Association between incomplete surgical ligation of left atrial appendage and stroke and systemic embolization

State of the Art in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has become an important therapeutic target for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Over the past 2 decades, several advancements in LAAO devices (percutaneous and surgical) have been made for stroke prevention and arrhythmia therapy. However, there are several unanswered questions regarding optimal patient selection, the preferred LAAO approach and device, the management of periprocedural and postprocedural complications, including pericardial effusion, device-related thrombus, and device leaks. This review focuses on fundamental foundational concepts in various aspects of the left atrial appendage and management strategies as they relate to current clinical needs.

Efficacy of four different left atrial appendage closure techniques during cardiac surgery-A transesophageal echocardiography follow-up study

Objective

Closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is a routine part of atrial fibrillation ablation surgery and significantly reduces stroke rates. Different LAA-closure techniques are used in cardiac surgery with variable results reported. We therefore evaluated the efficacy of 4 different LAA-closure techniques in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Methods

In total, 149 patients who underwent concomitant LAA closure during cardiac surgery between 2015 and 2019 were included in this retrospective transesophageal echocardiography study. Four different LAA-closure techniques were evaluated: LAA clipping (n = 62), suture ligation (n = 28), stapler resection (n = 30), and surgical LAA excision (n = 29). Successful LAA closure was defined as absence of LAA perfusion and absence of a stump greater than 10 mm.

Results

The mean patients age was 68.7 ± 9.4 years; 61.7% were male. No complications related to LAA closure were observed. Mean follow-up was 36.5 ± 8 months. Transesophageal echocardiography follow-up showed the following LAA closure success rates: LAA clip 98.4%, surgical excision 93.1%, stapler resection 76.6%, and suture ligation 39.2%. Suture ligation resulted in a high rate of recanalization (50%) and residual stumps (10.8%), whereas stapler resection resulted in a high rate of residual stumps (23.4%). Overall, 4 patients (2.7%) had a stroke during follow-up. In detail, 2 of 27 (7.4%) patients with unsuccessful LAA closure had a stroke, whereas 2 of the 122 (1.6%) patients with successful LAA closure had a stroke.

Conclusions

In our study, LAA clipping and surgical LAA excision proved to be both successful LAA-closure methods. External LAA ligation and stapler resection resulted in low rates of successful LAA closure and should be avoided.

A Comparative Study of Thoracoscopic Left Atrial Appendage Clipping vs Stapled Resection

BACKGROUND

The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the predominant site of thrombus formation in atrial fibrillation (AF), which is associated with ischemic stroke. This study comparatively evaluated the complete LAA closure rates between LAA clipping and stapled resections.

METHODS

The study included 333 patients who underwent thoracoscopic operation with both preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic scans. Propensity score matching (4:1 ratio) was applied, matching 90 LAA clipping patients with 206 stapled resection patients. The primary end point was complete LAA closure, defined as a residual LAA depth of <1 cm on computed tomographic images obtained 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

No 30-day death was observed. Complete LAA closure was achieved in 85.9% (286 of 333) of patients. After propensity score matching, the clipping group demonstrated a significantly higher complete LAA closure rate than the stapled resection group (95.6% vs 83.0%, P = .003). The residual LAA stump depth was also shorter in the clipping group compared with the stapled resection group (2.9 vs 5.3 mm, P = .001). Two patients with a residual LAA stump exhibited an association with ischemic stroke during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The clipping group demonstrated a higher rate of complete LAA closure compared with the stapled resection group. Close monitoring of patients with residual LAA stumps is essential. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to elucidate impact of the residual LAA stump on thromboembolic events.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of left atrial appendage closure's influence on early and long-term mortality and stroke

Objective

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) concomitant to heart surgery in patients with underlying atrial fibrillation (AF) has gained attention because of long-term reduction of thromboembolic complications. As of mortality benefits in the setting of non-AF, data from both observational studies and randomized controlled trials are conflicting.

Methods

On-line databases were screened for studies comparing LAAC versus no LAAC concomitant to other heart surgery. End points assessed were all-cause mortality and stroke at early and longest-available follow-up. Subgroup analyses stratified on preoperative AF were performed. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% CIs served as primary statistics.

Results

Electronic search yielded 25 studies (N = 660 [158 patients]). There was no difference between LAAC and no LAAC in terms of early mortality. In the overall population analysis, LAAC reduced long-term mortality (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-1.00; P = .05; I 2 = 88%), reduced early stroke risk by 19% (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.93; P = .002; I 2 = 57%), and reduced late stroke risk by 13% (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.90; P < .001; I 2 = 58%). Subgroup analysis showed lower mortality (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72-1.01; P = .06; I 2 = 91%), short-, and long-term stroke risk reduction only in patients with preoperative AF (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.93; P = .003; I 2 = 71% and RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.91; P < .001; I 2 = 70%, respectively). No benefit of LAAC in patients without AF was found.

Conclusions

Concomitant LAAC was associated with reduced stroke rates at early and long-term and possibly reduced all-cause mortality at the long-term follow-up but the benefits were limited to patients with preoperative AF. There is not enough evidence to support routine concomitant LAAC in non-AF settings.

Feasibility of concomitant exclusion of left atrial appendage during novel transapical off-pump beating heart mitral valve repair

The AtriClip device enables the safe and reproducible epicardial clipping of the left atrial appendage. Transapical off-pump beating heart mitral valve repair using NeoChord DS100 Artificial Chordae Delivery System has matured and become more standardized. We aim to evaluate the feasibility of combining NeoChord repair and left atrial appendage exclusion in a single procedure through the same minithoracotomy in patients with mitral valve prolapse and atrial fibrillation. From 2018 to 2019, seven patients with severe mitral regurgitation and atrial fibrillation underwent transesophageal echocardiography-guided transapical off-pump mitral valve repair with the novel NeoChord DS 1000 system and concomitant left atrial appendage exclusion using the AtriClip Pro II device. Both procedures were performed via left mini-thoracotomy. The AtriClip device was applied after the NeoChord repair was done. All seven patients had less than moderate mitral regurgitation after the NeoChord repair and successful left atrial appendage occlusion. There were no device or procedure-related complications. Clinical follow-up revealed significant symptomatic improvement, and no cardiovascular complications were reported. Transesophageal echocardiography at 6-12 months post-procedure showed stable left atrial appendage occlusion with no residual flow between the left atrium and the left atrial appendage and a stump of less than 5 mm. Beating heart epicardial clipping of the left atrial appendage using AtriClip concomitant with transapical mitral valve repair using Neochord DS 1000 system is a feasible and safe treatment option in mitral valve prolapse and atrial fibrillation in patients with limited indications. However, its safety needs to be confirmed in a larger series of patients.

Residual leaks following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and outcomes: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Residual leaks are not infrequent after left atrial appendage occlusion. However, there is still uncertainty regarding their prognostic implications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of residual leaks after left atrial appendage occlusion.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted until 19 February 2023. Residual leaks comprised peri-device leaks (PDLs) on transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or computed tomography (CT), as well as left atrial appendage patency on CT. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to assess the clinical impact of residual leaks.

RESULTS

Overall 48 eligible studies (44 non-randomized/observational and 4 randomized studies) including 61 666 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent left atrial appendage occlusion were analysed. Peri-device leak by TEE was present in 26.1% of patients. Computed tomography-based left atrial appendage patency and PDL were present in 54.9% and 57.3% of patients, respectively. Transoesophageal echocardiography-based PDL (i.e. any reported PDL regardless of its size) was significantly associated with a higher risk of thromboembolism [pooled odds ratio (pOR) 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.52-2.74], all-cause mortality (pOR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.08-1.24), and major bleeding (pOR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03-1.22), compared with no reported PDL. A positive graded association between PDL size and risk of thromboembolism was noted across TEE cut-offs. For any PDL of >0, >1, >3, and >5 mm, the pORs for thromboembolism were 1.82 (95% CI: 1.35-2.47), 2.13 (95% CI: 1.04-4.35), 4.14 (95% CI: 2.07-8.27), and 4.44 (95% CI: 2.09-9.43), respectively, compared with either no PDL or PDL smaller than each cut-off. Neither left atrial appendage patency, nor PDL by CT was associated with thromboembolism (pOR 1.45 and 1.04, 95% CI: 0.84-2.50 and 0.52-2.07, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Peri-device leak detected by TEE was associated with adverse events, primarily thromboembolism. Residual leaks detected by CT were more frequent but lacked prognostic significance.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

Cardioembolism after thoracoscopic left atrial appendage clipping in a patient on oral anticoagulation therapy

Cardioembolism associated with atrial fibrillation is a major cause of ischemic stroke. Left atrial appendage occlusion in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing cardiac surgery reduces the risk of postoperative stroke. A 78-year-old man with a history of atrial fibrillation and severe mitral regurgitation underwent thoracoscopic mitral valve repair with left atrial appendage clipping and the cryo-maze procedure 4 years previously. He was taking a direct oral anticoagulant for stroke prevention because his atrial fibrillation had recurred. He presented with acute onset disturbed consciousness, omnidirectional gaze palsy, left facial palsy, severe dysarthria, bilateral limb ataxia, and sensory disturbance. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 16. Although non-contrast computed tomography showed no early ischemic changes, computed tomography angiography revealed occlusion of the basilar artery. Intravenous thrombolysis was performed, which resulted in recanalization. Transesophageal echocardiography showed left atrial spontaneous echo contrast and thrombus in the left atrial appendage. Contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography confirmed incomplete left atrial appendage occlusion. Cardioembolic stroke was diagnosed, and warfarin was initiated. Cardioembolism may occur after thoracoscopic left atrial appendage clipping despite direct oral anticoagulant therapy, particularly if appendage occlusion is incomplete. Occlusion status should be evaluated after thoracoscopic clipping.

Learning objective

To illustrate, incomplete left atrial appendage closure may increase the risk of ischemic stroke even after thoracoscopic left atrial appendage clipping is performed to prevent embolism.

WATCHMEN: a case report highlighting the closure of a bilobed left atrial appendage using two WATCHMAN-FLX devices

Background

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) performed percutaneously has emerged as a widely accepted method for stroke prevention, offering a viable alternative to anticoagulation. Numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of this procedure. However, in certain cases, the use of a single LAAO device may not adequately achieve optimal closure due to variations in the anatomy of the left atrial appendage (LAA).

Case summary

In this manuscript, we highlight the successful closure of a bilobed LAA with a large ostium utilizing two WATCHMAN™ FLX devices and using the double sheath technique. The aim was to achieve optimal closure and address the unique anatomical characteristics of the patient's LAA.

Discussion

The utilization of two LAAO devices in bilobed appendage anatomy, where a single device may not be sufficient, is possible, although it poses a challenge because of the lack of technical expertise and limited published evidence. Transoesophageal imaging can serve as a valuable tool for assessing the precise anatomy of the LAA and guide the selection and placement of the occlusion devices.

Mechanism and management of leaks arising after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC)

This article reviews the latest available data in regard to the diagnosis, management, and intervention of both central and peri-device leaks that arise after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). The aim of this article is to have a better understanding of both addressing leaks arising after LAAC, and which interventions and closure methods are best served for each type of residual leak based on etiology, size, and operator experience.

Surgical and percutaneous left atrial appendage intervention: silent cerebral embolism considerations

OBJECTIVES

Left atrial appendage intervention is an alternative to oral anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. The aim of our study was to compare the incidence of silent cerebral embolisms after surgical and percutaneous intervention and to identify the risk factors for procedure-related silent cerebral embolisms after intervention.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included consecutive atrial fibrillation patients from 2 independent cohorts (left atrial appendage excision (LAAE) cohort and left atrial appendage occlusion cohort) between September 2018 and December 2020. All patients underwent cerebral magnetic resonance imaging before and after the procedure. Silent cerebral embolism was defined as new focal hyperintense lesions detected only on postprocedural sequence.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients from the LAAE cohort and 42 patients from the occlusion cohort were enrolled. A significantly lower incidence of silent cerebral embolism was observed in the LAAE cohort as compared with occlusion (6.3% vs 54.8%, P < 0.001). In the left atrial appendage occlusion cohort, patients who developed silent cerebral embolism after the procedure had significantly higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores [odds ratio (OR) 2.172; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.149-4.104; P = 0.017], longer occlusion placement time (OR 1.067; 95% CI 1.018-1.118; P = 0.006) and lower peak activated clotting time level after transseptal puncture (OR 0.976; 95% CI 0.954-0.998; P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of procedure-related silent cerebral embolism was strikingly lower in patients with LAAE than in patients with occlusion. More cardiovascular comorbidities, longer occlusion placement time and lower activated clotting time level were significantly associated with the development of procedure-related silent cerebral embolism.

Atrial Fibrillation Occurring During Acute Hospitalization: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Acute atrial fibrillation is defined as atrial fibrillation detected in the setting of acute care or acute illness; atrial fibrillation may be detected or managed for the first time during acute hospitalization for another condition. Atrial fibrillation after cardiothoracic surgery is a distinct type of acute atrial fibrillation. Acute atrial fibrillation is associated with high risk of long-term atrial fibrillation recurrence, warranting clinical attention during acute hospitalization and over long-term follow-up. A framework of substrates and triggers can be useful for evaluating and managing acute atrial fibrillation. Acute management requires a multipronged approach with interdisciplinary care collaboration, tailoring treatments to the patient's underlying substrate and acute condition. Key components of acute management include identification and treatment of triggers, selection and implementation of rate/rhythm control, and management of anticoagulation. Acute rate or rhythm control strategy should be individualized with consideration of the patient's capacity to tolerate rapid rates or atrioventricular dyssynchrony, and the patient's ability to tolerate the risk of the therapeutic strategy. Given the high risks of atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with acute atrial fibrillation, clinical follow-up and heart rhythm monitoring are warranted. Long-term management is guided by patient substrate, with implications for intensity of heart rhythm monitoring, anticoagulation, and considerations for rhythm management strategies. Overall management of acute atrial fibrillation addresses substrates and triggers. The 3As of acute management are acute triggers, atrial fibrillation rate/rhythm management, and anticoagulation. The 2As and 2Ms of long-term management include monitoring of heart rhythm and modification of lifestyle and risk factors, in addition to considerations for atrial fibrillation rate/rhythm management and anticoagulation. Several gaps in knowledge related to acute atrial fibrillation exist and warrant future research.

Surgical left atrial appendage occlusion with concomitant cardiac surgical procedures: exacerbating heart failure or preventing stroke

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The left atrial appendage (LAA) is a common source of thromboembolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Current guidelines recommend consideration of surgical LAA occlusion concomitant with other cardiac surgical procedures based mostly on observational data and a few small trials. Recently published results of several large retrospective studies and one prospective trial are reviewed herein.

RECENT FINDINGS

Large retrospective studies using quality and administrative databases show mixed results with regard to efficacy of surgical LAA occlusion in preventing stroke, although most showed stroke reduction in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (AF). Safety concerns have been raised based on nonrandomized data suggesting increased complications. A recent large, multicenter international randomized study with 3-year follow-up demonstrated significant reduction in stroke following LAA occlusion with no differences in death or heart failure exacerbations.

SUMMARY

Most patients with AF undergoing another cardiac surgical procedure should be considered for concomitant LAA occlusion as part of a heart team discussion. The choice of surgical closure technique is critical. There is insufficient data to recommend LAA occlusion as an alternative to anticoagulation.

Surgical atrial appendage closure: time for a randomized study

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and is assumed to affect more than 30 million people worldwide. Studies report that the left atrial appendage (LAA) plays an important role in thrombus formation and is considered the embolic source in 90% of affected patients with non-valvular and 57% with valvular AF. Oral anticoagulants have been the standard of care for stroke prevention in patients with AF for decades. However, bleeding complications and noncompliance are barriers to effective embolic protection. Therefore, as an alternative to conventional anti-thrombotic therapy, surgical LAA occlusion, which may lead to a reduced risk of thromboembolism, has received increasing attention. However, the procedure can be associated with additional risks such as prolonged operation time, damage to the circumflex coronary artery, and incomplete LAA occlusion. This review discusses some of the observational studies that have examined the impact of LAA occlusion on stroke, the LAAOS III (Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study) trial, which provided definitive evidence for the benefit of surgical LAA occlusion on ischemic stroke, which surgical methods are safe and effective for LAA occlusion, and whether oral anticoagulation can be stopped after surgical removal of the LAA.

Left atrial appendage occlusion with Watchman device after incomplete surgical ligation

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the most common cause of cardioembolic stroke. The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the major source of cardiac emboli in patients with NVAF. Anticoagulation (AC) is the standard of care for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), but many patients are intolerant of AC. Surgical exclusion of the LAA may result in incomplete closure and is associated with an increased risk of embolism. We report a case of a woman in her 50s with a history of persistent AF, mitral valve prolapse s/p repair with surgical LAA exclusion, and multifocal haemorrhagic stroke presented for elective LAA closure who underwent a Watchman placement successfully. This case demonstrates that a percutaneous approach for occlusion of the LAA when surgical exclusion was incomplete may be feasible with appropriate planning. Clinical outcome data for this patient group are needed.

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Current Stroke Prevention Strategies and a Shift Toward Data-Driven, Patient-Specific Approaches

The left atrial appendage (LAA) is a complex structure with unknown physiologic function protruding from the main body of the left atrium. In patients with atrial fibrillation, the left atrium does not contract effectively. Insufficient atrial and LAA contractility predisposes the LAA morphology to hemostasis and thrombus formation, leading to an increased risk of cardioembolic events. Oral anticoagulation therapies are the mainstay of stroke prevention options for patients; however, not all patients are candidates for long-term oral anticoagulation. Percutaneous occlusion devices are an attractive alternative to long-term anticoagulation therapy, although they are not without limitations, such as peri-implant leakage and device-related thrombosis. Although efforts have been made to reduce these risks, significant interpatient heterogeneity inevitably yields some degree of device-anatomy mismatch that is difficult to resolve using current devices and can ultimately lead to insufficient occlusion and poor patient outcomes. In this state-of-the-art review, we evaluated the anatomy of the LAA as well as the current pathophysiologic understanding and stroke prevention strategies used in the management of the risk of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation. We highlighted recent advances in computed tomography imaging, preprocedural planning, computational modeling, and novel additive manufacturing techniques, which represent the tools needed for a paradigm shift toward patient-centric LAA occlusion. Together, we envisage that these techniques will facilitate a pipeline from the imaging of patient anatomy to patient-specific computational and bench-top models that enable customized, data-driven approaches for LAA occlusion that are engineered specifically to meet each patient's unique needs.

Impact of Peridevice Leak on 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure

BACKGROUND

In the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clinical trials of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure, a postimplantation peridevice leak (PDL) of ≤5 mm (PDL≤5) was accepted as sufficient LAA "closure." However, the clinical consequences of these PDLs on subsequent thromboembolism are poorly characterized.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the impact of PDL≤5 on clinical outcomes after implantation of the Watchman device.

METHODS

Using combined data from the FDA studies PROTECT-AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation), PREVAIL (Evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation vs Long Term Warfarin Therapy), and CAP2 (Continued Access to PREVAIL), we assessed patients with successful device implantation for PDL by means of protocol-mandated transesophageal echocardiograms (TEEs) at 45 days and 1 year. Five-year outcomes were assessed as a function of the absence or presence of PDL≤5.

RESULTS

The cohort included 1,054 patients: mean age 74 ± 8.3 years, 65% male, and CHA₂DS₂-VASc 4.1 ± 1.4. TEE imaging at 45 days revealed 634 patients (60.2%) without and 404 (38.3%) with PDL≤5, and 1-year TEE revealed 704 patients (71.6%) without and 272 (27.7%) with PDL≤5. The presence of PDL≤5 at 1 year, but not at 45 days, was associated with an increased 5-year risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (adjusted HR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.15-3.29; P = 0.014), largely driven by an increase in nondisabling stroke (HR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.03-3.78; P = 0.04), while disabling or fatal stroke rates were similar (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.19-2.46; P = 0.56). PDL≤5 was not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular or unexplained death (HR: 1.20; P = 0.45) or all-cause death (HR: 0.87; P = 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

PDL≤5 at 1 year after percutaneous LAA closure with the Watchman device are associated with increased thromboembolism, driven by increased nondisabling stroke, but similar mortality. (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation [PROTECT-AF; NCT00129545]; Evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation vs Long Term Warfarin Therapy [PREVAIL; NCT01182441]; Continued Access to PREVAIL [CAP2; NCT01760291]).

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion, A Misnomer?: Where Do We Go From Here?

The importance of the left atrial appendage (LAA) as the source of thromboembolism including stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is well documented, with more than 90% of ischemic strokes related to a LAA thrombus. Although oral anticoagulation has been the standard of care, approximately 50% to 60% of patients either have contraindications to oral anticoagulation or do not continue the medication beyond the first year. This led to the development of local site-specific therapy to occlude the LAA by either surgical or transcatheter means. Despite marked advancements, incomplete LAA closure with surgical and transcatheter approaches remains frequent. The etiology of incomplete LAA closure and its clinical implications remain unclear. Multiple strategies are in development including changes in deployment techniques, a new device design, and alternative approaches to leak closure.

Management of atrial fibrillation: two decades of progress - a scientific statement from the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. The aim of this review was to evaluate the progress made in the management of AF over the two last decades.

RESULTS

Clinical classification of AF is usually based on the presence of symptoms, the duration of AF episodes and their possible recurrence over time, although incidental diagnosis is not uncommon. The majority of patients with AF have associated cardiovascular diseases and more recently the recognition of modifiable risk factors both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular which should be considered in its management. Among AF-related complications, stroke and transient ischaemic accidents (TIAs) carry considerable morbidity and mortality risk. The use of implantable devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators, wearable garments and subcutaneous cardiac monitors with recording capabilities has enabled to access the burden of "subclinical AF". The recent introduction of non-vitamin K antagonists has led to improve the prevention of stroke and peripheral embolism. Agents capable of reversing non-vitamin K antagonists have also become available in case of clinically relevant major bleeding. Transcatheter closure of left atrial appendage represents an option for patients unable to take oral anticoagulation. When treating patients with AF, clinicians need to select the most suitable strategy, i.e. control of heart rate and/or restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm. The studies comparing these two strategies have not shown differences in terms of mortality. If an AF episode is poorly tolerated from a haemodynamic standpoint, electrical cardioversion is indicated. Otherwise, restoration of sinus rhythm can be obtained using intravenous pharmacological cardioversion and oral class I or class III antiarrhythmic is used to prevent recurrences. During the last two decades after its introduction in daily practice, catheter ablation has gained considerable escalation in popularity. Progress has also been made in AF associated with heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant progress has been made within the past 2 decades both in the pharmacological and non-pharmacological managements of this cardiac arrhythmia.

A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage Following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation

(1) Background: The assessment of residual peri-device leakages (PDL) after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remains crucial for post-procedural management. Our study aimed to verify a novel echocardiographic classification for the prediction of PDL. (2) Methods: Echocardiographic data of 72 patients who underwent percutaneous LAAO were evaluated. All echo images were analyzed by two independent investigators using standard analysis software (Image-Arena IA-4.6.4.44 by TomTec^®, Munich, Germany). A total number of 127 studies was evaluated. Forty-four patients had baseline studies, at 45 days and at 6 months post-implantation. We propose a morphological classification of LAA devices based on the amount of echodensity inside the devices into three types: type A showing complete homogenous thrombosis, type B incompletely thrombosed device with inhomogeneous echo-free space <50% of device, and type C with partially thrombosed device in which the echo free space was >50% of device in various planes, which we called the “ice-cream cone” sign. Each type was matched to the degree of PDL and clinical outcome parameters. (3) Results: Patients with type C had the highest percentage of PDL at 45 days follow-up (type A: 24%, type B: 31%, type C 100% PDL, p < 0.001) and at 6 months follow-up (type A: 7%, type B: 33%, type C 100% PDL, p < 0.001). Notably, device size in patients with PDL was larger than that in patients without PDL at 6 months follow-up (25.6 ± 3.5 mm vs. 28.7 ± 3.4 mm, p = 0.004). Device size in patients with type C appearance was the largest of the three types (type A: 25.9 ± 3.6 mm, type B: 25.8 ± 3.4 mm, type C 29.8 ± 3.0 mm, type A vs. C; p = 0.019; type B vs. C, p = 0.007). (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, PDL are common post-LAAO, and their frequency is underestimated and under-recognized. PDL are much more common in patients with larger LAA ostial sizes and likely lower longitudinal compression. Type C appearance of the LAAO devices (“ice-cream cone sign”) has a high positive predictive value for PDL. Further studies are needed for better delineation of the clinical importance of this proposed classification.

Left atrial appendage shape impacts on the left atrial flow hemodynamics: A numerical hypothesis generating study on two cases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the most common region for thrombus formation in atrial fibrillation (AF). Morphological parameters such as shape, size, and LAA volume can cause insufficient effectiveness of available therapeutic options. This study aimed to examine blood flow inside LAA and its removal effects. Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations were carried out on two patients with different morphologies.

METHODS

Two patients' CT was used to reconstruct the 3D geometries of the left atrium (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA). Then, the geometries were refined in the mentioned software, and the LAA in some models was removed. Next, in generated 3D volume mesh, sinus rhythm (SR) and atrial fibrillation (AF) outflow velocity were imposed at the mitral valve as boundary conditions. Finally, CFD simulation was conducted to analyzing blood flow within LA with/without LA.

RESULTS

The results confirmed that velocity and vorticity decreased under AF conditions inside the LA domain for both patients. However, removing LAA may cause unpredictable consequences, due to different shape and volume of LAA. LAA removal had insignificant effects on velocity and vorticity within LA in SR-mitral outflow. However, removing LAA increased the blood flow rate by 9.15% and vorticity by 7.27% for patient one under AF rhythm (SR)-outflow. In contrast, for patient two, LAA removal in both AF and SR decreased velocity and vorticity within the LA domain. In SR-mitral outflow, velocity dropped by 18.8 %, and vorticity by 13.2%. Also, under AF velocity and vorticity decreased by 23.33% and 18.6% respectively. Meanwhile, the results indicated that the vorticity magnitude increased inside the LAA under AF associated with the risk of thrombus formation, particularly for patient one under AF. The distal part of LAA in both patients was the most common region for blood stasis because of the lowest velocity magnitude.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the morphology of LAA could be the critical parameter to determine the possibility of thrombosis formation, particularly under AF conditions. High volume, low blood flow velocity and two-lobe-appendage are more likely to have blood stasis. Furthermore, the morphology difference can affect the LAA removal result and make it more complicated. So, it could be challenging to generalize LAA removal as a therapeutic option for different patients. The implication of this CFD observation needs more investigation.

Safety and feasibility of peri-device leakage closure after LAAO: an international, multicentre collaborative study

BACKGROUND

Residual peri-device leakage (PDL) is frequent after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Little is known about management strategies, procedural aspects and outcomes of interventional PDL closure.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of PDL closure after LAAO.

METHODS

Fifteen centres contributed data on baseline characteristics, in-hospital and follow-up outcomes of patients who underwent PDL closure after LAAO. Outcomes of interest included acute success and complication rates and long-term efficacy of the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients were included and a cumulative number of 104 leaks were closed. The majority of PDLs were detected within 90 days (range 41-231). Detachable coils were the most frequent approach (42.3%), followed by the use of the AMPLATZER Vascular Plug II (29.8%) and the AMPLATZER Duct Occluder II (17.3%). Technical success was 100% with 94.2% of devices placed successfully within the first attempt. There were no major complications requiring surgical or transcatheter interventions. During follow-up (96 days [range 49-526]), persistent leaks were found in 18 patients (18.9%), yielding a functional success rate of 82.7%, although PDLs were significantly reduced in size (pre-leak sizemax: 6.1±3.6 mm vs post-leak sizemax: 2.5±1.3 mm, p<0.001). None of the patients had a leak >5 mm. Major adverse events during follow-up occurred in 5 patients (2 ischaemic strokes, 2 intracranial haemorrhages, and 1 major gastrointestinal bleeding).

CONCLUSIONS

Several interventional techniques have become available to achieve PDL closure. They are associated with high technical and functional success and low complication rates.

Amulet or Watchman Device for Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Primary Results of the SWISS-APERO Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: No study has so far compared Amulet with the new Watchman FLX in terms of residual left atrial appendage (LAA) patency or clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous LAA closure (LAAC). Methods: In the investigator-initiated SWISS APERO trial, patients undergoing LAAC were randomized (1:1) open-label to receive Amulet or Watchman 2.5 or FLX (Watchman) across 8 European centres. The primary endpoint was the composite of justified crossover to a non-randomized device during LAAC procedure or residual LAA patency detected by cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) at 45 days. The secondary endpoints included procedural complications, device related thrombus (DRT), peridevice leak (PDL) at transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and clinical outcomes at 45 days. Results: Between June 2018, and May 2021, 221 patients were randomly assigned to Amulet (111 [50.2%]) or Watchman (110 [49.8%]), of whom 25 (22.7%) patients included before October 2019 received Watchman 2.5, and 85 (77.3%) patients received Watchman FLX. The primary endpoint was assessable in 205 (92.8%) patients and occurred in 71 (67.6%) Amulet and 70 (70.0%) Watchman patients respectively (risk ratio [RR] 0.97 [95% CI 0.80- 1.16]; P=0.713). A single justified cross-over occurred in an Amulet patient who fulfilled LAA patency criteria at 45-day CCTA. Major procedure related complications occurred more frequently in the Amulet group (9.0% vs. 2.7%; P=0.047), owing to more frequent bleeding (7.2% vs.1.8%). At 45 days, the PDL rate at TEE was higher with Watchman than Amulet (27.5% vs. 13.7%, p=0.020), albeit none was major (i.e. > 5 mm), whereas DRT was detected in 1 (0.9%) patient with Amulet and 3 (3.0%) patients with Watchman at CCTA and in 2 (2.1%) and 5 (5.5%) patients at TEE, respectively. Clinical outcomes at 45 days did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: Amulet was not associated with lower rate of the composite of crossover or residual LAA patency compared with Watchman at 45-day CCTA. Amulet, was however associated with lower PDL rates at TEE, higher procedural complications and similar clinical outcomes at 45 days compared with Watchman. The clinical relevance of CCTA-detected LAA patency requires further investigation. Clinical Trial Registration: URL https://clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier NCT03399851.

Lessons learned from experimental models of cerebrovascular aneurysms to improve endocardial device occlusion of the left atrial appendage

In patients with atrial fibrillation, left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion devices represent an alternative to anticoagulation but are associated with residual peridevice leaks (PDLs) and device-related thrombi (DRT). Similarly, cerebrovascular aneurysms can be treated with coil embolization, but pericoil leaks represent a significant limitation. In experimental models of cerebrovascular aneurysms, endothelial denudation achieved independently with (1) embolization with radioactive coils, (2) mechanical removal of the endothelium, or (3) radiofrequency ablation was dramatically effective in preventing or eliminating pericoil leaks.

Anatomical, physiological, and blood flow similarities exist between the LAA and saccular aneurysms. Concepts developed in treating aneurysm leaks can be used to treat similar problems in the LAA. Learning from aneurysms, we conceived of a novel technique to denude local endothelium and thus eliminate residual leaks around LAA-occlusion devices. We recently successfully tested this hypothesis in patients with a PDL in a prospective manner in a multicenter study. In this article, we expand on the rationale of the technique developed to close PDLs and potentially also prevent DRTs.

Evidence and Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Management

This review aimed to discuss the anatomical properties of the left atrial appendage (LAA), its relationship with atrial fibrillation (AF), effectiveness of LAA occlusion (LAAO), techniques, and new devices used to perform this procedure. An electronic search was performed to identify studies, in the English language, on LAA management. Searches were performed on PubMed Central, Scopus, and Medline from the dates of database inception to February 2020. For the assessed papers, data were extracted from the reviewed text, tables, and figures, by two independent authors. Anticoagulant therapy for patients with AF has proven beneficial and is highly recommended, but it is challenging for many patients to maintain optimal treatment. Surgery is the most cost-effective option; surgical methods include simple LAA resection, thoracoscopic surgery, and catheter treatment. Each procedure has its advantages and disadvantages, and many prospective studies have been conducted to evaluate various treatment methods. In managing the LAA, dissection of the LAA, such as changes in its shape and size due to remodeling during AF, changes in autonomic nerve function, and thrombosis, must be understood anatomically and physiologically. We believe that early treatment intervention for the LAA should be considered particularly in cases of recurrent AF.

Conclusion: SLET under artificial pneumothorax is feasible and safe in minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.

Radiofrequency Energy Applications Targeting Significant Residual Leaks After Watchman Implantation: A Prospective, Multicenter Experience

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) energy applications targeting the atrial side of a significant residual leak in patients with acute and chronic evidence of incomplete percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion.

BACKGROUND

RF applications have been proved to prevent recanalization of intracranial aneurysms after coil embolization, thereby favoring complete sealing. From a mechanistic standpoint, in vitro and in vivo experiments have demonstrated that RF promotes collagen deposition and tissue retraction.

METHODS

Forty-three patients (mean age 75 ± 7 years mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score 4.6 ± 1.4, mean HAS-BLED score 4.0 ± 1.1) with residual leaks ≥4 mm after Watchman implantation were enrolled. Procedural success was defined as complete LAA occlusion or presence of a mild or minimal (1- to 2-mm) peridevice leak on follow-up transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), which was performed approximately 45 days after the procedure.

RESULTS

RF-based leak closure was performed acutely after Watchman implantation in 19 patients (44.2%) or scheduled after evidence of significant leaks on follow-up TEE in 24 others (55.8%). The median leak size was 5 mm (range: 4-7 mm). On average, 18 ± 7 RF applications per patient (mean maximum contact force 16 ± 3 g, mean power 44 ± 2 W, mean RF time 5.1 ± 2.5 minutes) were performed targeting the atrial edge of the leak. Post-RF median leak size was 0 mm (range: 0-1 mm). A very low rate (2.3% [n = 1]) of major periprocedural complications was observed. Follow-up TEE revealed complete LAA sealing in 23 patients (53.5%) and negligible residual leaks in 15 (34.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

RF applications targeting the atrial edge of a significant peri-Watchman leak may promote LAA sealing via tissue remodeling, without increasing complications. (RF Applications for Residual LAA Leaks [REACT]; NCT04726943).

Design and Rationale of the Swiss-Apero Randomized Clinical Trial: Comparison of Amplatzer Amulet vs Watchman Device in Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Residual or newly acquired leaks are routinely appraised after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). The Watchman and the Amulet are the two most frequently used devices for LAAC but no randomized study has so far assessed their comparative leak rates after intervention. The "Comparison of Amplatzer Amulet vs Watchman devices in patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure" (Swiss-Apero, clinicaltrial.gov NCT03399851) is an academic-sponsored multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing Amulet versus Watchman/FLX devices among patients undergoing a clinically indicated LAAC. The study is designed to assess the superiority of Amulet vs. Watchman/FLX in terms of leaks detected by cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) at 45 days (primary endpoint) and 13 months (secondary endpoint) after intervention by an imaging Core Laboratory. The Swiss-Apero study is the first randomized clinical trial comparing Amulet and Watchman/FLX with respect to the prevalence of post-procedural leak as assessed with CCTA.

Leaks after Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Ignored or Neglected?

Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has recently been approved as an alternative management for stroke prevention in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation who have difficulties with long-term oral anticoagulation. The various shapes and sizes of LAA and orientation of the atrial ostium may contribute to the incomplete LAA closure from circular design devices and orientation of the non-steerable delivery catheter. Incomplete closure of LAA leads to a high-velocity blood flow through the peri-device gap, resulting in peri-device leak (PDL). Residual leaks are frequently diagnosed after LAA closure procedures, regardless of closure methods. There is a controversy in the clinical significance of the leaks, particularly about its association with thromboembolic events. PDL <5 mm was not associated with any increase of risk for thromboembolism. Current literatures with small study population have not been sufficient to clarify the role of the leaks after LAA closure. Nevertheless, management of severe leaks has been a challenging concern for cardiologists. Leaks after epicardial LAA closures are at the neck of the incompletely closed LAA and have shown to increase the risk of thromboembolism. Percutaneous closure of the leaks after LAA closure has been attempted with good safety and success, but long-term safety and efficacy remains unclear. Further large long-term studies which aim to assess the role of leaks or PDLs in predicting thromboembolic events and management strategies are warranted.

Combination of ablation and left atrial appendage closure as "One-stop" procedure in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: Current status and future perspective

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common arrhythmia, is a major cause of stroke and systemic embolism. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has been proved to be noninferior to traditional Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) as well as novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which is becoming an important alternative to prevent stroke in non‐valvular AF. Catheter‐based AF ablation (CA) is recommended to be a standard of care in patients with AF refractory to drug therapy due to a better rhythm control and improvement of life quality than antiarrhythmic drugs. Theoretically, the one‐stop combination with LAAC and CA tends to bring more benefits in patients with AF, as it not only relieves symptoms, but also reduces the risk of stroke significantly. However, several important questions still need to be considered in the combination procedure although quite a few attempts have already been made in clinical practice. This review provides a comprehensive update on the concept, technique, perioperative management, benefits and other critical issues of the “one‐stop” procedure.

Transcatheter embolic coils to treat peridevice leaks after left atrial appendage closure

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has proven to be an effective alternative to long-term oral anticoagulation in the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. In a minority of patients, inadequate seal may result in persistent peridevice flow and inability of the appendage to fully thrombose, thereby representing a potential source for thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to study the use of endovascular coiling of the appendage to address persistent peridevice leak in patients undergoing LAAC with the Watchman device.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-center analysis involving patients who underwent placement of a LAAC device and returned for endovascular coiling to address persistent device leak between 2018 and 2020. Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes, and follow-up echocardiograms were analyzed to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of this technique.

RESULTS

Patients (N = 20) were identified with a mean leak size of 3.8 ± 1.3 mm (range 2.5-7 mm), all of whom had a non-thrombosed appendage. Acute procedural success was achieved in 95% of patients. Complete or significant reduction in flow beyond the LAAC device was achieved in 61% and 33% of patients, respectively. The 1 procedure-related adverse event was a pericardial effusion before coil deployment, requiring percutaneous drainage.

CONCLUSION

The clinical impact of residual peridevice leak post-Watchman implantation is a matter of continuing investigation. However, appendage coiling represents a new therapeutic tool to address this potential source for thromboembolism. Further studies should address the clinical impact of this technique, including the safety of discontinuing anticoagulation after successful coiling.

Modification of the left atrial appendage and its role in stroke risk reduction with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common cardiovascular disorders encountered by clinicians in clinical practice. Patients with atrial fibrillation are at risk of cerebrovascular and systemic embolic events, which may be attenuated by commencement of anticoagulation therapy. Even so, due to extremely high bleeding risk certain patients may not be suitable for long-term anticoagulation therapy. The left atrial appendage is a common site for thrombus formation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Left atrial appendage exclusion, either surgical or percutaneous, has been performed to ostensibly reduce the risk of cerebrovascular events and potentially minimise or omit anticoagulation therapy in select patients. This review summarises the role of the left atrial appendage in cerebrovascular events, current evidence with modification of the left atrial appendage and future trials that may change practice with these procedures.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Incomplete Surgical Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage on Follow-up Transesophageal Echocardiogram

Objectives

In patients with atrial fibrillation, incomplete left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is associated with an increased risk for cardio-embolic events compared to complete closure. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors for incomplete surgical closure of the LAA in the modern surgical era.

Methods

Records of 74 patients with surgical LAA closure who underwent follow-up transesophageal echocardiogram for any reason between 2010 and 2016, were assessed for incomplete closure. Complete closure was defined by absence of Doppler or color flow between the left atrial appendage and the left atrial body in more than 2 orthogonal views.

Results

Surgical LAA closure was incomplete in 21 patients (28%) and complete in 53 patients (72%). All included cases were completed via oversewing method with a double layer of running suture with or without excision of the LAA. While no individual demographic, echocardiographic, or surgical feature was significantly different between groups, incomplete closure of the LAA was more prevalent in patients with two or more of the risk factors; female sex, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia (OR 5.1, 95%Cl 1.5-17).

Conclusions

A significant rate of incomplete surgical LAA closure still exists in the modern surgical era, and the presence of multiple risk factors associate an increased risk of incomplete closure.

Use of a Novel Septal Occluder Device for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Postsurgical and Postlariat Leaks or Anatomies Unsuitable for Conventional Percutaneous Occlusion

Background:

Interventional therapies aiming at excluding the left atrial appendage (LAA) from systemic circulation have been established as a valid alternative to oral anticoagulation in patients at high thromboembolic risk. However, their efficacy on stroke prophylaxis may be compromised owing to incomplete LAA closure. Additionally, the need for an alternative thromboembolic prevention may remain unmet in patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation whose appendage anatomy is unsuitable for some conventional devices commercially available. We aimed at evaluating the feasibility of LAA closure with the novel Gore Cardioform Septal Occluder in patients with incomplete appendage ligation or anatomic features which do not meet the manufacturer’s requirements for Watchman deployment.

Methods:

Twenty-one consecutive patients (mean age: 72±6 years; 85.7% males; CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc: 4.5±1.4; HAS-BLED: 3.6±1.0) were included. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed within 2 months to assess for residual LAA patency.

Results:

Fourteen patients had incomplete LAA closure following surgical (n=6) or Lariat ligation (n=8). In 7 patients with an appendage anatomy unsuitable for Watchman deployment, the mean maximal landing zone size and LAA depth were 14.4±1.3 and 18.6±2.8 mm. Successful Cardioform Septal Occluder deployment was achieved in all patients. No peri-procedural complications were documented. Procedure and fluoroscopy times were 46±13 and 14±5 minutes. Follow-up transesophageal echocardiography after 58±9 days revealed complete LAA closure in all patients.

Conclusions:

Transcatheter LAA closure via a Cardioform Septal Occluder device might be a valid alternative in patients with residual leaks following failed appendage ligation or whose LAA anatomy does not meet the minimal anatomic criteria to accommodate a Watchman device.

Graphic Abstract:

A graphic abstract is available for this article.

The relationship between incomplete surgical obliteration of the left atrial appendage and thromboembolic events after mitral valve surgery (from the ISOLATE Registry)

Left atrial appendage (LAA) is a common site of thrombus formation especially in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Complete surgical LAA closure (cSLC) is the surgical aim, however incomplete surgical LAA closure (iSLC) is not rare. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the risk of thromboembolic complications (TEC) in AF patients with iSLC after mitral valve surgery. A total of 101 AF patients (mean age: 61.8 ± 11.8 years; male:32), who underwent surgical suture ligation during mitral valve surgery were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients underwent transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) at least 3 months after surgery. The primary outcome was the occurrence of TEC including any ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, coronary or peripheral embolism. TEE examination revealed cSLC in 66 (65.3%) and iSLC in 35 patients (34.6%). A total of 12 TECs (11.9%) occurred during a mean follow-up time of 41.1 ± 15.6 months. TECs were found to be significantly higher in the iSLC group (25.7% vs 4.5%, p = 0.002). The prevalence of iSLC was significantly higher in patients with TEC (75 vs. 29.2%, p = 0.002). High CHA₂DS₂-VASc Score and iSLC were found to be independent predictors of TEC. Long term TEC free survival was found to be significantly decreased in patients with iSLC. The presence of iSLC was associated with a significantly increased risk of TEC in AF patients after mitral valve surgery. Routine intraoperative and postoperative screening for iSLC by TEE and long-term strict anticoagulation therapy are recommended in these patients.

Surgical left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing mechanical heart valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Surgical left atrial appendage occlusion (SLAAO) may be associated with a lower risk of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery. However, evidence regarding the effectiveness of SLAAO in patients undergoing mechanical heart valve replacement (MHVR) is lacking. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association between SLAAO and the cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing MHVR.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data for 497 patients with atrial fibrillation; 27.6% of the patients underwent SLAAO, and the remainder of the patients did not (No-SLAAO group). The primary outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality. Cumulative event-free survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and we performed multivariate Cox analyses to evaluate the association between SLAAO and outcomes. We used one-to-one propensity score matching to balance patients' baseline characteristics, and analyzed 120 matching pairs.

RESULTS

Five patients died within 30 days postoperatively, and there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding in-hospital complications (all P > 0.05). After a median follow-up of 14 months, 14 primary events occurred. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no difference in the cumulative incidence of freedom from the primary outcome (log-rank P = 0.830), hemorrhagic events (log-rank P = 0.870), and the secondary outcome (log-rank P = 0.730), between the two groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed no association between SLAAO and any outcome (all P > 0.05). After propensity score matching, cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time, and the postoperative length of stay were significantly longer in the SLAAO group (all P < 0.05); results were similar to the unadjusted analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant SLAAO and MHVR was associated with longer length of stay, and cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time, but was not associated with additional protective effects against thromboembolic events and mortality during the 14-month follow-up.