1
|
Blanchard Z, Brown EA, Ghazaryan A, Welm AL. PDX models for functional precision oncology and discovery science. Nat Rev Cancer 2025; 25:153-166. [PMID: 39681638 DOI: 10.1038/s41568-024-00779-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/19/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024]
Abstract
Precision oncology relies on detailed molecular analysis of how diverse tumours respond to various therapies, with the aim to optimize treatment outcomes for individual patients. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models have been key to preclinical validation of precision oncology approaches, enabling the analysis of each tumour's unique genomic landscape and testing therapies that are predicted to be effective based on specific mutations, gene expression patterns or signalling abnormalities. To extend these standard precision oncology approaches, the field has strived to complement the otherwise static and often descriptive measurements with functional assays, termed functional precision oncology (FPO). By utilizing diverse PDX and PDX-derived models, FPO has gained traction as an effective preclinical and clinical tool to more precisely recapitulate patient biology using in vivo and ex vivo functional assays. Here, we explore advances and limitations of PDX and PDX-derived models for precision oncology and FPO. We also examine the future of PDX models for precision oncology in the age of artificial intelligence. Integrating these two disciplines could be the key to fast, accurate and cost-effective treatment prediction, revolutionizing oncology and providing patients with cancer with the most effective, personalized treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zannel Blanchard
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Elisabeth A Brown
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Arevik Ghazaryan
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Alana L Welm
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jin Y, Chen P, Zhou H, Mu G, Wu S, Zha Z, Ma B, Han C, Chiu ML. Developing transcriptomic biomarkers for TAVO412 utilizing next generation sequencing analyses of preclinical tumor models. Front Immunol 2025; 16:1505868. [PMID: 39995668 PMCID: PMC11847686 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1505868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2025] [Indexed: 02/26/2025] Open
Abstract
Introduction TAVO412, a multi-specific antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (c-Met), and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), is undergoing clinical development for the treatment of solid tumors. TAVO412 has multiple mechanisms of action for tumor growth inhibition that include shutting down the EGFR, c-Met, and VEGF signaling pathways, having enhanced Fc effector functions, addressing drug resistance that can be mediated by the crosstalk amongst these three targets, as well as inhibiting angiogenesis. TAVO412 demonstrated strong in vivo tumor growth inhibition in 23 cell-line derived xenograft (CDX) models representing diverse cancer types, as well as in 9 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) lung tumor models. Methods Using preclinical CDX data, we established transcriptomic biomarkers based on gene expression profiles that were correlated with anti-tumor response or distinguished between responders and non-responders. Together with specific driver mutation that associated with efficacy and the targets of TAVO412, a set of 21-gene biomarker was identified to predict the efficacy. A biomarker predictor was formulated based on the Linear Prediction Score (LPS) to estimate the probability of patients or tumor model response to TAVO412 treatment. Results This efficacy predictor for TAVO412 demonstrated 78% accuracy in the CDX training models. The biomarker model was further validated in the PDX data set and resulted in comparable accuracy. Conclusions In implementing precision medicine by leveraging preclinical model data, a predictive transcriptomic biomarker empowered by next-generation sequencing was identified that could optimize the selection of patients that may benefit most from TAVO412 treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Jin
- Research & Development Department, Tavotek Biotherapeutics, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Peng Chen
- Research & Development Department, Tavotek Biotherapeutics, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Huajun Zhou
- Global Center for Data Science and Bioinformatics, Crown Bioscience Inc., Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Guangmao Mu
- Research & Development Department, Tavotek Biotherapeutics, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Simin Wu
- Research & Development Department, Tavotek Biotherapeutics, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zhengxia Zha
- Research & Development Department, Tavotek Biotherapeutics, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Bin Ma
- Research & Development Department, Tavotek Biotherapeutics, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chao Han
- Research & Development, Tavotek Biotherapeutics, Spring House, PA, United States
| | - Mark L. Chiu
- Research & Development Department, Tavotek Biotherapeutics, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
- Research & Development, Tavotek Biotherapeutics, Spring House, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lei JT, Dobrolecki LE, Huang C, Srinivasan RR, Vasaikar SV, Lewis AN, Sallas C, Zhao N, Cao J, Landua JD, Moon CI, Liao Y, Hilsenbeck SG, Osborne CK, Rimawi MF, Ellis MJ, Petrosyan V, Wen B, Li K, Saltzman AB, Jain A, Malovannaya A, Wulf GM, Marangoni E, Li S, Kraushaar DC, Wang T, Damodaran S, Zheng X, Meric-Bernstam F, Echeverria GV, Anurag M, Chen X, Welm BE, Welm AL, Zhang B, Lewis MT. Patient-Derived Xenografts of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Enable Deconvolution and Prediction of Chemotherapy Responses. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2025:2024.12.09.627518. [PMID: 39713418 PMCID: PMC11661147 DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.09.627518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2024]
Abstract
Combination chemotherapy remains essential for clinical management of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Consequently, responses to multiple single agents cannot be delineated at the single patient level, even though some patients might not require all drugs in the combination. Herein, we conduct multi-omic analyses of orthotopic TNBC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) treated with single agent carboplatin, docetaxel, or the combination. Combination responses were usually no better than the best single agent, with enhanced response in only ~13% of PDX, and apparent antagonism in a comparable percentage. Single-omic comparisons showed largely non-overlapping results between genes associated with single agent and combination treatments that could be validated in independent patient cohorts. Multi-omic analyses of PDXs identified agent-specific biomarkers/biomarker combinations, nominating high Cytokeratin-5 (KRT5) as a general marker of responsiveness. Notably, integrating proteomic with transcriptomic data improved predictive modeling of pathologic complete response to combination chemotherapy. PDXs refractory to all treatments were enriched for signatures of dysregulated mitochondrial function. Targeting this process indirectly in a PDX with HDAC inhibition plus chemotherapy in vivo overcomes chemoresistance. These results suggest possible resistance mechanisms and therapeutic strategies in TNBC to overcome chemoresistance, and potentially allow optimization of chemotherapeutic regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan T. Lei
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lacey E. Dobrolecki
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Chen Huang
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Current affiliation: Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Ramakrishnan R. Srinivasan
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Suhas V. Vasaikar
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Current affiliation: Translational Oncology Bioinformatics, Pfizer, Bothell, WA 98021, USA
| | - Alaina N. Lewis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Christina Sallas
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Na Zhao
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jin Cao
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Current affiliation: The MOE Key Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection and Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - John D. Landua
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Chang In Moon
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yuxing Liao
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Susan G. Hilsenbeck
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - C. Kent Osborne
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mothaffar F. Rimawi
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Matthew J. Ellis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Current affiliation: Guardant Health, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Varduhi Petrosyan
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Bo Wen
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Current affiliation: Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Kai Li
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Current affiliation: Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Alexander B. Saltzman
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Core, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Antrix Jain
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Core, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Anna Malovannaya
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Core, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Gerburg M. Wulf
- Cancer Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Elisabetta Marangoni
- Laboratory of Preclinical investigation, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, PSL University, 26 Rue d’Ulm, Paris 75005, France
| | - Shunqiang Li
- Siteman Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Daniel C. Kraushaar
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Tao Wang
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | | | | | - Gloria V. Echeverria
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Meenakshi Anurag
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Xi Chen
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Bryan E. Welm
- Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Alana L. Welm
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Bing Zhang
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael T. Lewis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Lead contact
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Awasthi S, Dobrolecki LE, Sallas C, Zhang X, Li Y, Khazaei S, Ghosh S, Jeter CR, Liu J, Mills GB, Westin SN, Lewis MT, Peng W, Sood AK, Yap TA, Yi SS, McGrail DJ, Sahni N. UBA1 inhibition sensitizes cancer cells to PARP inhibitors. Cell Rep Med 2024; 5:101834. [PMID: 39626673 PMCID: PMC11722100 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 11/04/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024]
Abstract
Therapeutic strategies targeting the DNA damage response, such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi), have revolutionized cancer treatment in tumors deficient in homologous recombination (HR). However, overcoming innate and acquired resistance to PARPi remains a significant challenge. Here, we employ a genome-wide CRISPR knockout screen and discover that the depletion of ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 (UBA1) enhances sensitivity to PARPi in HR-proficient ovarian cancer cells. We show that silencing or pharmacological inhibition of UBA1 sensitizes multiple cell lines and organoid models to PARPi. Mechanistic studies uncover that UBA1 inhibition not only impedes HR repair to sensitize cells to PARP inhibition but also increases PARylation, which may subsequently be targeted by PARP inhibition. In vivo experiments using patient-derived xenografts demonstrate that combining PARP and UBA1 inhibition provided significant survival benefit compared to individual therapies with no detectable signs of toxicity, establishing this combination approach as a promising strategy to extend PARPi benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharad Awasthi
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Lacey E Dobrolecki
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christina Sallas
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xudong Zhang
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sima Khazaei
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sumanta Ghosh
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Collene R Jeter
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jinsong Liu
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gordon B Mills
- Division of Oncological Science, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T Lewis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Weiyi Peng
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy A Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - S Stephen Yi
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Department of Oncology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA; Interdisciplinary Life Sciences Graduate Programs (ILSGP), College of Natural Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA; Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences (ICES), The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Daniel J McGrail
- Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Nidhi Sahni
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Quantitative and Computational Biosciences Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rinkenbaugh AL, Qi Y, Cai S, Shao J, Hancock F, Jeter-Jones S, Zhang X, Powell E, Huo L, Lau R, Fu C, Gould R, den Hollander P, Ravenberg EE, White JB, Rauch GM, Arun B, Yam C, Thompson AM, Echeverria GV, Moulder SL, Symmans WF, Chang JT, Piwnica-Worms H. An annotated biobank of triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenografts featuring treatment-naïve and longitudinal samples throughout neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.11.25.625287. [PMID: 39651299 PMCID: PMC11623626 DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.25.625287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2024]
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) that fails to respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) can be lethal. Developing effective strategies to eradicate chemoresistant disease requires experimental models that recapitulate the heterogeneity characteristic of TNBC. To that end, we established a biobank of 92 orthotopic patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of TNBC from the tumors of 75 patients enrolled in the ARTEMIS clinical trial ( NCT02276443 ) at MD Anderson Cancer Center, including 12 longitudinal sets generated from serial patient biopsies collected throughout NACT and from metastatic disease. Models were established from both chemosensitive and chemoresistant tumors, and nearly 30% of PDX models were capable of lung metastasis. Comprehensive molecular profiling demonstrated conservation of genomes and transcriptomes between patient and corresponding PDX tumors, with representation of all major transcriptional subtypes. Transcriptional changes observed in the longitudinal PDX models highlight dysregulation in pathways associated with DNA integrity, extracellular matrix interactions, the ubiquitin-proteasome system, epigenetics, and inflammatory signaling. These alterations reveal a complex network of adaptations associated with chemoresistance. This PDX biobank provides a valuable resource for tackling the most pressing issues facing the clinical management of TNBC, namely chemoresistance and metastasis.
Collapse
|
6
|
Berner MJ, Beasley HK, Vue Z, Lane A, Vang L, Baek ML, Marshall AG, Killion M, Zeleke F, Shao B, Parker D, Peterson A, Rhoades JS, Scudese E, Dobrolecki LE, Lewis MT, Hinton A, Echeverria GV. Three-dimensional analysis of mitochondria in a patient-derived xenograft model of triple negative breast cancer reveals mitochondrial network remodeling following chemotherapy treatments. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.09.09.611245. [PMID: 39314272 PMCID: PMC11419075 DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.09.611245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
Mitochondria are hubs of metabolism and signaling and play an important role in tumorigenesis, therapeutic resistance, and metastasis in many cancer types. Various laboratory models of cancer demonstrate the extraordinary dynamics of mitochondrial structure, but little is known about the role of mitochondrial structure in resistance to anticancer therapy. We previously demonstrated the importance of mitochondrial structure and oxidative phosphorylation in the survival of chemotherapy-refractory triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells. As TNBC is a highly aggressive breast cancer subtype with few targeted therapy options, conventional chemotherapies remain the backbone of early TNBC treatment. Unfortunately, approximately 45% of TNBC patients retain substantial residual tumor burden following chemotherapy, associated with abysmal prognoses. Using an orthotopic patient-derived xenograft mouse model of human TNBC, we compared mitochondrial structures between treatment-naïve tumors and residual tumors after conventional chemotherapeutics were administered singly or in combination. We reconstructed 1,750 mitochondria in three dimensions from serial block-face scanning electron micrographs, providing unprecedented insights into the complexity and intra-tumoral heterogeneity of mitochondria in TNBC. Following exposure to carboplatin or docetaxel given individually, residual tumor mitochondria exhibited significant increases in mitochondrial complexity index, area, volume, perimeter, width, and length relative to treatment-naïve tumor mitochondria. In contrast, residual tumors exposed to those chemotherapies given in combination exhibited diminished mitochondrial structure changes. Further, we document extensive intra-tumoral heterogeneity of mitochondrial structure, especially prior to chemotherapeutic exposure. These results highlight the potential for structure-based monitoring of chemotherapeutic responses and reveal potential molecular mechanisms that underlie chemotherapeutic resistance in TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariah J. Berner
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Cancer, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heather K. Beasley
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Zer Vue
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Audra Lane
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Cancer, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Larry Vang
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Mokryun L. Baek
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Cancer, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrea G. Marshall
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Mason Killion
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Faben Zeleke
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Bryanna Shao
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Dominque Parker
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA
- Program in Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Autumn Peterson
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Julie Sterling Rhoades
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Estevão Scudese
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lacey E. Dobrolecki
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Cancer, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T. Lewis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Cancer, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Antentor Hinton
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Gloria V. Echeverria
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Cancer, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Souto EP, Gong P, Landua JD, Srinivasan RR, Ganesan A, Dobrolecki LE, Purdy SC, Pan X, Zeosky M, Chung A, Yi SS, Ford HL, Lewis MT. The interferon/STAT1 signaling axis is a common feature of tumor-initiating cells in breast cancer. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.09.15.557958. [PMID: 37745510 PMCID: PMC10515955 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.15.557958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
A tumor cell subpopulation of tumor-initiating cells (TIC), or "cancer stem cells", are associated with therapeutic resistance, as well as both local and distant recurrence. Enriched populations of TIC are identified by markers including aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH1) activity, the cell surface marker combination CD44 + /CD24 - , or fluorescent reporters for signaling pathways that regulate TIC function. We showed previously that S ignal T ransducer and A ctivator of T ranscription (STAT)-mediated transcription allows enrichment for TIC in claudin-low models of human triple-negative breast cancer using a STAT-responsive reporter. However, the molecular phenotypes of STAT TIC are not well understood, and there is no existing method to lineage-trace TIC as they undergo cell state changes. Using a new STAT-responsive lineage-tracing (LT) system in conjunction with our original reporter, we enriched for cells with enhanced mammosphere-forming potential in some, but not all, basal-like triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) xenograft models (TNBC) indicating TIC-related and TIC-independent functions for STAT signaling. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) of reporter-tagged xenografts and clinical samples identified a common interferon (IFN)/STAT1-associated transcriptional state, previously linked to inflammation and macrophage differentiation, in TIC. Surprisingly, most of the genes we identified are not present in previously published TIC signatures derived using bulk RNA sequencing. Finally, we demonstrated that bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 (BST2), is a cell surface marker of this state, and that it functionally regulates TIC frequency. These results suggest TIC may exploit the IFN/STAT1 signaling axis to promote their activity, and that targeting this pathway may help eliminate TIC. Significance TIC differentially express interferon response genes, which were not previously reported in bulk RNA sequencing-derived TIC signatures, highlighting the importance of coupling single-cell transcriptomics with enrichment to derive TIC signatures.
Collapse
|
8
|
Wehbe E, Patanwala AE, Lu CY, Kim HY, Stocker SL, Alffenaar JWC. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Biomarkers; towards Better Dosing of Antimicrobial Therapy. Pharmaceutics 2024; 16:677. [PMID: 38794338 PMCID: PMC11125587 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16050677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Due to variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, clinical outcomes of antimicrobial drug therapy vary between patients. As such, personalised medication management, considering both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, is a growing concept of interest in the field of infectious diseases. Therapeutic drug monitoring is used to adjust and individualise drug regimens until predefined pharmacokinetic exposure targets are achieved. Minimum inhibitory concentration (drug susceptibility) is the best available pharmacodynamic parameter but is associated with many limitations. Identification of other pharmacodynamic parameters is necessary. Repurposing diagnostic biomarkers as pharmacodynamic parameters to evaluate treatment response is attractive. When combined with therapeutic drug monitoring, it could facilitate making more informed dosing decisions. We believe the approach has potential and justifies further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eman Wehbe
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (E.W.); (A.E.P.); (C.Y.L.); (H.Y.K.); (S.L.S.)
- Department of Pharmacy, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Asad E. Patanwala
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (E.W.); (A.E.P.); (C.Y.L.); (H.Y.K.); (S.L.S.)
- Department of Pharmacy, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Christine Y. Lu
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (E.W.); (A.E.P.); (C.Y.L.); (H.Y.K.); (S.L.S.)
- Department of Pharmacy, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
- Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, The Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Hannah Yejin Kim
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (E.W.); (A.E.P.); (C.Y.L.); (H.Y.K.); (S.L.S.)
- Department of Pharmacy, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
- Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Sophie L. Stocker
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (E.W.); (A.E.P.); (C.Y.L.); (H.Y.K.); (S.L.S.)
- Department of Pharmacy, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
- Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
| | - Jan-Willem C. Alffenaar
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (E.W.); (A.E.P.); (C.Y.L.); (H.Y.K.); (S.L.S.)
- Department of Pharmacy, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
- Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vinik Y, Maimon A, Dubey V, Raj H, Abramovitch I, Malitsky S, Itkin M, Ma'ayan A, Westermann F, Gottlieb E, Ruppin E, Lev S. Programming a Ferroptosis-to-Apoptosis Transition Landscape Revealed Ferroptosis Biomarkers and Repressors for Cancer Therapy. ADVANCED SCIENCE (WEINHEIM, BADEN-WURTTEMBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 11:e2307263. [PMID: 38441406 PMCID: PMC11077643 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202307263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
Ferroptosis and apoptosis are key cell-death pathways implicated in several human diseases including cancer. Ferroptosis is driven by iron-dependent lipid peroxidation and currently has no characteristic biomarkers or gene signatures. Here a continuous phenotypic gradient between ferroptosis and apoptosis coupled to transcriptomic and metabolomic landscapes is established. The gradual ferroptosis-to-apoptosis transcriptomic landscape is used to generate a unique, unbiased transcriptomic predictor, the Gradient Gene Set (GGS), which classified ferroptosis and apoptosis with high accuracy. Further GGS optimization using multiple ferroptotic and apoptotic datasets revealed highly specific ferroptosis biomarkers, which are robustly validated in vitro and in vivo. A subset of the GGS is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer patients and PDXs and contains different ferroptosis repressors. Depletion of one representative, PDGFA-assaociated protein 1(PDAP1), is found to suppress basal-like breast tumor growth in a mouse model. Omics and mechanistic studies revealed that ferroptosis is associated with enhanced lysosomal function, glutaminolysis, and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, while its transition into apoptosis is attributed to enhanced endoplasmic reticulum(ER)-stress and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE)-to-phosphatidylcholine (PC) metabolic shift. Collectively, this study highlights molecular mechanisms underlying ferroptosis execution, identified a highly predictive ferroptosis gene signature with prognostic value, ferroptosis versus apoptosis biomarkers, and ferroptosis repressors for breast cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaron Vinik
- Molecular Cell Biology DepartmentWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovot76100Israel
| | - Avi Maimon
- Molecular Cell Biology DepartmentWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovot76100Israel
| | - Vinay Dubey
- Molecular Cell Biology DepartmentWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovot76100Israel
| | - Harsha Raj
- Molecular Cell Biology DepartmentWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovot76100Israel
| | - Ifat Abramovitch
- The Ruth and Bruce RappaportFaculty of MedicineTechnion–Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifa3525433Israel
| | - Sergey Malitsky
- Metabolic Profiling UnitWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovot76100Israel
| | - Maxim Itkin
- Metabolic Profiling UnitWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovot76100Israel
| | - Avi Ma'ayan
- Department of Pharmacological SciencesMount Sinai Center for BioinformaticsIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNY10029USA
| | - Frank Westermann
- Neuroblastoma GenomicsGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)69120HeidelbergGermany
| | - Eyal Gottlieb
- The Ruth and Bruce RappaportFaculty of MedicineTechnion–Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifa3525433Israel
| | - Eytan Ruppin
- Cancer Data Science LaboratoryNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMD20892USA
| | - Sima Lev
- Molecular Cell Biology DepartmentWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovot76100Israel
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lewis MT, Caldas C. The Power and Promise of Patient-Derived Xenografts of Human Breast Cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2024; 14:a041329. [PMID: 38052483 PMCID: PMC10982691 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
In 2016, a group of researchers engaged in the development of patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) of human breast cancer provided a comprehensive review of the state of the field. In that review, they summarized the clinical problem that PDXs might address, the technical approaches to their generation (including a discussion of host animals and transplant conditions tested), and presented transplantation success (take) rates across groups and across transplantation conditions. At the time, there were just over 500 unique PDX models created by these investigators representing all three clinically defined subtypes (ER+, HER2+, and TNBC). Today, many of these PDX resources have at least doubled in size, and several more PDX development groups now exist, such that there may be well upward of 1000 PDX models of human breast cancer in existence worldwide. They also presented a series of open questions for the field. Many of these questions have been addressed. However, several remain open, or only partially addressed. Herein, we revisit these questions, and recount the progress that has been made in a number of areas with respect to generation, characterization, and use of PDXs in translational research, and re-present questions that remain open. These open questions, and others, are now being addressed not only by individual investigators, but also large, well-funded consortia including the PDXNet program of the National Cancer Institute in the United States, and the EuroPDX Consortium, an organization of PDX developers across Europe. Finally, we discuss the new opportunities in PDX-based research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Lewis
- Baylor College of Medicine, The Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Departments of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Carlos Caldas
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Park H. Unveiling Gene Regulatory Networks That Characterize Difference of Molecular Interplays Between Gastric Cancer Drug Sensitive and Resistance Cell Lines. J Comput Biol 2024; 31:257-274. [PMID: 38394313 DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2023.0215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally and chemotherapy is widely accepted as the standard treatment for gastric cancer. However, drug resistance in cancer cells poses a significant obstacle to the success of chemotherapy, limiting its effectiveness in treating gastric cancer. Although many studies have been conducted to unravel the mechanisms of acquired drug resistance, the existing studies were based on abnormalities of a single gene, that is, differential gene expression (DGE) analysis. Single gene-based analysis alone is insufficient to comprehensively understand the mechanisms of drug resistance in cancer cells, because the underlying processes of the mechanism involve perturbations of the molecular interactions. To uncover the mechanism of acquired gastric cancer drug resistance, we perform for identification of differentially regulated gene networks between drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cell lines. We develop a computational strategy for identifying phenotype-specific gene networks by extending the existing method, CIdrgn, that quantifies the dissimilarity of gene networks based on comprehensive information of network structure, that is, regulatory effect between genes, structure of edge, and expression levels of genes. To enhance the efficiency of identifying differentially regulated gene networks and improve the biological relevance of our findings, we integrate additional information and incorporate knowledge of network biology, such as hubness of genes and weighted adjacency matrices. The outstanding capabilities of the developed strategy are validated through Monte Carlo simulations. By using our strategy, we uncover gene regulatory networks that specifically capture the molecular interplays distinguishing drug-sensitive and drug-resistant profiles in gastric cancer. The reliability and significance of the identified drug-sensitive and resistance-specific gene networks, as well as their related markers, are verified through literature. Our analysis for differentially regulated gene network identification has the capacity to characterize the drug-sensitive and resistance-specific molecular interplays related to mechanisms of acquired drug resistance that cannot be revealed by analysis based solely on abnormalities of a single gene, for example, DGE analysis. Through our analysis and comprehensive examination of relevant literature, we suggest that targeting the suppressors of the identified drug-resistant markers, such as the Melanoma Antigen (MAGE) family, Trefoil Factor (TFF) family, and Ras-Associated Binding 25 (RAB25), while enhancing the expression of inducers of the drug sensitivity markers [e.g., Serum Amyloid A (SAA) family], could potentially reduce drug resistance and enhance the effectiveness of chemotherapy for gastric cancer. We expect that the developed strategy will serve as a useful tool for uncovering cancer-related phenotype-specific gene regulatory networks that provide essential clues for uncovering not only drug resistance mechanisms but also complex biological systems of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heewon Park
- School of Mathematics, Statistics and Data Science, Sungshin Women's University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jin Y, Huang S, Zhou H, Wang Z, Zhou Y. Multi-omics comprehensive analyses of programmed cell death patterns to regulate the immune characteristics of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Transl Oncol 2024; 41:101862. [PMID: 38237211 PMCID: PMC10825548 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a heterogeneous cancer with high morbidity and mortality. Triggering the programmed cell death (PCD) to enhance the anti-tumor therapies is being applied in multiple cancers. However, the limited understanding of genetic heterogeneity in HNSCC severely hampers the clinical efficacy. We systematically analyzed 14 types of PCD in HNSCC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We utilized ssGSEA to calculate the PCD scores and classify patients into two clusters. Subsequently, we displayed the genomic alteration landscape to unravel the significant differences in copy number alterations and gene mutations. Furthermore, we calculated the IC50 values of targeted drugs to predict the differences in sensitivity. To identify the immune-related prognostic types, we comprehensively estimated the relationship between immune indicators and all prognostic PCD in three datasets (TCGA, GSE65858, GSE41613). Finally, 7 regulators were filtered. Subsequently, we integrated 10 machine learning algorithms and 101 algorithm combinations to test the clinical predictive efficacy. Using WGCNA as a basis, we built a weighted co-expression network to identify modules involved in the immune landscape with different colors. Meanwhile, our results indicated that blue and red modules containing crucial regulators closely related to the CD4+, CD8+ T cells, TMB or PD-L1. FCGR2A from blue module, CSF2, INHBA, and THBS1 from the red module were determined. After verifying in vivo experiments, FCGR2A was identified as hub gene. In conclusion, our findings suggest a potential role of PCD in HNSCC, offering new insights into effective immunotherapy and anti-tumor therapies in HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, China; Key Laboratory of Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
| | - Siwei Huang
- School of Humanities and Management, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410208, China
| | - Hongyu Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, China; Key Laboratory of Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China
| | - Zhanwang Wang
- Department of Oncology, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
| | - Yonghong Zhou
- School of Medicine, Shanghai University, 99 Shangda Road, Shanghai 200444, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fontana F, Esser AK, Egbulefu C, Karmakar P, Su X, Allen JS, Xu Y, Davis JL, Gabay A, Xiang J, Kwakwa KA, Manion B, Bakewell S, Li S, Park H, Lanza GM, Achilefu S, Weilbaecher KN. Transferrin receptor in primary and metastatic breast cancer: Evaluation of expression and experimental modulation to improve molecular targeting. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0293700. [PMID: 38117806 PMCID: PMC10732420 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conjugation of transferrin (Tf) to imaging or nanotherapeutic agents is a promising strategy to target breast cancer. Since the efficacy of these biomaterials often depends on the overexpression of the targeted receptor, we set out to survey expression of transferrin receptor (TfR) in primary and metastatic breast cancer samples, including metastases and relapse, and investigate its modulation in experimental models. METHODS Gene expression was investigated by datamining in twelve publicly-available datasets. Dedicated Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were generated to evaluate matched primary and bone metastases as well as and pre and post chemotherapy tumors from the same patient. TMA were stained with the FDA-approved MRQ-48 antibody against TfR and graded by staining intensity (H-score). Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and isogenic metastatic mouse models were used to study in vivo TfR expression and uptake of transferrin. RESULTS TFRC gene and protein expression were high in breast cancer of all subtypes and stages, and in 60-85% of bone metastases. TfR was detectable after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, albeit with some variability. Fluorophore-conjugated transferrin iron chelator deferoxamine (DFO) enhanced TfR uptake in human breast cancer cells in vitro and proved transferrin localization at metastatic sites and correlation of tumor burden relative to untreated tumor mice. CONCLUSIONS TfR is expressed in breast cancer, primary, metastatic, and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Variability in expression of TfR suggests that evaluation of the expression of TfR in individual patients could identify the best candidates for targeting. Further, systemic iron chelation with DFO may upregulate receptor expression and improve uptake of therapeutics or tracers that use transferrin as a homing ligand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Fontana
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Alison K. Esser
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Christopher Egbulefu
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Partha Karmakar
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Xinming Su
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - John S. Allen
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Yalin Xu
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Jennifer L. Davis
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Ariel Gabay
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Jingyu Xiang
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Kristin A. Kwakwa
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Brad Manion
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Suzanne Bakewell
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Shunqiang Li
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Haeseong Park
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Gregory M. Lanza
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Samuel Achilefu
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Katherine N. Weilbaecher
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li Y, Dobrolecki LE, Sallas C, Zhang X, Kerr TD, Bisht D, Wang Y, Awasthi S, Kaundal B, Wu S, Peng W, Mendillo ML, Lu Y, Jeter CR, Peng G, Liu J, Westin SN, Sood AK, Lewis MT, Das J, Yi SS, Bedford MT, McGrail DJ, Sahni N. PRMT blockade induces defective DNA replication stress response and synergizes with PARP inhibition. Cell Rep Med 2023; 4:101326. [PMID: 38118413 PMCID: PMC10772459 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
Multiple cancers exhibit aberrant protein arginine methylation by both type I arginine methyltransferases, predominately protein arginine methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1) and to a lesser extent PRMT4, and by type II PRMTs, predominately PRMT5. Here, we perform targeted proteomics following inhibition of PRMT1, PRMT4, and PRMT5 across 12 cancer cell lines. We find that inhibition of type I and II PRMTs suppresses phosphorylated and total ATR in cancer cells. Loss of ATR from PRMT inhibition results in defective DNA replication stress response activation, including from PARP inhibitors. Inhibition of type I and II PRMTs is synergistic with PARP inhibition regardless of homologous recombination function, but type I PRMT inhibition is more toxic to non-malignant cells. Finally, we demonstrate that the combination of PARP and PRMT5 inhibition improves survival in both BRCA-mutant and wild-type patient-derived xenografts without toxicity. Taken together, these results demonstrate that PRMT5 inhibition may be a well-tolerated approach to sensitize tumors to PARP inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Li
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lacey E Dobrolecki
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christina Sallas
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xudong Zhang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Travis D Kerr
- Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Deepa Bisht
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yalong Wang
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sharad Awasthi
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Babita Kaundal
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Siqi Wu
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Weiyi Peng
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Marc L Mendillo
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Simpson Querrey Center for Epigenetics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Yiling Lu
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Collene R Jeter
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Guang Peng
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jinsong Liu
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T Lewis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jishnu Das
- Center for Systems Immunology, Department of Immunology, and Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - S Stephen Yi
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Department of Oncology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA; Interdisciplinary Life Sciences Graduate Programs (ILSGP), College of Natural Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA; Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences (ICES), The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Mark T Bedford
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel J McGrail
- Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Nidhi Sahni
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Quantitative and Computational Biosciences Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Huang X, Ren Q, Yang L, Cui D, Ma C, Zheng Y, Wu J. Immunogenic chemotherapy: great potential for improving response rates. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1308681. [PMID: 38125944 PMCID: PMC10732354 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1308681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The activation of anti-tumor immunity is critical in treating cancers. Recent studies indicate that several chemotherapy agents can stimulate anti-tumor immunity by inducing immunogenic cell death and durably eradicate tumors. This suggests that immunogenic chemotherapy holds great potential for improving response rates. However, chemotherapy in practice has only had limited success in inducing long-term survival or cure of cancers when used either alone or in combination with immunotherapy. We think that this is because the importance of dose, schedule, and tumor model dependence of chemotherapy-activated anti-tumor immunity is under-appreciated. Here, we review immune modulation function of representative chemotherapy agents and propose a model of immunogenic chemotherapy-induced long-lasting responses that rely on synergetic interaction between killing tumor cells and inducing anti-tumor immunity. We comb through several chemotherapy treatment schedules, and identify the needs for chemotherapy dose and schedule optimization and combination therapy with immunotherapy when chemotherapy dosage or immune responsiveness is too low. We further review tumor cell intrinsic factors that affect the optimal chemotherapy dose and schedule. Lastly, we review the biomarkers indicating responsiveness to chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy treatments. A deep understanding of how chemotherapy activates anti-tumor immunity and how to monitor its responsiveness can lead to the development of more effective chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy, thereby improving the efficacy of cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojun Huang
- Cancer Center, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qinghuan Ren
- Alberta Institute, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Leixiang Yang
- Cancer Center, The Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Genetic and Genomic Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Di Cui
- Cancer Center, The Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Chenyang Ma
- Department of Internal Medicine of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second People’s Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yueliang Zheng
- Cancer Center, Emergency and Critical Care Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Junjie Wu
- Cancer Center, The Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Genetic and Genomic Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhao J, Chao K, Wang A. Integrative analysis of metabolome, proteome, and transcriptome for identifying genes influencing total lignin content in Populus trichocarpa. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2023; 14:1244020. [PMID: 37771490 PMCID: PMC10525687 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1244020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
Lignin, a component of plant cell walls, possesses significant research potential as a renewable energy source to replace carbon-based products and as a notable pollutant in papermaking processes. The monolignol biosynthetic pathway has been elucidated and it is known that not all monolignol genes influence the total lignin content. However, it remains unclear which monolignol genes are more closely related to the total lignin content and which potential genes influence the total lignin content. In this study, we present a combination of t-test, differential gene expression analysis, correlation analysis, and weighted gene co-expression network analysis to identify genes that regulate the total lignin content by utilizing multi-omics data from transgenic knockdowns of the monolignol genes that includes data related to the transcriptome, proteome, and total lignin content. Firstly, it was discovered that enzymes from the PtrPAL, Ptr4CL, PtrC3H, and PtrC4H gene families are more strongly correlated with the total lignin content. Additionally, the co-downregulation of three genes, PtrC3H3, PtrC4H1, and PtrC4H2, had the greatest impact on the total lignin content. Secondly, GO and KEGG analysis of lignin-related modules revealed that the total lignin content is not only influenced by monolignol genes, but also closely related to genes involved in the "glutathione metabolic process", "cellular modified amino acid metabolic process" and "carbohydrate catabolic process" pathways. Finally, the cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase genes CAD1, CADL3, and CADL8 emerged as potential contributors to total lignin content. The genes HYR1 (UDP-glycosyltransferase superfamily protein) and UGT71B1 (UDP-glucosyltransferase), exhibiting a close relationship with coumarin, have the potential to influence total lignin content by regulating coumarin metabolism. Additionally, the monolignol genes PtrC3H3, PtrC4H1, and PtrC4H2, which belong to the cytochrome P450 genes, may have a significant impact on the total lignin content. Overall, this study establishes connections between gene expression levels and total lignin content, effectively identifying genes that have a significant impact on total lignin content and offering novel perspectives for future lignin research endeavours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Zhao
- College of Computer and Control Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China
| | - Kairui Chao
- College of Forestry, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China
| | - Achuan Wang
- College of Computer and Control Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Alkim E, Dowst H, DiCarlo J, Dobrolecki LE, Hernández-Herrera A, Hormuth DA, Liao Y, McOwiti A, Pautler R, Rimawi M, Roark A, Srinivasan RR, Virostko J, Zhang B, Zheng F, Rubin DL, Yankeelov TE, Lewis MT. Toward Practical Integration of Omic and Imaging Data in Co-Clinical Trials. Tomography 2023; 9:810-828. [PMID: 37104137 PMCID: PMC10144684 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9020066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Co-clinical trials are the concurrent or sequential evaluation of therapeutics in both patients clinically and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) pre-clinically, in a manner designed to match the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the agent(s) used. The primary goal is to determine the degree to which PDX cohort responses recapitulate patient cohort responses at the phenotypic and molecular levels, such that pre-clinical and clinical trials can inform one another. A major issue is how to manage, integrate, and analyze the abundance of data generated across both spatial and temporal scales, as well as across species. To address this issue, we are developing MIRACCL (molecular and imaging response analysis of co-clinical trials), a web-based analytical tool. For prototyping, we simulated data for a co-clinical trial in "triple-negative" breast cancer (TNBC) by pairing pre- (T0) and on-treatment (T1) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from the I-SPY2 trial, as well as PDX-based T0 and T1 MRI. Baseline (T0) and on-treatment (T1) RNA expression data were also simulated for TNBC and PDX. Image features derived from both datasets were cross-referenced to omic data to evaluate MIRACCL functionality for correlating and displaying MRI-based changes in tumor size, vascularity, and cellularity with changes in mRNA expression as a function of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emel Alkim
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Heidi Dowst
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Julie DiCarlo
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Austin, TX 78712, USA
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Lacey E Dobrolecki
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - David A Hormuth
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Austin, TX 78712, USA
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Yuxing Liao
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Apollo McOwiti
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Robia Pautler
- Department of Physiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mothaffar Rimawi
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ashley Roark
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Jack Virostko
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Austin, TX 78712, USA
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX 78712, USA
- Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Bing Zhang
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Fei Zheng
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Daniel L Rubin
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Thomas E Yankeelov
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Austin, TX 78712, USA
- Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX 78712, USA
- Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael T Lewis
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zapperi S, La Porta CAM. The Response of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and the Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24076422. [PMID: 37047393 PMCID: PMC10094549 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24076422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
It would be highly desirable to find prognostic and predictive markers for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a strongly heterogeneous and invasive breast cancer subtype often characterized by a high recurrence rate and a poor outcome. Here, we investigated the prognostic and predictive capabilities of ARIADNE, a recently developed transcriptomic test focusing on the epithelial–mesenchymal transition. We first compared the stratification of TNBC patients obtained by ARIADNE with that based on other common pathological indicators, such as grade, stage and nodal status, and found that ARIADNE was more effective than the other methods in dividing patients into groups with different disease-free survival statistics. Next, we considered the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and found that the classification provided by ARIADNE led to statistically significant differences in the rates of pathological complete response within the groups.
Collapse
|
19
|
Peehl DM, Badea CT, Chenevert TL, Daldrup-Link HE, Ding L, Dobrolecki LE, Houghton AM, Kinahan PE, Kurhanewicz J, Lewis MT, Li S, Luker GD, Ma CX, Manning HC, Mowery YM, O’Dwyer PJ, Pautler RG, Rosen MA, Roudi R, Ross BD, Shoghi KI, Sriram R, Talpaz M, Wahl RL, Zhou R. Animal Models and Their Role in Imaging-Assisted Co-Clinical Trials. Tomography 2023; 9:657-680. [PMID: 36961012 PMCID: PMC10037611 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9020053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The availability of high-fidelity animal models for oncology research has grown enormously in recent years, enabling preclinical studies relevant to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer to be undertaken. This has led to increased opportunities to conduct co-clinical trials, which are studies on patients that are carried out parallel to or sequentially with animal models of cancer that mirror the biology of the patients' tumors. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM) are considered to be the models that best represent human disease and have high translational value. Notably, one element of co-clinical trials that still needs significant optimization is quantitative imaging. The National Cancer Institute has organized a Co-Clinical Imaging Resource Program (CIRP) network to establish best practices for co-clinical imaging and to optimize translational quantitative imaging methodologies. This overview describes the ten co-clinical trials of investigators from eleven institutions who are currently supported by the CIRP initiative and are members of the Animal Models and Co-clinical Trials (AMCT) Working Group. Each team describes their corresponding clinical trial, type of cancer targeted, rationale for choice of animal models, therapy, and imaging modalities. The strengths and weaknesses of the co-clinical trial design and the challenges encountered are considered. The rich research resources generated by the members of the AMCT Working Group will benefit the broad research community and improve the quality and translational impact of imaging in co-clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna M. Peehl
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; (J.K.); (R.S.)
| | - Cristian T. Badea
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA;
| | - Thomas L. Chenevert
- Department of Radiology and the Center for Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (T.L.C.); (G.D.L.); (B.D.R.)
| | - Heike E. Daldrup-Link
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (H.E.D.-L.); (R.R.)
| | - Li Ding
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (L.D.); (S.L.); (C.X.M.)
| | - Lacey E. Dobrolecki
- Advanced Technology Cores, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | | | - Paul E. Kinahan
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA;
| | - John Kurhanewicz
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; (J.K.); (R.S.)
| | - Michael T. Lewis
- Departments of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Shunqiang Li
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (L.D.); (S.L.); (C.X.M.)
| | - Gary D. Luker
- Department of Radiology and the Center for Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (T.L.C.); (G.D.L.); (B.D.R.)
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Cynthia X. Ma
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (L.D.); (S.L.); (C.X.M.)
| | - H. Charles Manning
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Yvonne M. Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA;
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Peter J. O’Dwyer
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (P.J.O.); (M.A.R.); (R.Z.)
| | - Robia G. Pautler
- Department of Integrative Physiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Mark A. Rosen
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (P.J.O.); (M.A.R.); (R.Z.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Raheleh Roudi
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (H.E.D.-L.); (R.R.)
| | - Brian D. Ross
- Department of Radiology and the Center for Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (T.L.C.); (G.D.L.); (B.D.R.)
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Kooresh I. Shoghi
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (MIR), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (K.I.S.); (R.L.W.)
| | - Renuka Sriram
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; (J.K.); (R.S.)
| | - Moshe Talpaz
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Richard L. Wahl
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (MIR), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (K.I.S.); (R.L.W.)
| | - Rong Zhou
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (P.J.O.); (M.A.R.); (R.Z.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|