Dienogest is as effective as intranasal buserelin acetate for the relief of pain symptoms associated with endometriosis--a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial

The efficacy of progestins in managing pain associated with endometriosis, fibroids and pre-menstrual syndrome: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Alongside being contraceptives, progestins have been investigated as potential anti-inflammatory and analgesic therapies for use in painful gynaecological conditions. This review aims to synthesise evidence pertaining to the efficacy of progestins as analgesics for use in endometriosis, fibroids and pre-menstrual syndrome (PMS).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the extant literature investigating the analgesic efficacy of progestins compared to any comparator interventions for individuals with the three specified gynaecological conditions. The search was carried out across the PubMed and CENTRAL databases on 7 April 2024 for randomised control trials (RCTs) published in the peer-reviewed literature from 2000 onwards. Data pertaining to analgesic efficacy, assessed by changes in pain indices/scores before and after treatment, were synthesised narratively. Data pertaining to adverse effect frequency and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) were also synthesised narratively. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool.

RESULTS

The primary search identified 1220 potentially eligible RCTs of which 21 were ultimately included; 19 RCTs related to endometriosis, two related to fibroids and zero related to PMS. Quality assessment identified nine studies to be at a low risk of bias, nine studies with some concerns surrounding bias and three studies to be at a high risk of bias. The included studies represented a total of 2745 participants of whom 1317 were treated with a progestin and 1428 received a comparator intervention. In 18 of the 19 studies concerning endometriosis, progestins produced a statistically significant reduction in pain, further, in five instances progestins were more efficacious in reducing pain than comparator interventions. In both studies on fibroids, progestins produced significant reductions in pain, however, statistically significant differences compared to comparator interventions were not demonstrated. The most frequently cited adverse effect of progestins was spotting/irregular bleeding whilst those receiving comparator interventions most often reported hot flushes; cited in 12 and seven studies respectively. Five studies assessed the impact of progestins and comparators on BMD. Three studies found progestins significantly reduced BMD, however, in these instances reductions were significantly lower than those produced by comparator interventions and in two studies were not statistically significant after 12 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our review demonstrates the potential scope for the use of progestins as analgesics in the management of pain associated with endometriosis. Further research will need to be conducted to identify their efficacy in the management of pain associated with fibroids and PMS.

Add-on effect of curcumin to dienogest in patients with endometriosis: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological disorder characterized by significant pain and reduced quality of life (QOL). Current treatments, such as dienogest, are not fully effective, prompting the investigation of curcumin as a potential adjunct therapy. Although curcumin has demonstrated promise in preclinical studies, its clinical efficacy in endometriosis, particularly in combination with standard therapies like dienogest, remains underexplored.

PURPOSE

This is the first study aimed to evaluate the add-on effect of curcumin in combination with dienogest on pain relief, QOL, and sexual function in women with endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of curcumin combined with dienogest versus dienogest alone with a placebo.

METHODS

Eighty-six women aged 18-45 with stage 2-3 pelvic endometriosis and moderate to severe pain (visual analogue scale (VAS) ≥ 4) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either nanocurcumin soft gel capsules (80 mg/day) or a placebo, along with dienogest (2 mg/day), for 8 weeks. Outcomes were assessed using adjusted mean differences (aMD) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

After 8 weeks, the curcumin and dienogest group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in pain scores compared to the placebo group: dysmenorrhea (aMD: -1.55, 95 %CI: -2.04 to -1.06; p < 0.001), dyspareunia (aMD: -0.93, 95 %CI: -1.37 to -0.49; p < 0.001), chronic pelvic pain (aMD: -1.55, 95 %CI: -2.04 to -1.06; p < 0.001), and dyschezia (aMD: -0.30, 95 %CI: -0.58 to -0.03; p = 0.030). Additional benefits were observed in QOL and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores, except for the orgasm domain. Differences in endometrioma size were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The combination of curcumin and dienogest significantly reduced pain and improved QOL and sexual function in women with endometriosis, suggesting curcumin as an effective adjunct therapy.

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of 48-Week Low-Dose Dienogest Administration in Patients With Dysmenorrhea Caused by Endometriosis: Protocol for a Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Trial

BACKGROUND

The treatment of endometriosis includes analgesics, hormone therapy, and surgery. Even after surgical removal of endometriotic lesions, the risk of recurrence remains high once the normal menstrual cycle resumes. Therefore, long-term hormone therapy is essential to prevent recurrence. Among hormonal treatments, low-dose estrogen progestin preparations are not recommended for patients older than 40 years due to the increased risk of thrombotic side effects. In contrast, dienogest does not carry a thrombotic risk, making it a suitable option for older patients. Although dienogest requires long-term administration until menopause in patients with endometriosis, data on its long-term efficacy and potential adverse effects remain limited. In particular, comparative studies assessing the safety and effectiveness of long-term use of dienogest at different doses (1 mg/day vs 2 mg/day) have not been conducted, highlighting the need for further investigation.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and the incidence of adverse events of dienogest 1 mg/day after 48 weeks in patients with dysmenorrhea due to endometriosis, compared with dienogest 2 mg/day.

METHODS

This randomized, open-label, parallel-group, dose-comparison, multicenter trial follows the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) 2013 guidelines and is conducted at 6 centers in Japan. Participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either dienogest 1 mg/day or 2 mg/day. The drug is administered for 48 weeks, and its therapeutic effects and side effects are evaluated. Hospital visits include the use of questionnaires, vital sign measurements, imaging studies (magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound), blood tests, and bone density assessments. The primary endpoint is the change in the pain visual analog scale (VAS) score from baseline to 48 weeks. The VAS is a 10 cm horizontal scale where 0 cm represents no pain and 10 cm represents the maximum imaginable pain; participants indicate their pain level on the scale, and the change is analyzed over time. The target sample size is 88, determined with a noninferiority margin based on existing literature. The protocol was approved by the Nagoya City University Hospital Clinical Research Review Board. Findings will be presented at academic conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

RESULTS

Currently, data collection is ongoing. The first participant was enrolled in August 2021. As of March 22, 2025, a total of 88 participants had been enrolled in this clinical trial.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first trial to compare efficacy and safety between 1 mg/day and 2 mg/day of long-term dienogest use in patients with dysmenorrhea caused by endometriosis. Combining diagnostic imaging with patient questionnaires and blood tests allows the determination of efficacy against endometriosis itself.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs041210016; https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs041210016.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/66246.

Dienogest vs. combined oral contraceptive: A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and side effects to inform evidence-based guidelines

INTRODUCTION

Dienogest is a synthetic fourth-generation progestin that has been approved for the medical treatment of endometriosis, and its efficacy on pain symptoms and quality of life is well established even in the long term. Nowadays, only a few controlled trials evaluating the safety of dienogest compared with other hormonal therapies have been published. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare efficacy and tolerability data between dienogest and combined oral contraceptives (COC) in patients taking hormonal therapy for endometriosis treatment in order to inform evidence-based guidelines.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed (Medline), Web of Science, and Google Scholar were systematically searched from the inception of each database until October 2024. Selection criteria included any articles comparing efficacy outcomes and at least one tolerability data between dienogest and COC in patients diagnosed with endometriosis. Studies comparing COC containing Dienogest or another type of hormonal treatment were excluded. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted if adequate data were available from at least three studies, reporting pooled mean differences and odds ratios between groups using Review Manager V.7.9.0. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024598455.

RESULTS

A total of four randomized control trials and one observational study were included, showing moderate risk at bias assessment. Meta-analysis did not show any statistical difference in improving pelvic pain after treatment [CI 95% (-1.45-1.17); I2 = 86%; p = 0.84]. In contrast, dyspareunia after treatment was significantly lower in the COC group [CI 95% (0.64-1.33); I2 = 0%; p < 0.00001]. No statistical difference was found in terms of vaginal bleeding [OR = 0.88; CI 95% (0.39-1.96); I2 = 41%; p = 0.75], nausea and vomiting [OR = 0.51; CI 95% (0.16-1.63); I2 = 67%; p = 0.26], headache [OR = 0.91; CI 95% (0.38-2.21); I2 = 59%; p = 0.84], hot flushes [OR = 1.16; CI 95% (0.54-2.48); I2 = 0%; p = 0.71], and hair loss [OR = 1.69; CI 95% (0.52-5.53); I2 = 46%; p = 0.39]. Treatment discontinuation rate was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Dienogest is comparable to COC in terms of efficacy and tolerability. The therapeutic choice should be based on the patient's preference, clinical history, and experience.

Safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapies for pelvic inflammatory disease and endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) are gynecological conditions affecting women of reproductive age and causing pain symptoms. The symptoms caused by these conditions are similar; thus, the differential diagnosis may be challenging. The treatment of these conditions is very different because PID is treated with antibiotic therapy, while endometriosis is treated with hormonal therapies suppressing estrogen levels.

AREAS COVERED

A narrative review was conducted through a comprehensive literature search on endometriosis and PID. The search strategy incorporated relevant keywords and MeSH terms related to these topics.

EXPERT OPINION

The antibiotics used to manage PID have high efficacy and safety profiles. Commonly prescribed regimens include a combination of ceftriaxone, doxycycline, and metronidazole. These antibiotics are generally well-tolerated, with most adverse effects being mild and manageable (gastrointestinal disturbances or hypersensitivity reactions). Hormonal therapies are a cornerstone in the management of endometriosis; they include combined oral contraceptives (COCs), progestins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, and antagonists. COCs and progestins are generally well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile, though they may cause side effects (breakthrough bleeding and mood changes). Oral GnRH antagonists have emerged as a noteworthy option, offering partial estrogen suppression and thereby overcoming the limitations associated with previously used GnRH agonists.

Comparative Analysis of Medical Interventions to Alleviate Endometriosis-Related Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Endometriosis is a chronic condition that affects 6-10% of women of reproductive age, with pain and infertility being its primary symptoms. The most common aspects of pain are overall pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia. Our aim was to compare the available medical treatments for endometriosis-related pain. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in three medical databases to assess available drug options for pain management. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating various medical treatments for endometriosis-related pain on different pain scales were included. Results were presented as p-scores and, in cases of placebo controls, as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). From the available data, a network meta-analysis was carried out. Results: The search yielded 1314 records, of which 45 were eligible for data extraction. Eight networks were created, and a total of 16 treatments were analyzed. The highest p-score, meaning greatest pain relief (p-score: 0.618), for the treatment of dysmenorrhea was achieved using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists for 3 months on a scale of 0-100. Additionally, a p-score of 0.649 was attained following a 6-month treatment with GnRH agonists combined with hormonal contraceptives (CHCs). In the case of dyspareunia on a scale of 0-100 following 3 months of treatment, CHCs (p-score: 0.805) were the most effective, and CHCs combined with aromatase inhibitors (p-score: 0.677) were the best treatment option following 6 months of treatment. In the case of overall pelvic pain, CHCs (p-score: 0.751) yielded the highest p-score on a scale of 0-100 following 3 months of treatment, and progestins combined with aromatase inhibitors (p-score: 0.873) following 6 months of treatment. Progestins (p-score: 0.901) were most effective in cases of overall pelvic pain on a scale of 0-3 following 3 months of treatment. Conclusions: Our network meta-analysis showed that in cases of dysmenorrhea, GnRH agonists supplemented with CHCs reduced pain the most following 3 months of treatment. Regarding dyspareunia CHCs were most effective, and in the case of overall pelvic pain, CHCs or progestins combined with aromatase inhibitors yielded the most desirable results.

A systematic literature review on patient-reported outcome domains and measures in nonsurgical efficacy trials related to chronic pain associated with endometriosis: an urgent call to action

ABSTRACT

Endometriosis, a common cause for chronic pelvic pain, significantly affects quality of life, fertility, and overall productivity of those affected. Therapeutic options remain limited, and collating evidence on treatment efficacy is complicated. One reason could be the heterogeneity of assessed outcomes in nonsurgical clinical trials, impeding meaningful result comparisons. This systematic literature review examines outcome domains and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials. Through comprehensive search of Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL up until July 2022, we screened 1286 records, of which 191 were included in our analyses. Methodological quality (GRADE criteria), information about publication, patient population, and intervention were assessed, and domains as well as PROMs were extracted and analyzed. In accordance with IMMPACT domain framework, the domain pain was assessed in almost all studies (98.4%), followed by adverse events (73.8%). By contrast, assessment of physical functioning (29.8%), improvement and satisfaction (14.1%), and emotional functioning (6.8%) occurred less frequently. Studies of a better methodological quality tended to use more different domains. Nevertheless, combinations of more than 2 domains were rare, failing to comprehensively capture the bio-psycho-social aspects of endometriosis-associated pain. The PROMs used showed an even broader heterogeneity across all studies. Our findings underscore the large heterogeneity of assessed domains and PROMs in clinical pain-related endometriosis trials. This highlights the urgent need for a standardized approach to both, assessed domains and high-quality PROMs ideally realized through development and implementation of a core outcome set, encompassing the most pivotal domains and PROMs for both, stakeholders and patients.

A systematic review and Bayesian analysis of the adverse effects of dienogest

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Endometriosis and adenomyosis are two common diseases that impair women's health, and dienogest is one of the pharmacologic treatments which is the first-line therapeutic option for patients with pelvic pain and individuals who have no desire for immediate pregnancy. The goal of this study was to summarize the current evidence of adverse events associated with dienogest as well as the prevalence of these adverse events during treatment with dienogest.

METHODS

Several databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central and Clinicaltrials.gov, etc.) and the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard were searched on May 31, 2023, using the topic words alongside free words of dienogest and "adverse reaction". Studies were incorporated into this research if they reported or assessed safety issues or adverse reactions of dienogest during the period of endometriosis treatment or adenomyosis therapy. The extracted information comprised trial design, dienogest and control group demographics, as well as reported side effects.

RESULTS

This systematic review comprehended 39 publications in total. The mean age of patients in the included studies was 34.43 years. The follow-up duration varied from 3 to 60 months. Most adverse reactions were common and not serious, and the most common adverse reactions during dienogest medication were abnormal uterine bleeding (55%, 95% CI 37-73%), amenorrhea (17%, 95% CI 2-42%) and swelling (13%, 95% CI 3-28%). Uncommon adverse reactions included dysmenorrhea (0.2%, n = 1), dyspepsia (0.4%, n = 1), and (lower) abdominal pain (1%, 95% CI 0-3%), urticaria (1%, 95% CI 0-3%) and peritonitis (1%, n = 1). Serious adverse reactions including decreased lumbar spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), depression, peritonitis and so on have been reported. Heterogeneity assessment revealed that patient number and study design are influencing factors to adverse reaction prevalence. Moreover, abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, back pain and anemia are side effects reported both in the FAERS database and in the systematic review.

CONCLUSIONS

Dienogest's most frequent side effects were not severe. Dienogest is generally safe for treating endometriosis and adenomyosis. Nevertheless, people should be aware of serious adverse reactions, such as decreased lumbar spine BMD and hemorrhagic shock.

Dienogest attenuates STAT3 activation in ovarian endometriotic cysts

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies have suggested that endometriosis could be the result of excessive activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), which is associated with the regulation of essential cellular mechanisms such as proliferation, invasion, and apoptosis. That finding implies that regulating STAT3 activation could play a key role in treating endometriosis. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate whether the anti-endometriotic effects of dienogest is mediated by the regulation of STAT3 activation.

STUDY DESIGN

STAT3 activation was evaluated in normal endometrial and ovarian endometriotic tissues obtained from patients with/without preoperative dienogest treatment. A subsequent in vitro analysis with endometriotic cyst stromal cells (ECSCs) was used to confirm the direct influence of dienogest in STAT3 activation.

RESULT

STAT3 activation is significantly higher in endometriotic tissues from non-treated patients than in normal endometrial tissues, and that difference is reversed by preoperative administration of dienogest. Similarly, the inhibitory effects of dienogest on STAT3 activation are demonstrated by in vitro results showing that dienogest treatment significantly inhibits IL-6-stimulated STAT3 activation in cultured ECSCs. That inhibition was accompanied by decreased expression of proliferative (PCNA), invasive (MMP-2), and anti-apoptotic (BCL-2) proteins. Furthermore, downregulating STAT3 activity with siRNA decreased PCNA, MMP-2, and BCL-2 expression in IL-6-treated ECSCs.

CONCLUSION

Dienogest inhibits STAT3 activation in ECSCs, which affects their proliferation, invasiveness, and apoptosis.

A review of phase II and III drugs for the treatment and management of endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disease that gives rise to pelvic pain and infertility. Although estroprogestins and progestins currently stand as the first-line treatments for this condition, demonstrating efficacy in two-thirds of patients, a significant portion of individuals experience only partial relief or symptom recurrence following the cessation of these therapies. The coexistence of superficial, deep endometriosis, and ovarian endometriomas, as three distinct phenotypes with unique pathogenetic and molecular characteristics, may elucidate the current heterogeneous biological response to available therapy.

AREAS COVERED

The objective of this review is to furnish the reader with a comprehensive summary pertaining to phase II-III hormonal treatments for endometriosis.

EXPERT OPINION

Ongoing research endeavors are directed toward the development of novel hormonal options for this benign yet debilitating disease. Among them, oral GnRH antagonists emerge as a noteworthy option, furnishing rapid therapeutic onset without an initial flare-up; these drugs facilitate partial or complete estrogen suppression, and promote prompt ovarian function recovery upon discontinuation, effectively surmounting the limitations associated with previously employed GnRH agonists. Limited evidence supports the use of selective estrogen and progesterone receptor modulators. Consequently, further extensive clinical research is imperative to garner a more profound understanding of innovative targets for novel hormonal options.

Dienogest in endometriosis treatment: A narrative literature review

Endometriosis is characterized by the implantation of endometrial cells outside the uterus. This hormone-dependent disease is highly prevalent among women of reproductive age. Clinical symptoms of endometriosis include dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and infertility, which can negatively impact the overall quality of life of those affected. The medical treatment of endometriosis serves as an important therapeutic option, aimed at alleviating pain associated with the condition and suppressing the growth of endometriotic lesions. As such, it is employed as an adjuvant therapy following surgery or an empirical treatment after the clinical diagnosis of endometriosis. Dienogest, a fourth-generation progestin, has received approval for the treatment of endometriosis in many countries. A growing body of evidence has demonstrated its efficacy in managing endometriosis-associated pain, preventing symptoms, and reducing lesion recurrence. In this review, we examine the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dienogest in treating endometriosis. We also provide updated findings, drawing from clinical studies that focus on the long-term use of this medication in patients with endometriosis.

Pharmacomodulation of brain neuromedin U signaling as a potential therapeutic strategy

Neuromedin U (NMU) belongs to a family of multifunctional neuropeptides that modulate the activity of several neural networks of the brain. Acting via metabotropic receptor NMUR2, NMU plays a role in the regulation of multiple systems, including energy homeostasis, stress responses, circadian rhythms, and endocrine signaling. The involvement of NMU signaling in the central regulation of important neurophysiological processes and its disturbances is a potential target for pharmacological modulation. Number of preclinical studies have proven that both modified NMU analogues such as PASR8-NMU or F4R8-NMU and designed NMUR2 agonists, for example, CPN-116, CPN-124 exhibit a distinct pharmacological activity especially when delivered transnasally. Their application can potentially be useful in the more convenient and safe treatment of obesity, eating disorders, Alzheimer's disease-related memory impairment, alcohol addiction, and sleep disturbances. Accumulating findings suggest that pharmacomodulation of the central NMU signaling may be a promising strategy in the treatment of several neuropsychiatric disorders.

Update on the management of endometriosis-associated pain in France

The French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (CNGOF) published guidelines for managing endometriosis-associated pain in 2018. Given the development of new pharmacological therapies and a review that was published in 2021, most national and international guidelines now suggest a new therapeutic approach. In addition, a novel validated screening method based on patient questionnaires and analysis of 109-miRNA saliva signatures, which combines biomarkers and artificial intelligence, opens up new avenues for overcoming diagnostic challenges in patients with pelvic pain and for avoiding laparoscopic surgery when sonography and MRI are not conclusive. Dienogest (DNG) 2 mg has been a reimbursable healthcare expense in France since 2020, and, according to recent studies, it is at least as effective as combined hormonal contraception (CHC) and can be used as an alternative to CHC for first-line treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. Since 2018, the literature concerning the use of DNG has grown considerably, and the French guidelines should be modified accordingly. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG IUS) and other available progestins per os, including DNG, or the subcutaneous implant, can be offered as first-line therapy, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists with add-back therapy (ABT) as second-line therapy. Oral GnRH antagonists are promising new medical treatments for women with endometriosis-associated pain. They competitively bind to GnRH receptors in the anterior pituitary, preventing native GnRH from binding to GnRH receptors and from stimulating the secretion of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone. Consequently, estradiol and progesterone production is reduced. Oral GnRH antagonists will soon be on the market in France. Given their mode of action, their efficacy is comparable to that of GnRH agonists, with the advantage of oral administration and rapid action with no flare-up effect. Combination therapy with ABT is likely to allow long-term treatment with minimal impact on bone mass. GnRH antagonists with ABT may thus be offered as second-line treatment as an alternative to GnRH agonists with ABT. This article presents an update on the management of endometriosis-associated pain in women who do not have an immediate desire for pregnancy.

Clinical Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of the Available Medical Options in the Treatment of Endometriosis-Related Pelvic Pain: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

In this scoping review, we sought to identify published studies evaluating the drugs currently used in the treatment of endometriosis-related pelvic pain, with reflection on their chemical properties, pharmacokinetics, safety profile, and clinical efficacy.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted with the use of the PubMed and EMBASE electronic databases, focusing on identifying articles published in English between January 1990 and 2023.

RESULTS

Based on the included studies, current therapy options for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain identified and reviewed in this article were: (1) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; (2) combined oral contraceptive (COCs); (3) progestins; (4) gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists; (5) aromatase inhibitors (AIs); (6) selective estrogen and progesterone receptor modulators; and (7) levonorgestrel-intrauterine device.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the published evidence, clinicians should consider NSAIDs, COCs, and progestins as the first-line medical therapies. Compared with second-line options, such as GnRH agonists/antagonists or AIs, the abovementioned first-line options are well tolerated, efficacious, and exhibit lower overall price. Future research priorities should be to identify novel target therapies and to evaluate the effects of available drugs through different routes of administration.

Impact of dienogest pretreatment on IVF-ET outcomes in patients with endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To comprehensively evaluate the influence of dienogest (DNG) versus non-DNG pretreatment on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) outcomes for patients with endometriosis.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP were comprehensively searched for relevant publications until September 14, 2022. Primary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Secondary outcomes included retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, blastocysts, growing follicles, transferrable embryos, fertilization rate, implantation rate, and miscarriage rate. Subgroup analysis was performed according to different grouping methods and embryo types.

RESULTS

Five studies of 568 females with endometriosis were involved in this systematic review and meta-analysis. DNG treatment exhibited similar effects to non-DNG treatment on either the primary or the secondary outcomes (all P > 0.05). The DNG group had a significantly greater clinical pregnancy rate than the non-hormonal treatment group (pooled relative risk [RR]: 2.055, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.275, 3.312, P = 0.003), and exhibited a significantly lower clinical pregnancy rate than the long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) group (RR: 0.542, 95%CI: 0.321, 0.916, P = 0.022). For patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer, the DNG group displayed a significantly greater clinical pregnancy rate versus the non-DNG group (pooled RR: 1.848, 95%CI: 1.234, 2.767, P = 0.003). Patients receiving DNG had a significantly greater live birth rate than those with non-hormonal treatment (pooled RR: 2.136, 95%CI: 1.223, 3.734, P = 0.008), while having a significantly lower live birth rate than the long GnRH-a group (RR: 0.441, 95%CI: 0.214, 0.907, P = 0.026). While using fresh embryos, patients with DNG treatment had an increased live birth rate, compared with those without DNG treatment (pooled RR: 2.132, 95%CI: 1.090, 4.169, P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

DNG treatment may have similar effects to non-DNG treatment on IVF-ET outcomes. The clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate after DNG treatment may be significantly higher than those after non-hormonal treatment. More evidence is warranted to corroborate these findings.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues for endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is a common gynaecological condition affecting 6 to 11% of reproductive-age women and may cause dyspareunia, dysmenorrhoea, and infertility. One treatment strategy is medical therapy with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHas) to reduce pain due to endometriosis. One of the adverse effects of GnRHas is a decreased bone mineral density. In addition to assessing the effect on pain, quality of life, most troublesome symptom and patients' satisfaction, the current review also evaluated the effect on bone mineral density and risk of adverse effects in women with endometriosis who use GnRHas versus other treatment options.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of GnRH analogues (GnRHas) in the treatment of painful symptoms associated with endometriosis and to determine the effects of GnRHas on bone mineral density of women with endometriosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the trial registries in May 2022 together with reference checking and contact with study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared GnRHas with other hormonal treatment options, including analgesics, danazol, intra-uterine progestogens, oral or injectable progestogens, gestrinone and also GnRHas compared with no treatment or placebo. Trials comparing GnRHas versus GnRHas in conjunction with add-back therapy (hormonal or non-hormonal) or calcium-regulation agents were also included in this review.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodology as recommended by Cochrane. Primary outcomes are relief of overall pain and the objective measurement of bone mineral density. Secondary outcomes include adverse effects, quality of life, improvement in the most troublesome symptoms and patient satisfaction.  Due to high risk of bias associated with some of the studies, primary analyses of all review outcomes were restricted to studies at low risk of selection bias. Sensitivity analysis including all studies was then performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-two studies involving 7355 patients were included. The evidence was very low to low quality: the main limitations of all studies were serious risk of bias due to poor reporting of study methods, and serious imprecision.  Trials comparing GnRHas versus no treatment  We did not identify any studies. Trials comparing GnRHas versus placebo There may be a decrease in overall pain, reported as pelvic pain scores (RR 2.14; 95% CI 1.41 to 3.24, 1 RCT, n = 87, low-certainty evidence), dysmenorrhoea scores (RR 2.25; 95% CI 1.59 to 3.16, 1 RCT, n = 85, low-certainty evidence), dyspareunia scores (RR 2.21; 95% CI 1.39 to 3.54, 1 RCT, n = 59, low-certainty evidence), and pelvic tenderness scores (RR 2.28; 95% CI 1.48 to 3.50, 1 RCT, n = 85, low-certainty evidence) after three months of treatment. We are uncertain of the effect for pelvic induration, based on the results found after three months of treatment (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.79, 1 RCT, n = 81, low-certainty evidence). Besides, treatment with GnRHas may be associated with a greater incidence of hot flushes at three months of treatment (RR 3.08; 95% CI 1.89 to 5.01, 1 RCT, n = 100, low-certainty evidence). Trials comparing GnRHas versus danazol For overall pain, for women treated with either GnRHas or danazol, a subdivision was made between pelvic tenderness, partly resolved and completely resolved. We are uncertain about the effect on relief of overall pain, when a subdivision was made for overall pain (MD -0.30; 95% CI -1.66 to 1.06, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), pelvic pain (MD 0.20; 95% CI -0.26 to 0.66, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), dysmenorrhoea (MD 0.10; 95% CI -0.49 to 0.69, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), dyspareunia (MD -0.20; 95% CI -0.77 to 0.37, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), pelvic induration (MD -0.10; 95% CI -0.59 to 0.39, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), and pelvic tenderness (MD -0.20; 95% CI -0.78 to 0.38, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence) after three months of treatment. For pelvic pain (MD 0.50; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.90, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence) and pelvic induration (MD 0.70; 95% CI 0.21 to 1.19, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), the complaints may decrease slightly after treatment with GnRHas, compared to danazol, for six months of treatment. Trials comparing GnRHas versus analgesics  We did not identify any studies. Trials comparing GnRHas versus intra-uterine progestogens We did not identify any low risk of bias studies. Trials comparing GnRHas versus GnRHas in conjunction with calcium-regulating agents There may be a slight decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) after 12 months treatment with GnRHas, compared to GnRHas in conjunction with calcium-regulating agents for anterior-posterior spine (MD -7.00; 95% CI -7.53 to -6.47, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence) and lateral spine (MD -12.40; 95% CI -13.31 to -11.49, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For relief of overall pain, there may be a slight decrease in favour of treatment with GnRHas compared to placebo or oral or injectable progestogens. We are uncertain about the effect when comparing GnRHas with danazol, intra-uterine progestogens or gestrinone. For BMD, there may be a slight decrease when women are treated with GnRHas, compared to gestrinone. There was a bigger decrease of BMD in favour of GnRHas, compared to GnRHas in conjunction with calcium-regulating agents. However, there may be a slight increase in adverse effects when women are treated with GnRHas, compared to placebo or gestrinone. Due to a very low to low certainty of the evidence, a wide range of outcome measures and a wide range of outcome measurement instruments, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Current treatments for endometriosis in South Korea: an analysis of nationwide data from 2010 to 2019

While a wide range of treatments, including medical therapies and surgery, are used to manage endometriosis, the characteristics and treatment status of patients who received these treatments have not been investigated in Korea. This study analyzed the Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service-National Patient Sample (HIRA-NPS) data from 2010 to 2019 with 7530 patients diagnosed with endometriosis. Annual trends in the types of visit and surgery, medication prescriptions and associated costs were investigated. The analysis showed that surgery slightly decreased among the types of utilized healthcare services (2010: 16.3, 2019: 12.7), dienogest prescription rapidly increased due to national health insurance coverage from 2013 (2013: 12.1, 2019: 36.0), and the use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues decreased (2010: 33.6, 2019: 16.4). There was no significant change in total and outpatient costs per person over time. Regarding endometriosis treatment, conservative treatment mainly based on prescribed medications has been gradually replacing surgery. Particularly, the listing of dienogest for national health insurance coverage might have affected the trend. However, there were no significant changes in terms of total and medication costs per person.

Progesterone receptor ligands for the treatment of endometriosis

Estrogen dependence and progesterone resistance play a crucial role in the origin and development of endometriosis. Therefore, hormonal therapies are currently the most effective treatment. Progestins are considered the first-line approach, especially for a long-term management. Progestins are synthetic compounds that mimic the effects of progesterone by binding progesterone receptors. Continuous use of progestins leads to the suppression of ovarian steroidogenesis with anovulation and low serum levels of ovarian steroids, causing endometrial pseudodecidualization. Moreover, they act by interfering on several endometriosis pathogenetic pathways, decreasing inflammation, provoking apoptosis in endometriotic cells, stimulating atrophy or regression of endometrial lesions, inhibiting angiogenesis, and decreasing expression of metalloproteinases, thus diminishing the invasiveness of endometriotic implants. Progestins are effective for pain relief and improvement of the quality of life (QoL). The side effects are limited, and the compounds are available in different formulations and routes of administration and represent, in most cases, an inexpensive treatment option. Dienogest, Medroxyprogesterone acetate and Norethisterone acetate are the labeled progestins for endometriosis, but other progestins, such as Dyhidrogesterone, Levonorgestrel and Desogestrel, have been shown to be effective in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. The present review aims to describe the available and emerging evidences on progestins used for the treatment of endometriosis.

A Lifelong Impact on Endometriosis: Pathophysiology and Pharmacological Treatment

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with bothersome symptoms in premenopausal women and is complicated with long-term systemic impacts in the post-menopausal stage. It is generally defined by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity, which causes menstrual disorders, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility. Endometriotic lesions can also spread and grow in extra-pelvic sites; the chronic inflammatory status can cause systemic effects, including metabolic disorder, immune dysregulation, and cardiovascular diseases. The uncertain etiologies of endometriosis and their diverse presentations limit the treatment efficacy. High recurrence risk and intolerable side effects result in poor compliance. Current studies for endometriosis have paid attention to the advances in hormonal, neurological, and immunological approaches to the pathophysiology and their potential pharmacological intervention. Here we provide an overview of the lifelong impacts of endometriosis and summarize the updated consensus on therapeutic strategies.

Clinical and sonographic impact of oral contraception in patients with deep endometriosis and adenomyosis at 2 years of follow-up

Nowadays, combined oral contraceptives (COCs) are successfully employed for the treatment of endometriosis (END) and adenomyosis (AD) in a large proportion of patients. However, literature focusing on the clinical and sonographic response to treatment in the long-term follow-up of patients with deep endometriosis (DE) and AD is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in the symptoms and the sonographic exams at 12 and 24 months of follow-up in patients who had received a flexible extended COC regimen containing 2 mg of dienogest/30 μg ethinyl estradiol. This prospective, longitudinal, observational study included women diagnosed with DE and AD presenting no surgical indication and were candidates to treatment with COCs. The presence and severity of dysmenorrhea, non-menstrual pelvic pain, deep dyspareunia, dyschezia and dysuria were evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline, and at 12 and 24 months of treatment. Transvaginal ultrasound was also performed at these check points searching for criteria of AD and reporting the size of the DE nodules and ovarian endometriomas (OE). Sixty-four patients were included. A significant decrease in the number of patients with severe dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain was reported during follow-up. The mean NRS score for dysmenorrhea, non-menstrual pelvic pain, deep dyspareunia, dyschezia and dysuria was also significantly lower at follow-up. There was a significant reduction in the sonographic number and type of AD criteria during follow-up after treatment. Similarly, a significant decrease in the size of OE and uterosacral ligament involvement in DE was observed at the 12-month follow-up, with a further, albeit not statistically significant, decrease in the 12- to 24-month follow-up. Additionally, torus and rectosigmoid DE decreased in size, although the reduction was not statistically significant at any study point. This prospective study suggests a clinical and sonographic improvement after a flexible extended COC regimen in DE and AD patients, which was significant at 12 months of follow-up. The improvement was more evident in AD and OEs compared with DE. Further research with a longer follow-up, larger sample size and comparison with other treatments is needed.

The Asian Society of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis guidelines for managing adenomyosis

This is the first guidelines for adenomyosis from the Asian Society of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis.

Clinical Diagnosis and Early Medical Management for Endometriosis: Consensus from Asian Expert Group

This work provides consensus guidance regarding clinical diagnosis and early medical management of endometriosis within Asia. Clinicians with expertise in endometriosis critically evaluated available evidence on clinical diagnosis and early medical management and their applicability to current clinical practices. Clinical diagnosis should focus on symptom recognition, which can be presumed to be endometriosis without laparoscopic confirmation. Transvaginal sonography can be appropriate for diagnosing pelvic endometriosis in select patients. For early empiric treatment, management of women with clinical presentation suggestive of endometriosis should be individualized and consider presentation and therapeutic need. Medical treatment is recommended to reduce endometriosis-associated pelvic pain for patients with no immediate pregnancy desires. Hormonal treatment can be considered for pelvic pain with a clinical endometriosis diagnosis; progestins are a first-line management option for early medical treatment, with oral progestin-based therapies generally a better option compared with combined oral contraceptives because of their safety profile. Dienogest can be used long-term if needed and a larger evidence base supports dienogest use compared with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) as first-line medical therapy. GnRHa may be considered for first-line therapy in some specific situations or as short-term therapy before dienogest and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as add-on therapy for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain.

Advances in targeting estrogen synthesis and receptors in patients with endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disease on the background of progesterone resistance. Increased estrogen production, low estrogen metabolization, and altered estrogen receptors (ERs) expression contribute to the hyperestrogenic milieu within endometriotic lesions. Since estrogens play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of the disease, inhibition of estrogen production is one of the main targets of available and emerging drugs.

AREAS COVERED

Firstly, we described the molecular alterations responsible for estrogen dependence. Secondly, we reviewed available and emerging treatments that interfere, through central (gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs (GnRH-a), GnRH antagonists) or local mechanisms (aromatase inhibitors (AIs), inhibitors of steroid sulfatase (STS) and hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (17β-HSD1)), with estrogen dependence. Finally, we focused on emerging treatments targeting ERs (selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), estrogen receptors agonists, and antagonists).

EXPERT OPINION

Available treatments interfering with estrogen pathways exert a contraceptive effect, have hypoestrogenic side effects, and cannot prevent or definitively treat the disease. Preclinical and animal studies are focusing on emerging drugs targeting ERs in order to overcome limitations of available treatments. These treatments may represent a promising option, as they may produce a more specific inhibition of disease activity within endometriotic implants, avoiding prolonged hypoestrogenic status and limiting systemic side effects.

Roles of microRNAs in Regulating Apoptosis in the Pathogenesis of Endometriosis

Endometriosis is a gynecologic disorder characterized by the presence of endometrial tissues outside the uterine cavity affecting reproductive-aged women. Previous studies have shown that microRNAs and their target mRNAs are expressed differently in endometriosis, suggesting that this molecule may play a role in the development and persistence of endometriotic lesions. microRNA (miRNA), a small non-coding RNA fragment, regulates cellular functions such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis by the post-transcriptional modulation of gene expression. In this review, we focused on the dysregulated miRNAs in women with endometriosis and their roles in the regulation of apoptosis. The dysregulated miRNAs and their target genes in this pathophysiology were highlighted. Circulating miRNAs as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of endometriosis have also been identified. As shown by various studies, miRNAs were reported to be a potent regulator of gene expression in endometriosis; thus, identifying the dysregulated miRNAs and their target genes could help discover new therapeutic targets for treating this disease. The goal of this review is to draw attention to the functions that miRNAs play in the pathophysiology of endometriosis, particularly those that govern cell death.

Impact of Long-Term Dienogest Therapy on Quality of Life in Asian Women with Endometriosis: the Prospective Non-Interventional Study ENVISIOeN

Several clinical trials in women with endometriosis demonstrated that dienogest reduces endometrial lesions and improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL). To assess HRQoL in dienogest-treated patients in real-world setting, we conducted a prospective, non-interventional study in 6 Asian countries. Women aged ≥18 years with clinical or surgical diagnosis of endometriosis, presence of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain (EAPP) and initiating dienogest therapy were enrolled. The primary objective was to evaluate HRQoL using the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) questionnaire. The secondary objectives included analysis of EAPP, satisfaction with dienogest, endometriosis symptoms and bleeding patterns. 887 patients started dienogest therapy. Scores for all EHP-30 scales improved with the largest mean changes at month 6 and 24 in scale pain (−28.9 ± 27.5 and − 34 ± 28.4) and control and powerlessness (−23.7 ± 28.2 and − 28.5 ± 26.2). Mean EAPP score change was −4.6 ± 3.0 for both month 6 and 24 assessments. EAPP decrease was similar in surgically and only clinically diagnosed patients. From baseline to month 24, rates of normal bleeding decreased (from 85.8% to 17.5%) while rates of amenorrhea increased (from 3.5% to 70.8%). Majority of patients and physicians were satisfied with dienogest. Over 80% of patients reported symptoms improvement. 39.9% of patients had drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events, including vaginal hemorrhage (10.4%), metrorrhagia (7.3%) and amenorrhea (6.4%). In conclusion, dienogest improves HRQoL and EAPP in the real-world setting in women with either clinical or surgical diagnosis of endometriosis. Dienogest might be a promising first-line treatment option for the long-term management of debilitating endometriosis-associated symptoms.

NCT02425462, 24 April 2015.

Assessment of Quality of Life, Sexual Quality of Life, and Pain Symptoms in Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis Patients With or Without Associated Adenomyosis and the Influence of a Flexible Extended Combined Oral Contraceptive Regimen: Results of a Prospective, Observational Study

BACKGROUND

The quality of life of women with deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is impaired and may improve with combined oral contraceptives (COCs).

AIM

To compare the overall and sexual quality of life of patients diagnosed with DIE with or without associated adenomyosis (AD) with that of healthy controls and determine the influence of a COC containing 2 mg dienogest/30 μg ethinyl estradiol on these aspects.

METHODS

We enrolled 42 women diagnosed with DIE; 31 diagnosed with DIE + AD by transvaginal ultrasound, and 39 non-AD/DIE controls. All patients were interviewed regarding pain symptoms (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dyschezia, and dysuria), heavy menstrual bleeding using the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart, quality of life using the Short Form-36 questionnaire (SF-36), and sexual quality of life using the Sexual Quality of Life-Female questionnaire (SQOL-F) and the Brief Profile of Female Sexual Function (B-PFSF) before starting COCs and after 12 months of treatment.

OUTCOMES

There was significant improvement in overall and sexual quality of life after treatment in DIE and DIE + AD patients.

RESULTS

Non-AD/DIE controls showed significantly higher scores in the B-PFSF, the SQOL-F and the SF-36 questionnaires (P < .05) at baseline versus the other groups. DIE + AD patients showed poorer quality of sexual life and greater intensity in pain symptoms compared with DIE patients. After 12 months of treatment, there was a significant improvement in overall and sexual quality of life in the DIE and DIE + AD groups, with improvement in sexual quality of life being slightly greater in DIE + AD patients compared with DIE patients. Pain symptoms also decreased in both groups.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Patients with DIE + AD showed greater impairment in overall and sexual quality of life compared with patients with isolated DIE which seems to improve with a COC containing 2 mg dienogest/30 μg ethinyl estradiol.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

Strengths include the long-term follow up, assessment of the impact of two associated conditions, and administration of the same COC in all patients. Limitations include the relatively small sample size, and the fact that we did not assess the effectiveness of a flexible extended COC regimen containing 2 mg dienogest/30 μg ethinyl estradiol since the groups were different at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Patients diagnosed with DIE with or without AD have a decreased quality of life which may improve with a COC containing 2 mg dienogest/30 μg ethinyl estradiol. Further research is needed to confirm our results. Alcalde AM, Martínez-Zamora MÁ, Gracia M, et al. Assessment of Quality of Life, Sexual Quality of Life, and Pain Symptoms in Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis Patients With or Without Associated Adenomyosis and the Influence of a Flexible Extended Combined Oral Contraceptive Regimen: Results of a Prospective, Observational Study. J Sex Med 2022;19:311-318.

Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist, reduces endometriosis-associated pain compared with leuprorelin in Japanese women: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 40-mg relugolix (REL) compared with those of leuprorelin (LEU) in women with endometriosis-associated pain.

DESIGN

Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled study in Japanese patients.

SETTING

Hospitals and clinics.

PATIENT(S)

Women aged ≥20 years with regular menstrual cycles (25-38 days) experiencing endometriosis or ovarian endometrioma and reporting pelvic pain.

INTERVENTION(S)

In the REL group, 40 mg of REL was orally administered once a day for 24 weeks. In the LEU group, 3.75 or 1.88 mg of LEU was subcutaneously injected every 4 weeks for 24 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary endpoint was the change in the maximum visual analog scale score for pelvic pain from baseline until 28 days before the end of treatment.

RESULT(S)

Changes in the maximum visual analog scale score were -52.6 ± 1.3 for REL and -57.5 ± 1.4 for LEU. Ovarian endometrioma decreased by 12.26 ± 17.52 cm³ for REL and 14.10 ± 18.81 cm³ for LEU. Drug-related treatment emergent adverse events with an incidence of >10% for both groups were hot flush, metrorrhagia, headache, and genital hemorrhage. Discontinuations from treatment emergent adverse events were 2.9% for REL and 4.3% for LEU.

CONCLUSION(S)

Relugolix was noninferior to LEU for treating endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. Safety profiles of both medications were comparable, although menses returned earlier in patients taking REL, a huge benefit for women who plan to conceive after treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03931915.

Treatment of endometriosis: a review with comparison of 8 guidelines

Background

Endometriosis, the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, is a common clinical entity between women of reproductive age, with a prevalence of about 10%. Due to the variety of endometriosis-associated symptoms, a great variety of treatments have been implemented. The aim of this review is to give an overview on therapeutical approaches of eight national and international widely used guidelines.

Methods

Six national (College National des Gynecologues et Obstetriciens Francais, National German Guideline (S2k), Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, American College of Obstetricians (ACOG) and Gynecologists, American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and National Institute for Health and Care (NICE) and two international (World Endometriosis Society, European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology) guidelines are included in this review.

Conclusion

All the above-mentioned guidelines agree that the combined oral contraceptive pill, progestogens are therapies recommended for endometriosis associated pain. Concerning infertility, there is no clear consensus about surgical treatment. Discrepancies are also found on recommendation of the second- and third-line treatments.

Efficacy of dienogest vs combined oral contraceptive on pain associated with endometriosis: Randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of dienogest with the combined oral contraceptive pill (COC) Yasmin for the control of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain.

STUDY DESIGN

Seventy women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea or both for >6 months were randomized to either dienogest (Visanne) 2 mg/day or monophasic COC (Yasmin, 0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg drospirenone) for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was change in non-cyclic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhoea from baseline to end of treatment, assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary efficacy variable was change in the Biberoglu and Behrman (B&B) scale scores for chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was evaluated using the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) questionnaire at baseline and 24 weeks. Safety variables included incidence of side-effects, bleeding pattern and treatment tolerability.

RESULTS

Both treatments improved the mean VAS score for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain significantly: mean difference 6.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9-7.1; p < 0.0001] in the dienogest group and 4.54 (95% CI 3.1-5.9; p < 0.0001) in the COC group; the difference between them was not significant (p = 0.111). Similarly, both dienogest and COC improved HRQoL in various core and modular segments of the EHP-30 questionnaire with comparable requirements for supplemental pain medication (p = 0.782 and 0.258 at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively), and redistribution of the B&B severity profile for chronic pelvic pain (p = 0.052 and 0.526 at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively), dysmenorrhoea (p = 0.521 and 1 at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively) and dyspareunia (p = 0.376 and 0.835, respectively). Nevertheless, dienogest was associated with fewer side-effects, and hence had a better safety and tolerability profile than COC.

CONCLUSIONS

Dienogest (2 mg/day) is comparable to the COC Yasmin for the relief of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain and improvement in HRQoL.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov under number NCT04256200; date of registration 15/1/2020 (registered retrospectively).

Systematic review and Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of dienogest in treatment of endometriosis

BACKGROUND

The quality of life of women with endometriosis is substantially adversely affected by the pelvic pain caused by this disease. However, the choice of medication for endometriosis remains controversial, and no drug has been clearly proven to be superior to others.

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of dienogest, a synthetic progestin, in the treatment of women with painful symptoms of endometriosis.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases were searched from their inceptions to January 21, 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared dienogest with other popular prescription drugs for the treatment of endometriosis. Two reviewers extracted the data. Mean difference (MD) values and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Ultimately, seven RCTs with a total of 1493 participants met the requirements for this review. Dienogest was found to more effective than placebo in alleviating endometriosis-related pain (MD = -32.93, 95%CI: -44.63 to -21.23), but led to a more significant decline in plasma estradiol concentrations than placebo (MD = -44.7, 95%CI: -62.24 to -24.69). Dienogest was superior to gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a) in relieving pain (MD = -2.41, 95%CI: -3.58 to -1.24). Moreover, compared with dienogest, GnRH-a were significantly more likely to lead to the loss of bone mineral density (MD = 2.77, 95%CI: 0.16 to 5.37) and were significantly associated with a higher incidence of headaches (RR = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.52 to 0.91) and hot flushes (RR = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.18 to 1.02).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated that dienogest may be a better pain-relief treatment for endometriosis patients, due to its high efficacy and tolerability.

Role of medical treatment of endometriosis

Endometriosis is a chronic benign disease that affects women of reproductive age. Medical therapy is often the first line of management for women with endometriosis in order to ameliorate symptoms or to prevent post-surgical disease recurrence. Currently, there are several medical options for the management of patients with endometriosis and long-term treatments should balance clinical efficacy (controlling pain symptoms and preventing recurrence of disease after surgery) with an acceptable safety-profile. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used in the treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions, being efficacious in relieving primary dysmenorrhea. Combined oral contraceptives and progestins, available for multiple routes of administration, are commonly administered as first-line hormonal therapies. Several studies demonstrated that they succeed in improving pain symptoms in the majority of patients; moreover, they are well tolerated and not expensive. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonists are prescribed when first line therapies are ineffective, not tolerated or contraindicated. Even if these drugs are efficacious in treating women not responding to COCs or progestins, they are not orally available and have a less favorable tolerability profile (needing an appropriate add-back therapy). Because few data are available on long-term efficacy and safety of aromatase inhibitors they should be reserved only for women with symptoms who are refractory to other treatments only in a research environment. Almost all of the currently available treatment options for endometriosis suppress ovarian function and are not curative. For this reason, research into new drugs is unsurprisingly demanding. Amongst the drugs currently under investigation, gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists have shown most promise, currently in late-stage clinical development. There is a number of potential future therapies currently tested only in vitro, in animal models of endometriosis or in early clinical studies with a small sample size. Further studies are necessary to conclude whether these treatments would be of value for the treatment of endometriosis.

Endometriosis is a chronic systemic disease: clinical challenges and novel innovations

Endometriosis is a common disease affecting 5-10% of women of reproductive age globally. However, despite its prevalence, diagnosis is typically delayed by years, misdiagnosis is common, and delivery of effective therapy is prolonged. Identification and prompt treatment of endometriosis are essential and facilitated by accurate clinical diagnosis. Endometriosis is classically defined as a chronic, gynaecological disease characterised by endometrial-like tissue present outside of the uterus and is thought to arise by retrograde menstruation. However, this description is outdated and no longer reflects the true scope and manifestations of the disease. The clinical presentation is varied, the presence of pelvic lesions is heterogeneous, and the manifestations of the disease outside of the female reproductive tract remain poorly understood. Endometriosis is now considered a systemic disease rather than a disease predominantly affecting the pelvis. Endometriosis affects metabolism in liver and adipose tissue, leads to systemic inflammation, and alters gene expression in the brain that causes pain sensitisation and mood disorders. The full effect of the disease is not fully recognised and goes far beyond the pelvis. Recognition of the full scope of the disease will facilitate clinical diagnosis and allow for more comprehensive treatment than currently available. Progestins and low-dose oral contraceptives are unsuccessful in a third of symptomatic women globally, probably as a result of progesterone resistance. Oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists constitute an effective and tolerable therapeutic alternative when first-line medications do not work. The development of GnRH antagonists has resulted in oral drugs that have fewer side-effects than other therapies and has allowed for rapid movement between treatments to optimise and personalise endometriosis care. In this Review, we discuss the latest understanding of endometriosis as a systemic disease with multiple manifestations outside the parameters of classic gynaecological disease.

The Long-Term Effect of Dienogest on Bone Mineral Density After Surgical Treatment of Endometrioma

The aim of this study was to evaluate the changing pattern of bone mineral density (BMD) levels after 3 years of dienogest use post endometrioma surgery and investigate the possible predictive factors for BMD reduction. This retrospective study included 44 reproductive-aged women who took dienogest (2 mg/day) and followed up BMD for 3 years after laparoscopic endometrioma surgery from July 2013 to December 2018. In addition, to investigate the predictive factors in the group with decreased BMD, analysis was added for patients with decreased BMD after taking dienogest for 1 year post laparoscopic endometrioma surgery. After 3 years of treatment with dienogest, BMD of both the lumbar spine (- 4.4%) and femur neck (- 3.6%) decreased significantly compared to the baseline levels. Bone loss predominantly occurred during the first year of treatment in the lumbar spine (- 2.4%) and gradually decreased with time during the treatment period. The predictive factors for BMD reduction after dienogest use were evaluated based on a 1-year change in BMD levels of 160 women, but no associated factors were found. This study demonstrated that dienogest use for 3 years was associated with a significant and gradual decrease in BMD and no predictive factors for BMD reduction during the first year of treatment with dienogest were found. These results may be useful in counseling patients regarding long-term effects of dienogest use on reducing BMD levels so that appropriate preventive measures can be taken.

New treatment strategy for endometriosis using progestin-primed ovarian stimulation with dienogest: A prospective cohort study, comparison of dienogest versus dydrogesterone

Dienogest (DNG) is an oral progestin effective for the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis, such as reduction of endometrial lesion and control of pain intensity. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is a new controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) regimen, and several reports have shown that dydrogesterone (DYG) is an appropriate progestin for PPOS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of DNG in patients undergoing PPOS during COH in comparison with DYG. This was a prospective, cohort, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial of 150 women with endometriosis undergoing assisted reproductive technology between February 2018 and May 2020 at the single fertility center. The assignment to each protocol was based on the optimal treatment for each patient. Patients taking DNG 2 mg continuously were assigned in the DNG group(n = 73). The other patients were allocated in DYG group(n = 77). All viable embryos were cryopreserved for subsequent transfer. The main outcome measures were the mature oocyte and fertilization rates. During this study, no premature LH surge was detected. A smaller number of oocytes were retrieved in the DNG group than in the DYG group (6.18 ± 3.60 vs. 9.85 ± 5.77); however, the rate of mature oocytes was significantly higher in the DNG group than in the DYG group (89.1 % vs. 78.9 %). The fertilization rate was comparable between two groups. Therefore, patients taking DNG for PPOS can continue endometriosis treatment and obtain good-quality embryos during COH. Further prospective randomized-controlled trial should be performed to confirm of this novel strategy of DNG.

A case of hemorrhagic shock occurred during dienogest therapy for uterine adenomyosis

We present a case of hemorrhagic shock occurred during dienogest therapy for uterine adenomyosis which necessitated an emergency hysterectomy. The patient was a 45-year-old woman with adenomyosis. Magnetic resonance imaging showed type I adenomyosis measuring 10 cm. She had a history of intimal thrombectomy of pulmonary embolism and had been receiving warfarin and aspirin until the onset of the hemorrhagic shock. Following 6-month of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue, dienogest was commenced. Nine months after switching to dienogest, the patient experienced a persistent abnormal uterine bleeding for 2 weeks, eventually causing a massive bleeding and was transferred to our emergency room. A diagnosis of hemorrhagic shock with a severe anemia (hemoglobin 3.6 g/dL) was made. Despite blood transfusion and warfarin antagonization, continuous bleeding ≥150 g/h was not controlled. Emergent hysterectomy was opted and enabled hemostasis. Although the number of patients with adenomyosis who can avoid surgery by dienogest is increasing, care must be taken during dienogest therapy, especially in patients with anticoagulants and after gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue treatment. To prevent such a critical event, careful management including patient education should be carried out.

Do high-dose progestins impair sexual function in women treated for endometriosis? A prospective observational longitudinal study

INTRODUCTION

High-dose progestins are used as an effective therapy for painful symptoms of endometriosis but their impact on sexual function has been poorly studied. The study aims to assess the impact of high-dose progestin on sexual function among women treated for endometriosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this bicenter prospective observational study, women with endometriosis who received medical or surgical treatment for endometriosis and who were sexually active were included. They completed the Sexual Activity Questionnaire (SAQ, a validated tool) before (T0) and 12 months after (T1) endometriosis treatment. We classified patients into two groups according to whether they were using high-dose progestins at T1: a high-dose progestin group and a control group. The main outcome was sexual function measured by the SAQ score (from 0 to 30) at T1. The secondary outcomes were each individual SAQ item, the dyspareunia 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) and the quality of life assessed with EuroQoL Group 5D Index (EQ-5D) at T1. We also assessed the change in dyspareunia VAS and quality of life between T0 and T1. The Ethics Committee of Ile-de-France (Act 2004-806, 9 August 2004) approved the study.

RESULTS

Among 214 women included, 25 (12%) were exposed to high-dose progestins at T1. The SAQ score of women exposed to high-dose progestins was significantly lower compared with the control group, with or without adjustment for covariates (15.5 ± 6.3 vs 18.3 ± 6.2, P = .03, adjusted effect size -0.44 [95% CI -0.86 to -0.02], P = .04). High-dose progestin intake at T1 was associated with a lower subscore on two SAQ items: pleasure (1.8 ± 0.8 vs 2.2 ± 0.9, P = .02), and satisfaction with frequency of intercourse (1.2 ± 1.2 vs 1.8 ± 1.1, P = .02). In the overall population, dyspareunia VAS and quality of life assessed by EQ-5D improved between T0 and T1 (45 ± 29 at T0 vs 28 ± 29 at T1, P < .001; 0.78 ± 0.14 at T0 vs 0.86 ± 0.14 at T1, P < .001, respectively). At T1, the groups did not differ significantly for dyspareunia VAS (effect size 0.36 [95% CI -0.06 to 0.78], P = .10) and quality of life (EQ-5D, effect size 0.02 [95% CI -0.40 to 0.44], P = .91).

CONCLUSION

In this observational study, high-dose progestins impair the sexual function of women treated for endometriosis even though they improved dyspareunia.

Risk factors for non-response and discontinuation of Dienogest in endometriosis patients: A cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Progestins are commonly prescribed first-line drugs for endometriosis. High rates of non-response and intolerance to these drugs have been previously reported. However, no study to date has investigated the characteristics and comorbidities of patients taking progestins in relation to treatment outcomes, so identifying which patients will respond to or tolerate the treatment is currently impossible. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to identify risk factors for non-response and discontinuation of Dienogest (DNG) in women with endometriosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study including women currently taking, or newly prescribed, DNG for endometriosis-associated pain presenting in the Endometriosis Clinic of the University Hospital of Bern between January 2017 and May 2018. Women with initiation of treatment directly after surgery for endometriosis were excluded. For all participants the symptoms and comorbidities were documented. Effectiveness, tolerability and discontinuation of DNG were the primary end points. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression models were carried out to identify risk factors for non-response, intolerance and discontinuation of DNG.

RESULTS

A sufficient or excellent treatment response was reported by 85/125 (68%) participants. Genital bleeding during the DNG treatment was negatively (OR 0.185, 95% CI 0.056-0.610, P = .006) and rASRM endometriosis stages III and IV were positively (OR 3.876, 95% CI 1.202-12.498, P = .023) correlated with the DNG response. When accounting for exclusively pretreatment factors, primary dysmenorrhea (OR 0.236, 95% CI 0.090-0.615, P = .003) and suspicion of adenomyosis (OR 0.347, 95% CI 0.135-0.894, P = .028) were inversely correlated with DNG response, and the latter was also correlated with treatment discontinuation (OR 3.189, 95% CI 1.247-8.153, P = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

Genital bleeding during the DNG treatment and low rASRM stages are independent risk factors for DNG non-response. Before treatment initiation, primary dysmenorrhea and suspicion of adenomyosis correlate with DNG non-response. The results could assist the clinician first to provide detailed information to women before treatment initiation, second to identify and possibly modify in-therapy factors correlated to treatment effectiveness and lastly to switch treatment on time if needed.

Comparison of effect of preoperative dienogest and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist administration on laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometriomas

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of preoperative dienogest (DNG) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist administration on the improvement of preoperative symptoms and surgical outcomes in patients who underwent laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometriomas.

METHODS

Seventy patients who were scheduled for laparoscopic surgery were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups: 35 patients who received DNG for 4 months preoperatively (group D) and 35 patients who received low-dose sustained-release goserelin acetate for 4 months preoperatively (group G). Preoperative outcomes, including pain score associated with endometriosis, using the numerical rating scale (NRS), adverse events of hormonal therapy and Kupperman index (KI) before and after treatment, surgical outcomes including total surgical duration and blood loss, and postoperative recurrence of endometrioma were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Regarding preoperative symptoms, NRS and KI at 4 months after preoperative hormonal therapy were significantly lower in group D than in group G (NRS, 5.3 ± 5.5 vs. 2.7 ± 3.9; P = 0.01; KI, 16.0 ± 11.0 vs. 9.2 ± 7.6; P = 0.006). Regarding adverse events, the incidence of hot flashes was significantly lower in group D than in group G (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the incidence of breast pain and metrorrhagia was significantly higher in group D than in group G (P = 0.04 and P < 0.001, respectively). The total surgical duration and blood loss were not significantly different between the groups. At 12 months after surgery, ovarian endometrioma did not recur in either group.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative administration of DNG is more valuable for patients with endometriosis and scheduled for laparoscopic surgery to improve symptoms with good efficacy and tolerability than the administration of GnRH agonist.

Medical therapy options for endometriosis related pain, which is better? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Our objective was to assess and rank different pharmacological interventions for relieving endometriosis-related pain. We conducted an online bibliographic search in different databases from their inception until March 2019. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed different medical therapies in the management of endometriosis-related pain. We applied this network meta-analysis (NMA) based on the frequentist approach using statistical package "netmeta" (version 1.0-1) in R software. Our main outcomes were the change in severity of pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea score, non-menstrual pelvic pain score, and dyspareunia score. Overall, 36 RCTs were included in this study (patients no. = 7942). Dienogest (0.94), combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) (0.782), and elagolix (0.38) were the highest-ranked interventions for reducing the severity of pelvic pain at three months, while at six months, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues (0.75), levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) (0.73), and dienogest (0.65) were linked to more reduction in pelvic pain. The ranking p-score showed that GnRH analogues was the highest-ranked treatment for reducing dysmenorrhea at 3 months (1.00), while CHCs were the highest-ranked treatment at 6 months (0.97), followed by GnRH analogues (0.89). GnRH analogues (0.63) and elagolix (0.54) at three months while desogestrel (0.94) and CHCs (0.91) at six months were the highest-ranked treatment to reduce non-menstrual pelvic pain. GnRH analogues and elagolix were the highest-ranked pharmacologic therapies for reducing dyspareunia. In conclusion, CHCs, GnRH analogues, progesterone, and elagolix were the best approaches in reducing the pain of endometriosis.

A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, comparative study of dienogest at 1 mg/day in patients with primary and secondary dysmenorrhea

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dienogest (DNG), a progestational 19-norsteroid, in patients with primary and secondary dysmenorrhea.

DESIGN

Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

Clinical study sites in Japan.

PATIENT(S)

Ninety-four women with dysmenorrhea.

INTERVENTION(S)

Random assignment to receive DNG (1 mg/day, orally) or placebo for 12 weeks; patients treated for anemia before randomization in cases of complicated anemia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Change in the dysmenorrhea score from baseline to week 12 of treatment with visual analog scale used for pain assessment.

RESULT(S)

The DNG group was superior to the placebo group in terms of the change from baseline in the dysmenorrhea score at week 12 of treatment in patients with dysmenorrhea. In both primary and secondary dysmenorrhea, the DNG group was superior to the placebo group for each diagnostic category. The mean serum estradiol concentrations were similar between the DNG and the placebo groups. Although the incidence of irregular uterine bleeding was higher in the DNG group, there were no severe or serious events. Most events of genital bleeding were spotting or breakthrough bleeding, suggesting DNG was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION(S)

In both primary and secondary dysmenorrhea, DNG at 1 mg/day relieved pain and was well tolerated.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

JapicCTI-173547(en).

Dienogest suppresses cellular proliferation status of endometrial polyps and acts differently depending on the morphological type

Administration of Dienogest prior to hysteroscopic polypectomy is empirically performed, but the physiological effects of Dienogest on endometrial polyps are unclear. We aimed to investigate the effects of Dienogest on the proliferation and inflammation of endometrial polyps. We conducted a retrospective case study on 40 menstruating women who underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy at our hospital. We collected clinical data, and the polyps were divided by morphological appearance. The specimens obtained were immunostained for Ki67 as a marker of cellar proliferation and CD138 as a marker of plasmacytes, which are a hallmark of chronic endometritis. Dienogest significantly suppressed the proliferation status of EPs because Dienogest treatment prior to the operation significantly reduced the Ki67 index (41.25 ± 16.85 vs 7.18 ± 9.82, p < 0.01). We found that sessile-type polyps showed a significantly lower Ki67 index than the pedunculated type (12.28 ± 11.12 vs 2.09 ± 2.73, p = 0.026). The presence of CD138-positive cells was more pronounced in sessile-type polyps than in pedunculated polyps (p = 0.018). However, Dienogest treatment showed no apparent effect on inflammation status, as detected by CD138-positive cells. We revealed that Dienogest suppressed cellular proliferation, and morphological classification of endometrial polyps could be used to predict the responsiveness to Dienogest. However, Dienogest might not affect cellular inflammation.

Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and clinically recommended dose of dienogest in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinically recommended dose of dienogest (DNG; 0.5 mg/d, 1 mg/d, and 2 mg/d) in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea.

DESIGN

A phase II, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

Twenty study sites.

PATIENTS

A total of 235 patients with primary dysmenorrhea.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients were randomized to receive orally a placebo, DNG (0.5 mg/d, 1 mg/d, or 2 mg/d) or ethinylestradiol 0.02 mg/drospirenone 3 mg (an open-label reference drug) for 12 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the dysmenorrhea score at week 12 of treatment. The secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the visual analogue scale at week 12 of treatment. Subjects were assessed for lower abdominal pain and/or low back pain.

RESULTS

All DNG arms were superior to the placebo arm in terms of the change from baseline in the dysmenorrhea score. The results suggest an equal or greater effect of DNG 1 and 2 mg/d in relieving pain, when compared to the reference drug. In the safety profile of DNG, including irregular uterine bleeding, there was no obvious difference among the doses of DNG. A significant decrease in the serum estradiol concentration compared to that in the placebo arm was not observed in the DNG 1 mg/d arm but was observed in the DNG 2 mg/d arm.

CONCLUSION(S)

The results suggest that DNG at a dose of 1 mg/d is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for primary dysmenorrhea.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

JapicCTI-152977 (en).

Progesterone and Estrogen Signaling in the Endometrium: What Goes Wrong in Endometriosis?

In the healthy endometrium, progesterone and estrogen signaling coordinate in a tightly regulated, dynamic interplay to drive a normal menstrual cycle and promote an embryo-receptive state to allow implantation during the window of receptivity. It is well-established that progesterone and estrogen act primarily through their cognate receptors to set off cascades of signaling pathways and enact large-scale gene expression programs. In endometriosis, when endometrial tissue grows outside the uterine cavity, progesterone and estrogen signaling are disrupted, commonly resulting in progesterone resistance and estrogen dominance. This hormone imbalance leads to heightened inflammation and may also increase the pelvic pain of the disease and decrease endometrial receptivity to embryo implantation. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms governing progesterone and estrogen signaling supporting endometrial function and how they become dysregulated in endometriosis. Understanding how these mechanisms contribute to the pelvic pain and infertility associated with endometriosis will open new avenues of targeted medical therapies to give relief to the millions of women suffering its effects.

Is Scientific Medical Literature Related to Endometriosis Treatment Evidence-Based? A Systematic Review on Methodological Quality of Randomized Clinical Trials

Background and objectives: Informed decision-making requires the ability to identify and integrate high-quality scientific evidence in daily practice. We aimed to assess whether randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on endometriosis therapy follow methodological criteria corresponding to the RCTs' specific level in the hierarchy of evidence in such details to allow the reproduction and replication of the study. Materials and Methods: Using the keywords "therapy" and "endometriosis" and "efficacy" three bibliographic databases were searched for English written scientific articles published from 1 January 2008 to 3 March 2018. Only the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were evaluated in terms of whether they provided the appropriate level of scientific evidence, equivalent to level 1, degree 1b in the hierarchy of evidence. A list of criteria to ensure study replication and reproduction, considering CONSORT guideline and MECIR standards, was developed and used to evaluate RCTs' methodological soundness, and scores were granted. Three types of bias, namely selection bias (random sequence generation and allocation concealment), detection bias (blinding of outcome assessment), and attrition bias (incomplete outcome data) were also evaluated. Results: We found 387 articles on endometriosis therapy, of which 38 were RCTs: 30 double-blinded RCTs and 8 open-label RCTs. No article achieved the maximum score according to the evaluated methodological criteria. Even though 73.3% of the double-blinded RCTs had clear title, abstract, introduction, and objectives, only 13.3% provided precise information regarding experimental design and randomization, and also showed a low risk of bias. The blinding method was poorly reported in 43.3% of the double-blinded RCTs, while allocation concealment and random sequence generation were inadequate in 33.3% of them. Conclusions: None of the evaluated RCTs met all the methodological criteria, none had only a low risk of bias and provided sufficient details on methods and randomization to allow for the reproduction and replication of the study. Consequently, the appropriate level of scientific evidence (level 1, degree 1b) could not be granted. On endometriosis therapy, this study evaluated the quality of reporting in RCTs and not the quality of how the studies were performed.