A novel flow assay for the detection of cytokine secreting alloreactive T cells: application to immune monitoring

Polyfunctional donor-reactive T cells are associated with acute T-cell-mediated rejection of the kidney transplant

Acute T-cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR) still remains a clinical problem after kidney transplantation despite significant improvements in immunosuppressive regimens. Polyfunctional T cells, i.e. T cells producing multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines, are believed to be the most relevant T cells in an immune response. The aim of this study was to determine whether polyfunctional donor-reactive T cells are associated with aTCMR. In a case-control study, 49 kidney transplant recipients with a biopsy-proven aTCMR in the first year after transplantation were included, as well as 51 controls without aTCMR. Circulating donor-reactive T cells were identified by the expression of CD137 after short-term co-culture with donor antigen-presenting cells. Polyfunctional donor-reactive T cells were further characterized by dissection into different T-cell subsets encompassing the spectrum of naïve to terminally differentiated effector T cells. Prior to kidney transplantation, proportions of donor-reactive CD4+ (0.03% versus 0.02%; P < 0.01) and CD8+ (0.18% versus 0.10%; P < 0.01) CD137++ T cells were significantly higher in recipients with a biopsy-proven aTCMR versus non-rejectors. Polyfunctionality was higher (P = 0.03) in this subset of CD137-expressing T cells. These cells were predominantly of the EM/EMRA-phenotype, with polyfunctional donor-reactive CD137++CD4+ T cells predominantly co-expressing CD28 whereas approximately half of the polyfunctional CD137++CD8+ T cells co-expressed CD28. In addition, at the time of aTCMR, polyfunctional donor-reactive CD137++ CD4+, but not CD8+, T cells, were specifically decreased by 75% compared to before transplantation in recipients with as well as those without an aTCMR. Prior to transplantation, the proportion of polyfunctional donor-reactive CD137++ T cells is associated with the occurrence of a biopsy-proven aTCMR within the first year after transplantation.

Preservation of Antiviral Immunologic Efficacy Without Alloimmunity After Switch to Belatacept in Calcineurin Inhibitor-Intolerant Patients

Introduction

Belatacept has shown potential for prevention of rejection after kidney transplantation, given its demonstration of reduced nephrotoxicity in combination with absence of significant incidence of rejection. However, concerns have been raised regarding increased risk of viral infection.

Methods

We set out to explore the impact of the switch to belatacept on alloimmune and antiviral immunity through the study of patients switched from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to belatacept within 3 months of kidney transplantation compared with a matched cohort of control patients on a CNI-based regimen.

Results

After the switch to belatacept, immune phenotyping demonstrated a decrease in naive and an increase in terminally differentiated effector memory (TMRA) T cells, with no significant difference compared with control patients. Donor-specific immune response, measured by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS), did not change significantly either by single or double cytokine secretion, but it was associated with the appearance of donor-specific antibody (DSA) in the control but not the belatacept cohort (P = 0.039 for naive and P = 0.002 for TMRA subtypes). Increased incidence of de novo DSA development was observed in the control group (P = 0.035). Virus-specific immune response, as measured by ICS in response to cytomegalovirus (CMV) or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), was similar in both groups and stable over time.

Conclusion

We found that belatacept use was associated with an absence of alloreactivity without impact on immune phenotype, while preserving the antiviral immune response, for patients switched from a CNI-based regimen. In parallel, the antiviral immune response against CMV and EBV was preserved after the belatacept switch (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01953120).

Adaptive immune cell responses as therapeutic targets in antibody-mediated organ rejection

Humoral alloimmunity of organ transplant recipient to donor can lead to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), causing thousands of organ transplants to fail each year worldwide. However, the mechanisms of adaptive immune cell responses at the basis of humoral alloimmunity have not been entirely understood. In this review, we discuss how recent investigations have uncovered the key contributions of T follicular helper (TFH) and B cells and their coordinated actions in driving donor-specific antibody generation and immune progression towards ABMR. We show how recognition of the role of TFH-B cell interactions may allow the elaboration of improved clinical strategies for immune monitoring and the identification of novel therapeutic targets to tackle ABMR that will ultimately improve organ transplant survival.

Coordinated Circulating T Follicular Helper and Activated B Cell Responses Underlie the Onset of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) has been long recognized as a leading cause of allograft failure after kidney transplantation, the cellular and molecular processes underlying the induction of deleterious donor-specific antibody (DSA) responses remain poorly understood.

METHODS

Using high-dimensional flow cytometry, in vitro assays, and RNA sequencing, we concomitantly investigated the role of T follicular helper (T_FH) cells and B cells during ABMR in 105 kidney transplant recipients.

RESULTS

There were 54 patients without DSAs; of those with DSAs, ABMR emerged in 20 patients, but not in 31 patients. We identified proliferating populations of circulating T_FH cells and activated B cells emerging in blood of patients undergoing ABMR. Although these circulating T_FH cells comprised heterogeneous phenotypes, they were dominated by activated (ICOS⁺PD-1⁺) and early memory precursor (CCR7⁺CD127⁺) subsets, and were enriched for the transcription factors IRF4 and c-Maf. These circulating T_FH cells produced large amounts of IL-21 upon stimulation with donor antigen and induced B cells to differentiate into antibody-secreting cells that produced DSAs. Combined analysis of the matched circulating T_FH cell and activated B cell RNA-sequencing profiles identified highly coordinated transcriptional programs in circulating T_FH cells and B cells among patients with ABMR, which markedly differed from those of patients who did not develop DSAs or ABMR. The timing of expansion of the distinctive circulating T_FH cells and activated B cells paralleled emergence of DSAs in blood, and their magnitude was predictive of IgG3 DSA generation, more severe allograft injury, and higher rate of allograft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing ABMR may benefit from monitoring and therapeutic targeting of T_FH cell-B cell interactions.

CCR4 expression on host T cells is a driver for alloreactive responses and lung rejection

Despite current immunosuppressive strategies, long-term lung transplant outcomes remain poor due to rapid allogenic responses. Using a stringent mouse model of allo-airway transplantation, we identify the CCR4-ligand axis as a central node driving secondary lymphoid tissue homing and activation of the allogeneic T cells that prevent long-term allograft survival. CCR4 deficiency on transplant recipient T cells diminishes allograft injury and when combined with CTLA4-Ig leads to an unprecedented long-term lung allograft accommodation. Thus, we identify CCR4-ligand interactions as a central mechanism driving allogeneic transplant rejection and suggest it as a potential target to enhance long-term lung transplant survival.

Impact of Induction Therapy on Circulating T Follicular Helper Cells and Subsequent Donor-Specific Antibody Formation After Kidney Transplant

Introduction

The cellular events that contribute to generation of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) post-kidney transplantation (KTx) are not well understood. Characterization of such mechanisms could allow tailoring of immunosuppression to benefit sensitized patients.

Methods

We prospectively monitored circulating T follicular helper (cT_FH) cells in KTx recipients who received T-cell depleting (thymoglobulin, n = 54) or T-cell nondepleting (basiliximab, n = 20) induction therapy from pre-KTx to 1 year post-KTx and assessed their phenotypic changes due to induction and DSA occurrence, in addition to healthy controls (n = 13), for a total of 307 blood samples.

Results

Before KTx, patients displayed comparable levels of resting, central memory cT_FH cells with similar polarization to those of healthy controls. Unlike basiliximab induction, thymoglobulin induction significantly depleted cT_FH cells, triggered lymphopenia-induced proliferation that skewed cT_FH cells toward increased Th1 polarization, effector memory, and elevated programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)^int/hi expression, resembling activated phenotypes. Regardless of induction, patients who developed DSA post-KTx, harbored pre-KTx donor-reactive memory interleukin (IL)-21⁺ cT_FH cells and showed higher % cT_FH and lower % of T regulatory (T_REG) cells post-KTx resulting in elevated cT_FH:T_REG ratio at DSA occurrence.

Conclusion

Induction therapy distinctly shapes cT_FH cell phenotype post-KTx. Monitoring cT_FH cells before and after KTx may help detect those patients prone to DSA generation post-KTx.

Donor-specific alloreactive T cells can be quantified from whole blood, and may predict cellular rejection after renal transplantation

Preformed cellular alloreactivity can exist prior to transplantation and may contribute to rejection. Here, we used a rapid flow-cytometric whole-blood assay to characterize the extent of alloreactive T cells among 1491 stimulatory reactions from 61 renal transplant candidates and 75 controls. The role of preformed donor-specific alloreactive T cells in cellular rejection was prospectively analyzed in 21 renal transplant recipients. Alloreactive CD8⁺ T cells were more frequent than respective CD4⁺ T cells, and these levels were stable over time. CD8⁺ T cells were effector-memory T cells largely negative for expression of CD27, CD62L, and CCR7, and were susceptible to steroid and calcineurin inhibitor inhibition. Alloreactivity was more frequent in samples with higher number of HLA mismatches. Moreover, the percentage of individuals with alloreactive T cells was higher in transplant candidates than in controls. Among transplant candidates, 5/61 exhibited alloreactive CD8⁺ T cells against most stimulators, 23/61 toward a limited number of stimulators, and 33/61 did not show any alloreactivity. Among 21 renal transplant recipients followed prospectively, one had donor-specific preformed T-cell alloreactivity. She was the only patient who developed cellular rejection posttransplantation. In conclusion, donor-specific alloreactive T cells may be rapidly quantified from whole blood, and may predict cellular rejection after transplantation.

Alloreactive T Cells to Identify Risk HLA Alleles for Retransplantation After Acute Accelerated Steroid-Resistant Rejection

The risk of rejection by cellular alloreactivity to the transplant donor is not routinely assessed. Here we analyzed alloreactive T cells in kidney transplant recipients and report how their detection may have helped to prevent rejection of a second kidney graft in a patient with a history of acute accelerated steroid-resistant nonhumoral rejection. Alloreactive CD4 and CD8 T cells were quantified using a flow-cytometric mixed lymphocyte reaction assay based on interferon-γ induction. A group of 16 nonrejecting transplant recipients did not show any alloreactive T-cell immunity to their respective donors, whereas alloreactivity to third-party controls was detectable. In the patient with rejection, HLA-specific antibodies were not detectable before and shortly after rejection, but after transplantation the patient showed exceptionally high frequencies of alloreactive T cells against 2 of 11 HLA-typed controls (0.604% and 0.791% alloreactive CD4 T cells and 0.792% and 0.978% alloreactive CD8 T cells) who shared HLA alleles (HLA-A*24, -B*44, -C*02, -DQB1*5) with the kidney donor. These HLA alleles were subsequently excluded for allocation of a second graft. No alloreactive T cells were observed toward the second kidney donor, and this transplantation was performed successfully. Thus, shared HLA alleles between the donor and third-party controls may suggest that alloreactive T cells had contributed to rejection of the first graft. The rejecting patient highlights that determination of cellular alloreactivity before transplantation may be applied to identify unacceptable mismatches and to reduce the risk for acute cellular rejection episodes.

The Potential Use of Allogeneic Platelet-Rich Plasma for Large Bone Defect Treatment: Immunogenicity and Defect Healing Efficacy

Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been extensively investigated for large bone defect treatment, but its clinical application is harassed by controversial outcome, due to highly variable PRP quality among patients. Alternatively, allogeneic PRP from well-characterized donors cannot only generate more consistent and reliable therapeutic effect but also avoid harvesting large quantities of blood, an additional health burdens to patients. However, the use of allogeneic PRP for bone defect treatment is generally less investigated, especially for its immunogenicity in such application. Here, we meticulously investigated the immunogenicity of allogeneic PRP and evaluated its healing efficacy for critical-sized defect treatment. Allogeneic PRP contained 4.1-fold and 2.7- to 4.9-fold higher amount of platelets and growth factors than whole blood, respectively. The intramuscular injection of allogeneic PRP to rabbits did not trigger severe and chronic immunoresponse, evidenced by little change in muscular tissue microstructure and CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocyte subpopulation in peripheral blood. The implantation of allogeneic PRP/deproteinized bone matrix (DPB) constructs (PRP + DPB) successfully bridged 1.5-cm segmental radial defects in rabbits, achieving similar healing capacity as autologous MSC/DPB constructs (MSC + DPB), with greater bone formation (1.1–1.5x, p < 0.05) and vascularization (1.3–1.6x, p < 0.05) than DPB alone, shown by histomorphometric analysis, bone mineral density measurement, and radionuclide bone imaging. Furthermore, the implantation of both allogeneic PRP- and autologous MSC-mediated DPB constructs (PRP + MSC + DPB) resulted in the most robust bone regeneration (1.2–2.1x, p < 0.05) and vascularization (1.3–2.0x, p < 0.05) than others (PRP + DPB, MSC + DPB, or DPB alone). This study has demonstrated the promising use of allogeneic PRP for bone defect treatment with negligible immunogenicity, great healing efficacy, potentially more consistent quality, and no additional health burden to patients; additionally, the synergetic enhancing effect found between allogeneic PRP and autologous MSCs may shed a light on developing new therapeutic strategies for large bone defect treatment.

T-cell immune monitoring in organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic injury and late allograft loss remain major causes of morbidity in clinical transplantation. Biomarkers that can reliably assess the risk of posttransplant complications are required to direct and individualize therapy aimed at prolonging graft survival and improving patient health. The purpose of this review is to provide a framework for understanding how to use biomarkers in the context of clinical transplantation and to summarize current data on available noninvasive cellular-based immune monitoring methods to predict transplant outcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

New microarray and gene profiling data reveal peripheral blood cell gene expression patterns that identify operational tolerance, raising the possibility that the measurements can be used to direct immunosuppression withdrawal. Additional data support the use of selective urine gene products and soluble CD30 measurements in serum as reliable biomarkers of acute graft injury. Finally, recent studies demonstrate that measurement of T-cell alloimmunity by cytokine enzyme-linked immunospot is a promising, supplementary pretransplant risk assessment tool.

SUMMARY

Recently published studies in organ transplantation suggest that results derived from assays focused on markers of T-cell immunity can segregate transplant candidates or recipients into high and low-risk subgroups for posttransplant graft injury. Larger prospective studies are needed, however, before any proposed biomarker can be incorporated into the transplant physicians' armamentarium to guide individualized therapeutic decision-making.

Stimulation index for PCNA mRNA in peripheral blood as immune function monitoring after renal transplantation

Although more effective and potent immunosuppressive agents have recently reduced the incidence of acute rejection, drug-induced toxicity and infection caused by over-immunosuppression occasionally elicit a serious problem. However, no effective assay for evaluating overall patient's immune condition is in widespread use at present. We attempted to measure the stimulation index for mRNA of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), which is synthesized in early G1 and S phases of the cell cycle and would be expected to reflect the proliferation capacity of T lymphocytes under the immunosuppressive condition. The stimulation index for PCNA mRNA seemed to be closely related to the immunosuppressive state of renal transplant recipients. Patients with stimulation index less than 2.0 tended to have viral reactivation after transplantation. It was suggested that PCNA mRNA monitoring in peripheral blood could provide a warning of possible over-immunosuppression as one simple assay for immune function monitoring.

Monitoring of indirect allorecognition: wishful thinking or solid data?

Monitoring of T cells involved in the alloimmune response after transplantation requires the availability of reliable in vitro assays for the detection of T cells with both direct and indirect allospecificity. While generally accepted assays exist to measure helper and cytotoxic T cells involved in direct allorecognition, consensus about an assay for monitoring indirect T-cell allorecognition in clinical transplantation is lacking. Many studies claim a relationship between the reactivity of T cells with indirect allospecificity and graft rejection, but different protocols are used and essential controls are often lacking. In this review, the disadvantages and pitfalls of the current approaches are discussed, in some cases supported by the results of our own in vitro experiments. We conclude that an international workshop is necessary to establish and validate a uniform, robust and reliable assay for the monitoring of transplant recipients and to study the actual role of indirect allorecognition in acute and chronic rejection.