Drugged driving arrests in Norway before and after the implementation of per se law

Driving under the influence of cocaine and MDMA: Relationship between blood concentrations and results from clinical test of impairment

The general use of cocaine is increasing in recent years, while the trend for 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is less clear. The relationship between blood concentrations and impairment is poorly understood, which complicates interpretation. The aims of this study were to report prevalence and blood concentrations of cocaine and MDMA in drugged drivers, and to investigate the relationship between blood concentrations and impairment. Samples of whole blood were collected from apprehended drivers in the period 2000-2022, and a clinical test of impairment (CTI) was simultaneously performed. The samples were initially analyzed for cocaine and MDMA using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (until 2009 and 2012, respectively), and later using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Overall, cocaine was detected in 2,331 cases and MDMA in 2,569 cases. There were 377 and 85 mono cases of cocaine and MDMA, respectively. In the mono cases, the median cocaine concentration was 0.09 mg/L (range: 0.02-1.15 mg/L), and 54% of the drivers were clinically impaired. The median MDMA concentration was 0.19 mg/L (range: 0.04-1.36 mg/L), and 38% were clinically impaired. There was a statistically significant difference in the median cocaine concentration between drivers assessed as not impaired (0.07 mg/L) and drivers assessed as impaired (0.10 mg/L) (P = 0.009). There was also a significant effect of the blood concentration of cocaine (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-36.53, P = 0.036) and driving during the evening/night-time (aOR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.34-3.51, P = 0.002) on the probability of being assessed as impaired on the CTI. No significant differences were found for MDMA. Many drivers are not assessed as impaired on a CTI following cocaine or especially MDMA use. For cocaine, a relationship between blood concentrations and impairment was demonstrated, but this could not be shown for MDMA.

Carbon fiber-sampling combined flame ionization mass spectrometry for direct analysis of drugs in oral fluid

Drug-impaired driving poses a significant risk of collisions and other hazardous accidents, emphasizing the urgent need for simple and rapid roadside detection methods. Oral fluid, as an easily collectible and non-invasive test material, has gained widespread use in detecting drug-impaired driving. In this study, we have devised a method for direct sampling using a carbon fiber bundle combined with flame ionization mass spectrometry. The essence of this method lies in the synergy between the adsorption properties of carbon fiber and the plasma characteristics of the flame. Leveraging the strong adsorption capabilities of the carbon fiber bundle allows for the use of a minimal sample size (<100 μL) during sampling, presenting a distinct advantage in the roadside inspection and sampling process. Throughout the flame ionization process, proteins and salts within the oral fluid matrix adhere well to the carbon fiber bundle, while small molecule targets can be efficiently desorbed and react with charged species in the flame, leading to ionization. The results demonstrate the successful development of carbon fiber-sampling combined flame ionization mass spectrometry, capable of qualitative and quantitative analysis of drugs in oral fluid without the need for sample pre-treatment. Its quantitative capabilities are sufficient for real sample detection, providing an effective analytical method for the roadside detection of drugs in oral fluids.

Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map

Background

Road Traffic injuries (RTI) are among the top ten leading causes of death in the world resulting in 1.35 million deaths every year, about 93% of which occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite several global resolutions to reduce traffic injuries, they have continued to grow in many countries. Many high-income countries have successfully reduced RTI by using a public health approach and implementing evidence-based interventions. As many LMICs develop their highway infrastructure, adopting a similar scientific approach towards road safety is crucial. The evidence also needs to be evaluated to assess external validity because measures that have worked in high-income countries may not translate equally well to other contexts. An evidence gap map for RTI is the first step towards understanding what evidence is available, from where, and the key gaps in knowledge.

Objectives

The objective of this evidence gap map (EGM) is to identify existing evidence from all effectiveness studies and systematic reviews related to road safety interventions. In addition, the EGM identifies gaps in evidence where new primary studies and systematic reviews could add value. This will help direct future research and discussions based on systematic evidence towards the approaches and interventions which are most effective in the road safety sector. This could enable the generation of evidence for informing policy at global, regional or national levels.

Search Methods

The EGM includes systematic reviews and impact evaluations assessing the effect of interventions for RTI reported in academic databases, organization websites, and grey literature sources. The studies were searched up to December 2019.

Selection Criteria

The interventions were divided into five broad categories: (a) human factors (e.g., enforcement or road user education), (b) road design, infrastructure and traffic control, (c) legal and institutional framework, (d) post-crash pre-hospital care, and (e) vehicle factors (except car design for occupant protection) and protective devices. Included studies reported two primary outcomes: fatal crashes and non-fatal injury crashes; and four intermediate outcomes: change in use of seat belts, change in use of helmets, change in speed, and change in alcohol/drug use. Studies were excluded if they did not report injury or fatality as one of the outcomes.

Data Collection and Analysis

The EGM is presented in the form of a matrix with two primary dimensions: interventions (rows) and outcomes (columns). Additional dimensions are country income groups, region, quality level for systematic reviews, type of study design used (e.g., case-control), type of road user studied (e.g., pedestrian, cyclists), age groups, and road type. The EGM is available online where the matrix of interventions and outcomes can be filtered by one or more dimensions. The webpage includes a bibliography of the selected studies and titles and abstracts available for preview. Quality appraisal for systematic reviews was conducted using a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews, AMSTAR 2.

Main Results

The EGM identified 1859 studies of which 322 were systematic reviews, 7 were protocol studies and 1530 were impact evaluations. Some studies included more than one intervention, outcome, study method, or study region. The studies were distributed among intervention categories as: human factors (n = 771), road design, infrastructure and traffic control (n = 661), legal and institutional framework (n = 424), post-crash pre-hospital care (n = 118) and vehicle factors and protective devices (n = 111). Fatal crashes as outcomes were reported in 1414 records and non-fatal injury crashes in 1252 records. Among the four intermediate outcomes, speed was most commonly reported (n = 298) followed by alcohol (n = 206), use of seatbelts (n = 167), and use of helmets (n = 66). Ninety-six percent of the studies were reported from high-income countries (HIC), 4.5% from upper-middle-income countries, and only 1.4% from lower-middle and low-income countries. There were 25 systematic reviews of high quality, 4 of moderate quality, and 293 of low quality.

Authors' Conclusions

The EGM shows that the distribution of available road safety evidence is skewed across the world. A vast majority of the literature is from HICs. In contrast, only a small fraction of the literature reports on the many LMICs that are fast expanding their road infrastructure, experiencing rapid changes in traffic patterns, and witnessing growth in road injuries. This bias in literature explains why many interventions that are of high importance in the context of LMICs remain poorly studied. Besides, many interventions that have been tested only in HICs may not work equally effectively in LMICs. Another important finding was that a large majority of systematic reviews are of low quality. The scarcity of evidence on many important interventions and lack of good quality evidence-synthesis have significant implications for future road safety research and practice in LMICs. The EGM presented here will help identify priority areas for researchers, while directing practitioners and policy makers towards proven interventions.

Adaptation of a European categorization system for driving-impairing medicines in Iran

OBJECTIVE

Road traffic crashes due to impaired driving are a leading cause of preventable injuries and deaths. The purpose of this study was adaptation of a European categorization system for driving-impairing medicines in Iran.

METHODS

DRUID categorization system was used as a leading model to classify medicines. Medicines that were compatible with DRUID categorization system were identified and classified accordingly. Medicines that were not compatible with DRUID categorization system were assessed in an expert panel in terms of possiblity of classification. Instructions for health care providers and advice for patients were prepared based on the medicine's influence on fitness to drive.

RESULTS

Of the 1255 medicines in Iranian pharmacopeia, 488 medicines were classified in four categories. Among classified medicines 43.85% and 25.41% belonged to Category 0 and Category 1. About 13.94%, 10.04%, and 6.76% pertained to Category 2, Category 3, and Multiple categories respectively. Majority of the medicines with moderate and severe adverse influences on driving fitness belonged to the nervous system medicines (72.65%). Most of the medicines with non-existing or minor adverse influences on driving fitness pertained to cardiovascular medicines (16.56%). Majority of uncategorized medicines belonged to Iranian herbal medicines.

CONCLUSION

The current study disclosed that DRUID categorization system was implementable for most of the commonly prescribed medicines. Experimental studies are needed to determine the influence of uncategorized medicines of Iranian pharmacopeia. Other countries with similar settings can adapt DRUID categorization system until they develop their own model using original studies.

Categorization and labeling systems concerning driving-impairing medicines: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Classification systems concerning driving-impairing medicines can help healthcare providers identify medicinal drugs with no or the least impairing effects and inform patients of the potential risks of certain medicines to safe driving. This study aimed to comprehensively assess the characteristics of classifications and labeling systems regarding driving-impairing medicines.

METHODS

Google Scholar and several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, safetylit.org, and TRID were searched to identify the relevant published material. The retrieved material was assessed for eligibility. Data extraction was done to compare the categorization/labeling systems concerning driving-impairing medicines in terms of characteristics such as the number of categories, description of each category, and description of pictograms.

RESULTS

After screening 5,852 records, 20 studies were selected for inclusion in the review. This review identified 22 categorization/labeling systems regarding medicines and driving. Classification systems had different characteristics, but most of them were designed based on the graded categorization system described by Wolschrijn. Initially, categorization systems had seven levels, but later the medicine impacts were summarized into 3 or 4 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Although different categorization/labeling systems regarding driving-impairing medicines are available, the most effective systems in changing driver's behavior are the simple and understandable ones. Besides, health care providers should consider patient's socio-demographic features when informing them about driving under the influence.

A systematic review of factors associated with illegal drug driving

Drug driving is a serious problem worldwide that can increase the risk of road crashes. This systematic review seeks to identify factors associated with drug driving (i.e., driving after consuming drugs other than alcohol) to highlight gaps in existing knowledge and inform the design of more effective countermeasures. A search of the literature was conducted for the period January 1, 2005 to July 31, 2021 using six different databases. The search protocol followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (#CRD42021234616). Studies that met inclusion criteria compared drug drivers with either non-drug drivers, alcohol-only drivers or drug drivers from an earlier time period, to identify factors specifically associated with drug driving, rather than common to all drivers. Two hundred and nineteen publications met the inclusion criteria and were included within the review. Based on the findings, a logic model was developed that presents the factors associated with drug driving. Various sociodemographic, psychosocial and legal factors emerged as the main factors associated with illegal drug driving. At the sociodemographic and psychological levels, drug drivers were more likely to be single, young males who often drive after using cannabis and who score high on sensation-seeking and impulsivity scales. The key social factor found to be associated with drug driving was peer acceptance/disapproval of the behaviour. At the legal level, the review suggested that the effectiveness of current enforcement approaches to drug driving vary among jurisdictions around the world due to differences in the level of perceived certainty of apprehension and the chances of punishment avoidance. Future research into the anticipated and actual rewards for drug driving is needed to inform the development of more effective countermeasures.

Prevalence and concentrations of sedative-hypnotic drugs in blood of drivers involved in road traffic crashes in the Padova region of Italy - not so easy to interpret

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

This study reports the prevalence and concentrations of sedative-hypnotic drugs as exemplified by benzodiazepines (BZD) and zolpidem (Z-hypnotic) in blood samples from drivers involved in road traffic accidents (RTA) in the Padova region of Italy. Another aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of these drugs with concentrations in blood above the therapeutic intervals and above specific per se limits.

METHODS

A total of 4066 blood samples collected from drivers involved in RTA were analysed for the presence of alcohol, drugs of abuse and medicinal drugs with sedative-hypnotic properties. Prevalence of drivers positive for BZDs and zolpidem were reported according to the reporting limit of our laboratory (1 ng/mL) in a sort of zero tolerance approach and compared with the prevalence according to analytical cut-offs used in the "European Union's research project on Driving Under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines" (DRUID). The impairment-based, per se limits adopted in Norway and in England and Wales and the values used to define "therapeutic ranges" in blood and in plasma/serum were also applied to the case study.

RESULTS

175 blood samples were positive for sedative-hypnotics above 1 ng/mL, with the following prevalence: diazepam 44%, nordazepam 41.8%, lorazepam 32.6%, zolpidem 28%, oxazepam 25.6%, alprazolam 16%, delorazepam 11,6%, lormetazepam 11,6%, temazepam 11.6%, clonazepam 11.6%, triazolam 6.9%, N-desalkylflurazepam 4.6%, bromazepam 2.3%. When applying DRUID analytical cut-offs, the prevalence of BZDs and zolpidem sharply decreases. Applying the impairing cut-offs used in Norway, 56% of positive samples were above the limits equivalent to a BAC of 0.2 g/L, 39% above the limits corresponding to 0.5 g/L, and 23% above the cut-off corresponding to 1.2 g/L. Only 1% of the drivers had drug concentrations above the per se concentration limits adopted in England and Wales [26]. When comparing blood levels with therapeutic ranges in plasma, bromazepam, lormetazepam and delorazepam were often found above the highest limits. The adjustment of the concentrations with the plasma-to-blood ratios causes a significant increase of cases above the therapeutic ranges in plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

Sedative-hypnotic drugs are medicinal substances frequently identified in drivers involved in RTA, commonly in concentrations associated with driving impairment. Besides the concentrations of drugs in blood, several factors have to be considered to conclude that a driver was impaired. The frequent association with alcohol, cocaine and other BZDs, confirms the abuse potential of these medications.

Alcohol and drug consumption among motor vehicle drivers in the Brittany region of France: A 9-year cross-sectional population study

The primary objective of the present study was to evaluate the frequency of positive tests for alcohol and drugs during roadside testing or after road accidents among drivers in the Brittany region of France. The study’s secondary objective was to describe the blood concentrations of the substances found during these tests, in order to provide a scientific basis for the establishment or modification of legislative threshold values for road injuries prevention. We performed a cross-sectional study of a database compiled by Rennes University Hospital’s toxicology laboratory in the Brittany region of France between 2010 and 2018. Driver’s age, sex, and test status (positive or negative), and blood levels of ethanol, 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), methylene dioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), amphetamine, benzoylecgonine and 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM) were collected. Twelve thousand four hundred and ninety-seven drivers (males: 86.1%; median (range) age: 29 (15–94)) have provided roadside blood samples, giving a total of 25,998 test results. Among the 10,996 drivers with at least one positive test, the median blood concentrations of ethanol, THC, MDMA, amphetamine, benzoylecgonine, and 6-MAM were respectively 1.82 g/L, 2.41 ng/mL, 138.4 ng/mL, 67.7 ng/mL, 173.3 ng/mL, and 0.97 ng/mL. 1159 (10.54%) of the 10,996 drivers tested positive for two or more substances, and 151 (1.4%) tested positive for three or more substances. With the exception of heroin, the currently recommended threshold values appear to be appropriate for road injuries prevention with regard to the concentrations observed in offenders.

Blood Concentrations of Designer Benzodiazepines: Relation to Impairment and Findings in Forensic Cases

The use of designer benzodiazepines appears to be increasing in many countries, but data concerning blood concentrations are scarce, making interpretation of concentrations difficult. The aim of this study was to report blood concentrations of clonazolam, diclazepam, etizolam, flualprazolam, flubromazepam, flubromazolam and phenazepam and to investigate the relationship between blood concentrations and impairment. The concentration data are from blood samples collected from living cases (apprehended drivers and other drug offences) and medico-legal autopsies. The blood samples were analysed for the seven designer benzodiazepines mentioned above by ultra high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Positive cases from between 1 June 2016 and 30 September 2019 were included. Blood concentrations and the conclusion from a clinical test of impairment (when available) are reported. The presented seven benzodiazepines were detected in a total of 575 cases, where 554 of these cases concerned apprehended drivers or other criminal offenders. The number of findings and the median (range) concentrations were as follows: clonazolam, n = 22, 0.0041 mg/L (0.0017–0.053 mg/L); diclazepam, n = 334, 0.0096 mg/L (0.0016–0.25 mg/L); etizolam, n = 40, 0.054 mg/L (0.015–0.30 mg/L); flualprazolam, n = 10, 0.0080 mg/L (0.0033–0.056 mg/L); flubromazepam, n = 5, 0.037 mg/L (0.0070–0.70 mg/L); flubromazolam, n = 20, 0.0056 mg/L (0.0004–0.036 mg/L); and phenazepam, n = 138, 0.022 mg/L (0.0018–0.85 mg/L). A designer benzodiazepine was the only drug detected with relevance for impairment in 25 of the 554 living cases. The physician concluded with impairment in 19 of the 25 cases. Most of the concentrations in these cases were relatively similar to or higher than the median reported concentrations. The most frequent other drugs detected were amphetamine, tetrahydrocannabinol, clonazepam and methamphetamine. The presented blood concentrations can be helpful with the interpretation of cases involving one or more of these seven benzodiazepines. The results indicate that concentrations commonly observed in forensic cases are associated with impairment.

The implementation of per-se limits for driving under the influence of benzodiazepines and related drugs: No increased risk for arrest during therapeutic use in Norway

Objective: To investigate whether the use of recommended therapeutic doses of medicinal drugs has led to suspicion of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) after implementation of legislative limits for illicit and medicinal drugs in 2012.Methods: Data from suspected drug-impaired drivers apprehended by the police from 2013 to 2015 were selected from the Norwegian Forensic Toxicology Database. The blood samples had been analyzed for benzodiazepines (BZDs), z-hypnotics, opioids, stimulants, certain hallucinogens, and alcohol. Drivers who tested positive for one BZD or a z-hypnotic only, were included in the study. Drug concentrations measured in their blood samples were compared to the maximal obtainable steady state concentrations if the drug had been used in accordance with the recommendations set by the Norwegian Directorate of Health.Results: BZDs or z-hypnotics were found in 10 248 samples, representing 59.6% of the total number of drivers arrested for suspected DUID (n = 17 201). Only one BZD or z-hypnotic with a blood drug concentration above the legislative limit was detected in 390 (2.3%) of the total number of samples. Clonazepam was the most frequently detected BZD (n = 4656), while as a single drug above the legislative limit, it was detected in only 3.6% (n = 168) of the clonazepam-positive blood samples. For drivers testing positive for only one z-hypnotic, drug concentrations above the legislative limit were found in 27% (n = 55) of the blood samples that tested positive for zolpidem and 12.4% (n = 53) of the samples that tested positive for zopiclone. In total, 155 subjects out of 10 248 testing positive for BZDs or z-hypnotics displayed concentrations above the legislative limit but within the concentration ranges that are expected when taking recommended therapeutic drug doses, and 77 below the legislativel limit.Conclusions: The results show that the implementation of legislative limits for BZDs and z-hypnotics may have contributed to DUID suspicion for a small group of patients using therapeutic drug doses; only 1.3% of the suspected DUID offenders had concentrations of only one of those drugs in-line with recommended therapeutic dosing.

THC-influenced drivers in the new Danish 3-level offense system

Objective: The objectives of the study were to describe the distribution of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-influenced drivers in a new Danish 3-level offense system and discuss the consequences of the changed legislation.Methods: By request of the police, blood of individuals suspected of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) in Funen and Southern Jutland was sampled by medical staff and shipped to the Section of Forensic Toxicology of the University of Southern Denmark in Odense. Samples from individuals suspected for driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC) were stored at 5 °C prior to immediate analysis, and THC content in whole-blood samples was established by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. Quantitative results for blood THC levels were available from 2017 and 2018, resulting in 2,206 eligible cases. Data before and after the legal change on December 15, 2017, were extracted from the department's laboratory information management system.Results: With the new graduated sanctions introduced in December 2017, 70% of the DUIC suspects faced milder sanctions. The number of DUIC cases has been increasing and has almost doubled in the last 4 years, from 648 cases in 2015 to 1,206 in 2018. Correspondingly, the total number of DUID cases increased by 80% from 898 cases in 2015 to 1,614 cases in 2018. The concentration of THC in blood was above the legal limit of 0.001 mg/kg in 73% of the cases; 18% had concentrations categorized as low, 32% as medium, and 22% as high.Conclusion: We found that more than two-thirds of the THC offenders faced milder sanctions compared to before the new legislation, suggesting that the new graduated legislation has had a significant impact. The current trend is a steadily increasing number of DUID cases. We believe that the continual increase is caused by a combination of factors, including increased police awareness and training of police personnel along with improved roadside screening abilities.

Cannabis and alcohol in road traffic: an overview

Traffic medicine is an important part within the scope of concerns of forensic medicine. We are dealing with consequences of traffic accidents – fatal or survived – but this problem overlaps the borders of our specialization. Sustained injuries are the focus of various fields of medicine and in combination with alcohol and illicit drugs abuse this issue is growing. The following review has an ambition to bring more light into the problem concerning the effect of alcohol and cannabis (which is the most common illicit drug used worldwide) on driving abilities.

A review of drug abuse in recently reported cases of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) in Asia, USA, and Europe

Driving Under the Influence of Drugs (DUID) is considered a serious issue related to the abuse of illegal drugs. DUID cases, including deaths, are being continuously reported in Asia, USA, and Europe. This literature review focuses on illegal drug abuse in recent DUID cases reported in Asia, USA, and Europe. To determine illegal drug abuse in DUID suspects, previous studies collected and analyzed biological samples, such as blood, urine, oral fluids, and hair. In addition, there were forensic autopsies and surveys for investigation of illegal drugs in DUID cases and drivers. In previous studies, ketamine, morphine, methamphetamine (MA), and khat were mainly reported in Asia, whereas amphetamine, benzodiazepines (BZDs), and cannabinoids were mainly reported in USA, and synthetic cannabinoids (SCs), opiates, and cocaine were mainly reported in Europe. Since DUID suspects related to illegal drugs have been frequently reported in Asia, USA, and Europe, there is a need to plan for national monitoring for drivers or motor vehicles to regulate and prevent drug abuse and relevant DUID cases.

Driving under the influence of drugs: Prevalence in road traffic accidents in Italy and considerations on per se limits legislation

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to present the prevalence and concentrations of drugs in blood samples of drivers involved in road traffic accidents (RTAs) and to discuss the effects of adopting different concentration cutoff values proposed or applied in other European countries on the number of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) offenses.

METHODS

Blood samples from drivers involved in RTAs in Padova province from 2014 to 2017 were analyzed for the presence of alcohol and drugs. The prevalence of positive subjects was reported for each substance adopting the limits of quantification (LOQs) of our laboratory and the concentration cutoff values proposed and/or used in other European countries. The reduction of cases of driving under the influence of illicit drugs in applying different cutoffs was calculated.

RESULTS

Four thousand four hundred forty-three blood samples were analyzed: 23.7% were positive for alcohol and 19.9% for psychoactive drugs, with prevalences of polydrug and alcohol-drug abuse of 4.5 and 6%, respectively. The most frequently detected drugs were cannabinoids (9.7%) and cocaine (7.2%), followed by benzodiazepines (4.1%), opiates (1.9%), and other opioids (1.7%). Barbiturates, amphetamines, and ketamine were identified in a much smaller number of cases. The overall decrease in DUID cases when adopting different cutoffs with respect to cases above the LOQs was between 8 and 84%. The adoption of high LOQs such as those used in the European Union's research project on Driving Under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines (DRUID) decreases the hypothetical number of DUID offenses by a quarter, and per se limits proposed as broadly equivalent to a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) between 0.2 and 0.8 g/L dramatically reduce the cases of DUID (cocaine -81%, cannabis -79%, opioids -97%, opiates -96%, and amphetamines -77%); no ketamine-positive samples were above the cutoff.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of high analytical limits or per se limits based on impairing concentrations in the Italian legislation could result in the prosecution of a much lower number of drugged drivers involved in RTAs, with a decrease from 25% to more than 80% depending on the limits.

Driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs in the eastern part of Denmark in 2015 and 2016: Abuse patterns and trends

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to examine the frequency of psychoactive drugs and alcohol in drivers under suspicion of driving under the influence of drugs and alcohol in 2015 and 2016 in the eastern part of Denmark. The trends in the number of traffic cases sent for drug analysis since 2000 and alcohol analysis since 2011 are also discussed.

METHODS

Blood samples from drivers suspected of being under the influence of alcohol and/or medication and/or illicit drugs in 2015 and 2016 were investigated as requested by the police. The blood samples were screened for alcohol and/or tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) alone, for other drugs (covering all drugs, except THC, listed in the Danish list of narcotic drugs), or for THC and other drugs. Age and gender were also recorded. The number of drug traffic cases since 2000 and the number of alcohol cases since 2011 were extracted from our Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS).

RESULTS

In total, 11,493 traffic cases were investigated. Alcohol and/or drugs exceeded the legal limit in 9,657 (84%) cases. Men constituted 95% of the drivers investigated for drugs and 88% of the alcohol cases. The drivers investigated for drugs consisted primarily of young men, whereas drivers investigated for alcohol were older. The frequency was higher for positive alcohol cases above the legal limit (87%) than for drug cases (76%) above the fixed concentration limit. THC (67-69%) was the most frequently detected drug above the legal limit, followed by cocaine (27-28.5%), amphetamine (17%), and clonazepam (6-7%) in both years. Morphine (5.4%), included among the 5 most frequent drugs in 2015, was replaced by methadone (4.6%) in 2016. Few new psychoactive drugs (NPS) were detected. The number of traffic cases sent for drug analysis has increased more than 30-fold since 2000-2006, and the number of traffic cases submitted in 2016 for drug analysis was higher than the number for alcohol analysis; the latter has decreased since 2011.

CONCLUSION

Overall, alcohol was the most frequent compound detected above the legal limit in both years, followed by the well-known illicit drugs THC, cocaine, and amphetamine. NPS were seldom seen. One consequence of the increased focus on drugs in traffic has been an immense increase in drug traffic cases sent for analysis since 2006 in the eastern part of Denmark. Although this survey revealed only minimal changes compared to earlier investigations, surveys like this are invaluable for monitoring abuse patterns and trends in drugged and drunken driving.

Drugged Drivers Blood Concentrations in England and Wales Prior to the Introduction of Per Se Limits

This report details the blood concentration of drugs found in motorists suspected of driving under the influence of drugs from 2010 to 2012 in England and Wales. This study was carried out as new legislation has come into place, setting fixed blood concentration limits for drugs in motorists. These include a cannabis (Δ9-THC) blood concentration of 2 µg/L, amphetamine 250 µg/L, benzoylecgonine (BZE) 50 µg/L, cocaine 10 µg/L, 6-monoacetylmorphine 5 µg/L, morphine 80 µg/L, diazepam 550 µg/L and methadone 500 µg/L. Samples were screened for opiates, methadone, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, cocaine, amphetamines and methamphetamine. Cannabinoids were the most prevalent drug group (29.7%) followed by benzodiazepines (22.7%), opiates (18.8%), cocaine (16.3%), amphetamine (7%) and methadone (5.6%). The analytical results are compared with the new per se limits to give a reference of drug concentrations prior to this legislation coming into effect. Our studies show that 64.9% of the cannabis samples, 59.1% of the cocaine samples and 94.6% of the BZE samples would be above the new per se limits set under Section 5a of the Road Traffic Act. In contrast, the medicinal drugs such as benzodiazepines and opiates (morphine) were predominantly detected at concentrations below the new per se limit. Given its medical applications, amphetamines appear to have been grouped with the medicinal type drugs, with our data showing that 25.2% of the amphetamine positive samples would exceed the new specified limit. These data show that samples containing medicinal and prescription drugs are likely to be detected below the new legal limits, while illicit drugs were typically found at concentrations above the new specified limits.

International approaches to driving under the influence of cannabis: A review of evidence on impact

BACKGROUND

There are knowledge gaps regarding the effectiveness of different approaches designed to prevent and deter driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC). Policymakers are increasingly interested in evidence-based responses to DUIC as numerous jurisdictions worldwide have legally regulated cannabis or are debating such regulation. We contribute a comprehensive review of international literature on countermeasures that address DUIC, and identify where and how such measures have been evaluated.

METHODS

The following databases were systematically searched from 1995 to present: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, and Criminal Justice Abstracts. Hand searching of relevant documents, internet searches for grey literature, and review of ongoing email alerts were conducted to capture any emerging literature and relevant trends.

RESULTS

Numerous international jurisdictions have introduced a variety of measures designed to deter DUIC. Much interest has been generated regarding non-zero per se laws that set fixed legal limits for tetrahydrocannabinol and/or its metabolites detected in drivers. Other approaches include behavioural impairment laws, zero-tolerance per se laws, roadside drug testing, graduated licensing system restrictions, and remedial programs. However, very few evaluations have appeared in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some promising results have been reported (e.g., roadside testing), it is premature to draw firm conclusions regarding the broader impacts of general deterrent approaches to DUIC. This review points to the need for a long-term commitment to rigorously evaluate, using multiple methods, the impact of general and specific deterrent DUIC countermeasures.

Methiopropamine in blood samples from drivers suspected of being under the influence of drugs

OBJECTIVES

Methiopropamine (MPA; 1-(thiophen-2-yl)-2-methylaminopropane) belongs to the new psychoactive substances (NPS) that have emerged on the drug market in recent years. MPA appeared in 2011 and is an analogue of methamphetamine, sold as, for example, "Slush Eric" and "Blow." It is reported to have effects similar to those of methamphetamine, but the toxicity in humans is not known. Three fatal cases involving MPA have been reported. One analytical confirmed intoxication case has been published, and this supports the symptoms described by the users. The prevalence of recreational use of MPA is unknown, and no studies have reported the prevalence in driving under the influence of drug (DUID) cases.

METHODS

We investigated the frequency of MPA in DUID cases received at our institute during a 12-week period and report the analytical method using an ultraperformance liquid chromatography.tandem mass spectrometry for quantification of MPA in whole blood. The analytical findings were compared to the results from a clinical test of impairment performed by a physician shortly after the driving episode. The samples were analyzed for 42 different psychoactive substances.

RESULTS

MPA was detected in 10 DUID cases (0.8% of the cases), only from male drivers. Other drugs were detected concomitantly in all the cases. Two of the cases were traffic accidents.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that MPA is found in DUID cases and reveals that NPS are used among drivers and also proven in blood from drivers involved in traffic accidents. More studies are requested regarding the pharmacological and toxicological effects of MPA and other NPS. This is the first article that describes a method for analyzing and quantifying MPA in whole blood samples.