1
|
Riva L. The Physician-Assisted Suicide Pathway in Italy: Ethical Assessment and Safeguard Approaches. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2024; 21:185-192. [PMID: 37831290 PMCID: PMC11052828 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-023-10302-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
Although in Italy there is currently no effective law on physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia, Decision No. 242 issued by the Italian Constitutional Court on September 25, 2019 established that an individual who, under specific circumstances, has facilitated the implementation of an independent and freely-formed resolve to commit suicide by another individual is exempt from criminal liability. Following this ruling, some citizens have submitted requests for assisted suicide to the public health system, generating a situation of great uncertainty in the application processes. As a matter of fact, shared and defined procedures are lacking as Decision 242/2019 merely added some principles on which the legislature will have to base its future intervention. This paper analyses the advisory role that the Decision attributes to territorial ethics committees with the aim of stimulating discussions on their role in oversight mechanisms. The proposed conclusion is that the envisaged role does not appear consistent with the functions of these bodies and is ultimately substantially undefined and unjustified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciana Riva
- Bioethics Unit, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella 34, 00162, Roma, Italia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Favron-Godbout C, Racine E. Medical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:86. [PMID: 37875867 PMCID: PMC10594804 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00971-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical assistance in dying (MAiD) sparks debate in several countries, some of which allow or plan to allow MAiD where a mental disorder is the sole underlying medical condition (MAiD-MD). Since MAiD-MD is becoming permissible in a growing number of jurisdictions, there is a need to better understand the moral concerns related to this option. Gaining a better understanding of the moral concerns at stake is a first step towards identifying ways of addressing them so that MAiD-MD can be successfully introduced and implemented, where legislations allow it. METHODS Thus, this article aims (1) to better understand the moral concerns regarding MAiD-MD, and (2) to identify potential solutions to promote stakeholders' well-being. A qualitative thematic review was undertaken, which used systematic keyword-driven search and thematic analysis of content. Seventy-four publications met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS Various moral concerns and proposed solutions were identified and are related to how MAiD-MD is introduced in 5 contexts: (1) Societal context, (2) Healthcare system, (3) Continuum of care, (4) Discussions on the option of MAiD-MD, (5) MAiD-MD practices. We propose this classification of the identified moral concerns because it helps to better understand the various facets of discomfort experienced with MAiD-MD. In so doing, it also directs the various actions to be taken to alleviate these discomforts and promote the well-being of stakeholders. CONCLUSION The assessment of MAiD-MD applications, which is part of the context of MAiD-MD practices, emerges as the most widespread source of concern. Addressing the moral concerns arising in the five contexts identified could help ease concerns regarding the assessment of MAiD-MD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Favron-Godbout
- Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, Montreal Clinical Research Institute, 110 av. des Pins O, Montreal, QC, H2W 1R7, Canada
| | - Eric Racine
- Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, Montreal Clinical Research Institute, 110 av. des Pins O, Montreal, QC, H2W 1R7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maung HH. Externalist argument against medical assistance in dying for psychiatric illness. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2023; 49:553-557. [PMID: 36175124 PMCID: PMC10423508 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Medical assistance in dying, which includes voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide, is legally permissible in a number of jurisdictions, including the Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland and Canada. Although medical assistance in dying is most commonly provided for suffering associated with terminal somatic illness, some jurisdictions have also offered it for severe and irremediable psychiatric illness. Meanwhile, recent work in the philosophy of psychiatry has led to a renewed understanding of psychiatric illness that emphasises the role of the relation between the person and the external environment in the constitution of mental disorder. In this paper, I argue that this externalist approach to mental disorder highlights an ethical challenge to the practice of medical assistance in dying for psychiatric illness. At the level of the clinical assessment, externalism draws attention to potential social and environmental interventions that might have otherwise been overlooked by the standard approach to mental disorder, which may confound the judgement that there is no further reasonable alternative that could alleviate the person's suffering. At the level of the wider society, externalism underscores how social prejudices and structural barriers that contribute to psychiatric illness constrain the affordances available to people and result in them seeking medical assistance in dying when they otherwise might not have had under better social conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hane Htut Maung
- Department of Politics Philosophy and Religion, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Existential Suffering as a Legitimization of Euthanasia. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2023; 32:14-25. [PMID: 36330816 DOI: 10.1017/s0963180122000020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Several countries have legalized euthanasia on the basis of medically diagnosable suffering over the last decennial; the criteria to which they adhere differ. The topic of this article is euthanasia on the basis of existential suffering. This article presents a recent proposal to legalize euthanasia for people who experience such suffering and then discusses the issue of what the value of life may be, and whether the standard that life is normally something positive should be accepted. This provides the foundation to answer the question of whether euthanasia on the basis of existential suffering should be allowed.
Collapse
|
5
|
van Veen SMP, Evans N, Ruissen AM, Vandenberghe J, Beekman ATF, Widdershoven GAM. Irremediable Psychiatric Suffering in The Context of Medical Assistance in Dying: A Delphi-Study. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2022; 67:758-767. [PMID: 35311599 PMCID: PMC9510999 DOI: 10.1177/07067437221087052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with a psychiatric disorder are eligible to request medical assistance in dying (MAID) in a small but growing number of jurisdictions, including the Netherlands and Belgium. In Canada, MAID for mental illness will become possible in 2023. For this request to be granted, most of these jurisdictions demand that the patient is competent in her request, and that the suffering experienced is unbearable and irremediable. Especially the criterion of irremediability is challenging to establish in patients with psychiatric disorders. The aim of this research is to establish what criteria Dutch and Belgian experts agree to be necessary in characterising irremediable psychiatric suffering (IPS) in the context of MAID. METHODS A two-round Delphi procedure among psychiatrists with relevant experience. RESULTS Thirteen consensus criteria were established: five diagnostic and eight treatment-related criteria. Diagnostically, the participants deem a narrative description and attention to contextual and systemic factors necessary. Also, a mandatory second opinion is required. The criteria concerning treatment show that extensive biopsychosocial treatment is needed, and the suffering must be present for several years. Finally, in the case of refusal, the participants agree that there are limits to the number of diagnostic procedures or treatments a patient must undergo. CONCLUSIONS Consensus was found among a Dutch and Belgian expert group on potential criteria for establishing IPS in the context of MAID. These criteria can be used in clinical decision-making and can inform future procedural demands and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sisco M P van Veen
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands.,Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands.,113 Suicide prevention, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Natalie Evans
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea M Ruissen
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | | | - Aartjan T F Beekman
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Guy A M Widdershoven
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Veen SMP, Widdershoven GAM, Beekman ATF, Evans N. Physician Assisted Death for Psychiatric Suffering: Experiences in the Netherlands. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:895387. [PMID: 35795029 PMCID: PMC9251055 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.895387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Physician assisted death (PAD) for patients with a psychiatric disorder is a controversial topic of increasing relevance, since a growing number of countries are allowing it. General requirements for PAD include that patients possess decision-making capacity to decide on PAD and that their suffering is unbearable and irremediable. In the Netherlands PAD has been eligible for patients with psychiatric disorders since the 1990s, making it one of the few countries that can offer insights on the practice from real life experience. Much of the literature describing these experiences is only available in Dutch. This article aims to make this knowledge more widely available and provide a comprehensive overview of the experience with PAD for psychiatric suffering in the Netherlands. First, the history of PAD for patients suffering from a psychiatric disorder is described. Second, an overview of relevant rules and regulations governing the practice is given. Third, an overview is provided of the scarce epidemiological data. Finally, we will discuss two major clinical challenges; establishing irremediability and decision-making capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SMP van Veen
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - GAM Widdershoven
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - ATF Beekman
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - N. Evans
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Doherty AM, Axe CJ, Jones DA. Investigating the relationship between euthanasia and/or assisted suicide and rates of non-assisted suicide: systematic review. BJPsych Open 2022; 8:e108. [PMID: 35656575 PMCID: PMC9230443 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2022.71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) are practices that aim to alleviate the suffering of people with life-limiting illnesses, but are controversial. One area of debate is the relationship between EAS and suicide rates in the population, where there have been claims that availability of EAS will reduce the number of self-initiated deaths (EAS and suicide combined). Others claim that legislation for EAS makes it acceptable to end one's own life, a message at variance with that of suicide prevention campaigns. AIMS To examine the relationship between the introduction of EAS and rates of non-assisted suicide and self-initiated death. METHOD We conducted a systematic review to examine the association between EAS and rates of non-assisted suicide and of self-initiated death. We searched PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO and Science Direct, until 20 December 2021. Studies that examined EAS and reported data on population-based suicide rates were included. RESULTS Six studies met the inclusion criteria; four reported increases in overall rates of self-initiated death and, in some cases, increased non-assisted suicide. This increase in non-assisted suicide was mostly non-significant when sociodemographic factors were controlled for. Studies from Switzerland and Oregon reported elevated rates of self-initiated death among older women, consistent with higher rates of depressive illnesses in this population. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this review do not support the hypothesis that introducing EAS reduces rates of non-assisted suicide. The disproportionate impact on older women indicates unmet suicide prevention needs in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Caitlyn J Axe
- School of Bioethics, University of Washington, Washington, USA
| | - David A Jones
- Department of Bioethics, St Mary's University Twickenham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pronk R, Willems DL, van de Vathorst S. Feeling Seen, Being Heard: Perspectives of Patients Suffering from Mental Illness on the Possibility of Physician-Assisted Death in the Netherlands. Cult Med Psychiatry 2022; 46:475-489. [PMID: 34132955 PMCID: PMC8208069 DOI: 10.1007/s11013-021-09726-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Physician-assisted death (PAD) for patients suffering from a mental illness is allowed in the Netherlands under certain conditions but is a very controversial topic, mainly discussed by ethicists and physicians. The voice of the patient is rarely included in the debate, so we know little about what their views on the topic are. We aim to understand the views of patients with mental illness and wish to die with regard to the possibility of PAD in the Netherlands. The data for this qualitative study were collected through 21 in-depth interviews with Dutch patients who have a wish for PAD as a result of suffering from a mental illness. We identified four themes in relation to the meaning of PAD for the patients suffering from mental illness and wish to die. These themes are (1) Autonomy and self-determination, (2) ending the suffering, (3) recognition, and (4) a dignified end-of-life. The option of PAD for patients suffering from mental illnesses was considered of great importance to the patients who have a wish to die. We highlight the importance of 'recognition' for the situation of the patient, as this could lead to new perspective. We argue that psychiatrists need to reflect on providing this recognition in earlier phases of treatment, taking seriously and discussing a wish for PAD in treatment is beneficial to patients. It provides space for the patient to discuss their wishes and could cause them not wanting to die anymore.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalie Pronk
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, Room J2-126, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Dick L Willems
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, Room J2-126, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne van de Vathorst
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, Room J2-126, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van Veen SMP, Ruissen AM, Beekman ATF, Evans N, Widdershoven GAM. Establishing irremediable psychiatric suffering in the context of medical assistance in dying in the Netherlands: a qualitative study. CMAJ 2022; 194:E485-E491. [PMID: 35273025 PMCID: PMC8985907 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.210929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Establishing irremediability of suffering is a central challenge in determining the appropriateness of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) for patients with a psychiatric disorder. We sought to evaluate how experienced psychiatrists define irremediable psychiatric suffering in the context of MAiD and what challenges they face while establishing irremediable psychiatric suffering. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study of psychiatrists in the Netherlands with experience assessing irremediable psychiatric suffering in the context of MAiD. We collected data from in-depth, semistructured interviews focused on the definition of irremediable psychiatric suffering and on the challenges in establishing irremediability. We analyzed themes using a modified grounded theory approach. Results: The study included 11 psychiatrists. Although irremediable psychiatric suffering is a prospective concept, most participants relied on retrospective dimensions to define it, such as a history of failed treatments, and expressed that uncertainty was inevitable in this process. When establishing irremediable psychiatric suffering, participants identified challenges related to diagnosis and treatment. The main diagnostic challenge identified was the frequent co-occurrence of more than 1 psychiatric diagnosis. Important challenges related to treatment included assessing the quality of past treatments, establishing when limits of treatment had been reached and managing “treatment fatigue.” Interpretation: Challenges regarding the definition, diagnosis and treatment of irremediable psychiatric suffering complicate the process of establishing it in the context of MAiD. Development of consensus clinical criteria for irremediable psychiatric suffering in this context and further research to understand “treatment fatigue” among patients with psychiatric disorders may help address these challenges. Registration: This study was preregistered under osf.io/2jrnd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sisco M P van Veen
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities (van Veen, Ruissen, Evans, Widdershoven), Amsterdam University Medical Center; Department of Psychiatry (van Veen, Beekman), Amsterdam University Medical Center; 113 Suicide Prevention (van Veen), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea M Ruissen
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities (van Veen, Ruissen, Evans, Widdershoven), Amsterdam University Medical Center; Department of Psychiatry (van Veen, Beekman), Amsterdam University Medical Center; 113 Suicide Prevention (van Veen), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Aartjan T F Beekman
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities (van Veen, Ruissen, Evans, Widdershoven), Amsterdam University Medical Center; Department of Psychiatry (van Veen, Beekman), Amsterdam University Medical Center; 113 Suicide Prevention (van Veen), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Natalie Evans
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities (van Veen, Ruissen, Evans, Widdershoven), Amsterdam University Medical Center; Department of Psychiatry (van Veen, Beekman), Amsterdam University Medical Center; 113 Suicide Prevention (van Veen), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Guy A M Widdershoven
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities (van Veen, Ruissen, Evans, Widdershoven), Amsterdam University Medical Center; Department of Psychiatry (van Veen, Beekman), Amsterdam University Medical Center; 113 Suicide Prevention (van Veen), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mrozynski H, Kuhn E. Reasoning for autonomous suicide? A qualitative approach to pre-suicidal decision-making. Soc Sci Med 2022; 296:114764. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
11
|
Verhofstadt M, Pardon K, Audenaert K, Deliens L, Mortier F, Liégeois A, Chambaere K. Why adults with psychiatric conditions request euthanasia: A qualitative interview study of life experiences, motives and preventive factors. J Psychiatr Res 2021; 144:158-167. [PMID: 34638052 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As the empirical picture of adults with psychiatric conditions (further referred to as 'patients') requesting euthanasia is still incomplete, this study aims to deepen our understanding of why these patients request euthanasia, how this relates to the option of suicide, and what could have prevented these patients from considering death and requesting euthanasia. METHODS A qualitative study using in-depth, face-to-face interviews was conducted with 16 patients who had their euthanasia request under assessment in the period 2016-2020. Thematic coding was used. FINDINGS Most patients were in a state of feeling emotionally worn-out as a result of the many accumulated misfortunes and setbacks, leading to the all-pervasive sense that life is no longer worth living. Whereas some patients reported lifelong adversity, others struggled predominantly in later life. Whereas some patients longed for death strongly, others expressed ambivalence towards death ideation, and some even requested euthanasia to hear of their ineligibility for it, to restore hope and to (re)find meaning in life. patients valued euthanasia over suicide as being more dignified and acceptable, both for themselves and for their inner circle. With regard to preventive factors, patients posited the need for improved accessibility and quality of mental healthcare, as well as a profound change in society's perception of, and support for, these patients. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed the many complexities of euthanasia in the context of psychiatry, due to the many differences in patients' background characteristics, in their motives for requesting euthanasia, and the multi-layered aspects of mental suffering that go beyond the field of psychiatry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Verhofstadt
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Koen Pardon
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Kurt Audenaert
- Department of Psychiatry, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| | - Luc Deliens
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Freddy Mortier
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Brussels, Belgium; Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Axel Liégeois
- Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium; Organisation Brothers of Charity, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Kenneth Chambaere
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pronk R, Sindram NP, van de Vathorst S, Willems DL. Experiences and views of Dutch general practitioners regarding physician-assisted death for patients suffering from severe mental illness: a mixed methods approach. Scand J Prim Health Care 2021; 39:166-173. [PMID: 34241574 PMCID: PMC8293937 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1913895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the Netherlands, physician-assisted death (PAD) is allowed under certain conditions. Patients who suffer from mental illnesses are not excluded from this practice. In 2018, general practitioners (GPs) performed 20 out of a total of 67 cases of EAS for psychiatric suffering. OBJECTIVE More insight into GPs' experiences and views with regard to PAD in psychiatry. DESIGN The data for this study were obtained through a survey amongst 500 randomly selected Dutch GPs and by in-depth interviews with 20 Dutch GPs. SETTING A survey study and in-depth interviews. SUBJECTS Dutch GPs. RESULTS 86 out of 101 GPs found it conceivable to perform EAS in case of somatic disease, and 51 out of 104 GPs found it conceivable in the case a patient suffered from a mental illness only. The main reason given for refusing an PAD request was that the criteria of due care were not met. Reasons for supporting psychiatric PAD related to responsibility, self-determination, compassion, fairness, and preventing suicide. Reasons for not supporting psychiatric PAD were related to the scope of medicine, a perceived lack of experience, uncertainties regarding the criteria of due care and life-expectancy. CONCLUSION GPs are less likely to perform PAD for suffering from a mental illness, compared to somatic suffering. Some GPs apply an extra criterion of 'life-expectancy' in case of PAD for suffering from a mental illness. Refusing PAD based on a long life expectancy keeps open the possibility of recovery, but may also just prolong the suffering and add to the unbearableness of it.KEY POINTSCurrently, there is no qualitative research on what the views are of general practitioners regarding the subject of physician-assisted death (PAD) for patients suffering from severe mental disorders.General practitioners are less likely to consider a request for physician-assisted death by a patient suffering from a psychiatric disorder, compared to somatic suffering. Reasons for supporting psychiatric PAD related to responsibility, self-determination, compassion, fairness, and preventing suicide.Reasons for not supporting psychiatric PAD were related to the scope of medicine, a perceived lack of experience, uncertainties regarding the criteria of due care and life-expectancy.Significance for the reader: Although allowed in the Netherlands, PAD in case of severe mental suffering remains a controversial topic. We need in-depth information about the actual practice of it to have an informed debate with regard to this subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalie Pronk
- Department of General Practice, Medical Ethics Section, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nieke P. Sindram
- Department of General Practice, Medical Ethics Section, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S. van de Vathorst
- Department of General Practice, Medical Ethics Section, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D. L. Willems
- Department of General Practice, Medical Ethics Section, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pronk R, Willems DL, van de Vathorst S. Do Doctors Differentiate Between Suicide and Physician-Assisted Death? A Qualitative Study into the Views of Psychiatrists and General Practitioners. Cult Med Psychiatry 2021; 45:268-281. [PMID: 32833142 PMCID: PMC8110501 DOI: 10.1007/s11013-020-09686-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Physician-assisted death for patients suffering from psychiatric disorders is allowed in the Netherlands under certain circumstances. One of the central problems that arise with regard to this practice is the question of whether it is possible to distinguish between suicidality and a request for physician-assisted death. We set up this study to gain insight into how psychiatrists and general practitioners distinguish between suicidality and physician-assisted death. The data for this study were collected through qualitative interviews with 20 general practitioners and 17 psychiatrists in the Netherlands. From the interviews, we conclude that physicians distinguish three types of death wishes among patients suffering from psychiatric disorders: 'impulsive suicidality,' 'chronic suicidality,' and 'rational death wishes.' To discern between them they evaluate whether the death wish is seen as part of the psychopathology, whether it is consistent over time, and whether they consider it treatable. Some considered physician-assisted death an alternative to a 'rational suicide,' as this was perceived to be a more humane manner of death for the patient and their relatives. We argue that physician-assisted death can be justified also in some cases in which the death wish is part of the psychopathology, as the patient's suffering can be unbearable and irremediable. Physician-assisted death in these cases may remain the only option left to relieve the suffering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalie Pronk
- Department of General Practice, Medical Ethics Section, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of General Practice, Medical Ethics Section, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam UMC, Room J2-219, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Dick L Willems
- Department of General Practice, Medical Ethics Section, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne van de Vathorst
- Department of General Practice, Medical Ethics Section, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Möller HJ. The ongoing discussion on termination of life on request. A review from a German/European perspective. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract 2021; 25:2-18. [PMID: 32729770 DOI: 10.1080/13651501.2020.1797097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interest in the topic of termination of life has been growing for 2 decades. After legalisation of active euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) in the Netherlands in 2002, movements to implement similar laws started in other European countries. However, many people objected to legalisation on the basis of the experiences in the Netherlands and as a matter of principal. METHODS This selected and focussed review presents the theoretical discussions about EAS and describes the respective parliamentary discussions in Germany and the data and experiences in the Netherlands. It also considers people with mental disorders in the context of termination-of-life services. RESULTS So far, only a few European countries have introduced legislation on EAS. Legalisation of EAS in the Netherlands resulted in an unexpectedly large increase in cases. The number of people with mental disorders who terminate their lives on request remains low. CONCLUSIONS Experience from the Netherlands shows that widening criteria for EAS has problematic consequences.KEY POINTSTermination of life on request, which a subgroup of people support, is a matter of ongoing debate.Because of several problematic aspects, including ethical considerations, only a few countries in the world allow active euthanasia or assisted suicide.Even if euthanasia is well regulated, legalising it can have problematic consequences that are difficult to control, such as an unwanted excessive increase in euthanasia cases.The well-documented experiences with the euthanasia law in the Netherlands serve as an example of what is to be expected when euthanasia is legalised.We need to pay close attention to the relationship between suicide and suicide prevention on the one hand and euthanasia acts and promotion of euthanasia on the other.Further ethical, psychological and legal research is needed. In particular, the role of palliative medicine in societies' approach to end-of-life care must be explored in much more detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Jürgen Möller
- Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Guérinet L, Tournier M. [Euthanasia and assisted suicide for psychiatric disorder]. Encephale 2021; 47:246-253. [PMID: 33583568 DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Assisted death has been discussed for years in medicine. Ten countries have adopted legislation that authorises some form of euthanasia or assisted suicide, and the incidence and practices vary from country to country. Consideration of psychological pain linked to psychiatric disorders as a sufficient legal condition for enabling assisted death has added a new layer of complexity to the debate. Thus, Switzerland, Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg legalised assisted suicide or euthanasia for psychiatric reasons. In these cases, it is not a question of choosing death conditions but the occurrence of death. This manuscript is a narrative review of the literature about characteristics of patients with psychiatric disorders who requested assisted death in these countries. METHODS Scientific manuscripts, reports and legal documents were reviewed. RESULTS The incidence of assisted death for psychiatric reasons was low but has increased over the years. They represented 1.1 % of assisted deaths in Belgium (n=23) and 1.3 % in Netherlands (n=83) in 2017, and 4.5 % in Switzerland in 2014 when also considering dementia. The most frequent diagnoses were depressive and personality disorders. Patients were more often women than men, unlike suicide and middle aged. CONCLUSIONS Authors who support these practices emphasise the right to die with dignity and the inequality of ruling out patients with psychiatric reasons, whereas they meet the legal requirements, and psychological pain is as severe as somatic pain. Some major issues are highlighted: the close relationship between mood symptoms and death wish, thinking biases and cognitive disturbances that limit the ability to decide, access and consent to medical care, the difficulty of assessing psychological pain, and the definitions of incurability or treatment refractoriness in psychiatry. To date, medical knowledge and assessment tools are not sufficient to define possible indications and offer the best support possible to these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Guérinet
- Université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| | - M Tournier
- Université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France; Université de Bordeaux, Inserm Bordeaux Population Health Research Centre, équipe pharmaco-épidémiologie, UMR 1219, 146, rue Léo Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France; Centre hospitalier Charles-Perrens, 121, rue de la Béchade, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bouthillier ME, Vaillancourt H. Psychiatrie, soins palliatifs et de fin de vie : des univers (ir)réconciliables? Le cas de madame Sanchez. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS 2020. [DOI: 10.7202/1073546ar] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Contexte : En psychiatrie, la question d’offrir des soins palliatifs et de fin de vie pour ce qui serait une « condition psychiatrique terminale » ou, plus globalement, de considérer adopter une approche palliative pour des problèmes de santé mentale sévères et persistants constitue encore un tabou. Méthodologie : Cette question est abordée par l’analyse d’un cas effectuée lors d’une consultation en éthique clinique à l’aide de la méthode des scénarios d’Hubert Doucet. Il s’agit de madame Sanchez, une patiente âgée de plus de 90 ans, présentant des troubles psychiatriques, exprimant le désir de mourir par des gestes suicidaires, refusant les traitements proposés, ainsi que refusant de boire et manger. Son histoire clinique est racontée par le filtre de l’accompagnement réflexif offert en éthique clinique aux diverses parties prenantes. Résultats : L’analyse de cas, loin de répondre aux défis posés par le concept des soins palliatifs et de fin de vie en contexte psychiatrique, présente néanmoins une occasion d’en nommer les enjeux éthiques principaux : la souffrance psychique, le refus de manger et de boire ainsi que le refus de traitement, la sédation palliative et l’aide médicale à mourir, les volontés et directives médicales anticipées, ainsi que les défis clinico-organisationnels suscités par la clientèle gérontopsychiatrique. Conclusion : Les défis cliniques et éthiques demeurent nombreux pour les professionnels et les décideurs afin de répondre aux besoins de la clientèle de santé mentale très âgée. Nous appelons à un plus grand développement des connaissances sur ce thème précis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Eve Bouthillier
- Centre d’éthique du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux (CISSS) de Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada
- Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Hugues Vaillancourt
- Centre d’éthique du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux (CISSS) de Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Moshe S, Gershfeld-Litvin A. Old and Depressed? What We Think About Ending Their Suffering—Attitudes Toward Euthanasia for Elderly Suffering From Physical Versus Mental Illness. OMEGA-JOURNAL OF DEATH AND DYING 2020; 85:1026-1041. [DOI: 10.1177/0030222820961241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
This study aims to extend our knowledge regarding attitudes toward euthanasia. Specifically, the effect of patient’s age and illness type. 123 participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups completed the Assessing Right to Die Attitudes (ARDA) questionnaire after reading a patients age (79 vs. 29 year old) and illness type (cancer vs. depression) description. Findings revealed more positive attitudes toward euthanasia when the patient was physically ill, as opposed to mentally ill. Participants’ attitude towards euthanasia was more positive when the patient was elderly. Illness type as a function of the patient’s age did not significantly influence attitudes towards euthanasia. The results of the current study reinforce the individual influence of illness type and of patient age on attitudes toward euthanasia, and suggest additional avenues for further research regarding their combined influence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shir Moshe
- Academic College of Tel Aviv–Yaffo, Yaffo, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dembo J, van Veen S, Widdershoven G. The influence of cognitive distortions on decision-making capacity for physician aid in dying. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY 2020; 72:101627. [PMID: 32950802 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/22/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
As international laws on physician aid in dying (PAD) evolve, the question of permitting PAD in non-terminal illness, and in sole psychiatric illness, is under intense debate. In jurisdictions where PAD is permissible, certain safeguards and eligibility requirements must be met for all patients making a PAD request, and one of these requirements is that the patient have sound decision-making capacity with respect to the request. Legal criteria already exist for the determination of capacity, and they are quite similar between different jurisdictions. In current debates about the question of psychiatric PAD, one concern that has been raised is that cognitive distortions in mental disorders may affect a patient's decision-making capacity. At the same time, it has been established that all persons, with or without a mental disorder, experience cognitive distortions. If cognitive distortions are ubiquitous, it is likely that the severity and frequency of cognitive distortions is dimensional rather than categorical, between samples with and without mental illness. Furthermore, currently, there is no requirement for a formalized evaluation of cognitive distortions as part of capacity assessment for any type of medical decision, including PAD decisions. The current paper examines the literature related to cognitive distortions in mental disorders and in healthy populations. It proposes that the existence of cognitive distortions, alone, cannot be used as an argument for a blanket exclusion of psychiatric PAD. It therefore concludes that further research and ethical analysis should be undertaken to examine the impact of cognitive distortions on decision-making for consequential medical decisions, including PAD, in patients with and without mental disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Dembo
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Sisco van Veen
- GGZinGeest, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Guy Widdershoven
- Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
van Veen SMP, Ruissen AM, Widdershoven GAM. Irremediable Psychiatric Suffering in the Context of Physician-assisted Death: A Scoping Review of Arguments: La souffrance psychiatrique irrémédiable dans le contexte du suicide assisté : Une revue étendue des arguments. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2020; 65:593-603. [PMID: 32427501 PMCID: PMC7457463 DOI: 10.1177/0706743720923072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Physician-assisted death (PAD), also known as medical assistance in dying, of patients with a psychiatric disorder (PPD) is a global issue of debate. In most jurisdictions that allow PAD, irremediable suffering is a legal requirement, how to apply the concept of irremediability to PPD remains challenging. The aim of this article is to identify the main arguments concerning irremediability in the debate about PAD of PPD and give directions for further moral deliberation and empirical research. METHODS Systematic searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO were combined with 4 additional search strategies. All conceptual-ethical articles, quantitative and qualitative empirical studies, guidelines, case reports, and commentaries that met the inclusion criteria were included, and a qualitative data synthesis was used to identify recurring themes within the literature. The study protocol was preregistered at the Open Science Framework under registration code: thjg8. RESULTS A total of 50 articles met the inclusion criteria. Three main arguments concerning irremediability were found in the debate about PAD of PPD: uncertainty, hope, and treatment refusal. CONCLUSIONS Uncertainty about irremediability is inevitable, so which level of certainty is morally required should be the subject of moral deliberation. Whether PAD induces or resolves hopelessness is an empirical claim that deserves clarification. Treatment refusal in search of PAD raises questions about treatment efficacy in this patient group and about decision-making in the context of the physician-patient relationship. Going forward, more attention should be given to epidemiological research and to specific challenges posed by different psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sisco M. P. van Veen
- Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Centre
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the
Netherlands
| | - Andrea M. Ruissen
- Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Centre
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Haaglanden MC, the Hague, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
van Veen SMP, Scheurleer WFJ, Ruijsch ML, Röder CH, Widdershoven GAM, Batalla A. Last-Minute Recovery of a Psychiatric Patient Requesting Physician-Assisted Death. Psychiatr Serv 2020; 71:621-623. [PMID: 32041511 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Physician-assisted death is becoming legal in an increasing number of jurisdictions, but psychiatric patients are often explicitly excluded. However, in some countries, including the Netherlands, physician-assisted death of psychiatric patients is allowed. This Open Forum describes a patient with schizophrenia and symptoms diagnosed as refractory musical hallucinations. The patient requested assistance in dying only to recover after a mandatory second opinion, where his complaints were recognized as intrusive thoughts and treated accordingly. This case is used to reflect on how to deal with uncertainty about physician-assisted death of psychiatric patients and to argue for implementation of a due-diligence procedure, such as the one proposed in the Dutch Psychiatric Association's recent guideline concerning this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M P van Veen
- Department of Psychiatry (van Veen, Röder, Batalla) and Faculty of Medicine (Scheurleer, Ruijsch), University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam (van Veen, Widdershoven)
| | - W F J Scheurleer
- Department of Psychiatry (van Veen, Röder, Batalla) and Faculty of Medicine (Scheurleer, Ruijsch), University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam (van Veen, Widdershoven)
| | - M L Ruijsch
- Department of Psychiatry (van Veen, Röder, Batalla) and Faculty of Medicine (Scheurleer, Ruijsch), University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam (van Veen, Widdershoven)
| | - C H Röder
- Department of Psychiatry (van Veen, Röder, Batalla) and Faculty of Medicine (Scheurleer, Ruijsch), University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam (van Veen, Widdershoven)
| | - G A M Widdershoven
- Department of Psychiatry (van Veen, Röder, Batalla) and Faculty of Medicine (Scheurleer, Ruijsch), University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam (van Veen, Widdershoven)
| | - A Batalla
- Department of Psychiatry (van Veen, Röder, Batalla) and Faculty of Medicine (Scheurleer, Ruijsch), University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam (van Veen, Widdershoven)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nicolini ME, Kim SYH, Churchill ME, Gastmans C. Should euthanasia and assisted suicide for psychiatric disorders be permitted? A systematic review of reasons. Psychol Med 2020; 50:1241-1256. [PMID: 32482180 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291720001543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) based on a psychiatric disorder (psychiatric EAS) continue to pose ethical and policy challenges, even in countries where the practice has been allowed for years. We conducted a systematic review of reasons, a specific type of review for bioethical questions designed to inform rational policy-making. Our aims were twofold: (1) to systematically identify all published reasons for and against the practice (2) to identify current gaps in the debate and areas for future research. METHODS Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed a search across seven electronic databases to include publications focusing on psychiatric EAS and providing ethical reasons. Reasons were grouped into domains by qualitative content analysis. RESULTS We included 42 articles, most of which were written after 2013. Articles in favor and against were evenly distributed. Articles in favor were mostly full-length pieces written by non-clinicians, with articles against mostly reactive, commentary-type pieces written by clinicians. Reasons were categorized into eight domains: (1) mental and physical illness and suffering (2) decisional capacity (3) irremediability (4) goals of medicine and psychiatry (5) consequences for mental health care (6) psychiatric EAS and suicide (7) self-determination and authenticity (8) psychiatric EAS and refusal of life-sustaining treatment. Parity- (or discrimination-) based reasons were dominant across domains, mostly argued for by non-clinicians, while policy reasons were mostly pointed to by clinicians. CONCLUSIONS The ethical debate about psychiatric EAS is relatively young, with prominent reasons of parity. More direct engagement is needed to address ethical and policy considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie E Nicolini
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 - Box 7001 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Room 1C118, Bethesda, Maryland20892, USA
| | - Scott Y H Kim
- Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Room 1C118, Bethesda, Maryland20892, USA
| | - Madison E Churchill
- Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Room 1C118, Bethesda, Maryland20892, USA
| | - Chris Gastmans
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 - Box 7001 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Friesen P. Medically Assisted Dying and Suicide: How Are They Different, and How Are They Similar? Hastings Cent Rep 2020; 50:32-43. [PMID: 32068269 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
The practice of medically assisted dying has long been contentious, and the question of what to call it has become increasingly contentious as well. Particularly among U.S. proponents of legalizing the practice, there has been a growing push away from calling it "physician-assisted suicide," with assertions that medically assisted dying is fundamentally different from suicide. Digging deeper into this claim about difference leads to an examination of the difference between two kinds of suffering-suffering from physical conditions and suffering from psychological conditions-and therefore leads also toward an examination of whether requests for medical assistance in dying by those suffering from psychological conditions and those suffering from physical conditions should be painted with the same brush. In this article, I aim both to illuminate some of the considerations that ought to be included in discussions related to medically assisted dying and to shed light on what the indirect effects of such discussions can be. I consider some of the reasons commonly given for holding that suicide and medically assisted dying differ fundamentally and then whether the conclusion that medically assisted dying should not be called "suicide" follows from the premises. I ask what else might justify the conclusion that the two acts ought to be called by different names, and I examine possible justifications for accepting this premise, as well as what justifications might exist for emphasizing how the acts are alike. Finally, I argue that we should be cautious before concluding that medically assisted dying should not be called "suicide." We need more evidence either that the two acts are fundamentally different or that emphasizing differences between them is not likely to do more harm than good.
Collapse
|
23
|
Stoll J, Ryan CJ, Trachsel M. Perceived Burdensomeness and the Wish for Hastened Death in Persons With Severe and Persistent Mental Illness. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11:532817. [PMID: 33510652 PMCID: PMC7835407 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.532817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In several European countries, medical assistance in dying (MAID) is no longer confined to persons with a terminal prognosis but is also available to those suffering from persistent and unbearable mental illness. To date, scholarly discourse on MAID in this population has been dominated by issues such as decision-making capacity, uncertainty as to when a disease is incurable, stigmatization, isolation, and loneliness. However, the issue of perceived burdensomeness has received little attention. Objective: The study explores the possible impact of perceived burdensomeness on requests for MAID among persons with severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI). Method: Using the method of ethical argumentation, we discuss the issue of access to MAID for persons with SPMI and perceived burdensomeness. Conclusion: Perceived burdensomeness may be a contributing factor in the wish for hastened death among persons with SPMI. MAID is ethically unsupportable if SPMI causes the individual to make an unrealistic assessment of burdensomeness, indicating a lack of decision-making capacity in the context of that request. However, the possibility that some individuals with SPMI may perceive burdensomeness does not mean that they should be routinely excluded from MAID. For SPMI patients with intact decision-making capacity who feel their life is not worth living, perceived burdensomeness as a component of this intolerable suffering is not a sufficient reason to deny access to MAID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Stoll
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christopher James Ryan
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Westmead Clinical School and Sydney Health Ethics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Manuel Trachsel
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Clinical Ethics Unit, University Hospital Basel and University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Schultz IZ, Stewart AM, Sepehry AA. Determination of Competency for High-Gravity Life-Death Decision-Making. PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s12207-019-09361-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
25
|
Provencher-Renaud G, Larivée S, Sénéchal C. L’accès à l’aide médicale à mourir pour les personnes souffrant de troubles mentaux. ANNALES MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGIQUES 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amp.2018.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
26
|
|
27
|
Costa-Maia I, Marina S, Ricou M. Wish to Die: Suicide and Its Link to Euthanasia. OMEGA-JOURNAL OF DEATH AND DYING 2019; 83:927-943. [DOI: 10.1177/0030222819871182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This article analyzes suicidal behavior and how its inherent processes of death ideation can overlap with those seeking euthanasia. We present a literature review of three main events in suicide (suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and suicide) in different populations and evaluate implications for health-care practice and risk assessment taking into account the context of euthanasia. We ponder upon the motives behind suicide and its link with wish to die requests to hasten death. We discuss the possibility of the reversal of a wish to die as well as a potential process of differentiating between individuals who would maintain their wish and benefit from termination of life and others who would later change their minds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sílvia Marina
- Faculty of Medicine, CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Porto University, Portugal
| | - Miguel Ricou
- Faculty of Medicine, CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Porto University, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bahník Š, Vranka MA, Trefná K. What makes euthanasia justifiable? The role of symptoms' characteristics and interindividual differences. DEATH STUDIES 2019; 45:226-237. [PMID: 31198096 DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2019.1626945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The consideration of laypeople's views of conditions under which euthanasia is justifiable is important for policy decisions. In an online survey of US respondents, we examined how patient's symptoms influence justifiability of euthanasia. Euthanasia was judged more justifiable for conditions associated with physical suffering and negative impact on other people. The weight given to physical suffering and negative impact on others in evaluation of justifiability of euthanasia also differed based on personal characteristics. The results suggest that public discourse about medical assistance in dying should take into account differences in its perceived justifiability for patients with different conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Štěpán Bahník
- The Prague College of Psychosocial Studies, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Klára Trefná
- Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dembo J, Schuklenk U, Reggler J. "For Their Own Good": A Response to Popular Arguments Against Permitting Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) where Mental Illness Is the Sole Underlying Condition. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2018; 63:451-456. [PMID: 29635929 PMCID: PMC6099778 DOI: 10.1177/0706743718766055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Canada is approaching its federal government's review of whether patients should be eligible for medical assistance in dying (MAID) where mental illness is the sole underlying medical condition, and when "natural death" is not "reasonably foreseeable". For those opposed, arguments involve the following themes: capacity, value of life, vulnerability, stigma, irremediability, and the role of physicians. It has also been suggested that those who are able-bodied should have to kill themselves, even though suicide may be painful, lonely, and violent. Opponents of MAID for severe, refractory suffering due to mental illness imply that it is acceptable to remove agency from such patients on paternalistic grounds. After years of efforts to destigmatise mental illness, these kinds of arguments effectively declare all patients with mental illness, regardless of capacity, unable to make considered choices for themselves. The current paper argues that decisions about capacity must be made on an individual-patient basis. Given the rightful importance granted to respect for patient autonomy in liberal democracies, the wholesale removal of agency advocated by opponents of a permissive MAID regime is difficult to reconcile with Canadian constitutional values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Dembo
- 1 University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,2 Thompson Anxiety Disorders Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Udo Schuklenk
- 3 Department of Philosophy, Watson Hall 309, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Taylor C, Fertal JC, Liao S. Refractory Schizophrenia, Attempted Suicide, and Withdrawal of Life Support: A Clinical Ethics Case Report. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018; 56:153-157. [PMID: 29496535 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2017] [Revised: 02/16/2018] [Accepted: 02/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Withdrawal of life support for an individual with refractory schizophrenia after attempted suicide remains controversial. Discussion regarding prognosis of mental illness and the distinction between somatic and mental illness brings out many ethical issues. This article will examine the role and weight of severe persistent mental illness in the withdrawal of life support after attempted suicide. CASE DESCRIPTION A 30-year-old gentleman with deafness and schizophrenia was admitted with multiple self-inflicted visceral stab wounds. He developed postoperative complications necessitating ongoing critical care. The parties involved were as follows: the patient, his parents, the critical care trauma service, the palliative and psychiatry consult services, and the ethics committee. Over the patient's hospital course, his parents struggled to reconcile his poor preinjury quality of life with his ongoing need for intensive medical intervention. The primary and consulting teams were required to integrate differing perspectives on the patient's past responsiveness to treatment and the extent to which additional efforts might advance his quality of life and limit his future suffering and suicidality. The patient's surrogate decision makers unanimously requested withdrawal of life support. An ethics committee convened to address the question of whether refractory schizophrenia can produce so poor a quality of life as to merit the withdrawal of life-sustaining measures after a suicide attempt. Consensus was achieved, and life-sustaining measures were subsequently withdrawn, allowing the patient to pass away peacefully in an inpatient hospice facility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cory Taylor
- University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
| | | | - Solomon Liao
- UC Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Benrimoh D, Perreault A, Van Den Eynde F. Euthanasia requests in a Canadian psychiatric emergency room: A case series: Part 1 of the McGill University euthanasia in psychiatry case series. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY 2017; 55:37-44. [PMID: 29157510 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Revised: 08/25/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Euthanasia was decriminalized in Quebec in December 2015, and Canada-wide in June 2016. Both the Provincial and Federal legislation have limited the right to medical assistance in dying (MAID) to end-of-life cases; which makes MAID inaccessible to most patients solely suffering from psychiatric illness. While some end-stage anorexia nervosa or elderly patients may meet the end-of-life criterion because of their medical comorbidities or their age (Kelly et al., 2003), repeated suicide attempts or psychotic disorganization would not qualify since they would not be seen as elements of an illness leading to a foreseeable "natural death" (Canada, 2016). This is in contradiction to other jurisdictions, such as Belgium and the Netherlands as well as the eligibility criteria stated in the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Carter v. Canada (Supreme Court of Canada, 2015). Here we analyze three cases of patients who presented to a psychiatric emergency department and requested MAID for psychiatric reasons. While none of the patients were eligible for MAID under Canadian law, we find that their demographics match closely that of patients granted MAID for psychiatric reasons in jurisdictions where that practice is allowed. Based on these cases, we comment on potentially negative consequences that may come from decriminalizing MAID for psychiatric reasons (such as an increased assessment burden on ED staff) and potentially positive consequences (such as encouraging suffering patients who had not consulted to seek care). While it is by no means our intention to take a political or moral stand on this important issue, or to conclusively weigh the negatives and positives of allowing MAID for psychiatric reasons, we do stress the importance of an active voice for psychiatry in this ongoing public debate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Benrimoh
- McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, 1033 avenue des Pins Ouest, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada.
| | - Antoine Perreault
- McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, 1033 avenue des Pins Ouest, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Dierickx S, Deliens L, Cohen J, Chambaere K. Euthanasia for people with psychiatric disorders or dementia in Belgium: analysis of officially reported cases. BMC Psychiatry 2017; 17:203. [PMID: 28641576 PMCID: PMC5481967 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1369-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Euthanasia for people who are not terminally ill, such as those suffering from psychiatric disorders or dementia, is legal in Belgium under strict conditions but remains a controversial practice. As yet, the prevalence of euthanasia for people with psychiatric disorders or dementia has not been studied and little is known about the characteristics of the practice. This study aims to report on the trends in prevalence and number of euthanasia cases with a psychiatric disorder or dementia diagnosis in Belgium and demographic, clinical and decision-making characteristics of these cases. METHODS We analysed the anonymous databases of euthanasia cases reported to the Federal Control and Evaluation Committee Euthanasia from the implementation of the euthanasia law in Belgium in 2002 until the end of 2013. The databases we received provided the information on all euthanasia cases as registered by the Committee from the official registration forms. Only those with one or more psychiatric disorders or dementia and no physical disease were included in the analysis. RESULTS We identified 179 reported euthanasia cases with a psychiatric disorder or dementia as the sole diagnosis. These consisted of mood disorders (N = 83), dementia (N = 62), other psychiatric disorders (N = 22) and mood disorders accompanied by another psychiatric disorder (N = 12). The proportion of euthanasia cases with a psychiatric disorder or dementia diagnosis was 0.5% of all cases reported in the period 2002-2007, increasing from 2008 onwards to 3.0% of all cases reported in 2013. The increase in the absolute number of cases is particularly evident in cases with a mood disorder diagnosis. The majority of cases concerned women (58.1% in dementia to 77.1% in mood disorders). All cases were judged to have met the legal requirements by the Committee. CONCLUSIONS While euthanasia on the grounds of unbearable suffering caused by a psychiatric disorder or dementia remains a comparatively limited practice in Belgium, its prevalence has risen since 2008. If, as this study suggests, people with psychiatric conditions or dementia are increasingly seeking access to euthanasia, the development of practice guidelines is all the more desirable if physicians are to respond adequately to these highly delicate requests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sigrid Dierickx
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Luc Deliens
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joachim Cohen
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kenneth Chambaere
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rooney W, Schuklenk U, van de Vathorst S. Are Concerns About Irremediableness, Vulnerability, or Competence Sufficient to Justify Excluding All Psychiatric Patients from Medical Aid in Dying? HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s10728-017-0344-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
34
|
Blikshavn T, Husum TL, Magelssen M. Four Reasons Why Assisted Dying Should Not Be Offered for Depression. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2017; 14:151-157. [PMID: 27933459 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-016-9759-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2016] [Accepted: 08/19/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Recently, several authors have argued that assisted dying may be ethically appropriate when requested by a person who suffers from serious depression unresponsive to treatment. We here present four arguments to the contrary. First, the arguments made by proponents of assisted dying rely on notions of "treatment-resistant depression" that are problematic. Second, an individual patient suffering from depression may not be justified in believing that chances of recovery are minimal. Third, the therapeutic significance of hope must be acknowledged; when mental healthcare opens up the door to admitting hopelessness, there is a danger of a self-fulfilling prophecy. Finally, proponents of assisted dying in mental healthcare overlook the dangers posed to mental-health services by the institutionalization of assisted dying.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Blikshavn
- Department of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Akershus University Hospital, Pb. 1000, N-1478, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Tonje Lossius Husum
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Pb. 1130 Blindern, N-0318, Oslo, Norway
| | - Morten Magelssen
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Pb. 1130 Blindern, N-0318, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) is now legal in many jurisdictions for competent adults who have intolerable suffering and/or have a terminal illness with a short prognosis. Mental illness can be a source of suffering for these individuals, but it can also affect their capacity to make medical decisions. Clinicians, and psychiatrists in particular, need to understand how to assess patients with mental illness who are requesting MAID, to determine the impact of their mental illness on the MAID request. RECENT FINDINGS Psychiatric disorders can be a primary indication for MAID in parts of Europe, and recent published case series from Belgium and the Netherlands have generated strong responses from the psychiatric community. Patients dying of terminal illnesses who request MAID often have symptoms of depression or anxiety, but psychiatrists are rarely involved in their care. Psychiatrists may be helpful in assessing decision capacity, but documentation of capacity assessment could be improved. There is a broad need to develop educational resources to train current and future physicians about MAID. SUMMARY MAID represents an ethical and clinical challenge for psychiatrists in a variety of ways. As more jurisdictions legalize MAID, the psychiatric community will need to be prepared to meet these challenges with robust clinical standards and educational programs to ensure the highest standards of care for patients.
Collapse
|
36
|
Kim SYH, De Vries R, Peteet JR. Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide of Patients With Psychiatric Disorders in the Netherlands 2011 to 2014. JAMA Psychiatry 2016; 73:362-8. [PMID: 26864709 PMCID: PMC5530592 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Euthanasia or assisted suicide (EAS) of psychiatric patients is increasing in some jurisdictions such as Belgium and the Netherlands. However, little is known about the practice, and it remains controversial. OBJECTIVES To describe the characteristics of patients receiving EAS for psychiatric conditions and how the practice is regulated in the Netherlands. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This investigation reviewed psychiatric EAS case summaries made available online by the Dutch regional euthanasia review committees as of June 1, 2015. Two senior psychiatrists used directed content analysis to review and code the reports. In total, 66 cases from 2011 to 2014 were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Clinical and social characteristics of patients, physician review process of the patients' requests, and the euthanasia review committees' assessments of the physicians' actions. RESULTS Of the 66 cases reviewed, 70% (n = 46) were women. In total, 32% (n = 21) were 70 years or older, 44% (n = 29) were 50 to 70 years old, and 24% (n = 16) were 30 to 50 years old. Most had chronic, severe conditions, with histories of attempted suicides and psychiatric hospitalizations. Most had personality disorders and were described as socially isolated or lonely. Depressive disorders were the primary psychiatric issue in 55% (n = 36) of cases. Other conditions represented were psychotic, posttraumatic stress or anxiety, somatoform, neurocognitive, and eating disorders, as well as prolonged grief and autism. Comorbidities with functional impairments were common. Forty-one percent (n = 27) of physicians performing EAS were psychiatrists. Twenty-seven percent (n = 18) of patients received the procedure from physicians new to them, 14 of whom were physicians from the End-of-Life Clinic, a mobile euthanasia clinic. Consultation with other physicians was extensive, but 11% (n = 7) of cases had no independent psychiatric input, and 24% (n = 16) of cases involved disagreement among consultants. The euthanasia review committees found that one case failed to meet legal due care criteria. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Persons receiving EAS for psychiatric disorders in the Netherlands are mostly women and of diverse ages, with complex and chronic psychiatric, medical, and psychosocial histories. The granting of their EAS requests appears to involve considerable physician judgment, usually involving multiple physicians who do not always agree (sometimes without independent psychiatric input), but the euthanasia review committees generally defer to the judgments of the physicians performing the EAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Y H Kim
- Corresponding author. Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health and Adjunct Professor of Psychiatry, University of Michigan. 10 Center Drive, 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Raymond De Vries
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School; and CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - John R Peteet
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Attitudes of Psychiatric Nurses about the Request for Euthanasia on the Basis of Unbearable Mental Suffering(UMS). PLoS One 2015; 10:e0144749. [PMID: 26700007 PMCID: PMC4689522 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2015] [Accepted: 11/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION When psychiatric patients express a wish for euthanasia, this should first and foremost be interpreted as a cry for help. Due to their close day-to-day relationship, psychiatric nurses may play an important and central role in responding to such requests. However, little is known about nurses' attitudes towards euthanasia motivated by unbearable mental suffering. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to provide insight into the attitudes and actions taken by psychiatric nurses when confronted with a patient's euthanasia request based on unbearable mental suffering (UMS). METHOD A questionnaire was sent to 11 psychiatric hospitals in the Flemish part of Belgium. RESULTS The overall response rate was 70% (N = 627). Psychiatric nurses were frequently confronted with a request for euthanasia, either directly (N = 329, 53%) or through a colleague (N = 427, 69%). A majority (N = 536, 84%) did not object to euthanasia in a psychiatrically ill population with UMS. Confounding factors were the psychiatric diagnosis and the type of ward where the nurses were working. Most participants acknowledged a lack of knowledge and skills to adequately address the euthanasia request (N = 434, 71%). Nearly unanimously (N = 618, 99%), study participants indicated that dealing with euthanasia requests and other end-of-life issues should be part of the formal training of nurses. CONCLUSION The results highlight the need for ethically sound and comprehensive provision of care. Psychiatric nurses play an important role in dealing with the complex issue of requests for euthanasia. There is also a need for education, training and clear guidelines on the level of health care organizations.
Collapse
|
38
|
Schuklenk U, van de Vathorst S. Treatment-resistant major depressive disorder and assisted dying. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2015; 41:577-583. [PMID: 25935906 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2014] [Accepted: 04/02/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Competent patients suffering from treatment-resistant depressive disorder should be treated no different in the context of assisted dying to other patients suffering from chronic conditions that render their lives permanently not worth living to them. Jurisdictions that are considering, or that have, decriminalised assisted dying are discriminating unfairly against patients suffering from treatment-resistant depression if they exclude such patients from the class of citizens entitled to receive assistance in dying.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udo Schuklenk
- Department of Philosophy, Queens University, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hagens M, Pasman HRW, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. Cross-sectional research into counselling for non-physician assisted suicide: who asks for it and what happens? BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14:455. [PMID: 25278295 PMCID: PMC4283078 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2014] [Accepted: 09/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the Netherlands, people with a wish to die can request physician assistance in dying. However, almost two thirds of the explicit requests do not result in physician assistance in dying. Some people with a wish to end life seek counselling outside the medical context to end their own life. The aim of this cross-sectional research was to obtain information about clients receiving counselling for non-physician assisted suicide, and the characteristics and outcome of the counselling itself. Methods All counsellors working with foundation De Einder (an organisation that offers professional counselling for people with a wish to end life) (N=12) filled in registration forms about all clients they counselled in 2011 and/or 2012. Only client registration data forms with at least one face-to-face contact with the counsellor were selected for analysis (n=595). Results More than half of the clients were over 65 years old. More than one third of the clients had no wish to end life and 16% had an urgent wish to end life. Almost two thirds of the clients had not requested physician assistance in dying. Half of the clients had others involved in the counselling. More than half of the clients received explicit practical information concerning non-physician assisted suicide, while 13% of all clients actually ended their own life through non-physician assisted suicide. Clients without a (severe) disease were older than clients with a severe disease. They also had more problems of old age and existential suffering and more often wanted to be prepared for self-determination. The clients without a (severe) disease more often had no wish to end life and requested physician assistance in dying less often than clients with a severe disease. Conclusion While some of the clients receiving counselling for non-physician assisted suicide seem to be looking for a peaceful death to escape from current suffering, others have no wish to end life and seem to be looking for reassurance in anticipation of prospective suffering. If non-physician assisted suicide is be distinguished from ‘mutilating’ suicide, this asks for a different approach than suicide crisis intervention, for example suicide-attempt prevention. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-455) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn Hagens
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Expertise Centre for Palliative Care, VU University Medical Centre, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1091 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|