1
|
Itonaga M, Ashida R, Kitano M. Updated techniques and evidence for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions. DEN OPEN 2025; 5:e399. [PMID: 38911353 PMCID: PMC11190023 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA), including fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB), has revolutionized specimen collection from intra-abdominal organs, especially the pancreas. Advances in personalized medicine and more precise treatment have increased demands to collect specimens with higher cell counts, while preserving tissue structure, leading to the development of EUS-FNB needles. EUS-FNB has generally replaced EUS-FNA as the procedure of choice for EUS-TA of pancreatic cancer. Various techniques have been tested for their ability to enhance the diagnostic performance of EUS-TA, including multiple methods of sampling at the time of puncture, on-site specimen evaluation, and specimen processing. In addition, advances in next-generation sequencing have made comprehensive genomic profiling of EUS-TA samples feasible in routine clinical practice. The present review describes updates in EUS-TA sampling techniques of pancreatic lesions, as well as methods for their evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Itonaga
- Second Department of Internal MedicineWakayama Medical UniversityWakayamaJapan
| | - Reiko Ashida
- Second Department of Internal MedicineWakayama Medical UniversityWakayamaJapan
| | - Masayuki Kitano
- Second Department of Internal MedicineWakayama Medical UniversityWakayamaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Henry PMN, Boag AM, Dandrieux JRS, Rossi R, Woods GA. Diagnostic yield of percutaneous, ultrasound-guided, fine needle aspirates of the gastrointestinal wall: a retrospective analysis of 152 samples. J Small Anim Pract 2024. [PMID: 38958024 DOI: 10.1111/jsap.13759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim was to assess the technical success of percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirates of gastrointestinal wall lesions and evaluate predictors of success. Secondary aims included comparing the cytological diagnosis with histopathology, evaluating the utility of concurrent locoregional lymph node cytology and assessing the procedure's complication rate. MATERIAL AND METHODS Gastrointestinal wall cytology from 75 dogs and 70 cats obtained between 2018 and 2023 were reviewed and categorised as successful (resulting in a diagnostic cytology report) and accurate (resulting in the correct diagnosis when compared to histopathology). Unsuccessful fine needle aspirates, not submitted for cytology, were not recorded. Variables recorded included animal signalment, lesion and lymph node's appearance on ultrasound, size, location, number of smears submitted and experience of the ultrasonographer. RESULTS One hundred and fifty-two reports were analysed. Eighty-eight (58%) were successful: three normal epithelium, 21 inflammatory processes and 64 neoplasms. Variables associated with increased technical success included description of a mass, higher number of slides submitted and thickness of gastrointestinal lesion on ultrasound. Comparison with histopathology, performed for 17 lesions, showed discrepancies in eight, complete agreement in seven and partial in two. Eighty-four loco-regional lymph nodes were sampled, of which, 67 were successful (80%) and 52 brought additional clinical information (supporting GI wall cytology or diagnosing neoplasia not identified on GI wall cytology). No complication strictly attributable to gastrointestinal wall sampling was reported but when possibly related, death of the patient occurred in 2.5% of cases. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirate of gastrointestinal wall had moderate accuracy and was unsuccessful in 42% of cases, but technical success increased when sampling mass lesions, thicker intestinal layers and submitting more slides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P M N Henry
- Hospital for Small Animals, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, UK
| | - A M Boag
- Hospital for Small Animals, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, UK
| | - J R S Dandrieux
- Hospital for Small Animals, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, UK
| | - R Rossi
- Hospital for Small Animals, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, UK
| | - G A Woods
- Hospital for Small Animals, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sbeit W, Shahin A, Basheer M, Khoury T. The additive diagnostic value of cytology in fine needle biopsy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A tertiary center experience. Diagn Cytopathol 2024. [PMID: 38923863 DOI: 10.1002/dc.25376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endoscopic ultrasound guide fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is the main diagnostic tool for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In most instances, only histology is obtained via FNB, without sending cytological slides. The aim of our study was to assess the additive diagnostic yield of cytology performed through FNB. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of all patients with histological diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma who were diagnosed by EUS-FNB. RESULTS Overall, 80 patients were included in the study period. The overall concordance between cytology and histology all FNB needles was 78.2%. Notably, cytological assessment improved the diagnostic yield for malignancy by 12.8%. The overall kappa coefficient correlation between histology and cytology was .501, 95% CI 0.361-0.641. However, the kappa correlation for suspicious of malignancy and malignant was excellent of .872, 95% CI 0.733-1, suggesting that cytology is crucial when histology is inconclusive. Further analysis showed that the Acquire and Sharkcore needles outperformed the Procore needle in term of concordance between cytology and histology (kappa correlation of .527, 95% CI 0.331-0.724, .515, 95% CI 0.265-0.764, and .297, 95% CI -0.051-0.646), respectively. CONCLUSION Performing cytology specimen when using FNB improves the diagnostic yield in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wisam Sbeit
- Department of Gastroenterology, Galilee medical center, Nahariya, Israel
- Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Amir Shahin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Galilee medical center, Nahariya, Israel
- Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Maamoun Basheer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Galilee medical center, Nahariya, Israel
- Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Tawfik Khoury
- Department of Gastroenterology, Galilee medical center, Nahariya, Israel
- Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dahiya DS, Shah YR, Ali H, Chandan S, Gangwani MK, Canakis A, Ramai D, Hayat U, Pinnam BSM, Iqbal A, Malik S, Singh S, Jaber F, Alsakarneh S, Mohamed I, Ali MA, Al-Haddad M, Inamdar S. Basic Principles and Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Differentiation of Pancreatic Cancer from Other Pancreatic Lesions: A Comprehensive Review of Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2599. [PMID: 38731128 PMCID: PMC11084399 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Pancreatic lesions consist of both neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions and often pose a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to similar clinical and radiological features. In recent years, pancreatic lesions have been discovered more frequently as incidental findings due to the increased utilization and widespread availability of abdominal cross-sectional imaging. Therefore, it becomes imperative to establish an early and appropriate diagnosis with meticulous differentiation in an attempt to balance unnecessary treatment of benign pancreatic lesions and missing the opportunity for early intervention in malignant lesions. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become an important diagnostic modality for the identification and risk stratification of pancreatic lesions due to its ability to provide detailed imaging and acquisition of tissue samples for analysis with the help of fine-needle aspiration/biopsy. The recent development of EUS-based technology, including contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound, real-time elastography-endoscopic ultrasound, miniature probe ultrasound, confocal laser endomicroscopy, and the application of artificial intelligence has significantly augmented the diagnostic accuracy of EUS as it enables better evaluation of the number, location, dimension, wall thickness, and contents of these lesions. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the role of the different types of EUS available for the diagnosis and differentiation of pancreatic cancer from other pancreatic lesions while discussing their key strengths and important limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dushyant Singh Dahiya
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Motility, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Yash R. Shah
- Department of Internal Medicine, Trinity Health Oakland/Wayne State University, Pontiac, MI 48341, USA
| | - Hassam Ali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, East Carolina University/Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
| | - Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68178, USA
| | - Manesh Kumar Gangwani
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Andrew Canakis
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Umar Hayat
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center, Wilkes Barre, PA 18711, USA
| | - Bhanu Siva Mohan Pinnam
- Department of Internal Medicine, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Amna Iqbal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH 43614, USA
| | - Sheza Malik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY 14621, USA
| | - Sahib Singh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sinai Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA
| | - Fouad Jaber
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Saqr Alsakarneh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA
| | - Islam Mohamed
- Division of Hepatology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO 64108, USA
| | - Meer Akbar Ali
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Mohammad Al-Haddad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Jordan, 11942 Amman, Jordan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Sumant Inamdar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Esposto G, Massimiani G, Galasso L, Santini P, Borriello R, Mignini I, Ainora ME, Nicoletti A, Zileri Dal Verme L, Gasbarrini A, Alfieri S, Quero G, Zocco MA. Endoscopic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration or Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1658. [PMID: 38730610 PMCID: PMC11083840 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) are currently recommended for the pathologic diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions (PSLs). The application of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (ECEUS) could aid the endoscopist during an FNA and/or FNB procedure. CEUS is indeed able to better differentiate the pathologic tissue from the surrounding healthy pancreatic parenchyma and to detect necrotic areas and vessels. OBJECTIVES Our objective was to evaluate if ECEUS could reduce the number of needle passes and side effects and increase the diagnostic efficacy of FNA and/or FNB. METHODS A comprehensive literature search of clinical studies was performed to explore if ECEUS-FNA or FNB could increase diagnostic accuracy and reduce the number of needle passes and adverse effects compared to standard EUS-FNA or FNB. In accordance with the study protocol, a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the evidence was planned. RESULTS The proportion of established diagnoses of ECEUS was 90.9% compared to 88.3% of EUS, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.14). The diagnosis was made through a single step in 70.9% of ECEUS patients and in 65.3% of EUS patients, without statistical significance (p = 0.24). The incidence of adverse reactions was substantially comparable across both groups (p = 0.89). CONCLUSION ECEUS-FNA and FNB do not appear superior to standard EUS-FNA and FNB for the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Esposto
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.E.); (L.G.); (R.B.); (I.M.); (M.E.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Giuseppe Massimiani
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.M.); (S.A.); (G.Q.)
| | - Linda Galasso
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.E.); (L.G.); (R.B.); (I.M.); (M.E.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Paolo Santini
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (P.S.); (A.N.); (L.Z.D.V.)
| | - Raffaele Borriello
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.E.); (L.G.); (R.B.); (I.M.); (M.E.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Irene Mignini
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.E.); (L.G.); (R.B.); (I.M.); (M.E.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Maria Elena Ainora
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.E.); (L.G.); (R.B.); (I.M.); (M.E.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Alberto Nicoletti
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (P.S.); (A.N.); (L.Z.D.V.)
| | - Lorenzo Zileri Dal Verme
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (P.S.); (A.N.); (L.Z.D.V.)
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.E.); (L.G.); (R.B.); (I.M.); (M.E.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.M.); (S.A.); (G.Q.)
| | - Giuseppe Quero
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.M.); (S.A.); (G.Q.)
| | - Maria Assunta Zocco
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.E.); (L.G.); (R.B.); (I.M.); (M.E.A.); (A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Qiu J, Li K, Long X, Yu X, Gong P, Long Y, Wang X, Tian L. Clinical value of endoscopic ultrasound sound speed in differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesion and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7026. [PMID: 38477492 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesion (PSL) and prognosis of pancreatic cancer (PC) is a clinical challenge. We aimed to explore the differential diagnostic value of sound speed (SS) obtained from endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in PSL and the prognostic value of SS in PC. METHODS Patients with PSL in The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from March 2019 to October 2019 were prospectively enrolled, who obtained SS from PSL. Patients were divided into the PC group and the pancreatic benign lesion (PBL) group. SS1 is the SS of lesions and SS2 is the SS of normal tissues adjacent to lesions. Ratio1 is equal to SS1 divided by SS2 of PSL (ratio1 = SS1/SS2). RESULTS Eighty patients were enrolled (24 PBL patients, 56 PC patients). SS1 and ratio1 in PC group were higher compared with PBL group (SS1:1568.00 vs. 1550.00, Z = -2.066, p = 0.039; ratio1: 1.0110 vs. 1.0051, Z = -3.391, p = 0.001). The SS1 in PC (Z = -6.503, p < 0.001) was higher compared to SS2. In the nonsurgical group of PC, low ratio1 predicted high overall survival (OS) (7.000 months vs. 4.000 months; p = 0.039). In the surgical group of PC, low SS1 was associated with low median OS (4.000 months vs. 12.000 months; p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS SS plays a vital role in distinguishing between PBL and PC. Higher SS1 and ratio1 obtained by EUS are more related to PC than PBL. In PC patients, high SS1 may predict pancreatic lesions. In the nonsurgical group of PC, low ratio1 may predict high OS. However, in the surgical group of PC, low SS1 may predict low OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianing Qiu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Kangrong Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiuyan Long
- Department of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaoyu Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Pan Gong
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yu Long
- Health Management Center of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaoyan Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Li Tian
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Jong M, van Delft F, Roozen C, van Geenen EJ, Bisseling T, Siersema P, Bruno M. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs before endoscopic ultrasound guided tissue acquisition to reduce the incidence of post procedural pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:811-816. [PMID: 38516233 PMCID: PMC10950633 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i8.811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine needle aspiration or fine needle biopsy is the gold standard for sampling tissue to diagnose pancreatic cancer and autoimmune pancreatitis or to analyze cyst fluid. The most common reported adverse event of fine needle aspiration and/or fine needle biopsy is acute pancreatitis, which is likely induced by the same pathophysiological mechanisms as after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). According to the current European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are administered prior to ERCP as a scientifically proven treatment to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis incidence rate. A single suppository of diclofenac or indomethacin prior to EUS guided tissue acquisition (TA) is harmless in healthy adults. Since it is associated with low costs and, most important, may prevent a dreadsome complication, we strongly recommend the administration of 100 mg diclofenac rectally prior to EUS-TA. We will explain this recommendation in more detail in this review as well as the risk and pathophysiology of post-EUS TA pancreatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike de Jong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525 GA, Netherlands
| | - Foke van Delft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525 GA, Netherlands
| | - Christine Roozen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525 GA, Netherlands
| | - Erwin-Jan van Geenen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525 GA, Netherlands
| | - Tanya Bisseling
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525 GA, Netherlands
| | - Peter Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525 GA, Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015 GD, Netherlands
| | - Marco Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015 GD, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Blom M, Magarey MJR, Flatman S. Diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of surgeon-performed ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration in lateral neck masses. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:117-121. [PMID: 38205558 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Revised: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgeon-performed ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (SUS-FNA) reduces the time to diagnosis and treatment of head and neck pathology. Although it has been validated in the investigation of thyroid pathology, there is a paucity of evidence to support its use in lateral neck masses. This study aims to determine the accuracy and adequacy of SUS-FNA in the investigation of lateral neck masses. METHODS A retrospective cohort analysis was performed of patients who underwent a SUS-FNA for lateral neck mass between June 2018 and October 2022 at a single institution. Pathologist reports were reviewed to determine the rate of FNA sample adequacy. A comparison was made between FNA cytology results and final histopathological diagnosis following surgical excision in a subset of patients to determine FNA accuracy. RESULTS A total of 110 SUS-FNAs were performed on lateral neck masses. Diagnostic adequacy of SUS-FNA was determined to be 91% (100/110). When analysing the subset of patients who proceeded to surgical excision, the diagnostic accuracy of SUS-FNA was determined to be 88% (38/43). CONCLUSION SUS-FNA results in high adequacy rates with good diagnostic accuracy in the investigation of lateral neck masses. This tool has great potential in reducing treatment delay in the management of head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Blom
- Department of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew J R Magarey
- Department of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samuel Flatman
- Department of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sagami R, Nakahodo J, Minami R, Yamao K, Yoshida A, Nishikiori H, Takenaka M, Mizukami K, Murakami K. True diagnostic ability of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy sampling for small pancreatic lesions ≤10 mm and salvage diagnosis by pancreatic juice cytology: a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:73-80. [PMID: 37598865 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The diagnostic performance of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy sampling (EUS-FNAB) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) ≤10 mm in diameter is relatively low. Pancreatic juice cytology (PJC) has gained attention because of its high sensitivity for small PDACs. We aimed to clarify the diagnostic ability of EUS-FNAB and the salvage ability of PJC for PDAC ≤10 mm. METHODS Data obtained from attempted EUS-FNAB for patients with EUS-confirmed pancreatic tumors ≤10 mm (excluding pancreatic metastases/malignant lymphomas) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who experienced technical failure or had a negative EUS-FNAB result and had a strong likelihood of PDAC based on imaging characteristics underwent PJC. PDAC was diagnosed using resected histologic specimens, EUS-FNAB-positive tumor growth on the imaging examination, or additional EUS-FNAB-positive results after increase in tumor size. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic ability of EUS-FNAB for PDAC ≤10 mm. The salvage ability of PJC was also assessed. RESULTS Overall, 86 of 271 patients with pancreatic tumors ≤10 mm who underwent attempted EUS-FNAB were diagnosed with PDAC. The technical success rate, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNAB for PDAC ≤10 mm were 80.8%, 82.3%, 94.9%, and 91.3%, respectively. Among the 35 PDAC patients who experienced technical failure or false-negative results of EUS-FNAB, 26 (74.3%) were correctly diagnosed using salvage PJC. CONCLUSIONS The true success rate and sensitivity of EUS-FNAB for PDAC ≤10 mm were relatively low. When EUS-FNAB for a pancreatic lesion ≤10 mm strongly suspected to be PDAC is unsuccessful or yields a negative result, PJC is recommended. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000049965.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryota Sagami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oita San-ai Medical Center, Oita, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan; Pancreatic Cancer Research for Secure Salvage Young Investigators (PASSYON), Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jun Nakahodo
- Pancreatic Cancer Research for Secure Salvage Young Investigators (PASSYON), Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryuki Minami
- Pancreatic Cancer Research for Secure Salvage Young Investigators (PASSYON), Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Tenri Hospital, Nara, Japan
| | - Kentaro Yamao
- Pancreatic Cancer Research for Secure Salvage Young Investigators (PASSYON), Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Akihiro Yoshida
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | | | - Mamoru Takenaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Mizukami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan
| | - Kazunari Murakami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhao Y, Xiong D, Aruna, Chen Q, Kuang D, Xiong S, Wang Y, Yang Y, Guo Q, Chen L, Zhang J, Wu X, Feng Y, Cheng B. Fine needle biopsy versus fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of immunohistochemistry-required lesions: A multicenter study with prospective evaluation. Endosc Ultrasound 2023; 12:456-464. [PMID: 38948128 PMCID: PMC11213591 DOI: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives The superiority of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) over fine-needle aspiration (FNA) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of FNB and FNA in immunohistochemistry (IHC)-required lesions, including, type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), neuroendocrine tumor (NET), mesenchymal tumor, and lymphoma. Methods In this multicenter study, specimens from all eligible patients who underwent EUS-FNB/FNA with these specific lesions were prospectively evaluated. Demographics, adequacy of specimens for IHC, diagnostic accuracy, and integrity of tissue were analyzed. Subgroup analysis and multivariate logistic regression were also performed to control confounders. Results A total of 439 patients were included for analysis. Most lesion types were type 1 AIP (41.69%), followed by NET, mesenchymal tumor, and lymphoma. FNB yielded specimens with better adequacy for IHC (82.41% vs. 66.67%, P < 0.001) and higher diagnostic accuracy (74.37% vs. 55.42%, P < 0.001). The superiority of FNB over FNA in adequacy for IHC (odds ratio, 2.786 [1.515-5.291]) and diagnostic accuracy (odds ratio, 2.793 [1.645-4.808]) remained significant after control of confounders including needle size, lesion site, lesion size, and endoscopists. In subgroup analysis, FNB showed higher diagnostic accuracy in AIP and mesenchymal tumor, whereas no statistically significant difference was observed in NET and lymphoma. Conclusions FNB was superior to FNA needles in obtaining tissues with better adequacy and integrity. These results suggest that FNB should be considered a first-line modality in the diagnosis of IHC-required lesions, especially AIP and mesenchymal tumor. However, a randomized controlled trial with larger sample size is needed to further confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuchong Zhao
- The Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Dingkun Xiong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Aruna
- The Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Qian Chen
- The Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Dong Kuang
- The Division of Pathology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Si Xiong
- The Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Yun Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
| | - Yilei Yang
- The Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Qiaozhen Guo
- The Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Lan Chen
- The Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Jiqiao Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Minda Hospital of Hubei Minzu University, Enshi, Hubei Province, China
| | - Xiaoli Wu
- The Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Yunlu Feng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bin Cheng
- The Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hamamoto W, Onoyama T, Kawahara S, Sakamoto Y, Koda H, Yamashita T, Takeda Y, Matsumoto K, Harada K, Yamaguchi N, Isomoto H. Safety and Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy for Hypervascular Pancreatic Lesions. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6663. [PMID: 37892801 PMCID: PMC10606996 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12206663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is a common technique for diagnosing pancreatic lesions with high accuracy and a low incidence of procedural adverse events. However, occasional adverse events, particularly bleeding, may occur. Procedures for hypervascular lesions are considered important, but their risks are unknown. We aimed to evaluate the safety and diagnostic yield of EUS-FNB for hypervascular pancreatic solid lesions. This study included 301 patients with 308 solid pancreatic lesions who underwent EUS-FNB between May 2011 and December 2018. We performed propensity-score matching to balance clinical differences between hypervascular and hypovascular lesions and analyzed 52 lesions. We compared the safety and diagnostic performance of propensity score-matched cohorts. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of EUS-FNB for hypervascular lesions were 94.7%, 100%, and 96.2%, and those for hypovascular lesions were 80.0%, 100%, and 84.6%, respectively. There was no difference in diagnostic performance between hypervascular and hypovascular lesions. Furthermore, adverse events occurred in only one patient (pancreatitis) in the hypovascular group. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of adverse events between hypervascular and hypovascular lesions (0% vs. 3.8%, p = 1.000). Therefore, EUS-FNB may be safe with a high diagnostic yield, even for hypervascular solid pancreatic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wataru Hamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Nishi-cho 36-1, Yonago 683-8504, Japan
| | - Takumi Onoyama
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Nishi-cho 36-1, Yonago 683-8504, Japan
| | - Shiho Kawahara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Nishi-cho 36-1, Yonago 683-8504, Japan
| | - Yuri Sakamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Nishi-cho 36-1, Yonago 683-8504, Japan
| | - Hiroki Koda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Nishi-cho 36-1, Yonago 683-8504, Japan
| | - Taro Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Nishi-cho 36-1, Yonago 683-8504, Japan
| | - Yohei Takeda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Nishi-cho 36-1, Yonago 683-8504, Japan
| | - Kazuya Matsumoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Nishi-cho 36-1, Yonago 683-8504, Japan
| | - Kenichi Harada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Nishi-cho 36-1, Yonago 683-8504, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biological Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan
| | - Hajime Isomoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Nishi-cho 36-1, Yonago 683-8504, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jiao F, Cui J, Fu D, Li Q, Wu Z, Teng Z, Zhang H, Zhou J, Zhang Z, Chen X, Zhou Y, Li Y, Mou Y, Qin R, Sun Y, Jin G, Cheng Y, Wang J, Ren G, Yue J, Jin G, Xiao X, Wang L. Chinese Medical Association consensus for standardized diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Chin Med J (Engl) 2023; 136:2397-2411. [PMID: 37690992 PMCID: PMC10586833 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000002848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Jiao
- Department of Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Jiujie Cui
- Department of Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Deliang Fu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Qi Li
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200080, China
| | - Zheng Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| | - Zan Teng
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110801, China
| | - Hongmei Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Zhihong Zhang
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China
| | - Xiaobing Chen
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, China
| | - Yuhong Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yixiong Li
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, China
| | - Yiping Mou
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310014, China
| | - Renyi Qin
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, China
| | - Yongwei Sun
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Gang Jin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Yuejuan Cheng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
| | - Gang Ren
- Department of Radiotherapy, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing 100144, China
| | - Jiang Yue
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Guangxin Jin
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Xiuying Xiao
- Department of Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Liwei Wang
- Department of Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bellisario F, Attili F, Campana F, Borrelli de Andreis F, Bellesi S, Maiolo E, Alma E, Malafronte R, Macis G, Larocca LM, Annunziata S, D’Alò F, Hohaus S. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy in the Diagnostic Work-Up of Deep-Seated Lymphadenopathies and Spleen Lesions: A Monocentric Experience. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2839. [PMID: 37685377 PMCID: PMC10487140 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13172839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
EUS-FNB has been introduced in clinical practice as a less invasive diagnostic approach with respect to surgery. We performed a single-center retrospective study on the diagnostic efficacy of EUS-guided FNB, including 171 patients with lymph nodes, splenic, and extranodal lesions that underwent EUS for FNB at our institution. Excluding 12 patients who did not undergo FNB and 25 patients with a previous diagnosis of a solid tumor, we included 134 patients with clinical/radiological suspect of a lymphoproliferative disease, including 20 patients with a previous history of lymphoma. Out of the 134 biopsies, material of diagnostic quality was obtained in 111 procedures (84.3%). Histological examination of the EUS-FNB samples produced an actionable diagnosis in 100 cases (74.6%). Among the patients without an actionable diagnosis, a second, different diagnostic procedure produced a further eight diagnoses of lymphoma. Therefore, the sensitivity of EUS-FNB for diagnosing lymphomas was calculated to be 86.4% (51/59). Assignment of lymphomas to WHO classification subtypes was possible in 47/51 (92%) of the cases. In conclusion, EUS-FNB is an effective procedure for the histological characterization of lesions that are suspected to be lymphoproliferative disease, allowing for an actionable diagnosis in 75% of cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flaminia Bellisario
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.B.); (S.B.); (E.M.); (E.A.); (R.M.); (G.M.); (S.A.); (S.H.)
- Sezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Fabia Attili
- Endoscopia Digestiva, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.A.); (F.B.d.A.)
| | - Fabrizia Campana
- Sezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Federica Borrelli de Andreis
- Endoscopia Digestiva, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.A.); (F.B.d.A.)
| | - Silvia Bellesi
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.B.); (S.B.); (E.M.); (E.A.); (R.M.); (G.M.); (S.A.); (S.H.)
| | - Elena Maiolo
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.B.); (S.B.); (E.M.); (E.A.); (R.M.); (G.M.); (S.A.); (S.H.)
| | - Eleonora Alma
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.B.); (S.B.); (E.M.); (E.A.); (R.M.); (G.M.); (S.A.); (S.H.)
| | - Rosalia Malafronte
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.B.); (S.B.); (E.M.); (E.A.); (R.M.); (G.M.); (S.A.); (S.H.)
- Sezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Macis
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.B.); (S.B.); (E.M.); (E.A.); (R.M.); (G.M.); (S.A.); (S.H.)
| | - Luigi Maria Larocca
- Patologia Oncoematologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Salvatore Annunziata
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.B.); (S.B.); (E.M.); (E.A.); (R.M.); (G.M.); (S.A.); (S.H.)
| | - Francesco D’Alò
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.B.); (S.B.); (E.M.); (E.A.); (R.M.); (G.M.); (S.A.); (S.H.)
- Sezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Stefan Hohaus
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.B.); (S.B.); (E.M.); (E.A.); (R.M.); (G.M.); (S.A.); (S.H.)
- Sezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yang Y, Aruna, Cheng B, Xiong D, Kuang D, Cui H, Xiong S, Mao X, Feng Y, Zhao Y. Comparison of Fine-Needle Biopsy (FNB) versus Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) Combined with Flow Cytometry in the Diagnosis of Deep-Seated Lymphoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2777. [PMID: 37685315 PMCID: PMC10487053 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13172777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Evidence comparing ultrasound endoscopy-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in deep-seated lymphoma tissue sampling is insufficient. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of immunohistochemistry (IHC) or flow cytometry (FCM) on specimens obtained from EUS-FNB and EUS-FNA in the diagnosis and staging of deep-seated lymphomas. This real-world, dual-center study prospectively evaluated all eligible specimens from patients who underwent EUS-FNB/FNA over an 8-year period. 53 patients were enrolled, with 23 patients in the EUS-FNB group and 30 patients in the EUS-FNA group. FNB yielded specimens with longer core tissues (0.80 mm [0.55, 1.00] vs. 0.45 mm [0.30, 0.50], p = 0.009) and higher scores of specimen adequacy [4 (3.75, 4.00) vs. 3 (1.00, 4.00), p = 0.025]. Overall analysis revealed that the diagnostic accuracy of IHC based on specimens acquired from EUS-FNB was significantly higher than that of EUS-FNA (91.30% vs. 60.00%, p = 0.013). After controlling confounding factors including lesion size and endoscopists, EUS-FNB with IHC maintained a higher-level diagnostic accuracy compared to EUS-FNA (OR = 1.292 [1.037-1.609], p = 0.023). When FCM was additionally used to analyze the specimen acquired from EUS-FNA, the diagnostic yield was significantly improved (ROC AUC: 0.733 vs. 0.550, p = 0.015), and the AUC of FNB alone or combined with FCM was 0.739 and 0.761. Conclusions: FNB needles generate higher histopathological diagnostic accuracy and specimen quality than FNA for the deep-seated lymphoma. Though the application of FCM significantly improves the diagnostic efficacy of EUS-FNA, FNB was still the preferred diagnostic modality with a shorter procedure time, comparable diagnostic accuracy, and better cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yilei Yang
- The Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan 430030, China; (Y.Y.); (A.); (H.C.); (S.X.)
| | - Aruna
- The Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan 430030, China; (Y.Y.); (A.); (H.C.); (S.X.)
| | - Bin Cheng
- The Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan 430030, China; (Y.Y.); (A.); (H.C.); (S.X.)
| | - Dingkun Xiong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China; (D.X.); (Y.F.)
| | - Dong Kuang
- The Division of Pathology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China;
| | - Haochen Cui
- The Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan 430030, China; (Y.Y.); (A.); (H.C.); (S.X.)
| | - Si Xiong
- The Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan 430030, China; (Y.Y.); (A.); (H.C.); (S.X.)
| | - Xia Mao
- Department of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China;
| | - Yunlu Feng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China; (D.X.); (Y.F.)
| | - Yuchong Zhao
- The Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan 430030, China; (Y.Y.); (A.); (H.C.); (S.X.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aslan A, Stevens C, Aldine AS, Mamilly A, De Alba L, Arevalo O, Ahuja C, Cuellar HH. The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system. Diagn Interv Radiol 2023; 29:529-534. [PMID: 37070845 PMCID: PMC10679611 DOI: 10.4274/dir.2023.222052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The fragility index (FI) measures the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It complements the P value by taking into account the number of outcome events. In this study, the authors measured the FI for major interventional radiology RCTs. METHODS Interventional radiology RCTs published between January 2010 and December 2022 relating to trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, trans-arterial chemoembolization, needle biopsy, angiography, angioplasty, thrombolysis, and nephrostomy tube insertion were analyzed to measure the FI and robustness of the studies. RESULTS A total of 34 RCTs were included. The median FI of those studies was 4.5 (range 1-68). Seven trials (20.6%) had a number of patients lost to follow-up that was higher than their FI, and 15 (44.1%) had a FI of 1-3. CONCLUSION The median FI, and hence the reproducibility of interventional radiology RCTs, is low compared to other medical fields, with some having a FI of 1, which should be interrupted cautiously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Assala Aslan
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Ochsner-Louisiana State University, Shreveport, United States
| | - Christopher Stevens
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Ochsner-Louisiana State University, Shreveport, United States
| | - Amro Saad Aldine
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Ochsner-Louisiana State University, Shreveport, United States
| | - Ahmed Mamilly
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Ochsner-Louisiana State University, Shreveport, United States
| | - Luis De Alba
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Ochsner-Louisiana State University, Shreveport, United States
| | - Octavio Arevalo
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Ochsner-Louisiana State University, Shreveport, United States
| | - Chaitanya Ahuja
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Ochsner-Louisiana State University, Shreveport, United States
| | - Hugo H. Cuellar
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Ochsner-Louisiana State University, Shreveport, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fiore M, Coppola A, Petrianni GM, Trecca P, D’Ercole G, Cimini P, Ippolito E, Caputo D, Beomonte Zobel B, Coppola R, Ramella S. Advances in pre-treatment evaluation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a narrative review. J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 14:1114-1130. [PMID: 37201095 PMCID: PMC10186502 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-22-1034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Despite advances in the multidisciplinary management of pancreatic cancer, overall prognosis remains poor, due to early progression of the disease. There is a need to also take action in staging, to make it increasingly accurate and complete, to define the setting of the therapeutic strategy. This review was planned to update the current status of pre-treatment evaluation for pancreatic cancer. METHODS We conducted an extensive review, including relevant articles dealing with traditional imaging, functional imaging and minimally invasive surgical procedures before treatment for pancreatic cancer. We searched articles written in English only. Data in the PubMed database, published in the period between January 2000 and January 2022, were retrieved. Prospective observational studies, retrospective analyses and meta-analyses were reviewed and analysed. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS Each imaging modality (endoscopic ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, computed tomography, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, staging laparoscopy) has its own diagnostic advantages and limitations. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for each image set are reported. Data that support the increasing role of neoadjuvant therapy (radiotherapy and chemotherapy) and the meaning of a patient-tailored treatment selection, based on tumour staging, are also discussed. CONCLUSIONS A multimodal pre-treatment workup should be searched as it improves staging accuracy, orienting patients with resectable tumors towards surgery, optimizing patient selection with locally advanced tumors to neoadjuvant or definite therapy and avoiding surgical resection or curative radiotherapy in those with metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Fiore
- Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Operative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Gian Marco Petrianni
- Operative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale Trecca
- Operative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele D’Ercole
- Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Cimini
- Operative Research Unit of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Edy Ippolito
- Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Operative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Damiano Caputo
- Department of Surgery and Research Unit of General Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Operative Research Unit of General Surgery Unit Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Beomonte Zobel
- Operative Research Unit of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Coppola
- Department of Surgery and Research Unit of General Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Operative Research Unit of General Surgery Unit Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Ramella
- Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Operative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Masuda S, Koizumi K, Shionoya K, Jinushi R, Makazu M, Nishino T, Kimura K, Sumida C, Kubota J, Ichita C, Sasaki A, Kobayashi M, Kako M, Haruki U. Comprehensive review on endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition techniques for solid pancreatic tumor. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:1863-1874. [PMID: 37032729 PMCID: PMC10080698 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i12.1863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is speculated to become the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality by 2030, a high mortality rate considering the number of cases. Surgery and chemotherapy are the main treatment options, but they are burdensome for patients. A clear histological diagnosis is needed to determine a treatment plan, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition (TA) is a suitable technique that does not worsen the cancer-specific prognosis even for lesions at risk of needle tract seeding. With the development of personalized medicine and precision treatment, there has been an increasing demand to increase cell counts and collect specimens while preserving tissue structure, leading to the development of the fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needle. EUS-FNB is rapidly replacing EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) as the procedure of choice for EUS-TA of pancreatic cancer. However, EUS-FNA is sometimes necessary where the FNB needle cannot penetrate small hard lesions, so it is important clinicians are familiar with both. Given these recent dev-elopments, we present an up-to-date review of the role of EUS-TA in pancreatic cancer. Particularly, technical aspects, such as needle caliber, negative pressure, and puncture methods, for obtaining an adequate specimen in EUS-TA are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakue Masuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan
| | - Kazuya Koizumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan
| | - Kento Shionoya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan
| | - Ryuhei Jinushi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan
| | - Makomo Makazu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan
| | - Takashi Nishino
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan
| | - Karen Kimura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan
| | - Chihiro Sumida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan
| | - Jun Kubota
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan
| | - Chikamasa Ichita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan
| | - Akiko Sasaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan
| | - Makoto Kako
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan
| | - Uojima Haruki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa 252-0375, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Biliary Strictures. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:405-426. [PMID: 36863037 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
A biliary stricture is an abnormal narrowing in the ductal drainage system of the liver that can result in clinically and physiologically relevant obstruction to the flow of bile. The most common and ominous etiology is malignancy, underscoring the importance of a high index of suspicion in the evaluation of this condition. The goals of care in patients with a biliary stricture are confirming or excluding malignancy (diagnosis) and reestablishing flow of bile to the duodenum (drainage); the approach to diagnosis and drainage varies according to anatomic location (extrahepatic vs perihilar). For extrahepatic strictures, endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition is highly accurate and has become the diagnostic mainstay. In contrast, the diagnosis of perihilar strictures remains a challenge. Similarly, the drainage of extrahepatic strictures tends to be more straightforward and safer and less controversial than that of perihilar strictures. Recent evidence has provided some clarity in multiple important areas pertaining to biliary strictures, whereas several remaining controversies require additional research. The goal of this guideline is to provide practicing clinicians with the most evidence-based guidance on the approach to patients with extrahepatic and perihilar strictures, focusing on diagnosis and drainage.
Collapse
|
19
|
Takeshita K, Hijioka S, Nagashio Y, Maruki Y, Kawasaki Y, Maehara K, Murashima Y, Okada M, Ikeda G, Yamada N, Takasaki T, Agarie D, Hara H, Hagiwara Y, Okamoto K, Yamashige D, Ohba A, Kondo S, Morizane C, Ueno H, Saito Y, Ohe Y, Okusaka T. Diagnostic Ability of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using 19-Gauge Fine-Needle Biopsy Needle for Abdominal Lesions. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13030450. [PMID: 36766558 PMCID: PMC9914510 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13030450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Attempts at performing endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) with a 19G needle are increasing because histological diagnosis and comprehensive genomic profiling are a necessity. However, the diagnostic ability of the 19G fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needle, especially the third-generation FNB needle, is unclear and has been retrospectively reviewed. The 19G TopGain needle was used in 147 patients and 160 lesions between September 2020 and December 2021. The technical success rate of the biopsies was 99.4% (159/160). The early adverse event rate was 4.1% (6/147), and moderate or severe adverse event rate occurrence was 2.0% (3/147). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the 19G TopGain needle for 157 lesions with a confirmed diagnosis were 96.7%, 100%, and 96.8%, respectively. Rescue EUS-TA using the 19G TopGain needle was performed for nine lesions, and a successful diagnosis was made in six of these lesions (66.7%). The diagnostic ability of EUS-TA using the third-generation 19G TopGain needle was favorable. However, the use of 19G FNB needles may increase adverse events. Therefore, EUS-TA with a 19G FNB needle is mainly indicated in lesions where comprehensive genomic profiling may be necessary or the diagnosis could not be determined via EUS-TA using the 22G needle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kotaro Takeshita
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
- Cancer Medicine, Jikei University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-0003, Japan
| | - Susumu Hijioka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-3-3542-2511
| | - Yoshikuni Nagashio
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Yuta Maruki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Yuki Kawasaki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Kosuke Maehara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Yumi Murashima
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Mao Okada
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Go Ikeda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Natsumi Yamada
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Takasaki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Daiki Agarie
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Hidenobu Hara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Yuya Hagiwara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Kohei Okamoto
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Daiki Yamashige
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Akihiro Ohba
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Kondo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Chigusa Morizane
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Hideki Ueno
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Ohe
- Cancer Medicine, Jikei University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-0003, Japan
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Takuji Okusaka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Galgano SJ, Morani AC, Gopireddy DR, Sharbidre K, Bates DDB, Goenka AH, Arif-Tiwari H, Itani M, Iravani A, Javadi S, Faria S, Lall C, Bergsland E, Verma S, Francis IR, Halperin DM, Chatterjee D, Bhosale P, Yano M. Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a 2022 update for radiologists. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY (NEW YORK) 2022; 47:3962-3970. [PMID: 35244755 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03466-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PaNENs) are a unique group of pancreatic neoplasms with a wide range of clinical presentations and behaviors. Given their heterogeneous appearance and increasing detection on cross-sectional imaging, it is essential that radiologists understand the variable presentation and distinctions PaNENs display compared to other pancreatic neoplasms. Additionally, some of these neoplasms may be hormonally functional, and it is imperative that radiologists be aware of the common clinical presentations of hormonally active PaNENs. Knowledge of PaNEN pathology and treatments may influence which imaging modality is optimal for each patient. Each imaging modality used for PaNENs has distinct advantages and disadvantages, particularly in different treatment settings. Thus, the focus of this manuscript is to provide an update for the radiologist on PaNEN pathology, imaging, and treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Galgano
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | | | - Dheeraj R Gopireddy
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Kedar Sharbidre
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - David D B Bates
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ajit H Goenka
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Hina Arif-Tiwari
- Department of Radiology, University of Arizona-Tuscon, Tuscon, AZ, USA
| | - Malak Itani
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Amir Iravani
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sanaz Javadi
- Department of Radiology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Silvana Faria
- Department of Radiology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chandana Lall
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Emily Bergsland
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sadhna Verma
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Isaac R Francis
- Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Daniel M Halperin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Deyali Chatterjee
- Department of Pathology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Priya Bhosale
- Department of Radiology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Motoyo Yano
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Karstensen JG, Vilmann P. Historical perspective on needle development: From the past to the future. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 60-61:101814. [PMID: 36577533 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2022.101814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
With the introduction of EUS, endoscopy was no longer limited to luminal indications. However, the method was unable to distinguish malignant from benign lesions. Consequently, needles designed for tissue acquisition under EUS-guidance was designed. Initially, the needles were designed for fine needle aspiration (FNA); nevertheless, with increased requirement for the precured tissue in terms of quality and quantity, newly design needles aimed at obtaining tissue cores for histological assessment were developed. Recent studies demonstrate superiority of these fine needle biopsy needles (FNB) compared to FNA needles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Gásdal Karstensen
- Pancreatitis Centre East, Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark; Dept of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Peter Vilmann
- Dept of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Gastro Unit, Division of Endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yang MJ, Park SW, Lee KJ, Koh DH, Lee J, Lee YN, Park CH, Shin E, Kim S. EUS
‐guided tissue acquisition using a novel torque technique is comparable with that of the fanning technique for solid pancreatic lesions: A multicenter randomized trial. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2022; 30:693-703. [DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Min Jae Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology Ajou University School of Medicine Suwon Korea
| | - Se Woo Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine Gyeonggi‐do Korea
| | - Kyong Joo Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine Gyeonggi‐do Korea
| | - Dong Hee Koh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine Gyeonggi‐do Korea
| | - Jin Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine Gyeonggi‐do Korea
| | - Yun Nah Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine Bucheon Korea
| | - Chan Hyuk Park
- Department of Internal Medicine Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine Gyeonggi‐do Korea
| | - Eun Shin
- Department of Pathology Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine Gyeonggi‐do Korea
| | - Seokhwi Kim
- Department of Pathology Ajou University School of Medicine Suwon Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mathew P, Kanni P, Gowda M, Devarapu C, Ansari J, Garg A. A Comparative Study of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-Based Brush Cytology for Tissue Diagnosis in Malignant Biliary Obstruction. Cureus 2022; 14:e30291. [DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
24
|
Perik TH, van Genugten EAJ, Aarntzen EHJG, Smit EJ, Huisman HJ, Hermans JJ. Quantitative CT perfusion imaging in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:3101-3117. [PMID: 34223961 PMCID: PMC9388409 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03190-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death with a 5-year survival rate of 10%. Quantitative CT perfusion (CTP) can provide additional diagnostic information compared to the limited accuracy of the current standard, contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). This systematic review evaluates CTP for diagnosis, grading, and treatment assessment of PDAC. The secondary goal is to provide an overview of scan protocols and perfusion models used for CTP in PDAC. The search strategy combined synonyms for 'CTP' and 'PDAC.' Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 2000 to December 2020 for studies using CTP to evaluate PDAC. The risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. 607 abstracts were screened, of which 29 were selected for full-text eligibility. 21 studies were included in the final analysis with a total of 760 patients. All studies comparing PDAC with non-tumorous parenchyma found significant CTP-based differences in blood flow (BF) and blood volume (BV). Two studies found significant differences between pathological grades. Two other studies showed that BF could predict neoadjuvant treatment response. A wide variety in kinetic models and acquisition protocol was found among included studies. Quantitative CTP shows a potential benefit in PDAC diagnosis and can serve as a tool for pathological grading and treatment assessment; however, clinical evidence is still limited. To improve clinical use, standardized acquisition and reconstruction parameters are necessary for interchangeability of the perfusion parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T H Perik
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - E A J van Genugten
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - E H J G Aarntzen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - E J Smit
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - H J Huisman
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J J Hermans
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Li Z, Liu W, Xu X, Li P. A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 56:668-678. [PMID: 35470294 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The superiority between endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is still a debate. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the diagnostic value and safety of these 2 needles in sampling of all solid lesions and separately pancreatic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were searched for randomized controlled studies that reported the comparison of FNA and FNB in solid mass. Outcome measures included diagnostic accuracy, number of needle passes, diagnostic adequacy, presence of tissue cores, and adverse events. Standard error, upper and lower confidence intervals at 95% confidence interval for the risk were obtained using Review Manager Version 5.3 which was also used to generate forest plots for pooled analysis. The random or fixed effect model was applied depending on the heterogeneity ( I2 ). RESULTS Eighteen randomized control trial studies with a total of 2718 patients (1141 patients with EUS-FNA, 1108 with EUS-FNB, and remaining 469 patients were sampled with both needles alternatively) were included in the meta-analysis.FNB group has relatively good diagnostic accuracy relative risk (RR): 0.94, 0.92-0.97; P =0.0002), diagnostic adequacy (RR: 0.95, 0.9-1.0; P =0.04) and high quality histologic yield compared (RR: 0.77, 0.64-0.93; P =0.007) with the FNA group in solid gastrointestinal lesions, and the number of needle passes to obtain sufficient tissue (mean difference: 0.54, 0.45-0.64; P <0.00001) was lower in the FNB group. For solid pancreatic disease only, there was no difference in diagnostic accuracy (RR: 0.97, 0.93-1.01, P =0.13) or quality histologic yield (RR: 0.60, 0.29-1.23; P =0.16). The rate of adverse events (RR: 1.04, 0.48-2.29; P =0.92) did not significantly differ between FNA and FNB groups. CONCLUSIONS In solid gastrointestinal lesions, FNB is associated with a relatively better diagnostic adequacy, diagnostic adequacy and tissue cores rates, and less number of needle passes. For solid pancreatic disease only, there is no difference in diagnostic accuracy or tissue cores rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wei Liu
- Gastroenterology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, Hunan, China
| | - Xiaoda Xu
- Gastroenterology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, Hunan, China
| | - Peiyu Li
- Gastroenterology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Itonaga M, Yasukawa S, Fukutake N, Ogura T, Asada M, Shimokawa T, Inatomi O, Nakai Y, Shiomi H, Nebiki H, Suzuki A, Kitagawa K, Asai S, Shimatani M, Sanuki T, Kurita A, Takenaka M, Yoshida M, Hoki N, Yasuda H, Maruyama H, Matsumoto H, Yanagisawa A, Kitano M. Comparison of 22-gauge standard and Franseen needles in EUS-guided tissue acquisition for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:57-66.e2. [PMID: 35151711 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS This large multicenter randomized controlled trial compared the diagnostic yields of 22-gauge standard and 22-gauge Franseen needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) of solid pancreatic lesions. METHODS Consecutive patients with solid pancreatic lesions were prospectively randomized to EUS-TA using standard or Franseen needles. Samples obtained with the first needle pass and with second and subsequent passes were evaluated separately. The primary endpoint was the rate of accuracy for diagnosis of malignancy. Other endpoints were technical success rate, sample cellularity, adverse events, diagnostic accuracy in patient subgroups, and the diagnostic accuracy and numbers of second and subsequent needle passes. RESULTS Of 523 patients undergoing EUS-TA, 260 were randomized to using standard 22-gauge needles and 263 to 22-gauge Franseen needles. The technical success rate in each group was 99.6%, with similar adverse event rates in the standard (1.5%) and Franseen (.8%) needle groups. First-pass EUS-TA using the Franseen needle resulted in significantly greater diagnostic accuracy (84.0% vs 71.2%, P < .001) and sensitivity (82.4% vs 66.7%, P < .001) than first-pass EUS-TA using a standard needle and also resulted in superior diagnostic accuracy in patients requiring immunostaining. Second and subsequent EUS-TA using Franseen needles showed significantly greater accuracy (94.7% vs 90.0%, P = .049) and sensitivity (94.0% vs 88.6%, P = .047) and required fewer needle passes (1.81 vs 2.03, P = .008) than using standard needles. CONCLUSIONS EUS-TA with the Franseen needle is superior to EUS-TA with a standard needle with respect to diagnostic accuracy per pass, particularly in patients who require immunostaining, and number of passes when using macroscopic on-site evaluation. (Clinical trial registration numbers: UMIN000030634 and jRCTs052180062.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Itonaga
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Satoru Yasukawa
- Department of Pathology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan Department of Surgical Pathology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Nobuyasu Fukutake
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Ogura
- The Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Masanori Asada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Japanese Red Cross Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Toshio Shimokawa
- Clinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Osamu Inatomi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Nakai
- Digestive Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Shiomi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hiroko Nebiki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Azumi Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Koh Kitagawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Satoshi Asai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masaaki Shimatani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Sanuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kita-harima Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Akira Kurita
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kitano Hospital, Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mamoru Takenaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Motoyuki Yoshida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Prefecture Western Medical Center, Nara, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Hoki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bellland General Hospital, Sakai, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Yasuda
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Maruyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hisakazu Matsumoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Japanese Red Cross Society of Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Akio Yanagisawa
- Department of Pathology, Japanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Kyoto, Japan Department of Surgical Pathology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masayuki Kitano
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Bile duct stenosis continues to present a diagnostic dilemma for clinicians. It is important to establish the benign or malignant nature of the stricture early in order to avoid any unnecessary delay in medical treatment or surgery. Tissue acquisition for histological diagnosis is particularly crucial when the initial diagnostic work up is inconclusive. The diagnostic yield from the conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with brushing and biopsy is suboptimal. Patients with indeterminate biliary strictures (IDBSs) often require a multi-disciplinary diagnostic approach and additional endoscopic evaluation, including cholangioscopy and endoscopic ultrasound, before a final diagnosis can be reached. In this article, we discuss the recent endoscopic advancements in the diagnosis of biliary stricture with a focus on the roles of cholangioscopy and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS).
Collapse
|
28
|
Gkolfakis P, Crinò SF, Tziatzios G, Ramai D, Papaefthymiou A, Papanikolaou IS, Triantafyllou K, Arvanitakis M, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P, Mangiavillano B, Carrara S, Repici A, Hassan C, Facciorusso A. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:1067-1077.e15. [PMID: 35124072 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Evidence is limited on the comparative diagnostic performance of newer end-cutting fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles for tissue sampling of pancreatic masses. We performed a systematic review with network meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy of available FNB needles for sampling of solid pancreatic lesions. METHODS A systematic literature review (Medline and Cochrane Database) was conducted for studies evaluating the accuracy of newer FNB needles in adults undergoing EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes were sample adequacy, diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and adverse event rate. We performed pairwise and network meta-analyses and appraised the quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. RESULTS Overall, 16 RCTs (1934 patients) were identified. On network meta-analysis, Franseen needles (Acquire; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Mass, USA) significantly outperformed reverse-bevel needles (risk ratio [RR], 1.21 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.05-1.40] for accuracy and 1.31 [95% CI, 1.05-1.22] for adequacy) and FNA needles (RR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.01-1.25] for accuracy and 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02-1.13] for adequacy). Likewise, the Fork-tip needle (SharkCore; Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) was significantly superior to the reverse-bevel needle (RR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.03-1.33] for accuracy and 1.09 [95% CI, 1.02-1.16] for adequacy) and to the FNA needle (RR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.01-1.19] for accuracy and 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.07] for adequacy). Other comparisons did not achieve statistical significance. As a consequence, Franseen (surface under the cumulative ranking score, .89 for accuracy and .94 for adequacy) and Fork-tip needles (surface under the cumulative ranking score, .76 for accuracy and .73 for adequacy) ranked as the 2 highest-performing FNB needles. When considering different needle sizes, 25-gauge Franseen and 25-gauge Fork-tip needles were not superior to 22-gauge reverse-bevel needles (RR, 1.18 [95% CI, .96-1.46] and 1.04 [95% CI, .62-1.52]). None of the tested needles was significantly superior to the other FNB devices or to FNA needles when rapid onsite cytologic evaluation was available. CONCLUSIONS Franseen and Fork-tip needles, particularly 22-gauge size, showed the highest performance for tissue sampling of pancreatic masses, with low confidence in estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Carrara
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy; Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kitano M, Yoshida M, Ashida R, Kita E, Katanuma A, Itoi T, Mikata R, Nishikawa K, Matsubayashi H, Takayama Y, Kato H, Takenaka M, Ueki T, Kawashima Y, Nakai Y, Hashimoto S, Shigekawa M, Nebiki H, Tsumura H, Okabe Y, Ryozawa S, Harada Y, Mitoro A, Sasaki T, Yasuda H, Miura N, Ikemoto T, Ozawa E, Shioji K, Yamaguchi A, Okuzono T, Moriyama I, Hisai H, Fujita K, Goto T, Shirahata N, Iwata Y, Okabe Y, Hara K, Hashimoto Y, Kuwatani M, Isayama H, Fujimori N, Masamune A, Hatamaru K, Shimokawa T, Okazaki K, Takeyama Y, Yamaue H. Needle tract seeding after endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of pancreatic tumors: A nationwide survey in Japan. Dig Endosc 2022; 34:1442-1455. [PMID: 35502924 DOI: 10.1111/den.14346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. The present study aimed to investigate the current status of needle tract seeding (NTS) after EUS-TA of pancreatic tumors based on a nationwide survey in Japan. METHODS Patients who underwent surgical resection of primary pancreatic tumors after EUS-TA performed between April 2010 and March 2018 were surveyed. The incidence rates of NTS were determined, and compared in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) and other tumors, and in patients who underwent transgastric and transduodenal EUS-TA of PDACs. The detailed features and prognosis of patients with NTS were also assessed. RESULTS A total of 12,109 patients underwent surgical resection of primary pancreatic tumors after EUS-TA. The overall incidence rate of NTS was 0.330%, and the NTS rate was significantly higher in patients with PDAC than in those with other tumors (0.409% vs. 0.071%, P=0.004). NTS was observed in 0.857% of patients who underwent transgastric EUS-TA, but in none of those who underwent transduodenal EUS-TA. Of the patients with NTS of PDACs, the median time from EUS-TA to occurrence of NTS and median patient survival were 19.3 and 44.7 months, respectively, with 97.4% of NTS located in the gastric wall and 65.8% of NTS resected. The patient survival was significantly longer in patients who underwent NTS resection than in those without NTS resection (P=0.037). CONCLUSIONS NTS appeared only after transgastric not after transduodenal EUS-TA. Careful follow-up provides an opportunity to remove localized NTS lesions by gastrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Kitano
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Makoto Yoshida
- Medical Oncology, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Reiko Ashida
- Departments of Cancer Survey and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Emiri Kita
- Gastroenterology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Akio Katanuma
- Center for Gastroenterology, Teine-Keijinkai Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takao Itoi
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rintaro Mikata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | | | | | - Yukiko Takayama
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hironari Kato
- Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Mamoru Takenaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Toru Ueki
- Internal Medicine, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yohei Kawashima
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinichi Hashimoto
- Digestive and Lifestyle Diseases, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Minoru Shigekawa
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroko Nebiki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Yosinobu Okabe
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Shomei Ryozawa
- Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Harada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Akira Mitoro
- Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Tamito Sasaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Yasuda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Natsuki Miura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Ikemoto
- Department of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Eisuke Ozawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Shioji
- Internal Medicine, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Atsushi Yamaguchi
- Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Toru Okuzono
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai Kousei Hospital, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Ichiro Moriyama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shimane University Hospital, Shimane, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Hisai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Date Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Koichi Fujita
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yodogawa Christian Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuma Goto
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Nakao Shirahata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Iwata
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Okabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kakogawa Central City Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kazuo Hara
- Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yusuke Hashimoto
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaki Kuwatani
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nao Fujimori
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Atsushi Masamune
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Keiichi Hatamaru
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Toshio Shimokawa
- Clinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University Hospital, Wakayama, Japan
| | | | - Yoshifumi Takeyama
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroki Yamaue
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Park JS, Lee JH, Song TJ, Lee JS, Jo SJ, Oh DW, Song KB, Hwang DW, Park DH, Lee SS, Kim SC, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH. The impact of preoperative EUS-FNA for distal resectable pancreatic cancer: Is it really effective enough to take risks? Surg Endosc 2022; 36:3192-3199. [PMID: 34254183 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08627-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is frequently used for the preoperative histologic diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. However, debate continues regarding the clinical merits of preoperative EUS-FNA for the management of resectable pancreatic cancer. We aimed to evaluate the benefits and safety of preoperative EUS-FNA for resectable distal pancreatic cancer. METHODS The medical records of 304 consecutive patients with suspected distal pancreatic cancer who underwent EUS-FNA were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the clinical benefits of preoperative EUS-FNA. We also reviewed the medical records of 528 patients diagnosed with distal pancreatic cancer who underwent distal pancreatectomy with or without EUS-FNA. The recurrence rates and cancer-free survival periods of patients who did or did not undergo preoperative EUS-FNA were compared. RESULTS The diagnostic accuracy of preoperative EUS-FNA was high (sensitivity, 87.5%; specificity, 100%; positive predictive value 100%; accuracy, 90.7%; negative predictive value, 73.8%). Among patients, 26.7% (79/304) avoided surgery based on the preoperative EUS-FNA findings. Of the 528 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy, 193 patients received EUS-FNA and 335 did not. During follow-up (median 21.7 months), the recurrence rate was similar in the two groups (EUS-FNA, 72.7%; non-EUS-FNA, 75%; P = 0.58). The median cancer-free survival was also similar (P = 0.58); however, gastric wall recurrence was only encountered in the patients with EUS-FNA (n = 2). CONCLUSION Preoperative EUS-FNA is not associated with increased risks of cancer-specific or overall survival. However, clinicians must consider the potential risks of needle tract seeding, and care should be taken when selecting patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Seok Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Pungnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea
| | - Tae Jun Song
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Joune Seup Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok Jung Jo
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Wook Oh
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Byung Song
- Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Pungnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea
| | - Dae Wook Hwang
- Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Pungnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea
| | - Do Hyun Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Soo Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Song Cheol Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Pungnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea
| | - Dong Wan Seo
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Koo Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Myung-Hwan Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Watanabe M, Okuwaki K, Kida M, Imaizumi H, Matsumoto T, Iwai T, Hasegawa R, Masutani H, Kurosu T, Minato N, Tamaki A, Ishizaki J, Kusano C. Multicenter prospective study of the efficacy of stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in patients with pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 2022; 22:311-316. [PMID: 34969602 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In sample isolation processing by stereomicroscopy (SIPS), a technique used to assess the quality of specimens collected during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA), the cutoff value of stereomicroscopically visible white core (SVWC) (≥11 mm) indicates high diagnostic sensitivity. However, the procedure of SIPS is complicated and time-consuming. Therefore, we devised the stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation (SOSE), a new rapid assessment method that is simpler than SIPS and only determines if the SVWC cutoff value is attained. We aimed to examine the usefulness of SOSE in a multicenter, prospective setting. METHODS Seventy patients from multiple institutions with solid pancreatic masses suspected to be pancreatic cancer were included. EUS-TA was performed using a 22-gauge Franseen needle. SVWCs were measured on-site using stereomicroscopy. The primary outcome was the sensitivity of SVWC cutoff value in EUS-TA with SOSE. RESULTS The total number of punctures was 214 and SOSE was performed on 150 punctures. The SVWC cutoff value collection rate was 100% per lesion, with 80% in the first pass, 79% in the second pass, and 78% per puncture in all passes. The median time taken to determine the SVWC cutoff value for SOSE was 47 s. The sensitivity of the SVWC cutoff value was 93.2% for histology and 96.6% for cytology + histology. The per-lesion accuracy of pathological diagnosis reached the highest level (98.6%) at the second puncture. CONCLUSIONS SOSE showed high diagnostic sensitivity and may be a new rapid assessment method for the diagnosis of malignant pancreatic cancer using EUS-TA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masafumi Watanabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Kosuke Okuwaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan.
| | - Mitsuhiro Kida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Imaizumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Sagamino Hospital, 1-2-30 Huchinobe, Chuou, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0206, Japan
| | - Takaaki Matsumoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Isehara Kyodo Hospital, 345 Tanaka, Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1187, Japan
| | - Tomohisa Iwai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Rikiya Hasegawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Hironori Masutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Sagamino Hospital, 1-2-30 Huchinobe, Chuou, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0206, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kurosu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Naoki Minato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Isehara Kyodo Hospital, 345 Tanaka, Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1187, Japan
| | - Akihiro Tamaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Isehara Kyodo Hospital, 345 Tanaka, Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1187, Japan
| | - Junro Ishizaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Sagamino Hospital, 1-2-30 Huchinobe, Chuou, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0206, Japan
| | - Chika Kusano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Polkowski M. With or without ROSE: does fine-needle biopsy settle the debate on rapid on-site evaluation? Endoscopy 2022; 54:13-15. [PMID: 34375991 DOI: 10.1055/a-1513-0564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Polkowski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, and Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, The Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kitano M, Minaga K, Hatamaru K, Ashida R. Clinical dilemma of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer. Dig Endosc 2022; 34:307-316. [PMID: 34437750 DOI: 10.1111/den.14120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a first-line procedure for definitive tissue diagnosis of pancreatic cancer because of its high accuracy and low complication rate. The overall sensitivity of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is approximately 90%; however, its diagnostic ability for small lesions (<10 mm) remains limited. Although EUS-FNA is a relatively safe procedure, with an overall morbidity of ≤2%, it should be noted that needle tract seeding (NTS) can occur after EUS-FNA, which may affect the patient prognosis negatively. In patients with resected pancreatic tumors, preoperative EUS-FNA is not associated with an increased risk of postoperative recurrence. However, NTS after EUS-FNA for resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer has been highlighted recently, particularly by Japanese endoscopists. Thus, the use of preoperative EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer has become a clinical dilemma that challenges gastroenterologists and must be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis by weighing the benefits and risks. This review summarizes the pros and cons of performing EUS-FNA in patients with resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer and provides valuable insight for gastroenterologists treating pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Kitano
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Kosuke Minaga
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keiichi Hatamaru
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Reiko Ashida
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chen YI, Chatterjee A, Berger R, Kanber Y, Wyse J, Lam E, Gan I, Auger M, Kenshil S, Telford J, Donnellan F, Quinlan J, Lutzak G, Alshamsi F, Parent J, Waschke K, Alghamdi A, Barkun J, Metrakos P, Chaudhury P, Martel M, Dorreen A, Candido K, Miller C, Adam V, Barkun A, Zogopoulos G, Wong C. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial. Endoscopy 2022; 54:4-12. [PMID: 33506455 DOI: 10.1055/a-1375-9775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is the standard in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions, in particular when combined with rapid onsite evaluation of cytopathology (ROSE). More recently, a fork-tip needle for core biopsy (FNB) has been shown to be associated with excellent diagnostic yield. EUS-FNB alone has however not been compared with EUS-FNA + ROSE in a large clinical trial. Our aim was to compare EUS-FNB alone to EUS-FNA + ROSE in solid pancreatic lesions. METHODS A multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial involving seven centers was performed. Solid pancreatic lesions referred for EUS were considered for inclusion. The primary end point was diagnostic accuracy. Secondary end points included sensitivity/specificity, mean number of needle passes, and cost. RESULTS 235 patients were randomized: 115 EUS-FNB alone and 120 EUS-FNA + ROSE. Overall, 217 patients had malignant histology. The diagnostic accuracy for malignancy of EUS-FNB alone was non-inferior to EUS-FNA + ROSE at 92.2 % (95 %CI 86.6 %-96.9 %) and 93.3 % (95 %CI 88.8 %-97.9 %), respectively (P = 0.72). Diagnostic sensitivity for malignancy was 92.5 % (95 %CI 85.7 %-96.7 %) for EUS-FNB alone vs. 96.5 % (93.0 %-98.6 %) for EUS-FNA + ROSE (P = 0.46), while specificity was 100 % in both. Adequate histological yield was obtained in 87.5 % of the EUS-FNB samples. The mean (SD) number of needle passes and procedure time favored EUS-FNB alone (2.3 [0.6] passes vs. 3.0 [1.1] passes [P < 0.001]; and 19.3 [8.0] vs. 22.7 [10.8] minutes [P = 0.008]). EUS-FNB alone cost on average 45 US dollars more than EUS-FNA + ROSE. CONCLUSION EUS-FNB alone is non-inferior to EUS-FNA + ROSE and is associated with fewer needle passes, shorter procedure time, and excellent histological yield at comparable cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-I Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Avijit Chatterjee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert Berger
- Division of Gastroenterology, Moncton Hospital, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Yonca Kanber
- Department of Pathology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jonathan Wyse
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Eric Lam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St-Paul Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ian Gan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Manon Auger
- Department of Pathology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sana Kenshil
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer Telford
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St-Paul Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Fergal Donnellan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - James Quinlan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gregory Lutzak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Fatma Alshamsi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Josee Parent
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kevin Waschke
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Adel Alghamdi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Barkun
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Peter Metrakos
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Prosanto Chaudhury
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Myriam Martel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alastair Dorreen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristen Candido
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Corey Miller
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Viviane Adam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alan Barkun
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - George Zogopoulos
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Clarence Wong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pouw RE, Barret M, Biermann K, Bisschops R, Czakó L, Gecse KB, de Hertogh G, Hucl T, Iacucci M, Jansen M, Rutter M, Savarino E, Spaander MCW, Schmidt PT, Vieth M, Dinis-Ribeiro M, van Hooft JE. Endoscopic tissue sampling - Part 1: Upper gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary tracts. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2021; 53:1174-1188. [PMID: 34535035 DOI: 10.1055/a-1611-5091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
1: ESGE recommends that, where there is a suspicion of eosinophilic esophagitis, at least six biopsies should be taken, two to four biopsies from the distal esophagus and two to four biopsies from the proximal esophagus, targeting areas with endoscopic mucosal abnormalities. Distal and proximal biopsies should be placed in separate containers.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 2: ESGE recommends obtaining six biopsies, including from the base and edge of the esophageal ulcers, for histologic analysis in patients with suspected viral esophagitis.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 3: ESGE recommends at least six biopsies are taken in cases of suspected advanced esophageal cancer and suspected advanced gastric cancer.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 4: ESGE recommends taking only one to two targeted biopsies for lesions in the esophagus or stomach that are potentially amenable to endoscopic resection (Paris classification 0-I, 0-II) in order to confirm the diagnosis and not compromise subsequent endoscopic resection.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 5: ESGE recommends obtaining two biopsies from the antrum and two from the corpus in patients with suspected Helicobacter pylori infection and for gastritis staging.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 6: ESGE recommends biopsies from or, if endoscopically resectable, resection of gastric adenomas.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 7: ESGE recommends fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles equally for sampling of solid pancreatic masses.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 8: ESGE suggests performing peroral cholangioscopy (POC) and/or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition in indeterminate biliary strictures. For proximal and intrinsic strictures, POC is preferred. For distal and extrinsic strictures, EUS-guided sampling is preferred, with POC where this is not diagnostic.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 9: ESGE suggests obtaining possible non-neoplastic biopsies before sampling suspected malignant lesions to prevent intraluminal spread of malignant disease.Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence. 10: ESGE suggests dividing EUS-FNA material into smears (two per pass) and liquid-based cytology (LBC), or the whole of the EUS-FNA material can be processed as LBC, depending on local experience.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maximilien Barret
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital and University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Katharina Biermann
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - László Czakó
- First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Krisztina B Gecse
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gert de Hertogh
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tomas Hucl
- Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marietta Iacucci
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy and NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Marnix Jansen
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Matthew Rutter
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter T Schmidt
- Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institute and Department of Medicine, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tamanini G, Cominardi A, Brighi N, Fusaroli P, Lisotti A. Endoscopic ultrasound assessment and tissue acquisition of mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:1475-1491. [PMID: 34721779 PMCID: PMC8529915 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i10.1475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lymph nodes (LNs) has a fundamental role in the characterization and staging of malignant conditions, as well as in subsequent patients’ management. All imaging modalities (i.e. computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) rely mainly on size; endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) criteria based on B-mode evaluation and Doppler features fail to adequately characterize with high specificity LNs nature. The introduction of EUS-elastography and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS are useful techniques to increase the diagnostic yield in identifying metastatic LNs, to identify which suspicious LN should require pathological characterization and, finally, to target tissue acquisition. EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is increasingly being used for diagnosing lymphadenopathy whenever the characterization modifies patients’ subsequent management and when no superficial LN is accessible. Since target therapy are currently available (i.e. lung cancer, breast cancer), EUS-TA of malignant LNs could be required to identify tumor biology. In this field, both fine needle aspiration and biopsy needles are able to guarantee accurate results with almost perfect specificity and sub-optimal sensitivity. We finally propose a diagnostic algorithm based on most recent, high-level evidence for the diagnostic approach to suspected LNs assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Tamanini
- Department of Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola 40026, BO, Italy
| | - Anna Cominardi
- Department of Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola 40026, BO, Italy
| | - Nicole Brighi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola 47014, FC, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Department of Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola 40026, BO, Italy
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Department of Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola 40026, BO, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Nakai Y, Smith Z, Chang KJ, Dua KS. Advanced Endoscopic Techniques for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer and Management of Biliary and GastricOutlet Obstruction. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021; 30:639-656. [PMID: 34511187 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Following high-quality imaging studies for staging, endoscopic ultrasound examination fine needle aspiration/biopsy is the preferred modality for tissue diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with metal stent placement is used for palliation of malignant biliary obstruction. Metal stents can be placed in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer in whom surgery is going to be delayed. For palliation of gastric outlet obstruction, endoscopic enteral stenting is often selected because of its less invasiveness. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction or gastrojejunostomy for gastric outlet obstruction are emerging less invasive techniques as compared with palliative surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Zachary Smith
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200, West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Kenneth J Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Health Institute, University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Drive, Building 22C, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Kulwinder S Dua
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200, West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Crinò SF, Di Mitri R, Nguyen NQ, Tarantino I, de Nucci G, Deprez PH, Carrara S, Kitano M, Shami VM, Fernández-Esparrach G, Poley JW, Baldaque-Silva F, Itoi T, Manfrin E, Bernardoni L, Gabbrielli A, Conte E, Unti E, Naidu J, Ruszkiewicz A, Amata M, Liotta R, Manes G, Di Nuovo F, Borbath I, Komuta M, Lamonaca L, Rahal D, Hatamaru K, Itonaga M, Rizzatti G, Costamagna G, Inzani F, Curatolo M, Strand DS, Wang AY, Ginès À, Sendino O, Signoretti M, van Driel LMJW, Dolapcsiev K, Matsunami Y, van der Merwe S, van Malenstein H, Locatelli F, Correale L, Scarpa A, Larghi A. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy With or Without Rapid On-site Evaluation for Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial. Gastroenterology 2021; 161:899-909.e5. [PMID: 34116031 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The benefit of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) has never been evaluated in a randomized study. This trial aimed to test the hypothesis that in solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs), diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB without ROSE was not inferior to that of EUS-FNB with ROSE. METHODS A noninferiority study (noninferiority margin, 5%) was conducted at 14 centers in 8 countries. Patients with SPLs requiring tissue sampling were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo EUS-FNB with or without ROSE using new-generation FNB needles. The touch-imprint cytology technique was used to perform ROSE. The primary endpoint was diagnostic accuracy, and secondary endpoints were safety, tissue core procurement, specimen quality, and sampling procedural time. RESULTS Eight hundred patients were randomized over an 18-month period, and 771 were analyzed (385 with ROSE and 386 without). Comparable diagnostic accuracies were obtained in both arms (96.4% with ROSE and 97.4% without ROSE, P = .396). Noninferiority of EUS-FNB without ROSE was confirmed with an absolute risk difference of 1.0% (1-sided 90% confidence interval, -1.1% to 3.1%; noninferiority P < .001). Safety and sample quality of histologic specimens were similar in both groups. A significantly higher tissue core rate was obtained by EUS-FNB without ROSE (70.7% vs. 78.0%, P = .021), with a significantly shorter mean sampling procedural time (17.9 ± 8.8 vs 11.7 ± 6.0 minutes, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS EUS-FNB demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in evaluating SPLs independently on execution of ROSE. When new-generation FNB needles are used, ROSE should not be routinely recommended. (ClinicalTrial.gov number NCT03322592.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
| | - Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Nam Q Nguyen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS-ISMETT), Palermo, Italy
| | - Germana de Nucci
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rho and Garbagnate Milanese Hospital, ASST Rhodense, Milano, Italy
| | - Pierre H Deprez
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center- IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Masayuki Kitano
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Vanessa M Shami
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Gloria Fernández-Esparrach
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Francisco Baldaque-Silva
- Department of Upper GI Diseases, Unit of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Takao Itoi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Erminia Manfrin
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Laura Bernardoni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Armando Gabbrielli
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Conte
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Elettra Unti
- Pathology Unit, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Jeevinesh Naidu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia
| | | | - Michele Amata
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS-ISMETT), Palermo, Italy
| | - Rosa Liotta
- Pathology Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS - ISMETT), Palermo, Italy
| | - Gianpiero Manes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rho and Garbagnate Milanese Hospital, ASST Rhodense, Milano, Italy
| | - Franca Di Nuovo
- Pathology Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese (MI), Italy
| | - Ivan Borbath
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Mina Komuta
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center- IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Daoud Rahal
- Department of Pathology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Keiichi Hatamaru
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Masahiro Itonaga
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Gianenrico Rizzatti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Guido Costamagna
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; CERTT, Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Frediano Inzani
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Mariangela Curatolo
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Daniel S Strand
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Andrew Y Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Àngels Ginès
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oriol Sendino
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marianna Signoretti
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Digestive and Liver Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Lydi M J W van Driel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karoly Dolapcsiev
- Department of Pathology, Karolinska University Laboratory, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yukitoshi Matsunami
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Schalk van der Merwe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hannah van Malenstein
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Francesca Locatelli
- Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Loredana Correale
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy; ARC-Net Research Centre, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; CERTT, Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yousaf MN, Chaudhary FS, Ehsan A, Suarez AL, Muniraj T, Jamidar P, Aslanian HR, Farrell JJ. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and the management of pancreatic cancer. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2021; 7:bmjgast-2020-000408. [PMID: 32414753 PMCID: PMC7232396 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in western countries. Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancers plays a key role in the management by identification of patients who are surgical candidates. The advancement in the radiological imaging and interventional endoscopy (including endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic enteral stenting techniques) has a significant impact in the diagnostic evaluation, staging and treatment of pancreatic cancer. The multidisciplinary involvement of radiology, gastroenterology, medical oncology and surgical oncology is central to the management of patients with pancreatic cancers. This review aims to highlight the diagnostic and therapeutic role of EUS in the management of patients with pancreatic malignancy, especially pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Nadeem Yousaf
- Department of Medicine, Section Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA .,Department of Internal Medicine, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, MedStar Good Samaritan Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Fizah S Chaudhary
- Department of Internal Medicine, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, MedStar Good Samaritan Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Amrat Ehsan
- Department of Internal Medicine, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, MedStar Good Samaritan Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Alejandro L Suarez
- Department of Medicine, Section Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Thiruvengadam Muniraj
- Department of Medicine, Section Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Priya Jamidar
- Department of Medicine, Section Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Harry R Aslanian
- Department of Medicine, Section Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - James J Farrell
- Department of Medicine, Section Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Levine I, Trindade AJ. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration vs fine needle biopsy for pancreatic masses, subepithelial lesions, and lymph nodes. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:4194-4207. [PMID: 34326619 PMCID: PMC8311529 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i26.4194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound tissue acquisition, in the form of both fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB), is utilized for pancreatic mass lesions, subepithelial lesions, and lymph node biopsy. Both procedures are safe and yield high diagnostic value. Despite its high diagnostic yield, EUS-FNA has potential limitations associated with cytological aspirations, including inability to determine histologic architecture, and a small quantitative sample for further immunohistochemical staining. EUS-FNB, with its larger core biopsy needle, was designed to overcome these potential limitations. However, it remains unclear which technique should be used and for which lesions. Comparative trials are plagued by heterogeneity at every stage of comparison; including variable needles used, and different definitions of endpoints, which therefore limit generalizability. Thus, we present a review of prospective trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses on studies examining EUS-FNA vs EUS-FNB. Prospective comparative trials of EUS-FNA vs EUS-FNB primarily focus on pancreatic mass lesions, and yield conflicting results in terms of demonstrating the superiority of one method. However, consistent among trials is the potential for diagnosis with fewer passes, and a larger quantity of sample achieved for next generation sequencing. With regard to subepithelial lesions and lymph node biopsy, fewer prospective trials exist, and larger prospective studies are necessary. Based on the available literature, we would recommend EUS-FNB for peri-hepatic lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irving Levine
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, United States
| | - Arvind J Trindade
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, United States
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Imaoka H, Sasaki M, Hashimoto Y, Watanabe K, Miyazawa S, Shibuki T, Mitsunaga S, Ikeda M. Impact of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition on Decision-Making in Precision Medicine for Pancreatic Cancer: Beyond Diagnosis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:1195. [PMID: 34209310 PMCID: PMC8307595 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine in cancer treatment refers to targeted therapy based on the evaluation of biomarkers. Although precision medicine for pancreatic cancer (PC) remains challenging, novel biomarker-based therapies, such as pembrolizumab, olaparib, and entrectinib, have been emerging. Most commonly, endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) had been used for the diagnosis of PC until now. However, advances in EUS-TA devices and biomarker testing, especially next-generation sequencing, have opened up the possibility of sequencing of various genes even in limited amounts of tissue samples obtained by EUS-TA, and identifying potential genetic alterations as therapeutic targets. Precision medicine benefits only a small population of patients with PC, but biomarker-based therapy has shown promising results in patients who once had no treatment options. Now, the role of EUS-TA has extended beyond diagnosis into decision-making regarding the treatment of PC. In this review, we mainly discuss tissue sampling by EUS-TA for biomarker testing and the current status of precision medicine for PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Imaoka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa 277-8577, Chiba, Japan; (M.S.); (Y.H.); (K.W.); (S.M.); (T.S.); (S.M.); (M.I.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Marques S, Bispo M, Rio-Tinto R, Fidalgo P, Devière J. The Impact of Recent Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition on the Management of Pancreatic Cancer. GE-PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2021; 28:185-192. [PMID: 34056041 DOI: 10.1159/000510730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Over the last few decades, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition has become the method of choice for the pathological diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions. Due to its high diagnostic yield and low complication rate, EUS-guided tissue acquisition has surpassed percutaneous sampling techniques. For many years, EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was traditionally used to obtain cytological aspirates of solid pancreatic lesions, with sensitivity values ranging from 80 to 90% for the diagnosis of malignancy. Nevertheless, despite numerous technical advances, EUS-FNA still presents some limitations. Therefore, EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) has been introduced to provide tissue core biopsies, allowing histological assessment. A newly developed generation of FNB needles has demonstrated an outstanding diagnostic accuracy of over 95% for solid pancreatic lesions and provides samples appropriate for ancillary testing, such as immunohistochemistry and tumour molecular profiling. As a result, EUS-FNB is rapidly replacing EUS-FNA and is now the recommended technique for EUS-guided tissue acquisition in pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, with the recent expansion of neoadjuvant treatment criteria and with the advent of novel and personalised anti-cancer therapies, EUS-FNB is gaining a pivotal role in pancreatic cancer management and might soon be generalised to all patients, independent of disease stage. In this article, the authors present an updated review of the role of EUS-guided tissue acquisition in pancreatic cancer. Current indications, several technical aspects and new applications of EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Marques
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Miguel Bispo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ricardo Rio-Tinto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Paulo Fidalgo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Jacques Devière
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital - Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Watanabe M, Okuwaki K, Kida M, Tadehara M, Adachi K, Masutani H, Tamaki A, Imaizumi H, Iwai T, Yamauchi H, Kaneko T, Hasegawa R, Kurosu T, Koizumi W. Histopathological comparison of aspiration and biopsy needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in patients with subepithelial lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2021; 49:856-863. [PMID: 33885229 DOI: 10.1002/dc.24757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Information on whether a fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needle can improve histopathological specimen quality or the amount of core tissue collected in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions (SELs) remains insufficient. In this study, we aimed to compare the procedure outcomes and adequacy of histopathological specimens of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and FNB needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) using sample isolation processing by stereomicroscopy (SIPS) in patients with SELs. METHODS We performed a retrospective comparison of SEL cases registered in two previously conducted prospective studies. Of 61 cases, we identified 56 cases of SELs that involved the muscularis propria layer. Of these, 27 patients who underwent EUS-TA using a 22-gauge FNA needle between July 2016 and December 2017, and 29 patients who underwent the procedure using a 22-gauge FNB needle between March 2018 and January 2019 were included in the FNA and FNB group, respectively. RESULTS Patient background characteristics did not differ between the groups. The technical success rate was 100% in both groups. The median adequacy score was significantly higher in the FNB group than in the FNA group (P < .01). The histological diagnosis showed no significant difference in the accuracy rate between the groups. CONCLUSIONS In EUS-TA using the SIPS procedure to target SELs derived from the muscularis propria layer, FNB needles collect more core tissues and significantly improve histopathological specimen quality compared with FNA needles. When combined with SIPS, a high tissue diagnosis rate may be obtained regardless of the type of puncture needle used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masafumi Watanabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kosuke Okuwaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Kida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Tadehara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kai Adachi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hironori Masutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Akihiro Tamaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Imaizumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tomohisa Iwai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yamauchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Toru Kaneko
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Rikiya Hasegawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kurosu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Wasaburo Koizumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
van Riet PA, Erler NS, Bruno MJ, Cahen DL. Comparison of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy devices for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid lesions: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2021; 53:411-423. [PMID: 32583392 DOI: 10.1055/a-1206-5552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition is extensively used, but the optimal sampling device is still a matter of debate. We performed meta-analyses on studies comparing fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles, and studies comparing different FNB needles. METHODS Online databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of at least 50 cases with a suspected solid pancreatic or nonpancreatic lesion that compared FNA with FNB needles. Outcome measures included diagnostic accuracy, adequacy, number of passes, presence of tissue cores, and adverse events. We also performed meta-regression analysis on the effect of FNB design on diagnostic accuracy. Quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. RESULTS 18 RCTs comparing FNA with FNB needles were included. FNB provided a higher pooled diagnostic accuracy (87 % vs. 80 %; P = 0.02) and tissue core rate (80 % vs. 62 %; P = 0.002), and allowed diagnosis with fewer passes (P = 0.03), in both pancreatic and nonpancreatic lesions. A total of 93 studies were included comparing different FNB devices. Pooled diagnostic accuracy was higher for forward-facing bevel needles than for the reverse bevel needle. In this analysis, study quality was low and heterogeneity was high (I2 = 80 %). CONCLUSION FNB outperformed FNA when sampling pancreatic and nonpancreatic lesions. Forward-facing bevel FNB needles seemed to outperform the reverse bevel FNB needle, but the low quality of evidence prevents us from making strong recommendations on the optimal FNB design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priscilla A van Riet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole S Erler
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Djuna L Cahen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kandel P, Nassar A, Gomez V, Raimondo M, Woodward TA, Crook JE, Fares NS, Wallace MB. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial. Endoscopy 2021; 53:376-382. [PMID: 32767288 DOI: 10.1055/a-1223-2171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND National guidelines recommend genomic profiling of tumor tissue to guide precision therapy. We compared the specimen adequacy for genomic profiling and yield of DNA between endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA). METHODS In our tandem, randomized controlled trial, consecutive patients undergoing EUS for evaluation of pancreatic masses underwent both conventional EUS-FNA with a 25-gauge needle and paired EUS-FNB (19 or 22-gauge needle), with the order randomized (EUS-FNA first followed by EUS-FNB, or vice versa). A minimum of one pass with each needle was obtained for histology. Second and third passes were performed to collect DNA. Specimens were evaluated by a cytopathologist blinded to the needle type. Specimen adequacy for genomic profiling was calculated based on FoundationOne clinical diagnostic (CDx) adequacy requirements. We compared the adequacy for genomic profiling DNA (quantity) and histology yields with both needles. RESULTS Analysis included 50 patients (25 men; mean age 68 [standard deviation (SD) 13] years), with a mean lesion size of 38 (SD 17) mm; 37 lesions (74 %) were pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The mean DNA concentrations in PDAC by FNB and FNA needles were 5.930 (SD 0.881) µg/mL vs. 3.365 (SD 0.788) µg/mL, respectively (P = 0.01). The median standardized histology score per pass with EUS-FNB was 5 (sufficient for histology) and for EUS-FNA was 2 (enough for cytology). Specimen adequacy for genomic profiling and yield of DNA was significantly higher with FNB than with FNA needles. CONCLUSIONS In this study, adequacy for genomic profiling, DNA, and histology yield were considerably superior using an EUS-FNB needle compared with an EUS-FNA needle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pujan Kandel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Aziza Nassar
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Victoria Gomez
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Massimo Raimondo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Timothy A Woodward
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Julia E Crook
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Natalie S Fares
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Michael B Wallace
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Del Vecchio Blanco G, Palmieri G, Giannarelli D, Formica V, Portarena I, Nardecchia A, Troncone E, Benassi M, Giudice E, Anselmo A, Tisone G, Roselli M, Monteleone G, Paoluzi OA. Factors influencing diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic and biliary tumors. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:498-504. [PMID: 33539716 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1880628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is influenced by several factors, primarily operator expertise. Formal training in EUS-FNA, as suggested by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines, is not always available and is often expensive and time-consuming. In this study we evaluate factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of pancreatic EUS-FNA. METHODS In a retrospective study, 557 consecutive EUS-FNAs were evaluated. Several variables relating to the procedures were considered to calculate the EUS-FNA performance over eight years. RESULTS A total of 308 out of 557 EUS-FNAs were selected. Overall sensitivity of EUS-FNA was 66% (95% CI: 60.8-71.8), specificity 100%, and diagnostic accuracy 69% (95% CI: 64.0-74.4). An increase in diagnostic accuracy was observed to >90% using a new fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needle and in the case of simultaneous sampling of primary and metastatic lesions. Diagnostic accuracy >80% was observed after 250 procedures, in the absence of rapid on-site cytopathological examination (ROSE). Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that the FNB needle, operator skill, and double EUS-FNA sampling are associated with high diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS The learning curve for EUS-FNA may be longer and a considerable number of procedures are needed to achieve high diagnostic accuracy in the absence of ROSE. However, the use of FNB needles and the simultaneous sampling of primary and metastatic lesions can rapidly improve the diagnostic accuracy of the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giampiero Palmieri
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Biostatistical Unit, Regina Elena Institute-Hospital Physiotherapy Institutes, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Edoardo Troncone
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Benassi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncohematology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Emilia Giudice
- Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncohematology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Anselmo
- Transplant Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tisone
- Transplant Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Roselli
- Oncology Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Monteleone
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Omero Alessandro Paoluzi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Mie T, Sasaki T, Kanata R, Furukawa T, Takeda T, Kasuga A, Matsuyama M, Ozaka M, Sasahira N. Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using a 20-Gauge Menghini Needle with a Lateral Forward Bevel and a 22-Gauge Franseen Needle: A Single-Center Large Cohort Study. Clin Endosc 2021; 54:730-738. [PMID: 33657780 PMCID: PMC8505170 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2020.251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Several fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles are available for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition. However, there is disagreement on which type of needle has the best diagnostic yield. The aim of this study was to compare the performance and safety of two commonly used EUS-FNB needles.
Methods We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNB between June 2016 and March 2020 in our hospital. Two types of needles were evaluated: a 20-gauge Menghini needle with a lateral forward bevel and a 22-gauge Franseen needle. Rapid on-site evaluation was performed in all the cases. A multivariate analysis was performed to clarify the negative predictive factors for obtaining a histological diagnosis. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the diagnostic yields of these two needles.
Results We analyzed 666 patients and 690 lesions. The overall diagnostic rate of histology alone was 88.8%, and the overall adverse event rate was 1.5%. Transduodenal access and small lesions (≤2 cm) were identified as negative predictive factors for obtaining a histological diagnosis. After propensity score matching, 482 lesions were analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy rates of histology in the M and F needle groups were 89.2% and 88.8%, respectively (p=1.00). Conclusions Both the needles showed high diagnostic yield, and no significant difference in performance was observed between the two.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Mie
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Sasaki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryo Kanata
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takaaki Furukawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Takeda
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akiyoshi Kasuga
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Matsuyama
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Ozaka
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Sasahira
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hedenström P, Chatzikyriakos V, Shams R, Lewerin C, Sadik R. High Sensitivity of EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB in Lymphadenopathy Caused by Metastatic Disease: A Prospective Comparative Study. Clin Endosc 2021; 54:722-729. [PMID: 33657782 PMCID: PMC8505168 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2020.283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims The diagnostic work-up of lymphadenopathy is challenging but important to determine the correct therapy. Nevertheless, few studies have addressed the topic of endosonography (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition in lymphadenopathy. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy and safety of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling (EUS-FNB) in intrathoracic and intraabdominal lymphadenopathy.
Methods In a tertiary care center, patients with lymphadenopathy referred for EUS-guided sampling were included prospectively from 2014 to 2019 (NCT02360839). In all cases, EUS-FNB (22 gauge) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) (25 gauge) were performed. The patients were randomized to the first needle pass with FNB or FNA. Study outcomes were the diagnostic accuracy and adverse event rate.
Results Forty-eight patients were included (median age: 69 years [interquartile range, 59–76]; 24/48 females [50%]). The final diagnoses were metastasis (n=17), lymphoma (n=11), sarcoidosis (n=6), and inflammatory disease (n=14). The diagnostic performance of the two modalities was comparable, including a high sensitivity for metastatic nodes (EUS-FNB: 87% vs. EUS-FNA: 100%, p=0.5). The sensitivity for lymphoma was borderline superior in favor of EUS-FNB (EUS-FNB: 55% vs. EUS-FNA: 9%, p=0.06). No adverse events were recorded.
Conclusions In lymphadenopathy, both EUS-FNB and EUS-FNA are safe and highly sensitive for metastatic lymph node detection. Lymphoma diagnosis is challenging regardless of the needle used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per Hedenström
- Division of Medical Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Vasilis Chatzikyriakos
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Genetics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Roozbeh Shams
- Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Catarina Lewerin
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Section for Hematology and Coagulation, Department of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Riadh Sadik
- Division of Medical Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Guo Y, Ding X, Liu H, Hou F, Jiang Y, Tian Z. Mediastinal granular cell tumor diagnosed with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration via a modified technique based on wet suction: A case report and literature review. Diagn Cytopathol 2021; 49:E273-E276. [PMID: 33527755 DOI: 10.1002/dc.24704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Granular cell tumor (GCT) represents a less frequently seen tumor originating from Schwann cells. Although GCT develops in various locations in the human body, GCT of the mediastinum is extremely uncommon. A case of mediastinal GCT diagnosed by aspiration using a fine needle assisted by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS-FNA) via a modified technique based on wet suction was reported. An asymptomatic 28-year-old man was referred for assessment of a mass in the mediastinum that was found incidentally via chest computed tomography (CT) at health screening. EUS demonstrated a hypoechoic lesion with a distinct boundary, which was derived from the upper posterior mediastinum and partly located close to the posterior wall of the esophagus. Therefore, EUS-FNA with a modified wet suction technique was performed to harvest adequate specimens for the diagnosis of GCT. Minimally invasive tumor removal was performed, and histological examination of the specimen harvested surgically verified GCT, consistent with histological findings of the specimen obtained by EUS-FNA. The case highlights that a good accuracy of histological diagnosis and specimen quality are achieved for the modified wet-suction technique in EUS-FNA, and a preoperative diagnosis of mediastinal GCT can be made with certainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingjie Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Xueli Ding
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Hua Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Feng Hou
- Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Yueping Jiang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Zibin Tian
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ardengh JC, Brunaldi VO, Brunaldi MO, Gaspar AF, Lopes-JÚnior JR, Sankarankutty AK, Kemp R, Santos JSD. IS THE NEW PROCORE 20G DOUBLE FORWARD-BEVEL NEEDLE CAPABLE TO OBTAIN BETTER HISTOLOGICAL SAMPLES BY ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND FOR DIAGNOSING SOLID PANCREATIC LESIONS? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 33:e1554. [PMID: 33503114 PMCID: PMC7836075 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020200004e1554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fine needle biopsy (FNB) histological samples by endoscopic ultrasound. It is important to obtain representative histological samples of solid biliopancreatic lesions without a clear indication for resection. The role of new needles in such task is yet to be determined. AIM To compare performance assessment between 20G double fine needle biopsy (FNB) and conventional 22G fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biopsy. METHODS This prospective study examined 20 patients who underwent the random puncture of solid pancreatic lesions with both needles and the analysis of tissue samples by a single pathologist. RESULTS The ProCore 20G FNB needle provided more adequate tissue samples (16 vs. 9, p=0.039) with better cellularity quantitative scores (11 vs. 5, p=0.002) and larger diameter of the histological sample (1.51±1.3 mm vs. 0.94±0.55 mm, p=0.032) than the 22G needle. The technical success, puncture difficulty, and sample bleeding were similar between groups. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 88.9%, 100%, and 90% and 77.8%, 100%, and 78.9% for the 20G and 22G needles, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The samples obtained with the ProCore 20G FNB showed better histological parameters; although there was no difference in the diagnostic performance between the two needles, these findings may improve pathologist performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Celso Ardengh
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery (Endoscopy Unit), Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital das Clínicas, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Vitor Ottoboni Brunaldi
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery (Endoscopy Unit), Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital das Clínicas, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mariângela Ottoboni Brunaldi
- Hospital das Clínicas, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alberto Facuri Gaspar
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery (Endoscopy Unit), Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital das Clínicas, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jorge Resende Lopes-JÚnior
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery (Endoscopy Unit), Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital das Clínicas, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ajith Kumar Sankarankutty
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery (Endoscopy Unit), Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital das Clínicas, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rafael Kemp
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery (Endoscopy Unit), Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital das Clínicas, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - José Sebastião Dos Santos
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery (Endoscopy Unit), Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital das Clínicas, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|