Report of the ISHLT Working Group on Primary Lung Graft Dysfunction Part VI: Treatment

In vivo lung perfusion for prompt recovery from primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

No proven treatment after the development of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is currently available. Here, we established a novel strategy of in vivo lung perfusion (IVLP) for the treatment of PGD. IVLP involves the application of an in vivo isolated perfusion circuit to an implanted lung. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of IVLP vs conventional post-lung transplant (LTx) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) treatment using an experimental swine LTx PGD model.

METHODS

After 1.5-hour warm ischemia of the donor lungs, a left LTx was performed. Following the confirmation of PGD development, pigs were divided into 3 groups (n = 5 each): control (no intervention), ECMO, and IVLP. After 2 hours of treatment, a 4-hour functional assessment was conducted, and samples were obtained.

RESULTS

Significantly better oxygenation was achieved in the IVLP group (p ≤ 0.001). Recovery was confirmed immediately and maintained during the following 4-hour observation. The IVLP group also demonstrated better lung compliance than the control group (p = 0.045). A histologic evaluation showed that the lung injury score and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling assay showed significantly fewer injuries and a better result in the wet-to-dry weight ratio in the IVLP group.

CONCLUSIONS

A 2-hour IVLP is technically feasible and allows for prompt recovery from PGD after LTx. The posttransplant short-duration IVLP strategy can complement or overcome the limitations of the current practice for donor assessment and PGD management.

Postreperfusion Pulmonary Artery Pressure Indicates Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplant

BACKGROUND

Primary graft dysfunction is a risk factor of early mortality after lung transplant. Models identifying patients at high risk for primary graft dysfunction are limited. We hypothesize high postreperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure is a clinical marker for primary graft dysfunction.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 158 consecutive lung transplants performed at a single academic center from January 2020 through July 2022. Only bilateral lung transplants were included and patients with pretransplant extracorporeal life support were excluded.

RESULTS

Primary graft dysfunction occurred in 42.3% (n = 30). Patients with primary graft dysfunction had higher postreperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure (41 ± 9.1 mm Hg) than those without (31.5 ± 8.8 mm Hg) (P < .001). Logistic regression showed postreperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure is a predictor for primary graft dysfunction (odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.24, P < .001). Postreperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure of 37 mm Hg was optimal for predicting primary graft dysfunction by Youden index. The receiver operating characteristic curve of postreperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure at 37 mm Hg (sensitivity 0.77, specificity 0.78, area under the curve 0.81), was superior to the prereperfusion pressure curve at 36 mm Hg (sensitivity 0.77, specificity 0.39, area under the curve 0.57) (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated postreperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure after lung transplant is predictive of primary graft dysfunction. Postreperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure is more indicative of primary graft dysfunction than prereperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure. Using postreperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure as a positive signal of primary graft dysfunction allows earlier intervention, which could improve outcomes.

Primary graft dysfunction following lung transplantation: From pathogenesis to future frontiers

Lung transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage lung disease. Currently, just under 5000 lung transplants are performed worldwide annually. However, a major scourge leading to 90-d and 1-year mortality remains primary graft dysfunction. It is a spectrum of lung injury ranging from mild to severe depending on the level of hypoxaemia and lung injury post-transplant. This review aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, outcomes, and future frontiers involved in mitigating primary graft dysfunction. The current diagnostic criteria are examined alongside changes from the previous definition. We also highlight the issues surrounding chronic lung allograft dysfunction and identify the novel therapies available for ex-vivo lung perfusion. Although primary graft dysfunction remains a significant contributor to 90-d and 1-year mortality, ongoing research and development abreast with current technological advancements have shed some light on the issue in pursuit of future diagnostic and therapeutic tools.

History of Lung Transplantation

Lung transplantation remains the only available therapy for many patients with end-stage lung disease. The number of lung transplants performed has increased significantly, but development of the field was slow compared with other solid-organ transplants. This delayed growth was secondary to the increased complexity of transplanting lungs; the continuous needs for surgical, anesthetics, and critical care improvements; changes in immunosuppression and infection prophylaxis; and donor management and patient selection. The future of lung transplant remains promising: expansion of donor after cardiac death donors, improved outcomes, new immunosuppressants targeted to cellular and antibody-mediated rejection, and use of xenotransplantation or artificial lungs.

Effects of intraoperative fluid therapy on intensive care process, morbidity, and mortality after lung transplantation

Background

This study aims to evaluate the effect of intraoperative fluid therapy on intensive care process and first 90-day morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

Methods

Between March 2013 and December 2020, a total of 77 patients (64 males, 13 females; mean age: 47.6±13.0 years; range, 19 to 67 years) who underwent lung transplantation were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the amount of fluid given intraoperatively: Group 1 (<15 mL/kg^-1/h^-1) and Group 2 (>15 mL/kg^-1/h^-1). Demographic, clinical, intra- and postoperative data of the patients were recorded.

Results

Less than 15 mL/kg-1/h-1 f luid w as a dministered t o 75.3% (n=58) of the patients (Group 1) and 24.7% (n=19) were administered more than 15 mL/kg-1/h-1 (Group 2). In t erms of native disease, the rate of diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis was higher in Group 1, and the rate of other diagnoses was higher in Group 2 (p<0.01). The ratio of women in Group 2 was higher (p<0.05), while the body mass index values were significantly lower in this group (p<0.01). The erythrocyte, fresh frozen plasma, platelet, crystalloid and total fluid given in Group 2 were significantly higher (p<0.001). Inotropic/vasopressor agent use rates and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation requirement were significantly higher in Group 2 (p<0.01). Primary graft dysfunction, gastrointestinal complications, and mortality rates were also significantly higher in Group 2 (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The increased intraoperative fluid volume in lung transplantation is associated with primary graft dysfunction, gastrointestinal complications, and mortality rates.

Critical Care of the Lung Transplant Patient

Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for end-stage lung disease that improves survival and quality of life. Prelung transplant admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for bridge to transplant with mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is common. Primary graft dysfunction is an important immediate complication of lung transplantation with short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. Later transplant-related causes of respiratory failure necessitating ICU admission include acute cellular rejection, atypical infections, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Lung transplantation for COVID-19-related ARDS is increasingly common..

Review of outcomes of delayed chest closure following lung transplantation: a meta-analysis

Purpose

The clinical outcomes of delayed chest closure (DCC) compared with primary chest closure (PCC) following lung transplantation, including perioperative outcomes and long-term survival, remained controversial. This was the first systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify the short- and long-term outcomes of DCC following lung transplantation.

Methods

We comprehensively searched electronic literature from 4 databases up to April 1st, 2022. Dichotomous data and continuous data were pooled with odds ratio and weighted mean difference, respectively. The quality of included studies was assessed with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.

Results

Ten studies were included in the systematic review and 4 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed that DCC was associated with an increased risk of surgical site infection, prolonged hospital stays, and higher risk of primary graft dysfunction compared to PCC. The 30 day and 5 year survival were higher in PCC cohort compared with DCC cohort while differences in survival at 6 months was insignificant.

Conclusion

Our findings do not support the aggressive application of DCC. DCC should be cautiously applied since its association with worse perioperative outcomes and higher mortality. But it remains the life-saving steps under dangerous circumstances.

Inhaled Pulmonary Vasodilator Therapy in Adult Lung Transplant: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is commonly administered for selectively inhaled pulmonary vasodilation and prevention of oxidative injury after lung transplant (LT). Inhaled epoprostenol (iEPO) has been introduced worldwide as a cost-saving alternative to iNO without high-grade evidence for this indication.

Objective

To investigate whether the use of iEPO will lead to similar rates of severe/grade 3 primary graft dysfunction (PGD-3) after adult LT when compared with use of iNO.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This health system-funded, randomized, blinded (to participants, clinicians, data managers, and the statistician), parallel-designed, equivalence clinical trial included 201 adult patients who underwent single or bilateral LT between May 30, 2017, and March 21, 2020. Patients were grouped into 5 strata according to key prognostic clinical features and randomized per stratum to receive either iNO or iEPO at the time of LT via 1:1 treatment allocation.

Interventions

Treatment with iNO or iEPO initiated in the operating room before lung allograft reperfusion and administered continously until cessation criteria met in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was PGD-3 development at 24, 48, or 72 hours after LT. The primary analysis was for equivalence using a two one-sided test (TOST) procedure (90% CI) with a margin of 19% for between-group PGD-3 risk difference. Secondary outcomes included duration of mechanical ventilation, hospital and ICU lengths of stay, incidence and severity of acute kidney injury, postoperative tracheostomy placement, and in-hospital, 30-day, and 90-day mortality rates. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed for the primary and secondary outcomes, supplemented by per-protocol analysis for the primary outcome.

Results

A total of 201 randomized patients met eligibility criteria at the time of LT (129 men [64.2%]). In the intention-to-treat population, 103 patients received iEPO and 98 received iNO. The primary outcome occurred in 46 of 103 patients (44.7%) in the iEPO group and 39 of 98 (39.8%) in the iNO group, leading to a risk difference of 4.9% (TOST 90% CI, -6.4% to 16.2%; P = .02 for equivalence). There were no significant between-group differences for secondary outcomes.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among patients undergoing LT, use of iEPO was associated with similar risks for PGD-3 development and other postoperative outcomes compared with the use of iNO.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03081052.

Lung Transplantation, Pulmonary Endothelial Inflammation, and Ex-Situ Lung Perfusion: A Review

Lung transplantation (LTx) is the gold standard treatment for end-stage lung disease; however, waitlist mortality remains high due to a shortage of suitable donor lungs. Organ quality can be compromised by lung ischemic reperfusion injury (LIRI). LIRI causes pulmonary endothelial inflammation and may lead to primary graft dysfunction (PGD). PGD is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality post-LTx. Research into preservation strategies that decrease the risk of LIRI and PGD is needed, and ex-situ lung perfusion (ESLP) is the foremost technological advancement in this field. This review addresses three major topics in the field of LTx: first, we review the clinical manifestation of LIRI post-LTx; second, we discuss the pathophysiology of LIRI that leads to pulmonary endothelial inflammation and PGD; and third, we present the role of ESLP as a therapeutic vehicle to mitigate this physiologic insult, increase the rates of donor organ utilization, and improve patient outcomes.

Anesthetic management in lung transplantation: Our single-center experience

Background

In this study, we aimed to discuss our anesthesia management strategies, experiences, and outcomes in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

Methods

Between December 2016 and December 2018, a total of 53 patients (43 males, 10 females; mean age: 46.1±13 years; range, 14 to 64 years) undergoing lung transplantation in our center were included. The anesthesia technique, patients" characteristics, and perioperative clinical and follow-up data were recorded. The stage of lung disease was assessed using the New York Heart Association functional classification.

Results

Two patients underwent single lung transplantation, while 51 patients underwent double lung transplantation. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis was the most common indication in 41.5% of the patients. All patients had end-stage lung disease (Class IV) and 79% were oxygen-dependent. The extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was given to 32 patients.

Conclusion

The anesthetic management of lung transplantation is challenging, either due to the deterioration of the recipient"s physical performance and the complexity of the surgical techniques used. In general, a kind of mechanical support may be needed and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is the first choice in the majority of patients. A close communication should be maintained between the surgeons, perfusion technicians, and anesthesiologists to ensure an optimal multidisciplinary approach and to achieve successful outcomes.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and lung transplantation

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has had a positive impact on the outcomes after lung transplantation. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has a role in all phases of lung transplantation-preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. It serves as a bridge to transplantation in appropriate patients awaiting lung transplantation. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is used as a preferred method of cardiopulmonary support in some centres during implantation; and, after lung transplantation, it can be used to salvage the implanted lung in cases of severe primary graft dysfunction or as a planned extension of intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation onto the postoperative period. It has now gained acceptance as a mandatory tool in most lung transplant units. This article reviews the history of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and lung transplantation, their subsequent development, and the current use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during lung transplantation. Our institutional practice and experience are described. The implications of the current global coronavirus disease pandemic on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and lung transplantation are also briefly discussed.

Chest X-ray Sizing for Lung Transplants Reflects Pulmonary Diagnosis and Body Composition and Is Associated With Primary Graft Dysfunction Risk

BACKGROUND

Donor-recipient oversizing based on predicted total lung capacity (pTLC) is associated with a reduced risk of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) following lung transplant but the effect varies with the recipient's diagnosis. Chest x-ray (CXR) measurements to estimate actual total lung capacity (TLC) could account for disease-related lung volume changes, but their role in size matching is unknown.

METHODS

We reviewed adult double lung transplant recipients 2007-2016 and measured apex-to-costophrenic-angle distance (=lung height) on pretransplant donor and recipient CXRs (oversized donor-recipient ratio >1; undersized ≤1]. We tested the relationship between recipient lung height to actual TLC; between lung height ratio and donor/recipient characteristics; and between both lung height ratio or pTLC ratio and grade 3 PGD with logistic regression.

RESULTS

Two hundred six patients were included and 32 (16%) developed grade 3 PGD at 48 or 72 hours. Recipient lung height was related to TLC (r2=0.7297). Pulmonary diagnosis, donor BMI, and recipient BMI were the major determinants of lung height ratio (AUC 0.9036). Lung height ratio oversizing was associated with increased risk of grade 3 PGD (odds ratio, 2.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-5.47; P = 0.0182) in this cohort, while pTLC ratio oversizing was not.

CONCLUSIONS

CXR lung height estimates actual TLC and reflects pulmonary diagnosis and body composition. Oversizing via CXR lung height ratio increased PGD risk moreso than pTLC-based oversizing in our cohort.

Donor Preconditioning with Inhaled Sevoflurane Mitigates the Effects of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in a Swine Model of Lung Transplantation

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) occur in up to 30% of patients undergoing lung transplantation and may impact on the clinical outcome. Several strategies for the prevention and treatment of PGD have been proposed, but with limited use in clinical practice. In this study, we investigate the potential application of sevoflurane (SEV) preconditioning to mitigate IRI after lung transplantation. The study included two groups of swines (preconditioned and not preconditioned with SEV) undergoing left lung transplantation after 24-hour of cold ischemia. Recipients' data was collected for 6 hours after reperfusion. Outcome analysis included assessment of ventilatory, hemodynamic, and hemogasanalytic parameters, evaluation of cellularity and cytokines in BAL samples, and histological analysis of tissue samples. Hemogasanalytic, hemodynamic, and respiratory parameters were significantly favorable, and the histological score showed less inflammatory and fibrotic injury in animals receiving SEV treatment. BAL cellular and cytokine profiling showed an anti-inflammatory pattern in animals receiving SEV compared to controls. In a swine model of lung transplantation after prolonged cold ischemia, SEV showed to mitigate the adverse effects of ischemia/reperfusion and to improve animal survival. Given the low cost and easy applicability, the administration of SEV in lung donors may be more extensively explored in clinical practice.

Critical Care after Lung Transplantation

Since the first successful lung transplantation in 1983, there have been many advances in the field. Nevertheless, the latest data from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation revealed that the risk of death from transplantation is 9%. Various aspects of postoperative management, including mechanical ventilation, could affect intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality. Complications such as reperfusion injury, graft rejection, infection, and dehiscence of anastomosis increase fatal adverse side effects immediately after surgery. In this article, we review the possible immediate complications after lung transplantation and summarize current knowledge on prevention and treatment.

Perioperative Management of the Lung Graft Following Lung Transplantation

Perioperative management of patients undergoing lung transplantation is one of the most complex in cardiothoracic surgery. Certain perioperative interventions, such as mechanical ventilation, fluid management and blood transfusions, use of extracorporeal mechanical support, and pain management, may have significant impact on the lung graft function and clinical outcome. This article provides a review of perioperative interventions that have been shown to impact the perioperative course after lung transplantation.

Historical perspectives of lung transplantation: connecting the dots

Lung transplantation is now a treatment option for many patients with end-stage lung disease. Now 55 years since the first human lung transplant, this is a good time to reflect upon the history of lung transplantation, to recognize major milestones in the field, and to learn from others' unsuccessful transplant experiences. James Hardy was instrumental in developing experimental thoracic transplantation, performing the first human lung transplant in 1963. George Magovern and Adolph Yates carried out the second human lung transplant a few days later. With a combined survival of only 26 days for these first 2 lung transplant recipients, the specialty of lung transplantation clearly had a long way to go. The first "successful" lung transplant, in which the recipient survived for 10.5 months, was reported by Fritz Derom in 1971. Ten years later, Bruce Reitz and colleagues performed the first successful en bloc transplantation of the heart and one lung with a single distal tracheal anastomosis. In 1988, Alexander Patterson performed the first successful double lung transplant. The modern technique of sequential double lung transplantation and anastomosis performed at the mainstem bronchus level was originally described by Henri Metras in 1950, but was not reintroduced into the field until Pasque reported it again in 1990. Since then, lung transplantation has seen landmark changes: evolving immunosuppression regimens, clarifying the definition of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), establishing the lung allocation score (LAS), introducing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to transplant, allowing donation after cardiac death, and implementing ex vivo perfusion, to name a few. This article attempts to connect the historical dots in this field of research, with the hope that our effort helps summarize what has been achieved, and identifies opportunities for future generations of transplant pulmonologists and surgeons alike.

Care of the Postoperative Pulmonary Resection Patient

Patients undergoing pulmonary resection all exhibit, to some degree, a level of pulmonary dysfunction. This is due to the physiologic stress of the procedure performed, the patient’s comorbidities, and preexisting cardiopulmonary reserve. Although prognostic factors for intensive care requirement exist, to date, there is no consensus for postoperative admission. Institutional practices vary across the country, with patients often admitted to intensive care for surveillance. Guidelines published from the American Thoracic Society in 1999 emphasize that admission to the ICU be reserved for those patients requiring care and monitoring for severe physiologic instability. Admissions following pulmonary resection are typically due to respiratory complications and are an independent predictor of mortality. The following chapter will review the indications for admission to the ICU and common issues encountered following pulmonary resection and conclude with a discussion of the management of patients undergoing pulmonary transplantation.

Principi e indicazioni dell’assistenza circolatoria e respiratoria extracorporea in chirurgia toracica

In origine, l’extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) era una tecnica di assistenza respiratoria che utilizzava uno scambiatore gassoso a membrana. Per estensione, l’ECMO è diventata una tecnica respiratoria e cardiopolmonare utilizzata in caso di deficit respiratorio e/o cardiaco nell’attesa della restaurazione della funzione deficitaria o di un eventuale trapianto. Il supporto emodinamico può essere parziale o totale. Gli accessi vascolari possono essere periferici o centrali. Questo tipo di assistenza utilizza il concetto di circolazione extracorporea (CEC) sanguigna che in epoca moderna si è estesa con l’utilizzo di polmoni artificiali a membrana. Il circuito di base è semplice e comprende una pompa, un ossigenatore (che permette al sangue di caricarsi di O₂ e di eliminare CO₂) e delle vie d’accesso (una di drenaggio e una di reinfusione). La sua attuazione è facile, veloce e può essere avviata al letto del malato. Il miglioramento delle attrezzature, una migliore conoscenza delle tecniche e delle indicazioni, e le politiche di salute pubblica hanno reso popolare questa tecnica. Alcuni centri di chirurgia toracica la utilizzano di routine come assistenza alla realizzazione di un intervento terapeutico (soprattutto trapianto) assieme a team di rianimazione per il trattamento della sindrome da distress respiratorio acuto. Nel quadro della malattia polmonare dell’adulto, l’idea principale è quella di sviluppare il concetto di strategia minimalista con l’uso di una CEC adiuvante parziale – più che sostitutiva totale – che permetterebbe il recupero metabolico ad integrum del paziente. Nei prossimi anni, i progressi della tecnologia e dell’ingegneria così come le conoscenze approfondite permetteranno il miglioramento della prognosi dei pazienti colpiti da deficit respiratorio sotto assistenza meccanica.

Anesthesia for Lung Transplantation

Perioperative management of patients undergoing lung transplantation is challenging and requires constant communication among the surgical, anesthesia, perfusion, and nursing teams. Although all aspects of anesthetic management are important, certain intraoperative strategies (mechanical ventilation, fluid management, extracorporeal mechanical support deployment) have tremendous impact on the subsequent evolution of the lung transplant recipient, especially with respect to allograft function, and should be carefully considered. This review highlights some of the intraoperative anesthetic challenges and opportunities during lung transplantation.

Early postoperative management after lung transplantation: Results of an international survey

INTRODUCTION

Little data exist regarding optimal therapeutic strategies postoperatively after lung transplant (LTx). Current practice patterns rely on expert opinion and institutional experience resulting in nonuniform postoperative care. To better define current practice patterns, an international survey of LTx clinicians was conducted.

METHODS

A 30-question survey was sent to transplant clinicians via email to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation open forum mailing list and directly to the chief transplant surgeon and pulmonologist of all LTx centers in the United States.

RESULTS

Fifty-two clinicians representing 10 countries responded to the survey. Sedatives use patterns included: opiates + propofol (57.2%), opiates + dexmedetomidine (18.4%), opiates + intermittent benzodiazepines (14.3%), opiates + continuous benzodiazepines (8.2%), and opiates alone (2%). About 40.4% reported no formal sedation scale was followed and 13.5% of programs had no formal policy on sedation and analgesia. A lung protective strategy was commonly employed, with 13.8%, 51.3%, and 35.9% of respondents using tidal volumes of <6 mL/kg ideal body weight (IBW), 6 mL/kg IBW, and 8 mL/kg IBW, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Practice patterns in the early postoperative care of lung transplant recipients differ considerably among centers. Many of the reported practices do not conform to consensus guidelines on management of critically ill patients.

[Extracorporeal life support in thoracic surgery: What are the indications and the pertinence?]

INTRODUCTION

In thoracic surgery, extracorporeal life support (ECLS) technologies are used in cases of severe and refractory respiratory failure or as intraoperative cardiorespiratory support. The objectives of this review are to describe the rationale of ECLS techniques, to review the pulmonary diseases potentially treated by ECLS, and finally to demonstrate the efficacy of ECLS, using recently published data from the literature, in order to practice evidence based medicine.

STATE OF THE ART

ECLS technologies should only be undertaken in expert centers. ECLS allows a protective ventilatory strategy in severe ARDS. In the field of lung transplantation, ECLS may be used successfully as a bridge to transplantation, as intraoperative cardiorespiratory support or as a bridge to recovery in cases of severe primary graft dysfunction. In general thoracic surgery, ECLS technology seems to be safe and efficient as intraoperative respiratory support for tracheobronchial surgery or for severe respiratory insufficiency, without significant increase in perioperative risk.

PERSPECTIVE

The indications for ECLS are going to increase. Future improvements both in scientific knowledge and bioengineering will improve the prognosis of patients treated with ECLS for respiratory failure. Multicenter randomized controlled trials will refine the indications for ECLS and improve the global care strategies for these patients.

CONCLUSION

ECLS is an efficient therapeutic strategy that will improve the prognosis of patients suffering from, or exposed to, the risks of severe respiratory failure.

Fluid Management in Lung Transplant Patients

Overall, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials examining the correlation between fluid volume delivery and outcomes in postoperative lung transplant patients. However, using thoracic surgery patients as a guide, the evidence suggests that hypervolemia correlates with pulmonary edema and should be avoided in lung transplant patients. However, it is recognized that patients with hemodynamic instability may require volume for attenuation of this situation, but it can likely be mitigated with the use of inotropic medication to maintain adequate perfusion and avoid the development of edema.

Principi e indicazioni dell’assistenza circolatoria e respiratoria extracorporea in chirurgia toracica

In origine, l’extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) era una tecnica di assistenza respiratoria che utilizzava uno scambiatore gassoso a membrana. Per estensione, l’ECMO è diventata una tecnica respiratoria e cardiopolmonare utilizzata in caso di deficit respiratorio e/o cardiaco nell’attesa della restaurazione della funzione deficitaria o di un eventuale trapianto. Il supporto emodinamico può essere parziale o totale. Gli accessi vascolari possono essere periferici o centrali. Questo tipo di assistenza utilizza il concetto di circolazione extracorporea (CEC) sanguigna che in epoca moderna si è estesa con l’utilizzo di polmoni artificiali a membrana. Il circuito di base è semplice e comprende una pompa, un ossigenatore (che permette al sangue di caricarsi di O₂ e di eliminare CO₂) e delle vie d’accesso (una di drenaggio e una di reinfusione). La sua attuazione è facile, veloce e può essere avviata al letto del malato. Il miglioramento delle attrezzature, una migliore conoscenza delle tecniche e delle indicazioni, e le politiche di salute pubblica hanno reso popolare questa tecnica. Alcuni centri di chirurgia toracica la utilizzano di routine come assistenza alla realizzazione di un intervento terapeutico (soprattutto trapianto) assieme a team di rianimazione per il trattamento della sindrome da distress respiratorio acuto. Nel quadro della malattia polmonare dell’adulto, l’idea principale è quella di sviluppare il concetto di strategia minimalista con l’uso di una CEC adiuvante parziale – più che sostitutiva totale – che permetterebbe il recupero metabolico ad integrum del paziente. Nei prossimi anni, i progressi della tecnologia e dell’ingegneria così come le conoscenze approfondite permetteranno il miglioramento della prognosi dei pazienti colpiti da deficit respiratorio sotto assistenza meccanica.

Increased Intraoperative Fluid Administration Is Associated with Severe Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a major cause of early morbidity and mortality in patients after lung transplantation. The etiology and pathophysiology of PGD is not fully characterized and whether intraoperative fluid administration increases the risk for PGD remains unclear from previous studies. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that increased total intraoperative fluid volume during lung transplantation is associated with the development of grade-3 PGD.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort analysis included patients who had lung transplantation at the Cleveland Clinic between January 2009 and June 2013. We used multivariable logistic regression with adjustment for donor, recipient, and perioperative confounding factors to examine the association between total intraoperative fluid administration and development of grade-3 PGD in the initial 72 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included time to initial extubation and intensive care unit length of stay.

RESULTS

Grade-3 PGD occurred in 123 of 494 patients (25%) who had lung transplantation. Patients with grade-3 PGD received a larger volume of intraoperative fluid (median 5.0 [3.8, 7.5] L) than those without grade-3 PGD (3.9 [2.8, 5.2] L). Each intraoperative liter of fluid increased the odds of grade-3 PGD by approximately 22% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.34; P <0.001). The volume of transfused red blood cell concentrate was associated with grade-3 PGD (1.1 [0.0, 1.8] L for PGD-3 vs 0.4 [0.0, 1.1 for nongrade-3 PGD] L; adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.08-2.7; P = 0.002). Increased fluid administration was associated with longer intensive care unit stay (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92; 97.5% CI, 0.88-0.97; P < 0.001) but not with time to initial tracheal extubation (hazard ratio, 0.97; 97.5% CI, 0.93-1.02; P = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased intraoperative fluid volume is associated with the most severe form of PGD after lung transplant surgery. Limiting fluid administration may reduce the risk for development of grade-3 PGD and thus improve early postoperative morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation.

Primary Graft Dysfunction after Lung Transplantation

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a severe form of acute lung injury that is a major cause of early morbidity and mortality encountered after lung transplantation. PGD is diagnosed by pulmonary oedema with diffuse alveolar damage that manifests clinically as progressive hypoxemia with radiographic pulmonary infiltrates. Inflammatory and immunological response caused by ischaemia and reperfusion is important with regard to pathophysiology. PGD affects short- and long-term outcomes, the donor organ is the leading factor affecting these adverse ramifications. To minimize the risk of PGD, reduction of lung ischaemia time, reperfusion optimisation, prostaglandin level regulation, haemodynamic control, hormone replacement therapy, ventilator management are carried out; for research regarding donor lung preparation strategies, certain procedures are recommended. In this review, recent updates in epidemiology, pathophysiology, molecular and genetic biomarkers and technical developments affecting PGD are described.

Primary graft dysfunction: lessons learned about the first 72 h after lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In 2005, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation published a standardized definition of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), facilitating new knowledge on this form of acute lung injury that occurs within 72 h of lung transplantation. PGD continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This article will summarize the current literature on the epidemiology of PGD, pathogenesis, risk factors, and preventive and treatment strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since 2011, several manuscripts have been published that provide insight into the clinical risk factors and pathogenesis of PGD. In addition, several transplant centers have explored preventive and treatment strategies for PGD, including the use of extracorporeal strategies. More recently, results from several trials assessing the role of extracorporeal lung perfusion may allow for much-needed expansion of the donor pool, without raising PGD rates.

SUMMARY

This article will highlight the current state of the science regarding PGD, focusing on recent advances, and set a framework for future preventive and treatment strategies.

The role of donor chronic alcohol abuse in the development of primary graft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) following lung transplantation is clinically similar to the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Because alcohol abuse independently increases the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome in at-risk individuals, we hypothesized that donor alcohol use is correlated with an increased risk of PGD. As a pilot study, we collected alcohol use histories using a validated instrument, the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test questionnaire, from 74 donors and correlated these with the development of PGD in corresponding recipients. Nineteen percent (14/74) of donors were classified as heavy alcohol users, as defined by the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test scores ≥8. In the 1st 4 days post-transplantation, similar percentages of recipients developed grade 3 PGD on at least 1 day (heavy alcohol user = 29% [4/14] versus lighter alcohol user = 27% [16/60]); however, recipients receiving a lung from a heavy alcohol user were more likely to have multiple and consecutive days of grade 3 PGD, especially in the 1st 48 hours post-transplant. Both median length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital were somewhat longer in the heavy alcohol user group (9 versus 7 days and 19.5 versus 17.5 days, respectively). If these preliminary findings are validated in a multi-center study, they would have important implications not only for our understanding of the pathophysiology of PGD but also for the development of novel treatments based on the evolving evidence from experimental and clinical studies on how alcohol abuse renders the lung susceptible to acute edematous injury.

Neutrophil extracellular traps are pathogenic in primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation

RATIONALE

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) causes early mortality after lung transplantation and may contribute to late graft failure. No effective treatments exist. The pathogenesis of PGD is unclear, although both neutrophils and activated platelets have been implicated. We hypothesized that neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) contribute to lung injury in PGD in a platelet-dependent manner.

OBJECTIVES

To study NETs in experimental models of PGD and in lung transplant patients.

METHODS

Two experimental murine PGD models were studied: hilar clamp and orthotopic lung transplantation after prolonged cold ischemia (OLT-PCI). NETs were assessed by immunofluorescence microscopy and ELISA. Platelet activation was inhibited with aspirin, and NETs were disrupted with DNaseI. NETs were also measured in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and plasma from lung transplant patients with and without PGD.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

NETs were increased after either hilar clamp or OLT-PCI compared with surgical control subjects. Activation and intrapulmonary accumulation of platelets were increased in OLT-PCI, and platelet inhibition reduced NETs and lung injury, and improved oxygenation. Disruption of NETs by intrabronchial administration of DNaseI also reduced lung injury and improved oxygenation. In bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from human lung transplant recipients, NETs were more abundant in patients with PGD.

CONCLUSIONS

NETs accumulate in the lung in both experimental and clinical PGD. In experimental PGD, NET formation is platelet-dependent, and disruption of NETs with DNaseI reduces lung injury. These data are the first description of a pathogenic role for NETs in solid organ transplantation and suggest that NETs are a promising therapeutic target in PGD.

Heart and lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Every year, thousands of heart and lung transplants are performed worldwide. As experience and clinical acumen advance, both fields are continually evolving. This review elucidates and describes many of the recent changes in practice and future directions of heart and lung transplantation. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative developments are presented with supporting evidence in these continually evolving fields.

RECENT FINDINGS

The field of heart transplantation is continually adapting to the growing use of mechanical circulatory support devices as bridge to transplant and for postoperative support. Recent modifications in surgical technique have contributed to improved outcomes.Lung transplantation advancements include the increasing use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the perioperative period. Lobar transplantation and ex-vivo lung perfusion techniques may aid in providing successful lung grafts to those with potentially long wait list times.Rates of rejection continue to decline in both fields as immunosuppression regimens are improved and modified.

SUMMARY

This review investigates and summarizes the recent changes and advancements in heart and lung transplantation. Mechanical circulatory support and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are increasingly used in the perioperative setting, and continuing research will evaluate their safety profiles. Optimizing and tailoring immunosuppression regimens for transplant recipients continue to be the subject of ongoing investigation.

Human recombinant apyrase therapy protects against canine pulmonary ischemia-reperfusion injury

BACKGROUND

There is accumulating evidence that extracellular adenosine triphosphate (eATP) promotes many of the underlying mechanisms that exacerbate acute lung injury. However, much of these data are from inbred rodent models, indicating the need for further investigation in higher vertebrates to better establish clinical relevance. To this end we evaluated a human recombinant apyrase therapy in a canine warm pulmonary ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) model and measured eATP levels in human lung recipients with or without primary lung graft dysfunction (PGD).

METHODS

Warm ischemia was induced for 90 minutes in the left lung of 14 mongrel dogs. Seven minutes after reperfusion, the apyrase APT102 (1 mg/kg, n = 7) or saline vehicle (n = 7) was injected into the pulmonary artery. Arterial blood gases were obtained every 30 minutes up to 180 minutes after reperfusion. Bronchioalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was analyzed for eATP concentration, cellularity, and inflammatory mediator accumulation. Thirty bilateral human lung transplant recipients were graded for immediate early PGD and assessed for BALF eATP levels.

RESULTS

APT102-treated dogs had progressively better lung function and less pulmonary edema during the 3-hour reperfusion period compared with vehicle-treated controls. Protection from IRI was observed, with lower BALF eATP levels, fewer airway leukocytes, and blunted inflammatory mediator expression. Human lung recipients with moderate to severe PGD had significantly higher eATP levels compared with recipients without this injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Extracellular ATP accumulates in acutely injured canine and human lungs. Strategies that target eATP reduction may help protect lung recipients from IRI.

Effects of cyclosporine a in ex vivo reperfused pig lungs

OBJECTIVE

Several works highlight the role of CsA in the prevention of IRI, but none focus on isolated lungs. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of CsA on IRI on ex vivo reperfused pig lungs.

METHODS

Thirty-two pairs of pig lungs were collected and stored for 30 minutes at 4 °C. The study was performed in four groups. First, a control group and then three groups receiving different concentrations of CsA (1, 10, and 30 μM) at two different times: once at the moment of lung procurement and another during the reperfusion procedure. The ex vivo lung preparation was set up using an extracorporeal perfusion circuit. Gas exchange parameters, pulmonary hemodynamics, and biological markers of lung injury were collected for the evaluation.

RESULTS

CsA improved the PaO2 /FiO2 ratio, but it also increased PAP, Pcap, and pulmonary vascular resistances with dose-dependent effects. Lungs treated with high doses of CsA displayed higher capillary-alveolar permeability to proteins, lower AFC capacities, and elevated concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest a possible deleterious imbalance between the beneficial cell properties of CsA in IRI and its hemodynamic effects on microvascularization.

Extracorporeal life support in critically ill adults

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has become increasingly popular as a salvage strategy for critically ill adults. Major advances in technology and the severe acute respiratory distress syndrome that characterized the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic have stimulated renewed interest in the use of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to support the respiratory system. Theoretical advantages of ECLS for respiratory failure include the ability to rest the lungs by avoiding injurious mechanical ventilator settings and the potential to facilitate early mobilization, which may be advantageous for bridging to recovery or to lung transplantation. The use of venoarterial ECMO has been expanded and applied to critically ill adults with hemodynamic compromise from a variety of etiologies, beyond postcardiotomy failure. Although technology and general care of the ECLS patient have evolved, ECLS is not without potentially serious complications and remains unproven as a treatment modality. The therapy is now being tested in clinical trials, although numerous questions remain about the application of ECLS and its impact on outcomes in critically ill adults.

Recipient-related clinical risk factors for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the main cause of early morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Previous studies have yielded conflicting results for PGD risk factors. Herein, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature to identify recipient-related clinical risk factors associated with PGD development.

Method

A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus) for studies published from 1970 to 2013 was performed. Cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies that examined recipient-related risk factors of PGD were included. The odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) were calculated using random-effects models

Result

Thirteen studies involving 10042 recipients met final inclusion criteria. From the pooled analyses, female gender (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.75), African American (OR 1.82, 95%CI 1.36 to 2.45), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.13), sarcoidosis (OR 4.25, 95% CI 1.09 to 16.52), primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) (OR 3.73, 95%CI 2.16 to 6.46), elevated BMI (BMI≥25 kg/m²) (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.64), and use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (OR 2.29, 95%CI 1.43 to 3.65) were significantly associated with increased risk of PGD. Age, cystic fibrosis, secondary pulmonary hypertension (SPH), intra-operative inhaled nitric oxide (NO), or lung transplant type (single or bilateral) were not significantly associated with PGD development (all P>0.05). Moreover, a nearly 4 fold increased risk of short-term mortality was observed in patients with PGD (OR 3.95, 95% CI 2.80 to 5.57).

Conclusions

Our analysis identified several recipient related risk factors for development of PGD. The identification of higher-risk recipients and further research into the underlying mechanisms may lead to selective therapies aimed at reducing this reperfusion injury.

Primary graft dysfunction

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a syndrome encompassing a spectrum of mild to severe lung injury that occurs within the first 72 hours after lung transplantation. PGD is characterized by pulmonary edema with diffuse alveolar damage that manifests clinically as progressive hypoxemia with radiographic pulmonary infiltrates. In recent years, new knowledge has been generated on risks and mechanisms of PGD. Following ischemia and reperfusion, inflammatory and immunological injury-repair responses appear to be key controlling mechanisms. In addition, PGD has a significant impact on short- and long-term outcomes; therefore, the choice of donor organ is impacted by this potential adverse consequence. Improved methods of reducing PGD risk and efforts to safely expand the pool are being developed. Ex vivo lung perfusion is a strategy that may improve risk assessment and become a promising platform to implement treatment interventions to prevent PGD. This review details recent updates in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, molecular and genetic biomarkers, and state-of-the-art technical developments affecting PGD.

Lung Ischemia Reperfusion Injury

Lung ischemia reperfusion injury (LIRI) is a pathologic process occurring when oxygen supply to the lung has been compromised followed by a period of reperfusion. The disruption of oxygen supply can occur either via limited blood flow or decreased ventilation termed anoxic ischemia and ventilated ischemia, respectively. When reperfusion occurs, blood flow and oxygen are reintroduced to the ischemic lung parenchyma, facilitating a toxic environment through the creation of reactive oxygen species, activation of the immune and coagulation systems, endothelial dysfunction, and apoptotic cell death. This review will focus on the mechanisms of LIRI, the current supportive treatments used, and the many therapies currently under research for prevention and treatment of LIRI.

Managing complications following lung transplantation

Lung transplantation has become a proven therapeutic option for patients with end-stage lung disease, extending life and providing improved quality of life to those who otherwise would continue to be breathless and oxygen-dependent. Over the past 20 years, considerable experience has been gained in understanding the multitude of medical and surgical issues that impact upon patient survival. Today, clinicians have an armamentarium of tools to manage diverse problems such as primary graft dysfunction, acute and chronic allograft rejection, airway anastomotic issues, infectious complications, renal dysfunction, diabetes and osteoporosis, hematological and gastrointestinal problems, malignancy, and other unique issues that confront immunosuppressed solid organ transplant recipients.

Critical care management of the lung transplant recipient

Lung transplantation provides the prospect of improved survival and quality of life for patients with end stage lung and pulmonary vascular diseases. Given the severity of illness of such patients at the time of surgery, lung transplant recipients require particular attention in the immediate post-operative period to ensure optimal short-term and long-term outcomes. The management of such patients involves active involvement of a multidisciplinary team versed in common post-operative complications. This review provides an overview of such complications as they pertain to the practitioners caring for post-operative lung transplant recipients. Causes and treatment of conditions affecting early morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients will be detailed, including primary graft dysfunction, cardiovascular and surgical complications, and immunologic and infectious issues. Additionally, lung donor management issues and bridging the critically ill potential lung transplant recipient to transplantation will be discussed.

[Primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation]

Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for pulmonary diseases in which the other treatment options have failed or in cases of rapid disease progression. However, transplantation is not free from complications, and primary graft dysfunction is one of them. Primary graft dysfunction is a form of acute lung injury. It characteristically develops during the immediate postoperative period, being associated to high morbidity and mortality, and increased risk of bronchiolitis obliterans. Different terms have been used in reference to primary graft dysfunction, leading to a consensus document to clarify the definition in 2005. This consensus document regards primary graft dysfunction as non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema developing within 72 hours of reperfusion and intrinsically attributable to alteration of the lung parenchyma. A number of studies have attempted to identify risk factors and to establish the underlying physiopathology, with a view to developing potential therapeutic options. Such options include nitric oxide and pulmonary surfactant together with supportive measures such as mechanical ventilation or oxygenation bypass.

Current status of lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is a well-established treatment option for selected patients with end-stage lung disease, leading to improved survival and improved quality of life. The last 20 years have seen a steady growth in number of lung transplantation procedures performed worldwide. The increase in clinical activity has been associated with tremendous progress in the understanding of cellular and molecular processes that limit both short- and long-term outcomes. This review gives a comprehensive overview of the current status of lung transplantation for the referring physician. It demonstrates that careful selection of potential recipients, optimisation of their condition prior to transplant, use of carefully assessed donor organs, excellent surgery and meticulous long-term follow-up are all essential ingredients in determining a successful outcome.