Follow-up in newborn hearing screening - A systematic review

Evaluation of the current situation and quality of neonatal hearing screening from hearing screening practitioners' perspective: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

In recent years, neonatal hearing screening (NHS) has gained rapid traction in both developed and developing nations. However, the efficacy of these efforts depends on comprehensive standardization across all screening facets. This study aimed to assess the status and quality of NHS by investigating the knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices of hearing screening practitioners regarding NHS.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted, and an online questionnaire based on the knowledge-attitude/belief (A/B)-practice model was distributed to all NHS practitioners in Luzhou, western China. Valid questionnaires were examined and uniformly graded.

RESULTS

A total of 63 valid questionnaires were collected. The practitioners were mainly female (96.83%), with nursing backgrounds (63.49%), and undergraduate degrees (66.67%). Most had ≤5 years of experience (74.60%) and had junior/intermediate titles (93.65%). The NHS within the Luzhou area started in 2006 with provincial institutions, expanding to 42 institutions by 2022. Statistically significant correlations were observed between the A/B score and the conducting years of each NHS institution (p < .05) as well as between the Knowledge (K) and Practice (P) scores (p < .01). No significant correlation was found between the K score, P score, A/B score, and working years of practitioners (p > .05), or in the total score of NHS institutions at different levels or in different counties by one-way ANOVA (p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

It has been 17 years since the first medical institution in Luzhou launched NHS, and the overall performance of practitioners from different institutions has been consistent in terms of their knowledge, attitudes, or level of practice. However, there is room for further improvement in both the professional development of individuals and aspects related to work, such as health education and long-term follow-up.

Coalition for Global Hearing Health Hearing Care Pathways Working Group: Guidelines for Clinical Guidance for Readiness and Development of Evidence-Based Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs

Editor's Note: The following article discusses the timely topic Clinical Guidance in the areas of Evidence-Based Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs. This article aims to discuss areas of services needed, guidance to countries/organizations attempting to initiate early hearing detection and intervention systems. Expert consensus and systematic/scoping reviews were combined to produce recommendations for evidence-based clinical practice. In Ear and Hearing, our long-term goal for the Point of View article is to stimulate the field's interest in and to enhance the appreciation of the author's area of expertise. Hearing is an important sense for children to develop cognitive, speech, language, and psychosocial skills. The goal of universal newborn hearing screening is to enable the detection of hearing loss in infants so that timely health and educational/therapeutic intervention can be provided as early as possible to improve outcomes. While many countries have implemented universal newborn hearing screening programs, many others are yet to start. As hearing screening is only the first step to identify children with hearing loss, many follow-up services are needed to help them thrive. However, not all of these services are universally available, even in high-income countries. The purposes of this article are (1) to discuss the areas of services needed in an integrated care system to support children with hearing loss and their families; (2) to provide guidance to countries/organizations attempting to initiate early hearing detection and intervention systems with the goal of meeting measurable benchmarks to assure quality; and (3) to help established programs expand and improve their services to support children with hearing loss to develop their full potential. Multiple databases were interrogated including PubMed, Medline (OVIDSP), Cochrane library, Google Scholar, Web of Science and One Search, ERIC, PsychInfo. Expert consensus and systematic/scoping reviews were combined to produce recommendations for evidence-based clinical practice. Eight essential areas were identified to be central to the integrated care: (1) hearing screening, (2) audiologic diagnosis and management, (3) amplification, (4) medical evaluation and management, (5) early intervention services, (6) family-to-family support, (7) D/deaf/hard of hearing leadership, and (8) data management. Checklists are provided to support the assessment of a country/organization's readiness and development in each area as well as to suggest alternative strategies for situations with limited resources. A three-tiered system (i.e., Basic, Intermediate, and Advanced) is proposed to help countries/organizations at all resource levels assess their readiness to provide the needed services and to improve their integrated care system. Future directions and policy implications are also discussed.

Factors that influence health service access in deaf and hard-of-hearing children: a narrative review

OBJECTIVES

Early diagnosis and intervention of deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children leads to improved language and psychosocial outcomes. However, many child, parent and provider related factors can influence access to early intervention services, including hearing devices. This narrative review aims to explore factors that influence health service access in DHH children.

DESIGN

A systematic search was conducted to identify articles that explored factors that influenced health service access in DHH children in countries with Universal Newborn Hearing Screening, published between 2010 and 2022.

STUDY SAMPLES

Fifty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria for data extraction. This included 4 systematic reviews, 2 reviews, 39 quantitative and 5 mixed methods studies and 9 qualitative studies.

RESULTS

The identified factors were grouped into the following themes: (a) demographic factors, (b) family related factors, (c) child related factors, (d) factors specific to hearing devices, (e) service delivery, f) telehealth and (g) COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

This review provided a comprehensive summary of multiple factors that affect access to health services in DHH children. Psychosocial support, consistent clinical advice, allocation of resources to rural communities and use of telehealth are possible ways to address barriers and improve health service access.

Community Health Worker Intervention for Newborns Not Passing Initial Universal Hearing Screening

BACKGROUND

Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) is effective in identifying newborns with possible hearing loss (HL). Outpatient follow-up for newborns referred after hospital-based screening remains a potential area of improvement. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of a community health worker (CHW) intervention in promoting adherence to outpatient rescreening for newborns referred after initial UNHS.

METHODS

A mixed prospective-retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate a CHW intervention at an academic medical center. Caregivers of referred newborns were contacted by CHWs prior to discharge and educated about HL and the importance of follow-up screening. The CHW outreach intervention was performed for 297 referred newborns between May 2020 and June 2021 and compared to a cohort of 238 newborns without the CHW intervention between March 2019 and June 2021. Statistical analyses were conducted using 2 × 2 Chi-square tests, two-tailed unpaired t-tests, multinomial logistic regression, and multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

In the intervention group, 236 of 297 newborns (79.5%) completed their outpatient follow-up rescreening; in the comparison group, 170 of 238 newborns (71.4%) completed their follow-up rescreening (P = .031, OR = 1.55 with regression P = .04). In the intervention group, the average time to follow-up was 13.4 days versus 12.5 days for the comparison group (P = .449, multiple R2 = .02 with P = .78).

CONCLUSIONS

CHW outreach intervention may increase adherence to outpatient follow-up rescreening for newborns referred after initial, hospital-based UNHS. Expansion of nursery teams to include CHWs may thus improve completion of recommended follow-up hearing screens.

Factors associated with delayed referral and hearing rehabilitation for congenital sensorineural hearing loss

OBJECTIVES

To identify the impact of social determinants of health and clinical status on referral and intervention for congenital sensorineural hearing loss.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review of children with confirmed sensorineural or mixed hearing loss between 2013 and 2021 at a single academic medical institution.

METHODS

Referral rates and timing for hearing rehabilitation, rates and timing of completed evaluation, and rate and timing of amplification were recorded. Patient demographics included gestational age, race, ethnicity, sex, hearing loss severity, and CMV status.

RESULTS

There were 216 children with confirmed sensorineural or mixed hearing loss, of which 77 had a unilateral hearing loss and 89 a severe or profound hearing loss. Delayed referral for hearing aid evaluation was noted in premature patients (median 375 days premature, median 147 term; p < 0.01) and publicly insured patients (median 215 days, median 123 private; p = 0.04). Delayed time to hearing aid fitting was noted for non-white patients (median 325 days, median 203 white patients; p < 0.01), publicly insured patients (median 309 days, median 212 private insurance; p < 0.02), and premature patients (median 462 days, median 224 term; p = 0.03). White patients were more likely to be referred for cochlear implant (p = 0.03).Privately insured patients and patients with a positive CMV test were more likely to be referred for cochlear implant evaluation, be seen in the cochlear implant clinic, and undergo implantation (p < 0.05). Non-white patients had a delay in cochlear implantation referral (median 928 days, median 398 days white patients; p = 0.05). Prolonged interval between evaluation in cochlear implant clinic to implantation was noted for privately insured patients (median 125 days; median 78 days publicly insured; p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Sociodemographic factors were significantly associated with hearing amplification referral rates and time until amplification for children with identified congenital sensorineural hearing loss. For cochlear implantation, insurance type, CMV status were significantly associated with rate and timing of cochlear implant pathway.

[Newborn hearing screening in Germany-results of the 2011/2012 and 2017/2018 evaluations]

BACKGROUND

Newborn hearing screening (NHS) was introduced nationwide by the Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G‑BA) in 2009. In this process, quality targets were also set in the pediatrics directive. In order to review the quality NHS in Germany, the G‑BA commissioned a consortium to conduct an initial evaluation for the years 2011 and 2012 and a follow-up evaluation for 2017 and 2018.

METHODS

The evaluations were based on NHS screening parameters (Sammelstatistiken) that must be documented by all obstetrics and neonatology departments as NHS providers and can also be compiled through cooperation with hearing screening centers (HSCs). Additional data were collected through questionnaires and interviews and routine data were used to evaluate the screening process.

RESULTS

In 13 federal states, a total of 15 HSCs are involved in the screening process. Across Germany, an NHS screening rate of 86.1% was documented in 2018 (82.4% in 2012), but this differed significantly between the federal states. The specified quality targets could not yet be implemented everywhere. For example, only less than half of the obstetric departments achieved the specified screening rate of over 95%. A comparison of data from the follow-up evaluation and the first evaluation showed that the structural quality of NHS had improved, while the process quality remained the same or had deteriorated. The refer rate (children who were discharged without passing the screening) increased from 5.3% to 6.0%.

DISCUSSION

To improve the quality of NHS, HSCs should be established nationwide and a second screening should be carried out more consistently before discharge in the case of a refer result in the initial screening.

Hearing Outcomes in Failed Newborn Hearing Screening Infants With and Without Chronic Serous Otitis

OBJECTIVE

To identify outcomes in hearing loss (HL) diagnosis and intervention in infants with a failed newborn hearing screen (NBHS) and otitis media with effusion (OME) compared to those with failed NBHS and without OME.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary medical center.

METHODS

A chart review was performed on infants referred to Primary Children's Hospital for failed NBHS from 2012 to 2018. Eighty infants with failed NBHS and OME and 55 with failed NBHS and no OME were included. Incidence of permanent HL along with the age of HL confirmation and early intervention (EI) enrollment were compared.

RESULTS

The incidence of OME in infants with failed NBHS was 59.3%. Fifty-six percent of infants with OME and 12.5% of those without OME did not receive definitive hearing confirmation in either ear due to loss to follow-up or insufficient audiometric assessment. Permanent HL was identified in 11.3% (n = 9) of infants with OME and in 20.0% (n = 11) of those without OME. Infants with OME were significantly older at the time of HL confirmation (4.2 ± 2.1 months) and EI enrollment (5.4 ± 2.5 months) compared to those without OME at the time of HL confirmation (1.0 ± 1.0 months; p < .001) and EI enrollment (2.6 ± 1.8 months; p = .04).

CONCLUSION

Infants with failed NBHS and OME are highly susceptible to a significant delay in HL confirmation or lack of confirmatory hearing tests. Timely OME resolution with earlier ventilation tube insertion by 3 months of age and follow-up audiologic assessment is recommended.

Do all infants with congenital hearing loss meet the 1-3-6 criteria? A study of a 10-year cohort from a universal newborn hearing screening programme in Singapore

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate 1) the outcomes of a local universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) programme and its audiological follow-ups at 3- and 6-month points, 2) the education outcomes of children with congenital hearing loss (CHL).

DESIGN

Retrospective study that analysed data containing hearing screening, diagnosis, intervention and schooling information from electronic databases.

STUDY SAMPLE

Children aged 5 to 15 years old who were born between 2004-2014 and underwent UNHS in a local hospital.

RESULTS

Over a 10-year cohort, 99.4% of 29,972 newborns underwent UNHS; approximately 90% of them were screened by 1 month of age. However, only 10% of the cohort strictly fulfilled the 1-3-6 criteria recommended by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Lost to follow-up (LTF) rate was highest at post-diagnosis (35%). 80% of infants who were intervened between 6 and 48 months of age went to mainstream schools. The remaining 20% had additional disabilities or family factors.

CONCLUSIONS

A high UNHS coverage rate may not translate to meeting the 1-3-6 criteria. Despite ease of access to our healthcare system, LTF at post-diagnosis remained high. In the absence of additional disabilities or family factors, infants intervened during the sensitive window could still potentially make it into mainstream schools.

Effect of Neonatal Hearing Screening Results on the Lost to Follow-Up at the Diagnostic Level

(1) Background: An important part of any neonatal hearing screening program is monitoring diagnostic visits to confirm or exclude the presence of hearing loss. In addition, time plays an important role in the diagnosis. We identified the number of children who came for a diagnostic visit and analyzed the time of the first audiological visit, depending on the result of the hearing screening test performed in the first days of a child's life and the presence or absence of risk factors of hearing impairment. (2) Methods: We analyzed 6,580,524 children, of which 8.9% required further diagnostics. The mean time of follow-up diagnostic visit in the analyzed group was 130 days and differed due to the presence or absence of risk factors for hearing loss before and after the neonatal period. (3) Results: Although the risk of hearing loss in children with risk factors is 2.31 to 6.38 times higher than in children without risk factors depending on the result of the screening test, more than 40% of parents do not report to scheduled audiological visits. (4) Conclusions: Doctors, nurses, and midwives who screen hearing at the neonatological level play an important role in educating parents about the possibility of hearing loss in a child and the need for an audiological examination.

Assessment of Hearing Impairment in Sick Newborns: A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

 Undiagnosed neonatal hearing loss causes severe language, cognitive, and behavioral problems in children. Sick newborns who spend 48 hours in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) have a 10- to 20-fold increased risk of permanent hearing loss. The aim of this study is to identify hearing impairment in high-risk sick newborns who spend at least 48 hours in the NICU.

METHODS

 The present prospective observational study was conducted at a single center. All sick neonates admitted to the NICU for a minimum of 48 hours at the JK Lon Hospital, Zanana Hospital, and Mahila Chikitsalaya, Sawai Man Singh (SMS) Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India, from June 2017 to May 2018 were considered eligible for the study. The primary outcome was the assessment of hearing loss of high-risk newborns using otoacoustic emissions at the time of discharge, six weeks of age, and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) at three months of chronological age. The secondary outcome was to analyze the association of hearing loss with different risk factors in high-risk neonates.

RESULTS

 A total of 150 infants who had one or more risk factors were studied, 60 were female and 90 were male. No statistically significant difference in hearing loss was observed based on birth weight, sex, and gestational age. The first distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) screening was done on infants at the time of discharge from the NICU. Eighty-three infants (55.33%) had "refer" on the first DPOAE and the remaining 67 (44.67%) were passed results at the time of discharge. At six weeks of life, on repeat screening with a second DPOAE test, 36% "refer" on the first screen had a "refer" result on the second DPOAE. However, 4.4% "pass" on the first screen turned out to be "refer" on the second screen. These 33 infants who had "refer" results on the second screen were subjected to testing. At 10 weeks of life, AABR was performed on 33 infants. Eleven infants out of 33 had sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) on AABR. Hearing impairment with the DPOAE test was observed with risk factors neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (NHH), hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), and very low birth weight (VLBW) and was statistically significant among all risk factors. But, no such association (between hearing impairment and risk factors) was observed with the AABR test. In our study, we found that the duration of mechanical ventilation in mean days 7.67±6.24 had statistically significant SNHL compared to the lesser duration of mechanical ventilation (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Two-stage DPOAE done prior to AABR is helpful in the early detection of hearing loss.

Sociodemographic Factors Affecting Loss to Follow-Up After Newborn Hearing Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Universal newborn hearing screening (NBHS) has been widely implemented as a part of early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) programs worldwide. Even with excellent provider knowledge and screening rates, many infants do not receive definitive hearing testing or intervention after initial screening. The objective of this study was to identify sociodemographic factors contributing to loss of follow-up.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL.

REVIEW METHODS

Per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, the databases were searched from the date of inception through December 28, 2021. Studies containing sociodemographic information on patients who were referred to NBHS were included. Meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs) was performed comparing rates of sociodemographic variables between patients adherent and nonadherent to follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 169,238 infants from 19 studies were included. Low birth weight (OR 1.6 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.2-2.2, p < .001), racial minority (OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.2-1.6], p < .001), rural residence (OR 1.5 [95% CI 1.1-1.9], p = .005), lack of insurance (OR 1 [95% CI 1.4-2.5], p < .001), and public or state insurance (OR 1.7 [95% CI 1.2-4.2], p = .008) were associated with missed follow-up after referred NBHS. Associated maternal factors included low maternal education (OR 1.8 [95% CI 1.6-2.0], p < .001), young maternal age (OR 1.5 [95% CI 1.5-1.6], p < .001), unmarried maternal status (OR 1.5 [95% CI 1.1-1.9], p = .003), and current or former maternal smoking status (OR 1.8 [95% CI 1.4-2.2], p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Both infant and maternal sociodemographic factors influence follow-up compliance after referred NBHS. Focused efforts should be made by medical providers and policymakers to address these factors to ensure appropriate newborn hearing care and interventions are achieved.

Analysis of congenital hearing loss after neonatal hearing screening

Introduction

Neonates undergo neonatal hearing screening to detect congenital hearing loss at an early stage. Once confirmed, it is necessary to perform an etiological workup to start appropriate treatment. The study objective was to assess the different etiologies, risk factors, and hearing results of infants with permanent hearing loss and to evaluate the efficacy and consequences of the different screening devices over the last 21 years.

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort analysis for all neonatal hearing screening program referrals and performed an etiological workup in case of confirmed hearing loss. We analyzed the evolution of the etiological protocols based on these results.

Results

The governmental neonatal hearing screening program referred 545 infants to our center. Hearing loss was confirmed in 362 (66.4%) infants and an audiological workup was performed in 458 (84%) cases. 133 (24.4%) infants were diagnosed with permanent hearing loss. Ninety infants (56 bilateral and 34 unilateral) had sensorineural hearing loss, and the degree was predominantly moderate or profound. The most common etiology in bilateral sensorineural hearing loss was a genetic etiology (32.1%), and in unilateral sensorineural hearing loss, an anatomical abnormality (26.5%). Familial history of hearing loss was the most frequently encountered risk factor.

Conclusion

There is a significant number of false positives after the neonatal hearing screening. Permanent hearing loss is found only in a limited number of infants. During the 21 years of this study, we noticed an increase in etiological diagnoses, especially genetic causes, due to more advanced techniques. Genetic causes and anatomical abnormalities are the most common etiology of bilateral and unilateral sensorineural hearing loss, respectively, but a portion remains unknown after extensive examinations.

Predictors of Parental Recall of Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Saudi Arabia

Hearing impairment is a prevalent disabling condition among children; all newborns should undergo a universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS). Unfortunately, many newborns who fail the screening test are lost to follow-up. Our study aims to evaluate parents' perceptions of UNHS and to identify predictors for newborn hearing screening recall in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional study involving Saudi parents with 0-to-18-year-old children born in Saudi Arabia was conducted. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were used to describe the participants' characteristics and to identify UNHS recall predictors. A total of 1533 parents were surveyed. Overall, 29.9% of them recalled a hearing screening at birth, while 22.2% reported no hearing screening, and 47.8% were unable to remember. Only (6.9%) participants reported a failed hearing screening, of which 75.9% recalled a follow-up recommendation. Females, parents aged 30-34 years, consanguineous parents, and parents of newborns who were treated with antibiotics were more likely to recall hearing screening compared to others. This study highlights inadequate awareness of UNHS among parents. Our findings support the need to improve the reporting system of UNHS results and implement educational programs to increase parents' recall of hearing test results and ensure early follow-ups for neonates with failed test results.

Cochlear nerve dysplasia in unilateral severe to profound congenital sensorineural hearing loss - Prevalence in Australian children and the impact of socioeconomic disadvantage on its management

INTRODUCTION

Congenital unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (cuSNHL) carries potentially significant social, educational, and developmental consequences. Early diagnosis enables investigation, and consideration of options for management and early intervention, helping to mitigate the effects of hearing loss. Cochlear nerve dysplasia (CND) is a prominent cause of cuSNHL and may affect candidacy for cochlear implantation. Socioeconomic disadvantage may impact on a patient's family's capacity to participate in necessary intervention and follow-up.

METHODS

Infants with severe-profound cuSNHL referred to a large Australian quaternary pediatric center between October 2004 and December 2020 were retrospectively included. Audiometric and clinical data, and the presence of hearing loss risk factors were obtained from a prospectively collated database. In Australia MRI scans are provided free-of-charge to citizens and residents. MRI scans were reviewed to determine the status of the nerves within the internal acoustic meatus (IAM grade) along with attendance rates. Travel distance to the hospital was also calculated. Reasons for non-attendance at MRI were obtained from patient medical records and correspondence. Socioeconomic, educational, and occupational indices, and travel distances were obtained using patient residential postcodes with reference to Australian Bureau of Statistics data.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients were reviewed, 64.3% (n = 63) of whom underwent MRI. The median age at diagnosis was 40 days (IQR 27). The prevalence of CND was 75% (n = 47). Importantly, there was no significant difference in the degree of hearing loss between IAM grades (F(4,57) = 1.029, p = 0.405). Socioeconomic indices were significantly lower in patients not attending MRI investigations compared with patients who did attend. Travel distance was not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

CND is a prominent cause of cuSNHL in Australian infants. MRI at a young age allows parent education regarding management options and timely intervention where indicated. Socioeconomic disadvantage significantly impacts on participation in further routine assessment of cuSNHL, potentially limiting management options for these children long term.

Development of a questionnaire to assess mothers' knowledge, attitudes and practice with regard to childhood hearing loss and Universal Newborn Hearing Screening

BACKGROUND

The assessment of the validity and reliability of measurement tools in research provides quality data. However, evidence of the validity and reliability of parental knowledge and attitude regarding childhood hearing loss and newborn hearing screening is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To design a Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice (KAP) survey tool regarding childhood hearing loss and a Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programme of the rural Amajuba district, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, and then test for validity and test-retest repeatability.

METHODS

Face validity was conducted with 20 mothers and a content validity index was determined by two rounds of assessments, the first by 7 experts and the second by 3 experts. The kappa statistic was used to measure the stability of the tool using data from 160 mothers where repeated measurements were applied at two-week intervals. The feasibility of developing a tool was assessed by applying the criteria of science, population and resources.

RESULTS

The KAP tool was developed with twenty-nine items. For face validity, 97% of the participants reported that the items were clear, wording was appropriate and easy to read and the language was natural. Content validity produced excellent results with a scale and content validity index of 1. Test-retest repeatability for the KAP tool was good with a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.87). Individually, the knowledge scale had a kappa of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.95); the attitude scale had a kappa of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.99): the practice scale had a kappa of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.97) and the awareness scale had a kappa of 0.92 (0.83, 1.00). The development of a KAP tool was shown to be feasible, given sufficient time, funds, motivation and a study population.

CONCLUSION

The study produced a valid and reliable tool that can be useful in generating quality evidence of a community's KAP with respect to childhood hearing loss and newborn hearing screening. Evidence gathered could be used to tailor health education and health promotion material for a Universal New-born Hearing Screening (UNHS) programme in a culturally sensitive manner to promote service uptake.

Barriers to and Facilitators of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) is guided by the 1-3-6 approach: screening by one month, diagnosis by 3 mo, and early intervention (EI) enrollment by 6 mo. Although screening rates remain high, successful diagnosis and EI-enrollment lag in comparison. The aim of this systematic review is to critically examine and synthesize the barriers to and facilitators of EHDI that exist for families, as they navigate the journey of congenital hearing loss diagnosis and management in the United States. Understanding barriers across each and all stages is necessary for EHDI stakeholders to develop and test novel approaches which will effectively reduce barriers to early hearing healthcare.

DESIGN

A systematic literature search was completed in May and August 2021 for empirical articles focusing on screening, diagnosis, and EI of children with hearing loss. Two independent reviewers completed title and abstract screening, full-text review, data extraction, and quality assessments with a third independent reviewer establishing consensus at each stage. Data synthesis was completed using the Framework Analysis approach to categorize articles into EHDI journey timepoints and individual/family-level factors versus system-level factors.

RESULTS

Sixty-two studies were included in the narrative synthesis. Results revealed that both individual/family-level (e.g., economic stability, medical status of the infant including middle ear involvement) and system-level barriers (e.g., system-service capacity, provider knowledge, and program quality) hinder timely diagnosis and EI for congenital hearing loss. Specific social determinants of health were noted as barriers to effective EHDI; however, system-level facilitators such as care coordination, colocation of services, and family support programs have been shown to mitigate the negative impact of those sociodemographic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Many barriers exist for families to obtain appropriate and timely EHDI for their children, but system-level changes could facilitate the process and contribute to long-term outcomes improvement. Limitations of this study include limited generalizability due to the heterogeneity of EHDI programs and an inability to ascertain factor interactions.

Results and patient satisfaction from an early access infant hearing detection clinic

INTRODUCTION

National recommendations in the United States specify that all infants with hearing impairment should be identified by 3 months of age. Infants who fail universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) require follow up testing after hospital discharge. Follow up testing may be difficult to obtain in some communities within the ideal time frame. A rapid access multidisciplinary clinic was established for failed UNHS. The objective of this study is to report outcomes and patient satisfaction from an early access hearing detection clinic.

METHODS

Infants that failed UNHS were seen in the multidisciplinary clinic between 1/1/19 and 2/28/22. Patients underwent automated auditory brainstem response (ABR) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions testing and consulted with an otolaryngology nurse practitioner. Failed results were followed by diagnostic ABR. Surveys were administered at the beginning and end of the appointment.

RESULTS

In total, 169 infants were seen at a mean age of 8.4 weeks (95%CI 7.5, 9.4). Repeat testing was abnormal in 38 (22.4%). Diagnostic ABR was performed at an average age of 13.7 weeks (n = 34, 95% CI: 10.8, 16.6) and led to a diagnosis of hearing loss in 18 infants. Twenty-seven parents completed surveys at the initial visit. Anxiety level among patients with normal repeat testing (n = 20) decreased from 1.9 to 1.2 (p = .002), while anxiety level among those with abnormal repeat testing (n = 7) was not statistically different before and after (2.1 vs 2.7, p = .2). Satisfaction level was 3.7 ± 0.7 (scored 1-4). All parents reported having a better understanding of their child's hearing problem after the visit.

DISCUSSION

This novel nurse practitioner-led early hearing detection clinic enabled timely diagnosis of hearing loss and reassurance to families without hearing loss. Age at hearing loss diagnosis compares favorably to published cohorts.

Outcomes of Training Nurses Engaged in a Public Sector Newborn Hearing Screening Program in South India

This study evaluated the outcomes of training nurses engaged in a public sector newborn hearing screening (NHS) program in one urban district in South India. Twenty nurses performing NHS in Corporation Maternity Hospitals (CMH) participated in the training and evaluation. Baseline knowledge and skill of nurses regarding NHS and overall program outcomes were obtained eight months post the initial training. Knowledge was evaluated using questionnaire, skill was evaluated using Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and agreement between screening results obtained by audiologist and nurse. Records used for documentation of screening were analysed to evaluate program outcomes. A two-day retraining was designed to address the gaps identified. Evaluations were conducted immediately post and three months post retraining following the same procedure as baseline evaluations. Gaps were identified in knowledge and skill as well as in the program outcomes. Immediate post retraining evaluation results showed overall improvement in nurses' knowledge and skill. Three months post retraining, all the nurses achieved benchmark criteria of 75% in knowledge and skill. Program outcomes, such as coverage (95.3%), refer rate (3.2%) and follow up rate (86.1%) improved post retraining. The findings of this study suggests that knowledge and skill of nurses improved with periodic training. Periodic evaluation and monitoring enhanced the overall outcomes of the program.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-021-02920-2.

Audiological Risk Factors, Referral Rates and Dropouts: 9 Years of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening in North Sardinia

Background: Objectives of the present work were to analyze the prevalence of hearing loss in our population of screened newborns during the first 9 years of the universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) program at University Hospital Sassari (Italy) (AOU Sassari), to analyze the risk factors involved, and to analyze our effectiveness in terms of referral rates and dropout rates. Methods: Monocentric retrospective study whose target population included all the newborns born or referred to our hospital between 2011 and 2019. Results: From 2011 to 2019, a total of 11,688 babies were enrolled in our screening program. In total, 3.9‱ of wellborn babies and 3.58% of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) babies had some degree of hearing loss. The most frequently observed risk factors among non-NICU babies were family history of hearing loss (3.34%) and craniofacial anomalies (0.16%), among NICU babies were low birth weight (54.91%) and prematurity (24.33%). In the multivariate analysis, family history of hearing loss (p < 0.001), NICU (p < 0.001), craniofacial anomalies (p < 0.001), low birth weight (<1500 g) (p = 0.04) and HIV (p = 0.03) were confirmed as risk factors. Conclusions: Our data are largely consistent with the literature and most results were expected, one relevant exception being the possible role of NICU as a confounding factor and the limited number of risk factors confirmed in the multivariate analysis.

Community health workers and mHealth systems for hearing screening in rural Nicaraguan schoolchildren

Background

We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of using minimally trained community health workers (CHW) to screen schoolchildren in rural Nicaragua for hearing loss using a tablet-based audiometric system integrated with asynchronous telehealth evaluations and mobile health (mHealth) appointment reminders.

Methods

A population-based survey was conducted using community health workers (CHWs) to perform tablet-based audiometry, asynchronous telehealth evaluations, and mHealth reminders to screen 3398 school children (7-9 years of age) in 92 rural Nicaraguan communities. The accuracy of screening, test duration, testing efficiency, telehealth data validity, and compliance with recommended clinic visits were analyzed.

Results

Minimally trained CHWs successfully screened children within remote rural schools with automated audiometry (test duration = 5.8 minutes) followed by manual audiometry if needed (test duration = 4.3 minutes) with an estimated manual audiometry validity of 98.5% based on a review of convergence patterns. For children who were referred based on audiometry, the otoscopy and tympanometry obtained during telehealth evaluations were high quality (as reviewed by 3 experts) in 44.6% and 80.1% of ears, respectively. A combination of automated short message service (SMS) text messages and voice reminders resulted in a follow-up compliance of 75.2%. No families responded to SMS messages alone.

Conclusions

Tablet-based hearing screening administered by minimally trained CHWs is feasible and effective in low- and middle-income countries. Manual audiometry was as efficient as automated audiometry in this setting. The physical exam tasks of otoscopy and tympanometry require additional training. Mobile phone messages improve compliance for confirmatory audiometry, but the utility of SMS messaging alone is unclear in this population.

Challenges of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening in a Developing Country-a Double-Edged Sword

Objective to implement Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS) in a tertiary academic hospital and identify associated risk factors. Prospective study. Screening tests with Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE) were done among newborns, prior to hospital discharge. In babies who fail OAE twice, Brain Response Audiometry (BERA) was done, failing which they were referred to higher ENT center for repeat testing and hearing rehabilitation. A total 2323 babies were admitted in the neonatal unit during the study period. Only 773 babies (a third) could be screened for the first OAE, two thirds being lost to study right at inception!! Among the 773 neonates, in the "at risk" group of 301 neonates, 31(10%) and in the "not at risk" group of 472 neonates, 30 (6%) were lost to follow up respectively. The occurrence of hearing loss in this study population was 1.3 per 1000. Risk factors were noted in 38.9% of this subgroup with occurrence of hearing loss in "at risk" group being 3.32 per 1000. The implementation of UNHS in a developing country like India, has multiple challenges including infrastructural and non-compliance to follow up. In the meantime, the possibility of compromising 'at-risk" neonates, who are significantly more prone to hearing loss, both neonatal and delayed onset, is an additional grave reality which needs deep considerationin this Herculean task of attaining "universality".

Universal Newborn Hearing Screening: An Indian Experience of Conceptualizing and Testing a Comprehensive Model

There have been isolated attempts to implement newborn hearing screening at various setups across India. However, none of these attempts has followed a holistic model comprising of multiple components. Therefore, a need was felt to design and implement a comprehensive universal newborn hearing-screening model to, improve follow-up, and provide practically implementable solutions for developing economies. The model was conceptualized after a detailed preliminary planning level. Separate protocols for newborns from well-baby nursery and neonatal intensive care unit were implemented. Measures were implemented to improve follow-up. Knowledge, attitude, and practices survey followed by a sensitization program was carried out to highlight the importance of newborn hearing screening among the healthcare providers. A knowledge and attitude survey was also carried out among mothers. The estimated prevalence rate was 8.78 per 1000. Measures enabled an improved follow-up rate that lead to a reduced age of identification to 6 months. The surveys among mothers and healthcare providers helped to identify the lacunae in knowledge levels, which need to be filled in order to improve their attitudes. Thus, this was a successful model for universal newborn hearing screening comprising of two-stage screening, separate protocols, steps to improve follow-up, improving awareness among parents, sensitization programs, and surveys among mothers as well as healthcare providers.

Parent’s Satisfaction of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Iran

Measuring parent satisfaction is an important factor in pediatric health care service programs because parents play a major role in their child's life. The parental decisions are a basis for the success or failure of the child's treatment in many cases. The purpose of this study was to determine levels of parents' satisfaction following the implementation of universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) program in Iran. In this study, the Persain version of the parent satisfaction questionnaire with neonatal hearing screening program (PSQ-NHSP) was used to measure parents' satisfaction on information of newborn hearing screening program, personnel in charge of the hearing testing, hearing screening activities, and overall satisfaction. Newborns were screened using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and automatic auditory brainstem response tests within the first 48 h of life for each ear. Of the 312 questionnaires distributed, 217 parents (67%) responded. The mean scores of the "overall satisfaction" items ranged from 4.07 to 4.29, demonstrating high levels of parent satisfaction with this aspect of the program. More than 86% of parents were overally satisfied with the hearing screening program. In open-ended items, 84% of parents comments showed their satisfaction. The findings of the present study revealed that parents were generally satisfied with the UNHS program. The PSQ-NHSP questionnaire is easily employed and effective method for assessing parental satisfaction with newborn hearing screening programs.

Barriers to Equity in Pediatric Hearing Health Care: A Review of the Evidence

PURPOSE

We review the evidence regarding barriers to hearing health care for children who are deaf or hard of hearing.

BACKGROUND

There are considerable data to suggest that hearing health care disparities constitute a major factor in loss to follow-up or documentation for children going through the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention process. Families are affected by a combination of factors underlying these disparities, resulting in delayed care and suboptimal developmental outcomes for children who are deaf or hard of hearing.

CONCLUSIONS

To address the socioeconomic, cultural, and linguistic inequities seen in the diagnosis and management of childhood hearing loss, pediatric audiologists and speech-language pathologists have a responsibility to provide culturally responsive practice to their individual clients and their families, as well as advocate for substantive changes at the policy level that impact their clients' daily lives.

Does universal newborn hearing screening impact the timing of deafness treatment?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of the Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS) on the age at diagnosis, beginning of treatment, and first cochlear implant surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study with children up to 12 years old with bilateral hearing loss were divided into two groups: patients who underwent UNHS and the ones who didn't. The groups were compared according to their age at the beginning of the evaluation at a specialized center, at the beginning of the intervention, and, for the ones who had indication, at the cochlear implant surgery. The group who underwent UNHS was divided between the ones who passed the screening test and the ones who didn't. They were compared according to their ages at the same moments as the first two groups.

RESULTS

135 patients were included. The median age at the first appointment in a specialized center was 1.42 (0.50 and 2.50) years, at the beginning of treatment 2.00 (1.00 and 3.52) years, and the cochlear implant surgery 2.83 (1.83 and 4.66) years. Children who underwent UNHS were younger than those who didn't, at the three evaluated moments (p < 0.001). In a subanalysis, children who passed the UNHS but were later diagnosed with hearing loss reached the first appointment with a specialist and started treatment older than those who failed the tests.

CONCLUSION

Performing UNHS interfered with the timing of deafness diagnosis and treatment. However, children who passed the screening but were later diagnosed with hearing loss were the category with the most important delay.

Discriminant Validity of the Parent-Proxy Preschool HEAR-QL

OBJECTIVE

The parent-proxy Preschool HEAR-QL (Hearing Environments And Reflections on Quality of Life) is a quality of life (QOL) measure for 2 to 6-year-old children with hearing loss (HL). We compared Preschool HEAR-QL scores for children with HL and children with normal hearing (NH) to examine the measure's discriminant validity.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Three tertiary care pediatric otolaryngology clinics.

PATIENTS

Two hundred forty-eight parents of children 2 to 6 years old with NH or HL participated.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The Preschool HEAR-QL has five domains: Behavior and Attention, Hearing Environments, New Social Situations, Social Interactions, and Communications. Scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate higher QOL. Scores for children with NH and with HL were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves.

RESULTS

Total HEAR-QL mean (SD) scores were higher for children with NH compared to children with HL (75.7 [10.5] vs. 67.5 [15.5], p < 0.001). Scores were not significantly different between children with unilateral and bilateral HL. Children 2 to 4 years old received lower Communications-domain scores than children 4 to 6 years old across all children (63.7 [25.4] vs. 74.1 [24.3], p = 0.01) and within the HL cohort (61.3 [25.1] vs. 72.6 [25.3]; p = 0.009). The Hearing Environments domain displayed excellent discrimination (AUROC = 0.858); other domains showed little to no discrimination.

CONCLUSIONS

The Hearing Environments-domain of the Preschool HEAR-QL differentiated between children with and without HL. Children with NH had higher scores than children with HL on both Total HEAR-QL and Hearing Environment-domain scores.

Newborn Hearing Screening Benefits Children, but Global Disparities Persist

There is substantial evidence that newborn hearing screening (NHS) reduces the negative sequelae of permanent childhood hearing loss (PCHL) if performed in programs that aim to screen all newborns in a region or nation (often referred to as Universal Newborn Hearing Screening or UNHS). The World Health Organization (WHO) has called in two resolutions for the implementation of such programs and for the collection of large-scale data. To assess the global status of NHS programs we surveyed individuals potentially involved with newborn and infant hearing screening (NIHS) in 196 countries/territories (in the following text referred to as countries). Replies were returned from 158 countries. The results indicated that 38% of the world's newborns and infants had no or minimal hearing screening and 33% screened at least 85% of the babies (hereafter referred to as UNHS). Hearing screening programs varied considerably in quality, data acquisition, and accessibility of services for children with PCHL. In this article, we summarize the main results of the survey in the context of several recent WHO publications, particularly the World Report on Hearing, which defined advances in the implementation of NHS programs in the Member States as one of three key indicators of worldwide progress in ear and hearing care (EHC).

[Contextual and individual determinants of use of newborn hearing screening: the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013]

The current study assessed the effect of contextual and individual determinants of the use of newborn hearing screening in Brazilian state capitals and the Federal District. The conceptual theoretical model proposed by Andersen & Davidson (2014) oriented the analyses using multilevel logistic modeling with data from the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013. The study population (n = 585) is representative of 230,112 pairs of women/responsible person over 18 years of age and their respective children under 2 years of age. At the contextual level (state capitals and Federal District), the use of newborn hearing screening was determined by the proportion of extremely poor individuals (odds ratio - OR = 0.91; 95% confidence interval - 95%CI: 0.83-0.99) and by monthly coverage of newborn hearing screening (OR = 1.02; 95%CI: 1.01-1.02). At the individual level, use of newborn hearing screening was higher in the maternal age bracket 25 to 39 years, compared to < 25 years. The odds of use of newborn hearing screening were lower in mothers with brown race/color (OR = 0.47; 95%CI: 0.26-0.83) compared to white mothers. As for schooling, complete university education nearly tripled the odds of newborn hearing screening when compared to primary schooling (OR = 2.99; 95%CI: 1.15-7.79). Predominantly private prenatal care increased the odds of using newborn hearing screening by 2.18 times, compared to public prenatal care (OR = 2.18; 95%CI: 1.02-4.64). Effective enforcement of existing hearing health laws and policies and prioritization of primary healthcare and health education practices with a focus on more vulnerable newborns, based on the characteristics identified in this study, are initiatives that can help ensure an equitable social protection system.

Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Preschool Children for Hearing Loss in Australia

OBJECTIVES

While all newborns in Australia are tested for congenital hearing loss through universal newborn hearing screening programs, some children will acquire hearing loss in their first five years of life. Delayed diagnosed or undiagnosed hearing loss in children can have substantial immediate- and long-term consequences. It can significantly reduce school readiness, language and communication development, social and emotional development, and mental health. It can also compromise lifetime educational achievements and employment opportunities and future economic contribution to society through lost productivity. The need for a universal hearing screening program for children entering their first year of primary school has been noted in two separate Australian Government hearing inquiries in the last decade. Sound Scouts is a hearing screening application (app) that tests for hearing loss in children using a tablet or mobile device, supervised by parents at home. It tests for sensorineural or permanent conductive hearing loss and central auditory processing disorder in children. In 2018 the Australian Government funded the roll-out of Sound Scouts to allow up to 600,000 children to test their hearing using Sound Scouts. This study estimated the cost-effectiveness of screening 5-year-old children for hearing loss using Sound Scouts at home, compared with no screening.

DESIGN

A decision-analytic model was developed to estimate the incremental costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of administering Sound Scouts over a 20-year time horizon. Testing accuracy was based on comparing Sound Scouts test results to clinical test results while other parameters were based on published data. Costs were estimated from the perspective of the Australian health care system. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken.

RESULTS

Sound Scouts is estimated to result in an average incremental cost of A$61.02 and an average incremental increase in QALYs of 0.01. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of A$5392 per QALY gained, which is likely to be considered cost-effective by Australian decision makers. Screening with Sound Scouts was found to have a 96.2 per cent probability of being cost-effective using a threshold of A$60,000 per QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

Using Sound Scouts to screen five-year-old children for hearing loss (at home) is likely to be cost-effective. Screening children using Sound Scouts will result in early identification and intervention in childhood hearing loss, thereby reducing early childhood disadvantage through cumulative gains in quality of life, education, and economic outcomes over their lifetime.

New-born Hearing Screening Programmes in 2020: CODEPEH Recommendations

Programmes for early detection of congenital hearing loss have been successfully implemented mainly in developed countries, after overcoming some conceptual errors argued against their implementation and some criticism of their efficacy. However, some difficulties and weaknesses are still identified in these programmes: the detection of late-onset hearing loss and the percentage of children who did not pass the screening and did not complete the process of diagnosis and treatment, these being cases that are lost in the process. The purpose of this Document is to analyse these problems to determine areas for improvement and to emphasize one of the basic principles for the success of the programmes: continuous training for the interdisciplinary team. The result of the review process carried out by CODEPEH has been drafted as Recommendations for updating the Programmes with the evidence of the last decade, including advances in screening technology, the impact of the present knowledge on congenital infection by cytomegalovirus, genetic hearing loss research and control systems of lost to follow-up cases, treatment and follow up.

Expanding the Role of Educational Audiologists After a Failed Newborn Hearing Screening: A Quality Improvement Study

Purpose Lack of timely and proximal access to diagnostic hearing evaluation using auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing hampers the effectiveness of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programs in the United States. This study measured the impact of a state-based quality-improvement (QI) project that provided diagnostic ABR equipment and training to educational audiologists distributed throughout Iowa in regional special education centers. Method We used de-identified administrative data generated by the state EHDI program to analyze markers of access to early hearing health care for infants in a preproject condition ("Baseline") compared to the implementation of diagnostic ABRs at the regional special education centers ("QI Project"). Results Our findings revealed that the QI Project was associated with improvements in timeliness of first hearing evaluation, distance traveled for first hearing evaluation, and likelihood of receiving on-guideline audiology care during the first hearing evaluation. Conclusions Following the onset of the QI Project, infants and their families had greater access to initial hearing evaluation after failed newborn hearing screening. This improvement could have cascading effects on timeliness of later intervention among those with confirmed permanent childhood hearing loss.

Development and Implementation of a Low-Cost Tracking System after Newborn Hearing Screening in Upper Austria: Lessons Learned from the Perspective of an Early Intervention Provider

More than one decade after the introduction of newborn hearing screening in Upper Austria, most children were still older than 6 months at enrolment in early intervention. In this study, under the guidance of health authorities, a revised screening and tracking protocol was developed by a network of early intervention providers and representatives of ENT, obstetrics, and pediatrics, including screening professionals and parents of children with hearing loss. Critical process indicators following internationally recommended benchmarks were defined and collected annually by the health authorities. Due to data protection issues, the data collection system was not personalized. Regular network meetings, case-oriented meetings, and screener training sessions were held. As a result, even without additional costs and within the legal constraints related to data protection in Austria, the proportion of children enrolled in early intervention before 6 months of age was significantly increased from 26% to 81% in two representative birth cohorts before and after the introduction of the new protocol, respectively. The coverage for bilateral screening increased from 91.4 to 97.6% of the total number of births.

Decentralising paediatric hearing services through district healthcare screening in Western Cape province, South Africa

Background

Childhood hearing loss is a global epidemic most prevalent in low- and middle-income countries where hearing healthcare services are often inaccessible. Referrals for primary care services to central hospitals add to growing lists and delays the time-sensitive treatment of childhood hearing loss.

Aim

To compare a centralised tertiary model of hearing healthcare with a decentralised model through district hearing screening for children in the Western Cape province, South Africa.

Setting

A central paediatric tertiary hospital in Cape Town and a district hospital in the South Peninsula region.

Methods

A pragmatic quasi-experimental study design was used with a 7-month control period at a tertiary hospital (June 2019 to December 2019). Decentralising was measured by attendance rates, travelling distance, number of referrals to the tertiary hospital and hearing outcomes. There were 315 children in the tertiary group and 158 in the district group. Data were collected from patient records and an electronic database at the tertiary hospital.

Results

Attendance rate at the district hospital was significantly higher (p < 0.001). Travel distance to the district hospital was significantly shorter (p < 0.001). Number of referrals to the tertiary hospital decreased significantly during the intervention period (p < 0.001). Most children in both the tertiary and district groups (78.7% and 80.4%, respectively) passed initial hearing screening bilaterally.

Conclusion

Hearing screening should be conducted at the appropriate level of care to increase access, reduce patient travelling distances and associated costs and reduce the burden on tertiary-level hospitals.

Maternal Factors Predicting Loss to Follow-Up from Newborn Hearing Screenings in New Jersey

Because hearing loss in children can result in developmental deficits, early detection and intervention are critical. This article identifies a constellation of maternal factors that predict loss to follow-up (LTF) at the point of rescreening-the first follow-up for babies who did not pass the hearing screening performed at birth-through New Jersey's early hearing detection and intervention program. Maternal factors are critical to consider, as mothers are often the primary decision makers around children's health care. All data were obtained from the state's department of health and included babies born between June 2015 and June 2017. Logistic regression was used to predict LTF. Findings indicate that non-Hispanic Black mothers, younger mothers, mothers with previous live births, and mothers with obesity were more likely to be LTF. Hispanic mothers and those enrolled in the state's Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program were less likely to be LTF. Mothers most at risk for LTF should be targeted for intervention to help children with hearing loss achieve the benefits from early intervention. Being a WIC recipient is a protective factor for LTF; therefore, elements of WIC could be used to reduce the state's LTF rate.

Predicting hearing loss from 10 years of universal newborn hearing screening results and risk factors

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether demographic variables, risk factor presence or absence and universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) results can be used to predict permanent childhood hearing loss (PCHL) in infants referred from screening.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a UNHS database.

STUDY SAMPLE

Data were extracted from the state-wide UNHS database storing details of the 613,027 infants who were born in Queensland, Australia between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2016 and participated in UNHS. This study included the 6735 children who were referred from the UNHS program for diagnostic audiology due to failing the screen in one or both ears or bypassing screening.

RESULTS

Factors with a significant positive association with PCHL that were incorporated into a logistic regression model were: female gender, non-indigenous status, family history of PCHL, craniofacial anomalies and syndromes associated with PCHL, and a bilateral refer result on screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Odds of PCHL vary among infants referred for diagnostic assessment from UNHS programs. When an infant refers on the newborn hearing screen, information about their gender, indigenous status, identified risk factors and specific screening outcome can be used to predict the likelihood of a congenital PCHL diagnosis.

Frühe Prädiktoren der Sprachentwicklung von Kindern mit permanenter Hörstörung

Zusammenfassung. Theoretischer Hintergrund: Sprachentwicklungsverläufe bei Kindern mit Hörstörungen zeigen eine hohe und überwiegend ungeklärte Varianz. Fragestellung und Methode: Unsere Übersichtsarbeit präsentiert aktuelle Evidenz zu frühen Prädiktoren der Sprachentwicklung. Ergebnisse und Diskussion: Trotz deutlicher positiver Trends erreicht nur jedes zweite Kind ein Sprachentwicklungsniveau im Normbereich. Der Literaturüberblick ergibt signifikante kindbezogene und familiäre Prädiktoren mit eher geringer Beeinflussbarkeit. Als hoch prädiktiv für sprachliche Ergebnisse und zudem der Intervention zugänglich erweisen sich die frühe Erkennung und technische Versorgung mit Hörgeräten oder -implantaten und Aufnahme in die Frühförderung, konsistente Hörtechnikverwendung und/oder früher Zugang zur Gebärdensprache. Zudem zeigt sich die Qualität der täglichen Eltern-Kind-Interaktion als hocheffektiv für die Sprachentwicklung. Schlussfolgerung: Es bestätigt sich die Wirksamkeit aktueller Best Practice früher Erkennung, Versorgung und familienzentrierter Frühförderung.

Universal neonatal hearing screening program at a university hospital: an analysis using quality indicators

ABSTRACT Purpose: to assess the universal neonatal hearing screening program using quality indicators. Methods: the records of newborns who were submitted to the neonatal hearing screening in 2018 were analyzed, comparing the data with the first five quality indicators established by the national guideline for neonatal hearing screening attention: 1) rate of screening coverage (≥95%); 2) age at the screening in months (up to the first month of life); 3) rate of referrals for diagnosis (2% to 4%); 4) rate of attendance to diagnostic examination (≥90%); 5) age at confirmed diagnosis (up to the third month of life). The data were submitted to quantitative and descriptive statistical analysis. Results: the rate of coverage, age at screening, and the number of referrals for diagnosis met the indicators established by the national guideline. The rate of attendance to diagnostic examination fell short of the expected, and the age at confirmed diagnosis was verified in 70% of the cases. Conclusion: using the quality indicators furnished important data on the effectiveness of the neonatal hearing screening program and identified opportunities to improve the service, which can help identify hearing loss, early.

Does the involvement of first-year residents have a negative impact on the performance of a newborn hearing screening program?

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the efficiency of our hearing screening program, prior to hospital discharge, together with the consistency of our teamwork including first year residents by assessing a learning curve for the operators involved.

METHODS

We evaluated all the data collected during the first stage of the screening program of all non-NICU neonates from March 2009 to July 2013, analyzing by means of a linear regression model, the monthly referral rate for the whole period of activity of each group of residents.

RESULTS

performances of each group of screeners were statistically different (chi square test p < 0.005). The nptrend test showed that group 2 (p = 0.01) and group 4 (p = 0.01) reached a statistical significance in higher and lower referral rates respectively. No statistical differences were found in other groups (Group 1 p = 0.161; Group 3 p = 0.853).

CONCLUSION

Despite a statistically significant difference in the performances between the groups of residents, the referral rates for each group (range 6.18%-9.29%) and the overall referral rate for the whole period (7.84%) agree with the values commonly reported for TEOAEs in the literature. It means that our screening program is reasonably effective despite a yearly turnover of operators.

Follow-up after failed newborn hearing screening: Parental and primary care provider awareness

PURPOSE

The current loss to follow-up rate after failed newborn hearing screening (NBHS) is 34.4%. Previous studies have found that lack of parental and primary care provider (PCP) awareness of NBHS results are significant contributors to loss to follow-up. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with parental and PCP awareness of NBHS results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study. A survey asking about demographics and knowledge of NBHS testing and results was offered to parents in the waiting room of an urban pediatric primary care office. Included were biological parents ≥18 years of age of children ≤10 years of age born in Pennsylvania. Each child's chart was reviewed for PCP documentation of NBHS results. The odds of knowing NBHS results were evaluated using logistic regression.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 304 parents. 74.0% were aware of their child's NBHS results. Child age ≥1 year old (OR: 0.49, 95%CI[0.29, 0.82], P = 0.007) and Hispanic ethnicity (OR: 0.38, 95%CI[0.16, 0.89], P = 0.03) were associated with decreased odds of a parent knowing NBHS results. In addition, fewer fathers knew the results of their child's NBHS compared with mothers (OR: 0.33, 95%CI[0.18, 0.62], P < 0.001). However, parental awareness was not associated with birthing facility or insurance type. 222 charts were reviewed for NBHS documentation, revealing PCP awareness in 95.5% of cases and no associations with any of the factors examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors associated with parents not knowing NBHS results included being the parent of an older child, Hispanic, or the father.

Etiological Work-up in Referrals From Neonatal Hearing Screening: 20 Years of Experience

BACKGROUND

Confirmation of permanent hearing loss in a newborn should be followed by a search for an underlying etiology because this may impact hearing loss management and counselling.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all newborns seen at a tertiary referral center after referral from newborn hearing screening over a 20-year period. The changes in the diagnostic protocol over the years are outlined and the most recent protocol includes targeted next-generation sequencing using a panel for known hearing loss causing genes, in all cases of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).

RESULTS

Permanent hearing loss was confirmed in 235 of 1,002 neonates. A complete etiological work-up was performed in 138 cases of SNHL (77 bilateral and 61 unilateral), with the underlying cause found in 77.9% and in 67.2% of patients respectively. Genetic causes explained 55 (58.4%) of bilateral cases and in 17 a genetic cause was identified by the gene panel. Pathogenic variants in GJB2 and MYO15A explained most cases of nonsyndromic SNHL. Waardenburg syndrome was the most frequent syndromic cause. Cochlear nerve deficiency and congenital cytomegalovirus infection accounted for the majority of unilateral SNHL.Other causes of congenital hearing loss were conductive hearing loss (n = 12) and auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony (n = 9).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of targeted next-generation sequencing in the etiological work-up improves the diagnostic yield in congenital SNHL, leaving only about 20% of bilateral and 30% of unilateral cases unsolved.

Analysis of the effectiveness of coupon-mediated newborn hearing screening program through comparison of two government-funded pilot projects in South Korea

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study are to compare the results of two government-funded newborn hearing screening (NHS) pilot programs and evaluate the feasibility and the effectiveness of the coupon-mediated NHS program in Korea.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the database of the NHS center of the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHW) from 2007 to 2013. Before the NHS was covered by national health insurance in 2018, the MHW conducted two types of NHS pilot programs. For the first pilot program, the MHW initiated an area based universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) program which initially included 16 in 2007 and then spreading to 32 administrative areas in 2008 for all newborns in the pilot areas regardless of income level. The second pilot program was an offshoot of the continuing expansion of the first pilot program, which was a nationwide coupon-mediated NHS program for low-income families from 2009. The hearing loss (HL) was defined as a threshold of 40 dB nHL or worse on the auditory brainstem response (ABR) test. In both NHS pilot programs, the government financially supported the cost of the first NHS test and one ABR test for an infant who did not pass NHS test.

RESULTS

During the 1st NHS pilot program, 29.8% of the target neonates were screened which was 3.9% of total births; during the 2nd NHS pilot program 81.1% of the target neonates were screened which was 8.8% of total births. Documented diagnostic ABR tests were performed in 12.4% of referred infants in the 1st program and 33.5% in the 2nd program. The prevalence of HL was 0.11% in the 1st program and 0.15% in the 2nd program. In the 2nd NHS coupon-mediated program, the NHS was performed on average 5.4 ± 8.7 days after birth, and the diagnostic ABR test in the referred infants were performed on 61.3 ± 45.0 days after birth. There was no comparable recorded data in the 1st NHS pilot program.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the coupon-mediated NHS pilot program may be a worthwhile government-led NHS project for the proper tracking and accurate statistics. This program helped formulate UNHS national health insurance policies. However, to become a successful UNHS program, the governmental supports for both timely interventions and the inauguration of a web tracking system are mandatory.

Risk factors for non-participation in the Danish universal newborn hearing screening program: A population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To explore risk factors for non-participation for the Danish universal newborn hearing screening program, including socioeconomic demographic and peripartum conditions. Furthermore, the participation rate between children with medical risk factors for congenital hearing loss and healthy newborns was analyzed.

METHODS

The study was register-based and included all live births in Denmark between January 1st, 2008 and December 31st, 2011, in total 251,081 children. Potential risk factors were extracted from eight Danish national registers and analyzed via logistic regression models.

RESULTS

With respect to the participation rate, the strongest predictors of non-participation were increased maternal parity (from OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.82-0.89; p<0.0001 to OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.38-0.47; P<0.0001), low socio-economic status, including income, (from OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.09-1.23; p<0.0001 to OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.37-1.56; p<0.0001) and home birth (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.42-0.80; p=0.001). Children with a medical risk factor for congenital hearing loss had a 1.97% lower participation rate. Assisted ventilation and admission to a newborn intensive care unit for > 48 hours were identified as independent risk factors of non-participation for this group (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.52-0.80; p<0.0001 and OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.85-0.99; p=0.036, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In order to improve the participation rate, a national screening database in conjunction with a stronger collaboration between screening units and other health care professionals who are in contact with the family during the newborn period is warranted.

Comparison of newborn hearing screening results between well babies and neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit for more than 5 days: Analysis based on the national database in Korea for 9 years

Objective

The purpose of this cohort study is to compare newborn hearing screening (NHS) results between healthy newborns and neonates who were admitted to the neonate intensive care unit (NICU) for more than 5 days based on the national database for 9 years. Ultimately, we’ve tried to analyze the associated factors necessary to manage the national NHS program according to the group, which would help to establish policy to effectively detect and support hearing impaired children and which would help to control qualities.

Methods

The Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHW) introduced a nationwide coupon-mediated program for the low-income class since 2009. The coupon consisted of two parts, the screening part and the confirming parts with the same unique number, and the MHW supported the cost of one screening test and one diagnostic auditory brainstem response (ABR) test for infants who did not pass from the screening test. We have analyzed the screening test performing rate, the referral rate according to the screening methods or institutions, the prevalence of hearing loss, and the average age of hearing loss diagnosis. Hearing loss was defined as any hearing impairment either unilateral or bilateral with the hearing threshold ≥ 40 dB nHL on the diagnostic ABR test, irrespective of its etiology.

Results

A total of 524,371 newborns were enrolled in the study, and 506,634 (96.6%) neonates were in the “well-baby group (WBG)”, while 17,737 (3.4%) were in the “high-risk group (HRG)”. The referral rate of the screening test was 1.5% in average, 1.3% in the WBG, and 7.5% in the HRG. The referral rates varied according to the screening methods and screening institutions. The adjusted prevalence of HL was 5.6/1,000 in average, 4.6/1,000 in the WBC, and 28.8/1,000 in the HRG. The screening tests were performed 4.3 ± 6.7 days after birth and the diagnostic tests were done 62.7 ± 37.5 days after birth in WBG. In HRG, dates were 17.7 ± 19.3 days and 97.6 ± 51.4 days, respectively.

Conclusions

The prevalence of hearing loss in infants who were hospitalized in NICU for more than 5 days was about seven times higher than that in healthy newborns. However, different referral rates were noted depending on both institutions and the screening methods. These differences need to be addressed in order to improve our program and ensure that all neonates with hearing loss, especially neonates with high risk factor, are detected and appropriately referred for the treatment.

Perspectives of newborn hearing screening in resource constrained settings

Newborn hearing screening is an effective strategy for early identification of hearing loss in the newborn which result in early intervention and best outcome. However implementing universal screening strategy is a challenge in many resource constrained settings. There are various limitations towards successful implementation of hearing screening program in the developing countries. The cost effectiveness of the screening program also needs to be considered in a resource constrained settings. We attempt to provide a viewpoint that can be potentially helpful for the successful implementation of hearing screening in a resource constrained settings of the developing countries.

Limitations and drawbacks of the hospital-based universal neonatal hearing screening program: First report from the Arabian Peninsula and insights

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of the current universal neonatal hearing screening program in a tertiary medical institution in Oman, identify its limitations and drawbacks, and explore their causative factors.

METHODS

A retrospective review was carried out to analyse the hearing screening of 12,743 live babies born between January 2016 and December 2018. Screen coverage, drop outs, follow up rate, and age at completion of screening, diagnosis, and intervention were analysed. The results were compared with the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) performance quality indices. Prospective questionnaire-based telephonic interviews were then conducted with the parents or caregivers of neonates with hearing loss. Finally, the causes of loss to follow up or delays in hearing screenings, diagnosis, and/or early intervention were studied.

RESULTS

The true prevalence of hearing loss was 4.0 in 1000. The coverage of first-stage screening was 90% whereas the compliance with the second stage was 88.04%. 22.8% of the patients eventually obtained final diagnostic confirmation. The overall compliance with amplification was 30.2%. The completion ages of primary screening and final confirmation were 7.98 and 17.3 weeks respectively. The importance of hearing screening is well received by parents, but problems related to communication, delays in the appointment system, and inefficient follow up tracking were identified as the main limitations and drawbacks of the program.

CONCLUSION

The coverage of the neonatal hearing screening program had not yet reached the required goal of 95%. The performance indicators also fell below the international benchmark. There is a need to address the identified causative factors. Effective communication and well-maintained tracking systems need to be implemented.

Adherence to follow-up recommendations for babies at risk for pediatric hearing loss

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the families' compliance with recommendations for continued monitoring of babies with high-risk factors for hearing loss.

METHODS

Hearing screening and follow-up results from 604 babies were tracked across a five-year period. Bivariate analysis, including chi-square analysis, t-tests, and one-way analyses of variance were conducted to test whether various factors predicted likelihood of follow up.

RESULTS

Although 86% of the babies returned for the initial follow-up appointment, few completed the protocol or were diagnosed with hearing loss (10.3%). Excluding the babies who never returned, the average age for initial assessment was near the recommended 3-month target (3.5 months). However, babies were last seen at 9.4 months on average, which is earlier than recommended. Some factors positively predicted follow-up: receipt of ototoxic medication, hyperbilirubinemia requiring transfusion, ECMO, syndromes associated with hearing loss, craniofacial anomalies, and passing the newborn hearing screening. Others were negatively predictive: NICU stay >5 days, younger maternal age, and failing the newborn screening. There was no relationship between the results of the last test and whether the families continued with monitoring. Babies with risks categorized as more likely to be associated with delayed onset hearing loss were more often late to the initial follow up, but also followed up for a longer period of time.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate the need to focus on the barriers unique to babies with risk factors for late onset/progressive hearing loss in addition to those barriers that generally affect loss to follow up. Tools for parental engagement are recommended.

A Hearing Screening Pilot Study With Students With Significant Cognitive Disabilities

Purpose

Many children with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities are at a higher risk for hearing loss than their peers who are typically developing. Unfortunately, they do not consistently participate in routine school-based hearing screenings. The current study investigated the feasibility of increasing their participation using an otoacoustic emissions protocol and documented results relative to student educational profiles.

Method

A total of 43 students with significant cognitive disabilities enrolled at a public school exclusively serving this population participated in the study. All but 9, who were excluded because of known hearing loss, were screened by a licensed audiologist assisted by audiology doctoral students. The protocol included otoscopy, tympanometry, distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), and teacher surveys.

Results

DPOAE screening was attempted on 33 students without previously diagnosed hearing loss and successfully completed for 26 (78.8%). Two students (4.6%) with absent otoacoustic emissions and normal tympanograms were referred for further assessment due to concerns about possible sensorineural hearing loss in one or both ears, and 10 (23.3%) had abnormal tympanograms in one or both ears.

Conclusions

Considering the high risk of sensorineural hearing loss for children with significant disabilities, it is important for them to be included in school hearing screenings. The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of using DPOAEs for school-based hearing screenings with this population with an interprofessional team of licensed audiologists, educators, and speech-language pathologists. The results further suggest that students with significant disabilities and hearing loss may be unidentified and underserved. Given the complex needs of this population, an interprofessional practice model for hearing screenings and intervention services is recommended.

Age at onset of training in children with hearing and speech disorders and the analysis of related factors in Turkey

Background

Early diagnosis and intervention play a vital role in hearing and speech disorders and the effect of intervention varies according to the age at onset of training of children with such disorders. Aim of this study is to investigate the age at onset of training in children admitted to our center with complaints of hearing and speech disorder, and the related factors.

Methods

In the first phase of the study, data of 473 children admitted to our center between January 2015 and October 2018 with complaints of hearing and speech disorders and no additional disability were retrospectively analyzed. Then, their chronological age, gender, cause of admission, age at onset of training and the effect of factors that may have an impact on the age at onset of training were analyzed statistically. Study data were obtained from patient records.

Results

Of 473 children (350 males and 123 females) admitted to our training center with the complaints of hearing and speech disorders, 252 (53.3%) were presented with speech sound disorders, 90 (19.0%) with stuttering, 87 (18.4%) with delayed speech, 32 (6.8%) with hearing loss and 12 (2.5%) with other causes. Although there was a statistically significant difference between the age at onset of training and the factors; such as cause of admission, parental education level, employment status of the mother, occupation of the father, and socioeconomic status of the family (p < 0.05), no statistically significant difference was found between the age at onset of training and gender (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The study revealed that children with hearing loss have the chance of early diagnosis thanks to neonatal hearing screening programs and that they commence their training until the age of 2, which is considered to be a critical period for language and speech development. However, it is an undeniable fact that we have not yet reached the ideal age for the commencement of training (6th month). Similarly, the age of diagnosis and initiation of training is delayed in children with speech disorders due to families’ delayed referral to the training centers.