Computer-aided diagnosis for identifying and delineating early gastric cancers in magnifying narrow-band imaging

Artificial intelligence for gastric cancer in endoscopy: From diagnostic reasoning to market

Recognition of gastric conditions during endoscopy exams, including gastric cancer, usually requires specialized training and a long learning curve. Besides that, the interobserver variability is frequently high due to the different morphological characteristics of the lesions and grades of mucosal inflammation. In this sense, artificial intelligence tools based on deep learning models have been developed to support physicians to detect, classify, and predict gastric lesions more efficiently. Even though a growing number of studies exists in the literature, there are multiple challenges to bring a model to practice in this field, such as the need for more robust validation studies and regulatory hurdles. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the current use of artificial intelligence applied to endoscopic imaging to evaluate gastric precancerous and cancerous lesions and the barriers to widespread implementation of this technology in clinical routine.

Automatic lesion detection for narrow-band imaging bronchoscopy

Purpose

Early detection of cancer is crucial for lung cancer patients, as it determines disease prognosis. Lung cancer typically starts as bronchial lesions along the airway walls. Recent research has indicated that narrow-band imaging (NBI) bronchoscopy enables more effective bronchial lesion detection than other bronchoscopic modalities. Unfortunately, NBI video can be hard to interpret because physicians currently are forced to perform a time-consuming subjective visual search to detect bronchial lesions in a long airway-exam video. As a result, NBI bronchoscopy is not regularly used in practice. To alleviate this problem, we propose an automatic two-stage real-time method for bronchial lesion detection in NBI video and perform a first-of-its-kind pilot study of the method using NBI airway exam video collected at our institution.

Approach

Given a patient's NBI video, the first method stage entails a deep-learning-based object detection network coupled with a multiframe abnormality measure to locate candidate lesions on each video frame. The second method stage then draws upon a Siamese network and a Kalman filter to track candidate lesions over multiple frames to arrive at final lesion decisions.

Results

Tests drawing on 23 patient NBI airway exam videos indicate that the method can process an incoming video stream at a real-time frame rate, thereby making the method viable for real-time inspection during a live bronchoscopic airway exam. Furthermore, our studies showed a 93% sensitivity and 86% specificity for lesion detection; this compares favorably to a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 84% achieved over a series of recent pooled clinical studies using the current time-consuming subjective clinical approach.

Conclusion

The method shows potential for robust lesion detection in NBI video at a real-time frame rate. Therefore, it could help enable more common use of NBI bronchoscopy for bronchial lesion detection.

Consensus statements on the current landscape of artificial intelligence applications in endoscopy, addressing roadblocks, and advancing artificial intelligence in gastroenterology

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) AI Task Force along with experts in endoscopy, technology space, regulatory authorities, and other medical subspecialties initiated a consensus process that analyzed the current literature, highlighted potential areas, and outlined the necessary research in artificial intelligence (AI) to allow a clearer understanding of AI as it pertains to endoscopy currently.

METHODS

A modified Delphi process was used to develop these consensus statements.

RESULTS

Statement 1: Current advances in AI allow for the development of AI-based algorithms that can be applied to endoscopy to augment endoscopist performance in detection and characterization of endoscopic lesions. Statement 2: Computer vision-based algorithms provide opportunities to redefine quality metrics in endoscopy using AI, which can be standardized and can reduce subjectivity in reporting quality metrics. Natural language processing-based algorithms can help with the data abstraction needed for reporting current quality metrics in GI endoscopy effortlessly. Statement 3: AI technologies can support smart endoscopy suites, which may help optimize workflows in the endoscopy suite, including automated documentation. Statement 4: Using AI and machine learning helps in predictive modeling, diagnosis, and prognostication. High-quality data with multidimensionality are needed for risk prediction, prognostication of specific clinical conditions, and their outcomes when using machine learning methods. Statement 5: Big data and cloud-based tools can help advance clinical research in gastroenterology. Multimodal data are key to understanding the maximal extent of the disease state and unlocking treatment options. Statement 6: Understanding how to evaluate AI algorithms in the gastroenterology literature and clinical trials is important for gastroenterologists, trainees, and researchers, and hence education efforts by GI societies are needed. Statement 7: Several challenges regarding integrating AI solutions into the clinical practice of endoscopy exist, including understanding the role of human-AI interaction. Transparency, interpretability, and explainability of AI algorithms play a key role in their clinical adoption in GI endoscopy. Developing appropriate AI governance, data procurement, and tools needed for the AI lifecycle are critical for the successful implementation of AI into clinical practice. Statement 8: For payment of AI in endoscopy, a thorough evaluation of the potential value proposition for AI systems may help guide purchasing decisions in endoscopy. Reliable cost-effectiveness studies to guide reimbursement are needed. Statement 9: Relevant clinical outcomes and performance metrics for AI in gastroenterology are currently not well defined. To improve the quality and interpretability of research in the field, steps need to be taken to define these evidence standards. Statement 10: A balanced view of AI technologies and active collaboration between the medical technology industry, computer scientists, gastroenterologists, and researchers are critical for the meaningful advancement of AI in gastroenterology.

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus process led by the ASGE AI Task Force and experts from various disciplines has shed light on the potential of AI in endoscopy and gastroenterology. AI-based algorithms have shown promise in augmenting endoscopist performance, redefining quality metrics, optimizing workflows, and aiding in predictive modeling and diagnosis. However, challenges remain in evaluating AI algorithms, ensuring transparency and interpretability, addressing governance and data procurement, determining payment models, defining relevant clinical outcomes, and fostering collaboration between stakeholders. Addressing these challenges while maintaining a balanced perspective is crucial for the meaningful advancement of AI in gastroenterology.

Development of an Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic System Using Linked Color Imaging for Barrett's Esophagus

Background: Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma cases are increasing as gastroesophageal reflux disease increases. Using artificial intelligence (AI) and linked color imaging (LCI), our aim was to establish a method of diagnosis for short-segment Barrett's esophagus (SSBE). Methods: We retrospectively selected 624 consecutive patients in total at our hospital, treated between May 2017 and March 2020, who experienced an esophagogastroduodenoscopy with white light imaging (WLI) and LCI. Images were randomly chosen as data for learning from WLI: 542 (SSBE+/- 348/194) of 696 (SSBE+/- 444/252); and LCI: 643 (SSBE+/- 446/197) of 805 (SSBE+/- 543/262). Using a Vision Transformer (Vit-B/16-384) to diagnose SSBE, we established two AI systems for WLI and LCI. Finally, 126 WLI (SSBE+/- 77/49) and 137 LCI (SSBE+/- 81/56) images were used for verification purposes. The accuracy of six endoscopists in making diagnoses was compared to that of AI. Results: Study participants were 68.2 ± 12.3 years, M/F 330/294, SSBE+/- 409/215. The accuracy/sensitivity/specificity (%) of AI were 84.1/89.6/75.5 for WLI and 90.5/90.1/91.1/for LCI, and those of experts and trainees were 88.6/88.7/88.4, 85.7/87.0/83.7 for WLI and 93.4/92.6/94.6, 84.7/88.1/79.8 for LCI, respectively. Conclusions: Using AI to diagnose SSBE was similar in accuracy to using a specialist. Our finding may aid the diagnosis of SSBE in the clinic.

Enabling Personalized Medicine in Orthopaedic Surgery Through Artificial Intelligence: A Critical Analysis Review

» The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of orthopaedic surgery holds potential for revolutionizing health care delivery across 3 crucial domains: (I) personalized prediction of clinical outcomes and adverse events, which may optimize patient selection, surgical planning, and enhance patient safety and outcomes; (II) diagnostic automated and semiautomated imaging analyses, which may reduce time burden and facilitate precise and timely diagnoses; and (III) forecasting of resource utilization, which may reduce health care costs and increase value for patients and institutions.» Computer vision is one of the most highly studied areas of AI within orthopaedics, with applications pertaining to fracture classification, identification of the manufacturer and model of prosthetic implants, and surveillance of prosthesis loosening and failure.» Prognostic applications of AI within orthopaedics include identifying patients who will likely benefit from a specified treatment, predicting prosthetic implant size, postoperative length of stay, discharge disposition, and surgical complications. Not only may these applications be beneficial to patients but also to institutions and payors because they may inform potential cost expenditure, improve overall hospital efficiency, and help anticipate resource utilization.» AI infrastructure development requires institutional financial commitment and a team of clinicians and data scientists with expertise in AI that can complement skill sets and knowledge. Once a team is established and a goal is determined, teams (1) obtain, curate, and label data; (2) establish a reference standard; (3) develop an AI model; (4) evaluate the performance of the AI model; (5) externally validate the model, and (6) reinforce, improve, and evaluate the model's performance until clinical implementation is possible.» Understanding the implications of AI in orthopaedics may eventually lead to wide-ranging improvements in patient care. However, AI, while holding tremendous promise, is not without methodological and ethical limitations that are essential to address. First, it is important to ensure external validity of programs before their use in a clinical setting. Investigators should maintain high quality data records and registry surveillance, exercise caution when evaluating others' reported AI applications, and increase transparency of the methodological conduct of current models to improve external validity and avoid propagating bias. By addressing these challenges and responsibly embracing the potential of AI, the medical field may eventually be able to harness its power to improve patient care and outcomes.

Artificial Intelligence in endoscopy: A future poll

Artificial Intelligence [AI] has been a trendy topic in recent years, with many developed medical applications. In gastrointestinal endoscopy, AI systems include computer-assisted detection [CADe] for lesion detection as bleedings and polyps and computer-assisted diagnosis [CADx] for optical biopsy and lesion characterization. The technology behind these systems is based on a computer algorithm that is trained for a specific function. This function could be to recognize or characterize target lesions such as colonic polyps. Moreover, AI systems can offer technical assistance to improve endoscopic performance as scope insertion guidance. Currently, we believe that such technologies still lack legal and regulatory validations as a large sector of doctors and patients have concerns. However, there is no doubt that these technologies will bring significant improvement in the endoscopic management of patients as well as save money and time.

The value of machine learning approaches in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The application of machine learning (ML) for identifying early gastric cancer (EGC) has drawn increasing attention. However, there lacks evidence-based support for its specific diagnostic performance. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis was implemented to assess the performance of image-based ML in EGC diagnosis.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive electronic search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to September 25, 2022. QUADAS-2 was selected to judge the risk of bias of included articles. We did the meta-analysis using a bivariant mixed-effect model. Sensitivity analysis and heterogeneity test were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles were enrolled. The sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and SROC of ML-based models were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81-0.89), and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.39-1.00) in the training set and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86-0.93), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92), and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.19-1.00) in the validation set. The SEN, SPE, and SROC of EGC diagnosis by non-specialist clinicians were 0.64 (95% CI: 0.56-0.71), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89), and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.29-0.97), and those by specialist clinicians were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.85), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.37-0.99). With the assistance of ML models, the SEN of non-specialist physicians in the diagnosis of EGC was significantly improved (0.76 vs 0.64).

CONCLUSION

ML-based diagnostic models have greater performance in the identification of EGC. The diagnostic accuracy of non-specialist clinicians can be improved to the level of the specialists with the assistance of ML models. The results suggest that ML models can better assist less experienced clinicians in diagnosing EGC under endoscopy and have broad clinical application value.

Care Delivery Interventions for Individuals with Cancer: A Literature Review and Focus on Gastrointestinal Malignancies

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal malignancies represent a particularly challenging condition, often requiring a multidisciplinary approach to management in order to meet the unique needs of these individuals and their caregivers.

PURPOSE

In this literature review, we sought to describe care delivery interventions that strive to improve the quality of life and care for patients with a focus on gastrointestinal malignancies.

CONCLUSION

We highlight patient-centered care delivery interventions, including patient-reported outcomes, hospital-at-home interventions, and other models of care for individuals with cancer. By demonstrating the relevance and utility of these different care models for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, we hope to highlight the importance of developing and testing new interventions to address the unique needs of this population.

Third Eye? The Assistance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Endoscopy of Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal cancers are characterized by high incidence and mortality. However, there are well-established methods of screening. The endoscopy exam provides the macroscopical image and enables harvesting the tissue samples for further histopathological diagnosis. The efficiency of endoscopies relies not only on proper patient preparation, but also on the skills of the personnel conducting the exam. In recent years, a number of reports concerning the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine have arisen. Numerous studies aimed to assess the utility of deep learning/ neural network systems supporting endoscopies. In this review, we summarized the most recent reports and randomized clinical trials regarding the application of AI in screening and surveillance of gastrointestinal cancers among patients suffering from esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancer, along with the advantages, limitations, and controversies of those novel solutions.

The Importance of Artificial Intelligence in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Recently, there has been a growing interest in the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine, especially in specialties where visualization methods are applied. AI is defined as a computer's ability to achieve human cognitive performance, which is accomplished through enabling computer "learning". This can be conducted in two ways, as machine learning and deep learning. Deep learning is a complex learning system involving the application of artificial neural networks, whose algorithms imitate the human form of learning. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy allows examination of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum. In addition to the quality of endoscopic equipment and patient preparation, the performance of upper endoscopy depends on the experience and knowledge of the endoscopist. The application of artificial intelligence in endoscopy refers to computer-aided detection and the more complex computer-aided diagnosis. The application of AI in upper endoscopy is aimed at improving the detection of premalignant and malignant lesions, with special attention on the early detection of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus, the early detection of esophageal and stomach cancer and the detection of H. pylori infection. Artificial intelligence reduces the workload of endoscopists, is not influenced by human factors and increases the diagnostic accuracy and quality of endoscopic methods.

Lightweight deep learning model incorporating an attention mechanism and feature fusion for automatic classification of gastric lesions in gastroscopic images

Accurate diagnosis of various lesions in the formation stage of gastric cancer is an important problem for doctors. Automatic diagnosis tools based on deep learning can help doctors improve the accuracy of gastric lesion diagnosis. Most of the existing deep learning-based methods have been used to detect a limited number of lesions in the formation stage of gastric cancer, and the classification accuracy needs to be improved. To this end, this study proposed an attention mechanism feature fusion deep learning model with only 14 million (M) parameters. Based on that model, the automatic classification of a wide range of lesions covering the stage of gastric cancer formation was investigated, including non-neoplasm(including gastritis and intestinal metaplasia), low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, and early gastric cancer (including high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and early gastric cancer). 4455 magnification endoscopy with narrow-band imaging(ME-NBI) images from 1188 patients were collected to train and test the proposed method. The results of the test dataset showed that compared with the advanced gastric lesions classification method with the best performance (overall accuracy = 94.3%, parameters = 23.9 M), the proposed method achieved both higher overall accuracy and a relatively lightweight model (overall accuracy =95.6%, parameter = 14 M). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia were 94.5%, 93.0%, and 96.5%, respectively, achieving state-of-the-art classification performance. In conclusion, our method has demonstrated its potential in diagnosing various lesions at the stage of gastric cancer formation.

Artificial intelligence in clinical medicine: catalyzing a sustainable global healthcare paradigm

As the demand for quality healthcare increases, healthcare systems worldwide are grappling with time constraints and excessive workloads, which can compromise the quality of patient care. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool in clinical medicine, revolutionizing various aspects of patient care and medical research. The integration of AI in clinical medicine has not only improved diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes, but also contributed to more efficient healthcare delivery, reduced costs, and facilitated better patient experiences. This review article provides an extensive overview of AI applications in history taking, clinical examination, imaging, therapeutics, prognosis and research. Furthermore, it highlights the critical role AI has played in transforming healthcare in developing nations.

Artificial intelligence in theranostics of gastric cancer, a review

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the commonest cancers with high morbidity and mortality in the world. How to realize precise diagnosis and therapy of GC owns great clinical requirement. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been actively explored to apply to early diagnosis and treatment and prognosis of gastric carcinoma. Herein, we review recent advance of AI in early screening, diagnosis, therapy and prognosis of stomach carcinoma. Especially AI combined with breath screening early GC system improved 97.4 % of early GC diagnosis ratio, AI model on stomach cancer diagnosis system of saliva biomarkers obtained an overall accuracy of 97.18 %, specificity of 97.44 %, and sensitivity of 96.88 %. We also discuss concept, issues, approaches and challenges of AI applied in stomach cancer. This review provides a comprehensive view and roadmap for readers working in this field, with the aim of pushing application of AI in theranostics of stomach cancer to increase the early discovery ratio and curative ratio of GC patients.

Quality indicators in the endoscopic detection of gastric cancer

Gastroscopy is the reference standard for the diagnosis of gastric cancer, but it is operator-dependent and associated with missed gastric cancer. The proliferation of gastroscopic examinations, increasingly for the screening and detection of subtle premalignant lesions, has motivated scrutiny of quality in gastroscopy. The concept of a high-quality endoscopic examination for the detection of superficial gastric neoplasia has been defined by expert guidelines to improve mucosal visualization, engender a systematic examination process and detect superficial neoplasia. This review discusses the evidence supporting the components of a high-quality diagnostic gastroscopic examination in relation to the detection of gastric cancer, and their potential role as procedural quality indicators to drive a structured improvement in clinically meaningful outcomes.

Intensive Systematic "Train-the-Trainer" Course as an Effective Strategy to Improve Detection of Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

To improve the diagnosis of early gastric cancer (EGC), a train-the-trainer (TTT) course was developed. This trial aimed to investigate whether TTT courses from trained trainers could improve trainees' EGC detection.

METHODS

In this multi-center, retrospective study, the training was carried out 8 times in one year. Clinical records one year before ("2016"), during ("2017"), and after ("2018") the course were collected. The primary endpoint was the improvement of EGC detection rate after TTT courses.

RESULTS

Twenty-four trainees from 17 hospitals were included in this study. A total of 123,416 esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 65,570 colonoscopy procedures were analyzed. The early gastric cancer detection rate (EDR) was 0.101% in 2016, which significantly increased to 0.338% in 2018 (p = 0.015). The early gastric cancer ratio (ECR, ratio of newly detected EGCs to all newly detected gastric cancers) in 2016 was 8.440%, which consistently increased to 11.853% and 19.778% in 2017 and 2018 (p = 0.006), respectively. In contrast, the advanced gastric cancer detection rate (ADR) was similar before, during, or after the course (p = 0.987). The 3-year EDR, ECR, and ADR in esophageal and colorectal cancer were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic training course can improve EGC detection rate and may be an effective educational strategy to reduce gastrointestinal cancers mortality.

H. pylori Related Atrophic Gastritis Detection Using Enhanced Convolution Neural Network (CNN) Learner

Atrophic gastritis (AG) is commonly caused by the infection of the Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) bacteria. If untreated, AG may develop into a chronic condition leading to gastric cancer, which is deemed to be the third primary cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Precursory detection of AG is crucial to avoid such cases. This work focuses on H. pylori-associated infection located at the gastric antrum, where the classification is of binary classes of normal versus atrophic gastritis. Existing work developed the Deep Convolution Neural Network (DCNN) of GoogLeNet with 22 layers of the pre-trained model. Another study employed GoogLeNet based on the Inception Module, fast and robust fuzzy C-means (FRFCM), and simple linear iterative clustering (SLIC) superpixel algorithms to identify gastric disease. GoogLeNet with Caffe framework and ResNet-50 are machine learners that detect H. pylori infection. Nonetheless, the accuracy may become abundant as the network depth increases. An upgrade to the current standards method is highly anticipated to avoid untreated and inaccurate diagnoses that may lead to chronic AG. The proposed work incorporates improved techniques revolving within DCNN with pooling as pre-trained models and channel shuffle to assist streams of information across feature channels to ease the training of networks for deeper CNN. In addition, Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) feature fusion method and ReliefF feature selection approaches are intended to revamp the combined techniques. CCA models the relationship between the two data sets of significant features generated by pre-trained ShuffleNet. ReliefF reduces and selects essential features from CCA and is classified using the Generalized Additive Model (GAM). It is believed the extended work is justified with a 98.2% testing accuracy reading, thus providing an accurate diagnosis of normal versus atrophic gastritis.

Artificial intelligence applicated in gastric cancer: A bibliometric and visual analysis via CiteSpace

Objective

This study aimed to analyze and visualize the current research focus, research frontiers, evolutionary processes, and trends of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of gastric cancer using a bibliometric analysis.

Methods

The Web of Science Core Collection database was selected as the data source for this study to retrieve and obtain articles and reviews related to AI in gastric cancer. All the information extracted from the articles was imported to CiteSpace to conduct the bibliometric and knowledge map analysis, allowing us to clearly visualize the research hotspots and trends in this field.

Results

A total of 183 articles published between 2017 and 2022 were included, contributed by 201 authors from 33 countries/regions. Among them, China (47.54%), Japan (21.86%), and the USA (13.11%) have made outstanding contributions in this field, accounting fsor 82.51% of the total publications. The primary research institutions were Wuhan University, Tokyo University, and Tada Tomohiro Inst Gastroenterol and Proctol. Tada (n = 12) and Hirasawa (n = 90) were ranked first in the top 10 authors and co-cited authors, respectively. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (21 publications; IF 2022, 9.189; Q1) was the most published journal, while Gastric Cancer (133 citations; IF 2022, 8.171; Q1) was the most co-cited journal. Nevertheless, the cooperation between different countries and institutions should be further strengthened. The most common keywords were AI, gastric cancer, and convolutional neural network. The "deep-learning algorithm" started to burst in 2020 and continues till now, which indicated that this research topic has attracted continuous attention in recent years and would be the trend of research on AI application in GC.

Conclusions

Research related to AI in gastric cancer is increasing exponentially. Current research hotspots focus on the application of AI in gastric cancer, represented by convolutional neural networks and deep learning, in diagnosis and differential diagnosis and staging. Considering the great potential and clinical application prospects, the related area of AI applications in gastric cancer will remain a research hotspot in the future.

Current status and future perspective of linked color imaging for gastric cancer screening: a literature review

Screening endoscopy has advanced to facilitate improvements in the detection and prognosis of gastric cancer. However, most early gastric cancers (EGCs) have subtle morphological or color features that are difficult to detect by white-light imaging (WLI); thus, even well-trained endoscopists can miss EGC when using this conventional endoscopic approach. This review summarizes the current and future status of linked color imaging (LCI), a new image-enhancing endoscopy (IEE) method, for gastric screening. LCI has been shown to produce bright images even at a distant view and provide excellent visibility of gastric cancer due to high color contrast relative to the surrounding tissue. LCI delineates EGC as orange-red and intestinal metaplasia as purple, regardless of a history of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication, and contributes to the detection of superficial EGC. Moreover, LCI assists in the determination of Hp infection status, which is closely related to the risk of developing gastric cancer. Transnasal endoscopy (ultra-thin) using LCI is also useful for identifying gastric neoplastic lesions. Recently, several prospective studies have demonstrated that LCI has a higher detection ratio for gastric cancer than WLI. We believe that LCI should be used in routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopies.

Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A narrative review

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a complex concept, broadly defined in medicine as the development of computer systems to perform tasks that require human intelligence. It has the capacity to revolutionize medicine by increasing efficiency, expediting data and image analysis and identifying patterns, trends and associations in large datasets. Within gastroenterology, recent research efforts have focused on using AI in esophagogastroduodenoscopy, wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) and colonoscopy to assist in diagnosis, disease monitoring, lesion detection and therapeutic intervention. The main objective of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the research being performed within gastroenterology on AI in esophagogastroduodenoscopy, WCE and colonoscopy.

Artificial intelligence applications in pathological diagnosis of gastric cancer

Globally, gastric cancer is the third leading cause of death from tumors. Prevention and individualized treatment are considered to be the best options for reducing the mortality rate of gastric cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been widely used in the field of gastric cancer, including diagnosis, prognosis, and image analysis. Eligible papers were identified from PubMed and IEEE up to April 13, 2022. Through the comparison of these articles, the application status of AI technology in the diagnosis of gastric cancer was summarized, including application types, application scenarios, advantages and limitations. This review presents the current state and role of AI in the diagnosis of gastric cancer based on four aspects: 1) accurate sampling from early diagnosis (endoscopy), 2) digital pathological diagnosis, 3) molecules and genes, and 4) clinical big data analysis and prognosis prediction. AI plays a very important role in facilitating the diagnosis of gastric cancer; however, it also has shortcomings such as interpretability. The purpose of this review is to provide assistance to researchers working in this domain.

Application of artificial intelligence in the endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer, atrophic gastritis, and Helicobacter pylori infection

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most serious health problems worldwide. Chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) is most commonly caused by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. Currently, endoscopic detection of early gastric cancer (EGC) and CAG remains challenging for endoscopists, and the diagnostic accuracy of H. pylori infection by endoscopy is approximately 70%. Artificial intelligence (AI) can assist endoscopic diagnosis including detection, prediction of depth of invasion, boundary delineation, and anatomical location of EGC, and has achievable diagnostic ability even comparable to experienced endoscopists. In this review we summarized various AI-assisted systems in the diagnosis of EGC, CAG, and H. pylori infection.

Demarcation Line Determination for Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer Disease Range Using Unsupervised Machine Learning in Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging

Background and Aims: It is important to determine an accurate demarcation line (DL) between the cancerous lesions and background mucosa in magnifying narrow-band imaging (M-NBI)-based diagnosis. However, it is difficult for novice endoscopists. We aimed to automatically determine the accurate DL using a machine learning method. Methods: We used an unsupervised machine learning approach to determine the DLs. Our method consists of the following four steps: (1) an M-NBI image is segmented into superpixels using simple linear iterative clustering; (2) the image features are extracted for each superpixel; (3) the superpixels are grouped into several clusters using the k-means method; and (4) the boundaries of the clusters are extracted as DL candidates. The 23 M-NBI images of 11 cases were used for performance evaluation. The evaluation investigated the similarity of the DLs identified by endoscopists and our method, and the Euclidean distance between the two DLs was calculated. For the single case of 11 cases, the histopathological examination was also conducted to evaluate the proposed system. Results: The average Euclidean distances for the 11 cases were 10.65, 11.97, 7.82, 8.46, 8.59, 9.72, 12.20, 9.06, 22.86, 8.45, and 25.36. The results indicated that the proposed method could identify similar DLs to those identified by experienced doctors. Additionally, it was confirmed that the proposed system could generate pathologically valid DLs by increasing the number of clusters. Conclusions: Our proposed system can support the training of inexperienced doctors as well as enrich the knowledge of experienced doctors in endoscopy.

Efficient Synchronous Real-Time CADe for Multicategory Lesions in Gastroscopy by Using Multiclass Detection Model

Often more than one category of lesions in patients’ gastrointestinal tracts need to be found in the endoscopic examination. Therefore, there is a need to establish an efficient synchronous real-time computer-aided detection (CADe) system for multicategory lesion detection. This paper proposes to build a system with a multiclass detection model based on the YOLOv5 to detect multicategory lesions synchronously in real-time. Two joint detection CADe systems using multiple single-class detection models with the same structure in parallel or series are established for comparison. A retrospective dataset containing 31117 images from 3747 patients is used in this study. To train the model, various online data augmentation methods and multiple loss functions are used. The proposed CADe system can synchronously detect cancers, gastrointestinal stromal tumours, polyps, and ulcers from different quality input images with 98% precision, 89% recall, and 90.2% mAP. The detection speed is 47 frames per second with a 0.04 s latency on a PC workstation. Compared to the two joint detection CADe systems, the proposed system is more accurate with faster speed and lower latency. Two extra experiments indicated that the lesion detection model based on YOLOv5x could provide better performance than other common YOLO structures and that different accuracy metrics and lesion categories have different requirements for the number of training images. The proposed synchronous real-time CADe system with the multiclass detection model can detect multicategory lesions with high accuracy and speed and low latency on limited hardware. It expands the clinical application of CADe in endoscopy and uses expensive labelled medical images more efficiently than multiple single-category lesion models for joint detection.

Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Narrow-Band Imaging Technique in Early Gastric Cancer and Precancerous Lesions

Objective

To investigate the diagnostic value of endoscopic narrow-band imaging technique in early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions.

Methods

A total of 100 patients with recurrent upper gastrointestinal symptoms in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2022 were selected and divided into group A and group B according to the random number table method, with 50 cases in each group. Group A received white light endoscopy, and group B received narrow-band imaging technology combined with endoscopy. Narrow-band imaging combined with magnifying endoscopy was used to stain the area with suspicious mucosal lesions with indigo carmine and magnified observation.

Results

The endoscopic image clarity of group B was significantly better than that of group A in terms of lesion outline, gastric pit, and microvascular morphology (P < 0.05). There were 10 cases of early gastric cancer, 18 cases of benign lesions, and 9 cases of gastric cancer (nonearly stage); 17 cases of precancerous lesions, 12 cases of early gastric cancer, 13 cases of benign lesions, and 6 cases of gastric cancer (nonearly stage) were diagnosed by ordinary white light endoscopy. Pathological results confirmed that among the 50 patients in group B, there were 15 cases of precancerous lesions, 11 cases of early gastric cancer, 17 cases of benign lesions, and 7 cases of gastric cancer (nonearly stage). Among the 50 patients in group A, 16 were precancerous lesions, 11 were early gastric cancer, 15 were benign lesions, and 8 were gastric cancer (non early stage). In the diagnosis of precancerous lesions and early gastric cancer, the diagnostic consistency, sensitivity, and specificity of group B were better than those of group A (P < 0.05); NBI combined with endoscopy in the diagnosis of precancerous lesions and early gastric cancer (kappa = 0.860, kappa = 0.883) was more consistent with pathological diagnosis than common white light endoscopy (kappa = 0.433, kappa = 0.535).

Conclusion

The value of narrow-band imaging technology combined with endoscopy in the diagnosis of precancerous lesions and early gastric cancer is better than that of ordinary white light endoscopy, and it can be widely used in clinical practice.

A deep learning-based system for real-time image reporting during esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Endoscopic reports are essential for the diagnosis and follow-up of gastrointestinal diseases. This study aimed to construct an intelligent system for automatic photo documentation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and test its utility in clinical practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven convolutional neural networks trained and tested using 210,198 images were integrated to construct the endoscopic automatic image reporting system (EAIRS). We tested its performance through man-machine comparison at three levels: internal, external, and prospective test. Between May 2021 and June 2021, patients undergoing EGD at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University were recruited. The primary outcomes were accuracy for capturing anatomical landmarks, completeness for capturing anatomical landmarks, and detected lesions.

RESULTS

The EAIRS outperformed endoscopists in retrospective internal and external test. A total of 161 consecutive patients were enrolled in the prospective test. The EAIRS achieved an accuracy of 95.2% in capturing anatomical landmarks in the prospective test. It also achieved higher completeness on capturing anatomical landmarks compared with endoscopists: (93.1% vs. 88.8%), and was comparable to endoscopists on capturing detected lesions: (99.0% vs. 98.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The EAIRS can generate qualified image reports and could be a powerful tool for generating endoscopic reports in clinical practice.

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Diagnosis of Early Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic ability of artificial intelligence (AI) in the detection of early upper gastrointestinal cancer (EUGIC) using endoscopic images.

Methods

Databases were searched for studies on AI-assisted diagnosis of EUGIC using endoscopic images. The pooled area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

Results

Overall, 34 studies were included in our final analysis. Among the 17 image-based studies investigating early esophageal cancer (EEC) detection, the pooled AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR were 0.98, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.95–0.96), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94–0.95), 10.76 (95% CI, 7.33–15.79), 0.07 (95% CI, 0.04–0.11), and 173.93 (95% CI, 81.79–369.83), respectively. Among the seven patient-based studies investigating EEC detection, the pooled AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR were 0.98, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91–0.96), 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88–0.92), 6.14 (95% CI, 2.06–18.30), 0.07 (95% CI, 0.04–0.11), and 69.13 (95% CI, 14.73–324.45), respectively. Among the 15 image-based studies investigating early gastric cancer (EGC) detection, the pooled AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR were 0.94, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.87–0.88), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.87–0.88), 7.20 (95% CI, 4.32–12.00), 0.14 (95% CI, 0.09–0.23), and 48.77 (95% CI, 24.98–95.19), respectively.

Conclusions

On the basis of our meta-analysis, AI exhibited high accuracy in diagnosis of EUGIC.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42021270443).

Preparation of image databases for artificial intelligence algorithm development in gastrointestinal endoscopy

Over the past decade, technological advances in deep learning have led to the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging. The most commonly used structure in image recognition is the convolutional neural network, which mimics the action of the human visual cortex. The applications of AI in gastrointestinal endoscopy are diverse. Computer-aided diagnosis has achieved remarkable outcomes with recent improvements in machine-learning techniques and advances in computer performance. Despite some hurdles, the implementation of AI-assisted clinical practice is expected to aid endoscopists in real-time decision-making. In this summary, we reviewed state-of-the-art AI in the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy and offered a practical guide for building a learning image dataset for algorithm development.

The Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in the Endoscopic Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer: Pooled Analysis Study

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) for gastric cancer diagnosis has been discussed in recent years. The role of AI in early gastric cancer is more important than in advanced gastric cancer since early gastric cancer is not easily identified in clinical practice. However, to our knowledge, past syntheses appear to have limited focus on the populations with early gastric cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AI in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer from endoscopic images.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review from database inception to June 2020 of all studies assessing the performance of AI in the endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Studies not concerning early gastric cancer were excluded. The outcome of interest was the diagnostic accuracy (comprising sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) of AI systems. Study quality was assessed on the basis of the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Meta-analysis was primarily based on a bivariate mixed-effects model. A summary receiver operating curve and a hierarchical summary receiver operating curve were constructed, and the area under the curve was computed.

RESULTS

We analyzed 12 retrospective case control studies (n=11,685) in which AI identified early gastric cancer from endoscopic images. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of AI for early gastric cancer diagnosis were 0.86 (95% CI 0.75-0.92) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.93), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.94. Sensitivity analysis of studies using support vector machines and narrow-band imaging demonstrated more consistent results.

CONCLUSIONS

For early gastric cancer, to our knowledge, this was the first synthesis study on the use of endoscopic images in AI in diagnosis. AI may support the diagnosis of early gastric cancer. However, the collocation of imaging techniques and optimal algorithms remain unclear. Competing models of AI for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer are worthy of future investigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020193223; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=193223.

Scoping out the future: The application of artificial intelligence to gastrointestinal endoscopy

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a quickly expanding field in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Although there are a myriad of applications of AI ranging from identification of bleeding to predicting outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, a great deal of research has focused on the identification and classification of gastrointestinal malignancies. Several of the initial randomized, prospective trials utilizing AI in clinical medicine have centered on polyp detection during screening colonoscopy. In addition to work focused on colorectal cancer, AI systems have also been applied to gastric, esophageal, pancreatic, and liver cancers. Despite promising results in initial studies, the generalizability of most of these AI systems have not yet been evaluated. In this article we review recent developments in the field of AI applied to gastrointestinal oncology.

Artificial intelligence versus expert endoscopists for diagnosis of gastric cancer in patients who have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

AIMS

To compare endoscopy gastric cancer images diagnosis rate between artificial intelligence (AI) and expert endoscopists.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used the retrospective data of 500 patients, including 100 with gastric cancer, matched 1:1 to diagnosis by AI or expert endoscopists. We retrospectively evaluated the noninferiority (prespecified margin 5 %) of the per-patient rate of gastric cancer diagnosis by AI and compared the per-image rate of gastric cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

Gastric cancer was diagnosed in 49 of 49 patients (100 %) in the AI group and 48 of 51 patients (94.12 %) in the expert endoscopist group (difference 5.88, 95 % confidence interval: -0.58 to 12.3). The per-image rate of gastric cancer diagnosis was higher in the AI group (99.87 %, 747 /748 images) than in the expert endoscopist group (88.17 %, 693 /786 images) (difference 11.7 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Noninferiority of the rate of gastric cancer diagnosis by AI was demonstrated but superiority was not demonstrated.

Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly developing in various medical fields, and there is an increase in research performed in the field of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. In particular, the advent of convolutional neural network, which is a class of deep learning method, has the potential to revolutionize the field of GI endoscopy, including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), capsule endoscopy (CE), and colonoscopy. A total of 149 original articles pertaining to AI (27 articles in esophagus, 30 articles in stomach, 29 articles in CE, and 63 articles in colon) were identified in this review. The main focuses of AI in EGD are cancer detection, identifying the depth of cancer invasion, prediction of pathological diagnosis, and prediction of Helicobacter pylori infection. In the field of CE, automated detection of bleeding sites, ulcers, tumors, and various small bowel diseases is being investigated. AI in colonoscopy has advanced with several patient-based prospective studies being conducted on the automated detection and classification of colon polyps. Furthermore, research on inflammatory bowel disease has also been recently reported. Most studies of AI in the field of GI endoscopy are still in the preclinical stages because of the retrospective design using still images. Video-based prospective studies are needed to advance the field. However, AI will continue to develop and be used in daily clinical practice in the near future. In this review, we have highlighted the published literature along with providing current status and insights into the future of AI in GI endoscopy.

Usefulness of artificial intelligence in early gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is a major cancer worldwide, with high mortality and morbidity. Endoscopy, important for the early detection of GC, requires trained skills, high-quality technologies, surveillance and screening programs. Early diagnosis allows a better prognosis, through surgical or curative endoscopic therapy. Magnified endoscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy remarkably improve the detection of early gastric cancer (EGC) when endoscopy is performed by expert endoscopists. Artificial intelligence (AI) has also been introduced to GC diagnostics to increase diagnostic efficiency. AI improves the early detection of gastric lesions because it supports the non-expert and experienced endoscopist in defining the margins of the tumor and the depth of infiltration. AI increases the detection rate of EGC, reduces the rate of missing tumors, and characterizes EGCs, allowing clinicians to make the best therapeutic decision, that is, one that ensures curability. AI has had a remarkable evolution in medicine in recent years, moving from the research phase to clinical practice. In addition, the diagnosis of GC has markedly progressed. We predict that AI will allow great evolution in the diagnosis and treatment of EGC by overcoming the variability in performance that is currently a limitation of chromoendoscopy.

Diagnosis of histological type of early gastric cancer by magnifying narrow‐band imaging: A multicenter prospective study

Objectives

Distinguishing undifferentiated‐type from differentiated‐type early gastric cancers (EGC) is crucial for determining the indication of endoscopic resection. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of white‐light endoscopy (WLE) and magnifying narrow‐band imaging (M‐NBI) for the histological type of EGC.

Methods

In this multicenter prospective study, patients with histologically proven cT1 EGC, macroscopically depressed or flat type, size ≥5 mm, and without erosion/ulcer, were recruited. The diagnostic criterion of WLE for undifferentiated‐type EGC was pale color. The M‐NBI algorithm was created based on microsurface and microvascular patterns, and lesions with absent microsurface pattern and opened‐loop microvascular patterns were diagnosed as undifferentiated‐type. The center of the lesion was defined as the evaluation point and was initially evaluated by WLE, then by M‐NBI, and a biopsy specimen was taken as a reference standard. The primary and key secondary endpoints were overall diagnostic accuracy and specificity, respectively.

Results

In total, 167 lesions (122 differentiated‐type and 45 undifferentiated‐type EGCs) in 167 patients were analyzed. The overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio of WLE for undifferentiated‐type cancer were 80%, 69%, 84%, and 4.4, respectively, and those of M‐NBI were 82%, 53%, 93%, and 7.2, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall accuracy (p = 0.755), but specificity was significantly higher in M‐NBI (p = 0.041).

Conclusions

The use of M‐NBI did not improve the accuracy of WLE for the diagnosis of depressed/flat undifferentiated‐type EGCs but improved the specificity. It may reduce surgical overtreatment by preventing misdiagnosis of differentiated‐type EGC as undifferentiated‐type.

Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning for Upper Gastrointestinal Neoplasia

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasia account for 35% of GI cancers and 1.5 million cancer-related deaths every year. Despite its efficacy in preventing cancer mortality, diagnostic upper GI endoscopy is affected by a substantial miss rate of neoplastic lesions due to failure to recognize a visible lesion or imperfect navigation. This may be offset by the real-time application of artificial intelligence (AI) for detection (computer-aided detection [CADe]) and characterization (computer-aided diagnosis [CADx]) of upper GI neoplasia. Stand-alone performance of CADe for esophageal squamous cell neoplasia, Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia, and gastric cancer showed promising accuracy, sensitivity ranging between 83% and 93%. However, incorporation of CADe/CADx in clinical practice depends on several factors, such as possible bias in the training or validation phases of these algorithms, its interaction with human endoscopists, and clinical implications of false-positive results. The aim of this review is to guide the clinician across the multiple steps of AI development in clinical practice.

The development and clinical application of microscopic endoscopy for in vivo optical biopsies: Endocytoscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy

Endoscopies are crucial for detecting and diagnosing diseases in gastroenterology, pulmonology, urology, and other fields. To accurately diagnose diseases, sample biopsies are indispensable and are currently considered the gold standard. However, random 4-quadrant biopsies have sampling errors and time delays. To provide intraoperative real-time microscopic images of suspicious lesions, microscopic endoscopy for in vivo optical biopsy has been developed, including endocytoscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy. This article reviews recent advances in technology and clinical applications, as well as their shortcomings and future directions.

Identification of gastric cancer with convolutional neural networks: a systematic review

The identification of diseases is inseparable from artificial intelligence. As an important branch of artificial intelligence, convolutional neural networks play an important role in the identification of gastric cancer. We conducted a systematic review to summarize the current applications of convolutional neural networks in the gastric cancer identification. The original articles published in Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of Science database were systematically retrieved according to relevant keywords. Data were extracted from published papers. A total of 27 articles were retrieved for the identification of gastric cancer using medical images. Among them, 19 articles were applied in endoscopic images and 8 articles were applied in pathological images. 16 studies explored the performance of gastric cancer detection, 7 studies explored the performance of gastric cancer classification, 2 studies reported the performance of gastric cancer segmentation and 2 studies analyzed the performance of gastric cancer delineating margins. The convolutional neural network structures involved in the research included AlexNet, ResNet, VGG, Inception, DenseNet and Deeplab, etc. The accuracy of studies was 77.3 - 98.7%. Good performances of the systems based on convolutional neural networks have been showed in the identification of gastric cancer. Artificial intelligence is expected to provide more accurate information and efficient judgments for doctors to diagnose diseases in clinical work.

Optical Imaging in the Diagnosis of OPMDs Malignant Transformation

Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) are a heterogeneous group of oral lesions with a variable risk of malignant transformation to oral squamous cell carcinoma. The current OPMDs malignant transformation screening depends on conventional oral examination (COE) and is confirmed by biopsy and histologic examination. However, early malignant lesions with subtle mucosal changes are easily unnoticed by COE based on visual inspection and palpation. Optical techniques have been used to determine the biological structure, composition, and function of cells and tissues noninvasively by analyzing the changes in their optical properties. The oral epithelium and stroma undergo persistent structural, functional, and biochemical alterations during malignant transformation, leading to variations in optical tissue properties; optical techniques are thus powerful tools for detecting OPMDs malignant transformation. The optical imaging methods already used to detect OPMDs malignant transformation in vivo include autofluorescence imaging, narrowband imaging, confocal reflectance microscopy, and optical coherence tomography. They exhibit advantages over COE in detecting biochemical or morphologic changes at the molecular or cellular level in vivo; however, limitations also exist. This article comprehensively reviews the various real-time in vivo optical imaging methods used in the adjunctive diagnosis of OPMDs malignant transformation. We focus on the principles of these techniques, review their clinical application, and compare and summarize their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of current challenges and future directions of this field.

Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

We performed a meta-analysis of published data to investigate the diagnostic value of artificial intelligence for pancreatic cancer. Systematic research was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies up to October 2021. We extracted or calculated the number of true positives, false positives true negatives, and false negatives from the selected publications. In total, 10 studies, featuring 1871 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. R and RevMan 5.4.1 software were used for calculations and statistical analysis. The studies included in the meta-analysis did not show an overall heterogeneity (I² = 0%), and no significant differences were found from the subgroup analysis. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89–0.95) and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.83–0.94), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.95, and the diagnostic odds ratio was 128.9 (95% CI, 71.2–233.8), indicating very good diagnostic accuracy for the detection of pancreatic cancer. Based on these promising preliminary results and further testing on a larger dataset, artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic ultrasound could become an important tool for the computer-aided diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Construction and Multicenter Diagnostic Verification of Intelligent Recognition System for Endoscopic Images From Early Gastric Cancer Based on YOLO-V3 Algorithm

Introduction

Endoscopy is an important tool for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Therefore, a combination of artificial intelligence and endoscopy has the ability to increase the speed and efficiency of early gastric cancer diagnosis. YOU ONLY LOOK ONCE (YOLO) is an advanced object detection depth neural network algorithm that has not been widely used in gastrointestinal image recognition.

Objective

We developed an artificial intelligence system herein referred to as “EGC-YOLO” for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of endoscopic images from early gastric cancer.

Methods

More than 40000 gastroscopic images from 1653 patients in Yixing people’s Hospital were used as the training set for the system, while endoscopic images from the other two hospitals were used as external validation test sets. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, Youden index and ROC curve were analyzed to evaluate detection efficiencies for EGC-YOLO.

Results

EGC-YOLO was able to diagnose early gastric cancer in the two test sets with a high superiority and efficiency. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value for Test Sets 1 and 2 were 85.15% and 86.02%, 85.36% and 83.02%, 84.41% and 92.21%, and 95.22% and 95.65%, respectively. In Test Sets 1 and 2, the corresponding Threshold-values were 0.02, 0.16 and 0.17 at the maximum of the Youden index. An increase in Threshold-values was associated with a downward trend in sensitivity and accuracy, while specificity remained relatively stable at more than 80%.

Conclusions

The EGC-YOLO system is superior for the efficient, accurate and rapid detection of early gastric cancer lesions. For different data sets, it is important to select the appropriate threshold-value in advance to achieve the best performance of the EGC-YOLO system.

Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Endoscopic Lesion Detection and Classification Using Endoscopy Videos

In medical imaging, the detection and classification of stomach diseases are challenging due to the resemblance of different symptoms, image contrast, and complex background. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) plays a vital role in the medical imaging field, allowing accurate results to be obtained in minimal time. This article proposes a new hybrid method to detect and classify stomach diseases using endoscopy videos. The proposed methodology comprises seven significant steps: data acquisition, preprocessing of data, transfer learning of deep models, feature extraction, feature selection, hybridization, and classification. We selected two different CNN models (VGG19 and Alexnet) to extract features. We applied transfer learning techniques before using them as feature extractors. We used a genetic algorithm (GA) in feature selection, due to its adaptive nature. We fused selected features of both models using a serial-based approach. Finally, the best features were provided to multiple machine learning classifiers for detection and classification. The proposed approach was evaluated on a personally collected dataset of five classes, including gastritis, ulcer, esophagitis, bleeding, and healthy. We observed that the proposed technique performed superbly on Cubic SVM with 99.8% accuracy. For the authenticity of the proposed technique, we considered these statistical measures: classification accuracy, recall, precision, False Negative Rate (FNR), Area Under the Curve (AUC), and time. In addition, we provided a fair state-of-the-art comparison of our proposed technique with existing techniques that proves its worthiness.

Artificial Intelligence in the Analysis of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders

In the past, conventional machine learning was applied to analyze tabulated medical data while deep learning was applied to study afflictions such as gastrointestinal disorders. Neural networks were used to detect, classify, and delineate various images of lesions because the local feature selection and optimization of the deep learning model enabled accurate image analysis. With the accumulation of medical records, the evolution of computational power and graphics processing units, and the widespread use of open-source libraries in large-scale machine learning processes, medical artificial intelligence (AI) is overcoming its limitations. While early studies prioritized the automatic diagnosis of cancer or pre-cancerous lesions, the current expanded scope of AI includes benign lesions, quality control, and machine learning analysis of big data. However, the limited commercialization of medical AI and the need to justify its application in each field of research are restricting factors. Modeling assumes that observations follow certain statistical rules, and external validation checks whether assumption is correct or generalizable. Therefore, unused data are essential in the training or internal testing process to validate the performance of the established AI models. This article summarizes the studies on the application of AI models in upper gastrointestinal disorders. The current limitations and the perspectives on future development have also been discussed.

Scope of Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Oncology

Simple Summary

Gastrointestinal cancers cause over 2.8 million deaths annually worldwide. Currently, the diagnosis of various gastrointestinal cancer mainly relies on manual interpretation of radiographic images by radiologists and various endoscopic images by endoscopists. Artificial intelligence (AI) may be useful in screening, diagnosing, and treating various cancers by accurately analyzing diagnostic clinical images, identifying therapeutic targets, and processing large datasets. The use of AI in endoscopic procedures is a significant breakthrough in modern medicine. Although the diagnostic accuracy of AI systems has markedly increased, it still needs collaboration with physicians. In the near future, AI-assisted systems will become a vital tool for the management of these cancer patients.

Abstract

Gastrointestinal cancers are among the leading causes of death worldwide, with over 2.8 million deaths annually. Over the last few decades, advancements in artificial intelligence technologies have led to their application in medicine. The use of artificial intelligence in endoscopic procedures is a significant breakthrough in modern medicine. Currently, the diagnosis of various gastrointestinal cancer relies on the manual interpretation of radiographic images by radiologists and various endoscopic images by endoscopists. This can lead to diagnostic variabilities as it requires concentration and clinical experience in the field. Artificial intelligence using machine or deep learning algorithms can provide automatic and accurate image analysis and thus assist in diagnosis. In the field of gastroenterology, the application of artificial intelligence can be vast from diagnosis, predicting tumor histology, polyp characterization, metastatic potential, prognosis, and treatment response. It can also provide accurate prediction models to determine the need for intervention with computer-aided diagnosis. The number of research studies on artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal cancer has been increasing rapidly over the last decade due to immense interest in the field. This review aims to review the impact, limitations, and future potentials of artificial intelligence in screening, diagnosis, tumor staging, treatment modalities, and prediction models for the prognosis of various gastrointestinal cancers.

Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) has increased dramatically in the last 20 years, with clinical applications progressively being explored for most of the medical specialties. The field of gastroenterology and hepatology, substantially reliant on vast amounts of imaging studies, is not an exception. The clinical applications of AI systems in this field include the identification of premalignant or malignant lesions (e.g., identification of dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus, pancreatic malignancies), detection of lesions (e.g., polyp identification and classification, small-bowel bleeding lesion on capsule endoscopy, pancreatic cystic lesions), development of objective scoring systems for risk stratification, predicting disease prognosis or treatment response [e.g., determining survival in patients post-resection of hepatocellular carcinoma), determining which patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) will benefit from biologic therapy], or evaluation of metrics such as bowel preparation score or quality of endoscopic examination. The objective of this comprehensive review is to analyze the available AI-related studies pertaining to the entirety of the gastrointestinal tract, including the upper, middle and lower tracts; IBD; the hepatobiliary system; and the pancreas, discussing the findings and clinical applications, as well as outlining the current limitations and future directions in this field.

Challenges and opportunities in the application of artificial intelligence in gastroenterology and hepatology

Artificial intelligence (AI) is an umbrella term used to describe a cluster of interrelated fields. Machine learning (ML) refers to a model that learns from past data to predict future data. Medicine and particularly gastroenterology and hepatology, are data-rich fields with extensive data repositories, and therefore fruitful ground for AI/ML-based software applications. In this study, we comprehensively review the current applications of AI/ML-based models in these fields and the opportunities that arise from their application. Specifically, we refer to the applications of AI/ML-based models in prevention, diagnosis, management, and prognosis of gastrointestinal bleeding, inflammatory bowel diseases, gastrointestinal premalignant and malignant lesions, other nonmalignant gastrointestinal lesions and diseases, hepatitis B and C infection, chronic liver diseases, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and primary sclerosing cholangitis. At the same time, we identify the major challenges that restrain the widespread use of these models in healthcare in an effort to explore ways to overcome them. Notably, we elaborate on the concerns regarding intrinsic biases, data protection, cybersecurity, intellectual property, liability, ethical challenges, and transparency. Even at a slower pace than anticipated, AI is infiltrating the healthcare industry. AI in healthcare will become a reality, and every physician will have to engage with it by necessity.

Advances in optical gastrointestinal endoscopy: a technical review

Optical endoscopy is the primary diagnostic and therapeutic tool for management of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Most GI neoplasms arise from precancerous lesions; thus, technical innovations to improve detection and diagnosis of precancerous lesions and early cancers play a pivotal role in improving outcomes. Over the last few decades, the field of GI endoscopy has witnessed enormous and focused efforts to develop and translate accurate, user-friendly, and minimally invasive optical imaging modalities. From a technical point of view, a wide range of novel optical techniques is now available to probe different aspects of light-tissue interaction at macroscopic and microscopic scales, complementing white light endoscopy. Most of these new modalities have been successfully validated and translated to routine clinical practice. Herein, we provide a technical review of the current status of existing and promising new optical endoscopic imaging technologies for GI cancer screening and surveillance. We summarize the underlying principles of light-tissue interaction, the imaging performance at different scales, and highlight what is known about clinical applicability and effectiveness. Furthermore, we discuss recent discovery and translation of novel molecular probes that have shown promise to augment endoscopists' ability to diagnose GI lesions with high specificity. We also review and discuss the role and potential clinical integration of artificial intelligence-based algorithms to provide decision support in real time. Finally, we provide perspectives on future technology development and its potential to transform endoscopic GI cancer detection and diagnosis.

A New Dawn for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Pancreatology

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly becoming an essential tool in the medical field as well as in daily life. Recent developments in deep learning, a subfield of AI, have brought remarkable advances in image recognition, which facilitates improvement in the early detection of cancer by endoscopy, ultrasonography, and computed tomography. In addition, AI-assisted big data analysis represents a great step forward for precision medicine. This review provides an overview of AI technology, particularly for gastroenterology, hepatology, and pancreatology, to help clinicians utilize AI in the near future.

Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of gastric dysplasia and early cancer: Current evidence and what the future may hold

Gastric cancer accounts for a significant proportion of worldwide cancer-related morbidity and mortality. The well documented precancerous cascade provides an opportunity for clinicians to detect and treat gastric cancers at an endoscopically curable stage. In high prevalence regions such as Japan and Korea, this has led to the implementation of population screening programs. However, guidelines remain ambiguous in lower prevalence regions. In recent years, there have been many advances in the endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions. More advanced endoscopic imaging has led to improved detection and characterization of gastric lesions as well as superior accuracy for delineation of margins prior to resection. In addition, promising early data on artificial intelligence in gastroscopy suggests a future role for this technology in maximizing the yield of advanced endoscopic imaging. Data on endoscopic resection (ER) are particularly robust in Japan and Korea, with high rates of curative ER and markedly reduced procedural morbidity. However, there is a shortage of data in other regions to support the applicability of protocols from these high prevalence countries. Future advances in endoscopic therapeutics will likely lead to further expansion of the current indications for ER, as both technology and proceduralist expertise continue to grow.

Use of Artificial Intelligence to Improve the Quality Control of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

With the rapid development of science and technology, artificial intelligence (AI) systems are becoming ubiquitous, and their utility in gastroenteroscopy is beginning to be recognized. Digestive endoscopy is a conventional and reliable method of examining and diagnosing digestive tract diseases. However, with the increase in the number and types of endoscopy, problems such as a lack of skilled endoscopists and difference in the professional skill of doctors with different degrees of experience have become increasingly apparent. Most studies thus far have focused on using computers to detect and diagnose lesions, but improving the quality of endoscopic examination process itself is the basis for improving the detection rate and correctly diagnosing diseases. In the present study, we mainly reviewed the role of AI in monitoring systems, mainly through the endoscopic examination time, reducing the blind spot rate, improving the success rate for detecting high-risk lesions, evaluating intestinal preparation, increasing the detection rate of polyps, automatically collecting maps and writing reports. AI can even perform quality control evaluations for endoscopists, improve the detection rate of endoscopic lesions and reduce the burden on endoscopists.

Artificial Intelligence in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, several artificial intelligence (AI) systems are developed to assist in endoscopic assessment of (pre-)cancerous lesions of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. In this review, we aimed to provide an overview of the possible indications of AI technology in upper GI endoscopy and hypothesize about potential challenges for its use in clinical practice.

SUMMARY

Application of AI in upper GI endoscopy has been investigated for several indications: (1) detection, characterization, and delineation of esophageal and gastric cancer (GC) and their premalignant conditions; (2) prediction of tumor invasion; and (3) detection of Helicobacter pylori. AI systems show promising results with an accuracy of up to 99% for the detection of superficial and advanced upper GI cancers. AI outperformed trainee and experienced endoscopists for the detection of esophageal lesions and atrophic gastritis. For GC, AI outperformed mid-level and trainee endoscopists but not expert endoscopists.

KEY MESSAGES

Application of artificial intelligence (AI) in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy may improve early diagnosis of esophageal and gastric cancer and may enable endoscopists to better identify patients eligible for endoscopic resection. The benefit of AI on the quality of upper endoscopy still needs to be demonstrated, while prospective trials are needed to confirm accuracy and feasibility during real-time daily endoscopy.