1
|
Hirano Y, Shinya Y, Umekawa M, Hasegawa H, Kawashima M, Wipplinger C, Wipplinger T, Katano A, Saito N. Effectiveness and safety of hypofractionated gamma knife radiosurgery for large meningiomas and those adjacent to the optic pathway and brainstem: preliminary therapeutic outcomes. Neurosurg Rev 2025; 48:49. [PMID: 39809896 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-025-03199-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2024] [Revised: 11/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2025] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
Recent technologic advancements have facilitated the use of hypofractionated Gamma Knife-based radiosurgery (HF-GKRS) to treat large lesions or those in eloquent areas. This study aimed to analyze the preliminary results of HF-GKRS for these meningiomas, and to determine its effectiveness and safety. This single-center retrospective study analyzed data of patients who underwent HF-GKRS for large meningiomas or those in eloquent areas with > 6 months of follow-up. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcomes were neurological deterioration, post-treatment T2 signal changes following HF-GKRS, and tumor volume changes. Volumetric analysis of the tumors after treatment was also performed to assess changes in tumor size after HF-GKRS. Overall, 24 patients with a median follow-up period of 22 months (range: 6-49 months) were included. Among them, 18 (75%) patients had tumors in close proximity to the optic pathway, and 15 (63%) patients had large lesions (> 10 cm3). The cumulative 1- and 3-year PFS rates were 100% and 92%, respectively. The cumulative 3-year rate of adverse radiation effects was 9%. Overall, 12 patients (50%) showed tumor reduction, with a median tumor reduction rate of 45% (range: 25-58%). Our preliminary results revealed that HF-GKRS for large meningiomas or those in eloquent areas is safe and effective, with satisfactory short- and mid-term PFS and low adverse radiation effects. Further research with more patients and longer follow-up periods is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yudai Hirano
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Yuki Shinya
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
| | - Motoyuki Umekawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Hasegawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Mariko Kawashima
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | | | - Tamara Wipplinger
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA
| | - Atsuto Katano
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Nobuhito Saito
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Perlow HK, Raleigh DR, Wang TJC, Pollom EL, Milano MT, Breen WG, Detsky J, Chang EL, Tom MC, Shiue KR, Lehrer EJ, Saeed H, Pike LRG, Lo SS, Mishra MV, Knisely JPS, Chao ST, Sahgal A, Palmer JD. Consensus Radiation Treatment Planning Guidelines Using (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT For Resected Meningiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)03726-X. [PMID: 39701546 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2024] [Revised: 10/28/2024] [Accepted: 12/06/2024] [Indexed: 12/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumor. Somatostatin receptor 2 is almost universally expressed in meningioma tissue. For patients who require adjuvant radiation, somatostatin receptor based (68)Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET) imaging can detect additional or residual disease not discernible on magnetic resonance imaging. PET guided radiation treatments may improve local control, minimize toxicity by allowing for more precise radiation therapy plans, and allow for more precise dose-escalation to maximize local control. The aim of this study was to develop consensus PET guided treatment planning guidelines for common meningioma presentations. METHODS AND MATERIALS Five postoperative clinically relevant meningioma cases were selected from a prospective single-institutional registry of patients. Each patient had a preoperative and postoperative contrast-enhanced T1-weighted volumetric magnetic resonance imaging, and a postoperative (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, to assist with target delineation. The full treatment scenario including clinical history, histology, surgical history, and imaging were provided for each patient. Nineteen international experts who have published on the treatment and management of meningiomas, and who use (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in their practice, evaluated each case. Individual prescription recommendations were created, pooled, and discussed to create consensus recommendations. RESULTS Consensus recommendations were created for each case. In most cases, PET-based contouring allowed for more precise dose-escalation to 66-70 Gy targeting residual disease. When compared to RTOG 0539 and modern clinical trial contouring guidelines, a smaller clinical target volume expansion from the surgical cavity was recommended using PET guided radiation plans in the absence of radiographic or pathologic evidence of brain or bone invasion. CONCLUSIONS This report provides consensus target volume delineation guidelines for meningiomas receiving postoperative radiation in common clinical situations. Integration of these guidelines into clinical practice may allow for more precise biomarker guided radiation treatments and standardize radiation therapy on future meningioma clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley K Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - David R Raleigh
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Neurological Surgery, and Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Tony J C Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York-Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | - Erqi L Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, New York
| | - William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jay Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Eric L Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine and Norris Cancer Center at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Martin C Tom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CNS/Pediatrics Section, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kevin R Shiue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Hina Saeed
- Lynn Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Baptist Health South Florida, Boca Raton, Florida
| | - Luke R G Pike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Mark V Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang JZ, Landry AP, Raleigh DR, Sahm F, Walsh KM, Goldbrunner R, Yefet LS, Tonn JC, Gui C, Ostrom QT, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Perry A, Ellenbogen Y, Hanemann CO, Jungwirth G, Jenkinson MD, Tabatabai G, Mathiesen TI, McDermott MW, Tatagiba M, la Fougère C, Maas SLN, Galldiks N, Albert NL, Brastianos PK, Ehret F, Minniti G, Lamszus K, Ricklefs FL, Schittenhelm J, Drummond KJ, Dunn IF, Pathmanaban ON, Cohen-Gadol AA, Sulman EP, Tabouret E, Le Rhun E, Mawrin C, Moliterno J, Weller M, Bi W(L, Gao A, Yip S, Niyazi M, Aldape K, Wen PY, Short S, Preusser M, Nassiri F, Zadeh G. Meningioma: International Consortium on Meningiomas consensus review on scientific advances and treatment paradigms for clinicians, researchers, and patients. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:1742-1780. [PMID: 38695575 PMCID: PMC11449035 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors in adults and are increasing in incidence due to the aging population and increased access to neuroimaging. While most exhibit nonmalignant behavior, a subset of meningiomas are biologically aggressive and are associated with treatment resistance, resulting in significant neurologic morbidity and even mortality. In recent years, meaningful advances in our understanding of the biology of these tumors have led to the incorporation of molecular biomarkers into their grading and prognostication. However, unlike other central nervous system (CNS) tumors, a unified molecular taxonomy for meningiomas has not yet been established and remains an overarching goal of the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy-Not Official World Health Organization (cIMPACT-NOW) working group. Additionally, clinical equipoise still remains on how specific meningioma cases and patient populations should be optimally managed. To address these existing gaps, members of the International Consortium on Meningiomas including field-leading experts, have prepared this comprehensive consensus narrative review directed toward clinicians, researchers, and patients. Included in this manuscript are detailed overviews of proposed molecular classifications, novel biomarkers, contemporary treatment strategies, trials on systemic therapies, health-related quality-of-life studies, and management strategies for unique meningioma patient populations. In each section, we discuss the current state of knowledge as well as ongoing clinical and research challenges to road map future directions for further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Z Wang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexander P Landry
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David R Raleigh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Neurological Surgery, and Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Felix Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kyle M Walsh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Roland Goldbrunner
- Center of Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Leeor S Yefet
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jörg C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Munich LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Chloe Gui
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Quinn T Ostrom
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Hinsdale, Illinois, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jill Barnholtz-Sloan
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology (CBIIT), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Trans Divisional Research Program (TDRP), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Hinsdale, Illinois, USA
| | - Arie Perry
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Yosef Ellenbogen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - C Oliver Hanemann
- Peninsula Schools of Medicine, University of Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
| | - Gerhard Jungwirth
- Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael D Jenkinson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) “Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies,” Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tiit I Mathiesen
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael W McDermott
- Division of Neuroscience, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Miami Neuroscience Institute, Baptist Health of South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Marcos Tatagiba
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christian la Fougère
- Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) “Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies,” Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sybren L N Maas
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (IMN-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Felix Ehret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Katrin Lamszus
- Laboratory for Brain Tumor Biology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Franz L Ricklefs
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jens Schittenhelm
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Katharine J Drummond
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ian F Dunn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Omar N Pathmanaban
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Aaron A Cohen-Gadol
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Emeline Tabouret
- CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Emelie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian Mawrin
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jennifer Moliterno
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Wenya (Linda) Bi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew Gao
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephen Yip
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Kenneth Aldape
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susan Short
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Farshad Nassiri
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gelareh Zadeh
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tugcu AO, Dursun CU. In regard to Desideri et al. Radiother Oncol 2024; 197:110377. [PMID: 38857701 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmet Oguz Tugcu
- Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Cemal Ugur Dursun
- Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Umekawa M, Shinya Y, Hasegawa H, Morshed RA, Katano A, Shinozaki-Ushiku A, Saito N. Ki-67 labeling index predicts tumor progression patterns and survival in patients with atypical meningiomas following stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 2024; 167:51-61. [PMID: 38369575 PMCID: PMC10978635 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04537-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigated whether Ki-67 labeling index (LI) correlated with clinical outcomes after SRS for atypical meningiomas. METHODS This retrospective study examined 39 patients with atypical meningiomas who underwent SRS over a 10-year study period. Ki-67 LI was categorized into 3 groups: low (< 5%), intermediate (5%-10%), and high (> 10%). Local tumor control rates (LCRs), progression-free rates (PFRs), disease-specific survival (DSS) rates, and adverse radiation-induced events (AREs) were evaluated. RESULTS The median follow-up periods were 26 months. SRS was performed at a median prescription dose of 18 Gy for tumors with a median Ki-67 LI of 9.6%. The 3-year LCRs were 100%, 74%, and 25% in the low, intermediate, and high LI groups, respectively (p = 0.011). The 3-year PFRs were 100%, 40%, and 0% in the low, intermediate, and high LI groups (p = 0.003). The 5-year DSS rates were 100%, 89%, and 50% in the low, intermediate, and high LI groups (p = 0.019). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis showed a significant correlation of high LI with lower LCR (hazard ratio [HR], 3.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-13.04, p = 0.026), lower PFR (HR 3.80; 95% CI 1.46-9.88, p = 0.006), and shorter DSS (HR 6.55; 95% CI 1.19-35.95, p = 0.031) compared with intermediate LI. The ARE rates were minimal (8%) in the entire group. CONCLUSION Patients with high Ki-67 LI showed significantly more tumor progression and tumor-related death. Ki-67 LI might offer valuable predictive insights for the post-SRS management of atypical meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Motoyuki Umekawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
| | - Yuki Shinya
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Hirotaka Hasegawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Ramin A Morshed
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Atsuto Katano
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Nobuhito Saito
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rock CB, Weil CR, Rock CB, Gravbrot N, Burt LM, DeCesaris C, Menacho ST, Jensen RL, Shrieve DC, Cannon DM. Patterns of failure after radiosurgery for WHO grade 1 or imaging defined meningiomas: Long-term outcomes and implications for management. J Clin Neurosci 2024; 120:175-180. [PMID: 38262262 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We analyzed long-term control and patterns of failure in patients with World Health Organization Grade 1 meningiomas treated with definitive or postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery at the authors' affiliated institution. METHODS 96 patients were treated between 2004 and 2019 with definitive (n = 57) or postoperative (n = 39) stereotactic radiosurgery. Of the postoperative patients, 17 were treated adjuvantly following subtotal resection and 22 were treated as salvage at time of progression. Patients were treated to the gross tumor alone without margin or coverage of the dural tail to a median dose of 15 Gy. Median follow up was 7.4 years (inter-quartile range 4.8-11.3). Local control, marginal control, regional control, and progression-free survival were analyzed. RESULTS Local control at 5 and 10 years was 97 % and 95 %. PFS at 5 and 10 years was 94 % and 90 % with no failures reported after 6 years. Definitive and postoperative local control were similar at 5 (95 % [82-99 %] vs. 100 %) and 10 years (92 % [82-99 %] vs. 100 %). Patients treated with postoperative SRS did not have an increased marginal failure rate (p = 0.83) and only 2/39 (5 %) experienced recurrence elsewhere in the cavity. CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic radiosurgery targeting the gross tumor alone provides excellent local control and progression free survival in patients treated definitively and postoperatively. As in the definitive setting, patients treated postoperatively can be treated to gross tumor alone without need for additional margin or dural tail coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Calvin B Rock
- Department of Radiation Oncology Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | - Christopher R Weil
- Department of Radiation Oncology Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Christian B Rock
- Joe R and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, University of Texas, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Nicholas Gravbrot
- Department of Radiation Oncology Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Lindsay M Burt
- Department of Radiation Oncology Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Cristina DeCesaris
- Department of Radiation Oncology Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sarah T Menacho
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Randy L Jensen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Dennis C Shrieve
- Department of Radiation Oncology Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Donald M Cannon
- Department of Radiation Oncology Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huckhagel T, Riedel C, Flitsch J, Rotermund R. What to report in sellar tumor MRI? A nationwide survey among German pituitary surgeons, radiation oncologists, and endocrinologists. Neuroradiology 2023; 65:1579-1588. [PMID: 37735221 PMCID: PMC10567906 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-023-03222-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE While MRI has become the imaging modality of choice in the diagnosis of sellar tumors, no systematic attempt has yet been made to align radiological reporting of findings with the information needed by the various medical disciplines dealing with these patients. Therefore, we aimed to determine the prevailing preferences in this regard through a nationwide expert survey. METHODS First, an interdisciplinary literature-based catalog of potential reporting elements for sellar tumor MRI examinations was created. Subsequently, a web-based survey regarding the clinical relevance of these items was conducted among board certified members of the German Society of Neurosurgery, German Society of Radiation Oncology, and the Pituitary Working Group of the German Society of Endocrinology. RESULTS A total of 95 experts (40 neurosurgeons, 28 radiation oncologists, and 27 endocrinologists) completed the survey. The description of the exact tumor location, size, and involvement of the anatomic structures adjacent to the sella turcica (optic chiasm, cavernous sinus, and skull base), occlusive hydrocephalus, relationship to the pituitary gland and infundibulum, and certain structural characteristics of the mass (cyst formation, hemorrhage, and necrosis) was rated most important (> 75% agreement). In contrast, the characterization of anatomic features of the nasal cavity and sphenoid sinus as well as the findings of advanced MRI techniques (e.g., perfusion and diffusion imaging) was considered relevant by less than 50% of respondents. CONCLUSION To optimally address the information needs of the interdisciplinary treatment team, MRI reports of sellar masses should primarily focus on the accurate description of tumor location, size, internal structure, and involvement of adjacent anatomic compartments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torge Huckhagel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
| | - Christian Riedel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jörg Flitsch
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Pituitary Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Roman Rotermund
- Department of Neurosurgery, Diako Krankenhaus Flensburg, Flensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang JZ, Nassiri F, Landry AP, Patil V, Rebchuk A, Merali ZA, Gui C, Lee G, Rogers L, Sinha J, Patel Z, Zuccato JA, Voisin MR, Munoz D, Spears J, Cusimano MD, Das S, Makarenko S, Yip S, Gao A, Laperriere N, Tsang DS, Zadeh G. Fractionated radiotherapy for surgically resected intracranial meningiomas: A multicentre retrospective cohort study. Radiother Oncol 2023; 188:109861. [PMID: 37619659 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aside from surgical resection, the only standard of care treatment modality for meningiomas is radiotherapy (RT). Despite this, few studies have focused on identifying clinical covariates associated with failure of fractionated RT following surgical resection (fRT), and the timing of fRT following surgery still remains controversial (adjuvant versus salvage fRT). We assessed the outcomes of the largest, multi-institutional cohort of surgically resected meningiomas treated with subsequent adjuvant and salvage fRT to identify factors associated with local freedom from recurrence (LFFR) over 3-10 years post-fRT and to determine the optimal timing of fRT. METHODS Patients with intracranial meningiomas who underwent surgery and fRT between 1997 and 2018 were included. Primary endpoints were radiographic recurrence/progression and time to progression from the completion of fRT. RESULTS 404 meningiomas were included for analysis. Of these, 167 (41.3%) recurred post-fRT. Clinical covariates independently associated with worse PFS post-fRT included receipt of previous RT to the meningioma, having a WHO grade 3 meningioma or recurrent meningioma, the meningioma having a higher MIB1-index or brain invasion on pathology, and older patient age at diagnosis. Subgroup analysis identified higher MIB1-index as a histological factor associated with poorer LFFR in WHO grade 2 meningiomas. 179 patients underwent adjuvant RT shortly after surgery whereas 225 patients had delayed, salvage fRT after recurrence/progression. Following propensity score matching, patients that underwent adjuvant fRT had improved LFFR post-fRT compared to those that received salvage fRT. CONCLUSION There is a paucity of clinical factors that can predict a meningioma's response to fRT following surgery. Adjuvant fRT may be associated with improved PFS post-fRT compared to salvage fRT. Molecular biomarkers of RT-responsiveness are needed to better inform fRT treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Z Wang
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Farshad Nassiri
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander P Landry
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vikas Patil
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander Rebchuk
- Division of Neurosurgery, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Zamir A Merali
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chloe Gui
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Grace Lee
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lauren Rogers
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada; Faculty of Arts & Science, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Jessica Sinha
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zeel Patel
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffrey A Zuccato
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mathew R Voisin
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Munoz
- Department of Pathology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Julian Spears
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael D Cusimano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sunit Das
- Keenan Chair in Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Serge Makarenko
- Division of Neurosurgery, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Stephen Yip
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrew Gao
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Normand Laperriere
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Derek S Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gelareh Zadeh
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schmutzer M, Skrap B, Thorsteinsdottir J, Fürweger C, Muacevic A, Schichor C. Meningioma involving the superior sagittal sinus: long-term outcome after robotic radiosurgery in primary and recurrent situation. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1206059. [PMID: 37496660 PMCID: PMC10367096 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1206059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Treatment for meningiomas involving the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) is challenging and proved to be associated with higher risks compared to other brain locations. Therapeutical strategies may be either microsurgical (sub-)total resection or adjuvant radiation, or a combination of both. Thrombosis or SSS occlusion following resection or radiosurgery needs to be further elucidated to assess whether single or combined treatment is superior. We here present tumor control and side effect data of robotic radiosurgery (RRS) in combination with or without microsurgery. Methods From our prospective database, we identified 137 patients with WHO grade I meningioma involving the SSS consecutively treated between 2005 and 2020. Treatment decisions were interdisciplinary. Patients underwent RRS as initial/solitary treatment (group 1), as adjuvant treatment after subtotal resection (group 2), or due to recurrent tumor growth after preceding microsurgery (group 3). Positive tumor response was assessed by MRI and defined as reduction of more than 50% of volume. Study endpoints were time to recurrence (TTR), time to RRS, risk factors for decreased survival, and side effects. Overall and specific recurrence rates for treatment groups were analyzed. Side effect data included therapy-related morbidity during follow-up (FU). Results A total of 137 patients (median age, 58.3 years) with SSS meningiomas WHO grade I were analyzed: 51 patients (37.2%) in group 1, 15 patients (11.0%) in group 2, and 71 patients (51.8%) in group 3. Positive MR (morphological response) to therapy was achieved in 50 patients (36.4%), no response was observed in 25 patients (18.2%), and radiological tumor progression was detected in 8 patients (5.8%). Overall 5-year probability of tumor recurrence was 15.8% (median TTR, 41.6 months). Five-year probabilities of recurrence were 0%, 8.3.%, and 21.5% for groups 1-3 (p = 0.06). In multivariate analysis, tumor volume was significantly associated with extent of SSS occlusion (p = 0.026) and sex (p = 0.011). Tumor volume significantly correlated with TTR (p = 0.0046). Acute sinus venous thrombosis or venous congestion-associated bleedings did not occur in any of the groups. Conclusion RRS for grade I meningiomas with SSS involvement represents a good option as first-line treatment, occasionally also in recurrent and adjuvant scenarios as part of a multimodal treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Schmutzer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Benjamin Skrap
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Jun Thorsteinsdottir
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Christian Schichor
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mahgerefteh N, Mozaffari K, Teton Z, Malkhasyan Y, Kim K, Yang I. Incidental Meningiomas: Potential Predictors of Growth and Current State of Management. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2023; 34:347-369. [PMID: 37210125 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
The rise in availability of neuroimaging has led to an increase in incidentally discovered meningiomas. These tumors are typically asymptomatic and tend to display slow growth. Treatment options include observation with serial monitoring, radiation, and surgery. Although optimal management is unclear, clinicians recommend a conservative approach, which preserves quality of life and limits unnecessary intervention. Several risk factors have been investigated for their potential utility in the development of prognostic models for risk assessment. Herein, the authors review the current literature on incidental meningiomas, focusing their discussion on potential predictive factors for tumor growth and appropriate management practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Mahgerefteh
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, 300 Stein Plaza, Suite 562, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1761, USA
| | - Khashayar Mozaffari
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, 300 Stein Plaza, Suite 562, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1761, USA
| | - Zoe Teton
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, 300 Stein Plaza, Suite 562, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1761, USA
| | - Yelena Malkhasyan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, 300 Stein Plaza, Suite 562, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1761, USA
| | - Kihong Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, 300 Stein Plaza, Suite 562, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1761, USA
| | - Isaac Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, 300 Stein Plaza, Suite 562, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1761, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, 300 Stein Plaza, Suite 562, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1761, USA; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, 300 Stein Plaza, Suite 562, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1761, USA; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, 300 Stein Plaza, Suite 562, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1761, USA; Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, 300 Stein Plaza, Suite 562, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1761, USA; Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 300 Stein Plaza, Suite 562, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1761, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, 100 West Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90502, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee EJ, Chung HT, Park H, Kim JW, Kim DG, Paek SH. Factors associated with radiation toxicity and long-term tumor control more than 10 years after Gamma Knife surgery for non-skull base, nonperioptic benign supratentorial meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2023; 138:1580-1590. [PMID: 36208439 DOI: 10.3171/2022.8.jns22422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) is a well-established treatment for benign intracranial meningiomas; however, the dosimetric factors associated with long-term GKS efficacy and safety remain to be elucidated. Using data obtained with at least 10 years of follow-up, the authors aimed 1) to analyze GKS efficacy and safety for the treatment of benign meningiomas confined to non-skull base, nonperioptic supratentorial locations and 2) to determine the radiation dose window that allows for long-term efficacy and safety, namely the minimum dose to achieve long-term local control (LC) and the maximum safe dose to avoid adverse radiation effects (AREs). METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent GKS for benign meningiomas in the abovementioned location at the authors' institution between 1998 and 2010 and who received follow-up for more than 10 years. The authors meticulously extracted the values of various dosimetric factors by using a dose-volume histogram. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to investigate the dosimetric factors associated with LC and ARE. RESULTS Fifty-five patients (male/female ratio 1:4.2) with 68 tumors were enrolled. The median (range) gross target volume and marginal dose were 4.2 (0.2-31.7) cm3 and 14.3 (9-20) Gy, respectively. In total, 23.5% of tumors progressed at an average of 72 months, with 10- and 15-year progression-free survival rates of 80.9% and 73.5%, respectively. In univariate analysis, higher marginal dose, coverage (%), Dmin, D98%, Dmean, D2%, Dmax, and Paddick conformity index were significantly associated with LC. In multivariate analysis, D98% was the significant factor, with a cutoff value of 11 Gy (HR 0.754, p < 0.001). Symptomatic AREs occurred in 7 patients at an average of 7 months after GKS. AREs were significantly associated with the volume of normal tissue irradiated with more than 14 Gy (nV14Gy), with a cutoff value of 0.66 cm3 (HR 2.459, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS D98% was a barometer of the minimum required dose associated with long-term LC, and nV14Gy was related to symptomatic AREs. The authors recommend a marginal dose ranging from 11 to 14 Gy to achieve long-term efficacy and safety in patients with non-skull base, nonperioptic benign supratentorial meningiomas, with the assumption of thorough tumor coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Jung Lee
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - Hyun-Tai Chung
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - Hangeul Park
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - Jin-Wook Kim
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - Dong Gyu Kim
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - Sun Ha Paek
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul
- 3Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Seoul National University, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Meningiomas comprise a histologically and clinically diverse set of tumors arising from the meningothelial lining of the central nervous system. In the past decade, remarkable progress has been made in deciphering the biology of these common neoplasms. Nevertheless, effective systemic or molecular therapies for meningiomas remain elusive and are active areas of preclinical and clinical investigation. Thus, standard treatment modalities for meningiomas are limited to maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, or radiosurgery. This review examines the history, clinical rationale, and future directions of radiotherapy and radiosurgery as integral and effective treatments for meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Calixto-Hope G Lucas
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Stephen T Magill
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - C Leland Rogers
- Radiation Oncology, GammaWest Cancer Services, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - David R Raleigh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Speckter H, Palque-Santos S, Mota-Gonzalez R, Bido J, Hernandez G, Rivera D, Suazo L, Valenzuela S, Gonzalez-Curi M, Stoeter P. Can Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps replace Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) maps to predict the volumetric response of meningiomas to Gamma Knife Radiosurgery? J Neurooncol 2023; 161:547-554. [PMID: 36745271 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04243-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Noninvasive methods are desired to predict the treatment response to Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) to improve individual tumor management. In a previous study, we demonstrated that Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)-derived parameter maps significantly correlate to SRS response. This study aimed to analyze and compare the predictive value of intratumoral ADC and DTI parameters in patients with meningiomas undergoing radiosurgery. METHODS MR images of 70 patients treated with Gamma Knife SRS for WHO grade I meningiomas were retrospectively reviewed. MR acquisition included pre- and post-treatment DWI and DTI sequences, and subtractions were calculated to assess for radiation-induced changes in the parameter values. RESULTS After a mean follow-up period (FUP) of 52.7 months, 69 of 70 meningiomas were controlled, with a mean volume reduction of 34.9%. Whereas fractional anisotropy (FA) values of the initial exam showed the highest correlation to tumor volume change at the last FU (CC = - 0.607), followed by the differences between first and second FU values of FA (CC = - 0.404) and the first longitudinal diffusivity (LD) value (CC = - 0.375), the correlation coefficients of all ADC values were comparably low. Nevertheless, all these correlations, except for ADC measured at the first follow-up, reached significance. CONCLUSION For the first time, the prognostic value of ADC maps measured in meningiomas before and at first follow-up after Gamma Knife SRS, was compared to simultaneously acquired DTI parameter maps. Quantities assessed from ADC maps present significant correlations to the volumetric meningioma response but are less effective than correlations with DTI parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herwin Speckter
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. .,Department of Radiology, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
| | - Sarai Palque-Santos
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Ruben Mota-Gonzalez
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Jose Bido
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Giancarlo Hernandez
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Diones Rivera
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Luis Suazo
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Santiago Valenzuela
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Maria Gonzalez-Curi
- Department of Radiology, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Peter Stoeter
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.,Department of Radiology, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
The multiomic landscape of meningiomas: a review and update. J Neurooncol 2023; 161:405-414. [PMID: 36840836 PMCID: PMC9988797 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04253-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumor in adults. Traditionally they have been understudied compared to other central nervous system (CNS) tumors. However over the last decade, there has been renewed interest in uncovering the molecular topography of these tumors, with landmark studies identifying key driver alterations contributing to meningioma development and progression. Recent work from several independent research groups have integrated different genomic and epigenomic platforms to develop a molecular-based classification scheme for meningiomas that could supersede histopathological grading in terms of diagnostic accuracy, biological relevance, and outcome prediction, keeping pace with contemporary grading schemes for other CNS tumors including gliomas and medulloblastomas. METHODS Here we summarize the studies that have uncovered key alterations in meningiomas which builds towards the discovery of consensus molecular groups in meningiomas by integrating these findings. These groups supersede WHO grade and other clinical factors in being able to accurately predict tumor biology and clinical outcomes following surgery. RESULTS Despite differences in the nomenclature of recently uncovered molecular groups across different studies, the biological similarities between these groups enables us to likely reconciliate these groups into four consensus molecular groups: two benign groups largely dichotomized by NF2-status, and two clinically aggressive groups defined by their hypermetabolic transcriptome, and by their preponderance of proliferative, cell-cycling pathways respectively. CONCLUSION Future work, including by our group and others are underway to validate these molecular groups and harmonize the nomenclature for routine clinical use.
Collapse
|
15
|
Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas of the confluence of the falx and tentorium. J Neurooncol 2023; 161:225-233. [PMID: 36125641 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04125-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Meningiomas arising from the confluence of the falx and tentorium (CFT) are a rare and challenging subset of meningiomas. Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is well-established as a safe and effective management strategy for intracranial meningiomas, but its role in treating CFT meningiomas is not well-described. This paper reports the largest series focused exclusively on the outcomes of GKRS for CFT meningiomas. METHODS We retrospectively identified 20 CFT meningiomas out of 2031 meningioma patients who underwent GKRS at our institution between 1987 and 2021. Tumor control, overall survival (OS), and complications were recorded and analyzed. The median tumor margin dose was 13 Gy at the 50% isodose line. The median tumor volume treated was 4.4 cc (IQR 3.5-7.7). The median patient age was 58 years (range 33-83), the median MRI surveillance duration was 59 months (IQR 34-92), and the median overall follow-up duration was 92 months (IQR 42-201). RESULTS The local tumor control rate (PFS) at 5 and 10-years were 100% (N=10) and 83% (N=4), respectively. Eight patients had stable tumor volumes and 11 patients had regression. One patient with a twice-operated tumor had delayed progression at 7.5 years and was retreated with GKRS. No patient had adverse radiation effects during the period of MRI surveillance. The 5 and 10-year OS were 100% (N=13) and 100% (N=7), respectively. CONCLUSIONS GKRS is a valuable therapeutic strategy for patients with newly diagnosed CFT meningiomas or progressive residual tumors after surgical resection.
Collapse
|
16
|
Deng K, Yu Y, Ge L, Deng K, Zhang M. Radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer and meningioma with a history of Guillain-Barré syndrome: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e32124. [PMID: 36482598 PMCID: PMC9726365 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000032124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare autoimmune disease. Patients with cervical malignancies and intracranial meningiomas after the course of GBS are even rarer. There are no relevant reports at present. PATIENT CONCERNS We report a patient who developed cervical cancer (CC) and intracranial meningioma simultaneously after the course of GBS. DIAGNOSES The history, pelvic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathology confirmed cervical squamous cell carcinoma, and the head enhanced MRI confirmed meningioma. INTERVENTION After multi-disciplinary team, the patient received head stereotactic radiosurgery for meningioma and radical radiotherapy for CC. OUTCOMES The follow up for 1 year after treatment revealed a complete remission of the cervical tumor, stable disease of the meningioma, and no signs of GBS recurrence. Up to now, the general condition of the patient is acceptable and the curative effect is satisfactory. LESSONS This case report aims to improve the oncologists' understanding of malignant tumors with rare autoimmune diseases and provide treatment reference for similar diseases in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kangli Deng
- Department of Health Management & Institute of Health Management, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Yanxin Yu
- Department of Oncology, Chengdu 363 Hospital Affiliated to Southwest Medical University, Chengdu, China
| | - Liben Ge
- Department of radiotherapy, Jilin Provincial People’s Hospital, Changchun, China
| | - Kangyan Deng
- Department of Gynecology, Langzhong People’s Hospital, Langzhong, China
| | - Mo Zhang
- Department of Health Management & Institute of Health Management, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abdallah A, Seyithanoğlu MH, Gündağ Papaker M, Aralaşmak A, Yapar S, Baloğlu G. Early stage T1-weighted perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a factor that predicts local control response in patients with meningioma who underwent gamma-knife radiosurgery. Neurol Res 2022; 44:1113-1121. [PMID: 35981093 DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2022.2112377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gamma-knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is an alternative treatment option for selected intracranial meningiomas. The study's aim is to demonstrate the advantages of T1-weighted perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (T1-PMRI) by measuring the volume transfer coefficient (Ktrans) values in the prediction of local response for patients with meningioma who have undergone GKRS consecutively. METHODS The data of patients diagnosed radiologically with WHO grade 1 intracranial meningiomas was collected prospectively. The patients who were treated consecutively with GKRS at our institution (September 2017-September 2018) were included. After GKRS, the patients were followed up at the defined periods with routine contrast-enhanced MRI and T1-PMRI by measuring the Ktrans. The comparison between the pre-treatment and third-month post-treatment (PO3M) Ktrans was done using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS Thirty-one patients with 36 tumors have undergone GKRS. Twenty-two patients were female. The mean age was 55.3 years. The mean pre-GKRS volume was 7.67 ccs. The mean 50% radiation isodose was 12.2 Gy. The local tumor control rate was 100%. Fourteen tumors were regressed fully at the last MRI. PO3M Ktrans decreased when compared with the pre-GKRS values (p < 0.0001). However, the numerical decrease in tumor volumes on contrast-enhanced MRI was not statistically significant (p = 0.117). CONCLUSION Changes between Ktrans on PO3M and pre-GKRS T1-PMRI were more useful in determining the early response to GKRS in patients with meningioma than volumetric changes. Therefore, Ktrans should be taken as a reference to predict the early response to GKRS in follow-up imaging scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anas Abdallah
- Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Samatya, Turkey
| | | | | | - Ayşe Aralaşmak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Bahcelievler Hospital, Bahçelievler, Turkey
| | - Selçuk Yapar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University, Fatih, Turkey
| | - Gökhan Baloğlu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osmaniye State Hospital, Merkez, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chew CH, Chen JC, Hung SK, Wu TH, Lee MS, Chiou WY, Chen LC, Lin HY. Clinical outcomes of benign brain tumors treated with single fraction LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery: Experience of a single institute. Tzu Chi Med J 2022; 34:462-472. [PMID: 36578643 PMCID: PMC9791860 DOI: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_260_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a noninvasive and effective treatment modality widely used for benign brain tumors. This study aims to report 20-year treatment outcomes in our institute. Materials and Methods From May 2001 to December 2020, 127 patients treated with LINAC-based single-fraction SRS for their benign brain lesions were included. A neurosurgeon and two radiation oncologists retrospectively reviewed all data. Computed tomography (CT) simulation was performed after head-frame fixation under local anesthesia. All planning CT images were co-registered and fused with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging taken within 3 months for lesions targeting and critical organs delineation. The marginal dose was prescribed at 60%-90% isodose lines, respectively, to cover ≥95% planning target volume. Outcome evaluations included clinical tumor control rate (TCR), defined as the need for salvage therapy, and radiological response, defined as no enlargement of >2 cm in the maximal diameter. Overall survival (OS) and adverse reaction (defined according to CTCAE 5.0) were also analyzed. Results The present study included 76 female and 51 male patients for analysis. The median age was 59 years (range, 20-88 years). Their diagnoses were vestibular schwannoma (VS, n = 54), nonvestibular cranial nerve schwannoma (n = 6), meningioma (n = 50), and pituitary adenoma (n = 17). Totally 136 lesions were treated in a single fraction, predominantly skull base tumors, accounting for 69.1%. Median and mean follow-up duration was 49 and 61 months (range, 1-214 months), Overall TCR was 92.9%. The 5-year disease-specific TCR for VS, nonvestibular schwannoma, meningioma, and pituitary adenoma were 97.4%, 91.7%, 93.8%, and 83.3%. Salvage therapy was indicated for eight patients at 4-110 months after SRS. Among symptomatic patients, post-SRS symptom(s) was improved, stable, and worse in 68.2%, 24.3%, and 3.6%, respectively. Radiological response rate for 111 evaluable patients was 94.6% (shrinkage, 28.8%; stable, 65.8%). OS was 96.1% without treatment-related mortality. One patient with post-SRS cranial nerve injury (0.8%, involving the trigeminal nerve, grade 2 toxicities). No grade 3-4 acute or late toxicity was found. Conclusion Our results suggested that LINAC-based SRS effectively controls tumor growth and tumor-related neurological symptoms for patients with benign brain tumors. SRS is less aggressive, associated with low neurological morbidity and no mortality. Continuous follow-up is indicated to conclude longer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Hui Chew
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Jin-Cherng Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Kai Hung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Hsien Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Moon-Sing Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Yen Chiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Liang-Cheng Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Hon-Yi Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
- Institute of Molecular Biology, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Piper K, Yu S, Taghvaei M, Fernandez C, Mouchtouris N, Smit RD, Yudkoff C, Collopy S, Reyes M, Lavergne P, Karsy M, Prashant GN, Shi W, Evans J. Radiation of meningioma dural tail may not improve tumor control rates. Front Surg 2022; 9:908745. [PMID: 35860199 PMCID: PMC9289604 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.908745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Dural tails are thickened contrast-enhancing portions of dura associated with some meningiomas. Prior studies have demonstrated the presence of tumor cells within the dural tail, however their inclusion in radiation treatment fields remains controversial. We evaluated the role of including the dural tail when treating a meningioma with stereotactic radiation and the impact on tumor recurrence. Methods This is a retrospective, single-institution, cohort study of patients with intracranial World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1 meningioma and identified dural tail who were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) from January 2012 to December 2018. SRS and FSRT subgroups were categorized based on coverage or non-coverage of the dural tail by the radiation fields, as determined independently by a radiation oncologist and a neurosurgeon. Demographics, tumor characteristics, radiation plans, and outcomes were evaluated. High grade tumors were analyzed separately. Results A total of 187 WHO grade 1 tumors from 177 patients were included in the study (median age: 62 years, median follow-up: 40 months, 78.1% female) with 104 receiving SRS and 83 receiving FSRT. The dural tail was covered in 141 (75.4%) of treatment plans. There was no difference in recurrence rates (RR) or time to recurrence (TTR) between non-coverage or coverage of dural tails (RR: 2.2% vs 3.5%, P = 1.0; TTR: 34 vs 36 months, P = 1.00). There was no difference in the rate of radiation side effects between dural tail coverage or non-coverage groups. These associations remained stable when SRS and FSRT subgroups were considered separately, as well as in a high grade cohort of 16 tumors. Conclusion Inclusion of the dural tail in the SRS or FSRT volumes for meningioma treatment does not seem to reduce recurrence rate. Improved understanding of dural tail pathophysiology, tumor grade, tumor spread, and radiation response is needed to better predict the response of meningiomas to radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keenan Piper
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Correspondence: Keenan Piper
| | - Siyuan Yu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Mohammad Taghvaei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Christian Fernandez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Nikolaos Mouchtouris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Rupert D. Smit
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Clifford Yudkoff
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Sarah Collopy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Maikerly Reyes
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Pascal Lavergne
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Michael Karsy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Giyarpuram N. Prashant
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Wenyin Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - James Evans
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Speckter H, Radulovic M, Trivodaliev K, Vranes V, Joaquin J, Hernandez W, Mota A, Bido J, Hernandez G, Rivera D, Suazo L, Valenzuela S, Stoeter P. MRI radiomics in the prediction of the volumetric response in meningiomas after gamma knife radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 2022; 159:281-291. [PMID: 35715668 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04063-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This report presents the first investigation of the radiomics value in predicting the meningioma volumetric response to gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). METHODS The retrospective study included 93 meningioma patients imaged by three Tesla MRI. Tumor morphology was quantified by calculating 337 shape, first- and second-order radiomic features from MRI obtained before GKRS. Analysis was performed on original 3D MR images and after their laplacian of gaussian (LoG), logarithm and exponential filtering. The prediction performance was evaluated by Pearson correlation, linear regression and ROC analysis, with meningioma volume change per month as the outcome. RESULTS Sixty calculated features significantly correlated with the outcome. The feature selection based on LASSO and multivariate regression started from all available 337 radiomic and 12 non-radiomic features. It selected LoG-sigma-1-0-mm-3D_firstorder_InterquartileRange and logarithm_ngtdm_Busyness as the predictively most robust and non-redundant features. The radiomic score based on these two features produced an AUC = 0.81. Adding the non-radiomic karnofsky performance status (KPS) to the score has increased the AUC to 0.88. Low values of the radiomic score defined a homogeneous subgroup of 50 patients with consistent absence (0%) of tumor progression. CONCLUSION This is the first report of a strong association between MRI radiomic features and volumetric meningioma response to radiosurgery. The clinical importance of the early and reliable prediction of meningioma responsiveness to radiosurgery is based on its potential to aid individualized therapy decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herwin Speckter
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and Department of Radiology, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
| | - Marko Radulovic
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology & Radiology of Serbia, Pasterova 14, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | - Velicko Vranes
- Instituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo (INTEC), Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Johanna Joaquin
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and Department of Radiology, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Wenceslao Hernandez
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and Department of Radiology, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Angel Mota
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and Department of Radiology, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Jose Bido
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and Department of Radiology, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Giancarlo Hernandez
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and Department of Radiology, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Diones Rivera
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and Department of Radiology, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Luis Suazo
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and Department of Radiology, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Santiago Valenzuela
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and Department of Radiology, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Peter Stoeter
- Centro Gamma Knife Dominicano and Department of Radiology, CEDIMAT, Plaza de la Salud, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rogers CL, Pugh SL, Vogelbaum MA, Perry A, Ashby LS, Modi JM, Alleman AM, Barani IJ, Braunstein S, Bovi JA, de Groot JF, Whitton AC, Lindhorst SM, Deb N, Shrieve DC, Shu HK, Bloom B, Machtay M, Mishra MV, Robinson CG, Won M, Mehta MP. Low-risk meningioma: Initial outcomes from NRG Oncology/RTOG 0539. Neuro Oncol 2022; 25:137-145. [PMID: 35657335 PMCID: PMC9825319 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Three- and five-year progression-free survival (PFS) for low-risk meningioma managed with surgery and observation reportedly exceeds 90%. Herewith we summarize outcomes for low-risk meningioma patients enrolled on NRG/RTOG 0539. METHODS This phase II trial allocated patients to one of three groups per World Health Organization grade, recurrence status, and resection extent. Low-risk patients had either gross total (GTR) or subtotal resection (STR) for a newly diagnosed grade 1 meningioma and were observed after surgery. The primary endpoint was 3-year PFS. Adverse events (AEs) were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3. RESULTS Among 60 evaluable patients, the median follow-up was 9.1 years. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year rates were 91.4% (95% CI, 84.2 to 98.6), 89.4% (95% CI, 81.3 to 97.5), 85.0% (95% CI, 75.3 to 94.7) for PFS and 98.3% (95% CI, 94.9 to 100), 98.3%, (95% CI, 94.9 to 100), 93.8% (95% CI, 87.0 to 100) for overall survival (OS), respectively. With centrally confirmed GTR, 3/5/10y PFS and OS rates were 94.3/94.3/87.6% and 97.1/97.1/90.4%. With STR, 3/5/10y PFS rates were 83.1/72.7/72.7% and 10y OS 100%. Five patients reported one grade 3, four grade 2, and five grade 1 AEs. There were no grade 4 or 5 AEs. CONCLUSIONS These results prospectively validate high PFS and OS for low-risk meningioma managed surgically but raise questions regarding optimal management following STR, a subcohort that could potentially benefit from adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Leland Rogers
- Corresponding Author: C. Leland Rogers, MD, GammaWest Cancer Services, 3592 West 9000 South, Suite 100, West Jordan, UT 84088, USA ()
| | - Stephanie L Pugh
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Arie Perry
- University of California, San Francisco, Neuropathology, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lynn S Ashby
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Neurology, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Jignesh M Modi
- MidState Medical Center, Radiology, Meriden, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Igor J Barani
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Radiation Oncology, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Steve Braunstein
- University of California, San Francisco, Radiation Oncology, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Joseph A Bovi
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Radiation Oncology, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - John F de Groot
- University of California, San Francisco, Neuro Oncology, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Anthony C Whitton
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Scott M Lindhorst
- Medical University of South Carolina, Neuro Oncology, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Nimisha Deb
- St. Luke’s Hospital-Anderson Campus Cancer Center, Easton, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dennis C Shrieve
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Hui-Kuo Shu
- Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Beatrice Bloom
- Northwell Health, Radiation Oncology, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Mitchell Machtay
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mark V Mishra
- University of Maryland, Radiation Oncology, Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Clifford G Robinson
- Washington University, Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Minhee Won
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ruiz-Garcia H, Trifiletti DM, Mohammed N, Hung YC, Xu Z, Chytka T, Liscak R, Tripathi M, Arsanious D, Cifarelli CP, Caceres MP, Mathieu D, Speckter H, Mehta GU, Lekovic GP, Sheehan JP. Skull Base Meningiomas in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 2: An International Multicenter Study Evaluating Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Skull Base Surg 2022; 83:e173-e180. [PMID: 35832959 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective Meningiomas are the second most common tumors in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF-2). Microsurgery is challenging in NF-2 patients presenting with skull base meningiomas due to the intrinsic risks and need for multiple interventions over time. We analyzed treatment outcomes and complications after primary Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) to delineate its role in the management of these tumors. Methods An international multicenter retrospective study approved by the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation was performed. NF-2 patients with at least one growing and/or symptomatic skull base meningioma and 6-month follow-up after primary GKRS were included. Clinical and radiosurgical parameters were recorded for analysis. Results In total, 22 NF-2 patients with 54 skull base meningiomas receiving GKRS as primary treatment met inclusion criteria. Median age at GKRS was 38 years (10-79 years). Most lesions were located in the posterior fossa (55.6%). Actuarial progression free survival (PFS) rates were 98.1% at 2 years and 90.0% at 5 and 10 years. The median follow-up time after initial GKRS was 5.0 years (0.6-25.5 years). Tumor volume at GKRS was a predictor of tumor control. Lesions >5.5 cc presented higher chances to progress after radiosurgery ( p = 0.043). Three patients (13.64%) developed adverse radiation effects. No malignant transformation or death due to meningioma or radiosurgery was reported. Conclusions GKRS is effective and safe in the management of skull base meningiomas in NF-2 patients. Tumor volume deserve greater relevance during clinical decision-making regarding the most appropriate time to treat. GKRS offers a minimally invasive approach of particular interest in this specific group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Nasser Mohammed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Yi-Chieh Hung
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Tomas Chytka
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Manjul Tripathi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - David Arsanious
- Department of Neurological Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
| | - Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurological Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
| | - Marco Perez Caceres
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT Hospital, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Gautam U Mehta
- Department of Neurological Surgery, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Gregory P Lekovic
- Department of Neurological Surgery, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mishra H, Pahwa B, Agrawal D, M Ch MS, M Ch SSK. Gamma knife radiosurgery as an efficacious treatment for paediatric central nervous system tumours: a retrospective study of 61 neoplasms. Childs Nerv Syst 2022; 38:909-918. [PMID: 35290486 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-022-05463-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brain tumours have an incidence of 1.15 to 5.14 cases per 100,000 children and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Radiosurgery has become a promising approach to manage these paediatric CNS tumours. The aim of the present study was to analyse the efficacy of radiosurgery in the treatment of a variety of paediatric tumours of CNS. METHODS This retrospective study was conducted from 1997 to 2012 at a single Neurosurgery centre. All paediatric patients (≤ 18 years of age) with CNS tumours who were treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and had a minimum follow up of 6 months were included in the study. Patients with lesions other than tumours were excluded. Clinical, radiological and GKRS planning data was collected and analysed in all patients. RESULTS A total of 76 children with brain tumours had GKRS during the study period. Of these, 40 children (with 61 neoplasms) had follow-up available and were included in the study. The mean age was 16 years (6-18 years). Seventeen patients received primary GKRS, 20 patients received secondary, and 3 patients received both. The median tumour volume was 3.3 cm3 (0.14-38.9 cm3). The mean dose was 12.56 Gy at 50% isodose line. The majority of the tumours were meningioma (n = 20) followed by acoustic schwannoma (n = 17). The mean treatment time was 67.04 min. Thirty-three tumours responded favourably to GKRS, 24 showed a stable size, 3 had no response while 1 progressed, requiring surgery. CONCLUSION GKRS has the potential to become an indispensable tool in the management of paediatric brain neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harshit Mishra
- Consultant Neurosurgeon, We Care Hospital, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Bhavya Pahwa
- University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Deepak Agrawal
- Department of Neurosurgery, JPNA Trauma Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
| | - Manmohan Singh M Ch
- Department of Neurosurgery, JPNA Trauma Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India
| | - S S Kale M Ch
- Department of Neurosurgery, JPNA Trauma Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bin Alamer O, Palmisciano P, Mallela AN, Labib MA, Gardner PA, Couldwell WT, Lunsford LD, Abou-Al-Shaar H. Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of petroclival meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment outcomes of primary and adjuvant radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 2022; 157:207-219. [PMID: 35301638 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03934-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To summarize the clinical features and outcomes of petroclival meningioma patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as either a primary or an adjuvant modality. METHODS Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane. A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment outcomes comparing primary and adjuvant SRS was conducted. RESULTS Seven articles comprising 722 cases were included. The mean tumor marginal dose was 13.5 Gy. After SRS, symptoms improved in 28.7%, remained unchanged in 61.3%, and worsened in 10.0% of the cohort. Tumor control was achieved in 94.8% of patients. The mean tumor volume change was -6.4 cm3. The 5-year and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 91-100% and 69.6-89.9%, respectively. Overall, 61.9% of patients underwent primary radiosurgery, and 38.1% had adjuvant radiosurgery. Patients who had primary SRS reported higher rates of tumor control (94.3% vs. 88.2%) and fewer SRS-related complications (3.7% vs. 10.3%) than those who received adjuvant SRS (not accounting for microsurgical complications). The functional status of patients who had primary SRS was more likely to improve or remain unchanged, with an effect size of 1.12 (95% CI 1.1-1.25; I2 = 0). Neither group displayed superiority in worsening functional outcomes or tumor control rate. CONCLUSION SRS of petroclival meningiomas was associated with excellent long-term PFS and local tumor control rates. Primary SRS was highly effective for patients with smaller volume lesions without clinically symptomatic mass effect. In patients who warrant initial resection, adjuvant radiosurgery remains an important modality to prevent regrowth while maintaining postresection function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Othman Bin Alamer
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Paolo Palmisciano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Trauma Center, Gamma Knife Center, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Arka N Mallela
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Suite B-400, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Mohamed A Labib
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Suite B-400, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - William T Couldwell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Suite B-400, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Suite B-400, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) Induced Higher-Grade Transformation of a Benign Meningioma into Atypical Meningioma. Case Rep Surg 2022; 2022:4478561. [PMID: 35251732 PMCID: PMC8890901 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4478561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Revised: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a widely used treatment modality for the management of meningioma. Whether used as a primary, adjuvant, or salvage procedure, SRS is a safe, less invasive, and effective modality of treatment as microsurgery. The transformation of a meningioma following radiosurgery raises a concern, and our current understanding about it is extremely limited. Only a few case reports have described meningioma dedifferentiation after SRS to a higher grade. Moreover, a relatively small number of cases have been reported in large retrospective studies with little elaboration. Case Description. We report a detailed case description of a 41-year-old man with progressive meningioma enlargement and rapid grade progression after SRS, which was histopathologically confirmed before and after SRS. We discussed the clinical presentation, radiological/histopathological features, and outcome. We also reviewed previous studies that reported the outcome and follow-up of patients diagnosed with grade I meningioma histopathologically or presumed with benign meningioma by radiological features who underwent primary or adjuvant radiosurgery. Conclusion The risk of progression after SRS is low, and the risk of higher-grade transformation after SRS is trivial. The early timing for recurrence and field-related radiation may favor a relationship between SRS and higher-grade transformation (causality) although transformation as a part of the natural history of the disease cannot be fully excluded. Tumor progression (treatment failure) after SRS may demonstrate a transformation, and careful, close, and long follow-up is highly recommended. Also, acknowledging that there is a low risk of early and delayed complications and a trivial risk of transformation should not preclude its use as SRS affords a high level of safety and efficiency.
Collapse
|
26
|
Samanci Y, Ardor GD, Peker S. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for tuberculum sellae meningiomas: a series of 78 consecutive patients. Neurosurg Rev 2022; 45:2315-2322. [PMID: 35138486 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01753-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) have not been reported explicitly within any meningioma series. We present the first and largest TSM series with clinical, radiosurgical, and outcome features for 78 consecutive patients managed with GKRS. Patients who underwent GKRS for TSMs between 2005 and 2021 and had a minimum of 6 months of follow-up were included. Medical records, imaging studies, and follow-up examinations were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 78 patients with a median age of 50.5 years were included. SRS was conducted as an upfront treatment for 38 patients (48.7%). The median target volume was 1.7 cm3 (range, 0.1-14.6). During a median follow-up of 78.5 months, the cumulative PFS rates of the whole cohort at 1, 5, and 10 years by Kaplan-Meier analysis were 100%, 97.9%, and 94.5%, respectively. Of 47 patients with impaired vision, improvement and/or preservation of visual acuity, and visual field were achieved in 55.3% and 42.6%, respectively. No new-onset hormonal deficits were observed. Based on our data, SRS represents an effective and safe modality for unresected or recurrent/residual TSMs. SRS should be offered to patients who are not willing or not ideal candidates for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yavuz Samanci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Center, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gokce Deniz Ardor
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Center, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Selcuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Center, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. .,Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Koç University, Davutpasa Caddesi No:4, 34010, Zeytinburnu/İstanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ganz JC. Meningiomas. PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH 2022; 268:163-190. [PMID: 35074079 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2021.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Meningiomas arise in various locations. Convexity tumors are relatively simple to remove. Skull base tumors and tumors adjacent to the major cerebral veins and venous sinuses can be very difficult to extirpate. Attempts at radical resection can lead to serious morbidity. The combination of bulk reduction using microsurgery followed by GKNS gives greatly improved survival and very low morbidity. With smaller tumors, GKNS may be used as the primary treatment. Increasing numbers of asymptomatic meningiomas are demonstrated either as an unexpected finding or as a residual or recurrent tumor after surgery. In all of these situations, GKNS gives a better result than observation or reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy C Ganz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Damen PJJ, Bulthuis VJ, Hanssens PEJ, Lie ST, Fleischeuer R, Melotte V, Wouters KA, Ruland A, Beckervordersandforth J, Speel EJM. WHO grade I meningiomas that show regrowth after gamma knife radiosurgery often show 1p36 loss. Sci Rep 2021; 11:16432. [PMID: 34385566 PMCID: PMC8361078 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95956-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
WHO grade I meningiomas occasionally show regrowth after radiosurgical treatment, which cannot be predicted by clinical features. There is increasing evidence that certain biomarkers are associated with regrowth of meningiomas. The aim of this retrospective study was to asses if these biomarkers could be of value to predict regrowth of WHO grade I meningiomas after additive radiosurgery. Forty-four patients with WHO grade I meningiomas who underwent additive radiosurgical treatment between 2002 and 2015 after Simpson IV resection were included in this study, of which 8 showed regrowth. Median follow-up time was 64 months (range 24–137 months). Tumors were analyzed for the proliferation marker Ki-67 by immunohistochemistry and for deletion of 1p36 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Furthermore, genomic DNA was analyzed for promoter hypermethylation of the genes NDRG1–4, SFRP1, HOXA9 and MGMT. Comparison of meningiomas with and without regrowth after radiosurgery revealed that loss of 1p36 (p = 0.001) and hypermethylation of NDRG1 (p = 0.046) were correlated with regrowth free survival. Loss of 1p36 was the only parameter that was significantly associated with meningioma regrowth after multivariate analysis (p = 0.01). Assessment of 1p36 loss in tumor tissue prior to radiosurgery might be considered an indicator of prognosis/regrowth. However, this finding has to be validated in an independent larger set of tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim J J Damen
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, Postbox 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent J Bulthuis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Suan Te Lie
- Gamma Knife Center Tilburg, ETZ-Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Ruth Fleischeuer
- Department of Pathology, ETZ-Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle Melotte
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, Postbox 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kim A Wouters
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, Postbox 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Ruland
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, Postbox 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Beckervordersandforth
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, Postbox 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst Jan M Speel
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, Postbox 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Long-term outcome in meningiomas involving the major dural sinuses with combined therapy of subtotal resection and early postoperative gamma knife radiosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:1677-1685. [PMID: 33608765 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04766-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Total resection of meningiomas involving the major dural sinuses (MIMDS) is still challenging for neurosurgeons. Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) was shown to have a high probability of tumor control. The current study evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent subtotal resection alone or in combination with postoperative GKRS for the treatment of WHO grade I MIMDS. METHODS From January 2006 to December 2016, 204 patients with MIMDS underwent Simpson IV subtotal resection in Wuhan Union Hospital. In 151 patients, no additional treatment was performed, while the tumor remnant was treated with GKRS in 53 patients. All patients were monitored with regular MR follow-ups. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data, radiological characteristics, and outcomes of these 204 patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Related factors were determined by univariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS The mean follow-up period was 75.5 months. The tumor recurrence/progression rates were 13.9% in the microsurgery group and 3.8% in the combined therapy group (p = 0.045). The 5- and 10- year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 92.3 and 80.7%, respectively, in the microsurgery group and 100.0 and 88.5% in the combined therapy group. Treatment approach was found to be an independent prognostic factor for tumor recurrence/progression in the univariable analyses (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS Compared with microsurgery alone, targeted Simpson grade IV resection combined with early gamma knife treatment resulted in longer progression-free survival without increased complications for WHO grade I MIMDS.
Collapse
|
30
|
Giammattei L, di Russo P, Starnoni D, Passeri T, Bruneau M, Meling TR, Berhouma M, Cossu G, Cornelius JF, Paraskevopoulos D, Zazpe I, Jouanneau E, Cavallo LM, Benes V, Seifert V, Tatagiba M, Schroeder HWS, Goto T, Ohata K, Al-Mefty O, Fukushima T, Messerer M, Daniel RT, Froelich S. Petroclival meningiomas: update of current treatment and consensus by the EANS skull base section. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:1639-1663. [PMID: 33740134 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04798-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal management of petroclival meningiomas (PCMs) continues to be debated along with several controversies that persist. METHODS A task force was created by the EANS skull base section along with its members and other renowned experts in the field to generate recommendations for the management of these tumors. To achieve this, the task force reviewed in detail the literature in this field and had formal discussions within the group. RESULTS The constituted task force dealt with the existing definitions and classifications, pre-operative radiological investigations, management of small and asymptomatic PCMs, radiosurgery, optimal surgical strategies, multimodal treatment, decision-making, and patient's counselling. CONCLUSION This article represents the consensually derived opinion of the task force with respect to the management of PCMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Giammattei
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
| | - P di Russo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - D Starnoni
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Center, University Hospital of Lausanne and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - T Passeri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - M Bruneau
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasme Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - T R Meling
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - M Berhouma
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hopital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France
| | - G Cossu
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Center, University Hospital of Lausanne and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - J F Cornelius
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - D Paraskevopoulos
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, St. Bartholomew's and The Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - I Zazpe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - E Jouanneau
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hopital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France
| | - L M Cavallo
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Naples Federico II, Napoli, NA, Italy
| | - V Benes
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Medical Faculty, Military University Hospital and Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - V Seifert
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - M Tatagiba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - H W S Schroeder
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - T Goto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - K Ohata
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - O Al-Mefty
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - T Fukushima
- Department of Neurosurgery, Carolina Neuroscience Institute, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - M Messerer
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Center, University Hospital of Lausanne and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - R T Daniel
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Center, University Hospital of Lausanne and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - S Froelich
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
El-Shehaby AMN, Reda WA, Abdel Karim KM, Nabeel AM, Emad Eldin RM, Tawadros SR. Single-Session Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Large Benign Meningiomas: Medium-to Long-Term Results. World Neurosurg 2021; 150:e324-e336. [PMID: 33727203 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of intracranial meningiomas has been established as an effective and safe treatment modality. Larger meningiomas typically are managed by surgery followed by radiosurgery. Treatment of large meningiomas (usually defined as >10 cc) by stereotactic radiosurgery has been investigated in some recent reports, either by single-session, volume-staged, or the hypofractionation technique. We sought to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of single-session stereotactic radiosurgery for large (10 cc or more) intracranial benign meningiomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, we included 273 patients with large benign meningiomas (≥10 cc) who were treated by single-session SRS and followed up for more than 2 years. Tumors were in a basal location in 228 patients (84%). There were 161 tumors (59%) in the perioptic location. The median tumor volume was 15.5 (10-57.3 cc [interquartile range {IQR} 12.3 cc]). The median prescription dose was 12 Gy (9-15 Gy [IQR 1 Gy]). RESULTS The median follow-up period was 6.1 years (2-18 years [IQR 5.5 years]). The tumor control rate was 90%. The progression-free survival at 5 and 10 years was 96% and 81%, respectively, for the whole cohort. Among 161 patients with perioptic meningiomas, favorable (better/stable) visual outcome was reported in 155 patients (96%) and unfavorable (worse) outcome in 6 patients (4%). Temporary adverse radiation effects were observed in 41 patients (15%) but only 16 (6%) were symptomatic. CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic radiosurgery provides an effective and safe treatment option for large meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amr M N El-Shehaby
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute for Research and Treatment, Cairo, Egypt; Neurosurgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
| | - Wael A Reda
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute for Research and Treatment, Cairo, Egypt; Neurosurgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Khaled M Abdel Karim
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute for Research and Treatment, Cairo, Egypt; Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed M Nabeel
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute for Research and Treatment, Cairo, Egypt; Neurosurgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Qalubya, Egypt
| | - Reem M Emad Eldin
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute for Research and Treatment, Cairo, Egypt; Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sameh R Tawadros
- Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute for Research and Treatment, Cairo, Egypt; Neurosurgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Marchetti M, Sahgal A, De Salles AAF, Levivier M, Ma L, Paddick I, Pollock BE, Regis J, Sheehan J, Suh JH, Yomo S, Fariselli L. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Noncavernous Sinus Benign Meningioma: International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Practice Guideline. Neurosurgery 2021; 87:879-890. [PMID: 32463867 PMCID: PMC7566438 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for benign intracranial meningiomas is an established treatment. OBJECTIVE To summarize the literature and provide evidence-based practice guidelines on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS). METHODS Articles in English specific to SRS for benign intracranial meningioma, published from January 1964 to April 2018, were systematically reviewed. Three electronic databases, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register, were searched. RESULTS Out of the 2844 studies identified, 305 had a full text evaluation and 27 studies met the criteria to be included in this analysis. All but one were retrospective studies. The 10-yr local control (LC) rate ranged from 71% to 100%. The 10-yr progression-free-survival rate ranged from 55% to 97%. The prescription dose ranged typically between 12 and 15 Gy, delivered in a single fraction. Toxicity rate was generally low. CONCLUSION The current literature supporting SRS for benign intracranial meningioma lacks level I and II evidence. However, when summarizing the large number of level III studies, it is clear that SRS can be recommended as an effective evidence-based treatment option (recommendation level II) for grade 1 meningioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Marchetti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Unit of Radiotherapy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milano, Italia
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Marc Levivier
- Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Lijun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ian Paddick
- Medical Physics Ltd, Queen Square Radiosurgery Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bruce E Pollock
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jean Regis
- Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Unit CHU Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Shoji Yomo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Laura Fariselli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Unit of Radiotherapy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milano, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yu S, Xu H, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Dyer MA, Hirsch AE, Tam Truong M, Zhen H. Knowledge-based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:48-54. [PMID: 33560592 PMCID: PMC7984472 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To develop a knowledge‐based planning (KBP) model that predicts dosimetric indices and facilitates planning in CyberKnife intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT). Methods Forty CyberKnife SRS/SRT plans were retrospectively used to build a linear KBP model which correlated the equivalent radius of the PTV (req_PTV) and the equivalent radius of volume that receives a set of prescription dose (req_Vi, where Vi = V10%, V20% … V120%). To evaluate the model’s predictability, a fourfold cross‐validation was performed for dosimetric indices such as gradient measure (GM) and brain V50%. The accuracy of the prediction was quantified by the mean and the standard deviation of the difference between planned and predicted values, (i.e., ΔGM = GMpred − GMclin and fractional ΔV50% = (V50%pred − V50%clin)/V50%clin) and a coefficient of determination, R2. Then, the KBP model was incorporated into the planning for another 22 clinical cases. The training plans and the KBP test plans were compared in terms of the new conformity index (nCI) as well as the planning efficiency. Results Our KBP model showed desirable predictability. For the 40 training plans, the average prediction error from cross‐validation was only 0.36 ± 0.06 mm for ΔGM, and 0.12 ± 0.08 for ΔV50%. The R2 for the linear fit between req_PTV and req_vi was 0.985 ± 0.019 for isodose volumes ranging from V10% to V120%; particularly, R2 = 0.995 for V50% and R2 = 0.997 for V100%. Compared to the training plans, our KBP test plan nCI was improved from 1.31 ± 0.15 to 1.15 ± 0.08 (P < 0.0001). The efficient automatic generation of the optimization constraints by using our model requested no or little planner’s intervention. Conclusion We demonstrated a linear KBP based on PTV volumes that accurately predicts CyberKnife SRS/SRT planning dosimetric indices and greatly helps achieve superior plan quality and planning efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suhong Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University school of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Huijun Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers-Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Xin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University school of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael A Dyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University school of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ariel E Hirsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University school of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Minh Tam Truong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University school of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Heming Zhen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University school of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lovo EE, Moreira A, Navarro PA, Barahona KC, Campos F, Caceros V, Blanco A, Arguello-Méndez J, Arce L, Contreras WO. Multiplatform Radiosurgery for Intracranial Meningiomas and Dose to the Dural Tail. Cureus 2021; 13:e12683. [PMID: 33604217 PMCID: PMC7880855 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Meningiomas are extra-axial central nervous system tumors. Complete resection is often curative with macroscopically complete removal of the tumor, excision of its dural attachment, and any abnormal bone. Radiosurgery is also an option for high-risk patients or in patients with surgically residual disease. Dural tail is a typical radiological sign on contrast-enhanced MRI; it can contain tumor cells or be a reaction due to vascular congestion and edema. Radiosurgical planning treatment varies regarding the identification and coverage of the dural tail. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze a series of 143 patients with WHO Grade I meningiomas treated with different radiosurgical platforms, and dosing parameters focused on planning and dose delivery to the dural tail. Methods From February 2011 to July 2020, 143 patients with histologically confirmed or radiologically assumed WHO Grade I meningiomas were treated using rotating gamma-ray Infini™ (Gamma [MASEP Medical Science Technology Development Co., Shenzhen, China]), TomoTherapy® (Tomo [Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA]), and CyberKnife® (CK [Accuray Inc.]). All plans were retrospectively reviewed to establish the maximum distance (MaxDis) from the prescription dose to the end of the dural tail and the minimum dose at the dural tail (MinDoseT) at this point. We also established the midpoint distance (MPDis) from the prescription dose to MaxDis and the dose at this point (MPDose). Plans were further distinguished when the physician intended to cover the dural tail versus when not. Patients and tumor response were assessed by imaging and clinical and phone call evaluations. Results Of the 143 patients, 81 were treated using Gamma, 34 using Tomo, and 28 using CK. Eighty patients were eligible for follow-up, of whom 58 (72.5%) had an unmistakable dural tail sign. Median follow-up was 1,118 days (range 189-3,496), mean age was 54.5 (range 19-90), and 61 were women, and 19 were men. Overall tumor volume was 6.5 cc (range 0.2-59); mean tumor volumes by different platforms were 2.4, 9.45, and 8 cc; dose prescribed and mean tumor coverage were 14 Gy and 92%, 14.5 Gy and 95%, and 14 Gy and 95.75% with Gamma, Tomo, and CK, respectively. The dural tail was drawn and planned with an attempt to treat in 18 patients (31%); the mean MaxDis, MinDoseT, MPDis, and MPDose were 9.0 mm, 2 Gy, 4.5 mm, and 10.6 Gy, respectively. At last follow-up, tumor control was achieved in 96% of patients for the whole series, and there were no statistical variations regarding tumor volume, dose, conformality, or control when stereotactic radiosurgery was used to cover the dural tail versus when it was not (p=0.105). One patient experienced a Grade 4 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity as an adverse radiation effect that required surgery, and 11 (7.6%) experienced a Grade 1 toxicity. Conclusions This is our preliminary report regarding the efficacy of radiosurgery for meningiomas using diverse platforms at three years of follow-up; the results regarding tumor control are in accordance with the published literature as of this writing. A conscious pursuit of the dural tail with the prescription dose has not proven to provide better tumor control than not doing so - even small areas of the tumor uncovered by the prescription dose did not alter tumor control at current follow-up. The doses delivered to these uncovered areas are quite significant; further follow-up is necessary to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo E Lovo
- Radiosurgery, International Cancer Center, Diagnostic Hospital, San Salvador, SLV
| | - Alejandra Moreira
- Radiosurgery, International Cancer Center, Diagnostic Hospital, San Salvador, SLV
| | - Paula A Navarro
- Functional Neurosurgery, Clínica Foscal Internacional, Bucaramanga, COL
| | - Kaory C Barahona
- Radiosurgery, International Cancer Center, Diagnostic Hospital, San Salvador, SLV
| | - Fidel Campos
- Radiosurgery, International Cancer Center, Diagnostic Hospital, San Salvador, SLV
| | - Victor Caceros
- Radiosurgery, International Cancer Center, Diagnostic Hospital, San Salvador, SLV
| | - Alejandro Blanco
- Radiosurgery, Robotic Radiosurgery Center, International Cancer Center Group, San José, CRI
| | - Julio Arguello-Méndez
- Radiosurgery, Robotic Radiosurgery Center, International Cancer Center Group, San José, CRI.,Radioterapia Robótica, Centro Oncológico Costarricense, San José, CRI
| | - Leonor Arce
- Radiosurgery, Robotic Radiosurgery Center, International Cancer Center Group, San José, CRI
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Combs SE, Baumert BG, Bendszus M, Bozzao A, Brada M, Fariselli L, Fiorentino A, Ganswindt U, Grosu AL, Lagerwaard FL, Niyazi M, Nyholm T, Paddick I, Weber DC, Belka C, Minniti G. ESTRO ACROP guideline for target volume delineation of skull base tumors. Radiother Oncol 2020; 156:80-94. [PMID: 33309848 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE For skull base tumors, target definition is the key to safe high-dose treatments because surrounding normal tissues are very sensitive to radiation. In the present work we established a joint ESTRO ACROP guideline for the target volume definition of skull base tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed using various combinations of the following medical subjects headings (MeSH) and free-text words: "radiation therapy" or "stereotactic radiosurgery" or "proton therapy" or "particle beam therapy" and "skull base neoplasms" "pituitary neoplasms", "meningioma", "craniopharyngioma", "chordoma", "chondrosarcoma", "acoustic neuroma/vestibular schwannoma", "organs at risk", "gross tumor volume", "clinical tumor volume", "planning tumor volume", "target volume", "target delineation", "dose constraints". The ACROP committee identified sixteen European experts in close interaction with the ESTRO clinical committee who analyzed and discussed the body of evidence concerning target delineation. RESULTS All experts agree that magnetic resonance (MR) images with high three-dimensional spatial accuracy and tissue-contrast definition, both T2-weighted and volumetric T1-weighted sequences, are required to improve target delineation. In detail, several key issues were identified and discussed: i) radiation techniques and immobilization, ii) imaging techniques and target delineation, and iii) technical aspects of radiation treatments including planning techniques and dose-fractionation schedules. Specific target delineation issues with regard to different skull base tumors, including pituitary adenomas, meningiomas, craniopharyngiomas, acoustic neuromas, chordomas and chondrosarcomas are presented. CONCLUSIONS This ESTRO ACROP guideline achieved detailed recommendations on target volume definition for skull base tumors, as well as comprehensive advice about imaging modalities and radiation techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Brigitta G Baumert
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Graubuenden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alessandro Bozzao
- Dipartimento NESMOS, Università Sapienza Roma, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy
| | - Michael Brada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Bebington, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Fariselli
- Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Alba Fiorentino
- Radiation Oncology Department, General Regional Hospital F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle fonti, Italy
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Frank L Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, The Netherlands
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site (DKTK), Munich, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tufve Nyholm
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Ian Paddick
- Queen Square Radiosurgery Centre, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Image-Guided Multisession Radiosurgery of Skull Base Meningiomas. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123569. [PMID: 33260363 PMCID: PMC7761100 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Stereotactic radiosurgery has changed the landscape of treatment for skull base meningiomas. Lesions encasing or compressing radiosensitive structures are considered not suitable for single session stereotactic radiosurgery because of the high risk of side effects. Multisession stereotactic radiosurgery can reduce these risks, allowing for normal tissue repair between fractions, while delivering a high dose per fraction. The aim of this study is to validate the role of multi-session stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of skull base meningiomas, through a retrospective analysis of 156 patients affected by skull base meningioma, treated at the University of Messina between 2008 and 2018. Our study suggests that multisession stereotactic radiosurgery represents a safe and effective profile in the treatment of skull base meningioma, providing a satisfactory local control and a low toxicity rate, together with patient comfort from a frameless procedure. Abstract Background: The efficacy of single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS) for the treatment of intracranial meningioma is widely recognized. However, sSRS is not always feasible in cases of large tumors and those lying close to critically radiation-sensitive structures. When surgery is not recommended, multi-session stereotactic radiosurgery (mSRS) can be applied. Even so, the efficacy and best treatment schedule of mSRS are not yet established. The aim of this study is to validate the role of mSRS in the treatment of skull base meningiomas. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with skull base meningiomas treated with mSRS (two to five fractions) at the University of Messina, Italy, from 2008 to 2018, was conducted. Results: 156 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up period was 36.2 ± 29.3 months. Progression-free survival at 2-, 5-, and 10- years was 95%, 90%, and 80.8%, respectively. There were no new visual or motor deficits, nor cranial nerves impairments, excluding trigeminal neuralgia, which was reported by 5.7% of patients. One patient reported carotid occlusion and one developed brain edema. Conclusion: Multisession radiosurgery is an effective approach for skull base meningiomas. The long-term control is comparable to that obtained with conventionally-fractionated radiotherapy, while the toxicity rate is very limited.
Collapse
|
37
|
Ha MH, Jang WY, Jung TY, Kim IY, Lim SH, Moon KS, Jung S. Treatment Outcome of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Petroclival Meningiomas: Retrospective Analysis of a Single Institution Experience. Brain Tumor Res Treat 2020; 8:83-92. [PMID: 33118341 PMCID: PMC7595854 DOI: 10.14791/btrt.2020.8.e16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been widely used for intracranial meningiomas as an alternative or adjuvant treatment, guidelines have not been established for the selection of patients with petroclival meningioma (PCM) for GKRS. In this study, we reported the factors related to tumor progression and postoperative complications in PCM patients treated by GKRS, with a review of the literatures. Methods Between 2004 and 2019, 64 patients (52 patients for alternative and 12 patients for adjuvant treatment) with PCM underwent GKRS in our institution. The clinical and radiological factors were retrospectively analyzed. The mean radiologic follow-up duration was 58.4 months (range, 6–164 months). The mean tumor volume and diameter before GKRS were 13.4 cm3 and 2.9 cm, respectively. The median marginal dose was 12 Gy (range, 10–14 Gy) with a 50% median isodose line. Fractionation was used in 19 cases (29%, two fractionations in 5 cases & three fractionations in 14 cases). Results Progression was noted in 7 cases (10.9%) and the progression-free survival rates were 91.1% at 5 years and 69.6% at 10 years. Although large in volume, moderate to severe peritumoral edema and male gender were somewhat related to progression, they did not reach statistical significance. Ten patients (15.6%) developed complications after GKRS. The most common complication was cranial nerve deficit (n=8), followed by hemiparesis, cognitive dysfunction, and hydrocephalus. Large size (maximal diameter ≥5 cm) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.091, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.014–0.608; p=0.013] and multiplicity (HR 0.102, 95% CI 0.018–0.573; p=0.009) were independent factors for developing complications after GKRS. Conclusion GKRS can be considered an effective and safe treatment for large-volume PCM. However, for patients with large size or multiple masses, the treatment method should be determined with caution because the probability of complications after GKRS may increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myeong Hun Ha
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Woo Youl Jang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Tae Young Jung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - In Young Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Sa Hoe Lim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Kyung Sub Moon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea.
| | - Shin Jung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Huang SH, Wang CC, Wei KC, Chang CN, Chuang CC, Chen HC, Lin YJ, Chen KT, Pai PC, Hsu PW. Treatment of intracranial meningioma with single-session and fractionated radiosurgery: a propensity score matching study. Sci Rep 2020; 10:18500. [PMID: 33116194 PMCID: PMC7595213 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75559-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) is recognized as a safe and efficient treatment for meningioma. We aim to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) with SSRS in the treatment of grade I meningioma. A total of 228 patients with 245 tumors treated with radiosurgery between March 2006 and June 2017were retrospectively evaluated. Of these, 147 (64.5%) patients were treated with SSRS. The remaining 81 patients (35.5%) were treated with a fractionated technique. Protocols to treat meningioma were classified as 12-16 Gy per fraction for SSRS and 7 Gy/fraction/day for three consecutive days to reach a total dose of 21 Gy for FSRT. In univariate and multivariate analyses, tumor volume was found to be associated with local control rate (hazard ratio = 4.98, p = 0.025). The difference in actuarial local control rate (LCR) between the SSRS and FSRT groups after propensity score matching (PSM) was not statistically significant during the 2-year (96.86% versus 100.00%, respectively; p = 0.175), 5-year (94.76% versus 97.56%, respectively; p = 0.373), and 10-year (74.40% versus 91.46%, respectively; p = 0.204) follow-up period. FSRT and SSRS were equally well-tolerated and effective for the treatment of intracranial benign meningioma during the10-year follow-up period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng-Han Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, No. 5, Fu-Xing Street, Kwei-shan Dist., Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Chun-Chieh Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Kuo-Chen Wei
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, No. 5, Fu-Xing Street, Kwei-shan Dist., Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Cheng-Nen Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, No. 5, Fu-Xing Street, Kwei-shan Dist., Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Chi-Cheng Chuang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, No. 5, Fu-Xing Street, Kwei-shan Dist., Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Hsien-Chih Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Chang Gung University, Keelung, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Ya-Jui Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, No. 5, Fu-Xing Street, Kwei-shan Dist., Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Ko-Ting Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, No. 5, Fu-Xing Street, Kwei-shan Dist., Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Ping-Ching Pai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Peng-Wei Hsu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, No. 5, Fu-Xing Street, Kwei-shan Dist., Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan, Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Joshi KC, Raghavan A, Muhsen B, Hsieh J, Borghei-Razavi H, Chao ST, Barnett GH, Suh JH, Neyman G, Kshettry VR, Recinos PF, Mohammadi AM, Angelov L. Fractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery for skull base meningiomas: a single-institution experience. Neurosurg Focus 2020; 46:E8. [PMID: 31153152 DOI: 10.3171/2019.3.focus1963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVEGamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been successfully used for the treatment of intracranial meningiomas given its steep dose gradients and high-dose conformality. However, treatment of skull base meningiomas (SBMs) may pose significant risk to adjacent radiation-sensitive structures such as the cranial nerves. Fractionated GKRS (fGKRS) may decrease this risk, but until recently it has not been practical with traditional pin-based systems. This study reports the authors' experience in treating SBMs with fGKRS, using a relocatable, noninvasive immobilization system.METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent fGKRS for SBMs between 2013 and 2018 delivered using the Extend relocatable frame system or the Icon system. Patient demographics, pre- and post-GKRS tumor characteristics, perilesional edema, prior treatment details, and clinical symptoms were evaluated. Volumetric analysis of pre-GKRS, post-GKRS, and subsequent follow-up visits was performed.RESULTSTwenty-five patients met inclusion criteria. Nineteen patients were treated with the Icon system, and 6 patients were treated with the Extend system. The mean pre-fGKRS tumor volume was 7.62 cm3 (range 4.57-13.07 cm3). The median margin dose was 25 Gy delivered in 4 (8%) or 5 (92%) fractions. The median follow-up time was 12.4 months (range 4.7-17.4 months). Two patients (9%) experienced new-onset cranial neuropathy at the first follow-up. The mean postoperative tumor volume reduction was 15.9% with 6 patients (27%) experiencing improvement of cranial neuropathy at the first follow-up. Median first follow-up scans were obtained at 3.4 months (range 2.8-4.3 months). Three patients (12%) developed asymptomatic, mild perilesional edema by the first follow-up, which remained stable subsequently.CONCLUSIONSfGKRS with relocatable, noninvasive immobilization systems is well tolerated in patients with SBMs and demonstrated satisfactory tumor control as well as limited radiation toxicity. Future prospective studies with long-term follow-up and comparison to single-session GKRS or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy are necessary to validate these findings and determine the efficacy of this approach in the management of SBMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishna C Joshi
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University.,3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute; and
| | | | - Baha'eddin Muhsen
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University.,3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute; and
| | - Jason Hsieh
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University
| | - Hamid Borghei-Razavi
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University.,3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute; and
| | - Samuel T Chao
- 3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute; and.,4Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Gene H Barnett
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University.,3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute; and
| | - John H Suh
- 3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute; and.,4Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Gennady Neyman
- 3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute; and.,4Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Varun R Kshettry
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University.,3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute; and
| | - Pablo F Recinos
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University.,3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute; and
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University.,3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute; and
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University.,3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute; and
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for large-sized skull base meningiomas. J Neurooncol 2020; 149:87-93. [PMID: 32607731 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03575-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been proven to be effective and safe for treating intracranial meningiomas, concerns have been raised about the use of SRS for large-sized tumors involving the skull base that frequently encroach onto adjacent critical neural structures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of hypofractionated SRS as a therapeutic option for large-sized skull base meningiomas. METHODS Thirty-one consecutive patients (median age: 55 years, 9 men and 22 women) who had been treated with hypofractionated SRS using CyberKnife for large-sized skull base meningiomas (> 10 cm3 in volume, median of 18.9 cm3, range 11.6-58.2 cm3) were enrolled. All patients harbored middle or posterior skull base tumors, most frequently of cavernous sinus (n = 7, 22.6%), petroclival (n = 6, 19.4%), or tentorial edge (n = 6, 19.4%) locations. SRS was delivered in five daily fractions (range 3-5 fractions) with a median cumulative dose of 27.8 Gy (range 22.6-27.8 Gy). RESULTS With a median follow-up of 57 months (range 9-98 months), tumor control was achieved for 28 (90.3%) of 31 patients. Treatment response on MRI included partial response (volume decrease > 20%) in 17 (54.8%) patients, stable in 11 (35.5%), and progression (volume increase > 20%) in 3 (9.7%). Of 21 patients with cranial neuropathy, 20 (95.2%) showed improved neurological status. CONCLUSIONS Our current results suggest a promising role of hypofractionated SRS for large-sized skull base megningiomas in terms of tumor control and neurological outcomes. It is a reasonable therapeutic option for select patients.
Collapse
|
41
|
Pou P, Biau J, Verrelle P, Lemaire JJ, El Ouadih Y, Chassin V, Magnier F, Dedieu V, Lapeyre M, Dupic G, Khalil T. Long-Term Outcomes After Linac Radiosurgery for Benign Meningiomas. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:452-458. [PMID: 32201158 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 01/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Although several studies on outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for benign meningiomas have been reported, Linac-based SRS outcomes have not been as widely evaluated. The aim of this retrospective institutional single-centre study was to determine long-term outcomes of Linac-based SRS for benign intracranial meningiomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS From July 1996 to May 2011, 60 patients with 69 benign meningiomas were included. All patients were treated with single-fraction Linac-based SRS with four to five non-coplanar arcs, dynamic or not. The marginal dose prescribed for the periphery was 16 Gy. Prognostic factors associated with local control, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were tested. RESULTS The median follow-up was 128 months. No patient was lost to follow-up. The values observed at 1, 5 and 10 years were, respectively, 100%, 98.4% and 92.6% for local control, 94.9%, 93.2% and 78% for PFS and 100%, 94.7% and 92.7% for overall survival. In univariate analysis, local control after SRS was significantly higher for skull base and parasagittal meningiomas compared with convexity meningiomas (P = 0.031). Multivariate analyses showed significantly longer PFS when the minimum dose delivered to the tumour was greater than 10 Gy (P = 0.0082). No grade 5 toxicity was reported. CONCLUSION Our long-term results from a large sample size of benign meningiomas treated with Linac-based SRS confirmed excellent local control (>90%) and good safety, which is in line with published studies on Gamma Knife surgery. Above all, we showed significantly poorer PFS if the minimum dose to the tumour was under 10 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Pou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jean Perrin Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - J Biau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jean Perrin Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - P Verrelle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jean Perrin Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Clermont Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - J J Lemaire
- Clermont Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Y El Ouadih
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - V Chassin
- Department of Medical Physics, Jean Perrin Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - F Magnier
- Department of Medical Physics, Jean Perrin Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - V Dedieu
- Department of Medical Physics, Jean Perrin Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - M Lapeyre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jean Perrin Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - G Dupic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jean Perrin Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| | - T Khalil
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Christodoulides I, Lavrador JP, Bodi I, Laxton R, Gullan R, Bhangoo R, Vergani F, Ashkan K. Transformation of Grade II to Grade III Rhabdoid-Papillary Meningioma: Is Stereotactic Radiosurgery the Culprit? A Case Report and Literature Review. World Neurosurg 2019; 134:337-342. [PMID: 31715408 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 11/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the management of meningiomas, single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established alternative treatment to surgical resection. However, its effects on tumorigenesis and malignant transformation are still uncertain. CASE DESCRIPTION We have described a grade II parafalcine meningioma that was initially surgically resected (Simpson 2 clearance) and then managed with a single dose of SRS on recurrence. The tumor recurred again 7 years later, with histological features of a grade III rhabdoid-papillary lesion, with local brain invasion. CONCLUSION To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to describe malignant transformation of a grade II to grade III meningioma after SRS to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Christodoulides
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| | - José Pedro Lavrador
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Istvan Bodi
- Department of Neuropathology, King's College Hospital Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ross Laxton
- Department of Neuropathology, King's College Hospital Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Gullan
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ranjeev Bhangoo
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Francesco Vergani
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Keyoumars Ashkan
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Shimohonji W, Ishibashi K. Staged Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Large Skull Base Meningiomas. Cureus 2019; 11:e6001. [PMID: 31807388 PMCID: PMC6876917 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The authors have been treating skull base meningiomas using relatively low-dose gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS, ≤ 12 Gy) with acceptable tumor growth control and low morbidity. In the present study, volume-staged, low-dose GKS was performed for large skull base meningiomas with a maximum diameter > 4 cm. In this article, a treatment strategy for volume-staged GKS and results for large skull base meningiomas are described. Methods: Data from 27 patients with large skull base meningiomas histopathologically diagnosed as WHO grade I or diagnosed by imaging, who underwent volume-staged GKS between March 1995 and September 2018, were reviewed. Among these patients, 24 were followed-up for > six months. The tumor was located in the parasellar region in nine patients, cavernous sinus region in four, petroclival region in four, petrocavernous sinus region in four, cerebellopontine angle region in two, and in the tent in one. The mean tumor diameters ranged from 31 to 47.8 mm (median 39.4 mm), with tumor volumes between 14.7 and 49.5 cm3 (median 27.5 cm3). Results: The prescribed radiation dose was 8-12 Gy (median 10 Gy). The treatment interval between the first and second GKS was three to nine months (median 5.5 months). The median duration of follow-up after the first GKS was 84 months (range 6-204 months). Tumor volume decreased in nine (37.5%) patients, remained stable in nine (37.5%), and increased (local failure) in six (25%). The actuarial progression-free local control rate was 88% at three years, 78% at five years, 70% at 10 years, and 70% at 15 years. Neurological status improved in three (12.5%) patients, was unchanged in 16 (66.5%), and deteriorated in five (21%). Permanent radiation injury occurred in one (4%) patient. Conclusion: Volume-staged GKS demonstrated the usefulness for large skull meningiomas > 4 cm in diameter, over a long-term follow-up period.
Collapse
|
44
|
Akyoldaş G, Hergünsel ÖB, Yılmaz M, Şengöz M, Peker S. Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Anterior Clinoid Process Meningiomas: A Series of 61 Consecutive Patients. World Neurosurg 2019; 133:e529-e534. [PMID: 31562964 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Revised: 09/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) outcomes for anterior clinoid process (ACP) meningiomas have not been specifically reported within any meningioma series. We present the initial and largest series in the literature that describes the presenting features, radiosurgery parameters, and radiologic and long-term clinical outcomes for 61 patients with ACP meningiomas treated with GKRS. METHODS Medical records were reviewed for 61 consecutive patients at a single center who underwent GKRS for ACP meningioma between 2008 and 2016. RESULTS Of 61 patients with ACP meningiomas, 49 (80%) were treated with GKRS as primary treatment, and 12 (20%) were treated with GKRS as an adjuvant therapy. Before GKRS, 29 patients presented with visual impairment and 50 patients presented with headache. Median patient age was 54.9 years. Median tumor volume was 3.2 cm3, and median margin dose was 12.0 Gy. The median radiologic follow-up time after GKRS was 75 months. During follow-up, tumor volume regressed in 37 cases (61%) and remained unchanged in 24 cases (39%). None of the patients experienced tumor volume progression. Tumor volume <3 cm3 was an independent predictor of tumor volume regression after GKRS (univariate analysis, P = 0.047; multivariate analysis, P = 0.049). Of 29 patients who presented with visual impairment, 16 (55%) improved after GKRS. None of the 61 patients developed new neurologic deficits after GKRS. CONCLUSIONS GKRS provides a high rate of tumor volume control for ACP meningiomas as well as a low complication rate. Excellent tumor volume control was associated with smaller tumor size only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Göktuğ Akyoldaş
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Ömer Batu Hergünsel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Meltem Yılmaz
- Medical Biotechnology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Meriç Şengöz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Selçuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
O'Connor KP, Algan O, Vesely SK, Palejwala AH, Briggs RG, Conner AK, Cornwell BO, Andrews B, Sughrue ME, Glenn CA. Factors Associated with Treatment Failure and Radiosurgery-Related Edema in WHO Grade 1 and 2 Meningioma Patients Receiving Gamma Knife Radiosurgery. World Neurosurg 2019; 130:e558-e565. [PMID: 31299310 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Before the advent of radiosurgery, neurosurgical treatment of meningiomas typically involved gross total resection of the mass whenever surgery was deemed possible. Over the past 4 decades, though, Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has proved to be an effective, minimally invasive means to control the growth of these tumors. However, the variables associated with treatment failure (regrowth or clinical progression) after GKRS and GKRS-related complications, such as cerebral edema, are less well understood. METHODS We retrospectively collected data between 2009 and 2018 for patients who underwent GKRS for meningiomas. After data collection, we performed univariate and multivariable modeling of the factors that predict treatment failure and cerebral edema after GKRS. Hazard ratios (HR) and P values were determined for these variables. RESULTS Fifty-two patients were included our analysis. The majority of patients were female (38/52,73%), and nearly all patients presented with a suspected or confirmed World Health Organization grade 1 meningioma (48/52, 92%). The median tumor volume was 3.49 cc (range, 0.22-20.11 cc). Evidence of meningioma progression after treatment developed in 5 patients (10%), with a median time to continued tumor growth of 5.9 months (range, 2.7-18.3 months). In multivariable analysis, patients in whom treatment failed were more likely to be male (HR = 8.42, P = 0.045) and to present with larger tumor volumes (HR = 1.27, P = 0.011). In addition, 5 patients (10%) experienced treatment-related cerebral edema. On univariate analysis, patients who experienced cerebral edema were more likely present with larger tumors (HR = 1.16, P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS Increasing meningioma size and male gender predispose to meningioma progression after treatment with GKRS. Increasing tumor size also predicts the development of postradiosurgery cerebral edema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle P O'Connor
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Ozer Algan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Sara K Vesely
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Ali H Palejwala
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Robert G Briggs
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Andrew K Conner
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Benjamin O Cornwell
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Bethany Andrews
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Michael E Sughrue
- Department of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chad A Glenn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Linear Accelerator-Based Radiosurgery of Grade I Intracranial Meningiomas. World Neurosurg X 2019; 3:100027. [PMID: 31225520 PMCID: PMC6584458 DOI: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2019.100027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2015] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the local control rate and complication rate in the treatment of grade I intracranial meningiomas. Methods A retrospective study was performed of patients with grade I meningioma who received radiosurgery with a dedicated linear accelerator from January 2002 to August 2012 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We performed descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and progression-free survival analysis through a Kaplan-Meier curve. Results Seventy-five patients with 78 grade I meningiomas received radiosurgery, 39 underwent surgery plus adjuvant radiosurgery, and 36 only radiosurgery. The follow-up median time was 68 months (range, 35–120 months). The tumor control rate was 93%, the 5-year progression-free survival was 92% (95% confidence interval, 77%–98%). Acute toxicity was 2.6%, and grade 1–2 late toxicity was 26.6%. Postradiosurgery edema was the main late morbidity. Age >55 years was the only significant factor for attaining a response >75%. The background of surgery before radiosurgery was the only significant prognostic factor for showing edema (odds ratio 5.78 [95% confidence interval, 2.14–15.64]). Conclusions The local control rate attained in our series is similar to that reported in other series worldwide; the acute toxicity rate was low and late toxicity was moderate.
Collapse
|
47
|
Strategy and Technique of Endonasal Endoscopic Bony Decompression and Selective Tumor Removal in Symptomatic Skull Base Meningiomas of the Cavernous Sinus and Meckel's Cave. World Neurosurg 2019; 131:e12-e22. [PMID: 31226453 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 06/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parasellar meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus and Meckel's cave pose a management challenge because of invasion around neurovascular structures and the pituitary gland. The management options range from aggressive resection to focused radiotherapy alone. We present a strategy for these tumors that includes endonasal bony decompression, partial tumor removal, and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in select cases. METHODS The tumor location, previous treatments, cranial neuropathies, pituitary dysfunction, tumor control rates, use of stereotactic radiosurgery, SRT, and complications were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS Twenty patients (age range, 43-81 years; 65% women; 90% with World Health Organization grade I; median follow-up, 57 months; 14 without previous debulking and RT; 6 with previous debulking and RT) underwent endonasal bony decompression and partial tumor removal. The most common tumor locations were cavernous sinus (95%), Meckel's cave (95%), sella (75%), petroclival (60%), and optic canal/orbit (30%). Three patients with large meningiomas underwent staged transcranial and endonasal debulking. Of the 14 patients without previous debulking and RT, 11 had undergone postoperative SRT, with tumor shrinkage in 3 (27%). At the last follow-up examination, for these 14 patients and the 6 patients who had undergone previous surgery and RT, tumor control was 100% and 33% (P < 0.001) and the cranial neuropathies had improved in 57% and 33%, respectively. Major complications occurred in 2 patients: a permanent sixth cranial nerve palsy and cerebrospinal fluid leakage requiring reoperation. CONCLUSIONS Endonasal bony decompression and selective tumor removal, followed by SRT, appears to be a reasonable treatment option for most previously untreated parasellar meningiomas. For patients who have undergone previous debulking and RT, new targeted treatment strategies are needed.
Collapse
|
48
|
Multisession radiosurgery for perioptic meningiomas: medium-to-long term results from a CyberKnife cooperative study. J Neurooncol 2019; 143:597-604. [PMID: 31119480 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03196-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Most recent literature has confirmed the efficacy of single-session radiosurgery (sRS) in the treatment of intracranial meningioma. Unfortunately, sRS is not always applicable due to large tumor volume and the proximity of the tumor to critical structures. When sRS is not recommended, multi-session radiosurgery (mRS) can be the solution. The best treatment schedule for mRS, however, is not well established. The aim of the present retrospective study is to validate the effectiveness of one approach, 25 Gy delivered in 5 fractions in 5 consecutive days, to treat skull base meningiomas. METHODS This is a retrospective multicenter study. Patients with an anterior or a medium skull base meningioma that could not be treated by sRS due to large volume or proximity to the anterior optic pathways (AOPs) underwent 5-fraction mRS. Only patients with at least 36 months follow-up were included in the analysis. Local control and visual outcomes were investigated. RESULTS One-hundred-sixty-seven patients were included in the analysis. One-hundred-one patients underwent RS as a primary indication and 66 were treated after a previous surgery. The median follow-up period was 51 months (range 36-129 months). Progression-free survival at 3, 5 and 8 years were, respectively, 98%, 94% and 90%. Excluding the progressive disease patients, the visual worsening rate was 3.7%. The 42% of the patients with a pre-treatment visual deficit experienced improvement in vision. CONCLUSION 25 Gy delivered in 5 fractions is an effective modality for meningiomas that are near the AOP or are too large to be treated by sRS. The treatment schedule controlled the tumors while sparing visual function.
Collapse
|
49
|
The Role of Particle Therapy for the Treatment of Skull Base Tumors and Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS). Top Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 28:49-61. [PMID: 31022048 DOI: 10.1097/rmr.0000000000000197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is a mainstay in the interdisciplinary treatment of brain tumors of the skull base and brain. Technical innovations during the past 2 decades have allowed for increasingly precise treatment with better sparing of adjacent healthy tissues to prevent treatment-related side effects that influence patients' quality of life. Particle therapy with protons and charged ions offer favorable kinetics with sharp dose deposition in a well-defined depth (Bragg-Peak) and a steep radiation fall-off beyond that maximum. This review highlights the role of particle therapy in the management of primary brain tumors and tumors of the skull base.
Collapse
|
50
|
Luryi AL, Michaelides EM, Babu S, Bojrab DI, Kveton JF, Hong RS, Zappia J, Sargent EW, Schutt CA. Reliability of clinical diagnosis of masses of the cerebellopontine angle: A retrospective multi-institutional study. Am J Otolaryngol 2019; 40:133-136. [PMID: 30717992 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Revised: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the accuracy of pre-operative diagnosis of masses of the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) when compared to surgical pathology. DESIGN Retrospective chart review. PARTICIPANTS Patients who underwent surgery for CPA masses at two tertiary care institutions from 2007 to 2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Percent concordance between pre-operative and surgical pathologic diagnosis; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for predicted diagnoses. RESULTS Concordance between pre-operative diagnosis and surgical pathology was 93.2% in 411 sampled patients. Concordance was 57.9% for masses other than vestibular schwannoma. Prediction of vestibular schwannoma and meningioma had high positive (0.95 and 0.97, respectively) and negative (0.76 and 0.99, respectively) predictive values. Prediction of facial neuroma had sensitivity of 0.13 and positive predictive value of 0.25. Headache (p = 0.001) and facial weakness (p = 0.003) were significantly associated with different pathologic profiles. Hearing loss was associated with differences in diagnostic prediction (p = 0.02) but not with differences in surgical pathology (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Comparison between pre-operative predicted diagnosis and surgical pathology for cerebellopontine angle masses is presented. Vestibular schwannoma and meningioma were effectively identified while rarer CPA masses including facial neuroma were rarely identified correctly. Clinicians caring for patients with CPA masses should be mindful of diagnostic uncertainty which may lead to changes in treatment plan or prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander L Luryi
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06511, United States
| | - Elias M Michaelides
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06511, United States
| | - Seilesh Babu
- Department of Neurotology, Michigan Ear Institute, St. John Providence Hospital and Medical Centers, 30055 Northwestern Highway, Suite #101, Farmington Hills, MI 48334, United States
| | - Dennis I Bojrab
- Department of Neurotology, Michigan Ear Institute, St. John Providence Hospital and Medical Centers, 30055 Northwestern Highway, Suite #101, Farmington Hills, MI 48334, United States
| | - John F Kveton
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06511, United States
| | - Robert S Hong
- Department of Neurotology, Michigan Ear Institute, St. John Providence Hospital and Medical Centers, 30055 Northwestern Highway, Suite #101, Farmington Hills, MI 48334, United States
| | - John Zappia
- Department of Neurotology, Michigan Ear Institute, St. John Providence Hospital and Medical Centers, 30055 Northwestern Highway, Suite #101, Farmington Hills, MI 48334, United States
| | - Eric W Sargent
- Department of Neurotology, Michigan Ear Institute, St. John Providence Hospital and Medical Centers, 30055 Northwestern Highway, Suite #101, Farmington Hills, MI 48334, United States
| | - Christopher A Schutt
- Department of Neurotology, Michigan Ear Institute, St. John Providence Hospital and Medical Centers, 30055 Northwestern Highway, Suite #101, Farmington Hills, MI 48334, United States.
| |
Collapse
|