1
|
Schmidt R, Hamm CA, Rueger C, Xu H, He Y, Gottwald LA, Gebauer B, Savic LJ. Decision-Tree Models Indicative of Microvascular Invasion on MRI Predict Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Tumor Ablation. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2024; 11:1279-1293. [PMID: 38974016 PMCID: PMC11227855 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s454487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Histological microvascular invasion (MVI) is a risk factor for poor survival and early recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgery. Its prognostic value in the setting of locoregional therapies (LRT), where no tissue samples are obtained, remains unknown. This study aims to establish CT-derived indices indicative of MVI on liver MRI with superior soft tissue contrast and evaluate their association with patient survival after ablation via interstitial brachytherapy (iBT) versus iBT combined with prior conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE). Patients and Methods Ninety-five consecutive patients, who underwent ablation via iBT alone (n = 47) or combined with cTACE (n = 48), were retrospectively included between 01/2016 and 12/2017. All patients received contrast-enhanced MRI prior to LRT. Overall (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time-to-progression (TTP) were assessed. Decision-tree models to determine Radiogenomic Venous Invasion (RVI) and Two-Trait Predictor of Venous Invasion (TTPVI) on baseline MRI were established, validated on an external test set (TCGA-LIHC), and applied in the study cohorts to investigate their prognostic value for patient survival. Statistics included Fisher's exact and t-test, Kaplan-Meier and cox-regression analysis, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and Pearson's correlation. Results OS, PFS, and TTP were similar in both treatment groups. In the external dataset, RVI showed low sensitivity but relatively high specificity (AUC-ROC = 0.53), and TTPVI high sensitivity but only low specificity (AUC-ROC = 0.61) for histological MVI. In patients following iBT alone, positive RVI and TTPVI traits were associated with poorer OS (RVI: p < 0.01; TTPVI: p = 0.08), PFS (p = 0.04; p = 0.04), and TTP (p = 0.14; p = 0.03), respectively. However, when patients with combined cTACE and iBT were stratified by RVI or TTPVI, no differences in OS (p = 0.75; p = 0.55), PFS (p = 0.70; p = 0.43), or TTP (p = 0.33; p = 0.27) were observed. Conclusion The study underscores the role of non-invasive imaging biomarkers indicative of MVI to identify patients, who would potentially benefit from embolotherapy via cTACE prior to ablation rather than ablation alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Schmidt
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, 13353, Germany
- Experimental Clinical Research Center (ECRC) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin (MDC), Berlin, 13125, Germany
| | - Charlie Alexander Hamm
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, 13353, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, 10117, Germany
| | - Christopher Rueger
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Han Xu
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Yubei He
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, 13353, Germany
- Experimental Clinical Research Center (ECRC) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin (MDC), Berlin, 13125, Germany
| | | | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Lynn Jeanette Savic
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, 13353, Germany
- Experimental Clinical Research Center (ECRC) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin (MDC), Berlin, 13125, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, 10117, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Auer TA, Anhamm M, Böning G, Fehrenbach U, Schöning W, Lurje G, Gebauer B, Collettini F. Effectiveness and safety of computed tomography-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy in treating recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to repeated resection or radiofrequency ablation. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108429. [PMID: 38788357 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the efficacy and safety of computed tomography (CT)-guided high-dose-rate HDR) brachytherapy in treating recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not amenable to repeated resection or radiofrequency ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2010 to January 2022, 38 patients (mean age, 70.1 years; SD ± 9.0 years) with 79 nodular and four diffuse intrahepatic HCC recurrences not amenable to repeated resection or radiofrequency ablation underwent CT-guided HDR brachytheapy in our department. Tumor response was evaluated by cross-sectional imaging 6 weeks after CT-guided HDR brachytherapy and every 3 months thereafter. Local tumor control (LTC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves (KPCs). Severity of procedure-related complications (PRCs) was classified as recommended by the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR). RESULTS Patients were available for MRI evaluation for a mean follow-up of 33.1 months (SD, ±21.6 mm, range 4-86 months; median 29 months). Patients had a mean of 2.3 (SD, ±1.4) intrahepatic tumors. Mean tumor diameter was 43.2 mm (SD, ±19.6 mm). 13 of 38 (34.2%) patients showed local tumor progression after CT-guided HDR brachytherapy. Mean LTC was 29.3 months (SD, ±22.1). Distant tumor progression was seen in 12 patients (31.6%). The mean PFS was 20.8 months (SD, ±22.1). Estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates were 65.1%, 35.1% and 22.5%, respectively. 13 patients died during the follow-up period. Mean OS was 35.4 months (SD, ±21.7). Estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 91.5%, 77.4% and 58.0%, respectively. SIR grade 1 complications were recorded in 8.6% (5/38) and SIR grade 2 complications in 3.4% (2/58) of interventions. CONCLUSION CT-guided HDR brachytherapy is a safe and efficient therapeutic option for managing large or critically located HCC recurrences in the remaining liver after prior hepatic resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timo Alexander Auer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiology, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch 2, 10178, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Melina Anhamm
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiology, Germany
| | - Georg Böning
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiology, Germany
| | - Uli Fehrenbach
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiology, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Surgery, Germany
| | - Georg Lurje
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Surgery, Germany
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiology, Germany
| | - Federico Collettini
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, And Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiology, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch 2, 10178, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ümütlü MR, Öcal O, Puhr-Westerheide D, Fabritius MP, Wildgruber M, Deniz S, Corradini S, Rottler M, Walter F, Rogowski P, Seidensticker R, Philipp AB, Rössler D, Ricke J, Seidensticker M. Efficacy and Safety of Local Liver Radioablation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Lesions within and beyond Limits of Thermal Ablation. Dig Dis 2024:1-12. [PMID: 38781948 DOI: 10.1159/000538788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION CT-guided interstitial brachytherapy (iBT) radiotherapy has been established in the treatment of liver tumors. With iBT, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions can be treated beyond the limits of thermal ablation (i.e., size and location). However, a comprehensive analysis of the efficacy of iBT in patients within and beyond thermal ablation limits is lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 146 patients with 216 HCC lesions have been analyzed retrospectively. Clinical and imaging follow-up data has been collected. Lesions were evaluated in terms of suitability for thermal ablation or not. The correlation between local tumor control (LTC), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and clinical and imaging parameters have been evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS LTC rates at 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months were 87%, 75%, and 73%, respectively. 65% of lesions (n = 141) were not suitable for radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The median TTP was 13 months, and the median OS was not reached (3-year OS rate: 70%). No significant difference in LTC, TTP, or OS regarding RFA suitability existed. However, in the overall multivariable analysis, lesion diameter >5 cm was significantly associated with lower LTC (HR: 3.65, CI [1.60-8.31], p = 0.002) and shorter TTP (HR: 2.08, CI [1.17-3.70], p = 0.013). Advanced BCLC stage, Child-Pugh Stage, and Hepatitis B were associated with shorter OS. CONCLUSION iBT offers excellent LTC rates and OS in local HCC treatment regardless of the limits of thermal ablation, suggesting further evidence of its alternative role to thermal ablation in patients with early-stage HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Osman Öcal
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Moritz Wildgruber
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sinan Deniz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maya Rottler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Daniel Rössler
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Karim S, Seidensticker R, Seidensticker M, Ricke J, Schinner R, Treitl K, Rübenthaler J, Ingenerf M, Schmid-Tannwald C. Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in response prediction and evaluation after high dose rate brachytherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Radiol Oncol 2024; 58:33-42. [PMID: 38378033 PMCID: PMC10878766 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2024-0017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to assess the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to evaluate treatment response in patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this retrospective, observational cohort study, we included 19 patients with 18 responding metastases (R-Mets; follow-up at least one year) and 11 non-responding metastases (NR-Mets; local tumor recurrence within one year) who were treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and underwent pre- and post-interventional MRI. DWI (qualitatively, mean apparent diffusion coefficient [ADCmean], ADCmin, intraindividual change of ADCmean and ADCmin) were evaluated and compared between pre-interventional MRI, first follow-up after 3 months and second follow-up at the time of the local tumor recurrence (in NR-Mets, mean: 284 ± 122 d) or after 12 months (in R-Mets, mean: 387+/-64 d). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) for detection of local tumor recurrence were calculated on second follow up, evaluating (1) DWI images only, and (2) DWI with Gd-enhanced T1-weighted images on hepatobiliary phase (contrast-enhanced [CE] T1-weight [T1w] hepatobiliary phase [hb]). RESULTS ADCmean significantly increased 3 months after HDR-BT in both groups (R-Mets: 1.48 ± 0.44 and NR-Mets: 1.49 ± 0.19 x 10-3 mm2;/s, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.01), however, intraindividual change of ADCmean (175% vs.127%, p = 0.03) and ADCmin values (0.44 ± 0.24 to 0.82 ± 0.58 x 10-3 mm2/s) significantly increased only in R-Mets (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001). ADCmin was significant higher in R-Mets compared to NR-Mets on first follow-up (p = 0.04). Sensitivity (1 vs. 0.72), specificity (0.94 vs. 0.72), PPV (0.91 vs. 0.61) and NPV (1 vs. 0.81) could be improved by combining DWI with CE T1w hb compared to DWI only. CONCLUSIONS DW-MRI seems to be helpful in the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of treatment response after HDR-BT of colorectal metastases in the liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma Karim
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | | | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEntero-Pancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEntero-Pancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Regina Schinner
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Karla Treitl
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Rübenthaler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEntero-Pancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Ingenerf
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Schmid-Tannwald
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEntero-Pancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Auer TA, Müller L, Schulze D, Anhamm M, Bettinger D, Steinle V, Haubold J, Zopfs D, Pinto Dos Santos D, Eisenblätter M, Gebauer B, Kloeckner R, Collettini F. CT-guided High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy versus Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Radiology 2024; 310:e232044. [PMID: 38319166 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
Background CT-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (hereafter, HDR brachytherapy) has been shown to be safe and effective for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but studies comparing this therapy with other local-regional therapies are scarce. Purpose To compare patient outcomes of HDR brachytherapy and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with unresectable HCC. Materials and Methods This multi-institutional retrospective study included consecutive treatment-naive adult patients with unresectable HCC who underwent either HDR brachytherapy or TACE between January 2010 and December 2022. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between patients matched for clinical and tumor characteristics by propensity score matching. Not all patients who underwent TACE had PFS available; thus, a different set of patients was used for PFS and OS analysis for this treatment. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated from Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results After propensity matching, 150 patients who underwent HDR brachytherapy (median age, 71 years [IQR, 63-77 years]; 117 males) and 150 patients who underwent TACE (OS analysis median age, 70 years [IQR, 63-77 years]; 119 male; PFS analysis median age, 68 years [IQR: 63-76 years]; 119 male) were analyzed. Hazard of death was higher in the TACE versus HDR brachytherapy group (HR, 4.04; P < .001). Median estimated PFS was 32.8 months (95% CI: 12.5, 58.7) in the HDR brachytherapy group and 11.6 months (95% CI: 4.9, 22.7) in the TACE group. Hazard of disease progression was higher in the TACE versus HDR brachytherapy group (HR, 2.23; P < .001). Conclusion In selected treatment-naive patients with unresectable HCC, treatment with CT-guided HDR brachytherapy led to improved OS and PFS compared with TACE. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Chapiro in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timo A Auer
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Lukas Müller
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Daniel Schulze
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Melina Anhamm
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Dominik Bettinger
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Verena Steinle
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Johannes Haubold
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - David Zopfs
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Daniel Pinto Dos Santos
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Michel Eisenblätter
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Roman Kloeckner
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| | - Federico Collettini
- From the Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., M.A., B.G., F.C.); Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (T.A.A., F.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Mainz, Germany (L.M.); Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (D.S.); Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany (D.B.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (V.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (J.H.); Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (D.Z., D.P.d.S.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (D.P.d.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany (M.E.); and Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (R.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Groß S, Bitzer M, Albert J, Blödt S, Boda-Heggemann J, Brunner T, Caspari R, De Toni E, Dombrowski F, Evert M, Follmann M, Freudenberger P, Gani C, Geier A, Gkika E, Götz M, Helmberger T, Hoffmann RT, Huppert P, Krug D, La Fougère C, Lang H, Langer T, Lenz P, Lüdde T, Mahnken A, Nadalin S, Nguyen HHP, Nothacker M, Ockenga J, Oldhafer K, Paprottka P, Pereira P, Persigehl T, Plentz R, Pohl J, Recken H, Reimer P, Riemer J, Ritterbusch U, Roeb E, Rüssel J, Schellhaas B, Schirmacher P, Schlitt HJ, Schmid I, Schuler A, Seehofer D, Sinn M, Stengel A, Steubesand N, Stoll C, Tannapfel A, Taubert A, Tholen R, Trojan J, van Thiel I, Vogel A, Vogl T, Wacker F, Waidmann O, Wedemeyer H, Wege H, Wildner D, Wörns MA, Galle P, Malek N. S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie biliärer Karzinome“ – Langversion 4.0. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:e213-e282. [PMID: 38364849 DOI: 10.1055/a-2189-8567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Groß
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Michael Bitzer
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Jörg Albert
- Katharinenhospital, Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Stuttgart
| | - Susanne Blödt
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V. (AWMF), Berlin
| | | | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz
| | - Reiner Caspari
- Klinik Niederrhein, Erkrankungen des Stoffwechsels der Verdauungsorgane und Tumorerkrankungen, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler
| | | | | | | | - Markus Follmann
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V., Berlin
| | | | - Cihan Gani
- Klinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | - Andreas Geier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | - Martin Götz
- Medizinische Klinik IV - Gastroenterologie/Onkologie, Klinikverbund Südwest, Böblingen
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden
| | - Peter Huppert
- Radiologisches Zentrum, Max Grundig Klinik, Bühlerhöhe
| | - David Krug
- Strahlentherapie Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
| | - Christian La Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Hauke Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Thomas Langer
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V., Berlin
| | - Philipp Lenz
- Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| | - Tom Lüdde
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
| | - Andreas Mahnken
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | - Monika Nothacker
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V. (AWMF), Berlin
| | - Johann Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Karl Oldhafer
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek
| | - Philipp Paprottka
- Sektion für Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
| | - Philippe Pereira
- Zentrum für Radiologie, Minimal-invasive Therapien und Nuklearmedizin, SLK-Klinken Heilbronn
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - Ruben Plentz
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona
| | | | - Peter Reimer
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
| | | | | | - Elke Roeb
- Medizinische Klinik II Pneumologie, Nephrologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
| | - Jörn Rüssel
- Medizinische Klinik IV Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)
| | - Barbara Schellhaas
- Medizinische Klinik I Gastroenterologie, Pneumologie und Endokrinologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Allgemeine Pathologie und pathologische Anatomie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Hans J Schlitt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
| | - Irene Schmid
- Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital, LMU München
| | - Andreas Schuler
- Medizinische Klinik, Gastroenterologie, Alb-Fils-Kliniken, Geislingen an der Steige
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - Marianne Sinn
- II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Knochenmarktransplantation mit Abteilung für Pneumologie), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Innere Medizin VI - Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | | | | | - Anne Taubert
- Klinische Sozialarbeit, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Bundesverband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik 1: Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Allergologie, Endokrinologie und Diabetologie sowie Ernährungsmedizin, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | | | - Arndt Vogel
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | - Frank Wacker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | | | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Henning Wege
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Onkologie/Hämatologie, Gastroenterologie und Infektiologie, Klinikum Esslingen
| | - Dane Wildner
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Standort Lauf
| | - Marcus-Alexander Wörns
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie und Endokrinologie, Klinikum Dortmund
| | - Peter Galle
- 1. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Nephrologie, Rheumatologie, Infektiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Nisar Malek
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bitzer M, Groß S, Albert J, Blödt S, Boda-Heggemann J, Brunner T, Caspari R, De Toni E, Dombrowski F, Evert M, Follmann M, Freudenberger P, Gani C, Geier A, Gkika E, Götz M, Helmberger T, Hoffmann RT, Huppert P, Krug D, Fougère CL, Lang H, Langer T, Lenz P, Lüdde T, Mahnken A, Nadalin S, Nguyen HHP, Nothacker M, Ockenga J, Oldhafer K, Paprottka P, Pereira P, Persigehl T, Plentz R, Pohl J, Recken H, Reimer P, Riemer J, Ritterbusch U, Roeb E, Rüssel J, Schellhaas B, Schirmacher P, Schlitt HJ, Schmid I, Schuler A, Seehofer D, Sinn M, Stengel A, Steubesand N, Stoll C, Tannapfel A, Taubert A, Tholen R, Trojan J, van Thiel I, Vogel A, Vogl T, Wacker F, Waidmann O, Wedemeyer H, Wege H, Wildner D, Wörns MA, Galle P, Malek N. S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Hepatozellulären Karzinoms“ – Langversion 4.0. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:e67-e161. [PMID: 38195102 DOI: 10.1055/a-2189-6353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bitzer
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Sabrina Groß
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Jörg Albert
- Katharinenhospital, Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Stuttgart
| | - Susanne Blödt
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V.(AWMF), Berlin
| | | | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz
| | - Reiner Caspari
- Klinik Niederrhein Erkrankungen des Stoffwechsels der Verdauungsorgane und Tumorerkrankungen, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler
| | | | | | | | - Markus Follmann
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V., Berlin
| | | | - Cihan Gani
- Klinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | - Andreas Geier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | - Martin Götz
- Medizinische Klinik IV - Gastroenterologie/Onkologie, Klinikverbund Südwest, Böblingen
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden
| | - Peter Huppert
- Radiologisches Zentrum, Max Grundig Klinik, Bühlerhöhe
| | - David Krug
- Strahlentherapie Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
| | - Christian La Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Hauke Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Thomas Langer
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V., Berlin
| | - Philipp Lenz
- Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| | - Tom Lüdde
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
| | - Andreas Mahnken
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | - Monika Nothacker
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V.(AWMF), Berlin
| | - Johann Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Karl Oldhafer
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek
| | - Philipp Paprottka
- Sektion für Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
| | - Philippe Pereira
- Zentrum für Radiologie, Minimal-invasive Therapien und Nuklearmedizin, SLK-Klinken Heilbronn
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - Ruben Plentz
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona
| | | | - Peter Reimer
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
| | | | | | - Elke Roeb
- Medizinische Klinik II Pneumologie, Nephrologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
| | - Jörn Rüssel
- Medizinische Klinik IV Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)
| | - Barbara Schellhaas
- Medizinische Klinik I Gastroenterologie, Pneumologie und Endokrinologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Allgemeine Pathologie und pathologische Anatomie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | | | - Irene Schmid
- Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital, LMU München
| | - Andreas Schuler
- Medizinische Klinik, Gastroenterologie, Alb-Fils-Kliniken, Geislingen an der Steige
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - Marianne Sinn
- II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Knochenmarktransplantation mit Abteilung für Pneumologie), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Innere Medizin VI - Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | | | | | - Anne Taubert
- Klinische Sozialarbeit, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Bundesverband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik 1: Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Allergologie, Endokrinologie und Diabetologie sowie Ernährungsmedizin, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | | | - Arndt Vogel
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | - Frank Wacker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | | | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Henning Wege
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Onkologie/Hämatologie, Gastroenterologie und Infektiologie, Klinikum Esslingen
| | - Dane Wildner
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Standort Lauf
| | - Marcus-Alexander Wörns
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie und Endokrinologie, Klinikum Dortmund
| | - Peter Galle
- 1. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Nephrologie, Rheumatologie, Infektiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Nisar Malek
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Karim H, Thormann M, Omari J, Surov A, Schinner R, Seidensticker R, Ingenerf M, Ricke J, Schmid-Tannwald C. Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) for assessment of response to high-dose-rate CT-guided brachytherapy (HDR-BT) of hepatocellular carcinoma. Acta Radiol 2024; 65:14-22. [PMID: 36843430 DOI: 10.1177/02841851231154498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-dose-rate computed tomography (CT)-guided brachytherapy (HDR-BT) has shown promising results in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). While growing evidence shows clear limitations of mRECIST, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has relevant potential in improving the response assessment. PURPOSE To assess whether DWI allows evaluation of short- and long-term tumor response in patients with HCC after HDR-BT. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 22 patients with 11 non-responding HCCs (NR-HCC; local tumor recurrence within two years) and 24 responding HCCs (R-HCC; follow-up at least two years) were included in this retrospective bi-center study. HCCs were treated with HDR-BT and patients underwent pre- and post-interventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Analyses of DWI were evaluated and compared between pre-interventional MRI, 1.follow-up after 3 months and 2.follow-up at the time of the local tumor recurrence (in NR-HCC) or after 12 months (in R-HCC). RESULTS ADCmean of R-HCC increased significantly after HDR-BT on the first and second follow-up (ADCmean: 0.87 ± 0.18 × 10-3 mm2/s [pre-interventional]: 1.14 ± 0.23 × 10-3 mm2/s [1. post-interventional]; 1.42 ± 0.32 × 10-3 mm2/s [2. post-interventional]; P < 0.001). ADCmean of NR-HCC did not show a significant increase from pre-intervention to 1. post-interventional MRI (ADCmean: 0.85 ± 0.24 × 10-3 mm2/s and 1.00 ± 0.30 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively; P = 0.131). ADCmean increase was significant between pre-intervention and 2. follow-up (ADCmean: 1.03 ± 0.19 × 10-3 mm2/s; P = 0.018). There was no significant increase of ADCmean between the first and second follow-up. There was, however, a significant increase of ADCmin after 12 months (ADCmin: 0.87 ± 0.29 × 10-3 mm2/s) compared to pre-interventional MRI and first follow-up (P < 0.005) only in R-HCC. CONCLUSION The tumor response after CT-guided HDR-BT was associated with a significantly higher increase in ADCmean and ADCmin in short- and long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Homeira Karim
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Thormann
- Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jazan Omari
- Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Alexey Surov
- Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Regina Schinner
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Maria Ingenerf
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stechele M, Link H, Hirner-Eppeneder H, Alunni-Fabbroni M, Wildgruber M, Salvermoser L, Corradini S, Schinner R, Ben Khaled N, Rössler D, Galun E, Goldberg SN, Ricke J, Kazmierczak PM. Circulating miR-21 as a prognostic biomarker in HCC treated by CT-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:125. [PMID: 37507808 PMCID: PMC10375621 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02316-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Prognostic biomarkers identifying patients with early tumor progression after local ablative therapy remain an unmet clinical need. The aim of this study was to investigate circulating miR-21 and miR-210 levels as prognostic biomarkers of HCC treated by CT-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). MATERIALS AND METHODS 24 consecutive HCC patients (BCLC A and B) treated with CT-guided HDR-BT (1 × 15 Gy) were included in this prospective IRB-approved study. RT-PCR was performed to quantify miR-21 and miR-210 levels in blood samples acquired prior to and 2 d after HDR-BT. Follow-up imaging (contrast-enhanced liver MRI and whole-body CT) was performed in 3 months follow-up intervals. Therapy response was assessed with patients classified as either responders or non-responders (12 each). Responders were defined as having no local or diffuse systemic progression within 6 months and no diffuse systemic progression exceeding 3 nodules/nodule diameter > 3 cm from 6 months to 2 years. Non-responders had recurrence within 6 months and/or tumor progression with > 3 nodules or individual lesion diameter > 3 cm or extrahepatic disease within two years, respectively. Biostatistics included parametric and non-parametric testing (Mann-Whitney-U-test), as well as Kaplan-Meier curve construction. RESULTS The responder group demonstrated significantly decreasing miR-21 values 2 d post therapy compared to non-responders (median miR-21 2-ΔΔCт: responders 0.73 [IQR 0.34], non-responders 1.53 [IQR 1.48]; p = 0.0102). miR-210 did not show any significant difference between responders and non-responders (median miR-210 2-ΔΔCт: responders 0.74 [IQR 0.45], non-responders 0.99 [IQR 1.13]; p = 0.8399). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significantly shorter time to systemic progression for increased miR-21 (p = 0.0095) but not miR-210 (p = 0.7412), with events accumulating > 1 year post therapy in non-responders (median time to systemic progression 397 days). CONCLUSION Increasing circulating miR-21 levels are associated with poor response and shorter time to systemic progression in HDR-BT-treated HCC. This proof-of-concept study provides a basis for further investigation of miR-21 as a prognostic biomarker and potential stratifier in future clinical trials of interventional oncology therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION In this monocentric clinical study, we analyzed prospectively acquired data of 24 patients from the "ESTIMATE" patient cohort (Studiennummer: DRKS00010587, Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien). Ethical approval was provided by the ethics committee "Ethikkommission bei der LMU München" (reference number "17-346") on June 20, 2017 and August 26, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Stechele
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Henrike Link
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Heidrun Hirner-Eppeneder
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Marianna Alunni-Fabbroni
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz Wildgruber
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Salvermoser
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Regina Schinner
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Najib Ben Khaled
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Rössler
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Eithan Galun
- Goldyne Savad Institute of Gene Therapy and Division of Image-Guided Therapy and Interventional Oncology, Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Shraga Nahum Goldberg
- Goldyne Savad Institute of Gene Therapy and Division of Image-Guided Therapy and Interventional Oncology, Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thormann M, Heitmann F, Wrobel V, Heinze C, March C, Hass P, Damm R, Surov A, Pech M, Omari J. Interstitial Brachytherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Analysis of Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival and Application of a Risk Stratification Model. Dig Dis 2023; 41:957-966. [PMID: 37385234 PMCID: PMC10716867 DOI: 10.1159/000531732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Interstitial brachytherapy (iBT) is an effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Identification of prognostic factors is pivotal for patient selection and treatment efficacy. This study aimed to assess the impact of low skeletal muscle mass (LSMM) on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of iBT in patients with HCC. METHODS For this single-center study, we retrospectively identified 77 patients with HCC who underwent iBT between 2011 and 2018. Follow-up visits were recorded until 2020. The psoas muscle area, psoas muscle index, psoas muscle density (MD), and the skeletal muscle gauge were assessed on the L3 level on pre-treatment cross-sectional CT scans. RESULTS Median OS was 37 months. 42 patients (54.5%) had LSMM. An AFP level of >400 ng/ml (hazard ratio [HR] 5.705, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.228-14.606, p = 0.001), BCLC stage (HR 3.230, 95% CI: 0.972-10.735, p = 0.026), and LSMM (HR 3.365, 95% CI: 1.490-7.596, p = 0.002) showed a relevant association with OS. Weighted hazard ratios were used to form a predictive risk stratification model with three groups: patients with low risk (median OS 62 months), intermediate risk (median OS 31 months), and high risk (median OS 9 months). The model showed a good prediction of 1-year mortality, with an AUC of 0.71. Higher MD was associated with better PFS (HR 0.920, 95% CI: 0.881-0.962, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In patients undergoing iBT for HCC, LSMM is associated with worse OS. A risk stratification model based on LSMM, AFP >400 ng/mL, and BCLC stage successfully predicted patient mortality. The model may support and enhance patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Thormann
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Franziska Heitmann
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Vanessa Wrobel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Constanze Heinze
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Christine March
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Peter Hass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Robert Damm
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Alexey Surov
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Minden, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jazan Omari
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Damm R, Wybranska J, Hass P, Walke M, Omari J, Pech M, Seidensticker R, Ricke J, Seidensticker M. Prevention of radiation-induced liver toxicity after interstitial HDR brachytherapy by pentoxifylline and ursodeoxycholic acid: patient compliance and outcome in a randomized trial. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023:10.1007/s00432-023-04832-w. [PMID: 37166579 PMCID: PMC10374685 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04832-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
AIM To investigate the impact of pentoxifylline (PTX, 3 × 400 mg per day) and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA, 3 × 250 mg per day) administered for 12 weeks on radiation-induced liver toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS Inclusion criteria were liver metastases of extrahepatic malignancies undergoing HDR-BT. 36 patients were prospectively randomized to the medication (N = 18) or control arm (N = 18) and follow-up by hepatobiliary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was scheduled 6 and 12 weeks after local ablation by HDR-BT. We determined the threshold doses of fRILI by image fusion of MRI with the dosimetry data. RESULTS 32 patients completed the study schedule. Per-protocol treatment was limited to 8 patients in the medication group and 16 patients in the control group. 22 adverse events of any grade likely or certainly related to PTX were recorded in 12 patients leading to the discontinuation of the study medication in 7 patients and to a dose reduction of PTX in 2 patients. In the per-protocol population, statistical analysis failed to prove a reduction of fRILI 6 and 12 weeks after HDR-BT. The incidence of adverse effects attributed to PTX (70.6%) was well above the data found in the literature for its approved indication. CONCLUSION The study endpoint was not met mainly attributed to the low statistical power of the small per-protocol cohort. Independently, PTX cannot be recommended for the reduction of radiation-induced liver toxicity in oncologic patients undergoing HDR-BT of liver metastases. Further studies might focus on a combination of UDCA with other potential drugs to help establish a preventive and tolerable regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Damm
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-Von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Joanna Wybranska
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-Von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Peter Hass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helios Klinikum, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Mathias Walke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Otto-Von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jazan Omari
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-Von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-Von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | | | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bitzer M, Groß S, Albert J, Boda-Heggemann J, Brunner T, Caspari R, De Toni E, Dombrowski F, Evert M, Geier A, Gkika E, Götz M, Helmberger T, Hoffmann RT, Huppert P, Kautz A, Krug D, Fougère CL, Lang H, Lenz P, Lüdde T, Mahnken A, Nadalin S, Nguyen HHP, Ockenga J, Oldhafer K, Paprottka P, Pereira P, Persigehl T, Plentz R, Pohl J, Recken H, Reimer P, Riemer J, Ritterbusch U, Roeb E, Rüssel J, Schellhaas B, Schirmacher P, Schlitt HJ, Schmid I, Schuler A, Seehofer D, Sinn M, Stengel A, Stoll C, Tannapfel A, Taubert A, Tholen R, Trojan J, van Thiel I, Vogel A, Vogl T, Wacker F, Waidmann O, Wedemeyer H, Wege H, Wildner D, Wörns MA, Galle P, Malek N. S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie biliärer Karzinome – Langversion. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023; 61:e92-e156. [PMID: 37040776 DOI: 10.1055/a-2026-1240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bitzer
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Sabrina Groß
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Jörg Albert
- Katharinenhospital, Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Stuttgart
| | | | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz
| | - Reiner Caspari
- Klinik Niederrhein Erkrankungen des Stoffwechsels der Verdauungsorgane und Tumorerkrankungen, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler
| | | | | | | | - Andreas Geier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | - Martin Götz
- Medizinische Klinik IV - Gastroenterologie/Onkologie, Klinikverbund Südwest, Böblingen
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden
| | - Peter Huppert
- Radiologisches Zentrum, Max Grundig Klinik, Bühlerhöhe
| | | | - David Krug
- Strahlentherapie Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
| | - Christian La Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Hauke Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Philipp Lenz
- Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| | - Tom Lüdde
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
| | - Andreas Mahnken
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschrirugie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | - Johann Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Karl Oldhafer
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek
| | - Philipp Paprottka
- Sektion für Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
| | - Philippe Pereira
- Zentrum für Radiologie, Minimal-invasive Therapien und Nuklearmedizin, SLK-Klinken Heilbronn
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - Ruben Plentz
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona
| | | | - Peter Reimer
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
| | | | | | - Elke Roeb
- Medizinische Klinik II Pneumologie, Nephrologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
| | - Jörn Rüssel
- Medizinische Klinik IV Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)
| | - Barbara Schellhaas
- Medizinische Klinik I Gastroenterologie, Pneumologie und Endokrinologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Allgemeine Pathologie und pathologische Anatomie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | | | - Irene Schmid
- Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital, LMU München
| | - Andreas Schuler
- Medizinische Klinik, Gastroenterologie, Alb-Fils-Kliniken, Geislingen an der Steige
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - Marianne Sinn
- II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Knochenmarktransplantation mit Abteilung für Pneumologie), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Innere Medizin VI - Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | | | - Anne Taubert
- Klinische Sozialarbeit, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Bundesverband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik 1: Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Allergologie, Endokrinologie und Diabetologie sowie Ernährungsmedizin, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | | | - Arndt Vogel
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | - Frank Wacker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | | | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Henning Wege
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Onkologie/Hämatologie, Gastroenterologie und Infektiologie, Klinikum Esslingen
| | - Dane Wildner
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Standort Lauf
| | - Marcus-Alexander Wörns
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie und Endokrinologie, Klinikum Dortmund
| | - Peter Galle
- 1. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Nephrologie, Rheumatologie, Infektiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Nisar Malek
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Heinze C, Damm R, Othmer M, Thormann M, Surov A, Hass P, Seidesticker R, Seidensticker M, Ricke J, Powerski M, Pech M, Omari J. Local tumor control of intermediate and advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma after local ablative treatment with image-guided interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy: A subgroup analysis of 286 HCC nodules. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:231-241. [PMID: 36697267 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Image-guided interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (iBT) has been demonstrated to offer high local tumor control rates (LTC) of >90% after local ablation of intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; BCLC B and C). The purpose of this study was to show the efficacy of iBT stratified by subgroups and to identify clinical characteristics associated with superior local tumor control (LTC) based on a highly heterogenous patient population METHODS AND MATERIALS: A cumulative number of 286 HCC nodules in 107 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and imaging follow-ups were conducted every 3 months after treatment. Analyzed clinical factors were: etiology, presence of liver cirrhosis, radiographic features, lesion size, pretreatment, administered dose, presence of portal hypertension, portal vein thrombosis, and level of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). RESULTS LTC rate was 88.8% for a median follow-up of 14.3 months (range 3-81 months; 95% CI: 85-92%). Median minimal enclosing tumor dose (D100) was 16.1 Gy (range 7.1-30.3 Gy; reference dose 15 Gy). Subgroup analysis showed significant fewer local recurrences for alcoholic liver disease (ALD)-related HCCs compared to those related to other causes of liver cirrhosis (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, virus-related liver cirrhosis and other causes) (p = 0.015). LTC was significantly lower after prior surgical resection (p = 0.046). No significant variance was observed for the applied D100 in each group or for all other clinical factors tested. CONCLUSIONS IBT achieves high LTC rates across treated subgroups. However, further studies should particularly address the possible impact of underlying etiology on local recurrence with emphasis on a possible higher radiosensitivity of ALD-related HCCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constanze Heinze
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Robert Damm
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Max Othmer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Thormann
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Alexey Surov
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Peter Hass
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | | | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maciej Powerski
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jazan Omari
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Corradini S, Seidensticker M. "New" Kid on the Block: Interstitial Brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:277-279. [PMID: 36621229 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.08.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Thormann M, Surov A, Pech M, March C, Hass P, Damm R, Omari J. Local ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma by interstitial brachytherapy: prediction of outcome by diffusion-weighted imaging. Acta Radiol 2022; 64:1331-1340. [PMID: 36262039 DOI: 10.1177/02841851221129714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interstitial brachytherapy (iBT) has become a viable treatment option in the therapy of early and intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Prognostic imaging tools to predict patient outcome are missing. PURPOSE To assess the predictive value of baseline diffusion-weighted imaging in HCC before iBT with regard to local tumor control and overall survival (OS). MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively identified 107 patients who underwent iBT for HCC from 2011 to 2018 from our database. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for each treated lesion were analyzed in region of interest measurements. Additionally, explorative combined ratios adjusting total measured lesion area and mean measured lesion area per patient by ADC values were calculated. Measurements underwent a univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. The log rank test was then used to verify prognostic cutoff levels for median survival time. RESULTS A total of 189 lesions in 81 patients were measured. Median survival of patients was 46.0 months. Neither ADC parameter was indicative of local tumor control. Lesion size >5 cm was associated with lower local tumor control (hazard ratio [HR]=4.292, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.285-14.331; P = 0.018). Average measured lesion area divided by ADCmin (ADCarea mean, min) was identified to independently predict OS (HR=1.994, 95% CI=1.172-3.392; P = 0.011). A cutoff based on the variable's median (0.29 × 10-4 AU) identified patients with poor outcome (OS 36 vs. 61 months) for lower ADCarea mean, min values as verified by the log-rank test (P = 0.040). CONCLUSION Pre-treatment ADCarea mean, min may serve as an independent predictor of OS in patients with HCC undergoing iBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Thormann
- Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 39067University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Alexey Surov
- Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 39067University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 39067University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Christine March
- Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 39067University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Peter Hass
- Clinic for Radiation Oncology, 39067University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Robert Damm
- Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 39067University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jazan Omari
- Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 39067University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Solbiati LA, Arai Y. Interventional oncology of liver tumors: how it all started and where are we now. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20220434. [PMID: 35776630 PMCID: PMC9815741 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver was the very first organ for which interventional procedures were applied for the local treatment of primary and secondary malignancies. In this paper, the history of Interventional Oncology of liver, from the very beginning to the current situation, is summarized, including both percutaneous and intravascular procedures, and together with the evolution of the techniques for image guidance. The main ongoing developments, such as new techniques, combined interventional treatments and association of local interventions with new drugs are briefly described, too.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yasuaki Arai
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sharma NK, Kappadath SC, Chuong M, Folkert M, Gibbs P, Jabbour SK, Jeyarajah DR, Kennedy A, Liu D, Meyer JE, Mikell J, Patel RS, Yang G, Mourtada F. The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for permanent implant brachytherapy using Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for liver tumors. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:569-591. [PMID: 35599080 PMCID: PMC10868645 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a multidisciplinary consensus for high quality multidisciplinary implementation of brachytherapy using Yttrium-90 (90Y) microspheres transarterial radioembolization (90Y TARE) for primary and metastatic cancers in the liver. METHODS AND MATERIALS Members of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) and colleagues with multidisciplinary expertise in liver tumor therapy formulated guidelines for 90Y TARE for unresectable primary liver malignancies and unresectable metastatic cancer to the liver. The consensus is provided on the most recent literature and clinical experience. RESULTS The ABS strongly recommends the use of 90Y microsphere brachytherapy for the definitive/palliative treatment of unresectable liver cancer when recommended by the multidisciplinary team. A quality management program must be implemented at the start of 90Y TARE program development and follow-up data should be tracked for efficacy and toxicity. Patient-specific dosimetry optimized for treatment intent is recommended when conducting 90Y TARE. Implementation in patients on systemic therapy should account for factors that may enhance treatment related toxicity without delaying treatment inappropriately. Further management and salvage therapy options including retreatment with 90Y TARE should be carefully considered. CONCLUSIONS ABS consensus for implementing a safe 90Y TARE program for liver cancer in the multidisciplinary setting is presented. It builds on previous guidelines to include recommendations for appropriate implementation based on current literature and practices in experienced centers. Practitioners and cooperative groups are encouraged to use this document as a guide to formulate their clinical practices and to adopt the most recent dose reporting policies that are critical for a unified outcome analysis of future effectiveness studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navesh K Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Hershey School of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | - S Cheenu Kappadath
- Department of Imaging Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Michael Folkert
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Radiation Medicine at the Center for Advanced Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | | | - David Liu
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Rahul S Patel
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Gary Yang
- Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Firas Mourtada
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Luerken L, Haimerl M, Doppler M, Uller W, Beyer LP, Stroszczynski C, Einspieler I. Update on Percutaneous Local Ablative Procedures for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2022; 194:1075-1086. [PMID: 35545102 DOI: 10.1055/a-1768-0954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common tumor worldwide. Because many hepatocellular carcinomas are already unresectable at the time of initial diagnosis, percutaneous tumor ablation has become established in recent decades as a curative therapeutic approach for very early (BCLC 0) and early (BCLC A) HCC. The aim of this paper is to provide a concise overview of the percutaneous local ablative procedures currently in use, based on their technical characteristics as well as clinical relevance, taking into account the current body of studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS The literature search included all original papers, reviews, and meta-analyses available via MEDLINE and Pubmed on the respective percutaneous ablation procedures; the primary focus was on randomized controlled trials and publications from the last 10 years. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are well-established procedures that are considered equal to surgical resection in the treatment of stage BCLC 0 and A HCC with a diameter up to 3 cm due to their strong evidence in international and national guidelines. For tumors with a diameter between 3 and 5 cm, the current S3 guidelines recommend a combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and thermal ablation using RFA or MWA as combination therapy is superior to thermal ablation alone in tumors of this size and shows comparable results to surgical resection in terms of overall survival. Alternative, less frequently employed thermal procedures include cryotherapy (CT) and laser ablation (LA). Non-thermal procedures include irreversible electroporation (IRE), interstitial brachytherapy (IBT), and most recently, electrochemotherapy (ECT). Due to insufficient evidence, these have only been used in individual cases and within the framework of studies. However, the nonthermal methods are a reasonable alternative for ablation of tumors adjacent to large blood vessels and bile ducts because they cause significantly less damage to these structures than thermal ablation methods. With advances in the technology of the respective procedures, increasingly good evidence, and advancements in supportive techniques such as navigation devices and fusion imaging, percutaneous ablation procedures may expand their indications for the treatment of larger and more advanced tumors in the coming years. KEY POINTS · RFA and MWA are considered equal to surgical resection as a first-line therapy for the curative treatment of stage BCLC 0 and A HCCs with a diameter of up to 3 cm.. · For HCCs with a diameter between 3 and 5 cm, a combination of TACE and RFA or MWA is recommended. This combination therapy yields results comparable to those of surgical resection in terms of overall survival.. · Due to insufficient evidence, alternative ablation methods have only been used in individual cases and within the framework of studies. However, nonthermal methods, such as IRE, IBT, and, most recently, ECT, are a reasonable alternative for ablation of HCCs adjacent to large blood vessels and bile ducts because they cause significantly less damage to these structures than thermal ablation methods.. CITATION FORMAT · Luerken L, Haimerl M, Doppler M et al. Update on Percutaneous Local Ablative Procedures for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1768-0954.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Luerken
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michael Haimerl
- Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michael Doppler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Freiburg Department of Radiology, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Wibke Uller
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Freiburg Department of Radiology, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Philipp Beyer
- Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany.,Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann gGmbH, Potsdam, Germany
| | | | - Ingo Einspieler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
In Regard to Apisarnthanarax et al. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:e239. [PMID: 35512991 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
20
|
Karagiannis E, Strouthos I, Leczynski A, Zamboglou N, Ferentinos K. Narrative Review of High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy in Primary or Secondary Liver Tumors. Front Oncol 2022; 12:800920. [PMID: 35299745 PMCID: PMC8920984 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.800920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The optimal management of intrahepatic malignancies involves a multidisciplinary approach. Although surgical resection has been considered the only curative approach, the use of several minimally invasive ablative techniques has dramatically increased the last two decades, mainly due to the fact that they provide similar oncological results with significantly decreased morbidity. Among these modalities, interstitial liver brachytherapy, probably the most flexible liver ablative method, with excellent clinical data on its safety and effectiveness, is frequently not even mentioned as an option in the current peer reviewed literature and guidelines. Brachytherapy is a type of radiotherapy utilizing radionuclides that are directly inserted into the tumor. Compared to external beam radiation therapy, brachytherapy has the potential to deliver an ablative radiation dose over a short period of time, with the advantage of a rapid dose fall-off, that allows for sparing of adjacent healthy tissue. For numerous malignancies such as skin, gynecological, breast, prostate, head and neck, bladder, liver and soft-tissue tumors, brachytherapy as a monotherapy or combined with external beam radiation therapy, has become a standard treatment for many decades. This review article aims to describe the high-dose-rate liver brachytherapy technique, its selection criteria, present its advantages and disadvantages, as well as the available clinical data, in order to help physicians to explore and hopefully introduce liver brachytherapy into their clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efstratios Karagiannis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Agnes Leczynski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Nikolaos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sabrina V, Michael B, Jörg A, Peter B, Wolf B, Susanne B, Thomas B, Frank D, Matthias E, Markus F, Christian LF, Paul F, Andreas G, Eleni G, Martin G, Elke H, Thomas H, Ralf-Thorsten H, Wolf-Peter H, Peter H, Achim K, Gabi K, Jürgen K, David K, Frank L, Hauke L, Thomas L, Philipp L, Andreas M, Alexander M, Oliver M, Silvio N, Huu Phuc N, Johann O, Karl-Jürgen O, Philipp P, Kerstin P, Philippe P, Thorsten P, Mathias P, Ruben P, Jürgen P, Jutta R, Peter R, Johanna R, Ulrike R, Elke R, Barbara S, Peter S, Irene S, Andreas S, Dietrich VS, Daniel S, Marianne S, Alexander S, Andreas S, Nadine S, Christian S, Andrea T, Anne T, Jörg T, Ingo VT, Reina T, Arndt V, Thomas V, Hilke V, Frank W, Oliver W, Heiner W, Henning W, Dane W, Christian W, Marcus-Alexander W, Peter G, Nisar M. S3-Leitlinie: Diagnostik und Therapie des hepatozellulären Karzinoms. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2022; 60:e56-e130. [PMID: 35042248 DOI: 10.1055/a-1589-7568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Voesch Sabrina
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen
| | - Bitzer Michael
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen
| | - Albert Jörg
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Stuttgart
| | | | - Bechstein Wolf
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Transplantations- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main
| | | | - Brunner Thomas
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg A. ö. R., Magdeburg
| | - Dombrowski Frank
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald
| | | | - Follmann Markus
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, c/o Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V. Berlin
| | | | | | - Geier Andreas
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg
| | - Gkika Eleni
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg
| | | | - Hammes Elke
- Lebertransplantierte Deutschland e. V., Ansbach
| | - Helmberger Thomas
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal-invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen, München
| | | | - Hofmann Wolf-Peter
- Gastroenterologie am Bayerischen Platz, medizinisches Versorgungszentrum, Berlin
| | | | | | - Knötgen Gabi
- Konferenz onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege, Hamburg
| | - Körber Jürgen
- Klinik Nahetal, Fachklinik für onkologische Rehabilitation und Anschlussrehabilitation, (AHB), Bad Kreuznach
| | - Krug David
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel
| | | | - Lang Hauke
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz
| | - Langer Thomas
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, c/o Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V. Berlin
| | - Lenz Philipp
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Münster
| | - Mahnken Andreas
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Marburg
| | - Meining Alexander
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II des Universitätsklinikums Würzburg, Würzburg
| | - Micke Oliver
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld, Bielefeld
| | - Nadalin Silvio
- Universitätsklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen
| | | | | | - Oldhafer Karl-Jürgen
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Semmelweis Universität, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg
| | - Paprottka Philipp
- Abteilung für interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München
| | - Paradies Kerstin
- Konferenz onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege, Hamburg
| | - Pereira Philippe
- Zentrum für Radiologie, Minimal-invasive Therapien und Nuklearmedizin, Klinikum am Gesundbrunnen, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn GmbH, Heilbronn
| | - Persigehl Thorsten
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln
| | | | | | - Pohl Jürgen
- Interventionelles Endoskopiezentrum und Schwerpunkt Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg
| | - Riemer Jutta
- Lebertransplantierte Deutschland e. V., Bretzfeld
| | - Reimer Peter
- Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe gGmbH, Karlsruhe
| | - Ringwald Johanna
- Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen
| | | | - Roeb Elke
- Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Gießen
| | - Schellhaas Barbara
- Medizinische Klinik I, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - Schirmacher Peter
- Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - Schmid Irene
- Zentrum Pädiatrische Hämatologie und Onkologie, Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital, Klinikum der Universität München, München
| | | | | | - Seehofer Daniel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig
| | - Sinn Marianne
- Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | | | - Stengel Andreas
- Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen
| | | | | | - Tannapfel Andrea
- Institut für Pathologie der Ruhr-Universität Bochum am Berufsgenossenschaftlichen Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Bochum
| | - Taubert Anne
- Kliniksozialdienst, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Bochum
| | - Trojan Jörg
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main
| | | | - Tholen Reina
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie e. V., Köln
| | - Vogel Arndt
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Endokrinologie der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
| | - Vogl Thomas
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Frankfurt
| | - Vorwerk Hilke
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Marburg
| | - Wacker Frank
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
| | - Waidmann Oliver
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main
| | - Wedemeyer Heiner
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
| | - Wege Henning
- I. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - Wildner Dane
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Lauf an der Pegnitz
| | | | | | - Galle Peter
- I. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Mainz, Mainz
| | - Malek Nisar
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fleckenstein FN, Roesel MJ, Krajewska M, Auer TA, Collettini F, Maleitzke T, Böning G, Torsello GF, Fehrenbach U, Gebauer B. Combining Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE) and CT-Guided High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT): A Retrospective Analysis of Advanced Primary and Secondary Liver Tumor Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010072. [PMID: 35008236 PMCID: PMC8750400 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Clinical management of advanced stages of primary and secondary liver tumors remains challenging. Combining different treatment approaches to create the most effective therapy for patients is, however, often necessary. With this study we aim to analyze the efficacy and safety of a combined intrahepatic treatment of transarterial radioembolization and CT-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy. Our study showed that patients not responding to systemic chemotherapy or suffering from tumor relapse after surgical resection might benefit from a combined minimal-invasive treatment. Abstract Purpose: Treatment of patients with primary and secondary liver tumors remains challenging. This study analyzes the efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) combined with CT-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT) for the treatment of primary and secondary liver tumors. Patients and Methods: A total of 77 patients (30 female) with various liver malignancies were treated. Primary endpoints were median overall survival (OS) and time to untreatable progression (TTUP). Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed in consideration of diagnosis and procedure sequence. Median OS and TTUP prediction were estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. Results: A total of 115 CT-HDRBT and 96 TARE procedures were performed with no significant complications recorded. Median OS and TTUP were 29.8 (95% CI 18.1–41.4) and 23.8 (95% CI 9.6–37.9) months. Median OS for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-, cholangiocarcinoma carcinoma (CCA) and colorectal cancer (CRC) patients was 29.8, 29.6 and 34.4 months. Patients starting with TARE had a median OS of 26.0 (95% CI 14.5–37.5) compared to 33.7 (95% CI 21.6–45.8) months for patients starting with CT-HDRBT. Hazard ratio of 1.094 per month was shown for patients starting with CT-HDRBT. Conclusion: Combining TARE and CT-HDRBT is effective and safe for the treatment of advanced stage primary and secondary liver tumors. Our data indicate that early TARE during the disease progression may have a positive effect on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Nima Fleckenstein
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.J.R.); (T.A.A.); (F.C.); (G.B.); (G.F.T.); (U.F.); (B.G.)
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-30-450-657297
| | - Maximilian Julius Roesel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.J.R.); (T.A.A.); (F.C.); (G.B.); (G.F.T.); (U.F.); (B.G.)
| | - Maja Krajewska
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Timo Alexander Auer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.J.R.); (T.A.A.); (F.C.); (G.B.); (G.F.T.); (U.F.); (B.G.)
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Federico Collettini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.J.R.); (T.A.A.); (F.C.); (G.B.); (G.F.T.); (U.F.); (B.G.)
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Tazio Maleitzke
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany;
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg Böning
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.J.R.); (T.A.A.); (F.C.); (G.B.); (G.F.T.); (U.F.); (B.G.)
| | - Giovanni Federico Torsello
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.J.R.); (T.A.A.); (F.C.); (G.B.); (G.F.T.); (U.F.); (B.G.)
| | - Uli Fehrenbach
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.J.R.); (T.A.A.); (F.C.); (G.B.); (G.F.T.); (U.F.); (B.G.)
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.J.R.); (T.A.A.); (F.C.); (G.B.); (G.F.T.); (U.F.); (B.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Walter F, Rottler M, Nierer L, Landry G, Well J, Rogowski P, Mohnike K, Seidensticker M, Ricke J, Belka C, Corradini S. Interstitial High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy of Liver Metastases in Oligometastatic Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246250. [PMID: 34944869 PMCID: PMC8699459 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Local ablative treatments have emerged as a promising treatment strategy for patients with oligometastatic disease. Interstitial brachytherapy (iBT) is one of the locally ablative treatment options for unresectable liver metastases in oligometastatic disease. We report the feasibility and oncologic outcome of 141 iBT treatments of 244 oligometastatic liver metastases performed in patients with limited tumor burdens in a high-volume center. iBT was feasible, safe and effective in the treatment of oligometastatic liver metastases with good local control rates and low toxicity. Histology and total tumor volume had an impact on local control rates. Abstract Local ablative treatments have emerged as a promising treatment strategy for patients with oligometastatic disease. Among others, interstitial brachytherapy (iBT) is an upcoming treatment option for unresectable liver metastases. We report the feasibility and oncologic outcome of iBT of oligometastatic liver metastases performed in patients with limited tumor burdens in a high-volume center. Patients undergoing iBT between August 2017and March 2019 were included. A retrospective analysis of patient outcomes and treatment complications was performed. Patients treated for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC) were compared to other histologies. A total of 141 iBT procedures were performed in 106 patients (male:52; female:54) and 244 liver metastases. Overall, 51% (54/106) of patients had a diagnosis of metastatic CRC. The median follow-up was 9 months, and overall survival (OS) was 92.3% at 6 months and 76.3% at 12 months. Local-relapse-free survival (LRFS) was 88.4% at 6 months and 71.5% at 12 months, with a significant difference between patients with CRC (84.1% and 50.6%) versus other histologies (92.4% and 92.4%, p < 0.001). A sub-group analysis showed a significant advantage in patients with CRC receiving a minimal dose (D100) of 20 Gy to the planning target volume. Treatments of smaller total liver-tumor volumes (<18 ccm) resulted in better LRFS rates. iBT is a safe and effective treatment approach for oligometastatic liver disease. A higher treatment dose is needed for patients with CRC. Moreover, lower metastatic burdens may be favorable for LRFS. Prospective studies are needed to assess the role of iBT in the oligometastatic setting as an alternative to other local ablative treatment approaches in patients with liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.W.); (M.R.); (L.N.); (G.L.); (J.W.); (P.R.); (C.B.)
| | - Maya Rottler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.W.); (M.R.); (L.N.); (G.L.); (J.W.); (P.R.); (C.B.)
| | - Lukas Nierer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.W.); (M.R.); (L.N.); (G.L.); (J.W.); (P.R.); (C.B.)
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.W.); (M.R.); (L.N.); (G.L.); (J.W.); (P.R.); (C.B.)
| | - Justus Well
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.W.); (M.R.); (L.N.); (G.L.); (J.W.); (P.R.); (C.B.)
| | - Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.W.); (M.R.); (L.N.); (G.L.); (J.W.); (P.R.); (C.B.)
| | - Konrad Mohnike
- Diagnostisch Therapeutisches Zentrum (DTZ), 10243 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.S.); (J.R.)
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.S.); (J.R.)
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.W.); (M.R.); (L.N.); (G.L.); (J.W.); (P.R.); (C.B.)
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.W.); (M.R.); (L.N.); (G.L.); (J.W.); (P.R.); (C.B.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fabritius MP, Ben Khaled N, Kunz WG, Ricke J, Seidensticker M. Image-Guided Local Treatment for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-Role of Interventional Radiology. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10235574. [PMID: 34884275 PMCID: PMC8658286 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a highly aggressive malignancy with an increasing incidence in recent years. Prognosis is poor and most patients are not eligible for resection at the time of initial diagnosis due to the anatomic location, inadequate hepatic reserve, limiting comorbidities or metastatic disease. Several locoregional therapies from the field of interventional radiology exist for patients who are not amenable for surgery, or in case of local recurrence as a single treatment modality or combined with systemic treatment. To date, evidence is limited, with most conclusions drawn from single-center studies with small patient cohorts, often treated in the salvage situation or for local recurrence after initial resection. Nevertheless, the results are promising and suggest a survival benefit in selected patients. This narrative review focuses on the use of different locoregional treatment options for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias P. Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (J.R.)
- Correspondence: (M.P.F); (M.S.)
| | - Najib Ben Khaled
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany;
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang G. Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (J.R.)
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (J.R.)
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (J.R.)
- Correspondence: (M.P.F); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ben Khaled N, Jacob S, Rössler D, Bösch F, De Toni EN, Werner J, Ricke J, Mayerle J, Seidensticker M, Schulz C, Fabritius MP. Current State of Multidisciplinary Treatment in Cholangiocarcinoma. Dig Dis 2021; 40:581-595. [PMID: 34695826 DOI: 10.1159/000520346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly aggressive malignancy, and its incidence seems to be increasing over the last years. Given the high rate of irresectability at the time of initial diagnosis, new treatment approaches are important to achieve better patient outcomes. Our review provides an overview of current multimodal therapy options across different specialties of gastroenterology/oncology, surgery, and interventional radiology. SUMMARY CCA is subdivided into clinically and molecularly distinct phenotypes. Surgical treatment currently is the only potentially curative therapy, but unfortunately, the majority of all patients are not eligible for resection at the time of initial diagnosis due to anatomic location, inadequate hepatic reserve, metastatic disease, or limiting comorbidities. However, multimodal treatment options are available to prolong survival, relieve symptoms, and maintain life quality. KEY MESSAGES The treatment of CCA is complex and requires close interdisciplinary collaboration and individualized treatment planning to ensure optimal patient care at specialized centers. Molecular profiling of patients and inclusion into clinical trials is highly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najib Ben Khaled
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Jacob
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation-Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Rössler
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Bösch
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation-Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Enrico N De Toni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation-Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schulz
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Adamopoulou K, Gkamprana AM, Patsouras K, Halkia E. Addressing hepatic metastases in ovarian cancer: Recent advances in treatment algorithms and the need for a multidisciplinary approach. World J Hepatol 2021; 13:1122-1131. [PMID: 34630879 PMCID: PMC8473491 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i9.1122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The lifetime risk for ovarian cancer incidence is 1.39% and the lifetime risk of death is 1.04%. Most ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed at advanced stages (III, IV) because there were no specific symptoms or existing screening tests. Liver metastases have been found in up to 50% of patients dying of advanced ovarian cancer. Recent studies indicate the need for a multidisciplinary approach from initial diagnosis to oncologic surgery and chemotherapy treatment, mandating the involvement of gynecologic oncologists, surgical oncologist, medical oncologists, hepatobiliary surgeons, and interventional radiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Athanasia M Gkamprana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tzaneio General Hospital, Pireaus 18536, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Patsouras
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tzaneio General Hospital, Pireaus 18536, Greece
| | - Evgenia Halkia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tzaneio General Hospital, Pireaus 18536, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Xu H, Schmidt R, Hamm CA, Schobert IT, He Y, Böning G, Jonczyk M, Hamm B, Gebauer B, Savic LJ. Comparison of intrahepatic progression patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases following CT-guided high dose-rate brachytherapy. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2021; 13:17588359211042304. [PMID: 34539817 PMCID: PMC8442486 DOI: 10.1177/17588359211042304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Given the metachronous and multifocal occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC) and colorectal cancer metastases in the liver (CRLM), this study aimed
to compare intrahepatic progression patterns after computed tomography
(CT)-guided high dose-rate brachytherapy. Patients and methods: This retrospective analysis included 164 patients (114 HCC, 50 CRLM) treated
with brachytherapy between January 2016 and January 2018. Patients received
multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before, and about 8 weeks
after brachytherapy, then every 3 months for the first, and every 6 months
for the following years, until progression or death. MRI scans were assessed
for local or distant intrahepatic tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1
and electronic medical records were reviewed prior to therapy. The primary
endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Specifically, local and
distant intra-hepatic PFS were assessed to determine differences between the
intrahepatic progression patterns of HCC and CRLM. Secondary endpoints
included the identification of predictors of PFS, time to progression (TTP),
and overall survival (OS). Statistics included Kaplan–Meier analysis and
univariate and multivariate Cox regression modeling. Results: PFS was longer in HCC [11.30 (1.33–35.37) months] than in CRLM patients [8.03
(0.73–19.80) months, p = 0.048], respectively.
Specifically, local recurrence occurred later in HCC [PFS: 36.83
(1.33–40.27) months] than CRLM patients [PFS: 12.43 (0.73–21.90) months,
p = 0.001]. In contrast, distant intrahepatic
progression occurred earlier in HCC [PFS: 13.50 (1.33–27.80) months] than in
CRLM patients [PFS: 19.80 (1.43–19.80) months, p = 0.456]
but without statistical significance. Multivariate Cox regression confirmed
tumor type and patient age as independent predictors for PFS. Conclusion: Brachytherapy proved to achieve better local tumor control and overall PFS in
patients with unresectable HCC as compared to those with CRLM. However,
distant progression preceded local recurrence in HCC. As a result, these
findings may help design disease-specific surveillance strategies and
personalized treatment planning that highlights the strengths of
brachytherapy. They may also help elucidate the potential benefits of
combinations with other loco-regional or systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Xu
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robin Schmidt
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Charlie Alexander Hamm
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabel Theresa Schobert
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yubei He
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg Böning
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin Jonczyk
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Hamm
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lynn Jeanette Savic
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Öcal O, Rössler D, Ricke J, Seidensticker M. Advances in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Dig Dis 2021; 40:458-467. [PMID: 34348282 DOI: 10.1159/000518101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths, and radiological imaging and locoregional therapies are essential for the management of patients with HCC. SUMMARY In cirrhotic patients, a characteristic imaging pattern establishes the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC with acceptable sensitivity and high specificity. In addition to diagnosis, imaging is used in the staging of patients and treatment allocation. Multiparametric MRI with hepatospecific contrast agents improves lesion detection, characterization, and treatment allocation; recently described imaging criteria allow identification of precursor lesions. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have been established in the treatment of patients with HCC at the early and intermediate stages, respectively. Microwave ablation has been described as an alternative to RFA in selected cases. Imaging-guided brachytherapy, a catheter-based radiotherapy technique, offers advantages to overcome some limitations of the aforementioned therapies, including the tumor location and size. Currently, no adjuvant therapy is recommended after RFA or TACE, but several new drugs are under evaluation. Furthermore, although the exact role of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in HCC still needs to be defined, it is an alternative to systemic agents in patients with intolerance, and additional benefit has been shown in selected subgroups. Additionally, SIRT offers an alternate to TACE with higher objective response rates in patients who needs bridging before transplantation. KEY MESSAGES New imaging criteria improved lesion detection in patients at a risk for HCC, and advances in interventional therapies expanded the range of patients eligible for locoregional treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Öcal
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Rössler
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Walter F, Nierer L, Rottler M, Duque AS, Weingandt H, Well J, Shpani R, Landry G, Seidensticker M, Streitparth F, Ricke J, Belka C, Corradini S. Comparison of liver exposure in CT-guided high-dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy versus SBRT in hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:86. [PMID: 33957941 PMCID: PMC8103624 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01812-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma several local ablative treatments are available. Among others, radiation based treatments such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and high-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR BT) have shown good local control rates. Methods We conducted a dose comparison between actually performed HDR BT versus virtually planned SBRT to evaluate the respective clinically relevant radiation exposure to uninvolved liver tissue. Moreover, dose coverage and conformity indices were assessed. Results Overall, 46 treatment sessions (71 lesions, 38 patients) were evaluated. HDR BT was applied in a single fraction with a dose prescription of 1 × 15 Gy. D98 was 17.9 ± 1.3 Gy, D50 was 41.8 ± 8.1 Gy. The SBRT was planned with a prescribed dose of 3 × 12.5 Gy (65%-Isodose), D98 was 50.7 ± 3.1 Gy, D2 was 57.0 ± 2.3 Gy, and D50 was 55.2 ± 2.3 Gy. Regarding liver exposure Vliver10GyBT was compared to Vliver15.9GySBRT, Vliver16.2GySBRT (EQD2 equivalent doses), and Vliver20GySBRT (clinically relevant dose), all results showed significant differences (p < .001). In a case by case analysis Vliver10GyBT was smaller than Vliver20GySBRT in 38/46 cases (83%). Dmean of the liver was significantly smaller in BT compared to SBRT (p < .001). GTV volume was correlated to the liver exposure and showed an advantage of HDR BT over SBRT in comparison of clinically relevant doses, and for EQD2 equivalent doses. The advantage was more pronounced for greater liver lesions The Conformity Index (CI) was significantly better for BT, while Healthy Tissue Conformity Index (HTCI) and Conformation Number (CN) showed an advantage for SBRT (p < .001). Conclusion HDR BT can be advantageous in respect of sparing of normal liver tissue as compared to SBRT, while providing excellent target conformity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Lukas Nierer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Maya Rottler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Anna Sophie Duque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Helmut Weingandt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Justus Well
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Roel Shpani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Folkert MR, Gottumukkala S, Nguyen NT, Taggar A, Sur RK. Review of brachytherapy complications - Upper gastrointestinal tract. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:1005-1013. [PMID: 33358330 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
While brachytherapy applications are not widely used for cancer diagnoses in the upper GI tract (including the esophagus, liver, stomach, and pancreas), they have a clear role in palliation and symptom management and occasionally definitive locoregional treatment. With the increasing use of image-guided techniques, the incidence of side effects and complications has shown to be lower than many other alternative treatment modalities, making brachytherapy approaches a preferred treatment option. This review examines procedural complications and acute and chronic adverse effects from radiation associated with esophageal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic brachytherapy and their management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nhu Tram Nguyen
- McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amandeep Taggar
- University of Toronto, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ranjan Kumar Sur
- McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Seidensticker M, Schütte K, Seidensticker R, Mühlmann M, Schulz C. Multi-modal and sequential treatment of liver cancer and its impact on the gastrointestinal tract. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 48-49:101709. [PMID: 33317790 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Hepatic tumors include hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC), a small subgroup of tumors (approx. 1%) are classified as combined hepatocellularcholangiocellular carcinomas. Different stage-dependent therapeutic approaches comprise resection, local ablative techniques, locoregional therapies, systemic treatment, liver transplantation in selected cases and possible combination of these treatment modalities. This review summarizes current knowledge on multi-modal treatment strategies for liver cancer focusing on gastrointestinal side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Seidensticker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.
| | - Kerstin Schütte
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Niels-Stensen-Kliniken, Marienhospital, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Ricarda Seidensticker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc Mühlmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schulz
- Medical Department II, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Song Z, Ye J, Wang Y, Li Y, Wang W. Computed tomography-guided iodine-125 brachytherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Ther 2020; 15:1553-1560. [PMID: 31939437 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_629_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to retrospectively assess the outcome of interstitial iodine-125 brachytherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods Between February 2013 and March 2019, 57 patients with 108 unresectable HCC lesions treated with computed tomography (CT)-guided iodine-125 seed brachytherapy were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included local tumor control and progression-free survival (PFS). Potential factors associated with OS were assessed. Results The mean follow-up duration was 24.3 ± 15.6 months (median, 20.5 months; range, 3.9-66.8 months). The median OS time was 23.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.4-28.8 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year actuarial OS rates were 80.0%, 46.1%, and 24.3%, respectively. The median PFS time was 12 months (95% CI, 9.9-14.5 months). The 1- and 2-year actuarial PFS rates were 50% and 20.1%, respectively. Local progression was noted in 11 (11.3%) of 108 lesions with mean local control time of 20.5 ± 8.8 months. The 1- and 2-year local control rates were 96.5% and 88.8%, respectively. Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage and Child-Pugh score were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.330 [95% CI, 0.128-0.853] and HR = 0.303 [95% CI, 0.151-0.610], respectively). Hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm was found in 1 (1.8%) patient with lesion located in the porta hepatis. No other major complications developed during follow-up. Conclusion CT-guided iodine-125 brachytherapy may be an effective and safe alternative with promising survival and increased local control rate in unresectable HCC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaomin Song
- Department of Oncology, The Third Hospital of Qinhuangdao City, Qinhuangdao City, Hebei Province, China
| | - Jiacheng Ye
- Department of Interventional Medicine, Nanping First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Nanping City, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yongzheng Wang
- Department of Interventional Medicine, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Institute of Tumor Intervention, Shandong University, Jinan City, Shandong Province, Nanping City, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yuliang Li
- Department of Interventional Medicine, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Institute of Tumor Intervention, Shandong University, Jinan City, Shandong Province, Nanping City, Fujian Province, China
| | - Wujie Wang
- Department of Interventional Medicine, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Institute of Tumor Intervention, Shandong University, Jinan City, Shandong Province, Nanping City, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mohindra P, Beriwal S, Kamrava M. Proposed brachytherapy recommendations (practical implementation, indications, and dose fractionation) during COVID-19 pandemic. Brachytherapy 2020; 19:390-400. [PMID: 32423787 PMCID: PMC7252026 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Pranshu Mohindra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Mitchell Kamrava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tumor Seeding along the Puncture Tract in CT-Guided Interstitial High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31:720-727. [PMID: 32127321 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantify the occurrence of tumor seeding in computed tomography (CT)-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and to identify potential risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS CT-HDRBT is a minimally invasive therapeutic option for local ablation of unresectable tumors. The procedure involves CT-guided placement of an enclosed catheter and high-dose-rate brachytherapy using iridium-192. Transcutaneous puncture of a tumor with subsequent retraction of the applicator has the potential risk of tumor seeding along the puncture tract. A total of 1,765 consecutive CT-HDRBT procedures were performed at this center between 2006 and 2017 and were retrospectively analyzed. In addition, a distinction was made between whether the puncture tract was irradiated or not. Follow-up imaging datasets were evaluated for tumor seeding along the former puncture tracts. Descriptive and exploratory statistical analyses of the data were performed. RESULTS Tumor seeding was observed in 25 cases (25 of 1,765 cases [1.5%]). A total of 0.008 cases occurred per person-age. Patient age was identified as a potential risk factor with an odds ratio of 1.046 (95% confidence interval, 1.003-1.091; P = .04). There were no differences between whether the puncture tract was irradiated or not (P = .552). CONCLUSIONS Tumor seeding along the puncture tract can occur in CT-HDRBT but is rare.
Collapse
|
35
|
Complications of Computed Tomography-Guided High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT) and Risk Factors: Results from More than 10 Years of Experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2019; 43:284-294. [DOI: 10.1007/s00270-019-02386-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
36
|
Efficacy and safety of percutaneous computed tomography-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in treatment of oligometastatic lymph node metastases of retroperitoneal space. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2019; 11:436-442. [PMID: 31749852 PMCID: PMC6854865 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2019.88141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess efficacy, safety, and outcome of computed tomography (CT)-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy in patients with oligometastatic lymph node metastases of the retroperitoneal space. Material and methods 24 patients with a total of 47 retroperitoneal lymph node metastases from different primary tumors were treated with CT-guided interstitial brachytherapy using an 192Ir source (single fraction irradiation). Every three months after treatment, clinical and imaging follow-up were conducted to evaluate local control and safety. Results Median follow-up was 9.6 months (range, 2.9-39.0 months). Local tumor control rate was 95.7%. The median diameter of the gross tumor volume was 2.2 cm (range, 1-8.6 cm), treated with a median D100 (minimal enclosing tumor dose) of 14.9 Gy (range, 4.5-20.6 Gy). One severe adverse event (grade three) was recorded. Cumulative median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (range, 1.4-23.7 months), and cumulative median overall survival after interstitial brachytherapy was 15.9 months (range, 3.8-39.0 months). Conclusions CT-guided HDR interstitial brachytherapy is a safe and feasible method for local ablation of oligometastatic lymph node metastases of the retroperitoneal space, and might provide a well-tolerated additional therapeutic option in the multidisciplinary management of selected patients.
Collapse
|
37
|
Bergamo AM, Kauweloa K, Gan G, Shi Z, Daniels J, Crownover R, Narayanasamy G, Stathakis S, Mavroidis P, Papanikolaou N, Gutierrez A. Correlation between Biological Effective Dose and Radiation-induced Liver Disease from Hypofractionated Radiotherapy. J Med Phys 2019; 44:185-190. [PMID: 31576066 PMCID: PMC6764171 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_54_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The prevention of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) is very significant in ensuring a safe radiation treatment and high quality of life. Aims and Objectives The purpose of this study is to investigate the correlation of physical and biological effective dose (BED) metrics with liver toxicity from hypo-fractionated liver radiotherapy. Materials and Methods 41 hypo-fractionated patients in 2 groups were evaluated for classic radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) and chronic RILD, respectively. Patients were graded for effective toxicity (post-treatment minus pre-treatment) using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. Physical dose (PD) distributions were converted to BED. The V10Gy, V15Gy, V20Gy, V25Gy and V30Gy physical dose-volume metrics were used in the analysis together with their respective BED-converted metrics of V16.7Gy3, V30Gy3, V46.7Gy3, V66.7Gy3 and V90Gy3. All levels were normalized to their respective patient normal liver volumes (NLV) and evaluated for correlation to RILD. Results were measured quantitatively using R2 regression analysis. Results The classic RILD group had median follow-up time of 1.9 months and the average PD-NLV normalized V10Gy, V15Gy, V20Gy, V25Gy and V30Gy metrics per grade were plotted against RILD yielding R2 correlations of 0.84, 0.72, 0.73, 0.65 and 0.70, respectively while the BED-volume metrics of V16.7Gy3, V30Gy3, V46.7Gy3, V66.7Gy3 and V90Gy3 resulted in correlation values of 0.84, 0.74, 0.66, 0.78 and 0.74, respectively. BED compared to PD showed a statistically significant (p=.03) increase in R2 for the classic RILD group. Chronic RILD group had median follow-up time of 12.3 months and the average PD-NLV normalized V10Gy, V15Gy, V20Gy, V25Gy and V30Gy metrics per grade were plotted against RILD grade yielding R2 correlations of 0.48, 0.92, 0.88, 0.90 and 0.99 while the BED-volume metrics of V16.7Gy3, V30Gy3, V46.7Gy3, V66.7Gy3 and V90Gy3 resulted in correlation values of 0.43, 0.94, 0.99, 0.21 and 0.00, respectively. Conclusion The strong correlations of the V10Gy and V15Gy PD-volume metrics as well as the V16.7Gy3 (BED of V10Gy) to both classic and chronic RILD imply the appropriateness of the current 15Gy evaluation level for liver toxicity with hypo-fractionated treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo M Bergamo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Kevin Kauweloa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Gregory Gan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Zheng Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Janeen Daniels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Richard Crownover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Ganesh Narayanasamy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Sotirios Stathakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Panayiotis Mavroidis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Niko Papanikolaou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Alonso Gutierrez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hass P, Mohnike K, Kropf S, Brunner TB, Walke M, Albers D, Petersen C, Damm R, Walter F, Ricke J, Powerski M, Corradini S. Comparative analysis between interstitial brachytherapy and stereotactic body irradiation for local ablation in liver malignancies. Brachytherapy 2019; 18:823-828. [PMID: 31522972 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Revised: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT) is an alternative treatment option to stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the ablative treatment of liver malignancies. The aim of the present comparative planning study was to reveal the possibilities and limitations of both techniques with regard to dosimetric properties. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eighty-five consecutive patients with liver malignancy diagnosis were treated with interstitial BT between 12/2008 and 09/2009. The prescription dose of BT varied between 15 and 20 Gy, depending on histology. For dosimetric comparison, virtual SBRT treatment plans were generated using the original BT planning CTs. Additional margins reflecting the respiratory tumor motion were added to the target volumes for SBRT planning. RESULTS The mean PTVBT was 34.7 cm3 (0.5-410.0 cm3) vs. a mean PTVSBRT of 73.2 cm3 (6.1-593.4 cm3). Regarding the minimum peripheral dose (D99.9), BT achieved the targeted prescription dose of 15 Gy/20 Gy better without violating organ at risk constraints. The dose exposure of the liver was significantly influenced by treatment modality. The liver exposure to 5 Gy was statistically lower with 611 ± 43 cm3 for BT as compared with 694 ± 37 cm3 for SBRT plans (20-Gy group, p = 0.001), corresponding to 41.8% vs. 45.9% liver volume, respectively. CONCLUSIONS To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the comparison of clinically treated liver BT treatments with virtually planned SBRT treatments. The planning study showed a superior outcome of BT regarding dose coverage of the target volume and exposed liver volume. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to determine ideal applicability for each treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Konrad Mohnike
- Diagnostisch Therapeutisches Zentrum (DTZ), Berlin, Germany
| | - Siegfried Kropf
- Institute of Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Thomas B Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Mathias Walke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Albers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cordula Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Robert Damm
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Franziska Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maciej Powerski
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
de Azevedo MDBM, Melo VHS, Soares CRJ, Gamarra LF, Barros CHN, Tasic L. Poly(3-hydroxi-butyrate-co-3-hydroxy-valerate) (PHB-HV) microparticles loaded with holmium acetylacetonate as potential contrast agents for magnetic resonance images. Int J Nanomedicine 2019; 14:6869-6889. [PMID: 31507318 PMCID: PMC6718972 DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s191274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biodegradable polymers that contain radioactive isotopes such as Holmium 166 have potential applications as beta particle emitters in tumor tissues. Also, Ho(III) is paramagnetic, which makes it suitable as a contrast agent for magnetic resonance (MR) images. METHODS Holmium acetylacetonate (Ho(acac)3) loaded poly(3-hydroxy-butyrate-co-3-hydroxy-valerate) microspheres, with 5% or 8% of 3-hydroxy-valerate (HV), were prepared by emulsification/evaporation process within 20-53 μm size. Microspheres characterization was done using scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray, and infrared spectroscopies. The release of holmium(III) in sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) was followed for 9 days with inductively coupled plasma. Finally, T2 and T2* magnetic resonance images (MRI) were acquired and compared with the MRI of the inclusion complex of holmium acetylacetonate in some β-cyclodextrins. RESULTS Holmium acetylacetonate loading, evaluated by thermogravimetry, was up to 20 times higher for copolymer with 5% of HV. It was shown that microspheres loaded with Ho(acac)3 exhibited an accumulation of Ho(III) on their surfaces but were stable over time, as no expressive release of holmium(III) was detected in 9-day exposition to sodium phosphate buffer. Holmium acetylacetonate in both microspheres or inclusion complexes was very efficient in obtaining T2 and T2* weighted images in magnetic resonance, thus, might be used as contrast agents. CONCLUSION This is the first description of the use of inclusion complexes of holmium acetylacetonate in biodegradable polymers as contrast agents. New investigations are underway to evaluate the resistance of PHB-HV polymer microparticles to nuclear activation to assess their potential for use as radiopharmaceuticals for the treatment of liver cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vitor HS Melo
- Centro de Biotecnologia, IPEN/CNEN-SP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Caio HN Barros
- School of Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Instituto de Química, UNICAMP, SP, Campinas, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Damm R, Streitparth T, Hass P, Seidensticker M, Heinze C, Powerski M, Wendler JJ, Liehr UB, Mohnike K, Pech M, Ricke J. Prospective evaluation of CT-guided HDR brachytherapy as a local ablative treatment for renal masses: a single-arm pilot trial. Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 195:982-990. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01501-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
41
|
First report on extended distance between tumor lesion and adjacent organs at risk using interventionally applied balloon catheters: a simple procedure to optimize clinical target volume covering effective isodose in interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy of liver malignomas. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2019; 11:152-161. [PMID: 31139224 PMCID: PMC6536139 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2019.84798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Organs at risk (OARs), which are very close to a clinical target volume (CTV), can compromise effective tumor irradiation. The present study investigated the feasibility and safety of a novel approach, in particular, the extent of the dosimetric effect of distancing CTV from adjacent OARs by means of interventionally applied balloon catheters. Material and methods Patients with peripheral hepatic malignancies, in whom the critical proximity of an OAR to the CTV in the assessment by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and the preplanning process were included. Additionally, patients underwent placement of an interventional balloon catheter during computed tomography (CT)-guided application of interstitial brachytherapy (iBT) catheters inserted into the tissue between hepatic capsule and adjacent OAR. The virtual position of an OAR without balloon catheter was anticipated and contoured in addition to contouring of CTV and OAR. The calculated dose values for CTV as well as 1 cc of the relevant OAR (D1cc) with and without balloon were recorded. The D1cc of the realized irradiation plan was statistically compared to the D1cc of the virtually contoured OARs. Results In 31 cases, at least one balloon catheter was administered. The mean D1cc of the OAR in the group with balloon(s) was 12.6 Gy compared with 16 Gy in the virtual cohort without the device, therefore significantly lower (p < 0.001). Overall, there were no acute complications. Severe (> 2 CTCAEv4.03) late complications observed in 3/31 (9.6%) patients during follow-up period after brachytherapy were most certainly not due to the balloon application. Side effects were probably associated with pre-existing serious diseases and potentially additional local late effects of the irradiation in general rather than with the balloon catheters. Conclusions The distancing of the adjacent OARs allows a higher D100 value of CTV, therefore allowing for more efficient local control.
Collapse
|
42
|
Omari J, Heinze C, Wilck A, Hass P, Seidensticker M, Seidensticker R, Mohnike K, Ricke J, Pech M, Powerski M. Efficacy and safety of CT-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in primary and secondary malignancies of the pancreas. Eur J Radiol 2019; 112:22-27. [PMID: 30777214 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Revised: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate efficacy and safety of CT-guided iBT in patients with primary and secondary malignancies of the pancreas. MATERIAL AND METHODS 13 patients with 13 lesions of the pancreatic corpus and tail were included: 8 secondary malignancies (metastatic lesions = ML) and 5 primary malignancies, including 3 primary tumors (PT) and 2 isolated locoregional recurrences (ILR) after surgical resection were treated with image-guided iBT using a 192iridium source (single fraction irradiation). Every 3 months after treatment clinical and imaging follow-up were conducted to evaluate efficacy. Peri- and postinterventional complications were assessed descriptively. RESULTS The median diameter of the gross tumor volume (GTV) was 3 cm (range 1-6.5 cm), treated with a median D100 (minimal enclosing tumor dose) of 15.3 Gy (range 9.2-25.4 Gy). Local tumor control (LTC) was 92.3% within a median follow-up period of 6.7 months (range 3.2-55.7 months). Cumulative median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.2 months (range 2.8-25.7 months; PFS of primary and secondary malignancies was 5.8 and 6.2 months, respectively). Cumulative median over all survival (OS) after iBT was 16.2 months (range 3.3-55.7 months; OS of primary and secondary malignancies was 7.4 months and 45.6 months, respectively). 1 patient developed mild acute pancreatits post iBT, spontanously resolved within 1 week. No severe adverse events (grade 3+) were recorded. CONCLUSION Image-guided iBT is a safe and particularly effective treatment in patients with primary and secondary malignancies of the pancreas and might provide a well-tolerated additional therapeutic option in the multidisciplinary management of selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jazan Omari
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Constanze Heinze
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Antje Wilck
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Peter Hass
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Magdeburg, Germany.
| | | | | | - Konrad Mohnike
- Diagnostisch Therapeutische Zentrum (DTZ), Berlin, Germany.
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Munich, Germany.
| | - Maciej Pech
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Germany; 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland.
| | - Maciej Powerski
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Needle track seeding in hepatocellular carcinoma after local ablation by high-dose-rate brachytherapy: a retrospective study of 588 catheter placements. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:516-521. [PMID: 30662474 PMCID: PMC6335555 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.80626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Needle track seeding in the local treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not yet evaluated for catheter-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT), a novel local ablative technique. Material and methods We report a retrospective analysis of 100 patients treated on 233 HCC lesions by HDR-BT (using 588 catheters in total). No needle or catheter track irradiation was used. Minimum required follow-up with imaging was 6 months. In case of suspected needle track seeding (intra- and/or extrahepatic) in follow-up, image fusion of follow-up CT/MRI with 3D irradiation plan was used to verify the location of a new tumor deposit within the path of a brachytherapy catheter at the time of treatment. Results We identified 9 needle track metastases, corresponding to a catheter-based risk of 1.5% for any location of occurrence. A total of 7 metastases were located within the liver (catheter-based risk, 1.2%), and 2 metastases were located extrahepatic (catheter-based risk, 0.3%). Eight out of 9 needle track metastases were successfully treated by further HDR-BT. Conclusions The risk for needle track seeding after interstitial HDR-BT of HCC is comparable to previous reports of percutaneous biopsies and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), especially in case of extrahepatic needle track metastases. To compensate for the risk of seeding, a track irradiation technique similar to track ablation in RFA should be implemented in clinical routine.
Collapse
|
44
|
Radioablation by Image-Guided (HDR) Brachytherapy and Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase II Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 42:239-249. [DOI: 10.1007/s00270-018-2127-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
45
|
Biliary duct stenosis after image-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy of central and hilar liver tumors. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 195:265-273. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1404-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
46
|
Image-guided interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:439-445. [PMID: 30479621 PMCID: PMC6251452 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.79230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of computed tomography (CT)- and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR IBT = IBT) in patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Material and methods Eleven patients with 21 unresectable metastases of histologically proven esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were included in this retrospective study. Fourteen visceral and 7 lung metastases were treated with image-guided (CT or open MRI guidance) IBT using a 192Iridium source (single fraction irradiation). Clinical and imaging follow-up were performed every 3 months after treatment. Primary endpoint was local tumor control (LTC) and safety. Furthermore, we analyzed safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results The median diameter of the target lesions was 2.2 cm (range: 0.7-6.8 cm), treated with a median D100 of 20.1 Gy (range: 10-25 Gy). During a median follow-up of 6.3 months (range: 3-21.8 months), three patients displayed local recurrences, resulting in LTC of 85.7%. Median PFS was 3.4 months and median OS after IBT was 13.7 months. No severe adverse events (grade 3+) requiring hospitalization or invasive intervention were recorded. Conclusions Image-guided IBT is a safe and effective treatment in patients with metastasized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Collapse
|
47
|
Vogel A, Cervantes A, Chau I, Daniele B, Llovet JM, Meyer T, Nault JC, Neumann U, Ricke J, Sangro B, Schirmacher P, Verslype C, Zech CJ, Arnold D, Martinelli E. Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:iv238-iv255. [PMID: 30285213 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 620] [Impact Index Per Article: 103.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - A Cervantes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - I Chau
- Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey, UK
| | - B Daniele
- Direttore Dipartimento di Oncologia e U.O.C. Oncologia Medica A.O., Benevento, Italy
| | - J M Llovet
- Division of Liver Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, New York, USA
- Barcelona-Clínic Liver Cancer Group (BCLC), Unitat d'Hepatologia, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Meyer
- Oncology, Royal Free Hospital, London
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - J-C Nault
- Service d'hépatologie, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Bondy, France
| | - U Neumann
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Medizinische Fakultät der RWTH Aachen
| | - J Ricke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - B Sangro
- Liver Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra-IDISNA and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | - P Schirmacher
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Verslype
- Campus Gasthuisberg, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - C J Zech
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - D Arnold
- Department Oncology, Section Hematology and Palliative Care AK Altona, Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - E Martinelli
- Faculty of Medicine, Università della Campania L. Vanvitelli Naples, Caserta, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kieszko D, Cisek P, Kordzińska-Cisek I, Grzybowska-Szatkowska L. Treatment of hepatic metastases with computed tomography-guided interstitial brachytherapy. Oncol Lett 2018; 15:8717-8722. [PMID: 29928323 PMCID: PMC6004646 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 02/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of local treatment of liver metastases of various types of cancer using brachytherapy with computed tomography (CT) imaging. Retrospective analysis of 61 patients with unresectable hepatic metastases treated with CT-guided interstitial high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy of the liver between April 2014 and December 2016 was performed. Patients were treated with a single fractional dose of 15-25 Gy. Statistical analysis was performed on local relapse free survival (LRFS), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates across the group. In the 6 and 12-month follow-up periods, the 6- and 12-month LRFS rates were 88.7 and 70.7%, PFS rates were 78.1 and 53.8% and the OS rates were 96.7 and 79.6%, respectively. In the Cox regression analysis, the 100% isodose was a statistically significant predictor of LRFS (P=0.01) and PFS (P=0.02), but it was not significant in OS (P=0.07). The 90% isodose was a statistically significant predictor of LRFS (P=0,03) but not significant in PFS (P=0.17) or OS (P=0.25). In all patients, no serious complications were observed. Overall, 30% of patients experienced pain at the injection site, and 50% exhibited nausea or vomiting. In 2 patients, minor subcapsular bleeding occurred without clinical significance, and 1 patient was diagnosed with a pneumothorax that was not clinically significant. Brachytherapy HDR with CT imaging is an effective and safe method of local treatment of liver metastases. The effectiveness of the treatment is probably dose-dependent, and increases with increasing dosage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dariusz Kieszko
- Department of Brachytherapy, St. John's Cancer Center, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
| | - Paweł Cisek
- Department of Brachytherapy, St. John's Cancer Center, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
- Department of Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland
- Correspondence to: Dr Paweł Cisek, Department of Brachytherapy, St John's Cancer Center, 7 Jaczewskiego, 20-090 Lublin, Poland, E-mail:
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gottumukkala S, Tumati V, Hrycushko B, Folkert M. Endoluminal and Interstitial Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Malignancies: a Systematic Review. Curr Oncol Rep 2017; 19:2. [PMID: 28110462 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-017-0561-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy is an integral component in the multimodality management of many gastrointestinal (GI) cancers at all stages of clinical presentation. With recent advances in technology and radiation delivery, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) can be delivered with reduced toxicity. However, despite these advances, EBRT doses are still limited by the presence of radiosensitive serial structures near clinical targets in the GI tract. Relative to EBRT techniques, brachytherapy techniques have a lower integral dose and more rapid fall-off, allowing for high-dose delivery with little normal tissue exposure. Given the unique characteristics of brachytherapy, it is an attractive strategy to treat GI malignancies. This review addresses the application of both high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDRBT) to multiple GI malignancies for both definitive and palliative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujana Gottumukkala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Vasu Tumati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Brian Hrycushko
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Michael Folkert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Iridium-Knife: Another knife in radiation oncology. Brachytherapy 2017; 16:884-892. [PMID: 28392144 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2016] [Revised: 02/19/2017] [Accepted: 03/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intratarget dose escalation with superior conformity is a defining feature of three-dimensional (3D) iridium-192 (192Ir) high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT). In this study, we analyzed the dosimetric characteristics of interstitial 192Ir HDR BRT for intrathoracic and cerebral malignancies. We examined the dose gradient sharpness of HDR BRT compared with that of linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy, usually called X-Knife, to demonstrate that it may as well be called a Knife. METHODS AND MATERIALS Treatment plans for 10 patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme or intrathoracic malignancies, five of each entity, treated with X-Knife (stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma multiforme and stereotactic body radiation therapy for intrathoracic malignancies) were replanned for simulated HDR BRT. For 3D BRT planning, we used identical structure sets and dose prescription as for the X-Knife planning. The indices for qualitative treatment plan analysis encompassed planning target volume coverage, conformity, dose falloff gradient, and the maximum dose-volume limits to different organs at risk. RESULTS Volume coverage in HDR plans was comparable to that calculated for X-Knife plans with no statistically significant difference in terms of conformity. The dose falloff gradient-sharpness-of the HDR plans was considerably steeper compared with the X-Knife plans. CONCLUSIONS Both 3D 192Ir HDR BRT and X-Knife are effective means for intratarget dose escalation with HDR BRT achieving at least equal conformity and a steeper dose falloff at the target volume margin. In this sense, it can reasonably be argued that 3D 192Ir HDR BRT deserves also to be called a Knife, namely Iridium-Knife.
Collapse
|