Ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall: Adjunctive effects during ablation of atrial fibrillation

Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion for AF Ablation; A Review

The outcomes of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are modest with various adjunctive strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) yielding largely disappointing results in randomised controlled trials. Linear ablation is a commonly employed adjunct strategy but is limited by difficulty in achieving durable bidirectional block, particularly at the mitral isthmus. Epicardial connections play a role in AF initiation and perpetuation. The ligament of Marshall has been implicated as a source of AF triggers and is known to harbour sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve fibres that contribute to AF perpetuation. Ethanol infusion into the Vein of Marshall, a remnant of the superior vena cava and key component of the ligament of Marshall, may eliminate these AF triggers and can facilitate the ease of obtaining durable mitral isthmus block. While early trials have demonstrated the potential of Vein of Marshall 'ethanolisation' to reduce arrhythmia recurrence after persistent AF ablation, further randomised trials are needed to fully determine the potential long-term outcome benefits afforded by this technique.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Use of intracardiac echocardiography in vein of Marshall ethanol infusion for ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Few methods have been reported to demonstrate real-time effects during vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion in persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF).

OBJECTIVE

This study was to evaluate the impact of left atrial (LA) monitoring using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) during VOM ethanol infusion.

METHODS

Seventy-four consecutive patients with PeAF who underwent VOM ethanol infusion followed by radiofrequency (RF) ablation were included. Patients with findings on ICE consistent with echogenic streaming in the LA and with increased myocardial local echogenicity along the VOM area were placed into one group (group A) and those without into the other group (group B). Outcomes between the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (62%) were placed into group A. A new ethanol-induced low-voltage area in group A was larger than that in group B (8.5 cm2 [5.5-10.2 cm2] and 4.0 cm2 (2.4-6.3 cm2]; P < .001). The RF ablation time required to achieve MI block was reduced in group A patients (263.0 seconds [196.0-351.0 seconds] vs 417.0 seconds [315.0-709.5 seconds] in group B patients; P < .001). MI block was achieved in 46 patients (100%) via an endocardial approach in group A and 27 patients (96.4%) in group B (extra coronary sinus ablation in 4 patients). One patient developed clinically significant pericardial effusions and required pericardiocentesis in group B.

CONCLUSION

Presence of increased myocardial local echogenicity at the ridge and consistent echogenic streaming in the LA detected by ICE-based imaging during VOM ethanol infusion suggests increased ablated tissue in that region and lower RF ablation time during ablation for PeAF.

Clinical effect of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion on mitral isthmus ablation

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the effect of Marshall ethanol infusion (VOM-Et) in the vein on mitral isthmus (MI) ablation.

Methods

Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) were grouped into vein of VOM-Et combined with radiofrequency (RF) ablation (VOM-Et-RF) and RF groups. The primary outcome was MI block immediate block rate after surgery. Stratified analysis was also performed for factors affecting the outcome measures.

Results

A total of 118 consecutive patients underwent AF ablation at Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province from January 2018 to December 2021. Successful bidirectional perimitral block was achieved in 96% of patients in VOM-Et-RF (69 of 72) and in 76% of patients in the RF group (35 of 46) (P < 0.01). In the subgroup analysis, male sex, elder than 60 years, Left atrial diameter <55 mm, and AF duration <3 years were associated with the benefits of VOM-Et in AF Patients.

Conclusion

The vein of Marshall ethanol infusion for catheter ablation can improve the MI block rate. Male sex, elder age, smaller Left atrial diameter and shorter AF duration may have significant benefits for VOM-Et.

Angiographic assessment of vein of Marshall in atrial fibrillation: Implications for identification and cannulation

Background

The vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion improves rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF). The identification and cannulation of the VOM can be technically challenging. This study aimed to assess the angiographic morphology of the VOM and investigate its value in the VOM ethanol infusion.

Methods

Patients with AF (n = 162) scheduled for combined catheter ablation and VOM ethanol infusion were enrolled. The VOM morphologic features in the right anterior oblique (RAO), the left anterior oblique (LAO), and the LAO cranial views were analyzed. The impact of morphology on the identification and cannulation of the VOM was investigated.

Results

The VOM was identified in 159 (98.1 %) and cannulated in 150 (92.6 %) patients. The VOM identification rate in the RAO and LAO/LAO cranial view was 97.3 % and 89.3 %, respectively. Of 134 patients with VOM identification in the LAO/LAO cranial view, 104 (77.6 %) had a VOM ostium clock location (VOMoClock) of ≤3 and 3-4 o'clock. The VOM cannulation success rate in the ≤3, 3-4, 4-5, and 5-6 o'clock groups was 100 %, 92.6 %, 88.5 %, and 77.8 %, respectively (p = 0.032). The median (interquartile range) cannulation time in the four groups was 10.5 (6.3), 12.0 (9.0), 13.0 (23.0), and 34.0 (30.0) minutes, respectively (p < 0.001). The diameter of the coronary sinus ostium in the RAO view and the VOMoClock were independent predictors for difficult cannulation.

Conclusions

The VOM morphologic features in different angiographic views provide valuable information which could facilitate the identification and cannulation of the VOM.

Double-wire technique to facilitate vein of Marshall cannulation and ethanol infusion in atrial fibrillation: a case series

BACKGROUND

The vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion is increasingly performed in combination with catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation (AF). The cannulation of the VOM can sometimes be challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the double-wire technique in cases of difficult cannulation of the VOM.

CASE PRESENTATION

Patients with AF scheduled for combined catheter ablation and VOM ethanol infusion were consecutively enrolled. The procedure was performed via the femoral vein. If the regular cannulation technique with one angioplasty wire failed or took more than 20 min, the double-wire technique using a stabilizing wire and a cannulation wire was performed. The unique technique was used mainly in two scenarios, when the Eustachian ridge was too prominent as a barrier for catheter manipulation or when the VOM ostium was close to the coronary sinus ostium. Of 162 patients scheduled for VOM ethanol infusion, the double-wire technique was applied in 6 (3.7%) patients and led to a 100% successful cannulation rate of the VOM. Of the six patients, two had a prominent Eustachian ridge, and four had a VOM ostium close to the coronary sinus ostium. The mean cannulation time was 33.3 ± 7.3 min. The ethanol infusion was successfully performed in 5 patients. One patient had a collateral circulation in the distal VOM, and ethanol infusion was not performed.

CONCLUSIONS

The double-wire technique can facilitate VOM cannulation and ethanol infusion in challenging cases.

WORD COUNT

231.

A novel stepwise catheter ablation method of the mitral isthmus for persistent atrial fibrillation: efficacy and reproducibility

BACKGROUND

Ethanol infusion of the vein of Marshall (EI-VOM) has been widely used to facilitate mitral isthmus (MI) ablation. According to the literature, the success rate of achieving a bidirectional conduction block across the MI ranges from 51 to 96%, with no standardized strategy or method available for cardiac electrophysiologists.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to introduce and evaluate a novel ablation method of MI.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) that underwent catheter ablation were included. The MI ablation procedure followed a stepwise approach. In step 1, ethanol infusion of the vein of Marshall (EI-VOM) was performed. In step 2, a "V-shape" endocardial linear ablation connecting the left inferior pulmonary vein (LIPV) to mitral annulus (MA) was performed. In step 3, earliest activation sites(EASs) near the ablation line were identified using activation mapping followed by reinforced ablation. In step 4, precise epicardial ablation was performed, with the catheter introduced into the coronary sinus(CS) to target key ablation targets (KATs).

RESULTS

135 patients with PeAF underwent catheter ablation with the stepwise ablation method adopted in 119 cases. Bidirectional conduction blocks were achieved in 117 patients (98.3%). The block rates of every step were 0%, 58.0%, 44.0%, and 92.9%, and the cumulative block rates for the four steps were 0%, 58.0%, 76.5%, and 98.3%, respectively. No patient experienced fatal complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our novel stepwise catheter ablation method for MI yielded a high bidirectional block rate with high reproducibility.

The impact of empirical Marshall vein ethanol infusion as a first-choice intraoperative strategy on the long-term outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing mitral isthmus ablation

Background

Marshall vein ethanol infusion (MVEI) as an additional therapy to conventional catheter ablation (CA) has been proved to be efficacious in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). However, whether empirical MVEI could be the first-line strategy in mitral isthmus (MI) ablation has seldom been investigated. Here, we aim to compare the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes between provisional and empirical MVEI in PeAF patients undergoing the index MI ablation procedure.

Methods

We enrolled 133 patients with PeAF either in the provisional group (n = 38, MVEI was performed when conventional endocardial and/or epicardial ablation procedures were inadequate to achieve bidirectional MI block) or in the empirical group (n = 95, MVEI was performed empirically before MI CA).

Results

All of the baseline characteristics were comparable. Less spontaneous or inducible atrial tachycardias (ATs) were encountered in the empirical group of patients (P < 0.001). More epicardial ablations were applied (26.3% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.016) and a higher incidence of CA-facilitated restoration of sinus rhythm was recorded (86.8% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) in the provisional group of patients. Although more fluoroscopy time (6.4[4.2, 9.3] vs. 9.5[5.9, 11.6] min, P = 0.019) and radiation exposure (69.0[25.3, 160.2] vs. 122.0[62.5, 234.1] mGy, P = 0.010) were documented in the empirical group with comparable procedure time, less time (455.9 ± 192.2 vs. 366.5 ± 161.3 s, P = 0.038) was consumed to achieve bidirectional MI block during endocardial ablation in the provisional group. Incidences of procedure-related complications were similar between the two groups. During a 16.5 ± 4.4-month follow-up, the empirical group of patients showed a significantly higher rate of freedom from AT recurrence (95.8% vs. 81.6%, log-rank P = 0.003), while the rate of freedom from AF or atrial tachyarrhythmias (combining AF and AT) was similar. Both univariate (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.64, P = 0.008) and multivariate (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.92, P = 0.037) Cox regression analyses indicated that empirical MVEI was independently associated with lower long-term AT recurrence.

Conclusion

Among patients with PeAF who underwent the index MI ablation procedure, empirical MVEI could reduce endocardial MI ablation time and provide greater long-term freedom from AT recurrence.

Efficacy and durability of posterior wall isolation with ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall

INTRODUCTION

Ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) is expected to be an adjunctive therapy for mitral isthmus (MI) ablation. Additionally, EIVOM can widely ablate the epicardium via the branches that extend to the left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) and facilitate LAPW isolation. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and durability of LAPW isolation with EIVOM.

METHODS

Our cohort consisted of 413 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent both LAPW and MI ablations. EIVOM was first attempted in 177 (35%) patients with adequate VOMs. The VOM was infused with 5 mL of ethanol with a double coaxial guiding catheter technique. Both ablations were performed only by radiofrequency ablation (the RF group) in the remaining 236 (57%) patients.

RESULTS

EIVOM with 5 mL of ethanol was completely achieved in 106 patients (the EIVOM group). The application duration of LAPW isolation did not differ significantly between the two groups (718 ± 276 vs. 709 ± 288 s; p = .78). LAPW debulking ablation was required in 64/106 (60%) and 176/236 (75%) patients in the EIVOM and RF groups, respectively (p < .05). However, AF- or atrial tachycardia-free survival analyses revealed no significant differences between the two groups (log-rank p = .70). Among the cases of recurrence, 17 and 38 patients underwent subsequent ablation sessions; LAPW was reconnected in 9/17 (53%) and 25/38 (53%) patients (p = .36) in the EIVOM and RF groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

EIVOM reduced the number of cases that required LAPW debulking ablation but did not improve the durability of LAPW isolation or clinical outcomes.

A novel stepwise approach incorporating ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall for the ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

Introduction

Apart from pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), several step-by-step procedures that aim to modify left atrial substrate have been proposed for the ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), yet the optimal strategy remains elusive. There are cumulative data suggesting an incremental benefit of adding vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion to PVI in patients with persistent AF. We sought to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a novel stepwise ablation approach, incorporating a VOM alcoholization step, for persistent AF.

Methods

In this single-center study, we prospectively enrolled 66 consecutive patients with symptomatic persistent AF and failure of at least one antiarrhythmic drug (ADD). The ablation procedure consisted of (i) PVI, (ii) left atrial segmentation with VOM ethanol infusion and the deployment of linear radiofrequency lesions across the roof and the mitral isthmus and (iii) electrogram-based ablation of dispersion zones. The first two steps were performed in all patients, whereas the third step was carried out only in those still in AF at the end of the second step. Atrial tachycardias during the procedure were mapped and ablated. At the end of the procedure, cavotricuspid isthmus ablation was additionally performed in all patients. The primary endpoint was 12-month freedom from AF and atrial tachycardia after a single procedure and an initial three-month blanking period.

Results

Total procedure time was 153 ± 38.5 min. Fluoroscopy time was 16 ± 6.5 min and the radiofrequency ablation time was 26.14 ± 0.26 min. The primary endpoint occurred in 54 patients (82%). At 12 months, 65% of patients were off any AAD. In the univariate Cox regression analysis, left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% was the only predictor of arrhythmia recurrence (HR 3.56; 95% CI, 1.04-12.19; p = 0.04). One patient developed a pericardial tamponade and another a minor groin hematoma.

Conclusion

A novel stepwise approach, including a step of ethanol infusion in the VOM, is feasible, safe and provides a high rate of sinus rhythm maintenance at 12 months in patients with persistent AF.

Clinical Influence of Ethanol Infusion in the Vein of Marshall on Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Results of Feasibility and Safety during Implantation and at 60-Day Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall (EI-VOM) has the advantages of reducing the burden of atrial fibrillation (AF), decreasing AF recurrence, and facilitating left pulmonary vein isolation and mitral isthmus bidirectional conduction block. Moreover, it can lead to prominent edema of the coumadin ridge and atrial infarction. Whether these lesions will affect the efficacy and safety of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has not yet been reported.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the clinical outcome of EI-VOM on LAAO during implantation and after 60 days of follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 100 consecutive patients who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation combined with LAAO were enrolled in this study. Patients who also underwent EI-VOM at the same period of LAAO were assigned to group 1 (n = 26), and those who did not undergo EI-VOM were assigned to group 2 (n = 74). The feasibility outcomes included intra-procedural LAAO parameters and follow-up LAAO results involving device-related thrombus, a peri-device leak (PDL), and adequate occlusion (defined as a PDL ≤ 5 mm). Safety outcomes were defined as the composites of severe adverse events and cardiac function. Outpatient follow-up was performed 60 days post-procedure.

RESULTS

Intra-procedural LAAO parameters, including the rate of device reselection, rate of device redeployment, rate of intra-procedural PDLs, and total LAAO time, were comparable between groups. Furthermore, intra-procedural adequate occlusion was achieved in all patients. After a median of 68 days, 94 (94.0%) patients received their first radiographic examination. Device-related thrombus was not detected in the follow-up populations. The incidence of follow-up PDLs was similar between the two groups (28.0% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.803). The incidence of adequate occlusion was comparable between groups (96.0% vs. 98.6%, p = 0.463). In group 1, none of the patients experienced severe adverse events. Ethanol infusion significantly reduced the right atrial diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that undergoing an EI-VOM procedure did not impact the operation or effectiveness of LAAO. Combining EI-VOM with LAAO was safe and effective.

The adjunctive effect for left pulmonary vein isolation of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion in persistent atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to assess the effect of ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) on the acute success of left pulmonary vein (LPV) isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 313 patients with drug-resistant PeAF were enrolled (135 in Group 1 and 178 in Group 2). In Group 1, EIVOM was firstly performed, followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) including bilateral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and linear ablation at roofline, cavotricuspid isthmus, and mitral isthmus (MI). In Group 2, PVI and linear ablations were completed with RFA. First-pass isolation of the LPV was achieved in 119 (88.1%) and 132 (74.2%) patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.002). The rate of acute pulmonary vein reconnection (PVR) was significantly lower in Group 1 (9.6% vs. 22.5%, P = 0.003). About half of acute PVR occurred in the carina with or without EIVOM.

CONCLUSION

EIVOM is effective in achieving a higher first-pass isolation and a lower acute PVR of LPV in PeAF.

Impact of technical aspects of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion on mitral isthmus block for persistent atrial fibrillation ablation

Aims

Ethanol infusion into the VOM (EIVOM) adjunctive to radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) was a novel approach facilitating mitral isthmus (MIth) block for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF); However, there were remarkable disparities in its technical aspects. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of EIVOM technical aspects on acute MIth block.

Methods

Eighty consecutive patients (63 males, average age 66.4 ± 8.6 years) undergoing de novo PeAF ablation were assigned to different groups. The procedural parameters in “EIVOM first” (n = 13) or “RFCA first” (n = 13) as well as small dose ([SD], ≤4 ml, n = 26) or big dose ([BD], >4 ml, n = 54) approaches were analyzed to identify the predictors for acute MIth block.

Results

Compared with the “EIVOM first” approach, the “RFCA first” approach was associated with longer procedural and MIth ablation time (134 ± 27 min vs. 112 ± 17 min; 14.9 ± 5.5 min vs. 9.3 ± 5.1 min, both P < 0.05, respectively), but with comparable success of MIth block. The ethanol dose was 6.3 ± 1.5 ml in BD group vs. 3.1 ± 1.0 ml in SD group (P < 0.001) and was correlated significantly with the size of Δlow voltage area (r = 0.66, P < 0.001). The success of MIth block was 92.6% in BD group vs. 73.1% in SD group, P = 0.03. The ethanol dose >5.75 ml independently predicted successful MIth block (OR: 0.428, 95% CI: 0.219–0.839, P = 0.01).

Conclusions

Despite the comparable effectiveness on MIth block, the “EIVOM first” approach was associated with shorter procedural and MIth ablation time than the “RFCA first” approach. The ethanol dose in EIVOM was an independent predictor for MIth block.

Ethanol Infusion of Vein of Marshall for the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The Basics and Clinical Practice

Catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) is particularly challenging, as the clinical outcomes are modest. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus linear ablation is one of the main strategies for PeAF ablation. Completely durable transmural lesions are difficult to achieve by catheter ablation during mitral isthmus ablation. The ligament of Marshall contains the vein of Marshall (VOM), myocardial tracts and innervation, and serves as arrhythmogenic foci that make it an attractive target in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Additionally, it co-localizes with the mitral isthmus, and may serve as a part of the perimitral isthmus reentrant circuit. Ethanol infusion into the VOM results in rapid ablation of the neighboring myocardium and its innervation. Its incorporation into PVI significantly increases the success rate of mitral isthmus block and the clinical outcome of PeAF ablation.

Distribution of atrial low voltage induced by vein of Marshall ethanol infusion

INTRODUCTION

Systematic and quantitative descriptions of vein of Marshall (VOM)-induced tissue ablation are lacking. We sought to characterize the distribution of low voltage observed in the left atrium (LA) after VOM ethanol infusion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The distribution of ethanol-induced low voltage was evaluated by comparing high-density maps performed before and after VOM ethanol infusion in 114 patients referred for atrial fibrillation ablation. The two most frequently impacted segments were the inferior portion of the ridge (82.5%) and the first half of the mitral isthmus (pulmonary vein side) (92.1%). Low-voltage absence in these typical areas resulted from inadvertent ethanol infusion in the left atrial appendage vein (n = 3), initial VOM dissection (n = 3), or a "no branches" VOM morphology (n = 1). Visible anastomosis of the VOM with roof or posterior veins more frequently resulted in low-voltage extension beyond typical areas, toward the entire left antrum (19.0% vs. 1.9%, p = .0045) or the posterior LA (39.7% vs. 3.8%, p < .001) but with a limited positive predictive value ranging from 29.4% to 43.5%. Ethanol-induced low voltage covered a median LA surface of 3.6% (1.9%-5.0%) and did not exceed 8% of the LA surface in 90% of patients.

CONCLUSION

VOM ethanol infusion typically locates at the inferior ridge and the adjacent half of the mitral isthmus. Low-voltage extensions can be anticipated but not guaranteed by the presence of visible anastomosis of the VOM with roof or posterior veins.

Ten Steps in Adoption of Emerging Procedural Techniques: An Experience With Ethanol Ablation of Vein of Marshall (VOM)

Proceduralists must update their skill sets to provide patients with better care because of the addition of new and effective strategies post-training. For example, the current procedural strategy of pulmonary vein isolation for treating persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is inadequate. However, the addition of ethanol ablation of the vein of Marshall (VOM), a relatively new procedural technique, can improve outcomes. Furthermore, the purpose of this report was to briefly explain VOM ethanol ablation, its role in atrial fibrillation and atypical flutter ablation, and to provide a template for performing a new procedural technique in the field.

The Long-Term Outcomes of Ablation With Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion vs. Ablation Alone in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis

Background

The long-term outcomes of ablation with vein of Marshall ethanol infusion (VOM-ABL) compared with ablation alone in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains elusive. We aimed to explore whether VOM-ABL showed better long-term benefits and screen the potential determinants of outcome impact of VOM-ABL procedure.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to 1st September 2021. Studies comparing the long-term (one-year or longer) outcomes between VOM-ABL and ablation alone were included. Subgroup analysis identified potential determinants for VOM-ABL procedure.

Results

Compared with ablation alone, VOM-ABL was associated with a significantly higher rate of long-term freedom from AF/AT (risk ratio [RR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–1.47; p = 0.00) and successful mitral isthmus (MI) block (RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.16–1.99; p = 0.00), whereas, there was no significant difference in pericardial effusion, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), and all-cause death. Subgroup analysis identified two significant treatment-covariate interactions: one was ablation strategy subgroup (pulmonary vein isolation plus linear and/or substrate ablation [PVI+]; RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.27–1.56 vs. PVI; RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.92–1.19, p = 0.00 for interaction) for freedom from AF/AT, while the other was VOM-ABL group sample size subgroup (≥ 100; RR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.24–3.17 vs. <100; RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.10–1.30, p = 0.04 for interaction) for MI block.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis demonstrates that VOM-ABL has superior efficacy and comparable safety over ablation alone in AF patients with long-term follow-up. Moreover, PVI+ and VOM-ABL group sample size ≥ 100 may be associated with a great impact on freedom from AF/AT and MI block, respectively.

Adjunctive Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be associated with limited efficacy. Due to its autonomic innervation, the vein of Marshall (VOM) is an attractive target during AF ablation. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive ethanol infusion of VOM (VOM-EI) in AF ablation.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of VOM-EI in AF ablation compared to AF catheter ablation alone. The primary outcome of interest was late (≥3 months) AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. The secondary outcomes included acute mitral isthmus bidirectional block (MIBB) and procedural complications (pericardial effusion, stroke, or atrio-esophageal fistula). Pooled relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model.

Results

A total of four studies, including 804 AF patients (68.2% with persistent AF, the mean age of 63.5±9.9 years, 401 patients underwent VOM-EI plus CA vs. 403 patients who had CA alone), were included in the final analysis. VOM-EI group was associated with a lower risk of late AF/AT recurrence (RR:0.63; 95% CI:0.46-0.87; P = 0.005), and increased probability to achieve acute MIBB (RR:1.39; 95% CI:1.08-1.79; P = 0.009) without an increase in procedural complications (RR:1.05; 95% CI:0.57-1.94; P = 0.87).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that adjunctive VOM-EI strategy is more effective than conventional catheter ablation with similar safety profiles.

Durability of Left Atrial Lesions After Ethanol Infusion in the Vein of Marshall

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the persistence of left atrial (LA) lesions created by ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall (EIVM) by electroanatomical mapping on repeat catheter ablation for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia.

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the durability of LA lesions created by EIVM.

METHODS

The study included consecutive patients who underwent EIVM for persistent atrial fibrillation or perimitral LA flutter (index procedure) and repeat catheter ablation for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia or atrial fibrillation at a single center between January 2019 and April 2020. The acute effect of EIVM was assessed at the index procedure by comparing the area of bipolar voltage <0.05 mV in the vein of Marshall (VOM) region before and immediately after EIVM. The long-term effect of EIVM was assessed by comparing this area in the VOM region between the redo procedure and the index procedure.

RESULTS

Twenty-four consecutive patients (mean age 68.6 ± 6.1 years, 58% men) underwent redo procedures after previous EIVM for persistent atrial fibrillation (n = 21 [88%]) or perimitral LA flutter (n = 5 [21%]). In each patient, the EIVM-related lesion persisted, with a chronic scar in the VOM region (median 13.1 cm² [interquartile range: 8.1-15.9 cm²] vs 12.4 cm² [interquartile range: 7.6-15.7 cm²] acutely, respectively). One quarter of patients (9 of 20) had late mitral isthmus reconnection, which was located at the mitral annular edge or in the coronary sinus.

CONCLUSIONS

Atrial lesions created by EIVM are durable, which reinforces the efficacy profile of EIVM. Reconduction sites in the mitral isthmus are located at the edge of the scar and in the coronary sinus.

Effectiveness of ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall combined with a fixed anatomical ablation strategy (the "upgraded 2C3L" approach) for catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Linear ablation in addition to pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) has failed to improve the success rate for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), due to incomplete block of ablation lines, especially in the mitral isthmus (MI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study enrolled 191 patients (66 in group 1 and 125 in group 2). In group 1, ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall was first performed, followed by radiofrequency (RF) applications targeting bilateral PVAI and bidirectional block in the roofline, cavotricuspid isthmus, and MI. In group 2, PVAI and the three linear ablations were completed using only RF energy. MI block was achieved in 63 (95.5%) and 101 (80.8%) patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = .006). Patients in group 1 had shorter ablation time for left pulmonary vein antrum (8.15 vs. 12.59 min, p < .001) and MI (7.0 vs. 11.8 min, p < .001) and required less cardioversion (50 [78.5%] vs. 113 [90.4%], p = .007). During the 12-month follow-up, 58 (87.9%) patients were free from atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia in group 1 compared with 81 (64.8%) in group 2 (p < .001). In multivariate cox regression, the "upgraded 2C3L" procedure is associated with a lower recurrence rate (hazard ratio = 0.27, 95% confidence interval = 0.12-0.59).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the conventional "2C3L" approach, the "upgraded 2C3L" approach has higher effectiveness for ablation of PeAF.

Durability of mitral isthmus ablation with and without ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall

INTRODUCTION

Ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) effectively creates a linear ablation lesion in the mitral isthmus (MI). However, data on the long-term success rates of MI ablation is limited.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 560 patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent an initial MI ablation. Ablations were performed by only radiofrequency (RF) in 384 (RF group) or by RF and EIVOM in 176 (EIVOM/RF group) patients; 5 ml anhydrous ethanol was used to perform EIVOM in advance of RF. Following EIVOM, RF pulses were delivered to the lateral MI line. Bidirectional MI block was fully achieved in 353/384 (92%) (First 318, Re-do 35) patinents in the RF group and 171/176 (97%) (First 128, Re-do 43) patients in the EIVOM/RF group (p = .09 in the first, p = .10 in the re-do ablation cases). In cases with complete MI line block, recurrent AF or atrial tachycardia was observed in 130/353 (37%) patients in the RF group and in 64/171 (37%) patients in the EIVOM/RF group (log-rank p = .12 in the first, and p = .30 in the re-do ablation cases). Of the total 560 patients, 123 proceeded to the subsequent ablation session. Reconduction across MI line block was observed in 39/80 (49%) patients in the RF group and 25/43 (58%) patients in the EIVOM/RF group (p = .32).

CONCLUSION

EIVOM effectively ensures MI line block; however, the reconduction rate was similar between the two groups.

Feasibility, efficacy, and safety of ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall for atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Contemporary radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) approaches for atrial fibrillation (AF) have reached an efficacy "ceiling". Ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (EI-VOM) has shown potential in preliminary studies. Data on EI-VOM are largely limited to small single-center reports, and clinical benefits and risks have not been systematically examined. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of EI-VOM for AF.

METHODS

All studies evaluating EI-VOM for AF were initially searched from four electronic search engines: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and SinoMed. We used RevMan5.4 to calculate pooled outcomes of randomized controlled trial and cohort studies. We also performed single-arm meta-analyses using Open Meta-Analyst.

RESULTS

We included a total of 10 studies with 1322 patients. Successful EI-VOM was performed in 86.7% (95% CI 81.9-91.4%) of patients. For persistent AF patients, the recurrence of AF and/or atrial tachycardia (AT) was significantly lower in the EI-VOM combined with RFCA group compared with RFCA alone group (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.96, p = 0.04). EI-VOM combined with RFCA significantly increased the rate of bidirectional mitral isthmus block compared with RFCA alone in AF patients (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.67, p < 0.001). There were nine cardiac tamponades observed in 644 patients (PR 0.8%, 95% CI 0.1-1.5%) who were performed EI-VOM combined with RFCA.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis brings encouraging evidence that adjuvant EI-VOM reduces AF and/or AT recurrence rate in persistent AF patients and increases the success rate of bidirectional mitral isthmus block.

What are the post-ablation insular residual electrograms in the posterior left pulmonary veins electrically connected to?

A 67-year-old man underwent a third ablation procedure for a recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT) after an extensive pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, linear ablation along the left atrial (LA) roof and posterolateral mitral isthmus (MI), and defragmentation of persistent atrial fibrillation and an induced perimitral AT. High-resolution mapping during the clinical AT using the Rhythmia system (Boston Scientific) suggested that the AT was a ridge-related reentrant AT and exhibited a reconnection of the left PVs (LPVs). The residual electrograms in the posterior LPVs were surrounded by endocardial scar, which was like an island consisting of residual LPV electrograms. Retrograde venography of the vein of Marshall (VOM) demonstrated that the VOM reached the posterior left superior PV through the ridge between the LA appendage and left inferior PV and then the LPV carina. An ethanol infusion into the VOM resulted in a simultaneous AT termination and complete electrical isolation of the LPVs, that is, the disappearance of the residual LPV electrograms. The insular residual LPV electrograms in the present case did not appear to be endocardially connected to the LA, because the LPV electrograms were surrounded by endocardial scar and there was a large time gap between the earliest activation in the posterior LPVs and activation in the surrounding area. The VOM course on the venography and elimination of the residual LPV electrograms with an ethanol infusion into the VOM suggested that the insular residual LPV electrograms were electrically connected to the posterolateral LA via the VOM and its branches.

Efficacy and safety of ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall for mitral isthmus ablation

INTRODUCTION

Chemical ablation by retrograde infusion of ethanol into the vein of Marshall (VOM-EI) can facilitate the achievement of mitral isthmus block. This study sought to describe the efficacy and safety of this technique.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-two consecutive patients (14 males, median age 71 years) with attempted VOM-EI for mitral isthmus ablation were included in the study. VOM-EI was successfully performed with a median of 4 ml of 96% ethanol in 19 patients (86%) and the mitral isthmus was successfully blocked in all (100%). Touch up endocardial and/or epicardial ablation after VOM-EI was necessary for 12 patients (63%). Perimitral flutter was present in 12 patients (63%) during VOM-EI and terminated or slowed by VOM-EI in 4 and 3 patients, respectively. The low-voltage area of the mitral isthmus region increased from 3.1 cm² (interquartile range [IQR] 0-7.9) before to 13.2 cm² (IQR: 8.2-15.0) after VOM-EI and correlated significantly with the volume of ethanol injected (p = .03). Median high-sensitive cardiac troponin-T increased significantly from 330 ng/L (IQR: 221-516) the evening of the procedure to 598 ng/L (IQR: 382-769; p = .02) the following morning. A small pericardial effusion occurred in three patients (16%), mild pericarditis in one (5%), and uneventful VOM dissection in two (11%). After a median follow-up of 3.5 months (IQR: 3.0-11.0), 10 of 18 patients (56%) with VOM-EI and available follow-up had arrhythmia recurrence. Repeat ablation was performed in five patients (50%) and peri-mitral flutter diagnosed in three (60%).

CONCLUSION

VOM-EI is feasible, safe, and effective to achieve acute mitral isthmus block.

Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: From concept to clinical practice

The vein of Marshall (VOM) contains innervation, myocardial connections, and arrhythmogenic foci that make it an attractive target in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Additionally, it co-localizes with the mitral isthmus, which is critical to sustain perimitral flutter, and is a true atrial vein that communicates with underlying myocardium. Retrograde balloon cannulation of the VOM from the coronary sinus is feasible and allows for ethanol delivery, which results in rapid ablation of neighboring myocardium and its innervation. Here we review the body of work performed over a span of 13 years, from the inception of the technique, to its preclinical validation, to demonstration of its ablative and denervation effects, and finally to completion of a randomized clinical trial demonstrating favorable outcomes, improving rhythm control in catheter ablation of persistent AF.

Significance of manifest localized staining during ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall

BACKGROUND

Localized staining due to venule injury is attributable to ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (Et-VOM).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate adverse outcomes of localized staining during Et-VOM in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

Two hundred four patients (age 64 ± 10 years; 153 male) were sorted based on the aspect of localized staining. Staining of atrial myocardium that spread uniformly along the VOM vascular tree following selective VOM venography was considered normal, in contrast to predominantly localized staining that spread concentrically from a focal point due to vascular injury. Outcomes between the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

Localized staining was observed in 27% of patients. No patients developed clinically significant pericardial effusions during Et-VOM; however, 7 patients developed pericardial effusions on the first postprocedural day (3.6% in patients with vs 3.4% in patients without localized staining). No significant difference was found in achievement of acute mitral isthmus (MI) block (96% vs 98%) and size of the endocardial low-voltage area (8.5 ± 4.1 cm² vs 9.3 ± 5.3 cm²) in patients with and without localized staining, respectively. Long-term follow-up was not impacted by localized staining. Freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias (66% vs 76%) and durability of MI block (57% vs 54%) were not significantly different with and without localized staining. There were no cases of rehospitalization for pericarditis, chronic pericardial effusion, or heart failure.

CONCLUSION

In our study, localized staining was frequent but was not associated with clinically relevant impact or disadvantages.

Effect of Catheter Ablation With Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion vs Catheter Ablation Alone on Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The VENUS Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has limited success. Procedural strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation have failed to consistently improve results. The vein of Marshall contains innervation and AF triggers that can be ablated by retrograde ethanol infusion.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether vein of Marshall ethanol infusion could improve ablation results in persistent AF when added to catheter ablation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The Vein of Marshall Ethanol for Untreated Persistent AF (VENUS) trial was an investigator-initiated, National Institutes of Health-funded, randomized, single-blinded trial conducted in 12 centers in the United States. Patients (N = 350) with persistent AF referred for first ablation were enrolled from October 2013 through June 2018. Follow-up concluded in June 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to catheter ablation alone (n = 158) or catheter ablation combined with vein of Marshall ethanol infusion (n = 185) in a 1:1.15 ratio to accommodate for 15% technical vein of Marshall ethanol infusion failures.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was freedom from AF or atrial tachycardia for longer than 30 seconds after a single procedure, without antiarrhythmic drugs, at both 6 and 12 months. Outcome assessment was blinded to randomization treatment. There were 12 secondary outcomes, including AF burden, freedom from AF after multiple procedures, perimitral block, and others.

RESULTS

Of the 343 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 66.5 [9.7] years; 261 men), 316 (92.1%) completed the trial. Vein of Marshall ethanol was successfully delivered in 155 of 185 patients. At 6 and 12 months, the proportion of patients with freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia after a single procedure was 49.2% (91/185) in the catheter ablation combined with vein of Marshall ethanol infusion group compared with 38% (60/158) in the catheter ablation alone group (difference, 11.2% [95% CI, 0.8%-21.7%]; P = .04). Of the 12 secondary outcomes, 9 were not significantly different, but AF burden (zero burden in 78.3% vs 67.9%; difference, 10.4% [95% CI, 2.9%-17.9%]; P = .01), freedom from AF after multiple procedures (65.2% vs 53.8%; difference, 11.4% [95% CI, 0.6%-22.2%]; P = .04), and success achieving perimitral block (80.6% vs 51.3%; difference, 29.3% [95% CI, 19.3%-39.3%]; P < .001) were significantly improved in vein of Marshall-treated patients. Adverse events were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with persistent AF, addition of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion to catheter ablation, compared with catheter ablation alone, increased the likelihood of remaining free of AF or atrial tachycardia at 6 and 12 months. Further research is needed to assess longer-term efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01898221.

The ligament of Marshall and arrhythmias: A review

The ligament of Marshall (LOM) is a remnant of the embryonic sinus venosus and left cardinal vein, and contains fat and fibrous tissues, blood vessels, muscle bundles, nerve fibers, and ganglia. The complexity of LOM's structure makes it as a source of triggers and drivers as well as substrates of re-entry for atrial arrhythmias, especially for atrial fibrillation (AF). LOM also serves as a portion of left atrial macro-re-entrant circuit, especially peri-mitral isthmus re-entrant circuit. Experimental studies demonstrate that the LOM acts as a sympathetic conduit between the left stellate ganglion and the ventricles, and participates in the initiation and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmias. Endocardial or epicardial catheter ablation or ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall may serve as an important adjunct therapy to pulmonary vein isolation in patients with advanced stage of AF, and may help alleviate ventricular arrhythmias as well.

Percutaneous Epicardial Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

The observations afforded by epicardial mapping have not only increased the appreciation of distinct epicardial structures in the left atrium but also underscore the need to address the substrate transmurally. Although epicardial access and ablation have attendant risks, comparative studies with hybrid surgical approaches are lacking. In the search to find unifying mechanisms of atrial fibrillation, a conceptual shift that emphasizes the substrate in 3 dimensions, with the epicardium distinct from the endocardium, holds promise for future investigation and evolving therapeutic tools.

Alcohol Ablation of Cardiac Tissues Quantified and Evaluated Using CIELAB Euclidean Distances

Ethanol solubilizes cell membranes, making it useful for various ablation applications. We examined the effect of time and alcohol type on the extent of ablation, quantified as Euclidean distances between color coordinates. We obtained biopsy punch samples (diameter, 6 mm) of left atrial appendage, atrial, ventricular, and septal tissue from porcine hearts and placed them in transwell plates filled with ethanol or methanol for 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, or 60 min. Control samples were taken for each time point. At each time point, samples were collected, cut transversely, and photographed. With use of a custom MATLAB program, all images were analyzed in the CIELAB color space, which is more perceptually uniform than the red-green-blue color space. Euclidean distances were calculated from CIELAB coordinates. The mean and standard error of these distances were analyzed. Two-way analysis of variance was used to test for differences among time points, and 2-tailed t tests, for differences between the alcohol datasets at each time point. Generally, Euclidean distances differed significantly between all time points, except for those immediately adjacent, and methanol produced larger Euclidean distances than ethanol did. Some tissue showed a plateauing effect, potentially indicating transmurality. Mean Euclidean distances effectively indexed alcohol ablation in cardiac tissue. Furthermore, we found that methanol ablated tissue more effectively than ethanol did. With ethanol, the extent of ablation for atrial tissue was largest at 60 min. We conclude that to achieve full transmurality in clinical applications, ethanol must remain in contact with atrial tissue for at least one hour.

The Convergent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Procedure: Evolution of a Multidisciplinary Approach to Atrial Fibrillation Management

The treatment of AF has evolved over the past decade with increasing use of catheter ablation in patients refractory to medical therapy. While pulmonary vein isolation using endocardial catheter ablation has been successful in paroxysmal AF, the results have been more controversial in patients with long-standing persistent AF where extrapulmonary venous foci are increasingly recognised in the initiation and maintenance of AF. Hybrid ablation is the integration of minimally invasive epicardial ablation with endocardial catheter ablation, and has been increasingly used in this population with better results. The aim of this article was to analyse and discuss the evidence for the integration of catheter and minimally invasive surgical approaches to treat AF with specific focus on convergent ablation and exclusion of the left atrial appendage using a surgically applied clip.

Acute and mid-term outcome of ethanol infusion of vein of Marshall for the treatment of perimitral flutter

Aims 

We hypothesized that an epicardial approach using ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) may improve the result of ablation for perimitral flutter (PMF).

Methods and results 

We studied 103 consecutive patients with PMF undergoing high-resolution mapping. The first 71 were treated with radiofrequency (RF) ablation alone (RF-group), and the next 32 underwent EIVOM followed by RF on the endocardial and epicardial mitral isthmus (EIVOM/RF-group). Contact force was not measured during ablation. Acute and 1-year outcomes were compared. Flutter termination rates were similar between the RF-group (63/71, 88.7%) and EIVOM/RF-group (31/32, 96.8%, P = 0.27). Atrial tachycardia (AT) terminated with EIVOM alone in 22/32 (68.6%) in the EIVOM/RF-group. Bidirectional block of mitral isthmus was always achieved in the EIVOM/RF-group, but significantly less frequently achieved in the RF-group (62/71, 87.3%; P = 0.05). Median RF duration for AT termination/conversion was shorter [0 (0–6) s in the EIVOM/RF-group than 312 (55–610) s in the RF-group, P &lt; 0.0001], as well as for mitral isthmus block in the EIVOM/RF-group [246 (0–663) s] than in the RF-group [900 (525–1310) s, P &lt; 0.0001]. Pericardial effusion was observed in 1/32 (3.2%) in EIVOM/RF-group and 5/71 (7.0%) in RF-group (P = 0.66); two in RF-group required drainage and one of them developed subsequent ischaemic stroke. One-year follow-up demonstrated fewer recurrences in the EIVOM/RF-group [6/32 (18.8%)] than in the RF-group [29/71 (40.8%), P = 0.04]. By multivariate analysis, only EIVOM was significantly associated with less AT recurrence (hazard ratio = 0.35, P = 0.018).

Conclusion 

Ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall may reduce RF duration required for PMF termination as well as for mitral isthmus block without severe complications, and the mid-term outcome may be improved by this approach.

Ablation of Incessant Premature Ventricular Complex Through Retrograde Transvenous Ethanol Infusion

Ethanol infusion has been used for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmia. We describe a case of ethanol infusion through the coronary sinus venous network to treat refractory epicardial premature ventricular complexes. The premature ventricular complexes were initially successfully suppressed but recurred after resolution of the myocardial edema. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Comparative Study of Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency for Pulmonary Vein Isolation when Combined with vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Introduction

Ethanol infusion (EI) in the vein of Marshall (VOM) has multifactorial effects that could be synergistic to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) versus cryoablation when combined with a VOM-EI has never been investigated. The aim of this study is to evaluate outcome differences of AF ablation using RF versus cryoablation when combined with a VOM-EI.

Materials and Methods

Consecutive patients (n=132) underwent catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF with either RF or cryoballoon (CB) for PVI combined with VOM-EI. Bi-directional conduction block at the mitral isthmus was attempted. The end-point was the freedom from any atrial arrhythmias documented after a blanking period of 90 days after the procedure.

Results

Kaplan-Meier estimates of the arrhythmia-free survival after 1 year were 63.8 (RF + VOM), and 82.7 % (CB + VOM), respectively. Comparison between CB + VOM versus RF + VOM reached a significance (p=0.0292). The periprocedural complication rate was comparable in both groups (5.0 % RF, 5.8 % CB; p=0.14) with a significant difference in the incidence of phrenic nerve palsy (0 % RF, 2.0 % CB; p<0.05).

Conclusions

PVI with a CB had an increased freedom from AF recurrence compared to RF combined with VOM-EI. The present results suggest a potential additive effect of a VOM-EI to CB application.

Chemical mapping as a predictor of vein of Marshall ethanol ablative effects

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to test regional pharmacological effects of an antiarrhythmic agents to predict ablative effects.

BACKGROUND

The vein of Marshall (VOM) providing vascular access to myocardial tissue has been used for ablative purposes using ethanol.

METHODS

A total of 35 patients (male 21, 63.2 ± 7.8 years old) were included. A balloon-tipped infusion catheter was inserted into the VOM. Endocardial ultrahigh-resolution mapping was performed along the VOM region to record the change in atrial electrograms (AEs) after VOM injection of cibenzoline of 3.5 mg during sustained atrial fibrillation (AF). Subsequently, ethanol was infused into the VOM and ablative region was mapped.

RESULTS

In 17 patients (49 %), cibenzoline reduced AEs amplitude by >50%, all of which had also complete elimination of AEs following ethanol (Group A). In 18 patients (Group B), cibenzoline failed to eliminate AEs; yet, in 13 of 18 AEs were eliminated by ethanol. In the remaining five patients, ethanol did not eliminate AE.

CONCLUSIONS

Cibenzoline into the VOM could reliably predicts the results of subsequent ethanol infusion into the VOM using ultrahigh-resolution mapping system, which leads to avoid unnecessary permanent lesion creation by ethanol infusion.

Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion for persistent atrial fibrillation: VENUS and MARS clinical trial design

BACKGROUND

Although pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is effective in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), its success rates in persistent AF are suboptimal. Ablation strategies to improve outcomes including additional lesions beyond PVI have not consistently shown benefit. Recurrence as perimitral flutter (PMF) is a common form of ablation failure. The vein of Marshall (VOM) contains myocardial connections and abundant sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation implicated in the genesis and maintenance of AF, and is anatomically co-localized with the mitral isthmus, the ablation target of PMF. VOM ethanol infusion is effective in targeting these arrhythmia substrates.

OBJECTIVE

To test the safety and efficacy of VOM ethanol infusion when added to PVI in patients undergoing either de novo ablation of persistent AF or after a previous ablation failure.

STUDY DESIGN

VENUS-AF and MARS-AF are prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trials. VENUS-AF will enroll patients undergoing their first catheter ablation of persistent AF. MARS-AF will enroll patients undergoing ablation after previous ablation failure(s). Patients (n = 405) will be randomized to PVI alone or in combination with VOM ethanol infusion. The primary endpoints include procedural safety and freedom from AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) of more than 30 seconds on 30-day continuous event monitors at 6 and 12 months after randomization procedure (single-procedure success), off antiarrhythmic drugs. Key secondary endpoints include AF burden, freedom from AF/AT after repeat procedures and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The VENUS-AF and MARS-AF will determine the safety and potential rhythm control benefit of VOM ethanol infusion when added to PVI in patients with persistent AF undergoing de novo or repeat ablation, respectively.

Ethanol infusion for Marshall bundle epicardial connections in Marshall bundle-related atrial tachycardias following atrial fibrillation ablation: The accessibility and success rate of ethanol infusion by using a femoral approach

BACKGROUND

Ethanol infusion of the vein of Marshall (VOM) may be effective to treat Marshall bundle-related atrial tachycardia (MB-AT). However, methods and clinical results of ethanol infusion for MB-AT have been not established.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accessibility of the VOM and the success rate of ethanol infusion using a femoral approach for MB-AT.

METHODS

A single-center observational study included consecutive patients who had MB-AT and in whom we attempted to treat MB-AT during AT by ethanol infusion. When the VOM was able to be cannulated following VOM venogram using a femoral approach, we systematically performed ethanol infusion with selective balloon occlusion of the VOM. We analyzed in detail the efficacy of ethanol infusion of VOM in patients who were in MB-AT during ethanol infusion.

RESULTS

We enrolled 54 consecutive patients in whom we attempted to treat MB-AT by ethanol infusion. Of those, the VOM was accessible in 92.5% of patients (50 of 54). Of the 50 patients treated by ethanol infusion during MB-AT, AT was successfully terminated in 56% percent of the patients (28 of 50) by solo treatment of ethanol infusion without RF ablation. The remainder required additional RF application to terminate the MB-AT. A mean of 6.2 ± 2.8 mL of ethanol was infused resulting in the low-voltage area significantly larger than that before ethanol infusion (12.7 ± 8.3 vs 6.6 ± 5.3 cm² , P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that the VOM was highly accessible and MB-AT was amenable to treatment by ethanol infusion by using a femoral approach.