QRS prolongation induced by cardiac resynchronization therapy correlates with deterioration in left ventricular function

Delta QRS and outcomes post CRT in the Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial

BACKGROUND

Amongst patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and prolonged QRS duration, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can improve cardiac electromechanical synchrony, and prevent adverse clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the role of delta QRS duration (ΔQRSd) in predicting clinical response to CRT.

METHODS

The RAFT (Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial) study randomized 1798 patients to CRT with defibrillator or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) alone. Those who received CRT and had electrocardiograms available at baseline and post CRT implantation were included in this analysis. ΔQRSd was calculated as the absolute difference between QRS duration at baseline and with CRT pacing. The primary outcome was the composite of death and heart failure hospitalization.

RESULTS

There were 813 patients included in this analysis. The median age was 67 years, and 125 patients (15.2%) were female. The median ΔQRSd was -2 ms (-20 to 18ms), and 447 (55%) of patients had a ΔQRSd ≤ 0 post implant. ΔQRSd was an independent predictor of the composite outcome amongst patients with CRT (HR = 1.012, 95% CI 1.008-1.017). CRT recipients with ΔQRSd > 0 had higher rates of the composite outcome than patients randomized to ICD alone.

CONCLUSION

Amongst patients receiving CRT for heart failure with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and QRS prolongation, ΔQRSd was an independent predictor of long-term mortality and heart failure hospitalization.

QRS Narrowing Following CRT Implantation: Predictors, Dynamics, and Association with Improved Long-Term Outcome

Background: Heart failure (HF) patients with wide QRS often benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), although QRS narrowing does not always occur. The current study investigates the incidence and predictors for QRS narrowing following CRT and its long-term impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: Among individuals undergoing clinically indicated CRT, pre-and post-implantation electrocardiographs were meticulously analyzed for QRS duration change. All-cause mortality and the composite of mortality and HF hospitalizations were retrieved. Results: For 104 patients, mean age 67 years, 25% females, QRS narrowed within days by 20.2 ± 24.7 ms. In 55/104 (53%) QRS narrowed by ≥20 ms (“acute narrowing”). Female gender and baseline QRS predicted acute narrowing. Acute narrowing persisted for 1−6 weeks in 18/20 (90%) and 3−12 months in 21/31 (68%) of patients. During the average follow-up of 41 months, 29/104 (28%) died and 50/104 (48%) met the composite outcome. In a multivariable analysis including comorbidities and cardiac history, prolonged baseline PR interval (HR 1.015, CI 1.008−1.021, p < 0.001) and acute narrowing < 20 ms (HR 3.243, CI 1.593−6.603, p = 0.001) were significant and independent predictors for the composite outcome. Conclusions: Post-CRT acute QRS narrowing ≥ 20 ms is independently associated with favorable long-term outcomes and might be considered as a novel measure for procedural success.

Association between changes in QRS width and echocardiographic responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have illustrated the association of QRS width with the incidence of echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This study aimed to summarize the observational studies regarding the magnitude of change in QRS width between responders and nonresponders to CRT.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies investigating the changes of QRS width with the incidence of echocardiographic response to CRT from inception till May 2019. The pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated through random-effects model.

RESULTS

Five prospective and 6 retrospective studies with a total of 1524 patients were selected for final analysis. The reduction of QRS width in responders was significantly greater than nonresponders (WMD: -20.54 ms; 95% CI: -26.78 to -14.29; P < .001). Moreover, responders were associated with greater percentage reduction in QRS width when compared with nonresponders (WMD: -8.80%; 95% CI: -13.08 to -4.52; P < .001). Finally, the mean change in QRS width between responders and nonresponders differed when stratified by country, study design, mean age, percentage male, ejection fraction, measuring time of postimplanted QRS, ischemic cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, and study quality.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicated that shortening QRS width after CRT device implantation showed association with greater incidence of echocardiographic responses to CRT. Further prospective studies should be conducted to evaluate the prognostic values of QRS width on the incidence of echocardiographic response to CRT.

Scar burden is an independent and incremental predictor of cardiac resynchronisation therapy response

Objective

Determine the prognostic impact of scar quantification (scar %) by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in predicting heart failure admission, death and left ventricular (LV) function improvement following cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT), after controlling for the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB), QRS duration (QRSd) and LV lead tip location and polarity.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent CMR between 2002 and 2014 followed by CRT were included. The primary endpoint was death or heart failure admission. The secondary endpoint was change in ejection fraction (EF) ≥3 months after CRT. Cox proportional hazards, linear regression models and change in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used.

Results

A total of 84 patients were included (63% male, 51% with ischaemic cardiomyopathy). After adjusting for clinical factors, presence of LBBB and QRSd and LV lead tip location and polarity, greater scar % remained associated with a higher risk for clinical events (HR=1.06; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.10; p<0.001) and a smaller improvement in EF (slope: −0.61%; 95% CI −0.93% to 0.29%; p<0.001). When adding scar % to QRSd and LBBB, there was significant improvement in predicting clinical events at 3 years (AUC increased to 0.831 from 0.638; p=0.027) and EF increase ≥10% (AUC 0.869 from 0.662; p=0.007).

Conclusion

Scar quantification by CMR has an incremental value in predicting response to CRT, in terms of heart failure admission, death and EF improvement, independent of the presence of LBBB, QRSd, LV lead tip location and polarity.

Optimizing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: an Update on New Insights and Advancements

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on the current advancements in optimizing patient response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

RECENT FINDINGS

It has been well known that not every patient will derive benefit from CRT, and of those that do, there are varying levels of response. Optimizing CRT begins well before device implant and involves appropriate patient selection and an understanding of the underlying substrate. After implant, there are different CRT device programming options that can be enabled to help overcome barriers as to why a patient may not respond. Given the multifaceted components of optimizing CRT and the complex patient population, multi-subspecialty clinics have been developed bringing together specialists in heart failure, electrophysiology, and imaging. Data as to whether this results in better response rates and outcomes shows promise.

Avoiding non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a practical guide

Over two decades after the introduction of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) into clinical practice, ∼30% of candidates continue to fail to respond to this highly effective treatment of drug-refractory heart failure (HF). Since the causes of this non-response (NR) are multifactorial, it will require multidisciplinary efforts to overcome. Progress has, thus far, been slowed by several factors, ranging from a lack of consensus regarding the definition of NR and technological limitations to the delivery of therapy. We critically review the various endpoints that have been used in landmark clinical trials of CRT, and the variability in response rates that has been observed as a result of these different investigational designs, different sample populations enrolled and different means of therapy delivered, including new means of multisite and left ventricular endocardial simulation. Precise recommendations are offered regarding the optimal device programming, use of telemonitoring and optimization of management of HF. Potentially reversible causes of NR to CRT are reviewed, with emphasis on loss of biventricular stimulation due to competing arrhythmias. The prevention of NR to CRT is essential to improve the overall performance of this treatment and lower its risk-benefit ratio. These objectives require collaborative efforts by the HF team, the electrophysiologists and the cardiac imaging experts.

Programming Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Electrical Synchrony: Reaching Beyond Left Bundle Branch Block and Left Ventricular Activation Delay

BACKGROUND

QRS narrowing following cardiac resynchronization therapy with biventricular (BiV) or left ventricular (LV) pacing is likely affected by patient-specific conduction characteristics (PR, qLV, LV-paced propagation interval), making a universal programming strategy likely ineffective. We tested these factors using a novel, device-based algorithm (SyncAV) that automatically adjusts paced atrioventricular delay (default or programmable offset) according to intrinsic atrioventricular conduction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-five patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (age 66±11 years; 65% male; 32% with ischemic cardiomyopathy; LV ejection fraction 28±8%; QRS duration 162±16 ms) with intact atrioventricular conduction (PR interval 194±34, range 128-300 ms), left bundle branch block, and optimized LV lead position were studied at implant. QRS duration (QRSd) reduction was compared for the following pacing configurations: nominal simultaneous BiV (Mode I: paced/sensed atrioventricular delay=140/110 ms), BiV+SyncAV with 50 ms offset (Mode II), BiV+SyncAV with offset that minimized QRSd (Mode III), or LV-only pacing+SyncAV with 50 ms offset (Mode IV). The intrinsic QRSd (162±16 ms) was reduced to 142±17 ms (-11.8%) by Mode I, 136±14 ms (-15.6%) by Mode IV, and 132±13 ms (-17.8%) by Mode II. Mode III yielded the shortest overall QRSd (123±12 ms, -23.9% [P<0.001 versus all modes]) and was the only configuration without QRSd prolongation in any patient. QRS narrowing occurred regardless of QRSd, PR, or LV-paced intervals, or underlying ischemic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-implant electrical optimization in already well-selected patients with left bundle branch block and optimized LV lead position is facilitated by patient-tailored BiV pacing adjusted to intrinsic atrioventricular timing using an automatic device-based algorithm.

Predictors of short-term clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

AIMS

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure and QRS prolongation but there is uncertainty about which patient characteristics predict short-term clinical response.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In an individual patient meta-analysis of three double-blind, randomized trials, clinical composite score (CCS) at 6 months was compared in patients assigned to CRT programmed on or off. Treatment-covariate interactions were assessed to measure likelihood of improved CCS at 6 months. MIRACLE, MIRACLE ICD, and REVERSE trials contributed data for this analysis (n = 1591). Multivariable modelling identified QRS duration and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as predictors of CRT clinical response (P < 0.05). The odds ratio for a better CCS at 6 months increased by 3.7% for every 1% decrease in LVEF for patients assigned to CRT-on compared to CRT-off, and was greatest when QRS duration was between 160 and 180 ms.

CONCLUSIONS

In symptomatic chronic heart failure patients (NYHA class II-IV), longer QRS duration and lower LVEF independently predict early clinical response to CRT.

Biventricular Paced QRS Area Predicts Acute Hemodynamic CRT Response Better Than QRS Duration or QRS Amplitudes

INTRODUCTION

Vectorcardiographic (VCG) QRS area of left bundle branch block (LBBB) predicts acute hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients. We hypothesized that changes in QRS area occurring with biventricular pacing (BV) might predict acute hemodynamic CRT response (AHR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

VCGs of 624 BV paced electrocardiograms (25 LBBB patients with 35 different pacing configurations) were calculated according to Frank's orthogonal lead system. Maximum QRS vector amplitudes (X_Ampl , Y_Ampl , Z_Ampl , and 3D_Amp ) and QRS areas (X_Area , Y_Area , Z_Area , and 3D_Area ) in the orthogonal leads (X, Y, and Z) and in 3-dimensional projection were measured. Volume of the 3D vector loop and global QRS duration (QRSD) on the surface electrocardiogram were assessed. Differences (Δ) in VCG parameters between BV paced and LBBB QRS complexes were calculated. An increase of 10% in dP/dt max was considered as AHR. LBBB conduction is characterized by a large Z_Area (109 μVs, interquartile range [IQR]:75;135), significantly larger than X_Area (22 μVs, IQR:10;57) and Y_Area (44 μVs, IQR:32;62, P < 0.001). Overall, QRS duration, amplitudes, and areas decrease significantly with BV pacing (P < 0.001). Of all VCG parameters, 3D_Ampl , Δ3D_Ampl , Z_Area, ΔZ_Area , Δ3D_Area , and ΔQRSD differentiate AHR response from nonresponse (P < 0.05). ΔZ_Area predicted best positive AHR (area under the curve = 0.813) and outperformed any other VCG parameter or QRSD measurement.

CONCLUSION

Of all VCG parameters, reduction in QRS area, calculated in Frank's Z lead, predicts acute hemodynamic response best. This method might be an easy, noninvasive tool to guide CRT implantation and optimization.

Meta-Analysis of the Usefulness of Change in QRS Width to Predict Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

The existing data regarding the role of QRS duration (QRSd) change on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response show some inconsistent results. We conducted a meta-analysis of data obtained from observational studies to examine the impact of QRS change after CRT device implantation on the clinical and/or echocardiographic response. We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases for relevant studies published before January 2016. Twenty-seven studies were retrieved for detailed evaluation of which 12 studies with a total population of 1,545 patients met our eligibility criteria. The analysis demonstrated that QRSd narrowing was a positive predictor of response to CRT (mean difference [MD] = -19.24 ms, 95% CI = -24.00 to -14.48 ms, p <0.00001). This effect was consistent in the studies using clinical criteria (MD = -19.91 ms, 95% CI = -27.20 to -12.62 ms, p <0.00001) and in those that used echocardiographic criteria (MD = -19.51 ms, 95% CI = -25.78 to -13.25 ms, p <0.00001). The heterogeneity test showed moderate differences among the individual studies (I² = 42%). Subgroup analysis showed that QRSd change was more pronounced in studies having a follow-up ≤6 months. We did not find significant differences in studies measuring postimplantation QRSd after a certain follow-up period compared with studies measuring QRSd immediately after CRT device implantation. Further studies should clarify the exact timing of QRSd assessments during follow-up. In conclusion, QRSd shortening after CRT device implantation is associated with a favorable clinical and echocardiographic response.

Magnitude of QRS duration reduction after biventricular pacing identifies responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Several studies have investigated the association between native QRS duration (QRSd) or QRS narrowing and response to biventricular pacing. However, their results have been conflicting. The aim of our study was to determine the association between the relative change in QRS narrowing index (QI) and clinical outcome and prognosis in patients who undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 311 patients in whom a CRT device was implanted in accordance with current guidelines for CRT. On implantation, the native QRS, the QRSd and the QI during CRT were measured. After 6months, 220 (71%) patients showed a 10% reduction in LVESV. The median [25th-75th] QI was 14.3% [7.2-21.4] and was significantly related to reverse remodeling (r=+0.22; 95%CI: 0.11-0.32, p=0.0001). The cut-off value of QI that best predicted LV reverse remodeling after 6months of CRT was 12.5% (sensitivity=63.6%, specificity=57.1%, area under the curve=0.633, p=0.0002). The time to the event death or cardiovascular hospitalization was significantly longer among patients with QI>12.5% (log-rank test, p=0.0155), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.3 [95%CI: 0.11-0.78]. In the multivariate regression model adjusted for baseline parameters, a 10% increment in QI (HR=0.61[0.44-0.83], p=0.002) remained significantly associated with CRT response.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a larger decrease in QRSd after CRT initiation showed greater echocardiographic reverse remodeling and better outcome from death or cardiovascular hospitalization. QI is an easy-to-measure variable that could be used to predict CRT response at the time of pacing site selection or pacing configuration programming.

Different Methods to Measure QRS Duration in CRT Patients: Impact on the Predictive Value of QRS Duration Parameters

BACKGROUND

Measurements of QRS duration (QRSD) in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are not standardized. We hypothesized that both the measurement of QRSD and its predictive value on CRT response are sensitive to the method by which QRSD is measured.

METHODS

Electrocardiograms (ECGs) pre- and post-CRT from 52 CRT patients (66 ± 12 years, 65% male) were retrospectively analyzed. Custom-made software was developed to measure global QRSD (QRSDglobal ) and lead-specific QRSD (QRSDI,II,III,aVR,aVL,aVF,V1,V2,V3,V4,V5,V6 ). QRSD was also assessed automatic by a routinely used ECG device. For each method we measured QRSD pre- and post-CRT and shortening of QRSD (∆QRSD). Response to CRT at 6 months was defined as an improvement of ≥1 class in New York Heart Association classification and an increase by >7.5% in left ventricular ejection fraction.

RESULTS

The CRT response rate was 77% (n = 40). Different methods to measure QRSD show divergent nominal values before (median range 152-172 ms, P < 0.001) and after CRT (130-152 ms, P < 0.001). The predictive value of QRSD measurements for CRT response also varies significantly according to the method used (range AUC pre-CRT QRSD 0.400-0.580, P < 0.05; AUC post-CRT QRSD 0.447-0.768, P < 0.05; AUC ΔQRSD 0.540-0.858, P < 0.05). Global QRSD measurements revealed lower variability compared to lead-specific QRSD.

CONCLUSION

Different methods to measure QRSD yield not only different nominal values but also influence the value of QRSD in predicting CRT response. Measuring QRSD by a global method can help to standardize QRSD measurements in future studies.

Regression of fragmented QRS complex: a marker of electrical reverse remodeling in cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Fragmented QRS (fQRS) marks inhomogeneous activation and asynchronous cardiac contraction. It has been proved that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) could reverse geometrical remodeling as well as correct electrical dyssynchrony. We aimed to investigate whether fQRS changed corresponding to the therapeutic response to CRT.

METHODS

Patients who underwent de novo CRT implantation previously and had ≥1 follow-up between August 2012 and September 2013 in our hospital were investigated. Intrinsic electrocardiogram was recorded and fQRS in any lead was calculated. Response to CRT was defined as absolute improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction by ≥10% or by improvement >1 New York Heart Association class and without heart failure hospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 75 patients (48 male, mean ages, 61 ± 9 years) were included in this study. At a median follow-up of 13 months, 57 patients had response to CRT. Responders had narrowed QRS (from 167 ± 23 ms to 158 ± 19 ms, P = 0.003) and reduced fQRS post-CRT. Nonresponders had QRS prolonging (from 151 ± 26 ms to 168 ± 16 ms, P = 0.033) and increase in fQRS. Eleven of 12 patients with reduced fQRS were responders and 8 of 12 with increased fQRS were nonresponders. Both changes in QRS and fQRS correlated strongly with CRT response (r = 0.389, P = 0.001 and r = 0.403, P = 0.000, respectively). Reduction of fQRS in ≥1 leads had high specificity (95%) in association to responders, though in low sensitivity (19%).

CONCLUSIONS

The changes in fQRS associated with therapeutic response to CRT. Regression of fQRS could be a maker of electrical reverse remodeling following CRT.

An individual patient meta-analysis of five randomized trials assessing the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure

AIMS

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with or without a defibrillator reduces morbidity and mortality in selected patients with heart failure (HF) but response can be variable. We sought to identify pre-implantation variables that predict the response to CRT in a meta-analysis using individual patient-data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An individual patient meta-analysis of five randomized trials, funded by Medtronic, comparing CRT either with no active device or with a defibrillator was conducted, including the following baseline variables: age, sex, New York Heart Association class, aetiology, QRS morphology, QRS duration, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and systolic blood pressure. Outcomes were all-cause mortality and first hospitalization for HF or death. Of 3782 patients in sinus rhythm, median (inter-quartile range) age was 66 (58-73) years, QRS duration was 160 (146-176) ms, LVEF was 24 (20-28)%, and 78% had left bundle branch block. A multivariable model suggested that only QRS duration predicted the magnitude of the effect of CRT on outcomes. Further analysis produced estimated hazard ratios for the effect of CRT on all-cause mortality and on the composite of first hospitalization for HF or death that suggested increasing benefit with increasing QRS duration, the 95% confidence bounds excluding 1.0 at ∼140 ms for each endpoint, suggesting a high probability of substantial benefit from CRT when QRS duration exceeds this value.

CONCLUSION

QRS duration is a powerful predictor of the effects of CRT on morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic HF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction who are in sinus rhythm. QRS morphology did not provide additional information about clinical response.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV NUMBERS

NCT00170300, NCT00271154, NCT00251251.