1
|
Kim H, Olsen JR, Green OL, Chin RI, Hawkins WG, Fields RC, Hammill C, Doyle MB, Chapman W, Suresh R, Tan B, Pedersen K, Jansen B, DeWees TA, Lu E, Henke LE, Badiyan S, Parikh PJ, Roach MC, Wang-Gillam A, Lim KH. MR-Guided Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel Chemotherapy in Inoperable Pancreatic Cancer: A TITE-CRM Phase I Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:214-223. [PMID: 35878713 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ablative radiation therapy for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR/LA-PDAC) may limit concurrent chemotherapy dosing and usually is only safely deliverable to tumors distant from gastrointestinal organs. Magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy may safely permit radiation and chemotherapy dose escalation. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a single-arm phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of ablative hypofractionated radiation with full-dose gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in patients with BR/LA-PDAC. Patients were treated with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (1000/125 mg/m2) x 1c then concurrent gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel and radiation. Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel and radiation doses were escalated per time-to-event continual reassessment method from 40 to 45 Gy 25 fxs with chemotherapy (600-800/75 mg/m2) to 60 to 67.5 Gy/15 fractions and concurrent gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (1000/100 mg/m2). The primary endpoint was maximum tolerated dose of radiation as defined by 60-day dose limiting toxicity (DLT). DLT was treatment-related G5, G4 hematologic, or G3 gastrointestinal requiring hospitalization >3 days. Secondary endpoints included resection rates, local progression free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Thirty patients enrolled (March 2015-February 2019), with 26 evaluable patients (2 progressed before radiation, 1 was determined ineligible for radiation during planning, 1 withdrew consent). One DLT was observed. The DLT rate was 14.1% (3.3%-24.9%) with a maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (1000/100 mg/m2) and 67.5 Gy/15 fractions. At a median follow-up of 40.6 months for living patients the median OS was 14.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.9-28.2 months). The median OS for patients with Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group 0 and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 <90 were 34.1 (95% CI, 13.6-54.1) and 43.0 (95% CI, 8.0-not reached) months, respectively. Two-year LPFS and DMFS were 85% (95% CI, 63%-94%) and 57% (95% CI, 34%-73%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Full-dose gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel with ablative magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy dosing is safe in patients with BR/LA-PDAC, with promising LPFS and DMFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Kim
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri.
| | - Jeffrey R Olsen
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Denver, Colorado
| | - Olga L Green
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Re-I Chin
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - William G Hawkins
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Section of Pancreatic, Hepatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ryan C Fields
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Section of Pancreatic, Hepatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Chet Hammill
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Section of Pancreatic, Hepatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Majella B Doyle
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Section of Pancreatic, Hepatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - William Chapman
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Section of Pancreatic, Hepatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Rama Suresh
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Section of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Benjamin Tan
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Section of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Katrina Pedersen
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Section of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Brandi Jansen
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Esther Lu
- Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Lauren E Henke
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Shahed Badiyan
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Parag J Parikh
- Henry Ford Health System, Department of Radiation Oncology, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Michael C Roach
- Hawai'i Pacific Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Andrea Wang-Gillam
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Section of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kian-Huat Lim
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Section of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Umezawa R, Nakagawa K, Mizuma M, Katsuta Y, Tanaka S, Kadoya N, Suzuki Y, Takeda K, Takahashi N, Yamamoto T, Unno M, Jingu K. Comparison of acute gastrointestinal toxicities between 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy including prophylactic regions in chemoradiotherapy with S-1 for pancreatic cancer-importance of dose volume histogram parameters in the stomach as the predictive factors. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2022; 63:856-865. [PMID: 35993332 PMCID: PMC9726699 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrac049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities in patients who underwent 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with S-1 including prophylactic regions for pancreatic cancer. We also investigated the predictive factor of acute GI toxicities in dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters. Patients who received CRT with S-1 for pancreatic cancer between January 2014 and March 2021 were included. Radiotherapy (RT) with a total dose of 50-54 Gy was delivered. We examined the differences in the frequencies of acute GI toxicity of grade 2 or higher and DVH parameters of the stomach (ST) and duodenum (DU) between the 3DCRT group and the IMRT group. The RT-related predictive factors of acute GI toxicities were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses. There were 25 patients in the 3DCRT group and 31 patients in the IMRT group. The frequencies of acute GI toxicity of G2 or higher were 36% in the 3DCRT group and 9.7% in the IMRT group (p = 0.035). ST V50 was the most predictive factor (p = 0.001), and the incidences of acute GI toxicity of G2 or higher in ST V50 ≥ 4.1 cc and < 4.1cc were 43.7% and 7.7%, respectively. ST V40 was also a significant predictive factor of acute GI toxicity (p = 0.002). IMRT could reduce acute GI toxicities in CRT with S-1 including prophylactic regions for pancreatic cancer. Acute GI toxicities may be affected by moderate to high doses to the ST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rei Umezawa
- Corresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryou-machi, Aobaku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan. Tel: +81-22-717-7312; Fax: +81-22-717-7316; E-mail:
| | - Kei Nakagawa
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Masamichi Mizuma
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Katsuta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Shohei Tanaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Kadoya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yu Suzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kazuya Takeda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Noriyoshi Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takaya Yamamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Michiaki Unno
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Walker K, Hinsley S, Phillip R, Oughton JB, Murden G, Chalmers AJ, Faivre-Finn C, Greystoke A, Brown SR. Implementation of the Time-to-Event Continuous Reassessment Method Design in a Phase I Platform Trial Testing Novel Radiotherapy-Drug Combinations-CONCORDE. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2200133. [PMID: 36446040 PMCID: PMC9812638 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE CONCORDE is the first phase I drug-radiotherapy (RT) combination platform in non-small-cell lung cancer, designed to assess multiple different DNA damage response inhibitors in combination with radical thoracic RT. Time-to-event continuous reassessment method (TiTE-CRM) methodology will inform dose escalation individually for each different DNA damage response inhibitor-RT combination and a randomized calibration arm will aid attribution of toxicities. We report in detail the novel statistical design and implementation of the TiTE-CRM in the CONCORDE trial. METHODS Statistical parameters were calibrated following recommendations by Lee and Cheung. Simulations were performed to assess the operating characteristics of the chosen models and were written using modified code from the R package dfcrm. RESULTS The results of the simulation work showed that the proposed statistical model setup can answer the research questions under a wide range of potential scenarios. The proposed models work well under varying levels of recruitment and with multiple adaptations to the original methodology. CONCLUSION The results demonstrate how TiTE-CRM methodology may be used in practice in a complex dose-finding platform study. We propose that this novel phase I design has potential to overcome some of the logistical barriers that for many years have prevented timely development of novel drug-RT combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina Walker
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, England, United Kingdom
| | - Samantha Hinsley
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, England, United Kingdom
- Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Phillip
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, England, United Kingdom
| | - Jamie B. Oughton
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, England, United Kingdom
| | - Geraldine Murden
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, England, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony J. Chalmers
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Corinne Faivre-Finn
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust/University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Sarah R. Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, England, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Phase I Trial of nab-Paclitaxel Administered Concurrently With Radiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Inoperable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Pancreas 2022; 51:490-495. [PMID: 35849065 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000002065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Nab-paclitaxel has radiosensitizing antitumor efficacy in pancreatic cancer. We aimed to establish maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of nab-paclitaxel with radiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS In a phase I dose escalation trial patients received weekly nab-paclitaxel for 6 weeks with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). 3 + 3 design was used with nab-paclitaxel doses: 25 mg/m 2 (cohort 1), 50 mg/m 2 (cohort 2), 75 mg/m 2 (cohort 3), and 100 mg/m 2 (cohort 4). Primary endpoint was MTD. Secondary objectives were progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS Fourteen patients were recruited. Median age was 69 years (range, 40-86). Grade 1/2 toxicities were nausea (93%), vomiting (54%), diarrhea (57%), and fatigue (69%). There were no dose limiting toxicities (DLT) in cohorts 1 to 3. In cohort 4, DLTs of febrile neutropenia and enterocolitis were observed in patient 1. Subsequent DLT of febrile neutropenia and enterocolitis occurred in patient 5 in the expanded cohort. Following chemoradiotherapy median progression-free survival was 4.7 months (95% confidence interval, 2.5-27.5) and median overall survival was 10.8 months (95% confidence interval, 6.37-25.2). CONCLUSIONS Nab-paclitaxel and EBRT was well-tolerated at doses below 100 mg/m 2 . The MTD and recommended phase II study dose for nab-paclitaxel with EBRT is 75 mg/m 2 in this disease.
Collapse
|
5
|
Parisi S, Ferini G, Cacciola A, Lillo S, Tamburella C, Santacaterina A, Bottari A, Brogna A, Ferrantelli G, Pontoriero A, Minutoli F, Pergolizzi S. A non-surgical COMBO-therapy approach for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: preliminary results of a prospective study. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2022; 127:214-219. [PMID: 35034325 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-021-01441-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In this short report we present a series of thirteen patients with locally advanced, unresectable, pancreatic cancer treated with a COMBO-Therapy consisting of: STEP-1: induction chemotherapy; STEP-2: concomitant chemoradiotherapy; STEP-3: stereotactic body radiotherapy boost. After four weeks from the end of each step all patients had a re-staging and a surgical re-evaluation. All patients completed STEP-1 and STEP-2. STEP-3 has been successfully delivered to 8/13 patients with a median dose of 12 Gy (range 10-21 Gy) in 1-3 fractions. The median LC was 20 months (range 10-32) with a 2-year LC of 72.9%, and none of the patients developed G3 acute or late toxicities. The median OS was 21.5 months (range 12-34), and the 2-year OS was 53.9%; the median PFS was 17.5 months (range 10-27). Our non-surgical COMBO-Therapy has demonstrated a feasible profile with good tolerance. Further prospective protocols are needed to confirm our preliminary results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvana Parisi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Cacciola
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Sara Lillo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
| | - Consuelo Tamburella
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Bottari
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Anna Brogna
- Unit of Medical Physics, University Hospital Policlinico "G. Martino", Messina, Italy
| | - Giacomo Ferrantelli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Antonio Pontoriero
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Fabio Minutoli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Stefano Pergolizzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Elective Target Coverage for Pancreatic Cancer: When Less Does Not Clearly Achieve More. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 112:143-145. [PMID: 34919872 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
7
|
Huguet F, Rivin Del Campo E, Orthuon A, Mornex F, Bessières I, Guimas V, Vendrely V. Radiation therapy of pancreatic cancers. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:259-265. [PMID: 34953706 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on radiotherapy of pancreatic tumors. Currently, the use of radiation therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer is subject to discussion. In the adjuvant setting, the standard treatment is six months of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracile, irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Chemoradiation may improve the survival of patients with incompletely resected tumours (R1). This remains to be confirmed by a prospective trial. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is a promising treatment especially for patients with borderline resectable tumours. For patients with locally advanced tumours, there is no standard. An induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation for non progressive patients reduces the rate of local relapse. Whereas in the first trials of chemoradiation large fields were used, the treated volumes have been reduced to improve tolerance. Tumour movements induced by breathing should be taken in account. Intensity modulated radiation therapy allows a reduction of doses to the organs at risk. Whereas widely used, this technique has poor evidence-based recommendation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is also being studied, as a neoadjuvant or exclusive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Huguet
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, hôpitaux universitaires Est Parisien, Sorbonne Université, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France.
| | - E Rivin Del Campo
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, hôpitaux universitaires Est Parisien, Sorbonne Université, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - A Orthuon
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, hôpitaux universitaires Est Parisien, Sorbonne Université, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - F Mornex
- Service de radiothérapie, centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, hospices civils, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - I Bessières
- Département de physique médicale, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue Professeur-Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - V Guimas
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest centre René-Gauducheau, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44800 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - V Vendrely
- Service de radiothérapie, CHU de Bordeaux, 33604 Pessac cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sai S, Kim EH, Koom WS, Vares G, Suzuki M, Yamada S, Hayashi M. Carbon-Ion Beam Irradiation and the miR-200c Mimic Effectively Eradicate Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells Under in vitro and in vivo Conditions. Onco Targets Ther 2021; 14:4749-4760. [PMID: 34556996 PMCID: PMC8453446 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s311567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The study investigated the molecular mechanisms that killed pancreatic cancer cells, including cancer stem cells (CSCs), by carbon ion beam irradiation alone or in combination with miRNA-200c under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Methods Human pancreatic cancer (PC) cells, PANC1 and PK45, were treated with carbon-ion beam irradiation alone or in combination with microRNA-200c (miR-200c) mimic. Cell viability assay, colony and spheroid formation assay, quantitative real-time PCR analysis of apoptosis-, autophagy-, and angiogenesis-related gene expression, xenograft tumor control and histopathological analyses were performed. Results The cell viability assay showed that transfection of the miRNA-200c (10 nM) mimic into pancreatic CSC (CD44+/ESA+) and non-CSC (CD44-/ESA-) significantly suppressed proliferation of both types of cell populations described above. Combining carbon-ion beam irradiation with the miRNA-200c mimic significantly reduced the colony as well as spheroid formation abilities compared to that observed with the treatment of carbon-ion beam alone or X-ray irradiation combined with the miRNA-200c mimic. Moreover, the combination of carbon ion beam irradiation and miRNA-200c mimic increased the expression of apoptosis-related gene BAX, autophagy-related genes Beclin-1 and p62, addition of gemcitabine (GEM) further enhanced the expression of these genes. In vivo data showed that carbon-ion beam irradiation in combination with the miRNA-200c mimic effectively suppressed xenograft tumor growth and significantly induced tumor necrosis and cavitation. Conclusion The combination of miRNA-200c mimic and carbon ion beam irradiation may be powerful radiotherapy that significantly kills pancreatic cancer cells containing CSCs and enhances the effect of carbon-ion beam irradiation compared to carbon-ion beam irradiation alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sei Sai
- Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Eun Ho Kim
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Daegu Catholic University, Nam-gu, Daegu, 42472, South Korea
| | - Woong Sub Koom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Guillaume Vares
- Institute of Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - Masao Suzuki
- Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Shigeru Yamada
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Hayashi
- Breast Center, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Arscott WT, Nead KT, Bear A, Venigalla S, Shabason J, Lukens JN, Plastaras JP, Wojcieszynski A, Metz J, O’Hara M, Reiss KA, Teitelbaum U, Loaiza-Bonilla A, Drebin J, Lee MK, Shroff SG, Ben-Josef E. Concurrent Nab-paclitaxel and Radiotherapy: Novel Radiosensitization for Borderline Resectable or Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 44:469-474. [PMID: 34310350 PMCID: PMC8404955 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluates the toxicity and tumor response with concurrent nab-paclitaxel chemoradiotherapy (CRT) compared with standard (5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine) CRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty patients with borderline resectable or unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2014 to 2017 were divided into 2 groups: concurrent nab-paclitaxel (100 to 125 mg/m2 weekly) CRT (median: 2.1 Gy fraction size and 52.5 Gy total) or standard CRT (median: 1.8 Gy fraction size, 54.5 Gy total). The primary endpoint was toxicity, and secondary endpoints were local failure and conversion to resectability. Comparisons were made using rank-sum or Fisher exact test and multivariable competing risk regression for the cumulative incidence of local failure. RESULTS There were 28 patients in the nab-paclitaxel CRT group and 22 in the standard CRT group; 88% had the unresectable disease. The median follow-up was 18 months. The median duration of chemotherapy before concurrent CRT was 1.9 and 2.3 months in the nab-paclitaxel and standard CRT groups (P=0.337), and radiotherapy dose was 52.5 Gy (range, 52.5 to 59.4 Gy) and 54.5 Gy (range, 45.0 to 59.4 Gy), respectively. There were no statistically significant grade ≥2 toxicities. The nab-paclitaxel CRT group experienced a nonstatistically significant lower incidence of local failure (hazard ratio=0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.27-3.03, P=0.536). More patients in the nab-paclitaxel CRT group proceeded to surgery (9/28 compared with 3/22 in the standard CRT, P=0.186); of which 6 (25%) in the nab-paclitaxel CRT and 2 (10%) in the standard CRT groups were initially unresectable. CONCLUSIONS Nab-paclitaxel CRT had similar toxicity compared with standard CRT in the treatment of borderline resectable or unresectable pancreatic cancer. Its use was associated with an arithmetically lower cumulative incidence of local failure and an arithmetically higher conversion to resectability, both of which were not statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kevin T. Nead
- Departments of Radiation Oncology
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jeffrey Drebin
- Surgery, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Huguet F, Dabout V, Rivin Del Campo E, Gaujoux S, Bachet JB. The role of radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210044. [PMID: 34374297 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
At diagnosis, about 15% of patients with pancreatic cancer present with a resectable tumour, 50% have a metastatic tumour, and 35% a locally advanced tumour, non-metastatic but unresectable due to vascular invasion, or borderline resectable. Despite the technical progress made in the field of radiation therapy and the improvement of the efficacy of chemotherapy, the prognosis of these patients remains very poor. Recently, the role of radiation therapy in the management of pancreatic cancer has been much debated. This review aims to evaluate the role of radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Huguet
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Tenon, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Victoire Dabout
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Tenon, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | | | - Sébastien Gaujoux
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Chirurgie digestive et hépato-bilio-pancréatique, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Jean Baptiste Bachet
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Chirurgie digestive et hépato-bilio-pancréatique, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service d'Hépato - Gastro - Entérologie, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Umezawa R, Wakita A, Katsuta Y, Ito Y, Nakamura S, Okamoto H, Kadoya N, Takahashi K, Inaba K, Murakami N, Igaki H, Jingu K, Itami J. A Pilot Study of Synchronization of Respiration-Induced Motions in the Duodenum and Stomach for the Primary Tumor in Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer Using 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100730. [PMID: 34409214 PMCID: PMC8360956 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We investigated the synchronization of respiration-induced motions at the primary tumor and organs at risk at radiation planning for pancreatic cancer. Methods and Materials Four-dimensional computed tomography images were acquired under the condition of shallow free breathing in patients with pancreatic cancer. The gross tumor volume (GTV), duodenum (DU), and stomach (ST) were contoured. The center of mass was computed for each 4-dimensional volume of interest. The respiration dependence of coordinates for the center of each volume of interest was computed relative to its location at the 50% (maximum exhalation) phase. Based on the shift of the GTV, we investigated the synchronization of respiration-induced motions between each contouring target. We examined the differences in the volume averaged dose to the ST and DU in each respiratory phase. Results Nine patients with pancreatic cancer were analyzed in this study. The mean maximum 3-dimensional excursions at the GTV, DU, and ST were 9.6, 9.8, and 11.4 mm, respectively. At phase 0% and 90% (inhale phases), mean distance changes in the positional relationship with the GTV were 0.3 and 0.7 mm respectively for the DU and -2.5 and -2.4 mm respectively for the ST. There was no significant respiration associated change (RAC) between each respiratory phase in the DU (P = .568), and there was a significant RAC in the ST (P < .001). There was a significant RAC of the volume averaged dose to the ST (P = .023). Conclusions Our results indicate that the DU but not the ST might move synchronously with GTV due to respiration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rei Umezawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Akihisa Wakita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Katsuta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Kadoya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kana Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Inaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoya Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Igaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Jun Itami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rouffiac M, Ghirardi S, Chevalier C, Bessières I, Peignaux-Casasnovas K, Truc G, Créhange G. [Extreme hypofractionated radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer]. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:692-698. [PMID: 34284971 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.06.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer has poor prognosis and a continuously growing incidence. By 2030, it should become the second cause of death by cancer worldwide and in France. The only curative treatment is surgery that is achievable in only 20% of patients at the time of initial diagnosis, with a high rate of incomplete resection. Neoadjuvant treatments using chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy are more often admitted to play an important role by selecting non-progressing cases who will benefit from surgery, by increasing the number of complete resection, and by making locally advanced and borderline tumours accessible to resection. However, the role of radiotherapy is still debated. Because of its dosimetric advantages, its short total duration, and its good tolerance with reduced volumes of irradiation, stereotactic radiotherapy has been largely studied. Compared to chemoradiotherapy, this technique could improve the therapeutic index helping to preserve the general status of patients in order to give them access to secondary surgery. It remains a promising technique still under evaluation, to be delivered ideally, as part of a clinical trial, or within an experimented team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rouffiac
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue Professeur-Marion, 77980, 21079 Dijon cedex, France.
| | - S Ghirardi
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue Professeur-Marion, 77980, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - C Chevalier
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue Professeur-Marion, 77980, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - I Bessières
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue Professeur-Marion, 77980, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - K Peignaux-Casasnovas
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue Professeur-Marion, 77980, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - G Truc
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue Professeur-Marion, 77980, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - G Créhange
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brock K, Homer V, Soul G, Potter C, Chiuzan C, Lee S. Is more better? An analysis of toxicity and response outcomes from dose-finding clinical trials in cancer. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:777. [PMID: 34225682 PMCID: PMC8256624 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08440-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The overwhelming majority of dose-escalation clinical trials use methods that seek a maximum tolerable dose, including rule-based methods like the 3+3, and model-based methods like CRM and EWOC. These methods assume that the incidences of efficacy and toxicity always increase as dose is increased. This assumption is widely accepted with cytotoxic therapies. In recent decades, however, the search for novel cancer treatments has broadened, increasingly focusing on inhibitors and antibodies. The rationale that higher doses are always associated with superior efficacy is less clear for these types of therapies. METHODS We extracted dose-level efficacy and toxicity outcomes from 115 manuscripts reporting dose-finding clinical trials in cancer between 2008 and 2014. We analysed the outcomes from each manuscript using flexible non-linear regression models to investigate the evidence supporting the monotonic efficacy and toxicity assumptions. RESULTS We found that the monotonic toxicity assumption was well-supported across most treatment classes and disease areas. In contrast, we found very little evidence supporting the monotonic efficacy assumption. CONCLUSIONS Our conclusion is that dose-escalation trials routinely use methods whose assumptions are violated by the outcomes observed. As a consequence, dose-finding trials risk recommending unjustifiably high doses that may be harmful to patients. We recommend that trialists consider experimental designs that allow toxicity and efficacy outcomes to jointly determine the doses given to patients and recommended for further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian Brock
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Victoria Homer
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gurjinder Soul
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Claire Potter
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Cody Chiuzan
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shing Lee
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Waissi W, Amé JC, Mura C, Noël G, Burckel H. Gemcitabine-Based Chemoradiotherapy Enhanced by a PARP Inhibitor in Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:6825. [PMID: 34201963 PMCID: PMC8269291 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22136825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a devastating disease with a 5-year overall survival of 9% for all stages. Gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer is highly toxic. We conducted an in vitro study to determine whether poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibition radiosensitized gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Human pancreatic cancer cell lines, MIA PaCa-2, AsPC-1, BxPC-3 and PANC-1 were treated with gemcitabine (10 nM) and/or olaparib (1 µM). Low-LET gamma single dose of 2, 5 and 10 Gy radiations were carried out. Clonogenic assay, PAR immunoblotting, cell cycle distribution, γH2Ax, necrotic and autophagic cell death quantifications were performed. Treatment with olaparib alone was not cytotoxic, but highly radiosensitized cell lines, particularly at high dose per fraction A non-cytotoxic concentration of gemcitabine radiosensitized cells, but less than olaparib. Interestingly, olaparib significantly enhanced gemcitabine-based radiosensitization in PDAC cell lines with synergistic effect in BxPC-3 cell line. All cell lines were radiosensitized by the combination of gemcitabine and olaparib, through an increase of unrepaired double-strand, a G2 phase block and cell death. Radiosensitization was increased with high dose of radiation. The combination of olaparib with gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy could lead to an enhancement of local control in vivo and an improvement in disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waisse Waissi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Leon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - Jean-Christophe Amé
- Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation and Genome Integrity, Laboratoire d’Excellence Medalis, UMR7242, Centre Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique/Université de Strasbourg, Institut de Recherche de l’Ecole de Biotechnologie de Strasbourg, 300 bld. S. Brant, CS10413, 67412 Illkirch, France;
| | - Carole Mura
- Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg University, UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, Radiobiology Laboratory, 67000 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Georges Noël
- Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France;
- Strasbourg University, CNRS, IPHC, UMR 7178, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - Hélène Burckel
- Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg University, UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, Radiobiology Laboratory, 67000 Strasbourg, France;
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of treatment plan between CyberKnife and EDGE in stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Sci Rep 2021; 11:4065. [PMID: 33603030 PMCID: PMC7893157 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83648-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
To perform a comparison of the different stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plans between the Varian EDGE and CyberKnife (CK) systems for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Fifteen patients with pancreatic cancer were selected in this study. The median planning target volume (PTV) was 28.688 cm3 (5.736–49.246 cm3). The SBRT plans for the EDGE and CK were generated in the Eclipse and Multiplan systems respectively with the same contouring and dose constrains for PTV and organs at risk (OARs). Dose distributions in PTV were evaluated in terms of coverage, conformity index (CI), new conformity index (nCI), homogeneity index (HI), and gradient index (GI). OARs, including spinal cord, bowel, stomach, duodenum and kidneys were statistically evaluated by different dose-volume metrics and equivalent uniform dose (EUD). The volume covered by the different isodose lines (ISDL) ranging from 10 to 100% for normal tissue were also analyzed. All SBRT plans for EDGE and CK met the dose constraints for PTV and OARs. For the PTV, the dosimetric metrics in EDGE plans were lower than that in CK, except that D99 and GI were slightly higher. The EDGE plans with lower CI, nCI and HI were superior to generate more conformal and homogeneous dose distribution for PTV. For the normal tissue, the CK plans were better at OARs sparing. The radiobiological indices EUD of spinal cord, duodenum, stomach, and kidneys were lower for CK plans, except that liver were higher. The volumes of normal tissue covered by medium ISDLs (with range of 20–70%) were lower for CK plans while that covered by high and low ISDLs were lower for EDGE plans. This study indicated that both EDGE and CK generated equivalent plan quality, and both systems can be considered as beneficial techniques for SBRT of pancreatic cancer. EDGE plans offered more conformal and homogeneous dose distribution for PTV, while the CK plans could minimize the exposure of OARs.
Collapse
|
16
|
Stefanowicz S, Wlodarczyk W, Frosch S, Zschaeck S, Troost EGC. Dose-escalated simultaneously integrated boost photon or proton therapy in pancreatic cancer in an in-silico study: Gastrointestinal organs remain critical. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 27:24-31. [PMID: 33392399 PMCID: PMC7772695 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Robustly optimized proton plans (rMFO-IMPT) with simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) were clinically applicable. Gastrointestinal organs reached critical dose values in rMFO-IMPT, VMAT and Tomotherapy techniques. rMFO-IMPT significantly reduced the low and intermediate dose to organs at risk. No clinically significant differences on results depending on tumor location or surgical status were observed.
Purpose To compare the dosimetric results of an in-silico study among intensity-modulated photon (IMRT) and robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton (IMPT) treatment techniques using a dose-escalated simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) approach in locally recurrent or advanced pancreatic cancer patients. Material and methods For each of 15 locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients, a volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), a Tomotherapy (TOMO), and an IMPT treatment plan was optimized on free-breathing treatment planning computed tomography (CT) images. For the photon treatment plans, doses of 66 Gy and 51 Gy, both as SIB in 30 fractions, were prescribed to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and to the planning target volume (PTV), respectively. For the proton plans, a dose prescription of 66 Gy(RBE) to the GTV and of 51 Gy(RBE) to the clinical target volume (CTV) was planned. For each SIB-treatment plan, doses to the targets and OARs were evaluated and statistically compared. Results All treatment techniques reached the prescribed doses to the GTV and CTV or PTV. The stomach and the bowel, in particular the duodenum and the small bowel, were found to be frequently exposed to doses exceeding 50 Gy, irrespective of the treatment technique. For doses below 50 Gy, the IMPT technique was statistically significant superior to both IMRT techniques regarding decreasing dose to the OARs, e.g. volume of the bowel receiving 15 Gy (V15Gy) was reduced for IMPT compared to VMAT (p = 0.003) and TOMO (p < 0.001). Conclusion With all photon and proton techniques investigated, the radiation dose to gastrointestinal OARs remained critical when treating patients with unresectable locally recurrent or advanced pancreatic cancer using a dose-escalated SIB approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Stefanowicz
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Waldemar Wlodarczyk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Frosch
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden; Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Radiographic Response of Vessel Involvement and Resectability After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 43:776-783. [PMID: 32815856 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Survival of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is improved when neoadjuvant chemoradiation enables subsequent surgical resection. Here, the authors assess changes in vessel involvement as a possible indicator of resectability. METHODS Pancreatic gross tumor and all major abdominal vessels were contoured for 49 patients with unresectable LAPC before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Changes were compared by paired t tests. Tumor-vessel relationships were automatically quantified using Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit and examined for correlation with resectability and outcome. RESULTS Tumor volumes were significantly reduced by chemoradiation (41 to 33 mL, P<0.0001). Maximum circumferential vessel involvement decreased for most patients and was statistically significant for the superior mesenteric (P<0.003) and splenic veins (P<0.038). Resection was possible in some patients and correlated positively with survival (28 vs. 15 mo, r=0.40), a decrease in CA 19.9 levels (r=0.48), and reduced involvement of most vessels. Nevertheless, surgical resection with a successful detachment of tumor tissue from major vessels was also achieved in some patients who did not show improvement in radiographic vessel involvement, but rather a reduction in tumor volume and CA 19.9 levels. CONCLUSIONS The present analysis demonstrates that neoadjuvant chemoradiation can enable subsequent surgical resection in patients with LAPC. Complete resection substantially prolongs survival. Therefore, surgical exploration should be offered if vessel involvement is improved by chemoradiation and considered in radiographic unchanged vessel involvement if size and CA 19.9 levels decrease, as these factors may indicate resectable disease, too.
Collapse
|
18
|
Brunner TB, Haustermans K, Huguet F, Morganti AG, Mukherjee S, Belka C, Krempien R, Hawkins MA, Valentini V, Roeder F. ESTRO ACROP guidelines for target volume definition in pancreatic cancer. Radiother Oncol 2021; 154:60-69. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
19
|
Efficacy and feasibility of proton beam radiotherapy using the simultaneous integrated boost technique for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Sci Rep 2020; 10:21712. [PMID: 33303947 PMCID: PMC7729854 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78875-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and feasibility of proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) using the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), 81 LAPC patients receiving PBT using SIB technique were analyzed. The prescribed doses to planning target volume (PTV)1 and PTV2 were 45 or 50 GyE and 30 GyE in 10 fractions, respectively. Of 81 patients, 18 patients received PBT without upfront and maintenance chemotherapy (group I), 44 received PBT followed by maintenance chemotherapy (group II), and 19 received PBT after upfront chemotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy (n = 16) (group III). The median follow-up time was 19.6 months (range 2.3-57.6 months), and the median overall survival (OS) times of all patients and of those in groups I, II, and III were 19.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.8-21.7 months), 15.3 months (95% CI 12.9-17.7 months), 18.3 months (95% CI 15.9-20.7 months), and 26.1 months (95% CI 17.8-34.3 months), respectively (p = 0.043). Acute and late grade ≥ 3 toxicities related to PBT were not observed. PBT with the SIB technique showed promising OS for LAPC patients with a safe toxicity profile, and intensive combinations of PBT and chemotherapy could improve OS in these patients.
Collapse
|
20
|
Hagiwara Y, Yamada S, Isozaki Y, Takiyama H, Shinoto M, Kawashiro S, Bhattacharyya T, Nemoto K, Tsuji H. Efficacy and feasibility of re-irradiation using carbon ions for pancreatic cancer that recurs after carbon-ion radiotherapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 26:24-29. [PMID: 33294643 PMCID: PMC7691119 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Carbon-ion re-irradiation for pancreatic cancer; feasibility and efficacy. Adjuvant chemotherapy improve local control of re-irradiation using carbon ions. Carbon-ion radiotherapy for recurrent pancreatic cancer; reasonable option.
Background and purpose Patients who receive carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for primary pancreatic cancer may experience locoregional recurrence; however, the treatment options for such patients are limited. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of carbon-ion re-irradiation for patients with pancreatic cancer who experienced recurrence after initial C-ion RT. Materials and methods Twenty-one patients with recurrent pancreatic cancer who underwent repeat C-ion RT between December 2010 and November 2016 at our institute were retrospectively evaluated. The sites of post-initial C-ion RT failure were in-field central in 16 patients (76.2%) and marginal in 5 (23.8%). The median doses of initial and repeat C-ion RT were both 52.8 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]). Thirteen patients (61.9%) received concurrent chemotherapy with re-irradiation, while 11 (52.4%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Results The median follow-up period after re-irradiation was 11 months. The 1-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 53.5%, 24.5%, and 48.7%, respectively. Toxicity data was obtained from the patients’ charts. Only 1 patient (4.8%) developed grade 3 acute toxicities and none developed grade ≥3 late toxicities. Univariate analysis indicated that patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly improved local control rates compared with those who did not; the 1-year local control rates were 80.0% and 0.0%, respectively (P = 0.0469). Conclusion Repeating C-ion RT may be a reasonable option with tolerable toxicity for patients with recurrent pancreatic cancers. Adjuvant chemotherapy appears to improve the local control rate. This is the first study to examine re-irradiation using C-ion for recurrent pancreatic cancer after initial C-ion RT.
Collapse
Key Words
- 18F-FDG-PET, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
- C-ion RT, carbon-ion radiotherapy
- CT, computed tomography
- CTV, clinical target volume
- Carbon-ion radiotherapy
- D2cc, dose covering 2 cc
- EBRT, external beam radiation therapy
- GS, gemcitabine plus S1
- GTV, gross tumour volume
- IMRT, intensity-modulated radiotherapy
- LAPC, locally advanced pancreatic cancer
- LC, local control
- LET, linear energy transfer
- MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
- OS, overall survival
- PFS, progression-free survival
- PTV, planning target volume
- Pancreatic cancer
- RBE, relative biological effectiveness
- Re-irradiation
- S-1, tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil
- SBRT, stereotactic body radiation therapy
- Survival
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuhito Hagiwara
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Shigeru Yamada
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuka Isozaki
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hirotoshi Takiyama
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Makoto Shinoto
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shohei Kawashiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Tapesh Bhattacharyya
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kenji Nemoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tsuji
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
First report on the feasibility of a permanently implantable uni-directional planar low dose rate brachytherapy sheet for patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:207-217. [PMID: 32978081 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Margin negative resection in pancreatic cancer remains the only curative option but is challenging, especially with the retroperitoneal margin. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) can improve rates of local control but requires specially designed facilities and equipment. This retrospective review describes initial results of a novel implantable mesh of uni-directional low dose rate (LDR) Pd-103 sources (sheet) used to deliver a focal margin-directed high-dose boost in patients with concern for close or positive margins. METHODS Eleven consecutive patients from a single institution with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with concern for positive margins were selected for sheet placement and retrospectively reviewed. Procedural outcomes, including the time to implant the device and complications, and clinical outcomes, including survival and patterns of failure, are reported. A dosimetric comparison of the LDR sheet with hypothetical stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost is reported. RESULTS One patient had a resectable disease, and 10 patients had a borderline resectable disease and underwent neoadjuvant treatment. Sheet placement added 15 min to procedural time with no procedural or sheet-related complications. At a median follow up of 13 months, 64% (n = 7) of patients are alive and 55% (n = 6) are disease-free. Compared to a hypothetical SBRT boost, the LDR sheet delivered a negligible dose to kidneys, liver, and spinal cord with a 50% reduction in max dose to the small bowel. CONCLUSION This is the first report of the use of an implantable uni-directional LDR brachytherapy sheet in patients with resected pancreatic cancer with concern for margin clearance, with no associated toxicity and favorable clinical outcomes.
Collapse
|
22
|
Mori M, Passoni P, Incerti E, Bettinardi V, Broggi S, Reni M, Whybra P, Spezi E, Vanoli EG, Gianolli L, Picchio M, Di Muzio NG, Fiorino C. Training and validation of a robust PET radiomic-based index to predict distant-relapse-free-survival after radio-chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Radiother Oncol 2020; 153:258-264. [PMID: 32681930 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the value of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET Radiomic Features (RF) in predicting Distant Relapse Free Survival (DRFS) in patients with Locally AdvancedPancreaticCancer (LAPC) treated with radio-chemotherapy. MATERIALS & METHODS One-hundred-ninety-eight RFs were extracted using IBSI (Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative) consistent software from pre-radiotherapy images of 176 LAPC patients treated with moderate hypo-fractionation (44.25 Gy, 2.95 Gy/fr). Tumors were segmented by applying a previously validated semi-automatic method. One-hundred-twenty-six RFs were excluded due to poor reproducibility and/or repeatability and/or inter-scanner variability. The original cohort was randomly split into a training (n = 116) and a validation (n = 60) group. Multi-variable Cox regression was applied to the training group, including only independent RFs in the model. The resulting radiomic index was tested in the validation cohort. The impact of selected clinical variables was also investigated. RESULTS The resulting Cox model included two first order RFs: Center of Mass Shift (COMshift) and 10th Intensity percentile (P10) (p = 0.0005, HR = 2.72, 95%CI = 1.54-4.80), showing worse outcomes for patients with lower COMshift and higher P10. Once stratified by quartile values (<lowest quartile vs >highest quartile vs the remaining), the index properly stratified patients according to their DRFS (p = 0.0024, log-rank test). Performances were confirmed in the validation cohort (p = 0.03, HR = 2.53, 95%CI = 0.96-6.65). The addition of clinical factors did not significantly improve the models' performance. CONCLUSIONS A radiomic-based index including only two robust PET-RFs predicted DRFS of LAPC patients after radio-chemotherapy. The current results could find relevant applications in the treatment personalization of LAPC. A multi-institution independent validation has been planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Mori
- Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Paolo Passoni
- Radiotherapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Elena Incerti
- Nuclear Medicine, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Sara Broggi
- Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Michele Reni
- Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Phil Whybra
- School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Emiliano Spezi
- School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK; Department of Medical Physics, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Elena G Vanoli
- Nuclear Medicine, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Luigi Gianolli
- Nuclear Medicine, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuclear Medicine, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Nadia G Di Muzio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Radiotherapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorino
- Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Placidi L, Romano A, Chiloiro G, Cusumano D, Boldrini L, Cellini F, Mattiucci GC, Valentini V. On-line adaptive MR guided radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Clinical and dosimetric considerations. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:15-21. [PMID: 32642565 PMCID: PMC7334416 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2020.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Magnetic Resonance-guided Radiation Therapy (MRgRT) allows online adaptations (OA) of the treatment plan to optimize daily dose distribution based on patient's anatomy, just before fraction delivery. The aim of this study is to evaluate feasibility and the dosimetric improvement of the OA workflow implemented in our institution for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients, in terms of target coverage and organs at risk (OARs) sparing. Methods We retrospectively analysed 8 LAPC patients treated with MRgRT in combination with the OA approach, using video-assisted inspiratory breath-hold for a total of 38 fractions with a dose ranging from 30 Gy to 40 Gy in 5 fractions.Dose distribution of the baseline plan was first calculated based on daily anatomy, obtaining a "predicted" plan to assess the dosimetric improvement. If the dose distribution did not meet the constraints set in the planning phase, PTV, GTV and OARs were re-contoured within a distance of 3 cm from the PTV external edge and a new online "adaptive" plan was generated. Other clinical and planning parameters were also evaluated to assess the feasibility and the dosimetic benefit of the online adaptive workflow. Results Out of 38 total fractions, 26 (68.4%) were adapted online and 12 (31.6%) were delivered using the baseline plan. The use of the adaptive workflow resulted to be feasible in our clinical practice and advantageous in all the patients: mean PTV V95% increased by 10.8% (5.7-20.8) while mean CTV V98% of 12.6% (7.3-17.7). Also OARs V33 and V25 showed a positive trend avoiding unnecessary irradiation. Conclusion OA workflow improves the dosimetric benefit of MRgRT, preventing the occurrence of high-doses to OARs and increasing the safety of stereotactic treatment for LAPC, without any drawback for our daily clinical practice routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Placidi
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.,Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Romano
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giuditta Chiloiro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Davide Cusumano
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.,Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Cellini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.,Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.,Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Raturi VP, Hojo H, Hotta K, Baba H, Takahashi R, Rachi T, Nakamura N, Zenda S, Motegi A, Tachibana H, Ariji T, Motegi K, Nakamura M, Okumura M, Hirano Y, Akimoto T. Radiobiological model-based approach to determine the potential of dose-escalated robust intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy in reducing gastrointestinal toxicity in the treatment of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer of the head. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:157. [PMID: 32571379 PMCID: PMC7310413 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01592-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to determine the potential of escalated dose radiation (EDR) robust intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (ro-IMPT) in reducing GI toxicity risk in locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAUPC) of the head in term of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) predictive model. Methods For 9 patients, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was compared with ro-IMPT. For all plans, the prescription dose was 59.4GyE (Gray equivalent) in 33 fractions with an equivalent organ at risk (OAR) constraints. Physical dose distribution was evaluated. GI toxicity risk for different endpoints was estimated using published NTCP Lyman Kutcher Burman (LKB) models for stomach, duodenum, small bowel, and combine stomach and duodenum (Stoduo). A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for dosimetry parameters and NTCP values comparison. Result The dosimetric results have shown that, with similar target coverage, ro-IMPT achieves a significant dose-volume reduction in the stomach, small bowel, and stoduo in low to high dose range in comparison to IMRT. NTCP evaluation for the endpoint gastric bleeding of stomach (10.55% vs. 13.97%, P = 0.007), duodenum (1.87% vs. 5.02%, P = 0.004), and stoduo (5.67% vs. 7.81%, P = 0.008) suggest reduced toxicity by ro-IMPT compared to IMRT. ∆NTCP IMRT – ro-IMPT (using parameter from Pan et al. for gastric bleed) of ≥5 to < 10% was seen in 3 patients (33%) for stomach and 2 patients (22%) for stoduo. An overall GI toxicity relative risk (NTCPro-IMPT/NTCPIMRT) reduction was noted (0.16–0.81) for all GI-OARs except for duodenum (> 1) with endpoint grade ≥ 3 GI toxicity (using parameters from Holyoake et al.). Conclusion With similar target coverage and better conformity, ro-IMPT has the potential to substantially reduce the risk of GI toxicity compared to IMRT in EDR of LAUPC of the head. This result needs to be further evaluated in future clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay P Raturi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 chome, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577, Japan.,Course of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Graduate school of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hidehiro Hojo
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 chome, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Kenji Hotta
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 chome, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Hiromi Baba
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 chome, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Ryo Takahashi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 chome, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Toshiya Rachi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 chome, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Naoki Nakamura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 chome, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Sadamoto Zenda
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 chome, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Atsushi Motegi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 chome, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Hidenobu Tachibana
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 chome, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Takaki Ariji
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 chome, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Kana Motegi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 chome, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Masaki Nakamura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 chome, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Masayuki Okumura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 chome, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hirano
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 chome, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 chome, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577, Japan. .,Course of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Graduate school of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
van Werkhoven E, Hinsley S, Frangou E, Holmes J, de Haan R, Hawkins M, Brown S, Love SB. Practicalities in running early-phase trials using the time-to-event continual reassessment method (TiTE-CRM) for interventions with long toxicity periods using two radiotherapy oncology trials as examples. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20:162. [PMID: 32571298 PMCID: PMC7477911 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01012-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Awareness of model-based designs for dose-finding studies such as the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) is now becoming more commonplace amongst clinicians, statisticians and trial management staff. In some settings toxicities can occur a long time after treatment has finished, resulting in extremely long, interrupted, CRM design trials. The Time-to-Event CRM (TiTE-CRM), a modification to the original CRM, accounts for the timing of late-onset toxicities and results in shorter trial duration. In this article, we discuss how to design and deliver a trial using this method, from the grant application stage through to dissemination, using two radiotherapy trials as examples. METHODS The TiTE-CRM encapsulates the dose-toxicity relationship with a statistical model. The model incorporates observed toxicities and uses a weight to account for the proportion of completed follow-up of participants without toxicity. This model uses all available data to determine the next participant's dose and subsequently declare the maximum tolerated dose. We focus on two trials designed by the authors to illustrate practical issues when designing, setting up, and running such studies. RESULTS In setting up a TiTE-CRM trial, model parameters need to be defined and the time element involved might cause complications, therefore looking at operating characteristics through simulations is essential. At the grant application stage, we suggest resources to fund statisticians' time before funding is awarded and make recommendations for the level of detail to include in funding applications. While running the trial, close contact of all involved staff is required as a dose decision is made each time a participant is recruited. We suggest ways of capturing data in a timely manner and give example code in R for design and delivery of the trial. Finally, we touch upon dissemination issues while the trial is running and upon completion. CONCLUSION Model-based designs can be complex. We hope this paper will help clinical trial teams to demystify the conduct of TiTE-CRM trials and be a starting point for using this methodology in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samantha Hinsley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Jane Holmes
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Maria Hawkins
- CRUK MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Gray Laboratories, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Umezawa R, Ito Y, Wakita A, Nakamura S, Okamoto H, Takahashi K, Inaba K, Murakami N, Igaki H, Jingu K, Itami J. How Much Was the Elective Lymph Node Region Covered in Involved-Field Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer? Evaluation of Overlap Between Gross Target Volume and Celiac Artery-Superior Mesenteric Artery Lymph Node Regions. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:377-387. [PMID: 32529131 PMCID: PMC7278027 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Revised: 08/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the overlaps between gross target volume (GTV) and the celiac artery (CA) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) lymph node regions and to examine the dose incidentally irradiated to the CA and SMA lymph node regions by involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods and Materials Fifty-nine patients who had LAPC without distant metastasis were included. They received IFRT at 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. We calculated the percentages of overlap of GTV in the CA and SMA lymph node regions and examined what cases tend to have an overlap. We also investigated the dose metrics of CA and SMA lymph node regions by IFRT and the frequency of CA or SMA lymph node metastasis after IFRT. Results The median GTV volume was 52.2 mL. Median overlap percentages in the CA and SMA lymph node regions were 39.2% and 28.6%, respectively. There was a significant correlation between GTV volume and SMA overlap percentage (P < .001). Although the SMA overlap percentage was higher in the pancreas head (P = .028), the CA overlap percentage was higher in the pancreas body or tail (P = .002). Median mean dose, D95, and minimum dose in the CA lymph node region were 50.1 Gy, 48.7 Gy, and 45.9 Gy, respectively, and those in the SMA lymph node region 49.9 Gy, 47.3 Gy, and 39.2 Gy, respectively. CA lymph node metastases after IFRT were detected in 4 patients (6.8%). Conclusions An overlap between GTV and CA-SMA lymph node regions was detected in many patients, and the CA and SMA lymph node regions were irradiated incidentally even by IFRT. Prophylactic lymph node regions might not be necessary in radiation therapy planning of LAPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rei Umezawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihisa Wakita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kana Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Inaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoya Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Igaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Jun Itami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rutenberg MS, Nichols RC. Proton beam radiotherapy for pancreas cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11:166-175. [PMID: 32175120 PMCID: PMC7052755 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.03.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic carcinoma is a challenging malignancy to manage with a very poor prognosis. Despite continued difficulties in its management, there have been incremental improvements in outcomes over the past several decades. Achieving the best oncologic outcomes requires a multimodality approach including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Proton radiotherapy enables the delivery of high-dose radiotherapy to the tumor or resection bed while sparing nearby critical organs. Due to their unique physical properties, protons can deliver radiotherapy dose distributions that are not achievable with photons (X-rays) even with advanced photon delivery techniques (e.g., intensity-modulated radiotherapy). Improved dose distributions can lead to reduced treatment toxicity and enable treatment intensification. As better chemotherapy regimens lead to better systemic disease control, it will become increasingly important that local-regional control is achieved. This will in part be accomplished by combining better radiotherapy with more active chemotherapies. Proton radiotherapy provides an excellent means for achieving this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Rutenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Romaine C Nichols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Isozaki Y, Takiyama H, Bhattacharyya T, Ebner D, Kasuya G, Makishima H, Tsuji H, Kamada T, Yamada S. Heavy charged particles for gastrointestinal cancers. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11:203-211. [PMID: 32175123 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.03.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Carbon ion beams constitute the primary delivery method of heavy ion radiotherapy. It offers improved dose distribution, and enables concentration of dose within target volumes with minimal extraneous exposure of normal tissue, while delivering superior biological effect in comparison with photon and proton technologies. Here, we review the application of this technology to various gastrointestinal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuka Isozaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hirotoshi Takiyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tapesh Bhattacharyya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Daniel Ebner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Goro Kasuya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Makishima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tsuji
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tadashi Kamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shigeru Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
George G, Lewis S, Chopra S, Phurailatpam R, Engineer R. A Retrospective Study of the Dosimetric Parameters and Duodenal Toxicity in Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal and Gynaecological Cancers Treated With Radiation Therapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:e53-e59. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Revised: 06/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
30
|
Dell’Oro M, Short M, Wilson P, Bezak E. Clinical Limitations of Photon, Proton and Carbon Ion Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12010163. [PMID: 31936565 PMCID: PMC7017270 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12010163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Revised: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Despite improvements in radiation therapy, chemotherapy and surgical procedures over the last 30 years, pancreatic cancer 5-year survival rate remains at 9%. Reduced stroma permeability and heterogeneous blood supply to the tumour prevent chemoradiation from making a meaningful impact on overall survival. Hypoxia-activated prodrugs are the latest strategy to reintroduce oxygenation to radioresistant cells harbouring in pancreatic cancer. This paper reviews the current status of photon and particle radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer in combination with systemic therapies and hypoxia activators. Methods: The current effectiveness of management of pancreatic cancer was systematically evaluated from MEDLINE® database search in April 2019. Results: Limited published data suggest pancreatic cancer patients undergoing carbon ion therapy and proton therapy achieve a comparable median survival time (25.1 months and 25.6 months, respectively) and 1-year overall survival rate (84% and 77.8%). Inconsistencies in methodology, recording parameters and protocols have prevented the safety and technical aspects of particle therapy to be fully defined yet. Conclusion: There is an increasing requirement to tackle unmet clinical demands of pancreatic cancer, particularly the lack of synergistic therapies in the advancing space of radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela Dell’Oro
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia; (M.S.); (E.B.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-435214264
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia; (M.S.); (E.B.)
| | - Puthenparampil Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia;
- School of Engineering, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia; (M.S.); (E.B.)
- Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tran NH, Sahai V, Griffith KA, Nathan H, Kaza R, Cuneo KC, Shi J, Kim E, Sonnenday CJ, Cho CS, Lawrence TS, Zalupski MM. Phase 2 Trial of Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Concurrent With Fixed-Dose Rate-Gemcitabine in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:124-133. [PMID: 31494181 PMCID: PMC7245020 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 08/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Preoperative therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is intended to increase R0 resection rates. An optimal approach in BRPC is yet to be defined. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with BRPC, confirmed adenocarcinoma, performance status ≤1, and adequate organ function enrolled in a single-institution, phase 2 trial. Patients received FOLFIRINOX × 6 cycles, then radiation therapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions) concurrent with fixed-dose rate gemcitabine (1 g/m2 over 100 minutes) followed by 2 additional gemcitabine infusions. Computed tomography scans were performed at 2-month intervals during treatment. Patients without distant disease were offered surgical exploration. The primary objective was R0 resection rate with an alternate hypothesis of 55%. Secondary objectives included median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), response rate, and safety. The trial registration number is NCT01661088. RESULTS Twenty-five patients with median age of 60 years (range, 47-77 years) enrolled from November 2011 through January 2017. Twenty-one (84%) completed FOLFIRINOX and 19 (76%) completed all protocol therapy. Treatment-related grade 3 to 4 toxicities included neutropenia (40%), nausea and vomiting (28%), diarrhea (16%), and fatigue (12%). Eighteen patients (72%) underwent laparotomy, 13 (52%) were resected (all R0). The median PFS and OS in 25 patients were 13.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3-24.7) and 24.4 months (95% CI, 12.6-40.0), respectively. For resected patients, median PFS was 21.6 months (95% CI, 8.2-37.1) and OS was 37.1 months (95% CI, 15.4-not reached). CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFIRINOX, followed by intensity modulated radiation therapy concurrent with fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine in BRPC is feasible and tolerated. Although the alternate hypothesis was not met, the OS of the resected cohort was favorable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ravi Kaza
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Jiaqi Shi
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Edward Kim
- Work completed at University of Michigan. Currently at University of California, Davis, California
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Raturi VP, Tochinai T, Hojo H, Rachi T, Hotta K, Nakamura N, Zenda S, Motegi A, Ariji T, Hirano Y, Baba H, Ohyoshi H, Nakamura M, Okumura M, Bei Y, Akimoto T. Dose-Volume and Radiobiological Model-Based Comparative Evaluation of the Gastrointestinal Toxicity Risk of Photon and Proton Irradiation Plans in Localized Pancreatic Cancer Without Distant Metastasis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:517061. [PMID: 33194580 PMCID: PMC7645056 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.517061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Radiobiological model-based studies of photon-modulated radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer have reported reduced gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, although the risk is still high. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of 3D-passive scattering proton beam therapy (3D-PSPBT) in limiting GI organ at risk (OAR) toxicity in localized pancreatic cancer based on dosimetric data and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model. Methods: The data of 24 pancreatic cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed, and these patients were planned with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and 3D-PSPBT. The tumor was targeted without elective nodal coverage. All generated plans consisted of a 50.4-GyE (Gray equivalent) dose in 28 fractions with equivalent OAR constraints, and they were normalized to cover 50% of the planning treatment volume (PTV) with 100% of the prescription dose. Physical dose distributions were evaluated. GI-OAR toxicity risk for different endpoints was estimated by using published NTCP Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) models. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the dosimetric data, and ΔNTCPIMRT-PSPBT and ΔNTCPVMAT-PSPBT were also computed. Results: Similar homogeneity and conformity for the clinical target volume (CTV) and PTV were exhibited by all three planning techniques (P > 0.05). 3D-PSPBT resulted in a significant dose reduction for GI-OARs in both the low-intermediate dose range (below 30 GyE) and the highest dose region (D max and V 50 GyE) in comparison with IMRT and VMAT (P < 0.05). Based on the NTCP evaluation, the NTCP reduction for GI-OARs by 3D-PSPBT was minimal in comparison with IMRT and VMAT. Conclusion: 3D-PSPBT results in minimal NTCP reduction and has less potential to substantially reduce the toxicity risk of upper GI bleeding, ulceration, obstruction, and perforation endpoints compared to IMRT and VMAT. 3D-PSPBT may have the potential to reduce acute dose-limiting toxicity in the form of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea by reducing the GI-OAR treated volume in the low-to-intermediate dose range. However, this result needs to be further evaluated in future clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay P. Raturi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Course of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
- *Correspondence: Vijay P. Raturi
| | - Taku Tochinai
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hidehiro Hojo
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Toshiya Rachi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kenji Hotta
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naoki Nakamura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sadamoto Zenda
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsushi Motegi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takaki Ariji
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hirano
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiromi Baba
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hajime Ohyoshi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaki Nakamura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masayuki Okumura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yanping Bei
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Course of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Polley MYC, Cheung YK. Early-Phase Platform Trials: A New Paradigm for Dose Finding and Treatment Screening in the Era of Precision Oncology. JCO Precis Oncol 2019; 3:1900057. [PMID: 32923846 DOI: 10.1200/po.19.00057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Applications in early-phase cancer trials have motivated the development of many statistical designs since the late 1980s, including dose-finding methods, futility screening, treatment selection, and early stopping rules. These methods are often proposed to address the conventional cytotoxic therapeutics for neoplastic diseases and cancer. Recent advances in precision medicine have motivated novel trial designs, most notably the idea of master protocol (eg, platform trial, basket trial, umbrella trial, N-of-1 trial), for the evaluation of molecularly targeted cancer therapies. In this article, we review the concepts and methodology of early-phase cancer trial designs with a focus on dose finding and treatment screening and put these methods in the context of platform trials of molecularly targeted cancer therapies. Because most cancer trial designs have been developed for cytotoxic agents, we will discuss how these time-tested design principles hold relevance for targeted cancer therapies, and we will delineate how a master protocol may serve as an efficient platform for safety and efficacy evaluations of novel targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ying Kuen Cheung
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Role of upper abdominal reirradiation for gastrointestinal malignancies: a systematic review of cumulative dose, toxicity, and outcomes on behalf of the Re-Irradiation Working Group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 196:1-14. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01519-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
35
|
Cusumano D, Boldrini L, Menna S, Teodoli S, Placidi E, Chiloiro G, Placidi L, Greco F, Stimato G, Cellini F, Valentini V, Azario L, De Spirito M. Evaluation of a simplified optimizer for MR-guided adaptive RT in case of pancreatic cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:20-30. [PMID: 31444952 PMCID: PMC6753732 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Revised: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) is considered a promising resource for pancreatic cancer, as it allows to online modify the dose distribution according to daily anatomy. This study aims to compare the dosimetric performance of a simplified optimizer implemented on a MR-Linac treatment planning system (TPS) with those obtained using an advanced optimizer implemented on a conventional Linac. METHODS Twenty patients affected by locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) were considered. Gross tumor volume (GTV) and surrounding organ at risks (OARs) were contoured on the average 4DCT scan. Planning target volume was generated from GTV by adding an isotropic 3 mm margin and excluding overlap areas with OARs. Treatment plans were generated by using the simple optimizer for the MR-Linac in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and the advanced optimizer for conventional Linac in IMRT and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. Prescription dose was 40 Gy in five fractions. The dosimetric comparison was performed on target coverage, dosimetric indicators, and low dose diffusion. RESULTS The simplified optimizer of MR-Linac generated clinically acceptable plans in 80% and optimal plans in 55% of cases. The number of clinically acceptable plans obtained using the advanced optimizer of the conventional Linac with IMRT was the same of MR-Linac, but the percentage of optimal plans was higher (65%). Using the VMAT technique, it is possible to obtain clinically acceptable plan in 95% and optimal plans in 90% of cases. The advanced optimizer combined with VMAT technique ensures higher target dose homogeneity and minor diffusion of low doses, but its actual optimization time is not suitable for MRgART. CONCLUSION Simplified optimization solutions implemented in the MR-Linac TPS allows to elaborate in most of cases treatment plans dosimetrically comparable with those obtained by using an advanced optimizer. A superior treatment plan quality is possible using the VMAT technique that could represent a breakthrough for the MRgART if the modern advancements will lead to shorter optimization times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Cusumano
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per immagini, radioterapia oncologica ed ematologiaFondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCSRomaItaly
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per immagini, radioterapia oncologica ed ematologiaFondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCSRomaItaly
| | - Sebastiano Menna
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per immagini, radioterapia oncologica ed ematologiaFondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCSRomaItaly
| | - Stefania Teodoli
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per immagini, radioterapia oncologica ed ematologiaFondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCSRomaItaly
| | - Elisa Placidi
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per immagini, radioterapia oncologica ed ematologiaFondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCSRomaItaly
| | - Giuditta Chiloiro
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per immagini, radioterapia oncologica ed ematologiaFondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCSRomaItaly
| | - Lorenzo Placidi
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per immagini, radioterapia oncologica ed ematologiaFondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCSRomaItaly
| | - Francesca Greco
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per immagini, radioterapia oncologica ed ematologiaFondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCSRomaItaly
| | - Gerardina Stimato
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per immagini, radioterapia oncologica ed ematologiaFondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCSRomaItaly
| | - Francesco Cellini
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per immagini, radioterapia oncologica ed ematologiaFondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCSRomaItaly
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per immagini, radioterapia oncologica ed ematologiaFondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCSRomaItaly
- Istituto di RadiologiaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomaItaly
| | - Luigi Azario
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per immagini, radioterapia oncologica ed ematologiaFondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCSRomaItaly
- Istituto di FisicaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomaItaly
| | - Marco De Spirito
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per immagini, radioterapia oncologica ed ematologiaFondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCSRomaItaly
- Istituto di FisicaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomaItaly
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cuneo KC, Morgan MA, Sahai V, Schipper MJ, Parsels LA, Parsels JD, Devasia T, Al-Hawaray M, Cho CS, Nathan H, Maybaum J, Zalupski MM, Lawrence TS. Dose Escalation Trial of the Wee1 Inhibitor Adavosertib (AZD1775) in Combination With Gemcitabine and Radiation for Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:2643-2650. [PMID: 31398082 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE AZD1775 (adavosertib) is an inhibitor of the Wee1 kinase. In this study, we built on our preclinical studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AZD1775 in combination with gemcitabine and radiation in patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-four patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled with the intention to receive four 21-day cycles of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) with AZD1775 (once daily on days 1, 2, 8, and 9). Cycles 2 and 3 were administered concurrently with radiation, and cycles 5 to 8 were optional. AZD1775 was dose escalated using a time-to-event continual reassessment method on the basis of the rate of dose-limiting toxicities within the first 15 weeks of therapy. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of AZD1775 given in conjunction with gemcitabine and radiation. Secondary objectives were to estimate overall and progression-free survival and determine pharmacodynamic activity of AZD1775 in surrogate tissues. RESULTS The recommended phase II dose of AZD1775 was 150 mg/d. Eight patients (24%) experienced a dose-limiting toxicity, most commonly anorexia, nausea, or fatigue. The median overall survival for all patients was 21.7 months (90% CI, 16.7 to 24.8 months), and the median progression-free survival was 9.4 months (90% CI, 8.0 to 9.9 months). Hair follicle biopsy samples demonstrated evidence of Wee1 inhibition with decreased phosphorylation of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 staining by immunohistochemistry after AZD1775 administration at the recommended phase II dose. CONCLUSION AZD1775 in combination with gemcitabine and radiation therapy was well tolerated at a dose that produced target engagement in a surrogate tissue. The overall survival is substantially higher than prior results combining gemcitabine with radiation therapy and warrants additional investigation.
Collapse
|
37
|
Fasting Reduces Intestinal Radiotoxicity, Enabling Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:537-547. [PMID: 31271824 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Revised: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy is the most commonly used approach for treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The use of curative doses of radiation in this disease setting is constrained because of the close proximity of the head of the pancreas to the duodenum. The purpose of this study was to determine whether fasting protects the duodenum from high-dose radiation, thereby enabling dose escalation for efficient killing of pancreatic tumor cells. METHODS AND MATERIALS C57BL/6J mice were either fed or fasted for 24 hours and then exposed to total abdominal radiation at 11.5 Gy. Food intake, body weight, overall health, and survival were monitored. Small intestines were harvested at various time points after radiation, and villi length, crypt depth, and number of crypts per millimeter of intestine were determined. Immunohistochemistry was performed to assess apoptosis and double-strand DNA breaks, and microcolony assays were performed to determine intestinal stem cell regeneration capacity. A syngeneic KPC model of pancreatic cancer was used to determine the effects of fasting on the radiation responses of both pancreatic cancer and host intestinal tissues. RESULTS We demonstrated that a 24-hour fast in mice improved intestinal stem cell regeneration, as revealed by microcolony assay, and improved host survival of lethal doses of total abdominal irradiation compared with fed controls. Fasting also improved survival of mice with orthotopic pancreatic tumors subjected to lethal abdominal radiation compared with controls with free access to food. Furthermore, fasting did not affect tumor cell killing by radiation therapy and enhanced γ-H2AX staining after radiation therapy, suggesting an additional mild radiosensitizing effect. CONCLUSIONS These results establish proof of concept for fasting as a dose-escalation strategy, enabling ablative radiation in the treatment of unresectable pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|
38
|
Corradini S, Alongi F, Andratschke N, Belka C, Boldrini L, Cellini F, Debus J, Guckenberger M, Hörner-Rieber J, Lagerwaard FJ, Mazzola R, Palacios MA, Philippens MEP, Raaijmakers CPJ, Terhaard CHJ, Valentini V, Niyazi M. MR-guidance in clinical reality: current treatment challenges and future perspectives. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:92. [PMID: 31167658 PMCID: PMC6551911 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1308-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 242] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) marks the beginning of a new era. MR is a versatile and suitable imaging modality for radiotherapy, as it enables direct visualization of the tumor and the surrounding organs at risk. Moreover, MRgRT provides real-time imaging to characterize and eventually track anatomical motion. Nevertheless, the successful translation of new technologies into clinical practice remains challenging. To date, the initial availability of next-generation hybrid MR-linac (MRL) systems is still limited and therefore, the focus of the present preview was on the initial applicability in current clinical practice and on future perspectives of this new technology for different treatment sites.MRgRT can be considered a groundbreaking new technology that is capable of creating new perspectives towards an individualized, patient-oriented planning and treatment approach, especially due to the ability to use daily online adaptation strategies. Furthermore, MRL systems overcome the limitations of conventional image-guided radiotherapy, especially in soft tissue, where target and organs at risk need accurate definition. Nevertheless, some concerns remain regarding the additional time needed to re-optimize dose distributions online, the reliability of the gating and tracking procedures and the interpretation of functional MR imaging markers and their potential changes during the course of treatment. Due to its continuous technological improvement and rapid clinical large-scale application in several anatomical settings, further studies may confirm the potential disruptive role of MRgRT in the evolving oncological environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - F. Alongi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Sacro Cuore don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - N. Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - C. Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - L. Boldrini
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - F. Cellini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - J. Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M. Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - J. Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F. J. Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. Mazzola
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Sacro Cuore don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - M. A. Palacios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. E. P. Philippens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C. P. J. Raaijmakers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C. H. J. Terhaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V. Valentini
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - M. Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Boldrini L, Cusumano D, Cellini F, Azario L, Mattiucci GC, Valentini V. Online adaptive magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: state of the art, pearls and pitfalls. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:71. [PMID: 31036034 PMCID: PMC6489212 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1275-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different studies have proved in recent years that hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) improves overall survival of patients affected by locally advanced, unresectable, pancreatic cancer. The clinical management of these patients generally leads to poor results and is considered very challenging, due to different factors, heavily influencing treatment delivery and its outcomes. Firstly, the dose prescribed to the target is limited by the toxicity that the highly radio-sensitive organs at risk (OARs) surrounding the disease can develop. Treatment delivery is also complicated by the significant inter-fractional and intra-fractional variability of therapy volumes, mainly related to the presence of hollow organs and to the breathing cycle. The recent introduction of magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) systems leads to the opportunity to control most of the aforementioned sources of uncertainty influencing RT treatment workflow in pancreatic cancer. MRgRT offers the possibility to accurately identify radiotherapy volumes, thanks to the high soft-tissue contrast provided by the Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI), and to monitor the tumour and OARs positions during the treatment fraction using a high-temporal cine MRI. However, the main advantage offered by the MRgRT is the possibility to online adapt the RT treatment plan, changing the dose distribution while the patient is still on couch and successfully addressing most of the sources of variability. SHORT CONCLUSION Aim of this study is to present and discuss the state of the art, the main pitfalls and the innovative opportunities offered by online adaptive MRgRT in pancreatic cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Boldrini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Davide Cusumano
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, UOC Fisica Sanitaria, Fondazione Policlinico Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Francesco Cellini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Luigi Azario
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, UOC Fisica Sanitaria, Fondazione Policlinico Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Conversion surgery for initially unresectable pancreatic cancer: current status and unresolved issues. Surg Today 2019; 49:894-906. [PMID: 30949842 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-019-01804-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal of all malignancies. One of the reasons for the dismal prognosis is that most diagnoses are made when the disease is either locally advanced or metastatic. Recent advances in chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) enable "conversion surgery" to be performed for selected patients with initially unresectable pancreatic cancer following favorable responses to preoperative treatment. Using FOLFIRINOX as preoperative treatment, the resection rate was reported as 6-44% of patients with locally advanced cancer and the prognosis of these patients was favorable. Even for metastasized cancer, recent reports show the effectiveness of conversion surgery, which has achieved 27-56 months of median overall survival. However, there are many unanswered questions about conversion surgery. The optimal regimen and duration of preoperative treatment remain unclear and there is still debate regarding the safety and effectiveness of vascular resection, which is often required for curative resection of locally advanced cancer. Accumulation of more data on conversion surgery is required to establish the safety and effectiveness of this treatment. In this review, we summarize the current status and unresolved issues about conversion surgery for initially unresectable pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|
41
|
Strauss VY, Shaw R, Virdee PS, Hurt CN, Ward E, Tranter B, Patel N, Bridgewater J, Parsons P, Radhakrishna G, O’Neill E, Sebag-Montefiore D, Hawkins M, Corrie PG, Maughan T, Mukherjee S. Study protocol: a multi-centre randomised study of induction chemotherapy followed by capecitabine ± nelfinavir with high- or standard-dose radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (SCALOP-2). BMC Cancer 2019; 19:121. [PMID: 30717707 PMCID: PMC6360784 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5307-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation is a treatment option for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, overall survival is comparable to chemotherapy alone and local progression occurs in nearly half of all patients, suggesting chemoradiation strategies should be optimised. SCALOP-2 is a randomised phase II trial testing the role of radiotherapy dose escalation and/or the addition of the radiosensitiser nelfinavir, following induction chemotherapy of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GEMABX). A safety run-in phase (stage 1) established the nelfinavir dose to administer with chemoradiation in the randomised phase (stage 2). METHODS Patients with locally advanced, inoperable, non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma receive three cycles of induction GEMABX chemotherapy prior to radiological assessment. Those with stable/responding disease are eligible for further trial treatment. In Stage 1, participants received one further cycle of GEMABX followed by capecitabine-chemoradiation with escalating doses of nelfinavir in a rolling-six design. Stage 2 aims to register 262 and randomise 170 patients with responding/stable disease to one of five arms: capecitabine with high- (arms C + D) or standard-dose (arms A + B) radiotherapy with (arms A + C) or without (arms B + D) nelfinavir, or three more cycles of GEMABX (arm E). Participants allocated to the chemoradiation arms receive another cycle of GEMABX before chemoradiation begins. Co-primary outcomes are 12-month overall survival (radiotherapy dose-escalation question) and progression-free survival (nelfinavir question). Secondary outcomes include toxicity, quality of life, disease response rate, resection rate, treatment compliance, and CA19-9 response. SCALOP-2 incorporates a detailed radiotherapy quality assurance programme. DISCUSSION SCALOP-2 aims to optimise chemoradiation in LAPC and incorporates a modern induction regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION Eudract No: 2013-004968-56; ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT02024009.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachel Shaw
- Oncology Clinical Trials Office, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Elizabeth Ward
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
| | - Bethan Tranter
- Pharmacy Department, Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre NHS University Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - Neel Patel
- Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - John Bridgewater
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Philip Parsons
- Cardiff NCRI RTTQA group, Department of Medical Physics, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Ganesh Radhakrishna
- Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, UK
| | - Eric O’Neill
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, CRUK MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Maria Hawkins
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, CRUK MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford, UK
| | - Pippa G. Corrie
- Cambridge Cancer Centre, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Timothy Maughan
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, CRUK MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford, UK
| | - Somnath Mukherjee
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, CRUK MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Cozzi L, Comito T, Fogliata A, Franzese C, Franceschini D, Bonifacio C, Tozzi A, Di Brina L, Clerici E, Tomatis S, Reggiori G, Lobefalo F, Stravato A, Mancosu P, Zerbi A, Sollini M, Kirienko M, Chiti A, Scorsetti M. Computed tomography based radiomic signature as predictive of survival and local control after stereotactic body radiation therapy in pancreatic carcinoma. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0210758. [PMID: 30657785 PMCID: PMC6338357 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Accepted: 01/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To appraise the ability of a radiomics signature to predict clinical outcome after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pancreas carcinoma. METHODS A cohort of 100 patients was included in this retrospective, single institution analysis. Radiomics texture features were extracted from computed tomography (CT) images obtained for the clinical target volume. The cohort of patients was randomly divided into two separate groups for the training (60 patients) and validation (40 patients). Cox regression models were built to predict overall survival and local control. The significant predictors at univariate analysis were included in a multivariate model. The quality of the models was appraised by means of area under the curve and concordance index. RESULTS A clinical-radiomic signature associated with Overall Survival (OS) was found significant in both training and validation sets (p = 0.01 and 0.05 and concordance index 0.73 and 0.75 respectively). Similarly, a signature was found for Local Control (LC) with p = 0.007 and 0.004 and concordance index 0.69 and 0.75. In the low risk group, the median OS and LC in the validation group were 14.4 and 28.6 months while in the high-risk group were 9.0 and 17.5 months respectively. CONCLUSION A CT based radiomic signature was identified which correlate with OS and LC after SBRT and allowed to identify low and high-risk groups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Cozzi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Tiziana Comito
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Antonella Fogliata
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Cristiana Bonifacio
- Diagnostic Radiology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Angelo Tozzi
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Lucia Di Brina
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Giacomo Reggiori
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Francesca Lobefalo
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Antonella Stravato
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Pietro Mancosu
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Pancreatic Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Martina Sollini
- Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Margarita Kirienko
- Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy
- Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kim TH, Lee WJ, Woo SM, Kim H, Oh ES, Lee JH, Han SS, Park SJ, Suh YG, Moon SH, Kim SS, Kim DY. Effectiveness and Safety of Simultaneous Integrated Boost-Proton Beam Therapy for Localized Pancreatic Cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2018; 17:1533033818783879. [PMID: 29962281 PMCID: PMC6048612 DOI: 10.1177/1533033818783879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and feasibility of simultaneous integrated
boost-proton beam therapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Methods: Thirty-seven patients with localized pancreatic cancer underwent simultaneous
integrated boost-proton beam therapy, and 8 (21.6%) patients received induction
chemotherapy. The internal target volume was obtained by summing the gross tumor volumes
in exhalation phase computed tomography images. Planning target volume 1 included
internal target volume plus 3 to 5 mm margins, excluding the 5 mm expanded volume of
gastrointestinal structures, and planning target volume 2 included the internal target
volume plus 7 to 12 mm margins. The prescribed doses to planning target volume 1 and
planning target volume 2 were 45 GyE (equivalent dose in 2 Gy, 54.4 GyE10)
and 30 GyE (equivalent dose in 2 Gy, 32.5 GyE10) in 10 fractions,
respectively. Results: Overall, treatment was well tolerated, with no grade of toxicity ≥3. Median overall
survival was 19.3 months, and 1-year local progression-free survival, relapse-free
survival, and overall survival rates were 64.8%, 33.2%, and 75.7%, respectively.
Patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost-proton beam therapy after induction
chemotherapy had a significantly higher median overall survival time compared to those
with simultaneous integrated boost-proton beam therapy alone (21.6 months vs 16.7
months, P = .031). Multivariate analysis showed that induction
chemotherapy was a significant factor for overall survival (P <
.05). Conclusions: Simultaneous integrated boost-proton beam therapy could be feasible and promising for
patients with localized pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Hyun Kim
- 1 Center for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.,2 Center for Proton Therapy, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo Jin Lee
- 1 Center for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Myung Woo
- 1 Center for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyunjung Kim
- 2 Center for Proton Therapy, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Sang Oh
- 2 Center for Proton Therapy, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Ju Hee Lee
- 1 Center for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Sik Han
- 1 Center for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Jae Park
- 1 Center for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Yang-Gun Suh
- 2 Center for Proton Therapy, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Ho Moon
- 2 Center for Proton Therapy, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Soo Kim
- 2 Center for Proton Therapy, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Yong Kim
- 2 Center for Proton Therapy, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Blakaj A, Stein SM, Khan SA, Johung KL. Review and current state of radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:1027-1036. [PMID: 30603121 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.03.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is characterized by a high rate of metastatic spread and overall poor prognosis. Yet 30% of patients have progressive local disease at the time of death, and local progression can cause significant morbidity. Approximately 30-40% of patients present with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) that is not surgically resectable, and the optimal treatment for these patients continues to evolve. The role of radiation in the management of LAPC is an area of controversy, and the recent LAP07 randomized trial reported no survival benefit of radiation following gemcitabine plus or minus erlotinib. However, the efficacy of modern systemic regimens has improved since the design of the LAP07 study, and radiation therapy may be of greater benefit in the context of more effective systemic therapy. Advances in radiation delivery including the increasing use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have the potential to improve outcomes through dose escalation and better treatment tolerability. In addition, the combination of radiation therapy and immune therapy is an area of promising research. These advances suggest that radiation therapy will continue to play an integral role in the management of LAPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Blakaj
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Stacey M Stein
- Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sajid A Khan
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kimberly L Johung
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Stefanowicz S, Stützer K, Zschaeck S, Jakobi A, Troost EGC. Comparison of different treatment planning approaches for intensity-modulated proton therapy with simultaneous integrated boost for pancreatic cancer. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:228. [PMID: 30466468 PMCID: PMC6249773 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1165-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant radio(chemo)therapy of non-metastasized, borderline resectable or unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer is complex and prone to cause side-effects, e.g., in gastrointestinal organs. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) enables a high conformity to the targets while simultaneously sparing the normal tissue such that dose-escalation strategies come within reach. In this in silico feasibility study, we compared four IMPT planning strategies including robust multi-field optimization (rMFO) and a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for dose-escalation in pancreatic cancer patients. METHODS For six pancreatic cancer patients referred for adjuvant or primary radiochemotherapy, four rMFO-IMPT-SIB treatment plans each, consisting of two or three (non-)coplanar beam arrangements, were optimized. Dose values for both targets, i.e., the elective clinical target volume [CTV, prescribed dose Dpres = 51Gy(RBE)] and the boost target [Dpres = 66Gy(RBE)], for the organs at risk as well as target conformity and homogeneity indexes, derived from the dose volume histograms, were statistically compared. RESULTS All treatment plans of each strategy fulfilled the prescribed doses to the targets (Dpres(GTV,CTV) = 100%, D95%,(GTV,CTV) ≥ 95%, D2%,(GTV,CTV) ≤ 107%). No significant differences for the conformity index were found (p > 0.05), however, treatment plans with a three non-coplanar beam strategy were most homogenous to both targets (p < 0.045). The median value of all dosimetric results of the large and small bowel as well as for the liver and the spinal cord met the dose constraints with all beam arrangements. Irrespective of the planning strategies, the dose constraint for the duodenum and stomach were not met. Using the three-beam arrangements, the dose to the left kidney could be significant decreased when compared to a two-beam strategy (p < 0.045). CONCLUSION Based on our findings we recommend a three-beam configuration with at least one non-coplanar beam for dose-escalated SIB with rMFO-IMPT in advanced pancreatic cancer patients achieving a homogeneous dose distribution in the target while simultaneously minimizing the dose to the organs at risk. Further treatment planning studies on aspects of breathing and organ motion need to be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Stefanowicz
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Kristin Stützer
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika Jakobi
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany. .,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. .,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Nakamura A, Hiraoka M, Itasaka S, Nakamura M, Akimoto M, Ishihara Y, Mukumoto N, Goto Y, Kishi T, Yoshimura M, Matsuo Y, Yano S, Mizowaki T. Evaluation of Dynamic Tumor-tracking Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Sci Rep 2018; 8:17096. [PMID: 30459454 PMCID: PMC6244273 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35402-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 11/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is now regarded as an important treatment option for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). To reduce the underlying tumor motions and dosimetric errors during IMRT as well as the burden of respiratory management for patients, we started to apply a new treatment platform of the dynamic tumor dynamic tumor-tracking intensity-modulated radiotherapy (DTT-IMRT) using the gimbaled linac, which can swing IMRT toward the real-time tumor position under patients' voluntary breathing. Between June 2013 and March 2015, ten patients were treated, and the tumor-tracking accuracy and the practical benefits were evaluated. The mean PTV size in DTT-IMRT was 18% smaller than a conventional ITV-based PTV. The root-mean-squared errors between the predicted and the detected tumor positions were 1.3, 1.2, and 1.5 mm in left-right, anterior-posterior, and cranio-caudal directions, respectively. The mean in-room time was 24.5 min. This high-accuracy of tumor-tracking with reasonable treatment time are promising and beneficial to patients with LAPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masahiro Hiraoka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Satoshi Itasaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mami Akimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshitomo Ishihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Mukumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoko Goto
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Michio Yoshimura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yukinori Matsuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinsuke Yano
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ma SJ, Prezzano KM, Hermann GM, Singh AK. Dose escalation of radiation therapy with or without induction chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:214. [PMID: 30400962 PMCID: PMC6219058 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1158-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dose escalation of conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT) above 45-54 Gy has an unclear survival benefit. Prior National Cancer Database (NCDB) analyses have shown improved overall survival with induction chemotherapy (iC) prior to concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Our study compared dose-escalated CFRT with and without iC. METHODS The NCDB was queried for primary stage III, cT4 N0-1 M0 LAPC treated with CRT with or without iC (2004-2015). CFRT was stratified by < 55 Gy and ≥ 55 Gy. Cohort iC + CRT and CRT included those with and without iC, respectively. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards method, and propensity score matching were used. RESULTS Among 2029 patients, cohort iC + CRT had 738 patients (n = 601 for 45-55 Gy and n = 137 for ≥55 Gy) and cohort CRT had 1291 patients (n = 1066 for 45-55 Gy and n = 225 for ≥55 Gy). Median follow-up was 24.3 months and 24.6 months for cohorts iC + CRT and CRT, respectively. Dose escalation showed improved survival in the multivariable analysis in cohort iC + CRT (HR 0.77, p = 0.013) but not in cohort CRT (HR 0.91, p = 0.19). Using 2:1 propensity score matching, a total of 387 patients for cohort iC + CRT and 549 patients for cohort CRT were matched. After matching, dose escalation remained significant for improved overall survival in cohort iC + CRT (median OS 16.2 vs 15.2 months; 2-yr OS 33.4% vs 25.4%; p = 0.022) but not in cohort CRT (median OS 11.8 vs 10.6 months; 2-yr OS 13.3% vs 10.1%; p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer who undergo iC have improved survival with radiation dose escalation above 55 Gy. For patients without iC, there is no clear association between radiation dose escalation and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
| | - Kavitha M. Prezzano
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
| | - Gregory M. Hermann
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
| | - Anurag K. Singh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Goldsmith C, Plowman PN, Green MM, Dale RG, Price PM. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as primary, adjuvant, consolidation and re-treatment option in pancreatic cancer: scope for dose escalation and lessons for toxicity. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:204. [PMID: 30340643 PMCID: PMC6194644 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1138-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 02/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) offers an alternative treatment for pancreatic cancer, with the potential for improved tumour control and reduced toxicity compared with conventional therapies. However, optimal dose planning and delivery strategies are unelucidated and gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity remains a key concern. METHODS Patients with inoperable non-metastatic pancreatic cancer who received CyberKnife® SABR (18-36 Gy) in three fractions as primary, adjuvant, consolidation or re-treatment options were studied. Patient individualised planning and delivery variables were collected and their impact on patient outcome examined. Linear-quadratic (LQ) radiobiology modelling methods were applied to assess SABR parameters against a conventional fractionated radiotherapy schedule. RESULTS In total 42 patients were included, 37 (88%) of whom had stage T4 disease. SABR was used > 6 months post-primary therapy to re-treat residual disease in 11 (26.2%) patients and relapsed disease in nine (21.4%) patients. SABR was an adjuvant to other primary therapy for 14 (33.3%) patients and was the sole primary therapy for eight (19.0%) patients. The mean (95% CI) planning target volume (PTV), prescription isodose, percentage cover, minimum dose to PTV and biological effective dose (BED) were 76.3(63.8-88.7) cc, 67.3(65.2-69.5)%, 96.6(95.5-97.7)%, 22.3(21.0-23.6) Gy and 50.3(47.7-53.0) Gy, respectively. Only 3/37 (8.1%) patients experienced Grade 3 acute toxicities. Two (4.8%) patients converted to resectable status and median freedom-from-local-progression (FFLP) and overall survival (OS) were 9.8 and 8.4 months, respectively. No late toxicity was experienced in 27/32 (84.4%) patients; however, four (12.5%) patients - of whom two had particularly large PTV, two had sub-optimal number of fiducials and three breached organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints-showed Grade 4 duodenal toxicities. Longer delivery time, extended treatment course and reduced percentage coverage additionally associated with late toxicity, likely reflecting parameters typically applied to riskier patients. Larger PTV size and longer treatment course associated with OS. Comparator regimen LQ modelling analysis indicated 50% of patients received minimum PTV doses less potent than a conventional radiotherapy regimen, indicating scope for dose escalation. CONCLUSION The results demonstrate the value of SABR for a range of indications in pancreatic cancer. Dose escalation to increase BED may improve FFLP and OS in inoperable, non-metastatic disease: however concomitant enhanced stringency for duodenal protection is critical, particularly for patients where SABR is more challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - P Nicholas Plowman
- The London CyberKnife Centre, The Harley Street Clinic, 81 Harley Street, London, W1G 8PP, UK.,St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Melanie M Green
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Roger G Dale
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Patricia M Price
- The London CyberKnife Centre, The Harley Street Clinic, 81 Harley Street, London, W1G 8PP, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Oh ES, Kim TH, Woo SM, Lee WJ, Lee JH, Youn SH, Han SS, Park SJ, Kim DY. Effectiveness and feasibility of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy with and without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Radiat Oncol J 2018; 36:200-209. [PMID: 30309211 PMCID: PMC6226140 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2018.00073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients. Materials and Methods Between January 2011 and May 2015, 47 LAPC patients received CRT using SIB-IMRT. Prior to SIB-IMRT, 37 patients (78.7%) received induction chemotherapy (IC-CRT group) and remaining 10 patients (21.3%) did not received induction chemotherapy (CRT group). During SIB-IMRT, all patients received concomitant chemotherapy, with gemcitabine (n = 37) and capecitabine (n = 10). Results At the time of analysis, 45 patients had died and 2 patients remained alive and the median follow-up time was 14.2 months (range, 3.3 to 51.4 months). For all patients, the median times of local progression-free survival (LPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 18.1, 10.3, and 14.2 months, respectively. The median time of LPFS between IC-CRT and CRT groups was similar (18.1 months vs. 18.3 months, p = 0.711). IC-CRT group had a higher trend in PFS (10.9 months vs. 4.1 months, p = 0.054) and had significantly higher OS (15.4 months vs. 9.5 months, p = 0.007) than CRT group. In multivariate analysis, the use of induction chemotherapy and tumor response were significant factors associated with OS (p < 0.05, each). During SIBIMRT, toxicity of grade ≥3 was observed in 7 patients (14.9%) in all patients. Conclusions CRT using SIB-IMRT is feasible and promising in LAPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Sang Oh
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Institute, Goyang, Korea
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Institute, Goyang, Korea
- Correspondence: Tae Hyun Kim, MD, Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Institute, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Korea. Tel: +82-31-920-1725, Fax: +82-31-920-0149, E-mail:
| | - Sang Myung Woo
- Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Institute, Goyang, Korea
| | - Woo Jin Lee
- Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Institute, Goyang, Korea
| | - Ju Hee Lee
- Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Institute, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sang Hee Youn
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Institute, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sung Sik Han
- Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Institute, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sang Jae Park
- Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Institute, Goyang, Korea
| | - Dae Yong Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Institute, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Alexander MS, Wilkes JG, Schroeder SR, Buettner GR, Wagner BA, Du J, Gibson-Corley K, O'Leary BR, Spitz DR, Buatti JM, Berg DJ, Bodeker KL, Vollstedt S, Brown HA, Allen BG, Cullen JJ. Pharmacologic Ascorbate Reduces Radiation-Induced Normal Tissue Toxicity and Enhances Tumor Radiosensitization in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Res 2018; 78:6838-6851. [PMID: 30254147 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-1680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2018] [Revised: 08/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
: Chemoradiation therapy is the mainstay for treatment of locally advanced, borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Pharmacologic ascorbate (P-AscH-, i.e., intravenous infusions of ascorbic acid, vitamin C), but not oral ascorbate, produces high plasma concentrations capable of selective cytotoxicity to tumor cells. In doses achievable in humans, P-AscH- decreases the viability and proliferative capacity of pancreatic cancer via a hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-mediated mechanism. In this study, we demonstrate that P-AscH- radiosensitizes pancreatic cancer cells but inhibits radiation-induced damage to normal cells. Specifically, radiation-induced decreases in clonogenic survival and double-stranded DNA breaks in tumor cells, but not in normal cells, were enhanced by P-AscH-, while radiation-induced intestinal damage, collagen deposition, and oxidative stress were also reduced with P-AscH- in normal tissue. We also report on our first-in-human phase I trial that infused P-AscH- during the radiotherapy "beam on." Specifically, treatment with P-AscH- increased median overall survival compared with our institutional average (21.7 vs. 12.7 months, P = 0.08) and the E4201 trial (21.7 vs. 11.1 months). Progression-free survival in P-AscH--treated subjects was also greater than our institutional average (13.7 vs. 4.6 months, P < 0.05) and the E4201 trial (6.0 months). Results indicated that P-AscH- in combination with gemcitabine and radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma is safe and well tolerated with suggestions of efficacy. Because of the potential effect size and minimal toxicity, our findings suggest that investigation of P-AscH- efficacy is warranted in a phase II clinical trial. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings demonstrate that pharmacologic ascorbate enhances pancreatic tumor cell radiation cytotoxicity in addition to offering potential protection from radiation damage in normal surrounding tissue, making it an optimal agent for improving treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew S Alexander
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.,Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Justin G Wilkes
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.,Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Samuel R Schroeder
- Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Garry R Buettner
- Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.,The Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Brett A Wagner
- Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Juan Du
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Katherine Gibson-Corley
- The Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Brianne R O'Leary
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Douglas R Spitz
- Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.,The Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - John M Buatti
- Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.,The Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Daniel J Berg
- The Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.,Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Kellie L Bodeker
- Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.,The Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Sandy Vollstedt
- Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.,The Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Heather A Brown
- Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.,The Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Bryan G Allen
- Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.,The Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Joseph J Cullen
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa. .,Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.,The Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.,The Veterans' Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|