Standard (60 Gy) or short-course (40 Gy) irradiation plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for elderly patients with glioblastoma: a propensity-matched analysis

Exploring management and outcomes of elderly patients with glioblastoma using data from two randomised trials (GEINO1401/EX-TEM)

PURPOSE

The impact of age on optimal management of glioblastoma remains unclear. A recent combined analysis of two randomised trials, GEINO14-01 and EX-TEM, found no benefit from extending post-radiation temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Here, we explore the impact of age.

METHODS

Relevant intergroup statistics were used to identify differences in tumour, treatment and outcome characteristics based on age with elderly patients (EP) defined as age 65 years and over. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method.

RESULTS

Of the combined 205 patients, 57 (28%) were EP. Of these, 95% were ECOG 0-1 and 65% underwent macroscopic resection compared with 97% and 61% of younger patients (YP) respectively. There were numerically less MGMT-methylated (56% vs. 63%, p = 0.4) and IDH-mutated (4% vs. 13%, p = 0.1) tumours in EP vs. YP. Following surgery, EP were more likely to receive short course chemoradiation (17.5% vs. 6%, p = 0.017). At recurrence, EP tended to receive or best supportive care (28.3% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.09) or non-surgical options (96.2% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.06), but were less likely to receive bevacizumab (23.1% vs. 49.5%, p < 0.01). Median PFS was similar at 9.3months in EP and 8.5months in YP, with similar median OS at 20months.

CONCLUSION

In this trial population of predominantly fit EP, survival was similar to YP despite a proportion receiving less aggressive therapy at diagnosis and recurrence. Advancing age does not appear to be an adverse prognostic factor for glioblastoma when patients are fit for treatment, and a less aggressive approach in selected patients may not compromise outcomes.

Management of glioblastoma in elderly patients: A review of the literature

High grade gliomas are the most common primary aggressive brain tumours with a very poor prognosis and a median survival of less than 2 years. The standard management protocol of newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients involves surgery followed by radiotherapy, chemotherapy in the form of temozolomide and further adjuvant temozolomide. The recent advances in molecular profiling of high-grade gliomas have further enhanced our understanding of the disease. Although the management of glioblastoma is standardised in newly diagnosed adult patients there is a lot of debate regarding the best treatment approach for the newly diagnosed elderly glioblastoma patients. In this review article we attempt to summarise the findings regarding surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and their combination in order to offer the best possible management modality for this group of patients. Elderly patients 65-70 with an excellent functional level could be considered as candidates for the standards treatment consisting of surgery, standard radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. Similarly, elderly patients above 70 with good functional status could receive the above with the exception of receiving a shorter course of radiotherapy instead of standard. In elderly GBM patients with poorer functional status and MGMT promoter methylation temozolomide chemotherapy can be considered. For elderly patients who cannot tolerate chemotherapy, hypofractionated radiotherapy is an option. In contrast to the younger adult patients, it seems that a careful individualised approach is a key element in deciding the best treatment options for this group of patients.

Recommendation for reducing the crystalline lens exposure dose by reducing imaging field width in cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy: an anthropomorphic phantom study

In cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of the head, we evaluated the exposure dose reduction effect to the crystalline lens and position-matching accuracy by narrowing one side (X2) of the X-ray aperture (blade) in the X-direction. We defined the ocular surface dose of the head phantom as the crystalline lens exposure dose and measured using a radiophotoluminescence dosimeter (RPLD, GD-352 M) in the preset field (13.6 cm) and in each of the fields when blade X2 aperture was reduced in 0.5 cm increments from 10.0 to 5.0 cm. Auto-bone matching was performed on CBCT images acquired five times with blade X2 aperture set to 13.6 cm and 5.0 cm at each position when the head phantom was moved from - 5.0 to + 5.0 mm in 1.0 mm increment. The maximum reduction rate in the crystalline lens exposure dose was - 38.7% for the right lens and - 13.2% for the left lens when blade X2 aperture was 5.0 cm. The maximum difference in the amount of position correction between blade X2 aperture of 13.6 cm and 5.0 cm was 1 mm, and the accuracy of auto-bone matching was similar. In CBCT of the head, reduced blade X2 aperture is a useful technique for reducing the crystalline lens exposure dose while ensuring the accuracy of position matching.

Autologous cell immunotherapy (IGV-001) with IGF-1R antisense oligonucleotide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients

Standard-of-care first-line therapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM) is maximal safe surgical resection, then concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide, followed by maintenance temozolomide. IGV-001, the first product of the Goldspire™ platform, is a first-in-class autologous immunotherapeutic product that combines personalized whole tumor-derived cells with an antisense oligonucleotide (IMV-001) in implantable biodiffusion chambers, with the intent to induce a tumor-specific immune response in patients with ndGBM. Here, we describe the design and rationale of a randomized, double-blind, phase IIb trial evaluating IGV-001 compared with placebo, both followed by standard-of-care treatment in patients with ndGBM. The primary end point is progression-free survival, and key secondary end points include overall survival and safety.

Optimizing adjuvant treatment options for patients with glioblastoma

Background

This study focused on minimizing the costs and toxic effects associated with unnecessary chemotherapy. We sought to optimize the adjuvant therapy strategy, choosing between radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT), for patients based on their specific characteristics. This selection process utilized an innovative deep learning method.

Methods

We trained six machine learning (ML) models to advise on the most suitable treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) patients. To assess the protective efficacy of these ML models, we employed various metrics: hazards ratio (HR), inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted HR (HRa), the difference in restricted mean survival time (dRMST), and the number needed to treat (NNT).

Results

The Balanced Individual Treatment Effect for Survival data (BITES) model emerged as the most effective, demonstrating significant protective benefits (HR: 0.53, 95% CI, 0.48-0.60; IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.65, 95% CI, 0.55-0.78; dRMST: 7.92, 95% CI, 7.81-8.15; NNT: 1.67, 95% CI, 1.24-2.41). Patients whose treatment aligned with BITES recommendations exhibited notably better survival rates compared to those who received different treatments, both before and after IPTW adjustment. In the CRT-recommended group, a significant survival advantage was observed when choosing CRT over RT (p < 0.001). However, this was not the case in the RT-recommended group (p = 0.06). Males, older patients, and those whose tumor invasion is confined to the ventricular system were more frequently advised to undergo RT.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that BITES can effectively identify GBM patients likely to benefit from CRT. These ML models show promise in transforming the complex heterogeneity of real-world clinical practice into precise, personalized treatment recommendations.

Management of Glioblastoma Multiforme During the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Pandemic: A Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and other patients with cancer are at a greater risk of developing severe complications as a result of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Therefore, it is crucial to adjust therapeutic approaches to reduce exposure and complications and achieve the most appropriate treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to help physicians to make decisions based on the latest data in the literature.

METHOD

We provide a comprehensive review of the literature on the current issues of GBM and COVID-19 infection.

RESULTS

The mortality of patients with diffuse glioma as a result of COVID-19 infection was 39%, which is higher than in the general population. The statistics showed that 84.5% of patients with diagnosed brain cancer (mostly GBM) and 89.9% of their caregivers received COVID-19 vaccines. The decision to apply different therapeutic approaches must be made individually based on age, tumor grade, molecular profile, and performance status. The advantages and disadvantages of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy after the surgery should be evaluated carefully. In the setting of the follow-up period, special considerations must be considered to minimize COVID-19 exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

The pandemic altered medical approaches worldwide, and the management of patients in an immunocompromised state, such as patients with GBM, is challenging; therefore, special considerations must be considered.

Prognostic analysis and nomogram construction for older patients with IDH-wild-type glioblastoma

As many countries face an ageing population, the number of older patients with glioblastoma (GB) is increasing. Thus, there is an urgent need for prognostic models to aid in treatment decision-making and life planning. A total of 98 patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wild-type GB aged ≥65 years were analysed from January 2012 to January 2020. Independent prognostic factors were identified by prognostic analysis. Using the independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), a nomogram was constructed by R software to predict the prognosis of older patients with IDH-wild-type GB. The concordance index (C-index) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to assess model discrimination, and the calibration curve was used to assess model calibration. Prognostic analysis showed that the extent of resection (EOR), adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI), O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status, postoperative radiotherapy, and postoperative temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS. MGMT methylation status and subventricular zone (SVZ) involvement were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS). A nomogram was constructed based on EOR, ACCI, MGMT methylation status, postoperative radiotherapy and postoperative TMZ chemotherapy to predict the 6-month, 12-month and 18-month OS of older patients with IDH-wild-type GB. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.72, and the ROC curves showed that the areas under the curve (AUCs) at 6, 12 and 18 months were 0.874, 0.739 and 0.779, respectively. The calibration plots showed that the nomogram was in good agreement with the actual observations in predicting the OS of older patients with IDH-wild-type GB. Older patients with IDH-wild-type GB can benefit from gross total resection (GTR), postoperative radiotherapy and postoperative TMZ chemotherapy. A high ACCI score and MGMT nonmethylation are poor prognostic factors. We constructed a nomogram including the ACCI to facilitate clinical decision-making and follow-up interval selection.

Update for astrocytomas: medical and surgical management considerations

Astrocytomas include a wide range of tumors with unique mutations and varying grades of malignancy. These tumors all originate from the astrocyte, a star-shaped glial cell that plays a major role in supporting functions of the central nervous system (CNS), including blood-brain barrier (BBB) development and maintenance, water and ion regulation, influencing neuronal synaptogenesis, and stimulating the immunological response. In terms of epidemiology, glioblastoma (GB), the most common and malignant astrocytoma, generally occur with higher rates in Australia, Western Europe, and Canada, with the lowest rates in Southeast Asia. Additionally, significantly higher rates of GB are observed in males and non-Hispanic whites. It has been suggested that higher levels of testosterone observed in biological males may account for the increased rates of GB. Hereditary syndromes such as Cowden, Lynch, Turcot, Li-Fraumeni, and neurofibromatosis type 1 have been linked to increased rates of astrocytoma development. While there are a number of specific gene mutations that may influence malignancy or be targeted in astrocytoma treatment, O 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene function is an important predictor of astrocytoma response to chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide (TMZ). TMZ for primary and bevacizumab in the setting of recurrent tumor formation are two of the main chemotherapeutic agents currently approved in the treatment of astrocytomas. While stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has debatable implications for increased survival in comparison to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), SRS demonstrates increased precision with reduced radiation toxicity. When considering surgical resection of astrocytoma, the extent of resection (EoR) is taken into consideration. Subtotal resection (STR) spares the margins of the T1 enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) region, gross total resection (GTR) includes the margins, and supramaximal resection (SMR) extends beyond the margin of the T1 and into the T2 region. Surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy are integral components of astrocytoma treatment.

Patterns of failure in glioblastoma multiforme following Standard (60 Gy) or Short course (40 Gy) radiation and concurrent temozolomide

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the patterns of failure in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) treated using chemoradiotherapy in the Standard radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions; Standard) or Short course (40 Gy/15 fractions: Short).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-three consecutive patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated at our hospital between April 2007 and December 2016, and 68 patients who could be followed up were included. All patients underwent surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide. We retrospectively analyzed treatment outcomes and recurrence patterns.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period of the surviving patients was 82.8 months (range: 46.0-158.9 months). Of the 68 patients, 58 patients (85%) had recurrences, 34 underwent the Standard and 24 Short course. The Standard course was seen in younger age groups and had a better Karnofsky performance status (KPS) than the Short course. The median survival time (MST) was 25.8 months for the Standard and 15.4 months with the Short in all cases. Standard course had significantly longer MST than the Short (p = 0.001) course. For recurrent cases only, there was no significant difference between Standard and Short courses in OS (p = 0.06). The recurrences occurred at the radiation fields alone (Standard/Short: 85%/83%), only at distant sites (Standard/Short: 12%/13%), and at both the radiation fields and distant sites (Standard/Short: 3%/4%). There was no significant difference in recurrence pattern and frequency between the two protocols (p = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Standard course tended to be significant in younger age groups and have a better KPS than the Short course; therefore, the Standard course has a longer OS, but the recurrence pattern of the Short course is similar to that of the Standard treatment.

Optimizing Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Single-Institution Audit of Clinical Outcomes from a Tertiary-Care Comprehensive Cancer Center in India

BACKGROUND

There is lack of consensus regarding optimal adjuvant therapy in elderly glioblastoma (GBM). We have been treating elderly (≥60 years) GBM patients with normofractionated or hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) plus temozolomide (TMZ) based on Karnofsky performance status (KPS). Herein we report clinical outcomes in this cohort treated at our institute using this approach.

METHODS

Medical records of elderly GBM patients (≥60 years) treated between 2013 and 2017 with either normofractionated RT (59.4-60 Gy/30-33 fractions/6-6.5 weeks) or hypofractionated RT (35 Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks) plus TMZ were reviewed retrospectively. Outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and ≥grade 3 myelotoxicity. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier methods, compared using log-rank test, and reported as point estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The normofractionated cohort (n = 126) was characterized by a higher proportion of patients younger than age 65 years, KPS ≥70, methylated O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), and receiving adjuvant TMZ including extended adjuvant TMZ (>6 cycles) compared with the hypofractionated cohort (n = 20), confirming selection bias. At a median follow-up of 13 months, 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS and OS were 43% (95% CI: 36%-52%) and 56% (95% CI: 48%-64%), yielding median PFS and OS of 11.0 months and 13.1 months, respectively. Higher KPS, methylated MGMT, normofractionated RT, and extended adjuvant TMZ emerged as favorable prognostic factors. TMZ was well tolerated with a low risk of ≥grade 3 myelotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our single-institution clinical audit confirms poor survival in elderly GBM with suboptimal performance status but demonstrates acceptably fair outcomes in patients with preserved KPS comparable with the nonelderly cohort.

Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma in Elderly Patients

Purpose of Review

Elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (eGBM) carry a worse prognosis compared with their younger counterparts. eGBM garners special attention due to the unique challenges, including increased treatment-associated toxicity, less relative benefit from aggressive therapy, medical comorbidities, and immunosuppression. The pivotal GBM trials excluded patients > 70 years old and the optimal treatment approach remains unsettled for eGBM. In this review, we analyze the historical evidence-based data for treating eGBM and discuss the future direction for managing this vulnerable population.

Recent Findings

Treatment for eGBM continues to evolve. Therapy choice is guided by performance status and presence of O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. For eGBM with good performance status, combinatorial hypofractionated radiation therapy (hRT) and temozolomide should be recommended. For those with poor performance status, further stratification based on MGMT promoter methylation test result is recommended. Single-agent temozolomide is a viable treatment option for MGMT methylated tumors (mMGMT); in particular, those classified with receptor tyrosine kinase II methylation. hRT alone can be considered in MGMT unmethylated (uMGMT) eGBM patients. As precision oncology continues to advance, effective targeted and immunotherapy may emerge as new treatment options for eGBM.

Summary

Management of elderly patients with newly diagnosed GBM carries a unique set of challenges. Progress has been made in defining the optimal therapeutic approach for these patients, but many questions remain to be answered.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Elderly Glioblastoma Patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Background

Management of elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is a controversial scenario and needs careful assessment and selection for aggressive radical treatment and chemotherapy protocols vs short-course radiotherapy without chemotherapy.

Methods

We evaluated treatment patterns and outcome among elderly GBM patients treated in KFMC, Riyadh. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS); patients were reviewed regarding radiotherapy (Rth) fractionation modalities, surgery, and chemotherapy (CTR) given in correlation to PFS, OS.

Results

Fifty-nine patients were recruited in our study with median age 66 (range: 60–81) years, and 47 (80%) were males. Thirty-seven patients (62.7%) had ECOG performance status (PS) ≥2, and 22 patients (37.3%) had PS <2. Gross total resection (GTR) and subtotal resection (STR) were done in 49 (82.9%) patients, and the median follow-up was 12 months. Thirty-eight (64%) patients received conventional Rth 60 Gray (Gy)/30 fractions or equal doses and 21 (36%) patients received hypofractionation Rth (40 Gy/15, 25 Gy/5 or 30 Gy/10 fractions). The median OS was 12 months (95%CI: 9.52–14.48). Receiving conventional Rth and completion of six months adjuvant CTR were significant factors for O.S (P=0.043 and 0.026), respectively. The median PFS was nine months (95%CI: 6.13–11.87). For univariate analysis, PS, time to start adjuvant treatment, and completion of six months CTR were significant factors for PFS.

Conclusion

Conventional Rth and completion of adjuvant CTR lead to better OS, while earlier start of adjuvant treatment and the completion of adjuvant CTR were associated with a better PFS.

Standard 6-week chemoradiation for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is frequent in elderly patients, but their frailty provokes debate regarding optimal treatment in general, and the standard 6-week chemoradiation (CRT) in particular, although this is the mainstay for younger patients. All patients with newly diagnosed GBM and age ≥ 70 who were referred to our institution for 6-week CRT were reviewed from 2004 to 2018. MGMT status was not available for treatment decision at that time. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), early adverse neurological events without neurological progression ≤ 1 month after CRT and temozolomide hematologic toxicity assessed by CTCAE v5. 128 patients were included. The median age was 74.1 (IQR: 72-77). 15% of patients were ≥ 80 years. 62.5% and 37.5% of patients fulfilled the criteria for RPA class I-II and III-IV, respectively. 81% of patients received the entire CRT and 28% completed the maintenance temozolomide. With median follow-up of 11.7 months (IQR: 6.5-17.5), median OS was 11.7 months (CI 95%: 10-13 months). Median PFS was 9.5 months (CI 95%: 9-10.5 months). 8% of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 hematologic events. 52.5% of patients without neurological progression had early adverse neurological events. Post-operative neurological disabilities and age ≥ 80 were not associated with worsened outcomes. 6-week chemoradiation was feasible for "real-life" elderly patients diagnosed with glioblastoma, even in the case of post-operative neurological disabilities. Old does not necessarily mean worse.

Poor-Prognosis Patients Affected by Glioblastoma: Retrospective Study of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost and Concurrent/Adjuvant Temozolomide

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a very poor-prognosis brain tumor. To date, maximal excision followed by radiochemotherapy, in 30 fractions, is the standard approach. Limited data are present in the literature about hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypo-RT) in GBM poor prognosis patients. Thus, this retrospective study was conducted to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of hypo-RT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in association with temozolomide (TMZ) in this patient setting.

METHODS

Poor-prognosis GBM patients underwent surgery (complete, subtotal or biopsy) followed by SIB-hypo-RT and concomitant/adjuvant TMZ. The prescription dose was 40.05 Gy (15 fractions) with a SIB of 52.5 Gy (3.5 Gy/fraction) on surgical cavity/residual/macroscopic disease. Volumetric modulated arc therapy was performed.

RESULTS

From July 2019 to July 2021, 30 poor-prognosis patients affected by GBM were treated by SIB-hypo-RT; 25 were evaluated in the present analysis due to a minimum follow up of 6 months. The median age and KPS were 65 years and 60%, respectively. At the median follow-up time of 15 months (range 7-24), median and 1-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 13 months and 54%, and 8.4 months and 23%, respectively. No acute or late neurological side effects of grade ≥ 2 were reported. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity occurred in three cases.

CONCLUSION

SIB-hypo-RT associated with TMZ in poor-prognosis patients affected by GBM is an effective and safe treatment. Prospective studies could be warranted.

Prognostic value of test(s) for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for predicting overall survival in people with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma is an aggressive form of brain cancer. Approximately five in 100 people with glioblastoma survive for five years past diagnosis. Glioblastomas that have a particular modification to their DNA (called methylation) in a particular region (the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter) respond better to treatment with chemotherapy using a drug called temozolomide.

OBJECTIVES

To determine which method for assessing MGMT methylation status best predicts overall survival in people diagnosed with glioblastoma who are treated with temozolomide.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index to December 2018, and examined reference lists. For economic evaluation studies, we additionally searched NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) up to December 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible studies were longitudinal (cohort) studies of adults with diagnosed glioblastoma treated with temozolomide with/without radiotherapy/surgery. Studies had to have related MGMT status in tumour tissue (assessed by one or more method) with overall survival and presented results as hazard ratios or with sufficient information (e.g. Kaplan-Meier curves) for us to estimate hazard ratios. We focused mainly on studies comparing two or more methods, and listed brief details of articles that examined a single method of measuring MGMT promoter methylation. We also sought economic evaluations conducted alongside trials, modelling studies and cost analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently undertook all steps of the identification and data extraction process for multiple-method studies. We assessed risk of bias and applicability using our own modified and extended version of the QUality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. We compared different techniques, exact promoter regions (5'-cytosine-phosphate-guanine-3' (CpG) sites) and thresholds for interpretation within studies by examining hazard ratios. We performed meta-analyses for comparisons of the three most commonly examined methods (immunohistochemistry (IHC), methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and pyrosequencing (PSQ)), with ratios of hazard ratios (RHR), using an imputed value of the correlation between results based on the same individuals.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 32 independent cohorts involving 3474 people that compared two or more methods. We found evidence that MSP (CpG sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87) is more prognostic than IHC for MGMT protein at varying thresholds (RHR 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.71). We also found evidence that PSQ is more prognostic than IHC for MGMT protein at various thresholds (RHR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.84). The data suggest that PSQ (mainly at CpG sites 74 to 78, using various thresholds) is slightly more prognostic than MSP at sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87 (RHR 1.14, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.48). Many variants of PSQ have been compared, although we did not see any strong and consistent messages from the results. Targeting multiple CpG sites is likely to be more prognostic than targeting just one. In addition, we identified and summarised 190 articles describing a single method for measuring MGMT promoter methylation status.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

PSQ and MSP appear more prognostic for overall survival than IHC. Strong evidence is not available to draw conclusions with confidence about the best CpG sites or thresholds for quantitative methods. MSP has been studied mainly for CpG sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87 and PSQ at CpG sites ranging from 72 to 95. A threshold of 9% for CpG sites 74 to 78 performed better than higher thresholds of 28% or 29% in two of three good-quality studies making such comparisons.

Advanced Imaging Techniques for Radiotherapy Planning of Gliomas

The accuracy of target delineation in radiation treatment (RT) planning of cerebral gliomas is crucial to achieve high tumor control, while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences, represents the current standard imaging modality for target volume delineation of gliomas. However, conventional sequences have limited capability to discriminate treatment-related changes from viable tumors, owing to the low specificity of increased blood-brain barrier permeability and peritumoral edema. Advanced physiology-based MRI techniques, such as MR spectroscopy, diffusion MRI and perfusion MRI, have been developed for the biological characterization of gliomas and may circumvent these limitations, providing additional metabolic, structural, and hemodynamic information for treatment planning and monitoring. Radionuclide imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET) with amino acid radiopharmaceuticals, are also increasingly used in the workup of primary brain tumors, and their integration in RT planning is being evaluated in specialized centers. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical results of advanced MRI and PET imaging techniques that have promise as a complement to RT planning of gliomas.

Adjuvant Radiation in Older Patients With Glioblastoma: A Retrospective Single Institution Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Standard 6-week and hypofractionated 3-week courses of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) are both options for older patients with glioblastoma (GBM), but deciding the optimal regimen can be challenging. This analysis explores clinical factors associated with selection of RT course, completion of RT, and outcomes following RT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This IRB-approved retrospective analysis identified patients ≥70 years old with GBM who initiated adjuvant RT at our institution between 2004 and 2016. We identified factors associated with standard or hypofractionated RT using the Cochran-Armitage trend test, estimated time-to-event endpoints using the Kaplan-Meier method, and found predictors of overall survival (OS) using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients with a median age of 74 (range 70-90) initiated adjuvant RT, with 43 (69%) receiving standard RT and 19 (31%) receiving hypofractionated RT. Selection of short-course RT was associated with older age (p = 0.04) and poor KPS (p = 0.03). Eight (13%) patients did not complete RT, primarily for hospice care due to worsening symptoms. After a median follow-up of 37 months, median OS was 12.3 months (95% CI 9.0-15.1). Increased age (p < 0.05), poor KPS (p < 0.0001), lack of MGMT methylation (p < 0.05), and lack of RT completion (p < 0.0001) were associated with worse OS on multivariate analysis. In this small cohort, GTV size and receipt of standard or hypofractionated RT were not associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of older patients with GBM, age and KPS was associated with selection of short-course or standard RT. These regimens had similar OS, though a subset of patients experienced worsening symptoms during RT and discontinued treatment. Further investigation into predictors of RT completion and survival may help guide adjuvant therapies and supportive care for older patients.

Extent of resection and survival outcomes of geriatric patients with glioblastoma: Is there benefit from aggressive surgery?

OBJECTIVE

We examine the impact of age and extent of resection (EOR) on overall survival (OS) in geriatric patients with Glioblastoma (GBM).

METHODS

The SEER 18 Registries was used to identify patients aged 65 and above with GBM from 2000-2016. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on EOR: Biopsy/Local Excision (B/LE), Subtotal Resection (STR), Gross Total Resection (GTR), and Supratotal Resection (SpTR). Primary endpoint was OS, which was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by the Log-rank and Wilcoxon-Breslow-Gehan test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was utilized to identify factors associated with OS. Likelihood of undergoing SpTR was explored using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results are given as median [IQR] and HR [95 % CI].

RESULTS

Among 17,820 geriatric patients with GBM, median age was 73 years [68-78], 44 % were female, 91 % White, and 8% Hispanic. SpTR was performed in 2907 (16 %), GTR was performed in 2451 (14 %) patients, STR in 4879 (28 %), and B/LE in 7396 (42 %). There was a decline in the proportion of patients treated with SpTR with advancing age (65-69 years, 17 % vs 95+ years, 0%; p < 0.0001), and older age corresponded with a decrease in the odds of undergoing SpTR. In survival analysis, GTR (HR 0.61 [0.58-0.65]) and SpTR (HR 0.65 [0.62-0.68]) were associated with improved survival, even in octogenarian patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that aggressive surgical resection is associated with improvement in OS in geriatric patients. These results emphasize that age should not influence surgical strategy, as there is a survival benefit from maximal resection in geriatric patients.

The 70-year-old newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients are older than the 65-year-old? Outcome evaluation of the two categories in a matched case control study with propensity score balancing

BACKGROUND

The standard of care for elderly, newly-diagnosed glioblastoma patients consists, if feasible, of surgical resection followed by a short course of radiation therapy (RT) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy (TMZCHT). To date, the literature lacks of consistence in the definition of elderly, if older than 65 years, or 70 years. Aim of this study was to explore whether differences exist between these two cohorts, comparing outcomes using a propensity score matched analysis (PSM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred twenty-one elderly newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients were included. All patients received surgery followed by RT with concurrent and adjuvant TMZCHT. The RT dose prescribed was 60 Gy/30 fractions for patients 65-69-year-old or 40.5 Gy/15 fractions for ≥70-year-old. After 1:1 matching there were 86 patients in each group. Distribution of covariates was adequately balanced in the matched data set.

RESULTS

After PSM median PFS time, 1,2,3-year PFS rates were 10 months, 33.3%, 13.1%, and 6.6% for the 65-69-year group, 9 months, 34.7%, 11% and 4.8% for the ≥70-year group (p = 0.530). Median OS time, and 1,2,3-year OS rates were 14 months, 54.1%, 23.4%, 13.9% for the 65-69-year old group, and 12 months, 49.3%, 21.5%, 10% for the ≥70-year group (p = 0.357). No differences were recorded in relation to different groups of age.

CONCLUSIONS

The PSM analyses showed a similar outcome in 65-69-year old patients compared to older ones notwithstanding a more burdensome RT schedule. Hypofractionated RT treatment has to be considered also in this group of younger elderly, newly-diagnosed GBM patients.

The role of radiation therapy in treatment of adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline update

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adult patients diagnosed with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. QUESTION 1 : In adult patients (aged 65 and under) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, is the addition of radiation therapy (RT) more beneficial than management without RT in improving survival?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level I: Radiation therapy (RT) is recommended for the treatment of newly diagnosed malignant glioblastoma in adults. QUESTION 2 : In adult patients (aged 65 and under) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, is the RT regimen of 60 Gy given in 2 Gy daily fractions more beneficial than alternative regimens in providing survival benefit while minimizing toxicity?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level I: Treatment schemes should include dosage of up to 60 Gy given in 2 Gy daily fractions that includes the enhancing area. QUESTION 3 : In adult patients (aged 65 and under) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, is a tailored target volume superior to regional RT for reduction of radiation-induced toxicity while maintaining efficacy?

RECOMMENDATION

Level II: It is recommended that radiation therapy planning include 1-2 cm margin around the radiographically T1 weighted contrast-enhancing tumor volume or the T2 weighted abnormality on MRI. Level III: Recalculation of the radiation volume during RT treatment may be necessary to reduce the radiated volume of normal brain since the volume of surgical defect will change during the long period of RT. QUESTION 4 : In adult patients (aged 65 and under) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, does the addition of RT of the subventricular zone to standard tumor volume treatment improve tumor control and overall survival?

RECOMMENDATION

No recommendation can be formulated as there is contradictory evidence in favor of and against intentional radiation of the subventricular zone (SVZ) QUESTION 5 : In elderly (age > 65 years) and/or frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, does the addition of RT to surgical intervention improve disease control and overall survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level I: Radiation therapy is recommended for treatment of elderly and frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma to improve overall survival. QUESTION 6 : In elderly (age > 65 years) and/or frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, does modification of RT dose and fractionation scheme from standard regimens decrease toxicity and improve disease control and survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level II: Short RT treatment schemes are recommended in frail and elderly patients as compared to conventional 60 Gy given in 2 daily fractions because overall survival is not different while RT risk profile is better for the short RT scheme. Level II: The 40.05 Gy dose given in 15 fractions or 25 Gy dose given in 5 fractions or 34 Gy dose given in 10 fractions should be considered as appropriate doses for Short RT treatments in elderly and/or frail patients. QUESTION 7 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is there advantage to delaying the initiation of RT instead of starting it 2 weeks after surgical intervention in decreasing radiation-induced toxicity and improving disease control and survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: It is suggested that RT for patients with newly diagnosed GBM starts within 6 weeks of surgical intervention as compared to later times. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the optimal specific post-operative day within the 6 weeks interval to start RT for adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma that have undergone surgical resection. QUESTION 8 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma is Image-Modulated RT (IMRT) or similar techniques as effective as standard regional RT in providing tumor control and improve survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: There is no evidence that IMRT is a better RT delivering modality when compared to conventional RT in improving overall survival in adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Hence, IMRT should not be preferred over the Conventional RT delivery modality. QUESTION 9 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma does the use of radiosensitizers with RT improve the efficacy of RT as determined by disease control and overall survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: Iododeoxyuridine is not recommended to be used as radiosensitizer during RT treatment for patients with newly diagnosed GBM QUESTION 10 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is the use of Ultrafractionated RT superior to standard fractionation regimens in improving disease control and survival?

RECOMMENDATION

There is insufficient evidence to formulate a recommendation regarding the use of ultrafractionated RT schemes and patient population that could benefit from it. QUESTION 11 : In patients with poor prognosis with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is hypofractionated RT indicated instead of a standard fractionation regimen as measured by extent of toxicity, disease control and survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level I: Hypofractionated RT schemes may be used for patients with poor prognosis and limited survival without compromising response. There is insufficient evidence in the literature for us to be able to recommend the optimal hypofractionated RT scheme that will confer longest overall survival and/or confer the same overall survival with less toxicities and shorter treatment time. QUESTION 12 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is the addition of brachytherapy to standard fractionated RT indicated to improve disease control and survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level I: Brachytherapy as a boost to external beam RT has not been shown to be beneficial and is not recommended in the routine management of patients with newly diagnosed GBM. QUESTION 13 : In elderly patients (> 65 year old) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma under what circumstances is accelerated hyperfractionated RT indicated instead of a standard fractionation regimen as measured by extent of toxicity, disease control and survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: Accelerated Hyperfractionated RT with a total RT dose of 45 Gy or 48 Gy has been shown to shorten the treatment time without detriment in survival when compared to conventional external beam RT and should be considered as an option for treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed GBM. QUESTION 14 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is the addition of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) boost to conventional standard fractionated RT indicated to improve disease control and survival?

RECOMMENDATION

Level I: Stereotactic Radiosurgery boost to external beam RT has not been shown to be beneficial and is not recommended in patients undergoing routine management of newly diagnosed malignant glioma.

Central Nervous System Cancers, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The NCCN Guidelines for Central Nervous System (CNS) Cancers focus on management of adult CNS cancers ranging from noninvasive and surgically curable pilocytic astrocytomas to metastatic brain disease. The involvement of an interdisciplinary team, including neurosurgeons, radiation therapists, oncologists, neurologists, and neuroradiologists, is a key factor in the appropriate management of CNS cancers. Integrated histopathologic and molecular characterization of brain tumors such as gliomas should be standard practice. This article describes NCCN Guidelines recommendations for WHO grade I, II, III, and IV gliomas. Treatment of brain metastases, the most common intracranial tumors in adults, is also described.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is radiotherapy, although conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) may not be in the best interest of the patient. Instead, hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) may shorten the treatment period and reduce related costs for this treatment, which is typically palliative in nature.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated survival outcomes among patients who received HFRT or CFRT for DIPG. The PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register, and Scopus databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Overall survival was the primary outcome of interest and progression-free survival was the secondary outcome of interest.

RESULTS

The search identified a total of 2376 reports, although only 4 reports were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The studies included 88 patients who underwent HFRT and 96 patients who underwent CFRT. Relative to CFRT, HFRT provided comparable outcomes in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-1.47) and progression-free survival (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.75-1.45).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that CFRT and HFRT provide similar survival outcomes for patients with DIPG.

Guiding Treatment Choices for Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma by a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The incidence of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) increases with age; more than half of newly diagnosed patients are older than 65 years. Due to age-dependent decreasing organ functions, comorbidities, functional decline, and increasing risk of social isolation, not all patients are able to tolerate standard therapy of GBM with 6 weeks of radiochemotherapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

A set of alleviated therapies, e.g., chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone, hypofractionated radiotherapies with different total doses and variable fractionation regimens as well as hypofractionated radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy, have been evaluated during the last years. However, clinicians are still unsure which therapy would fit best to a given patient. Recently, the predictive value of comprehensive geriatric assessment regarding tolerance of chemotherapy and prediction of early mortality has been validated for older GBM patients in a retrospective trial. Thus, it appears that neuro-oncology is now ready for the prospective implementation of geriatric assessment to guide treatment planning for elderly GBM patients.

Survival after hypofractionation in glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has a poor prognosis despite a multi modal treatment that includes normofractionated radiotherapy. So, various hypofractionated alternatives to normofractionated RT have been tested to improve such prognosis. There is need of systematic review and meta-analysis to analyse the literature properly and maybe generalised the use of hypofractionation. The aim of this study was first, to perform a meta-analysis of all controlled trials testing the impact of hypofractionation on survival without age restriction and secondly, to analyse data from all non-comparative trials testing the impact of hypofractionation, radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic RT in first line.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases to identify all publications testing the impact of hypofractionation in glioblastoma between 1985 and March 2020. Combined hazard ratio from comparative studies was calculated for overall survival. The impact of study design, age and use of adjuvant temozolomide was explored by stratification. Meta-regressions were performed to determine the impact of prognostic factors.

RESULTS

2283 publications were identified. Eleven comparative trials were included. No impact on overall survival was evidenced (HR: 1.07, 95%CI: 0.89-1.28) without age restriction. The analysis of non-comparative literature revealed heterogeneous outcomes with limited quality of reporting. Concurrent chemotherapy, completion of surgery, immobilization device, isodose of prescription, and prescribed dose (depending on tumour volume) were poorly described. However, results on survival are encouraging and were correlated with the percentage of resected patients and with patients age but not with median dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Because few trials were randomized and because the limited quality of reporting, it is difficult to define the place of hypofactionation in glioblastoma. In first line, hypofractionation resulted in comparable survival outcome with the benefit of a shortened duration. The method used to assess hypofractionation needs to be improved.

Hypofractioned radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of multiform glioblastoma in adults over 70 years old

Aim:

Multiform glioblastoma (MG) represents 70% of all gliomas, with half of patients older than 65 years with median survival of 12–18 months, hypofractionation seeks to reduce the intensity and duration of treatment without impacting on survival rates. The objective was to determine the global survival and recurrence-free survival of adults over 70 years old with MG treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy and standard scheme. The review of patients older than 70 years treated with radiotherapy from 2013 to 2016 was performed.

Results:

Twenty-four patients were analysed, with a median follow-up of 239 days, and there is no difference in overall survival 12·3 versus 10·5 months (p = 0·55) and recurrence-free survival 8·3 versus 3·4 months (p = 0·48) between both schemes, conventional versus hypofractioanted, respectively.

Conclusion:

The results in this study show that hypofractionated scheme could be comparable in overall survival and recurrence-free survival to conventional fractionation, but a longer patients’ trial should be done.

Optimal adjuvant therapy in elderly glioblastoma: results from a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There exists lack of consensus worldwide regarding the most optimal adjuvant therapy regimen in elderly patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM).

PURPOSE

To identify the most optimal adjuvant therapy regimen in elderly GBM patients through systematic review and network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Prospective trials randomly assigning elderly GBM patients post-operatively to any adjuvant therapy regimen were included. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. Numbers of events, patients at-risk, and censored patients for survival were estimated from Kaplan-Meier survival curves in the interval of 0-12 months. The total person-time at risk and the mortality × 100 person-months was also estimated. The relative ranking probability of each treatment and rankograms were used to estimate the hierarchy of each intervention in terms of overall survival. The mean rank values and the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curves were also calculated.

RESULTS

A systematic literature search identified 1278 abstracts, that were screened to retrieve full-text manuscripts of potentially eligible articles. After detailed assessment, data from 1569 patients in 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) treated with one of following regimens was extracted and analyzed: normofractionated radiotherapy (RT) delivered over 5.5-6 weeks; moderately hypofractionated RT (2-3 weeks) either alone or in combination with temozolomide or bevacizumab; extremely hypofractionated RT (1-week); temozolomide monotherapy; and best supportive care alone. In terms of overall survival, moderately hypofractionated RT (3-weeks) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide emerged as the best and second-best adjuvant therapy option with 81% probability and 99.1% probability respectively. Using SUCRA, the surface area for moderately hypofractionated RT (3-weeks) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide reached almost 100%, confirming it as the best intervention. As expected, best supportive care alone was ranked as the worst treatment strategy.

CONCLUSION

Moderately hypofractionated RT (3-weeks) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide is the most optimal and preferred adjuvant therapeutic regimen in elderly GBM.

Glioblastoma Multiforme in the over 70's: "To treat or not to treat with radiotherapy?"

BACKGROUND

The incidence of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is increasing among the older population and is associated with poor prognosis. Management guidelines are lacking in this group. The purpose of this study was to analyze survival data and determine predictors of survival in patients aged ≥70 years treated with radiotherapy (RT) and/or Temozolomide.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all GBM patients treated at our institution between January 2011 and January 2017 was carried out.

RESULTS

One-hundred and four patients were eligible. Median age was 73.8 years (70-87). Thirty-three patients received radical RT and 71 palliative RT. Overall median survival (MS) was 6 months. The MS was 10.6 months for radical patients and 4.9 months for palliative patients (P < 0.0005). The MS was 6.9 months in patients aged 70-75 years and 5.2 months in those aged 76-80 years (P = 0.004). The debulked group had a statistically significantly longer survival (8.0 months) than the biopsy only group (4.9 months). Biopsy only (hazard ratio [HR] 2.4), ECOG performance status 3 vs 0 (HR 6.4), and increasing age (HR 1.06) were associated with statistically significant shorter survival after adjustment for the effects of concurrent chemo, delay in starting RT, and RT dose.

CONCLUSION

The MS for radical patients was favorable and approaching current literature for the under 70 age group. Radical treatment should be considered for good performance patients aged 70-75 years. Increasing age was associated with shorter MS in patients aged ≥76 years. Debulking and good performance status were associated with improved survival.

Hypofractionated versus standard radiation therapy in combination with temozolomide for glioblastoma in the elderly: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no clear consensus regarding the optimal treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) in the elderly. Hypofractionated radiation therapy (hRT) has emerged as a viable and comparable radiation regime compared to standard radiation therapy (sRT), however the survival effect of temozolomide (TMZ) with hRT is uncertain. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate survival outcomes of hRT + TMZ vs sRT + TMZ in this specific demographic.

METHODS

Searches of 7 electronic databases from inception to January 2019 were conducted following the appropriate guidelines. Articles were screened against pre-specified criteria. The progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) metrics were then extracted and pooled by meta-analysis evaluating mean difference (MD).

RESULTS

A total of 7 individual comparative studies describing hRT + TMZ vs sRT + TMZ (n = 917) respectively satisfied inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis by random-effects modelling indicated that compared to sRT + TMZ, hRT + TMZ resulted in comparable PFS (MD 0.3 months; 95% CI - 2.4 to 2.9; I² = 91.7%; P-effect = 0.85) and significantly shorter OS (MD - 3.5 months; 95% CI - 6.3 to - 0.6; I² = 98.9%; P-effect = 0.02). Subgroup analysis between age definitions of elderly of > 65 vs > 70 years old both demonstrated the same significant trend with no statistical difference between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The combination of hRT + TMZ is feasible in well-selected elderly GBM cases, and appears to confer a statistically comparable PFS compared to sRT + TMZ. However, expectations that the OS with hRT + TMZ is comparable to that of sRT + TMZ in all elderly GBM presentations should be tempered. It is likely a specific subgroup of elderly GBM patients will benefit greatly from the addition of TMZ to hRT, and greater investigation is needed to identify their characteristics.

[Hypofractioned radiotherapy in elderly patient with glioblastoma]

Glioblastoma is the most frequent primary brain tumor, with more than half of all patients being at least 65 years old. The treatment of the elderly in this pathology represents therefore a considerable challenge for oncologists and radiation therapists. However, in most clinical trials, age is a non-eligible criterial. In the last ten years, geriatric therapeutic trials have been multiplied. The treatment of glioblastoma consists of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In elderly patients, the evaluation of performans status and the molecular characteristics of the tumor are important factors in order to propose the appropriate treatment in terms of efficacy and toxicity.

The Clinical Significance of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Promoter Methylation Status in Adult Patients With Glioblastoma: A Meta-analysis

Background and objective

Promoter status of O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) has been widely established as a clinically relevant factor in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. However, in addition to varied therapy schedule, the prognosis of GBM patients is also affected by variations of age, race, primary or recurrent tumor. This study comprehensively investigated the association between MGMT promoter status and prognosis in overall GBM patients and in different GBM subtype including new diagnosed patients, recurrent patients and elderly patients.

Methods

A comprehensive search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases to identify literatures (published from January 1, 2005 to April 1, 2017) that evaluated the associations between MGMT promoter methylation and prognosis of GBM patients.

Results

Totally, 66 studies including 7,886 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall GBM patients with a methylated status of MGMT receiving temozolomide (TMZ)-containing treatment had better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) [OS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41–0.52, p < 0.001, Bon = 0.017; PFS: HR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.40–0.57, p < 0.001, Bon = 0.014], but no significant advantage on OS or PFS in GBM patients with TMZ-free treatment was observed (OS: HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.91–1.03, p = 0.08, Bon = 1; PFS: HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.57–1.02, p = 0.068, Bon = 0.748). These different impacts of MGMT status on OS were similar in newly diagnosed GBM patients, elderly GBM patients and recurrent GBM. Among patients receiving TMZ-free treatment, survival benefit in Asian patients was not observed anymore after Bonferroni correction (Asian OS: HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.64–0.95, p = 0.02, Bon = 0.24, I² = 0%; PFS: HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.94, p = 0.02, Bon = 0.24). No benefit was observed in Caucasian receiving TMZ-free therapy regardless of Bonferroni adjustment.

Conclusion

The meta-analysis highlights the universal predictive value of MGMT methylation in newly diagnosed GBM patients, elderly GBM patients and recurrent GBM patients. For elderly methylated GBM patients, TMZ alone therapy might be a more suitable option than radiotherapy alone therapy. Future clinical trials should be designed in order to optimize therapeutics in different GBM subpopulation.

Management of elderly patients with glioblastoma-multiforme-a systematic review

The management of elderly patients with glioblastoma-multiforme (GBM) remains poorly defined with many experts in the past advocating best supportive care, in view of limited evidence on efficacy of more aggressive treatment protocols. There is randomised evidence (NORDIC and NA-O8 studies) to support the use of surgery followed by adjuvant monotherapy with either radiotherapy (RT) using hypofractionated regimes (e.g. 36 Gy in 6 fractions OR 40 Gy in 15 fractions) or chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) in patients expressing methylation of promoter for O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase enzyme. However, the role of combined-modality therapy involving the use of combined RT and TMZ protocols has remained controversial with data from the EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer)-NCIC (National Cancer Institute of Canada) studies indicating that patients more than 65 years of age may not benefit significantly from combining standard RT fractionation using 60 Gy in 30 fractions with concurrent and adjuvant TMZ. More recently, randomised data has emerged on combining hypofractionated RT with concurrent and adjuvant TMZ. We provide a comprehensive review of literature with the aim of defining an evidence-based algorithm for management of elderly glioblastoma-multiforme population.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy with low-dose continuous 5-fluorouracil reduces hematological toxicity without compromising survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients

Background and purpose

To compare chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with low-dose continuous 5-fluorouracil (5FU) to CRT with 5FU+cisplatin (CDDP) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in a retrospective cohort study.

Methods and materials

We reviewed the cases of Stage I–IV ESCC patients who underwent definitive CRT in 2000–2014. Concomitant chemotherapy was one of the three regimens: (1) high-dose intermittent 5FU and CDDP (standard-dose FP: SDFP), (2) low-dose continuous 5FU and CDDP (LDFP), or (3) low-dose continuous 5FU (LD5FU). The general selection criteria for chemotherapy were: SDFP for patients aged <70 yrs; LDFP for those aged 70–74 yrs; LD5FU for those aged ≥75 yrs or with performance status (PS) ≥3. Propensity scores were derived with chemotherapy (LD5FU vs. 5FU+CDDP) as the dependent variable.

Results

In a multivariate analysis, chemotherapy (LD5FU vs. SDFP, p = .24; LDFP vs. SDFP, p = .52) did not affect the overall survival (OS). LD5FU caused significantly less grade 3–4 leukopenia (9%) compared to SDFP (47%) and LDFP (44%) (p < .001). In a propensity-matched analysis, LD5FU affected neither OS (HR 1.06; 95%CI 0.55–2.05; p = .87) nor progression-free survival (HR 0.95, 95%CI 0.50–1.81; p = .87).

Conclusion

CRT with low-dose continuous 5FU may be a less toxic option for elderly ESCC patients.

Glioblastoma Treatment in the Elderly

Although current treatment advances prolong patient survival, treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) in the elderly has become an emerging issue. The definition of "elderly" differs across articles; GBM predominantly occurs at an age ≥65 years, and the prognosis worsens with increasing age. Regarding molecular markers, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are less common in the elderly with GBM. Meanwhile, O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation has been identified in approximately half of patients with GBM. Surgery should be considered as the first-line treatment even for elderly patients, and maximum safe resection is recommended if feasible. Concurrently, radiotherapy is the standard adjuvant therapy. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (e.g., 40 Gy/15 Fr) is suitable for elderly patients. Studies also supported the concurrent use of temozolomide (TMZ) with radiotherapy. In cases wherein elderly patients cannot tolerate chemoradiation, TMZ monotherapy is an effective option when MGMT promoter methylation is verified. Conversely, tumors with MGMT unmethylated promoter may be treated with radiotherapy alone to reduce the possible toxicity of TMZ. Meanwhile, the efficacy of bevacizumab (BEV) in elderly patients remains unclear. Similarly, further studies on the efficacy of carmustine wafers are needed. Based on current knowledge, we propose a treatment diagram for GBM in the elderly.

Radiotherapy plus temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma: a "real-life" report

Background

The optimization of the management for elderly glioblastoma patients is crucial given the demographics of aging in many countries. We report the outcomes for a “real-life” patient cohort (i.e. unselected) comprising consecutive glioblastoma patients aged 70 years or more, treated with different radiotherapy +/− temozolomide regimens.

Methods

From 2003 to 2016, 104 patients ≥ 70 years of age, consecutively treated by radiotherapy for glioblastoma, were included in this study. All patients were diagnosed with IDH-wild type glioblastoma according to pathological criteria.

Results

Our patient cohort comprised 51 female patients (49%) and 53 male. The median cohort age was 75 years (70–88), and the median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 70 (30–100). Five (5%) patients underwent macroscopic complete resection, 9 (9%) had partial resection, and 90 (86%), a stereotactic biopsy. The MGMT promoter was methylated in 33/73 cases (45%). Fifty-two (50%), 38 (36%), and 14 (14%) patients were categorized with RPA scores of III, IV, and I-II. Thirty-three (32%) patients received normofractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy, 30 sessions) with temozolomide (Stupp), 37 (35%) received hypofractionated radiotherapy (median dose 40 Gy, 15 sessions) with temozolomide (HFRT + TMZ), and 34 (33%) HFRT alone. Patients receiving only HFRT were significantly older, with lower KPSs. The median overall survival (OS; all patients) was 5.2 months. OS rates at 12, 18, and 24 months, were 19%, 12%, and 5%, respectively, with no statistical differences between patients receiving Stupp or HFRT + TMZ (P = 0.22). In contrast, patients receiving HFRT alone manifested a significantly shorter survival time (3.9 months vs. 5.9 months, P = 0.018). In multivariate analyses, the prognostic factors for OS were: i) the type of surgery (HR: 0.47 [0.26–0.86], P = 0.014), ii) RPA class (HR: 2.15 [1.17–3.95], P = 0.014), and iii) temozolomide use irrespective of radiotherapy schedule (HR: 0.54 [0.33–0.88], P < 0.02). MGMT promoter methylation was neither a prognostic nor a predictive factor.

Conclusions

These outcomes agree with the literature in terms of optimal surgery and the use of HFRT as a standard treatment for elderly GBM patients. Our study emphasizes the potential benefit of using temozolomide with radiotherapy in a real-life cohort of elderly GBM patients, irrespective of their MGMT status.

Utilization of hypofractionated radiotherapy in treatment of glioblastoma multiforme in elderly patients not receiving adjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A National Cancer Database Analysis

To assess the utilization and outcomes of adjuvant monotherapy with hypofractionated radiation (RT) among elderly patients not receiving traditional adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (cRT) for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). A retrospective analysis using the National Cancer Data Base with GBM patients aged 65 years or older treated between 2005 and 2012 was conducted. Patients who underwent hypofractionated RT (40 Gy), conventional RT (60 Gy), chemotherapy, or best supportive care alone were included. Statistical methods included logistic regression for utilization and Cox regression for survival analysis. A total of 9556 patients were analyzed. On multivariate analysis (compared to those receiving conventional RT), patients more likely to be treated with hypofractionated RT were older (75-84 years old OR 2.05; p < 0.01 and ≥ 85 years old OR 3.32; p < 0.01), with a Charlson/Deyo score of 2 or higher (OR 1.80; p = 0.05), from communities > 50 miles from their treatment facility (50-100 miles OR 8.03; p < 0.01 and > 100 miles OR 7.16; p < 0.01), treated at an Academic/Research facility (OR 2.85; p = 0.04), and diagnosed between 2011 and 2012 (OR 4.15; p < 0.01). On Cox regression, hypofractionated RT (HR 0.65; p < 0.01), conventional RT (HR 0.60; p < 0.01), and chemotherapy alone (HR 0.69; p < 0.01) were all associated with decreased risk of death compared to no adjuvant therapy. Among patients receiving adjuvant treatment, utilization of hypofractionated RT increased from 7 to 19% during the study period. Among elderly patients with GBM not receiving cRT, the utilization of adjuvant monotherapy with hypofractionated RT has increased over time. Retrospective evidence suggests it may be better than best supportive care alone and as good as conventionally fractionated RT alone.

Effect of temozolomide on survival in elderly patients with glioblastoma and impaired performance status: a propensity score-matching analysis

OBJECTIVE

At present, there is no consensus regarding the standard treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) in elderly patients with impaired Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores. This study aimed to determine the effects of temozolomide (TMZ) versus best supportive care (BSC) in this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients aged ≥65 years with histologically confirmed GBM and KPS scores ≤70 who were treated at our institution between January 2006 and July 2014. Demographic data, treatments, and outcomes were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the independent prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The impact of TMZ on survival was analyzed by the application of propensity score matching of clinicopathological factors among patients who received TMZ vs BSC.

RESULTS

There were 153 patients (86 men, 56.2%) in this study. The median patient age was 70 years (range: 65-83 years). The median KPS score was 60 (range: 30-70). Seventy-eight patients (51.0%) received TMZ, whereas 75 (49.0%) received BSC. Median OS and PFS were 6.0 and 4.5 months, respectively. Compared with BSC, TMZ was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17-0.70; P=0.002) and PFS (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.21-0.76; P=0.003) after propensity score matching. Factors independently associated with OS were KPS score (HR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.48-7.67; P=0.016), extent of resection (HR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.45-5.14; P=0.026), and treatment group (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.23-0.87; P=0.019). The most frequent toxicity in the TMZ group was myelosuppression.

CONCLUSION

Compared with BSC, TMZ increased survival with acceptable toxicity in elderly GBM patients with KPS scores ≤70.

Recurrent glioblastomas in the elderly after maximal first-line treatment: does preserved overall condition warrant a maximal second-line treatment?

A growing literature supports maximal safe resection followed by standard combined chemoradiotherapy (i.e. maximal first-line therapy) for selected elderly glioblastoma patients. To assess the prognostic factors from recurrence in elderly glioblastoma patients treated by maximal safe resection followed by standard combined chemoradiotherapy as first-line therapy. Multicentric retrospective analysis comparing the prognosis and optimal oncological management of recurrent glioblastomas between 660 adult patients aged of < 70 years (standard group) and 117 patients aged of ≥70 years (elderly group) harboring a supratentorial glioblastoma treated by maximal first-line therapy. From recurrence, both groups did not significantly differ regarding Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (p = 0.482). Oncological treatments from recurrence significantly differed: patients of the elderly group received less frequently oncological treatment from recurrence (p < 0.001), including surgical resection (p < 0.001), Bevacizumab therapy (p < 0.001), and second line chemotherapy other than Temozolomide (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, Age ≥70 years was not an independent predictor of overall survival from recurrence (p = 0.602), RTOG-RPA classes 5-6 (p = 0.050) and KPS at recurrence <70 (p < 0.001), available in all cases, were independent significant predictors of shorter overall survival from recurrence. Initial removal of ≥ 90% of enhancing tumor (p = 0.004), initial completion of the standard combined chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.007), oncological treatment from recurrence (p < 0.001), and particularly surgical resection (p < 0.001), Temozolomide (p = 0.046), and Bevacizumab therapy (p = 0.041) were all significant independent predictors of longer overall survival from recurrence. Elderly patients had substandard care from recurrence whereas age did not impact overall survival from recurrence contrary to KPS at recurrence <70. Treatment options from recurrence should include repeat surgery, second line chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic agents.

Pattern of care and outcome in elderly patients with glioblastoma: Data in 151 patients from 3 Lombardia Hospitals

The appropriate treatment approach for elderly patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is unclear, although different studies suggest survival benefit in fit patients treated with radiotherapy and chemiotherapy after surgery. We performed a retrospective analysis of 151 patients older than 65years with GBM treated in 3 Lombardia Hospitals. In univariate regression analysis higher KPS (p=0.02), macroscopical total resection (p<0.003), radiotherapy (p<0.0001), chemotherapy (p<0.0001) and second line chemotheraphy (p=0.02) were of positive prognostic value. On the contrary older age (>70years), presence of seizure at onset and additional resection after tumor recurrence did not influence OS. Multivariate analysis revealed radiotherapy (HR 0.2 p<0.0001) and extent of surgery (HR 0.3, p=0,0063) as positive independent prognostic factors. Patients receiving radio-chemiotherapy displayed more treatment-related toxicities with a slightly prolonged OS versus those receiving hypofractionated radiotherapy. With the limits of a retrospective study, our data suggest that in elderly fit patients extensive surgery should be considered, moreover adjuvant treatments led to an increase in OS. Randomized controlled study are needed to develop treatment guidelines for elderly GBM patients and to assess whether the combination of post-surgical radio and chemiotherapy may be superior to hypofractionated radiotherapy and chemiotherapy in fit patients.

Management of GBM: a problem of local recurrence

Forty years ago, adjuvant treatment of patients with GBM using fractionated radiotherapy following surgery was shown to substantially improve survival compared to surgery alone. However, even with the addition of temozolomide to radiotherapy, overall survival is quite limited and local failure remains a fundamental problem, despite multiple attempts to increase dose to the tumor target. This review presents the historical background and clinical rationale leading to the current standard of care consisting of 60 Gy total dose in 2 Gy fractions to the MRI-defined targets in younger, high performance status patients and more hypofractionated regimens in elderly and/or debilitated patients. Particle therapies offer the potential to increase local control while reducing dose and, potentially, long-term neurocognitive toxicity. However, improvements in systemic therapies for GBM will need to be implemented before the full benefits of improved local control can be realized.

Impact of standard care on elderly glioblastoma patients

Background

Uncertainty persists about the survival advantage of concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) plus radiotherapy (RT) in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). We compared the clinical outcome of unselected elderly GBM patients treated with 4 adjuvant treatment modalities, including the Stupp protocol.

Methods

From 2010 to 2014, retrospective chart review was performed on 171 GBM patients aged ≥55 who received either concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) with standard 60 Gy/30 (SRT); CCRT with hypofractionated 40 Gy/15 (HRT); HRT alone; or TMZ alone. Stratification is by age (55-69, ≥70), KPS (<70, ≥70), and resection status (biopsy, resection).

Results

Out of 171 patients identified, 128(75%) had surgical resection, median age was 66(55-83), and median overall survival (mOS) 11.4mo. Majority (109/171) were treated according to the Stupp protocol (CCRT-SRT), and 106/171 received post-CCRT adjuvant TMZ (median of 3 cycles). In our population, age <70yo was a significant prognostic factor (mOS of patients aged 55-69 vs ≥70 yo = 13.3 vs 6.6 mo; P = .001). However, among the population receiving the Stupp regimen, there was no difference in survival between patients aged 55-69 and those ≥70 (respectively, 14.4 vs 13.2 mo; P = .798). Patients ≥70 yo had similar survival when treated with CCRT-HRT and CCRT-SRT (P = .248), although numbers were small.

Conclusions

Our data suggests that, despite having a worse global prognostic than their younger counterparts, GBM patients ≥70yo with a good performance status could be treated according to the Stupp protocol with similar survival. Theses results need prospective confirmation.

Comparative effectiveness of radiotherapy with vs. without temozolomide in older patients with glioblastoma

It is unknown whether the addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to radiotherapy (RT) is associated with improved overall survival (OS) among older glioblastoma patients. We performed a retrospective cohort SEER-Medicare analysis of 1652 patients aged ≥65 years with glioblastoma who received ≥10 fractions of RT from 2005 to 2009, or from 1995 to 1999 before TMZ was available. Three cohorts were assembled based on diagnosis year and treatment initiated within 60 days of diagnosis: (1) 2005-2009 and TMZ/RT, (2) 2005-2009 and RT only, or (3) 1995-1999 and RT only. Associations with OS were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score analyses; OS was calculated starting 60 days after diagnosis. Pre-specified sensitivity analyses were performed among patients who received long-course RT (≥27 fractions). Median survival estimates were 7.4 (IQR, 3.3-14.7) months for TMZ/RT, 5.9 (IQR, 2.6-12.1) months for RT alone in 2005-2009, and 5.6 (IQR, 2.7-9.6) months for RT alone in 1995-1999. OS at 2 years was 10.1 % for TMZ/RT, 7.1 % for RT in 2005-2009, and 4.7 % for RT in 1995-1999. Adjusted models suggested decreased mortality risk for TMZ/RT compared to RT in 2005-2009 (AHR, 0.86; 95 % CI, 0.76-0.98) and RT in 1995-1999 (AHR, 0.71; 95 % CI, 0.57-0.90). Among patients from 2005 to 2009 who received long-course RT, however, the addition of TMZ did not significantly improve survival (AHR, 0.91; 95 % CI, 0.80-1.04). In summary, among a large cohort of older glioblastoma patients treated in a real-world setting, the addition of TMZ to RT was associated with a small survival gain.

Feasibility evaluation of hypofractionated radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Although hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) is preferred to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy when treating elderly patients with glioblastoma, the benefits and tolerability of HFRT with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) remain unknown for such patients. We assessed the feasibility and outcomes of elderly patients with glioblastoma treated with HFRT and concurrent TMZ.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 11 patients aged ≥70 years who were treated with HFRT and concurrent TMZ. All patients had newly diagnosed and histologically confirmed glioblastoma and were treated at our institution between October 2011 and April 2015. The median age was 74 years (range, 70-85 years). Total resection/subtotal resection/biopsy were performed in 2/5/4 patients, respectively. The planning target volume included the T1-enhancing tumor and the resection cavity plus 2-cm margins, and all surrounding edema. The median prescription dose was 35 Gy (range, 35-42.5 Gy), delivered in 10 fractions. Seven patients received TMZ at 150 mg/m² for 5 days and 4 received TMZ at 75 mg/m² during HFRT. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from surgery to death or the last follow-up.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 13.2 months. The median OS and progression-free survival (PFS) times were 13.2 and 7.0 months, respectively. One patient experienced grade 4 neutropenia, lymphocytopenia, and thrombocytopenia. No grade 3 or higher nonhematological adverse event was noted.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis demonstrated the feasibility of HFRT with concurrent TMZ used to treat elderly patients with glioblastoma. Further prospective clinical trials are needed to define therapies that balance efficacy with tolerability.

Glioblastoma care in the elderly

Glioblastoma is common among elderly patients, a group in which comorbidities and a poor prognosis raise important considerations when designing neuro-oncologic care. Although the standard of care for nonelderly patients with glioblastoma includes maximal safe surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide, the safety and efficacy of these modalities in elderly patients are less certain given the population's underrepresentation in many clinical trials. The authors reviewed the clinical trial literature for reports on the treatment of elderly patients with glioblastoma to provide evidence-based guidance for practitioners. In elderly patients with glioblastoma, there is a survival advantage for those who undergo maximal safe resection, which likely includes an incremental benefit with increasing completeness of resection. Radiotherapy extends survival in selected patients, and hypofractionation appears to be more tolerable than standard fractionation. In addition, temozolomide chemotherapy is safe and extends the survival of patients with tumors that harbor O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. The combination of standard radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide has not been studied in this population. Although many questions remain unanswered regarding the treatment of glioblastoma in elderly patients, the available evidence provides a framework on which providers may base individual treatment decisions. The importance of tumor biomarkers is increasingly apparent in elderly patients, for whom the therapeutic efficacy of any treatment must be weighed against its potential toxicity. MGMT promoter methylation status has specifically demonstrated utility in predicting the efficacy of temozolomide and should be considered in treatment decisions when possible. Cancer 2016;122:189-197. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Glioblastoma in the elderly: Therapeutic dilemmas

Background:

Glioblastoma (GBM) is commonly diagnosed in patients older than 60 years, but the treatment protocols are mostly based on trials in patients aged up to 70 years. These lead to little consensus and to an absence of protocols regarding the standard treatments. The objective of this study is to analyze the prognostic factors, treatment efficacy, and adverse events in a cohort of elderly patients.

Methods:

A retrospective observational study of all patients aged ≥65 with histologically confirmed GBM followed at Centro Hospitalar S. João between 2005 and 2013. Demographic, clinical, radiographic, treatment, and outcome data were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results:

A total of 126 patients were reviewed. Median progression-free survival was 5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.138 to 5.862 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 8 months (95% CI, 5.950 to 10.050 months). Univariate analysis showed the statistically significant associations between the higher OS and age <70 (P = 0.046), Karnofsky performance status ≥70 (P = 0.001), single lesions (P = 0.007), lesions affecting one lobe (P = 0.007), total resection (P = 0.048), and Charlson age-comorbidity index ≤5. Multivariate analysis identified the completion of 60 Gy radiotherapy and completion of 6 or more cycles of temozolomide chemotherapy as independent prognostic factors positively correlated with increased survival.

Conclusions:

Maximal resection and radiochemotherapy treatment completion are associated with longer OS, and age alone should not preclude elderly patients from receiving surgery and adjuvant treatment. However, only a few patients were able to finish the proposed treatments. Poor performance and high comorbidity index status might compromise the benefit of treatment aggressiveness and must be considered in therapeutic decision.