Endocrine-Sensitive Disease Rate in Postmenopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Rich/ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Anastrozole, Fulvestrant, or Their Combination: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Adding fulvestrant to anastrozole (A+F) improved survival in postmenopausal women with advanced estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative breast cancer. However, the combination has not been tested in early-stage disease.

Objective

To determine whether neoadjuvant fulvestrant or A+F increases the rate of pathologic complete response or ypT1-2N0/N1mic/Ki67 2.7% or less residual disease (referred to as endocrine-sensitive disease) over anastrozole alone.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A phase 3 randomized clinical trial assessing differences in clinical and correlative outcomes between each of the fulvestrant-containing arms and the anastrozole arm. Postmenopausal women with clinical stage II to III, ER-rich (Allred score 6-8 or >66%)/ERBB2-negative breast cancer were included. All analyses were based on data frozen on March 2, 2023.

Interventions

Patients received anastrozole, fulvestrant, or a combination for 6 months preoperatively. Tumor Ki67 was assessed at week 4 and optionally at week 12, and if greater than 10% at either time point, the patient switched to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or immediate surgery.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the endocrine-sensitive disease rate (ESDR). A secondary outcome was the percentage change in Ki67 after 4 weeks of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) (week 4 Ki67 suppression).

Results

Between February 2014 and November 2018, 1362 female patients (mean [SD] age, 65.0 [8.2] years) were enrolled. Among the 1298 evaluable patients, ESDRs were 18.7% (95% CI, 15.1%-22.7%), 22.8% (95% CI, 18.9%-27.1%), and 20.5% (95% CI, 16.8%-24.6%) with anastrozole, fulvestrant, and A+F, respectively. Compared to anastrozole, neither fulvestrant-containing regimen significantly improved ESDR or week 4 Ki67 suppression. The rate of week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10% was 25.1%, 24.2%, and 15.7% with anastrozole, fulvestrant, and A+F, respectively. Pathologic complete response/residual cancer burden class I occurred in 8 of 167 patients and 17 of 167 patients, respectively (15.0%; 95% CI, 9.9%-21.3%), after switching to neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10%. PAM50 subtyping derived from RNA sequencing of baseline biopsies available for 753 patients (58%) identified 394 luminal A, 304 luminal B, and 55 nonluminal tumors. A+F led to a greater week 4 Ki67 suppression than anastrozole alone in luminal B tumors (median [IQR], -90.4% [-95.2 to -81.9%] vs -76.7% [-89.0 to -55.6%]; P < .001), but not luminal A tumors. Thirty-six nonluminal tumors (65.5%) had a week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10%.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, neither fulvestrant nor A+F significantly improved the 6-month ESDR over anastrozole in ER-rich/ERBB2-negative breast cancer. Aromatase inhibition remains the standard-of-care NET. Differential NET response by PAM50 subtype in exploratory analyses warrants further investigation.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588.

Combining the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Cabozantinib and the mTORC1/2 Inhibitor Sapanisertib Blocks ERK Pathway Activity and Suppresses Tumor Growth in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Current treatment approaches for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) face challenges in achieving durable tumor responses due to tumor heterogeneity and drug resistance. Combination therapies that leverage tumor molecular profiles could offer an avenue for enhancing treatment efficacy and addressing the limitations of current therapies. To identify effective strategies for treating RCC, we selected ten drugs guided by tumor biology to test in six RCC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. The multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) cabozantinib and mTORC1/2 inhibitor sapanisertib emerged as the most effective drugs, particularly when combined. The combination demonstrated favorable tolerability and inhibited tumor growth or induced tumor regression in all models, including two from patients who experienced treatment failure with FDA-approved TKI and immunotherapy combinations. In cabozantinib-treated samples, imaging analysis revealed a significant reduction in vascular density, and single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) analysis indicated a decreased proportion of endothelial cells in the tumors. SnRNA-seq data further identified a tumor subpopulation enriched with cell-cycle activity that exhibited heightened sensitivity to the cabozantinib and sapanisertib combination. Conversely, activation of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathway, detected at the protein level, was associated with drug resistance in residual tumors following combination treatment. The combination effectively restrained ERK phosphorylation and reduced expression of ERK downstream transcription factors and their target genes implicated in cell-cycle control and apoptosis. This study highlights the potential of the cabozantinib plus sapanisertib combination as a promising treatment approach for patients with RCC, particularly those whose tumors progressed on immune checkpoint inhibitors and other TKIs.

SIGNIFICANCE

The molecular-guided therapeutic strategy of combining cabozantinib and sapanisertib restrains ERK activity to effectively suppress growth of renal cell carcinomas, including those unresponsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Interplay between ESR1/PIK3CA codon variants, oncogenic pathway alterations and clinical phenotype in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC): comprehensive circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis

BACKGROUND

although being central for the biology and druggability of hormone-receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations are simplistically dichotomized as mutated or wild type in current clinical practice.

METHODS

The study analyzed a multi-institutional cohort comprising 703 patients with luminal-like MBC characterized for circulating tumor DNA through next generation sequencing (NGS). Pathway classification was defined based on previous work (i.e., RTK, RAS, RAF, MEK, NRF2, ER, WNT, MYC, P53, cell cycle, notch, PI3K). Single nucleotide variations (SNVs) were annotated for their oncogenicity through OncoKB. Only pathogenic variants were included in the models. Associations among clinical characteristics, pathway classification, and ESR1/PIK3CA codon variants were explored.

RESULTS

The results showed a differential pattern of associations for ESR1 and PIK3CA codon variants in terms of co-occurring pathway alterations patterns of metastatic dissemination, and prognosis. ESR1 537 was associated with SNVs in the ER and RAF pathways, CNVs in the MYC pathway and bone metastases, while ESR1 538 with SNVs in the cell cycle pathway and liver metastases. PIK3CA 1047 and 542 were associated with CNVs in the PI3K pathway and with bone metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated how ESR1 and PIK3CA codon variants, together with alterations in specific oncogenic pathways, can differentially impact the biology and clinical phenotype of luminal-like MBC. As novel endocrine therapy agents such as selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDS) and PI3K inhibitors are being developed, these results highlight the pivotal role of ctDNA NGS to describe tumor evolution and optimize clinical decision making.

Genetic Alterations Detected by Circulating Tumor DNA in HER2-Low Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

About 50% of breast cancers are defined as HER2-low and may benefit from HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugates. While tissue sequencing has evaluated potential differences in genomic profiles for patients with HER2-low breast cancer, genetic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have not been well described.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed 749 patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and ctDNA evaluation by Guardant360 from three academic medical centers. Tumors were classified as HER2-low, HER2-0 (IHC 0) or HER2-positive. Single-nucleotide variants, copy-number variants, and oncogenic pathways were compared across the spectrum of HER2 expression. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by HER2 status and according to oncogenic pathways.

RESULTS

Patients with HER2-low had higher rates of PIK3CA mutations [relative risk ratio (RRR), 1.57; P = 0.024] compared with HER2-0 MBC. There were no differences in ERBB2 alterations or oncogenic pathways between HER2-low and HER2-0 MBC. Patients with HER2-positive MBC had more ERBB2 alterations (RRR, 12.43; P = 0.002 for amplification; RRR, 3.22; P = 0.047 for mutations, in the hormone receptor-positive cohort), fewer ERS1 mutations (RRR, 0.458; P = 0.029), and fewer ER pathway alterations (RRR, 0.321; P < 0.001). There was no difference in OS for HER2-low and HER2-0 MBC [HR, 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-1.29], while OS was improved in HER2-positive MBC (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21-0.49; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a higher rate of PIK3CA mutations, but no significant difference in ERBB2 alterations, oncogenic pathways, or prognosis, between patients with HER2-low and HER2-0 MBC. If validated, our findings support the conclusion that HER2-low MBC does not represent a unique biological subtype.

[A case of lymphatic vessel abnormality with chylous pneumonia]

Chylous pneumonia is a rare respiratory disease. The main clinical manifestation is coughing up chylous sputum with a variety of causes which can be clarified by lymphangiography. The lack of understanding of the disease, and infrequent lymphangiography have led to a high rate of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. Here, we reported a case of bronchial lymphatic fistula caused by lymphatic abnormality that led to the diagnosis and treatment of chylous pneumonia, with the aim of improving clinicians' understanding of this disease.

A Gene Panel Associated With Abemaciclib Utility in ESR1-Mutated Breast Cancer After Prior Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6-Inhibitor Progression

PURPOSE

For patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), first-line treatment is endocrine therapy (ET) plus cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i). After disease progression, which often comes with ESR1 resistance mutations (ESR1-MUT), which therapies to use next and for which patients are open questions. An active area of exploration is treatment with further CDK4/6i, particularly abemaciclib, which has distinct pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties compared with the other approved CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib and ribociclib. We investigated a gene panel to prognosticate abemaciclib susceptibility in patients with ESR1-MUT MBC after palbociclib progression.

METHODS

We examined a multicenter retrospective cohort of patients with ESR1-MUT MBC who received abemaciclib after disease progression on ET plus palbociclib. We generated a panel of CDK4/6i resistance genes and compared abemaciclib progression-free survival (PFS) in patients without versus with mutations in this panel (CDKi-R[-] v CDKi-R[+]). We studied how ESR1-MUT and CDKi-R mutations affect abemaciclib sensitivity of immortalized breast cancer cells and patient-derived circulating tumor cell lines in culture.

RESULTS

In ESR1-MUT MBC with disease progression on ET plus palbociclib, the median PFS was 7.0 months for CDKi-R(-) (n = 17) versus 3.5 months for CDKi-R(+) (n = 11), with a hazard ratio of 2.8 (P = .03). In vitro, CDKi-R alterations but not ESR1-MUT induced abemaciclib resistance in immortalized breast cancer cells and were associated with resistance in circulating tumor cells.

CONCLUSION

For ESR1-MUT MBC with resistance to ET and palbociclib, PFS on abemaciclib is longer for patients with CDKi-R(-) than CDKi-R(+). Although a small and retrospective data set, this is the first demonstration of a genomic panel associated with abemaciclib sensitivity in the postpalbociclib setting. Future directions include testing and improving this panel in additional data sets, to guide therapy selection for patients with HR+/HER2- MBC.

Genomic Complexity Predicts Resistance to Endocrine Therapy and CDK4/6 Inhibition in Hormone Receptor-Positive (HR+)/HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Clinical biomarkers to identify patients unlikely to benefit from CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) are lacking. We implemented a comprehensive circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis to identify genomic features for predicting and monitoring treatment resistance.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

ctDNA was isolated from 216 plasma samples collected from 51 patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) on a phase II trial of palbociclib combined with letrozole or fulvestrant (NCT03007979). Boosted whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed at baseline and clinical progression to evaluate genomic alterations, mutational signatures, and blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB). Low-pass whole-genome sequencing was performed at baseline and serial timepoints to assess blood copy-number burden (bCNB).

RESULTS

High bTMB and bCNB were associated with lack of clinical benefit and significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) compared with patients with low bTMB or low bCNB (all P < 0.05). Dominant APOBEC signatures were detected at baseline exclusively in cases with high bTMB (5/13, 38.5%) versus low bTMB (0/37, 0%; P = 0.0006). Alterations in ESR1 were enriched in samples with high bTMB (P = 0.0005). There was a high correlation between bTMB determined by WES and bTMB determined using a 600-gene panel (R = 0.98). During serial monitoring, an increase in bCNB score preceded radiographic progression in 12 of 18 (66.7%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Genomic complexity detected by noninvasive profiling of bTMB and bCNB predicted poor outcomes in patients treated with ET and CDK4/6i and identified early disease progression before imaging. Novel treatment strategies including immunotherapy-based combinations should be investigated in this population.

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors Beyond Progression in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Real-World Biomarker Analysis

PURPOSE

As the continuation beyond progression (BP) of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) is becoming increasingly attractive for the treatment of patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), the definition of resistance factors is crucial. The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of CDK 4/6i BP and to explore potential genomic stratification factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a multi-institutional cohort of patients with HR-positive HER2-negative MBC characterized for circulating tumor DNA through next-generation sequencing before treatment start. Differences across subgroups were analyzed by chi-square test, and survival was tested by univariable and multivariable Cox regression. Further correction was applied by propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Among the 214 patients previously exposed to CDK4/6i, 172 were treated with non-CDK4/6i-based treatment (non-CDK) and 42 with CDK4/6i BP. Multivariable analysis showed a significant impact of CDK4/6i BP, TP53 single-nucleotide variants, liver involvement, and treatment line on both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching confirmed the prognostic role of CDK4/6i BP both for PFS and OS. The favorable impact of CDK4/6i BP was consistent across all subgroups, and a differential benefit was suggested for ESR1-mutated patients. ESR1 and RB1 mutations were more represented in the CDK4/6i BP subgroup with respect to CDK4/6i upfront.

CONCLUSION

The study highlighted a significant prognostic impact of the CDK4/6i BP strategy with a potential added benefit in patients with ESR1 mutations suggesting the need for an extensive biomarker characterization.

Animal Models and Their Role in Imaging-Assisted Co-Clinical Trials

The availability of high-fidelity animal models for oncology research has grown enormously in recent years, enabling preclinical studies relevant to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer to be undertaken. This has led to increased opportunities to conduct co-clinical trials, which are studies on patients that are carried out parallel to or sequentially with animal models of cancer that mirror the biology of the patients' tumors. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM) are considered to be the models that best represent human disease and have high translational value. Notably, one element of co-clinical trials that still needs significant optimization is quantitative imaging. The National Cancer Institute has organized a Co-Clinical Imaging Resource Program (CIRP) network to establish best practices for co-clinical imaging and to optimize translational quantitative imaging methodologies. This overview describes the ten co-clinical trials of investigators from eleven institutions who are currently supported by the CIRP initiative and are members of the Animal Models and Co-clinical Trials (AMCT) Working Group. Each team describes their corresponding clinical trial, type of cancer targeted, rationale for choice of animal models, therapy, and imaging modalities. The strengths and weaknesses of the co-clinical trial design and the challenges encountered are considered. The rich research resources generated by the members of the AMCT Working Group will benefit the broad research community and improve the quality and translational impact of imaging in co-clinical trials.

Design of SERENA-6, a phase III switching trial of camizestrant in ESR1-mutant breast cancer during first-line treatment

ESR1 mutation (ESR1m) is a frequent cause of acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), which is a first-line therapy for hormone-receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Camizestrant is a next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that in a phase II study significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) over fulvestrant (also a SERD) in ER+/HER2- ABC. SERENA-6 (NCT04964934) is a randomized, double-blind, phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of switching from an AI to camizestrant, while maintaining the same CDK4/6i, upon detection of ESR1m in circulating tumor DNA before clinical disease progression on first-line therapy for HR+/HER2- ABC. The aim is to treat ESR1m clones and extend the duration of control of ER-driven tumor growth, delaying the need for chemotherapy. The primary end point is PFS; secondary end points include chemotherapy-free survival, time to second progression event (PFS2), overall survival, patient-reported outcomes and safety.

A phase II study of palbociclib plus letrozole plus trastuzumab as neoadjuvant treatment for clinical stages II and III ER+ HER2+ breast cancer (PALTAN)

Patients with ER+/HER2+ breast cancer (BC) are less likely to achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after chemotherapy with dual HER2 blockade than ER-/HER2+ BC. Endocrine therapy plus trastuzumab is effective in advanced ER+/HER2+ BC. Inhibition of CDK4/6 and HER2 results in synergistic cell proliferation reduction. We combined palbociclib, letrozole, and trastuzumab (PLT) as a chemotherapy-sparing regimen. We evaluated neoadjuvant PLT in early ER+/HER2+ BC. Primary endpoint was pCR after 16 weeks. Research biopsies were performed for whole exome and RNA sequencing, PAM50 subtyping, and Ki67 assessment for complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA: Ki67 ≤ 2.7%). After 26 patients, accrual stopped due to futility. pCR (residual cancer burden-RCB 0) was 7.7%, RCB 0/I was 38.5%. Grade (G) 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 19. Among these, G3/4 neutropenia was 50%, hypertension 26.9%, and leucopenia 7.7%. Analysis indicated CCCA in 85% at C1 day 15 (C1D15), compared to 27% at surgery after palbociclib was discontinued. Baseline PAM50 subtyping identified 31.2% HER2-E, 43.8% Luminal B, and 25% Luminal A. 161 genes were differentially expressed comparing C1D15 to baseline. MKI67, TK1, CCNB1, AURKB, and PLK1 were among the genes downregulated, consistent with CCCA at C1D15. Molecular Signatures Database gene-sets analyses demonstrated downregulated processes involved in proliferation, ER and mTORC1 signaling, and DNA damage repair at C1D15, consistent with the study drug's mechanisms of action. Neoadjuvant PLT showed a pCR of 7.7% and an RCB 0/I rate of 38.5%. RNA sequencing and Ki67 data indicated potent anti-proliferative effects of study treatments. ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT02907918.

The oral selective estrogen receptor degrader GDC-0810 (ARN-810) in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative (HR + /HER2 -) advanced/metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

GDC-0810 (ARN-810) is a novel, non-steroidal, orally bioavailable, selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that potentially inhibits ligand-dependent and ligand-independent estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated signaling.

METHODS

A phase Ia/Ib/IIa dose escalation, combination treatment with palbociclib or a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, and expansion study determined the safety, pharmacokinetics, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of GDC-0810 in postmenopausal women with ER + (HER2 -) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Baseline plasma ctDNA samples were analyzed to determine the ESR1 mutation status.

RESULTS

Patients (N = 152) received GDC-0810 100-800 mg once daily (QD) or 300-400 mg twice daily, in dose escalation, expansion, as single agent or combination treatment. Common adverse events regardless of attribution to study drug were diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, and constipation. There was one dose-limiting toxicity during dose escalation. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. GDC-0810 600 mg QD taken with food was the RP2D. Pharmacokinetics were predictable. FES reduction (> 90%) highlighting pharmacodynamic engagement of ER was observed. Outcomes for the overall population and for patients with tumors harboring ESR1 mutations included partial responses (4% overall; 4% ESR1), stable disease (39% overall; 42% ESR1), non-complete response/non-progressive disease (13% overall; 12% ESR1), progressive disease (40% overall; 38% ESR1), and missing/unevaluable (5% overall; 5% ESR1). Clinical benefit (responses or SD, lasting ≥ 24 weeks) was observed in patients in dose escalation (n = 16, 39%) and expansion (n = 24, 22%).

CONCLUSION

GDC-0810 was safe and tolerable with preliminary anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with ER + advanced/MBC, with/without ESR1 mutations, highlighting the potential for oral SERDs. Clinical Trial and registration date April 4, 2013. NCT01823835 .

Proteins in Tumor-Derived Plasma Extracellular Vesicles Indicate Tumor Origin

Cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) promote tumorigenesis, premetastatic niche formation, and metastasis via their protein cargo. However, the proteins packaged by patient tumors into EVs cannot be determined in vivo because of the presence of EVs derived from other tissues. We therefore developed a cross-species proteomic method to quantify the human tumor-derived proteome of plasma EVs produced by patient-derived xenografts of four cancer types. Proteomic profiling revealed individualized packaging of novel protein cargo, and machine learning accurately classified the type of the underlying tumor.

KSTAR: An algorithm to predict patient-specific kinase activities from phosphoproteomic data

Kinase inhibitors as targeted therapies have played an important role in improving cancer outcomes. However, there are still considerable challenges, such as resistance, non-response, patient stratification, polypharmacology, and identifying combination therapy where understanding a tumor kinase activity profile could be transformative. Here, we develop a graph- and statistics-based algorithm, called KSTAR, to convert phosphoproteomic measurements of cells and tissues into a kinase activity score that is generalizable and useful for clinical pipelines, requiring no quantification of the phosphorylation sites. In this work, we demonstrate that KSTAR reliably captures expected kinase activity differences across different tissues and stimulation contexts, allows for the direct comparison of samples from independent experiments, and is robust across a wide range of dataset sizes. Finally, we apply KSTAR to clinical breast cancer phosphoproteomic data and find that there is potential for kinase activity inference from KSTAR to complement the current clinical diagnosis of HER2 status in breast cancer patients.

Abstract CT026: The effect of intrinsic subtype on inhibition of tumor growth by anastrozole vs. fulvestrant vs. the combination: Results from the Alliance neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) ALTERNATE trial

Introduction: The ALTERNATE trial randomized postmenopausal women with ER Allred 6-8 HER2- breast cancer to 6 months of NET with anastrozole (A), fulvestrant (F) or the combination (A+F). Biopsies were taken preNET and after 4-weeks(wks). Patients with Ki67 values &gt;10% at 4-wks were offered triage to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with on-treatment Ki67 ≤ 10% who completed NET underwent surgery and Ki67 was reassessed. The primary endpoint was endocrine-sensitive disease rate (ESDR). ESD is defined as pCR or PEPI-0 residual disease (pT1-2, pN0, Ki67 ≤ 2.7%). We previously reported that the ESDR difference between the F-containing arms and the A arm was not &gt;10% (ASCO 2020) and that baseline RNA-seq-based intrinsic subtypes predicted outcomes overall (SABCS 2021). Herein we describe relationships between PAM50 intrinsic subtype and Ki67 values by treatment arm because comparative drug effectiveness in adjuvant endocrine therapy studies in ER+ HER2- breast cancer can be predicted by the degree of Ki67 suppression (PMC3518447).

Methods: 743 of the 1297 eligible patients (A: 264; F: 231; A+F: 248) had RNA extracted from preNET frozen tumor biopsies with &gt;50% tumor content and subjected to RNA seq. Intrinsic subtypes were then assigned as LumA, LumB, and NonLum (Basal or HER2-E) using open-source PAM50-based informatics. Differences in the proportion with wk4 Ki67 &gt; 10%, % change in wk4 ki67, and surgical CCCA (Ki67 ≤ 2.7%) rate (sxCCCA) between treatments and by intrinsic subtype was assessed using stratified logistic regression, Wilcoxon rank sum test, and Fisher’s exact test, respectively. Analysis of sxCCCA excluded those who failed to complete NET for reasons other than disease progression or early Ki67 &gt;10%.

Results: Amongst the 358 LumA cases there were no significant differences in Ki67-based endpoints between treatments. Among the 292 LumB cases, the wk4 ki67 &gt; 10% rate was lower with A+F (19.4%) than A (43%) (P=0.0002) and was somewhat lower in F (31%) versus A (P=0.076). The % change in wk4 Ki67 in LumB cases, adjusted for baseline Ki67, showed markedly superior suppression for A+F versus A (-90% vs. -77%; P=&lt;0.0001) and versus F (-90% vs. -80%; P=0.0026). Furthermore sxCCCA rates were significantly higher with A+F than A (53% vs. 25% P = &lt;0.0001) and somewhat higher for F (37%) than A (p=0.068), indicating that superior antiproliferative effects for A+F persist after 6 months on therapy. Lack of Ki67 suppression in response to treatment was observed in the majority of 43 NonLum samples regardless of treatment.

Conclusion: The combination of A+F was significantly more effective than either drug alone for the control of LumB breast cancer cell proliferation. This suggests that A+F may be a more effective adjuvant endocrine therapy than A alone in LumB disease. The lower Ki67 suppression with A alone also suggests that poorer outcome in some LumB tumors may be due to insufficient ER targeting rather than ER-independent tumor growth

Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, UG1CA189856, U10CA180868 (NRG), NCI BIQSFP, BCRF, Genentech, AstraZeneca. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. (MJE) CPRIT RR140033, P50-CA186784, P50-CA58223, U01-CA214125, U24-CA210954, Gift from Ralph and Lisa Eads, McNair Scholarship.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588

Citation Format: Matthew J. Ellis, Meenakshi Anurag, Jeremy Hoog, Aranzazu Fernandez-Martinez, Cheng Fan, Richard Gibbs, Souzan Sanati, Kiran Vij, Mark Watson, Travis Dockter, Olwen Hahn, Joseph Guenther, Abigail Caudle, Erica Crouch, Amy Tiersten, Monica Mita, Wajeeha Razaq, Tina J. Hieken, Yang Wang, A. Marilyn Leitch, Gary W. Unzeitig, Eric Winer, Anna Weiss, Kelly Hunt, Ann H. Partridge, Charles M. Perou, Vera Suman, Cynthia X. Ma, Lisa A. Carey. The effect of intrinsic subtype on inhibition of tumor growth by anastrozole vs. fulvestrant vs. the combination: Results from the Alliance neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) ALTERNATE trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT026.

Neratinib plus fulvestrant plus trastzuzumab (N+F+T) for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative, HER2-mutant metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Outcomes and biomarker analysis from the SUMMIT trial

1028

Background: N is an oral, irreversible pan-HER TKI with activity against HER2 mutations. Genomic analyses from the SUMMIT MBC cohort following N±F suggest that resistance to N may occur via mutant allele amplification or secondary HER2 mutations. Adding T to N+F in SUMMIT showed encouraging durable responses in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2-mutant MBC and prior CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). Methods: SUMMIT (NCT01953926) enrolled pts with HR+, HER2-negative MBC with activating HER2 mutation(s) and prior CDK4/6i. Pts received N+F+T (oral N 240 mg/d with loperamide prophylaxis, im F 500 mg d1&15 of cycle 1 then q4w, iv T 8 mg/kg initially then 6 mg/kg q3w). During the small, randomized portion of the trial, pts received N+F+T, F+T or F (1:1:1 ratio). Pts randomized to F+T or F could crossover to N+F+T at progression. Efficacy endpoints: investigator-assessed ORR and CBR (RECIST v1.1); DOR; best overall response. Pre-treatment tumor tissue was centrally assessed retrospectively by next-generation sequencing. ctDNA from patient samples was assessed by NGS. Results: SUMMIT has completed enrolment; we report efficacy from 45 pts in the N+F+T cohort, plus 10 pts who progressed on F (n=6) or F+T (n=4) and crossed over to N+F+T (Table). HER2 allelic variants in the 45 N+F+T pts and ORR (%) (pts may have >1 mutation) were: V777L (n=6, 50%), L755S/P (n=15, 40%), S310F (n=4, 50%), exon 20 insertion (n=11, 36%), other KD missense (n=6, 33%), TMD missense (n=2, 0%), exon 19 deletion (n=1, 0%). Conclusions: N+F+T is a promising combination for HR+, HER2-mutated MBC with prior exposure to CDK4/6i, across a range of activating HER2 mutations. Results from the upcoming Apr 2022 data cut, including biomarkers, safety, mechanisms of acquired resistance, and preclinical mechanism of N+T, will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01953926. [Table: see text]

Defining resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibition in hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) through a machine learning approach applied to circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)

3055

Background: Although cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are a primary treatment for hormone receptor-positive/HER2 negative MBC, data regarding resistance mechanisms are still an unmet need. The aim of the study was to highlight new resistance pathways using machine learning (ML) to detect multiparametric patterns in complex datasets. Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 610 hormone receptor positive HER2 negative MBC patients (pts) at Northwestern University, Massachusetts General Hospital and Washington University in St. Louis between 2015-2020 with baseline ctDNA testing by Guardant360. Pathways were defined based on previous work (Sanchez-Vega F et al, Cell. 2018) (i.e., RTK, RAS, RAF, MEK, NRF2, ER, WNT, MYC, P53, cell cycle, notch, PI3K). Only pathogenic variants according to OncoKB were included in the models. Associations among single nucleotide (SNVs) and copy number (CNVs) variations, pathway classification and previous exposure to CDK4/6i were explored through logistic regression and Gradient boosted machines (GBMs) ML algorithm. Results: at baseline, 322 pts (52.8%) were previously treated with CDK4/6i. The most detected pathway alterations were SNVs in PI3K (37.1%), P53 (31.8%), ER (29.2%) and RTK (22.3%). After stepwise logistic regression, RB1, NF1 and ESR1 SNVs were associated with previous exposure to CDK4/6i (respectively OR: 3.55 P = 0.017; OR: 3.06 P = 0.026 and OR: 1.82 P < 0.001), while SNVs in the ER pathway were associated with CDK4/6i (1.56 P < 0.001). Two GBMs models were designed based on gene variants (training AUC: 0.695, cross validation AUC: 0.631) and oncogenic pathways (training AUC: 0.713, cross validation AUC: 0.619). The highest relative importance (RI) was observed for ESR1 SNVs (RI: 35.35), TP53 SNVs (RI: 11.33), NF1 SNVs (RI: 3.45), SMAD4 SNVs (RI: 3.39) and RB1 SNVs (RI: 3.33). Alterations at a pathway level with the highest RI were ER SNVs (RI: 33.50), P53 SNVs (RI: 14.98), PI3K SNVs (RI: 14.40), RTK SNVs (RI: 10.55), RTK CNVs (RI: 10.26), cell cycle CNVs (RI: 6.99), cell cycle SNVs (RI: 6.77) and RAS SNVs (RI: 6.54). Of the previously highlighted pathway alterations, a significant impact on PFS after ctDNA collection was observed among de novo pts treated with CDK4/6i (165 pts) for ER SNVs (P < 0.0001), RTK SNVs (P = 0.0011), RTK CNVs (P = 0.0006), Cell cycle CNVs (P = 0.0010) and Cell cycle SNVs (P = 0.0143). No impact was observed on PFS for pts who had not received a CDK4/6i-based regimen. Conclusions: The combination of ctDNA-based datasets and machine learning algorithms defined novel resistance pathways for patients treated with CDK4/6i. Although preliminary, these results suggest that alterations of the ER, RTK and Cell cycle pathways might be crucial to optimize treatment strategy and drug development.

Interplay between B cell and GABA metabolism (GABAm) and association with immune evasion in breast carcinoma (BC)

1097

Background: GABAergic signaling has been reported to play a pivotal role in breast cancer (BC) tumorigenesis and metastasis, however, its role in immune modulation remains unclear. Recent in vitro and in vivo studies (Zhang et al., Nature, 2021) report the role of B cell-derived GABA metabolites in promoting anti-inflammatory macrophages (MM), thus limiting anti-tumor immunity. In this study, we aim to characterize the interplay between B cells and the GABAm pathway, as well as their associated immune infiltrates and cytokines. Methods: BC tumors (n = 9455) were analyzed by next generation sequencing (NextSeq, 592 Genes and WES, NovaSEQ) and whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS, NovaSeq) at Caris Life Sciences. Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) scores were used for GABAm pathway activity (GMPA). IFN score to test the likelihood of a tumor’s response to anti PD1 therapy and Immune cell fraction (quanTIseq) were assessed by mRNA analysis. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was applied (p without, q with multiple comparison correction). Correlation coefficients were calculated using spearman correlation. Results: GMPA demonstrated a statistically significant positive correlation with B cells fraction (r = 0.24, p < 0.0001). When stratified by classical molecular subtypes, the positive correlations were exclusive to HR+ and HER2+ BC, and absent in TNBC. GMPA was the most enriched in HR+ BC, followed by HER2+ and TNBC. BC tumors with high B cell infiltration were then grouped into GMPA-high (B+G+, cutoff > median for both) or GMPA-low (B+/G-), which likely represented tumors with B cell-derived high and low GMPA group, respectively. The GMPA-high group demonstrated significantly less fractions of MM1 (2.8 vs 3.7) and CD8+ T cells (0.8 vs 1.2) but greater MM2 (5.3 vs 4.9). mRNA levels of the MM2 marker IL10, a proposed marker of immune evasion, was significantly overexpressed in the B+/G+ group compared to the B+/G- group (fold change, FC = 1.39). mRNA levels of GAD1, a GABA-generating enzyme, were higher in B+/G+ than B+/G- (FC = 7.19). B+/G+ group had notably less IFN score than B+/G- group (-0.37 vs -0.27). When further stratified into molecular subtypes, concurrent more MM2 (5.4 vs 5.2) and less CD8+ T cell (0.74 vs 0.91) fractions were found in B+/G+ compared to B+/G- in HR+ tumors, but not in HER2+ or TNBC tumors. B+/G+ group also demonstrated a lower IFN score (-0.38 vs -0.32) in HR+ tumors. Additionally, IL10 and GAD1 were consistently overexpressed in B+/G+ regardless of subtype, reaching FC 7.9 in HR+ tumors. q < 0.0001 for all comparisons. Conclusions: Our study is the largest clinical dataset to demonstrate the association of interplay between B cell and GABAm with immunogenicity. Our results support the potential role of B cell-derived GABAm metabolites in immune modulation in BC in a subtype-specific manner. Targeting small metabolites to modulate immune evasion in BC warrants further investigation.

A phase I/II trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of eribulin in combination with copanlisib in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)

TPS1128

Background: Metastatic (met) TNBC remains a clinical challenge with limited treatment options and inevitable chemoresistance. Aberrant PI3K pathway signaling is frequently observed in TNBC. Increasing evidence shows PI3K pathway activation maintains the stemness and chemoresistance of BC stem cells (CSCs), and PI3K inhibition sensitizes CSCs to chemotherapy (chemo). Eribulin (E), a non-taxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor, showed survival benefit in met HER2 negative BC. Preclinically, E impacts tumor vascular remodeling, inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis – key mechanisms implicated in PI3K inhibition resistance. Copanlisib (C), a potent pan-class I PI3K inhibitor ( i), improved anti-tumor effect in E-sensitive and resistant TNBC patient-derived xenograft models, irrespective of PIK3CA/PTEN mutation (mut) status, when combined with E. This phase I/II study is aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of E+C in pts with met TNBC. Methods: This trial includes a phase I portion with the primary objective to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of E+C, followed by a phase II randomized portion of E+C (at RP2D) versus ( vs) E with the primary objective of progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary objectives include objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) [phase I]; and ORR and CBR, by arm and by PIK3CA/PTEN mut status and assessment of treatment induced target engagement [phase II]. Key exploratory objectives include analysis of genomic, proteomic and metabolomic changes as potential response biomarkers in tumor tissue and blood. Key eligibility criteria include pts with: met TNBC who progressed on ≤5 chemo lines, including anthracycline/taxane (unless contraindicated), ECOG 0-1, adequate organ function and known archival tumor PIK3CA/PTEN mut status. Key exclusions: prior E or PI3K/mTOR/AKT i, grade ≥2 neuropathy, tumor AKT mut, congenital QT prolongation, and uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension. Phase I portion will follow a 3+3 design for E+C dose escalation to enroll 18 max pts, starting at E 1.1 mg/m2 IV and C 45 mg IV on days (D) 1/8 of 21-D cycle (C) (to E 1.4 mg/m2 and C 60 mg max). RP2D will be defined as the highest dose level at which at most 1 of 6 pts experience DLT during C1. 88 pts will be randomized (1:1) in the phase II portion to E+C vs E (1.4 mg/m2 D 1/8), stratified by PTEN/PIK3CA mut status. Response assessment by Response Evaluation Criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1 will occur every 9 weeks (+/-7 D). Tumor biopsy is required at baseline and C2D1-2, and optional at progression. A sample size of 88 achieves 80% power to detect PFS difference of median PFS 6.95 vs 4 months (corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.5755) between the 2 arms, based on 1-sided two-sample log rank test at 0.1 α level. The phase I study is actively enrolling pts. Clinical trial information: NCT04345913.

A phase 1a/b trial of imlunestrant (LY3484356), an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) in ER-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer (aBC) and endometrial endometrioid cancer (EEC): Monotherapy results from EMBER

1021

Background: Imlunestrant is a novel, orally bioavailable SERD with pure antagonistic properties that result in sustained inhibition of ER-dependent gene transcription and cell growth. In dose escalation, imlunestrant showed favorable safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy in patients with ER+, HER2- aBC and ER+ EEC (Phase 1a EMBER, Jhaveri 2021). Here we present updated data from the dose escalation (Phase 1a) and dose expansion (Phase 1b) of imlunestrant monotherapy in EMBER (NCT04188548). Methods: Phase 1a/1b enrolled patients with ER+ aBC (prior ET sensitivity; ≤3 prior therapies for aBC in Phase 1a following protocol amendment and ≤2 in Phase 1b) and ER+ EEC (prior platinum therapy; no prior fulvestrant or aromatase inhibitor). Premenopausal women received a concomitant GnRH agonist. Serial plasma samples were obtained for PK and ctDNA analysis. Key endpoints included recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) determination, safety and tolerability, PK, objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 (ORR: complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) in patients with measurable disease and ≥1 post-baseline tumor assessment or discontinued prior to tumor assessment, and clinical benefit rate (CBR: CR or PR, or stable disease ≥24 weeks) in patients enrolled ≥24 weeks prior to data cut. Results: As of January 14, 2022, 138 patients (n = 114 aBC, n = 24 EEC) received imlunestrant monotherapy at doses ranging from 200-1200 mg QD. Median age was 62.0 years (range 32-95). Median number of prior therapies for aBC and EEC was 2 (range 0-8) and 1 (0-5), respectively. aBC patients had received a prior ET (94.7%), CDK4/6 inhibitor (92.1%), fulvestrant (50.9%) and chemotherapy (26.3%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were grade 1. At the RP2D (400 mg QD, n= 69), the most common all grade TEAE’s were nausea (33.3%), fatigue (27.5%), and diarrhea (23.2%). Across all doses, the incidence of treatment-related grade 3 AEs was low (3.6%). No patient discontinued due to a TEAE. In evaluable aBC patients, ORR was 8.0% (6/75) and CBR was 40.4% (42/104). In evaluable EEC patients, ORR was 5.0% (1/20 had a PR- ongoing pending confirmation) and CBR was 47.1% (8/17). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of baseline ESR1 mutation status as determined by ctDNA sequencing. Additional biomarker analyses will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Imlunestrant continues to demonstrate a favorable side effect profile, with no cardiac or opthalmic safety signals, and has continued evidence of clinical activity in heavily pre-treated ER+ aBC and EEC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04188548.

FLEX, the 30,000 breast cancer transcriptome project: A platform for early breast cancer research using full-genome arrays paired with clinical data

TPS612

Background: The ongoing, multi-center FLEX trial (NCT03053193) began in the United States in 2017, with the ultimate goal of 30,000 patients enrolled. The primary objective is to create a large-scale collaborative registry of early-stage breast cancer patients that links comprehensive clinical and full genome expression data to reveal new prognostic and/or predictive gene signatures. A key secondary objective of the trial is to enable investigator-initiated studies to explore early-stage breast cancer at a relatively low cost to the investigator. Methods: The prospective FLEX trial enrolls patients aged ≥ 18 years with histologically proven stage I-III breast cancer, with negative or 1-3 positive lymph nodes. Eligible patients have received MammaPrint, with or without BluePrint testing as standard of care, and consent to clinically annotated full transcriptome data collection. The FLEX base study protocol permits investigators to submit their own concept proposal, and upon review and approval by the Research and Scientific Review Committees, investigators interrogate clinical and genomic data from the FLEX database. The 10-year enrollment goal is a minimum of 30,000 patients. Since April 2017, 9,170 patients have been enrolled at over 109 sites in the United States. To date, 38 investigator-initiated substudies have been approved and are in progress, and 28 abstracts have been published in the US scientific congresses. To ensure inclusion of diverse populations, patients from local communities and 11 National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers were included. Our diverse data set is helping meet the needs of historically under-represented patients with breast cancer. Of the self-reported ethnicities within the FLEX database, 65% are White or Caucasian, 8% Black or African American, 4% Latin American, and 2% Asian. There are 5 ongoing FLEX sub studies investigating racial disparities. The molecular profiling and differential gene expression analysis in early-stage breast cancer patients of African American, Asian, Hispanic ancestries helps to provide critical insights that correlate tumor biology with treatment outcomes. FLEX is expanding globally with sites anticipated in multiple European countries. The FLEX trial continues to expedite the discovery and development of novel genomic profiles, bringing precision oncology into the clinic to improve breast cancer management. Clinical trial information: NCT03053193.

Abstract P2-07-02: Genomic predictors of rapid progression to first line endocrine and CDK4/6 inhibitor combination therapy in patients with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) HER-2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC)

Background: Endocrine therapy with CDK 4/6 inhibitors (ET/CDK4/6i) represents the 1st line therapy for ER+/HER2- ABC. While majority of patients derive clinical benefit with combination therapy, a subset have refractory disease with progression within 6 months. However, predictive biomarkers for rapid progression are lacking. In this study, we evaluated genomic profiles associated with rapid disease progression on ET/CDK4/6i. Methods: We identified 77 patients who received 1st line ET/CDK4/6i combination therapy (AI or SERD with one of the 3 approved CDK4/6is) and had ctDNA analysis performed via plasma based genotyping utilizing the commercially available Guardant360 assay at three sites: Washington University in St. Louis, MO, Northwestern University (Chicago, IL), and Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA). We aimed to look at the differences in patient characteristics and genomic profiles of the tumors assessed from baseline ctDNA specimens between the patients with rapid progression (time to progression TTP&lt;=6 months) vs others. In particular, we focused on growth factor receptors (FGFR, EGFR) given that previous studies have shown that activation of FGFR1 and EGFR signaling may be implicated in resistance to endocrine based therapy in breast cancer. Time to progression was estimated by using Cox regression. Variable associations were estimated via logistic regression. Results: In the combined cohort, FGFR1 amplification (FGFR1amp) was detected in 15/77 patients (19.5%). FGFR1amp was seen in 5/10 (50%) of patients with rapid progression, consistent with existing knowledge that FGFR1amp contributes to resistance to CDK4/6i and/or ET. Presence of FGFR1amp was independently associated with shorter TTP (11.2 vs. 34.7 months, HR=3.14, p=0.02). EGFR mutations (EGFRmut) were detected in 8/77 (10.4%) patients, 3 of which were found among patients with rapid progression and another 5 among those with TTP&lt;=15 months. Presence of EGFRmut was also associated with shorter TTP (8.5 vs. 31.7 months, HR=6.50, p&lt;0.001) in multivariable analysis. Of the 4 patients with shortest TTP (&lt;3 months) 3 harbored both FGFR1amp and EGFRmut. In another 3 patients we observed FGFR1amp and co-activation of genes implicated in G1/S phase cell cycle transition, suggesting that FGFR1 amplified cells may require a co-activating downstream event that ultimately, via multiple pathway cross-talk, renders them resistant to ET/CDK4/6 inhibition. Patients with FGFR1 amplified tumors were younger compared to those without FGFR1amp (54.3 vs. 62.7 years, p=0.04). Presence of FGFR1amp was associated with presence of liver (p=0.01) but not bone or lung metastases which could be one of the explanations why patients with higher liver tumor burden are more resistant to ET/CDK4/6i inhibition. PIK3CA and TP53 gene mutations in our cohort were frequent (found in 41% and 30% of the patients, respectively) but were independently not associated with TTP (PIK3CAmut+ HR=1.31, p=0.55, TP53mut+ HR=0.67, p=0.36). ESR1 mutations were rarely encountered (9%) as the cohort had only been exposed to adjuvant endocrine therapy. Conclusions: These findings highlight how ctDNA can be used for patient stratification prior to initiation of first line of therapy in ER+/HER2- ABC since it is evident that not all patients derive the same benefit from ET/CDK4/6i. Certain genomic alterations, particularly in FGFR1, EGFR, and G1/S phase cell cycle transition are associated with rapid progression to 1st line ET/CDK4/6i therapy, and highlight the need for clinical trials investigating combination/novel therapies for this subgroup of patients with HR+/HER2- ABC. Our findings are hypothesis-generating and require further exploration in larger datasets.

Citation Format: Marko Velimirovic, Lorenzo Gerratana, Andrew A Davis, Whitney L Hensing, Katherine Clifton, Ami N Shah, Paolo D'Amico, Charles S Dai, Elyssa N Denault, Cynthia X Ma, Seth A Wander, Dejan Juric, Massimo Cristofanilli, Bruce A Chabner, Aditya Bardia. Genomic predictors of rapid progression to first line endocrine and CDK4/6 inhibitor combination therapy in patients with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) HER-2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-07-02.

Abstract OT2-11-05: SERENA-6: A Phase III study to assess the efficacy and safety of AZD9833 (camizestrant) compared with aromatase inhibitors when given in combination with palbociclib or abemaciclib in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer with detectable ESR1m who have not experienced disease progression on first-line therapy

Background: More than two thirds of patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) have hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) tumors. Current guidelines recommend combining endocrine therapy (ET), such as an aromatase inhibitor (AI), with an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6i) as first-line (1L) treatment (Cardoso et al. Ann Oncol 2020). However, drug resistance eventually develops, leading to disease progression. Mutations in the estrogen receptor (ER) alpha gene (ESR1m) result in constitutively active, estrogen-independent ER signaling which can reduce AI efficiency (Reinert et al. Front Oncol 2017). Clinically, ESR1m are associated with acquired resistance to AI as well as more aggressive disease features, including development of visceral metastasis (Gerratana et al. Eur J Cancer 2021). At the initial diagnosis of mBC, the frequency of ESR1m is low (approximately 3%) (Bidard et al. Ann Oncol 2019); however, this increases to 17−35% of patients when disease progresses on an AI + CDK4/6i (Bidard et al. Ann Oncol 2019; Goetz et al. J Clin Oncol 2020). Patients with ESR1m tumors have poor outcomes with subsequent lines of therapy. New approaches are needed to maximize time on 1L treatment with ET + CDK4/6i and prevent further clinical and radiological disease progression. AZD9833 (camizestrant) is a highly potent, next-generation oral selective ER degrader (ngSERD) and pure ER antagonist that has demonstrated antitumor activity in a wide range of ER+ breast cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenograft models, including those with wild type ESR1 (ESR1wt) and the most prevalent ESR1m, D538G and Y537S (Scott et al. AACR 2020; Lawsone et al. AACR 2020). The Phase I SERENA-1 study demonstrated that AZD9833 shows encouraging clinical activity as monotherapy or in combination with a CDK4/6i in heavily pre-treated patients with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer whose tumors are ESR1wt or ESR1m (Baird et al. SABCS 2020). SERENA-6 will assess the efficacy of switching patients from AI to AZD9833, while continuing CDK4/6i treatment, once ESR1m are detected but before overt disease progression. Study description: SERENA-6 is an ongoing, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, Phase III trial. Patients with HR+/HER2− mBC who have received at least 6 months of 1L AI (letrozole or anastrozole) + CDK4/6i (palbociclib or abemaciclib) and do not have clinical or radiological disease progression will be enrolled into Step 1, the ESR1m detection phase. During this phase, patients will be monitored regularly for the presence of ESR1m via central circulating tumor DNA analysis. Patients with detectable ESR1m and no overt disease progression (by RECIST v1.1 criteria) will be enrolled into Step 2 double-blind 1:1 randomization to either continue AI plus CDK4/6i, plus a placebo for AZD9833, or switch to AZD9833 (75 mg oral once daily), plus the same CDK4/6i plus a placebo for the AI. The primary endpoint will be investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 criteria. A key secondary endpoint will be time to second progression or death on a subsequent therapy. Other secondary endpoints will include overall survival, chemotherapy-free survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. Enrollment began in June 2021 and is expected at approximately 200 sites across 19 countries. Acknowledgments: We thank Julia Mawer, PhD, of Oxford PharmaGenesis, UK, for medical writing assistance, which was funded by AstraZeneca. Funding: The SERENA-6 trial is funded and overseen by AstraZeneca.

Citation Format: François-Clément Bidard, Kevin Kalinsky, Massimo Cristofanilli, Giampaolo Bianchini, Stephen KL Chia, Wolfgang Janni, Cynthia X Ma, Erica L Mayer, Yeon Hee Park, Steven Fox, Xiaochun Liu, Andrew Walding, Cynthia Huang Bartlett, Nick C Turner. SERENA-6: A Phase III study to assess the efficacy and safety of AZD9833 (camizestrant) compared with aromatase inhibitors when given in combination with palbociclib or abemaciclib in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer with detectable ESR1m who have not experienced disease progression on first-line therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-11-05.

Abstract P3-09-04: Genomic landscape of HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer with PIK3CA gain-of-function mutations

Background: Alpelisib and fulvestrant are used as a combination treatment option for postmenopausal PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), advanced or metastatic breast cancer (a/mBC) patients. However, despite the presence of activating mutations in PIK3CA, the majority of patients do not derive benefit, or ultimately progress while on alpelisib therapy. Here, we investigate the genomic landscape of PIK3CA-mutated, HER2- a/mBC using next-generation sequencing (NGS) to provide insight into possible mechanisms of therapeutic resistance to alpelisib/fulvestrant and to identify potential targetable pathways. Methods: We utilized the Tempus LENS platform to retrospectively analyze de-identified NGS data from 2,918 a/mBC patients with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor biopsies sequenced using the Tempus|xT solid tumor assay (DNA-seq of 595-648 genes at 500x coverage; full transcriptome RNA-seq). Mutations identified included germline and/or somatic single nucleotide variants, insertions/deletions and copy number variations (gains defined as ≥8 copies). We used curated clinical data to determine HER2 and hormone receptor (ER/PR) status. Results: Among 2,918 a/mBC patients, we identified somatic mutations in PIK3CA in 782 (26.8%). Within these tumors, 629 (80.4%) had one of the 11 mutations currently included in the alpelisib companion diagnostic, and we focused on this population (here defined as mut-PIK3CA). Of these 629, 546 (86.8%) were HER2-, with 176 (32.3%) and 370 (67.7%) derived from primary and metastatic tumors, respectively. Cases were further classified as HR+ (defined as ER+ or PR+) or triple negative (TNBC). While the majority of mutPIK3CA samples were identified in HR+ disease, 10% of the cases occurred in TNBC. Within the mutPIK3CA cohort, tumor mutational burden high (TMB-H; defined as ≥10 mutations/MB) was detected in 11.5% of samples, while microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) was detected in 0.5%. MSI-H was detected at a higher frequency in TNBC compared to HR+. Overall, the most commonly co-mutated genes among mutPIK3CA, HER2- samples were TP53 (34.6%), CDH1 (21.6%), ESR1 (12.3%), KMT2C (11%), MAP3K1 (9.5%), ARID1A (8.1%), PTEN (6.8%), GATA3 (6.6%), NF1 (5.9%), and TBX3 (5.9%) among others (Table 1); some of these genes have previously been implicated in resistance to endocrine therapy or PI3K inhibitor. In addition, in HR+ disease, metastatic samples had a higher frequency of mutations in genes implicated in endocrine resistance, such as ESR1 (18.7% vs 1.9%), ERBB2 (3.3% vs 2.6%), NF1 (6.8% vs 2.6%), compared to primary tumors. We also identified copy number gains (CNG) in several cell cycle genes, including: CCND1 (15.2%), CDK4 (2.7%), and AURKA (2.6%) (Table 1). Finally, further analyses at the transcript-level are the subject of on-going research. Conclusions: Our study highlights that there is substantial genomic heterogeneity among mutPIK3CA, HER2- a/mBCs. Across a series of comparisons between primary and metastatic samples, as well as HR+ and TNBC subtypes, we identified a number of co-mutations that occur alongside mutPIK3CA and which could be potentially exploited by targeted therapies. Future studies are needed to assess the prognostic/predictive role of these and other candidate gene alterations.

Table 1. Genomic features of mutPIK3CA, HER2– a/mBCPrimaryMetastaticTotalAny PIK3CA Mutation1255527782mutPIK3CA2204425629HER2– (n=176)HER2– (n=370)546HR+ HER2– 154 (88%)TNBC 22 (12%)HR+ HER2– 337 (91%)TNBC 33 (9%)TMB-H16 (10.3%)2 (9.1%)41 (12%)4 (12%)63 (11.5%)MSI-H1 (0.6%)1 (4.5%)0 (0%)1 (3.0%)3 (0.5%)Co-mutations (mutPIK3CA): n (%)TP5347 (30.5%)14 (63.6%)101 (30%)27 (81.8%)189 (34.6%)CDH137 (24%)1 (4.5%)75 (22.3%)5 (15.2%)118 (21.6%)KMT2C17 (11%)1 (4.5%)40 (11.9%)2 (6.1%)60 (11%)MAP3K117 (11%)1 (4.5%)31 (9.2%)1 (3%)50 (9.2%)ARID1A15 (9.7%)0 (0%)26 (7.7%)2 (6.1%)43(7.9%)PTEN12 (7.8%)1 (4.5%)21 (6.2%)3 (9.1%)37 (6.8%)GATA311 (7.1%)0 (0%)23 (6.8%)2 (6.1%)35 (6.6%)TBX311 (7.1%)1 (4.5%)19 (5.6%)1 (3%)32 (5.9%)NCOR12 (1.3%)1 (4.5%)18 (5.3%)0 (0%)21 (3.8%)FOXA17 (4.5%)2 (9.1%)10 (3%)1 (3%)20 (3.7%)MAP2K41 (0.6%)1 (4.5%)12 (3.6%)1 (3%)15 (2.7%)ESR13 (1.9%)0 (0%)63 (18.7%)1 (3%)67 (12.3%)PIK3R13 (1.9%)0 (0%)4 (1.2%)0 (0%)7 (1.3%)AKT11 (0.6%)0 (0%)1 (0.6%)0 (0%)2 (0.4%)RB15 (3.2%)1 (4.5%)8 (2.4%)1 (3%)15 (2.7%)NF14 (2.6%)3 (13.6%)23 (6.8%)2 (6.1%)32 (5.9%)ERBB24 (2.6%)4 (18.2%)11 (3.3%)2 (6.1%)21 (3.8%)CCND1 CNG22 (14%)0 (0%)61 (18%)0 (0%)83 (15.2%)AURKA CNG3 (1.9%)0 (0%)11 (3.3%)0 (0%)14 (2.6%)CDK4 CNG5 (3.2%)1 (4.5%)7 (2.1%)1 (3.0%)14 (2.6%)1any somatic variant detected in PIK3CA2somatic PIK3CA mutations among the 11 currently included in the alpelisib companion diagnostic (C420R, E542K, E545A, E545D, E545G, E545K, Q546E, Q546R, H1047L, H1047R, and H1047Y)

Citation Format: Jing Xi, Kathleen Harnden, Jingqin Luo, Greg S. Call, Elizabeth Mauer, Karyn Ronski, Cynthia X. Ma, Neil Vasan. Genomic landscape of HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer with PIK3CA gain-of-function mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-04.

Abstract PD6-06: Comprehensive characterization of neurotransmitters and neuronal signaling gene alterations in invasive breast cancers

BACKGROUNDIt has been reported that the sympathetic nervous system and associated neurotransmitters (NTs) play a pivotal role in driving breast cancer (BC) tumorigenesis and metastasis, however, comprehensive characterization of these pathways in BC is lacking. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively characterize NTs and neuronal signaling (NTNS) gene alterations in a large real-world BC cohort. METHODS A total of 6464 BC tumors were analyzed by next generation sequencing (NextSeq, 592 genes and WES, NovaSEQ, 720 genes) and whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS, NovaSeq) at Caris Life Sciences. Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) scores were calculated (positive: higher gene expressions in a selected gene set compared to genes outside that gene set in each tumor specimen, vice versa for negative) to assess expression of major NTNS genes, including GABA, nicotinic (NIC), muscarinic (MUS), dopamine (DA), reelin (RELN), and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF). GSVA scores were compared by histologic subtype, primary or metastatic site, and hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status with corrected Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney testing. All significance levels were p&lt;0.01. RESULTS The 6464 BC specimens in this cohort included 2520 primary sites and 3944 metastasis (mets) (liver: 1012; lymph node: 714; bone: 575; lung: 420; brain: 196). Predictive biomarker status in this cohort was HR+/HER2-: 3705; HR+/HER2+: 238; HR-/HER2+: 189; TNBC: 1654. Invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) were the most common histologic subtype and demonstrated significantly higher GSVA scores for RELN and NIC pathways with respect to invasive lobular carcinomas (ILC) (Table). TNBC tumors had significantly higher enrichment overall (GABA, -0.04 vs -0.14; RELN, -0.05 vs -0.31; DA, -0.03 vs -0.08; MUS, 0.13 vs -0.16; NIC, 0.01 vs -0.12; and GDNF, 0.04 vs -0.04). HR-/HER2+ had significantly higher scores in GABA, -0.04 vs -0.14; RELN, -0.03 vs -0.31; MUS, 0.12 vs -0.16; and NIC, -0.01 vs -0.12 genes. Brain mets had significantly enriched pathway scores for GABA, 0.30 vs -0.13; MUS, 0.15 vs -0.08; and NIC, 0.13 vs -0.09 compared to primary tumors. Similarly, GABA,0.09 vs -0.13; DA, 0.07 vs -0.05; MUS, 0.17 vs -0.08; and NIC, 0.02 vs -0.09 pathways were enriched in bone mets compared to those from primary tumors. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate that NTNS pathways are significantly enriched in IDC, TNBC tumors, and particularly in brain and bone mets. Our data advance the current understanding of the role of NTNS pathways in BC tumorigenesis and metastasis. Further investigation on genetic. determinants and signaling alternations associated with the observed NTNS pathway deregulation is warranted and could inform the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Significant comparisons with Bonferroni corrected p values are shown with an asterisk.

Citation Format: Irene Kang, Krutika Deshpande, Sarah Persing, Jun Yin, Joanne Xiu, Wolfgang Michael Korn, Jia Zeng, Evanthia T Roussos-Torres, Janice Lu, Darcy Spicer, Stephen F Sener, Antoinette R Tan, Ashley Sumrall, David SB Hoon, Cynthia X Ma, Carey K Anders, Heather L McArthur, Reva Basho, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Josh Neman. Comprehensive characterization of neurotransmitters and neuronal signaling gene alterations in invasive breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-06.

Abstract PD6-08: Exploring the interplay among ESR1/PIK3CA codon variants, oncogenic pathway alterations and clinical phenotype of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) through circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS)

Background: High throughput genomic technologies such as NGS are enhancing the ability to dynamically characterize MBC but their role in describing biological evolution of multiple mutations together remains unclear. ESR1 and PIK3CA are central mutations related to the biology and druggability of hormone-receptor positive, HER2 negative (luminal-like) MBC. The aim of this study was to explore the interplay between oncogenic pathway alterations and ESR1 and PIK3CA codon variants on the impact and clinical phenotype of luminal-like MBC. Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed a multi-institutional cohort comprising 1047 MBC patients (pts) characterized for ctDNA through NGS before treatment start at Northwestern University (Chicago, IL), Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA) and Washington University in St. Louis between 2015-2020. The analysis was then focused on luminal-like MBC. Pathway classification was defined based on previous work (Sanchez-Vega F et al, Cell. 2018) (i.e., RTK, RAS, RAF, MEK, NRF2, ER, WNT, MYC, P53, cell cycle, notch, PI3K). Single nucleotide variations (SNVs) were annotated for their oncogenicity through OncoKB and ClinVar. Only pathogenic variants were included in the models. Associations among, pathway classification, and ESR1/PIK3CA codon variants were explored through stepwise logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was tested through Cox regression. Results: The luminal-like cohort comprised 702 pts. ESR1 mutations were detected in 166 pts (24%) and PIK3CA in 214 pts (31%). The most common ESR1 gene mutations were found in codons 537 (31%), 538 (21%), 536 (8%) and 380 (7%), while alterations in codons 1047 (38%), 545 (25%), and 542 (20%) were the most common for PIK3CA. Other pathogenic SNVs were observed in 33% and 17% of pts for ESR1 and PIK3CA, respectively with the former being polyclonal. SNVs alterations were mainly observed in the PI3K (35%), P53 (32%), ER (28%), RAS (8%), RTK (8%) and cell cycle (5%) pathways, while copy number variations (CNVs) were detected in the RTK (15%), cell cycle (11%), MYC (7%) PI3K (6%) and RAF (5%) pathways. ESR1 537 variants were associated with alterations in the ER and WNT pathways, 538 with cell cycle, 380 with P53 and ER, 536 with RTK. PIK3CA 1047 variants were associated with alterations in the RTK and P53 pathways, 542 with RTK, RAS and RAF, E545 with PI3K, RAS, cell cycle and P53. 1047 and 542 were also associated with CNVs in the PI3K pathway. Independent prognostic factors in terms of OS were ESR1 537/380 codon variants (HR 1.94 P = 0.001 and HR 2.29 P = 0.047), SNVs in the RAS, cell cycle, and P53 pathways (HR 1.74 P = 0.003 HR 1.84 P = 0.009 and HR 1.56 P &lt; 0.001) and CNVs in the cell cycle pathway (HR 1.96 P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrated how ESR1 and PIK3CA codon variants, together with alterations in specific oncogenic pathways, can differentially impact the biology and clinical phenotype of luminal-like MBC. As novel endocrine therapy agents such as selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) and PI3K inhibitors are being developed, these results highlight the pivotal role of ctDNA NGS to describe tumor evolution and optimize clinical decision making.

Odds Ratio95% Confidence IntervalPESR1 Y537ER SNVs3.341.487.530.004WNT SNVs6.251.4127.740.016ESR1 D538cell cycle SNVs5.221.7915.230.003ESR1 E380P53 SNVs4.801.4116.310.012ER SNVs5.331.3321.400.018ESR1 L536RTK CNVs4.511.1517.690.031PIK3CA H1047RTK SNVs3.751.708.290.001P53 SNVs2.611.584.34&lt; 0.001PI3K CNVs6.082.4515.08&lt; 0.001PIK3CA E542RTK SNVs5.001.9412.880.001RAS SNVs3.651.369.770.01RAF SNVs6.011.0733.870.042PI3K CNVs6.302.2917.36&lt; 0.001PIK3CA E545PI3K SNVs2.881.276.530.011RAS SNVs2.871.186.980.02cell cycle SNVs3.071.088.740.035NRF2 SNVs21.431.29356.520.033P53 SNVs3.752.046.89&lt; 0.001

Citation Format: Lorenzo Gerratana, Andrew A Davis, Marko Velimirovic, Katherine Clifton, Whitney L Hensing, Ami N Shah, Charles S Dai, Carolina Reduzzi, Paolo D’Amico, Qiang Zhang, Firas Wehbe, Seth Wander, William J Gradishar, Amir Behdad, Fabio Puglisi, Cynthia X Ma, Aditya Bardia, Massimo Cristofanilli. Exploring the interplay among ESR1/PIK3CA codon variants, oncogenic pathway alterations and clinical phenotype of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) through circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-08.

Abstract PD14-04: Circulating tumor DNA characterization of invasive lobular carcinoma in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Background:Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common histology of breast cancer, accounting for approximately 10-15% of cases. Prior studies have demonstrated that loss of E-cadherin, as well as alterations in tissue including CDH1, FOXA1, TBX3 and PTEN loss, that were more commonly observed in Luminal A ILC, while GATA3 was more commonly observed in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (Ciriello et al., Cell 2015). However, data regarding the characterization of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients (pts) with metastatic ILC are limited. We hypothesized that there would be distinct mutational profiles between pts with metastatic ILC and IDC that could be characterized using ctDNA. Methods:This retrospective cohort study included de-identified clinical, pathological, and ctDNA data from pts with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) combined under a data use agreement and approved by the institutional review boards of three sites: Washington University in St. Louis (MO), Northwestern University (Chicago, IL), and Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA). All pts included in the study had ctDNA testing per standard of care with plasma-based genotyping performed by Guardant360 (Redwood City, CA) between 2015-2020. Histological classification (ILC vs. IDC) was defined based on review of pathology reports from the primary tumor or from breast biopsies of de novo MBC, and additional clinical and pathological variables were obtained via electronic medical record review. Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were annotated using OncoKB and ClinVar and only pathogenic variants were included. Mutational profiles were compared across histologic subtypes using Fisher’s exact test to assess differences in alteration frequency across subtypes. Multivariable analysis was performed. Results:A total of 994 pts with MBC underwent ctDNA testing and were included in the analysis. 10.7% of pts had ILC (N=106) and 89.3% had IDC (N=888). 89.4% of ILC cases were categorized as hormone-receptor positive (HR+) compared with 67.1% of IDC cases. Pts with ILC had a lower frequency of triple-negative (6.7% vs. 17.7%) and HER2 positive (3.9% vs. 15.2%) breast cancer compared with IDC. Pts with ILC had a significantly higher number of pathogenic SNVs compared with IDC (mean 4.45 vs. 2.77; P=0.0037). In contrast, pts with ILC had a significantly lower number of copy number alterations as compared to pts with IDC (mean 0.40 vs. 1.03; P=0.0017). No differences were observed in mutant allele frequency between pts with ILC and IDC. The 5 most common alterations observed in pts with ILC were the following: PIK3CA, TP53, ESR1, ERBB2, and ARID1A. Alterations in AR, BRAF, CDH1, ERBB2, FGFR2, IDH2, KRAS, NF1, PIK3CA, SMAD4, and TERT were significantly higher in ILC than IDC (all P&lt;0.05). In contrast, mutations in GATA3, and amplifications in ERBB2 and MYC were significantly more common in pts with IDC (all P&lt;0.05). In multivariable analysis, mutations in BRAF, CDH1, ERBB2, IDH2, TERT remained significantly higher in ILC, while amplification of MYC was significantly higher in IDC (all P&lt;0.05). After restricting the analysis to pts with HR+ HER2 negative MBC, the following genes were significant in multivariate analysis: CDH1 and ERBB2 for pts with ILC and MYC amplification for pts with IDC (all P&lt;0.05). Discussion:In this large, multi-institutional dataset, pts with metastatic ILC were characterized by a significantly higher number of SNVs in ctDNA compared to pts with IDC, suggesting higher mutational burden. We report several alterations that were significantly different in ILC vs. IDC. These results demonstrate the ctDNA profile of pts with ILC, and future studies should explore serial plasma-based genotyping to track ILC evolution to develop targeted precision medicine based therapeutic approaches for this unique subset of pts with MBC.

Citation Format: Andrew A Davis, Lorenzo Gerratana, Katherine Clifton, Marko Velimirovic, Whitney L Hensing, Ami N Shah, Paolo D’Amico, Carolina Reduzzi, Qiang Zhang, Charles S Dai, Elyssa N Denault, Nusayba A Bagegni, Mateusz Opyrchal, Foluso O Ademuyiwa, Ron Bose, William J Gradishar, Amir Behdad, Cynthia X Ma, Aditya Bardia, Massimo Cristofanilli. Circulating tumor DNA characterization of invasive lobular carcinoma in patients with metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD14-04.

Abstract P2-01-01: Genetic alterations detected by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

Introduction: Approximately 40-50% of breast cancers are characterized by low HER2 expression (HER2-low), defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+ and HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) unamplified, encompassing a large and heterogeneous subgroup that may confer benefit from novel HER2 directed therapies. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive technique to detect cancer-specific gene aberrations. Genetic alterations in ctDNA of HER2-low MBC have not been well described, and we hypothesized that HER2-low MBC may have a distinct genomic profile, beyond standard histopathologic features. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with MBC treated at Washington University in St. Louis, Northwestern University (Chicago, IL) and Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA) who had undergone ctDNA analysis during the course of treatment using the commercially available Guardant360® assay. HER2 expression was evaluated by IHC/FISH according to ASCO/CAP guidelines on metastatic tissue biopsies (or primary breast tumor tissue if a metastatic site biopsy was not available). Tumors were classified as HER2-low (IHC 1+ or 2+/FISH negative), HER2-0 (IHC 0) or HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/FISH amplified). Clinicopathologic characteristics and ctDNA genetic alterations for HER2-low MBC were described and compared with the HER2-0 and HER2-positive subgroups. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used for categorical variables. Logistical regression was performed for multivariable analyses. Results: A total of 991 patients with MBC were analyzed, including 160 (16.1%) HER2-positive, 351 (35.4%) HER2-0, and 480 (48.4%) HER2-low MBC. The majority (89.2%) of HER2-low MBC were estrogen-receptor positive (ER+). Compared with HER2-0 MBC, HER2-low MBC had a significantly higher incidence of PIK3CA mutations (OR 1.54, p=0.027). PDGFRA and MYC amplifications were also more common among HER2-low MBC (2.3% vs 0.28% and 8.1% vs 4.6%, respectively), although not significantly associated with this subtype in multivariable analysis. Within the ER+ MBC cohort, those with HER2-low also had higher rates of PIK3CA mutations (OR 1.66, p=0.012) and MYC amplification (OR 2.29, p=0.034), as compared to HER2-0. Compared with HER2-positive, HER2-low MBC had significantly lower rates of ERBB2 alterations (OR 0.26, p=0.0076 for ERBB2 mutations and OR 0.022, p&lt;0.001 for ERBB2 amplification). ESR1, AKT1, and RB1 mutations were more common in HER2-low compared with HER2-positive MBC (14.0% vs 6.9%; 3.1% vs none; 3.1% vs none, respectively), but were not significant in multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Among patients with ER+ MBC, HER-low had a higher incidence of PIK3CA mutations and MYC amplification compared to HER2-0 MBC, and both of these alterations have been implicated as mechanisms of endocrine resistance. We did not demonstrate a high incidence of ERBB2 alterations in patients with HER2-low MBC. To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe genetic alterations detected by ctDNA in patients with HER2-low MBC. Given the emergence of novel HER2-targeted antibody drug conjugates with clinical activity in HER2-low MBC, these findings may guide combination treatment strategies and patient selection for future studies. Further studies are needed to confirm whether HER2-low MBC represents a truly unique biologic subtype.

Citation Format: Whitney L Hensing, Lorenzo Gerratana, Katherine Clifton, Marko Velimirovic, Ami Shah, Paolo D'Amico, Carolina Reduzzi, Qiang Zhang, Charles S Dai, Nusayba A Bagegni, Mateusz Opyrchal, Foluso O Ademuyiwa, Bose Ron, Amir Behdad, Cynthia X Ma, Aditya Bardia, Massimo Cristofanilli, Andrew A Davis. Genetic alterations detected by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-01-01.

Abstract OT2-07-01: The FLEX real-world data platform explores new gene expression profiles and investigator-initiated protocols in early-stage breast cancer

Background: Genomic signatures provide prognostic information such as tumor metastatic potential, outperforming information gained from clinicopathologic factors alone, which has transformed personalized treatment of early breast cancer. Together, whole genome expression data can accurately stratify tumors into clinically actionable molecular subtypes. The FLEX study (NCT03053193) is a large, real-world dataset, combining whole genome expression with clinically annotated data, to accelerate research and discovery of subgroups in breast cancer. The goal of FLEX is to discover and develop novel genomic profiles that bring precision oncology to the clinic, and ultimately improve treatment and outcomes of patients with breast cancer. Study Design: The FLEX study is a multicenter, prospective observational trial of patients aged ≥ 18 years with stage I-III breast cancer who receive MammaPrint, with or without BluePrint. Patients consent to the acquisition of clinical data and clinically annotated full transcriptome tumor analysis. The FLEX study creates a unique infrastructure to develop and investigate hypotheses for targeted subset analyses and/or clinical trials. In doing so, the adaptive protocol allows submission of investigator-initiated sub-studies. Upon approval by a Scientific Review Committee, FLEX investigators can query the clinical and genomic data in FLEX to investigate hypotheses for targeted subset analysis. Patients enrolled in the original study who meet all eligibility criteria may be enrolled in sub-studies without additional consent. All necessary clinical data will be collected from patients, starting from diagnosis through 10-year follow-up. Sub-study research categories include: breast cancer and age, optimization of therapeutic strategies, breast cancer tumor types, biomarker identification and quality of care. The FLEX enrollment goal is a minimum of 30,000 patients within 10 years; since April 2017, more than 7,500 patients were enrolled at more than 90 sites. Participating sites include community hospitals and nine National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer centers to ensure inclusion of diverse populations, particularly patient populations that are underrepresented in traditional clinical trials. Most recently, the FLEX network was expanded globally with additional sites in Greece and Israel. To date, 38 investigator-initiated sub-studies have been approved, resulting in 23 published abstracts at national congresses. Trial contact information: NCT03053193, FLEX@agendia.com

Citation Format: Cynthia X. Ma, Robert Maganini, Pat Whitworth, Jennifer A. Crozier, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Sami Diab, Beth-Ann Lesnikoski, June Lee, Nina D'Abreo, Blanche H. Mavromatis, Pond Kelemen, Darina Pronin, Hiwot Abebe, Michelle L. Bolner, Christine Finn, Lisa Blumencranz, William Audeh, FLEX Investigators Group. The FLEX real-world data platform explores new gene expression profiles and investigator-initiated protocols in early-stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-07-01.

Abstract P2-13-01: Phase 2 study of neoadjuvant palbociclib, letrozole, and trastuzumab in patients with ER+ HER2+ breast cancer (PALTAN)

Background Patients (pts) with ER+ HER2+ breast cancer (BC) are less likely to achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with dual HER2 blockade than pts with ER- HER2+ BC. Endocrine therapy (ET) plus trastuzumab is effective in advanced ER+ HER2+ BC, but pCR rate is low in the neoadjuvant setting. Inhibition of CDK4/6 and HER2 results in synergistic reduction in cell proliferation in preclinical studies. We therefore combined ET with CDK4/6 inhibition and trastuzumab in ER+ HER2+ BC as a chemotherapy-sparing regimen. Methods We evaluated the efficacy of palbociclib, letrozole, trastuzumab (PLT) in the neoadjuvant setting for pts with stages II or III ER+ HER2+ BC. Primary endpoint was pCR after 16 weeks of therapy. We assumed null of 15% pCR and pCR ≥ 30% warrants further investigation. To achieve 80% power at 1-sided 0.05 significance, 48 pts were to be enrolled. Evaluable population included pts who completed Cycle (C) 1 unless discontinued due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) prior to completing C1. All who received one dose on study were considered evaluable for toxicity. Biopsies were collected at baseline (BL), C1 day 15 (C1D15), and surgery for RNA sequencing and central Ki67 assessment, for PAM50 subtype distribution, complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA: Ki67 ≤2.7%) at C1D15 and surgery, and treatment induced signaling changes. Results Accrual stopped early due to futility. 26 pts accrued were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. pCR (residual cancer burden- [RCB] 0) was 7.7% (95% CI 0.9 - 25.1%) and RCB 0/I was 38.5% (95% CI 20.2 - 59.4%). TEAEs (n= 337) were seen in all pts (71.5% grade [G] 1, 19.3% G2, 8.6% G3, 0.6% G4); the most common were leukopenia (7.7%), neutropenia (7.1%), anemia (5.9%). G3/4 TEAEs occurred in 19 pts (73.1%). Among the 19, incidence of G3/4 neutropenia was 50%, hypertension 26.9%, leucopenia 7.7%. TEAEs (hypertension, ventricular tachycardia, pulmonary edema) leading to treatment discontinuation were reported in 1 pt. Two pts had at least one SAE. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Pt reported outcomes using NCI PRO-CTCAE revealed no differences in appetite, nausea, respiratory symptoms, edema, palpitations, rashes and dry skin, or concentration from BL to end of C4. Pts had worsening hair loss from BL to end of C4. Ki67 analysis indicated CCCA in 78% at C1D15, compared to 18% at surgery after only P had been discontinued approximately 4 weeks prior to surgery. RNA sequencing was performed on available biopsies collected at BL (N=16), C1D15 (N=5), and surgery (N=2) from 16 pts. Among 16 BL samples, PAM50 subtyping identified 5 (31.3%) basal-like, 2 (12.5%) HER2-E, 6 (37.5%) Lum B, and 3 (18.8%) normal. Subtype switching to Lum A at C1D15 (N=3, 1 each with HER2-E, Lum B, and normal at BL) or normal (N=2, 1 basal and 1 HER2-E at BL) was observed. 161 genes were differentially expressed (FDR p&lt;0.05); 145 downregulated and 16 upregulated comparing C1D15 to BL. MKI67, TK1, CCNB1, AURKB, PLK1 were among the downregulated genes, consistent with CCCA for majority of the samples at C1D15 by Ki67. Analysis of the Molecular Signatures Database Hallmark gene-sets comparing C1D15 and BL samples demonstrated downregulated biological processes involved in proliferation (E2F targets, G2M checkpoint, MYC targets, mitotic spindle), signaling (Estrogen response, mTORC1 signaling), and DNA damage (DNA repair) at C1D15, consistent with the mechanisms of action of the study drugs. E2F targets were higher in BL samples of RCB II/III, compared to RCB I (FDR p=0.042). Conclusions PALTAN did not meet its primary endpoint of pCR. Neoadjuvant PLT showed a pCR of 7.7% but was well tolerated. RNA sequencing and Ki67 data indicated potent anti-proliferative effects of study treatments, despite significant heterogeneity of intrinsic subtypes. Clinical trial information: NCT02907918.

Citation Format: Foluso O Ademuyiwa, Donald Northfelt, Tracey O'Connor, Ellis Levine, Jingqin Luo, Yu Tao, Jeremy Hoog, Marie Laury, Tracy Summa, Trish Hammerschmidt, Zhanfang Guo, Ashley Frith, Katherine Weilbaecher, Mateusz Opyrchal, Rebecca Aft, Katherine Clifton, Rama Suresh, Nusayba Bagegni, Ian S Hagemann, Cynthia X Ma. Phase 2 study of neoadjuvant palbociclib, letrozole, and trastuzumab in patients with ER+ HER2+ breast cancer (PALTAN) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-01.

Abstract PD9-03: Pam50 intrinsic subtype and risk of recurrence score (ROR) for the prediction of endocrine (ET) sensitivity and pathologic response to chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II/III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) in the alternate trial (Alliance A011106)

Background: Neoadjuvant ET (NET) offers an opportunity to assess ET sensitivity for ER+ HER2- BC and potentially to tailor therapy. Ki67 &gt;10% on biopsy after 2-4 weeks (wks) of NET identifies patients (pts) with intrinsic ET resistance; while pathologic complete response (pCR) and modified preoperative endocrine prognostic index of 0 (mPEPI 0: pT1-2N0, Ki67 ≤2.7%) at surgery indicates sensitivity to ET. However, on-NET biopsy is not always acceptable or feasible and delays the ET sensitivity determination. PAM50 ROR score and intrinsic subtypes by tumor RNA profiling are prognostic in pts with early stage ER+ HER2- BC, and predict pCR rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) (PMC2667820). We therefore hypothesized that PAM50 analysis on pre-NET biopsies could predict the likelihood of a) a high on-NET Ki67, b) mPEPI-0 or pCR at surgery and, c) pCR for pts triaged to NCT. Methods: The ALTERNATE trial is a phase III study that randomized postmenopausal pts with clinical stage II/III ER+ (Allred score 6-8) HER2- BC to receive neoadjuvant anastrozole, fulvestrant, or both for 6 months before surgery. Research biopsy was required at pre-NET and wk 4, then optional at wk 12. Pts with Ki67 &gt;10% on biopsy at wk 4 or 12 discontinued NET and were offered NCT. PAM50 intrinsic subtype and ROR-P values were generated from mRNA sequencing (RNASeq) analysis on pre-NET biopsies using open-source informatics (PMC7723687) and evaluated for prediction of on-NET Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12, pCR or mPEPI-0 post NET, and pCR post NCT. Results: 749 of 1,297 eligible trial pts were included in the analyses, after excluding 548 pts due to insufficient pre-NET tumor for RNASeq (n=511) or PAM50 normal subtype (n=37). Similar to the entire ALTERNATE population, the rate of Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12 was 24.4% (95% CI: 21.4-27.7%) and the rate of mPEPI-0/pCR post NET was 19.8% (95% CI: 17.0-22.8%). There were 393 (52.5%) Lum A, 302 (40.3%) Lum B, and 54 (7.2%) non-Lum (9 Basal, 45 HER2-E) BCs. These included 196 (26.2%) ROR-P low, 354 (47.3%) ROR-P medium and 199 (26.6%) ROR-P high BCs. Both the rates of Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12 and mPEPI-0/pCR differed significantly with respect to PAM50 subtype or ROR-P category, such that Lum A or ROR-P low BCs were least likely to have a Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12 and most likely to achieve mPEPI-0/pCR (Table).

93 of 168 (55.4%) pts triaged to NCT had RNA-seq results, yielding 26 Lum A, 49 Lum B, 4 Basal and 14 HER2-E, with the pCR rates of 0%, 6.1%, 0%, and 21.4%, respectively. There were 10 ROR-P low, 39 medium, and 44 high tumors, with a pCR rate of 0%, 5.1% and 9.1%, respectively. Conclusion: These data indicate that both baseline ROR-P and intrinsic subtype are predictive of early on-NET Ki67 &gt; 10% and mPEPI 0/pCR at surgery after NET. For pts triaged to NCT based on an early on-NET Ki67 &gt;10%, the HER2-E group had the highest pCR rate (20%) and no pCRs were observed in Lum A. These data may be useful for directing neoadjuvant therapy in postmenopausal pts with ER+ HER2- BC. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, UG1CA189856, U10CA180868 (NRG), NCI BIQSFP, BCRF, Genentech, AstraZeneca. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. (MJE) CPRIT RR140033, P50CA186784, P50-CA58223, U01 CA214125, U24CA210954, Gift from Ralph and Lisa Eads, McNair Scholarship. Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588.

Table 1.Rates of Ki67 &gt;10% and mPEPI-0/pCR post NET by PAM50 subtype and ROR-P categoryKi67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12mPEPI 0/pCR post NETPAM50 SubtypenYes, n (%)PnNo, n (%)PLum A37251 (13.7%) 95% CI: 10.4-17.6%&lt;0.0001393104 (26.5%) 95%CI: 22.2-31.1%&lt;0.0001Lum B29394 (32.1%) 95% CI: 26.8-37.8%30243 (14.2%) 95%CI: 10.5-18.7%Non-luminal (Basal and HER2-E)5338 (71.7%) 95%CI: 57.6-83.2%541 (1.9%) 95%CI: 0.05-9.9%ROR-P CategorynYes, n (%)PnNo, n (%)PLow18018 (10.0%) 95%CI: 6.0-15.3%&lt;0.000119660 (30.6%) 95%CI: 24.2-37.6%&lt;0.0001Intermediate34474 (21.5%) 95%CI: 17.3-26.2%35471 (20.1%) 95%CI: 16.0-24.6%High19491 (46.9%) 95%CI: 39.7-54.2%19917 (8.5%) 95%CI: 5.1-13.3%

Citation Format: Cynthia X Ma, Meenakshi Anurag, Travis Dockter, Jeremy Hoog, Aranzazu Fernandez-Martinez, Cheng Fan, Richard Gibbs, Souzan Sanati, Kiran Vij, Mark Watson, Olwen Hahn, Joseph Guenther, Abigail Caudle, Erika Crouch, Amy Tiersten, Monica Mita, Wajeeha Razaq, Tina J Hieken, Yang Wang, A. Marilyn Leitch, Gary W Unzeitig, Anna Weiss, Eric P Winer, Kelly Hunt, Ann H Partridge, Lisa A Carey, Charles M Perou, Matthew J Ellis, Vera Suman. Pam50 intrinsic subtype and risk of recurrence score (ROR) for the prediction of endocrine (ET) sensitivity and pathologic response to chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II/III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) in the alternate trial (Alliance A011106) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-03.

Abstract PD10-03: BEGONIA: Phase 1b/2 study of durvalumab (D) combinations in locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Results from Arm 1 D + paclitaxel (P), Arm 2 D+P + capivasertib (C), and Arm 5 D+P + oleclumab (O)

Background: Chemotherapy, together with immune checkpoint inhibitors, improves outcomes vs chemotherapy alone for patients (pts) with metastatic (m)TNBC PD-L1+ disease. Most of these pts progress within a year. In a previous study, D (anti-PD-L1) combined with chemotherapy enhanced antitumor immune responses in early TNBC (Loibl. Ann Oncol 2019). In TNBC, activation of the PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway and high CD73 expression are common. BEGONIA is an ongoing 2-part, multicenter, multi-arm, open-label platform study, evaluating safety and efficacy of D or D+P combined with novel therapies as first-line treatment for mTNBC (NCT03742102). Preliminary results from 2 arms were presented at ASCO 2021 (Abstract #1023). Here, we report results from Arm 1 D+P, Arm 2 D+P+C, and Arm 5 D+P+O. C is an oral, selective, ATP-competitive catalytic inhibitor of all 3 AKT isoforms, and O is a mAb targeting CD73. Methods: Eligible pts had untreated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic TNBC. In Arms 1 and 5, pts received D 1500 mg IV Q4W + P 90 mg/m2 IV day (d)1, d8, d15 of every cycle. Pts in Arm 5 also received O 3000 mg IV on d1 and d15 for the first 2 cycles, then Q4W. In Arm 2, pts received D 1500 mg IV Q4W + P 80/90 mg/m2 IV in 4-week cycles (d1, d8, d15, 1 week off) + C 400 mg BID in 4-week cycles (d2-5 × 3 weeks, 1 week off). Primary objectives were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response. Tumors were assessed Q8W per RECIST v1.1. The first 6 pts treated in Arms 2 and 5 were evaluated for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), with additional pts enrolled if treatment was tolerated. PD-L1 expression was assessed retrospectively. Previously presented data from Arm 1 D+P, are included for reference (Schmid. ASCO 2021, #1023). Results: In Arm 2 (data cutoff Mar 2021), 30 pts received D+P+C (15 P[80], 15 P[90]; total 13 ongoing); 2 pts (6.7%) discontinued all treatment due to AEs. The rates of dose delays were 13 pts (43%) for D and 15 (50%) for P; dose interruptions were 1 (3%) for D, 12 (40%) for P, 15 (50%) for C; dose reductions were 12 (40%) for P and 14 (47%) for C. Treatment-related (tr)SAEs and G3/4 trAEs were experienced by 7 (23%) and 22 (73%) pts. In Arm 5 (data cutoff Sep 2020), 33 pts received D+P+O (14 ongoing); no pts discontinued due to AEs. The rates of dose delays were 13 pts (39%) for D, 10 (30%) for P, 10 (30%) for O; dose interruptions were 2 (6%) for D, 10 (30%) for P, 3 (9%) for O; and dose reductions were 12 (36%) for P. trSAEs and G3/4 trAEs were experienced by 1 (3%) and 5 (15%) pts. In both arms, there were no DLTs or deaths due to AEs. The Table presents follow-up time and efficacy outcomes for Arms 1, 2, and 5. Responses were observed regardless of PD-L1 expression. The potential value of mutations in the PI3K pathway and CD73 expression as predictive biomarkers will be discussed for Arms 2 and 5, respectively. Updated data for Arm 1 will be presented. Conclusions: The safety profiles of triplet combinations in Arms 2 and 5 were consistent with the individual agents; however, in Arm 2, there was a relatively high rate of G3/4 trAEs but a low discontinuation rate for AEs. Although BEGONIA was not designed to compare activity across arms and numbers were small, the ORR of each triplet therapy was numerically similar to D+P. Biomarker analysis may elucidate pts that benefit from the combination of C or O with D+P. Funding: AstraZeneca

Table. Efficacy outcomes in Arms 1, 2, and 5 of BEGONIAArm 1Arm 2Arm 5D+P N=23D+P(80)+C n=15D+P(90)+C n=15All D+P+C N=30D+P+O N=33Duration of follow-up at data cutoff, months, median (range)16.6 (8.5-19.8)6.7 (2-9)16.8 (6-21)8.2 (2-21)8.6 (4.1-14.6)Confirmed ORR, n (%)13 (56.5)8 (53.3)8 (53.3)16 (53.3)15 (45.5)95% CI34.5-76.826.6-78.726.6-78.7NC28.1-63.3CR, n10111PR12871514SD (Unconfirmed PR)7 (3)6 (2)4 (2)10 (4)13 (4)PD31345Percentage with ongoing response at data cutoff53.8%75.0%25.0%50.0%66.7%Arm 1 data cutoff was Sep 2020. C, capivasertib; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; D, durvalumab; NC, not calculable; O, oleclumab; ORR, objective response rate; P, paclitaxel; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.

Citation Format: Peter Schmid, Zbigniew Nowecki, Seock-Ah Im, Wei-Pang Chung, Simon Lord, Anne Armstrong, Cynthia X Ma, Robert Huisden, Ross Stewart, Rakesh Kumar, Gaia Schiavon, Hannah Dry, Ana Nunes, Kyung Hae Jung, Yeon Hee Park. BEGONIA: Phase 1b/2 study of durvalumab (D) combinations in locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Results from Arm 1 D + paclitaxel (P), Arm 2 D+P + capivasertib (C), and Arm 5 D+P + oleclumab (O) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-03.

The phase II MutHER study of neratinib alone and in combination with fulvestrant in HER2 mutated, non-amplified metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

HER2 mutations (HER2^mut) induce endocrine resistance in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this single arm multi-cohort phase II trial, we evaluated the efficacy of neratinib plus fulvestrant in patients with ER+/HER2^mut, HER2-non-amplified metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the fulvestrant-treated (n=24) or fulvestrant-naïve cohort (n=11). Patients with ER-negative/HER2^mut MBC received neratinib monotherapy in an exploratory ER- cohort (n=5).

RESULTS

The clinical benefit rate (CBR: 95% CI) was 38% (18-62%), 30% (7-65%), and 25% (1-81%) in the fulvestrant-treated, fulvestrant-naïve, and ER- cohort, respectively. Adding trastuzumab at progression in 5 patients resulted in 3 partial responses and 1 stable disease {greater than or equal to}24 weeks. CBR appeared positively associated with lobular histology and negatively associated with HER2 L755 alterations. Acquired HER2^mut were detected in 5 of 23 patients at progression.

CONCLUSION

Neratinib and fulvestrant is active for ER+/HER2^mut MBC. Our data supports further evaluation of dual HER2 blockade for the treatment of HER2^mut MBC.

Effective Treatment of Established Bone Metastases Can Be Achieved by Combinatorial Osteoclast Blockade and Depletion of Granulocytic Subsets

Osteoclast (OC) blockade has been successful in reducing tumor growth in bone in preclinical settings, but antiresorptive drugs, such as zoledronic acid (ZA), fail to improve the overall survival rate of patients with bone metastasis despite ameliorating skeletal complications. To address this unmet clinical need, we interrogated what other cells modulated tumor growth in bone in addition to OCs. Because myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC)-heterogeneous populations expressing CD11b, Ly6C, and Ly6G markers-originate in the bone marrow and promote tumor progression, we hypothesized that their accumulation hinders ZA antitumor effects. By using a murine model of bone metastasis insensitive to OC blockade, we assessed the antitumor effect of MDSC depletion using anti-Gr1 in mice bearing skeletal lung [Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC)], melanoma (B16-F10), and mammary (4T1) tumors. Differently from soft tissue tumors, anti-Gr1 did not reduce bone metastases and led to the paradoxical accumulation of bone marrow-resident CD11b+Ly6CintLy6Gint cells that differentiated into OCs when cultured in vitro Anti-Gr1-mediated depletion of Ly6G+ granulocytic MDSCs combined with ZA-induced OC blockade reduced growth of established skeletal metastases compared with each agent alone. CD15+ granulocytic populations were increased in patients with breast cancer with progressive bone disease after antiresorptive treatment compared with those with stable bone disease. We provide evidence that antiresorptive therapies fail to reduce bone metastases in the presence of elevated granulocytic populations and that effective treatment of established skeletal metastases requires combinatorial depletion of granulocytes and OC blockade.

Intermittent fasting in the prevention and treatment of cancer

Chronic caloric restriction (CR) has powerful anticarcinogenic actions in both preclinical and clinical studies but may be difficult to sustain. As an alternative to CR, there has been growing interest in intermittent fasting (IF) in both the scientific and lay community as a result of promising study results, mainly in experimental animal models. According to a survey by the International Food Information Council Foundation, IF has become the most popular diet in the last year, and patients with cancer are seeking advice from oncologists about its beneficial effects for cancer prevention and treatment. However, as discussed in this review, results from IF studies in rodents are controversial and suggest potential detrimental effects in certain oncologic conditions. The effects of IF on human cancer incidence and prognosis remain unknown because of a lack of high-quality randomized clinical trials. Preliminary studies suggest that prolonged fasting in some patients who have cancer is safe and potentially capable of decreasing chemotherapy-related toxicity and tumor growth. However, because additional trials are needed to elucidate the risks and benefits of fasting for patients with cancer, the authors would not currently recommend patients undergoing active cancer treatment partake in IF outside the context of a clinical trial. IF may be considered in adults seeking cancer-prevention benefits through means of weight management, but whether IF itself affects cancer-related metabolic and molecular pathways remains unanswered.

Comprehensive characterization of 536 patient-derived xenograft models prioritizes candidatesfor targeted treatment

Development of candidate cancer treatments is a resource-intensive process, with the research community continuing to investigate options beyond static genomic characterization. Toward this goal, we have established the genomic landscapes of 536 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models across 25 cancer types, together with mutation, copy number, fusion, transcriptomic profiles, and NCI-MATCH arms. Compared with human tumors, PDXs typically have higher purity and fit to investigate dynamic driver events and molecular properties via multiple time points from same case PDXs. Here, we report on dynamic genomic landscapes and pharmacogenomic associations, including associations between activating oncogenic events and drugs, correlations between whole-genome duplications and subclone events, and the potential PDX models for NCI-MATCH trials. Lastly, we provide a web portal having comprehensive pan-cancer PDX genomic profiles and source code to facilitate identification of more druggable events and further insights into PDXs' recapitulation of human tumors.

[Application strategy and clinical effects of paraumbilical perforator flap with inferior epigastric vessels in repairing destructive wounds]

Objective: To explore the application strategy and clinical effects of paraumbilical perforator flap with inferior epigastric vessels in repairing various destructive wounds. Methods: The retrospective observational study method was applied. From January 2015 to December 2020, 28 patients (21 males and 7 females, aged 25 to 66 years) with destructive wounds in various body parts were admitted to Beijing Jishuitan Hospital. The wound areas of patients ranged from 17 cm×8 cm to 35 cm×22 cm after debridement. Pedicled or free paraumbilical perforator flaps with inferior epigastric vessels were used to repair the wounds respectively. The areas of flaps were from 18 cm×10 cm to 37 cm×24 cm, and the lengths of vascular pedicles were 13.0-17.0 (15.1±2.3) cm. For type Ⅲ high-voltage electric burn wounds of wrist, two methods were used to reconstruct the blood flow of hand, one is to bridge the radial artery with saphenous vein grafting and the other one is to design blood flow-through flap. The strength of abdominal wall in the donor site was strengthened by polypropylene patch, and then the wounds were directly sutured. If the wounds could not be sutured directly, then allogenic acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was applied to strengthen the abdominal wall first, and then autologous medium-thickness skin graft was taken from the thigh to cover the wounds. The flap transplantation, hand blood flow reconstruction, the repair of donor site, the flap survival, the wound and donor site healing after operation, the appearance of flaps, and the wound and donor site recovery during follow-up were observed. Results: Among the patients in this group, 13 patients were treated with pedicled flap grafting, while 15 patients were treated with free flap grafting. The hand blood flow of 7 patients with type Ⅲ high-voltage electric burn wounds of wrist was reconstructed by bridging radial artery with saphenous vein grafting. The hand blood flow of 3 patients with type Ⅲ high-voltage electric burn wounds of wrist was reconstructed with blood flow-through flap. In 16 patients, the strength of abdominal wall was strengthened using patch in the donor site,and then the donor sites were sutured directly. In 12 patients, the strength of abdominal wall was strengthened using allogenic ADM, and then the donor sites were covered by skin grafting. All the transplanted flaps survived completely. The wounds of 24 patients were healed, while the wounds of 3 patients with type Ⅲ high-voltage electric burn wounds of wrist and 1 patient with chronic radiation ulcer of ilium failed to heal because of there were still some necrotic tissue and purulent secretion under the flaps. The wounds were healed eventually after debridement and dressing changes. During the follow-up of 6 months to 3 years, the flap survived well with good appearance in all patients, and there was no recurrence, or no abdominal wall hernia occurred in the donor site. Conclusions: Paraumbilical perforator flap with inferior epigastric vessels has flexible design, long vascular pedicle, large area for cut. It can be pedicled or freely transplanted, which is a good choice for repairing destructive wounds in various areas.

Abstract CT026: A phase II trial of neratinib (NER) or NER plus fulvestrant (FUL) (N+F) in HER2 mutant, non-amplified (HER2mut) metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Part II of MutHER

Introduction: The irreversible pan-HER inhibitor NER showed modest single agent activity for HER2mut MBC in Part I of MutHER trial. In Part II, we hypothesized that (1) N+F would improve activity in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) HER2mut MBC due to ER-HER2 crosstalk and (2) dual HER2 blockade by adding trastuzumab at disease progression (PD) could overcome resistance.

Methods: Pts with ER+HER2mut MBC were enrolled to 2 cohorts (FUL treated or naive) to receive N+F with diarrhea prophylaxis. ER- pts received NER in an exploratory ER- cohort. Trastuzumab was added at PD if approved by insurance. Simon's Minimax 2-stage phase II design with the primary endpoint of clinical benefit rate (CBR: rates of complete/partial response [CR/PR] plus stable disease [SD] &gt;24 weeks [wks]), with anticipated vs null hypothesis being CBR of 55% vs 35% (FUL treated) or 65% vs 40% (FUL naïve) with 80% power, 1 sided 0.05 alpha, was used. Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs). Serial blood samples were analyzed for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by Guardant360 for concomitant mutations, HER2mut variant allele frequency (VAF) dynamics, and resistance mechanisms.

Results: Between Sep. 2015 and Oct. 2020, 40 pts with HER2mut MBC were enrolled, completing the 1st stage of each ER+ cohort. 35 pts (21 FUL treated, 10 FUL naïve, 4 ER-) were evaluable for response, with median age 63 (35-82) years, 3 (0-12) prior MBC regimen, lobular BC in 13 (37%) and visceral mets in 32 (91%) pts. 21 (68%) ER+ pts had prior CDK4/6 inhibitor. All but 1 pt has come off study due to PD. Table 1 shows the efficacy by cohort. Further enrollment is closed per protocol. Adding trastuzumab at PD induced CB in 4 (3 PR, 1 SD≥24 wks) of 5 pts (1 ER-, 4 ER+), with PFS 28 (95% CI 18~NA) wks. Common AEs across cohorts were diarrhea (G3 21%) and fatigue (G3 5%). No G4 AEs.

ctDNA HER2mut was detected in 72% (23/32) baseline (BL) samples tested. In pts with paired samples, HER2mut VAF decreased at C1D15/C2D1 from BL in 75% (15/20) and rose in 89% (16/18) at PD. Acquired HER2mut, including the T798I gatekeeper mutation, were detected in 2 pts at PD. Mutations in TP53 (53%), PIK3CA (43%), and CDH1 (35%) were common, but none significantly associated with PFS in all or ER+ pts.

Conclusions: NER, or N+F, is active for HER2mut MBC with good tolerability. Adding trastuzumab at PD induced further response, supporting dual HER2 blockade for HER2mut MBC.

Table 1.EfficacyCohortFUL treatedFUL naïveER-Best Response, n evaluablen = 21n = 10n = 4CR, n100PR, n431SD (≥ 24 wks), n300SD (&lt; 24 wks), n1030PD, n343CBR, n with CB/total n evaluable, % (95% CI)8 of 20*, 40% (19~64%)3 of 10, 30% (7~65%)1 of 4, 25% (0.6~81%)mPFS (95% CI), wks, ITT (n)24 (16~31) wks, (n = 24)20 (8~NA) wks, (n = 11)8.5 (8~NA) wks, (n = 5)*20 of 21 pts are evaluable for CBR in the FUL treated Cohort as 1 pt had SD as best response and treatment is still ongoing. ITT (intent to treat) population is used for mPFS estimate.

Citation Format: Cynthia X. Ma, Jingqin Luo, Rachel A. Freedman, Timothy Pluard, Julie Nangia, Janice Lu, Frances Valdez-Albini, Melody Cobleigh, Jason Jones, Nancy U. Lin, Eric Winer, P. Kelly Marcom, Shana Thomas, Jill Anderson, Brittney Haas, Kimberly M. Hamann, Richard Bryce, Alshad S. Lalani, Lisa Carey, Matthew Goetz, Feng Gao, Gretchen Kimmick, Mark Pegram, Matthew J. Ellis, Ron Bose. A phase II trial of neratinib (NER) or NER plus fulvestrant (FUL) (N+F) in HER2 mutant, non-amplified (HER2mut) metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Part II of MutHER [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT026.

Predictors of Distant Metastases in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Without Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) predicts decreased distant metastasis. However, most patients do not experience pCR, and other risk factors for distant metastasis after NAC are poorly characterized. This study investigated factors predictive of distant metastasis in TNBC without pCR after NAC.

METHODS

Women with TNBC treated with NAC, surgery, and radiation therapy in 2000 through 2013 were reviewed. Freedom from distant metastasis (FFDM) was compared between patients with and without pCR using the Kaplan-Meier method. In patients without pCR, univariate and multivariable Cox analyses were used to determine factors predictive of distant metastasis.

RESULTS

We identified 153 patients with median follow-up of 4.0 years (range, 0.5-14.0 years). After NAC, 108 had residual disease (pCR, 29%). Five-year FFDM was 98% and 55% in patients with and without pCR, respectively (P<.001). Factors independently predicting FFDM in patients without pCR were pathologic nodal positivity (hazard ratio, 3.08; 95% CI, 1.54-6.14; P=.001) and lymphovascular space invasion (hazard ratio, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.07-3.43; P=.030). Patients with a greater number of factors had worse FFDM; 5-year FFDM was 76.5% for patients with no factors (n=38) versus 54.9% and 27.5% for patients with 1 (n=44) and 2 factors (n=26), respectively (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of pCR after NAC resulted in worse overall survival and FFDM, despite trimodality therapy. In patients with residual disease after NAC, pathologic lymph node positivity and lymphovascular space invasion predicted worse FFDM.

A first-in-human phase 1a/b trial of LY3484356, an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD) in ER+ advanced breast cancer (aBC) and endometrial endometrioid cancer (EEC): Results from the EMBER study

1050

Background: Novel degraders and antagonists of ER are under evaluation in aBC, to overcome both ER mediated resistance and the bioavailability and dosing limitations of fulvestrant, the only approved SERD. ER is also overexpressed in ̃80% of EEC and endocrine therapy (ET) is utilized for these patients (pts). LY3484356, a novel, orally bioavailable SERD with pure antagonistic properties results in sustained inhibition of ER-dependent gene transcription and cell growth. Preclinically, LY3484356 shows favorable efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, including antitumor activity in ESR1 mutants. Here we present the initial clinical data from EMBER, an ongoing first-in-human phase 1a/b trial of this novel agent. Methods: Phase 1a evaluated LY3484356 dose escalation (i3+3 design) in women with ER+, HER2- aBC (≤3 prior therapies for aBC following protocol amendment; prior ET sensitivity) and ER+ EEC (prior platinum therapy). Premenopausal women received a concomitant GnRH agonist. Key endpoints included determination of the recommended phase 2 dose, safety and tolerability, PK, and objective response rate and clinical benefit rate per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of the data cut (November 9, 2020), 28 pts (n = 24 aBC, n = 4 EEC) were enrolled at doses ranging from 200-1200 mg QD. Median age was 59 years (range, 35-80). Median number of prior therapies for aBC was 2 (range, 1-8; 6 pts enrolled prior to protocol amendment had received ≥4 prior therapies), including prior fulvestrant (46%), a CDK4/6 inhibitor (83%), and chemotherapy (33%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mostly grade 1-2, including nausea (32%), fatigue (25%), and diarrhea (18%). The only grade 3 treatment-related AE was diarrhea (n = 1). TEAEs of bradycardia and QTc prolongation were not observed despite intensive central ECG monitoring. Dose-proportional increases in LY3484356 exposures were observed across all evaluated doses and t1/2 was 25-30 hours. At the starting dose level (200 mg QD), unbound LY3484356 exposures exceeded those achieved with fulvestrant. 16 of 28 pts were efficacy evaluable, with the remaining 12 pts ongoing prior to first scan. Among 16 evaluable pts, 11 (8 aBC, 3 EEC) had stable disease (10 pts ongoing), and 5 had progressive disease. RECIST responses were observed after the data cut and will be detailed at the meeting. Plasma ctDNA analysis indicated decreases in mutant allele frequencies, including mutant ESR1 in 9/12 (75%) evaluable pts across all dose levels. Conclusions: LY3484356 QD dosing shows favorable safety and PK properties, along with preliminary efficacy in pts with heavily pretreated ER+ aBC and EEC. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT04188548 .

Evaluation of sensitivity to endocrine therapy index (SET2,3) for response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) and subsequent prognosis

580

Background: Patients (pts) in Cohort A of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 (Alliance) trial of NET for cStage II-III breast cancer were randomized to anastrozole [ANA], letrozole [LET] or exemestane [EXE] for 16-18 weeks (wks). In Cohort B, pts chose between ANA and LET and switched to chemotherapy or surgery if a tumor biopsy after 2-4 wks of NET had Ki67 >10%. Treatments after surgery were not defined by the trial protocol. SET2,3 measures nonproliferation gene expression related to estrogen and progesterone receptors adjusting for a baseline prognostic index that combines clinical tumor and nodal stage and a 4-gene molecular subtype (RNA4) defined by ESR1, PGR, ERBB2 and AURKA. High SET2,3 in a pre-treatment biopsy using cStage information is defined as SET2,3 >1.77. Methods: 379 pts had gene expression data from a research tumor biopsy prior to NET (Agilent 44K microarrays). A bioinformatician blinded to pt treatment and clinical outcomes determined SET2,3. The trial statistician then examined the association between SET2,3 and pharmacodynamic response at 2-4 wks (N=141, Cohort B): Ki67 ≤10% and complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA Ki67 ≤2.7%); pathologic outcomes in pts who completed NET: ypStage 0/1 (N=329, Cohorts A&B), PEPI-0 rate (N=155, Cohort B); and event-free survival (EFS) post-registration (N=244, Cohorts A&B). We used Fisher’s exact tests to assess whether responses, and Cox modeling to evaluate whether EFS, differed with respect to SET2,3 status. Results: High SET2,3 in 48% of pts (183/379) was associated with older age (median: 66 vs 63 years; p=0.012); cStage II (95% vs 75%; p <0.001); and pre-NET Ki67 ≤10% (37% vs 20%; p< 0.001) in pts with low SET2,3. In Cohort B, pts with high SET2,3 had a higher rate of pharmacodynamic response in their tumor at wk 2-4 than pts with low SET2,3 (Table). In the subset of Cohort B pts with wk 2-4 Ki67 ≤10%, pre-treatment SET2,3 trended numerically higher in pts who achieved PEPI-0 score (p=0.049) but the proportion achieving PEPI-0 did not differ by SET2,3 high/low status (Table). EFS was significantly longer for pts with high SET2,3 than pts with low SET2,3 (HR[H/L]: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.34-0.80; p=0.003). Conclusions: An exploratory analysis of Z1031 data demonstrated that the rate of pharmacodynamic suppression of proliferation by NET at 2-4 wks was greater and EFS was longer for pts with breast cancer expressing high SET2,3 disease than pts with low SET2,3. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org ; Clinical trial information: NCT00265759. [Table: see text]

Clinical and pathological characteristics of breast cancer with resected brain metastasis

1089

Background: Breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) has poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Studies have shown that BCBM may differ from their matched primary tumors in receptor subtypes and genomic characteristics. However, studies have been limited by the tissue availability of BCBM. Taking advantage of our institutional database of resected BCBM with matched primary breast samples, this study aimed to investigate the clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with resected BCBM. Methods: We performed retrospective chart review for all breast cancer patients who had resected BCBM samples at our institution over the last 20 years. Hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status of the primary breast and BCBM samples, location of BCBM, and extracranial metastases at time of BCBM diagnosis were categorized. Overall survival (OS) from time of BCBM diagnosis was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression interval and receptor subtype switching from primary diagnosis to brain metastasis were computed and compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher’s exact test, respectively. Results: Eighty-six patients were included in this study (median age at time of BCBM diagnosis 54.3 [range 28.3-84.0] years, median follow up 26.0 months). These included 47 HR+, 15 HER2+, 20 triple negative (TN), 4 unknown subtype breast samples, and 42 HR+, 18 HER2+, 17 TN and 9 unknown subtype brain samples. OS was significantly shorter in patients with TN compared to HR+ or HER2+ subtype, whether the TN status was in the primary breast tumor (median 20.5 vs 34.0 months, p = 0.04, thresholded at year 2) or in the brain metastasis (median 16.0 vs 34.0 months, p = 0.02, thresholded at year 2). No significant difference in OS was observed between HR+ and HER2+ groups. There was no significant difference in the progression interval from primary diagnosis to brain metastasis among receptor subtypes. From primary tumor to brain metastasis, receptor subtype switching occurred in 10 out of 73 patients (13.7%) for estrogen, 20 out of 70 (28.6%) for progesterone (PR), and 6 out of 72 (8.3%) for HER2. Receptor subtype switching did not significantly correlate with OS. Presence of extracranial metastases at time of BCBM diagnosis corresponded to significantly lower OS compared to no extracranial metastasis (16.5 vs 36.0 months, p = 0.01). No significant difference in OS was observed between patients with cerebral vs cerebellar brain metastases. Conclusions: These data indicate that patients with TN BCBM disease have the worst overall survival among all receptor subtypes. Metastases in extracranial sites at time of BCBM diagnosis significantly decreased survival. Location of the brain metastasis and receptor subtype switching from primary diagnosis to BCBM, which was relatively infrequent outside of the PR group, did not significantly correlate with OS in this limited data set.

Uncovering the differential impact of ESR1 and PIK3CA codon variants on the clinical phenotype of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) through circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS)

1033

Background: The exposure to endocrine therapy (ET) can induce the onset of ESR1 gene alterations that have an impact on not only treatment resistance but also clinical phenotype. We previously demonstrated the potential of liquid biopsy in describing the metastatic behavior of MBC. The aim of this study was to explore the different clinical phenotype across the main ESR1 and PIK3CA codon variants. Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 501 MBC patients (pts) characterized for ctDNA through NGS before treatment start at Northwestern University (Chicago, IL), Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA), CRO National Cancer Institute (Aviano, IT) and ASUFC Hospital (Udine, IT) between 2014 and 2020. Associations between clinical characteristics and ESR1 and PIK3CA codon variants were explored through logistic regression corrected for sites and ESR1/ PIK3CA status. Survival was tested through Cox regression both for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Of the total 501 pts, 289 (58%) were diagnosed with hormone-receptor positive (HRpos) MBC, 114 (23%) with HER2-positive MBC, and 93 (19%) with triple-negative MBC. ESR1 mutations were detected in 71 pts (14%) and PIK3CA in 154 pts (31%). The most represented ESR1 gene mutations were found in codons 380 (9%), 536 (23%), 537 (34%), and 538 (34%), while alterations in codons 542 (19%), 545 (21%), and 1047 (60%) were the most common for PIK3CA. As expected, ESR1 mutations were found only in HRpos pts previously exposed to ET (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed for PIK3CA. After multivariable analysis, ESR1mutations were confirmed as highly associated with liver and bone metastases (OR 3.31, P < 0.001 and OR 5.09, P < 0.001). Moreover, an association with lung (OR 2.07, P = 0.010) was observed in this cohort. After multivariable analysis, codon 537 mutations were associated with bone involvement (OR 12.97, P = 0.014), codon 538 with liver (OR 4.73, P = 0.010), and codon 536 with soft tissue (OR 5.84, P = 0.006) and liver (OR 4.06, P = 0.048). PIK3CA mutations were associated with bone (OR 2.61, P < 0.001) and lung metastases (OR 1.62, P = 0.044). Specifically, codon 1047 mutations were the primary driver (OR 3.14, P = 0.001 and OR 1.97, P = 0.019). In HRpos MBC, baseline mutations in ESR1 codon 537 and 538 had a negative impact on OS (HR 3.73, P < 0.010 and HR 2.99, P < 0.021), while 380 and 536 had a negative impact on PFS (HR 18.98, P < 0.001 and HR 2.60, P = 0.015). No impact was observed across PIK3CA gene variants. Conclusions: This study showed the different tumor biology across ESR1 and PIK3CA gene variants. As novel selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDS) and PIK3CA inhibitors are gaining momentum as new ET options in MBC, these results highlight the future pivotal role of ctDNA NGS in refining tumor biology characterization.

Molecular characterization of the Ras-MAPK pathway in metastatic breast cancer

1034

Background: The Ras-MAPK pathway is a known driver of tumorigenesis and therapeutic target in a variety of cancers. Alterations in this pathway have been linked to decreased tumor immunogenicity. However, molecular alterations in the Ras-MAPK are rare in breast cancer (BC) and their clinical implications remain unclear. As mutational status does not accurately correlate with transcriptional activity, a MAPK pathway activity score (MPAS, Wagle et al., 2018, npj Precision Medicine) is indicative of MAPK activation and correlates with response to MEK (MEKi) or BRAF inhibition (BRAFi). Our goal was to determine the frequency of molecular alterations in the Ras-MAPK and correlate to MAPK pathway activation in MBC. Methods: A total of 6464 BC samples underwent comprehensive molecular profiling at Caris Life Sciences. Analyses included next generation sequencing of DNA (592 Gene Panel, NextSeq; whole exome sequencing, NovaSEQ), RNA (NovaSeq, whole transcriptome sequencing, WTS) and IHC. MPAS and immune cell fraction (ICF, Quantiseq) were assessed by mRNA analysis. Wilcoxon, Fisher’s exact, or Dunnett’s test was used. All results shown were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Results: The predominant alteration of RAS genes was mutation followed by amplification, no fusions were detected (Table). Only 0.17% of all tumors harbor KRAS G12c mutations. The highest MPAS scores were found in KRAS mutants (mut), HRAS mut (Q61, G1213), BRAF V600 (class 1) mut and NRAS Q61 mut (Table) and therefore used to define Genomic MAPK Activated Tumors (GMAT). GMAT compared to wild type (WT) had significantly higher PD-L1 expression, TMB and MSI/dMMR. GMAT had less B cells (3.4% vs 4.4%), more M1 Macrophages (4.4% vs 3.4%) and neutrophils (5.5% vs 2.7%) regardless of HR status but less NK cells (2.3% s 3.0%), MSDCs (0.9% vs 3.0%) only in HR- tumors with respect to WT. GMAT tumors showed more frequent mutation rate (mr) of PIK3CA (HR+: 57.3% vs 40%; HR-: 41.9% vs 17.9%). HR+ tumors had a higher mr of MSH3 (11.8% vs 0.6%) while HR- tumors had higher mr of PIK3R1 (9.6% vs 3.8%), RhoA (5.3% vs 0.5%), DNA repair genes (TERT, 18.2% vs 1.0%; ARID1A, 18.2% vs 5.9%; PRKDC, 3.9% vs 0) and lower TP53 mr (54.5% vs 85.8%) compared to WT. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that RAS, BRAF and MEK1 mutations are associated with MAPK pathway activation indicative of benefit from MEKi or BRAFi. GMAT warrant further investigation for combinations targeting the RAS-MAPK pathway and immune checkpoint inhibitors.[Table: see text]

Clinical Outcomes With Abemaciclib After Prior CDK4/6 Inhibitor Progression in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Experience

BACKGROUND

Inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6i) are widely used as first-line therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+ MBC). Although abemaciclib monotherapy is also FDA-approved for treatment of disease progression on endocrine therapy, there is limited insight into the clinical activity of abemaciclib after progression on prior CDK4/6i.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified patients with HR+ MBC from 6 cancer centers in the United States who received abemaciclib after disease progression on prior CDK4/6i, and abstracted clinical features, outcomes, toxicity, and predictive biomarkers.

RESULTS

In the multicenter cohort, abemaciclib was well tolerated after a prior course of CDK4/6i (palbociclib)-based therapy; a minority of patients discontinued abemaciclib because of toxicity without progression (9.2%). After progression on palbociclib, most patients (71.3%) received nonsequential therapy with abemaciclib (with ≥1 intervening non-CDK4/6i regimens), with most receiving abemaciclib with an antiestrogen agent (fulvestrant, 47.1%; aromatase inhibitor, 27.6%), and the remainder receiving abemaciclib monotherapy (19.5%). Median progression-free survival for abemaciclib in this population was 5.3 months and median overall survival was 17.2 months, notably similar to results obtained in the MONARCH-1 study of abemaciclib monotherapy in heavily pretreated HR+/HER2-negative CDK4/6i-naïve patients. A total of 36.8% of patients received abemaciclib for ≥6 months. There was no relationship between the duration of clinical benefit while on palbociclib and the subsequent duration of treatment with abemaciclib. RB1, ERBB2, and CCNE1 alterations were noted among patients with rapid progression on abemaciclib.

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of patients with HR+ MBC continue to derive clinical benefit from abemaciclib after progression on prior palbociclib. These results highlight the need for future studies to confirm molecular predictors of cross-resistance to CDK4/6i therapy and to better characterize the utility of abemaciclib after disease progression on prior CDK4/6i.

Cisplatin +/- rucaparib after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative or BRCA mutated breast cancer

Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy have a high risk of recurrence. We tested the impact of DNA-damaging chemotherapy alone or with PARP inhibition in this high-risk population. Patients with TNBC or deleterious BRCA mutation (TNBC/BRCAmut) who had >2 cm of invasive disease in the breast or persistent lymph node (LN) involvement after neoadjuvant therapy were assigned 1:1 to cisplatin alone or with rucaparib. Germline mutations were identified with BROCA analysis. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) with 80% power to detect an HR 0.5. From Feb 2010 to May 2013, 128 patients were enrolled. Median tumor size at surgery was 1.9 cm (0-11.5 cm) with 1 (0-38) involved LN; median Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) score was 2.6. Six patients had known deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations at study entry, but BROCA identified deleterious mutations in 22% of patients with available samples. Toxicity was similar in both arms. Despite frequent dose reductions (21% of patients) and delays (43.8% of patients), 73% of patients completed planned cisplatin. Rucaparib exposure was limited with median concentration 275 (82-4694) ng/mL post-infusion on day 3. The addition of rucaparib to cisplatin did not increase 2-year DFS (54.2% cisplatin vs. 64.1% cisplatin + rucaparib; P = 0.29). In the high-risk post preoperative TNBC/BRCAmut setting, the addition of low-dose rucaparib did not improve 2-year DFS or increase the toxicity of cisplatin. Genetic testing was underutilized in this high-risk population.

Cancer-associated exportin-6 upregulation inhibits the transcriptionally repressive and anticancer effects of nuclear profilin-1

Aberrant expression of nuclear transporters and deregulated subcellular localization of their cargo proteins are emerging as drivers and therapeutic targets of cancer. Here, we present evidence that the nuclear exporter exportin-6 and its cargo profilin-1 constitute a functionally important and frequently deregulated axis in cancer. Exportin-6 upregulation occurs in numerous cancer types and is associated with poor patient survival. Reducing exportin-6 level in breast cancer cells triggers antitumor effects by accumulating nuclear profilin-1. Mechanistically, nuclear profilin-1 interacts with eleven-nineteen-leukemia protein (ENL) within the super elongation complex (SEC) and inhibits the ability of the SEC to drive transcription of numerous pro-cancer genes including MYC. XPO6 and MYC are positively correlated across diverse cancer types including breast cancer. Therapeutically, exportin-6 loss sensitizes breast cancer cells to the bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) inhibitor JQ1. Thus, exportin-6 upregulation is a previously unrecognized cancer driver event by spatially inhibiting nuclear profilin-1 as a tumor suppressor.