Mucosal Melanoma of the Head and Neck: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Adjuvant Therapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors after Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Mucosal Melanoma of the Head and Neck: A Case-Control Study

The development of new treatment strategies to improve the prognosis of mucosal malignant melanoma of the head and neck (MMHN) after carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is essential because of the risk of distant metastases. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment to justify its inclusion in the regimen after CIRT. Thirty-four patients who received CIRT as an initial treatment were included in the analysis and stratified into three groups: those who did not receive ICIs (Group A), those who received ICIs after recurrence or metastasis (Group B), and those who received ICIs as adjuvant therapy after CIRT (Group C). In total, 62% of the patients (n = 21) received ICIs. The 2-year local control and overall survival (OS) rates for all patients were 90.0% and 66.8%, respectively. The 2-year OS rates for patients in Groups A, B, and C were 50.8%, 66.7%, and 100%, respectively. No significant differences were observed between Groups A and B (p = 0.192) and Groups B and C (p = 0.112). However, a significant difference was confirmed between Groups A and C (p = 0.017). Adjuvant therapy following CIRT for MMHN may be a promising treatment modality that can extend patient survival.

Malignant melanoma in Portuguese adult population: a scoping review of the real-world evidence

PURPOSE

Malignant melanoma is an aggressive cancer, and there is a notable dearth on epidemiology, clinical and treatment characterization within the Portuguese population. We performed a scoping review to identify real-world evidence studies focused in Portuguese adult patients with malignant melanoma.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted. After screening, we described the studies by design, sample size, geographics, setting, population, and outcomes reported.

RESULTS

The search yielded 54 studies, mainly retrospective (79.6%). The population assessed was heterogeneous varying from patients with melanoma in general to specific types of melanoma, or even more restricted to patients with specific conditions. The evidence found was mostly concerning clinical outcomes (n=46), patients' clinical profile (n=44) and demographic characterization (n=48). Treatment information was described in 30 studies whereas only 18 reported epidemiological parameters. Studies were mainly performed by the major oncology centers in Lisbon, Oporto and Coimbra, and only two evaluated the entire Portuguese population. To allow comparability, only studies including patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma were considered (13 of the 54) for outcomes evaluation analysis. Median OS varied from 18 to 36 months, assessed after melanoma treatment. Incidence was the most reported epidemiological parameter, confirming the increasing number of cutaneous malignant melanoma patients over the years. Only one study reported prevalence and four reported mortality rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence found confirms the lack of information about malignant melanoma in Portugal, highlighting the need of real-world studies to assess melanoma prevalence and incidence rates, current treatment approaches, and clinical characterization of these patients.

Electrochemotherapy as adjuvant treatment in a sinonasal mucosal melanoma in elderly patient: a case report

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma (SNMM) is a rare but aggressive disease. Surgery with free margins, when feasible, is the treatment of choice. In the last three decades, electrochemotherapy (ECT) has emerged as a local ablative procedure, performed with the Cliniporator, for cutaneous and mucosal tumours of different histology. We present a case report of an ECT treatment performed by means of a new endoscopic electrode, on an elderly patient affected by primary SNMM.

METHODS

An 88-year-old man with a diagnosis of SNMM (cT4aN0M0)-Stage IV, of the left nasal fossa presented at our institution. Symptoms were epistaxis and complete left nasal obstruction. He refused sinonasal extended surgery and radiotherapy. He underwent a tumor debulking followed by ECT exclusively for symptom control, with palliative intent.

RESULTS

The patient underwent SNMM debulking under general anaesthesia, followed by ECT on tumour margins. After the procedure, he had been free from symptoms for 5 months, with a good quality of life. Local recurrence was controlled with a new local debulking and ECT procedure on margins. The patient remained symptom free for the next 4 months. Seventeen months after diagnosis, the patient is mild symptomatic for sinonasal disease. Therefore, he developed a systemic disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, ECT can be used as an adjuvant tool for symptom and local control in SNMM when extended surgery is out of curative intent or unfeasible. As expected, ECT does not appear to have any effect on systemic disease progression.

Mutational landscape and predictors of survival in head and neck mucosal melanoma

KEY POINTS

Head and neck mucosal melanomas have a diverse mutational landscape with low mutational burden. A molecular subset (∼13%) has ROS1 mutations, which is an actionable driver mutation. ROS1-mutated patients have improved overall survival likely due to high mutational burden.

Primary Nasopharyngeal Melanoma without invasive and Metastasis: A Rare Case Reports and Literature Reviews

Objective: Nasopharyngeal melanoma is a rare mucosal malignant melanoma with high recurrence rate, metastasis rate and vascular invasion rate. In this paper, we report a case of primary nasopharyngeal mucosal melanoma. Methods: A case of primary nasopharyngeal mucosal melanoma was reported, and its clinical symptoms, pathological characteristics, treatment and follow-up were described in detail. Results: This report describes a 59-year-old male patient with persistent nasal congestion and suspected malignant nasopharyngeal neoplasm. Patients receive surgical resection and adjuvant radiotherapy after complete resection. Imaging studies showed no tissue invasion or lymph node metastases. The results of immunohistochemistry were Melan-A(+), HMB45(+), and S100(+). The final diagnosis was malignant nasopharyngeal melanoma. After 2 years of follow-up, the prognosis was good, and there was no metastasis or recurrence. Discussion: Nasopharyngeal melanoma is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis, and surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment. Postoperative adjuvant therapy can improve the rate of local control of lesions. Early diagnosis and thorough examination are extremely important for the patient's prognosis.

Radiation oncology for the rhinologist

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This comprehensive review explores evolving treatment strategies for sinonasal and nasopharyngeal malignancies. It analyzes the role of adjuvant radiotherapy, the potential of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), and the relevance of de-escalation strategies nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Additionally, it discusses hyperfractionation in re-irradiation in NPC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Adjuvant radiotherapy remains pivotal for sinonasal tumors, improving locoregional control and survival, notably in squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, and adenoid cystic carcinomas. IMPT promises enhanced outcomes by sparing healthy tissues, potentially improving patients' quality of life. For select stage II/T3N0 NPC, radiotherapy alone offers comparable outcomes to concurrent chemoradiotherapy, with fewer adverse events and improved quality of life. Selective neck irradiation in NPC patients with uninvolved necks maintains oncologic outcomes while reducing late toxicity. Hyperfractionation in re-irradiation shows promise in lowering late toxicities and improving overall survival, particularly in undifferentiated sinonasal carcinomas.

SUMMARY

This review underscores the significance of adjuvant radiotherapy and the potential of advanced radiation techniques in optimizing sinonasal and nasopharyngeal malignancy outcomes. It emphasizes evolving de-escalation methods and individualized, evidence-based approaches. Future research will further refine strategies for these challenging malignancies.

Multicenter Evaluation of Radiation and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Mucosal Melanoma and Review of Recent Literature

Purpose

Optimal integration of local therapy and systemic immune therapy for patients with mucosal melanoma (MM) is uncertain. We evaluated treatment patterns and outcomes following radiation therapy (RT) in combination with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in MM.

Methods and Materials

Thirty-seven patients with localized (n = 32, 87%) or node-positive (n = 5, 14%) MM were treated across 4 institutions with RT to the primary tumor with or without oncologic resection (n = 28, 76%) and ICI from 2012 to 2020. Recurrence rates were estimated using cumulative incidence in the presence of the competing risk of death.

Results

Mucosal sites were head/neck (n = 29, 78%), vaginal (n = 7, 19%), and anorectal (n = 1, 3%). Patients received ICI prior to or concurrent with RT (n = 14, 38%), following RT (n = 5, 14%), or at recurrence (n = 18, 49%). The objective response rate for evaluable patients was 31% for ICI as initial treatment (95% CI, 11%-59%) and 19% for ICI at recurrence (95% CI, 4%-46%). Median follow-up was 26 months for living patients; median overall survival (OS) was 54 months (95% CI, 31 months-not reached). Two-year OS was 85%; distant metastasis-free survival 44%. The 2-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR) was 26% (95% CI, 13%-41%). For 9 patients with unresectable disease, 2-year OS was 88% (95% CI, 35%-98%); LR was 25% (95% CI, 3%-58%). For 5 patients with positive nodes at diagnosis, 2-year OS was 100%; LR was 0%.

Conclusions

High rates of local control were achieved with RT with or without oncologic resection and ICI for localized and locally advanced MM. In particular, favorable local control was possible even for patients with unresectable or node-positive disease. Although risk of distant failure remains high, patients with MM may benefit from aggressive local therapy including RT in the setting of immunotherapy treatment.

Prognostic biomarkers for survival in mucosal melanoma

Mucosal melanoma (MM) is a rare subtype of melanoma with an aggressive clinical course. In cutaneous melanoma (CM), the absence of pigmentation and presence of NRAS/KRAS mutations are biomarkers indicating an aggressive clinical course with shorter overall survival. Similar data for MM are missing. We present the real-world outcome data in a cohort of genotyped MM patients and assessed the prognostic relevance of pigmentation- and NRAS/KRAS mutation status. We correlated pathological reports and clinical data with overall survival of patients with MM. Furthermore, we performed clinically integrated molecular genotyping and analyzed real world treatment regimens for covariates associated with clinical outcome. We identified 39 patients with available clinical and molecular data. Patients with amelanotic MM had a significantly shorter overall survival (p = .003). In addition, the presence of a NRAS or KRAS mutation was significantly associated with poor overall survival (NRAS or KRAS p = .024). Currently, it is unknown if the same prognostic relevance for the lack of pigmentation and RAS mutations in CM, exists in MM. Here we analyzed a cohort of MM for outcome measures and determined that two known prognostic biomarkers for CM are in fact novel prognosticators for MM.

Dramatic response to radiation of a sinus melanoma: A case report

In this report, we shared our experience in the treatment of a patient with unresectable sinonasal melanoma, in whom a complete radiographic response was seen after a course of conventional external beam radiotherapy. Given that local control has an important role in maintaining the quality of life of patients.

Advances in the Application of Nanomaterials to the Treatment of Melanoma

Melanoma can be divided into cutaneous melanoma, uveal melanoma, mucosal melanoma, etc. It is a very aggressive tumor that is prone to metastasis. Patients with metastatic melanoma have a poor prognosis and shorter survival. Although current melanoma treatments have been dramatically improved, there are still many problems such as systemic toxicity and the off-target effects of drugs. The use of nanoparticles may overcome some inadequacies of current melanoma treatments. In this review, we summarize the limitations of current therapies for cutaneous melanoma, uveal melanoma, and mucosal melanoma, as well as the adjunct role of nanoparticles in different treatment modalities. We suggest that nanomaterials may have an effective intervention in melanoma treatment in the future.

Oral melanoma: a multicenter study of 69 patients from Japan

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study was to investigate the demographic characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with mucosal malignant melanoma (MM) of the oral cavity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter study involving 8 Japanese universities. The medical records of 69 patients who were diagnosed with primary oral MM between January 2000 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors for OS were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

There were 40 (58.0%) males and 29 (42.0%) females, and their mean (range) age was 69.8 ± 14.6 (22-96) years old. The most common primary site was the palate (30 patients, 43.5%). Stage IVA was the most common disease stage (36 patients, 52.2%). Radical therapy was performed in 55 patients (79.7%). The 2-year and 5-year OS rates of the 69 patients were 64.6% and 42.5%, respectively. The 2-year and 5-year OS rates of the stage III patients were 85.9% and 72.5%, respectively, and those of the stage IVA patients were 56.3% and 26.0%, respectively. The 1-year OS rate of the stage IVB/IVC patients was 26.7%. The 2-year and 5-year OS rates of the radical therapy group were 74.1% and 50.5%, respectively, whereas the 2-year OS rate of the non-radical therapy group was 26.0%. An advanced T classification was the only identified prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio: 6.312, 95% confidence interval: 1.133-38.522, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Early detection and radical treatment are essential for improving the prognosis of oral MM patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Early detection and adequate radical therapy leads to the better prognosis of oral MM patients.

Evolution in Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma Management

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma is a rare and aggressive cancer with poor prognosis. Surgical resection with clear margins, when possible, remains the treatment of choice. Radiation therapy is generally used in the adjuvant setting with improved rates of local control following complete resection. Traditional chemotherapeutic agents do not improve the rates of locoregional control or survival. Immunotherapy has been used with some responders but with overall relatively poor outcomes. These outcomes highlight the need for new agents and more prospective trials in this space. We provide a unique case report of a patient with an advanced sinonasal mucosal melanoma and an overview of the recent literature pertaining to the management of this disease.

Nasal and paranasal sinus mucosal melanoma: Long-term survival outcomes and prognostic factors

OBJECTIVE

To determine prognostic factors and survival patterns for different treatment modalities for nasal cavity (NC) and paranasal sinus (PS) mucosal melanoma (MM).

METHODS

Patients from 1973 to 2013 were analyzed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable cox proportional hazard modeling were used for survival analyses.

RESULTS

Of 928 cases of mucosal melanoma (NC = 632, PS = 302), increasing age (Hazard Ratio [HR]:1.05/year, p < 0.001), T4 tumors (HR: 1.81, p = 0.02), N1 status (HR: 6.61, p < 0.001), and PS disease (HR: 1.50, p < 0.001) were associated with worse survival. Median survival length was lower for PS versus NC (16 versus 26 months, p < 0.001). Surgery and surgery + radiation therapy (RT) improved survival over non-treatment or RT alone (p < 0.001). Adding RT to surgery did not yield a survival difference compared with surgery alone (p = 0.43). Five-year survival rates for surgery and surgery + RT were similar, at 27.7% and 25.1% (p = 0.43).

CONCLUSION

Surgery increased survival significantly over RT alone. RT following surgical resection did not improve survival.

Malignant mucosal melanoma of paranasal sinuses: A case report

Introduction

Mucosal melanoma of paranasal sinuses is a rare disease with a challenging treatment and a poor prognosis. In this paper, we reported the successful multimodality treatment of malignant mucosal melanoma of frontal sinus.

Case presentation

A 65-year-old female presented with a frequent nosebleed for one month before admission. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed a mass in the right frontal and ethmoidal sinuses with adjacent bone erosion and right orbit invasion. Biopsy revealed malignant melanoma. No metastasis was found. The definitive diagnosis was malignant mucosal melanoma of paranasal sinuses AJCC stage IVb (T4bN0M0). We used right frontobasal craniotomy to resect tumor for local control of the disease. Immunohistochemical staining was Melan A(+), S100(+), and HMB45(+). A week postoperative, she received adjuvant radiotherapy and immunotherapy (pembrolizumab). For three months postoperative, the patient had no recurrence and metastasis, no headache and no new neurological deficits. She returned to her daily activities.

Clinical discussion

Mucosal melanoma of paranasal sinuses is usually aggressive and diagnosed at an advanced stage. Management options are surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. These options were performed on a case-by-case basis and depend on the extent and location of the tumor. Despite that, the prognosis remains very poor, with a high rate of local recurrences and distant metastases. Therefore, post-treatment lifetime and frequent follow-ups are highly recommended.

Conclusion

The critical issues in management of mucosal melanoma are early diagnosis, multimodality treatment, and frequent follow-ups.

•

Malignant mucosal melanoma of paranasal sinuses is a rare and complicated disease.

•

The prognosis of this disease remains very poor despite advances in treatment.

•

The critical issues in management are early diagnosis, multimodality treatment, and frequent follow-ups.

Mucosal Melanoma: Pathological Evolution, Pathway Dependency and Targeted Therapy

Mucosal melanoma (MM) is a rare melanoma subtype that originates from melanocytes within sun-protected mucous membranes. Compared with cutaneous melanoma (CM), MM has worse prognosis and lacks effective treatment options. Moreover, the endogenous or exogenous risk factors that influence mucosal melanocyte transformation, as well as the identity of MM precursor lesions, are ambiguous. Consequently, there remains a lack of molecular markers that can be used for early diagnosis, and therefore better management, of MM. In this review, we first summarize the main functions of mucosal melanocytes. Then, using oral mucosal melanoma (OMM) as a model, we discuss the distinct pathologic stages from benign mucosal melanocytes to metastatic MM, mapping the possible evolutionary trajectories that correspond to MM initiation and progression. We highlight key areas of ambiguity during the genetic evolution of MM from its benign lesions, and the resolution of which could aid in the discovery of new biomarkers for MM detection and diagnosis. We outline the key pathways that are altered in MM, including the MAPK pathway, the PI3K/AKT pathway, cell cycle regulation, telomere maintenance, and the RNA maturation process, and discuss targeted therapy strategies for MM currently in use or under investigation.

Multicenter Study of Carbon-ion Radiotherapy for Oropharyngeal Non-squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIM

To evaluate treatment outcomes of carbon-ion radiotherapy for oropharyngeal non-squamous cell carcinoma at four carbon-ion facilities in Japan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 33 patients with oropharyngeal non-squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy between November 2003 and December 2014.

RESULTS

The histology included adenoid cystic carcinoma (n=25) and mucosal malignant melanoma (n=4). No patients had T1 tumors; 23 had T4 tumors. The most-commonly prescribed dose was 57.6 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions. The median follow-up period was 34.8 months (range=4.2-122.8 months). The 3-year local control and overall survival rates were 94.7% and 90.7%, respectively. There were no grade ≥4 acute adverse events. Only one patient experienced a grade ≥4 late adverse event. No patients experienced late adverse events related to swallowing or salivary function.

CONCLUSION

Carbon-ion radiotherapy appears to be a promising treatment option for oropharyngeal non-squamous cell carcinoma.

The Role of Particle Therapy in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma and Mucosal Melanoma of the Head and Neck

Particle irradiation is suitable for resistant histologies owing to a combination of improved dose delivery with potential radiobiologic advantages in high linear energy transfer radiation. Within the head and neck, adenoid cystic carcinoma and mucosal melanoma are two such histologies, being radioresistant and lying closely proximal to critical structures. Here, we review the use of particle irradiation for adenoid cystic carcinoma and mucosal melanoma of the head and neck.

Spot Scanning Proton Therapy for Sinonasal Malignant Tumors

Purpose

Treatment of sinonasal malignant tumors is challenging, and evidence to establish a standard treatment is limited. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of spot scanning proton therapy (SSPT) for sinonasal malignant tumors.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients with sinonasal malignant tumors (T1-4bN0-2M0) who underwent SSPT between May 2014 and September 2019. The prescription dose was typically either 60 GyRBE in 15 fractions or 60.8 GyRBE in 16 fractions for mucosal melanoma and 70.2 GyRBE in 26 fractions for other histologic subtypes. Endpoints included local control (LC), progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and incidence of toxicity. Prognostic factors were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

Results

Of 62 enrolled patients, the common histologic subtypes were mucosal melanoma (35%), squamous cell carcinoma (27%), adenoid cystic carcinoma (16%), and olfactory neuroblastoma (10%). Locally advanced stages were common (T3 in 42% and T4 in 53%). Treatment-naïve tumors and postsurgical recurrent tumors accounted for 73% and 27%, respectively. No patient had previous radiotherapy. The median follow-up was 17 months (range, 6-66) for all patients and 21.5 months (range, 6-66) for survivors. The 2-year LC, progression-free survival, and OS rates of all patients were 92%, 50%, and 76%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed histology as a prognostic factor for OS, being higher in adenoid cystic carcinoma and olfactory neuroblastoma than in other tumors. Sixteen grade ≥3 late toxicities were observed in 12 patients (19%), including 11 events resulting in visual impairment; the most common was cataract. There was 1 grade 4 toxicity, and there were no grade 5 toxicities.

Conclusion

SSPT was well tolerated and yielded good LC for sinonasal malignant tumors. Although we consider SSPT to be a leading treatment modality, further studies are required to establish its status as a standard treatment.

Primary malignant mucosal melanoma of the maxillofacial area

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to collect and report data from all patients who have been diagnosed with mucosal malignant melanoma to obtain the epidemiology and principles of current treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2008 and December 2018, 20 patients underwent surgery or follow-up observations at Yonsei University Dental Hospital. The patients' clinical information was reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Seventeen of 20 patients had undergone definitive surgery, while only 6 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy or systemic therapy. Eight of 20 patients, including those that had recurrent lesions, were provided immunotherapy. The 3-year survival for all stages was 50%, with a local recurrence rate of 75% and a metastasis rate of 65%.

CONCLUSION

The overall survival of patients receiving surgical treatment was longer than that of patients who did not undergo surgical resection. Eight of 20 patients received immunotherapy as the first-line regimen at our clinic, and those patients exhibited longer overall survival compared to patients in reported keynote studies.

Clinical characterization and treatment of head and neck mucosal melanoma: a Chilean experience

OBJECTIVES

Head and neck mucosal melanoma (HNMM) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. The aim of this research was to analyze clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in a Latin American cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review of patients with HNMM treated between 2008 and 2019 was conducted. Demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, surgical treatment, adjuvant therapy, and oncologic outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty HNMMs were identified; 60% were in men. The most frequent primary location was the nasal cavity (10; 50%). Regional disease was uncommon and limited to the oral cavity. The median overall survival was 29 months; the 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 37.2% and 26.6%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that predictors of a worse overall survival were paranasal location (hazard ratio [HR], 4.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-18.40; P = .030), positive lymph nodes (HR, 6.00; 95% CI, 1.30-27.7; P = .022), positive margins (HR, 4.32; 95% CI, 1.08-17.2; P = .039), bone invasion (HR, 3.27;95% CI, 1.05-10.1; P = .041), and lymphovascular invasion (HR, 3.82; CI, 1.03-14.2; P = .045). Three-year recurrence-free survival was 17.3%, and most of the recurrences were with distant disease.

CONCLUSIONS

HNMM is an infrequent disease with an aggressive behavior. Survival outcomes are related to location of the primary disease, regional spread, lymphovascular invasion, and bone invasion.

A nomogram for predicting survival of head and neck mucosal melanoma

Objectives

We aimed to understand the clinical characteristics and better predict the prognosis of patients with mucosal melanoma of the head and neck (MMHN) using a nomogram.

Methods

Three hundred patients with nometastatic MMHN were included. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to analyze independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), and these factors were used to develop a nomogram. Concordance indexes (C-indexes), calibration plots, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed to test the predictive performance of the nomogram in both the primary (n = 300) and validation cohorts (n = 182).

Results

The primary tumor site, T stage and N stage were independent risk factors for survival and were included in the nomogram to predict the 3- and 5-year OS, DFS, DMFS, and LRRFS in the primary cohort. The C-indexes (both > 0.700), well-fit calibration plots, and area under the ROC curve (both > 0.700) indicated the high diagnostic accuracy of the nomogram, in both the primary and validation cohorts. The patients were divided into three groups (high-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk groups) according to their nomogram scores. The survival curves of OS, DFS, DMFS, and LRRFS were well separated by the risk groups in both cohorts (all P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The nomogram can stratify MMHN patients into clinically meaningful taxonomies to provide individualized treatment.

Importance of Margins, Radiotherapy, and Systemic Therapy in Mucosal Melanoma of the Head and Neck

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The ideal strategy in the treatment of mucosal melanoma of the head and neck (MMHN) remains unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the importance of surgical margins, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy in MMHN.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Single Institutional Review.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with MMHN treated at a tertiary care oncology center between 1999 and 2016.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were included, 60 of whom were treated with curative intent. Negative or close margins compared with positive margins were associated with higher 3-year overall survival (OS) (62% vs. 29% vs. 13% P = .012), disease-free survival (33% vs. 29% vs. 4% P = .003), and distant control (48% vs. 29% vs. 22% P = .039). Cases with pre-/postoperative radiotherapy had a marginally higher locoregional control versus without (69% vs. 59%, P = .117). Immunotherapy for recurrent and/or metastatic disease was associated with an increase in 3-year OS (15% vs. 3% P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Achieving negative surgical margins is relevant in disease control. Despite small sample size, our data suggest that radiotherapy may enhance surgical outcomes. Immunotherapy has therapeutic benefit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2021.

CDK4 and TERT amplification in head and neck mucosal melanoma

BACKGROUND

Recent high-throughput sequencing studies have revealed frequent CDK4 and TERT amplification in mucosal melanoma, suggesting that they are potential therapeutic targets. In this study, we investigated the statuses of CDK4 and TERT in head and neck mucosal melanoma (HNMM) with the aim of providing preclinical data to support future clinical trials.

METHODS

In total, 29 HNMM samples were collected, including 16 oral mucosal melanoma (OMM) samples and 13 nasal cavity/sinuses melanoma (SNMM) samples. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was used to analyze CDK4 and TERT amplification, and immunohistochemistry was used to analyze CDK4 and TERT protein expression patterns. CDK4 expression was knocked down in the ME cells (an OMM cell line), and changes in cell cycle were analyzed. Cell viability assays were performed to determine the sensitivity of ME to abemaciclib (a CDK4 inhibitor) combined with dacarbazine (an anti-melanoma chemotherapy drug).

RESULTS

We detected five samples exhibited CDK4 amplifications and nine samples exhibited TERT amplifications in our HNMM series, and found that CDK4 amplification tended to occur in combination with TERT amplification. Amplifications of CDK4 and TERT were more common in OMM than in SNMM. Amplifications of CDK4 and TERT were associated with greater CDK4 and TERT protein expression levels. CDK4 knockdown led to delayed G1/S phase transition in ME cells. Furthermore, ME cells were sensitive to abemaciclib (IC₅₀  = 5.23 nM). Abemaciclib and dacarbazine synergistically inhibited ME cells' viability.

CONCLUSION

We confirmed high frequencies of CDK4 and TERT amplification in OMM. Combined therapy with a CDK4/6 inhibitor and anti-melanoma chemotherapeutic agents will be a reasonable strategy for future clinical trials concerning unresectable or metastatic OMM.

Prognostic values of treatment modalities on head and neck mucosal melanomas in elderly patients: a population-based analysis

Background

Head and neck mucosal melanoma (HNMM) is defined as a rare malignant tumor derived from melanocytes. There is no consensus regarding the treatment protocol for HNMM in elderly patients.

Methods

The National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify elderly patients diagnosed with HNMM from 1975 to 2016. The chi-squared test was used to compare patient characteristics. The reverse Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median follow-up time. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate and compare the overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) of the groups. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for OS and DSS of HNMM.

Results

Our retrospective study included 828 elderly patients with HNMM, and the 5-year OS and DSS rates were 22.4% and 27.4%, respectively. After adjusting for other variables in multivariate analysis, patients undergoing radiotherapy alone had worse OS [hazard ratio (HR) =1.449, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.010–1.742, P=0.006] and DSS (HR =1.656, 95% CI: 1.257–2.181, P<0.001) than those undergoing surgery alone. No significant difference in OS (HR =0.892, 95% CI: 0.753–1.056, P=0.183) or DSS (HR =0.917, 95% CI: 0.764–1.101, P=0.354) was observed for patients undergoing surgery with or without radiotherapy. Our analysis of the subgroup of patients with complete clinical staging information demonstrated that the effects of surgery alone on OS (HR =0.734, 95% CI: 0.562–0.958, P=0.023) were inferior to those of surgery with radiotherapy, but no significant difference was noted compared with radiotherapy alone.

Conclusions

The survival of elderly patients with HNMM is increased with the combination of surgery and radiotherapy compared with surgery alone and radiotherapy alone. In addition, the population-based analysis demonstrated that combination therapy exhibited an obviously increased usage rate from 1975 to 2016, representing a mainstream treatment modality.

In situ melanoma of oral cavity: Diagnosis and treatment of a rare entity

Oral melanoma is an extremely aggressive and rare tumor. Commonly, oral melanomas are diagnosed as invasive tumors, which considerably reduces the chances of cure. In situ oral melanomas being exceedingly rare, which makes its clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics poorly known. Herein, we report a case of 67-year-old non-white woman with a large black patch on the maxillary alveolar mucosa. A biopsy was made and microscopical analysis revealed moderate atypical junctional melanocytic. Tumor cells were positive for S100 (Polyclonal), Melan-A (Clone A103) and Melanosome (HMB-45). The diagnosis of in situ oral melanoma was made and the patient was treated surgically with partial maxillectomy and rehabilitated with obturator prosthesis. Although extremely rare in situ melanomas should be considered in the differential diagnosis of non-invasive pigmented lesions of the oral mucosa.

Primary tumor volume as a predictor of distant metastases and survival in patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is an aggressive cancer with high mortality. Identifying patients at risk of distant metastasis assists with management and prognostication. We aimed to define the relationship between volume, survival, and risk of distant metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients with SNMM treated at a single institution over a 21-year period was conducted. Tumor volume was calculated using cross-sectional imaging and survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were included. Tumor volume was predictive of local progression-free survival (P = .03), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) (P = .002), and overall survival (OS) (P = .02). It was a better predictor than AJCC stage and T-classification. Tumor volume equal to or greater than 5 cm³ was associated with a significantly worse DMFS and OS (P = .02 and .009, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Calculation of tumor volume assists in quantifying the risk of distant metastases and death in SNMM.

Efficacy and safety of carbon-ion radiotherapy for the malignant melanoma: A systematic review

Malignant melanomas (MMs) were the fifth most common cancer in men and the sixth most common cancer in women in 2018, respectively. These are characterized by high metastatic rates and poor prognoses. We systematically reviewed safety and efficacy of carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for treating MMs. Eleven studies were eligible for review, and the data showed that MM patients showed better local control with low recurrence and mild toxicities after CIRT. Survival rates were slightly higher in patients with cutaneous or uveal MMs than in those with mucosal MMs. CIRT in combination with chemotherapy produced higher progression-free survival rates than CIRT only. In younger patients, higher rates of distant metastases of gynecological MMs were observed. The data indicated that CIRT is effective and safe for treating MMs; however, a combination with systemic therapy is recommended to ensure the best possible prognosis for MMs.

Local and disease control for nasal melanoma treated with radiation and concomitant anti-programmed death 1 antibody

Mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity is a rare disease that has been consistently associated with poor outcome. While complete surgical excision offers the only prospect of a cure, it is associated with a high risk of surgical morbidity due to the challenging anatomical location, and most patients still develop incurable metastatic disease. The efficacy of immunotherapy on mucosal melanoma is lower in comparison with cutaneous melanoma, and mucosal melanoma rarely has BRAF mutations. Although preclinical data have shown that combination treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiotherapy (RT) improve the response, there have been few reports on the combination of RT and anti-programmed death 1 therapy for mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity. We retrospectively investigated 10 cases of mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity in which combined treatment was applied. The local control (LC) rate of the primary lesion and regional lymph nodes was favorably 100%. On the other hand, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 29.6 weeks (range, 2-82). The 6-month PFS rate was 60%. Although severe mucositis occurred in one patient, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events was not significantly increased. RT with anti-programmed death 1 antibody therapy for mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity was tolerable and had the potential to improve LC and PFS.

Carbon-ion radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for head and neck mucosal melanoma: Prospective observational study

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of carbon-ion radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy using dacarbazine, nimustine, and vincristine (DAV therapy) in mucosal melanoma. Twenty-one patients with clinically localized mucosal melanoma of the head and neck were enrolled. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included local control, progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse event occurrence. Carbon-ion radiotherapy with a dose of 57.6-64.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 16 fractions was delivered concurrently with DAV therapy, and 2 cycles of adjuvant DAV therapy were administered every 6 weeks. The median follow-up periods were 15.5 months for all patients, and 31.2 months for 12 surviving patients. All patients had locally advanced T4a or T4b disease in the rhino-sinus area. In 16 patients (76.2%), 3 cycles of planned DAV therapy were completed. The 3-year OS and PFS rates were 49.2% and 37.0% respectively. The 3-year local control rate was 92.3%. Eleven patients (52%) developed distant metastasis, which was the most frequent pattern of the first failure. Commonly presenting acute grade 2-3 toxicities associated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy were mucositis (11 patients [53%]) and leukopenia (9 patients [43%]), which improved with conservative therapy. None of the patients developed grade 3 or greater late toxicities. Carbon-ion radiotherapy in combination with DAV therapy led to excellent local control for advanced mucosal melanoma within acceptable toxicities. The efficacy of additional DAV therapy in improving survival was weaker than expected as distant metastases still occurred frequently. Trial registration no. UMIN000007939.

Survival benefits from concomitant chemoradiotherapy before radical surgery in stage IVA sinonasal mucosal melanoma?

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to review a local treatment protocol for sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) focusing on triple modality treatment (TMT), that is, neoadjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery.

METHODS

In a retrospective design, data on clinical presentation, treatment, and survival were retrieved for 22 consecutive patients from a tertiary referral center.

RESULTS

The mean overall survival (OS) for all patients (3 stage III, 16 stage IVA, and 3 stage IVB) was 62 months, and the 5-year OS rate 50%. Four of the 22 patients received treatment with palliative intention. Of the 18 patients who received treatment with curative intention, patients with stage IVA disease who received TMT (n = 10) had a 5-year OS of 70% and 10-year OS of 20%. The median disease-free survival for these patients was 51 months compared with 9 months for stage IVA not receiving TMT (n = 4).

CONCLUSION

A seemingly favorable survival outcome for a disease with characteristically poor prognosis was observed. The lead finding was a high survival rate (70% 5-year OS) for stage IVA patients who received neoadjuvant TMT. The observations suggest the possibility that patients with advanced SNMM (stage IVA) might benefit from concomitant CRT before surgery by delaying the onset of local recurrences and distant metastases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4, case series (with or without comparison).

Effect of Radiotherapy Combined With Pembrolizumab on Local Tumor Control in Mucosal Melanoma Patients

Objective: Mucosal melanoma is an aggressive malignancy with a poor response to conventional therapies. The efficacy of radiotherapy (RT), especially combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), for this rare melanoma subtype remains unknown. We investigated the reciprocal effect of RT and ICI on mucosal melanoma patients.

Materials and Methods: We identified 23 patients with 31 tumors who were treated with RT between July 2008 and February 2017. All patients received RT for primary or metastatic gross tumor mass with a median dose of 4 Gy per fraction (range 1.8–12 Gy). Eleven patients (14 lesions) were treated with RT alone, whereas 12 (17 lesions) were administered pembrolizumab combined with RT (ICI+RT group). The local control (LC) and adverse event (AE) rates were compared between the groups. Eight patients with metastatic mucosal melanoma treated with ICI alone during the same study period were included as a comparison group.

Results: The median follow-up period was 17.4 (range 3.7–95.2) months. The target lesion control rate at 1-year was significantly higher in the ICI+RT group than in the RT-alone group or ICI-alone group (94.1% vs. 57.1% vs. 25%; P < 0.05). No abscopal effect was observed in our cohort. Treatment-related AEs were not significantly increased in the combined treatment group compared with the RT-alone group (P > 0.05). No grade ≥3 AEs occurred in the ICI+RT group.

Conclusions: Besides RT acting as an immune adjuvant, ICI might have a radiosensitizing effect and may increase LC without severe toxicity. We have initiated a phase II study to determine the effects of RT in patients with melanoma undergoing anti-PD1 (NCT04017897).

Amplification and attenuation of lung metastases depending on glucocorticoid dosage implicating long-acting activated memory cells induced by nivolumab against malignant melanoma

Firstly, glucocorticoids such as prednisolone can attenuate the effect of anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab. Secondly, malignant melanoma cells survived latently and unnoticeably in places other than those of previous metastatic lesions. Thirdly, effector T cells activated by nivolumab sustained their memory to attack malignant melanoma cells for several months.

An update on head and neck cancer: new entities and their histopathology, molecular background, treatment, and outcome

The head and neck region harbor numerous specialized tissues of all lineages giving rise to a plethora of different malignancies. In recent years, new types and subtypes of cancer has been described here due to the recognition of their histological and molecular characteristics. Some have been formally accepted in the most recent classifications from the World Health Organization (WHO) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) as distinct diseases due to characteristics in clinical presentation, outcome, and treatment. In particular, this applies to malignancies of the salivary gland, sinonasal tract, and oropharynx. In this overview, we present the most recent developments in the classification, histopathological characteristics, and molecular features of head and neck cancer. The clinical and radiological characteristics, outcome, and treatment options including perspectives for targeted therapies, are discussed.

Vulvar malignant melanoma: Pathogenesis, clinical behaviour and management: Review of the literature

Vulvar malignant melanoma (VMM) is a rare disease, accounting for 5% of all vulvar malignancies and is characterized by low survival and high recurrence rates. It is considered as a distinct entity of mucosal melanoma. Prognostic factors are higher age, advanced Breslow thickness, and lymph node involvement whilst central localization and ulceration status are still under debate. Surgery is the cornerstone for the treatment of primary VMM, however, it can be mutilating due to the anatomical location of the disease. Elective lymph node dissection is not part of standard care. The value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in VMM is still being studied. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment do not benefit survival. Immunotherapy in cutaneous melanoma has shown promising results but clinical studies in VMM are scarce. In metastatic VMM, checkpoint inhibitors and in case of BRAF or KIT mutated metastatic VMM targeted therapy have shown clinical efficacy. In this review, we present an overview of clinical aspects, clinicopathological characteristics and its prognostic value and the latest view on (adjuvant) therapy and follow-up.

Combined radiotherapy with nivolumab for extracranial metastatic malignant melanoma

PURPOSE

We retrospectively evaluated the tumor regression after radiotherapy in combination with the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab for metastatic melanoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated the extracranial metastatic melanoma lesions to which concomitant radiotherapy with nivolumab was administered from June 2015 to February 2017. Tumor volume and maximum diameter were measured at the time of pre-radiotherapy and best response, and the tumor reduction rate was assessed in two ways that our hospital adopts: tumor volume and diameter.

RESULTS

Seven lesions in five patients were evaluated. The median time from the start of nivolumab treatment to the start of radiotherapy was 5 months (range 0-22 months). The objective response rate was 85.7% in the evaluation by tumor volume and 42.9% by maximum diameter of the tumor. The objective complete response rate was 28.6% in evaluation by tumor volume and 14.3% by maximum dia. The 1-year tumor control rate was 62.5%. The 1- and 2-year overall survival rate after nivolumab treatment were 75% and 50%, respectively. Two patients who obtained a complete response had presented with vitiligo.

CONCLUSION

The combination of radiotherapy and nivolumab treatment produced favorable responses. Vitiligo may be correlated with a good response to concomitant radiotherapy with nivolumab.

Radiotherapy alone as a method of treatment for sinonasal mucosal melanoma: A report based on six cases and a review of current opinion

Objectives

Radiotherapy in patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) was given as alternative treatment to surgery in cases with advanced, inoperable tumors or those not eligible for surgery. We presented the outcomes for patients with SNMM treated with radiotherapy alone.

Material and methods

The retrospective review of 6 consecutive SNMM (nasal cavity - 4 pts. and paranasal sinus - 2 pts.) patients (3 males and 3 females at mean age 64 years) treated between 2008 and 2016 was presented. The stage of disease was: T3 (1 pt.), T4a (3 pts.), T4b (2 pts.); with N0 and M0 in all patients. All patients underwent definitive primary photon radiotherapy (IMRT) alone; dose 66-72 Gy was delivered in 22-24 fractions given in 5 fractions (3 Gy) a week.

Results

The complete remission was observed in all our patients but only one patient survived 5 years without disease. Five patients died due to multiple distant metastases; two of those patients developed associated local recurrence 7-8 months after radiotherapy.

Conclusion

SNMM has a poor prognosis due to its high metastatic potential. Based on our numerically small report and data from literature we concluded that primary radiotherapy alone assured complete remission and even 5-year disease-free survival in only a few individual patients.

Primary Middle Ear Mucosal Melanoma: Case Report and Comprehensive Literature Review of 21 Cases of Primary Middle Ear and Eustachian Tube Melanoma

OBJECTIVE

To present a case of primary middle ear mucosal melanoma and perform a comprehensive literature review of middle ear and eustachian tube mucosal melanoma.

PATIENT

A 61-year-old female presented with no prior history of melanoma and 3 months of aural fullness. A middle ear mass demonstrated primary mucosal melanoma. The mass extended from mesotympanum into hypotympanum, epitympanum, protympanum, eustachian tube, and mastoid antrum. Additionally, a nonenhancing expansile lesion of the petrous apex was noted on magnetic resonance imaging.

INTERVENTION

Subtotal temporal bone resection with transotic approach to the petrous abnormality was performed. Postoperative adjuvant radiation and immunotherapy were given.

RESULTS

Five months postoperatively, the patient developed an isolated cutaneous metastatic focus treated with wide local excision and has had no further evidence of recurrence to date. Upon comprehensive literature review, patients with primary middle ear melanomas (n = 10) present with otorrhea (50%), aural fullness (40%), and hearing loss (30%) most commonly, while hearing loss (81.8%) and aural fullness (54.5%) were the most common presenting symptoms for eustachian tube melanomas (n = 11). Patients were treated with combinations of surgery, radiation, and/or chemotherapy. Middle ear melanoma demonstrated particularly poor outcomes, with 70% mortality, 20% local recurrence, and 50% distant metastasis, whereas eustachian tube origin demonstrated 9.1%, 18.2%, and 36.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Middle ear and eustachian tube mucosal melanomas are exceedingly rare, with middle ear melanomas demonstrating a worse prognosis. Multimodality therapy is commonly used; however, outcomes are poor, with high mortality among affected patients.

Combination therapy improves immune response and prognosis in patients with advanced oral mucosal melanoma: A clinical treatment success

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to analyze disease response and immune response to assess treatment effectiveness and success in patients with advanced oral mucosal melanoma treated with cytokines injection, cryosurgery, and adoptive cell transfer therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Ten patients were enrolled in the study, and the relevant characteristics and immunologic differences were evaluated.

RESULTS

All patients achieved an objective clinical response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, including 7 cases of continuing complete remission (55, 27, 87 + , 58⁺, 58 + , 45 + , and 37 + months) and 3 cases of partial remission (30, 12, and 9 months). Five responders are currently alive. After combination therapy, we observed that the proportion of CD3+ lymphocytes and the secretion of interferon-γ increased, whereas interleukin-10 decreased. In the assay of improved cytokine-induced killer cells, CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells declined, and natural killer cells upregulated. Meanwhile, the proliferation rate of in vitro cultured improved cytokine-induced killer cells improved after courses of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy of cytokine injection, cryosurgery, and transfer of improved cytokine-induced killer cells may be a promising approach for patients with oral mucosal melanoma.

Definitive Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Sinonasal Malignant Tumors: Subgroup Analysis of a Multicenter Study by the Japan Carbon-Ion Radiation Oncology Study Group (J-CROS)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of carbon-ion radiation therapy (C-ion RT) for locally advanced sinonasal malignant tumors in a multicenter retrospective study (J-CROS 1402 HN).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Clinical data were collected for patients who had sinonasal malignant tumors of stage N0-1M0 and received C-ion RT at 4 institutions in Japan between November 2003 and December 2014. Of the 458 patients, 393 had naïve tumors and 65 had recurrent tumors. The tumors were located in the nasal cavity (n = 263), maxillary sinus (n = 109), ethmoid sinus (n = 71), and other locations (n = 15). The histologic types were mucosal melanoma (n = 221, 48%), adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 122, 27%), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 31, 7%), olfactory neuroblastoma (n = 30, 7%), adenocarcinoma (n = 21, 5%), and other types (n = 33, 7%). Of the 458 patients, 300 (66%) had T4 tumors. All patients received definitive C-ion RT.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 25.2 months for all patients (range, 1.4-132.3 months). The 2-year overall survival and local control rates were 79.6% and 84.1%, respectively. As analyzed according to histology, the 2-year overall survival rate was 68.0% for mucosal melanoma, 96.8% for adenoid cystic carcinoma, 70.0% for squamous cell carcinoma, 96.7% for olfactory neuroblastoma, and 89.7% for adenocarcinoma. Regarding late toxicities, 17% of patients developed grade 3 and 4 toxicities, of which visual impairment was the most common.

CONCLUSION

The results of our multicenter study have demonstrated that C-ion RT can provide excellent clinical outcomes with acceptable late toxicities in patients who have locally advanced sinonasal malignant tumors.

Endoscopic resection of sinonasal mucosal melanoma has comparable outcomes to open approaches

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic endonasal resection (EER) of sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SMM) is a newer surgical alternative to traditional external and/or open resection (OR). Studies on long-term outcomes are necessary to validate EER for this aggressive sinonasal malignancy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of EER versus OR in SMM.

METHODS

A case series of patients who underwent surgical resection of SMM at a tertiary-care institution (2000-2015) was studied retrospectively. Demographics, tumor site and stage, surgical approach, surgical margin status, local control, and survival were compared between those who underwent EER and OR.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Nine underwent EER and 13 underwent OR. The mean age in the EER and OR groups was similar, 78.7 and 72.3 years, respectively. Two-thirds of patients were women (EER, 66.7%; OR, 61.5%). The nasal cavity was the most common primary tumor site (EER, 77.8%; OR, 84.6%). The local tumor stage in both groups was similar, with the majority of cases being T4 (EER, 55.6%; OR, 61.5%; p = 0.99). Negative margins were achieved in all EERs and in 69.2% of ORs. Median follow-up was 25.0 months for the overall group (range, 1.7-172.9 months), 32.6 months (range, 3.4-58.7 months) for EER and 14.1 months (range, 1.7-172.9 months) for OR cohorts. The 5-year overall survival was statistically similar in both groups (EER, 53.3%; OR, 22.7%; p = 0.214) as was disease-free survival (EER, 55.6%; OR, 22.8%; p = 0.178). Local control, however, was significantly higher in the EER cohort (EER, 85.7%; OR, 37.6%; p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

In carefully selected patients with sinonasal melanoma, endoscopic surgery with an experienced team may offer comparable survival and improved local control over open surgery. Prospective, multicentered studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these results.

Recurrent epistaxis leading to diagnosis of primary sinonasal melanoma

A 48-year-old man presented to urgent care with recurrent epistaxis over 6 months. Initially, nosebleeds were controlled with packing or cautery. Ultimately, he was referred to ear, nose and throat department and underwent nasal endoscopy which revealed polypoid tissue. A biopsy of the polyp showed non-specific inflammation with no evidence of malignancy. Follow-up maxillofacial CT revealed a large mass lesion in the right maxillary sinus, right nasal fossa, much of the ethmoids and right sphenoid, with destruction of adjacent bony structures. MRI revealed a mass in the right nasal cavity with extension into the ethmoid and anterior sphenoid sinus, anterior cranial fossa and medial orbits. Staging CT discovered metastatic disease in the adrenal glands and lymphadenopathy in the neck. The patient underwent endoscopic sinus surgery with debulking and tissue diagnosis of malignant melanoma. He completed radiation therapy to sinus and was subsequently enrolled in a clinical trial. Most recent imaging revealed complete metabolic response on positron emission tomography.

Clinical patterns and management of primary mucosal melanoma: a single centre experience

BACKGROUND

Primary mucosal melanomas (MM) are rare neoplasms arising from melanocytes in mucosal membranes. Delayed diagnosis and aggressive disease biology contribute to a poorer prognosis. The clinical patterns of MMs treated in a large tertiary centre, and the differences between MMs in the head and neck versus other anatomical sites are described.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 43 patients diagnosed with MM in the head and neck, urogenital, esophageal and anorectal sites from 1993 to 2015 was conducted.

RESULTS

Distribution of head and neck, urogenital and gastrointestinal MM were 42, 30 and 28% respectively. Disease extent was local in 44%, regional in 40% and distal in 12% at diagnosis. Head and neck MMs were more likely to be diagnosed at an earlier stage as compared to other sites (P = 0.04). Surgery was performed with curative intent in 72%, while 2% had palliative surgery for symptom control. Of the remaining patients who did not undergo surgery, four had palliative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Median disease-free survival was 13 months (1-179 months). There was a significantly longer time to locoregional recurrence in head and neck MM (16 months) compared to other sites (11 months) (P = 0.03). The 2-year overall survival was also significantly higher in head and neck MM (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

MM of the head and neck is diagnosed at an earlier stage and associated with a longer time to locoregional recurrence. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment and may offer long-term survival benefit in selected patients.

Local control in sinonasal malignant melanoma: Comparing conventional to hypofractionated radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of fractionation schedule on local control in postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for sinonasal malignant melanoma.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients who were treated with surgery and postoperative RT in 4 accredited head and neck cancer centers in the Netherlands between 1998 and 2013 were retrospectively studied. Outcomes with conventional fractionation (2-2.4 Gy per fraction; n = 27) were compared to hypofractionation (4-6 Gy per fraction; n = 36). The primary endpoint was local control and the secondary endpoint was toxicity.

RESULTS

Comparable local control rates were found after 2 and 5 years (63% vs 64% and 47% vs 53%; P = .73 for, respectively, conventional fractionation vs hypofractionation). Local recurrences were predominantly present ipsilateral (92%) and within the irradiated volume (88%). Late toxicity grade ≥ 3 was observed in 2 of 63 patients, 1 patient in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy fractionation schedule did not influence the local control rate or the incidence of late toxicity in patients treated with surgery and RT for sinonasal malignant melanoma in this retrospective analysis. Due to this retrospective nature and the limited number of patients, strong recommendations cannot be made. Expected toxicity, patient convenience, and workload may be taken into account for the choice of fractionation schedule until conclusive evidence becomes available.