Effect of class III and class IV obesity on oocyte retrieval complications and outcomes

Treating obesity and fertility in the era of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists

The objective of this narrative review is to advocate for improved comprehensive care of patients with obesity and infertility. Persons with an increased body mass index have less successful reproductive outcomes, and recently, new medications to treat neuroendocrine hormone imbalances are producing meaningful weight loss akin to surgical interventions. For the first time, obesity is publicly being recognized as a disease. These medications contain the newest generation of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and deserve our attention for several reasons: regardless of body mass index, many patients will be using them; it is necessary to understand the mode of action, side effects, and implications for anesthetic procedures and pregnancy; and it is important to evaluate when they could be used to improve health outcomes and/or access to fertility care.

Addressing weight bias in reproductive medicine: a call to revisit body mass index restrictions for in vitro fertilization treatment

The prevalence of obesity has doubled among reproductive-age adults in the US over the past 40 years and is projected to impact half of the population by 2030. Obesity is associated with a twofold to threefold increase in infertility, largely because of anovulation, and is associated with a lower rate of pregnancy with ovulation induction among anovulatory women. As a result of these trends and associations, in vitro fertilization (IVF) care will need to be adapted to provide safe, effective, and equitable access for patients with obesity. Research over the past 10 years has demonstrated safe sedation practices and effective procedure modifications for oocyte retrievals and embryo transfers in patients with obesity undergoing IVF treatment. We encourage IVF medical directors to revisit body mass index restrictions for IVF treatment in favor of individualized patient risk assessments to minimize weight bias and provide timely access to safe and effective IVF care for patients with obesity and infertility.

Clinical factors associated with unexpected poor or suboptimal response in Poseidon criteria patients

RESEARCH QUESTION

What clinical factors are associated with 'unexpected' poor or suboptimal responses to IVF ovarian stimulation per POSEIDON's criteria, and which AMH and AFC threshold values distinguish this population?

DESIGN

Tri-centre retrospective cohort study (2015-2017) involving first-time IVF and ICSI cycles with conventional ovarian stimulation (≥150 IU/day of FSH). Eligibility criteria included sufficient ovarian reserve markers according to POSEIDON's classification (AMH ≥1.2 ng/ml; AFC ≥5). Ovarian response categories were poor (<4 oocytes), suboptimal (4-9 oocytes) and normal (≥9 oocytes). Primary outcomes included clinical factors associated with an unexpected poor or suboptimal response to conventional ovarian stimulation using logistic regression analyses, and the threshold values of AMH and AFC predicting increased risk of such responses using ROC curves.

RESULTS

A total of 7625 patients met the inclusion criteria: 204 (9.3%) were poor and 1998 (90.7%) were suboptimal responders. Logistic regression identified significant clinical predictors for a poor or suboptimal response, including AFC, AMH, total gonadotrophin dose, gonadotrophin type and trigger type (P ≤ 0.02). The ROC curves indicated that AMH 2.87 ng/ml (AUC 0.740) and AFC 12 (AUC 0.826) were the threshold values predicting a poor or suboptimal response; AMH 2.17 ng/ml (AUC 0.741) and AFC 9 (AUC 0.835) predicted a poor response; and AMH 2.97 ng/ml (AUC 0.722) and AFC 12 (AUC 0.801) predicted a suboptimal response.

CONCLUSIONS

The threshold values of AMH and AFC predicting 'unexpected' poor or suboptimal response were higher than expected. These findings have critical implications for tailoring IVF stimulation regimens and dosages.

Bariatric Surgery Induces Alterations in the Immune Profile of Peripheral Blood T Cells

Low-grade inflammation is closely linked to obesity and obesity-related comorbidities; therefore, immune cells have become an important topic in obesity research. Here, we performed a deep phenotypic characterization of circulating T cells in people with obesity, using flow cytometry. Forty-one individuals with obesity (OB) and clinical criteria for bariatric surgery were enrolled in this study. We identified and quantified 44 different circulating T cell subsets and assessed their activation status and the expression of immune-checkpoint molecules, immediately before (T1) and 7-18 months after (T2) the bariatric surgery. Twelve age- and sex-matched healthy individuals (nOB) were also recruited. The OB participants showed higher leukocyte counts and a higher percentage of neutrophils. The percentage of circulating Th1 cells were negatively correlated to HbA1c and insulin levels. OB Th1 cells displayed a higher activation status and lower PD-1 expression. The percentage of Th17 and Th1/17 cells were increased in OB, whereas the CD4+ Tregs' percentage was decreased. Interestingly, a higher proportion of OB CD4+ Tregs were polarized toward Th1- and Th1/17-like cells and expressed higher levels of CCR5. Bariatric surgery induced the recovery of CD4+ Treg cell levels and the expansion and activation of Tfh and B cells. Our results show alterations in the distribution and phenotype of circulating T cells from OB people, including activation markers and immune-checkpoint proteins, demonstrating that different metabolic profiles are associated to distinct immune profiles, and both are modulated by bariatric surgery.

The impact of increasing body mass index on in vitro fertilization treatment, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes

BACKGROUND

Citing the risks of administering anesthesia to patients with obesity, few fertility centers offer in vitro fertilization as a treatment modality for patients with body mass indexes ≥40 kg/m2. Although previous studies have assessed clinical pregnancy and cumulative live birth rates in patients who spontaneously conceive with body mass indexes ≥50 kg/m2, there is a paucity of in vitro fertilization, obstetrical, and neonatal outcome data in patients with severe obesity who conceive after in vitro fertilization.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of increasing body mass index on in vitro fertilization, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes in patients with obesity undergoing in vitro fertilization.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study within an academic fertility center including 2069 fresh in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and frozen embryo transfer cycles from January 1, 2012 to April 30, 2020; this cohort was used to determine in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes. A second embedded cohort of 867 fresh in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and frozen embryo transfer cycles that resulted in ongoing clinical pregnancies and deliveries within a single tertiary hospital system was used to determine pregnancy, maternal, and neonatal outcomes. All patients with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 underwent consultation with a maternal-fetal medicine specialist before starting treatment and a preoperative evaluation with an anesthesiologist before oocyte retrieval. Cycles were grouped by body mass index at cycle start (30-34.9, 35-39.9, 40-44.9, 45-49.9, and ≥50 kg/m2). Log-binomial regression and Poisson regression with an offset were fitted with body mass index of 30 to 34.9 kg/m2 as the reference group, adjusting for potential confounders including oocyte age, patient age, embryo quality, transfer type, and coexisting comorbidities. The primary outcome was live birth rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, blastulation rate, miscarriage rate, incidence of preeclampsia with severe features, gestational diabetes, labor induction, cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, and birthweight.

RESULTS

There were 2069 fresh in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and frozen embryo transfer cycle starts from January 1, 2012 to April 30, 2020. Of these, 1008 cycles were in the 30 to 34.9 kg/m2 group, 547 in the 35 to 39.9 kg/m2 group, 277 in the 40 to 44.9 kg/m2 group, 161 in the 45 to 49.9 kg/m2 group, and 76 in the ≥50 kg/m2 body mass index group. Live birth rate was not significantly different between groups. The body mass index ≥50 kg/m2 group was significantly more likely to experience preeclampsia with severe features when compared with the 30 to 34.9 kg/m2 body mass index group (absolute risk reduction, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-6.67). Fertilization rate, blastulation rate, miscarriage rate, incidence of gestational diabetes, labor induction, cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, and neonatal birthweights were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with body mass indexes from 30 to 60 kg/m2 who conceived via in vitro fertilization and received comprehensive prenatal care at a tertiary care hospital, in vitro fertilization, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes were largely comparable. These data support a collaborative care approach with maternal-fetal medicine specialists and skilled anesthesiologists, reinforcing the notion that in vitro fertilization should not be withheld as a treatment modality from patients with obesity.

Higher live birth rates are associated with a normal body mass index in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy frozen embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether body mass index (BMI) was associated with live birth in patients undergoing transfer of frozen-thawed preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) embryos.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of cycles reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System.

SUBJECTS

All autologous and donor recipient PGT-A-tested cycles reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System from 2014 to 2017.

INTERVENTION(S)

Body mass index.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome measure was the live birth rate, and the secondary outcome measures were the clinical pregnancy and biochemical pregnancy rates. Multivariable generalized additive mixed models and log-binomial models were used to model the relationship between BMI and outcome measures.

RESULT(S)

A total of 77,018 PGT-A cycles from 55,888 patients were analyzed. Of these cycles, 70,752 were autologous, and 6,266 were donor recipient. In autologous cycles, a statistically significant and clear nonlinear relationship was observed between the BMI and live birth rates, with the highest birth rates observed for the BMI range of 23-24.99 kg/m2. When using 23-24.99 kg/m2 as the referent, other BMI ranges demonstrated a lower probability of live birth and clinical pregnancy that continued to decrease as the BMI moved further from the reference value. Patients with a BMI of <18.5 kg/m2 had a 11% lower probability of live birth, whereas those with a BMI of ≥40 kg/m2 had a 27% lower probability than the referent.

CONCLUSION(S)

A normal-weight BMI range of 23-24.99 kg/m2 was associated with the highest probability of clinical pregnancy and live birth after a frozen-thawed PGT-A-tested blastocyst transfer in both autologous and donor recipient cycles. A BMI outside the range of 23-24.99 kg/m2 is likely associated with a malfunction in the implantation process, which is presumed to be related to a uterine factor and not an oocyte factor, as both autologous and donor recipient cycle outcomes were associated similarly with the BMI of the intended parent.

CD8+ Treg cells play a role in the obesity-associated insulin resistance

Obesity-related chronic low-grade inflammation may trigger insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes (T2D) development. Cells with regulatory phenotype have been shown to be reduced during obesity, especially CD4+ Treg cells. However, little is known about the CD8+ Treg cells. Therefore, we aim to characterize the CD8+ Treg cells in human peripheral blood and adipose tissue, specifically, to address the effect of obesity and insulin resistance in this regulatory immune cell population. A group of 42 participants with obesity (OB group) were recruited. Fourteen of them were evaluated pre- and post-bariatric surgery. A group of age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers (n = 12) was also recruited (nOB group). CD8+ Treg cell quantification and phenotype were evaluated by flow cytometry, in peripheral blood (PB), subcutaneous (SAT), and visceral adipose tissues (VAT). The OB group displayed a higher percentage of CD8+ Treg cells in PB, compared to the nOB. In addition, they were preferentially polarized into Tc1- and Tc1/17-like CD8+ Treg cells, compared to nOB. Moreover, SAT displayed the highest content of CD8+ Tregs infiltrated, compared to PB or VAT, while CD8+ Tregs infiltrating VAT displayed a higher percentage of cells with Tc1-like phenotype. Participants with pre-diabetes displayed a reduced percentage of TIM-3+CD8+ Tregs in circulation, and PD-1+CD8+ Tregs infiltrated in the VAT. An increase in the percentage of circulating Tc1-like CD8+ Treg cells expressing PD-1 was observed post-surgery. In conclusion, obesity induces significant alterations in CD8+ Treg cells, affecting their percentage and phenotype, as well as the expression of important immune regulatory molecules.

Impact of body mass index on surgical case durations in an academic medical center

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between patient body mass index (BMI) and operating room duration.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

SETTING

Demographic data and anesthesia/surgical times for adult surgical patients at University of Virginia Health between August 2017 and February 2019 were collected and analyzed.

PATIENTS

A total of 31,548 cases were included in the final analysis. 55% of patients were female, and 51% were classified as ASA Physical Status 2. The mean operating room (OR) duration was 144.2 min ± 112.7 (median = 118, IQR = 121). Orthopedic surgery (32%) was the most common surgery.

MEASUREMENTS

Linear mixed effects models were used to examine whether procedure intervals differed across three BMI categories (BMI < 30, 30 ≤ BMI < 40, BMI ≥ 40), considering within-surgeon correlations. Surgical times were log-transformed to correct for positive skewness.

MAIN RESULTS

The average time in the operating room was longer for patients with higher BMI (mean ± SD [median, IQR] = 139.5 ± 111.2 [113.0, IQR = 114], 150.2 ± 115.4 [125, IQR = 127], and 153.1 ± 111.1 [130, IQR = 134] for BMI < 30, 30 ≤ BMI < 40, and BMI ≥ 40), respectively. We found a 2% [95% CI = 1-3%] and 3% [95% CI = 1-5%] increase in OR time for 30 ≤ BMI < 40 and BMI ≥ 40, respectively, compared to BMI < 30, after controlling for within-surgeon correlations and covariates. The excess time was primarily determined by anesthesia times.

CONCLUSION

In an academic hospital, patients with BMI ≥ 30 required more time in the operating room than patients with BMI < 30, when controlling for confounders. This information can be incorporated into modern-day OR scheduling software, potentially resulting in more accurate case duration estimates that reduce waiting and improve OR efficiency.

Patient perceptions of body mass index restrictions limiting fertility care for women with high body mass index

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the patient experience of women with high body mass index (BMI) with BMI restrictions that limit fertility care?

DESIGN

Qualitative study using in-depth, semi-structured interview methodology. Interview transcripts were analysed for iterative themes in accordance with principles of grounded theory.

RESULTS

Forty women with a BMI of 35 kg/m2 or higher with scheduled or completed appointment at the Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (REI) clinic completed an interview. Most participants experienced BMI restrictions as unjust. Many perceived that BMI restrictions on fertility care may be medically justified and were in support of weight loss discussions to improve chances of pregnancy; however, several argued that they should have autonomy to commence treatment following an individualized risk assessment. Participants offered recommendations to improve discussion of BMI restrictions and weight loss, including framing the conversation as supportive of their reproductive goals and offering proactive referral to weight loss support to prevent the perception that BMI is a categorical exclusion to future fertility care.

CONCLUSIONS

Participant experiences highlight a need for enhanced strategies for communicating BMI restrictions and weight loss recommendations in ways that are perceived to be supportive of patients' fertility goals without further contributing to weight bias and stigma experienced in medical settings. Opportunities for training to mitigate experiences of weight stigma may be beneficial for clinical and non-clinical staff. Evaluation of BMI policies should be undertaken within the context of clinic policies that permit or prohibit fertility care for other high-risk groups.

Bariatric surgery and reproduction-implications for gynecology and obstetrics

As the rates of obesity continue to rise across the world, there has been an increasing resort to bariatric surgery amongst the options for treatment. Through the reproductive lifespan, between menarche and menopause, women might benefit from this surgical intervention, which may have a bearing on other aspects of their health. The consequences of bariatric surgery have been reported and evaluated from various perspectives in obstetrics and gynecology. Fertility and sexuality are enhanced, but not all gynecological diseases are ameliorated. There are also psychological and behavioral sequelae to be cognizant of. With multi-disciplinary and responsive care, most post-bariatric pregnancies have satisfactory outcomes. The effects of bariatric surgery on the babies conceived thereafter remains a subject of interest, whereas the possible effect on the climacteric is speculative.

Reproductive Surgery in Females with Obesity: Reproductive Consequences of Obesity and Applications for Surgical Care

Obesity is the most common medical problem in women of reproductive age. The surgical applications for this population, many of who are interested in current or future fertility, are critical to safe and effective evaluation and management of issues that impact the reproductive system. As rates of obesity continue to rise worldwide, it is projected that one in two individuals will have obesity by 2030 leading to increasing numbers of individuals affected by a disease process that has implications for their gynecologic surgical care, fertility-related assessment, and infertility treatment. Offering patients with obesity access to safe reproductive surgery is a cornerstone of reproductive autonomy. This review will summarize current recommendations regarding surgical concepts for the operating room, office hysteroscopy, oocyte retrieval, and embryo transfer in female patients with obesity.

Obesity and In Vitro Fertilization

Obesity is a highly prevalent chronic disease with a significant effect on reproductive-age women. The clinical implications of obesity on fertility and pregnancy are well studied citing ovulatory dysfunction, hormonal imbalances, higher miscarriage rates, and increased maternal and neonatal risks. For this reason, many patients with obesity seek reproductive specialists to help build their families. Despite this literature base, the effect of weight loss interventions prior to assisted reproductive technology (ART) is lacking. This review aims to outline the impact of obesity on ART, specifically in vitro fertilization (IVF). Response differences to treatment protocols compared with normal weight counterparts, limitations of access to care, and the mixed results of weight-reduction strategies prior to fertility treatment will be addressed. The known data surrounding benefits of lifestyle modification, pharmacologic therapies, and surgical interventions for obesity prior to IVF are outlined and found to emphasize a need for further research to determine the optimal approach for infertility patients with obesity.

Weight Bias in Reproductive Medicine: A Curiously Unexplored Frontier

Obesity has been associated with a multitude of medical comorbidities, infertility, and adverse obstetric outcomes. Weight stigma and weight bias pervade not only the medical field but also education, employment, and activities of daily living. The experience of weight stigma has been shown to adversely impact not only the mental health of individuals with overweight or obesity but also worsen obesogenic behaviors, and medical comorbidities. This review frames the rise of weight stigma and weight bias within the context of the "obesity epidemic" and explores its associations with infertility and decreased access to health care and its subsequent impact on the lives of individuals. Furthermore, it explores the concepts of intrinsic and extrinsic weight stigma/bias and highlights the need for further examination and research into the impact of these factors on access to reproductive medicine and subsequent outcomes.

Body Size, Fertility, and Reproductive Justice: Examining the Complex Interplay between BMI, Reproductive Health, and Access to Care

The relationship between obesity and reproduction is highly complex. While there are clear obstetrical and fertility risks associated with elevated BMI, it is less clear how weight loss impacts these outcomes. Increasingly, patients considered obese according to BMI are being denied access to fertility care, thus leaving them without treatment options for their disease (infertility). Notably, BMI cutoffs disproportionately affect historically marginalized populations in the United States and people of lower socioeconomic status (SES). This paper uses a reproductive justice framework to discuss access to reproductive healthcare based on BMI. In doing so, we connect obesity to larger systems of structural inequalities. We conclude that rather than strict BMI cutoffs, a more holistically patient-centered approach is appropriate taking into account the overall health of the individual, available scientific data, clinical capabilities, and the patient’s value system. This will ultimately make reproductive medicine more accessible to all patients.

Provision of fertility services for women at increased risk of complications during fertility treatment or pregnancy: an Ethics Committee opinion

This opinion addresses the ethics of providing fertility treatment to women at elevated risk from fertility treatment or pregnancy. It is ethically appropriate for providers to treat women who are at elevated risk provided that the women are carefully assessed, that specialists in their medical condition are consulted as appropriate, and that they are fully informed about the risks, benefits, and alternatives, which may include oocyte or embryo donation, use of a gestational surrogate, declining fertility treatment, and adoption. Providers also may conclude that the medical risks of fertility treatment for a given patient are too high, in which case it is ethical for them for them to decline to provide treatment. Such determinations must be made in a medically objective and unbiased manner, and patients must be fully informed of the decision and its rationale. Counseling for these women should incorporate the most current knowledge available, with cognizance of the woman's personal determinants in relation to her reproductive desires. In this way, both the physician and the patient will optimize decision making in an ethically sound, patient-supportive context. This document replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2016 (Fertil Steri 2016;106:1319-23).

The effect of Propofol versus Dexmedetomidine as anesthetic agents for oocyte pick-up on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine over different timescales on the IVF outcomes for transvaginal oocyte retrieval (TVOR). Twenty-four rats included in the study were divided into two main groups and three subgroups were subjected to the ovulation induction process. Group 1 was administered propofol (100 mg/kg i.v.) and group 2 were administered dexmedetomidine (25 µg/kg i.p.) The oviduct collection procedure was completed within 15 min for subgroup Pro15min, Dex15min (n = 4), within 16 to 30 min for subgroup Pro30min, Dex30min (n = 4) and within 31 to 60 min for subgroup Pro60min, Dex60min (n = 4) after euthanasia. The total number of oocytes was counted. After in vitro fertilization, the number and quality of embryos were evaluated. The number of pups born were evaluated after embryo transfer. The embryo number, quality and pup count decreased as the administration time for propofol increased (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between the dexmedetomidine subgroups for embryo number, quality and pup count(p > 0.05). As the exposure time to propofol increased, the number and quality of embryos obtained, and the pup count, decreased. The use of dexmedetomidine had no negative impacts on the number of embryos, their quality or the number of pups.

Obesity and reproduction: a committee opinion

The purpose of this American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee report is to provide clinicians with principles and strategies for the evaluation and treatment of couples with infertility associated with obesity. This revised document replaces the Practice Committee document titled "Obesity and reproduction: an educational bulletin" last published in 2015 (Fertil Steril 2015;104:1116-26).

Live birth outcomes in infertile patients with class III and class IV obesity following fresh embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

Assess the effect of class III (body mass index [BMI, kg/m2] 40-49.9) and class IV obesity (≥ 50) on clinical pregnancy and live birth outcomes after first oocyte retrieval and fresh embryo transfer cycle.

DESIGN

Cohort study SETTING: Academic center PATIENTS: Patients undergoing their first oocyte retrieval with planned fresh embryo transfer in our clinic between 01/01/2012 and 12/31/2018. Patients were stratified by BMI: 18.5-24.9 (n = 4913), 25-29.9 (n = 1566) 30-34.9 (n = 559), 35-39.9 (n = 218), and ≥ 40 (n = 114).

INTERVENTION

None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Live birth rate RESULTS: Following embryo transfer, there were no differences in pregnancy rates across all BMI groups (p value, linear trend = 0.86). However among pregnant patients, as BMI increased, a significant trend of a decreased live birth rate was observed (p value, test for linear trend = 0.004). Additionally, as BMI increased, a significant trend of an increased miscarriage rate was observed (p value, linear trend = < 0.001). Compared to the normal-weight cohort, women with a BMI ≥ 40 had a significantly higher rate of cancelled fresh transfers after retrieval (18.4% vs. 8.2%, OR 2.51; 95%CI 1.55-4.08). Among singleton deliveries, a significant trend of an increased c-section rate was identified as the BMI increased (p value, linear trend = <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Overall, patients with a BMI > 40 have worse IVF treatment outcomes compared to normal-weight patients. After embryo transfer, their pregnancy rate is comparable to normal-weight women; however, their miscarriage rate is higher, leading to a lower live birth rate for pregnant women in this population. Patients with a BMI > 40 have a c-section rate that is 50% higher than normal-weight patients.

Impact of class III obesity on outcomes and complications of transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte pickup

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of class III obesity on outcomes and complications of transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte pickup (OPU).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Hospital-based fertility clinic.

PATIENTS

All women undergoing OPU procedures during autologous in vitro fertilization (IVF) and oocyte banking cycles, grouped by patient body mass index (BMI: <25, 25-29.9, 30-34.9, 35-39.9, ≥40 kg/m2).

INTERVENTIONS

Transvaginal OPU under conscious sedation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sedation and procedure-related parameters and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 2,141 OPU procedures in 1,579 patients were analyzed, including 121 OPU procedures in 94 patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2. There was a statistically significant increase in total fentanyl and midazolam doses and procedure duration as BMI increased. Compared with patients with BMI <25 kg/m2, those with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 were more likely to require additional sedation during the procedure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-3.49). The rate of difficult access was 28.9% for procedures with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 compared with 5.2% with BMI <25 kg/m2 (aOR 7.57; 95% CI, 4.66-12.29). The OPU was incomplete due to inaccessible follicles through a transvaginal approach in 18.2% of procedures with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 compared with 1.3% with BMI <25 kg/m2 (aOR 16.94; 95% CI, 8.24-34.84). The rates of sedation and procedure-related complications were low, and none occurred in patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no increased risk of complications for women with class III obesity undergoing OPU with conscious sedation. However, the operator was more likely to encounter difficult access and to incompletely aspirate follicles through a transvaginal approach.

Update on the management of poor ovarian response in IVF: the shift from Bologna criteria to the Poseidon concept

Despite the considerate progress to which assisted reproduction technology (ART) has been subject since 1978, some issues remain unresolved. Notably, the clinical management of patients with a poor ovarian response is still a challenge in everyday practice, frustrating to both the patient and the fertility expert. Poor ovarian responders (PORs) embody 9–24% of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation, meaning that up to one in four patients conceals a poor reproductive prognosis. The last decade has witnessed the attempts of the medical community to standardize diagnosis of POR with the developing of the Bologna Criteria and the subsequent evolution of the low prognosis patient elaborated in the POSEIDON classification. The aim of this article is to summarize all evidence concerning etiology and management of poor ovarian response, including the most recent advances and future prospects in this regard.