Time-dependent prognostic effects of recipient and donor age in adult heart transplantation

Perioperative Risk Factors of Acute Kidney Injury After Heart Transplantation and One-Year Clinical Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify perioperative risk factors of acute kidney injury after heart transplantation and to evaluate 1-year clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

A retrospective single-center cohort study.

SETTING

At a university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients who underwent heart transplantation from January 2015 to December 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The authors recorded acute kidney injury after heart transplantation. One-year mortality and renal function also were recorded. Risk factors of acute kidney injury were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model. Long-term survival was compared between patients developing acute kidney injury and those who did not, using a log-rank test. Among 209 patients included in this study, 134 patients (64% [95% CI (58; 71)]) developed posttransplantation acute kidney injury. Factors independently associated with acute kidney injury were high body mass index (odds ratio [OR]: 1.18 [1.02-1.38] per kg/m2; p = 0.030), prolonged duration of cold ischemic period (OR: 1.11 [1.01-1.24] per 10 minutes; p = 0.039), and high dose of intraoperative dobutamine support (OR: 1.24 [1.06-1.46] per µg/kg/min; p = 0.008). At 1 year, patients who developed postoperative acute kidney injury had higher mortality rates (20% v 8%, p = 0.015). Among 172 survivors at 1 year, 82 survivors (48%) had worsened their renal function compared with preheart transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlighted the high incidence of acute kidney injury after heart transplantation and its impact on patient outcomes. Risk factors such as body mass index, prolonged cold ischemic period duration, and level of inotropic support with dobutamine were identified, providing insights for preventive strategies.

Influence of donor age and donor-recipient age difference on intimal hyperplasia in pediatric patients with young and adult donors vs. adult patients after heart transplantation

AIM

Optimal selection and allocation of donor hearts is a relevant aspect in transplantation medicine. Donor age and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) affect post-transplant mortality. To what extent donor age impacts intimal hyperplasia (CAVIH) in pediatric and adult patients after heart transplantation (HTx) is understudied.

METHODS

In a cohort of 98 HTx patients, 58 pediatric (24.1% with adult donors) and 40 adult patients, we assessed the effect of donor age and donor-recipient age difference (D-R) on the continuous parameter of maximal intima thickness (mIT) in optical coherence tomography. We evaluated their predictive value regarding higher mIT and the prevalence of CAVIH, defined as mIT > 0.3 mm, and compared it to established CAV risk factors.

RESULTS

In the overall population, donor age correlated with mIT (p < 0.001), while in the pediatric subpopulation, both donor age and D-R correlated with mIT (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). In the overall population, donor age was a main predictor of higher mIT and CAVIH (p = 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively) in addition to post-transplant interval, arterial hypertension, and dyslipidemia. In the pediatric patients, dyslipidemia remained a main predictor of both higher mIT and CAVIH (p = 0.004 and p = 0.040, respectively), while donor age and D-R were not.

CONCLUSION

While there was an effect of the non-modifiable parameter of donor age regarding maximal intimal thickness, a stronger association was seen between the modifiable risk factor dyslipidemia and higher maximal intimal thickness and CAVIH in both the overall population and the pediatric subpopulation.

Usage of older donors is associated with higher mortality after heart transplantation: A UNOS observational study

BACKGROUND

Utilization of heart from older donors is variable across centers with uncertain outcomes of recipients. We sought to utilize a national registry to examine the usage and outcomes of heart transplant (HT) recipients from older donors. We also explored the impact of current donor heart allocation scheme on the outcomes of hearts from older donors.

METHODS

This observational study utilized the United Network for Organ Sharing database between 2015 and 2023 with donors categorized into age <45 years or ≥45 years and evaluated organ disposition and geographical variation. Thirty-day, 1-, and 3-year mortality, and graft failure rates were compared among recipients as per donor age group. We also evaluated annual trends in HT for each group over the follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total of 24,966 adult donors were recovered: 3,742 (15.0%) were ≥45 years; 3,349 (15.6%) adults received heart from such donors with significant geographical variation, and a declining utilization in the transplantation rate in current donor allocation system. Donors with age ≥45 years had higher comorbidities and were allotted with a significantly shorter ischemic time to recipients who were significantly less likely to receive temporary mechanical circulatory support and more likely female. Unadjusted and adjusted, 30-day mortality were similar but 1- and 3-year mortality and graft failure rates were significantly higher in recipients of such donors. Spline analysis suggested a higher 1-year mortality risk at older donor age with risk increasing after age 40 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Older donor age was associated with worsened 1- and 3-year mortality and graft failure for heart transplant recipients.

Can we safely expand the donation after circulatory death donor heart pool by extending the donor age limit?

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the impact of donor age on outcomes following donation after circulatory death heart transplantation.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to analyze adult recipients who underwent isolated donation after circulatory heart transplantation from January 1, 2019, to September 30, 2023. The cohort was stratified into 2 groups according to donor age, where advanced donor age was defined as 40 years or more. Outcomes were 90-day and 1-year post-transplant survival. Propensity score matching was performed. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of recipient age on 90-day survival among the recipients with advanced-age donors.

RESULTS

A total of 994 recipients were included in the study period, and 161 patients (17.1%) received allografts from advanced-age donors. During the study period, the annual incidence of donation after circulatory heart transplantation with advanced-age donors substantially increased. The recipients with advanced-age donors had similar 90-day and 1-year post-transplant survivals compared with the recipients with younger donors. The comparable 90-day survival persisted in a propensity score-matched comparison. In the subgroup analysis among the recipients with advanced-age donors, the recipients aged 60 years or more had significantly reduced 90-day survival compared with the recipients aged less than 60 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of appropriately selected donation after circulatory donors aged 40 years or more has similar survival compared with that of younger donors. With careful candidate risk stratification and selection, consideration of using donation after circulatory donors aged more than 40 years may further ameliorate ongoing organ shortage with comparable early post-transplant outcomes.

Donor Age, Sex, and Cause of Death and Their Relationship to Heart Transplant Recipient Cardiac Death

BACKGROUND

Recent studies indicate that donor innate immune responses participate in initiating and accelerating innate responses and allorecognition in the recipient. These immune responses negatively affect recipient outcomes and predispose recipients to cardiovascular death (CV death). We hypothesized that a donor cause of death (COD) associated with higher levels of innate immune response would predispose recipients to more adverse outcomes post-transplant, including CV death.

METHODS

We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis comparing donor characteristics and COD to recipient adverse cardiovascular outcomes. We analyzed the medical records of local adult donors (age 18-64) in a database of donors where adequate data was available. Donor age was available on 706 donors; donor sex was available on 730 donors. We linked donor characteristics (age and sex) and COD to recipient CV death. The data were analyzed using logistic regression, the log-rank test of differences, and Tukey contrast.

RESULTS

Donor age, female sex, and COD of intracranial hemorrhage were significantly associated with a higher incidence of recipient CV death.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single institution study, we found that recipients with hearts from donors over 40 years, donors who were female, or donors who died with a COD of intracranial hemorrhage had a higher frequency of CV death. Donor monitoring and potential treatment of innate immune activation may decrease subsequent recipient innate responses and allorecognition stimulated by donor-derived inflammatory signaling, which leads to adverse outcomes.

Total ventricular mass oversizing +50% or greater was a predictor of worse 1-year survival after heart transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Current donor-recipient size matching guidelines rely primarily on body weight, with no specified oversizing cutoff values. Recent literature has explored predicted total ventricular mass matching over body weight matching. We aim to explore the impact of total ventricular mass oversizing on heart transplant outcomes.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for adults who underwent primary heart transplant from 1997 to 2017. By using validated equations, donor-recipient total ventricular mass mismatch was calculated. Donor-recipient pairs were divided into 3 groups by total ventricular mass mismatch. Post-heart transplant 1-year survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. We also investigated post-heart transplant complications, independent predictors for mortality, donor-recipient sex mismatch, and donor-recipient body habitus in total ventricular mass mismatch greater than +50%.

RESULTS

A total of 34,455 donor-recipient pairs were included. Fractional polynomial regression demonstrated increased the risk of mortality with higher total ventricular mass mismatch. Total ventricular mass mismatch of +48.3% maximized the Youden Index. Donor-recipient pairs were subsequently grouped by total ventricular mass mismatch as -20% to +30%, +30% to +50%, and greater than +50%. Total ventricular mass mismatch greater than +50% was an independent risk factor for 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.40, P = .004) and was associated with increased postoperative stroke (P = .002). Some 80.3% of these recipients were smaller female patients with male donors. Total ventricular mass mismatch from +30% to +50% was not associated with worse survival (P = .17).

CONCLUSIONS

Total ventricular mass mismatch greater than +50% is associated with worse 1-year survival, although this group comprises a small portion of heart transplant. total ventricular mass mismatch from +30% to +50% is not associated with worse survival. These outcomes should be considered in selecting donors and in efforts to expand the potential donor pool.

Donor heart selection: Evidence-based guidelines for providers

The proposed donor heart selection guidelines provide evidence-based and expert-consensus recommendations for the selection of donor hearts following brain death. These recommendations were compiled by an international panel of experts based on an extensive literature review.

Risk of recipient age on 1-year mortality after simultaneous heart-lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Heart-lung transplantation (HLTx) is relatively uncommon, and there is a paucity of literature to suggest an age at which older recipients may be exposed to excess risk for mortality. This analysis aimed to identify a threshold of age that predicts adverse outcomes after HLTx.

METHODS

The United Network of Organ Sharing registry was used to identify adult patients undergoing HLTx from 2005 to 2021. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality. Threshold regression was used to identify the threshold at which age impacts 1-year mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to model survival, and Cox proportional hazards modeling was used for risk-adjustment.

RESULTS

We identified 453 patients undergoing HLTx. Threshold analysis identified that the risk for 1-year mortality was significantly elevated beyond an age of 58 years, and 47 (10.38%) patients were older than this threshold. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, 1-year survival was significantly lower in patients > 58 years compared to younger recipients (64.7% vs. 82.0%, p = .007). After risk adjustment, the hazard ratio for 1-year mortality in recipients older than 58 years was 2.27 (95% confidence interval [1.21-4.28], p = .011).

CONCLUSION

A threshold for recipient age of 58 years of age may avoid excess 1-year mortality after HLTx. However, patients older than this threshold demonstrate acceptable early and midterm survival, and the majority survive to 1 year. Advanced age should be considered in patient selection for HLTx, but may not be a contraindication for candidacy particularly in the absence of other risk factors.

Heart Transplantation With Older Donors: Should There Be an Age Cutoff?

PURPOSE

Heart transplantation remains limited by donor availability. Currently, only some programs accept older donors, and their use remains contentious. We compared outcomes of heart transplant recipients who received donor hearts ≥55 years with those who received donor hearts <55 years.

METHODS

Records of first-time adult heart transplant recipients between 2010 and 2019 were reviewed. Endpoints included 30-day and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival; freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy; freedom from nonfatal major adverse cardiac events; and freedom from any rejections. The effect of donor age ≥55 years was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards modeling, 1:2 propensity score matching, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients received donor hearts ≥55 years and 766 received donor hearts <55 years. In the unmatched cohort, there was no significant difference in survival between the 2 groups at 30 days (93.9% vs 97.3%, P = .127), 1 year (87.9% vs 91.6%, P = .325), 3 years (86.4% vs 86.5%, P = .888), or 5 years (78.8% vs 83.8%, P = .497). The ≥55 years group had a significantly lower freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy and fatal major adverse cardiac events. In propensity-matched patients, recipients of donors ≥55 years had similar survival and freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy but significantly lower 1-year (76.7% vs 88.3%, P = .026), 3-year (68.3% vs 84.2%, P = .010), and 5-year (63.3% vs 83.3%, P = .002) freedom from nonfatal major adverse cardiac events when compared to recipients of younger donors.

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully selected older donors can be considered for a carefully selected group of recipients with acceptable outcomes.

Assessing the Relationship Between Molecular Rejection and Parenchymal Injury in Heart Transplant Biopsies

BACKGROUND

The INTERHEART study (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02670408) used genome-wide microarrays to detect rejection in endomyocardial biopsies; however, many heart transplants with no rejection have late dysfunction and impaired survival. We used the microarray measurements to develop a molecular classification of parenchymal injury.

METHODS

In 1320 endomyocardial biopsies from 645 patients previously studied for rejection-associated transcripts, we measured the expression of 10 injury-induced transcript sets: 5 induced by recent injury; 2 reflecting macrophage infiltration; 2 normal heart transcript sets; and immunoglobulin transcripts, which correlate with time. We used archetypal clustering to assign injury groups.

RESULTS

Injury transcript sets correlated with impaired function. Archetypal clustering based on the expression of injury transcript sets assigned each biopsy to 1 of 5 injury groups: 87 Severe-injury, 221 Late-injury, and 3 with lesser degrees of injury, 376 No-injury, 526 Mild-injury, and 110 Moderate-injury. Severe-injury had extensive loss of normal transcripts (dedifferentiation) and increase in macrophage and injury-induced transcripts. Late-injury was characterized by high immunoglobulin transcript expression. In Severe- and Late-injury, function was depressed, and short-term graft failure was increased, even in hearts with no rejection. T cell-mediated rejection almost always had parenchymal injury, and 85% had Severe- or Late-injury. In contrast, early antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) had little injury, but late ABMR often had the Late-injury state.

CONCLUSION

Characterizing heart transplants for their injury state provides new understanding of dysfunction and outcomes and demonstrates the differential impact of T cell-mediated rejection versus ABMR on the parenchyma. Slow deterioration from ABMR emerges as a major contributor to late dysfunction.

Impact of age mismatch between donor and recipient on heart transplant mortality

The effect of donor-to-recipient (D-R) age mismatch in adult heart transplant population is not clearly described, and we undertook this study to determine the impact of age mismatch on mortality. Heart transplant recipients from 2000 to 2017 were identified using the United Network of Organ Sharing database. The cohort was divided into three groups: donor age within 5 years of recipient age (Group 1), donors >5 years younger than recipient (group 2), and donors >5 years older than recipients (Group 3). We also evaluated if this finding changed by recipient age. Twenty eight thousand, four hundred and eleven patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared to group 1, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for mortality for group 2 was 0.91 (0.83-0.99, p value <.039) and for group 3 was 1.36 (1.21-1.52, p value <.001); however, when looking at recipient age as continuous variable, receiving a younger heart was protective only for recipients younger than 45 years of age, and receiving a heart transplant from an older donor was detrimental only in recipients aged 25-35.

Right ventricular undersizing is associated with increased 1-year mortality

OBJECTIVES

Right heart hemodynamic management is critical, because many post-heart transplantation (HTx) complications are related to right ventricular (RV) failure. However, current guidelines on size and sex matching rely primarily on weight matching, with recent literature using total ventricular mass (TVM), which places less emphasis on the impact of RV mass (RVM) matching. The aim of the present study was to analyze the relationship of RVM matching and survival after HTx.

METHODS

We performed the retrospective analysis using the UNOS database of adult HTx performed between January 1997 and December 2017. Previously validated equations were used to calculate TVM and RVM. The percent difference in ventricular mass in the donor and recipient pair was used for the size mismatch. All donor-recipient pairs were divided into 4 RVM groups by their mismatch ratio. We analyzed RVM matching and explored how RVM undersizing impacted outcomes. The primary outcome measure was 1-year survival; secondary outcomes measured included stroke and dialysis within 1 year and functional status.

RESULTS

A total of 38,740 donor-recipient pairs were included in our study. The 4 RVM match groupings were as follows: <0%, 0% to 20%, 20% to 40%, and >40%. Utilization of donors who were older and of female sex resulted in greater RVM undersizing. Survival analysis demonstrated patients with RVM undersizing had worse 1-year survival (P < .001). RVM undersizing was an independent predictor of higher 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 1.34; P < .001). RVM undersizing was also associated with higher rates of dialysis within 1-year of transplantation and poorer postoperative functional status.

CONCLUSIONS

RVM undersizing is an independent predictor for worse 1-year survival. Donors who are older and female have lower absolute predicted RVM and may be predisposed to RVM undersizing. RVM-undersized transplantation requires careful risk/benefit considerations.

Donor-recipient age interaction and the impact on clinical results after heart transplantation

To evaluate the impact of donor-recipient age matching on clinical outcomes after heart transplantation, a total of 509 patients (January 1990-December 2018, mean follow-up 111 ± 80 months) were stratified into 4 groups (young-R/young-D, young-R/old-D, old-R/young-D, old-R/old-D) according to the recipient (young-R < 60, old-R ≥ 60 years) and the donor (young-D < 50, old-D ≥ 50 years) age. No difference was found among 30-day mortality (P = .11) and postoperative complications between groups. Both unadjusted and adjusted survival was significantly higher for group young-R/young-D than that of other groups, in which survival was similar [adjusted HR for mortality of 2.0(1.2-3.4), 2.1(1.4-3.8) and 2.5(1.6-4.1) for groups old-R/young-D, young-R/old-D, old-R/old-D, respectively]. Compared to other groups, the incidence of grade ≥ 2 CAV was significantly lower in old-R/young-D group [adjusted HR 0.4(0.2-0.7)]. Among young recipients, the rate of acute grade ≥ 2 rejection episodes was higher in those receiving an old donor graft (P = .04). Old recipient groups were more affected by neoplasms and severe renal failure than young recipient groups (P < .01). Employment of hearts from donors ≥50 years of age adversely affects survival in recipients <60 years of age but does not influence outcomes in older recipients. Also, donor and recipient ages seem to have opposite effects on incidence of rejections and CAV of high grade.

Predisposing factors for late mortality in heart transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Because of the growing prevalence of terminal heart failure on the one hand and organ shortage on the other hand, an optimal care of heart transplant recipients based on the knowledge of potential risk factors not only early, but also in a long-term course after heart transplantation is of great importance. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to identify predisposing factors for late mortality in this patient collective.

METHODS

Data from long-term heart transplant patients collected during follow-up visits in the current center were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical, laboratory, including immune monitoring and apparative examination results were studied with regard to all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-two patients after heart transplantation (mean: 13.2 ± 6.4 years) were divided into two groups: survivors (n = 133) and non-survivors (n = 39). In comparison with survivors, non-survivors were characterized by significantly more pronounced renal insufficiency with more frequent dialysis, anemia and worse functional status. Additionally, non-survivors obtained hearts from relevantly more obese donors. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis the following parameters were shown to be independent risk factors for increased mortality: CD4 percentage < 42%, C-reactive protein ≥ 0.5 mg/dL, presence of rejections requiring therapies in the past, onset of cardiac allograft vasculopathy < 5 years following heart transplantation and no use of beta-blockers.

CONCLUSIONS

Low CD4+ cell percentages, sustained inflammation, relevant organ rejections, early onset of transplant vasculopathy and no use of beta-blockers are risk factors for higher mortality in a long-term follow-up after heart transplantation.

Donor and recipient age matching in heart transplantation: analysis of the UNOS Registry

The association of donor and recipient age with survival following adult heart transplantation has not been well characterized. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of the relationship between donor and recipient age on post-transplant survival. We retrospectively reviewed the 2005-2018 UNOS heart transplant database for all adult recipients undergoing first-time isolated heart transplantation. The impact of donor and recipient age on survival was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards modeling using restricted cubic splines. A total of 25 480 heart transplant donor and recipient pairs met inclusion criteria. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards modeling demonstrated a near-linear association between increasing donor age and decreased survival; in addition, older and younger recipient age was associated with decreased survival. After adjustment, there was no significant interaction between donor and recipient age. Older donors decreased survival similarly in both older and younger recipients. Increasing donor age and both younger and older recipient age are independently associated with worsened post-heart transplant survival. The relationship between donor and recipient age does not significantly affect survival following heart transplant.