1
|
Desideri I, Morelli I, Banini M, Greto D, Visani L, Nozzoli F, Caini S, Della Puppa A, Livi L, Perini Z, Zivelonghi E, Bulgarelli G, Pinzi V, Navarria P, Clerici E, Scorsetti M, Ascolese AM, Osti MF, Anselmo P, Amelio D, Minniti G, Scartoni D. Re-irradiation for recurrent intracranial meningiomas: Analysis of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110271. [PMID: 38588920 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Re-irradiation (re-RT) for recurrent intracranial meningiomas is hindered by the limited radiation tolerance of surrounding tissue and the risk of side effects. This study aimed at assessing outcomes, toxicities and prognostic factors in a cohort of patients with recurrent meningiomas re-treated with different RT modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multi-institutional database from 8 Italian centers including intracranial recurrent meningioma (RM) patients who underwent re-RT with different modalities (SRS, SRT, PT, EBRT) was collected. Biologically Equivalent Dose in 2 Gy-fractions (EQD2) and Biological Effective Dose (BED) for normal tissue and tumor were estimated for each RT course (α/β = 2 for brain tissue and α/β = 4 for meningioma). Primary outcome was second progression-free survival (s-PFS). Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicity. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used for analysis. RESULTS Between 2003 and 2021 181 patients (pts) were included. Median age at re-irradiation was 62 (range 20-89) and median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was 90 (range 60-100). 78 pts were identified with WHO grade 1 disease, 65 pts had grade 2 disease and 10 pts had grade 3 disease. 28 pts who had no histologic sampling were grouped with grade 1 patients for further analysis. Seventy-five (41.4 %) patients received SRS, 63 (34.8 %) patients SRT, 31 (17.1 %) PT and 12 (6.7 %) EBRT. With a median follow-up of 4.6 years (interquartile range 1.7-6.8), 3-year s-PFS was 51.6 % and 3-year OS 72.5 %. At univariate analysis, SRT (HR 0.32, 95 % CI 0.19-0.55, p < 0.001), longer interval between the two courses of irradiation (HR 0.37, 95 % CI 0.21-0.67, p = 0.001), and higher tumor BED (HR 0.45 95 % CI 0.27-0.76, p = 0.003) were associated with longer s-PFS; in contrast, Ki67 > 5 % (HR 2.81, 95 % CI 1.48-5.34, p = 0.002) and WHO grade > 2 (HR 3.08, 95 % CI 1.80-5.28, p < 0.001) were negatively correlated with s-PFS. At multivariate analysis, SRT, time to re-RT and tumor BED maintained their statistically significant prognostic impact on s-PFS (HR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.21-0.64, p < 0.001; HR 0.38, 95 % CI 0.20-0.72, p = 0.003 and HR 0.31 95 % CI 0.13-0.76, p = 0.01, respectively). Acute and late adverse events (AEs) were reported in 38 (20.9 %) and 29 (16 %) patients. Larger tumor GTV (≥10 cc) was significantly associated with acute and late toxicity (p < 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In patients with recurrent meningiomas, reirradiation is a feasible treatment option associated with acceptable toxicity profile. Prognostic factors in the decision-making process have been identified and should be incorporated in daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isacco Desideri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Ilaria Morelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| | - Marco Banini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniela Greto
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Visani
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Filippo Nozzoli
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Saverio Caini
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandro Della Puppa
- Neurosurgical Clinical Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Zeno Perini
- CyberKnife Unit, Ospedale S. Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Emanuele Zivelonghi
- Unit of Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy; Physic Department, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy
| | - Giorgia Bulgarelli
- Unit of Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy; Physic Department, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy
| | - Valentina Pinzi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta", Milan, Italy
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Ascolese
- Radiotherapy Department, St. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Falchetto Osti
- Radiotherapy Department, St. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Anselmo
- Radiotherapy Oncology Centre, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Dante Amelio
- Proton Therapy Center, 'S. Chiara' Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Scartoni
- Proton Therapy Center, 'S. Chiara' Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Pietro R, Zaccaro L, Marampon F, Tini P, De Felice F, Minniti G. The evolving role of reirradiation in the management of recurrent brain tumors. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:271-286. [PMID: 37624529 PMCID: PMC10522742 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04407-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Despite aggressive management consisting of surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and systemic therapy given alone or in combination, a significant proportion of patients with brain tumors will experience tumor recurrence. For these patients, no standard of care exists and management of either primary or metastatic recurrent tumors remains challenging.Advances in imaging and RT technology have enabled more precise tumor localization and dose delivery, leading to a reduction in the volume of health brain tissue exposed to high radiation doses. Radiation techniques have evolved from three-dimensional (3-D) conformal RT to the development of sophisticated techniques, including intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), and stereotactic techniques, either stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Several studies have suggested that a second course of RT is a feasible treatment option in patients with a recurrent tumor; however, survival benefit and treatment related toxicity of reirradiation, given alone or in combination with other focal or systemic therapies, remain a controversial issue.We provide a critical overview of the current clinical status and technical challenges of reirradiation in patients with both recurrent primary brain tumors, such as gliomas, ependymomas, medulloblastomas, and meningiomas, and brain metastases. Relevant clinical questions such as the appropriate radiation technique and patient selection, the optimal radiation dose and fractionation, tolerance of the brain to a second course of RT, and the risk of adverse radiation effects have been critically discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaella De Pietro
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucy Zaccaro
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Marampon
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Tini
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Isernia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zaghloul MS, Hunter A, Mostafa AG, Parkes J. Re-irradiation for recurrent/progressive pediatric brain tumors: from radiobiology to clinical outcomes. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:709-717. [PMID: 37194207 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2215439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors in children. Neurosurgical excision, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy represent the standard of care in most histopathological types of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Even though the successful cure rate is reasonable, some patients may develop recurrence locally or within the neuroaxis. AREA COVERED The management of these recurrences is not easy; however, significant advances in neurosurgery, radiation techniques, radiobiology, and the introduction of newer biological therapies, have improved the results of their salvage treatment. In many cases, salvage re-irradiation is feasible and has achieved encouraging results. The results of re-irradiation depend upon several factors. These factors include tumor type, extent of the second surgery, tumor volume, location of the recurrence, time that elapses between the initial treatment, the combination with other treatment agents, relapse, and the initial response to radiotherapy. EXPERT OPINION Reviewing the radiobiological basis and clinical outcome of pediatric brain re-irradiation revealed that re-irradiation is safe, feasible, and indicated for recurrent/progressive different tumor types such as; ependymoma, medulloblastoma, diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) and glioblastoma. It is now considered part of the treatment armamentarium for these patients. The challenges and clinical results in treating recurrent pediatric brain tumors were highly documented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed S Zaghloul
- Radiation Oncology department. National Cancer Institute, Cairo University & Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Alistair Hunter
- Division of Radiobiology, Radiation Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Ayatullah G Mostafa
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Egypt and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Cairo University, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jeannette Parkes
- Radiation Oncology Department, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Murray LJ, Appelt AL, Ajithkumar T, Bedford JL, Burnet NG, Lalondrelle S, Manolopoulos S, O'Cathail SM, Robinson M, Short SC, Slevin F, Thomson DJ. Re-irradiation: From Cell Lines to Patients, Filling the (Science) Gap in the Market. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:318-322. [PMID: 36842937 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- L J Murray
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
| | - A L Appelt
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - T Ajithkumar
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - J L Bedford
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N G Burnet
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S Lalondrelle
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| | - S Manolopoulos
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle, UK
| | - S M O'Cathail
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - M Robinson
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - S C Short
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - F Slevin
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - D J Thomson
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Andratschke N, Willmann J, Appelt AL, Alyamani N, Balermpas P, Baumert BG, Hurkmans C, Høyer M, Langendijk JA, Kaidar-Person O, van der Linden Y, Meattini I, Niyazi M, Reynaert N, De Ruysscher D, Tanadini-Lang S, Hoskin P, Poortmans P, Nieder C. European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus on re-irradiation: definition, reporting, and clinical decision making. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:e469-e478. [PMID: 36174633 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00447-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Re-irradiation can be considered for local recurrence or new tumours adjacent to a previously irradiated site to achieve durable local control for patients with cancer who have otherwise few therapeutic options. With the use of new radiotherapy techniques, which allow for conformal treatment plans, image guidance, and short fractionation schemes, the use of re-irradiation for different sites is increasing in clinical settings. Yet, prospective evidence on re-irradiation is scarce and our understanding of the underlying radiobiology is poor. Our consensus on re-irradiation aims to assist in re-irradiation decision making, and to standardise the classification of different forms of re-irradiation and reporting. The consensus has been endorsed by the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. The use of this classification in daily clinical practice and research will facilitate accurate understanding of the clinical implications of re-irradiation and allow for cross-study comparisons. Data gathered in a uniform manner could be used in the future to make recommendations for re-irradiation on the basis of clinical evidence. The consensus document is based on an adapted Delphi process and a systematic review of the literature was done according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Jonas Willmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ane L Appelt
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Najlaa Alyamani
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Brigitta G Baumert
- Institute of Radiation-Oncology, Cantonal Hospital of Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Coen Hurkmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Morten Høyer
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Yvette van der Linden
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands; Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Icro Meattini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences M Serio, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Nick Reynaert
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Laboratory of Medical Radiophysics, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre and Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Carsten Nieder
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chargari C, Escande A, Dupuis P, Thariat J. Reirradiation: A complex situation. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:911-915. [PMID: 35987812 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
Reirradiation of a tumor recurrence or second cancer in a previously irradiated area is challenging due to lack of high-quality physical, radiobiological, clinical data and inherent substantial risks of toxicity with cumulative dose and uncertain tissue recovery. Yet, major advances have been made in radiotherapy techniques, that have the potential to achieve cure while limiting severe toxicity rates, but still much research is necessary to better appraise the therapeutic index in such a complex situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Chargari
- Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
| | - A Escande
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, 59000 Lille, France; Faculté de médecine Henri-Warembourg, université de Lille, 59000 Lille, France; UMR 9189, Centre de recherche en informatique, signal et automatique de Lille (Cristal), 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France
| | - P Dupuis
- Léon Bérard Cancer Center, University of Lyon, 69373 Lyon, France
| | - J Thariat
- Francois Baclesse Cancer center. Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire/IN2P3-CNRS UMR 6534-ARCHADE, Unicaen-Université de Normandie, 14000 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Medin P, Hrycushko B, van der Kogel AJ. In Reply to Goyal and Madan. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:232-233. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
8
|
Hrycushko B, van der Kogel AJ, Phillips L, Chhabra A, Folkert MR, Sayre JW, Vernino S, Hassan-Rezaeian N, Yamada Y, Timmerman R, Medin PM. Brachial Plexus Tolerance to Single-Session SAbR in a Pig Model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:565-571. [PMID: 34597718 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The single-session dose tolerance of the spinal nerves has been observed to be similar to that of the spinal cord in pigs, counter to the perception that peripheral nerves are more tolerant to radiation. This pilot study aims to obtain a first impression of the single-session dose-response of the brachial plexus using pigs as a model. METHODS AND MATERIALS Ten Yucatan minipigs underwent computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for treatment planning, followed by single-session stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. A 2.5-cm length of the left-sided brachial plexus cords was irradiated. Pigs were distributed in 3 groups with prescription doses of 16 (n = 3), 19 (n = 4), and 22 Gy (n = 3). Neurologic status was assessed by observation for changes in gait and electrodiagnostic examination. Histopathologic examination was performed with light microscopy of paraffin-embedded sections stained with Luxol fast blue/periodic acid-Schiff and Masson's trichrome. RESULTS Seven of the 10 pigs developed motor deficit to the front limb of the irradiated side, with a latency from 5 to 8 weeks after irradiation. Probit analysis of the maximum nerve dose yields an estimated ED50 of 19.3 Gy for neurologic deficit, but the number of animals was insufficient to estimate 95% confidence intervals. No motor deficits were observed at a maximum dose of 17.6 Gy for any pig. Nerve conduction studies showed an absence of sensory response in all responders and absent or low motor response in most of the responders (71%). All symptomatic pigs showed histologic lesions to the left-sided plexus consistent with radiation-induced neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS The single-session ED50 for symptomatic plexopathy in Yucatan minipigs after irradiation of a 2.5-cm length of the brachial plexus cords was determined to be 19.3 Gy. The dose-response curve overlaps that of the spinal nerves and the spinal cord in the same animal model. The relationship between the brachial plexus tolerance in pigs and humans is unknown, and caution is warranted when extrapolating for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Hrycushko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Albert J van der Kogel
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Lauren Phillips
- Department of Neurology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Avneesh Chhabra
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Michael R Folkert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - James W Sayre
- Departments of Biostatistics; Radiology, University of California Los Angeles, California
| | - Steven Vernino
- Department of Neurology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Nima Hassan-Rezaeian
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Paul M Medin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
New clinical data on human spinal cord re-irradiation tolerance. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:463-473. [PMID: 33950265 PMCID: PMC8154818 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01772-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To provide additional clinical data about the re-irradiation tolerance of the spinal cord. Methods This was a retrospective bi-institutional study of patients re-irradiated to the cervical or thoracic spinal cord with minimum follow-up of 6 months. The maximum dose (Dmax) and dose to 0.1cc (D0.1cc) were determined (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]-defined cord) and expressed as equivalent dose in 2‑Gy fractions (EQD2) with an α/β value of 2 Gy. Results All 32 patients remained free from radiation myelopathy after a median follow-up of 12 months. Re-irradiation was performed after 6–97 months (median 15). In 22 cases (69%) the re-irradiation spinal cord EQD2 Dmax was higher than that of the first treatment course. Forty-eight of 64 treatment courses employed fraction sizes of 2.5 to 4 Gy to the target volume. The median cumulative spinal cord EQD2 Dmax was 80.7 Gy, minimum 61.12 Gy, maximum 114.79 Gy. The median cumulative spinal cord D0.1cc EQD2 was 76.1 Gy, minimum 61.12 Gy, maximum 95.62 Gy. Besides cumulative dose, other risk factors for myelopathy were present (single-course Dmax EQD2 ≥51 Gy in 9 patients, single-course D0.1cc EQD2 ≥51 Gy in 5 patients). Conclusion Even patients treated to higher cumulative doses than previously recommended, or at a considerable risk of myelopathy according to a published risk score, remained free from this complication, although one must acknowledge the potential for manifestation of damage in patients currently alive, i.e., still at risk. Individualized decisions to re-irradiate after appropriate informed consent are an acceptable strategy, including scenarios where low re-irradiation doses to the spinal cord would compromise target coverage and tumor control probability to an unacceptable degree.
Collapse
|
10
|
Mahadevan A, Emami B, Grimm J, Kleinberg LR, Redmond KJ, Welsh JS, Rostock R, Kemmerer E, Forster KM, Stanford J, Shah S, Asbell SO, LaCouture TA, Scofield C, Butterwick I, Xue J, Muacevic A, Adler JR. Potential Clinical Significance of Overall Targeting Accuracy and Motion Management in the Treatment of Tumors That Move With Respiration: Lessons Learnt From a Quarter Century of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy From Dose Response Models. Front Oncol 2021; 10:591430. [PMID: 33634020 PMCID: PMC7900559 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.591430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the long-term normal tissue complication probability with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatments for targets that move with respiration and its relation with the type of respiratory motion management (tracking vs. compression or gating). METHODS A PubMed search was performed for identifying literature regarding dose, volume, fractionation, and toxicity (grade 3 or higher) for SBRT treatments for tumors which move with respiration. From the identified papers logistic or probit dose-response models were fitted to the data using the maximum-likelihood technique and confidence intervals were based on the profile-likelihood method in the dose-volume histogram (DVH) Evaluator. RESULTS Pooled logistic and probit models for grade 3 or higher toxicity for aorta, chest wall, duodenum, and small bowel suggest a significant difference when live motion tracking was used for targeting tumors with move with respiration which was on the average 10 times lower, in the high dose range. CONCLUSION Live respiratory motion management appears to have a better toxicity outcome when treating targets which move with respiration with very steep peripheral dose gradients. This analysis is however limited by sparsity of rigorous data due to poor reporting in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand Mahadevan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Bahman Emami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Jimm Grimm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Lawrence R. Kleinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kristin J. Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - James S. Welsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Robert Rostock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Eric Kemmerer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Kenneth M. Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Jason Stanford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Sunjay Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, United States
| | - Sucha O. Asbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Tamara A. LaCouture
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Carla Scofield
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Ian Butterwick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Jinyu Xue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University, New York City, NY, United States
| | | | - John R. Adler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kotecha R, Dea N, Detsky JS, Sahgal A. Management of recurrent or progressive spinal metastases: reirradiation techniques and surgical principles. Neurooncol Pract 2020; 7:i45-i53. [PMID: 33299573 PMCID: PMC7705530 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npaa045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
With the growing incidence of new cases and the increasing prevalence of patients living longer with spine metastasis, a methodological approach to the management of patients with recurrent or progressive disease is increasing in relevance and importance in clinical practice. As a result, disease management has evolved in these patients using advanced surgical and radiotherapy technologies. Five key goals in the management of patients with spine metastases include providing pain relief, controlling metastatic disease at the treated site, improving neurologic deficits, maintaining or improving functional status, and minimizing further mechanical instability. The focus of this review is on advanced reirradiation techniques, given that the majority of patients will be treated with upfront conventional radiotherapy and further treatment on progression is often limited by the cumulative tolerance of nearby organs at risk. This review will also discuss novel surgical approaches such as separation surgery, minimally invasive percutaneous instrumentation, and laser interstitial thermal therapy, which is increasingly being coupled with spine reirradiation to maximize outcomes in this patient population. Lastly, given the complexities of managing recurrent spinal disease, this review emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary care from neurosurgery, radiation oncology, medical oncology, neuro-oncology, rehabilitation medicine, and palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, US
| | - Nicolas Dea
- Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jay S Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lentiviral Vector Induced Modeling of High-Grade Spinal Cord Glioma in Minipigs. Sci Rep 2020; 10:5291. [PMID: 32210315 PMCID: PMC7093438 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62167-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies have applied driver mutations targeting the RTK/RAS/PI3K and p53 pathways to induce the formation of high-grade gliomas in rodent models. In the present study, we report the production of a high-grade spinal cord glioma model in pigs using lentiviral gene transfer. METHODS Six Gottingen Minipigs received thoracolumbar (T14-L1) lateral white matter injections of a combination of lentiviral vectors, expressing platelet-derived growth factor beta (PDGF-B), constitutive HRAS, and shRNA-p53 respectively. All animals received injection of control vectors into the contralateral cord. Animals underwent baseline and endpoint magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and were evaluated daily for clinical deficits. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical analysis was conducted. Data are presented using descriptive statistics including relative frequencies, mean, standard deviation, and range. RESULTS 100% of animals (n = 6/6) developed clinical motor deficits ipsilateral to the oncogenic lentiviral injections by a three-week endpoint. MRI scans at endpoint demonstrated contrast enhancing mass lesions at the site of oncogenic lentiviral injection and not at the site of control injections. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated positive staining for GFAP, Olig2, and a high Ki-67 proliferative index. Histopathologic features demonstrate consistent and reproducible growth of a high-grade glioma in all animals. CONCLUSIONS Lentiviral gene transfer represents a feasible pathway to glioma modeling in higher order species. The present model is the first lentiviral vector induced pig model of high-grade spinal cord glioma and may potentially be used in preclinical therapeutic development programs.
Collapse
|
13
|
Evolution of the Supermodel: Progress in Modelling Radiotherapy Response in Mice. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:272-282. [PMID: 30871751 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Revised: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Mouse models are essential tools in cancer research that have been used to understand the genetic basis of tumorigenesis, cancer progression and to test the efficacies of anticancer treatments including radiotherapy. They have played a critical role in our understanding of radiotherapy response in tumours and normal tissues and continue to evolve to better recapitulate the underlying biology of humans. In addition, recent developments in small animal irradiators have significantly improved in vivo irradiation techniques, allowing previously unimaginable experimental approaches to be explored in the laboratory. The combination of contemporary mouse models with small animal irradiators represents a major step forward for the radiobiology field in being able to much more accurately replicate clinical exposure scenarios. As radiobiology studies become ever more sophisticated in reflecting developments in the clinic, it is increasingly important to understand the basis and potential limitations of extrapolating data from mice to humans. This review provides an overview of mouse models and small animal radiotherapy platforms currently being used as advanced radiobiological research tools towards improving the translational power of preclinical studies.
Collapse
|
14
|
Laufer I, Bilsky MH. Advances in the treatment of metastatic spine tumors: the future is not what it used to be. J Neurosurg Spine 2019; 30:299-307. [PMID: 30835704 DOI: 10.3171/2018.11.spine18709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
An improved understanding of tumor biology, the ability to target tumor drivers, and the ability to harness the immune system have dramatically improved the expected survival of patients diagnosed with cancer. However, many patients continue to develop spine metastases that require local treatment with radiotherapy and surgery. Fortunately, the evolution of radiation delivery and operative techniques permits durable tumor control with a decreased risk of treatment-related toxicity and a greater emphasis on restoration of quality of life and daily function. Stereotactic body radiotherapy allows delivery of ablative radiation doses to the majority of spine tumors, reducing the need for surgery. Among patients who still require surgery for decompression of the spinal cord or spinal column stabilization, minimal access approaches and targeted tumor excision and ablation techniques minimize the surgical risk and facilitate postoperative recovery. Growing interdisciplinary collaboration among scientists and clinicians will further elucidate the synergistic possibilities among systemic, radiation, and surgical interventions for patients with spinal tumors and will bring many closer to curative therapies.
Collapse
|
15
|
Nieder C. Second re-irradiation: A delicate balance between safety and efficacy. Phys Med 2019; 58:155-158. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Revised: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
|
16
|
Clinical safety and efficacy of salvage reirradiation for upper abdominal malignancies. Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 195:526-533. [PMID: 30689025 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-01420-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/22/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Reirradiation has the potential to provide effective local control of upper abdominal malignancies. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of reirradiation for upper abdominal malignancies. METHODS A total of 42 patients with a history of prior radiotherapy (RT) received reirradiation for abdominal malignancies between 2005 and 2017. Each patient's medical records, contours, and dose distribution for both RT courses were reviewed. The median dose of the prior RT was 50.0 Gy (range, 30.0-60.0 Gy) and the median dose of reirradiation was 45.0 Gy (range, 15.0-75.0 Gy). RESULTS With a median follow-up of 10.9 months, the median infield-failure-free survival (IFFS) rate was 9.2 months. Gross tumor volume (GTV) significantly related to IFFS in both the univariate (p = 0.009) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.024), and patients with a GTV of <60.0 mL had an improved IFFS (p = 0.001). Four patients experienced ≥grade 3 late toxicities. In the retrospective dose reconstruction analysis in these patients, the cumulative dose to the most exposed 2 cc (D2cc) of the duodenum was >60.0 Gy (range, 60.1-73.7 Gy). In the univariate analysis, the D2cc of the duodenum and a preexisting duodenal ulcer identified using endoscopy prior to reirradiation significantly correlated with late severe toxicity (p = 0.021 and 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Reirradiation for upper abdominal malignancies could be safely performed for patients without preexisting gastrointestinal morbidity unless the duodenum received excessive radiation doses. Reirradiation could also provide substantial IFFS, especially for patients with a GTV of <60.0 mL.
Collapse
|
17
|
Woolley TE, Belmonte-Beitia J, Calvo GF, Hopewell JW, Gaffney EA, Jones B. Changes in the retreatment radiation tolerance of the spinal cord with time after the initial treatment. Int J Radiat Biol 2018; 94:515-531. [PMID: 29620431 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1430911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate, from experimental data, the retreatment radiation 'tolerances' of the spinal cord at different times after initial treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS A model was developed to show the relationship between the biological effective doses (BEDs) for two separate courses of treatment with the BED of each course being expressed as a percentage of the designated 'retreatment tolerance' BED value, denoted [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. The primate data of Ang et al. ( 2001 ) were used to determine the fitted parameters. However, based on rodent data, recovery was assumed to commence 70 days after the first course was complete, and with a non-linear relationship to the magnitude of the initial BED (BEDinit). RESULTS The model, taking into account the above processes, provides estimates of the retreatment tolerance dose after different times. Extrapolations from the experimental data can provide conservative estimates for the clinic, with a lower acceptable myelopathy incidence. Care must be taken to convert the predicted [Formula: see text] value into a formal BED value and then a practical dose fractionation schedule. CONCLUSIONS Used with caution, the proposed model allows estimations of retreatment doses with elapsed times ranging from 70 days up to three years after the initial course of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas E Woolley
- a Cardiff School of Mathematics , Cardiff University , Cardiff , UK
| | - Juan Belmonte-Beitia
- b Department of Mathematics , University of Castilla-La Mancha , Ciudad Real , Spain
| | - Gabriel F Calvo
- b Department of Mathematics , University of Castilla-La Mancha , Ciudad Real , Spain
| | - John W Hopewell
- c Green Templeton College , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK
| | - Eamonn A Gaffney
- d Wolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford , Oxford , UK
| | - Bleddyn Jones
- e Gray Laboratory , CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford , Oxford , UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cao X, Fang L, Cui CY, Gao S, Wang TW. DTI and pathological changes in a rabbit model of radiation injury to the spinal cord after 125I radioactive seed implantation. Neural Regen Res 2018; 13:528-535. [PMID: 29623940 PMCID: PMC5900518 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.228758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Excessive radiation exposure may lead to edema of the spinal cord and deterioration of the nervous system. Magnetic resonance imaging can be used to judge and assess the extent of edema and to evaluate pathological changes and thus may be used for the evaluation of spinal cord injuries caused by radiation therapy. Radioactive 125I seeds to irradiate 90% of the spinal cord tissue at doses of 40–100 Gy (D90) were implanted in rabbits at T10 to induce radiation injury, and we evaluated their safety for use in the spinal cord. Diffusion tensor imaging showed that with increased D90, the apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy values were increased. Moreover, pathological damage of neurons and microvessels in the gray matter and white matter was aggravated. At 2 months after implantation, obvious pathological injury was visible in the spinal cords of each group. Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging revealed the radiation injury to the spinal cord, and we quantified the degree of spinal cord injury through apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Cao
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Le Fang
- First Department of Neurology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Chuan-Yu Cui
- Department of MRI, Fourth Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Shi Gao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Tian-Wei Wang
- Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kirsch DG, Diehn M, Kesarwala AH, Maity A, Morgan MA, Schwarz JK, Bristow R, Demaria S, Eke I, Griffin RJ, Haas-Kogan D, Higgins GS, Kimmelman AC, Kimple RJ, Lombaert IM, Ma L, Marples B, Pajonk F, Park CC, Schaue D, Tran PT, Willers H, Wouters BG, Bernhard EJ. The Future of Radiobiology. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018; 110:329-340. [PMID: 29126306 PMCID: PMC5928778 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2017] [Revised: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 10/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Innovation and progress in radiation oncology depend on discovery and insights realized through research in radiation biology. Radiobiology research has led to fundamental scientific insights, from the discovery of stem/progenitor cells to the definition of signal transduction pathways activated by ionizing radiation that are now recognized as integral to the DNA damage response (DDR). Radiobiological discoveries are guiding clinical trials that test radiation therapy combined with inhibitors of the DDR kinases DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ataxia telangiectasia related (ATR), and immune or cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors. To maintain scientific and clinical relevance, the field of radiation biology must overcome challenges in research workforce, training, and funding. The National Cancer Institute convened a workshop to discuss the role of radiobiology research and radiation biologists in the future scientific enterprise. Here, we review the discussions of current radiation oncology research approaches and areas of scientific focus considered important for rapid progress in radiation sciences and the continued contribution of radiobiology to radiation oncology and the broader biomedical research community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David G Kirsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Max Diehn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, and Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | | | - Amit Maity
- Department of Radiation Oncology Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Meredith A Morgan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Julie K Schwarz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Robert Bristow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Iris Eke
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Robert J Griffin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Daphne Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Geoff S Higgins
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Alec C Kimmelman
- Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Randall J Kimple
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Isabelle M Lombaert
- Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, Biointerfaces Institute, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Li Ma
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brian Marples
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Frank Pajonk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Catherine C Park
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Dörthe Schaue
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Phuoc T. Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Oncology and Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Henning Willers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Brad G. Wouters
- Department of Radiation Oncology (RB), Princess Margaret Cancer Center
| | - Eric J Bernhard
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dörr W, Gabryś D. The Principles and Practice of Re-irradiation in Clinical Oncology: An Overview. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:67-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2017] [Revised: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
21
|
Repeat reirradiation of the spinal cord: multi-national expert treatment recommendations. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 194:365-374. [PMID: 29362835 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1266-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 01/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved survival of patients with spinal bone metastases has resulted in an increased number of referrals for retreatment and repeat reirradiation. METHODS A consortium of expert radiation oncologists (RO) has been established with the aim of providing treatment recommendations for challenging clinical scenarios for which there are no established guidelines. In this case, a patient developed local progression of a T5 vertebral lesion after two prior courses of palliative radiotherapy (time interval >12 months, assumed cumulative biologically equivalent dose in 2‑Gy fractions [EQD2] for spinal cord [alpha/beta 2 Gy] 75 Gy). Expert recommendations were tabulated with the aim of providing guidance. RESULTS Five of seven RO would offer a third course of radiotherapy, preferably with advanced techniques such as stereotactic radiotherapy. However, the dose-fractionation concepts were heterogeneous (3-20 fractions) and sometimes adjusted to different options for systemic treatment. All five RO would compromise target volume coverage to reduce the dose to the spinal cord. Definition of the spinal cord planning-organ-at-risk volume was heterogeneous. All five RO limited the EQD2 for spinal cord. Two were willing to accept more than 12.5 Gy and the highest EQD2 was 19 Gy. CONCLUSIONS The increasing body of literature about bone metastases and spinal cord reirradiation has encouraged some expert RO to offer palliative reirradiation with cumulative cord doses above 75 Gy EQD2; however, no consensus was achieved. Strategies for harmonization of clinical practice and development of evidence-based dose constraints are discussed.
Collapse
|
22
|
Emphasis on Repair, Not Just Avoidance of Injury, Facilitates Prudent Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2017; 27:378-392. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2017.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
23
|
Chargari C, Maroun P, Louvel G, Drouet M, Riccobono D, François S, Dhermain F, Cosset JM, Deutsch É. [Repair and time-dose factor: The example of spinal cord irradiation]. Cancer Radiother 2017; 21:547-553. [PMID: 28888745 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.07.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Accepted: 07/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The question whether a reirradiation is possible, with either curative of palliative intent, is a frequent issue and a true therapeutic challenge, in particular for a critical organ sensitive to cumulative dose, such as the spinal cord. Preclinical experimental data, based on debatable models that are hardly transferable to patients, suggest that there is a possibility of reirradiation, beyond the classical threshold for dose constraints, taking into account the "time-dose factor". Although the underlying biological mechanisms are however uncertain, scarce clinical data seem to confirm that the tolerance of spinal cord to reirradiation does exist, provided that a particular attention to total dose is given. In the context where modern stereotactic irradiation facilities expand therapeutic perspectives, we review the literature on possibilities of reirradiation, through the example of spinal cord reirradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Chargari
- Département de radiothérapie, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France; Radiothérapie moléculaire UMR 1030, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France; Effets biologiques des rayonnements, Institut de recherche biomédicale des armées, D19, 91220 Brétigny-sur-Orge, France; École du Val-de-Grâce, place Alphonse-Laveran, 75005 Paris, France.
| | - P Maroun
- Département de radiothérapie, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - G Louvel
- Département de radiothérapie, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - M Drouet
- Effets biologiques des rayonnements, Institut de recherche biomédicale des armées, D19, 91220 Brétigny-sur-Orge, France
| | - D Riccobono
- Effets biologiques des rayonnements, Institut de recherche biomédicale des armées, D19, 91220 Brétigny-sur-Orge, France
| | - S François
- Effets biologiques des rayonnements, Institut de recherche biomédicale des armées, D19, 91220 Brétigny-sur-Orge, France
| | - F Dhermain
- Département de radiothérapie, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - J-M Cosset
- Centre Charlebourg-La Défense, groupe Amethyst, 65, avenue Foch, 92250 La Garenne-Colombes, France
| | - É Deutsch
- Département de radiothérapie, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France; Radiothérapie moléculaire UMR 1030, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zhou X, Liao X, Ren X, Xiang K, Hu Q, Zhang M, He H, Shen L, Wei Q. Dynamic MRI follow-up of radiation encephalopathy in the temporal lobe following nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy. Oncol Lett 2017; 14:715-724. [PMID: 28693225 PMCID: PMC5494759 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2015] [Accepted: 03/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The natural course of radiation encephalopathy following nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) radiotherapy remains poorly understood. The present study aimed to investigate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics and evolution of radiation encephalopathy. A series of 162 follow-up MRI examinations from 68 NPC patients with radiation encephalopathy in the temporal lobes were analyzed retrospectively. Each component of radiation encephalopathy was defined as follows: i) contrast enhanced lesions were enhanced lesions on contrast enhanced T1-weighted images (T1WI); ii) white matter lesions were lesions of homogeneous hyperintensity on T2-weighted images (T2WI) and hypointensity on T1WI; iii) cysts were round or oval well-defined lesions of hyperintensity on T2WI; iv) hemosiderin deposition were nodular or annular hypointense lesions with lower hypointense than normal white matter on both T1WI and T2WI; v) gray matter lesions were defined as disruption or erosion of hyperintensity in the cortex on T2WI. Contrast enhanced lesions, white matter lesions, gray matter lesions, cysts and hemosiderin deposition were detected in 105 (100.0%), 98 (93.3%), 94 (89.5%), 2 (1.7%) and 2 (1.7%) cases of the 105 initial diagnosed temporal lobe lesions. Contrast enhanced lesions were the most commonly observed, followed by white matter lesions, gray matter lesions, temporal lobe atrophy, cysts and hemosiderin deposition. In addition, 12 new lesions were identified during the follow-up, 4 of which presented as solid enhanced nodular lesions. Importantly, in 11 of the 117 (9.4%) affected temporal lobes, solid enhanced nodular lesions were observed to be the only initial abnormalities to occur. For those enhanced nodular lesions measuring <0.8 cm, no necrosis could be detected. On the contrary, all the contrast enhanced lesions measuring >2.0 cm exhibited a necrotic core. To the best of our knowledge, the present study revealed for the first time solid enhanced nodular lesions as the earliest MRI abnormalities of radiation encephalopathy following NPC radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofeng Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, National Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China
| | - Xiaofang Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Quzhou Central Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang 324000, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoqiu Ren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, National Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China
| | - Kewei Xiang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China
| | - Qiongge Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, National Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China
| | - Minming Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China
| | - Huijuan He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Quzhou Central Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang 324000, P.R. China
| | - Li Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, National Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China
| | - Qichun Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, National Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
CT-Guided 125I Seed Interstitial Brachytherapy as a Salvage Treatment for Recurrent Spinal Metastases after External Beam Radiotherapy. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2016; 2016:8265907. [PMID: 28105434 PMCID: PMC5220449 DOI: 10.1155/2016/8265907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2016] [Revised: 10/30/2016] [Accepted: 11/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical efficacy of CT-guided 125I seed interstitial brachytherapy in patients with recurrent spinal metastases after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Between August 2003 and September 2015, 26 spinal metastatic lesions (24 patients) were reirradiated by this salvage therapy modality. Treatment for all patients was preplanned using a three-dimensional treatment planning system 3-5 days before 125I seed interstitial brachytherapy; dosimetry verification was performed immediately after seed implantation. Median actual D90 was 99 Gy (range, 90-176), and spinal cord median Dmax was 39 Gy (range, 6-110). Median local control (LC) was 12 months (95% CI: 7.0-17.0). The 6- and 12-month LC rates were 52% and 40%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95% CI: 7.7-14.3); 6-month and 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 65%, 37%, 14%, and 9%, respectively. Pain-free survival ranged from 2 to 42 months (median, 6; 95% CI: 4.6-7.4). Treatment was well-tolerated, with no radiation-induced vertebral compression fractures or myelopathy reported. Reirradiation with CT-guided 125I seed interstitial brachytherapy appears to be feasible, safe, and effective as pain relief or salvage treatment for patients with recurrent spinal metastases after EBRT.
Collapse
|
26
|
Demyelination Occurred as the Secondary Damage Following Diffuse Axonal Loss in a Rat Model of Radiation Myelopathy. Neurochem Res 2016; 42:953-962. [DOI: 10.1007/s11064-016-2128-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2016] [Revised: 11/21/2016] [Accepted: 11/26/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
27
|
Strom T, Wishka C, Caudell JJ. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Recurrent Unresectable Head and Neck Cancers. Cancer Control 2016; 23:6-11. [DOI: 10.1177/107327481602300103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment of locoregional, recurrent head and neck cancers following definitive radiotherapy has evolved during the past 30 years. Brachytherapy as well as protracted courses of systemic therapy and chemoradiotherapy result in 12-month survival rates of 40% to 50% but have high rates of severe toxicity. Given the advancements in radiotherapy targeting and delivery, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been investigated as an alternative treatment option with the potential advantages of reduced treatment time and rates of toxicity. Methods The authors reviewed prospective trials and retrospective reports from the past decade addressing the management of locoregional, recurrent, previously radiated head and neck cancers, focusing on SBRT. Results The body of evidence is growing in support of reirradiation using SBRT for the treatment of recurrent head and neck cancers. The 1-year survival rates associated with SBRT are promising and similar to those seen with chemotherapy alone and concurrent, conventionally fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Treatment-related adverse events of reirradiation using SBRT are also similar to other palliative therapies. Late carotid rupture is a relatively rare but concerning late toxicity associated with reirradiation using SBRT. Conclusions SBRT is a promising treatment for locoregional recurrent head and neck cancers. It also offers a logistical advantage over other palliative treatments, as it only requires 1 to 2 weeks of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobin Strom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Christian Wishka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jimmy J. Caudell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pathobiology of radiation myelopathy and strategies to mitigate injury. Spinal Cord 2015; 53:574-80. [DOI: 10.1038/sc.2015.43] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2014] [Revised: 01/09/2015] [Accepted: 02/04/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
29
|
LeRoux LG, Bredow S, Grosshans D, Schellingerhout D. Molecular imaging detects impairment in the retrograde axonal transport mechanism after radiation-induced spinal cord injury. Mol Imaging Biol 2015; 16:504-10. [PMID: 24395625 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-013-0713-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study was to determine whether molecular imaging of retrograde axonal transport is a suitable technique to detect changes in the spinal cord in response to radiation injury. PROCEDURES The lower thoracic spinal cords of adult female BALB/c mice were irradiated with single doses of 2, 10, or 80 Gy. An optical imaging method was used to observe the migration of the fluorescently labeled nontoxic C-fragment of tetanus toxin (TTc) from an injection site in the calf muscles to the spinal cord. Changes in migration patterns compared with baseline and controls allowed assessment of radiation-induced alterations in the retrograde neuronal axonal transport mechanism. Subsequently, tissues were harvested and histological examination of the spinal cords performed. RESULTS Transport of TTc in the thoracic spinal cord was impaired in a dose-dependent manner. Transport was significantly decreased by 16 days in animals exposed to either 10 or 80 Gy, while animals exposed to 2 Gy were affected only minimally. Further, animals exposed to the highest dose also experienced significant weight loss by 9 days and developed posterior paralysis by 45 days. Marked histological changes including vacuolization, and white matter necrosis were observed in radiated cords after 30 days for mice exposed to 80 Gy. CONCLUSION Radiation of the spinal cord induces dose-dependent changes in retrograde axonal transport, which can be monitored by molecular imaging. This approach suggests a novel diagnostic modality to assess nerve injury and monitor therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia G LeRoux
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Jain AK, Yamada YJ. The role of stereotactic body radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in the re-irradiation of metastatic spinal tumors. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 14:1141-52. [PMID: 25066490 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2014.940326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are advanced radiotherapy delivery techniques that allow for the delivery of high-dose per fraction radiation. Advances in imaging technology and intensity modulation have allowed SRS and SBRT to be used for the treatment of tumors in close proximity to the spinal cord and cauda equina, in particular spinal metastases. While the initial treatment of spinal metastases is often conventional palliative radiotherapy, treatment failure is not uncommon, and conventional re-irradiation may not be feasible due to spinal cord tolerance. SBRT and SRS have emerged as important techniques for the treatment of spinal metastases in the proximity of previously irradiated spinal cord. Here we review the current data on the use of SBRT and SRS spinal re-irradiation, and future directions for these important treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anshu K Jain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center and New York Presbyterian Hospital, 622 W. 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Blanck O, Bode F, Gebhard M, Hunold P, Brandt S, Bruder R, Grossherr M, Vonthein R, Rades D, Dunst J. Dose-escalation study for cardiac radiosurgery in a porcine model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 89:590-8. [PMID: 24751407 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.02.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2013] [Revised: 02/21/2014] [Accepted: 02/24/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To perform a proof-of-principle dose-escalation study to radiosurgically induce scarring in cardiac muscle tissue to block veno-atrial electrical connections at the pulmonary vein antrum, similar to catheter ablation. METHODS AND MATERIALS Nine mini-pigs underwent pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of heart function and electrophysiology assessment by catheter measurements in the right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV). Immediately after examination, radiosurgery with randomized single-fraction doses of 0 and 17.5-35 Gy in 2.5-Gy steps were delivered to the RSPV antrum (target volume 5-8 cm(3)). MRI and electrophysiology were repeated 6 months after therapy, followed by histopathologic examination. RESULTS Transmural scarring of cardiac muscle tissue was noted with doses ≥32.5 Gy. However, complete circumferential scarring of the RSPV was not achieved. Logistic regressions showed that extent and intensity of fibrosis significantly increased with dose. The 50% effective dose for intense fibrosis was 31.3 Gy (odds ratio 2.47/Gy, P<.01). Heart function was not affected, as verified by MRI and electrocardiogram evaluation. Adjacent critical structures were not damaged, as verified by pathology, demonstrating the short-term safety of small-volume cardiac radiosurgery with doses up to 35 Gy. CONCLUSIONS Radiosurgery with doses >32.5 Gy in the healthy pig heart can induce circumscribed scars at the RSPV antrum noninvasively, mimicking the effect of catheter ablation. In our study we established a significant dose-response relationship for cardiac radiosurgery. The long-term effects and toxicity of such high radiation doses need further investigation in the pursuit of cardiac radiosurgery for noninvasive treatment of atrial fibrillation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Blanck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Luebeck and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany; CyberKnife Center Northern Germany, Guestrow, Germany.
| | - Frank Bode
- Medical Department II, University of Luebeck and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| | - Maximilian Gebhard
- Institute of Pathology, University of Luebeck and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| | - Peter Hunold
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Luebeck and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| | - Sebastian Brandt
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Luebeck and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| | - Ralf Bruder
- Institute for Robotics and Cognitive Systems, University of Luebeck and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| | - Martin Grossherr
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Luebeck and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| | - Reinhard Vonthein
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Luebeck and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| | - Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Luebeck and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany
| | - Juergen Dunst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Luebeck and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany; University Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Paralysis following stereotactic spinal irradiation in pigs suggests a tolerance constraint for single-session irradiation of the spinal nerve. Radiother Oncol 2013; 109:107-11. [PMID: 24060168 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2012] [Revised: 08/14/2013] [Accepted: 08/15/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Paralysis observed during a study of vertebral bone tolerance to single-session irradiation led to further study of the dose-related incidence of motor peripheral neuropathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS During a bone tolerance study, cervical spinal nerves of 15 minipigs received bilateral irradiation to levels C5-C8 distributed into three dose groups with mean maximum spinal nerve doses of 16.9 ± 0.3 Gy (n=5), 18.7 ± 0.5 Gy (n=5), and 24.3 ± 0.8 Gy (n=5). Changes developing in the gait of the group of pigs receiving a mean maximum dose of 24.3 Gy after 10-15 weeks led to the irradiation of two additional animals. They received mean maximum dose of 24.9 ± 0.2 Gy (n=2), targeted to the left spinal nerves of C5-C8. The followup period was one year. Histologic sections from spinal cords and available spinal nerves were evaluated. MR imaging was performed on pigs in the 24.9 Gy group. RESULTS No pig that received a maximum spinal nerve point dose ≤19.0 Gy experienced a change in gait while all pigs that received ≥24.1 Gy experienced paralysis. Extensive degeneration and fibrosis were observed in irradiated spinal nerves of the 24.9 Gy animals. All spinal cord sections were normal. Irradiated spinal nerve regions showed increased thickness and hypointensity on MR imaging. CONCLUSION The single-session tolerance dose of the cervical spinal nerves lies between 19.0 and 24.1 Gy for this model.
Collapse
|
33
|
Mantel F, Flentje M, Guckenberger M. Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the re-irradiation situation--a review. Radiat Oncol 2013; 8:7. [PMID: 23289496 PMCID: PMC3552718 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-8-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2012] [Accepted: 12/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Although locoregional relapse is frequent after definitive radiotherapy (RT) or multimodal treatments, re-irradiation is only performed in few patients even in palliative settings like e.g. vertebral metastasis. This is most due to concern about potentially severe complications, especially when large volumes are exposed to re-irradiation. With technological advancements in treatment planning the interest in re-irradiation as a local treatment approach has been reinforced. Recently, several studies reported re-irradiation for spinal metastases using SBRT with promising local and symptom control rates and simultaneously low rates of toxicity. These early data consistently indicate that SBRT is a safe and effective treatment modality in this clinical situation, where other treatment alternatives are rare. Similarly, good results have been shown for SBRT in the re-irradiation of head and neck tumors. Despite severe late adverse effects were reported in several studies, especially after single fraction doses >10 Gy, they appear less frequently compared to conventional radiotherapy. Few studies with small patient numbers have been published on SBRT re-irradiation for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Overall survival (OS) is limited by systemic progression and seems to depend particularly on patient selection. SBRT re-irradiation after primary SBRT should not be practiced in centrally located tumors due to high risk of severe toxicity. Only limited data is available for SBRT re-irradiation of pelvic tumors: feasibility and acceptable toxicity has been described, suggesting SBRT as a complementary treatment modality for local symptom control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederick Mantel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|