Stage IV melanoma of unknown primary: A population-based study in the United States from 1973 to 2014

Lymphangitic Melanomatosis: Case Report of Intralymphatic Spread of Melanoma in a 66-year-old Man

ABSTRACT

Melanoma with lymphatic invasion has been associated with increased risk of metastasis, but the mechanisms and clinical implications are poorly understood. Although current reports have documented angiotropic spread of melanoma and suggest lymphatic spread of melanoma to increase the likelihood of metastasis, to our knowledge, lymphangitic metastatic melanoma resembling cutaneous carcinomatosis or presenting with facial hyperpigmentation has not been described. In this case report, we describe extensive cutaneous intralymphatic spread of melanoma, or lymphangitic melanomatosis, producing macular skin pigmentation in a 66-year-old man.

An analysis of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in advanced stage IV melanoma of the skin: prognostic capabilities and demographic variability

Despite its limitations, in part due to decreased specificity in advanced disease, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is one of few serum factors used in cancer staging. This study quantifies the predictive capabilities of LDH in stage IV melanoma of the skin and explores the validity of suggested demographic discrepancies which may exist in its use. The 1975-2017 Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was queried for stage IV cutaneous melanoma cases. Demographic characteristics were compared between LDH groups using chi-square and t tests. Subsequent Cox multivariable regression was performed to assess survival differences. 334 cases of stage IV cutaneous melanoma (average age: 63.0 years) with measured serum LDH levels were identified. Of these patients, 150 (44.9%) had normal LDH, 112 (33.5%) had LDH < 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN), 57 (17.1%) had LDH 1.5-10 × ULN, and 15 (4.5%) had LDH > 10 × ULN. Lower incomes were associated with higher LDH; individuals with incomes < $50,000 had the greatest proportion of LDH 10 × ULN (19.2%; p = 0.0031). LDH > 10 × ULN also had the lowest proportion of White patients (p = 0.04). On Cox multivariable survival analysis, increasing LDH levels showed increased risk of death (LDH < 1.5 × ULN: HR = 2.05, p = 0.01; LDH 1.5-10 × ULN: HR = 1.46, p < 0.001; LDH > 10 × ULN: HR = 5.91, p < 0.001). This study reaffirms the utility of LDH as a significant predictor of mortality with incremental severity, suggesting possible use for mortality projections. We note that Black patients and those with lower incomes may be more likely to have an elevated LDH. Older age groups and presence of ulceration among patients with stage IV melanoma were also associated with a greater risk of mortality.

Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma at First Diagnosis: Review of the Literature

Metastatic melanoma (MM) is a pathological entity with a very poor prognosis that, until a few decades ago, had a low response rate to systemic treatments. Fortunately, in the last few years, new therapies for metastatic melanoma have emerged. Currently, targeted therapy and immunotherapy are the mainstays of the therapeutic arsenal available for patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. However, both clinical evolution and drug efficacy in melanoma patients are very different depending on the stage at which it is diagnosed. In fact, the aggressiveness of melanoma is different depending on whether it debuts directly as metastatic disease or if what occurs is a relapse after a first diagnosis at an early stage, although the biological determinants are largely unknown. Another key aspect in the clinical management of metastatic melanoma at first diagnosis strives in the different prognosis of melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) compared to melanoma of known primary (MPK). Understanding the mechanisms behind this, and the repercussion of implementing targeted and immune therapies in this specific form is crucial for designing diagnosis and treatment decision algorithms that optimize the current strategies. In this review article, we recapitulate the information available thus far regarding the epidemiology and response to immunotherapy treatments or targeted therapy in patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma as a first diagnosis, with especial emphasis on the emerging specific information of the subpopulation formed by MUP patients.

Clinical outcome of patients with metastatic melanoma of unknown primary in the era of novel therapy

Melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) is considered different from melanoma of known primary (MKP), and it is unclear whether these patients benefit equally from novel therapies. In the current study, characteristics and overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced and metastatic MUP and MKP were compared in the era of novel therapy. Patients were selected from the prospective nation-wide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry (DMTR). The following criteria were applied: diagnosis of stage IIIc unresectable or IV cutaneous MKP (cMKP) or MUP between July 2012 and July 2017 and treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition and/or targeted therapy. OS was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The stratified multivariable Cox regression model was used for adjusted analysis. A total of 2706 patients were eligible including 2321 (85.8%) patients with cMKP and 385 (14.2%) with MUP. In comparative analysis, MUP patients more often presented with advanced and metastatic disease at primary diagnosis with poorer performance status, higher LDH, and central nervous system metastases. In crude analysis, median OS of cMKP or MUP patients was 12 months (interquartile range [IQR] 5 – 44) and 14 months (IQR 5 – not reached), respectively (P = 0.278). In adjusted analysis, OS in MUP patients was superior (hazard rate 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.58–0.85; P < 0.001). As compared to patients with advanced and metastatic cMKP, MUP patients have superior survival in adjusted analysis, but usually present with poorer prognostic characteristics. In crude analysis, OS was comparable indicating that patients with MUP benefit at least equally from treatment with novel therapies.

Metastatic melanoma of unknown origin mimicking neurofibromatosis

We present an unusual case of metastatic melanoma in a young patient with imaging appearance resembling neurofibromatosis. A 36-year-old-man with a history of cervical radiculopathy presented with cauda equina syndrome. An MRI was performed for further evaluation demonstrating multiple intradural, extramedullary enhancing lesions in the thoracic and lumbar spine, as well as extra-axial enhancing lesions with involvement of the lateral ventricles and posterior fossa. Bilateral pulmonary masses were found on chest CT. Lung lesions were biopsied and positive for metastatic melanoma. Melanoma is the third most common primary neoplasm to produce brain metastasis and should be considered on the differential as a cause of newly detected intracranial and intraspinal masses in young patients.

Multidisciplinary Care for Melanoma of Unknown Primary: Experience in the Era of Molecular Profiling

BACKGROUND

Melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) accounts for approximately 3% of melanoma diagnoses. This study sought to evaluate treatment and outcomes for a modern MUP cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective review of MUP was performed at a tertiary referral cancer center.

RESULTS

Of 815 melanoma patients, 67 (8.2%) had MUP. Men were more likely to have MUP than women (67% vs. 55%; p = 0.04). The most common sites of MUP were lymph nodes (28%), visceral solid organs (25%), brain (16%), and skin/subcutaneous tissues (10%). Of the patients who underwent tumor genomic profiling, 52% harbored pathogenic BRAF mutations. Of the 24 patients who underwent multi-gene panel testing, all had pathogenic mutations and 21 (88%) had mutations in addition to or exclusive of BRAF, including 11 patients (46%) with telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutations. Checkpoint inhibitors (39%) and BRAF-MEK inhibitors (7%) were the most common first-line treatments. Upfront surgical resection was used for 25% of the MUP patients, and 12 of these resections were for curative intent. During a median follow-up period of 22.1 months, the median overall survival (OS) was not met for the patients with MUP isolated to lymph nodes. At 56.8 months, 75% of these patients were alive. The median OS was 37.4 months for skin/soft tissue MUP, 33.3 months for single solid organ viscera MUP, and 29.8 months for metastatic brain MUP.

CONCLUSION

Multigene panel testing identified pathogenic mutations in all tested MUP patients and frequently identified targets outside BRAF. Despite advanced stage, aggressive multimodal therapy for MUP can be associated with 5-year OS and should be pursued for appropriate candidates.

Trend and socioeconomic disparities in survival outcome of metastatic melanoma after approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

The approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for metastatic melanoma in 2011 has changed the treatment landscape of this disease. However, current trend of the population-based survival remains unclear.

METHODS

8078 patients with metastatic melanoma diagnosed in the pre-ICI (2005-2010) and post-ICI period (2011-2016) were enrolled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program for survival comparison. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce selection bias. Cox proportional hazards model was applied for identifying survival-related factors and constructing a prognostic nomogram. The accuracy of the nomogram was determined by concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and validated by an internal cohort.

RESULTS

Patients in the post-ICI period had a significantly longer median overall survival (OS) than those in the pre-ICI period, even after performing PSM between the two periods. We also found socioeconomic disparities in the survival improvement. Significant differences in OS between the two periods were only observed in cases with medical insurance and patients living in urban or low-poverty area, but not uninsured cases and patients from rural or high-poverty area. For patients in the post-ICI period, multivariate analysis demonstrated that socioeconomic and insurance status were independent prognostic factors, which can be combined with other clinical variates into a nomogram for OS prediction with promising C-index of 0.672 and 0.650 in the training- and testing cohort, respectively.

CONCLUSION

An overall trend to favorable survival at the population level and socioeconomic disparities in the survival trend are observed in metastatic melanoma after the ICI approval. The proposed nomogram is available for prognostication in the current melanoma management.

Patients with melanoma of unknown primary show better outcome under immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy than patients with known primary: preliminary results

Background: Melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) is an uncommon clinical subtype of melanoma of known primary (MKP). Objectives: We aimed to compare treatment outcomes of MUP and MKP patients who had undergone therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI). Methods: We studied 41 metastatic melanoma patients (32 with MKP and 9 with MUP) with an indication for ICPI. Results: Clinical characteristics such as age, gender, stage of disease, etc., did not significantly differ (P < .05) between MUP and MKP patients. 20/32 (62.5%) melanoma-specific deaths (MSD) were observed in the MKP group, whereas 2/9 (22.2%) were detected in the MUP group (P = .035). On logistic regression, the MUP status proved to be an independent predictor for a more favorable outcome under immunotherapy when compared to MKP (P = .030). Conclusion: Our preliminary results indicate that MUP patients show better clinical outcome under ICPI when compared to MKP.

Treatment of melanoma of unknown primary in the era of immunotherapy and targeted therapy: A Dutch population-based study

Melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) may have a different biology to melanoma of known primary, but clinical trials of novel therapies (e.g., immune checkpoint or BRAF/MEK inhibitors) have not reported the outcomes in this population. We therefore evaluated the overall survival (OS) among patients with MUP in the era of novel therapy. Data for stage III or IV MUP were extracted from a nationwide database for the period 2003–2016, with classification based on the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria. The population was divided into pre‐ (2003–2010) and post‐ (2011–2016) novel therapy eras. Also, OS in the post‐novel era was compared between patients with stage IV MUP by whether they received novel therapy. In total, 2028 of 65,110 patients (3.1%) were diagnosed with MUP. Metastatic sites were known in 1919 of 2028 patients, and most had stage IV disease (53.8%). For patients with stage III MUP, the 5‐year OS rates were 48.5% and 50.2% in the pre‐ and post‐novel eras, respectively (p = 0.948). For those with stage IV MUP, the median OS durations were unchanged in the pre‐novel era and post‐novel era when novel therapy was not used (both 4 months); however, OS improved to 11 months when novel therapy was used in the post‐novel era (p < 0.001). In conclusion, more than half of the patients with MUP are diagnosed with stage IV and the introduction of novel therapy appears to have significantly improved the OS of these patients.

What's new?

Melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) site may have a different biology to melanoma of known primary, but clinical trials of novel therapies (e.g., immune checkpoint or BRAF/MEK inhibitors) have not reported the outcomes in this population. Knowledge about outcomes could however aid clinical management of patients with MUP. In this nationwide study from 2003 to 2016, the authors show that the introduction of novel therapy has significantly improved the overall survival for patients with stage IV melanoma of unknown primary, who represented more than half of the patients diagnosed with MUP in the Netherlands.

Metastatic Melanoma of Uncertain Primary with 5-Year Durable Response after Conventional Therapy: A Case Report with Literature Review

A 51-year-old Thai woman presented with bilateral leg edema and painful left inguinal mass for 6 months. Physical examination revealed matted bilateral inguinal lymph nodes up to 9 cm in size. Otherwise, physical examinations including skin were unremarkable. The result of the lymph node incisional biopsy is consistent with that of metastatic melanoma. The extensive investigation demonstrated multiple intra-abdominal and inguinal lymph nodes without detectable primary tumor. Palliative radiation and conventional chemotherapy were prescribed. The CT scan between treatments showed that the response was stable disease, but the following CT scan demonstrated a gradual decrease in size from August 2012 to November 2017 including the lesions outside radiation fields. Moreover, she developed vitiligo during a follow-up visit. The previous data reported the median overall survival among the patients who were treated with conventional chemotherapy ranging from 9.1 to 9.3 months and whose 5-year survival was less than 10%. This case represented a metastatic melanoma of unknown primary who achieved a durable response by conventional treatment. The clinical features including nodal-only disease, vitiligo, and abscopal effect of radiation were considered to be the favorable factors.