Emergent versus urgent ERCP in acute cholangitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Biliary Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Since inception in 1968, biliary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has transformed into a highly effective, minimally invasive modality for the identification and treatment of a variety of biliary pathologies including benign, malignant, and iatrogenic diseases. The diagnostic role of ERCP has been largely replaced by high-quality imaging modalities including endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. However, there continues to be significant demand for therapeutic procedures. This article reviews the general principles of ERCP, as well as common indications, contraindications, and potential adverse events with which endoscopists and referring physicians should be familiar.

Impact of timing of ERCP on long term outcomes of ERCP for acute cholangitis - A single center retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Acute cholangitis is a critical medical emergency. The association between the timing of ERCP and clinical outcomes of acute cholangitis is still debated. The current study aims to evaluate whether ERCP within 48 h (urgent) is associated with improved long term clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This study is a single-center retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. All patients admitted with acute cholangitis as per Tokyo guidelines at AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad between January 2022 to December 2022 were included. We evaluated the association between urgent ERCP and length of hospital stay, need for reintervention and readmissions, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of consecutive 301 patients underwent ERCP for acute cholangitis; of which 217 patients (31.3 % females; mean age 54.02 ± 14.9 years) underwent urgent ERCP. The remaining 84 (32.1 % females; mean age 56.56 ± 13.9 years) underwent routine ERCP. Fifty-eight (26.7 %) and 22 (26.2 %) patients with Grade III underwent urgent and routine ERCP respectively. The median (IQR) hospital stay for urgent ERCP was 8.00 (6.00 - 11.00) days and for routine ERCP was 11.00(8.00 - 15.00; p value 0.0001), with similar hospital stay post ERCP (p 0.26). There was no significant difference in mortality upto one year between patients who underwent urgent (22.1 %;48/217) or routine ERCP (31.0 %;26/84, p 0.135). The cox proportional hazard model showed that mortality is independently associated with older age (HR 1.034;95 %CI: 1.013 - 1.054; p 0.001) and malignancy (HR 8.64;95 %CI:4.728 - 15.790; p 0.0001). There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of need for reinterventions and readmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Urgent ERCP for acute cholangitis is associated comparable overall mortality, need for reinterventions, and readmissions with decreased total length of hospital stay. There is an unmet need to confirm these findings by randomized controlled studies.

Part 2: Current Concepts in Radiologic Imaging & Intervention in Acute Biliary Tract Diseases

Acute cholangitis is encountered commonly in critically ill, often elderly, patients. The most common causes of cholangitis include choledocholithiasis, biliary strictures, and infection from previous endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical intervention of the biliary tract. Rare causes of acute cholangitis in the United States include sclerosing cholangitis and recurrent pyogenic cholangitis, the latter predominantly occurring in immigrants of Asian descent. Multidisciplinary management of these conditions is essential, with intensivists, surgeons, diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, gastroenterologists, endoscopists, and infectious disease physicians typically involved in the care of these patients. In this paper intended for intensivists predominantly, we will review the imaging findings and radiologic interventional management of critically ill patients with acute cholangitis, primary and secondary sclerosing cholangitis, and recurrent pyogenic cholangitis.

Morbidity and mortality in patients with stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma and acute cholangitis: Outcomes and risk prognostication

BACKGROUND

Acute cholangitis (AC) is a common complication of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Herein, we evaluated outcomes after the first AC episode and predictors of mortality and AC recurrence in patients with stage IV PDAC.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, retrospective observational study using institutional databases. Clinical data and outcomes for patients with stage IV PDAC and at least one documented episode of AC, were assessed. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression model was employed to identify predictors of AC recurrence and mortality.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-four patients with stage IV PDAC and AC identified between January 01, 2014 and October 31, 2020 were included. Median OS after first episode of AC was 4.1 months (95 % CI, 4.0-5.5), and 30-day, 6, and 12-month survival was 86.2 % (95 % CI, 80.3-92.5), 37 % (95 % CI, 29.3-46.6 %) and 18.9 % (95 % CI, 13.1-27.3 %), respectively. Primary tumor in pancreatic body/tail (HR 2.29, 95 % CI: 1.26 to 4.18, p = 0.011), concomitant metastases to liver and other sites (HR 1.96, 95 % CI: 1.16 to 3.31, p = 0.003) and grade 3 AC (HR 2.26, 95 % CI: 1.45 to 3.52, p < 0.001), predicted worse outcomes. Intensive care unit admission, sepsis, systemic therapy, treatment regimen, and time to intervention did not predict survival or risk of recurrence of AC.

CONCLUSIONS

AC confers significant morbidity and mortality in advanced PDAC. Worse outcomes are associated with higher grade AC, primary tumor location in pancreatic body/tail, and metastases to liver and other sites.

Urgent one-stage endoscopic treatment for choledocholithiasis related moderate to severe acute cholangitis: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

During emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), the safety and feasibility of performing one-stage endoscopic treatment for patients with acute cholangitis (AC) due to choledocholithiasis are unclear.

AIM

To investigate the safety and feasibility of one-stage endoscopic treatment for moderate to severe AC.

METHODS

We enrolled all patients diagnosed with moderate to severe cholangitis due to common bile duct stones from January 2019 to July 2023. The outcomes were compared in this study between patients who underwent ERCP within 24 h and those who underwent ERCP 24 h later, employing a propensity score (PS) framework. Our primary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, ICU length of stay, and duration of antibiotic use.

RESULTS

In total, we included 254 patients and categorized them into two groups based on the time elapsed between admission and intervention: The urgent group (≤ 24 h, n = 102) and the elective group (> 24 h, n = 152). Ninety-three pairs of patients with similar characteristics were selected by PS matching. The urgent ERCP group had more ICU admissions (34.4% vs 21.5%, P = 0.05), shorter ICU stays (3 d vs 9 d, P < 0.001), fewer antibiotic use (6 d vs 9 d, P < 0.001), and shorter hospital stays (9 d vs 18.5 d, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences observed in adverse events, in-hospital mortality, recurrent cholangitis occurrence, 30-d readmission rate or 30-d mortality.

CONCLUSION

Urgent one-stage ERCP provides the advantages of a shorter ICU stay, a shorter duration of antibiotic use, and a shorter hospital stay.

Conventional vs Short Duration of Antibiotics in Patients With Moderate or Severe Cholangitis: Noninferiority Randomized Trial

INTRODUCTION

Successful biliary drainage and antibiotics are the mainstays of therapy in management of patients with acute cholangitis. However, the duration of antibiotic therapy after successful biliary drainage has not been prospectively evaluated. We conducted a single-center, randomized, noninferiority trial to compare short duration of antibiotic therapy with conventional duration of antibiotic therapy in patients with moderate or severe cholangitis.

METHODS

Consecutive patients were screened for the inclusion criteria and randomized into either conventional duration (CD) group (8 days) or short duration (SD) group (4 days) of antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome was clinical cure (absence of recurrence of cholangitis at day 30 and >50% reduction of bilirubin at day 15). Secondary outcomes were total days of antibiotic therapy and hospitalization within 30 days, antibiotic-related adverse events, and all-cause mortality at day 30.

RESULTS

The study included 120 patients (the mean age was 55.85 ± 13.52 years, and 50% were male patients). Of them, 51.7% patients had malignant etiology and 76.7% patients had moderate cholangitis. Clinical cure was seen in 79.66% (95% confidence interval, 67.58%-88.12%) patients in the CD group and 77.97% (95% confidence interval, 65.74%-86.78%) patients in the SD group ( P = 0.822). On multivariate analysis, malignant etiology and hypotension at presentation were associated with lower clinical cure. Total duration of antibiotics required postintervention was lower in the SD group (8.58 ± 1.92 and 4.75 ± 2.32 days; P < 0.001). Duration of hospitalization and mortality were similar in both the groups.

DISCUSSION

Short duration of antibiotics is noninferior to conventional duration in patients with moderate-to-severe cholangitis in terms of clinical cure, recurrence of cholangitis, and overall mortality.

ERCP management of acute cholangitis caused by rupture of Echinococcus hepaticus into the biliary tract

Background

Hepatic cystic echinococcosis (HCE) rupture into the biliary tract, one of the most common and refractory complications, is treated by laparotomy to remove hydatid lesions. The aim of this article was to investigate the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the treatment of this particular disease.

Patients and Methods

This was is a retrospective analysis of 40 patients with HCE ruptured into the biliary tract in our hospital from September 2014 to October 2019. They were divided into two groups, ERCP group (group A, n = 14) and conventional surgery group (group B, n = 26). Group A was treated with ERCP first to control infection and improve the general condition before undergoing laparotomy at an optional stage while group B was treated with laparotomy directly. First, the infection parameters and liver, kidney and coagulation functions of group A patients before and after ERCP were compared to evaluate treatment effectiveness. Second, the intraoperative and post-operative parameters during the laparotomy of group A were compared with group B to evaluate the impact of ERCP treatment on laparotomy.

Results and Conclusions

White blood cell, NE%, platelet, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, Total bilirubin (TBIL), alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase (ALT), ALT and Cr in group A significantly improved by ERCP (P < 0.05); during laparotomy, the bleeding amount and hospital stay in group A were better (P < 0.05); moreover, concerning the post-operative complications, the incidence of acute renal failure and coagulation dysfunction in group A was significantly less (P < 0.05). ERCP, which not only quickly and effectively controls infection and improves the patient's systemic condition but also provides good support for subsequent radical surgery, enjoys good prospects for clinical application.

The association between sonographic common bile duct dilatation and outcomes in emergency department patients with cholangitis

BACKGROUND

The presentation of the patient with acute cholangitis (AC) ranges from mild illness to life-threatening shock. Therefore, prompt diagnosis and treatment are critical. Abdominal ultrasound (US) is the imaging of choice to locate bile duct dilatation. Other modalities include abdominal computed tomography (CT) or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether sonographic common bile duct dilatation in emergency department (ED) patients with AC predicts outcomes including sepsis, hospital length of stay (LOS), admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), time to ERCP, and mortality.

METHODS

Electronic medical records of all patients hospitalized in a tertiary care medical center between July 2012-February 2021 with a discharge diagnosis of cholangitis were assessed. Patients were dichotomously classified as CBD dilated or CBD non-dilated based on ultrasound. Dilation was defined as CBD larger than 6 mm in patients younger than 60 or larger than 6 mm + 1 mm per decade in patients over 60.

RESULTS

The study included 271 patients- 172 with CBD dilation versus 99 without. Mean LOS was 9.92 days for those with a dilated CBD versus 13.4 days without. The mean time to ERCP was 4.26 days for those with a dilated CBD versus 6.56 days without. Sepsis, mortality, and ICU admission were scarce and there was no statistically significant difference between the cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a dilated CBD per the abdominal US performed during the patient's ED stay, underwent ERCP earlier, and were hospitalized fewer days than patients without CBD dilation.

Can endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related procedures for resolving acute cholangitis be effectively and safely performed in patients with surgically altered anatomy? Comparison study to evaluate the timing of short-type single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

OBJECTIVES

Balloon enteroscopy (BE)-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related procedures to resolve acute cholangitis (AC) in patients with surgically altered anatomy (SAA) are limited. There is a lack of evidence on whether the timing of BE-assisted ERCP affects clinical outcomes in patients with AC. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of short-type single-balloon enteroscopy (short SBE)-assisted ERCP in patients with SAA and AC.

METHODS

Patients with AC who underwent short SBE-assisted ERCP procedures between September 2011 and April 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The outcomes of procedures undergone at ≤24 h and >24 h were compared. The primary outcome was the length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

Overall, 56 patients underwent procedures at ≤24 h, and 58 patients at >24 h. The procedural success and adverse event rates of short SBE-assisted ERCP were 87.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80.3-93.1%) and 4.4% (95% CI 1.4-9.9%), respectively. Patients with severe (Grade III) AC and systemic inflammatory response syndrome were more in early (at ≤24 h) ERCP groups. LOS and median time from ERCP procedures to discharge were shorter in the early group. Procedural success and adverse event rates between both groups had no significant differences. Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that ERCP performed at ≤24 h was associated with shorter LOS, while severe cholangitis and malignant biliary obstruction were associated with longer LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Short SBE-assisted ERCP is effective and safe in patients with SAA and AC. Early procedures seemed to attribute early improvement of general condition, thus shortening the LOS.

Timing of biliary decompression for acute cholangitis

Severe acute cholangitis (AC) exacerbates the risk of death because of the rapid progression of the disease. The optimal timing of biliary decompression (BD) as a necessary intervention in patients with severe AC is controversial. A recently report titled “Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of acute cholangitis of different severity” in the World Journal of Gastroenterology that the optimal time of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for treating patients with severe AC is ≤ 48 but not ≤ 24 h, providing clinical evidence for selecting the optimal time for implementation of BD. Here, we discuss the controversy over the optimal timing of BD for AC based on guidelines and clinical evidence, and consider that more high-level clinical researches are urgent needed to benefit the management of patients with different severity of AC.

Urgent and emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for gallstone-induced acute cholangitis and pancreatitis

Urgent or emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is indicated for gallstone-induced acute cholangitis and pancreatitis. The technique and optimal timing of ERCP depend on the disease state, its severity, anatomy, patient background, and the institutional situation. Endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage within 24 h is recommended for moderate to severe acute cholangitis. The clinical outcomes of biliary drainage with nasobiliary drainage tube placement and plastic stent placement are comparable, and the choice is made on a case-by-case basis considering the advantages and disadvantages of each. The addition of endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is basically not necessary when performing drainage alone, but single-session stone removal following EST is acceptable in mild to moderate cholangitis cases without antithrombotic therapy or coagulopathy. For gallstone pancreatitis, early ERCP/EST are recommended in cases with impacted gallstones in the papilla. In some cases of gallstone pancreatitis, a gallstone impacted in the papilla has already spontaneously passed into the duodenum, and early ERCP/EST lacks efficacy in such cases, with unfavorable findings of cholangitis or cholestasis. If it is difficult to diagnose the presence of gallstones impacted in the papilla on imaging, endoscopic ultrasonography can be useful in determining the indication for ERCP.

Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of acute cholangitis of different severity

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in acute cholangitis (AC) is uncertain, especially in patients with AC of varying severity.

AIM

To report whether the timing of ERCP is associated with outcomes in AC patients with different severities.

METHODS

According to the 2018 Tokyo guidelines, 683 patients who met the definite diagnostic criteria for AC were retrospectively identified. The results were first compared between patients receiving ERCP ≤ 24 h and > 24 h and then between patients receiving ERCP ≤ 48 h and > 48 h. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients with grade I, II or III AC. The primary outcome was 30-d mortality. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate, length of hospital stay (LOHS) and 30-d readmission rate.

RESULTS

Taking 24 h as the critical value, compared with ERCP > 24 h, malignant biliary obstruction as a cause of AC was significantly less common in the ERCP ≤ 24 h group (5.2% vs 11.5%). The proportion of cardiovascular dysfunction (11.2% vs 2.6%), respiratory dysfunction (14.2% vs 5.3%), and ICU admission (11.2% vs 4%) in the ERCP ≤ 24 h group was significantly higher, while the LOHS was significantly shorter (median, 6 d vs 7 d). Stratified by the severity of AC, higher ICU admission was only observed in grade III AC and shorter LOHS was only observed in grade I and II AC. There were no significant differences in 30-d mortality between groups, either in the overall population or in patients with grade I, II or III AC. With 48 h as the critical value, compared with ERCP > 48 h, the proportion of choledocholithiasis as the cause of AC was significantly higher in the ERCP ≤ 48 h group (81.5% vs 68.3%). The ERCP ≤ 48 h group had significantly lower 30-d mortality (0 vs 1.9%) and shorter LOHS (6 d vs 8 d). Stratified by AC severity, lower 30-d mortality (0 vs 6.1%) and higher ICU admission rates (22.2% vs 10.2%) were only observed in grade III AC, and shorter LOHS was only observed in grade I and II AC. In the multivariate analysis, cardiovascular dysfunction and time to ERCP were two independent factors associated with 30-d mortality.

CONCLUSION

ERCP ≤ 48 h conferred a survival benefit in patients with grade III AC. Early ERCP shortened the LOHS in patients with grade I and II AC.

Systematic Review: Impact of Social Determinants of Health on the Management and Prognosis of Gallstone Disease

Background:

Due to its prevalence, gallstone disease is a major public health issue. It affects diverse patient populations across various socioeconomic levels. Socioeconomic and geographic deprivation may impact both morbidity and mortality associated with digestive diseases, such as biliary tract disease.

Aim:

The aim of this systematic review was to review the available data on the impact of socioeconomic determinants and geographic factors on gallstone disease and its complications.

Methods:

This systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched by two investigators to retrieve studies about the impact of income, insurance status, hospital status, education level, living areas, and deprivation indices on gallstone disease. Thirty-seven studies were selected for this review.

Results:

Socially disadvantaged populations appear to be more frequently affected by complicated or severe forms of gallstone disease. The prognosis of biliary tract disease is poor in these populations regardless of patient status, and increased morbidity and mortality were observed for acute cholangitis or subsequent cholecystectomy. Limited or delayed access and low-quality therapeutic interventions could be among the potential causes for this poor prognosis.

Conclusions:

This systematic review suggests that socioeconomic determinants impact the management of gallstone disease. Enhanced knowledge of these parameters could contribute to improved public health policies to manage these diseases.

Risk factors for complications in elderly patients aged 85 years and over undergoing endoscopic biliary stone removal

Background and aim

The number of elderly patients with biliary stones is increasing. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) is considered to be an effective treatment for biliary stones. Having a sound knowledge of the risk factors can help reduce the incidence and severity of complications for ERCP. Furthermore, limited research has been published on patients aged over 85 years undergoing endoscopic biliary stone removal. This study aims to determine the risk factors that lead to complications of ERCP in patients over 85 years of age.

Methods

This was a single-center retrospective study. We analyzed 156 patients aged ≥ 85 years with biliary stones who underwent their first ERCP at Chinese PLA General Hospital from February 2002 to March 2021. Logistic regression models were employed to identify the independent risk factors for complications.

Results

A total of 13 patients (8.3%) had complications. Thereinto, pancreatitis, cholangitis, bleeding, and other complications occurred in 4 cases (2.6%), 1 cases (0.6%), 4 cases (2.6%), and 4 cases (2.6%), respectively. There was no perforation or death related to ERCP. Independent risk factors for complications were acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) (P = 0.017) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (P = 0.019). Significantly, reasons for incomplete stone removal at once were large stone (>10 mm) (P < 0.001) and higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation scoring system (APACHE-II) (P = 0.005).

Conclusions

ERCP was recommended with caution in patients ≥ 85 years of age with ABP or higher CCI undergoing endoscopic biliary stone removal. In patients with ABP without cholangitis or biliary obstruction we recommend against urgent (within 48 h) ERCP. Patients with higher CCI who can tolerate ERCP can undergo rapid ERCP biliary stenting or nasobiliary implantation with later treatment of stones, and patients who cannot tolerate ERCP are treated promptly with PTCD and aggressive conservative treatment.

Emergency Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Did Not Increase the Incidence of Postprocedural Pancreatitis Compared With Elective Cases: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of and risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) after emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

METHODS

We performed a prospective multicenter observational study of 3914 patients who underwent ERCP. We compared the incidence of PEP after emergency and elective ERCP.

RESULTS

A total of 3410 patients were enrolled in this study. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 44 of 800 patients (5.5%) and in 190 of 2418 patients (7.9%) in the emergency and elective groups, respectively. No significant difference was noted between the groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-1.03; P = 0.07). Multivariate analysis showed that the following factors increased the risk for PEP after emergency ERCP: contrast medium injection into the pancreatic duct (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.30-5.03; P = 0.005), >4 cannulation attempts (OR, 5.72; 95% CI, 2.61-12.50; P < 0.001), and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (OR, 9.24; 95% CI, 2.13-40.10; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was noted in the incidence of PEP in patients after emergency and elective ERCP. We may prevent PEP even after emergency ERCP by avoiding contrast injection into the pancreatic duct, multiple cannulation attempts, and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation.

Performance of diagnostic tools for acute cholangitis in patients with suspected biliary obstruction

Background

Acute cholangitis is an infection requiring endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and antibiotics. Several diagnostic tools help to diagnose cholangitis. Because diagnostic performance of these tools has not been studied and might therefore impose unnecessary ERCPs, we aimed to evaluate this.

Methods

We established a nationwide prospective cohort of patients with suspected biliary obstruction who underwent an ERCP. We assessed the diagnostic performance of Tokyo Guidelines (TG18), Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group (DPSG) criteria, and Charcot triad relative to real‐world cholangitis as the reference standard.

Results

127 (16%) of 794 patients were diagnosed with real‐world cholangitis. Using the TG18, DPSG, and Charcot triad, 345 (44%), 55 (7%), and 66 (8%) patients were defined as having cholangitis, respectively. Sensitivity for TG18 was 82% (95% CI 74‐88) and specificity 60% (95% CI 56‐63). The sensitivity for DPSG and Charcot was 42% (95% CI 33‐51) and 46% (95% CI 38‐56), specificity was 99.7% (95% CI 99‐100) and 99% (95% CI 98‐100), respectively.

Conclusions

TG18 criteria incorrectly diagnoses four out of ten patients with real‐world cholangitis, while DPSG and Charcot criteria failed to diagnose more than half of patients. As the cholangitis diagnosis has many consequences for treatment, there is a need for more accurate diagnostic tools or work‐up towards ERCP.

ASGE guideline on the management of cholangitis

Cholangitis is a GI emergency requiring prompt recognition and treatment. The purpose of this document from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy's (ASGE) Standards of Practice Committee is to provide an evidence-based approach for management of cholangitis. This document addresses the modality of drainage (endoscopic vs percutaneous), timing of intervention (<48 hours vs >48 hours), and extent of initial intervention (comprehensive therapy vs decompression alone). Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology was used to formulate recommendations on these topics. The ASGE suggests endoscopic rather than percutaneous drainage and biliary decompression within 48 hours. Additionally, the panel suggests that sphincterotomy and stone removal be combined with drainage rather than decompression alone, unless patients are too unstable to tolerate more extensive endoscopic treatment.

Association of Timing of Biliary Drainage with Clinical Outcomes in Severe Acute Cholangitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

The guidelines recommend urgent biliary drainage (BD) for severe acute cholangitis, without a clear definition of “urgent”. To explore the optimal time, we identified the impact of timing of BD on clinical outcomes in severe acute cholangitis.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective study of patients with severe acute cholangitis was conducted based on the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. Multivariable regressions were used to identified the effect of timing of BD on in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and the length of stay (LOS) in hospital and the intensive care unit (ICU) with adjustment for confounding factors.

Results

A total of 106 severe acute cholangitis patients underwent BD with a median time of 14.14 hours (IQR: 7.60–32.59). Among them, 67.9% were performed within 24 hours and 80.2% within 48 hours. Median length of stay was 2.65 days (IQR: 1.70–5.12) in the ICU and 7.54 days (IQR: 4.49–17.17) in hospital. The in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 13.2% and 14.2%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, every 1-day delay of BD increased 1.49 days of stay in hospital (P<0.0001). Delayed BD (>48 hours) was linked with 5.56 days longer ICU LOS (P = 0.0096), while urgent BD (<24 hours) did not significantly shorten the ICU stay (P = 0.0997). No significant increase was observed on in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.93–1.13) nor 30-day mortality (OR=1.01; 95% CI 0.87–1.14) with BD delay in this population.

Conclusion

In severe acute cholangitis patients, delay in BD increased in-hospital LOS. BD after 48 hours was associated with longer ICU LOS. Yet, BD within 24 hours did not significantly reduce the mortality nor shortened the ICU LOS.

Acute Cholangitis: Causes, Diagnosis, and Management

Acute cholangitis, also referred to as ascending cholangitis, is an infection of the biliary tree characterized by fever, jaundice, and abdominal pain, which in most cases is the consequence of biliary obstruction. Diagnosis is commonly made by the presence of clinical features, laboratory tests, and imaging studies. The treatment modalities include administration of intravenous fluids, antimicrobial therapy, and prompt drainage of the bile duct. Early diagnosis and treatment of acute cholangitis are crucial to prevent unwanted clinical outcome of the disease. This article provides an update on early diagnosis and management of acute cholangitis.

ERCP within 6 or 12 h for acute cholangitis: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of biliary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for patients with acute cholangitis remains controversial. The aim of our study was to determine if ERCP performed within 6 or 12 h of presentation was associated with improved clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Medical records for all patients with acute cholangitis who underwent ERCP at our institution between 2009 and 2018 were reviewed. Outcomes were compared between those who underwent ERCP within or after 12 h using propensity score framework. Our primary outcome was length of hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, adverse events, ERCP failure, length of ICU stay, organ failure, recurrent cholangitis, and 30-day readmission. In secondary analysis, outcomes for ERCP done within or after 6 h were also compared.

RESULTS

During study period, 487 patients with cholangitis were identified, of whom 147 had ERCP within 12 h of presentation. Using propensity score matching, we selected 145 pairs of patients with similar characteristics. Length of hospitalization was similar between ERCP within or after 12 h (135.9 vs 122.1 h, p 0.094). No difference was noted in mortality, ERCP failure, adverse events, need and length of ICU stay, and recurrent cholangitis. However, 30-day readmission rates were lower when ERCP within 12 h (7.6 vs 15.2, p 0.042). No significant difference was noted in aforementioned outcomes between ERCP performed within or after 6 h.

CONCLUSIONS

ERCP performed within 6 h or 12 h of presentation was not associated with superior clinical outcomes, however, may result in reduced re-hospitalization.

Very urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is associated with early discharge in patients with non-severe acute cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a first-line procedure for biliary drainage in patients with acute cholangitis, and no study focused very urgent ERCP within several hours of hospital arrival. We aimed to elucidate the utility of very urgent ERCP for non-severe acute cholangitis.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included patients with non-severe acute cholangitis who underwent ERCP between April 2011 and June 2020 in the study institution. Patients were stratified into three groups based on the time to ERCP after hospital arrival: very urgent (≤3hours), urgent (3-24hours), and elective (>24hours). The primary outcome was length of hospital stay (LOS).

RESULTS

In the study cohort of 291 patients, including 168 males (57.7%), with a median age of 76 (interquartile range, 70-83) years, 47, 196, and 48 patients underwent very urgent, urgent, and elective ERCP, respectively. The median LOSs in the very urgent, urgent, and elective groups were 12, 14, and, 15 days, respectively (Kaplan-Meier method). A shorter LOS was associated with earlier ERCP (log-rank trend test, P=0.04). The rates of readmission within 30 days of discharge and adverse events were not significantly different among the three groups. By multivariate analysis, very urgent ERCP was associated with a significantly earlier discharge than urgent and elective ERCP (HR 0.71, P=0.04 and HR 0.47, P<0.01, respectively). In addition, age≥75years, pancreatitis, albumin≤2.8g/dL, and two or more ERCP procedures were associated with significantly longer LOS (HRs <1, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Very urgent ERCP for non-severe acute cholangitis was associated with early discharge.

Analysis of patterns of bacteremia and 30-day mortality in patients with acute cholangitis over a 25-year period

INTRODUCTION

Acute cholangitis (AC) is a condition of bacterial infection in the biliary tract with a high mortality rate of around 10%. Direct association between presence of bacteremia and 30-day mortality among AC patients is sparsely investigated and remains unclear.

AIMS AND METHODS

Our aim was to investigate association between bacteremia and 30-day mortality among patients with AC included over a period of 25 years. All AC patients that underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at Odense University Hospital, between 1 January 1990 and 31 October 2015, were identified using a prospective ERCP database. Blood culture results from the patients along with antimicrobial resistance patterns were collected from a bacteremia research database.

RESULTS

During the study period, 775 consecutive AC patients underwent ERCP and blood cultures were collected from 528 patients. Among these patients 48% (n = 260) had bacteremia. Overall, 30-day mortality in patients with blood cultures performed was 13% (n = 69). In patients with bacteremia, 30-day mortality was 19% (n = 49), compared to 7% (n = 20) in patients without bacteremia (p < .01). Presence of bacteremia was associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR [95% CI]: 3.43 [1.92-6.13]; p < .01) following adjustment for confounding factors. Among the species, bacteremia with Enterobacter cloacae was significantly associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR [95% CI]: 2.97 [1.16-7.62]; p = .02).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that presence of bacteremia was associated with a nearly fourfold increase in 30-day mortality among AC patients.

Optimal timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for acute cholangitis associated with distal malignant biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of studies regarding the optimal timing for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with cholangitis caused by distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). This study aims to investigate the optimal timing of ERCP in patients with acute cholangitis associated with distal MBO with a naïve papilla.

METHODS

A total of 421 patients with acute cholangitis, associated with distal MBO, were enrolled for this study. An urgent ERCP was defined as being an ERCP performed within 24 h following emergency room (ER) arrival, and early ERCP was defined as an ERCP performed between 24 and 48 h following ER arrival. We evaluated both 30-day and 180-day mortality as primary outcomes, according to the timing of the ERCP.

RESULTS

The urgent ERCP group showed the lowest 30-day mortality rate (2.2%), as compared to the early and delayed ERCP groups (4.3% and 13.5%) (P < 0.001). The 180-day mortality rate was lowest in the urgent ERCP group, followed by early ERCP and delayed ERCP groups (39.4%, 44.8%, 60.8%; P = 0.006). A subgroup analysis showed that in both the primary distal MBO group, as well as in the moderate-to-severe cholangitis group, the urgent ERCP had significantly improved in both 30-day and 180-day mortality rates. However, in the secondary MBO and mild cholangitis groups, the difference in mortality rate between urgent, early, and delayed ERCP groups was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute cholangitis associated with distal MBO, urgent ERCP might be helpful in improving the prognosis, especially in patients with primary distal MBO or moderate-to-severe cholangitis.

Timing of endoscopic therapy for acute bilio-pancreatic diseases: a practical overview

Diseases of the pancreas and hepatobiliary tree often require a therapeutic approach with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), generally following noninvasive imaging techniques. Appropriate indications and the correct timing for urgent ERCP would benefit both patients and clinicians and allow optimal utilization of health resources. Indications for urgent (<24 h) ERCP include severe acute cholangitis, acute biliary pancreatitis with cholangitis, biliary or pancreatic leaks, in the absence of percutaneous drainage, and severe acute cholecystitis in patients who are unfit for surgery and do not respond to conservative management. In patients who have severe acute biliary pancreatitis with ongoing biliary obstruction but without cholangitis, early (<48-72 h) ERCP is indicated. This overview aims to provide decisional flowcharts that can be easily used for managing patients with acute bilio-pancreatic disorders when they are referred to the Emergency Department.

Triaging advanced GI endoscopy procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic: consensus recommendations using the Delphi method

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is a lack of consensus on which GI endoscopic procedures should be performed during the COVID-19 pandemic, and which procedures could be safely deferred without having a significant impact on outcomes.

METHODS

We selected a panel of 14 expert endoscopists. We identified 41 common indications for advanced endoscopic procedures from the ASGE Appropriate Use of GI Endoscopy guidelines. Using a modified Delphi method, we first achieved consensus on the patient-important outcome for each procedural indication. Panelists prioritized consensus patient-important outcome when categorizing each indication into one of the following 3 procedural time periods: (1) time-sensitive emergent (schedule within 1 week), (2) time-sensitive urgent (schedule within 1 to 8 weeks), and (3) non-time sensitive (defer for >8 weeks and then reassess the timing). Three anonymous rounds of voting were allowed before attempts at consensus were abandoned.

RESULTS

All 14 invited experts agreed to participate in the study. The prespecified consensus threshold of 51% was achieved for assigning patient-important outcome(s) to each advanced endoscopy indication. The prespecified consensus threshold of 66.7% was achieved for 40 of 41 advanced endoscopy indications in stratifying them into 1 of 3 procedural time periods. For 12 of 41 indications, 100% consensus was achieved; for 20 of 41 indications, 75% to 99% consensus was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

By using a Modified Delphi method that prioritized patient-important outcomes, we developed consensus recommendations on procedural timing for common indications for advanced endoscopy. These recommendations and the structured decision framework provided by our study can inform decision making as endoscopy services are reopened.

The impact of covid-19 pandemic on urgent endoscopy in Italy: a nation-wide multicenter study

Objective: COVID-19 pandemic has seriously affected Italy. Radical changes occurred in the Italian NHS and thus in GI departments, as only urgent endoscopies were guaranteed. The study aimed to report how the demand for urgent endoscopy changed during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy and to evaluate the appropriateness of urgent referrals in the Endoscopy Unit.Material and methods: Nation-wide, cross-sectional survey study in 54 Italian GI Units. Data were collected regarding urgent endoscopies (EGD, CS, ERCP) in two different time periods: March 2019 and March 2020.Results: Thirty-five (64.8%) GI endoscopy Units responded to the survey. The entity of reduction of overall urgent EGDs and CSs performed in March 2020 versus March 2019 was statistically significant: 541 versus 974 (-80%), p < .001 for EGD and 171 versus 265 (-55%), p < .008, for CS, respectively. No statistically significant reduction of urgent ERCP performed in March 2020 versus March 2019 was found. The increase in overall diagnostic yield for urgent EGD in March 2020 versus March 2019 was 7.3% (CI [0.028-0.117], p = .001). No statistically significant difference in diagnostic yield for CS between 2019 and 2020 was found.Conclusion: The study showed a statistically significant reduction of urgent EGD and CS performed during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, in March 2020, compared to March 2019. The diagnostic yield of urgent EGD performed in March 2020 was significantly higher than that of March 2019. No statistically significant difference was found in terms of diagnostic yield of urgent CS between March 2020 and March 2019.

National trends and outcomes in timing of ERCP in patients with cholangitis

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines recommend early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the management of acute cholangitis, but the definition of the term "early" remains debatable. This study analyzed national trends in the timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and identified the ideal time to perform preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with acute cholangitis.

METHODS

The 2005 to 2016 National Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients undergoing cholecystectomy for acute cholangitis. Severity of cholangitis was defined using the 2013 Tokyo Grading Criteria, where Tokyo grade III patients were defined as having organ dysfunction and non-Tokyo grade III patients were defined as grades I and II. Multivariable regressions (accounting for patient and hospital characteristics) were used to identify the timing of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography associated with the least mortality risk.

RESULTS

Of 91,051 patients undergoing cholecystectomy for cholangitis, 55% underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: 24% of patients received endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography on the day of admission, 41% on hospital day 2, and the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography decreased gradually thereafter. Mortality rates remained under 1% if endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed during the first 3 days and increased as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed during days 4 to 7 (P < .001). On multivariable regression, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography performed >72 hours after admission was associated with increased mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.80, P = .01). Receiving endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography P > 72 hours increased risk of death among Tokyo grade III patients (adjusted odds ratio 1.88, P = .01). Overall, during the study period, the utilization of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for all grades of acute cholangitis increased from 39% of patients in 2005 to 51% in 2016 (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

There has been an increase in the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for acute cholangitis. Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography on the day of admission was not associated with a decrease in mortality in patients with Tokyo grade III disease, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography within 72 hours of hospitalization was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality.

What constitutes urgent endoscopy? A social media snapshot of gastroenterologists' views during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background and study aims  There is a consensus among gastroenterology organizations that elective endoscopic procedures should be deferred during the COVID-19 pandemic. While the decision to perform urgent procedures and to defer entirely elective procedures is mostly evident, there is a wide "middle ground" of time-sensitive but not technically urgent or emergent endoscopic interventions. We aimed to survey gastroenterologists worldwide using Twitter to help elucidate these definitions using commonly encountered clinical scenarios during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods  A 16-question survey was designed by the authors to include common clinical scenarios that do not have clear guidelines regarding the timing or urgency of endoscopic evaluation. This survey was posted on Twitter. The survey remained open to polling for 48 hours. During this time, multiple gastroenterologists and fellows with prominent social media presence were tagged to disseminate the survey. Results  The initial tweet had 38,795 impressions with a total of 2855 engagements. There was significant variation in responses from gastroenterologists regarding timing of endoscopy in these semi-urgent scenarios. There were only three of 16 scenarios for which more than 70 % of gastroenterologists agreed on procedure-timing . For example, significant variation was noted in regard to timing of upper endoscopy in patients with melena, with 44.5 % of respondents believing that everyone with melena should undergo endoscopic evaluation at this time. Similarly, about 35 % of respondents thought that endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography should only be performed in patients with choledocholithiasis with abdominal pain or jaundice. Conclusion  Our analysis shows that there is currently lack of consensus among gastroenterologists in regards to timing of semi-urgent or non-life-threatening procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. These results support the need for the ongoing development of societal guidance for these "semi-urgent" scenarios to help gastroenterologists in making difficult triage decisions.