Histologic characterization and improved prognostic evaluation of 209 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms. Hum Pathol. 2011;42:1373-1384. [PMID: 21531442 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.01.018]

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: current development, challenges, and clinical perspectives

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are highly heterogeneous and potentially malignant tumors arising from secretory cells of the neuroendocrine system. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are the most common subtype of NENs. Historically, GEP-NENs have been regarded as infrequent and slow-growing malignancies; however, recent data have demonstrated that the worldwide prevalence and incidence of GEP-NENs have increased exponentially over the last three decades. In addition, an increasing number of studies have proven that GEP-NENs result in a limited life expectancy. These findings suggested that the natural biology of GEP-NENs is more aggressive than commonly assumed. Therefore, there is an urgent need for advanced researches focusing on the diagnosis and management of patients with GEP-NENs. In this review, we have summarized the limitations and recent advancements in our comprehension of the epidemiology, clinical presentations, pathology, molecular biology, diagnosis, and treatment of GEP-NETs to identify factors contributing to delays in diagnosis and timely treatment of these patients.

Heterogeneous Uptake of 68 Ga-DOTATATE and 18 F-FDG in Initial Diagnosed Neuroendocrine Tumors Patients : Which Patients Are Suitable for Dual-Tracer PET Imaging?

PURPOSE

This study was designed to assess the uptake heterogeneity in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients at initial diagnosis with dual-tracer PET imaging and the staging changes and prognostic value it brings to explore the indication of the use of dual-tracer PET.

METHODS

Fifty-one newly diagnosed patients with pathologically confirmed NET who underwent 18 F-FDG and 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET imaging between January 2020 and September 2022 were enrolled. Dual-tracer uptake patterns were classified into 3 groups: A. 68 Ga-DOTATATE positive and 18 F-FDG negative, B. 68 Ga-DOTATATE positive and 18 F-FDG positive, and C. 68 Ga-DOTATATE negative and 18 F-FDG positive. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the heterogeneity of dual-tracer uptake patterns among different grading (G) groups, between primary and metastatic lesions, and staging changes. Moreover, dual-tracer uptake patterns, grade, age, sex, and stage were compared with progression-free survival (PFS) by Cox regression.

RESULTS

In the different G groups, none of the patients with dual-tracer uptake pattern A had grade 3 histology, but 57% of patients with grade 1 disease had FDG avidity (25% of them resulting in dual-tracer uptake pattern C). Patients with no metastasis were well differentiated, but one of them presented with dual-tracer uptake pattern C. Different uptake patterns were also observed between primary and metastatic lesions, particularly 44% of patients with dual-tracer uptake pattern A of primary with FDG avidity of metastases. Moreover, 9 (17.6%) had new lesions detected by additional 18 F-FDG PET imaging, and 3 of them (5.9%) had clinical stage changed accordingly. The Cox regression test showed that the dual-tracer uptake patterns were significantly correlated with PFS by univariate and multivariate analyses ( P = 0.026 and 0.039, respectively), whereas the grade and stage did not correlate with survival (all P >0.05).

CONCLUSION

The current study has proven the uptake heterogeneity of the NET at initial diagnosis and demonstrated the staging and prognostic value of dual-tracer PET imaging. Our preliminary results have confirmed the importance of dual-tracer imaging modalities and concluded that dual-tracer PET imaging could be considered as prognostic tool for all patients with an initial diagnosis of NET.

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms in gastroenteropancreatic tract

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are a heterogeneous group of malignant neoplasms that can settle in the gastroenteropancreatic tract. They are composed of a neuroendocrine (NE) and a non-NE component in at least 30% of each tumour. The non-NE component can include different histological combinations of glandular, squamous, mucinous and sarcomatoid phenotypes, and one or both of the components can be low-or high grade malignant. Recent changes in the nomenclature of these neoplasms might lead to great deal of confusion, and the lack of specific clinical trials is the main reason why their management is difficult. The review aims to clarify the definition of MiNEN and analyze available evidence about their diagnosis and treatment options according to their location and extension through careful analysis of the available data. It would be important to reach a general consensus on their diagnosis in order to construct a classification that remains stable over time and facilitates the design of clinical trials that, due to their low incidence, will require long recruitment periods.

Gastric mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms

The uncommon tumour known as gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (G-MiNENs) is made up of parts of neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. The biological and clinical features are different from those of gastric adenocarcinoma. Their pathophysiology, diagnostic standards, and clinical behaviour have all been the subject of lengthy debates, and their nomenclature has undergone multiple changes. Its emergence has created new challenges in the classification and diagnosis of gastric tumours. This review will update information on the topic, covering molecular aspects, diagnostic criteria, treatment, and prognostic factor discovery. It will also provide a historical context that will aid in understanding the evolution of the idea and nomenclature of mixed gastric tumours. Additionally, it will provide the reader a thorough understanding of this difficult topic of cancer that is applicable to real-world situations.

Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: A comprehensive analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic implications of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs).

METHODS

A retrospective enrollment of 142 patients diagnosed with g-NENs was conducted at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2021. The study compared essential clinicopathological features and survival rates. Additionally, the prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas/mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NEC/MiNEN) were contrasted with those of gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC).

RESULTS

The study comprised a total of 142 g-NENs cases, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 2:1. The 5-year survival rates for g-NEC and g-MiNEN were 26.7% and 35.2%, respectively. Corresponding 5-year survival rates for G1 and G2 were observed at 100% and 80.0%, respectively. g-NEC/MiNEN showed a significantly worse prognosis compared to g-NET (p < 0.001). g-NEC/MiNEN exhibited a poor prognosis compared to GAC (p < 0.001), and within poorly differentiated GAC, g-NEC/MiNEN demonstrated a worse prognosis (p = 0.007). Additionally, patients receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy exhibited notably prolonged overall survival (OS) in the case of g-NEC/MiNEN (p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

In short, the prognosis of g-NEC/MiNEN was worse than that of g-NET, GAC and poorly differentiated GAC, but this group benefit from postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Current understanding of pathogenetic mechanisms in neuroendocrine neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Despite the fact that important advances in research on neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have been made, consistent data about their pathogenetic mechanism are still lacking. Furthermore, different primary sites may recognize different pathogenetic mechanisms.

AREAS COVERED

This review analyzes the possible biological and molecular mechanisms that may lead to NEN onset and progression in different organs. Through extensive research of the literature, risk factors including hypercholesterolemia, inflammatory bowel disease, chronic atrophic gastritis are evaluated as potential pathogenetic mechanisms. Consistent evidence is available regarding sporadic gastric NENs and MEN1 related duodenopancreatic NENs precursor lesions, and genetic-epigenetic mutations may play a pivotal role in tumor development and bone metastases onset. In lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), diffuse proliferation of neuroendocrine cells on the bronchial wall (DIPNECH) has been proposed as a premalignant lesion, while in lung neuroendocrine carcinoma nicotine and smoke could be responsible for carcinogenic processes. Also, rare primary NENs such as thymic (T-NENs) and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) have been analyzed, finding different possible pathogenetic mechanisms.

EXPERT OPINION

New technologies in genomics and epigenomics are bringing new light to the pathogenetic landscape of NENs, but further studies are needed to improve both prevention and treatment in these heterogeneous neoplasms.

[Characteristics of gastric neuroendocrine tumors and the PDX-1 transcription factor expression]

OBJECTIVE

To study the features of gastric neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and the diagnostic and prognostic significance of PDX-1 expression in them.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

207 NETs identified in 56 men and 115 women (59 had multiple NETs), and 94 cases of gastric cancer (comparison group) were studied morphologically and immunohistochemically.

RESULTS

In more than half of the cases (54.93%), NETs were localized in the body of the stomach; the cardiac and antral parts of the stomach accounted for 8.64% and 11.73%, respectively. NETs of the cardiac region predominated in men, and of the body and antrum - in women. NETs of the cardiac region predominated in men, and of the body and antrum - in women. The vast majority of NETs were highly differentiated (89.20%), of which Grade 1, 2 and 3 were 55.41%, 40.76% and 3.82%, respectively. Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) accounted for 10.80% of all NET cases. NECs were more often localized in the cardiac part of the stomach and accounted for 35.71% of all NETs in the cardiac part. The share of NEC among all NETs of the antrum was 15.79%, of the body of the stomach - only 3.37%. Metastases were found in 17.90% of NETs. Expression of PDX-1 was detected in 44.73% of NETs, 70% of NECs and 74.50% of gastric cancers.

CONCLUSION

PDX-1 is involved in the mechanisms of precancerous and cancerous lesions of the stomach and its overexpression is detected in the majority of the most malignant NETs and gastric cancers.

Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors According to the 2019 World Health Organization Grading System: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study

Background/Aims

Although gastric neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are uncommon neoplasms, their prevalence is increasing. The clinical importance of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of gastric NETs, compared with NETs in other organs, has been underestimated. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical and pathologic characteristics of gastric NETs based on the 2019 WHO classification and to assess the survival outcomes of patients from a single-center with a long-term follow-up.

Methods

The medical records of 427 patients with gastric NETs who underwent endoscopic or surgical resection between January 2000 and March 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. All specimens were reclassified according to the 2019 WHO classification. The clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment, and oncologic outcomes of 139 gastric NETs were analyzed.

Results

The patients' median age was 53.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 46.0 to 63.0 years). The median follow-up period was 36.0 months (IQR, 15.0 to 63.0 months). Of the patients, 92, 44, and 3 had grades 1, 2, and 3 NETs, respectively. The mean tumor size significantly increased as the tumor grade increased (p=0.025). Patients with grades 2 and 3 gastric NETs more frequently had lymphovascular invasion (29.8% vs 10.9%, p=0.005) and deeper tissue invasion (8.5% vs 0%, p=0.012) than those with grade 1 tumors. The overall disease-specific survival rate was 100%. Two patients with grades 2-3 gastric NETs experienced extragastric recurrence.

Conclusions

Although gastric NETs have an excellent prognosis, grade 2 or grade 3 gastric NETs are associated with a larger size, deeper invasion, and extragastric recurrence, which require active treatment.

Clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis of type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors in a large Japanese national cohort

OBJECTIVES

Optimal management of type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors (T1-GNETs) remains unknown, with few reports on their long-term prognosis. This study investigated the clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis of T1-GNETs.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with T1-GNET during 1991-2019 at 40 institutions in Japan.

RESULTS

Among 172 patients, endoscopic resection (ER), endoscopic surveillance, and surgery were performed in 84, 61, and 27, respectively, including 27, 77, and 2 patients with pT1a-M, pT1b-SM, and pT2 tumors, respectively. The median tumor diameter was 5 (range 0.8-55) mm. Four (2.9%) patients had lymph node metastasis (LNM); none had liver metastasis. LNM rates were significantly higher in tumors with lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (15.8%; 3/19) than in those without (1.1%; 1/92) (P = 0.016). For tumors <10 mm, LVI and LNM rates were 18.4% (14/76) and 2.2% (2/90), respectively, which were not significantly different from those of tumors 10-20 mm (LVI 13.3%; 2/15, P = 0.211; and LNM 0%; 0/17, P = 1.0). However, these rates were significantly lower than those of tumors >20 mm (LVI 60%; 3/5, P = 0.021; and LNM 40%; 2/5, P = 0.039). No tumor recurrence or cause-specific death occurred during the median follow-up of 10.1 (1-25) years. The 10-year overall survival rate was 97%.

CONCLUSIONS

Type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors showed indolent nature and favorable long-term prognoses. LVI could be useful in indicating the need for additional treatments. ER for risk prediction of LNM should be considered for tumors <10 mm and may be feasible for tumors 10-20 mm.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) under the identifier UMIN000029927.

Gastric neuroendocrine tumors in a BRCA2 germline mutation carrier: A case report

BACKGROUND

The molecular changes present in gastric neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) include a loss of heterozygosity or mutation of MEN1, CDKN1B gene mutation, P27 heterozygous mutation, and ATP4A gene missense mutation. We identified and are the first to report a case of type 1 histamine-producing enterochromaffin-like cell NETs (ECL-cell NETs) with a BRCA2 gene germline mutation.

CASE SUMMARY

The patient had a history of iron-deficient anemia for 5 years, and gastroscopic examination indicated multiple gastric tumors. Then, the patient underwent distal gastrectomy. Microscopically, multifocal tumor cells were found in the mucosa and submucosa; tumor cells were organoid and arranged in nests and cords, and the stroma was rich in sinusoids. The surrounding gastric mucosa showed atrophy with mild intestinal metaplasia or pseudopyloric gland metaplasia. Neuroendocrine cells could be seen with diffuse linear, nodular, and adenomatous hyperplasia. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells diffusely expressed cytokeratin, chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56. Whole-genome high-throughput molecular sequencing revealed a pathogenic germline mutation in the BRCA2 gene, a heterozygous germline frameshift mutation in exon 11, c.6443_6444del (p.S2148Yfs*2). The final diagnosis was gastric type 1 ECL-cell NETs with a BRCA2 gene germline mutation, accompanied by autoimmune gastritis.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of a case of type 1 gastric ECL-cell NETs with a pathogenic germline mutation of the BRCA2 gene. The findings of this report will expand the germline mutation spectrum of gastric NETs and increase the understanding of the molecular changes present in these tumors for their improved diagnosis in the future.

The Morphologic Spectrum of Gastric Type 1 Enterochromaffin-Like Cell Neuroendocrine Tumors

Although most well-differentiated gastric neuroendocrine tumors (gNETs) arise from enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells in patients with autoimmune metaplastic atrophic gastritis (AMAG), the morphologic spectrum of these type 1 ECL-cell gNETs is not well defined. The extent of metaplastic progression in the background mucosa of AMAG patients with gNETs is likewise unclear. Here we report the histomorphology of 226 gNETs, including 214 type 1 gNETs (78 cases from 50 AMAG patients) pooled from a population with high AMAG prevalence. Most type 1 gNETs were ≤1.0 cm, of low grade, and multifocal, consistent with the results of previous reports. However, a high proportion (70/214, 33%) displayed unusual gNET morphologies not previously appreciated in AMAG patients. Unlike other type 1 gNETs with conventional neuroendocrine tumor morphologies, unconventional type 1 gNETs displayed cribriform networks of atrophic cells embedded within myxoid matrix (secretory-cribriform variant, 59%), sheets of deceptively bland discohesive cells resembling inflammatory infiltrates (lymphoplasmacytoid variant, 31%), or wreath-like arrangements of columnar cells wrapped around collagenous cores (pseudopapillary variant, 14%). Another unusual feature was that unconventional gNETs grew laterally within the mucosa (50/70, 71%) and were only rarely sampled from the submucosa (3/70, 4%). These features also differed from the conspicuous radial nodules (99/135, 73%) and frequent submucosal involvement (57/135, 42%) observed for conventional gNETs (P < .0001). Irrespective of morphology, type 1 gNETs were nearly always detected at first AMAG diagnosis (45/50, 90%) and tended to persist thereafter (34/43, 79%), despite similar clinical symptoms and laboratory values between AMAG patients with gNETs and those without. However, unlike AMAG patients without gNETs (n = 50), the background mucosa in patients with gNETs (n = 50) had already progressed to the morphologic equivalent of end-stage metaplasia (P < .0001). This included diffuse loss of parietal cells (92% vs 52%), complete intestinal metaplasia (82% vs 40%), and pancreatic metaplasia (56% vs 6%). Thus, type 1 ECL-cell gNETs are morphologically heterogeneous with a high prevalence of unconventional gNET morphologies. They tend to present silently at first AMAG diagnosis as multifocal lesions that persist within fields of mature metaplasia.

Practice patterns for reporting digestive system neuroendocrine neoplasms: results from a large, comprehensive international survey

AIMS

Criteria for the interpretation of digestive system neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) continue to evolve. Although there are some literature recommendations regarding workup and diagnosis of these lesions, different practice patterns exist among pathologists when signing out these specimens. The aim of this study was to assess practice trends among pathologists worldwide when reporting these neoplasms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We created an online survey with multiple questions pertaining to digestive NENs. The results were analysed based on type of practice setting, years of sign-out experience, and practice location. Respondents included 384 practicing pathologists: 70% academic, 30% private practice; 63% gastrointestinal (GI) pathology-subspecialised, 37% not; 39% North American, 42% European, 19% others; 45% with ≤10 years in practice; 55% with >10 years. Some question responses were chosen by the majority (e.g. 85% use both mitotic count and Ki67 index for grading NENs, 82% complete a synoptic, and Ki67 stain even for small incidental appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours [NETs], and 96% utilize the diagnosis of grade 3 NET). However, some questions showed varying responses, including counting mitotic figures, Ki67 stain interpretation, and pancreatic grade 3 NEN workup. Pathologists also had some variability in interpreting regional metastatic foci of small bowel NETs and in choosing blocks for Ki67 staining in multifocal lesions.

CONCLUSION

There existed scenarios wherein practice patterns varied despite recommendations in the literature, and there were also scenarios lacking clear guidelines wherein pathologists used varying judgement. This survey highlights current key grey areas in digestive system NEN evaluation, leading to variation in practice patterns.

Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Survival in Patients With Functional Neuroendocrine Tumors of Gastrointestinal Origin

OBJECTIVES

Functional neuroendocrine tumors (FNETs) are characterized by excess secretion of disease-specific hormones. In this study, we attempted to define survival trends in patients with some of these uncommon tumors.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 529 patients with FNETs (gastrinoma, insulinoma, glucagonoma, VIPoma, and somatostatinoma) were identified. We analyzed patient and tumor characteristics, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

Functional neuroendocrine tumors were found to be more predominant in White patients older than 50 years. Most common FNETs were gastrinoma (56.3%) and insulinoma (23.8%). Most FNETs were found in the pancreas, with the second most common location being the small bowel. Surgery was the primary modality of treatment, used in 55.8% of the cases. Median overall survival was 9.8 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.9-11.8) with a median cancer-specific survival of 18.5 years (95% CI, 12.8-24.2). In multivariate analysis, age >50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; 95% CI, 2.02-3.64), no surgical resection (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.43-2.46), metastasis (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.0-4.5), and poor differentiation were associated with poor survival. Site and histology did not have a significant impact on survival (P = 0.82 and 0.57 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the most important prognostic factors for gastrointestinal FNETs.

Defining prognostic parameters of well-differentiated gastric neuroendocrine tumors based on metastatic potential: a two-center experience

Background: Gastric neuroendocrine tumors [gNETs] are heterogeneous tumors and we are still unable to predict the behavior of these tumors. We aim to define the prognostic parameters of well-differentiated gNETs based on metastatic potential and to evaluate the current classification systems. Patients and methods: We retrospectively retrieved 44 well differentiated gNET cases who underwent radical surgery between 2000-2015 at two tertiary-care centers. Results: Among the 44 well-differentiated gNET patients, 17 (38%) patients had metastatic disease to lymph nodes and/or distant sites, while 27 (62%) were confined to the stomach. Higher risk of metastasis was observed with increasing tumor size, grade, depth of invasion and with type-3 and solitary tumors. 30 (68%) patients had type-1 gNET and 14 (32%) had type-3 gNET. Majority of the type-1 cases (76,6%) were Grade 1 [G1] and type-3 cases (78,5%) were Grade 3 [G3]. Type-1 subgroup had no G3 tumor, and type-3 had no G1. Grade 2 [G2] tumors were more controversial, with metastatic and non-metastatic cases. G2 cases with a >10% Ki67 expression or type-3, had a worse prognosis. Although most of the type-1 gNETs had an indolent course, 6 of 30 (20%) patients had metastatic disease. Metastasizing type-1 gNETs were >10 mm in diameter or extended to/beyond the submucosa. Conclusion: Regarding our results, tumor type, grade, size, focality and depth of invasion are the prognostic parameters for gNETs, based on metastatic potential. Besides these parameters, a two-tiered grading system with a 10% Ki-67 proliferation index cut-off value could be considered for right treatment choice.

Spannungsfeld endoskopische Resektionsverfahren bei GEP-NET // Endoscopic resection for GEP-NET

Neuroendokrine Tumoren des Verdauungstraktes (GEP-NET) sind eine seltene Tumorentität, die häufig als Zufallsbefund diagnostiziert werden. Ein großer Teil dieser Zufallsdiagnosen wird im Rahmen einer endoskopischen Untersuchung gestellt. Während die vollständige Entfernung des Tumors im Sinne einer kurativen chirurgischen Resektion nach onkologischen Kriterien das Standardvorgehen für lokalisierte Tumorerkrankungen ist, kann bei kleinen Tumoren ohne Hinweis und Risiko für eine lymphogene Metastasierung eine endoskopische Abtragung in gleicher Intention erfolgen. Während dies für Magen-, Duodenum- und Rektum-NET der Standard ist, sollten NET des Jejunums und Ileums aufgrund der hohen Metastasierungsrate trotz geringer Tumorgröße regelhaft nicht endoskopisch angegangen werden. Die Grenze für eine endoskopische Resektion ergibt sich sowohl durch die technische Machbarkeit im Sinne des Erreichens einer R0-Resektion, der erwarteten Komplikationen im Sinne von Blutung und Perforationen als auch durch das vermutete Risiko für eine lymphogene Metastasierung. Generell wird eine endoskopische Resektion bei Befunden < 1 cm regelhaft empfohlen, da sowohl die gute technische Machbarkeit als auch das geringe Metastasierungsrisiko für eine endoskopische Resektion sprechen. Bei allen Befunden über 2 cm Größe sind sowohl die technischen Erfolgsaussichten so niedrig als auch das Metastasierungsrisiko so hoch, dass in dieser Situation regelhaft ein chirurgisches Vorgehen erfolgen sollte. Es bleibt somit ein Graubereich bei der Tumorgröße zwischen 1 und 2 cm, wo sowohl endoskopische, aber auch chirurgische Resektionsverfahren sinnvoll eingesetzt werden können. Zunehmend kommen auch gemeinsame Eingriffe im Sinne eines endoskopisch-laparoskopischen Rendezvous-Verfahrens zum Einsatz – insbesondere im Duodenum bieten sich diese Eingriffe an, um eine minimale Resektion mit größtmöglicher R0-Erfolgsrate und niedriger Perforationsrate zu erreichen.

The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on 18F-FDG and 18F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Background

To identify parameters based on dual-imaging ¹⁸F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide (¹⁸F-OC) and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for predicting the prognosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs).

Materials and Methods

Sixty-six patients (age: mean ± standard deviation (SD): 51.8 ± 11.8 years) who underwent both ¹⁸F-OC and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging were enrolled in our retrospective study. The following PET parameters were measured: the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) and the volumetric parameters—¹⁸F-OC SSR-derived tumor volume (TV) and somatostatin receptor expression (SRE, TV multiplied by the mean standardized uptake value (SUV_mean)) and the ¹⁸F-FDG-derived multiple tumor volume (MTV) and tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG). The NETPET grade based on dual-imaging PET images was assessed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was set as an endpoint. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed for PET parameters and clinical tumor data.

Results

In the univariate survival analyses of clinical information, PFS was significantly associated with age (>45.5 vs ≤45.5, years, P < 0.034) and the presence of bone metastases (P = 0.04). Higher values for the ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-OC volumetric parameters and the NETPET grade were adverse factors for PFS according to the dual-imaging PET parameters. In the multivariate survival analysis, the NETPET grade and SRE were predictors of PFS in NEN patients.

Conclusion

The NETPET grade is a potential noninvasive prognostic biomarker for NENs.

Usefulness of 68-Gallium PET in Type I Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: A Case Series

Background: Type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia (gNEN) is a rare and low-grade tumor in which the therapeutic strategy is almost always endoscopic. For this reason, the use of radiology or nuclear medicine imaging is not recommended by guidelines. Conversely, in a small number of cases, locoregional or distant metastases may develop, thus suggesting a role for imaging techniques. This retrospective study was performed to explore the usefulness of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT in the management of patients with T1gNENs. Patients and Method: Single-center retrospective analysis, in an ENETS Center of Excellence, of patients with type I gNEN who underwent [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT. The indication for performing [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT was generally based on the presence of at least one of the following criteria: (1) polyps > 10 mm; (2) endoscopic positive (R1) margin after previous endoscopic resection; and (3) Ki-67 > 3%. Results: A total of 120 patients with T1gNEN were evaluated. Overall, 15 out of 120 (13%) patients had performed [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT. The median Ki-67 value was 6% (IQR 1−9): 9 out of 15 (60%) were G1 tumors, and 6 out of 15 (40%) were G2 tumors. Ninety-three percent of patients were treated by tumor endoscopic resection, whereas surgery was performed in two patients (13%) after incomplete endoscopic resection; the remaining patients (6.6%) received somatostatin analogs due to the presence of multiple recurrent tumors. Overall, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT was positive in 8 out of 15 patients (53%). Following the [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT findings, the clinical management was modified in 6 out of 15 (40%) patients. Conclusion: [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT can be useful in a restricted and selected group of patients with gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia with relevant risk factors to establish the most appropriate therapeutic strategy.

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms and precursor lesions: Case reports and literature review

RATIONALE

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) represent a distinctive group of gastric tumors, stratified into different prognostic categories according to different histological characteristics, put forth in the 2018 World Health Organization classification system. The clinical presentations, as well as pathological features, represent important data in establishing the type of the tumor, in estimating the tumor behavior, and in selecting the best therapeutic strategy. In our case series we presented different clinical scenarios that may be encountered in practice regarding gastric NENs. We performed a literature review and discussed diagnostic strategy, current classification system, precursor lesions, and therapeutic options in g-NENs.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The first patient was a 41-year-old female with weight loss, persistent dyspeptic complaints and a history of pernicious anemia. In the second clinical case a 61-year-old man was admitted with heartburn, abdominal pain, diarrhea and mild iron deficiency anemia. The third patient was a 56-year-old male with a history of neoplasia, admitted for weight loss, dyspeptic complaints, and liver metastases.

DIAGNOSIS

All the 3 patients underwent upper endoscopy with targeted biopsies. Histopathological and laboratory evaluation, together with imagistic evaluation (abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging) allowed the distinction between 3 different types of gastric tumors: type 1 enterochromaffin-like-cell G1 NET, type 2 enterochromaffin-like-cell G2 NET, and type 3 G2 NET with liver metastases.

INTERVENTIONS

Endoscopic polypectomy of the largest lesion was performed in patient with type 1 g-NET and autoimmune chronic atrophic gastritis, followed by regular endoscopic surveillance with biopsies. In type 2 g-NET associated with pancreatic gastrinoma, pancreaticoduodenectomy with total gastrectomy were performed. In type 3 g-NET, detected in metastatic stage, oncologic therapy was performed.

OUTCOMES

The patients follow-up was selected according to tumor behavior, from regular endoscopic surveillance to oncology follow-up. The prognosis was good in case 1, whilst poorer outcomes were associated with more aggressive tumors in case 2 and case 3.

LESSONS

g-NENs are rare tumors with distinct clinical and histological features. Our case series emphasized the role of close collaboration between clinician and pathologist, as well as the importance of a detailed pathology report.

Pathogenic ATM Variant-Harbouring Well-Differentiated Aggressive Type 1 Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumour with High-grade Features (G3 NET): a New Addition to the Clinical and Pathological Spectrum of Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Gastric type 1 neuroendocrine tumours are considered to have low rates of proliferation and a good prognosis. We report here a patient with an aggressive well-differentiated high-grade gastric neuroendocrine tumour (gastric grade 3 NET), in a context of autoimmune gastritis. Consistent with grade 3 disease, the tumour had a Ki-67 proliferation index of 30%. Targeted next-generation sequencing identified variants of four genes, including a pathogenic ATM variant underlying the differentiation and metastatic potential of the tumour. Liver metastasis was diagnosed during follow-up, and the patient died after 6 years, due to disease progression.

Is local excision sufficient in selected grade 1 or 2 type III gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms?

PURPOSE

Type III gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) have historically been regarded as aggressive tumours, hence current guidelines advocate radical surgery with lymph node dissection. Data on the roles of endoscopic or less extensive surgical resections are more limited. The aim of our study is to evaluate the clinicopathological features and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing endoscopic or limited surgical resection for localised grade 1 or 2 type III g-NENs when compared to radical surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with a localised grade 1 or 2 type III g-NENs across six tertiary NEN centers between 2006 and 2019.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were diagnosed with a potentially resectable grade 1 or 2 type III g-NEN of whom 36 underwent either endoscopic or surgical resection. No statistically significant differences were found between the three resection groups in terms of patient age, tumour location, grade or size. Only tumour size was found to be significantly associated with poor clinical outcome (p = 0.012) and ROC curve analysis identified tumour size >10 mm as a negative predictor (AUC:0.8030, p = 0.0021). Tumours >10 mm were also more likely to be associated with lymph node metastases on imaging and histology (p = 0.039 and p = 0.026 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Localised grade 1 or 2 type III g-NENs had a good prognosis in this series. Tumour size >10 mm was the most significant prognostic factor affecting patient outcome. Endoscopic resection or limited surgical resection is feasible and safe in small type III g-NENs which demonstrate favourable grade 1/2, well differentiated histology.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms G3: Novel insights and unmet needs

According to the 2019 WHO pathology grading system, high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) can be divided into well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors G3 (NETs G3) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). GEP-NETs G3 and GEP-NECs present significant differences in driver genes and disease origin. NETs G3 and NECs have been confirmed to be two distinct diseases with different genetic backgrounds, however, this issue remains controversial. The prognosis of NETs G3 is significantly better than that of NECs. The differential diagnosis of GEP-NETs G3 and GEP-NECs should be combined with the patient's medical history, tumor histopathology, Ki-67 index, DAXX/ATRX, TP53 and Rb expression as well as other immunohistochemical indicators. In addition, the treatment strategies of these two subgroups are very different. Here, we summarize recent findings focused on the genomics, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment and other aspects of high-grade GEP-NENs (G3). This review may help further our understanding of the carcinogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs G3.

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: A review

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) or neuroendocrine tumors are generally slow-growing tumors with increasing incidence. They arise from enterochromaffin like cells and are divided into four types according to clinical characteristic features. Type 1 and 2 are gastrin dependent, whereas type 3 and 4 are sporadic. The reason for hypergastrinemia is atrophic gastritis in type 1, and gastrin releasing tumor (gastrinoma) in type 2 g-NEN. The diagnosis of g-NENs needs histopathological investigation taken by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. g-NENs are positively stained with chomogranin A and synaptophysin. Grading is made with mitotic index and ki-67 proliferation index on histopathological analysis. It is crucial to discriminate between types of g-NENs, because the management, treatment and prognosis differ significantly between subtypes. Treatment options for g-NENs include endoscopic resection, surgical resection with or without antrectomy, medical treatment with somatostatin analogues, netazepide or chemotherapy regimens. Follow-up without excision is another option in appropriate cases. The prognosis of type 1 and 2 g-NENs are good, whereas the prognosis of type 3 and 4 g-NENs are close to the prognosis of gastric adenocancer.

Textbook Outcome as a measure of surgical quality assessment and prognosis in gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma: A large multicenter sample analysis

OBJECTIVE

Quality assurance is crucial for oncological surgical treatment assessment. For rare diseases, single-quality indicators are not enough. We aim to develop a comprehensive and reproducible measurement, called the "Textbook Outcome" (TO), to assess the quality of surgical treatment and prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (G-NEC) patients.

METHODS

Data from patients with primary diagnosed G-NEC included in 24 high-volume Chinese hospitals from October 2005 to September 2018 were analyzed. TO included receiving a curative resection, ≥15 lymph nodes examined, no severe postoperative complications, hospital stay ≤21 d, and no hospital readmission ≤30 d after discharge. Hospital variation in TO was analyzed using a case mix-adjusted funnel plot. Prognostic factors of survival and risk factors for non-Textbook Outcome (non-TO) were analyzed using Cox and logistic models, respectively.

RESULTS

TO was achieved in 56.6% of 860 G-NEC patients. TO patients had better overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) than non-TO patients (P<0.05). Moreover, TO patients accounted for 60.3% of patients without recurrence. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed non-TO as an independent risk factor for OS, DFS, and RFS of G-NEC patients (P<0.05). Increasing TO rates were associated with improved OS for G-NEC patients, but not hospital volume. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that non-lower tumors, open surgery, and >200 mL blood loss were independent risk factors for non-TO patients (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TO is strongly associated with multicenter surgical quality and prognosis for G-NEC patients. Factors predicting non-TO are identified, which may help guide strategies to optimize G-NEC outcomes.

Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

The latest WHO classification cleanly divides gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms into neuroendocrine tumor (NET; well-differentiated, any grade) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC; poorly differentiated, high-grade by definition), along with mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms. NECs are always aggressive, with multiple mutations; they are treated with chemotherapy. NETs have widely different presentations, behavior, and management depending on site of origin. Esophageal examples are vanishingly rare. Most gastric and appendiceal tumors are indolent, as are many colonic and rectal tumors. The duodenum is home to some unusual variants of NET, and jejunal/ileal NETs frequently metastasize, which impacts their staging and clinical management.

Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors: Reappraisal of Type in Predicting Outcome

BACKGROUND

Type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors (GNETs) are typically managed either expectantly or endoscopically. In contrast, locoregional surgery has been recommended for patients with type III GNETs because of the risk of metastasis. This study aimed to identify predictors of outcome independent of type in a contemporary cohort of GNET patients.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective cohort study of 121 patients with a pathologic diagnosis of primary GNET between January 2009 and June 2019 was performed. GNETs were designated as type 1 (n = 74) if atrophic gastritis was present, or as type III (n = 47) in the absence of atrophic gastritis. Demographic, clinical, and histopathologic factors were examined using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression to assess the impact of various factors on recurrence and overall survival.

RESULTS

Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 62.7 months. While there was no difference in OS in patients with different GNET types (p = 0.10), higher tumor grade (p = 0.02) and presence of nodal or distant metastases (p = 0.02) predicted worse survival on multivariable analysis. Among type III GNET patients, those with small (< 0.5 cm), grade 1 lesions ("low-risk") were less likely to develop metastases (0% versus 33%, p < 0.01) and more likely to survive (100% versus 67%, p < 0.01) at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Size and tumor grade predict recurrence and survival in patients with GNETs irrespective of type. Small, low-grade type III GNETs are associated with minimal risk of progression and may be managed accordingly.

Challenges in High-grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Mixed Neuroendocrine/Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasms

The growth in knowledge of the pathogenesis, molecular background, and immunohistochemical profile of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has led not only to an increased awareness of these diseases but also to several changes of the nomenclature. In particular, the concept and terminology of high-grade (grade 3) NENs and mixed neoplasms have changed considerably over the last 20 years, creating some confusion among pathologists and clinicians. The aim of this review is to elucidate the diagnostic criteria, including the most important differential diagnoses of high-grade NENs and mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs). The role of the Ki67 labelling index and morphology, used to define grade 3 NENs of the digestive system and lungs, is also discussed. The evolution of the concepts and terminology of MiNENs is revised, including the most important differential diagnoses.

Genomics of High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor with High-Grade Features (G3 NET) and Neuroendocrine Carcinomas (NEC) of Various Anatomic Sites

High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-NENs) are clinically aggressive diseases, the classification of which has recently been redefined. They now include both poorly differentiated NENs (neuroendocrine carcinoma, NECs) and high proliferating well-differentiated NENs (called grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors, G3 NETs, in the digestive system). In the last decade, the "molecular revolution" that has affected all fields of medical oncology has also shed light in the understanding of HG NENs heterogeneity and has provided new diagnostic and therapeutic tools, useful in the management of these malignancies. Considering the kaleidoscopic aspects of HG NENs in various anatomical sites, this review systematically addresses the genomic landscape of such neoplasm throughout the more common thoracic and digestive locations, as well as it will consider other rare but not exceptional primary sites, including the skin, the head and neck, and the urogenital system. The revision of the available literature will then be oriented to understand the translational relevance of molecular data, by analyzing conceptual issues, clinicopathological correlations, and unmet needs in this field.

Characterization of a Novel Entity of G3 (High-grade Well-differentiated) Colorectal Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET) in the SEER Database

OBJECTIVES

Small studies suggest that a new entity of high-grade (HG) (G3, by Ki-67 or mitotic index) well-differentiated (histologically) gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) exists, but prognosis and characteristics are unknown. We further characterized demographics and prognosis of patients with colorectal G3 NETs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to study colorectal NETs diagnosed from 2000 to 2015. We evaluated demographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics. We compared overall survival (OS) for G1-2 NET, G3 NET, and NEC (neuroendocrine carcinoma). We used logistic regression to detect grade associations and Cox proportional hazards models to examine predictors of survival.

RESULTS

We identified 5894 cases with colorectal NET (5780 [98.1%] G1-2 and 114 [1.9%] G3); the cohort was 66% white, 47% male, and had a median age of 54. Patients with G3 NET were likely to be older (odds ratio [OR]: 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-4.19 for 60 to 69 vs. <50), unmarried (OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.02-2.38), and less likely to be diagnosed after 2010 (OR: 0.09; 95% CI: 0.06-0.15). OS for G3 NET (median, 36 mo; 95% CI: 13-92) fell between OS for NEC (median, 7 mo; 95% CI: 6-8), and G1-2 NET (median not reached, >120 mo). Among G1-3 NETs, black patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.03-1.62), older patients (HR: 3.63; 95% CI: 2.63-5.01 for age 60 to 69 vs. <50), unmarried patients (HR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.17-1.68), and those with HG features (HR: 3.97; 95% CI: 3.15-4.99) had worse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We defined a subset of G3 NETs that are HG and well differentiated, more common in older, unmarried patients, with a prognosis between that of NEC and G1-2 NETs. Our analysis adds the first national registry study in support of a new classification of nonpancreatic HG and well-differentiated NETs.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the esophagus and stomach

Esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms (E-NENs) are much rarer than other gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, the majority showing aggressive behavior with early dissemination and poor prognosis. Among E-NENs, exceptionally rare well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (E-NET) and more frequent esophageal poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (E-NEC) and mixed neuroendocrine-non neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) can be recognized. E-NECs usually exhibit a small cell morphology or mixed small and large cells. Esophageal MiNEN are composed of NEC component admixed with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma. Gastric (G) NENs encompass a wide spectrum of entities ranging from indolent G-NETs to highly aggressive G-NECs and MiNENs. Among G-NETs, ECL-cell NETs are the most common and, although composed of histamine-producing cells, are a heterogeneous group of neoplastic proliferations showing different clinical and prognostic features depending on the patient’s clinico-pathological background including the morphology of the peri-tumoral mucosa, gastrin serum levels, presence or absence of antral G-cell hyperplasia, and presence or absence of MEN1 syndrome. In general, NET associated with hypergastrinemia show a better outcome than NET not associated with hypergastrinemia. G-NECs and MiNENs are aggressive neoplasms more frequently observed in males and associated with a dismal prognosis.

Spontaneous regression of gastric gastrinoma after resection of metastases to the lesser omentum: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Gastric gastrinoma and spontaneous tumor regression are both very rarely encountered. We report the first case of spontaneous regression of gastric gastrinoma.

CASE SUMMARY

A 37-year-old man with a 9-year history of chronic abdominal pain was referred for evaluation of an 8 cm mass in the lesser omentum discovered incidentally on abdominal computed tomography. The tumor was diagnosed as grade 2 neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a 7 mm red polypoid lesion with central depression in the gastric antrum, also confirmed to be a grade 2 NEN. Laparoscopic removal of the abdominal mass confirmed it to be a metastatic gastrinoma lesion. The gastric lesion was subsequently diagnosed as primary gastric gastrinoma. Three months later, the gastric lesion had disappeared without treatment. The patient remains symptom-free with normal fasting serum gastrin and no recurrence of gastrinoma during 36 mo of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Gastric gastrinoma may arise as a polypoid lesion in the gastric antrum. Spontaneous regression can rarely occur after biopsy.

Chromosomal and molecular pathway alterations in the neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma components of gastric mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm

Gastric mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) is a clinically aggressive subtype of mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) with unclear clonal origin. In this study, we analyzed high-resolution copy number (CN) profiling data using the OncoScan CNV Assay in the neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and adenocarcinoma components of eight MANECs. Some common CNVs, including the gain of CCNE1 (19q12) and the loss of FAT1 (4q35.2), were frequently detected in both components; these CNVs were verified by FISH, qPCR and immunohistochemistry staining assays in samples with sufficient material. The identification of common CNVs in both components supports the likelihood of single clonal origin of morphologically heterogeneous tumor cells and suggests several novel genetic events potentially involved in the development of gastric MANEC. We also detected and validated some CNVs and alterations specific for the NEC component, such as MAPK1 loss and MAPK signaling pathway alterations, which could contribute to the neuroendocrine differentiation of gastric MANEC. In addition, we found that the NEC component presented more CNVs and greater CN loss than the adenocarcinoma component (P = 0.007 and P = 0.004, respectively); the NEC components from different cases were not clustered in the hierarchical clustering analysis, indicating the marked genetic heterogenicity of the NEC component in gastric MANEC. In summary, this study describes the cytogenetic characteristics of each component of gastric MANEC, providing some clues for further studies on the development and progression of gastric MANEC as well as providing some potential therapeutic targets.

Neuroendocrine neoplasia of the gastrointestinal tract revisited: towards precision medicine

Over the past 5 years, a number of notable research advances have been made in the field of neuroendocrine cancer, specifically with regard to neuroendocrine cancer of the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this Review is to provide an update on current knowledge that has proven effective for the clinical management of patients with these tumours. For example, for the first time in the tubular gastrointestinal tract, well-differentiated high-grade (grade 3) tumours and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are defined in the WHO classification. This novel classification enables efficient identification of the most aggressive well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours and helps in defining the degree of aggressiveness of MiNENs. The Review also discusses updates to epidemiology, cell biology (including vesicle-specific components) and the as-yet-unresolved complex genetic background that varies according to site and differentiation status. The Review summarizes novel diagnostic instruments, including molecules associated with the secretory machinery, novel radiological approaches (including pattern recognition techniques), novel PET tracers and liquid biopsy combined with DNA or RNA assays. Surgery remains the treatment mainstay; however, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with novel radioligands and new emerging medical therapies (including vaccination and immunotherapy) are evolving and being tested in clinical trials, which are summarized and critically reviewed here.

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of ascending colon: A case report

•

Colon MiNEN, in this case, adenocarcinoma and NET G1 is a rare tumor.

•

Preoperative diagnosis of MiNEN is difficult, and detailed observation of histopathology is important.

•

Prognosis depends on the more aggressive components of adenocarcinoma or NET.

Introduction

Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) that develops in the right-sided colon is relatively rare. Coexistence of adenocarcinoma and NET is extremely rare, and such cases are called mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN).

Presentation of case

Colonoscopy in an 85-year-old woman for an anemia examination indicated laterally spreading tumor-nongranular (LST-NG) in the transverse colon. Colonoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) showed that the depth of the tumor invasion was deep submucosal. The tumor localization was diagnosed as transverse colon close to the hepatic curvature by enema. Computed tomography (CT) showed no obvious lymph node or distant metastasis. Based on these findings, laparoscopic transverse colectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy was performed. Pathologically, most of the tumor was well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma, but some solid follicles of polygonal tumor cells with poor nuclear atypia were observed. Immunostaining was positive for synaptophysin and diagnosed as NET G1. This tumor consisted of adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumor, so we diagnosed it as MiNEN and classified the tumor as fT1N0M0 fStage I (TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 8th Edition). Since it was an early stage cancer, postoperative adjuvant therapy was not performed. No recurrence has yet been noted.

Discussion

Although MiNEN is extremely rare, the detailed pathological specimen observation and diagnosis are important because long-term follow-up after surgery is needed, as is the adequate selection of postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Conclusion

It is important to elucidate the mechanisms involved in the coexistence of NET and adenocarcinoma and to apply these findings to future medical care.

Gastric neuroendocrine tumours from long-term proton pump inhibitor users are indolent tumours with good prognosis

AIMS

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most widely used medications in the United States. Most PPI users have persistent hypergastrinaemia during treatment. However, gastric neuroendocrine tumours diagnosed in long-term PPI users are rarely reported. Their clinicopathological features and prognosis are not characterised. It remains unclear whether or not they can be classified as Type III sporadic tumours.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively characterised 66 gastric neuroendocrine tumours from patients without atrophic gastritis and gastrinoma from two tertiary care medical centres, including 38 tumours in patients who had used PPIs for at least 1 year and 28 tumours from patients without long-term PPI use (control group, Type III tumours). Compared to controls, tumours from long-term PPI users tended to be in the pT1-2 category (98% versus 79%, P = 0.09) and less often invaded the serosa (3% versus 18%, P = 0.08) or lymphovascular spaces (11% versus 32%, P = 0.06). Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, long-term PPI users had significantly longer overall survival than controls (P = 0.035). While three control patients developed distant metastasis and seven died, long-term PPI users were without distant metastasis (P = 0.06) or death (P = 0.002) during follow-up. However, five long-term PPI users developed additional gastric neuroendocrine tumour(s), while none of the controls did (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that gastric neuroendocrine tumours of long-term PPI users are probably less aggressive compared to Type III sporadic tumours and have an indolent disease course. Our findings support the classification of gastric neuroendocrine tumours in long-term PPI users as a separate subtype.

Clinical implications of mismatch repair deficiency screening in patients with mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN)

INTRODUCTION

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) are rare tumors, mainly encountered in the gastroenteropancreatic tract. Based on the limited available data, MiNEN is usually a highly aggressive neoplasm combining a high-grade neuroendocrine and a non-neuroendocrine component, associated with a poor prognostic outlook. Deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR) results in microsatellite instability, which is a useful screening marker for identifying patients with Lynch syndrome and a prognostic factor for chemotherapeutic interventions. Little information on MMR status in MiNEN is available in published studies. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the status and putative role of MMR on MiNEN.

METHODS

We investigated the MMR status in 44 cases and characterized their clinicopathological features and prognoses. Immunohistochemistry was performed for four mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2).

RESULTS

Mean age at diagnosis was 61 years, and 75% of the patients were male. Lymph node metastases were observed in 14 (35.9%) patients. The most common tumor localizations were gastric (28 patients, 63.6%). Lack of immunohistochemical expression of MMR proteins was shown in 38.6% of cases. The common deletion rates of one or more proteins were 29.4% (5/17) for MLH1/PMS2 and 23.5% (4/17) for MLH1. Correlation between clinicopathological parameters showed that MMR deficiency was significantly associated with early TNM stage and better prognoses in patients with MiNEN.

CONCLUSION

MiNENs showed frequent losses of MMR protein expression, which contributes to the knowledge of the pathological and clinical aspects of MiNEN tumors.

Comparison of overall survival of gastric neoplasms containing neuroendocrine carcinoma components with gastric adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching study

Background

Gastric neoplasms containing neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) components are rare malignancies with highly aggressive behavior and a poor prognosis and include pure NEC and mixed tumors containing NEC components. We aimed to investigate whether there is a distinct difference in overall survival (OS) between gastric neoplasms containing NEC components and gastric adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Surgically resected gastric neoplasms containing NEC components (n = 180) and gastric adenocarcinomas (n = 785) from January 2013 to December 2019 at Peking University Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analysed. Patients were categorized into a surgical group and a neoadjuvant group and adjusted using propensity score matching. In the two groups, gastric neoplasms containing NEC components were divided into pure NEC and mixed tumors with less than 30% (< 30% G-HMiNEN), between 30 and 70% (G-HMiNEN) and more than 70% (> 70% G-HMiNEN) neuroendocrine carcinoma components. OS was compared between these groups and the gastric adenocarcinoma group.

Results

The OS of gastric neoplasms containing neuroendocrine NEC components was poorer than that of gastric adenocarcinomas in the surgical group, regardless of whether the percentage of neuroendocrine cancer components was less than 30%, between 30 and 70%, more than 70% or 100%. Cox multivariable regression analysis suggested that tumor category (neoplasms containing NEC components or gastric adenocarcinoma) was an independent risk factor for prognosis. Interestingly, among patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, the difference was not significant.

Conclusions

Gastric neoplasms containing any proportion of NEC components had poorer overall survival than gastric adenocarcinoma in patients treated with surgery directly, indicating that these neoplasms are more malignant than gastric adenocarcinoma. Among the patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, the difference in overall survival was not significant, which was in sharp contrast with the results of the surgery group, suggesting that neoadjuvant therapy may have a good effect in the treatment of these neoplasms.

Survival Profile and Prognostic Factors for Appendiceal Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A SEER Population-Based Study

Introduction

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is a rare form of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics and survival profile of appendiceal MiNENs, with a view of providing robust clinical features of this rare disease.

Methods

Patients were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004–2016). The prognosis of MiNEN (n = 315) was compared with other histological subtypes including neuroendocrine tumor (NETs) (n = 1734), neuroendocrine carcinoma (NECs) (n = 375), goblet cell carcinoid (GCC) (n = 968), signet ring cell carcinoma (n = 463), mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) (n = 2355), and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMAC) (n = 1187) in the appendix. Age-adjusted incidence was calculated using Joinpoint regression. The Cox proportional hazards model and the Fine–Gray competing risk model were used to perform overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) analyses, respectively.

Results

The age-adjusted incidence of MiNENs increased from 0.01/100,000 person-years in 2004 to 0.07/100,000 person-years in 2016. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS rates for MiNENs were 69.5, 57.4, and 43.7%, respectively, and the corresponding CSM rates were 23.1, 36.4, and 45.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the prognosis of MiNENs was worse than that of NETs, NECs, GCC, and MAC but better than that of NMAC and signet ring cell carcinoma. Tumor extension was the only independent factor influencing the prognosis of MiNENs, but tumor size, grade, and surgical approaches were not. Moreover, when compared with local excision or appendectomy, extensive surgery such as hemicolectomy or colectomy did not prolong the survival of individuals with MiNENs.

Conclusion

MiNEN is a rare but aggressive tumor with a poor prognosis differing from NENs, GCC and adenocarcinomas. To improve the prognosis of the disease, early diagnosis and comprehensive evaluation are necessary.

[Mixed Neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine Neoplasm of the Stomach that is Distributed in Depth on the Same Tumor: Inconsistent with the Definition of Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinoma in the 2010 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Digestive System]

A mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) of the stomach is a rare disease entity that was first defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) classification (2010) for tumors of the digestive system. According to the WHO classification (2010), MANEC is referred to as a tumor with both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine neoplasms; each component of the tumor should be at least 30%. On the other hand, this cut-off value lacks clinical evidence and does not explain the characteristics and heterogeneity of this tumor. A 66-year-old male diagnosed with early gastric cancer (EGC) at a community hospital was referred to the Kosin University Gospel Hospital for further evaluation of gastric cancer. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and EUS performed at the Kosin University Gospel Hospital revealed a sub-mucosal tumor-like component. In addition, a re-biopsy revealed a neuroendorine tumor at different depths of the same tumor. The final pathologic-diagnosis through surgery revealed a mixed neuroendocrine- non-neuroendocrine neoplasm, which is inconsistent with the definition of MANEC. Clinicians should consider EUS when a tumor has atypical endoscopic findings, even if EGC has already been diagnosed.

Pathologic Considerations in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

This review serves as a primer on contemporary neuroendocrine neoplasm classification, with an emphasis on gastroenteropancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Topics discussed include general features of neuroendocrine neoplasms, general neuroendocrine marker immunohistochemistry, the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor from pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma and other diagnostic mimics and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma from diagnostic mimics, the concepts of differentiation and grade and the application of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry to determine the latter, the various WHO classifications of neuroendocrine neoplasms including the 2019 WHO classification of gastroenteropancreatic tumors, organ-specific considerations for gastroenteropancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, immunohistochemistry to determine site of origin in metastatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor of occult origin, immunohistochemistry in the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, and, finally, required and recommended reporting elements for biopsies and resections of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine epithelial neoplasms.

Prognostic value of the 2017 World Health Organization Classification System for gastric neuroendocrine tumors: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Gastric neuroendocrine tumors (G-NETs) are rare tumors, but their incidence is gradually increasing. Despite the existence of many classification systems, determining prognosis and planning treatment in patients with G-NETs remains a clinical challenge. In this study, the prognostic value of the World Health Organization (WHO) 2017 grading system and the effect of surgery on survival in low grade neuroendocrine tumors were investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

G-NETs who were diagnosed between January 2000 and May 2017 were included in the study. Patients' demographic characteristics, treatment details, and survival data were obtained from medical charts. Pathological samples were re-classified according to the WHO 2017 grading system.

RESULTS

Of the total 94 evaluated patients, 50 (53.2%) were classified with G1 NETs, 37(39.4%) with G2 NETs, 4(4.2%) with well-differentiated G3 NETs, and the remaining 3 patients with poorly differentiated G3 neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). The median follow-up time was 83.2 months. There was a statistically significant difference in 5-year progression free survival (PFS) between G1 tumors (100%) and G2 tumors (76%) (p<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant deference in 5-year overall survival rate (OS) for G1 (97%) and G2 (82%) tumors (p=0.141). When G2 and G1 NETs were compared according to their surgical approach, radical surgery was more frequently performed in patients with G2 tumors (p<0.001). However, radical surgery did not improve PFS in G1 and G2 NETs.

CONCLUSION

The WHO 2017 NET classification system may have low prognostic value for determining the prognosis of patients with G1 and G2 tumors. Radical surgery for G1 and G2 NETs did not improve PFS in our study.

Surgical resection for duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasia: Outcome, prognostic factors and risk of metastases

BACKGROUND

Clinical management of duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (dNEN) is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of surgical management and to identify risk factors for metastatic disease.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for dNEN were retrospectively analysed. Clinicopathologic features, perioperative outcome and survival were assessed. A literature review with focus on risk factors for metastatic disease was additionally performed.

RESULTS

24 patients were identified. Out of 22 patients presenting with their primary tumour, 20 patients underwent curative resection and 18 patients received curative resection with systematic lymphadenectomy. 17 patients underwent formal oncological resection. Surgical mortality was 1 out of 24 patients. The 5-year overall survival rate was 67% in the entire cohort, 71% in patients undergoing resection for their primary tumour, 72% for patients undergoing curative resection with systematic lymphadenectomy, 75% for pN0 and 70% for pN1 tumours. Lymph node metastases were identified in 15 patients undergoing systematic lymphadenectomy, including 9 of 14 patients with tumours smaller than 2 cm, and 6 of 10 patients with G1 tumours. Literature review confirmed a high risk of metastases in small (58%) or G1 (24%) tumours. Tumour grade and angioinvasion were significantly associated with overall and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Even well differentiated or small dNEN harbour a considerable risk of metastases. These data challenge the concepts of surveillance, local resection and endoscopic management for dNEN based on size and grading. Angioinvasion was identified as a strong negative predictor of overall and disease-free survival in dNEN.

Do neuroendocrine carcinomas and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract have the same prognosis? A SEER database analysis of 12,878 cases

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are both rare and malignant; however, it is unclear whether their prognosis is the same.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 12,878 patients with NEC or MiNEN in the GI tract were reviewed retrospectively by searching the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database. Next, we compared the characteristics and survival between patients with NEC or MiNEN and further analyzed the prognostic factors for the patients.

RESULTS

The data showed that patients with MiNEN had a worse prognosis as compared with patients with pure NEC in the small intestine (SI) and appendix, whereas there was no significant survival difference between NEC and MiNEN in the other parts of the GI system. On the whole, age ⩾55 years (p < 0.0001), male (p = 0.002), being diagnosed at TNM Stage II-IV (p < 0.0001) or not receiving surgical treatment (p < 0.0001) were the independent negative prognostic factors for NEC patients, whereas age ⩾55 years (p = 0.003), being diagnosed at TNM Stage III-IV (p < 0.001) or not receiving surgical treatment (p < 0.001) were identified as the independent negative prognostic factors for the MiNEN patients. Furthermore, when NECs or MiNENs were classified based on the primary tumor site, the results showed that the prognostic factors for NEC and MiNEN varied between the tumor sites.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic differences between NECs and MiNENs in the GI tract are heterogeneous and site-related. Patients with appendiceal or SI MiNEN have a poorer prognosis than patients with pure appendiceal or SI NEC. Therefore, we should pay more attention to patients with MiNEN in the SI and appendix and monitor them more closely.

[Gastric neuroendocrine tumors]

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors are rare neoplasms. Currently, incidence of gastric neuroendocrine tumors (gNETs) is being significantly increased. There are 3 groups of gNETs: types I, II and III. Each type has important features regarding clinical picture, prognosis and treatment strategy. Type I is the most common (70-80%) and associated with chronic atrophic gastritis including autoimmune gastritis and Helicobacter associated atrophic gastritis. Type II (5-6%) is associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (MEN I - ZES). Both types are characterized by hypergastrinemia and small tumor dimension. These neoplasms are multiple and mostly benign. On the contrary, NETs type III (10-15%) is not associated with hypergastrinemia and represented by single large neoplasms. Tumors are malignant as a rule. Therefore, surgical resection and chemotherapy are preferred for these tumors. Endoscopic surgery followed by observation is acceptable for almost all NETS type I and II. At the same time, this approach is advisable only for small and highly differentiated neoplasms type III.

Response and relapse rates after treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogs in multifocal or recurrent type-1 gastric carcinoids: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors represent a recurring disease and long-acting somatostatin analogs can inhibit both gastrin release and endocrine cell proliferation. The efficacy and timing of this treatment are still unclear. We performed a systematic review of the literature to clarify the role of somatostatin analog treatment in type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors.

METHODS

A computerized literature search was performed using relevant keywords to identify all the pertinent articles published in the last 15 years.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in this systematic review on somatostatin analogs in type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors. A complete response rate ranged from 25-100%. When only the six prospective studies were considered, no significant heterogeneity was observed, and the pooled cumulative complete response rate was 84.5% (confidence interval 73.8-92.8). Three studies evaluated the type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumor recurrence, with a cumulative relapse rate of 30.2% (confidence interval 13.1-50.6) after 34 months.

CONCLUSION

Somatostatin analogs, namely lanreotide and octreotide, have an excellent response rate, with a good safety profile in selected type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors, which cannot be safely managed by endoscopic follow-up or resection due to multiple or frequently recurring disease. After therapy discontinuation, the cumulative relapse rate observed after a median 34-month follow-up was relatively high (30.2%).

Retrospective study on mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms from five European centres

BACKGROUND

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is a rare diagnosis, mainly encountered in the gastro-entero-pancreatic tract. There is limited knowledge of its epidemiology, prognosis and biology, and the best management for affected patients is still to be defined.

AIM

To investigate clinical-pathological characteristics, treatment modalities and survival outcomes of a retrospective cohort of patients with a diagnosis of MiNEN.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with a histologically proven diagnosis of MiNEN were identified at 5 European centres. Patient data were retrospectively collected from medical records. Pathological samples were reviewed to ascertain compliance with the 2017 World Health Organisation definition of MiNEN. Tumour responses to systemic treatment were assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1. Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to estimate survival outcomes. Associations between clinical-pathological characteristics and survival outcomes were explored using Log-rank test for equality of survivors functions (univariate) and Cox-regression analysis (multivariable).

RESULTS

Sixty-nine consecutive patients identified; Median age at diagnosis: 64 years. Males: 63.8%. Localised disease (curable): 53.6%. Commonest sites of origin: colon-rectum (43.5%) and oesophagus/oesophagogastric junction (15.9%). The neuroendocrine component was; predominant in 58.6%, poorly differentiated in 86.3%, and large cell in 81.25%, of cases analysed. Most distant metastases analysed (73.4%) were occupied only by a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine component. Ninety-four percent of patients with localised disease underwent curative surgery; 53% also received perioperative treatment, most often in line with protocols for adenocarcinomas from the same sites of origin. Chemotherapy was offered to most patients (68.1%) with advanced disease, and followed protocols for pure neuroendocrine carcinomas or adenocarcinomas in equal proportion. In localised cases, median recurrence free survival (RFS); 14.0 months (95%CI: 9.2-24.4), and median overall survival (OS): 28.6 months (95%CI: 18.3-41.1). On univariate analysis, receipt of perioperative treatment (vs surgery alone) did not improve RFS (P = 0.375), or OS (P = 0.240). In advanced cases, median progression free survival (PFS); 5.6 months (95%CI: 4.4-7.4), and median OS; 9.0 months (95%CI: 5.2-13.4). On univariate analysis, receipt of palliative active treatment (vs best supportive care) prolonged PFS and OS (both, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

MiNEN is most commonly driven by a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine component, and has poor prognosis. Advances in its biological understanding are needed to identify effective treatments and improve patient outcomes.

Tumour type and size are prognostic factors in gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia: A multicentre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasias (gNEN) are defined as type I if associated with atrophic body gastritis and type III when tumour is sporadic. This classification, together with grading and size, plays a crucial prognostic role. Nevertheless, the impact of these features on clinical outcome is not clear.

AIM

To identify factors predicting poor outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Analysis of type I and type III gNEN. A composite endpoint was defined if tumour-related death or metastases or angioinvasion were observed.

RESULTS

156 gNENs were evaluated: 137 (87.8%) type I and 19 (12.2%) type III. Among type I, 103 were G1 (75.2%) and 34 (24.8%) were G2. In type III group, 8 were G1 (42.1%), 10 were G2 (52.6%), and 1 was G3 (5.3%). Negative endpoint occurred in 18 patients including 10 type III and 8 type I. Male gender (p = 0.032), tumour type (p = 0.003) and size >10 mm (p = 0.024) were predictors for poor outcome, whereas Ki67 was not confirmed on multivariate analysis (p = 0.192). 5-yr survival rates in type I and type III were 100% and 76.2%, respectively (p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumour size, tumour type and gender affect clinical outcome in gNENs. In contrast to NENs rising from other sites, Ki67 plays a less important role.

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasias: manifestations and comparative outcomes

Although gastric neuroendocrine neoplasias (gNEN) are an orphan disease, their incidence is rising. The heterogeneous clinical course powers the ongoing discussion of the most appropriate classification system and management. Prognostic relevance of proposed classifications was retrospectively analysed in 142 patients from a single tertiary referral centre. Baseline, management and survival data were acquired for statistical analyses. The distribution according to the clinicopathological typification was gNEN-1 (n = 86/60.6%), gNEN-2 (n = 7/4.9%), gNEN-3 (n = 24/16.9%) and gNEN-4 (n = 25/17.6%), while hypergastrinemia-associated gNEN-1 and -2 were all low-grade tumours (NET-G1/2), formerly termed sporadic gNEN-3 could be subdivided into gNEN-3 with grade 1 or 2 and gNEN-4 with grade 3 (NEC-G3). During follow-up 36 patients died (25%). The mean overall survival (OS) of all gNEN was 14.2 years. The OS differed statistically significant across all subgroups with either classification system. According to UICC 2017 TNM classification, OS differed for early and advanced stages, while WHO grading indicated poorer prognosis for NEC-G3. Cox regression analysis confirmed the independent prognostic validity of either classification system for survival. Particularly careful analysis of the clinical course of gNEN-1 (ECLomas, gastric carcinoids) confirmed their mostly benign, but recurrent and extremely slowly progressive behaviour with low risk of metastasis (7%) and an efficient long-term control by repetitive endoscopic procedures. Our study provides evidence for the validity of current classifications focusing on typing, grading and staging. These are crucial tools for risk stratification, especially to differentiate gNEN-1 as well as sporadic gNET and gNEC (gNEN-3 vs -4).