Clinical management of young competitive athletes with premature ventricular beats: A prospective cohort study

What is the most appropriate age for the first cardiac screening of athletes?

For sporting organisations that conduct screening of athletes, there are very few consistent guidelines on the age at which to start. Our review found the total rate of sudden cardiac arrest or death is very low between the ages of 8-11 years (less than 1/100,000/year), increasing to 1-2/100,000/year in both elite athletes and community athletes aged 12-15 years and then steadily increases with age. The conditions associated with sudden cardiac death in paediatric athletes and young adult athletes are very similar with some evidence that death from coronary artery abnormalities occurs more frequently in athletes 10-14 years old. The decision when to begin a screening program involves a complex interplay between requirements and usual practices in a country, the rules of different leagues and programs, the age of entry into an elite program, the underlying risk of the population and the resources available. Given the incidence of sudden cardiac arrest or death in young people, we recommend beginning cardiac screening no earlier than 12 years (not later than 16 years). The risk increases with age, therefore, starting a program at any point after age 12 has added value. Importantly, anyone with concerning symptoms (e.g. collapse on exercise) or family history of an inherited cardiac condition should see a physician irrespective of age. Finally, no screening program can capture all abnormalities, and it is essential for organisations to implement a cardiac emergency plan including training on recognition and response to sudden cardiac arrest and prompt access to resuscitation, including defibrillators.

Cardiac autonomic regulation following a 246-km mountain ultra-marathon: An observational study

Physical exercise requires integrated autonomic and cardiovascular adjustments to maintain homeostasis. We aimed to observe acute posture-related changes in blood pressure, and apply a portable noninvasive monitor to measure the heart index for detecting arrhythmia among elite participants of a 246-km mountain ultra-marathon. Nine experienced ultra-marathoners (8 males and 1 female) participating in the Run Across Taiwan Ultra-marathon in 2018 were enrolled. The runners' Heart Spectrum Blood Pressure Monitor measurements were obtained in the standing and supine positions before and immediately after the race. Their high-sensitivity troponin T and N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide levels were analyzed 1 week before and immediately after the event. Heart rate was differed significantly in the immediate postrace assessment compared to the prerace assessment, in both the standing (P = .011; d = 1.19) and supine positions (P = .008; d = 1.35). Postural hypotension occurred in 4 (44.4%) individuals immediately postrace. In 3 out of 9 (33.3%) recruited finishers, the occurrence of premature ventricular complex signals in the standing position was detected; premature ventricular complex signal effect was observed in the supine position postrace in only 1 participant (11.1%). Premature ventricular complex signal was positively correlated with running speed (P = .037). Of the 6 individuals who completed the biochemical tests postrace, 2 (33.3%) had high-sensitivity troponin T and 6 (100%) had N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide values above the reference interval. A statistically significant increase was observed in both the high-sensitivity troponin T (P = .028; d = 1.97), and N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide (P = .028; d = 2.91) levels postrace compared to prerace. In conclusion, significant alterations in blood pressure and heart rate were observed in the standing position, and postexercise (postural) hypotension occurred among ultra-marathoners. The incidence of premature ventricular complexes was higher after the race than before.

Palpitations in athletes: diagnosis, workup and treatment

Palpitations are a common reason for athletes to seek medical care. Although often benign, palpitations may serve as a harbinger for underling cardiac pathology. Given the unique challenges in this population, this review will serve to discuss the basic underlying pathophysiology, which may predispose athletes to palpitations. In addition, we will review the aetiologies, diagnostic evaluation, management and counselling strategies for some of the most common diagnoses seen in athletes.

Left Ventricular Trabeculation: Arrhythmogenic and Clinical Significance in Elite Athletes

INTRODUCTION

Left ventricular (LV) trabeculations (LVTs) are common findings in athletes. Limited information exists regarding clinical significance, management, and outcome.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to examine the prevalence and morphologic characteristics of LVTs in elite athletes, with a focus on clinical correlates and prognostic significance.

METHODS

We enrolled 1,492 Olympic elite athletes of different sports disciplines with electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and exercise stress test. Individuals with a definite diagnosis of LV noncompaction (LVNC) were excluded; we focused on athletes with LVTs not meeting the criteria for LVNC.

RESULTS

Four hundred thirty-five (29.1%) athletes presented with LVTs, which were more frequent in male athletes (62.1% vs 53.5%, P = .002) and Black athletes compared with Caucasian (7.1% vs 2.4%, P < .0001) and endurance athletes (P = .0005). No differences were found with relation to either the site or extent of trabeculations. Endurance athletes showed a higher proportion of LVTs and larger LV volumes (end-diastolic and end-systolic, respectively, 91.5 ± 19.8 mL vs 79.3 ± 29.9 mL, P = .002; and 33.1 ± 10 mL vs 28.6 ± 11.7 mL, P = .007) and diastolic pattern with higher E wave (P = .01) and e' septal velocities (P = .02). Ventricular arrhythmias were found in 14% of LVTs versus 11.6% of athletes without LVTs (P = .22). Neither the location nor the LVTs' extension were correlated to ventricular arrhythmias. At 52 ± 32 months of follow-up, no differences in arrhythmic burden were observed (11.1% in LVT athletes vs 10.2%, P = .51).

CONCLUSIONS

Left ventricular trabeculations are quite common in athletes, mostly male, Black, and endurance, likely as the expression of adaptive remodeling. In the absence of associated clinical abnormalities, such as LV systolic and diastolic impairment, electrocardiogram repolarization abnormalities, or family evidence of cardiomyopathy, athletes with LVTs have benign clinical significance and should not require further investigation.

Interpretation and management of premature ventricular beats in athletes: An expert opinion document of the Italian Society of Sports Cardiology (SICSPORT)

Premature ventricular beats (PVBs) are recorded in a sizeable proportion of athletes during pre-participation screening, especially if the evaluation includes both resting and exercise ECG. While in the majority of cases no underlying heart disease is present, in others PVBs may be the sign of a condition at risk of sudden cardiac death, including cardiomyopathies, congenital, coronary artery, heart valves and ion channels diseases. In this expert opinion document of the Italian Society of Sports Cardiology, we propose a multiparametric interpretation approach to PVBs in athletes and a stepwise diagnostic algorithm. The clinical work-up should include the assessment of the probable site of origin based on the ECG pattern of the ectopic QRS and of the arrhythmia behavior (including the number of different PVB morphologies, complexity, response to exercise and reproducibility), as well as first-line tests such as echocardiography. Based on this initial evaluation, most athletes can be reassured of the benign nature of PVBs and cleared for competition under periodical follow-up. However, when the clinical suspicion is high, further investigations with non-invasive (e.g. cardiac magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, genetic testing) and, in very selected cases, invasive (e.g. endocardial voltage mapping and endomyocardial biopsy) tests should be carried out to rule out a high-risk condition. Importantly, such advanced tests should be performed in centers with a consolidated experience not only in the technique, but also in evaluation of athletes.

An overview of the electrocardiographic monitoring devices in sports cardiology: Between present and future

BACKGROUND

Athletes represent a mainly healthy population, which however could be considered at risk of major arrhythmic events, especially in case of undiagnosed cardiomyopathies. For this reason, the periodical sports medicine examination and the electrocardiography are essential tools in the cardiovascular screening, even though they do not always succeed in identifying rhythm disturbances, particularly when asymptomatic or rarely symptomatic.

HYPOTHESIS

Prolonged cardiac monitoring often enables clinicians to stratify the arrhythmic risk and reach the diagnosis. The technological progress of the last decades has produced an always-increasing number of heart rhythm monitoring devices, starting from the 24-hour electrocardiogram Holter monitoring and ending with the wide world of wearable devices.

METHODS

In the literature, the extreme utility of this equipment in the patients affected by cardiovascular diseases and in the general population is well established. On the contrary, athletes-based randomized trials or large-scale epidemiological studies targeting the frequency of cardiac symptoms and the use of cardiac monitoring are missing, while an ever-growing number of case series and small observational studies are flourishing in recent years.

RESULTS

The present review showcases the available electrocardiographic monitoring options, principally in the medical setting, listing their characteristics, their indications, their supporting evidence, and their general pros and cons.

CONCLUSIONS

The ultimate goal of this review is guiding physicians through the wide variety of heart rhythm monitoring options in the specific subfield of sports cardiology, when an arrhythmia is suspected in an athlete, to tailor the diagnostic process and favor the best diagnostic accuracy.

Ventricular arrhythmias recorded on 12-lead ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring in healthy volunteer athletes and controls: what is common and what is not

AIMS

Premature ventricular beats (PVBs) in athletes are often benign, but sometimes they may be a sign of an underlying disease. We evaluated the prevalence, burden, and morphology of PVBs in healthy voluntary athletes and controls with the main purpose of defining if certain PVB patterns are 'common' and 'training related' and, as such, are more likely benign.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 433 healthy competitive athletes [median age 27 (18-43) years, 74% males] and 261 age- and sex-matched sedentary subjects who volunteered to undergo 12-lead 24 h ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring (24H ECG), with a training session in athletes. Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) were evaluated in terms of their number, complexity [i.e. couplet, triplet, or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT)], exercise inducibility, and morphology. Eighty-six percent of athletes and controls exhibited a total of ≤10 PVBs/24 h, and >90% did not show any couplets, triplets, or runs of NSVT > 3 beats. An higher number of PVBs correlated with increasing age (P < 0.01) but not with sex and level of training. The most frequent morphologies among the 36 athletes with >50 PVBs were the infundibular (44%) and fascicular (22%) ones. In a comparison between athletes and sedentary individuals, and male and female athletes, no statistically significant differences were found in PVBs morphologies.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence and complexity of VAs at 24H ECG did not differ between athletes and sedentary controls and were not related to the type and amount of sport or sex. Age was the only variable associated with an increased PVB burden. Thus, no PVB pattern in the athlete can be considered 'common' or 'training related'.

Electrocardiographic characteristics of right-bundle-branch-block premature ventricular complexes predicting absence of left ventricular scar in athletes with apparently structural normal heart

AIMS

Left ventricular scar is an arrhythmic substrate that may be missed by echocardiography and diagnosed only by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), which is a time-consuming and expensive imaging modality. Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) with a right-bundle-branch-block (RBBB) pattern are independent predictors of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) but their positive predictive value is low. We studied which electrocardiographic features of PVCs with an RBBB pattern are associated with a higher probability of the absence of an underlying LGE.

METHODS

The study included 121 athletes (36 ± 16 years; 48.8% men) with monomorphic PVCs with an RBBB configuration and normal standard clinical investigations who underwent CMR. LGE was identified in 35 patients (29%), predominantly in those with PVCs with a superior/intermediate axis (SA-IntA) compared to inferior axis (IA) (38% vs. 10%, P = 0.002). Among patients with SA-IntA morphology, the contemporary presence of qR pattern in lead aVR and V1 was exclusively found in patients without LGE at CMR (51.0% vs. 0%, P < 0.0001). Among patients with IA, the absence of LGE correlated to a narrow ectopic QRS (145 ± 16 vs. 184 ± 27 msec, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among athletes with apparently idiopathic PVCs with a RBBB configuration, the presence of a concealed LGE at CMR was documented in 29% of cases, mostly in those with a SA-IntA. In our experience, the contemporary presence of qR pattern in lead aVR and V1 in PVCs with RBBB/SA-IntA morphology or, on the other hand, a relatively narrow QRS in PVCs with an IA, predicted absence of LGE.

Electroanatomic mapping in athletes: Why and when. An expert opinion paper from the Italian society of sports cardiology

Three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping (EAM) has the potential to identify the pathological substrate underlying ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in different clinical settings by detecting myocardial areas with abnormally low voltages, which reflect the presence of different cardiomyopathic substrates. In athletes, the added value of EAM may be to enhance the efficacy of third-level diagnostic tests and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in detecting concealed arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies. Additional benefits of EAM in the athlete include the potential impact on disease risk stratification and the consequent implications for eligibility to competitive sports. This opinion paper of the Italian Society of Sports Cardiology aims to guide general sports medicine physicians and cardiologists on the clinical decision when to eventually perform an EAM study in the athlete, highlighting strengths and weaknesses for each cardiovascular disease at risk of sudden cardiac death during sport. The importance of early (preclinical) diagnosis to prevent the negative effects of exercise on phenotypic expression, disease progression, and worsening of the arrhythmogenic substrate is also addressed.

Reproducibility of ventricular arrhythmias at exercise testing for prediction of non-ischaemic left ventricular scar in athletes

AIMS

The non-ischaemic left ventricular scar (NILVS) is an emerging substrate of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in the athlete. We tested the diagnostic value of VA reproducibility at repeated exercise testing (ET).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included consecutive athletes who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for evaluation of VA and two consecutive ET off-therapy within 12 months. Those with a positive family history of premature sudden death/cardiomyopathy, syncope/pre-syncope, ECG or echocardiography abnormalities, or low-risk VA (exercise-suppressed infundibular or fascicular VA) were excluded. The NILVS was defined as subepicardial/midmyocardial stria of late gadolinium enhancement involving >5% of the LV mass. Reproducibility was defined as the occurrence of VA with the same pattern and behaviour during repeated ET. Of 325 athletes who underwent CMR for evaluation of VA, 75 were included, and 30 showed NILVS involving three [2-4] LV segments. At first ET, athletes with NILVS showed a higher prevalence of exercise-induced VA (93% vs. 53%, P < 0.001), while other VA characteristics did not differ between groups. At repeated ET, reproducibility was observed in 97% of athletes with vs. 13% without NILVS (P < 0.001). The remaining 87% of athletes with normal CMR either did not show any VA at repeated ET (59%) or showed arrhythmias with different patterns, mostly infundibular. Reproducibility yielded a positive predictive value for NILVS of 83% and a negative predictive value of 98%.

CONCLUSION

VA reproducibility at repeated ET predicted an underlying NILVS in athletes with VA and otherwise normal clinical work-up. This finding may improve risk stratification and appropriate CMR referral of athletes with apparently idiopathic VA.

SARS-CoV-2 infection and return to play in junior competitive athletes: is systematic cardiac screening needed?

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 infection might be associated with cardiac complications in low-risk populations, such as in competitive athletes. However, data obtained in adults cannot be directly transferred to preadolescents and adolescents who are less susceptible to adverse clinical outcomes and are often asymptomatic.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted this prospective multicentre study to describe the incidence of cardiovascular complications following SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large cohort of junior athletes and to examine the effectiveness of a screening protocol for a safe return to play.

METHODS

Junior competitive athletes suffering from asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent cardiac screening, including physical examination, 12-lead resting ECG, echocardiogram and exercise ECG testing. Further investigations were performed in cases of abnormal findings.

RESULTS

A total of 571 competitive junior athletes (14.3±2.5 years) were evaluated. About half of the population (50.3%) was mildly symptomatic during SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the average duration of symptoms was 4±1 days. Pericardial involvement was found in 3.2% of junior athletes: small pericardial effusion (2.6%), moderate pericardial effusion (0.2%) and pericarditis (0.4%). No relevant arrhythmias or myocardial inflammation was found in subjects with pericardial involvement. Athletes with pericarditis or moderate pericardial effusion were temporarily disqualified, and a gradual return to play was achieved after complete clinical resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of cardiac involvement was low in junior athletes after asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. A screening strategy primarily driven by cardiac symptoms should detect cardiac involvement from SARS-CoV-2 infection in most junior athletes. Systematic echocardiographic screening is not recommended in junior athletes.

Causes of sudden cardiac death in young athletes and non-athletes: systematic review and meta-analysis: Sudden cardiac death in the young

INTRODUCTION

The etiology of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young people continues to attract much attention. This meta-analysis aimed to identify the most frequent causes of SCD in individuals aged ≤35 years, the differences between athletes and non-athletes and geographic areas.

METHODS

Studies published between 01/01/1990 and 01/31/2020 and evaluating post-mortem the aetiology of SCD in young individuals (≤35 years) were included. Individuals were divided into athletes and non-athletes. Studies that did not report separate data between athletes and non-athletes were excluded.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, and a total population of 5,060 victims of SCD were analyzed (2,890 athletes, 2,170 non-athletes). Comparing the causes of SCD between athletes and non-athletes, non-ischemic left ventricular scar (NILVS) (5.1% vs. 1.1%, p=0.01) was more frequent in the former, while coronary artery disease (CAD) (19.6% vs. 9.1%, p=0.009), arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) (11.5% vs. 4.7%, p=0.03) and channelopathies (8.4% vs. 1.9%, p=0.02) were more frequent in the latter. In studies published in the last decade, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (p=0.002), dilated cardiomyopathy (p=0.047), and anomalous origin of coronary arteries (AOCA) (p=0.009) were more frequently the causes of SCD in athletes while aortic dissection (0.022) was the cause in non-athletes. HCM (p=0.01) and AOCA (p=0.004) were more frequently the causes of SCD in the US while ACM (p=0.001), structurally normal heart (p=0.02), and channelopathies (p=0.02) were more frequent in Europe.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the causes of SCD, NILVS was the more frequent cause in athletes, while CAD, ACM and channelopathies were more frequent causes in non-athletes. The causes of SCD differ between the US and Europe.

A prospective study on the consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the heart of young adult competitive athletes: Implications for a safe return-to-play

Objectives

The COVID-19 pandemic has shocked the sports world because of the suspension of competitions and the spread of SARS-CoV-2 among athletes. After SARS-CoV-2 infection, cardio-pulmonary complications can occur and, before the resumption of sports competitions, a screening has been recommended. However, few data are available and discrepancies exist in the screening modalities. We conducted this prospective study to investigate the incidence of cardiovascular consequences following SARS-CoV-2 infection in young adult competitive athletes and the appropriate screening strategies for a safe return-to-play.

Methods

Ninety competitive athletes (24 ± 10 years) after asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection were screened by physical examination, blood testing, spirometry, 12‑lead resting ECG, 24-h ambulatory ECG monitoring, echocardiogram, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET).

Results

Sixty-four athletes (71.1%) were male, and most (76.7%) were mildly symptomatic. After SARS-CoV-2 infection, spirometry and resting ECG were normal in all athletes. Ambulatory ECG monitoring demonstrated <50/24 h supraventricular and ventricular premature beats in 53.3% and 52.2% of athletes, respectively, in the absence of malignant arrhythmias. CPET did not demonstrate cardiopulmonary limitations. Echocardiography showed pericardial effusion in 3 athletes (all females) with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (3.3%; 4.4% in the symptomatic group) with a definitive diagnosis of myopericarditis in 1 athlete (1.1%) and pericarditis in 2 athletes (2.2%).

Conclusions

Cardiac consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection were found in 3.3% of competitive athletes. An appropriate screening primarily based on the detection of uncommon arrhythmias and cardiac symptoms should be recommended in competitive athletes after SARS-CoV-2 infection to detect a cardiac involvement and guarantee a safe return-to-play.