Causes of death in men with prevalent diabetes and newly diagnosed high- versus favorable-risk prostate cancer

MnTE-2-PyP protects fibroblast mitochondria from hyperglycemia and radiation exposure

Radiation is a common anticancer therapy for prostate cancer, which transforms tumor-associated normal fibroblasts to myofibroblasts, resulting in fibrosis. Oxidative stress caused by radiation-mediated mitochondrial damage is one of the major contributors to fibrosis. As diabetics are oxidatively stressed, radiation-mediated reactive oxygen species cause severe treatment failure, treatment-related side effects, and significantly reduced survival for diabetic prostate cancer patients as compared to non-diabetic prostate cancer patients. Hyperglycemia and enhanced mitochondrial damage significantly contribute to oxidative damage and disease progression after radiation therapy among diabetic prostate cancer patients. Therefore, reduction of mitochondrial damage in normal prostate fibroblasts after radiation should improve the overall clinical state of diabetic prostate cancer patients. We previously reported that MnTE-2-PyP, a manganese porphyrin, reduces oxidative damage in irradiated hyperglycemic prostate fibroblasts by scavenging superoxide and activating NRF2. In the current study, we have investigated the potential role of MnTE-2-PyP to protect mitochondrial health in irradiated hyperglycemic prostate fibroblasts. This study revealed that hyperglycemia and radiation increased mitochondrial ROS via blocking the mitochondrial electron transport chain, altered mitochondrial dynamics, and reduced mitochondrial biogenesis. Increased mitochondrial damage preceeded an increase in myofibroblast differentiation. MnTE-2-PyP reduced myofibroblast differentiation, improved mitochondrial health by releasing the block on the mitochondrial electron transport chain, enhanced ATP production efficiency, and restored mitochondrial dynamics and metabolism in the irradiated-hyperglycemic prostate fibroblasts. Therefore, we are proposing that one of the mechanisms that MnTE-2-PyP protects prostate fibroblasts from irradiation and hyperglycemia-mediated damage is by protecting the mitochondrial health in diabetic prostate cancer patients.

•

MnTE-2-PyP protects mitochondria from radiation and hyperglycemia-induced stress.

•

MnTE-2-PyP reduced mitochondrial ROS by restoring the levels of OXPHOS complexes.

•

MnTE-2-PyP increased the number of healthy mitochondria and enhanced ATP production efficiency.

•

Mitochondrial protection by MnTE-2-PyP inhibits myofibroblast differentiation.

•

MnTE-2-PyP treatment partly restores radiation-mediated metabolic changes.

Preexisting diabetes, metformin use and long-term survival in patients with prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess prostate cancer-specific and overall survival in prostate cancer patients with or without preexisting type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with regards to metformin use.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer in the Lithuanian population between 2001 and 2005 were identified through the Lithuanian Cancer Registry and followed until 2016, date of death, loss to follow-up or whichever came first. Information regarding the diagnosis of T2DM and antihyperglycemic medications were obtained from the National Health Insurance Fund database. Prostate cancer-specific and overall survival outcomes were analysed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Out of 6689 men included, 254 (3.8%) had preexisting T2DM. There were 4807 deaths during follow-up, including 2084 from prostate cancer. No differences were found in prostate cancer-specific survival between men with or without T2DM. The risk of overall mortality was higher (HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.07-1.43) in diabetic men. Univariate analysis showed cancer stage at diagnosis and age to be significant predictors of survival. After adjustment for age and stage at diagnosis, there was no difference in prostate-specific survival between non-diabetic patients compared to metformin users or metformin non-users. However, overall survival was lower in T2DM patients, with a higher mortality risk for metformin non-users (HR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.27-2.10). Prostate cancer-specific mortality risk was insignificantly lower in diabetic men on metformin (HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.54-1.02).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in long-term prostate cancer-specific survival in patients with or without T2DM. Overall survival was lower in T2DM patients not treated with metformin.

MnTE-2-PyP, a manganese porphyrin, reduces cytotoxicity caused by irradiation in a diabetic environment through the induction of endogenous antioxidant defenses

Radiation is a common anticancer therapy for many cancer patients, including prostate cancer. Diabetic prostate cancer patients suffer from increased lymph node metastasis, tumor recurrence and decreased survival as compared to non-diabetic prostate cancer patients. These patients are also at increased risk for enhanced radiation-induced normal tissue damage such as proctitis. Diabetics are oxidatively stressed and radiation causes additional oxidative damage. We and others have reported that, MnTE-2-PyP, a manganese porphyrin, protects normal prostate tissue from radiation damage. We have also reported that, in an in vivo mouse model of prostate cancer, MnTE-2-PyP decreases tumor volume and increases survival of the mice. In addition, MnTE-2-PyP has also been shown to reduce blood glucose and inhibits pro-fibrotic signaling in a diabetic model. Therefore, to investigate the role of MnTE-2-PyP in normal tissue protection in an irradiated diabetic environment, we have treated human prostate fibroblast cells with MnTE-2-PyP in an irradiated hyperglycemic environment. This study revealed that hyperglycemia causes increased cell death after radiation as compared to normo-glycemia. MnTE-2-PyP protects against hyperglycemia-induced cell death after radiation. MnTE-2-PyP decreases expression of NOX4 and α-SMA, one of the major oxidative enzymes and pro-fibrotic molecules respectively. MnTE-2-PyP obstructs NF-κB activity by decreasing DNA binding of the p50-p50 homodimer in the irradiated hyperglycemic environment. MnTE-2-PyP increases NRF2 mediated cytoprotection by increasing NRF2 protein expression and DNA binding. Therefore, we are proposing that, MnTE-2-PyP protects fibroblasts from irradiation and hyperglycemia damage by enhancing the NRF2- mediated pathway in diabetic prostate cancer patients, undergoing radiotherapy.

The association of diabetes and obesity with prostate cancer aggressiveness among Black Americans and White Americans in a population-based study

PURPOSE

Few studies have investigated the role of race in the association of diabetes and obesity with prostate cancer aggressiveness. Here we evaluate the independent association between diabetes and obesity with prostate cancer aggressiveness in White Americans and Black Americans.

METHODS

Our cross-sectional, case-only study consisted of 1,058 White Americans and 991 Black Americans from the North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer (PCaP) project. Diabetes status was determined by self-report. Obesity was determined using body mass index and calculated based on anthropometric measurements. High aggressive prostate cancer was defined as Gleason sum ≥8, or prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/ml, or Gleason sum = 7 and clinical stage cT3-cT4. The association between diabetes and obesity with high aggressive prostate cancer at diagnosis was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Diabetes was not associated with high aggressive prostate cancer in the overall sample (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.79, 1.37), White Americans (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.65, 1.57) or Black Americans (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.75, 1.53). Obesity, independent of diabetes, was positively associated with high aggressive prostate cancer in White Americans (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.14, 3.43), but not in the overall sample (OR 1.37; 95% CI 0.99, 1.92) or Black Americans (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.71, 1.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes was not associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness, overall, or in either race group. Obesity, independent of diabetes, was associated with high aggressive prostate cancer only in White Americans.

Diabetes and mortality in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting results as to the association between pre-existing diabetes and the risk of mortality in patients with prostate cancer. The purpose of this study is to estimate the influence of pre-existing diabetes on prostate cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Embase to identify studies that investigated the association between pre-existing diabetes and risk of death among men with prostate cancer. Pooled risk estimates and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated using fixed-effects models or random-effects models. Heterogeneity tests were conducted between studies. Publication bias was analyzed by using the Egger's test, Begg's test, and the trim and fill method.

RESULTS

Of the 733 articles identified, 17 cohort studies that had 274,677 male patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pre-existing diabetes was associated with a 29 % increase in prostate cancer-specific mortality [relative risk (RR) 1.29, 95 % CI 1.22-1.38, I(2) = 66.68 %], and with a 37 % increase in all-cause mortality (RR 1.37, 95 % CI 1.29-1.45, p < 0.01, I(2) = 90.26 %). Additionally, in a subgroup analysis that was a type specific analysis focusing on type 2 diabetes and was conducted only with three cohort studies, pre-existing type 2 diabetes was associated with all-cause mortality (RR 2.01, 95 % CI 1.37-2.96, I(2) = 95.55 %) and no significant association with prostate cancer-specific mortality was detected (RR 1.17, 95 % CI 0.96-1.42, I(2) = 75.59 %). There was significant heterogeneity between studies and no publication bias was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests diabetes may result in a worse prognosis for men with prostate cancer. Considering heterogeneity between studies, additional studies should be conducted to confirm these findings, and to allow generalization regarding the influence that each type of diabetes has on prostate cancer mortality.

A review of clinical effects associated with metabolic syndrome and exercise in prostate cancer patients

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), a primary treatment for locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer, is associated with the adverse effects on numerous physiologic parameters, including alterations in cardiometabolic variables that overlap with components of the metabolic syndrome (MetS). As MetS is an established risk factor for cardiovascular mortality and treatment for prostate cancer has been associated with the development of MetS, interventions targeting cardiometabolic factors have been investigated in prostate cancer patients to attenuate the detrimental effects of ADT. Much support exists for exercise interventions in improving MetS variables in insulin-resistant adults, but less evidence is available in men with prostate cancer. Regular exercise, when performed at appropriate intensities and volumes, can elicit improvements in ADT-related adverse effects, including MetS, and contributes to the growing body of literature supporting the role of exercise in cancer survivorship. This review (1) discusses the biologic inter-relationship between prostate cancer, ADT and MetS, (2) evaluates the current literature in support of exercise in targeting MetS and (3) describes the physiological mechanisms by which exercise may favorably alter MetS risk factors in prostate cancer patients on ADT.

The impact of diabetes and other metabolic disorders on prostate cancer prognosis

AIMS

To investigate the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) and other metabolic disorders on the survival of men with prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort-study based on 715 men with PCa, originally enrolled in an Italian case-control study between 1995 and 2002. Anthropometric measures, self-reported medical conditions, and Gleason score were assessed at enrollment. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of death, with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), were estimated using Fine and Gray's regression model.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 11.6years, 244 (34.1%) deaths occurred, 77 (31.6%) due to PCa. Excess mortality from all causes was reported in PCa patients with DM (HR=1.56, 95% CI: 1.03-2.36), which increased to 1.76 (95% CI: 0.99-3.13) when at least two out of three metabolic disorders (i.e., waist circumference ≥102cm, drug-treated hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia) were additionally present. The impact of metabolic disorders was stronger on non-PCa-specific mortality with HRs equal to 2.21 (95% CI: 1.38-3.54) for DM, 1.45 (95% CI: 0.97-2.19) for waist circumference ≥102cm, and 1.63 (95% CI: 1.19-2.22) for drug-treated hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

DM and other metabolic disorders unfavorably affected the survival of PCa patients, mainly impacting on the risk of death from causes other than PCa.

Diabetes, Epstein-Barr virus and extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma in India: Unravelling the plausible nexus

The International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas estimates a staggering 590 million people affected with diabetes mellitus (DM) within the next two decades globally, of which Type 2 DM will constitute more than 90%. The associated insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, and hyperglycemia pose a further significant risk for developing diverse malignant neoplasms. Diabetes and malignancy are multifactorial heterogeneous diseases. The immune dysfunction secondary to Type 2 diabetes also reactivates latent infections with high morbidity and mortality rates. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), a ubiquitous human herpes virus-4, is an oncogenic virus; its recrudescence in the immunocompromised condition activates the expression of EBV latency genes, thus immortalizing the infected cell and giving rise to lymphomas and carcinomas. Extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTCL), common in South-East Asia and Latin America; is a belligerent type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) almost invariably associated with EBV. An analysis of articles sourced from the PubMed database and Google Scholar web resource until February 2014, suggests an increasing incidence of NHL in Asia/India and of ENKTCL in India, over the last few decades. This article reviews the epidemiological evidence linking various neoplasms with Type 2 DM and prognosticates the emergence of ENKTCL as a common lymphoreticular malignancy secondary to Type 2 diabetes, in the Indian population in the next few decades.

Diabetes mellitus is associated with elevated risk of mortality amongst patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of 11 cohort studies

PURPOSE

Diabetes mellitus is associated with a decreased risk of prostate cancer. However, previous studies examining the associations between diabetes mellitus and prostate cancer prognosis have produced mixed results. Here, we aim to summarize the effect of diabetes mellitus on prostate cancer prognosis.

METHODS

We searched the database of PubMed from inception through 31 March 2014 for articles evaluating the effect of diabetes on outcome in prostate cancer patients, and a meta-analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 11 cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis, of which seven studies were carried out to investigate whether diabetes mellitus is associated with all-cause mortality amongst those with prostate cancer, seven studies to investigate whether diabetes mellitus is associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality and two studies to investigate the relationship of diabetes mellitus and nonprostate cancer mortality. The meta-analysis results suggested that diabetes mellitus could significantly affect the incidence of all-cause mortality amongst those with prostate cancer (hazard ratio = 1.50, 95% confidence interval = 1.25-1.79). Besides, diabetes mellitus was also associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio = 1.26, 95% confidence interval = 1.20-1.33) and nonprostate cancer mortality (hazard ratio = 1.83, 95% confidence interval = 1.33-2.52) separately. There was no obvious publication bias amongst the studies included.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis reveal an association of diabetes mellitus with adverse prognosis amongst those with prostate cancer. The biological basis of the association of diabetes mellitus with prostate cancer incidence and prognosis remains unclear. Doctors could pay more attention to prostate patients with pre-existing diabetes mellitus, and more aggressive treatment regimens should be considered.

Diabetes mellitus and the risk of prostate cancer: an update and cumulative meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

To provide further insight into the association between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the pathophysiology of prostate cancer, we conducted an updated, detailed meta-analysis of 56 published case-control and cohort studies.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were used to identify the literature published in April 2012 related to both diabetes mellitus and prostate cancer. A sensitivity analysis was performed, and potential confounding effects were investigated using a stratified meta-analysis. A cumulative meta-analysis was also carried out to evaluate the cumulative effect estimate over time.

RESULTS

A total of 24 case-control and 32 cohort studies with information on a total of ~8,000,000 subjects and ~140,000 individuals with prostatic cancer showed published estimates of the association between diabetes and prostate cancer malignancy. The pooled effect estimate revealed a relative risk (RR) of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.82-0.93). Interestingly, there was an increased trend for Asians (RR = 1.72, n = 7) but not Americans (RR = 0.82, n = 28) and Europeans (RR = 0.86, n = 21) regarding the association between diabetes mellitus and prostate cancer. The sensitivity analysis, excluding any one study, did not significantly change the pooled RR. The range for the pooled RR when one study was omitted was 0.84-0.89.

DISCUSSION

The findings of our meta-analysis provide strong evidence of an inverse association between diabetes and prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research should focus on limitations in the current literature and re-assess the relationship between diabetes and prostate cancer by analyzing the two different diabetes mellitus types separately.

Prostate cancer treatment and survival: evidence for men with prevalent comorbid conditions

BACKGROUND

The absence of evidence-based guidelines for prostate cancer treatment led the Institute of Medicine to include localized prostate cancer treatment among the 25 most important topics for comparative effectiveness research.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared prostate cancer treatment and survival in men with and without prevalent comorbid conditions.

RESEARCH DESIGN

The sample comprised elderly men, aged 66 years and older, extracted from SEER-Medicare data, between 2004 and 2009 (N=73,563). Treatment and survival for men with at least 1 of 4 prevalent comorbid conditions were compared with men who did not have any of the 12 Charlson comorbid conditions. The sample was stratified by comorbid condition and low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk disease.

RESULTS

Over half of men received some form of cancer-directed treatment, irrespective of comorbid condition. Men who have congestive heart failure (CHF) or multiple comorbid conditions were less likely to be treated, whereas men with diabetes were more likely to be treated. With the exception of men with CHF, men with comorbid conditions and low-risk disease received no survival benefit from any type of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Most men received treatment, particularly radiation therapy, regardless of comorbid condition. The evidence suggests more caution should be used when treating men with low-risk disease and comorbid conditions as they are at risk for adverse events and additional medical costs, without a survival benefit.

Diabetes and cancer

Diabetes is a worldwide health problem that has been increasingly associated with various types of cancers. Epidemiologic studies have shown an increased risk of cancer as well as a higher mortality rate in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The biologic mechanisms driving the link between T2D and cancer are not well understood. In this review, various proposed mechanisms are addressed to explain the relationship between T2D and cancer. Understanding the precise mechanisms that link T2D, obesity, and the metabolic syndrome with cancer will aid in developing treatments that will reduce mortality in individuals with T2D and cancer.

Diabetes and cancer relationships

Diabetes and cancer are both heterogeneous and multifactorial diseases with tremendous impact on health worldwide. Epidemiologic evidence suggests that certain malignancies may be associated with diabetes, as well as with diabetes risk factors and, perhaps, with certain diabetes treatments. Numerous biological mechanisms could account for these relationships. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, IGF-2, IGF-1 receptors, insulin, and the insulin receptor play roles in the development and progression of cancers. Although evidence from randomized controlled trials does not support or refute associations of diabetes and its treatments with either increased or reduced risk of cancer incidence or prognosis, consideration of malignancy incidence rates and the magnitude of the trials that would be required to address these issues explains why such studies may not be readily undertaken.

Diabetes, antihyperglycemic medications and cancer risk: smoke or fire?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review article is to discuss the epidemiological links between diabetes and cancer; the potential biological mechanisms linking diabetes, obesity and cancer; the risk of cancer associated with antidiabetic medications.

METHODS

The data discussed in this review were obtained from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Consensus Conference on Diabetes and Cancer, held in New York, NY, USA, September 2012.

RESULTS

The results of these studies demonstrate a significant association between diabetes and the risk of multiple cancers, including hepatocellular, pancreatic, endometrial, colorectal, breast, kidney, bladder, gastric, and ovarian cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, T cell lymphoma and leukemia. There are multiple potential biological mechanisms that may link type 2 diabetes, obesity and cancer. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia may lead to direct activation of the insulin receptors on tumor cells and promote tumor growth. Other potential mechanisms include increased circulating, local or bioavailable insulin-like growth factor 1, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, increased circulating or local estrogen, adipokines and direct and indirect effects of inflammatory cytokines. Epidemiological studies have had conflicting results regarding the associations between various classes of antidiabetic medication and cancer development. Animal studies have demonstrated increased tumor growth with certain medications, but their relevance to humans is uncertain. Metformin may, however, have protective effects on cancer development and may improve survival in patients with cancer.

CONCLUSION

We describe the current understanding of the links among diabetes, antidiabetic medication and cancer risk. We highlight some of the issues that should be addressed in the future to prevent cancer development and death in those with diabetes.

Diabetes and risk of cancer

Diabetes and cancer represent two complex, diverse, chronic, and potentially fatal diseases. Cancer is the second leading cause of death, while diabetes is the seventh leading cause of death with the latter still likely underreported. There is a growing body of evidence published in recent years that suggest substantial increase in cancer incidence in diabetic patients. The worldwide prevalence of diabetes was estimated to rise from 171 million in 2000 to 366 million in 2030. About 26.9% of all people over 65 have diabetes and 60% have cancer. Overall, 8–18% of cancer patients have diabetes. In the context of epidemiology, the burden of both diseases, small association between diabetes and cancer will be clinically relevant and should translate into significant consequences for future health care solutions. This paper summarizes most of the epidemiological association studies between diabetes and cancer including studies relating to the general all-site increase of malignancies in diabetes and elevated organ-specific cancer rate in diabetes as comorbidity. Additionally, we have discussed the possible pathophysiological mechanisms that likely may be involved in promoting carcinogenesis in diabetes and the potential of different antidiabetic therapies to influence cancer incidence.

The impact of diabetes mellitus on survival in men with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with permanent interstitial brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Patients with cancer of any origin with preexisting diabetes mellitus (DM) are at increased risk for all-cause mortality compared with those without DM. However, the influence of DM on biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) has not been clearly defined for men with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 1995 to May 2006, 1624 consecutive patients underwent brachytherapy with or without supplemental therapies. A prebrachytherapy diagnosis of diabetes was present in 199 patients (12.3%). Median follow-up was 7.8 years. Cause of death was determined for each deceased patient. Patients with metastatic prostate cancer or castrate-resistant disease without obvious metastases who died of any cause were classified as dead of prostate cancer. All other deaths were attributed to the immediate cause of death.

RESULTS

In patients without (n=1425) and with (n=199) DM, CSS was 97.2% versus 100% (P=0.168), bPFS was 95.6% versus 95.7% (P=0.960), and OS was 77.3% versus 56.0% at 12 years (P=0.003). In Cox regression analysis, OS in nondiabetic patients was most closely related to patient age, coronary artery disease, tobacco consumption, and androgen deprivation. In patients with diabetes, OS was related to patient age and coronary artery disease. In patients without diabetes, CSS was associated with Gleason score and clinical stage. No patient with diabetes died of prostate cancer. Patients with DM were more likely to die of cardiovascular disease (17.8% vs. 12.4%, P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

DM does not impact CSS or bPFS after brachytherapy. OS is significantly lower in patients with diabetes due to more deaths from cardiovascular disease.

Metformin and prostate cancer: reduced development of castration-resistant disease and prostate cancer mortality

BACKGROUND

In vitro data and early clinical results suggest that metformin has desirable antineoplastic effects and has a theoretical benefit on castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the use of metformin would be associated with improved clinical outcomes and a reduction in the development of CRPC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Data from 2901 consecutive patients (157 metformin, 162 diabetic non-metformin, and 2582 nondiabetic) with localized prostate cancer treated with external-beam radiation therapy from 1992 to 2008 were collected from a single institution in the United States.

INTERVENTION

Use of metformin in localized prostate cancer.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Univariate and multivariate regression models utilizing k-sample, Fine and Gray, Cox regression, log-rank, and Kaplan-Meier methods to assess prostate-specific antigen-recurrence-free survival (PSA-RFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), overall survival (OS), and development of CRPC.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

With a median follow-up of 8.7 yr, the 10-yr actuarial rates for metformin, diabetic non-metformin, and nondiabetic patients for PCSM were 2.7%, 21.9%, and 8.2% (log-rank p ≤ 0.001), respectively. Metformin use independently predicted (correcting for PSA, T stage, Gleason score, age, diabetic status, and androgen-deprivation therapy use) improvement in all outcomes compared with the diabetic non-metformin group; PSA-RFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.99 [1.24-3.18]; p=0.004), DMFS (adjusted HR: 3.68 [1.78-7.62]; p<0.001), and PCSM (HR: 5.15 [1.53-17.35]; p=0.008). Metformin use was also independently associated with a decrease in the development of CRPC in patients experiencing biochemical failure compared with diabetic non-metformin patients (odds ratio: 14.81 [1.83-119.89]; p=0.01). The retrospective study design was the primary limitation of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, our results are the first clinical data to indicate that metformin use may improve PSA-RFS, DMFS, PCSM, OS, and reduce the development of CRPC in prostate cancer patients. Further validation of metformin's potential benefits is warranted.

Diabetes and cancer (2): evaluating the impact of diabetes on mortality in patients with cancer

In this paper we address methodological aspects of aetiological importance in the link between diabetes and mortality in patients with cancer. We identified nine key points on the cancer pathway at which confounding may arise-cancer screening use, stage at diagnosis, cancer treatment selection, cancer treatment complications and failures, peri-treatment mortality, competing risks for long-term mortality, effects of type 2 diabetes on anti-cancer therapies, effects of glucose-lowering treatments on cancer outcome and differences in tumour biology. Two types of mortality studies were identified: (1) inception cohort studies that evaluate the effect of baseline diabetes on cancer-related mortality in general populations, and (2) cohorts of patients with a cancer diagnosis and pre-existing type 2 diabetes. We demonstrate, with multiple examples from the literature, that pre-existing diabetes affects presentation, cancer treatment, and outcome of several common cancer types, often to varying extents. Diabetes is associated with increased all-cause mortality in cancer patients, but the evidence that it influences cancer-specific mortality is inconsistent. In the absence of data that address the potential biases and confounders outlined in the above framework, we caution against the reporting of cancer-related mortality as a main endpoint in analyses determining the impact of diabetes and glucose-lowering medications on risk of cancer.

Long-term (10-year) gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity after treatment with external beam radiotherapy, radical prostatectomy, or brachytherapy for prostate cancer

Objective.To examine gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity profiles of patients treated in 1999 with external beam radiotherapy (RT), prostate interstitial brachytherapy (PI) or radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods. TThe records of 525 patients treated in 1999 were reviewed to evaluate toxicity. Late GI and GU morbidities were graded according to the RTOG late morbidity criteria. Other factors examined were patient age, BMI, smoking history, and medical co-morbidities. Due to the low event rate for late GU and GI toxicities, a competing risk regression (CRR) analysis was done with death as the competing event. Results. Median follow-up time was 8.5 years. On CRR univariate analysis, only the presence of DM was significantly associated with GU toxicity grade >2 (P = 0.43, HR 2.35, 95% Cl = 1.03–5.39). On univariate analysis, RT and DM were significantly associated with late GI toxicity. On multivariable analysis, both variables remained significant (RT: P = 0.038, HR = 4.71, CI = 1.09–20.3; DM: P = 0.008, HR = 3.81, 95% Cl = 1.42–10.2). Conclusions. Late effects occur with all treatment modalities. The presence of DM at the time of treatment was significantly associated with worse late GI and GU toxicity. RT was significantly associated with worse late GI toxicity compared to PI and RP.

Diabetes mellitus, race and the odds of high grade prostate cancer in men treated with radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Black men present more frequently with high grade prostate cancer and are more likely to have diabetes mellitus. We evaluated whether there is an independent association between diabetes mellitus and the risk of high grade prostate cancer in men diagnosed with prostate cancer and treated with radiation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A polychotomous logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate whether a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was associated with the odds of Gleason score 7 or 8-10 prostate cancer in a cohort of 16,286 men, adjusting for black race, advancing age, prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination findings.

RESULTS

Black men (adjusted OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.08-3.13, p = 0.024) and nonblack men (adjusted OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.33-1.89, p <0.001) with diabetes were more likely to have Gleason score 8-10 vs 6 or less prostate cancer than nondiabetic men. However, this was not true for Gleason score 7 vs 6 or less prostate cancer. Black race was significantly associated with Gleason score 7 vs 6 or less prostate cancer in men without and with diabetes (adjusted OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.17-1.63, p <0.001 and 1.61, 95% CI 1.17-2.21, p = 0.003, respectively). Black race was also associated with Gleason score 8-10 vs 6 or less prostate cancer in men without and with diabetes (adjusted OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01-1.83, p = 0.04 and 1.58, 95% CI 0.98-2.53, p = 0.06, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of men undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with an increased risk of being diagnosed with Gleason score 8-10 prostate cancer independent of black race.

Type of diabetes mellitus and the odds of Gleason score 8 to 10 prostate cancer

PURPOSE

It has been recently shown that diabetes mellitus (DM) is significantly associated with the likelihood of presenting with high-grade prostate cancer (PCa) or Gleason score (GS) 8 to 10; however, whether this association holds for both Type 1 and 2 DM is unknown. In this study we evaluated whether DM Type 1, 2, or both are associated with high-grade PCa after adjusting for known predictors of high-grade disease.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1991 and 2010, a total of 15,330 men diagnosed with PCa and treated with radiation therapy were analyzed. A polychotomous logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate whether Type 1 or 2 DM was associated with odds of GS 7 or GS 8 to 10 compared with 6 or lower PCa, adjusting for African American race, age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and digital rectal examination findings.

RESULTS

Men with Type 1 DM (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-3.27; p = 0.003) or Type 2 DM (AOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.26-1.99; p < 0.001) were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with GS 8 to 10 PCa compared with nondiabetic men. However this was not true for GS 7, for which these respective results were AOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.93-1.82; p = 0.12 and AOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.98-1.32; p = 0.10.

CONCLUSION

Type 1 and 2 DM were associated with a higher odds of being diagnosed with Gleason score 8 to 10 but not 7 PCa. Pending validation, men who are diagnosed with Type I DM with GS 7 or lower should be considered for additional workup to rule out occult high-grade disease.

Thiazolidinediones and metformin associated with improved survival of diabetic prostate cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The association between antidiabetic medications and the prognosis of human prostate cancer has not been explored. This study examined the impact of these drugs on the outcomes of diabetic patients with prostate cancer to provide a basis for diabetes management strategy in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Records of consecutive prostate cancer patients with coexisting diabetes mellitus type 2 who were treated at the study institution between 15 July 1999 and 31 December 2008 were reviewed. The survival, cancer pathological grade, stage at the time of diagnosis, and antidiabetic pharmacotherapy of the patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 233 consecutive cases were analyzed. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, thiazolidinedione (log-rank, P = 0.005) and metformin (log-rank, P = 0.035) usage were significant predictors of improved overall survival, while insulin and insulin secretagogue usage were not significant predictors. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that thiazolidinedione {hazard ratio [HR] = 0.454 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.213-0.965], P = 0.040} and metformin [HR = 0.550 (95% CI 0.315-0.960), P = 0.035] usage remained as significant predictors of favorable survival after controlling for variables including age, race, Gleason grade, and stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Thiazolidinediones and metformin appear to be associated with improved overall survival of diabetic prostate cancer patients. The choice of antidiabetic pharmacotherapy may influence overall survival of these patients.