1
|
Scuderi S, Scilipoti P, Nocera L, Longoni M, Quarta L, Zaurito P, Barletta F, Pellegrino F, de Angelis M, Robesti D, Pellegrino A, Stabile A, Larcher A, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Gandaglia G. Perioperative outcomes, environmental impact and economic implications of pelvic drain discontinuation in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2025; 43:271.e1-271.e8. [PMID: 39690076 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2024] [Revised: 09/22/2024] [Accepted: 11/22/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The utility of a pelvic drain (PD) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been recently questioned. We investigated the impact of discontinuing PD placement after RARP on complications, pain, environmental benefits, and cost savings. METHODS We identified 1,199 patients who underwent RARP with or without extended pelvic lymph node dissection from 2016 to 2023 at a referral center. Starting in 2018, PD placement was discontinued in uncomplicated RARPs. Complications were collected following the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations on reporting and grading. Multivariable logistic regression models (MLR) evaluated the impact of PD use on perioperative outcomes and opioid usage. The PD life cycle-associated Carbon Dioxide Equivalent Emissions (CO2e) and its economic impact were estimated. RESULTS A PD was placed in a total of 555 (46%) patients, with a decreasing rate from 94% to 18% between 2016 and 2023. The rates of any and high-grade (HG) complications were similar between patients with and without PD (29 vs. 28% and 5% vs. 6%, respectively; all P ≥ 0.2). At MLR, the PD placement was not associated with the risk of any (OR:1.09, 95%CI:0.79-1.5) or HG complications (OR 1.45, 95%CI 0.80-2.63). PD placement was associated with greater postoperative opioid usage (OR:1.58, 95%CI:1.01-2.51, P = 0.045). The CO2e spared rose from 220 in 2016 to 2,180 in 2022 and cost savings per year increased from 1,855€ in 2016 to 18,506€ in 2022. CONCLUSION Unnecessary PD placement should be avoided in uncomplicated RARPs to obtain environmental benefits, reduce health-related costs, and improve patients' outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Pietro Scilipoti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Quarta
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Zaurito
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Antony Pellegrino
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Al-Nader M, Krafft U, Heß J, Püllen L, Szarvas T, Tschirdewahn S, Hadaschik BA, Mahmoud O. Temporal patterns of major postoperative events after radical cystectomy: analysis of 90-day morbidity. World J Urol 2025; 43:111. [PMID: 39928167 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-025-05493-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2025] [Indexed: 02/11/2025] Open
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY To investigate the time points at which different major complications occur and their temporal distribution over the postoperative intervals. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who underwent RC between January 2003 and March 2024 at the university hospital Essen and had complete records regarding postoperative complications and their timing were included. All major complications with Clavian-Dindo (CD) grading III-V were identified and recorded according to a predefined morbidity catalog. The time to occurrence of complications, readmission and mortality, was plotted against the postoperative day over a 90-day period to illustrate the distribution of events in the postoperative period. For each complication group, the median timing and the interquartile range (IQR) as well as the incidence during the postoperative weeks were calculated. RESULTS Out of 757 patients, 282 (37.2%) suffered at least one major complication (CDC grade III-IV) with a total of 452 major complications. Most common complications were gastrointestinal, genitourinary and wound complications. Median (IQR) time to first major complication was 7 (4-17) days. Hospital readmission due to major complications was required in 68 (9%) patients at a median of 47 days. Most of cardiac, pulmonary, bleeding and gastrointestinal complications occurred very early in the first week, at a median of 3, 4, 4 and 5 days, respectively. Wound complications were more likely to occur within the second and third week, with a median time of 13 days. Thromboembolism developed at similar rates throughout the first 3 weeks. The other groups of complications including infectious, genitourinary and miscellaneous (mostly lymphocele) complications showed no specific pattern and occurred in a wide range over the 90 days and were considered intermediate and late events. Further analysis of the time to all complications (first major and secondary), showed an increase in median time to occurance for all complications except genitouranry and lymphocele, which occurred earlier. Deaths related to major complications were observed in 50 (6.6%) patients at a median time of 17 days. CONCLUSION The current study shows the temporal patterns of the major complications within the RC morbidity catalog. Physicians should be aware of these patterns to facilitate anticipation and prevent fatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mulham Al-Nader
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Krafft
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Jochen Heß
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Lukas Püllen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Tibor Szarvas
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Stephan Tschirdewahn
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Boris A Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Osama Mahmoud
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
- Department of Urology, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.
- Department of Urology, Qena Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Safaga Road, Qena, 83523, Egypt.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marcon J, Bischoff R, Rattenhuber K, Chaloupka M, Askari D, Jokisch JF, Becker AJ, Pfitzinger PL, Keller P, Berg E, Stief CG, Siegl D, Kowalski C, Buchner A, Pyrgidis N, Weinhold P. Impact of Intraoperative Opioid Use and a Combined Anesthesia Regimen in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer in a Single-Center Cohort. J Clin Med 2024; 13:7506. [PMID: 39768429 PMCID: PMC11677334 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2024] [Revised: 12/02/2024] [Accepted: 12/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Higher intraoperative opioid doses may be associated with worse long-term oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. We aimed to evaluate the impact of higher doses of intraoperative opioids and type of anesthesia on biochemical recurrence (BCR) and mortality after RP in a high-volume tertiary center. Methods: All patients underwent RP at our center between 2015 and 2021. The role of major intraoperative opioid agents, such as sufentanil remifentanil, and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), as well as the type of anesthesia [total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), versus a combination of TIVA and epidural anesthesia, versus solely epidural anesthesia], was assessed in predicting BCR and survival after RP. Results: A total of 1137 patients who had a median age of 66 years (interquartile range: 61-72) were included. Overall, 1062 (93%) patients received TIVA, 37 (3%) received TIVA and epidural anesthesia, and 41 (4%) only epidural anesthesia. At a median follow-up of 431 days (interquartile range: 381-639) from RP, 257 (24%) patients developed a BCR. Accordingly, at a median follow-up of 500 days (interquartile range: 450-750), 33 (2.9%) patients died. The type of anesthesia, as well as the dosage or type of the selected intraoperative opioid agents, did not affect either BCR or long-term overall survival. Conclusions: These findings suggest that intraoperative opioid application during RP has no negative oncological impact in the short and long term in patients with localized prostate cancer. Accordingly, combined TIVA and epidural anesthesia, as well as solely epidural anesthesia were associated with similar short- and long-term outcomes compared to TIVA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Marcon
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (R.B.); (K.R.); (M.C.); (D.A.); (J.-F.J.); (A.J.B.); (P.L.P.); (P.K.); (E.B.); (C.G.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Robert Bischoff
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (R.B.); (K.R.); (M.C.); (D.A.); (J.-F.J.); (A.J.B.); (P.L.P.); (P.K.); (E.B.); (C.G.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Kaspar Rattenhuber
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (R.B.); (K.R.); (M.C.); (D.A.); (J.-F.J.); (A.J.B.); (P.L.P.); (P.K.); (E.B.); (C.G.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Michael Chaloupka
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (R.B.); (K.R.); (M.C.); (D.A.); (J.-F.J.); (A.J.B.); (P.L.P.); (P.K.); (E.B.); (C.G.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Darjusch Askari
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (R.B.); (K.R.); (M.C.); (D.A.); (J.-F.J.); (A.J.B.); (P.L.P.); (P.K.); (E.B.); (C.G.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Jan-Friedrich Jokisch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (R.B.); (K.R.); (M.C.); (D.A.); (J.-F.J.); (A.J.B.); (P.L.P.); (P.K.); (E.B.); (C.G.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Armin J. Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (R.B.); (K.R.); (M.C.); (D.A.); (J.-F.J.); (A.J.B.); (P.L.P.); (P.K.); (E.B.); (C.G.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Paulo L. Pfitzinger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (R.B.); (K.R.); (M.C.); (D.A.); (J.-F.J.); (A.J.B.); (P.L.P.); (P.K.); (E.B.); (C.G.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Patrick Keller
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (R.B.); (K.R.); (M.C.); (D.A.); (J.-F.J.); (A.J.B.); (P.L.P.); (P.K.); (E.B.); (C.G.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Elena Berg
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (R.B.); (K.R.); (M.C.); (D.A.); (J.-F.J.); (A.J.B.); (P.L.P.); (P.K.); (E.B.); (C.G.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Christian G. Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (R.B.); (K.R.); (M.C.); (D.A.); (J.-F.J.); (A.J.B.); (P.L.P.); (P.K.); (E.B.); (C.G.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Daniel Siegl
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (D.S.); (C.K.)
| | - Christian Kowalski
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (D.S.); (C.K.)
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (R.B.); (K.R.); (M.C.); (D.A.); (J.-F.J.); (A.J.B.); (P.L.P.); (P.K.); (E.B.); (C.G.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Nikolaos Pyrgidis
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (R.B.); (K.R.); (M.C.); (D.A.); (J.-F.J.); (A.J.B.); (P.L.P.); (P.K.); (E.B.); (C.G.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Philipp Weinhold
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.M.); (R.B.); (K.R.); (M.C.); (D.A.); (J.-F.J.); (A.J.B.); (P.L.P.); (P.K.); (E.B.); (C.G.S.); (P.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dell'Oglio P, Tappero S, Mandelli G, Saccucci T, Dibilio E, Caviglia A, Vecchio E, Maltzman O, Martiriggiano M, Olivero A, Secco S, Barbieri M, Di Trapani D, Buratto C, Palagonia E, Strada E, Napoli G, Petralia G, Bocciardi AM, Galfano A. Surgical and Oncological Outcomes of Level III-IV Versus Level I-II Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: A Decennial Experience of a High-Volume European Referral Center. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:8383-8393. [PMID: 39060696 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15878-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) the role of the extent of tumor thrombus into the inferior vena cava (IVC) has never been addressed from a surgical and oncologic standpoint. This study aims to evaluate differences between level III-IV versus level I-II patients concerning peri- and postoperative morbidity, additional treatments and long-term oncological outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS Overall, 40 patients with RCC underwent radical nephrectomy (RN) with IVC thrombectomy at a single European institution between 2010 and 2023. Complications were reported according to the European Union (EAU) guidelines recommendations. Spider chart served as graphical depiction of surgical and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS Overall, 22 (55%) and 18 (45%) patients harbored level III-IV and I-II IVC thrombus. Level III-IV patients experienced significantly higher rates of intraoperative transfusions (68 vs 39%), but not significantly higher rates of intraoperative complications (32% vs 28%). Level III-IV patients had significantly higher rates of postoperative transfusions (82% vs 33%) and Clavien Dindo ≥3 complications (41% vs 15%). In level III-IV versus level I-II patients, median follow up was 482 and 1070 days, the rate of distant recurrence was 59% and 50%, the rate of systemic progression was 27% and 13%, and the rate of additional treatment/s was 64% and 61%, respectively (all p values > 0.05). Overall survival was 36% in level III-IV patients and 67% in level I-II (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that patients with level III-IV RCC who are candidates for IVC thrombectomy should be counselled about the higher likelihood of postoperative severe adverse events and worse overall survival relative to level I-II counterparts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Stefano Tappero
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giuditta Mandelli
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Saccucci
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Dibilio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Alberto Caviglia
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Vecchio
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ofir Maltzman
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Martiriggiano
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alberto Olivero
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Secco
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Barbieri
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Di Trapani
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Buratto
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Erika Palagonia
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Strada
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Napoli
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Petralia
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Galfano
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pellegrino F, Leni R, Basile G, Rosiello G, Re C, Scilipoti P, De Angelis M, Longoni M, Avesani G, Quarta L, Zaurito P, Cattafi F, Burgio G, Gandaglia G, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Moschini M. Peri- and post-operative outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy after the implementation of the EAU guidelines recommendations for collecting and reporting complications at a high-volume referral center. World J Urol 2024; 42:270. [PMID: 38679650 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04970-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE No studies relied on a standardized methodology to collect postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). The aim of our study was to evaluate peri- and post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing RARC adhering to the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations for reporting surgical outcomes and using a long postoperative follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS 246 patients who underwent RARC with intracorporal urinary diversion at a single tertiary referral center with a postoperative follow-up ≥ 1 year for survivors. Postoperative outcomes were collected prospectively by interviews done by medical doctors. Complications were scored using the Clavien-Dindo classification (CD), grouped by type and severity (severe: CD score ≥ 3). We described peri- and post-operative outcomes and complication chronological distribution. RESULTS Overall, 16 (6.5%) and 225 patients (91%) experienced intraoperative and postoperative complications, respectively. Moreover, 139 (57%) experienced severe complications. The most common any-grade and severe complications were infectious (72%) and genitourinary (35%), respectively. Overall, 52% of complications (358/682) occurred within 10 days from surgery, and 51% of severe complications (106/207) occurred within 35 days. However, 13% of complications (90/682) and 28% of severe complications (59/207) occurred 3 months after surgery. The earliest complications were fever of unknown origins and paralytic ileus (median time-to-complication [mTTC]: 4 days), the latest complications were urinary tract infection (mTTC: 40 days) and hydronephrosis/ureteral obstruction (mTTC: 70 days). CONCLUSIONS The rate of postoperative complications after RARC is > 90% when a standardized collection method and a long follow-up is implemented. These results should be used to identify potential areas of improvement and for preoperative patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franceso Pellegrino
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Leni
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Basile
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rosiello
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Re
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Scilipoti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario De Angelis
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulio Avesani
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Quarta
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Zaurito
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Cattafi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giusy Burgio
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baas DJH, de Baaij JMS, Sedelaar JPM, Hoekstra RJ, Vrijhof HJEJ, Somford DM, van Basten JPA. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is an independent risk factor for major complications. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:140. [PMID: 38554195 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01881-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the major postoperative complication rate after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to identify related risk factors. A consecutive series of patients who underwent RARP between September 2016 and May 2021, with or without extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) were analyzed for postoperative complications that occurred within 30 days following surgery. Potential risk factors related to complications were identified by means of a multivariate logistic analysis. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed for the occurrence of major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher) on a per patient level. A multivariate logistic regression with risk factors was performed to identify contributors to complications. In total, 1280 patients were included, of whom 79 (6.2%) experienced at least 1 major complication. Concomitant ePLND was performed in 609 (48%) of patients. The majority of all complications were likely related to the surgical procedure, with anastomotic leakage and lymphoceles being the most common. Upon multivariate analysis, performing ePLND remained the only significant risk factor for the occurrence of major complications (OR 2.26, p = 0.001). In contrast to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy alone, the combination with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) has a substantial risk of serious complications. Since the ePLND is performed mainly for staging purpose, the clinical contribution of the ePLND has to be reconsidered with the present use of the PSMA-PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diederik J H Baas
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg Door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Joost M S de Baaij
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg Door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J P Michiel Sedelaar
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Hoekstra
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Henricus J E J Vrijhof
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik M Somford
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg Door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Paul A van Basten
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg Door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bravi CA, Balestrazzi E, De Loof M, Rebuffo S, Piramide F, Mottaran A, Paciotti M, Sorce G, Nocera L, Sarchi L, Peraire M, Colla'-Ruvolo C, Frego N, Piro A, Ticonosco M, De Backer P, Farinha R, Van Den Bossche H, De Naeyer G, D'Hondt F, De Groote R, Mottrie A. Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed with Different Robotic Platforms: First Comparative Evidence Between Da Vinci and HUGO Robot-assisted Surgery Robots. Eur Urol Focus 2024; 10:107-114. [PMID: 37634969 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Revised: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the field of robotic surgery, there is a lack of comparative evidence on surgical and functional outcomes of different robotic platforms. OBJECTIVE To assess the outcomes of patients receiving robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) at a high-volume robotic center with daVinci and HUGO robot-assisted surgery (RAS) surgical systems. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We analyzed the data of 542 patients undergoing RARP ± extended pelvic lymph node dissection at OLV hospital (Aalst, Belgium) between 2021 and 2023. All procedures were performed by six surgeons using daVinci or HUGO RAS robots; the use of one platform rather than the other did not follow any specific preference and/or indication. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Multivariable analyses investigated the association between robotic system (daVinci vs HUGO RAS) and surgical outcomes after adjustment for patient- and tumor-related factors. Urinary continence recovery was defined as the use of no/one safety pad. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 378 (70%) and 164 (30%) patients underwent RARP with daVinci and HUGO RAS surgical systems, respectively. Despite a higher rate of palpable disease in the HUGO RAS group (34% vs 25%), baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups (all p > 0.05). After adjusting for confounders, we did not find evidence of a difference between the groups with respect to operative time (estimate: 16.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -6.35, 39.78; p = 0.12), estimated blood loss (estimate: 3.12; 95% CI: -67.03, 73.27; p = 0.9), and postoperative Clavien-Dindo ≥2 complications (odds ratio [OR]: 1.66; 95% CI: 0.34, 8.15; p = 0.5). On final pathology, 55 (15%) and 20 (12%) men in, respectively, the daVinci and the HUGO RAS group had positive surgical margins (PSMs; p = 0.5). On multivariable analyses, we did not find evidence of an association between a robotic system and PSMs (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.56, 2.07; p = 0.8). Similarly, the odds of recovering continence did not differ between daVinci and HUGO RAS cases after both 1 mo (OR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.38; p = 0.4) and 3 mo (OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.49, 2.79; p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS Among patients receiving RARP with daVinci or HUGO RAS surgical platforms, we did not find differences in surgical and functional outcomes between the robots. This may be a result of a standardized surgical technique that allowed surgeons to transfer their skills between robotic systems. Awaiting future investigations with longer follow-up, these results have important implications for patients, surgeons, and health care policymakers. PATIENT SUMMARY We compared surgical and functional outcomes of patients receiving robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with daVinci versus HUGO robot-assisted surgery (RAS) robots. The two platforms were able to achieve similar outcomes, suggesting that the introduction of HUGO RAS is safe and allows for optimal outcomes after radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Andrea Bravi
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Eleonora Balestrazzi
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Manon De Loof
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Silvia Rebuffo
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Angelo Mottaran
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Paciotti
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Urology, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Sorce
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium; Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium; Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Sarchi
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium; Urology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, La Statale University, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Peraire
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Claudia Colla'-Ruvolo
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Frego
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Urology, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Adele Piro
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Marco Ticonosco
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Pieter De Backer
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Rui Farinha
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hannes Van Den Bossche
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; Department of Urology, General Hospital West, Veurne, Belgium
| | - Geert De Naeyer
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Frederiek D'Hondt
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Ruben De Groote
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tappero S, Chierigo F, Parodi S, Bandini M, Moschini M, Cucchiara V, Chessa F, Di Maida F, Mari A, Manfredi M, Mantica G, Cerruto MA, Fiori C, Schiavina R, Briganti A, Suardi N, Brunocilla E, Antonelli A, Porpiglia F, Minervini A, Montorsi F, Terrone C. Radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients previously treated for prostate cancer: Insights from a large European multicentric series. Surg Oncol 2023; 50:101973. [PMID: 37454433 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2023.101973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Previous radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa) might impair feasibility of radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BCa). The current study addressed morbidity, operative time (OT), and length of stay (LOS) of RC, within the largest available series of patients with history of previous RP. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients previously submitted to RP for PCa and subsequently submitted to RC for BCa, at six high-volume European institutions between 2010 and 2019, were identified. Presence of either PCa or BCa metastases, RT as primary treatment for PCa, and palliative RC represented exclusion criteria. The quality criteria for accurate and comprehensive reporting of intra- and post-operative surgical outcomes, recommended by the European Association of Urology guidelines, were fulfilled. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regression analyses were performed. RESULTS Overall, 140 RC patients with history of RP were identified. After RP, 69 (49%) patients received radiotherapy (RT) for PCa, either in adjuvant (n = 50, 36%) or salvage setting (n = 19, 13%). Median age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index was 6 (IQR 5, 7). Median OT, estimated blood loss and LOS were, respectively, 300 min, 500 ml, and 16 days. Intra-operative transfusions rate was 47% (n = 65). One intra-operative complication occurred (EAUiaiC grade 2, perforation of the rectum managed with immediate repair). Eighty-two (59%) patients experienced a total of 107 post-operative complications during the hospital stay, and seven (5%) patients required hospital readmission. In multivariable regression analyses, RT for PCa was associated with higher risk of post-operative complications (odds ratio 1.82, p = 0.039), longer OT (incidence rate ratio 1.09, p < 0.001), and longer LOS (incidence rate ratio 1.24, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS RC in patients with history of RP is feasible, albeit burdened by remarkable morbidity, even in centers of excellence. RT after RP for PCa portends worse surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Tappero
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
| | - Francesco Chierigo
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Stefano Parodi
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Marco Bandini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Chessa
- Department of Urology, University of Bologna, St. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Maida
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Matteo Manfredi
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Mantica
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Department of Urology, University of Bologna, St. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Urology, Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Department of Urology, University of Bologna, St. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bravi CA, Dell'Oglio P, Mazzone E, Moschovas MC, Falagario U, Piazza P, Scarcella S, Bednarz C, Sarchi L, Tappero S, Knipper S, De Groote R, Sjoberg D, Schiavina R, Suardi N, Terrone C, Autorino R, Carrieri G, Galosi A, Galfano A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Patel V, Vickers A, Mottrie A. The Surgical Learning Curve for Biochemical Recurrence After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:414-421. [PMID: 35850976 PMCID: PMC10795739 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved cancer control with increasing surgical experience-the learning curve-was demonstrated for open and laparoscopic prostatectomy. In a prior single-center study, we found that this might not be the case for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). OBJECTIVE To investigate the relationship between prior experience of a surgeon and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RARP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We retrospectively analyzed the data of 8101 patients with prostate cancer treated with RARP by 46 surgeons at nine institutions between 2003 and 2021. Surgical experience was coded as the total number of robotic prostatectomies performed by the surgeon before the patient operation. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We evaluated the relationship of prior surgeon experience with the probability of BCR adjusting for preoperative prostate-specific antigen, pathologic stage, grade, lymph-node involvement, and year of surgery. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 1047 patients had BCR. The median follow-up for patients without BCR was 33 mo (interquartile range: 14, 61). After adjusting for case mix, the relationship between surgical experience and the risk of BCR after surgery was not statistically significant (p = 0.2). The 5-yr BCR-free survival rates for a patient treated by a surgeon with prior 10, 250, and 1000 procedures performed were, respectively, 82.0%, 82.7%, and 84.8% (absolute difference between 10 and 1000 prior procedures: 1.6% [95% confidence interval: 0.4%, 3.3%). Results were robust to a number of sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that, as opposed to open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, surgeons performing RARP achieve adequate cancer control in the early phase of their career. Further research should explore why the learning curve for robotic surgery differs from prior findings for open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. We hypothesize that surgical education, including simulation training and the adoption of objective performance metrics, is an important mechanism for flattening the learning curve. PATIENT SUMMARY We investigated the relationship between biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and surgeon's experience. Surgeons at an early stage of their career had similar outcomes to those of more experienced surgeons, and we hypothesized that surgical education in robotics might be an important determinant of such a finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo A Bravi
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium; Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ugo Falagario
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Pietro Piazza
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simone Scarcella
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; Division of Urology, United Hospital of Ancona, School of Medicine Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Marche, Italy
| | | | - Luca Sarchi
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Stefano Tappero
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Sophie Knipper
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ruben De Groote
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Daniel Sjoberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Division of Urology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Andrea Galosi
- Division of Urology, United Hospital of Ancona, School of Medicine Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Marche, Italy
| | - Antonio Galfano
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Vipul Patel
- AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, USA
| | - Andrew Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ji J, Yang Y, Chen Z, Zhang W, Jiang S, Shen X, Zhang J, Lin L, Qu M, Wang Y, Gao X. How education level affects postoperative rehabilitation and follow-up: a single-center experience. BMC Urol 2023; 23:123. [PMID: 37464331 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01282-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical prostatectomy remains the fundamental treatment for prostate cancer, and improving patients' compliance with postoperative follow-ups is essential for improving patients' quality of life. This study investigates the effect of education levels on patients' recovery and follow-up after radical prostatectomy. METHODS Data from 1,112 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy between 2011 and 2020 were collected using medical records, and "pc-follow" systems were used to collect patients' baseline information, education level, pathological information, number of outpatient visits, the time interval between each visit, and PSA test data. RESULTS Regarding postoperative outpatient data, there was no difference in the number of outpatient visits among the different education level groups in Shanghai (P = 0.063). A significant difference was found in the interval between outpatient visits among the groups (P < 0.001). Furthermore, significant differences were detected in the number and duration of outpatient clinic visits among the education level groups in all patients (P = 0.016, P = 0.0027). By contrast, no significant difference was found in the recovery time of urinary continence between all patients and those in Shanghai, grouped according to education level (P = 0.082, P = 0.68). For all patients and patients in the Shanghai area, the number of PSA follow-ups increased gradually with an increasing level of education (P < 0.001, P = 0.0029). CONCLUSIONS Education level affected the number of postoperative clinic visits, compliance, and the number of PSA tests. However, no significant effect on the recovery of urinary continence was found. Further, clinicians must increase their focus on patients with low education levels to achieve equitable access to health services for all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Ji
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University (Second Military Medical University), 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China
- Department of Urology, Naval Medical Center, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuchen Yang
- Nursing Department, Naval Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, PLA, Zhoushan, China
| | - Zeyu Chen
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University (Second Military Medical University), 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Wenhui Zhang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University (Second Military Medical University), 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China
| | - Shaoqin Jiang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University (Second Military Medical University), 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China
- Department of Urology, Fujian Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Xianqi Shen
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University (Second Military Medical University), 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China
| | - Jili Zhang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University (Second Military Medical University), 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China
| | - Lu Lin
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University (Second Military Medical University), 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China
| | - Min Qu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University (Second Military Medical University), 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University (Second Military Medical University), 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China
| | - Xu Gao
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University (Second Military Medical University), 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tappero S, Dell'Oglio P, Cerruto MA, Sanchez Salas R, Buisan Rueda O, Simone G, Hendricksen K, Soria F, Umari P, Antonelli A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, de Cobelli O, Terrone C, Galfano A, Moschini M, Di Trapani E, European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists EAU-YAU: Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group. Ileal Conduit Versus Orthotopic Neobladder Urinary Diversion in Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from a Multi-institutional Series. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 50:47-56. [PMID: 37101775 PMCID: PMC10123439 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Head-to-head comparisons between ileal conduit (IC) and orthotopic neobladder (ONB) in terms of peri- and postoperative outcomes and complications, in the specific setting of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), are not available. Objective To address the impact of the type of urinary diversion (UD, IC vs ONB) on RARC morbidity, as well as operative time (OT), length of stay (LOS), and readmissions. Design setting and participants Urothelial bladder cancer patients treated with RARC at nine high-volume European institutions between 2008 and 2020 were identified. Intervention RARC with either IC or ONB. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Intra- and postoperative complications were collected and reported according to the Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards recommendations and European Association of Urology guidelines, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression models tested the impact of UD on outcomes, after adjustment for clustering at single hospital level. Results and limitations Overall, 555 nonmetastatic RARC patients were identified. In 280 (51%) and 275 (49%) patients, an IC and an ONB were performed, respectively. Eighteen intraoperative complications were recorded. The rates of intraoperative complications were 4% in IC patients and 3% in ONB patients (p = 0.4). The median LOS and readmission rates were 10 versus 12 d (p < 0.001) and 20% versus 21% (p = 0.8) in IC versus ONB patients, respectively. At a multivariable logistic regression analyses, the type of UD (IC vs ONB) reached the independent predictor status for prolonged OT (odds ratio [OR]: 0.61, p = 0.03) and prolonged LOS (OR: 0.34, p < 0.001), but not for readmission (OR: 0.92, p = 0.7). Overall, 513 postoperative complications were experienced by 324 patients (58%). At least one postoperative complication was experienced by 160 (57%) IC patients versus 164 (60%) ONB patients (p = 0.6). The type of UD reached the status of an independent predictor of UD-related complications (OR: 0.64, p = 0.03). Conclusions Compared with RARC with ONB, RARC with IC is less prone to UD-related postoperative complications, prolonged OT, and prolonged LOS. Patient summary To date, the impact of the type of urinary diversion, namely, ileal conduit versus orthotopic neobladder, on peri- and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy is unknown. Based on a rigorous data accrual, which relied on established complication reporting systems (Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards and European Association of Urology recommended systems), we reported intra- and postoperative complications according to urinary diversion type. Moreover, we found that ileal conduit was associated with lower operative time and length of stay, and yielded a protective effect in terms of urinary diversion-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Tappero
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Corresponding author. Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132 Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Tel. +39 3287132369, +39 0105553935.
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | | | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Paolo Umari
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | | | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Antonio Galfano
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ettore Di Trapani
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sforza S, Palmieri VE, Raspollini MR, Roviello G, Mantovani A, Basso U, Affinita MC, D'Angelo A, Antonuzzo L, Carini M, Minervini A, Masieri L. Robotic approach with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in adult Wilms' tumor: A feasibility study report and a systematic review of the literature. Asian J Urol 2023; 10:128-136. [PMID: 36942112 PMCID: PMC10023547 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The incidence of Wilms' tumor (WT) among adult individuals accounts for less than 1% of kidney cancer cases, with a prognosis usually less favorable when compared to younger individuals and an overall survival rate of 70% for the adult patients versus 90% for the pediatric cases. The diagnosis and treatment of WT are complex in the preoperative setting; neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or robotic surgery has rarely been described. This study aimed to review the literature of robotic surgery in WT and report the first adult WT management using both NAC and robotic strategy. METHODS We reported a case of WT managed in a multidisciplinary setting. Furthermore, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations, a systematic review of the literature until August 2020 of WT treated with a robotic approach was carried out. RESULTS A 33-year-old female had a diagnosis of WT. She was scheduled to NAC, and according to the clinical and radiological response to a robotic radical nephrectomy with aortic lymph nodes dissection, she was managed with no intraoperative rupture, a favorable surgical outcome, and a follow-up of 25 months, which did not show any recurrence. The systematic review identified a total number of 230 cases of minimally invasive surgery reported in the literature for WT. Of these, approximately 15 patients were carried out using robotic surgery in adolescents while none in adults. Moreover, NAC has not been administered before minimally invasive surgery in adults up until now. CONCLUSION WT is a rare condition in adults with only a few cases treated with either NAC or minimally invasive approach so far. The advantage of NAC followed by the robotic approach could lead to favorable outcomes in this complex scenario. Notwithstanding, additional cases of adult WT need to be identified and investigated to improve the oncological outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Sforza
- Department of Oncologic, Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Meyer Children Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Maria Rosaria Raspollini
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Mantovani
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Meyer Children Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Umberto Basso
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Maria Carmen Affinita
- Hematology Oncology Division, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Alberto D'Angelo
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Lorenzo Antonuzzo
- Clinical Oncologic Unit, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Carini
- Department of Oncologic, Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Oncologic, Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Masieri
- Department of Oncologic, Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Meyer Children Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bravi CA, Gandaglia G, Mazzone E, Fossati N, Gallina A, Stabile A, Scuderi S, Barletta F, Nocera L, Rosiello G, Martini A, Pellegrino F, Cucchiara V, Dehò F, Capitanio U, Scattoni V, Salonia A, Briganti A, Montorsi F. Impact of Early Dorsal Venous Complex Ligation on Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:83-88. [PMID: 36154808 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether early ligation of the dorsal venous complex (DVC) might improve recovery of urinary continence (UC) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has never been investigated in a prospective randomized study. OBJECTIVE To assess whether early DVC ligation might affect UC recovery after RARP. INTERVENTION DVC ligation (early vs standard). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 312 patients with prostate cancer underwent primary RARP at a tertiary care institution. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary outcome was UC recovery at 1 and 4 mo after RARP. UC was defined as 0 pads/1 safety pad per day. All patients completed the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ)-Short Form questionnaires. Secondary outcomes were early (≤4 mo) erectile function recovery, the positive surgical margin (PSM) rate, 30-d Clavien-Dindo complications, and biochemical recurrence rates. Quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The association between treatment arm and UC recovery was also tested using multivariable regression models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS After surgery, 23 patients withdrew their consent and 29 were lost to follow-up, leaving 261 patients available for per-protocol analyses. Of these, 32 patients (24%) in the experimental group and 37 (29%) in the control group used no pad/one safety pad at 1 mo after RARP, whereas 96 (72%) in the control group versus 83 (65%) in the control group were continent at 4-mo follow-up (both p = 0.3). Median ICIQ and IPSS scores did not differ between the groups at both time points. The results were confirmed on multivariable regression analyses. PSMs were observed for 32 patients (25%) in the experimental group versus 30 (22%) in the control group (p = 0.6). The incidence of postoperative complications (17% experimental vs 13% control) and the 1-yr biochemical recurrence-free survival did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS In this randomized clinical trial, we did not find evidence that early ligation of the DVC during RARP was associated with better UC recovery after surgery in comparison to the standard technique. Given its safety in terms of surgical margins and complications, this technique may be considered as an option for surgical dissection according to the physician's preference. PATIENT SUMMARY Our trial showed that for patients undergoing robot-assisted surgical removal of the prostate, the timing of a specific step to control bleeding from a network of veins draining the prostate did not affect recovery of urinary continence after surgery. The results indicate that earlier control of these veins may be considered as an option according to the surgeon's preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo A Bravi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Civico USI-Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Civico USI-Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Armando Stabile
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rosiello
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Martini
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Dehò
- Department of Urology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi-ASST Sette Laghi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Scattoni
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cacciamani GE, Eppler M, Sayegh AS, Sholklapper T, Mohideen M, Miranda G, Goldenberg M, Sotelo RJ, Desai MM, Gill IS. Recommendations for Intraoperative Adverse Events Data Collection in Clinical Studies and Study Protocols. An ICARUS Global Surgical Collaboration Study. Int J Surg Protoc 2023; 27:23-83. [PMID: 36818424 PMCID: PMC9912855 DOI: 10.29337/ijsp.183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) occur and have the potential to impact the postoperative course. However, iAEs are underreported and are not routinely collected in the contemporary surgical literature. There is no widely utilized system for the collection of essential aspects of iAEs, and there is no established database for the standardization and dissemination of this data that likely have implications for outcomes and patient safety. The Intraoperative Complication Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) Global Surgical Collaboration initiated a global effort to address these shortcomings, and the establishment of an adverse event data collection system is an essential step. In this study, we present the core-set variables for collecting iAEs that were based on the globally validated ICARUS criteria for surgical/interventional and anesthesiologic intraoperative adverse event collection and reporting. Material and Methods This article includes three tools to capture the essential aspects of iAEs. The core-set variables were developed from the globally validated ICARUS criteria for reporting iAEs (item 1). Next, the summary table was developed to guide researchers in summarizing the accumulated iAE data in item 1 (item 2). Finally, this article includes examples of the method and results sections to include in a manuscript reporting iAE data (item 3). Then, 5 scenarios demonstrating best practices for completing items 1-3 were presented both in prose and in a video produced by the ICARUS collaboration. Dissemination This article provides the surgical community with the tools for collecting essential iAE data. The ICARUS collaboration has already published the 13 criteria for reporting surgical adverse events, but this article is unique and essential as it actually provides the tools for iAE collection. The study team plans to collect feedback for future directions of adverse event collection and reporting. Highlights This article represents a novel, fully-encompassing system for the data collection of intraoperative adverse events.The presented core-set variables for reporting intraoperative adverse events are not based solely on our opinion, but rather are synthesized from the globally validated ICARUS criteria for reporting intraoperative adverse events.Together, the included text, figures, and ICARUS collaboration-produced video should equip any surgeon, anesthesiologist, or nurse with the tools to properly collect intraoperative adverse event data.Future directions include translation of this article to allow for the widest possible adoption of this important collection system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni E. Cacciamani
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, US
| | - Michael Eppler
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, US
| | - Aref S. Sayegh
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, US
| | - Tamir Sholklapper
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, US
| | - Muneeb Mohideen
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, US
| | - Gus Miranda
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, US
| | - Mitch Goldenberg
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, US
| | - Rene J. Sotelo
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, US
| | - Mihir M. Desai
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, US
| | - Inderbir S. Gill
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, US
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cacciamani GE, Sholklapper T, Dell'Oglio P, Rocco B, Annino F, Antonelli A, Amenta M, Borghesi M, Bove P, Bozzini G, Cafarelli A, Celia A, Leonardo C, Ceruti C, Cindolo L, Crivellaro S, Dalpiaz O, Falabella R, Falsaperla M, Galfano A, Gallo F, Greco F, Minervini A, Parma P, Chiara Sighinolfi M, Pastore AL, Pini G, Porreca A, Pucci L, Sciorio C, Schiavina R, Umari P, Varca V, Veneziano D, Verze P, Volpe A, Zaramella S, Lebastchi A, Abreu A, Mitropoulos D, Shekhar Biyani C, Sotelo R, Desai M, Artibani W, Gill I. The Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) Global Surgical Collaboration Project: Development of Criteria for Reporting Adverse Events During Surgical Procedures and Evaluating Their Impact on the Postoperative Course. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:1847-1858. [PMID: 35177353 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) are surgical and anesthesiologic complications. Despite the availability of grading criteria, iAEs are infrequently reported in the surgical literature and in cases for which iAEs are reported, these events are described with significant heterogeneity. OBJECTIVE To develop Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) Global Surgical Collaboration criteria to standardize the assessment, reporting, and grading of iAEs. The ultimate aim is to improve our understanding of the nature and frequency of iAEs and our ability to counsel patients regarding surgical procedures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The present study involved the following steps: (1) collecting criteria for assessing, reporting, and grading of iAEs via a comprehensive umbrella review; (2) collecting additional criteria via a survey of a panel of experienced surgeons (first round of a modified Delphi survey); (3) creating a comprehensive list of reporting criteria; (4) combining criteria acquired in the first two steps; and (5) establishing a consensus on clinical and quality assessment utility as determined in the second round of the Delphi survey. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Panel inter-rater agreement and consistency were assessed as the overall percentage agreement and Cronbach's α. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The umbrella review led to nine common criteria for assessing, grading, and reporting iAEs, and review of iAE grading systems led to two additional criteria. In the first Delphi round, 35 surgeons responded and two criteria were added. In the second Delphi round, 13 common criteria met the threshold for final guideline inclusion. All 13 criteria achieved the consensus minimum of 70%, with agreement on the usefulness of the criteria for clinical and quality improvement ranging from 74% to 100%. The mean inter-rater agreement was 89.0% for clinical improvement and 88.6% for quality improvement. CONCLUSIONS The ICARUS Global Collaboration criteria might aid in identifying important criteria when reporting iAEs, which will support all those involved in patient care and scientific publishing. PATIENT SUMMARY We consulted a panel of experienced surgeons to develop a set of guidelines for academic surgeons to follow when publishing surgical studies. The surgeon panel proposed a list of 13 criteria that may improve global understanding of complications during specific procedures and thus improve the ability to counsel patients on surgical risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni E Cacciamani
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Tamir Sholklapper
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Bernardo Rocco
- Urological Unit, Department of Health Sciences, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Michele Amenta
- Department of Urology, Azienda ULSS n.4 Veneto Orientale, Portogruaro, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Antonio Celia
- Urology Unit, Ospedale San Bassiano, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | | | - Carlo Ceruti
- Urology Unit, AOU Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Simone Crivellaro
- Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Antonio Galfano
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Paolo Parma
- Urology Unit, Ospedale San Carlo Poma, Mantova, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Angelo Porreca
- Department of Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Luigi Pucci
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera A. Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Paolo Umari
- Urology Unit, Ospedale Maggiore della Carita, Novara, Italy
| | - Virginia Varca
- Urology Unit, ASAT Rhodense Ospedale Guido Salvini di Garbagnate, Garbagnate, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Verze
- Urology Unit, AOU San Giovanni di Rio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy
| | | | | | - Amir Lebastchi
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andre Abreu
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Dionysios Mitropoulos
- Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Chandra Shekhar Biyani
- Department of Urology, St. James' Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Rene Sotelo
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mihir Desai
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Inderbir Gill
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Huang H, Zhang Z, Hao H, Wang H, Shang M, Xi Z. The comprehensive complication index is more sensitive than the Clavien–Dindo classification for grading complications in elderly patients after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: Implementing the European Association of Urology guideline. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1002110. [PMID: 36338736 PMCID: PMC9631924 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1002110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Lack of assessment of 90-d perioperative morbidity in elderly patients after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) using a standard reporting methodology, and the Clavien–Dindo classification (CDC) does not accurately reflect the burden of complications. We aim to report the 90-d complications of elderly patients after radical cystectomy, and to compare the validity of the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) and CDC. Methods Retrospective review of 280 patients aged ≥75 years who received radical cystectomy between 2006 and 2021. The 90-d complications of elderly patients after radical cystectomy were reported by implementing the EAU criteria. The CDC and CCI were both used for grading complications. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to estimate the correlation between postoperative stay and CDC/CCI. Logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors for major complications. The sample size for a fictive superiority trial was calculated for different endpoints. Results A total of 225 (80.36%) patients suffered from 528 complications. The cumulative CCI had a more accurate prediction of postoperative stay than the CDC (r = 0.378, p < 0.001 vs. r = 0.349, p < 0.001). The need for sample size could decrease when CCI was used for the primary endpoint. More risk factors for major complications were identified when CCI ≥33.7 was defined as the endpoint of major complications. Conclusion CCI is better than CDC for grading the severity of complications in elderly patients after radical cystectomy and PLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiwen Huang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, National Research Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenan Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, National Research Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Beijing, China
| | - Han Hao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, National Research Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Beijing, China
| | - Haixin Wang
- Department of Urology, Yankuang New Journey General Hospital, Zoucheng, China
| | - Meixia Shang
- Department of Medical Statistics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhijun Xi
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, National Research Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Zhijun Xi,
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gandaglia G, Mazzone E, Stabile A, Pellegrino A, Cucchiara V, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Robesti D, Leni R, Samanes Gajate AM, Picchio M, Gianolli L, Brembilla G, De Cobelli F, van Oosterom MN, van Leeuwen FWB, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Prostate-specific membrane antigen Radioguided Surgery to Detect Nodal Metastases in Primary Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: Results of a Planned Interim Analysis of a Prospective Phase 2 Study. Eur Urol 2022; 82:411-418. [PMID: 35879127 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extended pelvic nodal dissection (ePLND) represents the gold standard for nodal staging in prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioguided surgery (RGS) could identify lymph node invasion (LNI) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). OBJECTIVE To report the planned interim analyses of a phase 2 prospective study (NCT04832958) aimed at describing PSMA-RGS during RARP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A phase 2 trial aimed at enrolling 100 patients with intermediate- or high-risk cN0cM0 PCa at conventional imaging with a risk of LNI of >5% was conducted. Overall, 18 patients were enrolled between June 2021 and March 2022. Among them, 12 patients underwent PSMA-RGS and represented the study cohort. SURGICAL PROCEDURE All patients received 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging; 99mTc-PSMA-I&S was synthesised and administered intravenously the day before surgery, followed by single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. A Drop-In gamma probe was used for in vivo measurements. All positive lesions (count rate ≥2 compared with background) were excised and ePLND was performed. MEASUREMENTS Side effects, perioperative outcomes, and performance characteristics of robot-assisted PSMA-RGS for LNI were measured. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, four (33%), six (50%), and two (17%) patients had intermediate-risk, high-risk, and locally advanced PCa. Overall, two (17%) patients had pathologic nodal uptake at PSMA PET. The median operative time, blood loss, and length of stay were 230 min, 100 ml, and 5 d, respectively. No adverse events and intraoperative complications were recorded. One patient experienced a 30-d complication (Clavien-Dindo 2; 8.3%). Overall, three (25%) patients had LNI at ePLND. At per-region analyses on 96 nodal areas, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PSMA-RGS were 63%, 99%, 83%, and 96%, respectively. On a per-patient level, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of PSMA-RGS were 67%, 100%, 100%, and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted PSMA-RGS in primary staging is a safe and feasible procedure characterised by acceptable specificity but suboptimal sensitivity, missing micrometastatic nodal disease. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate-specific membrane antigen radioguided robot-assisted surgery is a safe and feasible procedure for the intraoperative identification of nodal metastases in cN0cM0 prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. However, this approach might still miss micrometastatic nodal dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Antony Pellegrino
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Leni
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Maria Picchio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Gianolli
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Brembilla
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Matthias N van Oosterom
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Fijs W B van Leeuwen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Carbonara U, Minafra P, Papapicco G, De Rienzo G, Pagliarulo V, Lucarelli G, Vitarelli A, Ditonno P. Xi Nerve-sparing Robotic Radical Perineal Prostatectomy: European Single-center Technique and Outcomes. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 41:55-62. [PMID: 35633830 PMCID: PMC9133767 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Radical prostatectomy (RP) represents the standard of care for the treatment of patients with organ-confined prostatic cancer. Historically, perineal RP has been described as the first surgical approach for the complete removal of the prostatic gland. In the past years, robotic techniques provided some technical advantages that allow resuming alternative approaches, such as robotic radical perineal prostatectomy (r-RPP). Objective To present in detail the technique of Xi nerve-sparing r-RPP and to report perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes from a European tertiary center. Design setting and participants Patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostatic cancer not suitable for active surveillance and prostate volume up to 60 ml who underwent r-RPP between November 2018 and December 2020 were identified. Surgical procedure All patients underwent Xi nerve-sparing r-RPP. Measurements Baseline characteristics and intraoperative, pathological, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed. The complications were reported according to the standardized methodology to report complications proposed by European Association of Urology guidelines. Results and limitations Overall, our series included 26 patients who underwent r-RPP. Patients' median age was 62.5 yr. Thirteen (50%) and eight (30.7%) patients showed a body mass index (BMI) of 25-30 and >30, respectively. A history of past surgical procedures was present in seven (26.8%) patients. The median prostate volume was 40 (interquartile range [IQR]: 28-52) ml. The median operative time and blood lost were 246 (IQR: 230-268) min and 275 (IQR: 200-400) ml, respectively. Overall, four (15.4%) patients reported intraoperative complications and five (19.2%) reported postoperative complications, with one (3.8%) reporting major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3). No patient with biochemical recurrence (BCR) was reported at 1 yr of follow-up. Continence rates were 73.0%, 84.6%, and 92.3%, respectively, at 3, 6, and 12 mo after surgery. Erectile potency recovery rates were 57.1%, 66.6%, and 80.9% at 3, 6, and 12 mo of follow-up, respectively. Conclusions Xi r-RPP is a challenging but safe minimally invasive approach for selected patients. No patient reported BCR at 12 mo. The choice of the surgical approach for RP is likely to be based on the patient's characteristics as well as the surgeon's preferences. Patient summary Our study suggests that Xi radical perineal prostatectomy is a safe minimally invasive approach for patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostatic cancer, and complex abdominal surgical history or comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Carbonara
- Corresponding author. Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy. Tel. +39 342 755 2215; Fax: +39 080 559 5236.
| | | | - Giuseppe Papapicco
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation – Urology Unit, Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
| | - Gaetano De Rienzo
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation – Urology Unit, Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Pagliarulo
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation – Urology Unit, Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation – Urology Unit, Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Vitarelli
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation – Urology Unit, Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
| | - Pasquale Ditonno
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation – Urology Unit, Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tappero S, Dell'Oglio P, Longoni M, Buratto C, Palagonia E, Scilipoti P, Vecchio E, Martiriggiano M, Secco S, Olivero A, Barbieri M, Napoli G, Strada E, Petralia G, Di Trapani D, Bocciardi AM, Galfano A. Challenging cases in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2022; 40:1993-1999. [PMID: 35771257 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04073-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the relationship between enlarged prostate, bulky median lobe (BML) or prior benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery and perioperative functional, and oncological outcomes in high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP). METHODS 320 HR-PCa patients treated with RS-RARP between 2011 and 2020 at a single high-volume center. The relationship between prostate volume, BML, prior BPH surgery and perioperative outcomes, Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥ 2 90-day postoperative complications, positive surgical margins (PSMs), and urinary continence (UC) recovery was evaluated respectively in multivariable linear, logistic and Cox regression models. Complications were collected according to the standardized methodology proposed by EAU guidelines. UC recovery was defined as the use of zero or one safety pad. RESULTS Overall, 5.9% and 5.6% had respectively a BML or prior BPH surgery. Median PV was 45 g (range: 14-300). The rate of focal and non-focal PSMs was 8.4% and 17.8%. 53% and 10.9% patients had immediate UC recovery and CD ≥ 2. The 1- and 2-yr UC recovery was 84 and 85%. PV (p = 0.03) and prior BPH surgery (p = 0.02) was associated with longer operative time. BML was independent predictor of time to bladder catheter removal (p = 0.001). PV was independent predictor of PSMs (OR: 1.02; p = 0.009). Prior BPH surgery was associated with lower UC recovery (HR: 0.5; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION HR-PCa patients with enlarged prostate have higher risk of PSMs, while patients with prior BPH surgery have suboptimal UC recovery. These findings should help physicians for accurate preoperative counseling and to improve surgical planning in case of HR-PCa patients with challenging features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Tappero
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy. .,Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy. .,Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.,Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Buratto
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Erika Palagonia
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.,Division of Urology, School of Medicine, Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Hospital "Ospedali Riuniti", Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Pietro Scilipoti
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Vecchio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.,Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Marco Martiriggiano
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.,Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Silvia Secco
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Olivero
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Barbieri
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Napoli
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Strada
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Petralia
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Di Trapani
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Galfano
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nisen H, Erkkilä K, Ettala O, Ronkainen H, Isotalo T, Nykopp T, Seikkula H, Seppänen M, Tramberg M, Palmberg C, Kilponen A, Pogodin-Hannolainen D, Mustonen S, Veitonmäki T. Intraoperative complications in kidney tumor surgery: critical grading for the European Association of Urology intraoperative adverse incident classification. Scand J Urol 2022; 56:293-300. [PMID: 35730592 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2089228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The European Association of Urology committee in 2020 suggested a new classification, intraoperative adverse incident classification (EAUiaiC), to grade intraoperative adverse events (IAE) in urology. AIMS We applied and validated EAUiaiC, for kidney tumor surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective multicenter study was conducted based on chart review. The study group comprised 749 radical nephrectomies (RN) and 531 partial nephrectomies (PN) performed in 12 hospitals in Finland during 2016-2017. All IAEs were centrally graded for EAUiaiC. The classification was adapted to kidney tumor surgery by the inclusion of global bleeding as a transfusion of ≥3 units of blood (Grade 2) or as ≥5 units (Grade 3), and also by the exclusion of preemptive conversions. RESULTS A total of 110 IAEs were recorded in 13.8% of patients undergoing RN, and 40 IAEs in 6.4% of patients with PN. Overall, bleeding injuries in major vessels, unspecified origin and parenchymal organs accounted for 29.3, 24.0, and 16.0% of all IEAs, respectively. Bowel (n = 10) and ureter (n = 3) injuries were rare. There was no intraoperative mortality. IAEs were associated with increased tumor size, tumor extent, age, comorbidity scores, surgical approach and indication, postoperative Clavien-Dindo (CD) complications and longer stay in hospital. 48% of conversions were reactive with more CD-complications after reactive than preemptive conversion (43 vs. 25%). CONCLUSIONS The associations between IAEs and preoperative variables and postoperative outcome indicate good construct validity for EAUiaiC. Bleeding is the most important IAE in kidney tumor surgery and the inclusion of transfusions could provide increased objectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry Nisen
- Department of Urology, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kaisa Erkkilä
- Department of Surgery, Porvoo Hospital, Porvoo, Finland
| | - Otto Ettala
- Department of Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Hanna Ronkainen
- Department of Urology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Taina Isotalo
- Department of Surgery, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland
| | - Timo Nykopp
- Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Heikki Seikkula
- Department of Surgery, Central Hospital of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Marjo Seppänen
- Department of Surgery, Satakunta Central Hospital, Pori, Finland
| | - Margus Tramberg
- Department of Surgery, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Kotka, Finland
| | | | - Ansa Kilponen
- Department of Surgery, Kainuu Central Hospital, Kajaani, Finland
| | | | | | - Thea Veitonmäki
- Deparment of Urology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wijburg CJ, Hannink G, Michels CT, Weijerman PC, Issa R, Tay A, Decaestecker K, Wiklund P, Hosseini A, Sridhar A, Kelly J, d'Hondt F, Mottrie A, Klaver S, Edeling S, Dell'Oglio P, Montorsi F, Rovers MM, Witjes JA. Learning Curve Analysis for Intracorporeal Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 39:55-61. [PMID: 35528784 PMCID: PMC9068730 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The utilisation of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal reconstruction (iRARC) has increased in recent years. Little is known about the length of the learning curve (LC) for this procedure. Objective To study the length of the LC for iRARC in terms of 90-d major complications (MC90; Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3), 90-d overall complications (OC90, Clavien-Dindo grades 1–5), operating time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and length of hospital stay (LOS). Design, setting, and participants This was a retrospective analysis of all consecutive iRARC cases from nine European high-volume hospitals with ≥100 cases. All patients had bladder cancer for which iRARC was performed, with an ileal conduit or neobladder as the urinary diversion. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Outcome parameters used as a proxy for LC length were the number of consecutive cases needed to reach a plateau level in two-piece mixed-effects models for MC90, OC90, OT, EBL, and LOS. Results and limitations A total of 2186 patients undergoing iRARC between 2003 and 2018were included. The plateau levels for MC90 and OC90 were reached after 137 cases (95% confidence interval [CI] 80–193) and 97 cases (95% CI 41–154), respectively. The mean MC90 rate at the plateau was 14% (95% CI 7–21%). The plateau level was reached after 75 cases (95% CI 65–86) for OT, 88 cases (95% CI 70–106) for EBL, and 198 cases (95% CI 130–266) for LOS. A major limitation of the study is the difference in the balance of urinary diversion types between centres. Conclusions This multicentre retrospective analysis for the iRARC LC among nine European centres showed that 137 consecutive cases were needed to reach a stable MC90 rate. Patient summary We carried out a multicentre analysis of the surgical learning curve for robot-assisted removal of the bladder and bladder reconstruction in patients with bladder cancer. We found that 137 consecutive cases were needed to reach a stable rate of serious complications.
Collapse
|
22
|
Dell'Oglio P, Tappero S, Longoni M, Buratto C, Scilipoti P, Secco S, Olivero A, Barbieri M, Palagonia E, Napoli G, Strada E, Petralia G, Di Trapani D, Vanzulli A, Bocciardi AM, Galfano A. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Results from a Large Single-institution Series. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 38:69-78. [PMID: 35265866 PMCID: PMC8898917 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Retzius-sparing (RS) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy represents a valid surgical treatment option for prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, the available evidence on the role of RS in high-risk (HR) PCa setting is sparse. Objective To describe our RS technique for HR-PCa patients and to evaluate intra-, peri-, and postoperative oncological and functional outcomes. Design, setting, and participants A total of 340 D’Amico HR-PCa patients underwent RS at a single high-volume centre between 2011 and 2020. Surgical procedure Surgical procedures were performed by five experienced robotic surgeons. Measurements Complications were collected according to the standardised methodology proposed by the European Association of Urology guidelines. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated in patients with complete follow-up data (n = 320). Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as two consecutive prostate-specific antigen values of ≥0.2 ng/ml. Urinary continence (UC) recovery was defined as the use of zero or one safety pad. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were performed. Results and limitations Fourteen patients (4%) experienced intraoperative complications and 52 90-d complications occurred in 44 patients (14%), of whom 24 had Clavien-Dindo 3a/b. Final pathology reported 49% International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 4–5, 55% ≥pT3a, and 28.8% positive surgical margins (PSMs; 9.4% focal and 19.4% extended PSMs). The median follow-up was 47 mo. Overall, 35.3% and 1.3% harboured BCR and died from PCa. At 4 yr of follow-up, BCR-free survival and additional treatment-free survival were 63.6% and 56.6%, respectively. ISUP 4–5 at biopsy (odds ratio [OR]: 2.6), prostate volume (OR: 1.03), partial or full nerve sparing (OR: 1.9), and full bladder neck preservation (OR: 2.2) were independent predictors of PSMs. Pathological ISUP 4–5 (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.5) and PSMs (HR: 2.3) were independent predictors of BCR. Pathological ISUP 4–5 (HR: 1.5), PSMs (HR: 2.4), pT ≥3b (HR: 1.8), and pN ≥1 (HR: 1.8) were independent predictors of additional treatment. Immediate UC recovery was recorded in 53% patients. The 1- and 2-yr UC recovery and erectile function recovery were, respectively, 84% and 85%, and 43% and 50%. Conclusions RS in HR-PCa patients allows optimal intra-, peri-, and postoperative outcomes. The RS approach should be considered a valid surgical treatment option for HR-PCa patients in expert hands. Patient summary Relying on the largest cohort of high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with Retzius sparing (RS), we observed that the RS approach is safe and allows optimal cancer control, without significantly compromising functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Corresponding author. Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. Tel. +39 02 6444 4617; Fax: +39 02 6444 7896.
| | - Stefano Tappero
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Buratto
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Scilipoti
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Secco
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Olivero
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Barbieri
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Erika Palagonia
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Division of Urology, University Hospital “Ospedali Riuniti”, School of Medicine, Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Napoli
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Strada
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Petralia
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Di Trapani
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelo Vanzulli
- Department of Radiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Galfano
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Minimally invasive retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for men with testis cancer: a retrospective cohort study of safety and feasibility. World J Urol 2022; 40:1505-1512. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03974-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
24
|
Wever L, de Vries HM, Dell'Oglio P, van der Poel HG, Donswijk ML, Sikorska K, van Leeuwen FWB, Horenblas S, Brouwer OR. Incidence and risk factor analysis of complications after sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer. BJU Int 2022; 130:486-495. [PMID: 35257463 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical staging is recommended in intermediate to high risk clinically node negative (cN0) penile cancer (PeCa). Because (modified) inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is associated with high morbidity, dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) was introduced with the aim to reduce morbidity while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. OBJECTIVE To determine the incidence and types of complications after DSNB and identify risk factors for the occurrence of postoperative complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated 644 PeCa patients (1284 DSNB procedures) with at least one cN0 groin who underwent DSNB between 2011 and 2020 at a single high-volume centre. 30-day and 30-90-day postoperative complications were collected according to the modified Clavien Dindo classification and the standardized methodology proposed by the European Association of Urology panel. Univariable and multivariable generalized linear mixed models were used to identify risk factors for the occurrence of complications per groin. RESULTS A 30-day postoperative complication occurred in 14% of groins (n=186), of which 94% were mild to moderate. Wound infection and lymphocele formation were most common. 30-90-day postoperative complications occurred in 3.4% of the groins, all of which were mild or moderate (grade 1-2). The number of removed LNs per groin was the main independent predictor for any 30-day complications and grade≥2 complications (OR 1.40; p<0.001). An increase in the probability of postoperative complications with the number of LNs removed was observed after accounting for all confounders. CONCLUSIONS Despite being less morbid than (modified) ILND, DSNB is still associated with a considerable risk of mild to moderate postoperative complications. This risk increases with an increasing number of LNs removed. Further procedural refinement aimed at removing the true sentinel node(s) only, may help further reduce the morbidity of surgical staging in PeCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke Wever
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hielke M de Vries
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karolina Sikorska
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fijs W B van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Oscar R Brouwer
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sathianathen NJ, Lawrentschuk N, Thalmann GN, Furrer MA. Re: Impact of the Implementation of the EAU Guidelines Recommendation on Reporting and Grading of Complications in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2021; 81:214-215. [PMID: 34920896 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Niranjan J Sathianathen
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Marc A Furrer
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Urology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; The Australian Medical Robotics Academy, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dell'oglio P, Tappero S, Andras I, Palagonia E, Larcher A, Secco S, Mottrie A, Bocciardi AM, Suardi N, Galfano A. Comment on: "The surgical learning curve for salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective single-surgeon study". Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 73:680-682. [PMID: 34847652 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04721-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Dell'oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan Italy - .,Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands - .,Department of Radiology, Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands -
| | - Stefano Tappero
- Department of Urology, San Martino Hospital, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Iulia Andras
- Department of Urology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Erika Palagonia
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Hospital "Ospedali Riuniti", Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, URI-IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Secco
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan Italy
| | - Alexander Mottrie
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Aldo M Bocciardi
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan Italy
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- Department of Urology, San Martino Hospital, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Antonio Galfano
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fankhauser CD, Lee EWC, Issa A, Oliveira P, Lau M, Sangar V, Parnham A. Saphenous-sparing Ascending Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection Using a Leg Approach: Surgical Technique and Perioperative and Pathological Outcomes. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 35:9-13. [PMID: 34825230 PMCID: PMC8605329 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Open inguinal lymph node dissection (oILND) has high morbidity. Ascending saphenous-sparing video endoscopic ILND (VEILND-AS+) represents a minimally invasive alternative with potential benefits. Objective To describe our VEILND-AS+ technique and compare outcomes to oILND. Design, setting, and participants This was a retrospective cohort study of penile cancer patients. Surgical procedure VEILND-AS+ was performed according to the technique described in the supplementary video. Measurements We compared perioperative and pathological outcomes between the two procedures. Results and limitations In the study cohort of 206 men we performed 40 VEILND-AS+ and 251 oILND procedures. In comparison to oILND, VEILND-AS+ had a longer operation time (185 vs 120 min; p < 0.01) but a shorter hospital stay (2 vs 4 d; p < 0.01). A median of eight resected lymph nodes with a median of one affected node per groin was observed in both groups. Extranodal extension was found in 30% of cases after VEILND-AS+ and 35% after oILND. In both groups the median drainage time was 13 d. Wound infections were observed in 38% of cases after VEILND-AS+ and 27% after oILND (p = 0.19). Skin necrosis or wound breakdown occurred in 0% and 6% of cases after VEILND-AS+ and oILND (p < 0.01), while lymphoceles were drained in 18% and 7% of cases, respectively(p = 0.03). Following VEILND-AS+ and oILND, 20% and 14% of patients, respectively, were referred to a lymph oedema clinic (p < 0.01). Conclusions VEILND-AS+ is a safe procedure and offers shorter hospital stays and possibly a lower risk of skin necrosis and wound breakdown in comparison to oILND. Further improvements in the VEILND-AS+ technique are required to reduce complications associated with dead space and injury to lymphatic vessels. Patient summary For patients undergoing surgery on lymph nodes in the groin, a minimally invasive approach instead of open surgery led to discharge 2 days earlier and may have lower rates of severe wound complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian D Fankhauser
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trusts, Manchester, UK.,Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.,University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Maurice Lau
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trusts, Manchester, UK
| | - Vijay Sangar
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trusts, Manchester, UK
| | - Arie Parnham
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trusts, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Andersen CS, Thoft Jensen B, Nielsen Holck E, Kingo PS, Jensen JB. Prospective versus retrospective recordings of comorbidities and complications in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy - a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Urol 2021; 56:6-11. [PMID: 34658306 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2021.1987978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing radical cystectomy are predominantly elderly with many comorbidities and high risk of complications. Studies on comorbidity and complications following cancer surgery are often based on data collected retrospectively from records. However, prospective registration is often considered a more valid source of information. Therefore, it is relevant to investigate if the amount and severity of complications and comorbidities is valid when using retrospective registration compared to a more meticulous prospective registration. OBJECTIVE To investigate the difference in registered comorbidities and complications between prospective and retrospective data collection in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy. METHOD Seventy-three bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy were randomized to receive prospective or retrospective collection of data regarding comorbidities and complications. Data in the prospective arm was collected daily during hospitalization, 14-days after discharge and 90-days postoperatively. In the retrospective arm, medical records were reviewed retrospectively at 90-days. Comorbidities were compared using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and complications were reported as overall, minor and major dependent on Clavien Dindo Classification (CDC). The primary endpoint was the difference in overall complication rate. RESULTS No statistically significant difference in CCI was observed with median [IQR] 2[0;3] and 1[0;2] (p = 0.21). No statistically significant difference was found regarding all, minor (CDC I-II) or major (CDC III-V) complications at all three time points. CONCLUSION No statistically significant difference in comorbidity and complications between retrospectively and prospectively collected data was observed. We find that retrospective collected data is reliable when strict reporting guidelines are used in this single-centre study.
Collapse
|
29
|
Kaisa E, Veitonmäki T, Ettala O, Ronkainen H, Isotalo T, Nykopp T, Seikkula H, Seppänen M, Tramberg M, Palmberg C, Kilponen A, Dimitri PH, Mustonen S, Nisen H. Does every Clavien-Dindo complication matter? A national multi-center study in kidney cancer surgery. Scand J Urol 2021; 55:441-447. [PMID: 34533415 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2021.1960597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is huge variation in Clavien-Dindo (CD) complication rates in urology. We sought to optimize the use of the CD system in kidney tumor surgery. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 1,286 patients undergoing kidney tumor operations in 12 Finnish hospitals during 2016-2017. Primary CD assignments were made by site urologists. Data were centrally reviewed by two authors in consensus meetings. Consistency of the primary assignments was assessed by the number of cases requiring correction. Complication load was compared as different outcome rates between five university hospital regions. RESULTS The overall complication rate in primary data was 40% (517/1286) and varied significantly from 32 to 62% (p < 0.001) between the regions. The need for corrections in central review was significantly greater for CD1 (54%) compared to CD2 (16%, p < 0.001) and CD3-5 (11%, p < 0.001) categories. The final data comprised 500 CD complications after 390 surgeries. The most frequent pathologies were bleeding (8.4%), urological complications (5.9%) and postoperative fever (4.7%). The overall CD2 complications rate was statistically (p < 0.001) higher in region D and that of CD3-5 was higher (p = 0.007) in region B. In multivariable analysis, university hospital region, male sex, BMI ≥ 27, ECOG ≥ 1, partial nephrectomy type and open surgery significantly increased the risk of complications. CONCLUSIONS Comparative use of CD1 complications may be too inconsistent and only CD2-5 complications should be reported. Central review of the primary data and detailed guidelines are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erkkilä Kaisa
- Department of Surgery, South Karelia Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - Thea Veitonmäki
- Deparment of Urology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Otto Ettala
- Department of Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Hanna Ronkainen
- Department of Urology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Taina Isotalo
- Department of Surgery, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland
| | - Timo Nykopp
- Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Heikki Seikkula
- Department of Surgery, Central Hospital of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Marjo Seppänen
- Department of Surgery, Satakunta Central Hospital, Pori, Finland
| | - Margus Tramberg
- Department of Surgery, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Kotka, Finland
| | | | - Ansa Kilponen
- Department of Surgery, Kainuu Central Hospital, Kajaani, Finland
| | | | | | - Harry Nisen
- Abdominal Center, Urology, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Campi R, Marchioni M, Bertolo R, Erdem S, Kara O, Pavan N, Amparore D. Robotic surgery for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombosis: balancing feasibility and safety toward individualized decision-making. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 73:544-548. [PMID: 34494415 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04606-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Laboratory of Biostatistics, University "G. D'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.,Department of Urology, SS Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Selcuk Erdem
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Onder Kara
- School of Medicine, Department of Urology, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Nicola Pavan
- Clinic of Urology, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Science, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy -
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
The Unsolved Issue of Reporting of Late Complications in Urology. Eur Urol 2021; 80:527-528. [PMID: 34362581 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Lack of uniformity in the reporting of late complications hampers the quality of data available on surgical outcomes. Adoption of standardized criteria and a taxonomy for reporting of late complications is urgently needed.
Collapse
|
32
|
Impact of the Implementation of the EAU Guidelines Recommendation on Reporting and Grading of Complications in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2021; 80:129-133. [PMID: 34020829 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
In 2012, the European Association of Urology (EAU) Ad Hoc Panel proposed a standardised methodology on reporting and grading complications after urological surgical procedures. The aim of the current study was to assess the impact of this implementation on complications reporting for patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). A systematic review of all English-language original articles published on RARC until March 2020 was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The study selection process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The quality of reporting and grading complication was evaluated according to the EAU recommendations. Our analysis failed to observe a statistically significant improvement in reporting outcomes after the EAU guidelines recommendations except for three of the 14 criteria proposed (ie, follow-up duration, utilisation of a severity grade system, and risk factors included in the analyses). A lower statistically significant adherence to outcome reporting in terms of inclusion of readmissions and causes (p = 0.02), was observed. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we evaluated the impact of the proposed European Association of Urology (EAU) standardised reporting tool for urological complications, in patients treated with robot-assisted radical cystectomy. A low adherence to EAU guidelines recommendations for complications reporting was observed.
Collapse
|
33
|
Rosiello G, Gandaglia G, Scuderi S, Barletta F, Fossati N, Stabile A, Gallina A, Mazzone E, Vitale LM, Pellegrino A, Bravi C, Martini A, Cucchiara V, Karakiewicz PI, Mottrie A, Briganti A, Montorsi F. Reducing the Risk of Postoperative Complications After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients: Results of an Audit and Feedback Intervention Following the Implementation of Prospective Data Collection. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:431-437. [PMID: 33879394 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prospective data collection for perioperative outcomes might increase awareness of surgical results obtained for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). This would prompt the implementation of measures aimed at reducing the risk of adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of an audit and feedback process aimed at identifying the most common complications after RARP and at implementing measures to improve outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Overall, 415 patients treated with RARP by a high-volume surgeon were included. Perioperative outcomes for 187 patients treated between September 2016 and December 2017 were prospectively collected at 30 d according to the European Association of Urology guideline recommendations (group 1). An audit and feedback process was implemented in January 2018 whereby the most common complication (anastomotic leak) was identified and measures aimed at improving outcomes (changes in the anastomotic technique) were implemented. The outcomes for group 1 were then compared to 228 patients treated after implementation of the modified surgical technique (group 2). SURGICAL PROCEDURE A novel technique for posterior reconstruction and urethrovesical anastomosis was introduced. MEASUREMENTS Perioperative outcomes included blood loss, operative time, length of stay, and 30-d postoperative complications. Logistic regression models tested the effect of the novel surgical technique on anastomotic leaks. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 97 patients (23%) experienced postoperative complications at 30 d. The rate of anastomotic leaks was significantly lower in group 2 compared to group 1 (3.1% vs 9.6%; p < 0.01). Similarly, overall and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 complication rates were lower in group 2 versus group 1 (17% vs 31%, and 6% vs 20%; both p ≤ 0.001). In multivariable analyses, treatment after implementation of changes in the anastomotic technique independently predicted a lower risk of complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.89) and of anastomotic leaks (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.17-0.97). The lack of randomization represents the main limitation. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of changes in the urethrovesical anastomosis technique arising from increased awareness of surgical outcomes reduced the risk of anastomotic leaks. These findings highlight the importance of audit and feedback processes using a standardized method for reporting surgical morbidity. PATIENT SUMMARY Increased awareness of surgical outcomes prompted us to change our technique for connecting the bladder to the urethra during robot-assisted surgery to remove the prostate in patients with prostate cancer. These changes resulted in significant improvements in surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Rosiello
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Maria Vitale
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Antony Pellegrino
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Bravi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bandini M, Barbagli G, Leni R, Cirulli GO, Basile G, Balò S, Montorsi F, Sansalone S, Salonia A, Briganti A, Butnaru D, Lazzeri M. Assessing in-hospital morbidity after urethroplasty using the European Association of Urology Quality Criteria for standardized reporting. World J Urol 2021; 39:3921-3930. [PMID: 33855598 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03692-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To conduct a rigorous assessment of in-hospital morbidity after urethroplasty according with the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for complication reporting. METHODS We retrospectively (2015-2019) identified 469 consecutive patients receiving urethroplasty (e.g. bulbar urethroplasty with grafts, penile urethroplasty with/without grafts/flaps, Johanson, de novo or revision perineostomy, end-to-end anastomosis, meatoplasty and/or meatotomy) at our tertiary care institution. Complications were graded with Clavien-Dindo score and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Complications were classified in: bleeding no gastrointestinal, cardiac, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, infectious, neurological, oral, wound, miscellaneous, and pulmonary. Logistic regression tested for predictors of in-hospital complications and prolonged hospitalization (> 75th percentile). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression investigated the effect of complications on failure after urethroplasty. RESULTS Overall, 161 (34.3%) patients experienced at least one complication. Of those, 47 (10%) experienced two or more complications and 59 (12.6%) experienced at least one Clavien-Dindo ≥ II complication. Only two patients had Clavien-Dindo III complications. Infectious was the most frequent complication, and de novo or revision perineostomy was associated with the highest rate of complications. The occurrence of any complications, as well as complication with Clavien-Dindo ≥ II were associated with prolonged hospitalizations, but not with higher rates of post-urethroplasty failure. CONCLUSIONS Complications after urethroplasty were common events, but rarely with severe sequelae. Infectious were the most common complications and perineostomy was the type of urethroplasty with the highest rate of complications. The application of the EAU recommendations allowed the identifications of a higher number of complications after urethroplasty if compared with previous reports based on unsupervised chart review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Bandini
- Center for Reconstructive Urethra Surgery, Arezzo, Rome, Milan, Italy. .,Centro Chirurgico Toscano, Arezzo, Italy. .,Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Guido Barbagli
- Center for Reconstructive Urethra Surgery, Arezzo, Rome, Milan, Italy.,Centro Chirurgico Toscano, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Riccardo Leni
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe O Cirulli
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Basile
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Sofia Balò
- Centro Chirurgico Toscano, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Salonia
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Denis Butnaru
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Massimo Lazzeri
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Dell'Oglio P, Palagonia E, Wisz P, Andras I, De Groote R, Poelaert F, Beato S, Goossens M, Schatteman P, D'Hondt F, De Naeyer G, Mazzone E, Mottrie A. Robot-assisted Boari flap and psoas hitch ureteric reimplantation: technique insight and outcomes of a case series with ≥1 year of follow-up. BJU Int 2021; 128:625-633. [PMID: 33829630 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe step-by-step surgical techniques and report outcomes of the largest single-centre series of patients with distal ureteric disease exclusively treated with robot-assisted ureteric reimplantation with Boari flap (RABFUR) and psoas hitch (RAPHUR), with a minimum follow-up of 1 year and complete postoperative data. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 37 patients with distal ureteric disease were treated between 2010 and 2018. Of these, 81% and 19% underwent RAPHUR and RABFUR, respectively. Intra-, peri- and postoperative outcomes were assessed. The 90-day postoperative complications were reported according to the standardised methodology proposed by the European Association of Urology Ad Hoc Panel. Functional outcomes (creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) and postoperative symptoms (visual analogue pain scale) were assessed. RESULTS The median operating time and blood loss were 180 min and 100 mL, respectively. There were no conversions to open surgery and no intraoperative transfusions. The median length of stay, bladder catheter indwelling time and stent removal were 4, 7 and 30 days, respectively. The median follow-up was 24 months. Overall, 10 patients (27%) had postoperative complications and of these, eight (22%) and two (5.4%) were Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II and III, respectively. At the last follow-up, the median postoperative creatinine level and eGFR were 0.9 mg/dL and 73.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 , respectively. At the last follow-up, five (13.5%) and three (8%) patients had Grade 1 hydronephrosis and mild urinary symptoms, respectively. The study limitations include its retrospective nature. CONCLUSION In the present study, we present our RABFUR and RAPHUR techniques. We confirm the feasibility and safety profile of both approaches in patients with distal ureteric disease relying on the largest single-centre series with ≥1 year of follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.,Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Erika Palagonia
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.,Department of Urology, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Pawel Wisz
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | | | - Ruben De Groote
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Filip Poelaert
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | | | - Marijn Goossens
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Peter Schatteman
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Frederiek D'Hondt
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Geert De Naeyer
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.,Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cacciamani GE, Maas M, Nassiri N, Ortega D, Gill K, Dell'Oglio P, Thalmann GN, Heidenreich A, Eastham JA, Evans CP, Karnes RJ, De Castro Abreu AL, Briganti A, Artibani W, Gill I, Montorsi F. Impact of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection and Its Extent on Perioperative Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4:134-149. [PMID: 33745687 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) yields the most accurate staging in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa), although it can be associated with morbidity. OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the impact of PLND extent on perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing RP. A new PLND-related complication assessment tool is proposed. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) was conducted. MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched to yield studies discussing perioperative complications following RP and PLND. The extent of PLND was classified according to the European Association of Urology PCa guidelines. Studies were categorized according to the extent of PLND. Intra- and postoperative complications were classified as "strongly," "likely," or "unlikely" related to PLND. Anatomical site of perioperative complications was recorded. A cumulative meta-analysis of comparative studies was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Our search generated 3645 papers, with 176 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Details of 77 303 patients were analyzed. Of these studies, 84 (47.7%), combining data on 28 428 patients, described intraoperative complications as an outcome of interest. Overall, 534 (1.8%) patients reported one or more intraoperative complications. Postoperative complications were reported in 151 (85.7%) studies, combining data on 73 629 patients. Overall, 10 401 (14.1%) patients reported one or more postoperative complication. The most reported postoperative complication strongly related to PLND was lymphocele (90.6%). The pooled meta-analysis revealed that RP + limited PLND/standard PLND had a significantly decreased risk of experiencing any intraoperative complication (risk ratio [RR]: 0.55; p = 0.01) and postoperative complication strongly related to PLND (RR: 0.46; p = <0.00001), particularly for lymphocele formation (RR: 0.52; p = 0.0003) and thromboembolic events (RR: 0.59; p = 0.008), when compared with extended/superextended PLND. The extent of PLND was confirmed to be an independent predictor of lymphocele formation (RR: 1.77; p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS The perioperative morbidity of PLND in patients undergoing RP and PLND for PCa significantly correlates with the extent of PLND. More standardized reporting of intra- and postoperative complications is needed to better estimate the direct impact of PLND extent on perioperative morbidity. PATIENT SUMMARY Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the most accurate method for staging in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, although it can be associated with complications. This study aims to systematically evaluate the impact of PLND extent on perioperative complications in these patients. We found that intra- and postoperative complications correlate significantly with the extent of PLND. A more rigorous assessment and thorough reporting of perioperative complications are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni E Cacciamani
- The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Marissa Maas
- The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nima Nassiri
- The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - David Ortega
- The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Karanvir Gill
- The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - George N Thalmann
- Department of BioMedical Research, Urology Research Laboratory, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - James A Eastham
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christopher P Evans
- Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, USA; UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | - Andre L De Castro Abreu
- The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Urologic Clinic, Department of Oncological and Surgical Sciences, AOU Integrata and University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Inderbir Gill
- The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Montorsi F, Gandaglia G, Stabile A. RE: Retzius Sparing Prostatectomy Effect on Symptomatic Lymphocele Rates. Urology 2021; 152:205. [PMID: 33497719 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.12.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Montorsi F, Gandaglia G, Würnschimmel C, Graefen M, Briganti A, Huland H. Re: Paolo Afonso de Carvalho, Joāo A.B.A. Barbosa, Giuliano B. Guglielmetti, et al. Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes. Eur Urol 2020;77:628-35: Incredible Results for Robot-assisted Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients. Eur Urol 2020; 79:e44-e46. [PMID: 33067018 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Hartwig Huland
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion decreases postoperative complications only in highly comorbid patients: findings that rely on a standardized methodology recommended by the European Association of Urology Guidelines. World J Urol 2020; 39:803-812. [PMID: 32419055 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03237-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The available studies comparing robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal (ICUD) vs. extracorporeal (ECUD) urinary diversion have not relied on a standardized methodology to report complications and did not assess the effect of different approaches on postoperative outcomes. MATERIALS Two hundred and sixty seven patients treated with RARC at a single center were assessed. A retrospective analysis of data prospectively collected according to a standardized methodology was performed. Multivariable logistic regression models (MVA) assessed the impact of ICUD vs. ECUD on intraoperative complications, prolonged length of stay (LOS), 30-day Clavien Dindo (CD) ≥ 2 complications and readmission rate. Interaction terms tested the impact of the approach on different patient subgroups. Lowess graphically depicted the probability of CD ≥ 2 after ICUD or ECUD according to patient baseline characteristics. RESULTS Overall, 162 ICUD vs 105 ECUD (61 vs. 39%) were performed. Intraoperative complications were recorded in 24 patients. The median LOS and readmission rate were 11 vs. 13 (p = 0.02) and 24 vs. 22% (p = 0.7) in ICUD vs. ECUD, respectively. Overall, 227 postoperative complications were recorded. The overall rate of CD ≥ 2 was 35 and 43% in patients with ICUD vs. ECUD, respectively (p = 0.2). At MVA, the approach type was not an independent predictor of any postoperative outcomes (all p ≥ 0.4). Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) was associated with an increased risk of CD ≥ 2 (OR: 1.2, p = 0.006). We identified a significant interaction term between ACCI and approach type (p = 0.04), where patients with ICUD had lower risk of CD ≥ 2 relative to those with ECUD with increasing ACCI. CONCLUSIONS Relying on a standardized methodology to report complications, we observed that highly comorbid patients who undergo ICUD have lower risk of postoperative complications relative to those patients who received ECUD.
Collapse
|
40
|
Briganti A, Gandaglia G, Scuderi S, Gallina A, Colombo R, Fossati N, Barletta F, Pellegrino A, Nocera L, Montorsi F, Necchi A. Surgical Safety of Radical Cystectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Following Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab in Patients with Bladder Cancer: Prospective Assessment of Perioperative Outcomes from the PURE-01 Trial. Eur Urol 2020; 77:576-580. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
41
|
Rosiello G, Palumbo C, Knipper S, Deuker M, Stolzenbach LF, Tian Z, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Montorsi F, Shariat SF, Saad F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Preoperative frailty predicts adverse short-term postoperative outcomes in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2020; 23:573-580. [DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-0225-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
42
|
Complications of robotic surgery in urological diseases: are we using standardized methodology to report complications? Curr Opin Urol 2020; 29:19-24. [PMID: 30489329 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The current data on complications reporting related to robot-assisted procedures (RAPs) in the urology literature are not comparable and do not use a validated classification. In this review, findings from various studies reporting positive and negative outcomes will be outlined. RECENT FINDINGS Robotic procedures have outcomes similar to open and laparoscopic techniques but generally cause fewer adverse events. However, the lack of standards for presenting surgical morbidity related to RAP leads to underreporting of surgical complications, makes comparisons of surgical outcomes difficult and prevents adequate knowledge about the outcomes of procedures. SUMMARY Although a reasonable number of positive outcomes of RAP have been reported in the literature, the extent of underreporting with this process is unknown. Further research and the development of a validated classification for reporting surgical complications will facilitate a better understanding of the actual outcomes.
Collapse
|
43
|
Tafuri A, Sebben M, Pirozzi M, Processali T, Shakir A, Rizzetto R, Amigoni N, Tiso L, De Michele M, Panunzio A, Cerrato C, Migliorini F, Novella G, De Marco V, Siracusano S, Artibani W, Porcaro AB. Predictive Factors of the Risk of Long-Term Hospital Readmission after Primary Prostate Surgery at a Single Tertiary Referral Center: Preliminary Report. Urol Int 2020; 104:465-475. [PMID: 31991418 DOI: 10.1159/000505409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the predictors of the risk of long-term hospital readmission after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a single tertiary referral center where both open RP (ORP) and robot assisted RP (RARP) are performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS The risk of readmission was evaluated by clinical, pathological, and perioperative factors. Skilled and experienced surgeons performed the 2 surgical approaches. Patients were followed for complications and hospital readmission for a period of 6 months. The association of factors with the risk of readmission was assessed by Cox's multivariate proportional hazards. RESULTS From December 2013 to 2017, 885 patients underwent RP. RARP was performed in 733 cases and ORP in 152 subjects. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) was performed in 479 patients. Hospital readmission was detected in 46 cases (5.2%). Using a multivariate model, independent factors associated with the risk of hospital readmission were seminal vesicle invasion (hazard ratio [HR] 2.065; 95% CI 1.116-3.283; p = 0.021), ORP (HR 3.506; 95% CI 1.919-6.405; p < 0.0001), and ePLND (HR 5.172; 95% CI 1.778-15.053; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In a large single tertiary referral center, independent predictors of the risk of long-term hospital readmission after RP included ORP, ePLND, and seminal vesicle invasion. When surgery is chosen as a primary treatment of PCA, patients should be informed of the risk of long-term hospital readmission and its related risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy.,USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marco Sebben
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Pirozzi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Tania Processali
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Leone Tiso
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Mario De Michele
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Novella
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy,
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
The impact of extended pelvic lymph node dissection on the risk of hospital readmission within 180 days after robot assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2020; 38:2799-2809. [PMID: 31980875 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03094-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the factors associated with the risk of hospital readmission after robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with or without extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for prostate cancer (PCA) over a long term. MATERIALS AND METHODS The risk of readmission was evaluated by clinical, pathological, and perioperative factors. Skilled and experienced surgeons performed the procedures. Patients were followed for complications and hospital readmission for a period of six months. The logistic regression model and Cox's proportional hazards assessed the association of factors with the risk of readmission. RESULTS From January 2013 to December 2018, 890 patients underwent RARP; ePLND was performed in 495 of these patients. Hospital readmission was detected in 25 cases (2.8%); moreover, it was more frequent when RARP was performed with ePLND (4.4% of cases) than without (0.8% of patients). On the final multivariate model, ePLND was the only independent factor that was positively associated with the risk of hospital readmission (hazard ratio, HR = 5935; 95%CI 1777-19,831; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Over the long term after RARP for PCA, the risk of hospital readmission is associated with ePLND. In patients who underwent RARP and ePLND, 4.4% of them had a readmission, compared to RARP alone, in which only 0.8% of cases had a readmission. When ePLND is planned for staging pelvic lymph nodes, patients should be informed of the increased risk of hospital readmission.
Collapse
|
45
|
|
46
|
Sebben M, Tafuri A, Pirozzi M, Processali T, Rizzetto R, Amigoni N, Shakir A, De Michele M, Panunzio A, Cerrato C, Tiso L, Novella G, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, De Marco V, Siracusano S, Artibani W, Porcaro AB. Open approach, extended pelvic lymph node dissection, and seminal vesicle invasion are independent predictors of hospital readmission after prostate cancer surgery: a large retrospective study. MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2019; 72:72-81. [PMID: 31833722 DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.19.03586-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to evaluate factors (clinical, pathological and perioperative) associated with the risk of hospital readmission after radical prostatectomy (RP) over the long term in a single tertiary referral center where both open RP (ORP) and robot assisted RP (RARP) are performed. METHODS From January 2013 to December 2018 patients older than 18 years, who provided signed consent and underwent open or robot assisted radical prostatectomy were enrolled and retrospectively evaluated. Patients who underwent any previous prostate cancer (PCA) treatments were excluded. Specifically, skilled and experienced surgeons performed the two surgical approaches. Patients were followed for complications and hospital readmission (RAD) for a period of six months. The association of factors with the risk of readmission was assessed by Cox's multivariate proportional hazards. RESULTS A total of 1062 patients underwent RP. RARP was performed in 891 cases and ORP in 171 subjects. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) was performed in 651 patients. Hospital readmission occurred in 53 cases (5%). Based on the final multivariate model, independent factors associated with the risk of hospital readmission were seminal vesicle invasion (HR=2.093; 95% CI: 1.177-3.722), ORP (HR=4.393; 95% CI: 2.516-7.672) and ePLND (HR=4.418; 95% CI: 1.544-12.639). CONCLUSIONS ORP, ePLND and seminal vesicle invasion are independent predictors of the risk of hospital readmission over the long term at a large single tertiary referral center. When surgery is chosen as a primary treatment of PCA, patients should be informed of the risk of hospital readmission and related risk factors. Assessing seminal vesicle invasion by preoperative clinical staging identifies locally advanced disease, which is associated with an increased risk of hospital readmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Sebben
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.,Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marco Pirozzi
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Tania Processali
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mario De Michele
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Leone Tiso
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Novella
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio B Porcaro
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy -
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
It is crucial that urologists keep abreast of the latest advances in medical research. This should include an awareness of the role of imaging techniques, collaboration in multidisciplinary teams, adherence to current guidelines, and ongoing documentation of postoperative complications and outcomes. Taken together, these key elements should facilitate optimisation of patient management in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
|
48
|
Preisser F, Nazzani S, Mazzone E, Marchioni M, Bandini M, Tian Z, Haese A, Saad F, Zorn K, Montorsi F, Shariat SF, Graefen M, Tilki D, Karakiewicz PI. Comparison of Open Versus Robotically Assisted Cytoreductive Radical Prostatectomy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 17:e939-e945. [PMID: 31375352 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 05/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (CRP) may offer a survival advantage, according to several retrospective analyses. However, no direct comparisons are available regarding the type of surgical approach (open vs. robotic) in the metastatic setting. To address intraoperative and postoperative complications of robotically assisted CRP relative to open CRP in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Within the National Inpatient Sample database (2008-2013), we identified patients with metastatic prostate cancer who underwent robotically assisted versus open CRP. Multivariable logistic regression, multivariable Poisson regression models, and linear regression models were used. RESULTS Of 874 patients who underwent CRP, 412 (47.1%) versus 462 (52.9%) underwent open versus robotically assisted CRP, respectively. Between 2008 and 2013, robotically assisted CRP rates increased from 7.6% to 50.0% (P = .5). In multivariable logistic regression models, robotically assisted CRP resulted in lower rates of overall (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; P < .001), miscellaneous medical (OR, 0.47; P = .02), and miscellaneous surgical complications (OR, 0.40; P = .04), as well as in lower rates of blood transfusions (OR, 0.19; P < .001). In multivariable Poisson regression models, robotically assisted CRP was associated with shorter stay (OR, 0.72; P < .001) and higher total hospital charges ($2483 more for each robotic surgery; P < .001). Similar results were recorded after adjustment for clustering. CONCLUSION The intraoperative and postoperative complications associated with robotically assisted CRP are lower than those of open CRP. Similarly, robotically assisted CRP is associated with shorter stay. Conversely, an increase in total hospital charges is associated with robotically assisted CRP. Nonetheless, the complication profile of robotically assisted CRP validates its safety and feasibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Preisser
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; Martini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Sebastiano Nazzani
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Academic Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Urology, SS Annunziata Hospital, "G.D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Marco Bandini
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Alexander Haese
- Martini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Kevin Zorn
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Academic Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Peyronnet B, Khene ZE, Mathieu R, Bensalah K. Robot-assisted Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy: Do We Really Need More Evidence To End the Debate? Eur Urol Oncol 2019; 1:69-70. [PMID: 31100230 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
50
|
Abstract
Urologists should be aware of the importance of staying updated with the latest advances in medical research, chasing complications after surgery, being aware of postoperative results, building up a multidisciplinary team, and designing randomised trials for relevant research questions. Taken together, these key elements would allow for optimisation of patients' outcomes in everyday clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|