Impact of residual mitral regurgitation after MitraClip implantation

Pulmonary Vein Flow Morphology After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair as Predictor of Survival

BACKGROUND

Data on the prognostic factors after mitral valve (MV) transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER; MV-TEER) are limited. Pulsed-wave Doppler interrogation of pulmonary vein flow (PVF) is a convenient method to assess the hemodynamic burden of residual mitral regurgitation (MR), which could be of utility as a predictor of outcomes.

METHODS

Patients that underwent MV-TEER between May 2014 and December 2021 at our institution were evaluated. Pulmonary vein flow patterns post-MV-TEER were reviewed on the procedural transesophageal echocardiogram and classified as normal (systolic dominant or codominant) or abnormal (systolic blunting or reversal). The PVF pattern was correlated with all-cause mortality at follow-up.

RESULTS

Two-hundred sixty-five patients had diagnostic PVF post-MV-TEER, with 73 (27.5%) categorized as normal and 192 (72.5%) categorized as abnormal. Patients with abnormal PVF morphology were more likely to have atrial fibrillation (70% vs 42%, P < .001) and greater than moderate residual MR (16% vs 3%, P = .01) and had higher mean left atrial pressure (18.1 ± 5.0 vs 15.9 ± 4.2 mm Hg, P = .002) and left atrial V wave (26.6 ± 8.5 vs 21.4 ± 7.3 mm Hg, P < .001) postprocedure. In multivariable analysis, abnormal PVF morphology post-MV-TEER was independently associated with mortality at follow-up (hazard ratio = 1.70; 95% CI, 1.06-2.74; P = .03) after correction for end-stage renal disease, atrial fibrillation, and residual MR. Results were similar in subgroups of patients with moderate or less and those with mild or less residual MR.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary vein flow morphology is a simple and objective tool to assess MR severity immediately post-MV-TEER and offers important prognostic information to optimize procedural results. Additional studies are needed to determine whether patients with abnormal PVF pattern post-MV-TEER would benefit from more intensive goal-directed medical therapy postprocedure.

Mitral valve gradient changes associate with outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

INTRODUCTION

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is typically used to treat mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with high surgical risk. Increased post-procedural mitral valve gradient (MVG) may impact mortality and hospitalizations. We aim to evaluate and compare the absolute postprocedural MVG and the change in the MVG effect on outcomes for patients undergoing TEER therapy.

METHODS

Patients who underwent TEER for severe MR were divided into two groups, initially by postprocedural absolute MVG, TTE-based at discharge, and then by the difference between preprocedural and postprocedural MVG. Primary endpoints included all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization (HFH) during one year after the procedure.

RESULTS

The study included 100 patients. The mean MVG increased from 3.39 mmHg immediately after the procedure to 4.83 mmHg the following day, an increase of 1.44 mmHg (p < 0.001). First stratification was by MVG on the day following the procedure - MVG ≤5 mmHg (n = 70) and MVG >5 mmHg (n = 30). There was no significant difference in rates of survival (88.6%, 93.3%, p = 0.716) or HFH (18.6%, 33.3%, p = 0.178). Second stratification was by the difference in preprocedural and postprocedural MVG- delta MVG <3 mmHg (n = 55) and delta MVG ≥3 mmHg (n = 45). While survival rates did not significantly differ (87.3% vs. 93.3%, p = 0.503), delta MVG ≥3 mmHg correlated with higher HFH rates (12.7% vs. 35.6%, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

The MVG of patients undergoing TEER usually increases on the day after the procedure compared to the immediate post-procedure MVG. Higher delta MVG is associated with higher HFH rate.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in mitral regurgitation: A comparison of device systems and recommendations for tailored device selection. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is a minimally invasive method for the treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with prohibitive surgical risks. The traditionally used device, MitraClip, showed both safety and effectiveness in M-TEER. PASCAL is a newer device that has emerged as another feasible option to be used in this procedure.

METHODS

We searched for observational studies that compared PASCAL to MitraClip devices in M-TEER. The electronic databases searched for relevant studies were PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase. The primary outcomes were technical success and the grade of MR at follow-up. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, bleeding, device success and reintervention.

RESULTS

Technical success (PASCAL: 96.5% vs MitraClip: 97.6%, p = 0.24) and MR ≤ 2 at 30-day follow-up (PASCAL: 89.4vs MitraClip 89.9%, p = 0.51) were comparable between both groups. Both devices showed similar outcomes including all-cause mortality (RR: 0.68 [0.34, 1.38]; P = 0.28), major bleeding (RR: 1.87 [0.68, 5.10]; P = 0.22) and reintervention (RR: 1.02 [0.33, 3.16]; P = 0.97). Device success was more frequent with PASCAL device (PASCAL: 86% vs MitraClip 68.5%; P = 0.44), however, the results did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Clinical outcomes of PASCAL were comparable to those of MitraClip with no significant difference in safety and effectiveness. The choice between MitraClip and PASCAL devices should be guided by various factors, including mitral valve anatomy, etiology of regurgitation, and device-specific characteristics.

Mitral Valve Surgery for Persistent or Recurrent Mitral Regurgitation After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Is Associated With Improved Survival

Background

The management of severe mitral regurgitation (MR) after transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER) remains a clinical conundrum. Considering the growing volume of TEER, more outcomes data for mitral surgery in this cohort are needed.

Methods and Results

Symptomatic patients with persistent or recurrent severe MR after TEER evaluated between May 2014 and June 2021 were included. The primary outcome was all‐cause mortality in patients who were treated with surgery versus medical therapy. The Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods were used to report risk‐adjusted survival analyses. Among the 142 included patients, 44 (31.0%) underwent mitral surgery. Patients who underwent surgery were younger than those treated medically (74.1±8.9 versus 78.6±10.5 years, P=0.01). Major comorbidities were similar except obesity, sleep apnea, left ventricular dimensions, and ejection fraction. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Operative Mortality was 9.0±4.7 versus 7.9±4.9 in the surgical versus medical therapy groups, respectively, P=0.22. Time from TEER to detection of severe MR was similar in both groups (median [interquartile range] 97.5 [39.5–384] versus 93.5 [40–389] days in the surgical versus medical groups, respectively [P>0.05]). In the surgical group, valve replacement was performed in all patients. Operative mortality was 4.5% (observed/expected ratio 0.55), and major complications were uncommon. After risk‐adjustment, surgery was associated with significantly lower all‐cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.12–0.92], P=0.001) compared with medial therapy.

Conclusions

Compared with medical therapy, mitral surgery in patients with severe persistent or recurrent MR after TEER is associated with lower mortality despite the high‐risk profile of these patients. Patients with severe MR after TEER should be considered for surgery at a referral mitral surgical center.

One-year results following PASCAL-based or MitraClip-based mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

Aims

Mitral valve transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER) has been established as a suitable alternative to mitral valve surgery in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and high surgical risk. The PASCAL system represents a novel device, potentially augmenting the toolkit for TEER. The aim of this study was to assess and compare short and 1 year safety and efficacy of the PASCAL and MitraClip systems for TEER.

Methods and results

Procedural, short, and 1 year outcomes of a 1:2 propensity‐matched cohort including 41 PASCAL and 82 MitraClip cases were investigated. Matching was based on clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and functional characteristics. The primary endpoints assessed were procedural success [as defined by the Mitral Valve Academy Research Consortium (MVARC)], residual MR, functional class, and a composite endpoint comprising death, heart failure hospitalization, and mitral valve re‐intervention. We found for the PASCAL and the matched MitraClip cohort no significant differences in MVARC defined technical (90.2% vs. 95.1%, P = 0.44), device (90.2% vs. 89.0%, P = 1.0), or procedural (87.8% vs. 80.5%, P = 0.45) success rates. Accordingly, the overall MR reduction and improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class were comparable (1 year follow‐up: MR ≤ 2 95% vs. 93.6%, P = 1.0; NYHA ≤ 2 57.1% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.59). The composite outcome revealed no statistically significant difference between both devices (1 year follow‐up: 31.7% vs. 37.8%, P = 0.55). Interestingly, we found at both short and 1 year follow‐up a significantly higher rate of patients with none or trace MR in the PASCAL‐treated cohort (short follow‐up: 17.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.0081; 1 year follow‐up: 25% vs. 0%, P = 0.0016). Conversely, the rate of aborted device implantations due to an elevated transmitral gradient was higher in PASCAL interventions (9.8% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.04).

Conclusions

Transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair using the PASCAL or MitraClip device results in favourable and comparable outcomes regarding safety, efficacy, and clinical improvement after 1 year.

Role of 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair—A Mini Review

Edge-to-edge transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) using MitraClip has been evolving rapidly in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) at high surgical risk or having contraindications for surgery. Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography plays an important role in the management of severe MR. In particular, 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) imaging allows the evaluation of MV geometry and quantification of MR severity with dedicated software. Real-time 3D TEE is also commonly used to guide TMVr and facilitate the procedure. Further development of 3D echocardiography may help achieve safer and more beneficial results. The following article summarizes the current knowledge and the future perspectives of 3D TEE in TMVr.

Immediate Post-Procedural and Discharge Assessment of Mitral Valve Function Following Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair: Correlation and Association with Outcomes

The correlation between residual mitral regurgitation (rMR) grade or mitral valve pressure gradient (MVPG), at transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEEMr) completion and at discharge, is unknown. Furthermore, there is disagreement regarding rMR grade or MVPG from which prognosis diverts. We retrospectively studied 82 patients that underwent TEEMr. We tested the correlation between rMR or MVPG and evaluated their association, with outcomes. Moderate or less rMR (rMR ≤ 2) at TEEMr completion was associated with improved survival, whereas mild or less rMR (rMR ≤ 1) was not. Patients with rMR ≤ 1 at discharge demonstrated a longer time of survival, of first heart failure hospitalization and of both. The correlation for both rMR grade (r = 0.5, p < 0.001) and MVPG (r = 0.51, p < 0.001), between TEEMr completion and discharge, was moderate. MR ≤ 2 at TMEER completion was the strongest predictor for survival (HR 0.08, p < 0.001) whereas rMR ≤ 1 at discharge was independently associated with a lower risk of the combined endpoint (HR 4.17, p = 0.012). MVPG was not associated with adverse events. We conclude that the assessments for rMR grade and MVPG, at the completion of TEEMr and at discharge, should be distinctly reported. Improved outcome is expected with rMR ≤ 2 at TEEMr completion and rMR ≤ 1 at discharge. Higher MVPG is not associated with unfavorable outcomes.

Impact of Residual Mitral Regurgitation on Survival After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of residual mitral regurgitation (resMR) on mortality with respect to left ventricular dilatation (LV-Dil) or right ventricular dysfunction (RV-Dys) in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) who underwent mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER).

BACKGROUND

The presence of LV-Dil and RV-Dys correlates with advanced stages of heart failure in SMR patients, which may impact the outcome after TEER.

METHODS

SMR patients in a European multicenter registry were evaluated. Investigated outcomes were 2-year all-cause mortality and improvement in New York Heart Association functional class with respect to MR reduction, LV-Dil (defined as LV end-diastolic volume ≥159 ml), and RV-Dys (defined as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion-to-systolic pulmonary artery pressure ratio of <0.274 mm/mm Hg).

RESULTS

Among 809 included patients, resMR ≤1+ was achieved in 546 (67%) patients. Overall estimated 2-year mortality rate was 32%. Post-procedural resMR was significantly associated with mortality (p = 0.031). Although the improvement in New York Heart Association functional class persisted regardless of either LV-Dil or RV-Dys, the beneficial treatment effect of resMR ≤1+ on 2-year mortality was observed only in patients without LV-Dil and RV-Dys (hazard ratio: 1.75; 95% confidence interval: 1.03 to 3.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving optimal MR reduction by TEER is associated with improved survival in SMR patients, especially if the progress in heart failure is not too advanced. In SMR patients with advanced stages of heart failure, as evidenced by LV-Dil or RV-Dys, the treatment effect of TEER on symptomatic improvement is maintained, but the survival benefit appears to be reduced.

PASCAL mitral valve repair system versus MitraClip: comparison of transcatheter edge-to-edge strategies in complex primary mitral regurgitation

Background

The PASCAL system is a novel device for edge-to-edge treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR). The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the PASCAL to the MitraClip system in a highly selected group of patients with complex primary mitral regurgitation (PMR) defined as effective regurgitant orifice area (MR-EROA) ≥ 0.40 cm², large flail gap (≥ 5 mm) or width (≥ 7 mm) or Barlow’s disease.

Methods

38 patients with complex PMR undergoing mitral intervention using PASCAL (n = 22) or MitraClip (n = 16) were enrolled. Primary efficacy endpoints were procedural success and degree of residual MR at discharge. The rate of major adverse events (MAE) according to the Mitral Valve Academic Consortium (MVARC) criteria was chosen as the primary safety endpoint.

Results

Patient collectives did not differ relevantly regarding pertinent baseline parameters. Patients` median age was 83.0 [77.5–85.3] years (PASCAL) and 82.5 [76.5–86.5] years (MitraClip). MR-EROA at baseline was 0.70 [0.68–0.83] cm² (PASCAL) and 0.70 [0.50–0.90] cm² (MitraClip), respectively. 3D-echocardiographic morphometry of the mitral valve apparatus revealed no relevant differences between groups. Procedural success was achieved in 95.5% (PASCAL) and 87.5% (MitraClip), respectively. In 86.4% of the patients a residual MR grade ≤ 1 + was achieved with PASCAL whereas reduction to MR grade ≤ 1 + with MitraClip was achieved in 62.5%. Neither procedure time number of implanted devices, nor transmitral gradient differed significantly. No periprocedural MAE according to MVARC occured.

Conclusion

In this highly selected patient group with complex PMR both systems exhibited equal procedural safety. MitraClip and PASCAL reduced qualitative and semi-quantitative parameters of MR to an at least comparable extent.

Graphic abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-021-01845-8.

Predictors of functional mitral regurgitation recurrence after percutaneous mitral valve repair

We aimed to identify predictors of mitral regurgitation recurrence (MR) after percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). Patients with FMR were enrolled who underwent PMVR using the MitraClip^® device. Procedural success was defined as reduction of MR of at least one grade to MR grade ≤ 2 + assessed at discharge. Recurrence of MR was defined as MR grade 3 + or worse at one year after initially successful PMVR. A total of 306 patients with FMR underwent PMVR procedure. In 279 out of 306 patients (91.2%), PMVR was successfully performed with MR grade ≤ 2 + at discharge. In 11.4% of these patients, MR recurrence of initial successful PMVR after 1 year was observed. Recurrence of MR was associated with a higher rate of heart failure rehospitalization during the 12 months follow-up (52.0% vs. 30.3%; p = 0.029), and less improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class [68% vs. 19% of the patients presenting with NYHA functional class III or IV one year after PMVR when compared to patients without recurrence (p = 0.001)]. Patients with MR recurrence were characterized by a higher left ventricular sphericity index {0.69 [Interquartile range (IQR) 0.64, 0.74] vs. 0.65 (IQR 0.58, 0.70), p = 0.003}, a larger left atrium volume [118 (IQR 96, 143) ml vs. 102 (IQR 84, 123) ml, p = 0.019], a larger tenting height 10 (IQR 9, 13) mm vs. 8 (IQR 7, 11) mm (p = 0.047), and a larger mitral valve annulus [41 (IQR 38, 43) mm vs. 39 (IQR 36, 40) mm, p = 0.015] when compared to patients with durable optimal long-term results. In a multivariate regression model, the left ventricular sphericity index [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.120, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.039–1.413, p = 0.003)], tenting height (OR 1.207, 95% CI 1.031–1.413, p = 0.019), and left atrium enlargement (OR 1.018, 95% CI 1.000–1.038, p = 0.047) were predictors for MR recurrence after 1 year. In patients with FMR, baseline parameters of advanced heart failure such as spherical ventricle, tenting height and a large left atrium might indicate risk of recurrent MR one year after PMVR.

Effect of Mitral Valve Gradient After MitraClip on Outcomes in Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Results From the COAPT Trial

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to evaluate the association between mean mitral valve gradient (MVG) and clinical outcomes among patients who underwent MitraClip treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) in the COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation) trial.

BACKGROUND

In the COAPT trial, patients with heart failure (HF) and severe SMR who remained symptomatic despite guideline-directed medical therapy had marked 2-year reductions in mortality and HF hospitalizations after treatment with MitraClip.

METHODS

MitraClip-treated patients were divided into quartiles (Q) based on discharge echocardiographic MVG (n = 250). Endpoints including all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, and health status measures at 2 years were compared between quartiles.

RESULTS

Mean MVG after MitraClip was 2.1 ± 0.4 mm Hg, 3.0 ± 0.2 mm Hg, 4.2 ± 0.5 mm Hg, and 7.2 ± 2.0 mm Hg in Q1 (n = 63), Q2 (n = 61), Q3 (n = 62), and Q4 (n = 64), respectively. There was no difference across quartiles in the 2-year composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization (43.2%, 49.2%, 40.6%, and 40.9%, respectively; p = 0.80), nor in improvements in New York Heart Association functional class, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score, or 6-min walk time. Results were similar after adjustment for baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics, post-procedure MR grade, and number of clips (all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization Q4 [44.6%] vs. Q1 to Q3 [40.3%]; adjusted hazard ratio: 1.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.60 to 2.51; p = 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Among HF patients with severe SMR, higher MVGs on discharge did not adversely affect clinical outcomes following MitraClip. These findings suggest that in select patients with HF and SMR otherwise meeting the COAPT inclusion criteria, the benefits of MR reduction may outweigh the effects of mild-to-moderate mitral stenosis after MitraClip.

Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (GIse) registry Of Transcatheter treatment of mitral valve regurgitaTiOn (GIOTTO): impact of valve disease aetiology and residual mitral regurgitation after MitraClip implantation

AIMS

The Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (GIse) registry Of Transcatheter treatment of mitral valve regurgitaTiOn (GIOTTO) was conceived in order to assess the safety and efficacy of MitraClip therapy in Italy. The aim of this study was to assess procedural and mid-term outcomes, and clinical and echocardiographic predictors of mid-term mortality after MitraClip therapy, stratifying the results according to the diagnosis of functional and degenerative mitral regurgitation (FMR vs. DMR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between January 2016 and March 2020, 1659 patients were prospectively included in the GIOTTO registry (FMR 59.4% vs. DMR 40.6%). Acute Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) technical success was achieved in 97.2% of patients, without differences between FMR and DMR and with sustained results at 30 days. In the study population, all-cause mortality was 4.0%, 17.5% and 34.6% at 30 days, 1 year and 2 years, respectively. Cardiovascular death was the most frequent cause of mortality. Overall hospitalization rates were 6.3%, 23.4% and 31.7% at 30 days, 1 year and 2 years, respectively. The most frequent cause of hospitalization was heart failure, particularly in the first 30 days. FMR and MVARC structural and functional failure were strongly associated with 1-year mortality. Residual mitral regurgitation 1+ (rMR) was independently related to a reduced risk of 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 0.62; P = 0.005). Coherently, at 2-year follow up, FMR was associated with worse outcomes than DMR, and Kaplan-Meier all-cause mortality was related to rMR.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional mitral regurgitation aetiology affects 1-year mortality after MitraClip implantation, and differences in mortality and hospitalization rates between FMR and DMR can be observed within 2 years. Optimal rMR 1+ was correlated to a more favourable mid-term outcome, particularly in FMR.

Percutaneous Mitral Valve Intervention Using MitraClip for Functional Mitral Regurgitation and Heart Failure

Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) frequently coexists with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and advanced heart failure, and typically has poor clinical outcomes. Although various therapeutic options including cardiac resynchronization therapy and surgical mitral intervention, have been proposed, an optimal treatment strategy for functional mitral regurgitation has not yet been established. Over the last decade, transcatheter mitral valve repair using MitraClip has emerged as a novel alternative therapeutic option for functional mitral regurgitation. In 2018, the COAPT trial demonstrated that MitraClip treatment reduced rehospitalization due to heart failure and all-cause death in patients with functional mitral regurgitation and heart failure. As a consequence, the MitraClip has become a very promising potential treatment for functional mitral regurgitation. In this review, we discuss and summarize the current status and future perspectives of the treatment for functional mitral regurgitation and heart failure.

Comparison of percutaneous MitraClip versus mitral valve surgery for severe mitral regurgitation: a meta-analysis: Mitraclip and mitral valve surgery meta-analysis

AIMS

Mitral valve surgery (MVS) is the gold-standard treatment for severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation. Percutaneous mitral valve interventions such as the MitraClip procedure offer another dimension to its management particularly in high-risk patients. We meta-analysed the outcomes of MitraClip and MVS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus from 1980/01-2019/06 were searched for eligible studies. Data were extracted and pooled using random-effects models. After screening 959 studies and reviewing 21 full-text articles, nine studies totalling 640 MitraClip and 531 MVS (91% valve repair) procedures were included in the meta-analysis. MitraClip patients were older, with a higher prevalence of previous cardiac surgery, coronary disease and a higher EuroSCORE (all p<0.05) than MVS patients. Pooled operative mortality was similar for MitraClip, 3%, versus MVS, 5%, odds ratio (OR): 0.58, 95%, CI: 0.28-1.19, as well as at 1 year mortality, OR: 1.09, CI: 0.71-1.68 and 3-year mortality, OR: 1.08, CI: 0.72-0.163. MitraClip patients had higher rates of early and late significant mitral regurgitation (MR) and more cardiovascular readmissions, while MVS had higher rates of in-hospital bleeding and pacemaker implantation (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MitraClip patients had a higher baseline risk than MVS, but there were no significant differences in short- and long-term mortality. MitraClip patients had higher rates of cardiovascular admissions and significant MR post-operatively, while MVS patients had more procedural complications.

Insufficient Mitral Leaflet Remodeling in Relation to Annular Dilation and Risk of Residual Mitral Regurgitation After MitraClip Implantation

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the mitral valve (MV) total leaflet area (TLA)-to-mitral annular area (MAA) (TLA/MAA) ratio measured using 3-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was associated with residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after MitraClip implantation in patients with secondary MR.

BACKGROUND

The factors influencing the results of MitraClip implantation for secondary MR are controversial. This study hypothesized that insufficient remodeling of the mitral leaflets relative to the annular dilation may be associated with significant MR after MitraClip implantation.

METHODS

This study included patients with secondary MR treated with MitraClips. Using 3D TEE dataset, the TLA in diastole and MAA in systole were measured with dedicated software.

RESULTS

In a total cohort of 119 patients (mean age 74 ± 9 years; 61% male), significant residual MR (≥2+) was present in 43 patients (36%). In patients with significant residual MR, MAA was greater than in patients without residual MR (10.7 ± 2.4 cm² vs. 9.0 ± 2.1 cm²; p < 0.001) whereas no significant difference was observed in TLA (12.2 ± 2.6 cm² vs. 12.0 ± 2.9 cm²; p = 0.836). TLA/MAA ratio was lower in patients with significant residual MR as compared to their counterparts (1.14 ± 0.15 vs. 1.34 ± 0.16; p < 0.001), suggesting insufficient leaflet remodeling relative to annular dilation. On receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the TLA/MAA ratio had better discriminative power to identify patients who will have significant residual MR compared to MAA alone (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.830 vs. 0.723; p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with secondary MR, insufficient mitral leaflet remodeling relative to the annulus dilation, as reflected by a lower TLA/MAA ratio, is associated with significant residual MR after MitraClip implantation.

Impact of disproportionate secondary mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing edge-to-edge percutaneous mitral valve repair

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of echocardiographic parameters assessing secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) severity and left ventricular dimension, including proportionate versus disproportionate SMR, in MitraClip recipients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed 137 patients undergoing MitraClip implantation for SMR at three centres. SMR was classified as proportionate or disproportionate based on the median value of the ratio between effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalisation at two-year follow-up. Mean age was 70±10 years, 80% were male, and median EuroSCORE II was 5.7%. No differences were observed in the disproportionate compared to the proportionate group except for a more severe NYHA class and their expected higher EROA and lower LVEDV. Number of clips deployed, device success and procedural success were similar between the two groups. Residual mitral regurgitation (MR) >1+ at 30 days was more common among patients with an EROA >0.42 cm2 compared to those with an EROA ≤0.42 cm2 (81.3% vs 58%; p=0.004). The relative risk of the primary endpoint was independent from any echocardiographic parameter, including the presence of disproportionate SMR. The only independent predictors of clinical events were EuroSCORE II >8%, NYHA class and residual MR >1+ at 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Echocardiographic parameters, including the EROA/LVEDV ratio, do not have independent prognostic value in patients undergoing MitraClip implantation. High surgical risk, advanced symptoms and non-optimal MR reduction increase the relative risk of two-year clinical events.

MitraClip-Associated Endocarditis: Emergency Department Diagnosis With Point of Care Ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Management of mitral valve regurgitation in patients with multiple comorbidities is complicated because of poor surgical candidacy. Less invasive techniques for these patients include the MitraClip device, an endovascular repair option used to reduce mitral valve regurgitation symptoms. However, complications include leaflet damage, stenosis, and infectious endocarditis.

CASE REPORT

Four years after MitraClip placement, an 80-year-old man presented to the emergency department with progressive dyspnea. He was diagnosed with MitraClip-associated infectious endocarditis by the emergency physician using point-of-care ultrasound. There are 6 reported cases of infective endocarditis in patients with MitraClip devices, with this being the first case identified using point-of-care ultrasound. This is also the first reported case of MitraClip-associated Corynebacterium endocarditis. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: The use of the MitraClip device and its echocardiographic appearance is not widely described in the published emergency medicine literature. Knowledge of this device, its appearance, and the potential complications is essential for emergency physicians caring for these patients. Rapid diagnosis may lead to earlier initiation of treatment and optimal disposition for these complex patients.

To Clip or Not to Clip: The Use of MitraClip Therapy for Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Percutaneous edge-to-edge repair of the mitral valve with the MitraClip device has been shown to serve as a safe and effective treatment for severe mitral regurgitation in the high-risk surgical population. Although the device originally was designed for the reduction of degenerative mitral regurgitation resulting from primary leaflet abnormalities, numerous studies have included patients with functional mitral regurgitation from annular or ventricular distortion. Two recent landmark studies examined the use of the MitraClip device for functional mitral regurgitation treatment and found drastically opposing results. Data reconciliation by others has suggested only a subset of those with functional mitral regurgitation may benefit from this treatment. Herein 2 seemingly similar cases to illustrate the subtle differences in patient selection that eventually may change the clinical outcome for this procedure are presented.

Usefulness of Age (≥85 Years) and Residual Mitral Regurgitation (>1+/4+) for the Prediction of Adverse Outcomes in Patients Receiving the MitraClip

The goal of this study was to determine the predictors of adverse clinical outcomes in patients treated with the MitraClip for significant mitral regurgitation (MR) with a focus on acute changes in hemodynamics and cardiac function. This retrospective study included 63 patients (mean age 82 ± 8 years, 48% male) with moderate to severe or severe MR. Cardiac catheterization was performed before and immediately after MitraClip repair. Volumetric and functional changes were assessed in both ventricles. A major adverse cardiac event was defined as a composite of cardiac death and readmission for heart failure. Patients were followed up on average for 380 days. MR was improved in 92% of patients after MitraClip therapy from an average grade of 4+ to <2+ (p <0.001). The pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased from 22 ± 7 mm Hg to 19 ± 6 mm Hg (p <0.001), and the cardiac stroke volume increased by 28% from 102 ± 53 ml to 131 ± 54 ml (p <0.001). The left ventricular end-diastolic volume was significantly reduced 24 hours after MitraClip therapy compared to that at baseline (p = 0.001). In the multivariate Cox proportion hazard regression model, an age ≥85 years (p <0.001) and residual MR >1+ (p <0.048) were predictors of an adverse prognosis at follow-up. In conclusion, a reduced left ventricular end-diastolic volume and improved hemodynamics occurred early after MitraClip therapy. An advanced age (≥85 years) and residual MR >1+ were associated with an increased risk of mortality and heart failure.

Evolution of secondary mitral regurgitation

Aims

Secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) drives adverse remodelling towards late heart failure stages. Little is known about the evolution of MR under guideline-directed therapy (GDT) and its relation to cardiac remodelling and outcome. We therefore aimed to assess incidence, impact, and predictors of progressive secondary MR in patients under GDT.

Methods and results

We prospectively enrolled 249 patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction receiving GDT in this long-term observational study. Of patients with non-severe MR at baseline 81% remained stable whereas 19% had progressive MR. Those patients were more symptomatic (P < 0.001), had higher neurohumoral activation (encompassing various neurohumoral pathways in heart failure, all P < 0.05), larger left atrial size (P = 0.004) and more tricuspid regurgitation (TR, P = 0.02). During a median follow-up of 61 months (IQR 50-72), 61 patients died. Progression of MR conveyed an increased risk of mortality-univariately (HR 2.33; 95% CI 1.34-4.08; P = 0.003), that persisted after multivariate adjustment using a bootstrap-selected confounder model (adjusted HR 2.48; 95% CI 1.40-4.39; P = 0.002). In contrast, regression of MR was not associated with a beneficiary effect on outcome (crude HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.30-2.30; P = 0.73).

Conclusions

Every fifth patient with chronic heart failure suffers from MR progression. This entity is associated with a more than two-fold increased risk of death even after careful multivariable adjustment. Symptomatic status, left atrial size, TR, and neurohumoral pathways help to identify patients at risk for progressive secondary MR in an early disease process and open the possibility for closer follow-up and timely intervention.

MitraClip in Patients With Mitral Regurgitation and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction <30% - Potential Implications for the Treatment of Patients in Japan

BACKGROUND

The effect of the unique Japanese indication for MitraClip based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is unclear. Methods and Results: We analyzed 874 patients who underwent MitraClip because of mitral regurgitation (MR) and compared the characteristics and outcomes between patients with LVEF <30% and ≥30%. Patients with LVEF ≤30% accounted for 33% of the study population and had a higher prevalence of functional MR. Severity of MR after MitraClip was comparable, and LVEF <30% did not independently affect survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Japanese unique indication based on LVEF may exclude one third of patients who were treated with MitraClip in Europe.

Repeat MitraClip for early recurrent mitral regurgitation

Treatment for recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR) after MitraClip therapy remains a challenging issue. This study reports the efficacy of repeat MitraClip therapy for recurrent MR during the early phase after the index MitraClip procedure. We present a case series of four consecutive patients who underwent repeat MitraClip procedures for severe recurrent MR during the early phase. Partial clip detachment (PCD) was the suspected cause of recurrent MR in these cases. All patients received additional clip(s). PCD could be stabilized and MR grade improved in all cases compared with that before the second procedure. Repeat MitraClip procedures for recurrent MR due to PCD are feasible during the early phase. However, patients having PCD with paracommissural MR may not be good candidates for repeat MitraClip.

Transcatheter Therapy for Mitral Regurgitation Clinical Challenges and Potential Solutions

Severe mitral regurgitation is a common and complex disease that is associated with an adverse prognosis. For decades, surgical treatment has been the standard of care. Recently, multiple technologies for transcatheter mitral therapy have emerged, with the potential for both repair and replacement in patients with native mitral regurgitation. Transcatheter mitral technologies have potential as solutions for unmet clinical needs. Further rigorous clinical studies are needed to determine their efficacy and safety, as well as the appropriate patient candidates. These evaluations will help to define the role of transcatheter mitral therapy as a potentially exciting new strategy to improve the lives of patients with mitral regurgitation.

Clinical outcomes of conventional surgery versus MitraClip® therapy for moderate to severe symptomatic mitral valve regurgitation in the elderly population: an institutional experience

Background

The aim of this study was to compare treatment of moderate to severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) with either conventional surgery or the mitral valve edge-to-edge device (MitraClip®) in very elderly patients. The newly introduced MitraClip device has demonstrated promising acute results in treating this patient cohort. Also noteworthy is the fact that patients who otherwise would have been denied surgery are increasingly referred for treatment with the MitraClip device. We sought to review our institutional experience, comparing outcomes in both surgical and MitraClip arms of treatment in the elderly population with symptomatic MR.

Methods

From October 2008 through October 2014, 136 consecutive patients aged ≥ 80 with moderate to severe symptomatic MR were scheduled for either conventional surgery or MitraClip intervention. 56 patients ≥ 80 were operated for symptomatic MR and 80 patients ≥ 80 were treated with the mitraClip device. Patients suitable for this study were identified from our hospital database. Patients ≥80 with moderate/severe symptomatic MR treated with either conventional surgery or the MitraClip device were eligible for our analysis. We compared the surgical patient cohort with the mitraClip patient cohort after eliminating patients that did not meet our inclusion criteria. Forty-two patients were identified from the conventional cohort who were then compared with 42 patients from the mitraClip cohort. Forty-two patients (50%) underwent mitral valve repair or replacement (40.5% functional MR, 59.5% organic/mixed MR) and 42 patients (50%) underwent MitraClip intervention (50% functional MR, 50% organic/mixed MR). Associated procedures in the conventional surgical group were myocardial revascularization 38%, pulmonary vein ablation 23.8%, left atrial appendage resection 52.4% and PFO occlusion 11.9%.

Results

Patients who underwent MitraClip treatment were though slightly older but the differences did not attain statistical significance (mean, 82.2 ± 1.65 vs 81.7 ± 1.35 years, p = 0,100), had lower LVEF (mean, 47.6 ± 14.2 vs 53.4 ± 14.3, p = 0.072), lower logistic EuroScore II (mean, 11.3 ± 5.63 vs 12.1 ± 10.6, p = 0.655) but higher STS risk score (mean, 11.8 ± 6.7 vs 8.1 ± 5.6, p = 0.008) respectively compared to surgical patients. Procedural success was 100% vs 96% in surgery and MitraClip groups respectively. Thirty -day mortality was 7.1% vs 4.8% (p = 1.000) in surgery and MitraClip group respectively. Residual postoperative MR ≥2 at discharge was present in none of the patients treated surgically, whereas this was the case in 10 (23.8%) patients treated with the MitraClip device. At 1 year a cumulative number of four (9.52%) patients died in the surgical group vs 9 (21.4%) patients who died in the MitraClip group.

Conclusions

Elderly patients presenting with moderate to severe symptomatic MR may either be treated by conventional surgery or with the MitraClip device with acceptable acute outcomes. The decision for treatment with the MitraClip device should not depend on age alone rather on cumulative risk of conventional surgery. Concomitant cardiac pathologies, often times treated simultaneously during surgery for symptomatic MR may be omitted, if patients are scheduled outright to MitraClip treatment. The effect of concomitant cardiac pathologies left untreated at the time of interventional mitral valve repair on outcome after MitraClip therapy remain widely unknown.