1
|
Sachpekidis C, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Long Axial Field-of-View (LAFOV) PET/CT in Prostate Cancer. Semin Nucl Med 2024:S0001-2998(24)00045-X. [PMID: 38825439 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2024.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
PSMA-targeted PET/CT is currently considered the most effective non-invasive diagnostic technique for imaging PSMA-positive lesions in prostate cancer (PC), and its introduction has significantly enhanced the role of nuclear medicine in both the diagnosis and therapy (theranostics) of this oncological entity. In line with developments in radiopharmaceuticals, significant progress has been made in the development of PET/CT systems. In particular, the advent of long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT scanners has represented a major leap forward in molecular imaging, with early results from clinical applications of these systems showing significant improvements over previous standard axial field-of-view systems in terms of sensitivity, image quality and lesion quantification, while enabling whole-body dynamic PET imaging. In this context, the introduction of the new LAFOV scanners may further enhance the use and potential of PSMA-ligand PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of PC. The initial but steadily growing literature on the application of the new technology in the field of PSMA-ligand PET/CT has already yielded encouraging results regarding the detection of PC lesions with high sensitivity while providing the possibility of ultra-fast or ultra-low dose examinations. Moreover, whole-body dynamic PET has rendered for the first time feasible to capture the pharmacokinetics PSMA-ligands in all major organs and most tumor lesions with high temporal resolution. The main results of these studies are presented in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Sachpekidis
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Szczesniewski JJ, Tellez Fouz C, García Tello A, de la Rubia Marcos M, García Alonso MP, Llanes González L. Cost analysis of next-generation imaging in high-risk prostate cancer staging. Actas Urol Esp 2024; 48:328-334. [PMID: 38159802 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE Next-generation imaging (NGI) tests, such as choline PET/CT and PSMA PET, have shown to increase sensitivity in the detection of nodal and metastatic disease in prostate cancer. However, their use implies an increase in diagnostic costs compared to conventional imaging (CI) tests such as CT and bone scan. The aim of our study was to determine which diagnostic pathway is more cost-effective in high-risk prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHOD Cost-effectiveness analysis of the available imaging tests (CI, Choline/PSMA PET) for the staging of high-risk prostate cancer. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated based on published evidence, and costs were collected from the Management Department. In order to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis, five diagnostic pathways were proposed estimating the accurate diagnoses. RESULTS PSMA PET was the most accurate diagnostic option. The CI diagnostic workup was the most economical and CI+PSMA the most expensive. Analyzing the diagnostic cost-effectiveness ratio, CI+PSMA proved to be the most expensive (€5627.30 per correct diagnosis) followed by PET PSMA (€4987.11), choline (€4599.84) and CI (€4444.22). CONCLUSIONS PSMA PET is the most accurate strategy in staging distant disease in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Radiotracer uptake tests such as CI have been shown to be the most cost-effective option, followed by choline and PSMA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J J Szczesniewski
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - C Tellez Fouz
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain
| | - A García Tello
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain
| | - M de la Rubia Marcos
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain
| | - M P García Alonso
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain
| | - L Llanes González
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moran S, Cheng HH, Weg E, Kim EH, Chen DL, Iravani A, Ippolito JE. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) of prostate cancer: current and emerging applications. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:1288-1305. [PMID: 38386156 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04188-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is transforming the management of patients with prostate cancer. In appropriately selected patients, PSMA-PET offers superior sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional imaging (e.g., computed tomography and bone scintigraphy) as well as choline and fluciclovine PET, with the added benefit of consolidating bone and soft tissue evaluation into a single study. Despite being a newly available imaging tool, PSMA-PET has established indications, interpretation guidelines, and reporting criteria, which will be reviewed. The prostate cancer care team, from imaging specialists to those delivering treatment, should have knowledge of physiologic PSMA radiotracer uptake, patterns of disease spread, and the strengths and limitations of PSMA-PET. In this review, current and emerging applications of PSMA-PET, including appropriateness use criteria as well as image interpretation and pitfalls, will be provided with an emphasis on clinical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shamus Moran
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Emily Weg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Eric H Kim
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Delphine L Chen
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Amir Iravani
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joseph E Ippolito
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, 4559 Scott Ave., Mail Stop Code: 8131, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen DC, Huang S, Buteau JP, Kashyap R, Hofman MS. Clinical Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: Quarter-Century Transformation of Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging. PET Clin 2024; 19:261-279. [PMID: 38199918 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2023.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Although positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) underwent rapid growth during the last quarter-century, becoming a new standard-of-care for imaging most cancer types, CT and bone scan remained the gold standard for patients with prostate cancer. This occurred as 2-fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose was perceived to have a limited role owing to low sensitivity in many patients. A resurgence of interest occurred with the use of fluorine-18-sodium-fluoride PET/CT as a replacement for bone scintigraphy, and then choline, fluciclovine, and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) PET/CT as prostate "specific" radiotracers. The last decade, however, has seen a true revolution with the meteoric rise of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Chen
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Siyu Huang
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne
| | - James P Buteau
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Raghava Kashyap
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kolade OU, Brink A, Ayeni AO, More S, Holness J. Optimizing PSMA scintigraphy for resource limited settings - a retrospective comparative study. Cancer Imaging 2024; 24:46. [PMID: 38556864 PMCID: PMC10983723 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00693-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND PSMA PET/CT is the most sensitive molecular imaging modality for prostate cancer (PCa), yet much of the developing world has little or no access to PET/CT. [99mTc]Tc-PSMA scintigraphy (PS) is a cheaper and more accessible gamma camera-based alternative. However, many resource-constrained departments have only a single camera without tomographic or hybrid imaging functionality, and camera time is frequently in high demand. Simplifying imaging protocols by limiting the field of view (FOV) and omitting SPECT/CT or even SPECT may provide a partial solution. The aim was thus to determine the adequacy of PS planar-only and/or SPECT-only imaging protocols with a limited FOV. METHODS The scans of 95 patients with histologically proven PCa who underwent PS with full-body planar and multi-FOV SPECT/CT were reviewed. The detection rates for uptake in the prostate gland/bed and in metastases were compared on planar, SPECT, and SPECT/CT. The agreement between modalities was calculated for the detection of metastases and for staging. The impact of imaging a limited FOV was determined. RESULTS Pathological prostatic uptake was seen in all cases on SPECT/CT (excluding two post-prostatectomy patients), 90.3% of cases on SPECT, and 15.1% on planar images (p < 0.001). Eleven (11.7%) patients had seminal vesicle involvement on SPECT/CT, which was undetectable/indistinguishable on planar images and SPECT. The agreement between modalities was moderate to good (κ = 0.41 to 0.61) for the detection of nodal metastases, with detection rates that did not differ significantly (SPECT/CT = 11.6%, SPECT = 8.4%, planar = 5.3%). Detection rates for bone metastases were 14.7% (SPECT/CT) and 11.6% (SPECT and planar). Agreement between modalities for the detection of bone metastases was good (κ = 0.73 to 0.77). Three (3.1%) patients had visceral metastases on SPECT/CT, two of which were detected on SPECT and planar. There was good agreement between modalities for the TNM staging of patients (κ = 0.70 to 0.88). No metastatic lesions were missed on the limited FOV images. CONCLUSION When PS scintigraphy is performed, SPECT/CT is recommended. However, the lack of SPECT/CT capabilities should not preclude the use of PS in the presence of limited resources, as both planar and SPECT imaging are adequate and will correctly stage most PCa patients. Furthermore, time-based optimisations are achievable by limiting the FOV to exclude the distal lower limbs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olumayowa U Kolade
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.
| | - Anita Brink
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria
| | - Akinwale O Ayeni
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klerksdorp/Tshepong Hospital Complex, Klerksdorp, South Africa
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Stuart More
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jennifer Holness
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging and Clinical Oncology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Piranfar A, Soltani M, Kashkooli FM, Uribe CF, Rahmim A. Spatiotemporal modeling of radiopharmaceutical transport in solid tumors: Application to 177Lu-PSMA therapy of prostate cancer. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2024; 245:108004. [PMID: 38215660 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.108004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE 177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) represents a pivotal advancement in addressing prostate cancer. However, existing therapies, while promising, remain incompletely understood and optimized. Computational models offer potential insights into RPTs, aiding in clinical drug delivery enhancement. In this study, we investigate the impact of various physiological parameters on the delivery of 177Lu-PSMA-617 RPT using the convection-diffusion-reaction (CDR) model. METHODS Our investigation encompasses tumor geometry and surrounding tissue, characterized by well-defined boundaries and initial conditions. Utilizing the finite element method, we solve governing equations across a range of parameters: dissociation constant KD (1, 0.1, 0.01 [nM]), internalization rate (0.01-0.0001 [min-1]), diverse tumor shapes, and variable necrotic zone sizes. This model can provide an accurate analysis of radiopharmaceutical delivery from the injection site to the tumor cell, including drug transport in the vascular, interstitial, and intracellular spaces, and considering important parameters (e.g., drug extravasation from microvessels or to lymphatic vessels, the extracellular matrix, receptors, and intracellular space). RESULTS Our findings reveal significant enhancements in tumor-absorbed doses as KD decreases. This outcome can be attributed to the higher affinity of radiopharmaceuticals for PSMA receptors as KD diminishes, facilitating a more efficient binding and retention of the therapeutic agent within the tumor microenvironment. Additionally, tumor-absorbed doses for KD ∼ 1 [nM] show an upward trend with higher internalization rates. This observation can be rationalized by considering that a greater internalization rate would result in a higher proportion of radiopharmaceuticals being taken up by tumor cells after binding to receptors on the cell surface. Notably, tumor shape and necrotic zone size exhibit limited influence on tumor absorbed dose. CONCLUSIONS The present study employs the CDR model to explore the role of physiological parameters in shaping 177Lu-PSMA-617 RPT delivery. These findings provide insights for improving prostate cancer therapy by understanding radiopharmaceutical transport dynamics. This computational approach contributes to advancing our understanding of radiopharmaceutical delivery mechanisms and has implications for enhancing treatment efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anahita Piranfar
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
| | - M Soltani
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, ON, Canada; Centre for Biotechnology and Bioengineering (CBB), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada; Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Farshad M Kashkooli
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
| | - Carlos F Uribe
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Functional Imaging, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Arman Rahmim
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Functional Imaging, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shanmugasundaram R, Saad J, Heyworth A, Wong V, Pelecanos A, Arianayagam M, Canagasingham B, Ferguson R, Goolam AS, Khadra M, Kam J, Ko R, McCombie S, Varol C, Winter M, Mansberg R, Nguyen D, Bui C, Loh H, Le K, Roberts MJ. Intra-individual comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography versus bone scan in detecting skeletal metastasis at prostate cancer diagnosis. BJU Int 2024; 133 Suppl 3:25-32. [PMID: 37943964 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the diagnostic performance and radiological staging impact of 68 Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) compared to 99 Tc whole-body bone scan (WBBS) for the detection of skeletal metastasis in the primary staging of prostate cancer (PCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS A prospective institutional database was retrospectively examined for patients who underwent both PSMA PET and WBBS within a 1 week interval for PCa primary staging. Lesions were categorised as 'negative', 'equivocal', or 'definite' based on nuclear medicine physician interpretation. Metastatic burden was characterised for each imaging modality according to three groups: (i) local disease (no skeletal metastases), (ii) oligometastatic disease (three or fewer skeletal metastases), or (iii) polymetastatic disease (more than three skeletal metastases). RESULTS There were 667 patients included. The median (interquartile range) prostate-specific antigen level was 9.2 (6.2-16) ng/mL and 60% of patients were high risk according to a modified D'Amico risk classification. The overall distribution of skeletal metastasis detection changed across the two scans overall (P = 0.003), being maintained within high-risk (P = 0.030) and low-risk (P = 0.018) groups. PSMA PET/CT identified more definite skeletal metastases compared to WBBS overall (10.3% vs 7.3%), and according to risk grouping (high: 12% vs 9%, intermediate: 4% vs 1%). Upstaging was more common with PSMA PET/CT than WBBS (P = 0.001). The maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax ) of the primary tumour was associated with upstaging of skeletal metastases on PSMA PET/CT (P = 0.025), while age was associated with upstaging on WBBS (P = 0.021). The SUVmax of the primary tumour and metastases were both higher according to extent of metastatic disease (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS More skeletal metastases were detected with PSMA PET/CT than WBBS, resulting in a higher upstaging rate mostly in high-risk patients. The SUVmax of the primary tumour and metastases was associated with upstaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramesh Shanmugasundaram
- Nepean Urology Research Group, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeremy Saad
- Nepean Urology Research Group, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ash Heyworth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Veronica Wong
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anita Pelecanos
- Statistics Unit, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mohan Arianayagam
- Nepean Urology Research Group, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Richard Ferguson
- Nepean Urology Research Group, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Mohamed Khadra
- Nepean Urology Research Group, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan Kam
- Nepean Urology Research Group, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Raymond Ko
- Nepean Urology Research Group, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen McCombie
- Nepean Urology Research Group, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
- University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Celi Varol
- Nepean Urology Research Group, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matthew Winter
- Nepean Urology Research Group, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert Mansberg
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Diep Nguyen
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chuong Bui
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Han Loh
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ken Le
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matthew J Roberts
- Nepean Urology Research Group, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sorger JM. How to objectively evaluate the impact of image-guided surgery technologies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023:10.1007/s00259-023-06504-w. [PMID: 37971499 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06504-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This manuscript aims to provide a better understanding of methods and techniques with which one can better quantify the impact of image-guided surgical technologies. METHODS A literature review was conducted with regard to economic and technical methods of medical device evaluation in various countries. Attention was focused on applications related to image-guided interventions that have enabled procedures to be performed in a minimally invasive manner, produced superior clinical outcomes, or have become standard of care. RESULTS The review provides examples of successful implementations and adoption of image-guided surgical techniques, mostly in the field of neurosurgery. Failures as well as newly developed technologies still undergoing cost-efficacy analysis are discussed. CONCLUSION The field of image-guided surgery has evolved from solely using preoperative images to utilizing highly specific tools and software to provide more information to the interventionalist in real time. While deformations in soft tissue often preclude the use of such instruments outside of neurosurgery, recent developments in optical and radioactive guidance have enabled surgeons to better account for organ motion and provide feedback to the surgeon as tissue is cut. These technologies are currently undergoing value assessments in many countries and hold promise to improve outcomes for patients, surgeons, care teams, payors, and society in general.
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu S, Tan DS, Graves N, Chacko AM. Economic Evaluations of Imaging Biomarker-Driven Companion Diagnostics for Cancer: A Systematic Review. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:841-855. [PMID: 37747620 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00833-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a boom in imaging biomarker-driven companion and complementary diagnostics (CDx) for cancer, which brings opportunity for personalized medicine. Whether adoption of these technologies is likely to be cost-effective is a relevant question, and studies on this topic are emerging. Despite the growing number of economic evaluations, no review of the methods used, quality of reporting, and potential risk of bias has been done. We report a systematic review to identify, summarize, and critique the cost-effectiveness evidence for the use of biomarker-driven and imaging-based CDx to inform cancer treatments. METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Systematic literature searches until 30 December 2022 were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and Scopus for economic evaluations of imaging biomarker-based CDx for cancer. The inclusion and exclusion of studies were determined by pre-specified eligibility criteria informed by the 'Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome' (PICO) framework. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) was used to assess the quality of reporting, and the Bias in Economic Evaluation (ECOBIAS) was used to examine the potential risk of bias of included studies. RESULTS A total of 12 papers were included, with eight model-based and four trial-based studies. Implementing biomarker-driven, imaging-based CDx was reported to be cost-effective, cost saving, or dominant (cost saving and more effective) in ten papers. Inconsistent methods were found in the studies, and the quality of reporting was lacking against the CHEERS reporting guideline. Several potential sources of 'risk of bias' were identified. These should be acknowledged and carefully considered by researchers planning future health economic evaluations. CONCLUSION Despite favorable results towards the implementation of imaging biomarker-based CDx for cancer, there is room for improvement regarding the quantity and quality of economic evaluations, and that is expected as the awareness of current study limitations increases and more clinical data become available in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sibo Liu
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Daniel Sw Tan
- Cancer Therapeutics Research Laboratory, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168853, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Graves
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
| | - Ann-Marie Chacko
- Division of Cellular and Molecular Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168853, Singapore.
- Laboratory for Translational and Molecular Imaging, Programme in Cancer & Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Holzgreve A, Unterrainer M, Calais J, Adams T, Oprea-Lager DE, Goffin K, Lopci E, Unterrainer LM, Kramer KKM, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Casuscelli J, Stief CG, Ricke J, Bartenstein P, Kunz WG, Mehrens D. Is PSMA PET/CT cost-effective for the primary staging in prostate cancer? First results for European countries and the USA based on the proPSMA trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:3750-3754. [PMID: 37428216 PMCID: PMC10547650 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06332-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The proPSMA trial at ten Australian centers demonstrated increased sensitivity and specificity for PSMA PET/CT compared to conventional imaging regarding metastatic status in primary high-risk prostate cancer patients. A cost-effectiveness analysis showed benefits of PSMA PET/CT over conventional imaging for the Australian setting. However, comparable data for other countries are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to verify the cost-effectiveness of PSMA PET/CT in several European countries as well as the USA. METHODS Clinical data on diagnostic accuracy were derived from the proPSMA trial. Costs for PSMA PET/CT and conventional imaging were taken from reimbursements of national health systems and individual billing information of selected centers in Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and the USA. For comparability, scan duration and the decision tree of the analysis were adopted from the Australian cost-effectiveness study. RESULTS In contrast to the Australian setting, PSMA PET/CT was primarily associated with increased costs in the studied centers in Europe and the USA. Mainly, the scan duration had an impact on the cost-effectiveness. However, costs for an accurate diagnosis using PSMA PET/CT seemed reasonably low compared to the potential consequential costs of an inaccurate diagnosis. CONCLUSION We assume that the use of PSMA PET/CT is appropriate from a health economic perspective, but this will need to be verified by a prospective evaluation of patients at initial diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jérémie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Thaiza Adams
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Kristina K M Kramer
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk Mehrens
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lucas Lucas C, García Zoghby L, Amo-Salas M, Soriano Castrejón ÁM, García Vicente AM. Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of PET/CT with 18F-DCFPyL versus 18F-Fluorocholine in initial staging of intermediate-/high-risk prostate cancer: a pilot study. Ann Nucl Med 2023; 37:551-560. [PMID: 37532975 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-023-01859-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
AIM To assess the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of PET/CT with 18F-DCFPyL with respect to 18F-Fluorocholine in initial staging of intermediate-/high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with recent diagnosis of intermediate-/high-risk PCa without androgen deprivation therapy and previous 18F-Fluorocholine-PET/CT (negative for extraprostatic disease or with oligometastatic disease) were referred to 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT. Patients' disease characteristic as grade group, D'Amico risk category (intermediate/high), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) closest to PET/CTs and its kinetics were obtained. The overall detection rate (DR) and molecular imaging TNM (miTNM) stage according to the prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation (PROMISE) criteria were assessed for both radiotracers, and their concordance (Kappa coefficient) was analyzed. The diagnostic and therapeutic impact of 18F-DCFPyL with respect to 18F-Fluorocholine was evaluated. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients were analyzed (84.5% high-risk). 18F-Fluorocholine showed a higher DR than 18F-DCFPyL of prostate gland involvement (100% versus 93.1%) and pelvic node disease (37.9% versus 31%; k = 0.436, p = 0.001). On the other hand, 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT showed a higher DR of metastatic disease than 18F-Fluorocholine-PET/CT, 9/58 patients (15.5%): 3 M1a, 5 M1b and 1 M1c) versus 5/58 (8.6%) patients: 1 M1a and 4 M1b), k = 0.426; p = 0.001. No significant association was found between clinical characteristics (grade group, risk category, PSA level and kinetic) and 18F-Fluorocholine or 18F-DCFPyL results. The results of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT modified the previously planned treatment compared to 18F-Fluorocholine-PET/CT in 13 patients (22.4%). CONCLUSIONS 18F-Fluorocholine and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a similar DR of prostate gland and lymph node involvement, although with moderate concordance for the latter. 18F-DCFPyL was superior to 18F-Fluorocholine in detecting regional and distant metastasis with a therapeutic impact in one of every five patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Lucas Lucas
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital, C/Obispo Rafael Torija s/n, 13005, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Laura García Zoghby
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Avda. Rio Guadiana s/n, 45007, Toledo, Spain
| | - Mariano Amo-Salas
- Department of Mathematics, Castilla-La Mancha University, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | | | - Ana María García Vicente
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Avda. Rio Guadiana s/n, 45007, Toledo, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kelly BD, Ptasznik G, Roberts MJ, Doan P, Stricker P, Thompson J, Buteau J, Chen K, Alghazo O, O'Brien JS, Hofman MS, Frydenberg M, Lawrentschuk N, Lundon D, Murphy DG, Emmett L, Moon D. A Novel Risk Calculator Incorporating Clinical Parameters, Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification Before Transperineal Prostate Biopsy. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 53:90-97. [PMID: 37441340 PMCID: PMC10334234 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can detect multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-invisible prostate tumours and improve the sensitivity of detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in comparison to mpMRI alone. Numerous risk calculators have been validated as tools for stratification of men at risk of being diagnosed with clinically significant (cs)PCa. Objective To develop a novel risk calculator using clinical parameters and imaging parameters from mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT in a cohort of patients undergoing mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT before biopsy. Design setting and participants A total of 291 men from the PRIMARY prospective trial underwent mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT before transperineal prostate biopsy with sampling of systematic and targeted cores. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Novel risk calculators were developed using multivariable logistic regression analysis to predict detection of overall PCa (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group [GG] ≥1) and csPCa (GG ≥2). The risk calculators were then compared with the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer risk calculator incorporating mpMRI (ERSPC-MRI). Resampling methods were used to evaluate the discrimination and calibration of the risk calculators and to perform decision curve analysis. Results and limitations Age, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, and mpMRI Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System scores were included in the MRI risk calculator, resulting in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.791 for overall PCa (GG ≥1) and 0.812 for csPCa (GG ≥2). Addition of the maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) on PSMA PET/CT for the prostate lesion, and of SUVmax for the mpMRI lesions for the MRI-PSMA risk calculator resulted in AUCs of 0.831 for overall PCa and 0.876 for csPCa (≥ISUP2).The ERSPC-MRI risk calculator had AUCs of 0.758 (p = 0.02) for overall PCa and 0.805 (p = 0.001) for csPCa. Both the MRI and MRI-PSMA risk calculators were superior to the ERSPC-MRI for both overall PCa and csPCa. Conclusions These novel risk calculators incorporate clinical and radiological parameters for stratification of men at risk of csPCa. The risk calculator including PSMA PET/CT data is superior to a calculator incorporating mpMRI data alone. Patient summary We evaluated a new risk calculator that uses clinical information and results from two types of scan to predict the risk of clinically significant prostate cancer on prostate biopsy. This risk model can guide patients and clinicians in shared decision-making and may help in avoiding unnecessary prostate biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian D. Kelly
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Urology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gideon Ptasznik
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Paul Doan
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Australia
| | | | | | - James Buteau
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging and Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kenneth Chen
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Omar Alghazo
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jonathan S. O'Brien
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael S. Hofman
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging and Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Monash University and Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dara Lundon
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Declan G. Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, Australia
| | - Daniel Moon
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chow KM, So WZ, Lee HJ, Lee A, Yap DWT, Takwoingi Y, Tay KJ, Tuan J, Thang SP, Lam W, Yuen J, Lawrentschuk N, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, Chen K. Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2023; 84:36-48. [PMID: 37032189 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Whether prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) should replace conventional imaging modalities (CIM) for initial staging of intermediate-high risk prostate cancer (PCa) requires definitive evidence on their relative diagnostic abilities. OBJECTIVE To perform head-to-head comparisons of PSMA-PET and CIM including multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), computed tomography (CT) and bone scan (BS) for upfront staging of tumour, nodal, and bone metastasis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A search of the PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Scopus databases was conducted from inception to December 2021. Only studies in which patients underwent both PSMA-PET and CIM and imaging was referenced against histopathology or composite reference standards were included. Quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) checklist and its extension for comparative reviews (QUADAS-C). Pairwise comparisons of the sensitivity and specificity of PSMA-PET versus CIM were performed by adding imaging modality as a covariate to bivariate mixed-effects meta-regression models. The likelihood ratio test was applied to determine whether statistically significant differences existed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 31 studies (2431 patients) were included. PSMA-PET/MRI was more sensitive than mpMRI for detection of extra-prostatic extension (78.7% versus 52.9%) and seminal vesicle invasion (66.7% versus 51.0%). For nodal staging, PSMA-PET was more sensitive and specific than mpMRI (73.7% versus 38.9%, 97.5% versus 82.6%) and CT (73.2% versus 38.5%, 97.8% versus 83.6%). For bone metastasis staging, PSMA-PET was more sensitive and specific than BS with or without single-photon emission computerised tomography (98.0% versus 73.0%, 96.2% versus 79.1%). A time interval between imaging modalities >1 month was identified as a source of heterogeneity across all nodal staging analyses. CONCLUSIONS Direct comparisons revealed that PSMA-PET significantly outperforms CIM, which suggests that PSMA-PET should be used as a first-line approach for the initial staging of PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed direct comparisons of the ability of a scan method called PSMA-PET (prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography) and current imaging methods to detect the spread of prostate cancer outside the prostate gland. We found that PSMA-PET is more accurate for detection of the spread of prostate cancer to adjacent tissue, nearby lymph nodes, and bones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kit Mun Chow
- YLL School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei Zheng So
- YLL School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Han Jie Lee
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Alvin Lee
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Yemisi Takwoingi
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jeffrey Tuan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sue Ping Thang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Winnie Lam
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - John Yuen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Urology and Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre at Epworth, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Department of Urology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kenneth Chen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hagens MJ, Luining WI, Jager A, Donswijk ML, Cheung Z, Wondergem M, Oprea-Lager DE, Vis AN, van Leeuwen PJ, van der Poel HG. The Diagnostic Value of PSMA PET/CT in Men with Newly Diagnosed Unfavorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med 2023:jnumed.122.265205. [PMID: 37385673 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Our objective was to determine the diagnostic value of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in staging men with newly diagnosed unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed unfavorable intermediate-risk PCa, in whom PSMA PET/CT was performed as a primary staging modality, were retrospectively studied. PSMA PET/CT was performed at several diagnostic centers and reported by expert nuclear medicine physicians within 2 high-volume PCa centers. A multivariate logistic regression analysis, taking into account clinical, biochemical, pathologic, and radiologic variables, was performed to identify potential independent predictors for metastatic disease on PSMA PET/CT. Results: In total, 396 men with newly diagnosed unfavorable intermediate-risk PCa were studied. Metastatic disease was observed in 37 (9.3%) men, of whom 29 (7.3%) had molecular imaging locoregional lymph node metastases (miN1) and 16 (4.0%) had distant metastases (miM1). A radiologic tumor stage of at least T3 on MRI (odds ratio, 2.72 [95% CI, 1.27-5.83]; P = 0.01) and more than 50% positive prostate biopsies (odds ratio, 3.87 [95% CI, 1.74-8.62]; P = 0.001) were found to be independently associated with metastatic disease on PSMA PET/CT. Conclusion: Given that metastatic disease was observed in nearly 1 in 10 men with newly diagnosed unfavorable intermediate-risk PCa, PSMA PET/CT is considered to be of diagnostic value within this population. Further stratification using the radiologic tumor stage and the percentage of positive prostate biopsies could aid in identifying those patients at risk of having metastatic disease on PSMA PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marinus J Hagens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wietske I Luining
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Auke Jager
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Zing Cheung
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Maurits Wondergem
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Albisinni S, Sarkis J, Diamand R, De Nunzio C. Prebiopsy 68Ga-PSMA PET imaging: can we improve the current diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer? Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023; 26:47-49. [PMID: 36085498 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00593-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
- Department of Urology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
| | - Julien Sarkis
- Department of Urology, Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Romain Diamand
- Department of Urology, Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Urology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, Sapienza University, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gillessen S, Bossi A, Davis ID, de Bono J, Fizazi K, James ND, Mottet N, Shore N, Small E, Smith M, Sweeney C, Tombal B, Antonarakis ES, Aparicio AM, Armstrong AJ, Attard G, Beer TM, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Blanchard P, Briganti A, Bristow RG, Bulbul M, Caffo O, Castellano D, Castro E, Cheng HH, Chi KN, Chowdhury S, Clarke CS, Clarke N, Daugaard G, De Santis M, Duran I, Eeles R, Efstathiou E, Efstathiou J, Ngozi Ekeke O, Evans CP, Fanti S, Feng FY, Fonteyne V, Fossati N, Frydenberg M, George D, Gleave M, Gravis G, Halabi S, Heinrich D, Herrmann K, Higano C, Hofman MS, Horvath LG, Hussain M, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kanesvaran R, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Khauli RB, Klotz L, Kramer G, Leibowitz R, Logothetis CJ, Mahal BA, Maluf F, Mateo J, Matheson D, Mehra N, Merseburger A, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mrabti H, Mukherji D, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Nguyen PL, Oh WK, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Pezaro C, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Rabah DM, Rathkopf D, Reiter RE, Rubin MA, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Pablo Sade J, Sartor OA, Scher HI, Sharifi N, Skoneczna I, Soule H, Spratt DE, Srinivas S, Sternberg CN, Steuber T, Suzuki H, Sydes MR, Taplin ME, Tilki D, Türkeri L, Turco F, Uemura H, Uemura H, Ürün Y, Vale CL, van Oort I, Vapiwala N, Walz J, Yamoah K, Ye D, Yu EY, Zapatero A, Zilli T, Omlin A. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Part I: Intermediate-/High-risk and Locally Advanced Disease, Biochemical Relapse, and Side Effects of Hormonal Treatment: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2022. Eur Urol 2023; 83:267-293. [PMID: 36494221 PMCID: PMC7614721 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation and the evolution of new therapies have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of clinical topics that greatly impact daily practice. To supplement evidence-based guidelines, the 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) surveyed experts about key dilemmas in clinical management. OBJECTIVE To present consensus voting results for select questions from APCCC 2022. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Before the conference, a panel of 117 international prostate cancer experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 198 multiple-choice consensus questions on (1) intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, (2) biochemical recurrence after local treatment, (3) side effects from hormonal therapies, (4) metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, (5) nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, (6) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and (7) oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the 105 physician panel members ("panellists") who directly engage in prostate cancer treatment decision-making. Herein, we present results for the 82 questions on topics 1-3. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The voting results reveal varying degrees of consensus, as is discussed in this article and shown in the detailed results in the Supplementary material. The findings reflect the opinions of an international panel of experts and did not incorporate a formal literature review and meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS These voting results by a panel of international experts in advanced prostate cancer can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers prioritise areas for future research. Diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised based on patient and cancer characteristics (disease extent and location, treatment history, comorbidities, and patient preferences) and should incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence, therapeutic guidelines, and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is always strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2022 once again identified important gaps (areas of nonconsensus) that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials. PATIENT SUMMARY The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference aims to share the knowledge of international experts in prostate cancer with health care providers and patients worldwide. At each APCCC, a panel of physician experts vote in response to multiple-choice questions about their clinical opinions and approaches to managing advanced prostate cancer. This report presents voting results for the subset of questions pertaining to intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, biochemical relapse after definitive treatment, advanced (next-generation) imaging, and management of side effects caused by hormonal therapies. The results provide a practical guide to help clinicians and patients discuss treatment options as part of shared multidisciplinary decision-making. The findings may be especially useful when there is little or no high-level evidence to guide treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Genitourinary Oncology, Prostate Brachytherapy Unit, Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University and Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Johann de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA; Urology/Surgical Oncology, GenesisCare, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Eric Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mathew Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher Sweeney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Ana M Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Département de Radiothérapie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rob G Bristow
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Christie NHS Trust and CRUK Manchester Institute and Cancer Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Muhammad Bulbul
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Castro
- Institute of Biomedical Research in Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK
| | - Noel Clarke
- The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Gedske Daugaard
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Ros Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Jason Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Onyeanunam Ngozi Ekeke
- Department of Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Alakahia, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
| | | | - Stefano Fanti
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Valerie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Civico USI - Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Prostate Cancer Research Program, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Anatomy & Developmental Biology, Faculty of Nursing, Medicine & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Daniel George
- Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martin Gleave
- Urological Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Celestia Higano
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lisa G Horvath
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Maha Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Robert Jones
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tampere Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland; Research, Development and Innovation Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Raja B Khauli
- Department of Urology and the Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute (NKBCI), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gero Kramer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Raya Leibowitz
- Oncology Institute, Shamir Medical Center, Be'er Ya'akov, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Christopher J Logothetis
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; University of Athens Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Brandon A Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Fernando Maluf
- Beneficiência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Departamento de Oncologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Joaquin Mateo
- Department of Medical Oncology and Prostate Cancer Translational Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Matheson
- Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, Walsall Campus, Walsall, UK
| | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Axel Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hind Mrabti
- National Institute of Oncology, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- Clemenceau Medical Center, Dubai, United Arab Emirates; Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William K Oh
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Carmel Pezaro
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Darren M C Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong; The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Danny M Rabah
- Cancer Research Chair and Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Urology, KFSHRC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dana Rathkopf
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Mark A Rubin
- Bern Center for Precision Medicine and Department for Biomedical Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Charles J Ryan
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Howard I Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nima Sharifi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, GU Malignancies Research Center, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Iwona Skoneczna
- Rafal Masztak Grochowski Hospital, Maria Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Howard Soule
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sandy Srinivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Matthew R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Levent Türkeri
- Department of Urology, M.A. Aydınlar Acıbadem University, Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fabio Turco
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Uemura
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yüksel Ürün
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; Ankara University Cancer Research Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Claire L Vale
- University College London, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - Inge van Oort
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, Marseille, France
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- Onkozentrum Zurich, University of Zurich and Tumorzentrum Hirslanden Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Burgard C, Hoffmann MA, Frei M, Buchholz HG, Khreish F, Marlowe RJ, Schreckenberger M, Ezziddin S, Rosar F. Detection Efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer with Very Low PSA Levels: A 7-Year, Two-Center "Real-World" Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051376. [PMID: 36900169 PMCID: PMC10000220 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
In biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (BCR), prompt tumor localization guides early treatment, potentially improving patient outcomes. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT) detection rates of lesions suspicious for prostate cancer are well known to rise along with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration. However, published data are limited regarding very low values (≤0.2 ng/mL). We retrospectively analyzed ~7-year "real-world" experience in this setting in a large post-prostatectomy cohort (N = 115) from two academic clinics. Altogether 44 lesions were detected in 29/115 men (25.2%) (median [minimum-maximum] 1 [1-4]/positive scan). The apparent oligometastatic disease was found in nine patients (7.8%) at PSA as low as 0.03 ng/mL. Scan positivity rates were highest when PSA was >0.15 ng/mL, PSA doubling time was ≤12 months, or the Gleason score was ≥7b (in 83 and 107 patients, respectively, with available data); these findings were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.04), except regarding PSA level (p = 0.07). Given the benefits of promptly localizing recurrence, our observations suggest the potential value of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the very low PSA BCR setting, especially in cases with more rapid PSA doubling time or with high-risk histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Burgard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University—Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Manuela A. Hoffmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55101 Mainz, Germany
- Institute for Preventive Medicine Bw, 56626 Andernach, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Madita Frei
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University—Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Georg Buchholz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55101 Mainz, Germany
| | - Fadi Khreish
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University—Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Samer Ezziddin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University—Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Florian Rosar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University—Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mehrens D, Kramer KKM, Unterrainer LM, Beyer L, Bartenstein P, Froelich MF, Tollens F, Ricke J, Rübenthaler J, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Herlemann A, Unterrainer M, Kunz WG. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:43-50.e2. [PMID: 36634610 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer poses a therapeutic challenge with poor prognosis. The VISION trial showed prolonged progression-free and overall survival in patients treated with lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan (177Lu-PSMA-617) radioligand therapy compared with using the standard of care (SoC) alone. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment compared with SoC therapy. METHODS A partitioned survival model was developed using data from the VISION trial, which included overall and progression-free survival and treatment regimens for 177Lu-PSMA-617 and SoC. Treatment costs, utilities for health states, and adverse events were derived from public databases and the literature. Because 177Lu-PSMA-617 was only recently approved, costs for treatment were extrapolated from 177Lu-DOTATATE. Outcome measurements included the incremental cost, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness ratio. The analysis was performed in a US setting from a healthcare system perspective over the lifetime horizon of 60 months. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set to $50,000, $100,000, and $200,000 per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS The 177Lu-PSMA-617 group was estimated to gain 0.42 incremental QALYs. Treatment using 177Lu-PSMA-617 led to an increase in costs compared with SoC ($169,110 vs $85,398). The incremental cost, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness ratio for 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy was $200,708/QALYs. Sensitivity analysis showed robustness of the model regarding various parameters, which remained cost-effective at all lower and upper parameter bounds. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations, therapy using 177Lu-PSMA-617 was determined as the cost-effective strategy in 37.14% of all iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $200,000/QALYs. CONCLUSIONS Treatment using 177Lu-PSMA-617 was estimated to add a notable clinical benefit over SoC alone. Based on the model results, radioligand therapy represents a treatment strategy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with cost-effectiveness in certain scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Mehrens
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias F Froelich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim-University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Fabian Tollens
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim-University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Annika Herlemann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ayati N, Herrmann K, Fanti S, Murphy DG, Hofman MS. More Accurate Imaging Is Not Stage Migration: Time To Move from "Hubble" to "Webb" in Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2023; 83:6-9. [PMID: 36280500 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) produces strikingly superior images compared to conventional imaging, raising the important question of whether conventional imaging is sufficiently accurate to guide patient management. Reducing false positive results with consequent improvement in accuracy is not stage migration and PSMA PET/CT can be a successor to conventional imaging in the staging of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narjess Ayati
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Department of Urology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Roberts MJ, Maurer T, Perera M, Eiber M, Hope TA, Ost P, Siva S, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, Emmett L, Fendler WP. Using PSMA imaging for prognostication in localized and advanced prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2023; 20:23-47. [PMID: 36473945 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00670-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed applications in modern prostate cancer management has evolved rapidly over the past few years, helping to establish new treatment pathways and provide further insights into prostate cancer biology. However, the prognostic implications of PSMA-PET have not been studied systematically, owing to rapid clinical implementation without long follow-up periods to determine intermediate-term and long-term oncological outcomes. Currently available data suggest that traditional prognostic factors and survival outcomes are associated with high PSMA expression (both according to immunohistochemistry and PET uptake) in men with localized and biochemically recurrent disease. Treatment with curative intent (primary and/or salvage) often fails when PSMA-positive metastases are present; however, the sensitivity of PSMA-PET in detecting all metastases is poor. Low PSMA-PET uptake in recurrent disease is a favourable prognostic factor; however, it can be associated with poor prognosis in conjunction with high 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clinical trials embedding PSMA-PET for guiding management with reliable oncological outcomes are needed to support ongoing clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marlon Perera
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Goettingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Distant Nodes Seen on PSMA PET-CT Staging Predicts Post-Treatment Progression in Men with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer-A Prospective Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246134. [PMID: 36551620 PMCID: PMC9777123 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PSMA PET-CT scans are now recommended in international urological guidelines for primary staging and re-staging of prostate cancer. However, there is little published literature on the clinical outcomes for patients after treatment decisions made using PSMA PET-CT results. This is a multisite, prospective cohort study investigating the clinical outcomes of men who received treatment plans based on PSMA PET-CT results for primary staging. Men with biopsy proven prostate cancer received a PSMA PET-CT scan for primary staging. Treatment plans were recommended by multidisciplinary teams (MDT). After treatment, these men were followed with 6 monthly PSA tests and imaging or biopsies if recommended by MDT. The primary outcome was treatment progression defined as the addition or change of any treatment modalities such as androgen deprivation therapy, radiation therapy or chemotherapy. In total, 80% of men did not have any treatment progression after enactment of treatment based on PSMA PET-CT primary staging results at 29 months of follow up. Men who had distant nodes seen on PSMA PET-CT had a 5 times increased risk of treatment progression. Larger studies with longer follow up are needed to validate our results and optimise the way clinicians use PSMA PET-CT results to guide management.
Collapse
|
22
|
Bukavina L, Luckenbaugh AN, Hofman MS, Hope T, Kamran SC, Murphy DG, Yamoah K, Ost P. Incorporating Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Management Decisions for Men with Newly Diagnosed or Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2022; 83:521-533. [PMID: 36404204 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising molecular target for prostate cancer (PCa) that has allowed the development of a novel diagnostic approach to PCA in the primary and recurrent settings. OBJECTIVE To summarize available data and recommendations regarding the use of PSMA in newly diagnosed and recurrent PCa via a narrative review. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature review was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Scopus. The search strategy included meta-analyses, reviews, and original studies on staging and restaging with 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Studies comparing PSMA-targeted imaging and conventional imaging suggest superior performance of PSMA-targeted imaging in primary and recurrent PCa, albeit with several clinically relevant limitations. Pretreatment 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT allowed more accurate PCa staging in compared to routine practice for high-risk cases, and identified a number of otherwise unknown metastatic lesions. In biochemically recurrent PCa, PSMA PET can reveal sites of recurrence with greater sensitivity and specificity than conventional imaging, potentially detecting a major proportion of occult disease. This review will help providers in applying the most up-to-date and relevant literature to (1) determine which patients truly have oligometastatic disease and (2) ascertain who is most likely to experience a meaningful response to local consolidation in the biochemical recurrence setting. CONCLUSIONS Data on PSMA diagnostic studies in primary and recurrent PCa highlight the accuracy and clinical application of PSMA PET. While this review and the evidence to date might lead to a perception of superiority in metastasis directed therapy, fundamental lack of phase III clinical trials with clinically meaningful outcomes are yet to be determined. PATIENT SUMMARY PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) scans have shown great promise for initial evaluation of prostate cancer (PCa) and in detection of PCa recurrence. The benefits are more apparent for initial staging of PCa. There are more limited clinical trial results for PCa recurrence on how best to use this new technique to guide cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
23
|
The Added Value of [18F]Choline PET/CT in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Staging: A Case Report. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12111728. [DOI: 10.3390/life12111728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In the management of prostate cancer (PCa), correct staging is crucial in order to assess the right therapeutic approach. [18F]Choline PET/CT has been shown to provide more accurate staging information than conventional imaging approaches. The aim of this paper is to provide a real practice demonstration of the impact of [18F]Choline PET/CT on low-risk prostate cancer staging and clinical management. We report a 64-year-old man with biochemical PCa recurrence diagnosis after transurethral resection of the prostate. The patient, after the detection of an increased level of PSA, underwent multi-parametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) that did not show evidence of disease. The patient was admitted to perform [18F]Choline PET/CT that showed a macroscopic prostate recurrence. Patient underwent photon external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) treatment, and [18F]Choline PET/CT was also used to define treatment volumes. At 3- and 6-month clinical follow-up evaluations, no late toxicity was detected and a significant reduction in PSA value was shown. Therefore, our case highlights the potential usefulness of [18F]Choline PET/CT for the staging of low-risk prostate cancer and its impact on the management and quality of life of such patients. The presented case should urge the scientific community to enhance larger and multicentric studies, assessing more extensively the potential impact of [18F]Choline PET/CT in this clinical scenario.
Collapse
|
24
|
The Role of [ 68Ga]PSMA PET/CT for Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer in Patients with or without Previous Negative Biopsy: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205036. [PMID: 36291820 PMCID: PMC9600353 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In this paper we systematically evaluate the evidence regarding the role of [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT for clinical suspicions of prostate cancer in patients with or without previous negative biopsy. A critical review of PubMed and Web of Science according to the PRISMA statement was conducted. Eighteen publications were selected for inclusion in the analysis. In 8 articles, there was a direct comparison with mpMRI. [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT resulted more accurate in identifying primary prostate cancer with PSA values between 4 and 20 ng/mL than mpMRI. Moreover, its use combined with MRI improved sensitivity for csPCa detection, thus potentially avoiding unnecessary biopsies. Overall, [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT resulted a promising technique in patients with clinical suspicion of PCa and precedent negative biopsy or contraindications to MRI. Abstract The purpose of the study is to systematically evaluate the evidence regarding the role of [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT for clinical suspicions of prostate cancer in patients with or without previous negative biopsy. We performed a critical review of PubMed and Web of Science according to the PRISMA statement. Eighteen publications were selected for inclusion in this analysis. QUADAS-2 evaluation was adopted for quality analyses. [68Ga]PSMA-11 was the radiotracer of choice in 15 studies, while [68Ga]PSMA-617 was used in another 3. In 8 articles, there was a direct comparison with mpMRI. The total number of patients included was 1379, ranging from 15 to 291, with a median age of 64 years (range: 42–90). The median baseline PSA value was 12.9 ng/mL, ranging from 0.85 to 4156 ng/mL. Some studies evaluated the PSMA uptake comparing the SUVmax of suspicious lesions with the SUVmax of the normal biodistribution to find out optimal cut-off points. In addition, some studies suggested a significant association between PSA levels, PSA density, and [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT finding. [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT seems to be more accurate in identifying primary prostate cancer with PSA values between 4 and 20 ng/mL than mpMRI. Moreover, in some trials, the combination of PSMA PET/CT and MRI improved the NPV in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) than MRI alone. Our findings are limited by the small numbers of studies and patient heterogeneity. [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT is a promising technique in patients with clinical suspicion of PCa and precedent negative biopsy or contraindications to MRI. Furthermore, its use combined with MRI improves sensitivity for csPCa detection and can avoid unnecessary biopsies.
Collapse
|
25
|
Li M, Zelchan R, Orlova A. The Performance of FDA-Approved PET Imaging Agents in the Detection of Prostate Cancer. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10102533. [PMID: 36289795 PMCID: PMC9599369 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) incorporated with X-ray computed tomography (PET/CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is increasingly being used as a diagnostic tool for prostate cancer (PCa). In this review, we describe and evaluate the clinical performance of some Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agents used for visualizing PCa: [18F]FDG, [11C]choline, [18F]FACBC, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, [18F]DCFPyL, and [18F]-NaF. We carried out a comprehensive literature search based on articles published from 1 January 2010 to 1 March 2022. We selected English language articles associated with the discovery, preclinical study, clinical study, and diagnostic performance of the imaging agents for the evaluation. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted imaging agents demonstrated superior diagnostic performance in both primary and recurrent PCa, compared with [11C]choline and [18F]FACBC, both of which target dividing cells and are used especially in patients with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values. When compared to [18F]-NaF (which is suitable for the detection of bone metastases), PSMA-targeted agents were also capable of detecting lesions in the lymph nodes, soft tissues, and bone. However, a limitation of PSMA-targeted imaging was the heterogeneity of PSMA expression in PCa, and consequently, a combination of two PET tracers was proposed to overcome this obstacle. The preliminary studies indicated that the use of PSMA-targeted scanning is more cost efficient than conventional imaging modalities for high-risk PCa patients. Furthering the development of imaging agents that target PCa-associated receptors and molecules could improve PET-based diagnosis of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Li
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, 751 23 Uppsala, Sweden
- Liaoning Medical Device Test Institute, Shenyang 110171, China
| | - Roman Zelchan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 5 Kooperativny St., 634009 Tomsk, Russia
- Research Centrum for Oncotheranostics, Research School of Chemistry and Applied Biomedical Sciences, Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Anna Orlova
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, 751 23 Uppsala, Sweden
- Research Centrum for Oncotheranostics, Research School of Chemistry and Applied Biomedical Sciences, Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
- Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Williams ISC, McVey A, Perera S, O’Brien JS, Kostos L, Chen K, Siva S, Azad AA, Murphy DG, Kasivisvanathan V, Lawrentschuk N, Frydenberg M. Modern paradigms for prostate cancer detection and management. Med J Aust 2022; 217:424-433. [PMID: 36183329 PMCID: PMC9828197 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Early detection and management of prostate cancer has evolved over the past decade, with a focus now on harm minimisation and reducing overdiagnosis and overtreatment, given the proven improvements in survival from randomised controlled trials. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is now an important aspect of the diagnostic pathway in prostate cancer, improving the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, enabling accurate localisation of appropriate sites to biopsy, and reducing unnecessary biopsies in most patients with normal magnetic resonance imaging scans. Biopsies are now performed transperineally, substantially reducing the risk of post-procedure sepsis. Australian-led research has shown that prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has superior accuracy in the staging of prostate cancer than conventional imaging (CT and whole-body bone scan). Localised prostate cancer that is low risk (International Society for Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade 1, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6; and ISUP grade group 2, Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 with less than 10% pattern 4) can be offered active surveillance, reducing harms from overtreatment. Prostatectomy and definitive radiation remain the gold standard for localised intermediate and high risk disease. However, focal therapy is an emerging experimental treatment modality in Australia in carefully selected patients. The management of advanced prostate cancer treatment has evolved to now include several novel agents both in the metastatic hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant disease settings. Multimodal therapy with androgen deprivation therapy, additional systemic therapy and radiotherapy are often recommended. PSMA-based radioligand therapy has emerged as a treatment option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and is currently being evaluated in earlier disease states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jonathan S O’Brien
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVIC,University of MelbourneMelbourneVIC
| | | | - Kenneth Chen
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVIC,Singapore General HospitalSingaporeSingapore
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVIC,University of MelbourneMelbourneVIC
| | - Arun A Azad
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVIC,University of MelbourneMelbourneVIC
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVIC,University College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVIC,University College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Mark Frydenberg
- Monash UniversityMelbourneVIC,Cabrini Institute, Cabrini HealthMelbourneVIC
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bone Scintigraphy versus PSMA-Targeted PET/CT or PET/MRI in Prostate Cancer: Lessons Learned from Recent Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14184470. [PMID: 36139630 PMCID: PMC9496815 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) using several radiopharmaceuticals [...]
Collapse
|
28
|
Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in primary prostate cancer diagnosis: First-line imaging is afoot. Cancer Lett 2022; 548:215883. [PMID: 36027998 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.215883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) is an excellent molecular imaging technique for prostate cancer. Currently, PSMA PET for patients with primary prostate cancer is supplementary to conventional imaging techniques, according to guidelines. This supplementary function of PSMA PET is due to a lack of systematic review of its strengths, limitations, and potential development direction. Thus, we review PSMA ligands, detection, T, N, and M staging, treatment management, and false results of PSMA PET in clinical studies. We also discuss the strengths and challenges of PSMA PET. PSMA PET can greatly increase the detection rate of prostate cancer and accuracy of T/N/M staging, which facilitates more appropriate treatment for primary prostate cancer. Lastly, we propose that PSMA PET could become the first-line imaging modality for primary prostate cancer, and we describe its potential expanded application.
Collapse
|
29
|
van der Sar ECA, Keusters WR, van Kalmthout LWM, Braat AJAT, de Keizer B, Frederix GWJ, Kooistra A, Lavalaye J, Lam MGEH, van Melick HHE. Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT at initial prostate cancer staging. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:132. [PMID: 35962838 PMCID: PMC9375809 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01265-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite its high specificity, PSMA PET/CT has a moderate to low sensitivity of 40–50% for pelvic lymph node detection, implicating that a negative PSMA PET/CT cannot rule out lymph node metastases. This study investigates a strategy of implementing PSMA PET/CT for initial prostate cancer staging and treatment planning compared to conventional diagnostics. In this PSMA PET/CT strategy, a bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) is only performed in case of a negative PSMA PET/CT; in case of a positive scan treatment planning is solely based on PSMA PET/CT results. Method A decision table and lifetime state transition model were created. Quality-adjusted life years and health care costs were modelled over lifetime. Results The PSMA PET/CT strategy of treatment planning based on initial staging with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT results in cost-savings of €674 and a small loss in quality of life (QoL), 0.011 QALY per patient. The positive effect of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was caused by abandoning both an ePLND and unnecessary treatment in iM1 patients, saving costs and resulting in higher QoL. The negative effect was caused by lower QoL and high costs in the false palliative state, due to pN1lim patients (≤ 4 pelvic lymph node metastases) being falsely diagnosed as iN1ext (> 4 pelvic lymph node metastases). These patients received subsequently palliative treatment instead of potentially curative therapy. Conclusion Initial staging and treatment planning based on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT saves cost but results in small QALY loss due to the rate of false positive findings. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-022-01265-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmée C A van der Sar
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Willem R Keusters
- Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arthur J A T Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart de Keizer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert W J Frederix
- Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anko Kooistra
- Department of Urology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Jules Lavalaye
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Parkinson B, Sharma R, Jeet V, Song R, Hoyle M. Microcosting Study of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Prostate Cancer. Value Health Reg Issues 2022; 32:17-22. [PMID: 35963186 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2022.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has emerged as a promising imaging tool in prostate cancer diagnosis. PSMA PET/CT radiotracers are produced in-house (gallium-68, eg, 68Ga-PSMA-11) or provided by commercial entities (fluorine-18, eg, 18F-DCFPyL). Nevertheless, the cost per procedure is not well established given that current estimates have several limitations. This study aimed to establish the cost of PSMA PET/CT in Australia. METHODS Hospitals and diagnostic facilities currently conducting PSMA PET/CT in Australia in metropolitan and regional areas completed a survey of PSMA PET/CT throughput, radiotracers involved, and the cost of assets, departmental staffing, consumables, and occupancy. Total costs were estimated using a top-down microcosting approach, involving identifying all relevant cost components and valuing each component for the average patient, and a gross costing approach, involving apportioning cost components at an aggregated level. RESULTS Data were collected from 8 facilities. The most common radiotracer used was 18F-DCFPyL (7 facilities, 87%), followed by 68Ga-PSMA-11 (4 facilities, 50%). The average cost of PSMA PET/CT was A$1554.77 and A$1306.00 based on the microcosting and gross costing approaches, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a detailed and accurate estimation of the cost of PSMA PET/CT in Australia. These costs can be used as a benchmark to identify potential efficiencies and help policy makers set the appropriate reimbursement rate for this procedure. The use of data from facilities using different radiotracers in metropolitan and regional areas and with different throughput increases the generalizability of the results, especially in countries with similar health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonny Parkinson
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Rajan Sharma
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Varinder Jeet
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachel Song
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Martin Hoyle
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Song R, Jeet V, Sharma R, Hoyle M, Parkinson B. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) for the Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer in Australia. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:807-821. [PMID: 35761117 PMCID: PMC9300561 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01156-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (CT) is a new imaging modality to detect the extra-prostatic spread of prostate cancer. PSMA PET/CT has a higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional imaging (CT ± whole body bone scan [WBBS]). This study conducted a cost-utility analysis of PSMA PET/CT compared with conventional imaging for patients with newly diagnosed, intermediate-risk or high-risk primary prostate cancer. PERSPECTIVE Australian healthcare perspective. SETTING Tertiary. METHODS A decision-analytic Markov model combined data from a variety of sources. The time horizon was 35 years. The sensitivity and specificity of PSMA PET/CT and CT alone were based on meta-analyses and the test accuracy of CT+WBBS was based on a single randomised controlled trial. Health outcomes included cases detected, life-years, and quality-adjusted life-years. Costs related to other diagnostic tests, initial treatment, adverse events, and post-disease progression were included. All costs were reported in 2021 Australian Dollars (A$). RESULTS The deterministic incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of PSMA PET/CT was estimated to be A $21,147/quality-adjusted life-year gained versus CT+WBBS, and A$36,231/quality-adjusted life-year gained versus CT alone. The results were most sensitive to the time horizon, and the initial treatments received by patients diagnosed with metastatic cancer. The probability of PSMA PET/CT being cost effective was estimated to be 91% versus CT+WBBS and 89% versus CT alone, using a threshold of AU$50,000/quality-adjusted life-year gained. CONCLUSIONS PSMA PET/CT is likely to be more costly than CT+WBBS or CT alone in Australia; however, it is still likely to be considered cost effective compared with conventional imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Song
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Level 1, 3 Innovation Road, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Varinder Jeet
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Level 1, 3 Innovation Road, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Rajan Sharma
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Level 1, 3 Innovation Road, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Martin Hoyle
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Level 1, 3 Innovation Road, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Bonny Parkinson
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Level 1, 3 Innovation Road, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wang Y, Galante JR, Haroon A, Wan S, Afaq A, Payne H, Bomanji J, Adeleke S, Kasivisvanathan V. The future of PSMA PET and WB MRI as next-generation imaging tools in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2022; 19:475-493. [PMID: 35789204 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00618-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Radiolabelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based PET-CT has been shown in numerous studies to be superior to conventional imaging in the detection of nodal or distant metastatic lesions. 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT is now recommended by many guidelines for the detection of biochemically relapsed disease after radical local therapy. PSMA radioligands can also function as radiotheranostics, and Lu-PSMA has been shown to be a potential new line of treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Whole-body (WB) MRI has been shown to have a high diagnostic performance in the detection and monitoring of metastatic bone disease. Prospective, randomized, multicentre studies comparing 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and WB MRI for pelvic nodal and metastatic disease detection are yet to be performed. Challenges for interpretation of PSMA include tracer trapping in non-target tissues and also urinary excretion of tracers, which confounds image interpretation at the vesicoureteral junction. Additionally, studies have shown how long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) affects PSMA expression and could, therefore, reduce tracer uptake and visibility of PSMA+ lesions. Furthermore, ADT of short duration might increase PSMA expression, leading to the PSMA flare phenomenon, which makes the accurate monitoring of treatment response to ADT with PSMA PET challenging. Scan duration, detection of incidentalomas and presence of metallic implants are some of the major challenges with WB MRI. Emerging data support the wider adoption of PSMA PET and WB MRI for diagnosis, staging, disease burden evaluation and response monitoring, although their relative roles in the standard-of-care management of patients are yet to be fully defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yishen Wang
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. .,Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford, UK.
| | - Joao R Galante
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Athar Haroon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Simon Wan
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Asim Afaq
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Heather Payne
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sola Adeleke
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
O'Brien JS, McVey A, Kelly BD, Jenjitranant P, Buteau J, Hoffman M, Kasivisvanithan V, Eapen R, Moon D, Murphy DG, Lawrentschuk N. PSMA PET-CT Funding Grants Free Access to Superior Staging for Australian Men with Prostate Cancer. BJU Int 2022; 130 Suppl 3:8-10. [PMID: 35574991 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan S O'Brien
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aoife McVey
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brian D Kelly
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - James Buteau
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Hoffman
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanithan
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC) and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, 3000, Australia
| | - Renu Eapen
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel Moon
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre at Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kaewput C, Vinjamuri S. Update of PSMA Theranostics in Prostate Cancer: Current Applications and Future Trends. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11102738. [PMID: 35628867 PMCID: PMC9144463 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
There is now an increasing trend for targeting cancers to go beyond early diagnosis and actually improve Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival. Identifying patients who might benefit from a particular targeted treatment is the main focus for Precision Medicine. Radiolabeled ligands can be used as predictive biomarkers which can confirm target expression by cancers using positron emission tomography (PET). The same ligand can subsequently be labeled with a therapeutic radionuclide for targeted radionuclide therapy. This combined approach is termed “Theranostics”. The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has emerged as an attractive diagnostic and therapeutic target for small molecule ligands in prostate cancer. It can be labeled with either positron emitters for PET-based imaging or beta and alpha emitters for targeted radionuclide therapy. This review article summarizes the important concepts for Precision Medicine contributing to improved diagnosis and targeted therapy of patients with prostate cancer and we identify some key learning points and areas for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chalermrat Kaewput
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
- Correspondence:
| | - Sobhan Vinjamuri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hiwase MD, Jay A, Bulamu N, Teh J, Paterson F, Kichenadasse G, Vincent AD, O'Callaghan M. Evaluation of selective bone scan staging in prostate cancer - external validation of current strategies and decision-curve analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022; 25:336-343. [PMID: 35288662 PMCID: PMC9184265 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00515-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Recommendations for staging newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients vary between guidelines and literature. Methods Our objective was to validate and compare prediction models selecting newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients for bone scan staging. To achieve this, we validated eleven models in a population-based cohort of 10,721 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2005 and 2019. The primary outcome was net-benefit. This was assessed at different balances of conservatism and tolerance, represented by preference ratio and number-willing-to-test (NWT). Secondary outcomes included calibration slope, calibration-in-the-large (intercept), and discrimination measured by Area-under-the-receiver-operator-characteristics curve (AUC). Results For preference ratios less than 1:39 (NWT greater than 40), scanning everyone provided greater net-benefit than selective staging. For preference ratios 1:39 to 3:97 (NWT 33–40), the European Association of Urology (EAU) 2020 guideline recommendation was the best approach. For preference ratios 3:97–7:93 (NWT 14–33), scanning EAU high-risk patients only was preferable. For preference ratios 7:93–1:9 (NWT 10–13), scanning only Gnanapragasam Group 5 patients was best. All models had similar fair discrimination (AUCs 0.68–0.80), but most had poor calibration. Conclusions We identified three selective staging strategies that outperformed all other approaches but did so over different ranges of conservatism and tolerance. Scanning only EAU high-risk patients provided the greatest net-benefit over the greatest range of preference ratios and scenarios, but other options may be preferable depending upon the local healthcare system’s degree of conservatism and tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mrunal D Hiwase
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide Medical School, Adelaide, SA, Australia. .,Department of Surgery, Central Adelaide Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - Alex Jay
- Flinders Medical Centre, Urology Unit, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Norma Bulamu
- Health Economist, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Johnathan Teh
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide Medical School, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Northern Adelaide Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Felix Paterson
- Nuclear Medicine Physician and Radiologist, Dr Jones and Partners Radiology and Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ganessan Kichenadasse
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders Medical Centre/Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Andrew D Vincent
- Freemasons Centre for Male Health and Wellbeing, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bhanji Y, Rowe SP, Pavlovich CP. New imaging modalities to consider for men with prostate cancer on active surveillance. World J Urol 2022; 40:51-59. [PMID: 34146124 PMCID: PMC8730712 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03762-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To discuss the potential utility of newer imaging modalities including micro-ultrasound and PSMA-PET for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, technologies that may gain roles as adjuncts to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the active surveillance (AS) setting. METHODS Narrative review of two new imaging modalities used for primary prostate cancer through April 2021. A targeted search was performed to identify current relevant literature on the role of new imaging modalities for primary prostate cancer using search terms "micro-ultrasound," "molecular imaging," "prostate cancer," "active surveillance," "multiparametric MRI," "PI-RADS," "PRI-MUS," and "detection rate." In addition, references of included articles were screened for further relevant publications. RESULTS Micro-ultrasound (micro-US) and prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) are increasing in their use and applicability to prostate cancer imaging. Micro-US is used for cancer detection and may identify higher grade cancers more accurately than conventional ultrasound, despite technical hurdles in its initial launch. PSMA-PET is highly sensitive and specific for high-grade and metastatic prostate cancer, though costly and not easily available. Though data are sparse, it may have an emerging role in cancer diagnosis in select localized cases, and in some men considering (or currently on) AS who have indications of more aggressive disease. CONCLUSION There are very limited data on micro-US and PSMA-PET in AS patients. However, given the ability of these modalities to identify high-grade cancer, their judicious use in AS patients may be of utility in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasin Bhanji
- The Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Steven P Rowe
- The Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Christian P Pavlovich
- The Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Quality and Quantity: Evaluating Tumor Biology Alongside Novel Imaging on Diagnosis of Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2022; 81:437-439. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
38
|
Ong JS, Hofman MS. PET imaging of prostate cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822960-6.00111-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
39
|
Schnitzer ML, Kremer C, Hertel A, Haselmann V, von Münchhausen N, Schoenberg SO, Froelich MF. Economic assessment of molecular imaging in the oncology treatment process. Eur J Radiol 2021; 146:110105. [PMID: 34920293 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The development towards targeted treatments in oncology has been accompanied by significant improvements in molecular imaging. Yet, broad application of novel imaging techniques has partly been slowed down due to economical considerations. Building on the broad positive evidence of its diagnostic accuracy, modelling of effects on long-term costs and effectiveness may help to foster a broader application and acceptance of comprehensive molecular imaging techniques, such as PET/MRI. In this article, common economic evaluation techniques and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) evaluation methods will be introduced including Markov models and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). This is complemented with a review of literature on recently published cost-effectiveness of molecular imaging. Additionally, the strategic relevance of CEAs for the molecular imaging community is discussed and combined with a global outlook.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz L Schnitzer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christophe Kremer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Alexander Hertel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Verena Haselmann
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medicine Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Niklas von Münchhausen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stefan O Schoenberg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Matthias F Froelich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ceci F, Musi G, De Cobelli O. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography, Not Conventional Imaging, Should Be Performed for Primary Staging of High-risk Prostate Cancer. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 34:17-18. [PMID: 34766033 PMCID: PMC8572873 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Alberts I, Mingels C, Zacho HD, Lanz S, Schöder H, Rominger A, Zwahlen M, Afshar-Oromieh A. Comparing the clinical performance and cost efficacy of [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [ 18F]PSMA-1007 in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer: a Markov chain decision analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 49:4252-4261. [PMID: 34773473 PMCID: PMC9525363 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05620-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Amongst others, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]PSMA-1007 are available for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer (rPC). There are currently limited data comparing the performance of these two radioligands with respect to clinical outcomes or their cost efficacy, which this study aims to address. Methods Two hundred and forty-four patients undergoing PSMA PET/CT for rPC were retrospectively analysed for this study (one hundred and twenty two with each radiopharmaceutical) to generate rates of PET positivity, negativity and unclear findings. Patients underwent follow-up to determine the rate of additional examinations and to confirm PET findings. A Markov chain decision analysis was implemented to model clinical decision-making processes and to analyse clinical performance of the two tracers. We determine their clinical cost efficacies using cost data from several countries where both radiotracers are in routine use. Results The PET positivity rate was non-significantly higher for [18F]PSMA-1007 compared to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (91.8% vs. 86.9%, p = 0.68), whereas the rate of uncertain findings was significantly greater (17.2% vs. 8.25%, p = 0.02). The probability of a true positive finding was higher for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (0.90, 95% CI 0.70-0.98) vs. [18F]PSMA-1007 (0.81, 95% CI 0.66–0.91). A significantly (p < 0.0001) higher PPV for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (0.99, 95% CI 0.99–1.0 vs. 0.86) was found compared to [18F]PSMA-1007 (0.86, 95% CI 0.82–1.00). Intervention efficacy analysis favoured [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, where the number needed to image (to achieve a true positive finding) was 10.58 and the number needed to image to harm (to achieve a false positive finding) was − 8.08. A cost efficacy analysis favours [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in three of the four jurisdictions analysed where health economic data was available (Switzerland, Israel, Australia) and [18F]PSMA-1007 in one jurisdiction (Denmark). Conclusion The analysis reveals a non-significantly higher PET positivity rate for [18F]PSMA-1007, but finds significantly greater rates of uncertain findings and false positive findings when compared to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. We find differences in the two tracers in terms of clinical performance and cost efficacy. The method presented herein is generalisable and can be used with clinical or cost data for other countries or tracers. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05620-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Alberts
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland. .,Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Clemens Mingels
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.,Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Helle D Zacho
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Sabine Lanz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.,Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.,Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marcel Zwahlen
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ali Afshar-Oromieh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.,Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Jadvar H, Calais J, Fanti S, Feng F, Greene KL, Gulley JL, Hofman M, Koontz BF, Lin DW, Morris MJ, Rowe SP, Royce TJ, Salami S, Savir-Baruch B, Srinivas S, Hope TA. Appropriate Use Criteria for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Imaging. J Nucl Med 2021; 63:59-68. [PMID: 34593595 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Jadvar
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California;
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Felix Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Kirsten L Greene
- Department of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Michael Hofman
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Bridget F Koontz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel W Lin
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Michael J Morris
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Steve P Rowe
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Trevor J Royce
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Simpa Salami
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Sandy Srinivas
- Department of Medicine (Oncology), Stanford University, California; and
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Sandhu S, Moore CM, Chiong E, Beltran H, Bristow RG, Williams SG. Prostate cancer. Lancet 2021; 398:1075-1090. [PMID: 34370973 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00950-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 233] [Impact Index Per Article: 77.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The management of prostate cancer continues to evolve rapidly, with substantial advances being made in understanding the genomic landscape and biology underpinning both primary and metastatic prostate cancer. Similarly, the emergence of more sensitive imaging methods has improved diagnostic and staging accuracy and refined surveillance strategies. These advances have introduced personalised therapeutics to clinical practice, with treatments targeting genomic alterations in DNA repair pathways now clinically validated. An important shift in the therapeutic framework for metastatic disease has taken place, with metastatic-directed therapies being evaluated for oligometastatic disease, aggressive management of the primary lesion shown to benefit patients with low-volume metastatic disease, and with several novel androgen pathway inhibitors significantly improving survival when used as a first-line therapy for metastatic disease. Research into the molecular characterisation of localised, recurrent, and progressive disease will undoubtedly have an impact on clinical management. Similarly, emerging research into novel therapeutics, such as targeted radioisotopes and immunotherapy, holds much promise for improving the lives of patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahneen Sandhu
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Edmund Chiong
- Department of Urology and Department of Surgery, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Robert G Bristow
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Scott G Williams
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Young S, Metser U, Sistani G, Langer DL, Bauman G. Establishing a Provincial Registry for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Providing Access to PSMA PET/CT in Ontario, Canada. Front Oncol 2021; 11:722430. [PMID: 34408985 PMCID: PMC8366560 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.722430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is becoming established as a standard of care for the (re)staging of high-risk primary and prostate cancer recurrence after primary therapy. Despite the favorable performance of this imaging modality with high accuracy in disease detection, the availability of PSMA PET/CT varies across jurisdictions worldwide due to variability in the selection of PSMA PET/CT agent, regulatory approvals and funding. In Canada, PSMA based radiopharmaceuticals are still considered investigational new drug (IND), creating limitations in the deployment of these promising imaging agents. While regulatory approval rests with Health Canada, as a single payer health system, funding for Health Canada approved drugs and devices is decided by Provincial Health Ministries. Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) (OH-CCO) is the agency of the Ministry of Health (MOH) in Ontario responsible for making recommendations to the MOH around the organization and funding of cancer services within Ontario (population of 15 million), and the PET Steering Committee of OH-CCO is responsible for providing recommendations on the introduction of new PET radiopharmaceuticals and indications. For Health Canada approved PET radiopharmaceuticals like 18F-FDG, OH-CCO (on behalf of the MOH) provides coverage based on levels of evidence and specific PET Registries are established to aid in real-world evidence collection to inform OH-CCO regarding emerging PET applications. In the case of PSMA PET/CT, adapting this model to an IND PSMA PET/CT agent, 18F-DCFPyL, necessitated the creation of a hybrid Registry-Study model to leverage the existing OH-CCO Registry structure while respecting the need for a Health Canada Clinical Trials Application (CTA) for the deployment of this agent in the province. Within the first 2 years of the registry, over 1700 men have been imaged resulting in a change in management (compared to pre-PET management plans) in over half of the men imaged. In this article, we describe the organization and deployment of the PSMA PET/CT (PREP) Registry throughout the province to provide access for men with suspected prostate cancer recurrence along with key stakeholder perspectives and preliminary results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sympascho Young
- London Regional Cancer Program, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ur Metser
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital, Women's College Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Golmehr Sistani
- Department of Medical Imaging, London Health Sciences Center and Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Deanna L Langer
- Clinical Institutes and Quality Programs, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Glenn Bauman
- London Regional Cancer Program, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Health technology assessment for PSMA-PET: striving towards a cost-effective management of prostate cancer. Clin Transl Imaging 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-021-00446-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
46
|
Mittlmeier LM, Brendel M, Beyer L, Albert NL, Todica A, Zacherl MJ, Wenter V, Herlemann A, Kretschmer A, Ledderose ST, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Kunz WG, Ricke J, Bartenstein P, Ilhan H, Unterrainer M. Feasibility of Different Tumor Delineation Approaches for 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT Imaging in Prostate Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2021; 11:663631. [PMID: 34094956 PMCID: PMC8176856 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.663631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Delineation of PSMA-positive tumor volume on PET using PSMA-ligands is of highest clinical interest as changes of PSMA-PET/CT-derived whole tumor volume (WTV) have shown to correlate with treatment response in metastatic prostate cancer patients. So far, WTV estimation was performed on PET using 68Ga-labeled ligands; nonetheless, 18F-labeled PET ligands are gaining increasing importance due to advantages over 68Ga-labeled compounds. However, standardized tumor delineation methods for 18F-labeled PET ligands have not been established so far. As correlation of PET-based information and morphological extent in osseous and visceral metastases is hampered by morphological delineation, low contrast in liver tissue and movement artefacts, we correlated CT-based volume of lymph node metastases (LNM) and different PET-based delineation approaches for thresholding on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET. Methods Fifty patients with metastatic prostate cancer, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and non-bulky LNM (short-axis diameter ≥10mm) were included. Fifty LNM were volumetrically assessed on contrast-enhanced CT (volumetric reference standard). Different approaches for tumor volume delineation were applied and correlated with the reference standard: I) fixed SUV threshold, II) isocontour thresholding relative to SUVmax (SUV%), and thresholds relative to III) liver (SUVliver), IV) parotis (SUVparotis) and V) spleen (SUVspleen). Results A fixed SUV of 4.0 (r=0.807, r2 = 0.651, p<0.001) showed the best overall association with the volumetric reference. 55% SUVmax (r=0.627, r2 = 0.393, p<0.001) showed highest association using an isocontour-based threshold. Best background-based approaches were 60% SUVliver (r=0.715, r2 = 0.511, p<0.001), 80% SUVparotis (r=0.762, r2 = 0.581, p<0.001) and 60% SUVspleen (r=0.645, r2 = 0.416, p<0.001). Background tissues SUVliver, SUVparotis & SUVspleen did not correlate (p>0.05 each). Recently reported cut-offs for intraprostatic tumor delineation (isocontour 44% SUVmax, 42% SUVmax and 20% SUVmax) revealed inferior association for LNM delineation. Conclusions A threshold of SUV 4.0 for tumor delineation showed highest association with volumetric reference standard irrespective of potential changes in PSMA-avidity of background tissues (e. g. parotis). This approach is easily applicable in clinical routine without specific software requirements. Further studies applying this approach for total tumor volume delineation are initiated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M Mittlmeier
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias J Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Annika Herlemann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jadvar H. Competitive Advantage of PSMA Theranostics in Prostate Cancer. Radiology 2021; 299:261-263. [PMID: 33788590 PMCID: PMC8103912 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021210348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Jadvar
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2250 Alcazar St, CSC 102, Los Angeles, CA 90033
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Schiavina R, Bianchi L, Bunocilla E. PSMA PET/CT to stage high-risk prostate cancer: is already the time to replace conventional imaging? Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 73:135-136. [PMID: 33764031 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04343-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy -
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy -
| | - Eugenio Bunocilla
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy -
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Farolfi A, Calderoni L, Mattana F, Mei R, Telo S, Fanti S, Castellucci P. Current and Emerging Clinical Applications of PSMA PET Diagnostic Imaging for Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:596-604. [PMID: 33712536 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.257238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed on most prostate cancer (PCa) cells, and several PSMA ligands for PET imaging are now available worldwide. 68Ga-PSMA-11 has already received U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval, and use of PSMA PET is currently suggested by several international guidelines for investigating PCa in different clinical settings. In primary PCa, PSMA PET has been shown to be superior to cross-sectional imaging for the detection of pelvic lymph nodes and distant metastases with subsequent clinical management changes. Additionally, it might also have a role in intraprostatic tumor localization, especially when combined with multiparametric MRI. In a setting of PCa recurrence, higher detection rates have been observed than for any other available imaging techniques, especially at low prostate-specific antigen values. Furthermore, PSMA PET consistently led to a shift in clinical management, thus increasing the proportion of radiotherapy, surgery, or other focal therapies at the expense of systemic options or no treatment. In oligometastatic disease after radical surgery, PSMA PET may be relevant in guiding a metastasis-directed therapy approach, as preliminary data seem to suggest a benefit in terms of progression-free survival after treatment of PSMA PET-positive lesions. As a staging and gatekeeping technique, PSMA PET represents a reliable whole-body imaging procedure in combination with second-line therapy of castration-resistant PCa, as well as being pivotal when assessing patients eligible for radioligand therapy such as 177Lu-PSMA. This critical review aims at providing a comprehensive overview of the latest literature on the current or emerging main indications, as well as a general outlook on the recommended interpretation criteria for PSMA PET imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Letizia Calderoni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Mattana
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Mei
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sivi Telo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Essential elements of anaesthesia practice in ERAS programs. World J Urol 2020; 40:1299-1309. [PMID: 32839862 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03410-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Enhanced recovery pathways vary amongst institutions but include key components for anesthesiologists, such as haemodynamic optimization, use of short-acting drugs (and monitoring), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis, protective ventilation, and opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia. METHODS After critical appraisal of the literature, studies were selected with particular attention being paid to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and large prospective cohort studies. For each item of the perioperative treatment pathway, available English literature was examined and reviewed. RESULTS Patients should be permitted to drink clear fluids up to 2 h before anaesthesia and surgery. Oral carbohydrate loading should be used routinely. All patients may have an individualized plan for fluid and haemodynamic management that matches the monitoring needs with patient and surgical risk. Minimizing the side effects of anaesthetics and analgesics using short-acting drugs with careful perioperative monitoring should be encouraged. Protective ventilation with alveolar recruitment maneuvers is required. Preventive use of a combination with 2-3 antiemetics in addition to propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) is most likely to reduce PONV. While the ideal analgesia regimen remains to be determined, it is clear that a multimodal opioid-sparing analgesic strategy has significant benefits. CONCLUSION Careful evaluation of single patient and planning of the anesthetic care are mandatory to join the ERAS philosophy. Optimal fluid management, use of short-acting drugs, prevention of PONV, protective ventilation, and multimodal analgesia are the cornerstones of the anaesthesia management within ERAS protocols.
Collapse
|