Length of hospital stay and discharge disposition in older trauma patients

Predictive Factors for Onset of Moderate-to-Severe Disability Following Hospital Discharge Due to Rib Fractures

BACKGROUND

According to previous studies, a prolonged hospital stay, along with the patient's clinical features, can lead to the onset of disability.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify predictive factors of moderate-to-severe disability following hospital discharge in rib fracture patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study with hospitalized adult patients with rib fractures who received conservative treatment. Patients' clinical profiles and characteristics were collected from their clinical histories and healthcare professional records.

RESULTS

Overall, patients exhibited a 44% rate of moderate-to-severe disability after a six-day hospital stay. The incidence of patients with a prolonged hospital stay who showed disabilities was associated with male sex (HR 0.73, p < 0.001), presence of first rib fracture (HR 1.78, p = 0.047), presence of flail chest (HR 1.29, p = 0.046), severity of lung injury (HR 1.65, p < 0.001), and functional status (HR 1.37, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate-to-severe disability in patients with rib fractures may depend on factors such as sex, functionality, severity of lung injury, and presence of first rib fracture and flail chest during a prolonged hospital stay.

The predictive value of the Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) in the outcome of multi-traumatic patients compared to the estimated Injury Severity Score (eISS)

PURPOSE

The classification of trauma patients in emergency settings is a constant challenge for physicians. However, the Injury Severity Score (ISS) is widely used in developed countries, it may be difficult to perform it in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). As a result, the ISS was calculated using an estimated methodology that has been described and validated in a high-income country previously. In addition, a simple scoring tool called the Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) was developed recently. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of KTS and estimated ISS (eISS) in order to achieve a valid and efficient scoring system in our resource-limited setting.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study between December 2020 and March 2021 among the multi-trauma patients who presented at the emergency department of Imam Reza hospital, Tabriz, Iran. After obtaining informed consent, all data including age, sex, mechanism of injury, GCS, KTS, eISS, final outcome (including death, morbidity, or discharge), and length of hospital stay were collected and entered into SPSS version 27.0 and analyzed.

RESULTS

381 multi-trauma patients participated in the study. The area under the curve for prediction of mortality (AUC) for KTS was 0.923 (95%CI: 0.888-0.958) and for eISS was 0.910 (95% CI: 0.877-0.944). For the mortality, comparing the AUCs by the Delong test, the difference between areas was not statistically significant (p value = 0.356). The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for the prediction of mortality KTS and eISS were 28.27 and 32.00, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In our study population, the KTS has similar accuracy in predicting the mortality of multi-trauma patients compared to the eISS.

Investigating Length of Stay Patterns and Its Predictors in the South Wales Trauma Network

Background

Length of stay (LOS) is frequently employed as a performance metric for trauma care. Following the establishment of the trauma network worldwide, the assessment and prediction of LOS in different levels of trauma centres have been extensively studied. However, assessing the total patient length of stay from a whole trauma network perspective is unclear. The objective of this study was to systematically analyse the overall Length of Stay (LOS) pattern within the SWTN before its establishment and in the immediate time after its foundation and, secondly, to assess the association between relevant impact factors and LOS.

Methodology

A retrospective secondary analysis based on the trauma admission dataset from Trauma Audit and Research Network(TARN) dataset was conducted. The studied sample covered around 18000 patients admitted to trauma centres from South Wales Major trauma network between January 2012 and October 2021. The primary outcome is the total length of stay in the trauma network. Statistical tests were applied to examine the difference between normal and outlier LOS. Data visualisation was utilised to demonstrate the LOS patterns and potential association between LOS and relevant demographic and clinical predictors.

Results

The distribution of length of stay in SWTN follows a right-skewed distribution with a median of 10 (IQR, 5-18) and a mean of 15.92 days. There were 1520 patients with outliers for LOS. A significant difference (p¡ 0.05) was found between the normal and outlier groups of LOS based on demographic (age, gender and residential information) and clinical characteristics(ward type, maximum of anatomically-based injury severity score(AIS) and probability of survival). Age group, maximum AIS score on specific injured region, ward type and its interaction effect with the number of admissions may associated with the LOS. Specifically, patients admitted to the geriatric ward exhibited notably prolonged LOS, and individuals with more than 2 admissions to long-term care and recovery-related wards such as neurosurgical rehabilitation, spinal injuries and burns wards also displayed elevated LOS.

Conclusion

Our finding supports prior evidence indicating elderly people are vulnerable to longer stays. Moreover, concerning the types of admission wards, patients admitted to rehabilitation wards who underwent more than 2 hospitalisations also faced an increased risk of prolonged stay. Based on these results, policymakers and healthcare providers should contemplate expanding the allocation of medical resources to this demographic to mitigate the length of stay and optimise associated healthcare costs.

Retrospective Analysis of Nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Orthopedic and Traumatological Inpatients

SARS-CoV-2 has had a measurable impact on the field of orthopedic and traumatological surgery. To date, scarce data on intramural SARS-CoV-2 infections in orthopedic and traumatological patients have been reported. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate the effect of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infections in orthopedic and traumatological inpatients regarding symptoms of infection, mortality, duration of hospitalization, and other relevant patient-dependent factors. Patients admitted to hospital for an orthopedic or traumatological indication were screened retrospectively for nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infections and included in this study. An age-, sex-, and ICD 10-matched control group was assigned and demographic data, clinical symptoms of a SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as mortality, length of hospital stays, time to surgery, pre-existing conditions, LKF-points representing the financial effort, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index were collected. A significantly higher length of stay was observed in the SARS-CoV-2 group (25 days; 4-60; SD 12.5) when compared to the control group (11 days; 2-36; SD 7; p < 0.05). LKF points were significantly higher in the SARS-CoV-2 group (13,939 points vs. 8542 points). No significant difference in mortality could be observed. An infection with SARS-CoV-2 in inpatients significantly increases length of hospital stay and cost of treatment. Although no significant difference in mortality was found, care should be taken to avoid intramural SARS-CoV-2 infections, resulting in prolonged hospitalization, higher costs, and potentially further individual risks.

Insurance status and traumatized patients' outcomes: a report from the national trauma registry of Iran

BACKGROUND

Trauma care is one of the most expensive medical procedures that is significantly affected by factors like insurance status. Providing medical care to injured patients has a significant impact on patients' prognosis. This study examined whether insurance status was associated with different outcomes, including hospital length of stay (HLOS), mortality, and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission.

METHODS

This prospective study analyzed the data of traumatized patients who had been registered in the National Trauma Registry of Iran (NTRI), and hospitalized at Sina Hospital, Tehran, Iran, from March 22, 2016, to February 8, 2021. Given the type of insurance, the insured patients were classified as basic, road traffic, and foreign nationality. The outcomes of in-hospital death, ICU admission, and HLOS between insured and uninsured patients, and then different insurance statuses, were compared using regression models.

RESULT

A total of 5014 patients were included in the study. 49% of patients (n = 2458) had road traffic insurance, 35.2% (n = 1766) basic insurance, 10.5% (n = 528) were uninsured, and 5.2% (n = 262) had foreign nationality insurance. The mean age of patients with basic, road traffic insurance, foreign nationality, and uninsured patients was 45.2 (SD = 22.3), 37.8 (SD = 15.8), 27.8 (SD = 13.3), and 32.4 (SD = 11.9) years, respectively. There was a statistically significant association between insurance status and mean age. Based on these results, the mean age of patients with basic insurance was higher than other groups (p < 0.001). Additionally, 85.6% of the patients were male, with male to female ratio of 9.64 in road traffic insurance, 2.99 in basic insurance, 14.4 in foreign nationality, and 16 in uninsured patients. There was no statistically significant difference between in-hospital mortality in insured and uninsured patients, 98 (2.3%) vs. 12 (2.3%), respectively. The odds of in-hospital mortality in uninsured patients were 1.04 times the odds of in-hospital death in insured patients [Crude OR: 1.04, 95%CI: 0.58 to 1.90]. Multiple logistic regression showed that after adjusting for age, sex, ISS, and Cause of trauma, the odds of in-hospital death in uninsured patients were 2.97 times the odds of in-hospital death in insured patients [adjusted OR: 2.97, 95%CI: 1.43 to 6.21].

CONCLUSION

This study shows that having insurance can change the ICU admission, death, and HLOS in traumatized patients. The results of this study can provide essential data for national health policy for minimizing the disparities among different insurance statuses and proper use of medical resources.

Association between major trauma centre care and outcomes of adult patients injured by low falls in England and Wales

BACKGROUND

Disability and death due to low falls is increasing worldwide and disproportionately affects older adults. Current trauma systems were not designed to suit the needs of these patients. This study assessed the association between major trauma centre (MTC) care and outcomes in adult patients injured by low falls.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Trauma Audit and Research Network on adult patients injured by falls from <2 m between 2017 and 2019 in England and Wales. 30-day survival, length of hospital stay and discharge destination were compared between MTCs and trauma units or local emergency hospitals (TU/LEHs) using an adjusted multiple logistic regression model.

RESULTS

127 334 patients were included, of whom 27.6% attended an MTC. The median age was 79.4 years (IQR 64.5-87.2 years), and 74.2% of patients were aged >65 years. MTC care was not associated with improved 30-day survival (adjusted OR (AOR) 0.91, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.96, p<0.001). Transferred patients had a significant impact on the results. After excluding transferred patients, MTC care was associated with greater odds of 30-day survival (AOR 1.056, 95% CI 1.001 to 1.113, p=0.044). MTC care was also associated with greater odds of 30-day survival in the most severely injured patients (AOR 1.126, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.22, p=0.002), but not in patients aged >65 years (AOR 1.038, 95% CI 0.982 to 1.097, p=0.184).

CONCLUSION

MTC care was not associated with improved survival compared with TU/LEH care in the whole cohort. Patients who were transferred had a significant impact on the results. In patients who are not transferred, MTC care is associated with greater odds of 30-day survival in the whole cohort and in the most severely injured patients. Future research must determine the optimum means of identifying patients in need of higher-level care, the components of care which improve patient outcomes, develop patient-focused outcomes which reflect the characteristics and priorities of contemporary trauma patients, and investigate the need for transfer in specific subgroups of patients.

Race and Insurance Status Disparities in Post-discharge Disposition After Hospitalization for Major Trauma

BACKGROUND

Investigations detailing predictive measures of hospital disposition after traumatic injury are scarce. We aim to examine the discharge practices among trauma centers in the US and to identify factors that may influence post-hospital disposition.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of trauma patients using the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program dataset from 2007-2017. Primary study outcome was hospital disposition (including long term care facility [LTC], others). Secondary outcomes included: Intensive Care Unit (ICU)-length of stay (LOS), complications, others).

RESULTS

6 899 538 patients were analyzed. Odds of LTC discharge was significantly higher for Black patients (aOR = 1.30, 95% CI:1.24-1.37), abbreviated injury score (AIS) ≥3 (aOR = 4.22, 95% CI: 4.05-4.39), and higher injury severity score (ISS) (aOR = 9.41, 95% CI:9.03-9.80). Significantly more self-pay patients were discharged home compared to other insurance types (P < .0001). Significantly longer hospital- and ICU-LOS were experienced by those who had an AIS ≥3 (hospital: 4.8 days (±7.1) vs. 7.9 (±10.1); ICU: 4.6 (±6.9) vs. 5.9 (±7.9), P < .0001) and had a high ISS (hospital: 4.5 days (±5.9) vs. 16.8 (±17.9); ICU: 3.6 (±5.0) vs. 10.2 (±11.5), P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient race, insurance status, and injury severity were predictive of post-hospitalization care discharge. Self-pay and Black patients were less likely to be discharged to secondary care facilities. These findings have the potential to improve in-hospital patient management and predict discharge secondary care needs, and necessitate the need for future research to investigate the extent of inequalities in access to trauma care.

The effect of birth order on length of hospitalization for pediatric traumatic brain injury: an analysis of the 1987 Finnish birth cohort

Purpose

This study examines the relationship between birth order and length of hospitalization due to pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods

We prospectively followed 59,469 Finnish newborns from 1987 until age 18 years. Data on first diagnosis of TBI was recorded within the 1987 Finnish Birth Cohort (FBC). Hospitalization period was divided into two categories: 2 days or less and more than 2 days. The latter was considered in this study as longer hospitalization.

Results

Compared with first born siblings, later born siblings had an increased risk of a longer hospitalization for TBI (12.7% of fourth or higher born birth children diagnosed with TBI were hospitalized for 2 or more days, 11.3% of first born, 10.4% of third born and 9.0% of second born). Fourth or higher born children were more likely to experience a repeat TBI; 13.4% of fourth or higher born children diagnosed with TBI had 2–3 TBIs during the study period compared to 9% of third born, 7.8% of second born and 8.8% of the first born. Injuries in the traffic environment and falls were the most common contributors to pediatric TBI and occurred most frequently in the fourth or higher birth category; 29.3% of TBIs among fourth or higher birth order were due to transport accidents and 21% were due to falls.

Conclusions

This study revealed a significant increase in risk for longer hospitalization due to TBI among later born children within the same sibling group. The study provides epidemiological evidence on birth order as it relates to TBI, and its potential to help to explain some of the statistical variability in pediatric TBI hospitalization over time in this population.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13690-022-00919-x.

Disparities in discharge patterns of admitted older patients with ocular trauma

PURPOSE

In older patients, poor vision from ocular trauma increases the likelihood of further injuries and repeat hospitalizations, underscoring the need for appropriate post-hospitalization care. We sought to evaluate disposition patterns of older patients admitted with ocular trauma.

METHODS/MATERIALS

This retrospective observational study analyzed the National Trauma Data Bank (2008-2014) and de-identified data of patients, ≥65 years old, admitted with ocular trauma were identified using ICD-9CM and E-codes. Age, gender, race/ethnicity, type of ocular injury, comorbidities, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, length of hospital stay, location and US region, insurance, and discharge disposition were extracted. Analysis was performed with student's t-test, Chi-squared test, and odds ratios (OR) using SPSS software. Statistical significance was set at P <.05.

RESULTS

58,074 (18.3%) of 316,485 patients admitted with ocular trauma were >65yrs. 26,346 (45.4%) were discharged home and 23,314 (40.1%) to an advanced care facility (ACF). Nursing home residents were most likely to return to ACF (OR, 4.76; 95%CI, 4.40-5.14; P < .001). Patients with severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow coma score [GCS]<8) (OR, 4.57; 95%CI, 4.09-5.11; P < .001), very severe injury severity score (ISS ≥24) (OR, 3.73; 95%CI, 3.46-4.01; P < .001), females (OR, 1.27; 95%CI, 1.23-1.32; P < .001), white patients (OR, 1.29; 95%CI, 1.24-1.36; P < .001) and Medicare beneficiaries (OR, 1.14; 95%CI, 1.09-1.19; P < .001) were most likely to be discharged to an ACF. Demography-related discharge propensities prevailed nationwide and within insurance categories. Multivariate regression analysis revealed factors determining ACF placement were, in order: length of hospital stay, nursing home residency, GCS<8, ISS>24, female gender, white race, and Medicare insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Hispanic, black, male, and self-paying patients were disproportionately discharged home. Ocular injuries had low impact on ACF placement. Understanding these disparities will assist in developing guidelines for appropriate and equitable post-trauma rehabilitation in this vulnerable population.

Risk Factors for Nonhome Discharge After Esophagectomy for Neoplastic Disease

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomies are known to be technically challenging operations that create significant physiologic changes. These patients often require assisted care postoperatively that necessitates a nonhome discharge. The purpose of this study was to assess factors associated with nonhome discharge after esophagectomy for neoplastic disease.

METHODS

The 2016 to 2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Esophagectomy database was queried to identify patients who underwent esophagectomy for a neoplasm. Patients were excluded if they died within 30 days of their operation, the index operation was considered emergent, or had missing data for the variables of interest. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify which factors were predictive of nonhome discharge.

RESULTS

One thousand seven patients were included. Of those, 121 (12.0%) had a nonhome discharge. Multivariable analysis showed that the following factors were associated with nonhome discharge: Modified Charlson comorbidity index (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49-2.86), partially dependent preoperative functional status (aOR, 13.18; 95% CI, 1.07-315.67), urinary tract infection (aOR, 5.25; 95% CI, 1.32-20.41), and length of stay (aOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified various factors associated with nonhome discharge. Early identification of patients who are at risk for nonhome discharge is important for early discharge planning, which may decrease nonmedical delays and healthcare costs.

What factors affect length of hospital stay among trauma patients? A single-center study, Southwestern Iran

PURPOSE

Trauma is a major health concern. Length of hospital stay (LOS) has been targeted as an important metric to assess trauma care. This study aims to evaluate the risk factors that affect LOS among trauma patients in a trauma center in Southwestern Iran.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted on patients admitted to Rajaee Trauma Center, Shiraz, Iran between January 1, 2018 and December 30, 2018. The inclusion criteria were age above 15 years and having traffic accident injuries, including car, motorcycle and pedestrian injury mechanisms. The exclusion criteria were existing diseases including cardiovascular, cerebral, renal, and pulmonary diseases prior to this study, dead upon arrival or within 48 h after admission, and stay at the hospital for less than 6 h. The risk variables analyzed for prolonged LOS were age, gender, mechanism of traffic accident injury, infection during hospital stay, type of injury, injury severity score, surgery during hospitalization, and survival. Poisson regression was performed to evaluate the partial effects of each covariate on trauma hospitalization (≥3 days as longer stay).

RESULTS

This study was conducted on 14,054 patients with traffic accident injury and the mean age was (33.89 ± 15.78) years. Additionally, 74.35% of the patients were male, with male to female ratio of 2.90. The result of Poisson regression indicated that male patients, higher age, combination of thoracic injuries, onset of infected sites, and surgery patients were more susceptible to have a longer LOS. Considering the site of injury, patients with face injuries followed by those with thorax injuries had the highest means of LOS (3.74 days and 3.36 days, respectively). Simultaneous existence of surgical intervention and infection in a patient had the greatest impact on prolonged LOS.

CONCLUSION

This study identified that age, gender, mechanism of injury, infection, type of injury, survival, and ISS could lead to prolongation of LOS, but the affect can be reduced by eliminating modifiable risk factors.

Polytrauma patients in the Netherlands and the USA: A bi-institutional comparison of processes and outcomes of care

BACKGROUND

Modern trauma systems differ worldwide, possibly leading to disparities in outcomes. We aim to compare characteristics and outcomes of blunt polytrauma patients admitted to two Level 1 Trauma Centers in the US (USTC) and the Netherlands (NTC).

METHODS

For this retrospective study the records of 1367 adult blunt trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16 admitted between July 1, 2011 and December 31, 2013 (640 from NTC, 727 from USTC) were analysed.

RESULTS

The USTC group had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (mean [standard deviation] 1.15 [2.2] vs. 1.73 [2.8], p<0.0001) and Injury Severity Score (median [interquartile range, IQR] 25 [17-29] vs. 21 [17-26], p<0.0001). The in-hospital mortality was similar in both centers (11% in USTC vs. 10% NTC), also after correction for baseline differences in patient population in a multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.61-1.48, p=0.83). USTC patients had a longer Intensive Care Unit stay (median [IQR] 4 [2-11] vs. 2 [2-7] days, p=0.006) but had a shorter hospital stay (median [IQR] 6 [3-13] vs. 8 [4-16] days, p<0.0001). USTC patients were discharged more often to a rehabilitation center (47% vs 10%) and less often to home (46% vs. 66%, p<0.0001), and had a higher readmission rate (8% vs. 4%, p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Although several outcome parameters differ in two urban area trauma centers in the USA and the Netherlands, the quality of care for trauma patients, measured as survival, is equal. Other outcomes varied between both trauma centers, suggesting that differences in local policies and processes do influence the care system, but not so much the quality of care as reflected by survival.