a Multicenter Cohort Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024:102082. [PMID: 38641443 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The CheckMate274 trial has reported enhanced disease-free survival rates in patients with stage pT3-4/ypT2-4 or pN+ urothelial carcinoma (UC) undergoing adjuvant nivolumab therapy. This study compares prognostic differences between urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 719 patients with UC who underwent radical surgery, stratifying to patients at stage pT3-4 and/or pN+ without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or at ypT2-4 and/or ypN+ with NAC (potential candidates for adjuvant immunotherapy), and to those who were not candidates for adjuvant immunotherapy. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to assess oncological outcomes, particularly nonurothelial tract recurrence-free survival (NUTRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Risk factors were identified by Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly lower NUTRFS, CSS, and OS for potential adjuvant immunotherapy candidates than for noncandidates in each UCB and UTUC group. NUTRFS, CSS, and OS did not differ significantly between adjuvant immunotherapy candidates with UBC or UTUC. Trends were similar among patients ineligible for adjuvant immunotherapy. Pathological T stage (pT3-4 or ypT2-4), pathological N stage, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were independent predictors of oncological outcomes on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION The criteria for adjuvant immunotherapy candidates from the CheckMate 274 trial can also effectively stratify UC patients after radical surgery. Substantial clinical significance is attached to LVI status as well as to pathological T and N status, suggesting that LVI status should be considered when selecting suitable candidates for adjuvant immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chisato Narita
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumihiko Urabe
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosuke Iwatani
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yu Imai
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiji Yasue
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koichi Aikawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kojiro Tashiro
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Jikei Katsushika Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuta Yamada
- Department of Urology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Steffi Kar Kei Yuen
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Tatsuya Shimomura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Yamada
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Jikei Katsushika Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Furuta
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhu S, Zhao H. Sexual dimorphism in bladder cancer: a review of etiology, biology, diagnosis, and outcomes. Front Pharmacol 2024; 14:1326627. [PMID: 38283839 PMCID: PMC10811034 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1326627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Bladder carcinoma represents a prevalent malignancy, wherein the influence of sex extends across its incidence, biological attributes, and clinical outcomes. This scholarly exposition meticulously examines pertinent investigations, elucidating the nuanced impact of sex on bladder cancer, and posits cogent avenues for future research and intervention modalities. In the initial discourse, an exhaustive scrutiny is undertaken of the etiological underpinnings of bladder cancer, encompassing variables such as tobacco consumption, occupational exposures, and genetic aberrations. Subsequently, a comprehensive dissection unfolds, delving into the intricate biological disparities inherent in sex vis-à-vis the initiation and progression of bladder cancer. This analytical framework embraces multifaceted considerations, spanning sex hormones, sex chromosomal dynamics, metabolic enzymatic cascades, and the intricate interplay with the microbiome. Lastly, a synthesized exposition encapsulates the ramifications of gender differentials on the diagnostic and prognostic landscapes of bladder cancer, underscoring the imperative for intensified investigative endeavors directed towards elucidating gender-specific variances and the formulation of tailored therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng Zhu
- Department of Urology, Guilin Hospital of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Guilin, China
| | - Huasheng Zhao
- Department of Urology, ShaoYang Hosptial, Affiliated to University of South China, ShaoYang, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dłubak A, Karwacki J, Logoń K, Tomecka P, Brawańska K, Krajewski W, Szydełko T, Małkiewicz B. Lymph Node Dissection in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:1327-1344. [PMID: 37801187 PMCID: PMC10640513 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01460-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This narrative review aims to evaluate the role of lymph node dissection (LND) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and its implications for staging and management outcomes, as well as future perspectives. RECENT FINDINGS Multiple studies have demonstrated the limitations of conventional imaging techniques in accurately localizing lymph node metastasis (LNM) in UTUC. While 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) shows promise for preoperative LNM detection, its specificity is low. Alternative methods such as choline PET/CT and sentinel lymph node detection are under consideration but require further investigation. Additionally, various preoperative factors associated with LNM hold potential for predicting nodal involvement, thereby improving nodal staging and oncologic outcomes of LND. Several surgical approaches, including segmental ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy, provide a possibility for LND, while minimizing morbidity. LND remains the primary nodal staging tool for UTUC, but its therapeutic benefit is still uncertain. Advances in imaging techniques and preoperative risk assessment show promise in improving LNM detection. Further research and multi-center studies are needed to comprehensively assess the advantages and limitations of LND in UTUC, as well as the long-term outcomes of alternative staging and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Dłubak
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Jakub Karwacki
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Logoń
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Paulina Tomecka
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Kinga Brawańska
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Won YD, Lee SL, Seo KJ. Unusual Duodenal Ulcer: Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma of the Renal Pelvis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2455. [PMID: 37510203 PMCID: PMC10377969 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13142455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis (MUCP), a type of metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (MUTUC), is a rare malignancy, and some patients with MUCP present with distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis. MUCP in the gastrointestinal tract is even rarer. Herein, we report a 78-year-old man with MUCP that presented as a duodenal ulcer. He complained of anorexia, dizziness, and melena for one month. Endoscopic examination at a local clinic revealed a duodenal hemorrhagic and ulcerative lesion, and the patient was referred. He noted dark-colored stools with increasing frequency, but he denied hematochezia, coffee ground emesis, weight changes, or abdominal pain. Gastroduodenoscopic examination at our hospital demonstrated an ulcerofungating lesion of the second portion of the duodenum. Colonoscopic findings showed no abnormality. Computed tomography showed a 6.7 cm sized mass abutting the inferior vena cava, second portion of the duodenum, lower pole of the right kidney, and right iliopsoas. The mass showed heterogeneous enhancement and internal hemorrhagic necrosis and infiltrated the perinephric soft tissues, the second portion of the duodenum, the right psoas muscle, the right renal vein, and the right adrenal gland. Duodenal biopsy showed moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) showed diffuse and strong positivity for CK5/6. Tissue from the liver biopsy showed similar histopathologic features and showed GATA3 positivity on IHC. The imprint cytology smears of the liver tissue showed "cercariform" cell features. We confirmed the diagnosis as MUCP. This case illustrated a rare cause of a secondary duodenal tumor, MUCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoo Dong Won
- Department of Radiology, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Su Lim Lee
- Department of Radiology, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Jin Seo
- Department of Hospital Pathology, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liang PI, Lai HY, Chan TC, Li WM, Hsing CH, Huang SK, Hsieh KL, Tseng WH, Chen TJ, Li WS, Chen HD, Kuo YH, Li CF. Upregulation of dihydropyrimidinase-like 3 (DPYSL3) protein predicts poor prognosis in urothelial carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:599. [PMID: 37380971 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11090-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dihydropyrimidinase-like 3 (DPYSL3) is a cytosolic phosphoprotein expressed in the nervous system and is crucial for neurogenesis. A previous study showed that increased DPYSL3 expression promotes tumour aggressiveness in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, gastric cancer, and colon cancer. However, the role of DPYSL3 in affecting the biological behaviour of urothelial carcinoma (UC) is not yet understood. METHODS A UC transcriptomic dataset from the Gene Expression Omnibus and the Urothelial Bladder Cancer (BLCA) dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas were used for the in silico study. We collected 340 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and 295 urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma (UBUC) samples for the immunohistochemical study. Fresh tumour tissue from 50 patients was used to examine the DPYSL3 mRNA level. In addition, urothelial cell lines with and without DPYSL3 knockdown were used for the functional study. RESULTS The in silico study revealed that DPYSL3 correlated with advanced tumour stage and metastasis development while functioning primarily in the nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process (GO:0006139). DPYSL3 mRNA expression is significantly upregulated in advanced UC. Furthermore, overexpression of the DPYSL3 protein is significantly associated with the aggressive behaviour of UTUC and UBUC. DPYSL3 expression independently predicts disease-specific survival (DSS) and metastatic-free survival (MFS) in patients with UC. In non-muscle-invasive UBUC, DPYSL3 expression predicts local recurrence-free survival. UC cell lines with DPYSL3 knockdown exhibited decreased proliferation, migration, invasion, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) tube formation but increased apoptosis and G1 arrest. Gene ontology enrichment analysis revealed that the enriched processes related to DPYSL3 overexpression in UC were tissue morphogenesis, cell mesenchyme migration, smooth muscle regulation, metabolic processes, and RNA processing. In vivo study revealed DPYSL3 knockdown in UC tumours significantly suppressed the growth of tumours and decreased MYC and GLUT1 protein expression. CONCLUSIONS DPYSL3 promotes the aggressiveness of UC cells by changing their biological behaviours and is likely associated with cytoskeletal and metabolic process modifications. Furthermore, DPYSL3 protein overexpression in UC was associated with aggressive clinicopathological characteristics and independently predicted poor clinical outcomes. Therefore, DPYSL3 can be used as a novel therapeutic target for UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peir-In Liang
- Department of Pathology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807378, Taiwan
| | - Hong-Yue Lai
- Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, 710402, Taiwan
| | - Ti-Chun Chan
- Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, 710402, Taiwan
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, 704016, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807378, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807378, Taiwan
- Center for Liquid Biopsy and Cohort Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807378, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung, 90054, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Hsi Hsing
- Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, 710402, Taiwan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, 710402, Taiwan
| | - Steven K Huang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, 710402, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Science Industries, College of Health Sciences, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, 711301, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Lin Hsieh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, 710402, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hsin Tseng
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, 710402, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Ju Chen
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, 710402, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Technology, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, Tainan, 71703, Taiwan
| | - Wan-Shan Li
- Department of Medical Technology, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, Tainan, 71703, Taiwan
- Department of Pathology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, 710402, Taiwan
| | - Huan-Da Chen
- Department of Pathology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807378, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Hsuan Kuo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, 710402, Taiwan.
- College of Pharmacy and Science, Chia Nan University, Tainan, 71710, Taiwan.
| | - Chien-Feng Li
- Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, 710402, Taiwan.
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, 704016, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Huang YC, Liu JM, Liu HY, Chang YL, Chen CS, Ho DR, Wu CT, Chen MF, Wang HJ, Luo HL. Clinical Determinants of Extraurinary Tract Recurrence and Survival after Radical Surgery for pT2 Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061858. [PMID: 36980748 PMCID: PMC10047134 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Oncologic outcomes for pT2N0M0 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after nephroureterectomy are not well defined, with most previous studies focused on a heterogeneous population. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the clinical determinants of extraurinary tract recurrence and survival after radical surgery in patients with localized UTUC. Methods: We retrospectively identified 476 patients with pT2N0M0 UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy or ureterectomy between October 2002 and March 2022. To evaluate the prognostic impact, patients were divided into renal pelvic, ureteral, and both-region (renal pelvis plus synchronous ureter) groups based on tumor location. The outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Associations were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression analyses for prognostic factors and Kaplan–Meier analyses for survival curves. Results: The renal pelvic, ureteral, and both-region groups consisted of 151 (31.7%), 314 (66.0%), and 11 (2.3%) patients, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analyses comparing the three tumor types showed significant differences in 5-year RFS (83.6% vs. 73.6% vs. 52.5%, p = 0.013), CSS (88.6% vs. 80.7% vs. 51.0%, p = 0.011), and OS (83.4% vs. 70.1% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.002). Multivariable analyses showed that age >60 years, previous bladder cancer history, ureteral involvement (ureteral and both-regional groups), and positive surgical margins were significant negative prognostic factors for the studied outcomes. Conclusions: Patients with pT2 UTUC and presence of ureteral involvement had more frequent disease relapse. Subsequent adjuvant therapy regimens and close follow-up in patients with negative prognostic factors are warranted despite complete pathological removal of the tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun-Ching Huang
- Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 613, Taiwan; (Y.-C.H.); (C.-S.C.); (D.-R.H.)
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Jui-Ming Liu
- Department of Urology, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taoyuan 330, Taiwan;
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Ying Liu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan; (H.-Y.L.); (Y.-L.C.)
| | - Yin-Lun Chang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan; (H.-Y.L.); (Y.-L.C.)
| | - Chih-Shou Chen
- Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 613, Taiwan; (Y.-C.H.); (C.-S.C.); (D.-R.H.)
| | - Dong-Ru Ho
- Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 613, Taiwan; (Y.-C.H.); (C.-S.C.); (D.-R.H.)
| | - Chun-Te Wu
- Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan;
| | - Miao-Fen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan;
| | - Hung-Jen Wang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan; (H.-Y.L.); (Y.-L.C.)
- Correspondence: (H.-J.W.); (H.-L.L.); Tel.: +886-7-7317123 (ext. 8094) (H.-J.W. & H.-L.L.); Fax: +886-7-7354309 (H.-J.W. & H.-L.L.)
| | - Hao-Lun Luo
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan; (H.-Y.L.); (Y.-L.C.)
- Center for Shockwave Medicine and Tissue Engineering, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (H.-J.W.); (H.-L.L.); Tel.: +886-7-7317123 (ext. 8094) (H.-J.W. & H.-L.L.); Fax: +886-7-7354309 (H.-J.W. & H.-L.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mertens LS, Sharma V, Matin SF, Boorjian SA, Houston Thompson R, van Rhijn BW, Masson-Lecomte A. Bladder Recurrence Following Upper Tract Surgery for Urothelial Carcinoma: A Contemporary Review of Risk Factors and Management Strategies. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 49:60-66. [PMID: 36793750 PMCID: PMC9922921 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Bladder recurrences have been reported in 22-47% of patients after surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This collaborative review focuses on risk factors for and treatment strategies to reduce bladder recurrences after upper tract surgery for UTUC. Objective To review the current evidence on risk factors and treatment strategies for intravesical recurrence (IVR) after upper tract surgery for UTUC. Evidence acquisition This collaborative review is based on a literature search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and currently available guidelines on UTUC. Relevant papers on bladder recurrence (etiology, risk factors, and management) after upper tract surgery were selected. Special attention has been paid to (1) the genetic background of bladder recurrences, (2) bladder recurrences after ureterorenoscopy (URS) with or without a biopsy, and (3) postoperative or adjuvant intravesical instillations. The literature search was performed in September 2022. Evidence synthesis Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that bladder recurrences after upper tract surgery for UTUC are often clonally related. Clinicopathologic risk factors (patient, tumor, and treatment related) have been identified for bladder recurrences after UTUC diagnosis. Specifically, the use of diagnostic ureteroscopy before radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is associated with an increased risk of bladder recurrences. Further, a recent retrospective study suggests that performing a biopsy during ureteroscopy may further worsen IVR (no URS: 15.0%; URS without biopsy: 18.4%; URS with biopsy: 21.9%). Meanwhile, a single postoperative instillation of intravesical chemotherapy has been shown to be associated with a reduced bladder recurrence risk after RNU compared with no instillation (hazard ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.82). Currently, there are no data on the value of a single postoperative intravesical instillation after ureteroscopy. Conclusions Although based on limited retrospective data, performing URS seems to be associated with a higher risk of bladder recurrences. Future studies are warranted to assess the influence of other surgical factors as well as the role of URS biopsy or immediate postoperative intravesical chemotherapy after URS for UTUC. Patient summary In this paper, we review recent findings on bladder recurrences after upper tract surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S. Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Corresponding author. Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel. +31 20 512 2553.
| | - Vidit Sharma
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Surena F. Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Bas W.G. van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zalay O, Yan M, Sigurdson S, Malone S, Vera-Badillo FE, Mahmud A. Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Oncol 2022; 30:19-36. [PMID: 36661651 PMCID: PMC9858283 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30010002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare form of malignancy comprising only 5% of urothelial cancers. The mainstay of treatment is radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy is often used in locally advanced disease. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), however, remains controversial. To further explore the potential role of adjuvant RT, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from 1990 to present. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified 810 candidate articles from database searches, of which 67 studies underwent full-text review, with final inclusion of 20 eligible studies. Among the included studies, there were no randomized controlled trials and a single prospective trial, with the remainder being retrospective series. We performed quantitative synthesis of the results by calculating the pooled odds ratios (OR) for the primary outcome of locoregional recurrence (LRR) and secondary outcomes of overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and distant recurrence (DR). RESULTS Adjuvant RT, which was mostly prescribed for locally advanced or margin-positive disease following RNU, significantly reduced locoregional recurrence risk OR 0.43 (95% CI: 0.23-0.70), and the effect remained significant even following subgroup analysis to account for adjuvant systemic therapy. The effect of adjuvant RT on 3-year OS, 5-year CSS and DR was non-significant. However, 5-year OS was unfavourable in the adjuvant RT arm, but study heterogeneity was high, and analysis of small-study effects and subgroups suggested bias in reporting of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant RT in the setting of locally advanced UTUC improves locoregional control following definitive surgery, but does not appear to improve OS. Higher-quality studies, ideally randomized controlled trials, are needed to further quantify its benefit in this setting, and to explore multi-modal treatments that include systemic agents given concomitantly or sequentially with RT, which may offer an OS benefit in addition to the locoregional control benefit of RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osbert Zalay
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Michael Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Samantha Sigurdson
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Shawn Malone
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Francisco Emilio Vera-Badillo
- Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen’s Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON K7L 2V5, Canada
| | - Aamer Mahmud
- Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Prognostic Significance of Organ-Specific Metastases in Patients with Metastatic Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11185310. [PMID: 36142956 PMCID: PMC9504073 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11185310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Existing data on metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (mUTUC) are limited. In this study, we investigated the prognostic value of site-specific metastases in patients with mUTUC and its association with survival outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2016. Kaplan−Meier analysis with a log-rank test was used for survival comparisons. Multivariate Cox regression was employed to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results: 633 patients were selected in this study cohort. The median follow-up was 6 months (IQR 2−13) and a total of 584 (92.3%) deaths were recorded. Within the population presenting with a single metastatic organ site, the most common metastatic sites were distant lymph nodes, accounting for 36%, followed by lung, bone and liver metastases, accounting for 26%, 22.8% and 16.2%, respectively. In patients with a single metastatic organ site, the Kaplan−Meier curves showed significantly worse OS for patients with liver metastases vs. patients presenting with metastases in a distant lymph node (p < 0.001), bone (p = 0.023) or lung (p = 0.026). When analyzing CSS, statistically significant differences were detectable only between patients presenting with liver metastases vs. distant lymph node metastases (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that the presence of liver (OS: HR = 1.732, 95% CI = 1.234−2.430, p < 0.001; CSS: HR = 1.531, 95% CI = 1.062−2.207, p = 0.022) or multiple metastatic organ sites (OS: HR = 1.425, 95% CI = 1.159−1.753, p < 0.001; CSS: HR = 1.417, 95% CI = 1.141−1.760, p = 0.002) was an independent predictor of poor survival. Additionally, survival benefits were found in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) (OS: HR = 0.675, 95% CI = 0.514−0.886, p = 0.005; CSS: HR = 0.671, 95% CI = 0.505−0.891, p = 0.006) and chemotherapy (CHT) (OS: HR = 0.405, 95% CI = 0.313−0.523, p < 0.001; CSS: HR = 0.435, 95% CI = 0.333−0.570, p < 0.001). Conclusions: A distant lymph node was the most common site of single-organ metastases for mUTUC. Patients with liver metastases and patients with multiple organ metastases exhibited worse survival outcomes. Lastly, CHT administration and RNU were revealed to be predictors of better survival outcomes in the mUTUC cohort.
Collapse
|
15
|
Li X, Li H, Gao XS, Fang D, Qin S, Zhang Z, Zhou L, Li X, Wang D. Effectiveness of adjuvant radiotherapy for high recurrence risk patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:410.e1-410.e10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
16
|
Laukhtina E, Lemberger U, Bruchbacher A, Ilijazi D, Korn S, Berndl F, D’Andrea D, Susani M, Enikeev D, Compérat E, Shariat SF, Hassler MR. Expression Analysis and Mutational Status of Histone Methyltransferase KMT2D at Different Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Locations. J Pers Med 2021; 11:1147. [PMID: 34834500 PMCID: PMC8625702 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11111147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The gene coding for histone methyltransferase KMT2D is found among the top mutated genes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); however, there is a lack of data regarding its association with clinicopathologic features as well as survival outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to investigate KMT2D expression, mutation patterns, and their utility as prognostic biomarkers in patients with UTUC. A single-center study was conducted on tumor specimens from 51 patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Analysis of KMT2D protein expression was performed using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Customized next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to assess alterations in KMT2D exons. Cox regression was used to assess the relationship of KMT2D protein expression and mutational status with survival outcomes. KMT2D expression was increased in patients with a previous history of bladder cancer (25% vs. 0%, p = 0.02). The NGS analysis of KMT2D exons in 27 UTUC tumors revealed a significant association between pathogenic KMT2D variants and tumor location (p = 0.02). Pathogenic KMT2D variants were predominantly found in patients with non-pelvic or multifocal tumors (60% vs. 14%), while the majority of patients with a pelvic tumor location (81% vs. 20%) did not harbor pathogenic KMT2D alterations. Both IHC and NGS analyses of KMT2D failed to detect a statistically significant association between KMT2D protein or KMT2D gene alteration status and clinical variables such as stage/grade of the disease or survival outcomes (all p > 0.05). KMT2D alterations and protein expression were associated with UTUC features such as multifocality, ureteral location, and previous bladder cancer. While KMT2D protein expression and KMT2D mutational status do not seem to have prognostic value in UTUC, they appear to add information to improve clinical decision-making regarding the type of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119435 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Ursula Lemberger
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Andreas Bruchbacher
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Dafina Ilijazi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Stephan Korn
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Florian Berndl
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
| | - David D’Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
| | - Martin Susani
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (M.S.); (E.C.)
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119435 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (M.S.); (E.C.)
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119435 Moscow, Russia;
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, 1010 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Melanie R. Hassler
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.L.); (U.L.); (A.B.); (D.I.); (S.K.); (F.B.); (D.D.); (S.F.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhao F, Qi N, Zhang C, Xue N, Li S, Zhou R, Chen Z, Yao R, Zhu H. Impact of Surgical Wait Time on Survival in Patients With Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma With Hydronephrosis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:698594. [PMID: 34290988 PMCID: PMC8287585 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.698594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives Due to the inevitability of waiting time for surgery, this problem seems to have become more pronounced since the outbreak of COVID-19, and due to the high incidence of preoperative hydronephrosis in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients, it is particularly important to explore the impact of preoperative waiting time and hydronephrosis on upper urinary urothelial carcinoma. Methods 316 patients with UTUC who underwent radical surgery at a high-volume center in China between January 2008 and December 2019 were included in this study. We retrospectively collected the clinicopathologic data from the medical records, including age, sex, smoking history, ECOG performance status (ECOG PS), body mass index (BMI), tumor location and size, number of lesions, T stage, N stage, surgical approach and occurrence of hydronephrosis, lymph node invasion, lymph node dissection, surgical margin, tumor necrosis, infiltrative tumor architecture, lymphovascular invasion and concomitant bladder cancer. Surgical wait time was defined as the interval between initial imaging diagnosis and radical surgery of UTUC. Hydronephrosis was defined as abnormal dilation of the renal pelvis and calyces due to obstruction of the urinary system. Firstly, all patients were divided into short-wait (<31 days), intermediate-wait (31-90 days) and long-wait (>90 days) groups according to the surgical wait time. The clinicopathological characteristics of each group were evaluated and the survival was compared. For patients with hydronephrosis, we subsequently divided them into two groups: short-wait (≤60 days) and long-wait (>60 days) groups according to the surgical wait time. Univariate and multivariate COX regression analysis were performed to evaluate the prognostic risk factor for patients with hydronephrosis. Results A total of 316 patients with UTUC were included in this study with a median surgical wait time of 22 days (IQR 11-71 days). Of the 316 patients, 173 were classified into the short-wait group (54.7%), 69 into the intermediate-wait group (21.8%) and 74 into the long-wait group (23.5%). The median follow-up time for all patients was 43 months (IQR 28-67months). The median surgical wait times of the short-wait, intermediate-wait and long-wait group were12 days (IQR 8-17days), 42days (IQR 37-65days) and 191days (IQR 129-372days), respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of all patients was 54.3%. The 5-year OS of short-wait, intermediate-wait and long-wait groups were 56.4%, 59.3% and 35.1%, respectively (P=0.045). The 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) of short-wait, intermediate-wait and long-wait groups were 65.8%, 70.9% and 39.6%, respectively (P=0.032). In the subgroup analysis, we divided 158 UTUC patients with hydronephrosis into short-wait group (≤60 days) and long-wait group (> 60 days), 120 patients were included in the short-wait group and 38 patients in the long-wait group. The median surgical wait times of the short-wait and long-wait group were 14days (IQR 8-28days) and 174days (IQR 100-369days), respectively. The 5-year OS of long-wait group was significantly lower than the OS of short-wait group (44.2% vs. 55.1%, P =0.023). The 5-year CSS of long-wait and short-wait group were 49.1% and 61.7%, respectively (P=0.041). In multivariate Cox regression analysis of UTUC patients with hydronephrosis, surgical wait time, tumor grade, pathological T stage, and tumor size were independent risk factors for OS and CSS. Lymph node involvement was also a prognostic factor for CSS. Conclusion For patients with UTUC, the surgical wait time should be limited to less than 3 months. For UTUC patients with hydronephrosis, the OS and CSS of patients with surgical wait time of more than 60 days were relatively shorted than those of patients with surgical wait time of less than 60 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangzheng Zhao
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Nienie Qi
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Chu Zhang
- Department of Neurobiology, Xuzhou Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Ning Xue
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Shuaishuai Li
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Raorao Zhou
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Zeyu Chen
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Ruiqin Yao
- Department of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Haitao Zhu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
König F, Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Mun DH, Rink M, Pradere B. Quality indicators for the management of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma requiring radical nephroureterectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:291-296. [PMID: 33973537 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this article was to identify quality indicators for an optimized management of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) requiring radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). RECENT FINDINGS RNU with bladder cuff resection is the standard treatment of high-risk UTUC. For the bladder cuff resection, two main approaches are accepted: transvesical and extravesical. Lymph node dissection following a dedicated template should be performed in all high-risk patients undergoing RNU as it improves tumour staging and possibly survival. Postoperative bladder instillation of single-dose chemotherapy should be administered after RNU to decrease the risk of intravesical tumour recurrence. Perioperative systemic chemotherapy should always be considered for advanced cancers. Although level-1 evidence is available for adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, neoadjuvant regimens are still being evaluated. SUMMARY Optimal management of high-risk UTUC requires evidence-based reproducible quality indicators in order to allow guidance and frameworks for clinical practices. Adherence to quality indicators allows for the measurement and comparison of outcomes that are likely to improve prognosis. Based on the literature, we found four evidence-based accepted quality indicators that are easily implementable to improve the management of high-risk UTUC patients treated with RNU: adequate management of the distal ureter/ bladder cuff, template-based lymph node dissection, single-shot postoperative intravesical chemotherapy, and perioperative systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Dong-Ho Mun
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Anno T, Kikuchi E, Shigeta K, Ogihara K, Watanabe K, Yanai Y, Takamatsu K, Hasegawa S, Masuda T, Oyama M, Mizuno R, Oya M. Site-specific differences in survival among upper and lower tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical surgery. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 51:984-991. [PMID: 33589927 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyab003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It currently remains unclear whether the location of primary tumours affects the clinical outcomes of patients with locally advanced urothelial carcinoma in the urinary tract. The aim of the present study was to compare prognostic differences between bladder urothelial carcinoma and upper tract urothelial carcinoma, particularly pT3 or higher tumours. METHODS In total, 307 patients with pT3 or higher urothelial carcinoma without distant metastasis who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder urothelial carcinoma (N = 127, 41.4%) or radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (N = 180, 58.6%) at Keio University Hospital and three affiliated hospitals between 1994 and 2017 were enrolled. Oncological outcomes were compared between bladder urothelial carcinoma and upper tract urothelial carcinoma using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Significantly higher rates of male patients, smokers, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, lymph node involvement and lymphovascular invasion were observed in the bladder urothelial carcinoma group. The incidence of regional lymph node or local recurrence was higher in patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma than in those with upper tract urothelial carcinoma, while that of lung metastasis was lower. In all patients, bladder urothelial carcinoma was independently associated with disease recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 1.504, P = 0.035) in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and lymphovascular invasion. Bladder urothelial carcinoma was also independently associated with cancer death (HR = 1.998, P = 0.002) as well as lymphovascular invasion. Following the exclusion of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, bladder urothelial carcinoma remained an independent risk factor for disease recurrence and cancer death (HR = 1.702, P = 0.010 and HR = 1.888, P = 0.013, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Bladder urothelial carcinoma may follow worse prognosis compared to upper tract urothelial carcinoma, particularly that with a high pathological stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadatsugu Anno
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiji Kikuchi
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Keisuke Shigeta
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koichiro Ogihara
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keitaro Watanabe
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Yanai
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Shintaro Hasegawa
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Tochigi Medical Center, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Takeshi Masuda
- Department of Urology, Saitama City Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masafumi Oyama
- Department of Uro-Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Mizuno
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mototsugu Oya
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Risk Stratification of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma for Kidney-Sparing Surgery. Bladder Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
21
|
Inamoto T, Matsuyama H, Komura K, Ibuki N, Fujimoto K, Shiina H, Sakano S, Nagao K, Mastumoto H, Miyake M, Tatsumi Y, Yasumoto H, Azuma H. Tumor Location Based Segmentation in Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Impacts on the Urothelial Recurrence-Free Survival: A Multi-Institutional Database Study. Curr Urol 2020; 14:183-190. [PMID: 33488336 DOI: 10.1159/000499240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction and Objectives The predictive impact of primary tumor location for patients with upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in the presence of concomitant urothelial bladder cancer, along with urothelial recurrence after the curative treatment is still contentious. We evaluated the association between precise tumor location and concomitant presence of urothelial bladder cancer and urothelial recurrence-free survival in patients with UTUC treated by radical nephroureterectomy with a bladder cuff. Methods A total of 1,349 patients with localized UTUC (Ta-4N0M0) from a retrospective multi-institutional cohort were studied. We queried four UTUC databases. This retrospective clinical series was of patients with localized UTUC managed by nephroureter-ectomy with a bladder cuff, for whom data were from the Nishinihon Uro-Oncology Collaborative Group registries. Patients with a history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded from the study. Associations between the location of the tumor and subsequent outcome following nephroureterectomy were assessed using COX multivariate analysis. The location of the tumor was verified by pathological samples. Urothelial recurrence was defined as tumor relapse in any local urothelium, and coded apart from distant metastasis. The median follow-up was 34 months. Results A total of 887 patients had an evaluation of the tumor location in which 475 patients had pelvic tumors (53.6%), 96 had ureteral tumors in the U1 segment (10.8%), 87 in the U2 segment (9.8%), and 176 in the U3 segment (19.8%). There were 52 patients who had multifocal tumors (5.9%) as follows: 8 (0.9%) in the pelvis and ureter, 11 (1.2%) in U1 + U2, 1 (0.1%) in U1 + U3, 27 (3.0 %) in U2 + U3, and 6 (0.7%) in U1 + U2 + U3. In all, 145 (16.3%) had concomitant bladder tumors. Logistic regression analysis of gender, age, hydronephrosis, cytology, performance status, grade, lymphovascular invasion, pT, pN, and tumor focality showed that tumor location was associated with the presence of concomitant bladder cancer (p = 0.004, HR = 1.265). When the tumor location was stratified into 8 segments, including multifocal tumors, only the U3 segment remained as a predictor for the presence of concomitant bladder cancer (p = 0.002, HR = 2.872). Kaplan-Meier analysis for unifocal disease showed that lower ureter tumors (a combination of U2 and U3) had a worse prognosis for urothelial recurrence than pelvic tumors or upper ureteral tumors (U1) (p < 0.001 for lower ureteral tumors versus pelvic tumors, p = 0.322 for upper ureteral tumor versus pelvic tumor by log rank). Multivariate analysis showed that lower ureter remained as a prognostic factor for urothelial recurrence after adjusting for gender, age, hydronephrosis, urine cytology, lymphovascular invasion, pT, and pN (p < 0.001, HR = 1.469), and a similar tendency was found when the analysis was run for patients without concomitant bladder tumors (p = 0.003, HR = 1.446). Patients with lower ureteral tumors had a higher prevalence of deaths (HR = 2.227) compared to patients with upper ureter tumors. Conclusions This multi-institutional study showed that the primary tumor locations were independently associated with the presence of concomitant bladder tumors and subsequent urothelial recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teruo Inamoto
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka
| | - Hideyasu Matsuyama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi
| | - Kazumasa Komura
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka
| | - Naokazu Ibuki
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka
| | | | - Hiroaki Shiina
- Department of Urology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Shigeru Sakano
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi
| | - Kazuhiro Nagao
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi
| | - Hiroaki Mastumoto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi
| | - Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara
| | | | - Hiroaki Yasumoto
- Department of Urology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Haruhito Azuma
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Aydh A, Abufaraj M, Mori K, Quhal F, Pradere B, Motlagh RS, Mostafaei H, Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF. Performance of fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging for lymph node staging in bladder and upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review. Arab J Urol 2020; 19:59-66. [PMID: 33763249 PMCID: PMC7954498 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2020.1858012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the current literature on the accuracy of fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG PET-CT) for lymph node (LN) staging in urothelial carcinoma (UC), as robust evidence on the value of this technology in UC is still lacking. Methods: The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE)/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched for eligible studies. We included all original studies evaluating FDG PET-CT in bladder or upper tract UC. The search results were restricted to the English language, and included prospective and retrospective studies without time restriction. We included only studies reporting the sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET-CT in detecting UC LN metastases. Results: We identified 23 articles meeting our inclusion criteria. In the preoperative setting, the sensitivity of FDG PET-CT for detecting LN metastases in patients with bladder cancer was widely variable ranging from 23% to 89%; the specificity ranged from 81% to 100%; and the overall accuracy ranged from 65% to 89%. During bladder cancer monitoring the sensitivity for detecting LN metastases ranged from 75% to 92% and the specificity ranged from 60% to 92%. The sensitivity for LN staging in upper tract UC ranged between 82% and 95%, with a specificity of 84–91%. Conclusion: Despite the inconsistencies in sensitivity between the reports, FDG PET-CT seems to have a high specificity for LN staging in patients with UC. Future prospective, well-designed studies are necessary to evaluate the role of FDG PET-CT in UC management. Abbreviations: FDG: fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose; LN: lymph node; PET: positron emission tomography; PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses; PSMA: prostate-specific membrane antigen; (N)(P)PV: (negative) (positive) predictive value; QUADAS-2: Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2; SUVmax: maximum standard uptake value; (UT)UC: (upper urinary tract) urothelial carcinoma
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, the University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, To Urs, France
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, the University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.,Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Karl Landsteiner Institute, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Singla N, Christie A, Freifeld Y, Ghandour RA, Woldu SL, Clinton TN, Petros FG, Robyak H, Yeh HC, Fang D, Enikeev D, Bagrodia A, Sagalowsky AI, Lotan Y, Raman JD, Matin SF, Margulis V. Pathologic stage as a surrogate for oncologic outcomes after receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:933.e7-933.e12. [PMID: 32430254 PMCID: PMC10676742 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Whether pathologic stage at radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) can serve as an appropriate surrogate for oncologic outcomes in patients with high-grade (HG) upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is not defined. We sought to determine whether patients who achieve pathologically non-muscle-invasive (ypT0, ypTa, ypT1, ypTis) HG UTUC after receipt of NAC exhibit oncologic outcomes comparable to those who are inherently low stage without chemotherapy. METHODS We identified 647 UTUC patients who underwent RNU among 3 institutions from 1993to2016. Patients with low or unknown grade, pathologic muscle invasion, or receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. We compared clinicopathologic data and oncologic outcomes between pT0-1 and ypT0-1 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess overall (OS), cancer-specific (CSS), and systemic recurrence-free (RFS) survival. Predictors of these endpoints were identified using Cox regression. RESULTS 234 (43 ypT0-1, 191 pT0-1) patients with HG UTUC were included. Two patients exhibited pathologic complete response after NAC. OS (P = 0.055), CSS (P = 0.152), and RFS (P = 0.098) were similar between ypT0-1 and pT0-1 patients. Predictors of worse outcomes included African-American race (RFS, CSS, and OS), Charlson score (OS), and systemic recurrence (OS and CSS). CONCLUSIONS Patients with HG UTUC who achieve ypT0-1 stage after NAC exhibit favorable oncologic outcomes comparable to those inherently non-muscle-invasive who do not receive chemotherapy. Improvements in clinical staging will play an important role in better defining candidacy for NAC in treating HG UTUC while minimizing overtreatment. Furthermore, pathologic stage may serve as an appropriate early surrogate for oncologic endpoints in designing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Alana Christie
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Clinical Sciences, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Yuval Freifeld
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Rashed A Ghandour
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Solomon L Woldu
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Timothy N Clinton
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Firas G Petros
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Haley Robyak
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Hsin-Chih Yeh
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Dong Fang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Arthur I Sagalowsky
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jay D Raman
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tam AW, Liaw C, Li E, Katims AB, Say RK, Gul Z, Winoker JS, Martini A, Audenet F, Sfakianos JP. The effect of tumor location on overall survival for pT2-4 bladder and upper tract urothelial carcinoma following radical surgery. Can Urol Assoc J 2020; 15:E248-E255. [PMID: 33119498 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Historically, staging and treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma were extrapolated from bladder urothelial carcinoma literature. However, embryological, genetic, and anatomical differences exist between them. We sought to explore the relationship between location of urothelial cancer and overall survival (OS). METHODS Data was culled from the National Cancer Database from 2004-2015. Patients with pT2-pT4 treated with definitive surgery were included; those with metastatic disease or who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment were excluded. Patients were stratified by tumor location and pathological stage. The primary outcome was OS. Secondary outcomes were predictors of mortality in each pT stage stratum. RESULTS A total of 11 330 patients with bladder, 954 patients with ureteral, and 1943 patients with renal pelvis urothelial carcinoma were analyzed. Mean followup was 43.3, 39.4, and 41.4 months for bladder, ureteral, and renal pelvis, respectively. On univariable analysis, ureteral pT2 was associated with worse OS compared to both bladder (61.3 vs. 80.4 months, p=0.007) and renal pelvis (61.3 vs. 80.5 months, p=0.014). Renal pelvis pT3 was associated with improved OS compared to both bladder (42.5 vs. 28.6 months, p=0.003) and ureteral (42.5 vs. 25.7 months, p<0.001). Renal pelvis pT4 had decreased survival compared to bladder (11.4 vs. 17.7 months, p<0.001). On multivariable Cox regression, only renal pelvis pT3 was associated with a 20% decreased risk of mortality compared to bladder pT3 (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.72-0.88, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Renal pelvis pT3 is associated with lower mortality. Mutational and embryological differences may play a role in this disparity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew W Tam
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Christine Liaw
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Eric Li
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Andrew B Katims
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rollin K Say
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Zeynep Gul
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jared S Winoker
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Francois Audenet
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - John P Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
D'Andrea D, Matin S, Black PC, Petros FG, Zargar H, Dinney CP, Cookson MS, Kassouf W, Dall'Era MA, McGrath JS, Wright JL, Thorpe AC, Morgan TM, Holzbeierlein JM, Bivalacqua TJ, Sridhar SS, North S, Barocas DA, Lotan Y, Stephenson AJ, van Rhijn BW, Spiess PE, Daneshmand S, Shariat SF. Comparative effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bladder and upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int 2020; 127:528-537. [PMID: 32981193 PMCID: PMC8246716 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess the differential response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) compared to upper tract urothelial carcioma (UTUC) treated with radical surgery. Patients and Methods Data from 1299 patients with UCB and 276 with UTUC were obtained from multicentric collaborations. The association of disease location (UCB vs UTUC) with pathological complete response (pCR, defined as a post‐treatment pathological stage ypT0N0) and pathological objective response (pOR, defined as ypT0‐Ta‐Tis‐T1N0) after NAC was evaluated using logistic regression analyses. The association with overall (OS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) was evaluated using Cox regression analyses. Results A pCR was found in 250 (19.2%) patients with UCB and in 23 (8.3%) with UTUC (P < 0.01). A pOR was found in 523 (40.3%) patients with UCB and in 133 (48.2%) with UTUC (P = 0.02). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients with UTUC were less likely to have a pCR (odds ratio [OR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27–0.70; P < 0.01) and more likely to have a pOR (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.89–2.08; P < 0.01). On univariable Cox regression analyses, UTUC was associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.64–0.99, P = 0.04) and CSS (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.49–0.83; P < 0.01). On multivariable Cox regression analyses, UTUC remained associated with CSS (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45–0.82; P < 0.01), but not with OS. Conclusions Our present findings suggest that the benefit of NAC in UTUC is similar to that found in UCB. These data can be used as a benchmark to contextualise survival outcomes and plan future trial design with NAC in urothelial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Surena Matin
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Firas G Petros
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplant, Eleanor N. Dana Cancer Center, The University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Homayoun Zargar
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Colin P Dinney
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael S Cookson
- Department of Urology, Center and The Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marc A Dall'Era
- Department of Urology, Davis Medical Center, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - John S McGrath
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Andrew C Thorpe
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Trinity J Bivalacqua
- Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Scott North
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Stephenson
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bas W van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Urology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.,European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Quhal F, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, Mori K, Motlagh RS, Rink M, D'Andrea D, Abufaraj M, Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF. Diagnostic challenges and treatment strategies in the management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Turk J Urol 2020; 47:S33-S44. [PMID: 33052841 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease, posing many challenges for the treating physician due to the lack of strong evidence-based recommendations. However, novel molecular discoveries and a better understanding of the clinical behavior of the disease lead to a continuous evolution of therapeutic landscape in UTUC. The aim of the review is to provide a comprehensive update of the current diagnostic modalities and treatment strategies in UTUC with a special focus on recent developments and challenges. A comprehensive literature search including relevant articles up to August 2020 was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed database. Despite several technological improvements, accurate staging and outcome prediction remain major challenges and hamper appropriate risk stratification. Kidney-sparing surgery can be offered in low risk UTUC; however, physician and patient must be aware of the high rate of recurrence and risk of progression due to tumor biology and understaging. The value and efficacy of intracavitary therapy in patients with UTUC remains unclear due to the lack of high-quality data. In high-risk diseases, radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision and template lymph node dissection is the standard of care. Perioperative systemic chemotherapy is today accepted as a novel standard for advanced cancers. In metastatic or unresectable disease, the therapeutic landscape is rapidly changing due to several novel agents, such as checkpoint inhibitors. While several diagnostic and treatment challenges remain, progress in endoscopic technology and molecular knowledge have ushered a new age in personalized management of UTUC. Novel accurate molecular and imaging biomarkers are, however, still needed to guide decision making as tissue acquisition remains suboptimal. Next generation sequencing and novel agents are promising to rapidly improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zennami K, Sumitomo M, Takahara K, Nukaya T, Takenaka M, Fukaya K, Ichino M, Fukami N, Sasaki H, Kusaka M, Shiroki R. Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int 2020; 127:332-339. [PMID: 32896105 PMCID: PMC7984033 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for high-risk cN0M0 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and to evaluate the efficacy of NAC in patients with localised disease (≤cT2). PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analysed patients with high-risk cN0M0 UTUC who received NAC followed by surgery, compared with a matched cohort who underwent initial surgery at Fujita Health University during 2005-2019. Baseline and tumour characteristics, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the cohorts. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS There were 117 and 67 patients in the study group and the control group, respectively. Significantly higher pathological downstaging (pDS) and lower lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were observed in the study group than in the control group (48% vs 22%, P = 0.008 and 29% vs 46%, P = 0.045, respectively). The NAC group had significantly better 5-year OS (79% vs 53%, P = 0.003), 5-year CSS (84% vs 66%, P = 0.008), and 5-year RFS (80% vs 61%, P = 0.001) than the control group. The OS benefit of NAC was observed even in patients with localised (≤cT2) disease (P = 0.019). Patients with LVI showed significantly worse CSS both in pathologically locally advanced (≥pT3) and in localised (≤pT2) tumours (P = 0.048 and P = 0.018, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified LVI, NAC, and pDS as independent predictors of OS. Male sex and post-NAC LVI were identified as predictors of worse survival in patients who underwent NAC. CONCLUSIONS Two cycles of NAC improved the survival of patients with high-risk UTUC, even in patients with localised disease. Although two cycles of NAC appear to be effective in cN0M0 high-risk UTUC including localised disease, additional larger sample size multicentre prospective studies comparing short-course NAC regimens followed by surgery and surgery alone are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Zennami
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Makoto Sumitomo
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Takahara
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Takuhisa Nukaya
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Masashi Takenaka
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Kosuke Fukaya
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Manabu Ichino
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Naohiko Fukami
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Hitomi Sasaki
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Mamoru Kusaka
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Shiroki
- Department of Urology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
D'Andrea D, Pradere B, Shariat SF. Re: Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (the POUT Trial): A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur Urol 2020; 79:163-164. [PMID: 32981804 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Academic Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
The Performance of Tumor Size as Risk Stratification Parameter in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC). Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 19:272.e1-272.e7. [PMID: 33046411 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of different tumor diameters for identifying ≥ pT2 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) at radical nephroureterectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a multi-institutional retrospective study that included 932 patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy for nonmetastatic UTUC between 2000 and 2016. Tumor sizes were pathologically assessed and categorized into 4 groups: ≤ 1 cm, 1.1 to 2 cm, 2.1 to 3 cm, and > 3 cm. We performed logistic regression and decision-curve analyses. RESULTS Overall, 45 (4.8%) patients had a tumor size ≤ 1 cm, 141 (15.1%) between 1.1 and 2 cm, 247 (26.5%) between 2.1 and 3 cm, and 499 (53.5%) > 3 cm. In preoperative predictive models that were adjusted for the effects of standard clinicopathologic features, tumor diameters > 2 cm (odds ratio, 2.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.70-3.32; P < .001) and > 3 cm (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-2.38; P < .001) were independently associated with ≥ pT2 pathologic staging. The addition of the > 2-cm diameter cutoff improved the area under the curve of the model from 58.8% to 63.0%. Decision-curve analyses demonstrated a clinical net benefit of 0.09 and a net reduction of 8 per 100 patients. CONCLUSION The 2-cm cutoff appears to be most useful in identifying patients at risk of harboring ≥ pT2 UTUC. This confirms the current European Association of Urology guideline's risk stratification. Tumor size alone is not sufficient for optimal risk stratification, rather a constellation of features is needed to select the best candidate for kidney-sparing surgery.
Collapse
|
30
|
Petros FG. Epidemiology, clinical presentation, and evaluation of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1794-1798. [PMID: 32944542 PMCID: PMC7475674 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.11.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
An overview of epidemiological pattern of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), including outcome of UTUC over past decades as well as factors responsible for observed epidemiological changes was performed. Gender and racial disparities influencing incidence of UTUC were reviewed. The incidence of multifocal urothelial carcinoma and relation of UTUC to urothelial carcinoma of bladder were examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Firas G Petros
- Department of Urology, The University of Toledo Medical Center, College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Liu Z, Huang J, Li X, Huang C, Ye Y, Zhang J, Liu Z. The effectiveness of chemotherapy for patients with pT3N0M0 renal pelvic urothelial carcinomas: An inverse probability of treatment weighting comparison using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. Cancer Med 2020; 9:5756-5766. [PMID: 32585775 PMCID: PMC7433845 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Unlike the established evidence to use chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, presently there are insufficient data to inform a recommendation on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treatment. The prognosis for patients with stage T4 and positive lymph nodes is poor; however, primary tumors in the renal pelvis are associated with favorable prognoses compared to those located in the ureter. Our study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of chemotherapy in patients with pT3N0M0 renal pelvic urothelial carcinomas (RPUC) who have relative favorable prognosis. Methods Patients with pT3N0M0 tumors who underwent radical nephroureterectomy combined with bladder cuff excision between 2005 and 2014 and registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were eligible for inclusion (n = 939). Baseline characteristics between the chemotherapy and observation groups were controlled for with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)‐adjusted analysis. Results After the IPTW‐adjusted analysis, the 5‐year IPTW‐adjusted rates of overall survival (OS) for the chemotherapy and observation groups were 53.1% and 44.9%, respectively. The IPTW‐adjusted Kaplan‐Meier curves suggested that chemotherapy was associated with increased OS compared with observation (P = .028). In the IPTW‐adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression model, chemotherapy was associated with favorable survival benefits compared with observation (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% CI 0.52‐0.92, P = .031), and this was maintained after bootstrapping (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.49‐0.93). Chemotherapy had a protective effect on OS benefits, which were found in a majority of the results of the subgroup analysis and were consistent with the main results (all P‐interactions > 0.05). Conclusion Chemotherapy may provide significant OS benefits for patients with pT3N0M0 RPUC. The results of our study could strengthen the evidence for using adjuvant chemotherapy in this rare group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zefu Liu
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jialing Huang
- Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiangdong Li
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chaowen Huang
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yunlin Ye
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jinxin Zhang
- Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhouwei Liu
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Califano G, Xylinas E. Re: Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy Followed by Extirpative Surgery in Patients with High Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2020; 78:113-114. [PMID: 32387123 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital Paris Descartes University, Paris, France; Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tan P, Shi M, Chen J, Xu H, Xie N, Xu H, Jiang Y, Ai JZ, Liu LR, Yang L, Wei Q. The preoperative serum cystatin-C as an independent prognostic factor for survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Asian J Androl 2020; 21:163-169. [PMID: 30416134 PMCID: PMC6413544 DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_84_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Cystatin-C (Cys-C) has been reported as a valuable prognostic biomarker in various malignancies. However, its effect on upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients has not been investigated before. Thus, to explore the impact of Cys-C on survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), a total of 538 patients with UTUC who underwent RNU between 2005 and 2014 in our center (West China Hospital, Chengdu, China) were included in this study. Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between Cys-C and survival outcomes using SPSS version 22.0. The cutoff value of Cys-C was set as 1.4 mg l−1 using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Youden index. The mean age of patients included was 66.1 ± 11.1 years, and the median follow-up duration was 38 (interquartile range: 19–56) months. Overall, 162 (30.1%) patients had elevated Cys-C, and they were much older and had worse renal function than those with Cys-C <1.4 mg l−1 (both P < 0.001). Meanwhile, Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that the group with elevated Cys-C had worse cancer-specific survival (CSS, P = 0.001), disease recurrence-free survival (RFS, P = 0.003), and overall survival (OS, P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox analysis suggested that the elevated Cys-C was identified as an independent prognostic predictor of CSS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.997, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 1.331–2.996), RFS (HR: 1.429, 95% CI: 1.009–2.023), and OS (HR: 1.989, 95% CI: 1.366–2.896). In conclusion, our result revealed that the elevated preoperative serum Cys-C was significantly associated with worse outcomes in UTUC patients undergoing RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Tan
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Ming Shi
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Hang Xu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Nan Xie
- Department of Emergency, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Huan Xu
- Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yong Jiang
- Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Jian-Zhong Ai
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Liang-Ren Liu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Lu Yang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Quhal F, Mori K, Sari Motlagh R, Laukhtina E, Pradere B, Rouprêt M, Necchi A, Moschini M, Shariat SF. Efficacy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for localized and locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 2020; 25:1037-1054. [PMID: 32206939 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01650-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The objectives of this study are to evaluate the available literature regarding the oncologic effect of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with clinically non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and locally advanced UTUC. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases in November 2019, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We included studies that compared patients with non-metastatic UTUC who received either neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy with patients who underwent surgery alone. Subgroup meta-analyses were also performed for studies that investigated only locally advanced UTUC. Overall, 36 studies were included in the review of which 22 studies and 15,378 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was associated with higher rates of pathological downstaging (pDS) (RR 6.48, 95% CI 2.05-20.44, p = 0.001) and pathological complete response (RR 18.46, 95% CI 3.34-99.24, p = 0.001); and this was also proven in a subgroup analysis of studies that evaluated pDS in locally advanced UTUC (RR 3.18, 95% CI 2.0-5.07, p < 0.001). The association of NAC with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was also statistically significant in all patients and in patients with locally advanced UTUC. Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) was associated with improved metastasis-free survival (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.76, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.57-0.77, p < 0.001), which continued to be true for the patients with locally advanced UTUC. The association of AC with OS was only significant in patients with locally advanced UTUC. Perioperative chemotherapy might provide better survival outcomes in patients with clinically non-metastatic UTUC treated with radical nephroureterectomy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems to have promising results, although high level of evidence is still lacking. Despite the low level, the body of evidence suggests a need for multimodal therapy of invasive UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Urology Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
- European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mori K, Janisch F, Mostafaei H, Kimura S, Lysenko I, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, Enikeev DV, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Chlosta P, Nyirady P, Babjuk M, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Prognostic role of preoperative De Ritis ratio in upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:601.e17-601.e24. [PMID: 32127252 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 12/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To validate the predictive and prognostic role of the De Ritis ratio in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy in a large multi-institutional cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS The preoperative De Ritis ratio was assessed in a multi-institutional cohort of 2,492 patients. An altered De Ritis ratio was defined as a ratio >1.35. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of the De Ritis ratio with advanced disease. The association of the De Ritis ratio with survival outcomes was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS An altered De Ritis ratio was observed in 985 (41.5%) patients; it was associated with a more advanced pathological features. In a preoperative model, the De Ritis ratio was an independent predictive factor for the presence of lymph node metastasis and muscle-invasive and nonorgan-confined disease (P < 0.05). Compared to patients with a normal De Ritis ratio, those with an altered De Ritis ratio had worse recurrence free (P <0.0001), cancer specific (P = 0.0003), and overall survival (P = 0.0014) in the Kaplan-Meier analyses. In the multivariable analyses that was adjusted for the effects of standard clinicopathologic features, the De Ritis ratio did not retain its independent prognostic value. CONCLUSIONS In UTUC, the preoperative De Ritis ratio is associated with adverse clinicopathologic features and independently predicts features of biologically and clinically aggressive UTUC. Therefore, it might be useful to incorporate the De Ritis ratio into prognostic tools in selecting appropriate treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Florian Janisch
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ivan Lysenko
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Dmitry V Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology Department, PARIS, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Piotr Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Peter Nyirady
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Borgna V, Lobos-González L, Guevara F, Landerer E, Bendek M, Ávila R, Silva V, Villota C, Araya M, Rivas A, López C, Socias T, Castillo J, Alarcón L, Burzio LO, Burzio VA, Villegas J. Targeting antisense mitochondrial noncoding RNAs induces bladder cancer cell death and inhibition of tumor growth through reduction of survival and invasion factors. J Cancer 2020; 11:1780-1791. [PMID: 32194789 PMCID: PMC7052861 DOI: 10.7150/jca.38880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Knockdown of the antisense noncoding mitochondrial RNAs (ASncmtRNAs) induces apoptotic death of several human tumor cell lines, but not normal cells, supporting a selective therapy against different types of cancer. In this work, we evaluated the effects of knockdown of ASncmtRNAs on bladder cancer (BCa). We transfected the BCa cell lines UMUC-3, RT4 and T24 with the specific antisense oligonucleotide Andes-1537S, targeted to the human ASncmtRNAs. Knockdown induced a strong inhibition of cell proliferation and increase in cell death in all three cell lines. As observed in UMUC-3 cells, the treatment triggered apoptosis, evidenced by loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and Annexin V staining, along with activation of procaspase-3 and downregulation of the anti-apoptotic factors survivin and Bcl-xL. Treatment also inhibited cell invasion and spheroid formation together with inhibition of N-cadherin and MMP 11. In vivo treatment of subcutaneous xenograft UMUC-3 tumors in NOD/SCID mice with Andes-1537S induced inhibition of tumor growth as compared to saline control. Similarly, treatment of a high-grade bladder cancer PDX with Andes-1537S resulted in a strong inhibition of tumor growth. Our results suggest that ASncmtRNAs could be potent targets for bladder cancer as adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Borgna
- Fundación Ciencia & Vida.,Facultad de Medicina, Universidad De Santiago.,Servicio de Urología, Hospital Barros Luco-Trudeau
| | - Lorena Lobos-González
- Centro de Medicina Regenerativa, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Claudio Villota
- Escuela de Nutrición y Dietética, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Bernardo O'Higgins
| | - Mariela Araya
- Fundación Ciencia & Vida.,Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andrés Bello
| | | | | | | | - Jorge Castillo
- Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Barros Luco-Trudeau. Santiago, Chile
| | - Luis Alarcón
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Barros Luco-Trudeau
| | - Luis O Burzio
- Fundación Ciencia & Vida.,Andes Biotechnologies SpA.,Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andrés Bello
| | - Verónica A Burzio
- Fundación Ciencia & Vida.,Andes Biotechnologies SpA.,Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andrés Bello
| | - Jaime Villegas
- Fundación Ciencia & Vida.,Andes Biotechnologies SpA.,Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andrés Bello
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Inamoto T, Sassa N, Hattori R, Ibuki N, Komura K, Minami K, Takai T, Uchimoto T, Saito K, Tanda N, Tsujino T, Sano T, Kato M, Tsuzuki T, Gotoh M, Azuma H. Influence of the Body Mass Index and its Effect on Tumor Characteristics and Survival among a Population with Access to Surgical Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Curr Urol 2019; 12:201-209. [PMID: 31602186 DOI: 10.1159/000499305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 06/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To examine the association between the body mass index (BMI) and the risk of survival, and to evaluate whether tumor characteristics differ by BMI in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) managed by surgery. Methods A clinical series on 876 patients with localized UTUC following nephroureterectomy with a bladder cuff, with data from Osaka Medical College registry (discovery cohort) and the Nagoya group (validation cohort) was examined. In addition to analyzing the overall survival and cancer-specific survival (CSS), the survival impact adjusted by pathological variables was also assessed by the BMI group. Results The percentage of high risk features including positive lymphovascular invasion was doubled in the discovery cohort compared to the validation cohort. The group of BMI ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> was associated with improved CSS in the discovery cohort (p = 0.004), and this tendency was verified in the validation cohort (p = 0.006). Nonproportional hazards existed for the group of BMI ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and the BMI 18.5-25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> relative to the group of BMI < 18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, with a change in the CSS hazard. In multivariable Cox models, the BMI group had a superior predictive value compared with other pre-clinical factors both in the discovery cohort (HR = 3.85, p = 0.01; 95%CI: 0.09-0.73) and the validation cohort (HR = 1.56, p = 0.01; 95%CI: 0.45-0.91). When adjusted by lymphovascular invasion, the concordance of the model proposed by the discovery cohort (0.52) challenged in the validation cohort was 0.59. Conclusions We found a clinically relevant signature for high risk patients with BMI grouping. Further research is necessary on whether tailoring recommendations for weight and nutrition management to tumor characteristics will improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Naoto Sassa
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Ryohei Hattori
- Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Naoki Tanda
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Osaka
| | | | - Tomoyasu Sano
- Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya
| | - Masashi Kato
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
| | | | - Momokazu Gotoh
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kardoust Parizi M, Glybochko PV, Enikeev D, Rouprêt M, Fajkovic H, Seebacher V, Shariat SF. Risk stratification of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A Review of the Current Literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2019; 19:503-513. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1621753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Teheran, Iran
| | - Petr V. Glybochko
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC no. 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Veronika Seebacher
- Department for Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Miyake M, Owari T, Hori S, Nakai Y, Fujimoto K. Emerging biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of urothelial carcinoma. Res Rep Urol 2018; 10:251-261. [PMID: 30588457 PMCID: PMC6299471 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s173027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) arises extensively from the renal pelvis, ureter, urinary bladder, and urethra. UC represents a clinical and social challenge because of its incidence, post-treatment recurrence rate, and prognosis. Combinations of urine cytology, cystoscopy, and conventional imaging such as computed tomography are currently used for diagnosis and monitoring modalities of UC. Both the poor diagnostic accuracy of urine cytology and poor cost performance of cystoscopy and conventional imaging modalities emphasize the urgent need for advancement in clinical guidance for UC. Urine- and blood-based biomarkers for detection of UC of the bladder and upper urinary tract represent a considerable research area. Biomarkers can help to improve UC diagnosis with the aim of replacing cystoscopy and other imaging examinations in future and may enable individualizing risk stratification regarding therapy and follow-up. Over the decades, numerous studies have focused on the potential application of biomarkers for UC, including urine, circulating tumor DNA, RNAs, proteins, and extracellular vesicles. Although some biomarkers such as ImmunoCyt/uCyt+, UroVysion, NMP-22, bladder tumor antigen, CxBladder, and Xpert Bladder Cancer are currently available in clinical practice, few biomarkers achieve high sensitivity and specificity. Emerging biomarkers are continuously developed and reported in medical journals. However, there is a significant lack on following external validation using different cohorts. The positive results are needed to be confirmed by more studies with large-scale cohorts and long follow-up periods to prove the true value of novel biomarkers, followed by their adoption in clinical practice. The present paper provides an overview of the evidence based on high-impact studies regarding urine- and blood-based biomarkers and their clinical applications in bladder cancer and upper tract UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara-shi, Nara 634-8522, Japan,
| | - Takuya Owari
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara-shi, Nara 634-8522, Japan,
| | - Shunta Hori
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara-shi, Nara 634-8522, Japan,
| | - Yasushi Nakai
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara-shi, Nara 634-8522, Japan,
| | - Kiyohide Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara-shi, Nara 634-8522, Japan,
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Prognostic Factors and Risk Stratification in Invasive Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2018; 16:e751-e760. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Revised: 01/26/2018] [Accepted: 01/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
41
|
Moschini M, Shariat SF, Rouprêt M, De Santis M, Bellmunt J, Sternberg CN, Tombal B, Collette L. Impact of Primary Tumor Location on Survival from the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Advanced Urothelial Cancer Studies. J Urol 2018; 199:1149-1157. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, University Paris Sorbonnes, Paris, France
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- University of Warwick, Cancer Research Unit, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Cora N. Sternberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Camillo and Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc/Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Locke JA, Hamidizadeh R, Kassouf W, Rendon RA, Bell D, Izawa J, Chin J, Kapoor A, Shayegen B, Lattouf JB, Saad F, Lacombe L, Fradet Y, Fairey AS, Jacobson NE, Drachenberg DE, Cagiannos I, So AI, Black PC. Surveillance guidelines based on recurrence patterns for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Can Urol Assoc J 2018; 12:243-251. [PMID: 29688881 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for 5% of all urothelial tumours. Due to its rarity, evidence regarding postoperative surveillance is lacking. The objective of this study was to develop a post-radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) surveillance protocol based on recurrence patterns in a large, multi-institutional cohort of patients. METHODS Retrospective clinical and pathological data were collected from 1029 patients undergoing RNU over a 15-year period (1994-2009) at 10 Canadian academic institutions. A multivariable model was used to identify prognostic clinicopathological factors, which were then used to define risk categories. Risk-based surveillance guidelines were proposed based on actual recurrence patterns. RESULTS Overall, 555 (49.9%) patients developed recurrence, including 289 (25.9%) in the urothelium and 266 (23.9%) with loco-regional and distant recurrences. Based on multivariable analysis, three risk groups were identified: 1) low-risk patients with pTa-T1, pN0 disease, and no adverse histological features (high tumour grade, lymphovascular invasion [LVI], tumour multifocality); 2) intermediate-risk patients with pTa-T1, pN0 disease with one or more of the adverse histological features; and 3) high-risk patients with a ≥pT2 tumour and/or nodal involvement. Low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients were free of urothelial recurrence at three years in 72%, 66%, and 63%, respectively, and free of regional/distant recurrence in 93%, 87%, and 62%, respectively. The risks of loco-regional and distant recurrences (p<0.0001) and time to death (p<0.0001) were significantly different between the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS Based on recurrence patterns in a large, multicentre patient cohort, we have proposed an evidence-based, risk-adapted post-RNU surveillance protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - David Bell
- Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | - Joseph Chin
- University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Fred Saad
- University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alan I So
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Peter C Black
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Donahue TF, Bagrodia A, Audenet F, Donoghue MT, Cha EK, Sfakianos JP, Sperling D, Al-Ahmadie H, Clendenning M, Rosty C, Buchanan DD, Jenkins M, Hopper J, Winship I, Templeton AS, Walsh MF, Stadler ZK, Iyer G, Taylor B, Coleman J, Lindor NM, Solit DB, Bochner BH. Genomic Characterization of Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients With Lynch Syndrome. JCO Precis Oncol 2018; 2018:PO.17.00143. [PMID: 30854504 PMCID: PMC6404976 DOI: 10.1200/po.17.00143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) have a significantly increased risk of developing upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Here, we sought to identify differences in the patterns of mutational changes in LS-associated versus sporadic UTUCs. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed targeted sequencing of 17 UTUCs from patients with documented LS-associated germline mutations (LS-UTUCs) using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Integrated Molecular Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets targeted exon capture assay and compared the results with those from a recently characterized cohort of 82 patients with sporadic UTUC. RESULTS Patients with LS-UTUC were significantly younger, had had less exposure to tobacco, and more often presented with a ureteral primary site compared with patients with sporadic UTUC. The median number of mutations per tumor was significantly greater in LS-UTUC tumors than in tumors from the sporadic cohort (58; interquartile range [IQR], 47-101 v 6; IQR, 4-10; P < .001), as was the MSIsensor score (median, 25.1; IQR, 17.9-31.2 v 0.03; IQR, 0-0.44; P < .001). Differences in the genetic landscape were observed between sporadic and LS-associated tumors. Alterations in KMT2D, CREBBP, or ARID1A or in DNA damage response and repair genes were present at a significantly higher frequency in LS-UTUC. CIC, NOTCH1, NOTCH3, RB1, and CDKN1B alterations were almost exclusive to LS-UTUC. Although FGFR3 mutations were identified in both cohorts, the R248C hotspot mutation was highly enriched in LS-UTUC. CONCLUSION LSand sporadic UTUCs have overlapping but distinct genetic signatures. LS-UTUC is associated with hypermutation and a significantly higher prevalence of FGFR3 R248C mutation. Prospective molecular characterization of patients to identify those with LS-UTUC may help guide treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy F. Donahue
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - François Audenet
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Mark T.A. Donoghue
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Eugene K. Cha
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - John P. Sfakianos
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Dahlia Sperling
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Hikmat Al-Ahmadie
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Christophe Rosty
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Daniel D. Buchanan
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Mark Jenkins
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - John Hopper
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Ingrid Winship
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Allyson S. Templeton
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Michael F. Walsh
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Zsofia K. Stadler
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Gopa Iyer
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Barry Taylor
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Jonathan Coleman
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Noralane M. Lindor
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - David B. Solit
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Bernard H. Bochner
- Timothy F. Donahue, François Audenet, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Eugene K. Cha, Dahlia Sperling, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Michael F. Walsh, Zsofia K. Stadler, Gopa Iyer, Barry Taylor, Jonathan Coleman, David B. Solit, and Bernard H. Bochner, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; John P. Sfakianos, Mount Sinai Hospital; Aditya Bagrodia, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Jenkins, John Hopper, and Ingrid Winship, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Allyson S. Templeton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Noralane M. Lindor, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Singla N, Fang D, Su X, Bao Z, Cao Z, Robyak H, Xiong G, Zhang L, Woldu S, Hutchinson R, Sagalowsky A, Lotan Y, Li X, Zhou L, Raman JD, Margulis V. Preoperative predictors of nonorgan-confined disease in upper-tract urothelial carcinoma differ between China and the United States. Urol Oncol 2017; 36:88.e11-88.e18. [PMID: 29174945 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Revised: 10/15/2017] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare preoperative predictors of nonorgan-confined (NOC) disease in patients with upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) from the United States (US) and China. METHODS Clinicopathologic data of patients with UTUC treated surgically at tertiary care facilities in the US or China from 1998 to 2015 were, retrospectively, compiled. Patient characteristics, preoperative imaging, cytology, ureteroscopic findings, and serum markers (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, estimated glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin, and albumin) were evaluated. After excluding patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, rates of NOC disease at definitive surgery were tabulated. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to determine predictors of NOC for each country using previously published nomograms, and the cohorts were compared. RESULTS Totally, 753 patients with UTUC were included for analysis (451 Chinese and 302 US). NOC rates were similar between the 2 countries (31% vs. 29%, P = 0.568). On multivariable analysis, cT3 stage (P = 0.001) and high-grade pathology on ureteroscopy (P = 0.011) were significant predictors for NOC in the US, while male gender (P = 0.034), tumor location on imaging (P = 0.009), tumor size on imaging (P = 0.044), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (P = 0.043), and preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.028) were significant in China. Areas under the curve differed by nomogram used (Western model: 0.750 in US, vs. 0.670 in China; Chinese model: 0.763 in US, vs. 0.828 in China). CONCLUSION Predictors for NOC in UTUC differ between the US and China. There may be unique population-based markers that more profoundly influence the accuracy of nomograms in certain populations. Our findings highlight the importance of considering population differences when clinically applying predictive tools in UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Dong Fang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohong Su
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Zhengqing Bao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenpeng Cao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Haley Robyak
- Division of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Gengyan Xiong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Solomon Woldu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Ryan Hutchinson
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Arthur Sagalowsky
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Jay D Raman
- Division of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lee JY, Kim K, Sung HH, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Choi HY, Kwon GY, Kim KM, Lee J, Lim HY, Park SH. Molecular Characterization of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder and Upper Urinary Tract. Transl Oncol 2017; 11:37-42. [PMID: 29161613 PMCID: PMC5699894 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Revised: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A better understanding of the molecular basis of urothelial carcinoma (UC) is needed to refine the clinical decision-making process. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed next-generation sequencing to investigate the mutational and transcriptional profiles of commonly mutated genes in UC using Ampliseq v2. Copy number variations (CNVs) were detected with nCounter assay. Genetic alterations between upper tract UC (UTUC) and urinary bladder UC (UBUC) were compared. RESULTS Tumor samples from 31 UTUC and 61 UBUC patients were included in analysis. The two groups showed similar clinicopathologic features including tumor grade and stage. Median survival was longer in UTUC than UBUC patients, though this was statistically nonsignificant (59 vs 41 months, P=.137). In total, we found 982 genetic alterations from 92 samples: single nucleotide variants were the most common type of somatic mutation (479/508, 94.3%). Frequently detected somatic mutations included TP53 (68.5%), KDR (41.3%), and PIK3CA (17.4%). Notably, RB1 mutations were the only mutations significantly different between the UBUC and UTUC groups (19.7% vs. 0%, P=.020). The most common types of CNVs included amplifications (56/62, 90.3%): 17.7% of patients identified amplifications in NOTCH1. We also identified five translocations in the entire study population, including one case with FGFR3-TACC3 (Chr4) fusion. CONCLUSION Within a small study population, we identified similar genetic alterations in both UTUC and UBUC patients, indicating a basis for similar management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Yun Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Kyung Kim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Hwan Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hwang Gyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Soo Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Moo Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Han-Yong Choi
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ghee-Young Kwon
- Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyoung-Mee Kim
- Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeeyun Lee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ho Yeong Lim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se Hoon Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Significance of multiple preoperative laboratory abnormalities as prognostic indicators in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract following radical nephroureterectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 2017; 23:151-157. [PMID: 28856495 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-017-1184-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2017] [Accepted: 08/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of multiple preoperative laboratory abnormalities in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUTUC) patients. METHODS This study included a total of 135 consecutive patients with clinically localized UUTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The impact of several preoperative blood-based markers in addition to conventional clinical factors on extravesical recurrence-free survival (eRFS) in these patients was retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS Despite the lack of a significant correlation between conventional clinical factors and any of the postoperative pathologic parameters, preoperative laboratory abnormalities were shown to have a significant impact on some pathological factors reflecting an aggressive phenotype as follows-C-reactive protein (CRP) level on pathological stage, De Ritis (aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase) ratio on nodal involvement, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on pathological stage. During the observation period of this study (median 36.1 months), extravesical disease recurrence was detected in 44 (32.6%) of the 135 patients with a 5-year eRFS rate of 62.1%. Of several factors examined, the CRP level, De Ritis ratio, and NRL were significantly correlated with eRFS on univariate analysis. Of these significant factors, the De Ritis ratio and NRL were identified as independent predictors of eRFS on multivariate analysis. Moreover, there were significant differences in eRFS according to the positive numbers of these two independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that it is important to consider laboratory abnormalities, particularly the De Ritis ratio and NLR, to predict disease recurrence following RNU in patients with clinically localized UUTUC.
Collapse
|
47
|
Caveolin-1 Expression in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus 2017; 5:97-103. [PMID: 28753840 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2017] [Revised: 05/23/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improvement in postoperative risk stratification of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is required to better predict outcomes and counsel patients on adjuvant treatment. OBJECTIVE To validate the association between caveolin-1 and oncological outcomes in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Caveolin-1 expression was evaluated via immunochemistry on a tissue microarray from 621 patients. Caveolin-1 was considered overexpressed when at least 50% of the tumor cells stained positive. The median follow-up in this retrospective study was 35 mo (interquartile range 16-65). INTERVENTION Radical nephroureterectomy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the association between caveolin-1 expression and recurrence and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Caveolin-1 was overexpressed in 150 patients (24%). Overexpression was associated with higher pathological stage (p<0.001) and grade (p<0.001). In univariate analyses, overexpression of caveolin-1 was significantly associated with lower recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.6; p=0.004) and CSM (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7; p=0.005); however, multivariable analyses did not prove its independent association with outcomes. The study is limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS Despite overexpression in a quarter of UTUC patients, caveolin-1 was not independently associated with oncological outcomes. Its use could be evaluated to improve clinical staging of biopsy specimens and to help in clinical decision-making regarding a kidney-sparing approach or neoadjuvant systemic treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY Development of a panel of prognostic and predictive markers is mandatory for patient consultations in the era of personalized medicine. We evaluated the role of caveolin-1 in a large series of patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and found that it was not independently associated with oncological outcomes. Nevertheless, it was associated with adverse pathological features. Considering caveolin-1 in UTUC biopsy specimens could help in improving clinical staging and decision-making regarding a kidney-sparing approach or neoadjuvant systemic treatment.
Collapse
|
48
|
Li Q, Assel M, Benfante N, Pietzak E, Bagrodia A, Cha E, Dalbagni G, Coleman J. Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Panurothelial Carcinoma Treated with Radical Nephroureterectomy Following Cystectomy for Metachronous Recurrence. J Urol 2017; 198:546-551. [PMID: 28342936 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report pathological, functional and oncologic outcomes in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy following radical cystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified patients who underwent radical cystectomy and then radical nephroureterectomy for metachronous urothelial recurrence at our institution between January 1995 and December 2014. Univariable Cox regression was used to assess the association between overall survival and age, grade, stage, lymph node metastasis and radiographic findings. RESULTS Of the 3,173 patients treated with radical cystectomy 64 underwent subsequent radical nephroureterectomy for metachronous urothelial recurrence. Median age at radical cystectomy was 66 years (IQR 61-74). In the 64 patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy median time from radical cystectomy to radical nephroureterectomy was 2.7 years (IQR 1.4-4.6). Among 37 patients who underwent ureteroscopy prior to radical nephroureterectomy 29 (78%) had a positive biopsy. Radical nephroureterectomy pathology findings revealed locally advanced disease (pT3/pT4) in 39% of cases and positive node status in 11% compared with locally advanced disease in 17% and positive node status in 6% on radical cystectomy pathology findings. The post-radical nephroureterectomy estimated glomerular filtration rate was less than 60 and less than 30 ml/minute/1.73 m2 in 96% and 40% of patients, respectively. Median overall survival after radical nephroureterectomy was 3.1 years (95% CI 2.4-4.3). Only lymph node involvement at radical nephroureterectomy was significantly associated with worse overall mortality (HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.04-7.15, p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS The prognosis is poor in patients with panurothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy following cystectomy with locally advanced disease in a large proportion. Renal function after these procedures diminished and almost all patients were ineligible for cisplatin based chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Li
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics (MA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Melissa Assel
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics (MA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nicole Benfante
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics (MA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eugene Pietzak
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics (MA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics (MA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eugene Cha
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics (MA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Guido Dalbagni
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics (MA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan Coleman
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology-Biostatistics (MA), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Shariat SF. ICUD guidelines for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a state-of-the-art evidence-based guidance for clinical decisions regarding diagnosis, management and treatment. World J Urol 2017; 35:325-326. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2016-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2017] [Accepted: 01/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
50
|
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare condition and recommendations based on a high level of evidence for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up monitoring are lacking. Current decision-making is often based on evidence from trials investigating urothelial carcinoma of the lower tract. Radical nephroureterectomy has been the standard of care for UTUC but kidney-sparing treatment using endoscopic approaches has been established for a select patient group with low-grade and low-stage disease. Optimal treatment choice requires correct tumour characterization. According to available recommendations, diagnostic work-up of UTUC includes evaluation by CT urography or MRI urography, cystoscopy and urine cytology. Ureterorenoscopy and lesion biopsy are grade C recommendations in patients with suspected UTUC. When kidney-sparing treatment is planned, ureterorenoscopy and biopsy should be considered and are the procedures of choice in most cases. These diagnostics have limitations and their accuracy varies in defining tumour characteristics and predicting grade and stage. Urinary tests have higher sensitivity than cytology for detection of lower tract urothelial carcinoma but evidence of their benefit in UTUCs is lacking. New optical and image enhancement techniques are being developed to facilitate real-time diagnostics with increased accuracy. A new diagnostic algorithm for patients with suspected UTUC that integrates the diagnosis, treatment and clinical risk stratification is required.
Collapse
|