Neratinib + fulvestrant + trastuzumab for HR-positive, HER2-negative, HER2-mutant metastatic breast cancer: outcomes and biomarker analysis from the SUMMIT trial

BACKGROUND

HER2 mutations are targetable alterations in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In the SUMMIT basket study, patients with HER2-mutant MBC received neratinib monotherapy, neratinib + fulvestrant, or neratinib + fulvestrant + trastuzumab (N + F + T). We report results from 71 patients with HR+, HER2-mutant MBC, including 21 (seven in each arm) from a randomized substudy of fulvestrant versus fulvestrant + trastuzumab (F + T) versus N + F + T.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with HR+ HER2-negative MBC with activating HER2 mutation(s) and prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) therapy received N + F + T (oral neratinib 240 mg/day with loperamide prophylaxis, intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg on days 1, 15, and 29 of cycle 1 then q4w, intravenous trastuzumab 8 mg/kg then 6 mg/kg q3w) or F + T or fulvestrant alone. Those whose disease progressed on F + T or fulvestrant could cross-over to N + F + T. Efficacy endpoints included investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (RECIST v1.1), duration of response, and progression-free survival (PFS). Plasma and/or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were collected at baseline; plasma was collected during and at end of treatment. Extracted DNA was analyzed by next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

ORR for 57 N + F + T-treated patients was 39% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26% to 52%); median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI 6.0-15.1 months). No responses occurred in fulvestrant- or F + T-treated patients; responses in patients crossing over to N + F + T supported the requirement for neratinib in the triplet. Responses were observed in patients with ductal and lobular histology, 1 or ≥1 HER2 mutations, and co-occurring HER3 mutations. Longitudinal circulating tumor DNA sequencing revealed acquisition of additional HER2 alterations, and mutations in genes including PIK3CA, enabling further precision targeting and possible re-response.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefit of N + F + T for HR+ HER2-mutant MBC after progression on CDK4/6is is clinically meaningful and, based on this study, N + F + T has been included in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment guidelines. SUMMIT has improved our understanding of the translational implications of targeting HER2 mutations with neratinib-based therapy.

Abstract P4-07-45: Treatment strategies for advanced triple negative breast cancer patients as per routine clinical practice: analysis from the observational study GEICAM/2014-03 (RegistEM)

Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is well known for its more aggressive course and poorer prognosis compared to other BC subtypes. RegistEM study provides real world data to understand the distribution of BC subtypes in the advanced setting, being its primary objective. Biological samples collection is part of its procedures. This is a non-interventional cohort study and 1,907 patients (pts) have been enrolled up to now (females and males) with advanced BC (ABC), diagnosed from Jan-2016 to Dec-2019, either after recurrence or as first BC diagnosis, in 38 Spanish sites. These pts will be followed for at least 5 years.

Methods: In the current analysis (cut-off date 08/April/2022, database ongoing), we describe characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes, including comparison between recurrent and de novo disease, of 157 pts with advanced TNBC included in the RegistEM study. Those pts represent the 10% of pts available in the database at the cut-off date and with ABC diagnosis up to December 2018 (n=1559). The BC clinical subtypes were histologically confirmed on the most recent tumor lesion (metastatic [M] or primary BC) before starting with the 1st-line therapy.

Results: At first ABC diagnosis, 73% pts had recurrent early BC (EBC), 26% de novo MBC and 1% unresectable locally ABC (ULABC). Median age was 57 years (range 30-88), all pts were women, 98% Caucasian and 65% postmenopausal. Family history of BC and/or ovarian cancer was reported in 37% pts, and a hereditary-risk genetic test was performed in 59 of 147 pts. Germline BRCA1/2 and TP53 were the most frequently mutated genes, 21% (6/28) and 47% (8/17) pts, respectively. Visceral involvement was present in 69% pts (similar between recurrent EBC and de novo ABC, although brain metastases were only present in the recurrent EBC group), and ≤ 2 metastatic locations in 59%. In 61% (70/115) pts with recurrent EBC, the subtype was assessed in metastatic lesions, and 39 pts of them also had TN subtype in primary BC. In terms of the most frequent therapies by line: 1) 1st-line: chemotherapy (CT) (60%) and CT/biological therapy (BT) (39%). Of the 87 pts with CT alone, monotherapy was the preferred option in 57% pts (capecitabine 25%, taxanes 16%, and eribulin or vinorelbine, 5% each). Bevacizumab was the most frequent BT (79%) combined with CT (single agent in 56% pts, mostly taxanes and capecitabine). Progressive disease (PD) was reported in 85% pts (similar in pts with both recurrent and de novo MBC or ULABC); 2) 2nd-line: CT (79%) (monotherapy capecitabine, eribulin, taxanes) and CT/BT (17%) (CT-containing bevacizumab 82%). Progression was reported in 92% pts; 3) 3rd-line: CT (90%) (eribulin 33%, platinum-based 25%) and CT/BT (9%) (CT-containing bevacizumab 67%). Progression was reported in 88% pts. At database cut-off date, death was reported in 133 (85%) pts, mainly because of PD. Overall survival (OS) was similar between both groups, recurrent and de novo MBC.

Conclusion: In this population of Spanish TNBC pts with ABC, three quarters had recurrent disease. De novo ABC pts had a higher proportion of non-visceral metastases, with absence of brain involvement at the first diagnosis. Single-agent CT and CT plus bevacizumab were the most frequent therapies, and OS was similar between recurrent and de novo MBC pts, although numerically higher in the later group.

Abstract P4-07-38: Real-world data of Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) patients with HER2-positivity before the second-line therapy: data from the observational study GEICAM/2014-03 (RegistEM)

Background: Over the last years, the treatment of HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) has been changing because of the development of new anti-HER2 agents. In the current analysis, we describe the features, treatment patterns, progression-free survivall (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes of BC pts with HER2 + (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+ or IHC 2+ and in situ hybridization [ISH]+), following ASCO/CAP 2018 guidelines in the most recent tumor lesion before the 2nd-line.

Methods: The RegistEM study is an ongoing BC registry study that is providing prospective data from around 1900 pts diagnosed with advanced BC (ABC) between 01/Jan/2016 and 31/Dec/2019, in 38 Spanish institutions from GEICAM network. In this analysis, 296 HER2+ BC pts have been included, representing the 18% of pts available in the database at the cut-off date (08/Apr/2022), with ABC diagnosis before 2019 (n=1559).

Results: At first ABC diagnosis, 58% (n=173) pts had recurrent disease (>36 months [mo] from initial BC diagnosis in 62%), 41% (n=120) de novo metastatic BC and 1% (n=3) unresectable locally ABC (ULABC); the median age was 58 years, 68% were postmenopausal and there was only 1 male pt. From total 296 pts, 66% had hormone receptor expression [HR+]; the BC subtype was assessed in tumor tissue from the breast (58%) or a metastatic lesion (34%), and in 8% pts, HER2 positivity was observed after the 1st-line. Family history of BC and/or ovarian cancer was reported in 28% pts, and a hereditary-risk genetic test was performed in 26% pts (n=74/282). Germline BRCA1/2 and TP53 genetic testing were reported in 14 and 26 pts respectively, being mutated in 3/14 (21%) and 5/26 (19%) pts. Bone (50%), lymph nodes (49%), liver (35%), lung (31%), soft tissue (8%) and central nervous system (CNS), mostly in brain (8%), were the main metastatic sites. One hundred pts were diagnosed with CNS metastases: 24 at baseline, 48 during the 1st-line and 28 in subsequent lines. Additional data according to HR status and type of ABC are detailed in the table below, showing a worse prognosis in absence of HR expression. In HR- pts, bone metastases were less frequent and lymph nodes metastases more frequent compared to HR+ pts. Visceral disease was present in 69% (66% in HR+ and 74% in HR-; non-statistically significant) pts and ≈80% had ≤3 (54%, ≤2) locations involved. The most common therapies by line were: 1) 1st-line: Chemotherapy (CT) + biological therapy (BT) (38%), CT + BT+ endocrine therapy (ET) (35%), and ET + BT [11%]; 2) 2nd-line: BT (55%), CT + BT (20%) and ET + BT (15%); 3) 3rd-line: CT + BT (49%) and BT (31%). The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) progression-free survival (PFS) on 1st, 2nd and 3rd line was 18 (15-22), 8 (7-9) and 6 (5-8) mo, respectively. The median (95% CI) overall survival (OS) from ABC diagnosis was 43 (40-49) mo. These survival outcomes were higher in HR+ pts, however, the differences were only statistically significant in OS (p=0.006; log-rank). At database cut-off date, death was reported in 47% pts.

Conclusions: In spite of the anti-HER2 therapies administered in the advanced setting, the HR expression is a relevant prognostic factor, with a clinically and statistically significant impact in OS, improving the outcomes of HR+ pts.

Neratinib plus fulvestrant plus trastzuzumab (N+F+T) for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative, HER2-mutant metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Outcomes and biomarker analysis from the SUMMIT trial

1028

Background: N is an oral, irreversible pan-HER TKI with activity against HER2 mutations. Genomic analyses from the SUMMIT MBC cohort following N±F suggest that resistance to N may occur via mutant allele amplification or secondary HER2 mutations. Adding T to N+F in SUMMIT showed encouraging durable responses in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2-mutant MBC and prior CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). Methods: SUMMIT (NCT01953926) enrolled pts with HR+, HER2-negative MBC with activating HER2 mutation(s) and prior CDK4/6i. Pts received N+F+T (oral N 240 mg/d with loperamide prophylaxis, im F 500 mg d1&15 of cycle 1 then q4w, iv T 8 mg/kg initially then 6 mg/kg q3w). During the small, randomized portion of the trial, pts received N+F+T, F+T or F (1:1:1 ratio). Pts randomized to F+T or F could crossover to N+F+T at progression. Efficacy endpoints: investigator-assessed ORR and CBR (RECIST v1.1); DOR; best overall response. Pre-treatment tumor tissue was centrally assessed retrospectively by next-generation sequencing. ctDNA from patient samples was assessed by NGS. Results: SUMMIT has completed enrolment; we report efficacy from 45 pts in the N+F+T cohort, plus 10 pts who progressed on F (n=6) or F+T (n=4) and crossed over to N+F+T (Table). HER2 allelic variants in the 45 N+F+T pts and ORR (%) (pts may have >1 mutation) were: V777L (n=6, 50%), L755S/P (n=15, 40%), S310F (n=4, 50%), exon 20 insertion (n=11, 36%), other KD missense (n=6, 33%), TMD missense (n=2, 0%), exon 19 deletion (n=1, 0%). Conclusions: N+F+T is a promising combination for HR+, HER2-mutated MBC with prior exposure to CDK4/6i, across a range of activating HER2 mutations. Results from the upcoming Apr 2022 data cut, including biomarkers, safety, mechanisms of acquired resistance, and preclinical mechanism of N+T, will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01953926. [Table: see text]

Abstract GS4-10: Neratinib + fulvestrant + trastuzumab for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-mutant metastatic breast cancer and neratinib + trastuzumab for triple-negative disease: Latest updates from the SUMMIT trial

Background: HER2 mutations are oncogenic drivers in a subset of metastatic breast cancers (MBC). Neratinib (N) is an oral, irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor with preclinical and clinical activity against HER2 mutations. Genomic analyses from paired biopsies following N ± fulvestrant (F) suggest that resistance to N may occur via amplification of the mutant allele or by acquisition of secondary HER2 mutations. Addition of trastuzumab (T) to N+F showed encouraging clinical activity with durable responses in the SUMMIT trial in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-mutant MBC, including patients (pts) who had previously received cyclin-dependent kinase 4 & 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) [Jhaveri et al. SABCS 2020]. On the basis of these findings, and in order to better understand the contribution of N to the activity of the N+F+T combination, SUMMIT has recently been expanded to include a randomized Simon 2-stage comparison of N+F+T vs. F+T vs. F in pts with HR+, HER2-mutated, HER2-negative MBC who were exposed to CDK4/6i. Enrollment for stage 1 is now complete (N+F+T, n=7; F+T, n=7; F, n=7), and results will be forthcoming once the data are mature. Here we report updated findings from the breast cancer cohorts of the SUMMIT trial for which data are currently available. Methods: The phase 2 SUMMIT trial (NCT01953926) enrolled pts with HR+, HER2-negative MBC whose tumors harbored activating HER2 mutation(s) identified by genomic sequencing. Prior to starting the randomized portion of the trial, these patients were enrolled in a non-randomized cohort and received N+F+T (oral N 240 mg/d, i.m. F 500 mg d1&15 of cycle 1 then q4w, i.v. T 8 mg/kg initially then 6 mg/kg q3w). Following initiation of the randomized portion of the trial, these pts received N+F+T, F+T or F (1:1:1 ratio; dose schedules as above). Pts with HER2-mutant triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) were enrolled in a non-randomized cohort and received N+T (dose schedules as above). Loperamide prophylaxis was mandatory during the first 2 treatment cycles. There was no restriction on the number of prior lines of systemic therapy for MBC. Efficacy endpoints: investigator-assessed objective response rate and clinical benefit rate (RECIST v1.1 or other defined criteria); duration of response; best overall response. Results: Prior to enrolling the randomized cohort, 24 pts with HR+, HER2-mutated MBC who had previously received CDK4/6i were enrolled in the non-randomized cohort and received N+F+T, and 17 pts with HER2-mutant TNBC were enrolled and received N+T, as of 18-Jun-2021. Data for randomized pts are not yet mature. HER2 allelic variants across both cohorts (pts may have >1 mutation): kinase domain hotspots (n=26); exon-20 insertion (n=9); extracellular domain hotspot (n=4); exon-19 deletion (n=1); transmembrane domain missense (n=1); kinase domain non-hotspot (n=2). Efficacy findings are reported in the Table. Diarrhea was the most commonly reported adverse event: N+F+T (non-randomized cohort), 96%; N+T (TNBC cohort), 94%. No grade 4 diarrhea was reported.

Conclusions: N+F+T is a promising combination for pts with HR+, HER2-mutated MBC with prior exposure to CDK4/6 inhibitors. N+T also showed encouraging activity in HER2-mutated TNBC. The first results from the randomized comparison of N+F+T vs. F+T vs. F in pts with HR+, HER2-mutated MBC (Simon stage 1 analysis) will be presented at the meeting.

Table: Efficacy findingsHR+, HER2-mutated, HER2-non-amplified MBCHER2-mutant TNBCN+F+T (n=24)N+T (n=17)Confirmed objective response,a n (%)11 (46)5 (29)CR0 (0)1 (6)PR11 (46)4 (24)ORR, % (95% CI)46 (26–67)29 (10–56)Best overall response, n (%)13 (54)7 (41)CR0 (0)1 (6)PR13 (54)6 (35)Best overall response rate, % (95% CI)54 (33–74)41 (18–67)Medianb DOR, months (95% CI)14.4 (6.4–NR)NRClinical benefit, n (%)14 (58)6 (35)CR or PR11 (46)5 (29)SD ≥24 weeks3 (13)1 (6)CBR,b % (95% CI)58 (37–78)35 (14–62)aORR defined as either a CR or PR confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the response criteria are met; bCBR defined as confirmed CR or PR or SD for ≥24 weeks. Note: Tumor response is based on investigator tumor assessments per RECIST v1.1 for HR+, HER2-mutated cohort, and RECIST v1.1 or modified PERCIST for HER2-mutated TNBC cohort. CBR, clinical benefit rate; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; DOR, duration of response; F, fulvestrant; HR+, hormone receptor-positive; MBC, metastatic breast cancer; N, neratinib; NR, not reached; ORR, objective response rate; PERCIST, Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors; PR, partial response; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; SD, stable disease; T, trastuzumab, TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.

Citation Format: Komal Jhaveri, Haeseong Park, James Waisman, Jonathan W Goldman, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Valentina Boni, Barbara Haley, Ingrid A Mayer, Adam Brufsky, Eddy S Yang, José A García-Sáenz, François-Clement Bidard, John Crown, Bo Zhang, Aimee Frazier, Irmina Diala, Lisa D Eli, Brian Barnett, Hans Wildiers. Neratinib + fulvestrant + trastuzumab for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-mutant metastatic breast cancer and neratinib + trastuzumab for triple-negative disease: Latest updates from the SUMMIT trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-10.

Genomic and Transcriptomic Analyses of Breast Cancer Primaries and Matched Metastases in AURORA, the Breast International Group (BIG) Molecular Screening Initiative

AURORA aims to study the processes of relapse in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) by performing multi-omics profiling on paired primary tumors and early-course metastases. Among 381 patients (primary tumor and metastasis pairs: 252 targeted gene sequencing, 152 RNA sequencing, 67 single nucleotide polymorphism arrays), we found a driver role for GATA1 and MEN1 somatic mutations. Metastases were enriched in ESR1, PTEN, CDH1, PIK3CA, and RB1 mutations; MDM4 and MYC amplifications; and ARID1A deletions. An increase in clonality was observed in driver genes such as ERBB2 and RB1. Intrinsic subtype switching occurred in 36% of cases. Luminal A/B to HER2-enriched switching was associated with TP53 and/or PIK3CA mutations. Metastases had lower immune score and increased immune-permissive cells. High tumor mutational burden correlated to shorter time to relapse in HR+/HER2- cancers. ESCAT tier I/II alterations were detected in 51% of patients and matched therapy was used in 7%. Integration of multi-omics analyses in clinical practice could affect treatment strategies in MBC. SIGNIFICANCE: The AURORA program, through the genomic and transcriptomic analyses of matched primary and metastatic samples from 381 patients with breast cancer, coupled with prospectively collected clinical data, identified genomic alterations enriched in metastases and prognostic biomarkers. ESCAT tier I/II alterations were detected in more than half of the patients.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2659.

Nuclear FGFR1 Regulates Gene Transcription and Promotes Antiestrogen Resistance in ER+ Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

FGFR1 overexpression has been associated with endocrine resistance in ER⁺ breast cancer. We found FGFR1 localized in the nucleus of breast cancer cells in primary tumors resistant to estrogen suppression. We investigated a role of nuclear FGFR1 on gene transcription and antiestrogen resistance.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Tumors from patients treated with letrozole were subjected to Ki67 and FGFR1 IHC. MCF7 cells were transduced with FGFR1(SP-)(NLS) to promote nuclear FGFR1 overexpression. FGFR1 genomic activity in ER⁺/FGFR1-amplified breast cancer cells ± FOXA1 siRNA or ± the FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) erdafitinib was examined by chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). The nuclear and chromatin-bound FGFR1 interactome was investigated by mass spectrometry (MS).

RESULTS

High nuclear FGFR1 expression in ER⁺ primary tumors positively correlated with post-letrozole Ki67 values. Nuclear FGFR1 overexpression influenced gene transcription and promoted resistance to estrogen suppression and to fulvestrant in vivo. A gene expression signature induced by nuclear FGFR1 correlated with shorter survival in the METABRIC cohort of patients treated with antiestrogens. ChIP-Seq revealed FGFR1 occupancy at transcription start sites, overlapping with active transcription histone marks. MS analysis of the nuclear FGFR1 interactome identified phosphorylated RNA-Polymerase II and FOXA1, with FOXA1 RNAi impairing FGFR1 recruitment to chromatin. Treatment with erdafitinib did not impair nuclear FGFR1 translocation and genomic activity.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest nuclear FGFR1 contributes to endocrine resistance by modulating gene transcription in ER⁺ breast cancer. Nuclear FGFR1 activity was unaffected by FGFR TKIs, thus supporting the development of treatment strategies to inhibit nuclear FGFR1 in ER+/FGFR1 overexpressing breast cancer.

CCNE1 mRNA and cyclin E1 protein expression as predictive biomarkers for efficacy of palbociclib plus fulvestrant versus capecitabine in the phase III PEARL study

1014

Background: The randomized PEARL trial found no superiority of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy over capecitabine in patients (pts) with metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer resistant to prior aromatase inhibitors (Martin M, Ann Oncol 2020). Gene expression analysis showed high CCNE1 mRNA ( CCNE1) conferring relative resistance to palbociclib in the PALOMA-3 trial (Turner N, JCO 2019), but further validation is needed. Cyclin E1 protein (cyclin E1) expression in this context has not been studied in randomized trials. We explored CCNE1 and cyclin E1 as predictive biomarkers in tumor samples from the PEARL study. Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embeded tumor samples were retrieved from pts enrolled in PEARL cohort 2 (palbociclib (PAL) + fulvestrant (FUL) vs capecitabine (CAPE)). We measured CCNE1 using the HTG EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarker Panel (HTG Molecular Diagnostics). Cyclin E1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed using specific mouse monoclonal antibody HE12 (Abcam) and scored as percentage of invasive nuclei stained (0-100%). CCNE1 and cyclin E1 correlations were explored using Pearson coefficients. Cox regression models were used for progression free-survival (PFS) analyses using expression levels split by median, to define high ( > median values) vs. low expression. Site of disease and prior chemotherapy were used as confounders in multivariate models. Results: Analyses were conducted in 219 pts (47% receiving PAL + FUL and 53% CAPE) with available tumors, with the analysed patients representative of the overall study. Most samples were from the archival primary (72%), obtained > 5 years before this analysisº (74%). CCNE1 and cyclin E1 were only moderately correlated (r = 0.5). Median CCNE1 was higher in metastatic vs primary (7.37 vs 6.94, p < 0.01), and in luminal B and non-luminal subtypes compared to luminal A (p < 0.001). In patients with high CCNE1 expression, median PFS on CAPE was 10.35 and PAL + FUL was 5.68 (HR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.02-2.59, p = 0.042). In patients with low CCNE1 expression, median PFS on CAPE was 9.43 and PAL + FUL was 8.97 (adjusted HR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.59-1.48, p = 0.762, interaction p = 0.072). Median cyclin E1 protein was higher in luminal B and non-luminal subtypes compared to luminal A (p < 0.01). Cyclin E1 protein expression was not predictive of treatment effect (high cyclin E1 expression CAPE vs PAL + FUL HR = 1.17, low cyclin E1 expression CAPE vs PAL + FUL HR = 1.21, interaction p = 0.977). Conclusions: High tumor CCNE1 mRNA expression identified patients with relative resistance to palbociclib plus fulvestrant, validating prior observations although without statistical significance for interaction. Assessment of Cyclin E1 protein expression did not show predictive value. Investigation treatments to enhance CDK4/6 inhibitor efficacy in tumors with high CCNE1 expression is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02028507 .

MamaPred: A new and innovative approach to determine recurrence risk in HR+/HER2- early-stage breast cancer using HTG EdgeSeq technology

558

Background: Genomic platforms, such as Mammaprint (Agendia) (MP) and OncoType (Genomic Health) (OT), have been validated to determine the risk of relapse in therapeutic decision-making in early-stage hormone receptor positive (HR+), epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative breast cancer (BC). Discordances in risk allocation between these platforms affect up to 30% of patients. This study aims to develop the MamaPred test to improve the diagnostic performance of recurrence risk in HR+/HER2- early-stage BC. Methods: A total of 606 HR+/HER2- early-stage BC previously tested with OT [n = 287; Low Risk (LR) = 165, Intermediate Risk (IR) = 103 and High Risk (HR) = 19] and MP (n = 319; LR = 217 and HR = 102) were included. A retrospective independent series of 144 HR+/HER2- early-stage BC [median follow-up: 10.53 years (range: 3.1-23.1 yrs); age (median = 62.9 yrs (33-89 yrs); systemic relapse 10.5% (n = 15)] was used as validation set.The expression levels of 2560 cancer-related mRNAs were evaluated from one 5 μm thin-section of a FFPE block (15 mm2 tumor area) using the Oncology Biomarker Panel (OBP) and the HTG EdgeSeq System (HTG Molecular Diagnostics. Inc) and quantified by NGS on a NextSeq550 sequencer (Illumina). A predictive model was built from normalized and logarithmically transformed values (rescaled to [0, 1]) using as response a binary meta-variable constructed by taking the values -1 (for LR of MP and OT together the OT IR) and 1 (for HR MP and OT). Differential expression, GSEA and visualization were performed with DESeq2, gage and pathview packages respectively in R v4.0.1. Results: MamaPred consists of a logistic regression classifier with an elastic net penalty (mix of L1 and L2 priors as regularizer) where the mixing parameter is optimized along with regularization strength by selecting the ones that minimize the area under the precision and recall curve over a validation split for each training fold. Metrics of MamaPred were: balanced accuracy, 80.5%; Kappa, 0.562; specificity, 80.7%; and NPV, 91.4%. GSE analysis on differentially expressed genes (q < 0.1) showed four KEGG pathways overrepresented in HR (p < 0.05): adherens junction, tight junction, glutathione metabolism and focal adhesion; and two underrepresented: DNA replication (p = 0.0765) and pyrimidine metabolism (p = 0.086).The prognostic prediction of MamaPred was validated on the independent retrospective series, distant disease-free survival for HR and LR being 88.63% (95% IC: 78.72%-99.78%) and 98.1% (95% IC: 95.6%-100%) respectively (p = 0.00603). Correlation between the probabilities assigned to any given sample and its replicas was extremely high (r > 0.9 p < 1e-5). Conclusions: MamaPred identifies HR+/HER2- early-stage BC patients with high-risk of distant relapse improving the prognostic value of those studies that compare MP and OT, suggesting a more precise risk classification.

Abstract PD1-05: Latest findings from the breast cancer cohort in SUMMIT - a phase 2 ‘basket’ trial of neratinib + trastuzumab + fulvestrant for HER2-mutant, hormone receptor-positive, metastatic breast cancer

Background: HER2 mutations are oncogenic in hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and may confer resistance to prior endocrine therapy but retain sensitivity to neratinib. Neratinib is an oral, irreversible, pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor with clinical activity either as a single agent or in combination with fulvestrant in HER2-mutated, HER2-non-amplified MBC. Genomic analyses suggest that acquired resistance to neratinib can occur via additional HER2 alterations, which may alter HER2-pathway signaling. We investigated whether dual HER2-targeted therapy could improve clinical benefit in a cohort of patients with HER2-mutant, HR+ MBC treated with neratinib + trastuzumab + fulvestrant (N+T+F) from SUMMIT - a phase 2 basket trial (NCT01953926).

Methods: Patients with HR+ MBC with known or suspected pathogenic HER2 mutation(s) identified by genomic sequencing were eligible to receive N+T+F (oral neratinib 240 mg/day, i.v. trastuzumab 8 mg/kg initially followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks, and i.m. fulvestrant 500 mg on days 1&15 of month 1, then on day 1 every 4 weeks). Loperamide prophylaxis was mandatory during the first 2 treatment cycles. There was no restriction on the number of prior lines of systemic treatment for MBC. Efficacy endpoints: confirmed objective response rate and clinical benefit rate (RECIST v1.1); duration of response; progression-free survival.

Results: As of 22-May-2020, 46 patients were enrolled in the N+T+F cohort and received at least 1 dose of study medication (safety population). 14 unique HER2 allelic variants were identified: 8 kinase domain missense; 1 extracellular domain missense; 2 transmembrane domain missense; 2 exon-20 insertion; 1 exon-19 deletion. The most common HER2 mutant variant was L755S (n=15, 33%) Median number of prior systemic regimens for metastatic disease was 4 (range 0-10); 34 (74%) patients had received prior fulvestrant, and 31 (67%) patients had received prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor therapy. 16 (35%) patients had ductal histology, 29 (63%) had lobular carcinoma, and 1 (2%) had mixed ductal and lobular carcinoma. At this time, 30/46 patients had RECIST measurable disease and are efficacy evaluable (ongoing patients who did not have the opportunity for their first post-baseline tumor assessment were excluded); clinical activity - see Table. Diarrhea was the most commonly reported adverse event (80% any grade) with 15 (33%) patients reporting grade 3 diarrhea (no grade 4 diarrhea). 10 patients (22%) had a neratinib dose reduction due to diarrhea but no patients discontinued treatment due to diarrhea.

Conclusions: The combination of N+T+F demonstrated encouraging clinical activity in heavily pre-treated HER2-mutant, HR+, HER2-non-amplified MBC, including patients who had previously received either fulvestrant and/or CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapies. While the rate of grade 3 diarrhea was higher than that observed with single-agent neratinib in SUMMIT, this was manageable through loperamide prophylaxis, and no patients discontinued study treatment due to diarrhea. SUMMIT has recently been amended to evaluate N+T+F, T+F and F (1:1:1 randomization) and continues to enroll patients.

RECIST measurable and efficacy evaluable patients (n=30)Confirmed objective response,a n (%)12 (40)CR0PR12ORR, % (95% CI)40 (23-59)Best overall response, n (%)18 (60)CR0PR18Best overall response rate, % (95% CI)60 (41-77)Medianb DOR, months (95% CI)8.4 (4.1-NE)Clinical benefit,c n (%)14 (47)CR or PR12SD ≥24 weeks2CBR, % (95% CI)47 (28-66)Medianb PFS, months (95% CI)8.3 (4.2-12.5)aORR is defined as either a CR or a PR that is confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response are initially met; bKaplan-Meier analysis; cCBR is defined as confirmed CR or PR or SD for ≥24 weeks; CR, complete response; CBR, clinical benefit rate; DOR, duration of response; NE, not estimable; ORR, objective response rate; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.

Citation Format: Komal Jhaveri, Cristina Saura, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Iben Spanggaard, François-Clement Bidard, Jonathan W Goldman, José A García-Sáenz, Andrés Cervantes, Valentina Boni, John Crown, Adam Brufsky, Sherene Loi, Barbara Haley, Ingrid A Mayer, Stephen Chia, Janice Lu, James Waisman, Noa Efrat Ben-Baruch, Mark E Burkard, Jennifer M Suga, Lucía González-Cortijo, Bruno Perrucci, Feng Xu, Sofia Wong, Jie Zhang, Lisa D Eli, Alshad S Lalani, Hans Wildiers. Latest findings from the breast cancer cohort in SUMMIT - a phase 2 ‘basket’ trial of neratinib + trastuzumab + fulvestrant for HER2-mutant, hormone receptor-positive, metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-05.

Abstract PS5-22: Mutational profile from circulating tumor DNA in triple negative breast cancer: Results from the prospective registry of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer GEICAM/2014-03 (RegistEM)

Background: The RegistEM is a non-interventional cohort study enrolling 1,867 patients (pts) (males or females) with advanced breast cancer diagnosed from January 2016 to December 2019, either after recurrence or as first diagnosis, in 38 Spanish sites. Triple negative BC (TNBC) is clinically defined based on lack of expression of both estrogen and progesterone receptors, and HER2 overexpression, and constitutes approximately 16% of BC cases. It is a particularly proliferative and aggressive BC subtype characterized by higher rates of relapse, greater metastatic potential, and shorter overall survival compared with other BC subtypes. Recent studies have shown hormone receptor status can change from the primary (P) to the recurrence tumor (M) in a proportion of cases, inducing a switch to TNBC in the recurrence, while other remains TNBC both in the P and M setting. This feature might impact survival and treatment options. Methods: We selected TNBC pts from the RegistEM study with ctDNA plasma samples available from the relapse. TNBC pts were classified into 2 groups according to clinical subtype (CS): 1) CS-converted (CS-C), with a discordant phenotype (TN subtype in M but not in P); and 2) CS-non-converted (CS-NC), with TN phenotype in P and M. To compare the mutation profiles of the 2 groups, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed using the AVENIO Expanded ctDNA Analysis Kit (Roche Sequencing Solutions, Inc; 77 genes; SNPs, indels, fusions and CNVs). Genomics alterations at individual level and grouped by pathway were explored for pathogenic and probably pathogenics variants. Genomics findings were correlated with clinicopathological data and outcomes, in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and response to first line chemotherapy treatment. Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox regression model were used to analyze PFS, and Fisher’s test to analyze contingency tables. Bonferroni correction was used for multiple testing. Results: NGS data was available from 32 (17%) TNBC pts; 22 (69%) pts CS-NC and 10 (31%) CS-C. The time from diagnosis to relapse was 29.2 months (m) for CS-NC and 60.2m for CS-C (HR=4.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.59-14.59), p=0.0055; adjusted for confounders: menopausal status, grade, stage). In the metastatic setting, CS-NC had similar PFS than CS-C (8.3m CS-C vs 5.3m CS-NC; HR=1.63, 95% CI (0.71-3.72), p=0.2442). A median of 3 genomic alterations were found, similar in both groups. The most frequent somatic alterations were TP53 (50%), MAP2K1 (25%) and APC (25%). CS-C were enriched for MAP2K1 (60% vs. 9% in CS-NC; p=0.0243). No single genomic alteration was associated with outcome. Forty-percent of tumors harbored at least 1 mutation in PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway (PIK3CA, PIK3R1, AKT1, AKT2, PTEN or MTOR genes), with similar incidence between CS-NC and CS-C. Pts with an altered PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway had poor PFS (3.9m mutant vs 6.7m wild-type (WT); HR=3.02, 95% CI (1.4-6.56), p=0.0033) and a trend to worse response (complete or parcial response and stable disease: 23% mutant vs 77% WT, p=0.1581). CS-C tumors presented an altered MAPK-ERK pathway (mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, MAP2K1 or RAF1 genes) more frequently in comparison to CS-NC (60% vs 23%, p=0.0557), with no differences in response or PFS. Finally tumors with a high mutation allele frequency (≥mean) showed poor PFS (HR=3.64, 95% CI (1.52-8.75), p=0.0038). Conclusion: Analysis of ctDNA reveals diverse mutational spectrum in metastatic TNBC, suggesting that the presence of PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway alterations associates with worse outcome and poor response to standard therapies. The clinical subtype conversions from luminal primary tumor are enriched in MAPK-ERK pathway alterations.

Citation Format: Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Carlos Jara, Sara López-Tarruella, César A Rodríguez, Encarna Adrover, Catalina Falo, Purificación Martínez, Silvia Antolín, Mireia Margeli, Josefina Cruz, Alvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Vega Iranzo, César Gómez-Raposo, Jose Juan Illarramendi, Diego Malón, Jose Luis Alonso, Antonio Antón, Raquel Andrés, Jesús Herranz, Susana Bezares, Rosalía Caballero, Isabel Álvarez, Federico Rojo. Mutational profile from circulating tumor DNA in triple negative breast cancer: Results from the prospective registry of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer GEICAM/2014-03 (RegistEM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-22.

Abstract GS1-06: FGFR1 associates with gene promoters and regulates gene transcription: Implications for endocrine resistance in ER+/FGFR1-amplified breast cancer

Background: FGFR1 amplification occurs in ~ 15% of ER+ breast cancers. In these tumors, nuclear FGFR1 has been shown to interact with DNA, but its role in transcriptional regulation is unclear. Thus, we investigated the genomic role of FGFR1 in ER+/FGFR1-amplified breast cancer. Results: FGFR1 ChIP-Seq detected 4,412 DNA binding sites in CAMA1 ER+/FGFR1-amplified breast cancer cells cultured in estrogen-free conditions. Of these binding sites, 67% were enriched at promoter regions. ChIP-qPCR confirmed FGFR1 binding to several promoter regions in a second ER+/FGFR1-amplified cell line, MDA-MB-134, and a patient derived xenograft, HCI-011. To determine the nuclear FGFR1 interactome, we performed FLAG immunoprecipitation of mixed nuclear and chromatin fractions of CAMA1 cells transduced with a 3XFLAG-FGFR1 plasmid, followed by mass spectrometry (MS) of FLAG antibody pulldowns. MS revealed RNA Polymerase II subunits among the top nuclear FGFR1 interacting proteins. FGFR1 mainly bound Pol II phosphorylated on Ser5 (Pol II S5P), a marker of transcription initiation, in CAMA1, MDA-MB-134 and HCI-011 cell extracts. Pol II S5P ChIP-Seq revealed that 2,867/4,412 (65%) FGFR1 peaks were shared with Pol II S5P. ChIP-Seq also showed that 95% of FGFR1 peaks overlapped with both H3K4me3 and H3K27ac, markers of active transcription. Consistent with these results, RNA-Seq of CAMA1 cells showed that expression of FGFR1-bound genes was markedly higher than non FGFR1-bound genes (p&lt;0.0001), suggesting that FGFR1 binds to actively transcribed genes. In addition to Pol II, MS detected FOXA1 among FGFR1 interacting proteins. ChIP-Seq analysis revealed FOXA1 enriched at FGFR1-bound loci. siRNA-mediated FOXA1 knockdown reduced FGFR1 distribution to several genomic loci in CAMA1 cells, as measured by FGFR1 ChIP-Seq, suggesting that FOXA1 mediates FGFR1 recruitment to chromatin. We next transduced MCF-7 cells with an FGFR1(SP-)(NLS) plasmid, where the NLS sequence forces nuclear import of the resulting protein. To determine the role of FGFR1 on transcriptional regulation, we used Binding and Expression Target Analysis (BETA), integrating FGFR1 ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq results from MCF7FGFR1(SP-)(NLS) vs MCF7EV cells. This analysis predicted a direct role for genomic-bound FGFR1 in activating gene expression (p=8.01e-6). MCF7FGFR1(SP-)(NLS) cells were markedly less sensitive to fulvestrant compared to control cells. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) of the 1,009 genes upregulated in MCF7FGFR1(SP-)(NLS) cells and bound by FGFR1 at a genomic level revealed a strong enrichment of estrogen response early (q=2.2e-44) and late (q=6.4e-33) genes, suggesting that nuclear FGFR1 induces an ERα-associated transcriptional profile that may contribute to endocrine resistance. Finally, an expression signature associated with nuclear FGFR1 correlated with endocrine resistance in three cohorts of patients with ER+ breast cancer treated with aromatase inhibitors. We next studied the effect of growth factor stimulation on FGFR1 transcriptional function. Stimulation with FGF2 enhanced nuclear FGFR1 import in CAMA1 cells, as well as FGFR1-Pol II S5P association. Notably, these effects were not abrogated by treatment with the FGFR1 inhibitor erdafitinib. ChIP-Seq revealed that erdafitinib did not impair the FGFR1 genomic distribution. These results do not support a causal link between the FGFR1 activated TK and the receptor’s activity in the nucleus. Conclusions: We have demonstrated a role for nuclear FGFR1 in transcriptional regulation in breast cancer. FGFR1-induced gene expression contributes to endocrine resistance and is not affected by FGFR TKIs. These findings provide a rationale for developing treatment strategies to inhibit nuclear FGFR1 in ER+/FGFR1-amplified breast cancer.

Citation Format: Alberto Servetto, Rahul Kollipara, Luigi Formisano, Chang-Ching Lin, Kyung-min Lee, Dhivya R Sudhan, Ariella B Hanker, Sumanta Chatterjee, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Paula Gonzalez-Ericsson, Saurabh Mendiratta, Hiroaki Akamatsu, Nicholas James, Ralf Kittler, Carlos L Arteaga. FGFR1 associates with gene promoters and regulates gene transcription: Implications for endocrine resistance in ER+/FGFR1-amplified breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-06.

Abstract PS7-35: Geicam/2014-03 (registem): A prospective registry of advanced breast cancer: A subset of triple negative breast cancer patients with her2 low expression

Background: The RegistEM study will provide prospective data from advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients (pts). Understanding the real distribution of BC subtypes is its primary objective. A new nomenclature has been proposed for those cases with HER2 1+ or 2+ by immunohistochemistry and negative in situ hybridization, HER2-low BC. In clinical practice, these tumors are reported as HER2 negative. Methods: This is a non-interventional study that will enroll approximately 1,867 pts with ABC diagnosed from January 2016 to December 2019, either after recurrence or as 1st diagnosis, in 38 Spanish sites. Biological samples (primary and/or metastatic tumor lesions, and blood) collection is part of its procedures. In this analysis (cut-off date 01/April/2020, database ongoing), we describe the characteristics of pts with Triple Negative (TN) subtype and HER2-low expression (as mentioned above). Biomarkers, including HER2, were determined in either primary tumor (PT), M1 or in both, PT and M1. Results: This subset of pts make up 37.4% (n=49) of TN pts considered for this analysis (n=131). Their distribution within the three groups (PT, M1 and PT/M1), was 46.9% (n=23), 42.9% (n=21) and 10.2% (n=5), respectively. These pts were diagnosed with early BC (EBC) and at recurrence, 91.7% presented distant metastases. Median time from EBC diagnosis until recurrent disease in terms of ABC was 29.8 months (mo), with the majority of pts recurring at &gt;12 mo (95.9%), similar to the whole TN subset. Most pts were Caucasian (98%), and at diagnosis of ABC, the median age was 60 years (range 31-84) and 65.3% were postmenopausal. A change of BC subtype was documented in 15/49 (30.6%) pts, with the higher rate in M1 group (52.4%); as opposed to the TN subset, a change to HER2+ disease was reported in 6/15 (40.0%) pts and just after the TN subtype in all cases. Family history of BC and/or ovarian cancer was reported in 42.9% pts and any genetic test to assess the hereditary risk was performed in 30.6% pts. Similarly to TN subset, lung (36.7%), lymph nodes and bone (34.7% each) and liver (24.5%) were the most frequent metastatic locations; central nervous system metastases were developed by 14.3% pts. Visceral involvement was present in 66.7% pts, being this rate lower in M1 compared to PT and PT/M1 groups. The most frequent 1st-line therapies were chemotherapy (CT) (44.9%) and CT/biological therapy (BT) (36.7%). Type of CT mainly included capecitabine (36.4%), taxanes (27.3%), eribulin (13.6%) and platinum-based combinations (13.6%). Most pts received CT as monotherapy (86.4%). Bevacizumab (BVZ) was the most frequent BT associated to CT (77.8%), mainly with capecitabine and/or paclitaxel (72.2%). Progressive disease to 1st-line therapy in the whole group was reported in 73.5% pts (higher than in TN subset), with a median time to progression (TTP) of 5.7 mo (range 1.7-15.0); PT was the group with a higher PD rate. A 2nd-line therapy was reported in 63.3% pts. Similarly to 1st-line setting, the most frequent 2nd-line therapies were CT (74.2%) and CT/BT (12.9%) (with BVZ in 75.0% pts). CT in monotherapy was reported in 69.6% pts (capecitabine 31.3%, eribulin 25.0%). Median duration of this line therapy was 3.0 mo (range 0.6-15.8), PD has been reported in 96.8% pts (similar between groups), and 3rd-line therapy in 25/49 (51.0%) pts.

Conclusions: In TN/HER2-low ABC pts, lung, lymph nodes and bone were the most frequent metastatic locations. As opposed to TN subset, HER2+ disease is part of the subtype changes reported. Although the main 1st- and 2nd-line therapies were CT and CT/BT, similarly to TN subset, the rate of pts with PD to 1st- and 2nd-line therapies is higher, and also those pts treated in the 3rd-line setting.

Citation Format: Carlos Jara, Isabel Álvarez, César A Rodríguez, Purificación Martínez, Raquel Andrés, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Diego Malón, Jose Luis Alonso, Encarna Adrover, María José Echarri, Mireia Margeli, Ariadna Tibau, Judith Ramírez, Silvia Antolín, Ruth Campo, Juan José Miralles, Susana Bezares, Federico Rojo, Sara López-Tarruella, Angel Guerrero-Zotano. Geicam/2014-03 (registem): A prospective registry of advanced breast cancer: A subset of triple negative breast cancer patients with her2 low expression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-35.

Abstract PD3-03: Continued efficacy of neratinib in patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer: Final overall survival analysis from the randomized phase 3 ExteNET trial

Background: Neratinib (NERLYNX®) is an irreversible pan-HER inhibitor that significantly improves invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared with placebo when given as extended adjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) early breast cancer after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy. In the phase 3 ExteNET trial, an absolute iDFS benefit of 2.5% and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) benefit of 1.7% were observed with neratinib after 5 years’ follow-up. As reflected in the approved indication by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease who initiated neratinib treatment within 1 year of completing trastuzumab (HR+/≤1 year) experienced an absolute iDFS benefit of 5.1% and DDFS benefit of 4.7% at 5 years. In HR+/≤1 year patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy, absolute 5-year iDFS and DDFS benefits of 7.4% and 7.0%, respectively, were observed. Here we report the final protocol-defined, event-driven analysis of overall survival (OS) from ExteNET, and provide descriptive analyses of subgroups of primary interest according to the EU label and current clinical practice in early-stage HER2+ disease.

Methods: ExteNET was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of women with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer who had completed neoadjuvant or adjuvant trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (NCT00878709). Patients were randomly assigned to oral neratinib 240 mg/day or placebo for 1 year. Hazard ratios (HR) for OS were estimated from Cox proportional hazards models, and survival rates by the Kaplan-Meier method. The OS analysis was event-driven and powered for the intention-to-treat (ITT) population with a target of 248 events. Descriptive analyses were performed in the HR+/≤1 year subgroup per the approved indication in the EU, and in higher-risk patients, i.e. HR+/≤1 year who have residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy [i.e. those who did not achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR)]. Cut-off date: July 2019.

Results: 2840 patients were randomized to study treatment (1420 per group). After a median follow-up of 8.1 years, 127 (8.9%) and 137 (9.6%) patients in the neratinib and placebo ITT groups had died, respectively. The 8-year OS rates were 90.1% (95% CI, 88.3–91.6) in the neratinib group and 90.2% (95% CI, 88.4–91.7) in the placebo group (absolute difference at 8 years -0.1%; stratified HR=0.95; 95% CI, 0.75–1.21; p=0.6914). A positive trend was seen in the prespecified HR+ subgroup (n=1631; absolute difference at 8 years 1.5%; HR=0.80; 95% CI, 0.58–1.12), and within this population, descriptive analyses suggested greater benefits with neratinib in the HR+/≤1 year subgroup (n=1334; absolute difference at 8 years 2.1%; HR=0.79; 95% CI, 0.55–1.13) and in the HR+/≤1 year subset with no pCR after neoadjuvant therapy (n=295; absolute difference at 8 years 9.1%; HR=0.47; 95% CI, 0.23–0.92). No new safety signals were reported with this long-term follow-up to 8 years.

Conclusions: In this final OS analysis of ExteNET, there were fewer deaths with neratinib than placebo in the ITT population, but the results did not reach statistical significance. Analyses showed greater OS improvements with neratinib in subgroups including HR+/≤1 year, and HR+/≤1 year with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy. These findings are consistent with the results based on the primary endpoint of iDFS, and support the use of neratinib in clinical practice in these patients.

Citation Format: Frankie Ann Holmes, Beverly Moy, Suzette Delaloge, Stephen Chia, Bent Ejlertsen, Janine Mansi, Hiroji Iwata, Michael Gnant, Mark Buyse, Carlos Barrios, Tajana Silovski, Robert Separovic, Anna Bashford, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Neelima Denduluri, Debra Patt, Erhan Gokmen, Ira Gore, John Smith, Richard Bryce, Feng Xu, Alvin Wong, Miguel Martin, Arlene Chan. Continued efficacy of neratinib in patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer: Final overall survival analysis from the randomized phase 3 ExteNET trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-03.

Palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in hormonal receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative, aromatase inhibitor-resistant metastatic breast cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial-PEARL

BACKGROUND

Palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard treatment of hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, its efficacy has not been compared with that of chemotherapy in a phase III trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PEARL is a multicentre, phase III randomised study in which patients with aromatase inhibitor (AI)-resistant MBC were included in two consecutive cohorts. In cohort 1, patients were randomised 1 : 1 to palbociclib plus exemestane or capecitabine. On discovering new evidence about estrogen receptor-1 (ESR1) mutations inducing resistance to AIs, the trial was amended to include cohort 2, in which patients were randomised 1 : 1 between palbociclib plus fulvestrant and capecitabine. The stratification criteria were disease site, prior sensitivity to ET, prior chemotherapy for MBC, and country of origin. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) in cohort 2 and in wild-type ESR1 patients (cohort 1 + cohort 2). ESR1 hotspot mutations were analysed in baseline circulating tumour DNA.

RESULTS

From March 2014 to July 2018, 296 and 305 patients were included in cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively. Palbociclib plus ET was not superior to capecitabine in both cohort 2 [median PFS: 7.5 versus 10.0 months; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85-1.50] and wild-type ESR1 patients (median PFS: 8.0 versus 10.6 months; aHR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.87-1.41). The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities with palbociclib plus exemestane, palbociclib plus fulvestrant and capecitabine, respectively, were neutropenia (57.4%, 55.7% and 5.5%), hand/foot syndrome (0%, 0% and 23.5%), and diarrhoea (1.3%, 1.3% and 7.6%). Palbociclib plus ET offered better quality of life (aHR for time to deterioration of global health status: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.53-0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no statistical superiority of palbociclib plus ET over capecitabine with respect to PFS in MBC patients resistant to AIs. Palbociclib plus ET showed a better safety profile and improved quality of life.

Serum phospholipids fatty acids and breast cancer risk by pathological subtype: EpiGEICAM study

e13604

Background: The role of fatty acids (FA) in breast cancer (BC) etiology is unclear. Most studies are based on self-reported dietary intake, without considering their internal transformation. This analysis tries to assess whether serum levels of 26 phospholipid FA (PL-FAs) and markers of their endogenous metabolism are associated with BC risk, both globally and by pathological BC subtype. Methods: EpiGEICAM-01 is a Spanish multicenter matched case-control study. BC cases and healthy women completed a lifestyle and a food frequency questionnaire, and serum samples were collected. Serum PL-FAs percentages were measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Conditional and multinomial logistic regression models were used to quantify the association of PL-FAs tertiles with BC risk, overall and by pathologic BC subtypes [luminal, HER2+ and triple negative]. Models were adjusted for age and region (multinomial models), education level, body mass index (BMI), menopausal status, age at menarche and at first birth, hormone replacement therapy, alcohol consumption, last year physical activity, history of benign breast disease, family history of BC and caloric intake, and were corrected for multiple testing. Stratified analyses by BMI and menopausal status were also performed. Results: Questionnaires and serum samples were collected from 795 case-control pairs. Women with high serum levels of stearic acid [odds ratio (OR)T3vsT1= 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.30-0.66], linoleic acid (ORT3vsT1= 0.66; 95% CI = 0.49-0.90) and arachidonic to dihomo-γ-linolenic acids ratio (OR T3vsT1= 0.64 95%; CI = 0.48-0.84; differences were remarkable in overweight/obese women) presented lower BC risk. Participants with high concentrations of palmitoleic acid (ORT3vsT1= 1.65; 95% CI = 1.20-2.26), trans-ruminant palmitelaidic acid (ORT3vsT1= 1.51; 95% CI = 1.12-2.02; differences observed were noticeable both in postmenopausal and in overweight/obese women), trans-industrial elaidic acid (ORT3vsT1= 1.52; 95% CI = 1.14-2.03; markedly both in premenopausal and in non-obese women), and high oleic to stearic acids ratio (ORT3vsT1= 2.04; 95% CI = 1.45-2.87) showed higher risk. These associations were similar in all BC pathological subtypes. Conclusions: Our results, which should be confirmed in future studies, emphasize the importance of analyzing fatty acids individually, as well as the desaturase activity indices. A decrease in the dietary intake of trans-monounsaturated fatty acids could be a good strategy for BC prevention.

Abstract GS6-06: A neoadjuvant trial with letrozole identifies PRR11 in the 17q23 amplicon as a mechanism of resistance to endocrine therapy in ER-positive breast cancer

Although the 17q23 amplicon has been associated with luminal B breast cancer (BC) and high risk of recurrence, a specific gene or genes in this region that would be causal to endocrine resistance have not yet been uncovered. We performed whole transcriptome analysis on RNA extracted from 58 estrogen receptor (ER)+ BCs treated with neoadjuvant letrozole for median 7.2 months. PRR11 (Proline rich 11), located in 17q23, was upregulated in non-responding tumors as defined by relapse after a median follow up of 5 years and/or a preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) ≥4. Differential gene expression analysis between tumors expressing low vs high PRR11 mRNA showed that BC signatures associated with proliferation, IGF-1 and PI3K signaling were enriched in tumors with high PRR11 expression.

Rate of PRR11 amplification is 15.2% in the Metastatic Breast Cancer project, but 9.5% and 9.4% in METABRIC and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), respectively. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis revealed an enrichment of hallmark gene sets associated with proliferation in PRR11-amplified ER+ BCs in METABRIC and TCGA. Integrated analysis of gene expression with on-treatment Ki67 levels from three independent studies with operable ER+ BCs treated with neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor (ACOSOG-Z1031, NCT00651976, Llombart-Cussac et al.) showed that PRR11 was the only gene in 17q23 with a significant correlation with a high Ki67 levels across all studies.

PRR11 knockdown inhibited E2-independent growth of HCC1428 LTED (long-term estrogen deprived) and MCF7 LTED cells in culture and MCF7 xenografts. PRR11 siRNA also inhibited growth of fulvestrant-resistant and tamoxifen-resistant MCF7 cells. Conversely, PRR11 transduction induced MDA-MB-134VI cell growth under estrogen-depleted conditions. Using a PCR array with 84-cell cycle genes, we identified SKP2, CDKN1A, CCNB2, CCNA2, CKS2 and CCNB1 as genes downregulated by PRR11 knockdown. Except for SKP2 and CDKN1A, expression of all those genes was elevated in PRR11-amplifiedER+ BCs in TCGA and METABRIC.

Suggesting a link to activation of PI3K signaling, we found the proline-rich motif of PRR11 associates with the SH3 domain of the p85 regulatory subunit of PI3K. We hypothesized that this association suppresses p85 homodimer formation, thus facilitating binding of PI3Kα (p110α)-p85 dimers to IRS1, retention of p110α at the plasma membrane and, hence, activation of PI3K/AKT. To test this, we co-transfected HEK293T cells with HA-p85 and FLAG-p85. Forced expression of PRR11 reduced HA-p85 and FLAG-p85 homodimers as shown by HA and FLAG pulldowns followed by FLAG and HA immunoblots, respectively. PRR11 overexpression enhanced insulin-stimulated association of IRS1 to p110α and activation of AKT. PRR11 knockdown reduced insulin/IGF-1/2-stimulated p-AKT. In METABRIC and TCGA, PRR11 amplification and PIK3CA mutations are exclusive of each other, suggesting these alterations would be functionally linked with the same pathway.

Connectivity map analysis with the list of genes significantly overexpressed in ER+/PRR11-amplified BCs predicted PI3K inhibitors as perturbations that suppress such gene list. In the MGH/Sanger dataset, PRR11-amplified BC cell lines displayed significantly higher sensitivity to the pan-PI3K inhibitor pictilisib compared to cell lines without PRR11 amplification. Finally, inhibition of PI3Kα by siRNA or alpelisib abrogated E2-independent growth and insulin-stimulated growth of PRR11-transduced MDA-MB-134VI and MCF10A cells, respectively, suggesting p110α is required for the growth promoting effects of PRR11.

These data suggest that 1) PRR11 is a mediator of resistance to antiestrogens via amplification of PI3K/AKT signaling, and 2) PI3Kα is a potential therapeutic target in ER+ BCs harboring PRR11 amplification.

Citation Format: Kyung-min Lee, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Ariella Hanker, Alberto Servetto, Dhivya Sudhan, Luigi Formisano, Valerie Jansen, Paula González-Ericsson, Melinda Sanders, Thomas Stricker, Lewis Cantley, Carlos Arteaga. A neoadjuvant trial with letrozole identifies PRR11 in the 17q23 amplicon as a mechanism of resistance to endocrine therapy in ER-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-06.

Hyperactivation of TORC1 Drives Resistance to the Pan-HER Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Neratinib in HER2-Mutant Cancers

We developed neratinib-resistant HER2-mutant cancer cells by gradual dose escalation. RNA sequencing identified TORC1 signaling as an actionable mechanism of drug resistance. Primary and acquired neratinib resistance in HER2-mutant breast cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) was also associated with TORC1 hyperactivity. Genetic suppression of RAPTOR or RHEB ablated P-S6 and restored sensitivity to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The combination of the TORC1 inhibitor everolimus and neratinib potently arrested the growth of neratinib-resistant xenografts and organoids established from neratinib-resistant PDXs. RNA and whole-exome sequencing revealed RAS-mediated TORC1 activation in a subset of neratinib-resistant models. DNA sequencing of HER2-mutant tumors clinically refractory to neratinib, as well as circulating tumor DNA profiling of patients who progressed on neratinib, showed enrichment of genomic alterations that converge to activate the mTOR pathway.

Survival impact of primary tumor resection in de novo metastatic breast cancer patients (GEICAM/El Alamo Registry)

The debate about surgical resection of primary tumor (PT) in de novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients persists. We explored this approach's outcomes in patients included in a retrospective registry, named El Álamo, of breast cancer patients diagnosed in Spain (1990-2001). In this analysis we only included de novo MBC patients, 1415 of whom met the study's criteria. Descriptive, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were carried out. Median age was 63.1 years, 49.2% of patients had single-organ metastasis (skin/soft tissue [16.3%], bone [33.8%], or viscera [48.3%]). PT surgery (S) was performed in 44.5% of the cases. S-group patients were younger, had smaller tumors, higher prevalence of bone and oligometastatic disease, and lower prevalence of visceral involvement. With a median follow-up of 23.3 months, overall survival (OS) was 39.6 versus 22.4 months (HR = 0.59, p < 0.0001) in the S- and non-S groups, respectively. The S-group OS benefit remained statistically and clinically significant regardless of metastatic location, histological type, histological grade, hormone receptor status and tumor size. PT surgery (versus no surgery) was associated with an OS benefit suggesting that loco-regional PT control may be considered in selected MBC patients. Data from randomized controlled trials are of utmost importance to confirm these results.

Evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis from the LEA (GEICAM/2006-11_GBG51) and CALGB 40503 (Alliance) trials

BACKGROUND

Randomised trials comparing the efficacy of standard endocrine therapy (ET) versus experimental ET + bevacizumab (Bev) in 1st line hormone receptor-positive patients with metastatic breast cancer have thus far shown conflicting results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We pooled data from two similar phase III randomised trials of ET ± Bev (LEA and Cancer and Leukemia Group B 40503) to increase precision in estimating treatment effect. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and safety. Exploratory analyses were performed within subgroups defined by patients with recurrent disease, de novo disease, prior endocrine sensitivity or resistance and reported grades III-IV hypertension and proteinuria.

RESULTS

The pooled sample consisted of 749 patients randomised to ET or ET + Bev. Median PFS was 14.3 months for ET versus 19 months for ET + Bev (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.91; p < 0.01). ORR and CBR with ET and ET + Bev were 40 versus 61% (p < 0.01) and 64 versus 77% (p < 0.01), respectively. There was no difference in OS (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.77-1.18; p = 0.68). PFS was superior for ET + Bev for endocrine-sensitive patients (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.53-0.89; p = 0.004). Grade III-IV hypertension (2.2 versus 20.1%), proteinuria (0 versus 9.3%), cardiovascular (0.5 versus 4.2%) and liver events (0 versus 2.9%) were significantly higher for ET + Bev (all p < 0.01). Hypertension and proteinuria were not predictors of efficacy (interaction test p = 0.33).

CONCLUSION

The addition of Bev to ET increased PFS overall and in endocrine-sensitive patients but not OS at the expense of significant additional toxicity.

TRIALS REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.Gov NCT00545077 and NCT00601900.

Abstract 329: Hyperactivation of mTORC1 drives acquired resistance to the pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor neratinib in HER2-mutant cancers

Background: The HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) neratinib has exhibited clinical activity in patients with metastatic HER2-mutant cancers. However, responses are heterogeneous across tumor types and not generally prolonged, suggesting mechanisms of de novo and acquired drug resistance.

Methods: Neratinib-resistant 5637 (HER2S310F) bladder cancer and OVCAR8 (HER2G776V) ovarian cancer cells were developed after gradual dose escalation. Candidate pathways associated with drug resistance identified by RNA sequencing were validated in a panel of HER2-mutant cell lines and in the SUMMIT basket trial in patients with HER2-mutant cancers.

Results: Neratinib-resistant 5637 and OVCAR8 cells were cross-resistant to the HER2 TKIs afatinib and lapatinib. Immunoblot analysis showed that neratinib was still able to suppress HER2, EGFR and HER3 phosphorylation. Gene Set Enrichment and Connectivity Map analyses of RNA-seq data suggested mTORC1 signaling as a druggable pathway driving neratinib resistance. Immunoblot analysis of drug-resistant cells revealed a striking increase in S6K and S6 phosphorylation compared to parental cells. P-S6 levels and viability of drug resistant cells/tumors were ablated upon combining neratinib with the TORC1i everolimus both in vitro and in vivo. Similar results were obtained in cells transfected with Raptor or Rheb siRNAs. Further, neratinib resistance was induced by TSC2 knockdown and resultant TORC1 hyperactivation in parental 5637, OVCAR8, and MCF7 cells expressing L755S or V777L HER2 mutations. RNA-seq also revealed significant enrichment of RAS pathway in neratinib resistant cells which was confirmed by RAS-GTP pulldown. Pharmacological inhibition of RAS signaling using the PI3Ki buparlisib and the MEKi trametinib, or genetic suppression using H-, K-, and N-RAS isoform-specific siRNAs, ablated P-S6 and viability of neratinib resistant cells, suggesting RAS is causally associated with TORC1 hyperactivity and drug resistance. Further, intrinsically neratinib-resistant HER2-mutant cell lines with KRAS or PIK3CA co-mutations [DV90 (ERBB2V842I, KRASG13D), SNUC2A (ERBB2R678Q, KRASG12D, TSC2P1521T), MCF7 (HER2L755S/V777L, PIK3CAH1047R)] were sensitized to neratinib upon the addition of everolimus. Finally, DNA sequencing of tumors (MSK-IMPACT panel; 410 genes) from 141 patients enrolled in the SUMMIT trial showed enrichment of somatic alterations associated with aberrant activation of TORC1 pathway (KRAS, NRAS, NF1, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, AKT1/2, PTEN) in patients exhibiting primary resistance to neratinib.

Conclusions: These data suggest that hyperactivation of TORC1 pathway promotes de novo and acquired resistance to neratinib across histologically distinct HER2-mutant cancers. Thus, we propose the combination of neratinib with TORC1 inhibitors is worthy of investigation in patients with HER2-mutant cancers.

Citation Format: Dhivya R. Sudhan, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Helen Won, Paula Gonzales Ericsson, Qi Liu, Teresa Dugger, James Koch, Alison Schram, Alberto Servetto, Richard Cutler, Alshad Lalani, Richard Bryce, Alan Auerbach, Ariella Hanker, Carlos L. Arteaga. Hyperactivation of mTORC1 drives acquired resistance to the pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor neratinib in HER2-mutant cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 329.

Abstract PD7-10: Neoadjuvant trial with letrozole identifies PRR11 in 17q21-23 amplicon as a resistance mechanism to endocrine therapy in ER-positive breast cancer

Approximately 20% of patients with early ER+ breast cancer (BC) treated with adjuvant antiestrogen therapy relapse with metastatic disease. Previously, we identified 3 amplicons (11q11.3, 8p11.23, and 17q21-23) associated with endocrine-resistance (Giltnane et al. Sci Transl Med 2017). The 17q21-23 amplicon has been associated with highly proliferative luminal B tumors and cancers with high genomic instability. A causal role of this region in endocrine resistance is unclear. We performed whole transcriptome analysis on RNA extracted from 58 ER+ breast cancers of patients treated with letrozole for 5.4-9.2 months (median 7.2 months). PRR11 (Proline rich 11), located in 17q21-23, was significantly upregulated in non-responding tumors as defined by cancer relapse after a median follow up of 5 years and/or a preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) ≥4. Differential gene expression analysis between tumors expressing low vs high PRR11 mRNA showed that BC signatures associated with proliferation, cell cycle, IGF-1 and PI3K signaling were enriched in tumors with high PRR11 expression. In the Metastatic Breast Cancer Project and TCGA, PRR11 amplification was higher in metastatic vs. primary BCs (16.5% and 8.5%, respectively; Fisher's p=0.0088). Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of mRNA expression in METABRIC and TCGA revealed significant enrichment of hallmark gene sets associated with proliferation in PRR11 amplified ER+ BCs. Genome-scale RNAi screening in Project Achilles showed that among all genes in the 17q21-23 amplicon, PRR11 knockdown results in the 4th strongest anti-proliferative effect in MCF7 cells. PRR11 knockdown with siRNA inhibited proliferation, cell cycle progression, and RB phosphorylation in HCC1428 LTED (long-term estrogen deprived), MCF7 LTED, and fulvestrant-resistant MCF7 cells. Using a PCR array with 84-cell cycle genes, we identified SKP2, CDKN1A, CCNB2, CCNA2, CKS2 and CCNB1 as genes downregulated by PRR11 knockdown. Except for CDKN1A, expression of all those genes was elevated ER+ BCs with PRR11 gain or amplification in TCGA. PRR11 associates with the p85 regulatory subunit of PI3K via its SH3 domain. We speculated this association would suppress p85 homodimers, thus permitting binding of PI3Kα (p110α)-p85 dimers to IRS1 and, hence, activating PI3K/AKT. To test this, we co-transfected HEK293T cells with HA-p85 and FLAG-p85. Transfection of PRR11 into these HEK293T cells reduced HA-p85 and FLAG-p85 homodimers as shown by HA and FLAG pulldowns followed by FLAG and HA immunoblots, respectively. Finally, PRR11 knockdown resulted in a reduction of p110a and S473 P-AKT levels and inhibition of IGF-1/2 stimulated P-AKT. Not inconsistent with these data, PRR11 amplification and PIK3CA mutations in METABRIC and TCGA are exclusive of each other, suggesting these alterations are functionally linked with the same signaling pathway. These data support a role of PRR11 in PI3K/AKT activation that may be causal to resistance to estrogen deprivation. We propose PRR11, located in the 17q21-23 amplicon, is a potential mediator of resistance to antiestrogen therapy by amplifying PI3K/AKT signaling, suggesting PI3K may be a therapeutic target in ER+ BCs harboring PRR11 amplification.

Citation Format: Lee K-M, Guerrero-Zotano A, Formisano L, Jansen V, Gonzalez Ericsson P, Arteaga C. Neoadjuvant trial with letrozole identifies PRR11 in 17q21-23 amplicon as a resistance mechanism to endocrine therapy in ER-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-10.

Extended Adjuvant Therapy with Neratinib Plus Fulvestrant Blocks ER/HER2 Crosstalk and Maintains Complete Responses of ER+/HER2+ Breast Cancers: Implications to the ExteNET Trial

PURPOSE

The phase III ExteNET trial showed improved invasive disease-free survival in patients with HER2⁺ breast cancer treated with neratinib versus placebo after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy. The benefit from neratinib appeared to be greater in patients with ER⁺/HER2⁺ tumors. We thus sought to discover mechanisms that may explain the benefit from extended adjuvant therapy with neratinib.Experimental Design: Mice with established ER⁺/HER2⁺ MDA-MB-361 tumors were treated with paclitaxel plus trastuzumab ± pertuzumab for 4 weeks, and then randomized to fulvestrant ± neratinib treatment. The benefit from neratinib was evaluated by performing gene expression analysis for 196 ER targets, ER transcriptional reporter assays, and cell-cycle analyses.

RESULTS

Mice receiving "extended adjuvant" therapy with fulvestrant/neratinib maintained a complete response, whereas those treated with fulvestrant relapsed rapidly. In three ER⁺/HER2⁺ cell lines (MDA-MB-361, BT-474, UACC-893) but not in ER⁺/HER2^- MCF7 cells, treatment with neratinib induced ER reporter transcriptional activity, whereas treatment with fulvestrant resulted in increased HER2 and EGFR phosphorylation, suggesting compensatory reciprocal crosstalk between the ER and ERBB RTK pathways. ER transcriptional reporter assays, gene expression, and immunoblot analyses showed that treatment with neratinib/fulvestrant, but not fulvestrant, potently inhibited growth and downregulated ER reporter activity, P-AKT, P-ERK, and cyclin D1 levels. Finally, similar to neratinib, genetic and pharmacologic inactivation of cyclin D1 enhanced fulvestrant action against ER⁺/HER2⁺ breast cancer cells.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that ER blockade leads to reactivation of ERBB RTKs and thus extended ERBB blockade is necessary to achieve durable clinical outcomes in patients with ER⁺/HER2⁺ breast cancer.

Abstract 1828: Hyperactivation of mTORC1 drives acquired resistance to the pan HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor neratinib in HER2 mutant cancers

Background: Tumor genomic profiling has identified patients with cancers harboring activating ERBB2 (HER2) mutations that are sensitive to HER2 targeted therapies. In the SUMMIT phase II ‘basket' trial, a subset of patients with ERBB2 mutant cancers have exhibited significant clinical benefit from treatment with the pan-HER irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) neratinib. However, durable responses to neratinib are few, suggesting mechanisms of de novo and acquired drug resistance. Thus, we sought to identify druggable mechanisms of resistance to neratinib.

Methods: We utilized 5637 bladder cancer (with HER2S310F) and OVCAR8 ovarian cancer (with HER2G776V) cells. Drug resistant cells were developed by exposing cells to increasing concentrations of neratinib over 6 months (5637, 600 nM; OVCAR8, 2 µM). Neratinib resistant H1781 lung cancer cells (with HER2G776&gt;VC) and MCF7 breast cancer cells (with L755S or V777L) knock-in mutations are currently being developed. For immunoblot and drug sensitivity assays, neratinib resistant cells were maintained drug-free for 96 hours and then retreated with neratinib and other inhibitors. Candidate pathways/genes driving neratinib resistance were identified by performing RNA sequencing and whole exome sequencing in drug-resistant and -sensitive cells.

Results: Neratinib-resistant 5637 and OVCAR8 cells were cross-resistant to the HER2 TKIs afatinib and lapatinib. Immunoblot analysis of both cells treated with neratinib showed effective suppression of HER2, EGFR and HER3 phosphorylation. However, they exhibited a striking increase in S6 kinase (S6K) activity and S6 phosphorylation compared to drug-sensitive parental cells, which was maintained in the presence of supra-pharmacological levels of neratinib (1 µM). S6 phosphorylation and viability of drug resistant cells was completely ablated by the combination of neratinib and the mTORC1 inhibitor everolimus, but not with the PI3Kα inhibitor alpelisib, the pan-PI3K inhibitor buparlisib, or the AKT inhibitor MK-2206, suggesting PI3K- and AKT-independent activation of mTORC1. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of RNA seq data from the drug-resistant cells revealed significant enrichment of K-Ras pathway components in addition to mTORC1 pathway. Consistent with these results, whole exome sequencing revealed activating alterations of the Ras pathway including a truncating mutation in RASA2 and a P200L mutation in PIK3CA Ras binding domain; thereby suggesting potential Ras mediated mTOR activation driving neratinib resistance. Studies are underway to confirm the contribution of Ras pathway in mTOR mediated neratinib resistance.

Conclusions: These data suggest that hyperactivation of mTORC1 promotes acquired resistance to neratinib across histologically distinct ERBB2-mutant cancers.

Citation Format: Dhivya R. Sudhan, Ariella B. Hanker, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Luigi Formisano, Yan Guo, Qi Liu, Francesca Avogadri-Connors, Richard E. Cutler, Alshad S. Lalani, Richard Bryce, Alan Auerbach, Carlos L. Arteaga. Hyperactivation of mTORC1 drives acquired resistance to the pan HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor neratinib in HER2 mutant cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1828.

An ERBB1-3 Neutralizing Antibody Mixture With High Activity Against Drug-Resistant HER2+ Breast Cancers With ERBB Ligand Overexpression

Background

Plasticity of the ERBB receptor network has been suggested to cause acquired resistance to anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapies. Thus, we studied whether a novel approach using an ERBB1-3-neutralizing antibody mixture can block these compensatory mechanisms of resistance.

Methods

HER2+ cell lines and xenografts (n ≥ 6 mice per group) were treated with the ERBB1-3 antibody mixture Pan-HER, trastuzumab/lapatinib (TL), trastuzumab/pertuzumab (TP), or T-DM1. Downregulation of ERBB receptors was assessed by immunoblot analysis and immunohistochemistry. Paired pre- and post-T-DM1 tumor biopsies from patients (n = 11) with HER2-amplified breast cancer were evaluated for HER2 and P-HER3 expression by immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization. ERBB ligands were measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Drug-resistant cells were generated by chronic treatment with T-DM1. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

Treatment with Pan-HER inhibited growth and promoted degradation of ERBB1-3 receptors in a panel of HER2+ breast cancer cells. Compared with TL, TP, and T-DM1, Pan-HER induced a similar antitumor effect against established BT474 and HCC1954 tumors, but was superior to TL against MDA-361 xenografts (TL mean = 2026 mm 3 , SD = 924 mm 3 , vs Pan-HER mean = 565 mm 3 , SD = 499 mm 3 , P = .04). Pan-HER-treated BT474 xenografts did not recur after treatment discontinuation, whereas tumors treated with TL, TP, and T-DM1 did. Post-TP and post-T-DM1 recurrent tumors expressed higher levels of neuregulin-1 (NRG1), HER3 and P-HER3 (all P < .05). Higher levels of P-HER3 protein and NRG1 mRNA were also observed in HER2+ breast cancers progressing after T-DM1 and trastuzumab (NRG1 transcript fold change ± SD; pretreatment = 2, SD = 1.9, vs post-treatment = 11.4, SD = 10.3, P = .04). The HER3-neutralizing antibody LJM716 resensitized the drug-resistant cells to T-DM1, suggesting a causal association between the NRG1-HER3 axis and drug resistance. Finally, Pan-HER treatment inhibited growth of HR6 trastuzumab- and T-DM1-resistant xenografts.

Conclusions

These data suggest that upregulation of a NRG1-HER3 axis can mediate escape from anti-HER2 therapies. Further, multitargeted antibody mixtures, such as Pan-HER, can simultaneously remove and/or block targeted ERBB receptor and ligands, thus representing an effective approach against drug-sensitive and -resistant HER2+ cancers.

A prognostic index for locoregional recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background

The appropriate selection criteria for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are poorly defined. The aim of this study is to analyse the incidence and prognostic factors for locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients with breast cancer (BC) treated with NAC to develop a prognostic score to help with clinical decision-making.

Materials and methods

Using our retrospective maintained BC database, we identified 730 patients treated with NAC (327 patients treated with BCS and 403 patients treated with mastectomy) between 1998 and 2014. To identify variables associated with an increased LRR rate, we performed firstly Kaplan–Meier curves, with comparisons among groups using log-rank test, and then, significant variables were included in a multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards. The prognostic index was developed by assigning score 0 (favourable) or score 1 (unfavourable) for each significant variable of multivariate analysis and was created separately for patients with BCS and mastectomy.

Results

At a median follow-up of 72 months, the 6-year cumulative incidence of LRR was 7.2% ( ± 3%) for BCS and 7.9% ( ± 3%) for mastectomy.

By univariate analysis, variables associated with an increased LRR were for BCS: HER2 positive, grade III, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), No-pCR (ypTis, ypN0), and age < 40 years; and for mastectomy, HER2-positive, DCIS, No-pCR, and LVI. By multivariate analysis, variables associated with an increased LRR were for BCS: HER2 positive (HR: 11.1, p = 0.001), DCIS (HR: 3.1, p = 0.005), and age < 40 years (HR: 2.8, p = 0.02); and for mastectomy: HER2 positive (HR: 9.5, p = 0.03), DCIS (HR: 2.7, p = 0.01), No-pCR (HR: 11.4, p = 0.01), and age < 40 years (HR: 2.8, p = 0.006).

The score stratified patients into three subsets with statistically different levels of risk for LRR. For BCS, the six-year LRR rates were 3%, 13%, and 33% for the low (score 0, n = 120), intermediate (score 1, n = 95) and high (score 2–3, n = 27) risk groups, respectively (p = 0.001). For mastectomy, the six-year LRR rates were 0%, 8%, and 27% for the low (score 0, n = 20), intermediate (score 1–2, n 191), and high (score 3–4, n = 30) risk groups, respectively (p = 0.001). Of note, 21 patients that had a LRR event were HER2 positive, all of them had received trastuzumab.

Conclusions

Patients with a score of 0, which made up to 19% of the study population, had very low risk of LRR. The score enabled the identification of a small group (7%) of patients with very high risk of LRR, and who may benefit from alternative treatment.

Abstract 4508: Genomic profiling of ER+ breast cancers treated with prolonged neoadjuvant letrozole reveal a high frequency of NOTCH2 mutations in clinically resistant tumors

Hypothesis: Approximately 20% of patients with early ER+ breast cancer (BC) treated with adjuvant antiestrogen therapy eventually relapse with endocrine-resistant metastatic disease. We hypothesized that profiling newly diagnosed ER+ breast tumors that persist following prolonged estradiol deprivation with letrozole would identify genomic alterations causally associated with endocrine resistance.

Methods: We treated 57 postmenopausal women (median 77 years; range 60-86) with ER+/HER2- early BC with neoadjuvant letrozole (median 7.5 months; range 3-36) followed by surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy. Patients were followed with serial ultrasounds and defined as non-responders if they developed recurrent locally or metastatic disease, or had a preoperative endocrine response index (PEPI) ≥4 (composite score of post-treatment ER, Ki67, T and N status). DNA extracted from post-treatment specimens was profiled using targeted exome sequencing of 300 cancer-related genes. We screened for variants with a high probability of disrupting protein function and excluded variants likely to be germline by filtering out every alteration not present in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC), if the variant had an allele frequency &gt;0.2% as per the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) dataset.

Results: Ten (10) patients had a PEPI 0 score, 32 patients were PEPI 1-3, and 15 were PEPI ≥4. After a median follow-up of 50 months (range 12-100), 9 patients have recurred with metastatic disease (4 with PEPI1-3, 5 with PEPI≥4). We identified 535 variants with a median coverage &gt;200x (387 nonsynonymous, 23 stop-gain, 124 indels). The median number of mutations was similar in responder vs non responders (8.03 vs 8.6). Recurrently mutated genes (&gt;5%) included PIK3CA (38%), NOTCH2 (31%), KMT2C (22%), VEZF1 (21%), TP53 (12%), NF1 (9%), MTOR (9%), ESR1 (7%) and ERBB2 (5%). Recurrent amplifications were detected in CCND1 (15%), ERBB2 (12%), FGF19 (12%) and FGFR1 (8%). The only mutations enriched in the non-responders and that correlated with long-term outcome were those in NOTCH2. The relapse-free survival rate at 40 months for patients with NOTCH2 mutations was 89% vs 41% for patients with wild-type NOTCH2 (p = 0.001). NOTCH2 mutations clustered as a frameshift deletion (P6fs) in exon 1, with a 20% average allele frequency. This mutation has been reported in TCGA and COSMIC at a mutation rate of 6%, across all tumor types and is predicted to produce an N-terminally truncated NOTCH2 protein (39 amino acids shorter) lacking the signal peptide.

Conclusions: Genomic profiling of residual ER+ breast cancers treated with prolonged neoadjuvant letrozole revealed a high frequency of NOTCH2 mutations. These alterations in NOTCH2 may cause hormone independence in ER+ breast cancer and are worthy of further mechanistic and clinical investigation.

Citation Format: Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Thomas Stricker, Katherine E. Hutchinson, Luigi Formisano, Jennifer Giltnane, Amparo Ruiz, Carlos L. Arteaga. Genomic profiling of ER+ breast cancers treated with prolonged neoadjuvant letrozole reveal a high frequency of NOTCH2 mutations in clinically resistant tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4508.

Familial breast cancer in Spain: A retrospective study of family history and clinical/pathologic characteristics from the GEICAM “El Álamo III” project

e12513

Background: Family history (FH) of breast cancer (BC), ovarian cancer (OC), and individual features (IF), like early age of onset, bilateral BC, coexistence of BC and OC, and triple negative BC (TNBC) younger than 50 years, are suspicion criteria of hereditary BC. Although it is assumed in the literature that 15-30% of BC cases can be familial BC (FBC), only 5-10% of BC are hereditary, explained by a germline mutation in BRCA1 or 2. Moreover, there is no international consensus to define FBC (e.g. number of relatives affected, age of onset), in contrast with, e.g. Lynch syndrome and Amsterdam/Bethesda criteria, in order to offer genetic counseling. In Spain, there are not population-based studies analyzing the real percentage of BC with familial and/or individual high risk features. Methods: A retrospective study based on 10,641 Spanish BC patients diagnosed from 1998-2001, collected in the “El Álamo III project”, was conducted. Specific data regarding FBC were analyzed: IF (age of onset, bilateral breast cancer, ovarian cancer and TNBC; and FH features (first and second degree relatives with BC and /or OC). Results: The Table summarizes the results. Conclusions: 21% of BC patients in Spain diagnosed from 1998 to 2001 have at least one relative with BC and/or OC. In addition, 2.8 % of patients with no FH of BC/OC fulfill high risk criteria. However, several study characteristics, such as 18% patients with no FH recorded, and lack of data regarding age of affected relatives, limit the interpretation of these results, being necessary to improve the family data collection in further “El Álamo” project studies. [Table: see text]

A polymorphism at the 3'-UTR region of the aromatase gene defines a subgroup of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with poor response to neoadjuvant letrozole

BACKGROUND

Aromatase (CYP19A1) regulates estrogen biosynthesis. Polymorphisms in CYP19A1 have been related to the pathogenesis of breast cancer (BC). Inhibition of aromatase with letrozole constitutes the best option for treating estrogen-dependent BC in postmenopausal women. We evaluate a series of polymorphisms of CYP19A1 and their effect on response to neoadjuvant letrozole in early BC.

METHODS

We analyzed 95 consecutive postmenopausal women with stage II-III ER/PgR [+] BC treated with neoadjuvant letrozole. Response to treatment was measured by radiology at 4th month by World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Three polymorphisms of CYP19A1, one in exon 7 (rs700519) and two in the 3'-UTR region (rs10046 and rs4646) were evaluated on DNA obtained from peripheral blood.

RESULTS

Thirty-five women (36.8%) achieved a radiological response to letrozole. The histopathological and immunohistochemical parameters, including hormonal receptor status, were not associated with the response to letrozole. Only the genetic variants (AC/AA) of the rs4646 polymorphism were associated with poor response to letrozole (p = 0.03). Eighteen patients (18.9%) reported a progression of the disease. Those patients carrying the genetic variants (AC/AA) of rs4646 presented a lower progression-free survival than the patients homozygous for the reference variant (p = 0.0686). This effect was especially significant in the group of elderly patients not operated after letrozole induction (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals that the rs4646 polymorphism identifies a subgroup of stage II-III ER/PgR [+] BC patients with poor response to neoadjuvant letrozole and poor prognosis. Testing for the rs4646 polymorphism could be a useful tool in order to orientate the treatment in elderly BC patients.

Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and outcome based on breast cancer subtype

e11516

Background: Gene expression profiling identifies several breast cancer subtypes with different chemosensitivity and outcome. We used immunohistochemistry surrogate markers to classify tumors according to known breast cancer subtypes and examined the relationship between neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response and long-term end points, including distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Review of clinical and pathological data from 271 breast cancer patients treated in our institution with NAC between 1991–2008. Breast cancer subtypes were defined as follows: Luminal A: Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and/or progesterone peceptor positive (PR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (Her-2+); Luminal B: ER+ and/or PR+,Her-2+; Basal: ER-,PR-,Her-2-;HER2: ER-,PR-,Her-2 +. ER and PR positive scored as positive if tumor cell nuclear staining was at least 2+. Her-2 scored as positive if test DAKO scored 3+ or FISH ratio Her-2/CEP-17>2.2. Results: 121 (45.8%) patients were classifed as Luminal A; 22 (8.1%) as Luminal B; 75 (27.7%) as Basal, and 50 (18.5%) as HER2. Most patients (63%) received NAC based on anthracyclines and taxanes. 36% Her-2+ patients were treated with NAC based on trastuzumab, and 43% received trastuzumab as adjuvant treatment. Response and outcome results are shown below (Table). Independently from subtype, only four patients out of 58 with pCR relapsed. Among patients who didn´t achieved pathologic complete response (pCR), basal and HER2 subtypes have the worst outcome (4 years SG 80% and 72% respectevely) compared with Luminal A (4 years SG: 94.7%), (log-rank p=0.009). Conclusions: Basal and HER2 tumor despite high chemosensitivity have worst long term outcome, particularly if pCR is not achieved after NAC.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.